The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: March 2020
Nothing wrong with being bucin, respecting women – The Jakarta Post – Jakarta Post
Posted: March 7, 2020 at 5:44 am
Celebrating International Womens Day on Sunday, men can start taking over their partners simple daily chores without fear of being labeled bucin.
Bucin is a portmanteau of the Indonesian termbudak cinta(slave to love) popularized among millennials and members of Generation Z as submission by men or women to their partners.
Local baby boomers have their own acronym for men who are dominated by their partners, which is ISTI, or Ikatan Suami Takut Istri (the Association of Husbands Afraid of their Wives). The other portmanteau with a religious nuance is ISTIQOMAH, which is short for Ikatan Suami Takut Istri Kalau di Rumah (the Association of Husbands Afraid of Wives When at Home), which usually refers to married men who go wild only when outside of their homes.
In a patriarchal society like Indonesia, these terms, normally used in jokes among men, only reflect deep-rooted gender inequality in the country. The cynical abbreviations suggest that men should instead demonstrate supremacy over women, for example by way of abuse or by leaving all the household chores to women.
The unequal gender relations are believed to be the root of many problems both in the domestic and public spheres. Marital rape, sexual harassment either verbal or physical, disparity in wages, for instance, are rampant and widely accepted as normal practices.
The awareness about a level playing field between men and women came to the fore, at least historically, in Indonesia in the 19th century through Raden Ajeng Kartini. Fast forward, the sweeping reforms in 1998 played a pivotal part in promoting gender equality in the country. Thanks to the changes, Indonesia has seen its first female president, and more women have held key ministerial posts and public offices such as regents and governors.
But gender inequality has remained an unresolved issue. How to help end the gender disparity, which the world has accepted as a major barrier to sustainable development?
You, men, could start with simple actions at home, such as sharing the burden of household jobs like washing the dishes and doing the laundry with your wives. In a show of respect for gender equality, husbands in Asias developed nations like South Korea take one-month paternity leave to help their wives take care of their new-born babies.
I am married to a woman from the Minang ethnic group in West Sumatra. My parents-in-law appear to feel ashamed when they see me washing the dishes after dinner. This despite the fact that Minang is one of the few ethnicities in the country that adopts the matrilineal kinship system.
Another small step is appreciating womens work and letting them develop themselves intellectually and publicly. In this regard, the husbands of female ministers and the late Taufik Kiemas, husband of former president Megawati Soekarnoputri, deserve appreciation.
You do not have to take to the streets to support the sexual violence eradication bill or to reject the family resilience bill. But if you do care, you can simply express your views on social media. For baby boomers, you may rally support for gender equality in your Facebook, Twitter and Instagram posts.
The International Womens Day commemoration comes against the backdrop of potential prosecution of actress Tara Basro under the draconian Electronic Transactions and Information (ITE) Law for uploading a black-and-white semi-naked picture of herself on Twitter. Tara has since deleted the post.
Of course you can join the International Womens Day march at the National Monument in Central Jakarta this Sunday. Never mind people who may call you a social justice warrior for supporting womens equal rights.
You will also contribute to gender-equality promotion by stopping making sexist jokes and rape jokes during conversations where female colleagues are present, as the anecdotes may hurt them. It is okay not to befriend sexist people.
You can also skip seminars and public discussions that feature male panellists only. If you organize a seminar or other events, you can promote female scholars from various fields, ranging from politics to religion, which this nation has in abundance.
Religion, or rather the interpretation of religious teachings actually, is the enemy of gender equality. The family resilience bill, which has been proposed by a number of politicians from several parties, speaks volumes for the efforts to give the state the authority to breach the privacy of its citizens, particularly women.
Those proposing the draft law are apparently inspired by old values or the interpretation of religious teachings that reduce womens roles to mere domestic work rather than in the public sphere.
Indonesia has an association of women clerics, who study and develop female religious teachings. The groups activities are still minor but with the help of the media and progressive people from all walks of life, the moderate principles will further spread.
Giving women more opportunities they deserve is important if we are to support equality for all genders. More affirmative action is also needed to help build a just and peaceful world for all genders.
It is quite easy for men to uphold equality for men and women. It starts from simple acts and starts with you.
***
Staff writer of The Jakarta Post and founder of the Alliance of Journalists for Pluralism (Sejuk)
Continued here:
Nothing wrong with being bucin, respecting women - The Jakarta Post - Jakarta Post
Posted in Mind Uploading
Comments Off on Nothing wrong with being bucin, respecting women – The Jakarta Post – Jakarta Post
Hollyoaks’ Stephanie Davis hospitalised with chest infection – digitalspy.com
Posted: at 5:44 am
Hollyoaks actress Stephanie Davis has been hospitalised with a chest infection.
Uploading a video onto her Instagram account, the 26-year-old informed her followers about the recent health scare, which is why she's been inactive on social media.
"The reason why I've not been about is because I've not been well," she began. "I've not wanted to post about it, or say anything. I didn't want anyone to worry because I'm alright now."
Related: Hollyoaks star Stephanie Davis opens up about high-functioning autism diagnosis
Stephanie continued: "I have been in for over a week. But I feel like I have turned a corner so I just wanted to come on.
"Sorry about the way I look... I've just been really run down for a long time, obviously since my relapse last year, and obviously when I tried to... and everything. I just haven't looked after myself for a long time, my chest, everything like that."
Last month, the soap star bravely opened up about a previous suicide attempt in an emotional statement.
"To feel like your life isn't worth something is the worst feeling I've ever experienced in my life, total despair and helplessness that I wouldn't wish on anyone," she wrote.
"And then I just got rapidly worse, I just gave up, I fought so hard to carry on to try, but I couldn't see a way out."
Adding that she was "in a really good place right now", she urged anyone experiencing a period of mental ill health to reach out, saying: "If it's not OK it's not the end. We can and will fight this together."
Hollyoaks airs Mondays through Fridays at 6.30pm on Channel 4, with first-look episodes airing on E4 at 7pm.
We would encourage anyone who identifies with the topics raised in this article to reach out. Organisations who can offer support include Samaritans on 116 123 (www.samaritans.org) or Mind on 0300 123 3393 (www.mind.org.uk). Readers in the US are encouraged to visit mentalhealth.gov or the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.
Digital Spy now has a newsletter sign up to get it sent straight to your inbox.
Read more news, spoilers and gossip on our Hollyoaks homepage
Want up-to-the-minute soaps news, spoilers and gossip on your social feeds? Just hit 'Like' on our Digital Spy Soaps Facebook page and 'Follow' on our @soapscoop Twitter account.
Read the original post:
Hollyoaks' Stephanie Davis hospitalised with chest infection - digitalspy.com
Posted in Mind Uploading
Comments Off on Hollyoaks’ Stephanie Davis hospitalised with chest infection – digitalspy.com
A Cambridge non-profit partnered with Google to help people with ALS preserve their voice through A.I. – Boston.com
Posted: at 5:44 am
I owe you a yoyo today.
This phrase started a whole database of words and idioms that researchers have used to help patients be understood after theyve been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS.
We picked that phrase when we started the project in 2014 because that phrase has a lot of interesting resonance components to it, CEO of the Cambridge-based ALS Therapy Development Institute (ALS TDI) Steven Perrin said. Its used in a lot of speech analysis scientific studies over the years, and so we copied it.
Starting with just this sentence, and collecting thousands more, Perrin sent the data to Google in the hopes of garnering better ways to track the progression of the disease. But it grew into a project that could find ways to help voice recognition technology understand compromised speech, and, eventually, translate that speech back into a persons original voice.
Project Euphonia, I would say, started by accident, Perrin said.
It started as just another way of collecting data for ALS TDIs precision medicine program in 2014.
If there were 100 newly diagnosed patients in the room here with us, I couldnt tell you which one is going to lose their battle with ALS in two months, and which one could live as long as Stephen Hawking, Perrin said.
So the precision medicine program sought a better way to measure ALSs progression by learning from those living with the neurodegenerative disease.
And since no one had ever tried the program for ALS, Perrin said they decided to record as much data in as many forms as possible like asking 600 questions on the history of the patients life, sequencing their full genomes after quarterly blood drawings, and asking for monthly recordings of their voice.
They moved forward analyzing most of the data except for the recordings, having had no idea what to do with them.
But then, Perrin said he met with Google and asked if they could help look at the voice recordings to see if they could correlate the clients voice with the diseases progression.
At first they laughed and said, Ah thats not big enough data for Google.
But a year later, once ALS TDI had 600 people in the program uploading monthly recordings, Google said yes.
Using a fourier transformation to convert the WAV file recordings into colorimetric patterns, or image files, Google applied its machine learning algorithm to the recordings.
Through that, they were able to more sensitively predict disease progression than anything else were using in ALS, Perrin said.
Googles A.I. model trains itself independently, which is why it requires so much data.
The more data it has, the more it can pick out patterns from the WAV files after theyve become image files.
Thats when Perrin said Google saw a light bulb go off.
They said to us, you know, we never thought about it before, but people lose their voice and we have all of their voice recordings before they lost them, Perrin said. Maybe we could reconstruct somebodys voice.
And so Project Euphonia began. At first, only having access to data from patients with ALS, Perrin and Google saw it as a way to adapt voice recognition technology to better help anyone with voice impairment issues. But Perrin said the project has developed a broader goal: to restore patients original voices.
Sure, theres devices out there now that help with communication, but out comes this computerized voice thats not your own, he said. Its kind of sterile, its not the most inviting thing.
Perrin said its been profound to watch people use Project Euphonia and hear their own voice come out of a computer.
One patients voice, once it was fully reconstructed, sounded so close to his original that his wife called Perrin in tears.
She hadnt heard her husbands voice since 2010.
Perrin said sharing your voice as part of the program is free to any patient who wants to contribute, and most do, despite a diagnosis telling them they only have a maximum of five years to live.
Like Andrea Lytle Peet, who was diagnosed with ALS in May 2014 at 33 years old and founded the Team Drea Foundation while also participating in ALS TDIs Precision Medicine Program.
I realized when I was diagnosed that I could choose whether to be depressed or to live life the best way I knew how the time would pass either way, Peet said in an email. I have chosen to dedicate my remaining time to finding a cure for ALS and helping to advance the science so that one day, no other families will have to go through this cruel disease.
Only a year before her diagnosis, she had been doing nine workouts a week to take part in a half Ironman triathlon in September 2013.
Peet said she went to five neurologists before getting her diagnosis, and shes been fighting ALS for five and a half years since, outliving the normal life expectancy of two to five years.
I went from the strongest Id ever been to walking with a cane in eight months, she said.
And everything about her life and future changed.
My husband and I no longer plan to have children, Peet said. We dont get to imagine growing old together. I cashed out my 401k because I wont live long enough to retire.
But shes grateful for what she can still do, like speaking despite slurred words, walking with a walker, eating, driving, and using the bathroom on her own.
These are all things that most people take for granted, but people with ALS lose over time, Peet said. I will never take for granted the neurological glue that is still holding me together.
She said after the diagnosis, she was nervous about a lot of things.
I worried after I was diagnosed that I would no longer have a purely happy thought, Peet said. But the happy memories are sweeter, and we dont often argue about little things that dont matter. We take adventures now we dont wait for someday anymore.
And Project Euphonia has eased some of her worries, too, giving her independence, allowing her to turn on lights, the TV, or lock the door using just her voice.
Peet said shes been using the technology every day for the past six months.
This technology also allows me to continue giving presentations for my foundation to keep raising money for ALS research, she said. It live captions what I say and I dont have to worry about being understood.
The project has also offered her peace of mind.
If my hands stop working, I know that I can use my voice to turn on the TV, turn on a podcast, or set an alarm, she said. Any small measure of independence means so much when youve lost everything else.
Perrin said losing the ability to speak might be the most traumatic part of the ALS disease course.
Communication is key to our existence, our well being, our mental health, he said.
And Project Euphonia is giving patients the ability to not worry as much about losing access to that vital part of being human.
While it took almost four years for ALS TDI and Google to get to where they are today with the project, theres still more to be adjusted.
Perrin said the systems arent automated yet.
Google takes the audio recordings from ALS TDI and their A.I. learns how to translate them, but to fully recreate and fine tune someones voice, Google needs more than twenty minutes of perfectly clear, pre-recorded audio of a patients voice before ALS affected it.
The problem is, aside from wedding speeches or recorded business conference calls, most people dont regularly record their voice.
I think the vision is to try to get it down to a minimal amount of high-quality audio, Perrin said. Less than a minute would be optimal, because probably everybody could find that.
He said theyre moving forward nonetheless, continuing to collect words and get to a point where the translation is automatic.
But the progress is ongoing, and its not going to happen overnight, Perrin said.
Here is the original post:
Posted in Mind Uploading
Comments Off on A Cambridge non-profit partnered with Google to help people with ALS preserve their voice through A.I. – Boston.com
TikTok: Art in 15 second slices – The Age
Posted: at 5:44 am
This is because TikTok doesnt know you yet. Where other social platforms connect you with friends, family or colleagues, TikTok doesnt care about people you may know. Its only concerned with what you actually want to see, and once the apps algorithm really gets to work analysing why one video holds your attention just a second longer than another, or why you swiped back three videos to watch one over again the AI powering its recommendations engine begins to feel scarily godlike.
Thats when the art of TikTok begins to reveal itself. It took the film industry decades to establish itself as a coherent system with its own internal logic, but in just a few years TikTok has done the same. What seems messy and chaotic at first quickly coagulates into a highly coded and creative ecology that pillages older media forms from Funniest Home Videos to vines and repurposes them to new ends.
The opening bars of AC/DCs Thunderstruck are recreated using only a babys gurgles. God invents seahorses: "what if baby saxophones could swim?" A woman correctly inserts a USB stick on the first try and a heavenly chorus erupts.
If this sounds like cringey internet fare circa 2005, its because the artistry of TikTok doesnt translate well into words. Its important that most of its videos are without speech, since the musical soundtrack does so much of the talking. When words are needed, theyre delivered via on-screen captions.
Nineteen-year-old Victorian Heath Kirley posted his first TikTok in January last year. Hes standing in his kitchen putting the finishing touches on a cryptic yellow costume with an oversized M on his chest as the early bars of Soulja Boys Pretty Boy Swag play out. When the bass drops, hes transformed into the yellow M&M.
A year later, he has 2.1 million followers.
"There were some weeks where 100,000 new people would follow me," he says. "It still blows my mind."
At first TikTok was just a private joke, a place to post whatever he thought might amuse a few strangers. "Until one of my videos blew up overnight. It got more than a million views and I was like, maybe this is more than just a creative outlet."
That video? "It was a joke around getting a tattoo of the word bread."
Again, its really hard to convey the humour of TikToks in words.
Most TikTok videos begin when the maker chooses its signature "sound", selecting a short audio track from the vast library the app offers. In most cases this is a song excerpt, though there are snippets from TV shows and stand-up routines too. The user then shoots a video to accompany the track, inserting their own take on the original.
The audio-first nature of TikTok means that almost every video is a kind of cover version, and a videos creativity emerges in the way each user delivers their own spin on an established product. Youll hear the same 15-second snatch of song hundreds of times, but with each iteration a user will respond to all of the previous versions by throwing in a last-second twist, a new punchline or jawdropping physical feat.
This format of creative expression within a formulaic structure extends to dance videos, lipsynchs, comic memes and skits. The TikTok algorithm rewards originality within set constraints most videos take their cues from a previous dance, joke, trick or stunt and then make it their own.
A sophisticated visual and aural vocabulary has quickly evolved. Comic videos almost always end prematurely, cutting off mid-sentence so the viewer has to finish the gag. Conversely, a moment of absurdity (someone catching a falling bottle with their butt cheeks) will freeze while the moment is repeated from eight increasingly extreme camera angles.
TikToks creators might be crafty, but is any of this art? The study of aesthetics has long held to categories such as the beautiful and the sublime, but US cultural theorist Sianne Ngai argues that more relevant categories for understanding art today are the zany, the cute and the interesting. Its the first of those that helps explain TikToks relevance.
"Zany" sounds like a backhanded compliment at best. It conjures something too busy, trying too hard, overreaching itself. If the zany is fun, its also stressful, perhaps even fun because its stressful. Think manic comedians from Lucille Ball to Jim Carrey, but also the visual too-muchness of Star Wars films today, the 100km/h delivery of Youtube personalities, the streaming series you inhale in one sitting. For Ngai, the zany is the experience of "too many things coming at (you) quickly and at once".
TikTok is undeniably zany. The majority of videos consciously cultivate a naive aesthetic, looking more like the home videos you produced at the age of eight than the glossed and airbrushed imagery on other social platforms. This in part excuses the dorkiness that comes with being zany TikTok is undeniably dorky, too because we dont judge the eight-year-old pretending to be a grown up with the same rigour wed judge a professional actor.
Ngai says that the zany is a category worth considering seriously because it reflects the experience of modern times. From the silent antics of Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton through to the frantic, frenetic busyness of TikTok acts, zany humour collapses the distinction between fun and work, between the demands of everyday life and the supposed escape of privacy. Its hard to think of a better description of social media than that. With too many things coming at you quickly and at once, a zany response might seem the only reasonable one.
TikTok would rather its users be zany, too. More than any other social platform it sells itself as a low-conflict zone, promoting wholesome content and actively removing material that might provoke divisive responses (how it interprets that is another matter). Where other platforms increase views by ratcheting up the outrage, Tiktok appears almost entirely absent of capital-P politics.
At the level of lived experience, though, TikTok is rife with politics. Many of its memes straddle the faultlines of race, sexuality, gender and other seismically volatile subjects.
They do this with humour. Theres a popular meme that presents a scene with the caption "What I think I look like" before cutting to a variation captioned "What everybody else sees". In one iteration, an African-Australian teen is browsing a Coles aisle in a contemplative fashion. As the soundtrack switches up a notch, "what everybody else sees" is the same man stuffing items from the shelves into his pockets.
But even this is zany, and the slapstick element is jokes finisher: its only on the third or fourth viewing that you notice his hand gets stuck in a box, his keychain snagged on the shelf. Its a comment about racial stereotyping wrapped up in a clown suit.
Loading
The content on TikTok appears to be far more diverse than elsewhere on the internet, though its entirely likely the apps algorithm is controlling that sense of diversity. Users have managed to gather a surprising amount of information as to how that algorithm works.
Melbourne high schooler Harvey Petito has a million and a half followers, but says that follower counts matter far less on TikTok than on other platforms. "The TikTok algorithm sends your videos out to people who arent actually following you too. Some weeks Ill look at my analytics and my content has reached over 20 million people, even though I have 1.4 million followers."
"The best part is that its not about followers," says Kirley. "Its about your originality and your creativity. There are accounts with zero followers and Im pretty sure, no matter what, the algorithm will still show their video to a very small amount of people. It all depends on how they interact with it."
Kirley is right. In the few hours after uploading, each TikTok video is seen by a few hundred random viewers, which is why youll be shown clips with just a few likes sandwiched between those with a million or more. How that small batch of viewers respond to the video is scrutinised by the app how much of the clip is actually watched, and how many times is it replayed or shared? The rule seems to be that if a video is liked once for every 10 times its viewed, its then catapulted out to a much larger audience. This is where the AI steps in and begins analysing content: is there hateful or divisive material in there, or anything that breaks the apps terms of service? If it passes the test, its shot out to an even bigger audience.
The next trigger is velocity a video that increases its likes by 20 per cent in a day will graduate to the next level of promotion, which is why TikTok is specifically geared for sudden viral spikes.
Engagement isnt based on the followers you already have, which is why first-time posters can rack up the kind of viewing numbers that would be impossible to attain elsewhere.
A relatively popular video will be circulated at this mass level for four days, and if it performs well enough a flesh-and-blood TikTok staffer will review the clip themselves and decide if it should be one of the tiny fraction of videos to go super-viral.
Reach that point and you might find yourself with one or two million followers. TikTokers wear their fame light, though. Harvey Petito is famous enough to be regularly recognised on the street, but hes more occupied by the same concerns as most other 16-year-olds. "It can be hard finding the time and energy to film when youve been at school all day and then had sports after school or something like that, then you come home and have to shower and get dressed to make tik toks when you know youve still got homework and stuff to do."
When Kirleys views went through the roof, things got pretty zany. "When it was all happening I felt it was something I had to do on the daily, to put all my time towards it, but Ive realised now and this sounds a bit weird that its not as significant as you might think it is ... Ive gotten to a point where I post what I want to post when I want to post it."
John Bailey is a contributor to The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.
Read more from the original source:
Posted in Mind Uploading
Comments Off on TikTok: Art in 15 second slices – The Age
Album Review: The best 3 tracks from Soccer Mommy’s melancholy masterpiece ‘color theory’ – The Post
Posted: at 5:44 am
Sophie Allison, who creates music under the moniker Soccer Mommy, can do no wrong. On her latest LP, the 10-track color theory, listeners watch her make sense of her own melancholia. Its heart-wrenching and enthralling, and it provides whats missing from most of the industry: feeling.
Soccer Mommy began creating music under her stage name and uploading it to Bandcamp in 2015. While she was studying music business at New York University, she played her first show, which shortly after resulted in a record deal with Fat Possum Records. She dropped out of NYU two years later, and since then, she has released three full-length albums and concocted her own formidable form of catharsis.
Even though meaningful music tends to go unnoticed, Soccer Mommy is well on her way to becoming a household name, already going on tour with the likes of Kacey Musgraves, Paramore and Vampire Weekend, among other notable names. She deserves every second of it, too.
Color theory goes beyond merely divulging raw human emotion. Soccer Mommy takes that, intertwines it with brutally honest lyricism and guitars that are delicate but can still roar and formed one of the best albums of 2020 already. The opener, bloodstream, sounds like the intro to an angsty teenage 2000s film with its acoustic guitar beginning and airy vocals. The tenderness of night swimming is inexplicably infectious. The candid nature of royal screw up is bound to rip your heart out and replace it with perpetual chills. Every track deserves accolades, but there are three that just edge the rest:
3. crawling in my skin
Though the melody of crawling in my skin may evoke feelings of euphoria, the lyrics will do anything but. Soccer Mommys tone and her supporting instrumentation of gentle guitars and drums completely juxtapose her inability to escape her demons. Despite their evil nature, they are something she feels she can no longer live without: I watch it creep and crawl through my room / But I cant move / Sedate me all the time / Dont leave me with my mind. There are no flaws to be found within this track.
2. up the walls
Despite having the shortest run time on the album, clocking in at two minutes and 44 seconds, up the walls packs one of the heaviest punches. Replicating a tone like that of Billie Eilish in her slower songs, Soccer Mommy reflects on a past love and how itll never make its way back to the present. Beside tranquil guitars, she admits nothing will ever feel as comforting again: Cause no ones really known me like you did when we were young / Our love was our everything / Everything you want but back then.
1. gray light
Closing the album is gray light, a track about watching a loved one suffer and pondering on your own fears. Guided by a simple yet stunning guitar line, Soccer Mommy reveals that as she is forced to watch her mom decline, she cant get away from the thought of her own death: I cant lose it, the feeling Im going down / I cant lose it; Im watching my mother drown. If goosebumps dont appear at some point, its safe to say youre not human. The track is wholly cathartic, and its the best on color theory.
Rating: 4.5/5
@bre_offenberger
Read the original:
Album Review: The best 3 tracks from Soccer Mommy's melancholy masterpiece 'color theory' - The Post
Posted in Mind Uploading
Comments Off on Album Review: The best 3 tracks from Soccer Mommy’s melancholy masterpiece ‘color theory’ – The Post
Committee approves bill addressing free speech in higher education – KSL.com
Posted: at 5:42 am
SALT LAKE CITY A Senate committee voted in favor of legislation that differentiates between free speech and discriminatory harassment at Utahs colleges and universities.
HB132, sponsored by Rep. Kim Coleman, R-West Jordan, would make it so universities are unable to punish speech that doesnt fall under the the Supreme Courts definition of harassment outlined in the 1999 ruling Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education.
Coleman said theres been a lot of attention in recent years on campus free speech rights. She believes there are two sides to this issue: students who feel like their rights have been inappropriately violated and students (who) are expressing concerns about speech that may be offensive.
Colleges have been all over the place with their student speech rights, she said, and her legislation would codify the standard set by the Davis ruling so it is applies across the board.
Almost all of our public institutions of higher education have problematic policies ... I would say they violate students free speech rights, Coleman said.
The bill would define discriminatory harassment as student-on-student speech that is unwelcome, discriminates on the basis of a classification protected under federal or state law, and is so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive to the point of distracting or undermining a students educational experience.
Coleman said courts have relied upon this as the standard in the education setting.
Over-broad, anti-harassment policies are the single most common way universities punish students for free speech that the Supreme Court has said is protected, said Joe Cohn, legislative and policy director for Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
According to Cohn, no Utah universities are in compliance with the Davis ruling.
If passed, Utah would joined the ranks of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Oklahoma and Tennessee that have codified the Davis standard.
Thereve been a number of cases that show its worked for students on both sides of this coin cases where students successfully sued schools for violating their free speech rights because they jumped the gun, and cases where schools have been successfully sued by victims of harassment because their schools didnt act when it was appropriate too, Cohn said.
To address concerns raised by Utahs board of regents and some universities, the committee approved a substitute to the bill that would create a filter between students and the decision to file charges against a university for violating their free speech.
Instead of the students being able to file a lawsuit, they could go to the attorney generals office and make their complaints and then the attorney general could file the lawsuit, explained Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Wood Cross.
When asked what he thought of the change, Cohn said he believes its generally better to allow individuals to take their rights into their own hands, but having an attorney general remedy is vastly superior to having no remedy at all.
Geoffrey Landward, general counsel for regents, said he remains neutral on the bill but feels the attorney general having the right to action is an appropriate balance.
We have two obligations to our students, Landward said. We want to and cherish their right to free speech we think that an important part of higher education is the exchange and marketplace of ideas. The other thing we have is an obligation to keep our students free from harassment.
The committee passed the substituted version of the bill 4-0. It goes to the full Senate.
See the original post:
Committee approves bill addressing free speech in higher education - KSL.com
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Committee approves bill addressing free speech in higher education – KSL.com
Hugh Hefner Foundation to Honor First Amendment Defenders, Raise Awareness of Threats to Free Speech and Free Press During 40th Anniversary of Awards…
Posted: at 5:42 am
Hugh M. Hefner Foundation Seeks Nominations, Announces Judges for First Amendment Awards
LOS ANGELES, March 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The Hugh M. Hefner Foundation is seeking nominations and announcing the independent panel of judges selected for the 2020 Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Awards, which is celebrating its 40th anniversary this year. The Hugh M. Hefner Awards are hosted annually to honor a group of individuals for their work to protect and enhance First Amendment freedoms for all Americans, and help educate and raise awareness of modern-day threats to free speech and free press in the U.S.
The nomination application form can be found here. The submission deadline for consideration in the 2020 First Amendment Awards is March 27, 2020.
The Awards were founded by Christie Hefner in 1979 and have honored over 150 individuals in journalism, education, law, book publishing, government and entertainment.
Christie Hefner said, "The First Amendment Awards remind us of the modern-day challenges to our First Amendment rights. Threats still exist, but our constitutional right to free speech and expression remain intact because of the brave individuals who have been honored over the past 40 years. During the Awards, we recognize and celebrate the work of these everyday American heroes high school students, lawyers, librarians, journalists and educators who took a bold stand against infringement on their rights or the rights of their fellow Americans to protect our basic American rights."
The awards ceremony will be held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. in summer 2020. Details about the event will be provided when the winners are announced in spring 2020.
The Hugh M. Hefner Awards JudgesWinners will be selected by a panel of independent judges. The 2020 judges are:
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.,Partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, and global Co-Chair of the firm's Litigation Group. Boutrous received the 2019 Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Award in the Law category for his work on behalf of CNN and Jim Acosta in connection with the restoration of Acosta's White House press credentials after the White House suspended Acosta's press access. Boutrous also received the 2020 Freedom of Press Award from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Distinguished Leadership Award by PEN America in 2019 for his leadership in advancing rights and protecting freedom of expression.
Kyle Pope, Editor-in-Chief and Publisher of the Columbia Journalism Review, a magazine for professional journalists that is published by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. The Columbia Journalism Review is referred to as "the voice of journalism." Pope previously served as deputy editor of Conde Nast's late Portfolio magazine, editor in chief of The New York Observer, and as a reporter, foreign correspondent, and editor during his decade career at The Wall Street Journal.
Allison Stanger, Russell Leng '60 Professor of International Politics and Economics at Middlebury College, and Author. Stranger recently authored a timely new book about the history of whistleblowers in the U.S. titled Whistleblowers: Honesty in America from Washington to Trump. Stanger received the 2018 Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Award in the Education category for her work defending the free exchange of ideas on college campuses after an incident at Middlebury College. Stanger, a liberal professor, helped promote a speaking event on campus featuring a conservative social scientist who was invited by a student group; she was injured during a violent confrontation after the event.
About the Hugh M. Hefner FoundationThe Hugh M. Hefner Foundation was established to work on behalf of individual rights in a democratic society. The primary focus of the foundation is to support organizations that advocate for and defend civil rights and civil liberties with special emphasis on First Amendment rightsand rational sex and drug policies. For a complete list of past winners and judges, please visit: hmhfoundation.org/winners-judges.
View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hugh-hefner-foundation-to-honor-first-amendment-defenders-raise-awareness-of-threats-to-free-speech-and-free-press-during-40th-anniversary-of-awards-301018700.html
SOURCE Hugh M. Hefner Foundation
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Hugh Hefner Foundation to Honor First Amendment Defenders, Raise Awareness of Threats to Free Speech and Free Press During 40th Anniversary of Awards…
The Right to Dignity in Free Speech Discourse and the Case of Omar Radi – Morocco World News
Posted: at 5:42 am
Luxembourg Earlier this year, media coverage in Morocco shifted focus from street violence and rape into issues of defamation, injury, and free speech involving both ordinary citizens and persons of public interest. It honestly felt like a relief from raw knife fight images and ruthless sexual assault stories.
We read about the rapper Gnawi versus law enforcement officers, Mol Kaskita and his Youtube videos, and later about journalist Omar Radi versus Judge Lahcen Talfi, among a handful of other speech cases.
Though the common thread among all these cases is that they compel us to rethink how we look at free speech and the rights of others, including those we most vehemently disagree with, Omar Radi and his prosecution for tweeting negatively about a Moroccan judge is particularly interesting.
Omar Radi is not a household name like others across the Moroccan media spectrum. But for the first time in a while, Moroccan society began engaging in meaningful questions around rights, obligations, and the rule of law.
Of course, the price has been hefty. Ahead of his court appearance, in an objectively harsh measure given the nature of the liability, Radi was arrested. The justice system then reversed course, sticking to the rule of law by not criminally prosecuting Radi and set him free as he awaits trial.
The journalist rightfully received much support from different media sources out of collegial solidarity and pride for the role journalism plays in free societies. His own employer, Medias24, released a statement.
Besides the brotherhood that unites us, Omar Radi was a journalist at Medias24 and was able to make himself loved and respected during this period. He has forged strong bonds of friendship and respect with the team. He has been professional and exemplary in his work at Medias24.
And yet the statement does not address the issue at its heart. How does being loved or friendly relate to the idea of freedom of speech and rights to dignity?
The statement also quoted Karim Tazi, ahighly respected intellectual and political activist: Our country cannot avoid a major challenge. Such moments of transition are obviously sensitive and necessarily lead to excesses. In my opinion, such transitions should be managed by drawing a clear dividing line between what falls within the scope of political dialogue and what deserves repression.
Tazi continued, It is urgent that this line should become the sole recourse to violence, and that everything else should be catalogued as freedom of opinion to be dealt with through the fruitful confrontation of ideas.
By diverting the argument from its legal and ethical dimension into an ode to his character, Omars colleagues were actually doing him a disservice and depriving his cause of genuine traction and wider support.
In line with Tazis statement, there are two options to respond to Radis tweet: Either 1) call Radi names and slap him with a conspiracy theory of supporting revolutionary ideas to overthrow the system or 2) respectfully challenge Radis views through the fruitful confrontation of ideas.
Karim Tazis standpoint is premised on the classic argument that the only restriction of speech should be on speech that incites violence. This theory says any other restrictions would kill the spirit of public debate, and our free societies would, consequently, go off course towards finding the truth.
American legal theory on freedom of speech is deeply rooted in this notion. English philosopher John Stuart Mills 1859 essay On Liberty is probably the most famous literary work advocating for free speech.
The essay argues the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Mill elaborates on his harm principle and free speech with a story about corn merchants. The claim Corn dealers are starvers of the poor! can be condoned if written in the press, but may be subject to restriction if said to an angry mob gathered outside the corn dealers house.
Mills harm principle oversimplifies free speech and its extent. The wording of Radis tweet is a denial of Judge Lahcens dignity, regardless of how flawed Lahcens rulings are.
Radi tweeted: Lahcen Talfi, judge of the Court of Appeal, executioner of our brothers, let us remember him well. In many regimes, small arms like him came back to beg afterwards, claiming to have carried out orders. No forgetting, no forgiveness for these officials with no dignity!
When I read Lets remember him, I hear a speech to an angry mob gathered around Lahcens personal and professional space. It could even put him in harms way.
Born and raised in the notorious J5 CYM neighborhood in the heart of Rabat, I know what remember means in this context. If someone says remember me, it is like serving somebody with a notice to watch out for their own safety, both hyperbolically and literally.
With such a tweet, Radi fails to hold himself accountable to Lahcen. His emotional and understandably staunch disagreement with the judges rulings cannot legitimize his harmful behavior.
As much as I would like to defend him, Omar Radi named and shamed a judge, a private citizen exercising a public service.
Was the judge doing a good job? It is definitely an open question, and everybody is entitled to participate in the debate on the efficiency of Moroccos legal system.
Some people might argue that the judge is the center of his court, and criticizing him is a critique of the court.
Here we need to set the record straight. We have to distinguish between a person of public interest and a private citizen. Judge Lahcen cannot, even remotely, be compared to the likes of former Head of Government Abdelilah Benkirane, agriculture minister Aziz Akhannouch or any similar public figure.
Those people made a choice to be publicly exposed. They do and say things subject to the rules of public debate. Such rules allow heated conversations, naming and shaming, hyperbolic accusations, etc., as part of democratically-open debates.
But those very rules do not apply when the same public figures leave politics or public space, once and for all.
A case in point was an incident involving Benkirane and a member of Rally of Independents (RNI) party led by Akhannouch.
We were all entertained by the sharp words, insults, and accusations against Benkirane. As far as I can tell, nobody was sued for defamation or injury, since Benkirane was fully aware that his job does not guarantee him a good name.
Likewise, then Government Spokesperson Mustapha El Khalfi called RNI party members at a rally in Tangier mortazika, meaning scroungers, or people who seek to make money at the expense of others or by stealth. The members filed a defamation lawsuit against El Khalfi, asking for MAD 50,000 ($5,200) in damages per member at the rally.
The case did not gain any traction and was clearly a defensive nuisance lawsuit. The rhetoric came during the peak of politicking ahead of elections and was part of an electoral campaign run by public figures within the realm of politics.
Another case makes the distinction clearer. Shortly after Benkirane resigned as head of government, a protester insulted him through an SMS, comparing him to a mule, a despicably regarded animal within Moroccan society. The defendant received a three-month sentence, serving only two after the plaintiff pardoned him.
What is the catch? First, the defendant and the plaintiff were not political opponents having a debate, nor was Benkirane functioning as a public figure. He was a strictly private citizen, fully entitled to the rights of privacy and dignity.
Second, calling someone an animal is permissible only in the right context. Benkiranes most famous political punchline uses animal equivalencycrocodilesto describe his political opponents, and yet he has never been held accountable for that in a court of law, because the metaphor was hyperbolically used as permitted by the rules of public debate. The metaphor was meant to criticize, not to demean.
In his case, Radi could have aspired to protection by the rights society grants to journalists by upholding the standards of meaningful journalism. But his amateurish tweet does not mesh with an expectation to be treated as a journalist exercising his profession.
I assume Radi, as a journalist, has access to the court ruling. He could have challenged the content of it rather than insinuating an uncalled-for revolution, especially because journalists should reflect the truth that an ordinary citizen might not be able to see.
Free speech is a mixed bag, and saying all speech in that bag is protected can be misleading. When we have cases like Omar Radis, journalists are no longer the watchers of our problems. They become the problem.
The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Morocco World News editorial views.
Morocco World News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Read the rest here:
The Right to Dignity in Free Speech Discourse and the Case of Omar Radi - Morocco World News
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on The Right to Dignity in Free Speech Discourse and the Case of Omar Radi – Morocco World News
YouTube Is Winning The Battle To Curb Free Speech | Screen Rant – Screen Rant
Posted: at 5:42 am
A recent court decision has determined YouTube does not qualify as a public forum and is therefore immune to free speech laws. This ruling sets a precedent for online free speech cases, as it has implications across all the web's social platforms.
The First Amendment debate has become especially intense in recent years as political arguments have intensified in online comments sections. Many people consider the internet a public place and attach the same notions to major sites like YouTube. Their concerns stem from the fear that if the largest video-sharing site in the world makes a choice to exclude one particular audience, it's effectively censoring millions of people.
Related:Notorious YouTuber Banned From EVERY EA Game and Online Service
Conservative media outlet PragerU pleaded this case in court after YouTube demonetized and restricted their videos, harming the channel's revenue generation in the process. A BBC report explains that San Francisco's Ninth Circuit court of appeals ruled against the popular right-wing channel, deciding that YouTube is not a public forum, and isn't required to promote free speech. PragerU's case argued that by denying some users access to their content, YouTube was deliberately silencing a conservative voice and continuing a trend of tech companies promoting a liberal bias.
A 2019 Supreme Court ruling referenced in this trial decided that "hosting speech by others is not a traditional, exclusive public function and does not alone transform private entities into state actors subject to First Amendment constraints."The logic behind this choice is that if every place that hosted public speech was subject to free speech laws, it would be impossible to moderate speech for a specific audience. On a platform with the ubiquity of YouTube, moderation is essential and it's easy to imagine other social platforms pointing to this ruling in defense of their own moderation efforts.
Despite the high profile nature of this case, it's unlikely that YouTube will adjust its stance here, considering the platform is open about its commitment to pleasing advertisers. Part of signing up for YouTube means agreeing to its terms that it can restrict or demonetize videos it doesn't consider "advertiser-friendly", to protect companies from running an ad before a video that may be unsuited to their brand. Other platforms have similar policies, so it could be argued that agreeing to such rules as part of joining an online service is an act of surrendering free speech rights by default.
It's worth noting that in addition to justifying the demonetization of certain videos based on terms of the site's policies, YouTube's restriction of PragerU's content is also less harsh than it may seem at first glance. The company revealed that less than 2% of its daily users log in as restricted, which means the vast majority of its audience still has access to such videos. To some, PragerU's argument that YouTube is promoting liberalism with its content moderation represents another example in the long history of right-wing media "crying wolf" about media exposure. At the same time, LGBTQ channels have been met with similar moderation, and have also pursued appeals. The battle for free speech on YouTube will certainly continue, but this decision will at least make it more clear that user-created content hosted on a publicly accessible forum is not subjected to free speech.
Next:Jim Sterling The YouTuber Standing Up To Game Industry Greed
Source: The BBC
Joker's New Girlfriend Punchline vs. Harley Quinn Confirmed
Hubert has been a journalist in spirit since age six, and can't see any good reasons to argue with that, so here we are. He spends most of his days working to leave the world a better place than it was when he showed up and trying to be better at Street Fighter.
Read the original:
YouTube Is Winning The Battle To Curb Free Speech | Screen Rant - Screen Rant
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on YouTube Is Winning The Battle To Curb Free Speech | Screen Rant – Screen Rant
Author Adam Cohen on the Supreme Court 50-Year Battle Against Justice – Free Speech TV
Posted: at 5:42 am
The makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court has come under intense criticism in recent years after two Trump-nominated justices joined the bench.
Senate Republicans confirmed Neil Gorsuch in 2017 after having refused to consider President Barack Obamas nominee in his final year in office, and they confirmed Brett Kavanaugh a year later despite multiple allegations of sexual misconduct against the judge.
During the 2020 Democratic presidential contest, several candidates floated the idea of packing the court appointing more than nine justices in order to counter the courts rightward drift. But while the current Supreme Court often earns the ire of progressive lawmakers and activists.
DN's guest Adam Cohen says it has actually been a force for injustice for the last 50 years, despite what Americans are taught about the courts role in protecting the rights of marginalized people.
The Supreme Court which is an institution that we think of as the bastion of fairness, the advocate for the underdog has actually been a major driver of inequality, says Cohen. His new book is Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Courts Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America.
Democracy Now! produces a daily, global, independent news hour hosted by award-winning journalists Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzlez.
Our reporting includes breaking daily news headlines and in-depth interviews with people on the front lines of the worlds most pressing issues.
On DN!, youll hear a diversity of voices speaking for themselves, providing a unique and sometimes provocative perspective on global events.
Missed an episode? Check out DN on FSTV VOD anytime or visit the show page for the latest clips.
#FreeSpeechTV is one of the last standing national, independent news networks committed to advancing progressive social change.
#FSTV is available on Dish, DirectTV, AppleTV, Roku, Sling and online at freespeech.org.
Adam Cohen Amy Goodman Brett Kavanaugh Democracy Now! Deocracy Now! Free Speech TV Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court United States
Read the rest here:
Author Adam Cohen on the Supreme Court 50-Year Battle Against Justice - Free Speech TV
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Author Adam Cohen on the Supreme Court 50-Year Battle Against Justice – Free Speech TV







