Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Judges, defense lawyers, police and prosecutors have been fighting over the Fourth Amendment for 230years, and its not hard to figure out why. So many of the words in the text are vague. Houses, papers, and effects, for example, means more today than they did when James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights. So, too, does the clause things to be seized. What things? Seized how and by whom? Only unreasonable searches and seizures were barred, remember, leaving it up to future courts to argue over what is and what is not a reasonable exercise of police power.
Madison and company knew that some of the ambiguities contained in the Bill of Rights were necessary to achieve the political compromise necessary to ensure ratification of a document that changed the way the U.S. government interacts with citizens. The drafters also knew that by these ambiguities, they were passing on tough definitional questions to future judges and legislators to figure out. The same thing happens today, by the way, when Congress enacts ambiguous legislation and then complains that federal judges arent interpreting it properly. The late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scaliaused to complain about thatall the time.
The justices over the centuries have developed a series of standards theyve used to determine when a search is a search under the Fourth Amendment and then whether such a search is reasonable. And because technology has ceaselessly evolved over the generations police once searched for written letters and diaries, now they also search for emails and text messages Fourth Amendment standards have evolved as well. The law is always catching up to technology, and the speed with which it catches up usually is determined by the Supreme Court or Congress.
For some answers about these standards, I turned toOrin Kerr, author and professor at UC Berkeley School of Law.Kerris known for his scholarship on criminal procedure in general and the Fourth Amendment and computer crimes in particular, and hesfrequently at the centerof legal and political debates at the intersection of technology and privacy rights.
COHEN:There is often great frustration over the willy-nilly way judges seem to interpret and enforce Fourth Amendment protections. You wrote a really interestingHarvard Law Reviewarticlein 2011in which you described an equilibrium adjustment theory of the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court adjusts the scope of Fourth Amendment protection in response to new facts in order to restore the status quo level of protection, you wrote. When changing technology or social practice expands government power, the Supreme Court tightens Fourth Amendment protection; when it threatens government power, the Supreme Court loosens constitutional protection.
A decade later, how has your theory held up? Have the Supreme Court and lower courts done more to harmonize what some see as cognitive dissonance at the heart of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, or has the law grown muddier?
KERR:I think my theory has held up well. Two of the biggest Fourth Amendment cases in the last decade areRiley v. CaliforniaandCarpenter v. United States,and thats exactly what the Supreme Court did in those two cases. InRiley, the Supreme Court held that the search-incident-to-arrest exception doesnt apply to cell phones. The government can always search physical property on a person at the time of arrest, the Court has long held, but underRileythe government needs a warrant to search a cell phone then. That new rule was needed, the Court said, because applying the old rule to new technology no longer made sense: Applying that reasoning to digital data has to rest on its own bottom.
Similarly, inCarpenter, the Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects historical cell-site location records. This was needed despite the older cases pointing to the opposite result, the Court reasoned, to assure preservation of that degree of privacy against government that existed when the Fourth Amendment was adopted." New technology of cell phones gave the government access to a new surveillance method, and the Court had to change the old legal rule to ensure that the government didnt have too much power.
Of course, some would still find the law muddled. Some might say thatRileyandCarpentermade the law more muddled than before. But I would say the law is just really fact specific. How the Fourth Amendment applies depends on the facts, and you have to read a lot of cases to understand what the rules are.
COHEN:Riley v. Californiawas decided in 2014when Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer were on the Court. They are all gone or about to be gone now.Carpenter v. United Stateswas decided in 2018and the majority opinion in that case included two justices (Ginsburg and Breyer) who are gone or who will soon be gone from the court. Whats your sense of how the three Trump-nominated justices will push or pull Fourth Amendment law in one direction or another? For that matter, whats your sense of what a Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would bring to the debate over the Fourth Amendment? Have you had a chance to compare her views with those of Justice Breyer, the man she would replace?
KERR:The overall effect of these newer justices is mixed, and it probably depends on the specific doctrine. But I can try to offer an overall take just by running through the new justices. First, Justice Brett Kavanaugh tended to be on the governments side in Fourth Amendment cases back when he was on the DC Circuit, but then he was the fifth vote (together with Chief John Roberts, Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor) for the plaintiff in last terms significant Fourth Amendment case, Torres v. Madrid. Second, Justice Neil Gorsuch has a significant libertarian streak, which you can see in his separate opinion inCarpenter, but he can also end up on the governments side in divided cases (as he did inTorres).
Its too early to tell how Justice Amy Coney Barrett will be in the Fourth Amendment area. Finally, I expect Ketanji Brown Jackson will favor considerably more expansive Fourth Amendment rights than did Breyer, who was a swing vote in Fourth Amendment cases. Jackson is likely to be pretty different. Shes a former public defender, and I would guess she will join Sotomayor (and perhaps go beyond her) in being most likely to disagree with the government in Fourth Amendment cases.
In terms of what these new justices will mean for Fourth Amendment litigation generally, I expect many more Fourth Amendment cases will be briefed to the justices using originalist arguments. Briefs tend to be written to the swing vote, the justice who is needed to secure a majority and therefore a victory. We dont quite know who the center votes will be in Fourth Amendment cases, but Justices Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Roberts are all possibilities. I suspect well see a lot of originalist arguments being made in Fourth Amendment cases to try to persuade those justices.
COHEN:You wrote a detailed analysis about a first-of-its-kind ruling on geofence warrants and their application to Fourth Amendment law. Geofencing involves the use of GPS technology to create a geographic boundary that allows police, relying on Google for example, to track a cell phone users location. The case is out of Virginia, U.S. v. Chatrie, in which a federal judge suppressed the results of a police search warrant because the warrant gathered geofencing data from a wide swath of people who could not possibly have any relationship to a nearby robbery officers were investigating. The complicated decision raises questions not just about what privacy expectations people have in the age of location-tracking on cell phones but whether new technology justifies a new way to approach Fourth Amendment jurisprudence more broadly.
You were skeptical of the judges analysis, and you suggest that such searches may not even be subject to Fourth Amendment protections in the first place, but I was struck by what you wrote toward the end of your piece: One wonders if the possibility that technology can enable the execution of warrants in a more privacy protective way than traditional warrants is leading [U.S. District Judge M. Hannah] Lauck to in effect seek a new Fourth Amendment standard that requires warrants to be executed in the most privacy protective way the new technology allows.
Can technology at last push Fourth Amendment law to a tipping point where federal judges start looking for new standards to guide their decisions? I suspect youll say that no matter what, these cases will necessarily be fact-specific, but is there a point where the governments use of new surveillance technology forces changes in the legal standards to which those facts will be applied? And if so, do you have a sense of which justices on the court would be most willing to entertain such a change?
KERR:I think there are two different questions. First, can technology so expand government power that the Supreme Court will adjust Fourth Amendment rules to limit government power? My answer to that is yes, and that is the basic idea of equilibrium-adjustment that we have been discussing. In the blog post, though, I was addressing a different question: If technology permits the government to access information but also creates the prospect of newer and better privacy protections than have existed before, should the Fourth Amendment require those new greater privacy protections?
Thats part of whats interesting about geofencing warrants, I think. Google can try to get the government to execute those warrants in a more privacy protective way than warrants have been executed previously. Traditionally, search warrants are executed in a brutal fashion: The government breaks in, rifles through everything, and sees everything. Its a severe privacy violation. In contrast, Google can (and wants) to carefully screen information from the government, limiting what the government can see and limiting the identifying information about whose account it is seeing. The question is, if technology creates new ways to protect privacy, should the law impose that requirement?
As to what the Supreme Court might say to that, the signals are mixed. On one hand, in a case likeMissouri v. McNeely, the Court suggested that the ready availability of telephone warrants these days might make the warrant requirement broader. As warrants become easier to get, the thinking runs, it becomes less burdensome to impose a warrant requirement. Thats not exactly the same. But its a little bit similar, I think. On the other hand, the Court has repeatedly rejected any kind of least intrusive means search requirement under the Fourth Amendment. And that cuts the other way.
COHEN: I want to go back to theTorrescase for a second because it addresses, or tries to address, the Fourth Amendments approach to police use-of-force cases, a topic near and dear to my heart.Torreshad to do withwhether a suspect was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when an officer tries but fails to subdue that suspect. And the Supreme Court ruled that the attempt alone to seize a suspect in that case officers firing at a woman fleeing in her car triggered a Fourth Amendment analysis. Were living in an era where there are more lawsuits alleging excessive force by police officers, and certainly more taxpayer-funded legal settlements paid by police officials, and Im wondering whether you are seeing the effects of these cases in Fourth Amendment law. In other words, how is police reform shaping Fourth Amendment law?
KERR:Its hard to tell, as we cant answer the counterfactual of what the law would look like otherwise. But Im skeptical that police reforms are shaping Fourth Amendment law. George Floyd was killed in May 2020. Since then, the Supreme Court has agreed to hearzeronew Fourth Amendment cases. Thats remarkable. In a typical term, the Supreme Court hears three or four Fourth Amendment cases. This term, for the first time I can recall, it isnt deciding any Fourth Amendment cases at all. The Court has also turned away a series of petitions asking it to overturnqualified immunity, the judge-made legal doctrine used to shield police officers, corrections officials, and others from liability for their misconduct. Justice Thomas has written dissents from denials of certiorari on this, as he wants the Court to reconsider qualified immunity. But the rest of the Court has been silent. Its hard to know, but renewed interest in police reforms might be making the justices less likely to step in themselves. They may be waiting for the elected branches to act. But this is all just speculation. Unfortunately, we dont know.
COHEN:Lets end by looking ahead. We know that there will be technological advances in the next decade that will affect Fourth Amendment law. There always are. Does anything in particular stand out to you as something to watch in the years ahead? Do you see the law and technology careening toward some flashpoint?
KERR:I dont think there will be flashpoints, but Im expecting continued evolution. The lower courts are disagreeing on a lot of Fourth Amendment issues involving technology, and that will likely prompt Supreme Court review in the next few years on those issues. The Supreme Courtwill probably decide how the Fourth Amendment applies to long-term pole camera surveillance, if it allows warrantless border searches of computers, how theprivate search reconstruction doctrine(which allows the police to view the results of warrantless online searches by private parties) applies to internet providers; what the limits of computer warrants are, and, in the Fifth Amendment area, when the government can force people to unlock their phones. As always, stay tuned!
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
This discussion is one of several in a Brennan Center series on the Bill of Rights. The interview with David Carroll about the Sixth Amendment ishere, and the interview with Carol Steiker on the Eighth Amendment ishere.
See more here:
Could Better Technology Lead to Stronger 4th Amendment Privacy Protections? - brennancenter.org
- Report: Apple acquires French startup behind AI and computer vision technology - 9to5Mac - April 22nd, 2024 [April 22nd, 2024]
- CACI Awarded $1.3 Billion Task Order to Provide Communications and Information Technology Expertise to U.S. ... - Business Wire - April 22nd, 2024 [April 22nd, 2024]
- What is semi-automated offside technology and how does it work? - The Athletic - April 22nd, 2024 [April 22nd, 2024]
- Can technology save us from an ecological apocalypse? - interview - CyberNews.com - April 22nd, 2024 [April 22nd, 2024]
- Does LaLiga have goalline technology? What about other major leagues? - AS USA - April 22nd, 2024 [April 22nd, 2024]
- Driver Assistance Technologies: NHTSA Should Take Action to Enhance Consumer Understanding of Capabilities and ... - Government Accountability Office - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- OpenAI reveals Voice Engine, but won't yet publicly release the risky AI voice-cloning technology - The Associated Press - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Nexalin Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: US$0.63 loss per share (vs US$0.30 loss in FY 2022) - Yahoo Finance - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- 'Battle for your brain': What the rise of brain-computer interface technology means for you - WBUR News - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Firsthand Technology Value Fund (NASDAQ:SVVC) Research Coverage Started at StockNews.com - Defense World - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Suzhou Anjie Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: Misses Expectations - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Inside the shadowy global battle to tame the world's most dangerous technology - POLITICO Europe - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- The Technological Pivot Of History: Power In The Age Of Exponential Innovation Analysis - Eurasia Review - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- 'Women Behind the Wheel' explores the intersection of gender, culture and cars - NPR - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Shanghai Weihong Electronic Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- A Look At The Fair Value Of Powertech Technology Inc. (TWSE:6239) - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Weaver Network Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: EPS Beats Expectations, Revenues Lag - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- New York City will introduce controversial AI gun detection technology amid subway crime crisis - SiliconANGLE News - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Earnings Not Telling The Story For Beijing CTJ Information Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301153) - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Vontron Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: EPS: CN0.35 (vs CN0.34 in FY 2022) - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Huawei Revenue Rises as Technology Giant Commits to Growth - Technology Magazine - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: Beats Expectations - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- USPACE Technology Group Limited (HKG:1725) May Have Run Too Fast Too Soon With Recent 28% Price Plummet - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- NYC to test gun-detecting technology in subway system - SILive.com - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Cancer Treatment: 3D Printing and Scanning Technology - Surviving Mesothelioma - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Does Contel Technology (HKG:1912) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet? - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Oppo Find X7 series now supports 5G-Advanced technology with up to 10 Gbps downlink speed - The Indian Express - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- DCPS receives nearly $20k in grants for technology program advancements - The Owensboro Times - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: Misses Expectations - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- International Business Digital Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: CN0.07 loss per share (vs CN0.019 loss in FY ... - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Analysts Are More Bearish On Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002709) Than They Used To Be - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Daheng New Epoch Technology Full Year 2023 Earnings: EPS: CN0.11 (vs CN0.16 in FY 2022) - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Tesla offers U.S. customers a month's trial of its driver-assist technology - Reuters - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Slam Dunk Technology: How AI Is Revolutionizing The Game Of Basketball - Forbes - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- China Environmental Technology and Bioenergy Holdings Full Year 2023 Earnings: CN0.03 loss per share (vs CN ... - Simply Wall St - March 31st, 2024 [March 31st, 2024]
- Vuma and Huawei team up to launch industry first 50G PON ... - Light Reading - July 15th, 2023 [July 15th, 2023]
- See What Kim Kardashian and Kylie Jenner Look Like With Aging ... - E! NEWS - July 15th, 2023 [July 15th, 2023]
- AFRL conducts swarm technology demonstration > ONE AFRL ... - afrl.af.mil - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Shell to use new AI technology in deep sea oil exploration - Reuters - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Former Google CEO says AI at 'center' of technology competition between US and China - Fox News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Agriculture and technology combine to drive the industrys growth - Times of India - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Technology and the Skills Shortage - Financial Times - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- New License Agreement Announced for Next-Generation Base ... - BioPharm International - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Orion Governance Licenses Technology from GE to Deliver Next Generation Data Governance Solution - Yahoo Finance - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- World needs to be 'vigilant' as AI technology improves and ... - KTVZ - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- After Losing Son, Ridgefield Mother Pushes For Technology to Prevent Hot Car Deaths - NBC Connecticut - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- After last year's fan violence in Queretaro, has Fan ID technology ensured safety for Liga MX fans? - ESPN - ESPN - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bleach: The Soul Reapers' Gigai Technology, Explained - CBR - Comic Book Resources - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Cogito Tech - Catalyzing Transformation in Global Healthcare ... - Business Standard - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Barriers to Use of Technology in Diabetes Management - Patient Care Online - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Blue technology startups presented at the inaugural Gulf Blue ... - The University of Southern Mississippi - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- CureVac files expanded patent lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech over ... - Reuters - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Harrison Ford defends use of de-ageing technology in new Indiana Jones film: I know that that is my face - Yahoo News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Sanwo-Olu: Nigeria needs technology to compete with likes of China - Guardian Nigeria - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Prejudice in technology, and the necessity of time: Books in brief - Nature.com - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- New technology uses ordinary sunlight to disinfect drinking water ... - Stanford University News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Incredible AI technology shows what UK cities will look like in 2050 - LADbible - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Your Firm and Your Tools - Top Technology Initiatives - CPAPracticeAdvisor.com - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Tom Hanks: I could appear in movies after death with AI technology - BBC - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Transform your career with Chief Technology Officer online course - Economic Times - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- e-Learning Jamaica Technology in Education Conference Slated for ... - Government of Jamaica, Jamaica Information Service - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Andrew Maynard | What's a Luddite? From Industrial Revolution to ... - TribDem.com - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- At Yale, Kaloyan Kolev used technology to create and to make ... - Yale News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- This technology could alter the entire planet. These groups want every nation to have a say. - MIT Technology Review - April 17th, 2023 [April 17th, 2023]
- The secret lives of snakes and how Georgia College uses technology to study them - 13WMAZ.com - April 8th, 2023 [April 8th, 2023]
- Technology Innovation Institute to host 2nd 'Additive Manufacturing the Future' seminar in Abu Dhabi - Devdiscourse - April 8th, 2023 [April 8th, 2023]
- Can Array Technologies Inc (ARRY) Stock Rise to the Top of Technology Sector Thursday? - InvestorsObserver - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- Here's Why We Think Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology (ETR:PFV) Might Deserve Your Attention Today - Simply Wall St - February 18th, 2023 [February 18th, 2023]
- Will WM Technology Inc (MAPS) Stay at the Top of the Technology Sector? - InvestorsObserver - February 18th, 2023 [February 18th, 2023]
- Ways in which technology can enhance the abilities of law enforcement agents to assist the community - Times of India - February 7th, 2023 [February 7th, 2023]
- Meet The Titans: Google And OpenView (Microsoft) Faceoff On Chat Technology Innovation - Forbes - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MTSI) Stock Has Been Sliding But Fundamentals Look Strong: Is The Market Wrong? - Simply Wall St - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- WVU Dept. of Ophthalmology acquires state-of-the-art technology for simulation lab - WV News - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- Executive Vice President of Technology & Operations Alok Sethi Just Sold A Bunch Of Shares In Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) - Simply Wall St - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- Is Now The Time To Put Amkor Technology (NASDAQ:AMKR) On Your Watchlist? - Simply Wall St - January 27th, 2023 [January 27th, 2023]
- There Are Reasons To Feel Uneasy About New Oriental Education & Technology Group's (NYSE:EDU) Returns On Capital - Simply Wall St - January 27th, 2023 [January 27th, 2023]
- Technology has set us on a path toward one of two dystopian scenariosbut its not too late to save democracy - Fortune - January 17th, 2023 [January 17th, 2023]
- IonQ Acquires Entangled Networks And Locks In Quantum Networking Technology Critical To Its Future Success - Forbes - January 10th, 2023 [January 10th, 2023]
- Industrialization 3.0 - How Technology, Wall Street, And The Government Can Help The US Win In A World Of Re-Industrialization - Forbes - January 10th, 2023 [January 10th, 2023]
- Connect with aspirational India through technology and work in interest of world: Anurag Thakur to NRIs - Economic Times - January 8th, 2023 [January 8th, 2023]