Daily Archives: April 11, 2020

Global Terminates MOU with World Innovation Technologies Other OTC:PSYC – GlobeNewswire

Posted: April 11, 2020 at 8:03 pm

SAN DIEGO, April 10, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Global Trac Solutions, Inc. (OTCPink: PSYC) (Global or the Company) is announcing that they have terminated the MOU and rescinded their offer to acquire World Innovation Technologies, LLC. (WIT).

From a capitalization perspective, once we took a deep look at the business, it wasnt justifiable for our business model. We are very impressed with their technology and product offerings but believe a better avenue will be to explore potential business initiative partnerships and synergies outside of an acquisition. While this is regrettable, I am convinced it is in the long-term best interests of the Company, said Vanessa Luna, CEO.

About Global Trac Solutions, Inc.(OTC Pink:PSYC)

Global Trac Solutions is a diversified holding company dedicated to identifying new and emerging technologies specific to a variety of industry verticals ranging from Branding and Marketing, Fintech, Business Development, Sales and Distribution, High-Risk, Nutraceuticals, and more. We focus and leverage our teams diverse experience to effectively execute go-to-market strategies in order to position the companies we engage with for rapid growth and a structure to enhance profitability potential. We believe in a forward-thinking approach that embraces groundbreaking new technology and innovations while providing our partners with the infrastructure and vision necessary to evolve into the industry leaders of the future. We truly are the right TRAC to follow.

Formerly, Global Payout Inc. (GOHE): From 2014-2019 Global was focused on the payments and financial industry sectors with an emphasis in high-risk.

Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimer:

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "ongoing," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "should," "will," "would," or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainty and other factors that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this press release. This press release should be considered in light of all filings of the Company that are disclosed on the OTC Markets.com website.

Corporate Contact:

Global Trac Solutions, Inc.www.globaltracsolutions.com (619) 925-3202info@globaltracsolutions.com

Continue reading here:

Global Terminates MOU with World Innovation Technologies Other OTC:PSYC - GlobeNewswire

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Global Terminates MOU with World Innovation Technologies Other OTC:PSYC – GlobeNewswire

Is Progress In Autonomous Technology Gated By Research In Animal Communication? – Forbes

Posted: at 8:03 pm

A Cheetah sprints across a black background illustrating the concept of speed.

Research in animal communications conjures up images of Jane Goodall studying the great apes in Tanzania. Indeed, a great deal of research in the field is on higher level functions such as social interactions, animal cognition, or even emotional life. However, underneath all the higher level functions, there is a much more basic elemental aspect of intelligence consisting of simply surviving in the physical world. This capability seems to be so innate that there is little research on its basic functionality. What are the key characteristics of this capability ?

First, there is a large class of intelligence which is connected to perception of the physical future behaviour of other actors in the environment. Key ideas include:

Second, there is a basic calculation of physics. No, animals are not solving Newtons equations of motion. However, animals innately maintain balance, calculate interception trajectories, and manage the potential for threats to physically harm them.

Third, animals maintain a basic virtual mental model of their surrounding environment, and this model seems to generate an expectation which drives perception. The difference between perception and expectation combined with absolute distance seems to be central concept to drive behavior. For example, a surprise awareness of an unknown object in close proximity drives a highly visceral response.

With this range of perception, mental modeling and non-verbal cross species communication, animals do threat assessment(Autonomous Technology Term), and path planning(Autonomous Technology Term). Of course, humans have exactly the same capabilities in the lower levels of the human brain. Something like the Ellen Scares Guests video effectively demonstrates this principle.

What does all of this have to do with Autonomous Vehicles in a well regulated transportation network ?

Research on all the accidents to date with AVs has shown that the vast majority of them are caused by humans hitting AVs in low-speed rear-end collisions. Why do humans hit AVs at a higher rate than other humans ? It appears the answer is a miscalculation of the AVs future behaviour.

It is the nature of human beings to anthropomorphize and we also do so with automobiles. Humans interpret the micro-breaking, micro-accelerations, drift in the lane, and other factors in our own threat assessment of the situation. All of these nonverbal movements are a source of active communications for human beings. In addition, layered on top of this interpretation is more explicit non-verbal communication through eye-contact or hand gestures. Overall, this creates a non-verbal language-of-driving which effectively makes the whole cooperative transportation system work.

When autonomous vehicles do not participate in this communication, they create a danger to the overall system. AV researchers are just starting to look at aspects of this problem with a focus on the near term problems such as interpreting the potential movements of pedestrians at intersections. However, the fundamentals seem to be much deeper and broader. To be effective, it is likely that AVs will have to be able to interpret a broader language and this analysis may well have to extend to the behaviour of animals (deer, cats, dogs, etc) as well.After all, they share the road in residential settings. Note, this language-of-driving may well have regional dialects. The language of a Boston and Cincinnati driver has some variation.

"The primary and under appreciated challengein the application of autonomy is understanding & exploiting human/machine teaming, says Ken Ford, CEO of the Institute for Human Machine Cognition (IHMC).

With the world of Natural Language Processing (Alexa, etc), researchers have built a reasonable understanding for spoken and written language. However, this much more basic form of communication and perception is just at its beginning stages of understanding.

It seems the capability is so innate that we didnt know we did it, until we had to recreate it in autonomous systems.

Note: There is a companion article How Safe Is Safe For An AV ? The Answer (Expectation And Communication) which maybe of interest to the reader.

See more here:

Is Progress In Autonomous Technology Gated By Research In Animal Communication? - Forbes

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Is Progress In Autonomous Technology Gated By Research In Animal Communication? – Forbes

‘Iron lung’ backed by Stephen Hawking’s family to be trialled on Covid-19 patients – Telegraph.co.uk

Posted: at 8:03 pm

A cutting-edge ventilator, backed by the family of Stephen Hawking, is due to be trialled in the fight against coronavirus.

The new model, named Exovent, is a reinvention of the 'iron lung, a Negative Pressure Ventilator which saved the lives ofthousands of polio victims inthe 20th century.

While traditional ventilators require patients to be sedated and sometimes paralysed, Exoventis non-invasive and can be used on a normal ward, reducing the strain on intensive care units.

The device also allowspatients to remain conscious during treatment and it is not reliant on oxygen - which has become a precious resource for hospitals treating large numbers of coronavirus patients.

The collaborative task force behind the technology is made up of Cambridge-based engineers, Marshall Aerospace and Defence Group, the Warwick Manufacturing Group alongside the Royal National Throat Nose and Ear hospital and Imperial NHS Trust.

Representatives from the Exovent task force told the Telegraph that the technology is at the "detailed planning stage of development", and that the task force is"currently in talks with NHS teams to expand the use of the technology on patients hospitalised with coronavirus."

In the first instance, the device will be trialled at Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle, in collaboration with teams from other centres.

According to Dr Malcolm Coulthard, a paediatrician at Newcastle's Royal Victoria Infirmary who isworking with the taskforce, once trials are completed the technology could be swiftly rolled out across the UK.

He said: Once the trials are undertaken, it is a quick and easy product for manufacturers to produce, it is a fairly robust product with few moving parts, it is something that can be quickly rolled out

The actual prototypes that will be used in patients are still being built at the moment by Marshall Aerospace and Defence. We are hoping that that product will be ready for us to test in patients with Covid-19 disease in about 2 weeks time.

The team hasestimated that 5,000 unitscould be produced each week.

Patrick Wood, Chief Technical Officer for Marshall Aerospace and Defence Group said: This is one of a number of projects we are involved in following the governments call to industry for support in the battle against Covid-19 and we are incredibly proud that our engineering talent is being put to such important use.

The Exoventtechnology has also been backed by the family of Stephen Hawking. In a statement the family said: As the family of a ventilated man, we know the life and death difference that access to this kind of medical technology makes.

The Covid-19 epidemic has caused worldwide demand for ventilators to vastly outstrip supply.

We are so proud to support the technological and manufacturing innovation involved in producing low cost, effective ventilators swiftly and in large numbers and hope the combined efforts of everyone who has answered this call will mean the NHS receives the equipment it needs to save lives at this terrible time.

However, as the product remains in its testing stage, there are no immediate plans by the government to introduce the device within hospitals.

A government spokesman from the Department of Health and Social Care said: We are leading a coordinated effort to rapidly increase ventilator capacity and ensure these vital pieces of equipment are delivered to the frontline, and currently have 10,000 mechanical ventilators available to NHS patients.

Safety of those who need this vital equipment is our absolute priority and new orders are all dependent on machines passing regulatory tests to ensure they meet the necessary safety and regulatory standards.

Continue reading here:

'Iron lung' backed by Stephen Hawking's family to be trialled on Covid-19 patients - Telegraph.co.uk

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on ‘Iron lung’ backed by Stephen Hawking’s family to be trialled on Covid-19 patients – Telegraph.co.uk

Etihad to trial technology designed to identify passengers with symptoms of illness – Japan Today

Posted: at 8:03 pm

Etihad Airways has partnered with Elenium Automation, an Australian company, to trial technology which allows self-service devices at airports to be used to help identify travellers with symptoms of illness.

Etihad will be the first airline to trial the technology, which can monitor the temperature, heart rate and respiratory rate of any person using an airport touchpoint such as a check-in or information kiosk, a bag drop facility, a security point or immigration gate.

The Elenium system will automatically suspend the self-service check-in or bag drop process if a passengers vital signs indicate potential symptoms of illness, such as a very high temperature. It will then divert to a teleconference or alert qualified staff on site, who can make further assessments.

Etihad will trial the monitoring technology at its hub airport in Abu Dhabi at the end of April and throughout May 2020, initially with a range of volunteers, and, as flights resume, outbound passengers.

Jorg Oppermann, Vice President Hub and Midfield Operations, Etihad Airways, said, This technology is not designed or intended to diagnose medical conditions. It is an early warning indicator which will help to identify people with general symptoms, so that they can be further assessed by medical experts, potentially preventing the spread of some conditions to others preparing to board flights to multiple destinations. It has long been the case that aircraft, with their highly sophisticated air-recycling systems and standards of hygiene are not the transmission vehicle for illnesses.

"We are testing this technology because we believe it will not only help in the current COVID19 outbreak, but also into the future, with assessing a passengers suitability to travel and thus minimising disruptions. At Etihad we see this is another step towards ensuring that future viral outbreaks do not have the same devastating effect on the global aviation industry as is currently the case.

Read more:

Etihad to trial technology designed to identify passengers with symptoms of illness - Japan Today

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Etihad to trial technology designed to identify passengers with symptoms of illness – Japan Today

Easter When We Most Need a Resurrection – Patheos

Posted: at 8:02 pm

Easter When We Most Need a Resurrection!

This year in North America, Easter feels different. This year, there will no sunrise services, trumpets, lilies, bonnets, new suits and dresses. There will no joyful hugs and triumphant hymns in our sanctuary. We have been shaken out of our North American complacency. Our assumptions and illusions have been dashed by the realities of the Coronavirus. No willful pastor can defeat Coronavirus by holding Easter services. We dont expect the virus to go away miraculously. The stone of the virus is in our way, and it appears that it will roll away on its own terms and not ours. All the bloviations of political leaders and defiant pastors cannot dislodge the stone or produce the miracle we might hope for.

We need a miracle and a resurrection, but it will not come from the outside. It will come from the Easter event surfacing in our own lives and congregations, shaped the realities of history and nature.Still, there is no getting around the Easter miracles if you belong to the Jesus movement. Jesus first followers were transformed by their encounters with the Risen Christ. Once fearful, they became courageous; once uncertain, they became confident that Jesus was unique, the savior of humankind, victorious over sickness, sin, and death. The power of the resurrection to transform the lives of Jesus first followers cant be denied by any honest observer. For two thousand years, the amazing power of Jesus resurrection has continued to bring healing and wholeness indeed new birth to peoples lives. Stones have been rolled away, and way has been made where we perceived no path forward.

Moreover, within span of some of their lifetimes or the lifetimes of their closest confidants, the written gospels emerged and with them the clear but amazing affirmation that Christ is alive and that both cross and resurrection are central to the good news of our healing and salvation. Something dramatic happened that cannot be reduced to a tall tale, repetition of myths of death and rebirth, or a rotting corpse. Something mysterious and amazing occurred that cant be confined by a literalist understanding of the biblical stories. As the gospel of John proclaims, there is always more to Jesus than our own fabrications or the written text: his life, death, and resurrection will always transcend and sometimes transform the rational mind, opening the mind to a deeper rationalism in which all is wonder and miracle. Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book. But these are written so that you may come to that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life in his name.(John 20:30)

The resurrection will always remain a mystery, hidden from rationalists, Enlightenment-thinkers, and literalists. It is always more than we can ask or imagine. Some try to domesticate the Easter message by positing the creation of fanciful stories, recycled death-rebirth myths, trying to locate Jesus tomb and the corpse buried within, or suggesting that dogs ate the bones. The gospels even suggest that a rumor arose that Jesus corpse had been stolen by his followers. But the gospels make plain that a stolen body cant inspire a spiritual revolution. Others try to control the story by literalizing flesh and bone and questioning the piety of those who provide imaginative visions of the resurrection or seek to discern the events beneath the texts. The quest for the resurrected Jesus is often an act of faith.

Still, we cant separate the pre-Easter or post-Easter Christ, or the Christ of history and the Christ of faith: they are one holistic reality that transformed cells and souls in the first century and continues to do so today. The power of each energizes the power of the other.We can never fully encompass Jesus resurrection, but we can find a clue in C.S. Lewis Chronicles of Narnia. As the tale goes, in order to save Edmund, the lion-savior Aslan must sacrifice his own life. The White Witch, however, is unaware of the laws of Deeper Magic, which promise resurrection to the innocent victim. Aslan rises and the White Witch and her minions are defeated. The Deeper Magic embedded in the creation of the universe is mysterious, but it is part of the larger causal interdependence of the universe; in fact, it may be its animating energy. The resurrection of Aslan does not circumvent the laws of nature but occurs as a result of deeper laws of nature. This opens the door to seeing resurrection as part of Gods amazing universe and affirming that certain moments can be so closely aligned to Gods vision that unexpected and transformative energies can be released, radically changing cells and souls.

I will not try to explain resurrection, nor will try to explain it. However, it is clear to me that throughout his ministry Jesus tapped into deeper energies to promote the transformation of bodies, minds, and spirits. The energy of the universe flowed through Jesus, in response to a womans faith, immediately curing her of a hemorrhage. A Samaritan womans child is healed from a distance of a mysterious disease through the interplay of her faith and Jesus intentionality. Waves are calmed as a result of Jesus spiritual powers. All these amazing events can be understood in terms of the interdependent and energetic nature of the universe, described by cosmology, physics, and biology. The congruence of faith and science hardly minimizes our wonder but places our wonder in the context of an entirely wonderful universe, of which we are mostly oblivious.

For those of us who need a miracle, the miracle is always with us. There is a deeper naturalism, dynamic, open-ended, many-faceted, and containing random events. But even random events are touched by a gentle providence that moves through the universe, giving direction and life to personal, communal, planetary, and cosmic evolutions. Resurrection does not defy the causal relatedness of life or the dynamic laws of nature but reflects the deeper energetic nature of reality which is always amazing and revelatory of more than we can ask or imagine.

Today, our prayers and hymn may not eradicate the Coronavirus, but they give us power and courage to yes to life, to reach out to the vulnerable, to plan for a new future with radical changes in our national and global priorities beyond the pandemic. And, this very action may enhance our immune systems, give strength to help others in their anxieties, and nurture hope in a time of pandemic. That may be miracle enough. More a miracle than those faithless pastors who restrict Gods resurrection to their places of worship.

What, then, happened on Easter morning? While we may never know for sure and should never domesticate such amazing moments, let me suggest that Jesus resurrected body incarnated the deeper laws of the universe that were already manifest in his ministry of healing and hospitality. Perhaps, Jesus resurrection body became a highly charged quantum body, able to move from one place to another in a blink of an eye and move through dense material bodies, such as walls, as if they were air. While we cant literalize the gospel stories, the recognition that Jesus was recognized by his followers and known by his wounds points to a continuity of his post- resurrection body with his pre-resurrection body. Such events are possible in a lively, dynamic universe, and are surely no more marvelous than invoking the big bang as the first moment of our universe. How can one not be amazed to recognize that from a microcosmic energy event a universe of a trillion, and counting, galaxies emerged? All is natural, yet all amazing, mysterious, and beyond our imaginations.

This Easter, open to possibility, awaken to wonder, and look for hints of Jesus resurrection in your own cells, your spirit, and the world around. Look for miracles and as Wendell Berry counsels practice resurrection in pandemic. Beyond the fanfare of megachurch preachers, fearful prognostications, and bloviating of political leaders, you will discover that Christ is Risen in your life today!

+++Bruce Epperly is a Cape Cod pastor, professor, and author of over fifty books, including FAITH IN A TIME OF PANDEMIC and GOD ON LINE: A MYSTICS GUIDE TO THE INTERNET

Follow this link:

Easter When We Most Need a Resurrection - Patheos

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Easter When We Most Need a Resurrection – Patheos

The Coronavirus and a Coup d’tat of the Brain – Merion West

Posted: at 8:02 pm

Today, we are witnessing the medical equivalent of the Manhattan Project or the Apollo Moon Mission.

The great Peloponnesian War began in 431 B.C., when Spartan armies invaded the Attic peninsula. The agrarian population fled to the great city of Athens, whose population soon tripled. In 430 B.C., plague broke out in Athens. Chaos and death followed. Thucydides speculated that the plague came from somewhere south of Egypt, but ancient Greeks knew nothing of the biological nature of the invisible force that was killing them:

No other human art was of any avail; and as to supplications in temples, and inquiries of oracles, and the like, they were all useless; and at last men were overpowered by the calamity and gave them all up.

The plague raged within the city for four years and debilitated Athens far more than the fearsome Spartan warriors outside its walls. Eventually, as much as half of Athens bloated population would perish before the plague disappeared as mysteriously as it arrived.

Parts and Wholes

Our current response to the Coronavirus pandemic could not be more different than that of ancient Athens. Modern science does not deal with problems by means of supplications in temples nor with inquiries of oracles. Science attends to reality in a way quite different than religion and, in turn, generates its own kind of knowledge. Science deals with facts, as revealed by scientific methodologies.

Todays pandemic is precisely the kind of problem modern science is best equipped to deal with. Modern science offers detailed and specific knowledge, and it prescribes a range of specific remedies and behaviors. Today, we are witnessing the medical equivalent of the Manhattan Project or the Apollo Moon Mission. The analytic powers of science have been summoned, and armies of researchers and health workersas disciplined as a hoplite phalanxwage war upon a microscopic enemy.

For over two hundred years, science has systematically displaced religion as our way of knowing reality. The science versus religion conflict, however, tends to miss a more elemental conflict. The significance of the dominance of modern science is not simply that it renders religion irrelevant when it comes to knowledge; science renders the human imagination irrelevant as a way of knowing reality.

Many of the most profound critiques of the rise of science in the early nineteenth century were not made by theologiansbut by artists and poets. Goethe, Blake, Wordsworth, Shelley and otherseither explicitly or implicitlyaddress the rise of modern science. The great poets of the Romantic Age were not interested in protecting the prerogatives of the Church or of kings. Nor were they themselves necessarily hostile to the emergence of reason and science. What concerned them was that human reason (in general) and scientific methodologies (in particular) only presented a limited knowledge of reality

Percy Bysshe Shelley in his essay A Defence of Poetry describes two classes of mental actionreason and imagination. Science is a ritualized form of reason that tends to focus on the parts or pieces of reality, whereas the imagination deals with the relationships and the whole. Science is concerned with analysis, and the poetic imagination with synthesis. The imagination is capable of describing and revealing relationships by means of metaphors, myth, music, dance, stories, and images that are not amenable to scientific procedures.

Unlike the scientist, nature for the poet is not treated as some object outside of ourselvesbut as part of who we are. The human imagination is the principle within human beings capable of adapting to the forces that envelop us. All of usnot just poetshave a capacity not only to analyze facts but to harmonize facts to generate meaningful wholes. This is precisely what we do all day every day.

Poets, dealing in images and metaphors, implicitly acknowledge the unknown and the limited nature of human knowledge. Understanding that all human-generated forms and ideas are limited is what Nietzsche called the tragic insight. The Greeks called defiance of the limited nature of human knowledge hubris

A work of art is a kind of description or analogue of how nature worksand who we are in relationship to nature. Poets, claims Shelley, are the institutors of laws, and the founders of civil society. What we call a religion itself began as a poetic event and may be the accumulation of a series of poetic events.

Religions are dynamic systems which, like a life form or any way of thinking, evolve over time. They are born, they grow, flourish and tend to become sclerotic and even decay. Every epoch, says Shelley, under names more or less specious, has deified its errors. Modern critics of religion seem to fixate on religions in their latter sclerotic forms with little acknowledgement of the whole complex process. Such critics are apparently unaware that their own thinking is subject to precisely the same processes and even the same hubris.

A Long Slow Coup d Etat

Science and arts differing ways of attending to reality are, not surprisingly, reflected in the actual structure and functioning of the human brain. The brain says psychiatrist and neuroscientist Iain McGilchrist, is a metaphor of the world. The brain functions like the world functions. In his provocative book The Master and His Emissary, McGilchrist documents how the left and right hemispheres of the brain tend to focus on different aspects of reality and, in turn, generate different kinds of knowledge.

McGilchrist stresses that real hemispherical differences exist but that both sides are quite interdependent, as they integrate two aspects of experiential reality. The left side is concerned with things (or human generated distinctions and abstractions), while the right hemisphere is concerned with the relations between things and is open to the whole. In our normal day to day activities, both sides tend to function simultaneously, more or less in harmony. McGilchrist generally affirms Shelleys distinctions between reason and imagination: We live by harmonizing distinctions.

McGhichrist argues that the balance of part to whole radically shifts with the emergence of modern science. The left hemispheres focus on details comes to dominate as our common cultural way of interpreting reality. Sciences capacity to break the world down into its pieces predominates, with little concern for the right hemispheres capacity to look at the whole. This is a momentous shift in consciousness that virtually defines the modern world. Roberto Calasso describes this radical shift as a long and slow coup d edat by which the brains analogical pole [is] gradually supplanted by the digital pole.

As science objectifies reality (today, we literally see the transformation of reality into digital information), a great coup dtat is set in motion. It is consummated when our consciousness is thoroughly adapted to this new reality.

The story of the modern world is very much a story of this coup d etat. The emergence of the modern world is both disturbing and exhilarating. Science subverts traditional forms and breaks the world into pieces, and this generates both alienation and liberation. As traditional forms dissolve, we lose a sense of wholeness and meaning though ultimately we are compensated with a sense of power over the elements of nature. Much of the art and literature of the past two centuries can be understood as manifestations of and commentary on our shifting consciousness.

Nietzsche not only observed the coup dtat in progress; he could see where it was heading. He well understood that the great changes were not political or even ideological but in the very nature of human consciousness. Nietzsches infamous pronouncement of the death of God has been routinely interpreted as a kind of achieved wisdom of modern man over naivet and superstition. However, as Nietzsche himself suggests, I believe it more accurate to describe it as a psychological state of human beings incapable of transcendence, incapable of seeing wholes.

Nietzsches commonly used term decadent signifies not only a cultural breakdown but a psychological one. He characterizes decadence in literature as

life no longer animates the whole. Words become predominant and leap right out of the sentencethe sentences themselves trespass beyond their bounds, and obscure the sense of the whole page, and the page in its turn gains in vigor at the cost of the whole,the whole is no longer a whole.

Nietzsche is anticipating what would become postmodern literary criticism. A great work of art epitomizes the imaginations highest powers of apprehending unity. But its presumed transcendent powers dissolve as the works are interrogated, demystified, and deconstructed by postmodern critics. A great work of art which once radiated all kinds of connections is torn apart, the author himself is declared dead and even the end of metanarratives proclaimed. Not only is the whole no longer a wholeit is denied as ever having even existed. Harold Bloom calls this approach to literature and art, the School of Resentment.

It is not without great irony that Nietzsches skepticism, which is to say, his ability to take things apart, would be appropriated by postmodern theorists. Nietzsche is indeed the greatest of modern skeptics, but he, ultimately, is all about wholeness and transcendence. Referring to himself as an artistic Socrates, he recognizes the need to apprehend reality as whole is as important as breaking it into pieces. Art critic Clement Greenberg once defined the word kitsch as debased and academized simulacra; postmodernism can be describe as kitsch Nietzsche.

Postmodern skepticism even presumes to challenge the modern world formed by science and reason. One of the great paradoxes of the triumph of science as knowledge is that the more the world is turned into an object, the more we think of ourselves as subjective beings. Postmodern hyper-emphasis on the subjective nature of reality is not so much a challenge to Enlightenment rationalism as it is its fulfillment. These seemingly conflicting ways of thinking are merely two manifestations of the incapacity to see wholes:manifestations of the atrophy of the imagination and the disjunction of the left and right sides of the brain. In both science and postmodern skepticism, the brains digital pole subjugates the analogical poles proclivity to make connections and apprehend unity. The scientific mind generates fragmentation; the postmodern mind adapts to and even celebrates fragmentation.

What we call postmodernism is emblematic of the fragmented thinking of modern secular man in general. The denial of (or the incapacity for) transcendence is precisely what characterizes Nietzsches last man. Abstracted from nature and history, the last man is smug, hypersensitive, and incapable of creativity. In Nietzsches vision of the land of education, he mocks those who mindlessly pride themselves on their lack of belief: real are we entirely, and without belief or superstition. It is precisely the educated who have most lost faith in faith, who have lost any sense of transcendence or unity. It is, then, in Academia, with all its expertise and isolated silos of knowledge, where we see the consummation of the coup d etat.

We modern secular humans now pride ourselves on our education, our skepticism, our critical thinking and our openness. The inability to see connections is now celebrated as a kind of liberation from what appears to be the arbitrary authority of any claim to a transcendent whole. All social hierarchies, social mores, artistic conventions, and even geographic borders appear as arbitrary, nave, or self-serving. Unhappily for the educated, the world is yet full of true believers, rubes, and deplorables, clinging to their guns and religion.

The coup d etat ushers in what Calasso calls the Experimental Society.We are now in what Calasso calls post history (or what Fukuyama calls the end of history), where the constitution of society is not a problem of the imagination but a purely theoretical problem. Modern society has been transformed into a vast laboratory where we conduct experiments on nature and on ourselves. Our great ideological conflicts largely consist of power struggles over who controls the laboratory and which experiments are run.

The Experimental Society knows no boundaries and perpetually replicates itself to envelop the whole globe. It is a metanarrative of no metanarratives, and, in the name of denouncing imperialism, it is the greatest imperial force the world has ever seen. Society, like everything else, is more or less raw material, data generated by science, which can be molded into whatever we determine to be fair and just. All problemssocial, environmental, personalare to be treated essentially the same way as a viral pandemic. The tragedy of life can be alleviated by a deus ex machina of technological wizardry or the intervention of beneficent experts. Suffering is just natures way of telling us we need better experiments.

If the brain is a metaphor of the world, then the world is a metaphor of the brain. With the rise of modern science, we make the world over in our image. The McGilchrist tell us that extreme hyperawareness of the pieces in individuals is called schizophrenia. The extreme hyperawareness of the pieces in a whole civilization we often call Progress.

Radiating Power

Speaking of how the world works, Calasso writes:

There are two movements:

We cannot do without either of these two movements, in any of their articulations

Calasso is again making a similar distinction as between the digital and analogical poles of consciousness. Clearly, confronting our current pandemic, we require the powers of science to address the coronavirus as if it is usable material. We want science to break the problem down into its fragments; we want to be able to control or even annihilate the virus. A viral pandemic is a problem of knowing the fragments and conducting effective experiments.

But how does the emergence of our current pandemic relate to the whole vast world we call the Global Economy? How does a relate to b? How does touching one element affect all the other elements?

Calasso continues:

In the post-historical phase, only the action of a is generally recognized by society; b leads a wild and clandestine life, but radiates its power over everything.

With our fragmented minds we are blind as to how a relates to b. The coronavirus is indeed a disease which can be known and controlled by science. Yet, simultaneously it is but one manifestation of powers and relationships which, unnamed and unacknowledged, lead wild and clandestine lives.

And how do we know these invisible powers even exist? Consider this: Someone touches a bat in Eastern China, and a whole global civilization is brought to its knees.

The Athenians never fully recovered from the plague, and the great Peloponnesian War dragged on for decades. In one great final attempt to extend its power, imperial Athens invaded distant Sicily. Overextended, unsure of purpose and led by corrupt and weak generals, Athens suffered a humiliating defeat. The end of Athens Golden Age was precipitated by a great act of cultural hubris

Hubris is the arrogance that you know more than you know. The hubris of modern science as knowledge is that it tends not even to know what it does not know. Breaking the world up into pieces can never give us knowledge of the whole. Scientific knowledge can be enfolded or guided by some vision of the whole, but it cannotas sciencegenerate that whole. The complete domination of the kind of thinking that allows us to overcome a great pandemic is, at the same time, the kind of thinking that ensures events like pandemics. The strength of science is simultaneously its weakness.

The whole is illimitable and, therefore, can never truly be known. Ultimately, its radiant powers can only be described by metaphor or analogy. We can eradicate a thousand viruses and still not know who we are in the universe. Addressing the emergence of modern science, the poet and scientist Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote in his 1891 Studies for the Physiology of Plants,

The seekers of knowledge may cross themselves and bless themselves against imagination as often as they wishbefore they know it, they will have to call upon the imaginations creative power for help.

Chris Augusta is an artist living in Maine.

Here is the original post:

The Coronavirus and a Coup d'tat of the Brain - Merion West

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on The Coronavirus and a Coup d’tat of the Brain – Merion West

Expect More Jobs And More Automation In The Post-COVID-19 Economy – Forbes

Posted: at 8:00 pm

An Amazon Fulfillment Center in Washington state. Workers have partnered with machines to move and ... [+] sort packages in warehouses for decades. COVID-19 has created urgency to adopt more automation, leading to safer, more satisfied workers and customers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has halted economic activity globally. Factories and warehouses are forced to shut down to protect their workers, while those that are essential struggle with preventing outbreaks. Could a more automated workforce have alleviated the economic damage COVID-19 has caused? The International Federation of Robotics (IFR) reported the cost of robots has decreased and continues to decrease enabling wide adoption. South Korea has seven robots per 100 workers and every third robot installed is in China. A 2019 report by Oxford Economics predicted 12.5 million manufacturing jobs will be automated in China by 2030. In the aftermath of the pandemic, it could be many more.

So what does this mean for workers? Before the crisis hit, fearful reaction and alarmist headline buzz immediately harkened to predictions of massive job loss, disproportionate allocation of prosperity and further political polarization. Now that we are in the midst of massive job loss, that hasnt been caused by automation, the question is now How can automation accelerate our recovery and protect us from future pandemics?

Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, estimates on the specific impact automation will have on jobs varied drastically: McKinsey projected up to 30% of jobs in the US will be automated by 2030, and automation and AI will lift productivity and economic growth, but millions of people worldwide may need to switch occupations or upgrade skills. The World Economic Forum (WEF) estimated the emerging professions resulting from automation could account for 6.1 million jobs globally between 2020 to 2022. We have yet to see how the global pandemic will impact jobs in the long term, but its safe to assume that we will see acceleration in automation where it keeps human workers, and consumers, safer.

Prior to the crisis, the WEF reported that automation will generate vast new opportunities for fulfilling peoples potential and aspirations. Now there is evidence that automation protects humans. Consider logistics automation: it protects warehousing and delivery workers from being exposed to pathogens. Robots continuously cleaning hospitals avoid imperiling health workers. Digital payments obviate exchanging money, cards, and signatures for those who work in retail.

Automation and jobs are not mutually exclusive. To mitigate uncertainty as we find our way out of this crisis, we must focus on humans achieving their full potential and aspirations. This means founders, investors, industry leaders and public policy-shapers must all emphasize workers and the customers they serve.

Focusing on Three Key Factors: Automation, Education and Prosperity of Human Workers

In 2017, I wrote a post-presidential election piece about how both candidates overlooked automation and education as powerful catalysts behind shaping future jobs. Instead, both Clinton and Trump talked about minimum wage, taxes, and trade agreements. It was a missed opportunity of epic proportions for both sides. Instead, they could have emphasized opportunity for better-paying, higher-quality jobs through a skilled workforce partnered with automation, and allayed the fears of those who are anxious about the future of work.

In this crucial election cycle, we need to select candidates who 1) have a plan for how technology can synergistically enable humans, and 2) emphasize the important role of continuous education.

Things have evolved in the last three years as the reality of automations arrival dawned for policymakers. The Trump administration has gone from Treasury Secretary Mnuchin admitting at a 2017 Axios Newshapers event that job automation is not even on our radar to an about-face with the formation of the National Council for the American Worker in 2018. The council's purpose is to detail a way forward through the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It amplifies the alarm that our countrys education and job training programs have prepared Americans for the economy of the past. The rapidly changing digital economy requires the United States to view education and training as encompassing more than a single period of time in a traditional classroom.

In a further evolution of the administration's policy, the March 2019 Economic Report of the President indicated that the impending threat of automation and its impact on jobs had become high priority and that astute policymaking will play an integral role in leveraging technology as an asset for the country, while mitigating potential disruptions.

In light of the pandemic, we can expect to see supply chains existing closer to home. To achieve the replacement of cheap labor found in foreign markets, automation will be a critical component in this trend.

While Biden supports tax incentives, government grants and technical training programs, Sanders made automation a major point in his speech announcing his candidacy for president the second time; running on a mix of policies like raising the federal minimum wage and federal jobs guarantees. Whether its from a new administration or the existing one, we should expect to see massive economic recovery efforts going towards re-training.

The best plan has to be bi-partisan and human-centered. It is one that will need to be rapidly iterative like the technology advancements themselves. Notably, we shouldnt automate just for the sake of cool technology. I agree with MIT Economics Professor Daron Acemoglus definition of the right technology and so-so technology. The right technology creates opportunities for higher quality work versus a zero-sum game of destroying jobs. An example of the right technology has been how typesetters have moved up the value chain with graphic design. So-so technology completely displaces workers and doesnt offer the end-user a radically improved experience or service.

Venture investors must seek the right technology, which yields higher-wage, rewarding work and higher-quality, cheaper, more sustainable products and services. The key is to focus on how we can best adapt and who can lead public policy in that direction.

Most well-known automation technologies never replaced humans; instead they took over tedious, dangerous and onerous tasks. In 1885 William Burroughs, for instance, didnt wipe out accountants jobs with his calculating machine. The new inventions eliminated the long hours of tedious addition. He innovated the machine because he was tired of the long hours it took to do his job. The resulting machine and commercial entity based on this innovation is the DNA of Unisys, the multi-billion dollar IT company.

The most important lesson from the past and to avoid repeating as we recover from this crisis is that the most recent technical advances havent resulted in a shared prosperity. MIT reports that technology has led to more productivity over the last 40 years, but has failed to translate into shared prosperity for workers. From 1973 to 2016, labor productivity rose by 75%, but workers' compensation only rose by 12% and the stagnant earnings hit people of color particularly hard. We are at a unique point in history to course correct for more shared prosperity.

To be successful we all need to get comfortable with the notion that we will all be lifelong learners and will need to be open to ongoing skill sharpening or even entirely re-skilling as we progress. I have had to re-skill in the past and will likely need to again, as will you.

So our challenge when turning to the future of work is to champion the notion that ongoing learning will need to be at the heart of a job shift that distributes prosperity more evenly through society. Happily, this is where the two ends of the political spectrum currently agree.

In light of all these macro issues, founders have a big opportunity to advance automation at this time of crisis towards advancing human prosperity. And smart investors should seek to partner with those founders acting on this opportunity. Here are four lessons for those aspiring founders building great robotics startups:

Articulate a vision for a future where humans are empowered by machines

Great startups uncover a unique, non-consensus market opportunity, and invent a powerful tool that will endow them with a dominant position in that market. We seek founding teams that can articulate a vision to attract the dollars and talent to build the tools to execute on this opportunity. These people are the kernel of fantastic teams. Those teams will build upon those tools to build amazing companies.

Fantastic founders will articulate a hypothesis around how they can build a massive business that solves a big problem with the secret they have uncovered, or tool they plan to build. They will broadcast that hypothesis to attract the amazing talent. They will construct a plan for reducing that hypothesis into an exciting business. They will raise the capital required to build that business, and lead the people who will be held accountable towards devising and executing that plan.

Acquire a deep understanding of how your automation product is impacting the metrics your customers business, and how much they will pay for those improved metrics

Great founders gain a deep understanding of their customers current circumstances to benefit them with automation, rather than just push fancy robots. They build a team with deep relationships into the customer community. This creates almost-instant credibility for teams and the product, to attract other big customers, as well.

Hire talented teams that speak to customers in their own language, instilling confidence that their robot will deliver on their promises

Some of the best innovations come from outside the sector where they will be put to use. One example is Aeva, founded by an extraordinary team out of Apple, who discovered that sensors used to characterize electronics can help robots see in a way cameras, radar, and lidar could not.

The most effective startups speak the language while drawing tech from a completely different field. These high quality interactions bypass the many years it would have taken for these outsiders to build credibility in a new industry.

Help shape policy to promote continuous education programs

The WEF report says that collaboration between the public and private sectors can advance an entirely different agendaone in which peoples futures as well as global economic prospects are enhanced by mobilizing worldwide mass action on better education, jobs and skills.

Regulation plays a key role here, as do industry leaders. They can ensure their trade associations are paying attention to public policy so that it ensures automation is concurrent with re-training our workforce.

Prior to the economic crisis, we were beginning to see a collective realization that a companys workforce is its primary source of value creation. We saw shifts happening in how firms account for their human capital investments with an, an ISO certification for human capital and the Security Exchange Commissions Investor Advisory Committee recommending increasing reporting requirements for companies that are making workforce investments. A Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance report found that many firms are at nascent stages of voluntarily reporting their governance and management of human capital. Soon, we expect agreed-upon KPIs, one of which will be investment in education and re-training.

We rely on amazing talent led by fantastic founding teams to better position our workforce and our nation in the global economy. They are building companies in response to the opportunities this crisis presents. We expect that many once-in-generation companies to emerge, and we are actively seeking to partner with them.

Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus

Go here to see the original:

Expect More Jobs And More Automation In The Post-COVID-19 Economy - Forbes

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Expect More Jobs And More Automation In The Post-COVID-19 Economy – Forbes

Cleaning Automation Becomes Post COVID-19 Priority – Propmodo

Posted: at 8:00 pm

The common thread we keep hearing is the need to self isolate, limit human contact, practice social distancing, and what that equates to is the growing importance of automation. How so? The more automation technology available to us, the less need for people to manually do things. Automation allows traditional steps required to be skipped, typically saving people time, and therefore money. But now, we need to look at automation through the lens of eliminating as many steps as possible that require human to human contact.

Couple this increased demand for automation with a need for sanitary conditions. Humans create messes. We leave germs behind in our wake, so even if you havent had physical contact with another human, you could have second degree contact by being in a place theyve been. We are all now well aware of just how long viruses can live in a variety of environments. The COVID-19 pandemic will inevitably have lasting effects on society and human behavior, inevitably creating needs and opportunities that may not have previously been viewed as a priority, but now are.

Cleaning automation, particularly in large commercial spaces, will now be a priority. People who inhabit these spaces, and who will be inhabiting them (once the time comes to reopen offices and non-essential businesses), will want to know these places are clean and safe. Whether as workers, patrons, managers, tenants, or owners, people will be much more inquisitive about how the spaces they occupy are cleaned, not just one time to disinfect, but on a regular basis going forward.

We now understand the preventative measures that should be taken to minimize risks for not only pandemic threats, but for any kind of viral contagion. Even a simple strain of the flu can immobilize large quantities of people if given the right conditions in which to spread. COVID-19 has been the catalyst to highlight the importance of proper cleaning protocols and ways to mitigate the spread of disease, including social distancing. In taking all of this into consideration, I think its safe to say the market for commercial cleaning automation is poised to grow exponentially in the coming years.

Given the tremendous square footage of commercial spaces, cleaning automation isnt a new concept. In fact, cleaning is the fifth largest industry in the world, according to Kass Dawson, the Head of Strategy and Marketing Communications at Softbank Robotics. Softbank Robotics has developed a robotic vacuum called Whiz, which uses lidar technology, computer vision, and proprietary algorithms to navigate and clean commercial spaces.

Brady Watkins, the Head of Commercial Automation for Softbank Robotics, explains that over 50 percent of commercial spaces are carpeted, which means a lot of time and manpower has traditionally been dedicated to vacuuming, or in some cases, spot cleaning is interspersed with regular vacuuming to save time. However, Watkins says that cutting corners means sacrificing air quality because carpeting acts as a filter for debris and dust, so when it is cleaned less frequently, that debris and dust simply collects and builds up. When people walk through the space or when furniture is moved, the debris, dust, and possible contaminants that have collected there are then stirred up, diminishing the air quality. If weve learned anything from this pandemic about building health, its the importance of air quality.

Perhaps more importantly, automated vacuum cleaners allow people to focus on more important tasks. For cleaning crews, that time could be spent sanitizing high touch surfaces. Dawson refers to this as cobotics, or how robots and humans can work together to optimize performance. He says, Robots arent here to steal jobs. Robots are a part of augmenting the workforce of the future. Vacuuming can be a monotonous, repetitive task that requires little thought, so by using robots like Whiz to take care of the carpet, humans are able to accomplish more.

Other automated cleaning solutions include the use of UV lights. An article about clean tech automation recently reported a company that produces UV light-emitting robots has seen a huge increase in demand since the outbreak began in China and that some studies show significant decreases in the spread of infection in healthcare facilities that use UV lights to kill microbes. We recently published an article discussing Well building standards, and one of their air quality optimizations called for the use of UV lights to filter particulate matter from HVAC units. For non-carpeted floors, the Neo by Avidbots is being used in commercial spaces like airports. Again, these technologies dont replace humans, but they offer a clean foundation for humans to build upon manually.

Cleaning automation doesnt always require robots, either. Another company Microshare deploys sensors for all kinds of uses within healthcare facilities to help automate a number of things, one of which can be to alert the facility when more than just a routine cleaning might be needed. Push button sensors can be used in operating rooms as a way for staff to signal when a deep clean might be needed after a person with an infectious disease was treated in the space. Other sensors are able to read and transmit air temperature and water quality data, which can be used to determine predictive cleaning patterns as well as set optimal conditions for disease transmission reduction.

For a lot of people, the cleanliness of the buildings they frequent may not have been at the forefront of their mind, but now it is something we all think about. The external environment that surrounds our bodies has a profound impact on our internal health. Before COVID-19, health was often viewed as something largely individual, meaning if you do what youre supposed to care for your body, you have a much better chance at maintaining optimal health. While that assumption still holds truth, people have come to the startling realization that doing what youre supposed to now includes everyones participation in upholding external environmental health parameters. Maintaining optimal health means we all have to take the necessary steps away from one another. It also means the environments we share have to uphold a better standard of clean. Automated cleaning allows for both of those things to happen simultaneously, but the necessary protocols to implement it should begin now in order to minimize risk in spaces that are currently occupied and better prepare spaces that will soon begin to reopen.

Go here to read the rest:

Cleaning Automation Becomes Post COVID-19 Priority - Propmodo

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Cleaning Automation Becomes Post COVID-19 Priority – Propmodo

9 Ways Accelerated City Automation Will Create a ‘New Normal’ After the Pandemic – Interesting Engineering

Posted: at 8:00 pm

Get up in the morning, get a coffee brewing, grab a bite for breakfast, hit the sofa, and get straight to work. Does this sound familiar? Millions of people globally have been adapting to a "new normal" since the COVID-19 outbreak started to spread from mainland China after the new year.

Some have been getting used to telecommuting, others, including medical workers, are getting accustomed to working alongside new fleets of disinfecting robots, and many have taken movie and series binges to historic levels.

What impact is this surge in digital reliance and automation having now, and how will it shape our future? Here are 9 ways that accelerated city automation and digitalization, caused by COVID-19, will likely form the "new normal" for years to come.

Though the scale of the COVID-19 outbreak might be unprecedented in our modern times, the impact of historic outbreaks, dating as far back as the Middle Ages, shows us how the socio-economic aftermath of a pandemic can lead to innovations and widespread changes in infrastructures.

After the Black Death ravaged the world and reduced Europe's population by 30 percent during the 14th century, large gaps left in the workforce led to the technological as well as societal innovations that spurred on what came to be known as the Renaissance. Cholera epidemics in the 19th century, meanwhile, led to the building of new advanced sewer systems and the writing of zoning laws to prevent overcrowding. Many more examples can be found throughout history.

This effect is also seen in a smaller scale with countries like Singapore, Taiwan, and Vietnam, where the 2003 SARS outbreak led to changes in infrastructure and protocols, meaning that these countries have so far been relativelysuccessful at containing COVID-19 Taiwan and Singapore have both recorded 0 coronavirus deaths at the time of writing.

These historical changes are leading experts to highlight key sectors including city automation, digitalization, and architecture where they believe COVID-19 will have a long-lasting impact.

Though it's difficult to put a positive spin on a pandemic, there might be some silver linings. As Peter Xing,associate director in technology and growth initiatives at KPMG, saidat Singularity Universitys recentCOVID-19 virtual summit, the outbreak provides "an opportunity forautomation to happen at the last mile.

That's to say that if restaurants today, as an example, are automating parts of the delivery process, our current situation will leadto more businesses testing the limits of automation in the service they provide. In China, for example, the use of automated delivery drones has already gone up since the outbreak began.

RELATED: COVID-19: 7 METHODS ASTRONAUTS USE TO COPE WITH LONG-TERM CONFINEMENT

In many cases, companies that had previously been on the verge of experimenting with automated methods for parts of their delivery chain or services will be forced to take that step to survive. If they invest in that technology and show it to work successfully, they will likely see no need to re-hire humans to fill those roles after the outbreak is controlled.

As already mentioned in this article, difficult moments in history provide opportunities for innovations to come to the fore.Broadly speaking, AI, robotics, and data analytics are playing a key role in fighting COVID-19. They are accelerating drug discovery, helping to evaluate the spread of the virus and, in many cases, allowing health professionals to carry out their work from a distance or with a safety that wasn't previously possible.

There are countless examples of the way these technologies have transformed the global reaction to the pandemic: demand for UV light-emitting robots that zap viruses and infections has gone up dramatically since the outbreak began; doctors are using AI to screen coronavirus patients; companies like Deepmind are publishing automated predictions of how COVID-19 will evolve.

All of this has led to a widespread reflection on the role city automation can play in our future and has renewed calls for a Universal Basic Income more on this in section 7.

We are currently in the midst of what can be viewed as the largest remote work experiment in history with remote work tools like Zoom, Slack, and Todoist seeing an unprecedented surge in demand.

Tools for remote work will continue to grow as will remote workers.The COVID-19 pandemic has already resulted in historic numbers of unemployment benefit claims in countries including the U.S and Spain. Much of this workforce will likely reconsider their future employment and look for jobs that are safer against future crises, and that are relatively stable in the face of accelerated city automation, including jobs that can easily be done from home.

Then there's the way we consume entertainment and art, and the impact it is having, and will have on these sectors. Large movie studios like Universal Studios and Disney have put several of their big releases on the fast lane for on-demand streaming. So many people are using streaming services that the European Union has actually asked Netflix to slightly reduce the quality of its streaming output so that the continent can put up with the surge.

As the Financial Times points out, several cinemas, which were already dealing with competition from early streaming releases, will see permanent closures due to the coronavirus. In general, any sector that was already struggling in the face of innovation and city automation will likely be hit hard by the coronavirus.

Despite the fact that people burning down cellphone masts amidst 5G coronavirus conspiracy theories is an example of the outbreak bringing out the worst in people, the pandemic will only provide further incentive for the rollout of 5G.

Weve been looking at redesigning public spaces so that they can also work as logistics and treatment areas in cities for epidemics like this, David Green, a principal at Perkins and Will, a design firm that has worked on health districts, tells FastCompany. Green is one of many urban design professionals that sees the pandemic effect as a reason to reevaluate how we design our cities.

As already mentioned, outbreaks of cholera inthe 19th century led to the building of new sewer systems globally. That is just one example of the way disease outbreaks have historically affected urban design.

City automation will likely be at the center of future innovations in the aftermath of COVID-19, as will the adaptability, or modularity, of cities Green mentions.

Singapore's Changi Airport recently shifted tocontactless screening for returning citizensso as to minimize waiting times and proximity of passengers. Such screening technology for outbreaks might be built into public spaces, while cheaper ventilation solutions and UV light technology might also be implemented to fight the effects of diseases.

Air onboard airplanes is actually well-filtered to prevent the easy circulation of viruses,Luke Leung, director of sustainable engineering at SOM explains toFastCompany. However, as Leung also says,we can do it in our public transportation system, but its not done. Cleaner, well-filtered air might become more of a priority in the future of public transportation following the coronavirus pandemic.

Public transport, another sector that is being increasingly automated, might also be part of a renewed focus on widespread city automation. Today, we are already seeing increasingly long trips be automated, and AI systems showing great promise for preventing enormous accumulated delay times. Systems for railways and metros, for example, are already being used to optimize efficiencyso that trains are utilized properly during peak hours.

A similar approach to public transportation automation might be able to help with adequately distributing trains and buses amidst the reduced necessity for public transportation during an outbreak.

In 2016, a World Economic Forum report predicted the loss of7.1 million jobs between 2015 and 2020. This would largely be due to"artificial intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, and other socio-economic factors that will replace the need for human workers."

What do we do when the robots and AI systems powering these mass job losses are owned by a select few companies worldwide?The benefits of automation arent being passed on to the average citizen, Peter Xing said in his Singularity University virtual summit. "Theyre going to the shareholders of the companies creating the automation."

Even before COVID-19's patient zero was infected, there were calls for policies like Universal basic income (UBI), whereby everyone in a country's population receives a basic monthly salary that allows them to survive regardless of whether they are working or not.

Spain, in fact, hasannounced plans for a permanent basic income to help vulnerable families in the aftermath of COVID-19. While this isn't universal basic income, as several big publications have wrongly written this week, it is undeniably a big step towards something resembling UBI in the country.

The driving force for calls for UBI has always been the belief that city automation will eventually replace an unsustainable amount of jobs. If it were implemented now, it would also be helping large amounts of people left unemployed by the outbreak.

AsYuval Noah Harari, author of Sapiens, Homo Deus and 21 Lessons for the 21st Centurywrote in an article for theFinancial Times, "many short-term emergency measures will become a fixture of life. That is the nature of emergencies. They fast-forward historical processes."

As a darker, dystopian portrayal of the way things could turn after the coronavirus, Harari claims that temporary surveillance measures could be legitimized by the outbreak, leading to unprecedented surveillance of populations after COVID-19 with the pretext of preventing future pandemics.

As Harari writes, "today, for the first time in human history, technology makes it possible to monitor everyone all the time." China has already started monitoring people's smartphones, making use of facial recognition cameras, obliging people to report their body temperature and medical condition, and has tracked widespread individual cases via big data.

The distinction Harari makes with this new type of surveillance is that it's "under-the-skin" meaning that it would allow governments unprecedented insight into the way information changes our physiology something that could lead to something akin to a Cambridge Analytica 2.0.

Though Yuval Noah Harari cautions against authoritarian impulses being rejuvenated by the coronavirus (see point 8), he also envisions a future where this pandemic might renew trust in global collaboration and slow the recent trend towards right-wing nationalism.

"First and foremost, in order to defeat the virus, we need to share information globally. Thats the big advantage of humans over viruses," Harari writes. "A coronavirus in China and a coronavirus in the US cannot swap tips about how to infect humans. But China can teach the US many valuable lessons about coronavirus and how to deal with it."

In order to beat the COVID-19 pandemic, "we needa spirit of global co-operation and trust," he explains. This is already being seen globally, with partisanship being set aside in favor of pulling together,showings of solidarityspread globally and the scientific community demonstrating quick innovation through global collaboration. Much of this is thanks to city automation, which allows easy sharing of information.

Universal basic income, redesigned cities, and renewed globalization are just a few more examples of policies, innovations, and ideas that are coming to the forefront of public attention amidst these uncertain times a time that could herald unforeseen, widespread changes that will be felt for years to come.

See the original post:

9 Ways Accelerated City Automation Will Create a 'New Normal' After the Pandemic - Interesting Engineering

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on 9 Ways Accelerated City Automation Will Create a ‘New Normal’ After the Pandemic – Interesting Engineering

The Big Picture Network – Automation World

Posted: at 8:00 pm

Michael Bowne, executive director, PI North America

Over the coming year, we here at Profibus/Profinet North America will be highlighting 10 facets of digitalization that, together, give the complete view of a state-of-the-art Profinet networkin other words: The Big Picture.

These 10 facets are:

I/O Communication. Sending and receiving inputs and outputs is the fundamental function of any industrial network. But its actually about more than just inputs and outputs. Its about diagnostics, topologies, and the ecosystem of products that can be connected to the network. Because, at the end of the day, the famous quote by John Gage, formerly of Sun Microsystems, still rings true: The network is the computer.

Edge Computing. Much has been said in this space about edge computing. Some approaches include utilizing non-traditional data inputs (e.g., from the cloud) locally to make real-time decisions. Other approaches employ advanced analytics (locally on time-critical data) where cloud latency is an issue. Others still see edge computing as simply an extension of the processing already handled by the programmable logic controller (today. Either way, were pushing ourselves further along the path of digitalization.

Time Sensitive Networking (TSN). The beauty of time-sensitive networking (TSN) is that, if we do everything right, end-users should be blissfully unaware that their Ethernet network is now deterministic-by-design. The same Profinet protocol, engineering, features, and services will simply reside on a new and improved Ethernet. The important part is TSN will ensure robustness even as information technology and operational technology converge, and multiple protocols share the same wire.

C2C Communication. Other protocols can also benefit from TSNs determinism, namely: OPC UA. With its publish/subscribe addition and vendor agnosticism, best-in-class machines can be connected controller-to-controller (C2C) with real-time communication. Deterministic machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is a challenge that becomes much easier to solve with OPC UA. Thats why Profibus/Profinet International (PI) has selected OPC UA as its protocol of choice for C2C communication.

C2C Safety. Functional safety between controllers at the machine level is another significant challenge in industrial automation. For this, PI has provided its ProfiSafe technology to the OPC Foundation. Safety over OPC UA enables new use-cases, such as autonomous mobile robots, and is being integrated as a core specification.

Vertical Communication. By mapping Profinet data to OPC UA objects via a companion specification, we can help meet Industry 4.0 requirements. These include the use of administration shells facilitated by OPC UA information models. For the moment, our companion specification covers diagnostics and asset managementtwo pieces of data that are not time critical but can be valuable to multiple systems across a factory.

Data Semantics. Adding semantics to data turns it into valuable information. Application profiles allow us to do that. They standardize the structure, parameters, format, and units associated with data coming from a family of devices. So, if OPC UA provides the how, then companion specifications and application profiles provide the what.

Security. Over the coming year, PI will begin to look at expanding upon the security in Profinet. This might mean the signing of General Station Description (GSD) files or supporting particular types of read-only modes. Eventually the integrity and authenticity of configuration data could be secured. It may even make sense to investigate securing the confidentiality of I/O data itself.

Advanced Physical Layer (APL). Work is progressing quickly on Ethernet APL. This two-wire, intrinsically safe version of Ethernet brings its richness and beauty down to instruments in process automation. With Ethernet APL, Profinet can go all the way down to the field level without the need for a translation to/from Profibus PA while using existing cabling.

5G. 5G is a hot topic right now but, for industry, it only makes sense if it performs better than Wi-Fi/Bluetooth at a price point that is acceptable. To drive prices down, the focus now is on the ability for end-users to build their own private 5G networks. If so, the bandwidth and latencies being advertised by 5G proponents are impressive.

These ten topics make up our big picture. As you can see, digitalization is not just one thing. Its a gem with many facets. But its important to realize its not futuristicits future-proof. Installing a Profinet network today is all about openness and flexibility.

While things may not move as quickly in the industrial automation market as in other markets, you still want to ensure the automation network you install can grow with the times. Thats why it makes sense to plan ahead and install an infrastructure built for tomorrow on experience learned from the past. Go digital. Go Profinet.

Visit link:

The Big Picture Network - Automation World

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on The Big Picture Network – Automation World