Daily Archives: March 24, 2020

IOC member Dick Pound says Tokyo Olympics will be postponed – Yahoo Sports

Posted: March 24, 2020 at 6:12 am

Latest coronavirus news

The 2020 Tokyo Olympics will be postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic, according to longtime International Olympic Committee member Dick Pound.

On the basis of the information the IOC has, postponement has been decided, Pound said in a phone interview with USA Today. The parameters going forward have not been determined, but the Games are not going to start on July 24, that much I know.

As for when the IOC will announce its next steps, Pound said it will come in stages. We will postpone this and begin to deal with all the ramifications of moving this, which are immense.

Pound said that the Games are likely to be moved to 2021. When USA Today reached out to the IOC for comment, spokesperson Mike Adams responded via text: Well, as we announced yesterday, we are looking at scenarios."

IOC president Thomas Bach announced on Sunday that the IOC would take the next month to decide how to proceed with the 2020 Olympics in light of the coronavirus pandemic, which has shut down all sports for the foreseeable future. He did not commit to any path of action, but did for the first time acknowledge that postponement was a possibility. That admission came after several governing bodies called on Bach to postpone the Olympics, and after Canada said they would not send any athletes to the 2020 Olympics if they happened this year.

Postponing the Olympics is exceedingly complex. The entire event requires harmony among an interconnected web of athletes, governing bodies, city and national governments, local venues, businesses, and more. Its not as simple as moving everything forward a year especially if a COVID-19 vaccine has yet to be developed and widely administered.

More from Yahoo Sports:

Continue reading here:

IOC member Dick Pound says Tokyo Olympics will be postponed - Yahoo Sports

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on IOC member Dick Pound says Tokyo Olympics will be postponed – Yahoo Sports

Creators behind viral video of quarantined Italians share warning: Learn from our mistakes and dont underestimate this – Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted: at 6:12 am

Italians in quarantine are sharing important messages to themselves to who they were 10 days prior to the nationwide shutdown, to be specific and now a compilations of those videos has gone viral world-wide. In an effort to warn others about how detrimental the coronavirus outbreak really is, the creators of the video are speaking out about why people must pay attention.

The video, which has received over 3.7 million views on YouTube alone, was created by a Milano-based creative collective called A THING BY, founded in part by a man named Olmo Parenti. He tells Yahoo Lifestyle via email that while their city is at the epicenter of the coronavirus spread in Italy and Europe, theyve channeled their efforts into communicating the impact of this disease with others, which they admittedly didnt take seriously at first.

When we were first informed by Italian media about the coronavirus reaching Italy my friend group and I (along with the majority of the country) really underestimated the issue; we were almost mocking the few people who believed the issue was serious from the get-go, Parenti says. But once we saw what was happening in Italys hospitals and we found ourselves stuck at home we decided we had to redeem ourselves in some way.

He goes on to explain that hes watched as people in the United States, England, Germany and France have responded to the coronavirus with the same lack of urgency or understanding as many Italians did in the beginning, and decided to create something that can save nations from making that same mistake. We all realized how much our viewpoint had changed so quickly, Parenti says, which lent to the idea of A THING BYs latest video, published on March 15.

We werent sure how people would react to our request; filming yourself talking in first person to yourself from 10 days ago directly into a camera isnt the most comfortable thing to do (I know cause I tried). So we first asked our family and friends to do some tests and then once we saw their videos we also asked people on social media from all around Italy to send us their videos, he explains. The response was very surprising.

The result is a collection of video diaries from over a dozen Italians who address their past selves when they were making light of the coronavirus, making fun of those wearing masks and pushing to live their normal every day lives.

Idiot, one person calls herself.

The worst case scenario? another prompts, Thats exactly what will happen.

Another goes on to address that countries like the U.S. are likely in the same place that Italians were 10 days ago. A huge mess is about to happen, one warns. Another says, This issue is more serious than most of the world believes.

Parenti explains that the hope is that the video will reflect how much other nations can help themselves by taking the coronavirus seriously now. The situation is serious and Im afraid most countries are already late (just like we were) in containing the spread of the virus, he says. The cool thing about mistakes is that you can learn from other peoples too...Learn from our mistakes and dont underestimate this. We usually love taking risks ourselves, but this is not the time.

People all over have responded to the powerful video and urged that it continues to be shared as its been re-posted by people like Katie Couric and platforms like the @feminist Instagram page. Parenti adds that A THING BY is currently working on a piece about the first two weeks of complete lockdown so that citizens of other nations can know whats coming.

Most importantly, however, Parenti hopes that the camaraderie demonstrated by Italians is something that others can be inspired by.

Within this health crisis weve seen Italians unite in a way that was probably unprecedented, he says. I hope the same can happen between all nations fighting in this.

Read more from Yahoo Lifestyle:

For the latest news on the evolving coronavirus outbreak,follow along here. According to experts, people over 60 and those who are immunocompromised continue to be the most at risk. If you have questions, please reference theCDCandWHOsresource guides.

Go here to see the original:

Creators behind viral video of quarantined Italians share warning: Learn from our mistakes and dont underestimate this - Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Creators behind viral video of quarantined Italians share warning: Learn from our mistakes and dont underestimate this – Yahoo Lifestyle

COVID-19 could make a resurgence this fall depending on US response, infectious disease specialist – Yahoo Money

Posted: at 6:12 am

If you want to know how long social distancing will interrupt the American workforce as you know, ask an epidemiologist. The answer, of course, is: it depends, as duration could be curtailed or extended depending on how the U.S. responds.

If you suppress the epidemic your population is still susceptible, Penn State epidemiologist Maciej Boni explained Thursday on Yahoo Finances The First Trade.

Theres a difference between suppressing a disease and establishing so-called herd immunity, according to Boni. Herd immunity occurs when enough people are exposed to the disease, overcome it, and develop immunity, either through person-to-person transmission, or through vaccination, making it difficult for a disease to spread.

If we dont establish herd immunity, a second wave in the U.S. could happen over the 2020-2021 winter, Boni said. It might start in October or November when the school gets back into session and it probably means 12 months of hardship for all of us, he said.

As countries around the globe have already shown, theres more than one recipe to wrestle COVID-19. Some are comparatively swift and absent a vaccine leave populations vulnerable to a punishing second round of health and economic turmoil. Others lag and simultaneously breed risk of increased death as well as potential to inoculate masses from its future viral wrath.

According to Boni, three timeline scenarios could play out, and they depend in part on a populations approach to controlling its spread.

One is the scenario that unfolded in China and South Korea where early quarantine and extreme social distancing measures suppressed the virus within about a month. While effective for quickly reducing person to person spread, the method falls short of protecting a population from a second wave, according to Boni.

We don't know what the endgame is, because when you lift the suppressive measures, the virus will come back, Boni said.

Story continues

A second scenario is where the virus transmits successfully during the summer, meaning enough of the population contracts and overcomes the virus to establish herd immunity which Boni says could happen as early as late fall so that it will cease to again threaten at pandemic levels.

Under a third scenario, the virus fails to transmit successfully during the summer, and like scenario one, continues to rear its head. Under both the first and third possibilities the rate of transmission hopefully slows enough to buy the healthcare system and its workers adequate time to develop a vaccine or treatment, and to fortify hospitals and treatment facilities to handle resurgence.

It's like looking at the first 60 minutes of a hurricane and saying it's almost over, Boni said. It's not almost over at all. If thevirus can transmitin the summer under scenario 3 we'll see an epidemic wave that lasts through the summer and possibly through the end of the summer.

Dr. Karen Edwards, professor and chair of University of Californias epidemiology department, told Yahoo Finance that the number of new COVID-19 cases would need to remain at zero for 14 consecutive days before any consideration to relax social distancing practices and send Americans back to work. The challenge, she, said is getting all Americans to adopt cohesive social distancing practices that can accomplish the two-week goal.

The recommendations and guidelines about social distancing have been very patchwork across this country and there are probably some places that are not even really doing this at this point, so that's just going to prolong things, Edwards said.

All Americans need to participate in social distancing on a national level to get transmission under control, she said. In a perfect scenario, she said, if everyone in the U.S. immediately adopted aggressive social distancing measures it could theoretically take two weeks to see the first day of no new cases. Under a best case scenario, that means social distancing practices could be relaxed in a month.

I don't think we're, unfortunately, anywhere close to that situation, Edwards said. And part of the problem is we haven't been tested.

Policy that achieves a rate of no new cases while balancing life and death interests is a challenge authorities face.

Some uninformed people have said, Why not just let everybody get it and develop this immunity faster? The problem is the health care system would be overwhelmed, Edwards said.

If unmitigated in the U.S., the epidemic would likely kill 1 to 2 million Americans, alone, according to Boni. One million people will die, he said, and each [person] will know two or three people who will die.

Edwards agreed with Bonis projection, adding a caveat that the total global number of deaths will vary depending on the age of individuals exposed and other conditions that may heighten risk.

Boni said Americans are unlikely to adopt the extreme measures taken in China, which will prolong the spread of disease within U.S. borders and delay a return to life as usual.

Shortening the duration and curbing the number of deaths will also depend on how quickly diagnostic and immunity tests can be made available and developed. Availability of an antibody test, for example, would reveal which individuals are already immune to COVID-19 and allow authorities to understand the percent of the population that could safely resume social interaction, including work and general participation in the economy, Edwards explained.

While the pandemic persists, Boni said some jobs outside of essential businesses can still be done in-person and responsibly. The key is to determine that the work would not contribute to the pandemic.

If you can go to work and wash your hands all the time, contact other people minimally, and not be in large crowds then, yes, you're adding a minimalamount of risk to the overall epidemic, he said.

Read more:

What to do if you are laid off from work due to COVID-10

The U.S. government clarifies when workers need to get paid amid coronavirus shutdowns

Alexis Keenan is a New York-based reporter for Yahoo Finance and former litigation attorney.

Follow Alexis Keenan on Twitter@alexiskweed.

Follow Yahoo Finance onTwitter,Facebook,Instagram,Flipboard,SmartNews,LinkedIn,YouTube, andreddit.

Read the original here:

COVID-19 could make a resurgence this fall depending on US response, infectious disease specialist - Yahoo Money

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on COVID-19 could make a resurgence this fall depending on US response, infectious disease specialist – Yahoo Money

Trump claims he always took coronavirus seriously, but the record says otherwise – Yahoo News

Posted: at 6:12 am

At a White House briefing on Tuesday, President Trump said no one took the danger of the coronavirus more seriously than he did.

Ive always known this isa real this is a pandemic, said Trump. I felt it was a pandemic longbefore it was called a pandemic.

He doubled down on Wednesday morning in a tweet.

I always treated the Chinese Virus very seriously, and have done a very good job from the beginning, including my very early decision to close the borders from China - against the wishes of almost all, wrote Trump, referring to the coronavirus with a term that many consider offensive and medical experts discourage. Many lives were saved. The Fake News new narrative is disgraceful & false!

But reality undercuts Trumps assertions. In fact, the president downplayed the virus for weeks as it raged across other parts of the world and he was urged to begin mobilization against it in the United States.

We have it totally under control,he said on Jan. 22, adding, Its one person coming in from China. We have it under control. Its going to be just fine.

Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away, Trump said at a Feb. 10 rally in New Hampshire.

On Feb. 24, Trump tweeted, The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA. We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!

The Dow Jones average closed at 27,960 that day. Shortly after the open on Wednesday it was 20,127, approximately where it was when Trump took office in 2017.

The following day, White House National Economic Council DirectorLarry Kudlowsaid on CNBC,We have contained this, I wont say airtight but pretty close to airtight.

On Feb. 26, Trump said at a coronavirus briefing, When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, thats a pretty good job weve done.

Story continues

On March 6, Vice President Mike Pence had to correct Trumpabout the rules on testing. In a White House briefing, Trump said, Anybody that needs a test gets a test for coronavirus, a misleading statement at the time and still not the case. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has badly lagged other countries in preparing a nationwide testing regime. Yet Trump repeated his claim on March 12, stating, Frankly, the testing has been going very smooth.

Going beyond Trumps remarks in public, Politico has reported that the presidentdiscouraged widespread testing for the virus to keep the number of confirmed infections low. He said as much on March 6 when he discussed keeping sick people on a cruise ship off the coast of California because he didnt want them counted in the U.S. total.

I would rather because I like the numbers being where they are, Trump said. I dont need to have the numbers double because of one ship that wasnt our fault. And it wasnt the fault of the people on the ship either, OK? It wasnt their fault either, and theyre mostly Americans. So, I can live either way with it. Id rather have them stay on, personally.

On March 6 when Trump made those comments, the number of confirmed cases in the United States was 307. As of Wednesday morning, there were 6,496.

_____

Read more from Yahoo News:

Read this article:

Trump claims he always took coronavirus seriously, but the record says otherwise - Yahoo News

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Trump claims he always took coronavirus seriously, but the record says otherwise – Yahoo News

Papa John’s CEO shares how the pizza chain is navigating the coronavirus pandemic – Yahoo Money

Posted: at 6:12 am

The fast food industry is banding together to feed a nation of people quarantined due to the spreading of the coronavirus outbreak.

With a well-established delivery network and a food pizza that serves large families, Papa Johns CEO Rob Lynch says now is a key time for the industry.

I do think these are unique times, and it provides a lot of companies the opportunity to come together to really help the communities in which we live and serve, Lynch said on Yahoo Finances The First Trade.

Lynch continued, The industry is changing dramatically right now, where a lot of my peers that run dine-in restaurants are being asked to close their dining rooms and I feel really bad for them from a business standpoint. But from a community standpoint I feel its our responsibility that has more of a delivery model to pick up the slack and make sure the communities we live and work in have the food they need to get through this situation.

To be sure, quarantined Americans are relying heavily on fast food companies and third-party delivery services like Uber Eats right now.

A Papa John's pizzeria on South Rochester Road in Rochester Hills, Michigan.

Major fast-food chains such as Papa Johns, McDonalds, Burger King and Wendys are open for business (unlike most sit-down eateries) amidst the coronavirus outbreak even if its only takeout and delivery. The only question now is whether the industry could keep food flowing as supply chains are stressed with consumers panic buying products.

We are well positioned to continue to meet demand out there, Restaurant Brands CEO Jose Cil told Yahoo FinancesThe First Trade earlier this week, when asked if the fast-food player was running low on supplies. Cil, Lynch and other leading restaurant executives had a call Tuesday with President Trump and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin where they discussed the challenges of the sector at the moment.

Cil said his companys vast supply-chain network that feeds thousands of Burger King, Popeyes and Tim Hortons restaurants globally is in tact. Other industry insiders have also told Yahoo Finance supplies continue to flow rather normally.

Brian Sozzi is an editor-at-large and co-anchor of The First Trade at Yahoo Finance. Follow Sozzi on Twitter @BrianSozzi and on LinkedIn.

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, SmartNews, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit.

Original post:

Papa John's CEO shares how the pizza chain is navigating the coronavirus pandemic - Yahoo Money

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Papa John’s CEO shares how the pizza chain is navigating the coronavirus pandemic – Yahoo Money

It’s the ‘coronavirus,’ not the ‘Chinese virus,’ but Trump is right: China made it worse – Yahoo News

Posted: at 6:12 am

President Trump has taken pains over the past week to link the coronavirus outbreak to China, calling it the Chinese virus at daily briefings over objections that doing so unfairly stigmatizes an entire nation and might encourage hostility toward Asian-Americans.

On Wednesday, Trump was asked whether this practice was racist.

He calls the virus that, he said, because it comes from China. Its not racist at all, no, not at all. It comes from China, thats why. I want to be accurate, Trump replied.

While the Trump administration has been criticized for its response to the pandemic, especially delays in making tests available for the virus, Trump was correct that the virus originated in China, and that the Chinese government bears some responsibility for its spread by hiding and then minimizing the outbreak.

Trump also correctly pointed out that a Chinese government official tried to blame the U.S. for the outbreak.

The virus appears to have originated at Huanan live-animal market in Wuhan. Of the first 41 people infected with the virus, 27 had gone to the market, which sells and kills animals, some of them wild, for consumption, Vox reported. In 2002, officials traced the outbreak of the SARS virus to a market in southern China that also sold live, wild animals for food.

Chinas so-called wet markets arose in the 1970s, when famine killed millions there. In 1978, Chinas Communist government allowed private farming, and a decade later it legalized the private industry of raising and selling wildlife.

The unsanitary conditions of these markets and storage of animals in crates on top of one another has been blamed for the transmission of viruses between species. In the initial stages of the SARS outbreak, Chinese officials withheld information on the number of people infected and later conceded it was not well prepared for the epidemic.

A timeline of the coronavirus outbreak shows that an all-too-similar pattern has reemerged.

Story continues

Dec. 10, 2019: A 57-year-old seafood merchant at Huanan Market named Wei Guixian falls ill in what is believed to be the first case of COVID-19. Days later, he is hospitalized.

Dec. 30: After other food vendors at the market in Wuhan become sick with a mysterious pneumonia-like illness, Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital, participates in a meeting on WeChat, a popular Chinese social media network, with seven other doctors. The topic of conversation is a growing number of cases in which patients undergo a rapid deterioration linked to respiratory failure. Wenliang warns that the illness resembles SARS, which went on to kill more than 800 people in 17 countries.

Dec. 31: The Chinese government publicly confirms that dozens of patients in Wuhan are being treated for a pneumonia-like condition.

Jan. 1, 2020: Wuhan police announce they have taken legal measures against Wenliang and the other doctors to silence them from spreading rumors about the virus.

Jan. 5: Health officials in China rule out the possibility that the virus is a recurrence of SARS.

Jan. 7: Chinese officials say they have identified the COVID-19 virus behind the growing number of infections.

Jan. 10: Chinese scientists post the sequenced DNA of the virus online.

Jan. 11: China announces first death due to COVID-19. The 61-year-old man had been a regular customer at Huanan Market.

Jan. 13: A case of the virus is reported in Thailand, the first outside of China.

Jan. 16: Japanese officials report their first case of COVID-19, a man who had visited Wuhan.

Jan. 19: China allows Wuhan to holda Chinese Lunar New Year banquet,which is attended by tens of thousands of families in Wuhan.

Jan. 20: The U.S. reports its first case of COVID-19, a 35-year-old man in Snohomish County, Wash., who had traveled with his family to Wuhan.

Jan. 22: With 17 reported deaths and 550 infections in China due to the virus, the government officially locks down Wuhan. By this time, the citys mayor admits, more than 5 million people have already left the region.

Feb. 6: Li Wenliang dies at a hospital in Wuhan.

Feb. 23: Chinese President Xi Jinping holds a teleconference with 170,000 officials and declares that his government has acted swiftly to stop the spread of the virus.

March 12: Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian suggests that the virus was brought into China by members of the U.S. military. Be transparent! Zhao wrote on Twitter. Make public your data! US owe us an explanation!

March 17: Chinas Ministry of Foreign Affairs announces that it is expelling American journalists working for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post after the Trump administration limited the number of Chinese journalists who can work in the U.S.

March 18: For the first time since the outbreak began, Wuhan province reported no new cases of COVID-19. The outbreak that began in Wuhan infected 81,154 people in China, killing 3,249 so far. Globally, the number of cases and deaths continues to rise, with 222,499 infected and more than 9,800 deaths.

March 18: Chinese officials issue an apology to Wenliangs family and walk back criticism of the whistleblower. Li Wenliang was a Communist Party member, not a so-called antiestablishment figure, a party official said on state media.

_____

Read more from Yahoo News:

See the original post:

It's the 'coronavirus,' not the 'Chinese virus,' but Trump is right: China made it worse - Yahoo News

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on It’s the ‘coronavirus,’ not the ‘Chinese virus,’ but Trump is right: China made it worse – Yahoo News

Reviewing the 2020 Yahoo Friends and Family Fantasy Baseball Draft – Yahoo Sports

Posted: at 6:12 am

I have to start with the elephant in the room. Were in a health crisis, a critical health crisis. Its an uncertain and scary time for all of us. No one knows when normalcy will be restored. We know whats really important; the health and well-being of our families, our communities, our country.

I have my share of anxiety about things, too. But I will openly admit, the two hours I spent with my industry friends last Thursday was therapeutic. I needed to laugh with friends, kid around, make fun of each other. We kept the Yahoo Friends & Family League draft on the books and threw down with 16 teams. Its 5x5 roto, with a limit of 80 transactions. There are also seasonal limits that surely wont apply now. No one knows what the eventual season will look like.

Lets hope for the best, and prepare for what we need to prepare for. Lets be good to each other. If you need some thoughts and guidelines about how to handle your Yahoo Fantasy Baseball experience this year, we have you covered. And if you want to examine how a deep industry draft went down, read on.

You can reach out to me anytime, to talk about sports, music, movies, dogs, life: @scott_pianowski.

Thanks for being a part of our group. Were all in this together.

1. (1) Mike Trout (LAA - OF)

2. (32) Mike Clevinger (Cle - SP)

3. (33) Ozzie Albies (Atl - 2B)

4. (64) Max Muncy (LAD - 1B,2B,3B)

5. (65) Frankie Montas (Oak - SP)

6. (96) Jeff McNeil (NYM - 2B,3B,OF)

7. (97) Liam Hendriks (Oak - RP)

8. (128) David Dahl (Col - OF)

9. (129) David Price (LAD - SP)

10. (160) Sean Doolittle (Was - RP)

11. (161) Kevin Newman (Pit - 2B,SS)

12. (192) J.D. Davis (NYM - 3B,OF)

13. (193) Wilson Ramos (NYM - C)

14. (224) Christian Walker (Ari - 1B)

15. (225) Garrett Richards (SD - SP)

16. (256) Shogo Akiyama (Cin - OF)

17. (257) Dylan Cease (CWS - SP)

18. (288) Randal Grichuk (Tor - OF)

19. (289) Matt Shoemaker (Tor - SP)

20. (320) Kevin Pillar (Bos - OF)

21. (321) Diego Castillo (TB - SP,RP)

22. (352) Asdrbal Cabrera (Was - 2B,3B)

23. (353) Yoshihisa Hirano (Sea - RP)

24. (384) Clint Frazier (NYY - OF)

25. (385) Sean Newcomb (Atl - SP,RP)

26. (416) Robinson Chirinos (Tex - C)

D.J. Short, Rotoworld: In a vacuum, Ronald Acuna, Jr. has been my top-ranked player in drafts this spring, but this league is so deep that it changes the calculus a bit. Theres more room for one-tricky pony speed options and dice rolls from the waiver wire, so the speed advantage that Acuna offers is something I can make up later. Trout has been so darn consistent that I wanted to start my draft with the ultimate sure thing.

Ive made it a point to target versatility in my drafts this spring and I was able to accomplish that here too. Max Muncy, Jeff McNeil, Kevin Newman, J.D. Davis, and Asdrubal Cabrera are all multi-position eligible. Im going to try to get as close to the maximum games played as I possibly can at each position, so this strategy gives me the flexibility needed to pull that off. And obviously it guards you against injury too.

Mike Clevinger has slipped a bit on draft boards this spring due to his knee surgery, but obviously all the concerns about that can be thrown out the window since its going to be a long time before baseball is played. Whenever games do begin, Clevinger could be a bargain. He was the 11th starting pitcher off the board in this draft.

1. (2) Ronald Acua Jr. (Atl - OF)

2. (31) Clayton Kershaw (LAD - SP)

3. (34) Gleyber Torres (NYY - 2B,SS)

4. (63) Jonathan Villar (Mia - 2B,SS)

5. (66) Jos Berros (Min - SP)

6. (95) Josh Bell (Pit - 1B)

7. (98) Marcus Semien (Oak - SS)

8. (127) Kyle Hendricks (ChC - SP)

9. (130) Max Kepler (Min - OF)

10. (159) Luke Voit (NYY - 1B)

11. (162) Robbie Ray (Ari - SP)

12. (191) Hunter Dozier (KC - 1B,3B,OF)

13. (194) Mike Foltynewicz (Atl - SP)

14. (223) Ian Happ (ChC - 2B,3B,OF)

15. (226) Dansby Swanson (Atl - SS)

16. (255) Eric Hosmer (SD - 1B)

17. (258) Mike Yastrzemski (SF - OF)

18. (287) Yadier Molina (StL - C)

19. (290) Jeff Samardzija (SF - SP)

20. (319) Mike Fiers (Oak - SP)

21. (322) Renato Nez (Bal - 1B,3B)

22. (351) Daniel Hudson (Was - RP)

23. (354) Blake Treinen (LAD - RP)

24. (383) Cameron Maybin (Det - OF)

25. (386) Aaron Bummer (CWS - RP)

26. (415) Brandon Belt (SF - 1B,OF)

Scott Pianowski, Yahoo: First off, I cant stand picking near the ends, especially in a league of this size (16 teams). You lose the feel of the draft. You cant play the Maybe I can wait a round on this guy game; its now or never for most players you want. Of course, you get two tandem picks, but I dont like the idea of having to wait 28 selections before I get another throw.

Maybe its a personal flaw, but I feel I draft better in the middle. Or maybe I could just invite weaker competition (I keep inviting people who make the league stronger).

I didnt intend to punt saves, but the flow of the draft took me there. This league has a transaction cap and active managers, so I cant assume Ill be the saves kingpin on the wire; Ill try to be, but this isnt some casual league where you can own the free market. But a saves punt feels easier in 2020, given save striation and the sneaky scarcity of the stat. I dont need that many things to go right before Im back in the middle of the saves pack; maybe a trade, maybe a lucky late pick, maybe a wire add. And inside the draft, the punt was oddly liberating.

I knew Id be priced out of the top-shelf pitching given my slot, but I proactively filled that area and came away with a staff I can live with. The offense is versatile, flexible. Sometimes I tend to draft older teams, but I like the balance of the ages here. I should be able to compete, which is all you can ask for, this removed from opening pitch.

I should also add, in complete seriousness: I thought Salfino got a good price on Mallex Smith.

1. (3) Christian Yelich (Mil - OF)

2. (30) Javier Bez (ChC - SS)

3. (35) Luis Castillo (Cin - SP)

4. (62) Noah Syndergaard (NYM - SP)

5. (67) Josh Hader (Mil - RP)

6. (94) Matt Chapman (Oak - 3B)

7. (99) Mike Moustakas (Cin - 2B,3B)

8. (126) Cavan Biggio (Tor - 2B,OF)

9. (131) Yasmani Grandal (CWS - C,1B)

10. (158) Byron Buxton (Min - OF)

11. (163) Justin Turner (LAD - 3B)

12. (190) Edwin Encarnacin (CWS - 1B)

13. (195) Joe Musgrove (Pit - SP)

14. (222) A.J. Puk (Oak - RP)

15. (227) Nomar Mazara (CWS - OF)

16. (254) Anthony DeSclafani (Cin - SP)

17. (259) Corey Dickerson (Mia - OF)

18. (286) Ryan Helsley (StL - RP)

19. (291) Teoscar Hernndez (Tor - OF)

20. (318) Johnny Cueto (SF - SP)

21. (323) Robinson Can (NYM - 2B)

22. (350) Cole Hamels (Atl - SP)

23. (355) Jorge Mateo (Oak - SS)

24. (382) Spencer Howard (Phi - SP)

25. (387) Kevin Kiermaier (TB - OF)

26. (414) Daniel Ponce de Leon (StL - SP,RP)

Scott Jenstad, Rotowire: In a daily moves league, I am a little less worried about the back half of my starting pitching staff as I consider those likely churn-and-burn spots anyway. I wanted to get two really good starters but then focus on compiling as much offense as I can early on.

I think my offense is really good considering the league has 16 teams, but I pushed the third and fourth starters one turn too far and got burned in this deep a league. I like Joe Musgrove and AJ Puk just fine, but not when they are among your top four starters. Looking back, I should have passed on Grandal in a one-catcher league (he was deep enough in the draft where I liked the pick) and taken another starting pitcher there and the roster would look better.

I do think the offense will be near the top of the league and it is a trading league; Im going to have to trade or find a couple SP gems on the wire to have a shot at winning the league.

1. (4) Mookie Betts (LAD - OF)

2. (29) Shane Bieber (Cle - SP)

3. (36) Kris Bryant (ChC - 3B,OF)

4. (61) Aaron Nola (Phi - SP)

5. (68) J.T. Realmuto (Phi - C)

6. (93) Sonny Gray (Cin - SP)

Read more from the original source:

Reviewing the 2020 Yahoo Friends and Family Fantasy Baseball Draft - Yahoo Sports

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Reviewing the 2020 Yahoo Friends and Family Fantasy Baseball Draft – Yahoo Sports

Donald Trump Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics on Twitter, Appeals Court Affirms – Variety

Posted: at 6:11 am

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit denied the White Houses request for en banc review of a ruling that Donald Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking critics of the president on .

The Trump administration had appealed for a review of the unanimous three-judge ruling by the 2nd Circuit in July 2019 finding that Trumps @realDonaldTrump Twitter account constitutes a public forum under the U.S. Constitutions First Amendment.

That upheld a 2018 U.S. District Court judges ruling that Trumps blocking of individual accounts on Twitter was unconstitutional, rejecting the argument from the presidents lawyers that Trumps own First Amendment rights would be abridged if he was disallowed from blocking users. The district court ordered Trump to unblock the plaintiffs accounts on Twitter, and barred him from blocking speakers on the basis of political views.

Regarding the 2nd Circuits rejection Monday of the request for a rehearing, two dissenting circuit court judges contended that Trumps use of his personal @realDonaldTrump to conduct official business does not amount to state action. But U.S. Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker, in a statement, wrote that This argument is refuted by even a cursory perusal of examples of the tweets in question.

Parker cited Trump posts on Twitter in January 2020 about Iran as illustrating the fact that @realDonaldTrump is used as an official communications channel. These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner. Such legal notice is not required, but is given nevertheless! Trump tweeted from his personal account on Jan. 5.

The dissenting opinion misconstrues the applicable law and overstates the scope of the panels holding, Parker wrote in part. The critical question in this case is not the nature of the Account when it was set up a decade ago. The critical question for First Amendment purposes is how the President uses the Account in his capacity as President.

The lawsuit against Trump was filed in 2017 by Columbia Universitys Knight First Amendment Institute and seven individuals who said Trump blocked them from the @realDonaldTrump account after they criticized him in comments.

Were pleased that the full appeals court will leave the panels original ruling in place, Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institutes executive director, who argued the case before the 2nd Circuit, said in a statement. The ruling is an important affirmation of core First Amendment principles as applied to new communications technology.

The 2nd Circuits order denying the Trump administrations en banc petition is at this link.

The lawsuit also named White House social-media director Daniel Scavino and former Trump press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders as defendants.

More:
Donald Trump Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics on Twitter, Appeals Court Affirms - Variety

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Donald Trump Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics on Twitter, Appeals Court Affirms – Variety

Sixteen Stormy Days: Tripurdaman Singh’s account of the First Amendment to Indian Constitution makes for… – Firstpost

Posted: at 6:11 am

Its fair to say that the average Indians faith in the judiciary and the Constitution in general is at an all-time low. A few days ago, we learned that former Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, will be a Rajya Sabha MP soon. This is less than a year after he presided over his own sexual harassment allegation hearing just one of the many unpopular decisions he took in the last year of his career, all of which favoured the Narendra Modi government (Ayodhya, the Rafale deal and so on). The most contentious issue in India (other than the governments handling of COVID-19, of course) today, after all, is an act that many of us feel is unconstitutional (violates Article 14, for starters) and yet, the fight against the CAA is led by street protests, not legal challenges.

When did the executive branch begin to bend the judiciary to their (political) will in India and how? Sixteen Stormy Days (Penguin Random House India), a new non-fiction book by Tripurdaman Singh, tries to answer this question and address the long-term effects of the First Amendment to the Indian constitution.

Sixteen Stormy Days, by Tripurdaman Singh

As the author says, How did this magnificent Constitution, the most elaborate declaration of human rights yet framed go from being a charter of freedom & fulfillment of the dreams of Indias people in 1950 to being an impediment in the will of the same people by 1951?

Why did Jawaharlal Nehru push so hard for the First Amendment in 1951, especially in the face of challenges both within the provisional parliament (general elections were still a few months away) and from various High Courts? The answer is both simple and not. The objective was three-fold: the abolition of the zamindari system (the impediment being the right to property), the application of caste-based reservations (the impediment being the right to equality) and the censoring of publications deemed as national security threats (the impediment being freedom of speech).

Each of the three objectives, therefore, involved a clash between political objectives and fundamental rights. This brought Nehru back to the original question: why do we have fundamental rights in the first place? Is it not to protect the most vulnerable among us? Nehru was certainly correct in his over-arching view of things that as long as structural inequities existed in the Indian state (the caste system, for instance, something that persists to this day and is easily Indias biggest social justice issue), fundamental rights could be misused to privilege the powerful over the weak. Zamindari did need to go, caste-based reservations were needed in India (still are).

As part of its agenda, the Congress wanted to abolish the zamindari system as soon as possible. Obviously, faced with the overnight evaporation of their power, the zamindars of Bihar in particular fought back hard, helped by allies like Rajendra Prasad, Indias first President. On 12 March 1951, the Patna High Court struck down the Bihar Land Reforms Act, saying that it violated Article 14 of the Constitution (which pertains to the equality of all citizens in the eyes of the law).

In a searing indictment of the Congress party and the Bihar governments manifest authoritarianism, the judges denounced the Act as an unconstitutional law enacted in the belief that the right of the plaintiffs to challenge it and ask for relief from its operation has been taken away. The courts decision shook the government and the Congress party to its core. It shattered the illusion of the current regime having inherited the absolute power of the Raj. The Bihar Land Reforms Act bit the dust. An entire pillar of the Congress partys social agenda stood virtually crippled.Singhs research is thorough. He excels in the blow-by-blow accounts of those crucial weeks when Nehru tried to bring his allies and his opponents around to his point of view. (Realpolitik is a thorny affair at the best of times, one that Singh is clearly familiar with). Immediately after the Patna High Court ruling, Nehru had a fairly strong-worded statement for the press:

If the Constitution is interpreted by the Courts in a way which comes in the way of the wishes of the legislature in regard to basic social matters, then it is for the legislatures to consider how to amend the Constitution so that the will of the people as represented in the legislature should prevail.

Most students of history and/or political science will, I am sure, find the back-and-forth between Nehru and BR Ambedkar, or between Prasad and Nehru, compelling reading. This is among the reasons why Singhs work is such a valuable resource. To his credit, the book is also accessibly written, for the most part, only slipping into legalese at a few places every now and then small blemishes in an otherwise thoroughly professional job.

I was also impressed by the fact that Singh, despite his Bharatiya Janata Party affiliations (his father Mahendra Aridaman Singh re-joined the BJP in 2017; at various points through the 90s and 2000s, he had been a part of the Samajwadi Party and Janta Dal as well), isnt interested in painting Nehru as an outright villain (although predictably, his book has been gleefully reported on by right-wing publications with a history of Islamophobia and publishing falsehoods like Swarajya magazine, complete with headlines blasting Nehru). As the author himself pointed out in a recent interview, he saw Nehru as a hard-nosed politician (and not as the saboteur of fundamental rights in India, despite his stand here). Hopefully, this sense of nuance also reaches Singhs colleagues in the BJP soon.

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

More here:
Sixteen Stormy Days: Tripurdaman Singh's account of the First Amendment to Indian Constitution makes for... - Firstpost

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Sixteen Stormy Days: Tripurdaman Singh’s account of the First Amendment to Indian Constitution makes for… – Firstpost

Keep Federal COVID-19 Package Focused on the Virus and Its Effects – Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Posted: at 6:11 am

Below is a statement from F. Vincent Vernuccio, senior fellow for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy and policy advisor for Workers for Opportunity, on the draft of the Take Responsibility for Workers and Families Act, which is expected to be introduced by U.S. House Democrats later today. The act is a counterproposal for the current stimulus package.

Today, House Democrats introduced an over 1,400-page bill loaded with provisions that tie funding to a grab bag of policies that have nothing to do with the coronavirus or helping the economy. The bill is a giveaway to unions and seems to prioritize labor reforms Democrats have failed to pass in Congress. Airlines that take stimulus funding would have to give unions a seat on their board, for example. They would also have to sign away their First Amendment rights and not talk to their employees about unionization. There's even a $15.00 minimum wage mandate for companies seeking relief, for both employees and independent contractors and a bailout of union pension funds.Congress needs to be focused on the health of Americans and limiting the damage the virus is causing.

Negotiations are ongoing about the economic rescue package but the health and economic safety of Americans should not be used as a bargaining chip. The Mackinac Center and Workers for Opportunity believe it should be focused on mitigating the direct effects of the virus on businesses, workers and citizens. To learn more about Workers for Opportunity, a project of the Mackinac Center, visit https://workersforopportunity.org.

Go here to read the rest:
Keep Federal COVID-19 Package Focused on the Virus and Its Effects - Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Keep Federal COVID-19 Package Focused on the Virus and Its Effects – Mackinac Center for Public Policy