Daily Archives: May 8, 2014

NSA data collection overhaul advances

Posted: May 8, 2014 at 12:51 pm

Getty Images

Construction trailers sit in front of the new National Security Agency (NSA) data center June 10, 2013 in Bluffdale, Utah.

Privacy groups said they were delighted with the support for the bill. "This is a historic turn of events in our government's approach to counterterrorism policies," Laura Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington Legislation Office, said in a statement.

The legislation still faces several hurdles before becoming law, including winning the approval of a majority in the full House, as well as backing in the U.S. Senate. It is similar to NSA reforms proposed by President Barack Obama.

The House Intelligence Committee will debate and vote on its somewhat less restrictive version of the package on Thursday, which could set up a standoff on the House floor.

Read MoreEdward Snowden speaks via Skype at SXSW

Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, applauded the House committee's action, although he said he wished it had gone further, such as including a strong special advocate in the secret court that oversees NSA surveillance programs.

Signaling that the fight over the surveillance programs is not over, Leahy said in a statement that he would push for those reforms when his committee considers the legislation, known as the USA Freedom Act, this summer.

Read more here:

NSA data collection overhaul advances

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on NSA data collection overhaul advances

Articles about Fifth Amendment – Los Angeles Times

Posted: at 12:51 pm

NATIONAL

November 7, 2003 | John J. Goldman, Times Staff Writer

The captain of the Staten Island ferry that crashed into a pier last month, killing 10 people, finally met with investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board on Thursday, but would give only his name and age. NTSB head Ellen G. Engleman said that Michael Gansas exercised his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions about the Oct. 15 accident. "We hope we will be able to talk to Capt. Gansas in the future," Engleman said in a statement.

BUSINESS

March 23, 2002 | DAVID STREITFELD, TIMES STAFF WRITER

Nancy Temple, a lawyer for accounting firm Andersen being quizzed about her role in the shredding of Enron Corp. documents, cited her 5th Amendment right to keep silent 138 times Friday. Temple was deposed by lawyers who had filed a class-action suit against Andersen, which approved Enron's financial statements. In an unusual move, a federal judge in Houston permitted Temple and eight other Andersen employees to be questioned much earlier than such a case would normally allow.

NEWS

February 26, 2002

People who play the market are now at each other's throats. The Bulls & Tigers of Forest Hills, a ladies investment club of 10, meets every month to play the stock market. This month the meeting was held at Jane Peters' house. The club had made $20,000 in the year 2000, and while things went down in 2001, they could still barely hold their heads above water. When the going was good, they called themselves the Sunshine Ladies because they couldn't lose as far as their investments were concerned.

BUSINESS

More here:

Articles about Fifth Amendment - Los Angeles Times

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Articles about Fifth Amendment – Los Angeles Times

House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt

Posted: at 12:51 pm

Lois Lerner, former director of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division at the Internal Revenue Service, exercises her Fifth Amendment Right against self incrimination during a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Capitol Hill on March 5. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

WASHINGTON - The Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions related to the agency's undue scrutiny of certain tax-exempt groups.

The vote to hold Lerner in contempt of Congress was 231-187, with all Republicans voting in favor and all but a few Democrats voting against.

It's now up to a local U.S. attorney to consider criminal charges against Lerner. The Justice Department, however, has ignored past contempt charges against executive branch officials, including contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder.

While the vote may have no practical impact, it does up the ante in the political bout between Democrats and Republicans over the IRS scandal.

Republicans maintain they are determined to get to the bottom of the scandal and find out why IRS officials, starting in 2010, unfairly targeted groups for their political activity.

"All we're doing as Article One is saying an employee of Article Two, the executive branch, didn't properly assert her rights," House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., explained to his congressional colleagues Tuesday night in a meeting of the House Rules Committee. "We want Article Three, the federal court, to decide whether or not... we should be entitled to answers to some of our questions. ... Nothing could be less partisan than, in fact, to let the federal court decide."

In addition to holding Lerner in contempt, the House also voted 250-168 to approve a resolution calling on Holder to appoint a special counsel to investigate the IRS targeting.

Democrats have dismissed the GOP's aggressive pursuit of this issue as a partisan witch-hunt. They've noted that multiple investigations into the IRS have already been launched, including an ongoing Justice Department investigation. Democrats have also stressed that the IRS inappropriately targeted both conservative and liberal groups, while pointing to evidence showing the misconduct wasn't politically motivated.

On top of all that, Democrats assert there is no basis for the contempt charge.

See more here:

House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt

House holds Lois Lerner in contempt

Posted: at 12:51 pm

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

(CNN) -- Acting on a conservative battle cry and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about her agency's targeting of conservative and other groups.

The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power issues between the branches of government, political questions over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner's individual Fifth Amendment rights.

Lerner is in the middle of that trio. Until she retired last year, she ran the IRS division in charge of tax exempt status. An inspector general's report concluded her staff had inappropriately targeted Tea Party and other groups for extra scrutiny.

The term "progressive" was also flagged but the inspector general report indicated that conservative terms drew more attention from the IRS.

The Fifth Amendment question

For nearly a year, Lerner has refused House requests to testify on the matter, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Republicans insist that doesn't apply here, that she waived the right by first asserting her innocence when she appeared before the House Oversight Committee last May.

"Mrs. Lerner made 17 separate factual assertions before invoking her right to remain silent," proclaimed Rep. Richard Nugent, Republican of Florida, as he opened up Wednesday's debate. "You can't make selective assertions and still invoke your Fifth Amendment right."

Lerner's attorney, William Taylor, has dismissed that argument repeatedly and sent a statement rejecting it again Wednesday.

Read more here:

House holds Lois Lerner in contempt

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on House holds Lois Lerner in contempt

Second Amendment – Laws

Posted: at 12:50 pm

A Guide to the Second AmendmentThe Second Amendment, or Amendment II, of the United States Constitution is the amendment and the section of the Bill of Rights that says that people have the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights were introduced into the United States Constitution by James Madison.The Text of the Second AmendmentThere are two important versions of the text found in the Second Amendment, but the only differences are due to punctuation and capitalization. The text of the Second Amendment which is found in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights is the following:" A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."What Does the Second Amendment Mean?The Second Amendment is only a sentence long. However, there are some very important phrases that need to be carefully looked at. Here are some explanations for key phrases in the Second Amendment. Militia: During early American history, all males who were between the ages of sixteen to sixty were required to be a part of the local militia in their towns and communities.Almost everyone during this time used and owned guns.The few men who did not use or own a gun were required by law to pay a small fee instead of participating in the military services of their communities.These militias defended the communities against Indian raids and revolved, acted as a police force when it was needed, and was also available to be called upon to defense either the State or of the United States of America if it was needed.Bear arms: When the Second Amendment was written, arms meant weapons. The word arms did not necessarily only mean guns, but it definitely included guns. The Second Amendment did not specifically explain what categories or types of arms nor did it list what weapons were considered arms. When you bear arms, this means you physically carry weapon. You may have arms in your home as well as on your person.Shall not be infringed:The Second Amendment does not grant any right to bear arms. Furthermore, the rest of the Bill of Rights does not describe any right to do so. These rights are thought of as natural rights or God-given rights.In the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment is just a reminder to the government that they should not try to stop people from having this right.

A Guide to the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment, or Amendment II, of the United States Constitution is the amendment and the section of the Bill of Rights that says that people have the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights were introduced into the United States Constitution by James Madison.

The Text of the Second Amendment

There are two important versions of the text found in the Second Amendment, but the only differences are due to punctuation and capitalization. The text of the Second Amendment which is found in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights is the following:

" A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

What Does the Second Amendment Mean?

The Second Amendment is only a sentence long. However, there are some very important phrases that need to be carefully looked at. Here are some explanations for key phrases in the Second Amendment.

Militia: During early American history, all males who were between the ages of sixteen to sixty were required to be a part of the local militia in their towns and communities. Almost everyone during this time used and owned guns. The few men who did not use or own a gun were required by law to pay a small fee instead of participating in the military services of their communities. These militias defended the communities against Indian raids and revolved, acted as a police force when it was needed, and was also available to be called upon to defense either the State or of the United States of America if it was needed.

Bear arms: When the Second Amendment was written, arms meant weapons. The word arms did not necessarily only mean guns, but it definitely included guns. The Second Amendment did not specifically explain what categories or types of arms nor did it list what weapons were considered arms. When you bear arms, this means you physically carry weapon. You may have arms in your home as well as on your person.

Go here to see the original:

Second Amendment - Laws

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Second Amendment – Laws

Second Amendment in real time boils down to politics

Posted: at 12:50 pm

Originally published May 7, 2014 at 7:05 PM | Page modified May 8, 2014 at 12:02 AM

History, politics and law are all tangled up in contemporary court interpretations and public understanding of the Second Amendment, and politics is the greater part of the mix these days.

Last week, I wrote that weve so misread the amendment that maybe we ought to get rid of it. Thats certainly not on the horizon, but the idea drew a strong response and suggested to me that a review of the amendments history might be helpful. (Some of the responses also reinforced my belief there are many people who should not be allowed anywhere near a gun. What does racist name calling have to do with gun rights anyway?)

One theme that ran through comments supportive of unrestricted gun-ownership rights was that it is necessary for individuals to own guns to protect themselves against both crime and the U.S. government, and that the framers of the Constitution intended for the amendment to protect that individual right.

Thats a new way of reading the amendment.

I heard from Michael Schein, an attorney who handles appeals and who taught American legal history for 15 years at the University of Puget Sound and Seattle University.

Dont blame the framers, he wrote. For 217 years, the law under the 2nd Amendment was that it only protected possession or use of a firearm by well-regulated militia forces. ... It contained no right of personal self-defense until 2008, when the Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote brought that interpretation to its ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, which limited the Districts gun-regulation law.

Wednesday I called Schein, and we talked about the amendments history and current interpretation. Its heavily politicized and wrapped up in peoples emotions, so its difficult to get to the facts underlying it in any objective way, he said.

The Constitution was written to create a more effective federal government, but some people worried the government would trample on the rights of states and individuals. The Bill of Rights was intended to mollify them and make ratification of the Constitution possible. Some were particularly concerned that the federal government would form a standing army, and they wanted assurances that state militias would be in a position to fight against such an army if it came to that.

James Madison was tasked with drafting the amendments. Some of the states had asked for a personal right in one amendment, but he didnt include that. Instead he used a version of Virginia law that dealt with militias.

View post:

Second Amendment in real time boils down to politics

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Second Amendment in real time boils down to politics

Letter: First Amendment rights trampled

Posted: at 12:50 pm

I am writing about Donald Sterlings right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

What the media is doing to Sterling is a classic example of what happens when the billion-dollar, tax-exempt 501 (c)3 left-wing special interest groups and liberal Hollywood, sports and media personalities take a non-event, comments a man said in confidence to his girlfriend, and make them the number one story on the national, local and Hollywood entertainment news to advance their ideology.

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Or, use your linked account:

Need an account? Create one now.

Or, use your linked account:

kAm%96 A6@A=6 4@>A=2:?:?8 23@FE $E6C=:?8D 4@>>6?ED :8?@C65 $E6C=:?8D 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= C:89ED[ G:@=2E65 9:D AC:G24J 2?5 4@?G6?:6?E=J 7@C8@E 96 H2D 92G:?8 2 AC:G2E6 4@?G6CD2E:@?[ ?@E :?E6?565 7@C AF3=:4 4@?DF>AE:@?] w:D 4@>>6?ED H6C6 :==682==J C64@C565 2?5 C6=62D65 E@ E96 >65:2 7@C E96 D@F= AFCA@D6 @7 A6CD64FE:?8 9:>] (63DE6CD 567:?:E:@? 😀 E@ 277=:4E 4@?DE2?E=J D@ 2D E@ :?;FC6 @C 5:DEC6DD[ 6DA64:2==J 7@C C62D@?D @7 C6=:8:@?[ A@=:E:4D @C C246] %9:D 😀 6I24E=J H92E E96 >65:2 2C6 5@:?8]k^Am

kAm%9:D 😀 ;FDE 2?@E96C 6I2>A=6 @7 E96 =:36C2= DA64:2= :?E6C6DE 8C@FAD :?E:>:52E:?8 3FD:?6DD @H?6CD[ ;FDE =:<6 E96J :?E:>:52E6 A@=:E:4:2?D @C 4@6C46 4:G:4 =6256CD E@ 4@?5@?6 @C 2446AE 46CE2:? EJA6D @7 3692G:@C @C :56@=@8J] x7 J@F 5@?E 28C66 H:E9 E96>[ E96J =236= J@F 2 C24:DE[ D6I:DE @C 3:8@E] p=E9@F89 $E6C=:?8 92D 4@>>:EE65 ?@ 4C:>6[ 96 H2D 7:?65 Sa]d >:==:@?[ 32??65 7@C =:76 2?5 >256 E@ D6== 9:D E62>] yFDE :>28:?6 H92E E96J 4@F=5 5@ E@ J@F :7 J@F 5@?E 8@ 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C 286?52]k^Am

kAm%96 A6CD64FE:@? @7 $E6C=:?8 2?5 @E96CD[ =:<6 !9:= #@36CED@? @7 sF4< sJ?2DEJ[ 7@C 6I6C4:D:?8 E96:C 7C665@> @7 DA6649[ D9@F=5 36 @7 8C62E 4@?46C? E@ A6@A=6] (92E 5:C64E:@? 😀 E9:D 4@F?ECJ 962565 H96? @?=J E96 =:36C2= >65:2 564:56 H92E 😀 2446AE23=6 2?5 H92E 😀 ?@E]k^Am

kAm%9C@F89@FE 9:DE@CJ A6@A=6 92G6 366? A6CD64FE65 3642FD6 E96J E9:?< 7@C E96>D6=G6D 2?5 92G6 ?@E 8@?6 2=@?8 H:E9 E96 A@=:E:42= 4@CC64E?6DD @7 E96 D6=7AC@4=2:>65 A@E6?E2E6D @7 E96 52J]k^Am

More:

Letter: First Amendment rights trampled

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Letter: First Amendment rights trampled

Andreas M. Antonopoulos – L.A. Bitcoin Meetup – "Currency Creates Sovereignty" – Part 3 of 4 – Video

Posted: at 12:49 pm


Andreas M. Antonopoulos - L.A. Bitcoin Meetup - "Currency Creates Sovereignty" - Part 3 of 4
After visiting Dorian Nakamoto and before appearing on the Joe Rogan Experience, Andreas M. Antonopoulos visits the Los Angeles Bitcoin Meetup. Filmed April ...

By: reXBT

Originally posted here:

Andreas M. Antonopoulos - L.A. Bitcoin Meetup - "Currency Creates Sovereignty" - Part 3 of 4 - Video

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Andreas M. Antonopoulos – L.A. Bitcoin Meetup – "Currency Creates Sovereignty" – Part 3 of 4 – Video

Paid Bitcoin @ Gili Kite Surf – Video

Posted: at 12:49 pm


Paid Bitcoin @ Gili Kite Surf
In the middle of our survey for BitIslands project, we decided to visit Gili Kite Surf for a kite surfing lesson. Gili Kite Surf is the first merchant accepting Bitcoin in Gili Air Island,...

By: Bitcoin Islands

Continued here:

Paid Bitcoin @ Gili Kite Surf - Video

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Paid Bitcoin @ Gili Kite Surf – Video

SGH – Inwestycje Alternatywne – Bitcoin – Video

Posted: at 12:49 pm


SGH - Inwestycje Alternatywne - Bitcoin
Relacja: http://bitcoinet.pl/2014/05/06/relacja-z-debaty-w-sgh/ Bitcoin - "Zastosowania i perspektywy rozwoju kryptowalut" Lech Wilczyski https://InPay.pl ukasz Piechowiak http://bankier.pl...

By: Kurs na Bitcoin

Read this article:

SGH - Inwestycje Alternatywne - Bitcoin - Video

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on SGH – Inwestycje Alternatywne – Bitcoin – Video