Monthly Archives: April 2020

You’d Have to Be a Newborn From Mars Not to See Wisconsin Was a Test Run for November – Esquire

Posted: April 11, 2020 at 6:55 pm

Tuesday's farce of an election forced upon the people of Wisconsin by an alliance between their states gerrymandered Republican legislature and conservative justices on both the state and United States Supreme Court continues to be the crow on the Capitol as we look towards the November election. (Paul Krugman went to town on the subject in Fridays NYT. Hes not wrong, either.) Most of the ratfcking involved the absentee ballot process, which was a complete fiasco, if not an entirely accidental one. From The New York Times:

Now, the election officials in Milwaukee, which (mysteriously) had the most problems with its absentee ballots, want the U.S. Postal Service to investigate, according to WTMJ-TV.

(Of course, the USPS has its own problems at the moment. And the perpetually circling vultures are unusually close to the ground.)

Youd have to be a newborn from Mars to believe that Wisconsin wasnt a bench test for what the Republicans have planned for the general election in the fall. The propaganda drumbeat against vote-by-mail already has started from the very top. The federal courts are largely in position as a backstop, and the only real solutionswamp the pollsactually could be a life-or-death choice for a great number of citizens. Nice little republic we had. Shame that something happened to it.

View post:

You'd Have to Be a Newborn From Mars Not to See Wisconsin Was a Test Run for November - Esquire

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on You’d Have to Be a Newborn From Mars Not to See Wisconsin Was a Test Run for November – Esquire

House Republicans call on WHO to explain relationship with China | TheHill – The Hill

Posted: at 6:55 pm

Republicans on the House Oversight and Reform committee aredemandinganswers about the World Health Organizations (WHO) relationship with China amid mounting congressional criticism of its response to the coronavirusoutbreak.

In a letter to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the GOP lawmakers raised concerns thatthe United Nations body failed to prevent China from spreading misinformation that could have helped contain the deadly virus.

Despite the WHOs purported mission to operate as an apolitical international institution within the United Nations, recent media reports suggest that the WHO helped Beijing disseminate propaganda, downplayed the extent of the disease, and possibly delayed ordering a public health emergency, thelawmakers wrote.

The members questioned whether WHO officials were acting in the best interest of countries around the world, accusing the organization of failing to hold China accountable andslamming it for relying on false information from the Chinese government.

Given the actions and statements of WHO officials during the past few months, we are concerned that the WHO is no longer serving the needs of the world and is instead taking its cues from China. Throughout the crisis, the WHO has shied away from placing any blame on the Chinese government, which is, in essence, the Communist Party of China, they continued.

You, as leader of the WHO, even went so far as to praise the Chinese governments transparency during the crisis, when, in fact, the regime has consistently lied to the world by underreporting their actual infection and death statistics.

Members of the Trump administration have accused China of covering upits response to the spreading virus, though the president himself in recent days has touted his relationship with his Chinese counterpart anda recently agreed to trade deal between Washington and Beijing.

Trump has floated cutting off funding for the WHO the U.S. is the organization's largest contributor but the WHO has pushed back, withTedros warning in responsethis week: "If you dont want many more body bags, then you refrain from politicizing it."

In their letter Friday, the Republicans pointed to several examples where they said theWHO posted what turned out to be inaccurate information from the Chinese government, including a tweet stating [p]reliminary investigations conducted by Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus."

They also pointed to reports that the WHO delayed declaring the virus a global health emergency amid pressure from China and condemned theorganization for not moving sooner on calling for actions like travel restrictions.

On January 31, 2020, President TrumpDonald John TrumpCalifornia governor praises Trump's efforts to help state amid coronavirus crisis Trump threatens to withhold visas for countries that don't quickly repatriate citizens Trump admin looks to cut farmworker pay to help industry during pandemic: report MORE came under intense criticism when he barred travel from China. A certain politician called the order xenophobi[c]. In comparison to the WHOs inaction, the Presidents actions saved lives, they wrote.

They said they feel its critical that American taxpayers money is allocated to organizations that uniformly serve the interests of nations across the globe and not a communist regime.

The lawmakers called for the WHO to provide documents and information on all of its communications with the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government regarding public health from between August 2019 to now; all documentation and communications on the total number of infections and fatalities caused by COVID-19 in China; and all documentation and communications it had with Taiwan between August to the present time.

The Republicans requested the information by April 16.

More:

House Republicans call on WHO to explain relationship with China | TheHill - The Hill

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on House Republicans call on WHO to explain relationship with China | TheHill – The Hill

Heres how Georgias Republican governor is keeping the state in the dark about the coronavirus crisis – Raw Story

Posted: at 6:55 pm

As coronavirus continued to spread in America, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution published a bombshell expose titled, EXCLUSIVE: Public given sparse details on deadly outbreak.

Giant healthcare systems based in Atlanta refuse to say how many coronavirus patients theyre treating at their dozens of Georgia hospitals. They wont reveal how many of their front-line workers have gotten sick or even died from the virus, the newspaper noted. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities arent required to post information about outbreaks, and until Friday the state had not been revealing which homes have the most cases, leaving families and advocates in the dark about the conditions inside homes theyre now barred from visiting.

While the governors of New York and Ohio are giving detailed, daily briefings broadcast live, Georgias governor has only given periodic updates to the public. And while Louisiana details the race and underlying health conditions of victims, Georgia is in the dark about the extent of the coronavirus and who may be most affected, given a massive shortage of tests and limited information it receives on victims, the newspaper noted.

The papers reported that the office of Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA) has sometimes provided conflicting messages and his briefings have been less frequent than some other governors.

The paper interviewed Dr. Harry J. Heiman, a clinical associate professor at the Georgia State University School of Public Health.

There seems to be a black box and a lack of transparency about whats going on, Dr. Heiman said.

Melanie McNeil, the states long-term care ombudsman, also offered a sad prognosis.

We absolutely are in the dark, she said.

Read the full report.

then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has cut advertising rates in half, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnstons DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. Weve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. Weve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, weve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

See the original post:

Heres how Georgias Republican governor is keeping the state in the dark about the coronavirus crisis - Raw Story

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Heres how Georgias Republican governor is keeping the state in the dark about the coronavirus crisis – Raw Story

Republicans Trust Donald Trump More Than The CDC for Medical Information, Poll Shows – Newsweek

Posted: at 6:55 pm

Republicans in America trust President Donald Trump more than the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for medical information pertaining to the coronavirus, according to a new poll.

The poll, which was conducted by CBS News, asked 2,025 U.S. residents whom they trusted for specific medical information about the outbreak. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.

According to the survey, 80 percent of Republicans trust Trump for coronavirus information, compared with 74 percent naming the CDC as their trusted source. Among Republicans, "medical professionals" scored the highest percentage of trust, at 85 percent.

Of the remaining Republicans, 20 percent said they don't trust Trump, 26 percent said they don't trust the CDC, and 15 percent said they don't trust medical professionals.

These percentages change drastically for Democrats. According to the poll, only 9 percent of Democrats trust Trump for coronavirus information, while 86 percent named the CDC as their trusted source. As with the Republicans, medical professionals scored highest, with 92 percent of Democrats choosing them as their trusted source for coronavirus information.

Of the remaining Democrats, 91 percent said they do not trust Trump for coronavirus information, 14 percent don't trust the CDC, and only 8 percent don't trust medical professionals.

Among Americans overall, regardless of political party affiliation, 86 percent trust medical professionals, 78 percent trust the CDC, and 37 percent trust Trump. On the other hand, the poll also shows that, among Americans overall, 63 percent don't trust Trump for medical information, 22 percent don't trust the CDC, and 14 percent do not trust medical professionals.

The poll also asked American citizens if they felt that Trump was doing a good or bad job in handling the coronavirus outbreak, while showing how these percentages have changed over the past week.

According to the poll, 47 percent of citizens believe Trump is doing a good job handling the outbreak, a 4 point decrease from 51 percent the previous week.

The poll showed a 3-point increase in those saying that Trump was doing a bad job handling the outbreak, from 49 percent the previous week to 52 percent.

These percentages changed drastically when considering political party affiliation. The poll showed that 15 percent of Democrats believe Trump is doing a good job with the pandemic, while 85 percent said he is doing badly.

By comparison, 87 percent of Republicans believe the president is doing a good job handling the outbreak, while 12 percent answered the opposite. The remaining 1 percent was not reported in the poll.

The novel coronavirus, which causes the respiratory disease COVID-19, continues to spread throughout the U.S., which has become the pandemic's epicenter. According to a Johns Hopkins University tracker, the nation has over 486,900 confirmed cases and at least 18,022 deaths.

See the original post:

Republicans Trust Donald Trump More Than The CDC for Medical Information, Poll Shows - Newsweek

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Republicans Trust Donald Trump More Than The CDC for Medical Information, Poll Shows – Newsweek

The Republican Pandemic Playbook – The Bulwark

Posted: at 6:55 pm

Thinking back to the beginning of the year, the conventional wisdom was that if President Trump survived impeachment, the GOP would probably be able to ride a good economy through the summer and be competitive in the November elections. That was the old world, pre-pandemic.

In the span of a few weeks, more than 13,000 Americans have died from the novel coronavirus and 10 million jobs disappeared. Over the last 12 weeks, what President Trump says and does can no longer be brushed off as Trump being Trump. His reluctance to listen to experts, to honestly relay data, and to attack those who question his wild assertions isnt opera buffa anymore. Its tragedy. People have died because of it. Lives have been ruined.

Yet many incumbent Republicans, seeking to don the political version of PPE, are trying to avoid taking any stances that counter whatever Trump is saying in the momentlet alone criticize him. Instead, they claim that this isnt a time for politics.

If only that was true.

Politicians are managing this crisis, which means that the politics matter now, more than ever. And decrying the existence of politics is, itself, a political gambit. Republicans ought to know this, because the strategy was honed by Senate Majority Leader McConnell.

Podcast April 10 2020

On today's Bulwark Podcast, Windsor Mann joins host Charlie Sykes to discuss the President's response to COVID-19, hypoc...

McConnell, who is up for reelection this year, led the effort when he called on his Democratic opponent, Amy McGrath, to stop running political ads because of the coronavirus. In mid-March McConnells campaign manager said, As Kentuckians adjust their daily lives and schedules to help stem the outbreak, the last thing they need to see on TV is negative political advertising. The McGrath campaign must stop airing all of their advertisements.

McGrath refused, which was sensible, since McConnell has been a silent accomplice in Donald Trumps failure to prepare America for the outbreak. It was also sensible because there was no chance that McConnell wouldnt try to twist the crisis to his own benefit. Which is exactly what he did when he went up with ads depicting himself as being at the center of the battle to rush aid to Americans. The homepage of his campaign website currently features a photo of the senator with the caption Mitch McConnell led the passage of the biggest economic rescue in history.

Is a politician styling himself as the hero of the story and bragging about sending billions of dollars to constituents in an election year every bit as political as another politician criticizing the first guy for standing by while his president created the crisis in the first place?

Lets be on the safe side and say, abso-freaking-lutely. But, maybe now is not the time.

And because McConnell is so relentlessly politicaland dishonest, even by senatorial standardshe blames . . . the Democrats for the pandemic in America. How? Because they distracted him, and the president, with impeachment: He said that concerns about the coronavirus initially came up while we were tied down in the impeachment trial. And I think it diverted the attention of the government, because everything, every day, was all about impeachment.

Because no one could ever expect the highest levels of American government to walk and chew gum at the same time.

With that, a loose model for navigating the politics of the pandemic was established. And so a trio of the chambers most vulnerable incumbent Republican senatorsMartha McSally, Cory Gardner, and Susan Collinshave followed McConnells strategy. The playbook is simple: (1) Try to shush critics in the name of keeping politics out of this while also (2) Keeping your name in the press with the goodies youre handing out and (3) Blame anybody but Donald Trump for the predicament the country is in.

McSally, who is down in the polls against Democrat Mark Kelly, is following the playbook perfectly. She literally said in a March 20 statement that this is not the time for politics and has said she would stop all political ads and door-to-door campaigning for 30 days. After the $2 trillion stimulus bill passed the Senate, she bragged about pumping billions into the economy and cheered relief is finally on the way!

Which is, of course, totes non-political. Shes just voting to send government money to the citizens of Arizona in an election year.

But when it comes to the question of how America got into this mess? Dont bother asking her about Trump, whom she believes has taken the right steps to protect Americans from the coronavirus.

Also dont ask her about what she said on March 6 about how the coronavirus doesnt mean that everybody needs to stay home, not go to work, not go on spring break, not live their lives. That definitely is too much of a panic reaction that could have negative implications.

Instead, McSally has her sights on China.

She accuses China of a cover-up and blasts the media for parroting Chinese propaganda. Shes even demanded that China pay the United States damages for criminal conduct. Last week she called for the World Health Organization director-general Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to resign because he was too trusting of the figures being reported from China. Ive never trusted a communist, McSally said. And their cover-up of this virus that originated with them has caused unnecessary deaths around America and around the world.

On just about every count, shes right!

The Chinese did cover up the emergence of the coronavirus and their authoritarian duplicity almost certainly did cause the spread to turn into a global pandemic. And the Chinese absolutely should be held to account for their role in this disaster!

But it is a little strange for McSally not to have anything to say about how Donald Trump has trusted and praised the Chinese government from the start and been the most high-profile regurgitator of their propaganda.

If China really is the problem, then doesnt that bother her? Even a little bit?

And then theres the practical side of things: However much China is to blame, its not President Xi whos up for reelection in November. In seven months Americans will have the chance to decide whether or not they believe that our own leadership bears any responsibility for COVID-19.

Given Trumps serial lies and disproven predictionsnot to mention his boosterism of Chinese communists!why does she still trust Trump?

Well never know.

In Maine, Susan Collins is running a more sophisticated variation of the McConnell gambit. She has told the Bangor Daily News that she is not running traditional campaign ads and has replaced them with spots providing constituents with resources for obtaining aid and health care information. Im just not going to engage in political discussions at this point. I dont mean to be difficult, I just dont think its appropriate at a time when we are facing the most serious health crisis since the 1918 Spanish flu. She recently went up with a Thank You ad, in which she expresses her gratitude to healthcare workers, first responders, law-enforcement officials, truck drivers, grocery clerks, and restaurant workers.

Yet when Collins was asked if President Trump bears any responsibility for spreading misinformation, she took credit for advising him to listen to medical experts. This came after cautiously offering that it might be better if Trump would step back and let people such as Dr. Anthony Fauci do the talking at briefings. She said the federal message was inconsistent and I am not satisfied.

And now, she says its all better. On April 2 she said, I think in the beginning, there were times when he was speaking about what he hoped would happen rather than relying on the data and information of his experts. That has changed, and Im glad that it has.

Of course, Trump has not changed.

Since Collinss victory lap, the president advised people to take an untested course of powerful medication in order to treat COVID-19, saying, What do you have to lose?

Also, Trump turned over a large portion of the coronavirus task force to . . . Jared Kushner. One of Kushners first public acts was to declare that the Strategic National Stockpile was the property of the federal government and not intended to be used by states. This was directly at odds with the actual intended use of the Strategic National Stockpile. But Kushner is part of The Family, so the next day the White House had the language describing the purpose of the Strategic National Stockpile on the Department of Health and Human Services website changed to conform to Kushners off-the-cuff mistake.

So maybe Collins is not glad anymore? Tut-tut.

If this whole embarrassing minuet looks familiar, its because back in February Collins claimed that impeachment had taught Trump a pretty big lesson and that because of it he would no longer abuse the Constitution. (Excuse me a moment while I scream into the void.) A few days after voting to acquit Trump, Collins was forced to concede that this belief had been more aspirational than factual.

Perhaps shell make a similar concession should she be defeated in November.

Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner actually deserves some praise for how hes handled the situation.

Because unlike McSally, who was downplaying the outbreak in early March, Gardner tried to sound the alarm on COVID-19 early. On January 23you know, back when Mitch McConnell claims that no one could possibly have been expected to pay attention to both impeachment and a potential global pandemicGardner wrote letters to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Robert Redfield inquiring about what efforts were being undertaken to contain the novel coronavirus in China.

He was quiet through the second half of March, but it was for a good reason: He decided to self-quarantine after he met with a constituent who tested positive for COVID-19.

Once he got out, he published an op-ed for Fox News that said, The more we learn about COVID-19 and its origins, the clearer it becomes that much of the death and suffering could have been avoided had the Chinese Communist Party taken this threat more seriously.

But as for those letters he wrote to Pompeo and Dr. Redfield? The Colorado Springs Gazette reportedin a piece that praised Gardner for his foresight on the issuethat he never got a response from the executive branch.

One has to wonder how much death and suffering could have been avoided if the executive branch had taken Gardners warnings more seriously. But one of the strange things about our political moment is that even a guy like Gardner who had his eye on the ball early feels like he cant talk about his foresight, because it might offend Trump.

Thats one of the larger corruptions of Trumpism: Even the people who were right have to pretend not to have been, when Trump is wrong.

There is more than enough blame to go around for this disaster. The Chinese government failed to contain the outbreak. But our officials had the opportunity to protect our citizens. You can blame both the Chinese government and Americas executive branch. Including our president.

The guy came to power promising to build walls, deport millions, and travel ban his way into putting America First. Instead, the worst outbreak in a century happened on his watch, with thousands dead, millions unemployed, and every single one of our lives disrupted in unprecedented ways.

No one needs a playbook to figure out the politics of that argument. The truth is really darn easy for people to figure out.

The rest is here:

The Republican Pandemic Playbook - The Bulwark

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on The Republican Pandemic Playbook – The Bulwark

Coronavirus Live Updates: U.S. Surpasses Italy in Total Number of Confirmed Deaths – The New York Times

Posted: at 6:55 pm

In the federal system, which holds roughly 174,000 people across the country, at least 481 inmates and prison workers have tested positive for the virus, according to New York Times tracking data, and at least nine federal inmates have died, mainly in Louisiana. The Times has spoken with dozens of workers and inmates who say the federal Bureau of Prisons was ill-prepared for the outbreak.

On Friday, the director of the federal prison system defended his agencys response in an interview on CNN, saying the pandemic was an overwhelming challenge that no one expected. I dont think anybody was ready for this Covid, so were dealing with it just as well as anybody else, and Id be proud to say were doing pretty good, said Michael Carvajal, who took over as the head of the Bureau of Prisons less than two months ago.

Six of the federal prisoners who died were being held in Oakdale, La., where nearly 1,000 people are incarcerated, and where there have been reports of a revolt among inmates.

Attorney General William P. Barr last week ordered the Bureau of Prisons to release more people from federal custody and to focus on three prisons that have been hardest hit by the coronavirus, including the Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale.

State prisons and jails, which hold the vast majority of the people incarcerated in America, have also faced unrest in recent days. More than 100 men at a Washington State prison demonstrated in response to positive tests at the facility. Police officers fired pepper spray and sting balls, which eject rubber pellets, to quell the demonstration. In Kansas, inmates at the Lansing Correctional Facility, where at least 28 people have tested positive, set small fires and broke windows in a demonstration that lasted for nearly 12 hours. Two inmates suffered injuries.

And in Pennsylvania, families of inmates at the Franklin County jail told The PA Post, a local news website, that the inmates were staging a hunger strike.

Immigrants held at the Otay Mesa detention center in San Diego, Calif., said in phone calls recorded by their lawyers that guards had pepper-sprayed them on Friday after they demanded masks and began to make their own out of clothing and plastic bags. They also said they were asked to sign liability waivers absolving CoreCivic, the private prison company that operates the facility, from responsibility for any coronavirus-related illnesses.

Excerpt from:

Coronavirus Live Updates: U.S. Surpasses Italy in Total Number of Confirmed Deaths - The New York Times

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Coronavirus Live Updates: U.S. Surpasses Italy in Total Number of Confirmed Deaths – The New York Times

Florida Republicans raised nearly $2.5 million so far this year, thanks to Duke Energy, Anheuser-Busch and Disney – Orlando Weekly

Posted: at 6:55 pm

Gearing up for this falls elections, the Republican Party of Florida raised $2.467 million in cash during the first three months of the year, according to a newly filed finance report.

Fundraising appeared to slow in March as the novel coronavirus hammered the state, with the party pulling in about $364,000 during the month.

Large contributions during the quarter included $175,000 from Duke Energy; $100,000 from Leon Medical Centers in Miami-Dade County; $100,000 from the road-building firm Anderson Columbia Co., Inc.; $50,000 from the tobacco company RAI Services Co.; and $50,000 from the Anheuser-Busch beer company.

In addition to the cash contributions, the party also received a $122,000 in-kind contribution of lodging, food and beverages from Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, the filing shows. All state political candidates, committees and parties face a Friday night deadline for filing reports showing finance activity through March 31.

The Florida Democratic Partys report had not been posted to the state Division of Elections website as of Friday morning.

_Please follow CDC guidelines and Orange County advisories to stay safe, and please support this free publication. Our small but mighty team is working tirelessly to bring you news on how coronavirus is affecting Central Florida. Please consider making a one-time or monthly donation. Every little bit helps.

View post:

Florida Republicans raised nearly $2.5 million so far this year, thanks to Duke Energy, Anheuser-Busch and Disney - Orlando Weekly

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Florida Republicans raised nearly $2.5 million so far this year, thanks to Duke Energy, Anheuser-Busch and Disney – Orlando Weekly

Remembering the liberation of the Buchenwald concentration camp – The National

Posted: at 6:51 pm

It was 75 years ago today that the US forces liberated Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany. The 6th US Armoured Division reached the main camp, which was at the centre of a maze of sub-camps, making up the largest concentration camp on German soil.

What they found was a staggering array of utter evil, with scenes so shocking they made battle-hardened soldiers physically sick. Corpses were strewn everywhere and many of the inmates were so starving and emaciated that they died of the food given to them by the Americans.

Later estimates gained from the Nazis obsession with keeping records showed that more than 250,000 people were imprisoned at Buchenwald over an eight-year period, starting with political prisoners communists, mostly who were jailed by the Nazis before the war even started.

Dachau was the first such camp, opening in 1933, but Buchenwald was the largest in area, with some 56,000 people dying there.

WAS IT THE FIRST CONCENTRATION CAMP TO BE LIBERATED?

Holocaust historians now accept that there was a difference between concentration camps, where prisoners carried out forced labour, and extermination camps such as Auschwitz which existed mostly to carry out Adolf Hitlers Aryan racist mass murders, particularly the Nazis Final Solution which brought about the murder of six million Jews.

Another 11 million people are estimated to have died in Nazi extermination and concentration camps, including Soviet prisoners of war, Roma, Poles, Serbs and all those deemed to be non-Aryan such as homosexuals, people with disabilities Hitler was a strong believer in eugenics clergy and criminals. Jehovahs Witnesses were also put into the camps while some other prisoners of war, including captured British commandos, were also murdered.

The Soviet Red Army over-ran Majdanek camp in German-occupied Poland on July 22, 1944, and that provided the first evidence of mass extermination. The Soviets liberated Auschwitz in January, 1945 and found evidence a million people had died in its gas chambers. It was one of Buchenwalds sub-camps, Ohrdruf, which was the first to be liberated by the Allies coming from the west.

WHAT HAPPENED AT OHRDRUF?

Situated near the town of Gotha, Orhdruf was a forced labour camp built as late as November, 1944. The inmates were supposed to work on a railway, but it was never built due to the rapid advance of the Allies in early 1945.

At the start of April the SS forced most of the camps 12,000 inmates to march to Buchenwald 50 miles away, resulting in the deaths of many prisoners. The SS guards shot the remaining inmates and the American troops discovered piles of bodies, some covered with lime to accelerate putrefaction, and others partially incinerated on wooden pyres.

WHAT DID EISENHOWER DO?

Allied Supreme Commander, and later US President, General Dwight D Eisenhower insisted on seeing the camp for himself. He interviewed three inmates that had managed to escape, and wrote to General George C Marshall, head of the joint chiefs of staff in Washington: The visual evidence and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so overpowering as to leave me a bit sick. I made the visit deliberately, in order to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to propaganda.

Buchenwald was much bigger and Eisenhower made it his duty to get the press there. He also forced 1,000 German citizens to visit the camp and its mass graves. Four days later, the British liberated Bergen-Belsen, accompanied by newsreel cameras. The truth was out.

Scotland is in lockdown. Shops are closing and newspaper sales are falling fast. Its no exaggeration to say that the future of The National is at stake. Please consider supporting us through this with a digital subscription from just 2 for 2 months by following this link:http://www.thenational.scot/subscribe. Thanks and stay safe.

Read the original:

Remembering the liberation of the Buchenwald concentration camp - The National

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Remembering the liberation of the Buchenwald concentration camp – The National

Facebook is adding a Quiet Mode that silences push notifications on mobile – The Verge

Posted: at 6:49 pm

Facebook announced an all-new Quiet Mode for its main mobile app on Thursday, which will pause most push notifications and remind you that its turned on when you try to open the software on your phone while the mode is still active.

Its not clear exactly what notifications will be exempted from the new mode; the company says some, like privacy updates, it is legally required to send out. This new mode is also not to be confused with the existing mute push notifications setting that lets you stop only push notifications, but not those within the app, for a designated amount of time.

Instead, this new Quiet Mode will be found under Facebooks Your Time on Facebook dashboard, which it added back in November 2018, following a push for major platforms and device makers like Apple and Google to promote digital wellness apps.

Its part of a larger update to the dashboard that Facebook says will add week-over-week trends, usage tracking for daytime versus night, and a counter for total number of visits. Its rolling out now to iOS users and will arrive for Android users in May, the company says.

The new Quiet Mode will work both manually and on a set schedule if you so choose. It will pause notifications from within the app, like those obnoxious Facebook Watch badges, and on a system level, so you wont see numbered badges on iOS either.

As we all adjust to new routines and staying home, setting boundaries for how you spend your time online can be helpful. Whether its to help you focus on your family and friends, sleep without distraction or manage how you spend your time at home, we have tools that can help you find the right balance for how you use Facebook, reads a new update to the companys ongoing COVID-19 information blog post.

In addition to Quiet Mode, Facebook says its also added new shortcuts to the notification settings and News Feed preferences panel, so you can make the most of your time on Facebook by controlling the type of posts you see in your News Feed as well as the updates you receive.

More here:

Facebook is adding a Quiet Mode that silences push notifications on mobile - The Verge

Comments Off on Facebook is adding a Quiet Mode that silences push notifications on mobile – The Verge

These Tech Companies Managed to Eradicate ISIS Content. But They’re Also Erasing Crucial Evidence of War Crimes – TIME

Posted: at 6:49 pm

Filmed by a Syrian opposition soldier riding in the back of a pickup truck, the shaky footage posted to Facebook on Oct. 14 showed Turkish troops walking cheerfully across a rocky plain in northern Syria toward a town that had just been vacated by U.S. forces.

It was one in a flurry of videos posted by citizen journalist Abo Liath Aljazarawy to his Facebook page, chronicling a rapid reshaping of northern Syrias political map after President Trump ordered U.S. troops to withdraw from the region earlier that month.

But days later, the videos had disappeared from the Internet. Facebook had banned his page.

Aljazarawy, who asked to be referred to by a pseudonym for his security, had been using the page, called Eye on Alhasakah after his hometown, to share information about the Syrian civil war with his 50,000 followers. Some days, like that one in October, he shared news of troop movements. On others, he posted videos or photographs showing the bloody aftermath of military attacks. The point, he says, was to keep ordinary people informed. We dont have loyalty to anyone, Aljazarawy told TIME. Most of our followers are just common people.

But the videos and photographs he shared showing the ground reality of the Syrian civil war were the reason his page was banned. Facebook confirmed to TIME that Eye on Alhasakah was flagged in late 2019 by its algorithms, as well as users, for sharing extremist content. It was then funneled to a human moderator, who decided to remove it. After being notified by TIME, Facebook restored the page in early February, some 12 weeks later, saying the moderator had made a mistake. (Facebook declined to say which specific videos were wrongly flagged, except that there were several.)

The algorithms were developed largely in reaction to ISIS, who shocked the world in 2014 when they began to share slickly-produced online videos of executions and battles as propaganda. Because of the very real way these videos radicalized viewers, the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq and Syria worked overtime to suppress them, and enlisted social networks to help. Quickly, the companies discovered that there was too much content for even a huge team of humans to deal with. (More than 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute.) So, since 2017, beg have been using algorithms to automatically detect extremist content. Early on, those algorithms were crude, and only supplemented the human moderators work. But now, following three years of training, they are responsible for an overwhelming proportion of detections. Facebook now says more than 98% of content removed for violating its rules on extremism is flagged automatically. On YouTube, across the board, more than 20 million videos were taken down before receiving a single view in 2019. And as the coronavirus spread across the globe in early 2020, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter announced their algorithms would take on an even larger share of content moderation, with human moderators barred from taking sensitive material home with them.

But algorithms are notoriously worse than humans at understanding one crucial thing: context. Now, as Facebook and YouTube have come to rely on them more and more, even innocent photos and videos, especially from war zones, are being swept up and removed. Such content can serve a vital purpose for both civilians on the ground for whom it provides vital real-time information and human rights monitors far away. In 2017, for the first time ever, the International Criminal Court in the Netherlands issued a war-crimes indictment based on videos from Libya posted on social media. And as violence-detection algorithms have developed, conflict monitors are noticing an unexpected side effect, too: these algorithms could be removing evidence of war crimes from the Internet before anyone even knows it exists.

Content moderators work at a Facebook office in Austin, Texas. Facebook says more than 98% of content removed for violating its rules on extremism is flagged automatically.

Ilana Panich-Linsman for The Washington Post via Getty Images

On a rainy day in early January, Chris Woods leads the way up the narrow staircase of an end-of-terrace house on the campus of Goldsmiths University in southeast London. The top two floors here serve as the base of Airwars, which Woods founded in 2014 to hold militaries to account for civilian casualties. Out of this cramped headquarters, he and his small team have collected evidence of more than 52,000 civilian deaths, most gleaned from social media. They have forced the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq and Syria to share monthly information about civilians killed by collateral damage, and keep an eye on the Turkish and Russian militaries too. They also recently expanded to cover Somalia, and are working on a Yemen archive. All this is funded on a shoestring. Our budget for the next year is around a third of a million pounds [$430,000] for everything that we do, Woods says, in his attic office. Thats roughly the price of a guided bomb.

The removal of Eye on Alhasakah came as a blow to this tight operation. The page was one of the most comprehensive sources for news concerning northern and eastern Syria, says Mohammed al Jumaily, a conflict researcher for the group. Its closure meant that we lost a key source of local reporting, which is already pretty sparse in that region.

It was an example of how even one mistaken takedown can make the work of human rights defenders more difficult. Yet this is happening on a wider scale: of the 1.7 million YouTube videos preserved by Syrian Archive, a Berlin-based non-profit that downloads evidence of human rights violations, 16% have been removed. A huge chunk were taken down in 2017, just as YouTube began using algorithms to flag violent and extremist content. And useful content is still being removed on a regular basis. Were still seeing that this is a problem, says Jeff Deutsch, the lead researcher at Syrian Archive. Were not saying that all this content has to remain public forever. But its important that this content is archived, so its accessible to researchers, to human rights groups, to academics, to lawyers, for use in some kind of legal accountability. (YouTube says it is working with Syrian Archive to improve how they identify and preserve footage that could be useful for human rights groups.)

Most people working in conflict monitoring understand that the social media companies are in a tough position. Back in the attic in southeast London, Woods agrees that a lot of violent content has no place on social media sites. But he is frustrated with what he sees as three years of inaction by social networks when it comes to preventing valuable evidence from being lost forever, potentially reducing the chances of human rights violators being convicted of their crimes. Our own view is that if they are determined to delete videos, photographs, posts and so on, we think it should be put into a cordoned off area that is only accessible to researchers with permissions, Woods says. Basically at the moment, its an all or nothing. They will delete an entire archive and everything gets permanently lost, as far as we can tell.

Facebook and YouTubes detection systems work by using a technology called machine learning, by which colossal amounts of data (in this case, extremist images, videos, and their metadata) are fed to an artificial intelligence adept at spotting patterns. Early types of machine learning could be trained to identify images containing a house, or a car, or a human face. But since 2017, Facebook and YouTube have been feeding these algorithms content that moderators have flagged as extremist training them to automatically identify beheadings, propaganda videos and other unsavory content.

Both Facebook and YouTube are notoriously secretive about what kind of content theyre using to train the algorithms responsible for much of this deletion. That means theres no way for outside observers to know whether innocent content like Eye on Alhasakahs has already been fed in as training data, which would compromise the algorithms decision-making. In the case of Eye on Alhasakahs takedown, Facebook said, oops, we made a mistake, says Dia Kayyali, the Tech and Advocacy coordinator at Witness, a human rights group focused on helping people record digital evidence of abuses. But what if they had used the page as training data? Then that mistake has been exponentially spread throughout their system, because its going to train the algorithm more, and then more of that similar content that was mistakenly taken down is going to get taken down. I think that is exactly whats happening now. Facebook and YouTube, however, both deny this is possible. Facebook says it regularly retrains its algorithms to avoid this happening. In a statement, YouTube said: decisions made by human reviewers help to improve the accuracy of our automated flagging systems.

But Kayyali says there are signs that, for Arabic content especially, the way these algorithms work could be having a detrimental effect. Currently, Islamic extremist content from the Middle East probably makes up the bulk of training datasets, says Kayyali though theres no way to know for sure, because the platforms dont share that information. It means that other Arabic content like a video of the aftermath of a bombing, where the uploader has blamed ISIS in the accompanying text, for example is also at risk of removal. We have consistently seen Facebook and YouTube take down documentation of protests from the Arabic speaking world, Kayyali says.

Despite the human toll of content moderation, conflict monitors say one way to make sure this content is kept online is for the social networks to hire more content moderators, and ensure they are paid and treated just as well as other staff. But both Facebook and YouTube are moving in the other direction partly out of recognition that content moderation can be a demanding and emotionally damaging job, partly because computers are faster, and partly because running an algorithm is cheaper than employing skilled humans. This technology is showing a lot of promise, and in some cases we are now even able to detect and remove some harmful content automatically, without human review, Erin Saltman, Facebooks EMEA counter-terrorism policy manager, said in a statement to TIME. Thats the case, for example, with reuploads of known extremist content. But when algorithms flag content which has never been seen before, Facebook and YouTube both say it is always routed to a human moderator, who makes a final decision on whether it should be removed.

Thats because Facebooks policies allow some types of violence and extremism but not others meaning decisions on whether to take content down is often based on cultural context. Has a video of an execution been shared by its perpetrators to spread fear? Or by a citizen journalist to ensure the wider world sees a grave human rights violation? A moderators answer to those questions could mean that of two identical videos, one remains online and the other is taken down. This technology cant yet effectively handle everything that is against our rules, Saltman said. Many of the decisions we have to make are complex and involve decisions around intent and cultural nuance which still require human eye and judgement.

In this balancing act, its Facebooks army of human moderators many of them outsourced contractors who carry the pole. And sometimes, they lose their footing. After several of Eye on Alhasakahs posts were flagged by algorithms and humans alike, a Facebook moderator wrongly decided the page should be banned entirely for sharing violent videos in order to praise them a violation of Facebooks rules on violence and extremism, which state that some content can remain online if it is newsworthy, but not if it encourages violence or valorizes terrorism. The nuance, Facebook representatives told TIME, is important for balancing freedom of speech with a safe environment for its users and keeping Facebook on the right side of government regulations.

Facebooks set of rules on the topic reads like a gory textbook on ethics: beheadings, decomposed bodies, throat-slitting and cannibalism are all classed as too graphic, and thus never allowed; neither is dismemberment unless its being performed in a medical setting; nor burning people, unless they are practicing self-immolation as an act of political speech, which is protected. Moderators are given discretion, however, if violent content is clearly being shared to spread awareness of human rights abuses. In these cases, depending on how graphic the content is, we may allow it, but we place a warning screen in front of the content and limit the visibility to people aged 18 or over, said Saltman. We know not everyone will agree with these policies and we respect that.

But civilian journalists operating in the heat of a civil war dont always have time to read the fine print. And conflict monitors say its not enough for Facebook and YouTube to make all the decisions themselves. Like it or not, people are using these social media platforms as a place of permanent record, says Woods. The social media sites dont get to choose whats of value and importance.

Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Billy Perrigo at billy.perrigo@time.com.

Here is the original post:

These Tech Companies Managed to Eradicate ISIS Content. But They're Also Erasing Crucial Evidence of War Crimes - TIME

Comments Off on These Tech Companies Managed to Eradicate ISIS Content. But They’re Also Erasing Crucial Evidence of War Crimes – TIME