Is the Supreme Court too partisan, too politicized? How might we reform it without making things worse? Is the nations top judicial authority even democratic?
These questions and more are under consideration by a bipartisan commission of legal experts tasked by President Joseph Biden in April to study the origins of the debate around Supreme Court reform, the Courts role in the American constitutional system, and the legality and wisdom of current proposals for reform.
As part of its analysis, the 36-member commission, 16 of whom are Harvard Law School faculty or alumni, solicited testimony from scholars across the political spectrum to weigh in on the debate.
During public meetings held on June 30 and July 20, the commission invited seven scholars from Harvard Law School HLS Professors Nikolas Bowie 14, Noah Feldman, Charles Fried, Michael Klarman, Vicki C. Jackson, Stephen Sachs, and Visiting Professor Rosalie Abella to share both oral and written remarks.
On a June 30 panel about the contemporary origins of the debate around reform, Bowie, an assistant professor of law who teaches and writes about federal and state constitutional law, asked commissioners to look further into the past to understand current problems.
The public debate over reforming the Supreme Court began at least 150 years ago when the Supreme Court held that Congress had no power to limit the spread of slavery, said Bowie. President Abraham Lincoln disagreed with the Court, asserting that if its opinion stood Americans would cease to be their own rulers, he added. The president and Congress passed laws and constitutional amendments restricting slavery anyway, but the Court deprived them of their strength and then presided over the proliferation of Jim Crow laws, said Bowie. The Supreme Courts shameful trajectory on civil rights was temporarily reversed in its decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), he said, but for the past 50 years, the Court has resumed invalidating federal civil rights laws, tightening a chain of precedent around American democracy.
Credit: Lorin Granger Nikolas Bowie
In Bowies view, the Supreme Court is an anti-democratic institution whose main problem is judicial review. The question presented by judicial review is not whether the Constitution should be enforced, he told the commission, but rather what should happen when the president, over 500 members of Congress, and four justices of the Court interpret the Constitution to permit a particular law, and yet five justices disagree and think the law is unconstitutional, and consequently overturn that law, as was the case when the Court invalidated key pieces of the Voting Rights Act in 2013.
[The commission] should advocate for reforms that will help bring democracy to our workplaces, our legislatures, and our fundamental law before we lose what democracy we have, Bowie concluded in his written remarks.
On the same panel, Feldman, the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law and director of the Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jewish and Israeli Law, noted that that the present interest in SCOTUS reform stems not from an unpopular decision or set of decisions, as was the case in prior debates, but rather by a change in the unwritten norms surrounding the confirmation process for justices.
Credit: Deborah Feingold Noah Feldman
Feldman outlined what he saw as the Courts three main roles: protecting the rule of law, ensuring fundamental rights to liberty and equality, and overseeing the democratic process. Although the Court has not always gotten it right, he said, as the Supreme Court has evolved, it has become an integral and irreplaceable constitutional institution within the framework of our constitutional democracy.
Because of this critical role, Feldman said, the question in front of the commission should be whether under our current circumstances, weakening our Court through substantial reforms and I have in mind court packing and most forms of jurisdiction stripping would enhance or undermine the institutional legitimacy of the Court, which legitimacy enables it to fulfill these functions.
Feldman said his view was that such reforms would be disastrous, and that we should not assume that other unspecified institutions would emerge to cover the functions of protecting the rule of law, ensuring fundamental rights, and overseeing the democratic process.
According to Charles Fried, Beneficial Professor of Law, who offered written testimony on the Courts function in Americans constitutional system, the judiciary is revered because it is viewed as the guarantor of the rule of law, and it embodies the notion that we are subject to law and not to any passing political regime.
Credit: Martha Stewart Charles Fried
Fried, who served as U.S. solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, acknowledged that the confirmation process has become more contentious and the public has increasingly begun to view it through a partisan lens, even though the judiciary still enjoys the highest public regard of all the organs of government.
Fried recommended reforms that would limit justices to one non-renewable 18-year term, with nominations to be staggered in such a way that each president would have two appointments during each term. This way, he wrote, the stakes for each confirmation would be lower, and there would no longer be an incentive to nominate younger and younger justices.
Speaking on a July 20 panel about the Courts composition, Michael Klarman, Charles Warren Professor of American Legal History, struck a more urgent tone, detailing what he saw as an immediate threat to American democracy by the GOP, the Courts contributions to that problem, and why he advocated for court expansion.
Over the course of four years, said Klarman, President Donald Trump degraded long-accepted norms by attacking the press and judicial independence, politicizing the Justice Department, delegitimizing elections, refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, and more. And, as Klarman put it in his written testimony, to the astonishment of at least half the nation, the Republican Party proved overwhelmingly complicit with Trumps authoritarian bent, refusing to reign in his behavior or hold him accountable through oversight or impeachment. Even after initially condemning the January 6 Capitol riot, said Klarman, Republicans have largely reassessed their position, fix[ing] upon a strategy of minimizing the violence insisting that many of the demonstrators were Antifa, rather than Trump supporters, and denying that Trump bears responsibility for the attack.
Credit: Leah Fasten Michael Klarman
Klarman insisted that these issues were not new, and that since at least 2000, state legislatures have tried to restrict voting and solidify political advantage through partisan gerrymandering. Worse, he said, the Supreme Court has furthered these GOP political advantages over the years, nullifying the Voting Rights Acts preclearance provision, upholding voter purges, and making it difficult to prove racial discrimination in redistricting efforts. Klarman added that SCOTUS had also unleashed money in politics, enabling the wealthy to influence political outcomes and block widely popular policies like paid parental leave and a higher minimum wage. From Klarmans perspective, the best way to address these crises is to expand the Court to defend democracy.
Also testifying on July 20, Vicki C. Jackson, Laurence H. Tribe Professor of Constitutional Law, shared her expertise on term limits. Jackson believed it was time to revise justices unlimited tenure on the Court for three major reasons. First, she said, many other countries and most U.S. states have term limits or mandatory retirement ages for their judges. And, as people live longer, some of the disadvantages of indefinite tenure of judges remaining in office even though their health is failing, and for very long periods of time, blocking new appointees may be becoming more likely to occur, wrote Jackson in her submitted testimony.
Credit: Phil FarnsworthVicki C. Jackson
Secondly, there is a troubling gap between public voting in national elections, and which partys presidents have appointed members of the Court, taking away indirect democratic input on SCOTUSs makeup one of the reasons for the Courts legitimacy, according to Jackson. As an example, she contrasted President Carters zero Supreme Court appointments with President Trumps three.
Finally, she said, constitutions are supposed to provide a framework for peaceful resolution of disputes. Losers of elections, of court cases accept the results because they trust the overall fairness of the system. But, Jackson said, the Courts current structure may contribute to doubts about overall fairness.
Like her colleague Fried, Jacksons suggested reforms included an 18-year nonrenewable staggered term which would provide for two appointments during each four-year presidential term, a change she said might require a constitutional amendment to achieve. Alternatively, a less effective but perhaps more achievable by statue proposal, said Jackson, would be to allow each president to appoint at least one justice every four-year term, with the Courts size floating up or down as needed. Jackson also pointed out that mandatory retirement might pose constitutional problems, given the weight placed on permanency at the framing. Instead, Jackson suggested, pension boosts could be used to incentivize earlier retirement among justices.
On another panel, Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, cautioned commissioners to think deeply about how proposed reforms could impact not only the Courts ability to make judgements, but also the publics perception of it.
Stephen Sachs
In considering reforms preserve judicial independence, implored Sachs, adding that the Courts job is to apply cases before it and enforce the limited powers of each governmental branch.
Next, put politics in its place If you want a less political judiciary, you need a more political amendment process, he said. In other words, move political fights out of judicial conference rooms, and into state houses and the halls of Congress. A Court that can get away with constitutional amendment on the cheap is always going to be a target for partisan capture.
Finally, warned Sachs, beware unforeseen consequences of many proposed reforms. It is much easier to build than to destroy. Traditions of judicial independence that we have built up over time can be demolished much more quickly than one might expect, he said.
In considering potential reforms, the members of the commission have to be honest with each other and the public, concluded Sachs, adding that Americans would see through partisan changes to the Court. Reforms that are not perceived by both sides as enhancing the Courts legitimacy are not going to work at doing so.
In a final panel on July 20, Rosalie Abella, who will be the Pisar Visiting Professor of Law starting July 1, 2022, offered some closing remarks based on her experience as a justice on the Canadian Supreme Court.
Abella began by outlining what had happened since Canada adopted its Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. The addition of the charter led to a Copernican revolution in Canada, she said.
Credit: Philippe Landreville Rosalie Abella
In considering its new mandate, the court was innovative, it was bold, and it was transformative, and committed to new values of social justice and equality, said Abella. It adopted a theory of living constitutionalism that saw the charters role as growing and expanding over time to meet new social and political realities.
The court was hugely popular among the Canadian public, she said, but also received some conservative pushback in the 1990s. But, democracy is not and never was just about the wishes of the majority, she said, adding Canadians came to understand that this commitment to the protection of rights strengthened, rather than detracted from, its democracy.
Around the world today, though, these values are in danger, warned Abella, and if democracy and human rights are at risk anywhere, they are at risk everywhere.
Ultimately, concluded Abella, There can be no democracy without respect for rights, no respect for rights without respect for courts, and no respect for courts without respect for their demonstrably independent, impartial, nonpartisan, and fearless defense of democracy and rights.
Read the original post:
- Why are Jamaicans forced to live in poverty? - Jamaica Gleaner - October 29th, 2023 [October 29th, 2023]
- The ultimate price - The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting - October 29th, 2023 [October 29th, 2023]
- Cornyn, Cruz lead another GOP delegation on border tour of RGV - Brownsville Herald - October 29th, 2023 [October 29th, 2023]
- Landworkers' Alliance Report: Debt, Migration, and Exploitation - Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants - October 29th, 2023 [October 29th, 2023]
- Searching for wholeness in a nation fractured by capitalism and ... - Kansas Reflector - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Explainer: The State of Poverty and Slavery in Ecuador - JURIST - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- That AI You're Using Was Trained By Slave Labor, Basically - Futurism - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Bibb Announces Ten Winners of $5000 Restaurant Grants to ... - Cleveland Scene - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Sugarcane Burning Is a Plague on These Black Floridians Mother ... - Mother Jones - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- 18 of the Most Haunted Places in Alabama - AZ Animals - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Immigration Health Surcharge: equality impact assessment 2023 ... - GOV.UK - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Books The common cause - Morning Star Online - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- Search warrants executed in alleged human trafficking and slavery ... - ACT Policing News - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- Modern slavery and human trafficking: identifying and reporting ... - GOV.UK - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- Report: Government needs better policies to help narrow economic equity gap - Yahoo News - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- New Zealand criminal investigation into systemic migrant worker ... - WSWS - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- What back to school means in the era of PragerU - Reckon - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- The Jacksonville Shooting and the Far Right - Left Voice - September 3rd, 2023 [September 3rd, 2023]
- Build support for today's union struggles The Militant - The Militant - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Work requirements wont affect the debt ceiling but they will stir up ... - The Boston Globe - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Ten Percent of North Koreans Forced To Work as Slaves: New Report - The New York Sun - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Anti-Slavery Commissioner visits the Coffs Coast - News Of The Area - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Former Server Says Customers Should Tip If They Ask Questions - The Daily Dot - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- New exhibition looks at the UK's role in indenture labour - ianVisits - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- UNITED WE STAND: THE FIERCE URGENCY OF NOW - Savannah Tribune - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- No, MLK Was Not a Christian Nationalist - Word and Way - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Fact check: Tipping began amid slavery, then helped keep former Black ... - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Slavery - Wikipedia - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Social class - Wikipedia - December 23rd, 2022 [December 23rd, 2022]
- Author Ibram X. Kendi speaks in Portland on legacy of slavery and the tipped wage - Press Herald - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- As a Nation, We are Doomed to Fail if the 'Original Sin' of the Past is not Reconciled in the Present - CT Examiner - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Lincolnshire car wash owners handed 10-year slavery order - Lincolnshire Live - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- "Under The Banner of King Death" puts pirates in their place in the history of workers' rights - Boing Boing - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Forrest Hylton | To the Lighthouse LRB 18 October 2022 - London Review of Books - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Aussie Brands Among Most Improved in 2022's Ethical Fashion Report But There's Still a Long Way To Go - Broadsheet - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- DC voter guide: 2022 election what you need to know - WTOP - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Exploring the Fault Lines in Mental Health Discourse: An Interview with Psychologist Justin Karter - Mad in America - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Iran: 'Society has risen to overthrow the Islamic Republic' - Green Left - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Slavery by any name is wrong: the push to end forced labor in prisons - The Guardian US - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Abortion, Marijuana, Slavery: 11 Themes to 2022 Ballot Measures - The Epoch Times - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Visions of Progress tells tales of two Charlottesvilles, Black and white - Bristol Herald Courier - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Miss Malini's job advert puts spotlight back on 'exploitative bosses' and a 'pittance' as salary - Moneycontrol - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- As Hurricane Ian Threatens Florida's Southwest Coast, What's Happening On The Ground - KPCC - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Truths about student debt, college costs, and corporate freeloading on the backs of students. - Daily Kos - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- The Kohinoor, Cullinan and the enduring demand for reparations across the colonial world - The Indian Express - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Divine Politik: The rise of robots should be the downfall of capitalism The Daily Free Press - Daily Free Press - September 14th, 2022 [September 14th, 2022]
- Stop romanticizing the lives of 1950s housewives - Halifax Examiner - September 14th, 2022 [September 14th, 2022]
- Domestic workers, long excluded from labor protections, call for codified rights - The 19th* - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Pierre Poilievre Claims He's a Friend of the 'Working Class'. He's Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers. - PressProgress - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Stockard on the Stump: Governor declares he didn't violate the Little Hatch Act Tennessee Lookout - Tennessee Lookout - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- How Central American immigrants played a vital role in the U.S. labor - Fast Company - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- The unity imperative: Lessons for building the anti-fascist alliance - People's World - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- How FrontLine Farming Is Using Land to Grow Food and Heal Generational Trauma - 5280 | The Denver Magazine - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Queen Elizabeth II Reigned For 70 Years: Here Are The 10 Longest-Reigning Kings And Queens Of The UK - Forbes - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Ballot initiatives to watch in 2022 midterms, from abortion to slavery - USA TODAY - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- 10 Songs That Deal with Labor Rights and Hating Your Job - MetalSucks - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Conflict and modern slavery: the investment perspective - Schroders - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- The Santa Cruz County boom town that went BOOM - The Mercury News - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- This Labor Day, buy produce grown only on farms that respect workers rights - The Hill - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- The unity imperative: Lessons for building the anti-fascist alliance - Communist Party USA - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Agency visits US to share efforts to end fisher abuse - - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- High income tax in PNG is a disincentive - POST-COURIER - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- For women of color in care work, racial and economic inequities abound, report shows - The Boston Globe - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Opinion | Behind the Rise in Union SupportAnd the Challenge Ahead - Common Dreams - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Slavery and Trafficking Risk Order imposed on Lincolnshire car wash owners - Forecourt Trader - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Opinion | The Tide Is Turning: US Congress Finally Considers a National Domestic Workers Bill of Rights - Common Dreams - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Edited Transcript of ADH.AX earnings conference call or presentation 22-Aug-22 1:30am GMT - Yahoo Finance - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Conservatives Explain Why They Are Preparing For A Civil War - The Onion - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- 10 Black Millionaires Who Got Busted By The IRS For Failure To Pay Taxes - Moguldom - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- 34 Great Records You May Have Missed: Spring/Summer 2022 - Pitchfork - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Amazon Hit by Strikes Across the Globe - Novara Media - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- The Past, Present, and Future of Work - YES! Magazine - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- National Trust members: get ready to choke on your carrot cake - The Guardian - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Lost Yet Connected in Time: Brown, Peltier, Melaku-Bello, Abu-Jamal, and Assange - LA Progressive - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Mondelz commits to living wage for cocoa farmers and invests in education programmes for children - ConfectioneryNews.com - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Opinion | The Supreme Court Has Too Much Power and Liberals Are to Blame - POLITICO - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Breaking the stranglehold of speculative property ownership | interest.co.nz - Interest.co.nz - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Why fashion should act now to legislate living wages in the supply chain - Drapers - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Georgia's six-week abortion ban goes Into effect, an attack on... - Liberation - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- 10 years on, what is the true legacy of the London 2012 Olympics? - Metro.co.uk - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]