Category Archives: Mars Colonization

Reports are indicating that one of two asteroids located near Earth may contain $11 trillion worth of precious metals that could be harvested in the future.

A new study published in The Planetary Science Journal details an asteroid dubbed 1986 DA, and according to the researchers behind the study, the asteroid may contain $11.65 trillion worth of precious metals. The paper states that the asteroid may be a target for "for asteroid mining in the future." Space mining will be a massive industry when it becomes accessible, as retrieving valuable resources from the abundance of space will assist human civilization into unlocking new technology.

However, humans still have quite some time before that becomes and a reality. When humans have begun to colonize other planets such as Mars and have the tools to mine space rocks, asteroids such as 1986 DA and others like it will become valuable prospects for colonies that are lacking in certain resources such as metals.

The researchers wrote the study, "Our analysis shows that both near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) have surfaces with 85% metal such as iron and nickel and 15% silicate material, which is basically rock. These asteroids are similar to some stony-iron meteorites such as mesosiderites found on Earth."

If you are interested in reading more about this story, check out this link here.

Originally posted here:
There's an asteroid worth $11 trillion located near Earth - TweakTown

The president's lascivious press secretary, Jerry Ross (played by actor Martin Short), sees this whole Martian arrival as a big opportunity, both for the country and the president himself. He encourages the commander-in-chief to appear on TV and announce the alien presence outside the Earth's atmosphere before any news outlet can beat them to the punch. Jerry's proclivities for taking call girls back to the White House leads to him inadvertently aiding the Martians in their attempt to kill the president. Whoops.

In the 1997 comedy "Jungle 2 Jungle," Short played the role of cranky businessman Richard Kempster, partner toMichael Cromwell (Tim Allen), who learns he has a sonnamed Mimi-Siku (Sam Huntington) with his soon-to-be ex-wifePatricia (JoBeth Williams) in Venezuela. The same year, he played Murray, a fairy godfather toAnnabel (Mara Wilson), whose wish is to see her father land a role in a musical version of Charles Dickens' "A Tale of Two Cities" in the film "A Simple Wish." For a single season, Short hosted "The Martin Short Show," which featured his popular character Jiminy Glick, who later got his own Comedy Central show, "Primetime Glick," for three seasons beginning in 2000.

In 2006, Short reunited with Allen, appearing opposite him as Jack Frost in "The Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause." Beginning in 2010, he voiced the titular Dr. Seuss character in "The Cat in the Hat Knows a Lot About That!" for three spread out seasons and a total of five specials.Short is currently starring with longtime friend and co-star Steve Martin in the Hulu murder-podcast sitcom "Only Murders in the Building."

Link:
Mars Attacks!: What Ever Happened To The Cast? - Looper

Elon Musk's vision is clear, "to have enough capital to colonize Mars." But his decision to live in a 400 square foot prefab tiny home isn't just about freeing up capital to afford his mission and a whim of minimalistic enlightenment.

To process towards achieving this out-of-this-world plan to colonize Mars means doing whatever it takes. And that includes selling off a multi-million dollar property portfolio and living in a rented home that costs just $50,000 to build. A house so small and lightweight, a Tesla can trailer it around--no semi-trucks required.

On top of that, his tiny home doesn't resemble the quaint minimalist homes resting upon stunning landscapes with million-dollar views, as you might see in architecture magazines or in Airbnb's list of unique homes. His rented tiny home is on the bleak grounds of SpaceX in Boca Chica, Texas--a rural area lacking any form of glamour synonymous with the billionaire lifestyle.

But his goal isn't to have the biggest home in the best neighborhood but rather to create neighborhoods and homesteads on another planet. And the way in which that could be done depends on a lot more than an immense amount of capital. It requires an equally immense amount of planning, testing, and preparation.

If you look at Musk's Mars plans, you'll notice that, not surprisingly, the homes don't exactly resemble a city like Manhattan, nor does it look like your token, white picket fence-clad suburban developments. Constructing dwellings on another planet would naturally look different from what we're used to on this planet.

To effectively build a colony on Mars, buildings would need to be erected quickly and easily, with as little energy as possible. In other words, colonizing Mars would require a highly streamlined process with great precision. One that would look much like an assembly line within the most advanced manufacturing processes.

One variable in the success of this process would depend upon employing very small, lightweight, and easily transported materials. One that would likely function a lot like a Boxable home--Elon Musk's current dwelling.

That's right, it appears the real reason Musk is living in a $50,000 pre-fabricated tiny home is for product testing purposes.

It's not just the house itself that Musk is testing out either. He could have just as easily downsized and lived quite practically anywhere. And yet, he chose Boca Chica, Texas, an area consisting of miles of flatlands and a 40-minute drive from civilization. An area that, in many ways, provides a taste of what life on Mars might be like.

What it boils down to is his commitment to his goal. Musk has stated that, "when Tesla and SpaceX go bankrupt, I will go bankrupt personally." But the genius of Musk's mini house isn't just that he's all-in with skin in the game, but that he's willing to live his vision--helping it come to life in the process.

In an interview, Musk has stated that "I think possessions kind of weigh you down." And though the notion is at the core of minimalism, the seemingly universal statement says a lot coming from the man who is on a mission to colonize a planet 246-million miles away from Earth.

It's not enough to know where you want to be, you need to know how to get there--a key factor in learning how to launch like Elon Musk. Knowing what weighs you down is a vital aspect of planning for success is product testing, which provides an example of where Musk does a brilliant job of applying his brilliance and a vital aspect in strategy that drives success.

The most successful entrepreneurs don't just dream big, but they're ruthlessly committed to the point of putting everything on the line to make what might appear to be far-fetched dreams to others, their reality. And this doesn't just mean going all-in financially but going all-in when it comes to all facets in the pursuit of a goal. It's the Founders, like Elon Musk that do the unheard of who manages to do the unthinkable.

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

See the original post:
2 Words Explain the Real Reason Elon Musk Lives in a $50000 Tiny Home - Inc.

(Materials Today/Facebook)

Can humans build structures on other planets? Maybe it could be as easy as giving blood.

Given the expense and difficulty of getting building materials to places like the moon or Mars, the idea of construction is tricky at best.

A new study suggests some surprising materials that could make the task much easier: astronauts' blood, urine, or even tears.

In a paper in Materials Today Bio, researchers explore a proposed way to add astronauts' own bodily fluids to another planet's soil. The resulting material would be similar to concrete - but could be reinforced to be even stronger.

The formula relies on combining human serum albumin, the most abundant protein in blood plasma, with water and the dust and rock on other planets. They call the resulting material, which is similar to concrete, AstroCrete.

When the researchers added urea - a substance found in urine, sweat and tears - to the mixture, it increased its compressive strength threefold, making it much stronger than concrete.

The paper lays out the method and suggests ways to harvest the needed compounds and use them on a hypothetical lunar or Martian base. The compound could be used to create bricks or act as a mortar that binds existing rocks together, helping astronauts create much-needed shelters against the sun's radiation.

The scientists admit the feasibility and health effects of the method would need "significant further investigation," but they suggest a single astronaut could fuel the creation of the equivalent of a single clay brick a month with their blood plasma alone. Over the course of a mission on Mars, they write, each astronaut "could produce enough additional habitat space to support another astronaut, potentially allowing the steady expansion of an early Martian colony."

See the rest here:
Astronauts' bodily fluids might help build shelters on colonized planets - Stars and Stripes

Jordan Parker Erb Sep. 23, 2021, 10:00 AM

Good morning and welcome to 10 Things in Tech. If this was forwarded to you, sign up here. Plus, download Insiders app for news on the go click here for iOS and here for Android.

Lets get started.

1. Facebooks CTO is stepping down. Mike Schroepfer, Facebooks chief technology officer and one of Mark Zuckerbergs closest confidants, will be taking a role as senior fellow within Facebook next year. Everything we know about his departure, including his successor.

2. Apple CEO Tim Cook wants employees to stop leaking internal memos, according to leaked internal memo. In a note that was ultimately leaked to The Verge, Cook said people who leak memos do not belong at Apple, and that the company would track down whoever kept leaking internal documents. More on that ironic twist of fate.

3. Facebook and Instagram user satisfaction just dropped to all time lows. After surveying thousands of people, one of Wall Streets top internet analysts found that users are increasingly unhappy with the apps. Heres what else he found about the apps downward spiral.

4. Bill Gates was questioned about his meetings with Jeffrey Epstein in a new PBS interview. Gates said he regretted having dinners with the convicted sex offender and disgraced financier, and that their meetings were a mistake. Heres what else he said.

5. Facebook overpaid the FTC by nearly $US5 ($AU7) billion to protect Zuckerberg, shareholders claim. In a lawsuit made public Tuesday, shareholders said after the Cambridge Analytica scandal Facebook overpaid the FTC to prevent it from suing Zuckerberg personally. Get the details on the payments they allege were meant to make his problems go away.

6. Amazon gave $US100,000 ($AU138,098) in cash to employees who proved they were vaccinated against COVID-19. The company dolled out cash prizes and cars worth as much as $US40,000 ($AU55,239) to eight employees in a company lottery and two grand prizes of $US500,000 ($AU690,489) are still up for grabs.

7. Tesla drivers looked at the road less when using Autopilot, according to an MIT study. But researchers said the findings didnt necessarily mean the drivers were distracted heres why.

8. Elon Musk just took his last house off the market. Musk pledged in 2020 to sell almost all physical possessions to fund the colonization of Mars but seems to be hanging onto one final property. What we know about Musks Bay Area mansion.

9. New documents show the behind-the-scenes battle between a powerful Google exec and a fired right-wing agitator. Emails obtained by Insider show previously unreported details in the dustup between SVP Urs Hlzle and Kevin Cernekee, an engineer who many Googlers considered a right-wing provocateur, and who was ultimately fired. Read our exclusive report.

10. Better quadrupled its workforce during the pandemic and became one of Americas top startups. The mortgage company hired 7,000 people during the pandemic, and was nominated by LinkedIn as the top startup in the US. Execs shared with us how they ramped up hiring and how they keep staff happy. Get the inside story on Betters rise to the top.

Compiled by Jordan Erb. Tips/comments? Email [emailprotected] or tweet @JordanParkerErb.

Sign up for more Insider newsletters here.

See the article here:
10 things in tech you need to know today - Business Insider Australia

The subject of terraforming lies at the center of James Camerons Aliens, at least when it comes to worldbuilding. Released in 1979, Ridley Scotts Alien already saw a group of space truckers visit an unknown planetoid, which would later become LV-426 in the 1986 sequel. And spacesuits werent needed anymore to walk on its surface when Hadleys Hope went silent.

After Ellen Ripley and the crew of the Nostromo came across a massive ship of unknown origin filled to the brim with xenomorph eggs in 2122, the Weyland-Yutani Corporation knew they had struck (biological) gold, and a terraforming process was kickstarted as a cover-up in 2159, two years after the colony was established.

By the time Ripley was found floating in space and learned about the xeno-related developments, this slow but steady transformation had been going on for roughly 20 years. LV-426 still looked like a hellscape, but the air was breathable. How did Weyland-Yutani achieve this? And, more importantly, would it be feasible in real life? According to geophysicist David Waltham, it might just be a matter of getting lucky and finding the right planet, as there is nothing which would make it impossible.

Before we continue, if you want more Alien content, be sure to check out Alien movies ranked article to see a rundown of the franchise's highs and lows.

Watch the Alien franchise on Amazon Prime Video

The concept of terraforming has been around for quite a while, especially if we explore contemporary literature. Of course, plenty of science fiction stories deal with new planets already suited for humans (or at least humanoids), but some authors chose to explain how giant balls of rock and dust could potentially be turned into Earth-like worlds capable of supporting life.

An interesting riff on the subject (and one of the first) was H.G. Wells The War of the Worlds (1898), which described a red weed brought by Martians that quickly killed off Earths plant life and began to take over our planets surface. The idea of advanced extraterrestrials doing their own terraforming during or after an invasion is quite plausible. If you think about it, humans would be aliens to other planets everyone in the universe would want to feel at home and make their existence easier wherever they went, right?

Sci-fi has specifically put a lot of thought into the question: could we really terraform Mars, making it into a cozy new planet for mankind? Nowadays, were looking at our red neighbor as a dead planet that once, almost surely, harbored life of some kind. This idea was already floated by authors such as Edgar Rice Burroughs and his Princess of Mars (1912). Much later, films like Total Recall (1990) toyed with the notion of terraforming Mars in the mainstream, making it way too easy an underground ancient alien machine promptly turns solidified atmospheric gases that were buried into a breathable atmosphere. We can work with mysterious alien tech and solidified materials, but the process itself would take centuries regardless of the presence of the needed gases. More importantly, the pressure would also take quite a while to rise we dont want anyone without a spacesuit to explode.

Back to Aliens, we find Building Better Worlds as the main slogan of the nefarious Weyland-Yutani Corporation. Apparently, terraforming (and presumably mining) celestial bodies is a large part of their galactic business. When acid hits the fan and the xenomorphs take over Hadleys Hope, their operations on LV-426 have been active for decades. But is that enough time for Acheron (formally labelled as LV-426) to develop a breathable atmosphere?

The film itself doesnt have many answers when it comes to terraforming, but the procedure appears to revolve around reutilizing the existing atmosphere breaking down pre-existing elements, transforming, and redistributing them instead of starting from scratch, which would indeed take centuries. Basically, mankind cant turn any planet or planetoid into an Earth-like environment in the Alien universe; most components need to be present already, same goes for the atmospheric conditions. This fixes the centuries-long problem that comes up in other works of fiction, or at least makes the storytelling more realistic.

Complementary material detailing the Alien universes history and technology claim the first Automated Atmosphere Processor became a reality in 2029, with a first terraforming process happening on Gliese 667 Cc during the 2030s and ending around 2040. The Weyland Corp Terraforming Division was created in 2072, effectively starting a new age of space exploration. As stated before, native atmospheres are transformed thanks to the companys Atmosphere Processing Plants and other techniques, such as algae bloom tanks that consume excess carbon dioxide and generate oxygen. It all depends on the properties of planets which have been previously scouted, inspected, and approved for viable terraformation.

As we can see in Aliens, the process isnt pretty either. LV-426, which is actually one of the three moons orbiting Calpamos in the Zeta Reticuli system, is a dark and rocky wasteland unfit for life despite its now breathable atmosphere. Xenomorphs, which arent native inhabitants, do okay because, well theyre xenomorphs, the perfect organism. For all we know, they can float around space just fine.

Acherons transformation never reaches its end because the Processing Plants reactor exploded as a result of Ripley and the Colonial Marines battle against the xenomorph infestation of Hadleys Hope. We do, however, get to see successfully terraformed planets in other pieces of Alien media, but were not stepping outside the franchises cinematic canon here. Ridley Scotts Alien prequels Prometheus and Alien: Covenant are strictly linked to terraformation as seen in James Camerons film though. The former explores another moon of Calpamos, LV-223, whose atmosphere is nearly identical to Earths. And the latter takes place mostly in Planet 4, which housed a city populated by the Engineers, the ancient beings behind bio-weapons which gave birth to the xenos and who most likely colonized and terraformed a number of planets, including Earth. It all comes full circle in those films despite all their faults.

Planet 4 remains an interesting Earth-but-not-quite world; its vegetation clearly has the same origin as the plants on Earth, yet the planet was depicted as odd and different enough. Reaching such a step in planetary development would be a big and complicated job. Some scientists and artists suggest maybe we should try to terraform Earth by letting nature reclaim parts of our planet again and fix what weve destroyed in order to get a little practice.

Some thinkers have also warned (and keep warning) future space explorers and corporate giants of the inherent ethical problems that should be considered when drastically changing a worlds atmosphere and/or geography. For example, in his legendary book Cosmos, Carl Sagans opinion on the matter supported the idea of creating new worlds for mankind, yet he believed Mars . . . belongs to the Martians, even if they are microbes. We can safely guess some folks said something similar before Europeans discovered America and its peoples. This whole issue slips into environmental philosophy and the discussion around anthropocentrism, which may be stories for another article.

For now, NASA and other organizations claim that terraforming is not possible using present-day technology and that makes the creation of Earth-like environments impossible, so were a bit behind schedule when compared to the Alien canon. Needless to say, business magnates and new-age tech gurus like Elon Musk disagree, and are saying they can terraform Mars themselves right after the private space race takes them there. Lets just hope Tesla or Amazon dont end up becoming our universes version of Weyland-Yutani.

Visit link:
How does terraforming work in the Alien universe? - Space.com

Names have power.

Numerous studies have shown that names can impact a person's level of career success along with their likelihood of getting a job.There have also been cases where judges have had to legally intervene and prevent attempted name changes on the grounds of abuse, confusion, or simply being too bizarre.

Stackercombed through Social Security Administration data, examining births from 1920 to 2019 (most recent data), and the corresponding names given to newborns. All names are from Social Security card applications for births within the U.S., and the top 50 for each gender are ranked according to their popularity within the total births over the past 100 years.

Whether a child is named in honor of a grandparent, a fictional character, or just because a chosen moniker sounds pretty, that choice remains with that person for the rest of their life, short of an official name change. No matter how arbitrary, our given names resonate as significant components of our identities.

Keep reading to discover the most popular baby names in the last 100 yearsand if yours made the cut.

You may also like: Most popular baby names shared by famous musicians

- Babies born in the last century: 602,696- 2019 popularity rank: #676 (377 babies born)- Peak year: 1947

Perhaps the multitude of famous Jerrys, from Seinfeld to a certain mischievous mouse, have contributed to the popularity of this beloved name. Jerry has somewhat fallen from gracethere were more than 17,000 baby Jerrys in 1943 and just 488 in 2017.

- Babies born in the last century: 531,894- 2019 popularity rank: #537 (567 babies born)- Peak year: 1922

The popularity of the name Virginia may be linked to the state's crucial role in American history. When the English began colonizing North America in the late 16th century, Virginia covered more area than the state's modern boundaries and was named such in honor of The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth I of England.

- Babies born in the last century: 611,319- 2019 popularity rank: #552 (506 babies born)- Peak year: 1952

Modern-day Dennises have a long name lineage with varied cultural touchstones. The name's Greek origin is Dionysios, which refers to a follower of the god of wine and revelry, Dionysos. The name is also connected to St. Denis, a third-century martyrnot to mention the titular character from the classic TV series "Dennis the Menace" that ran from 1959 to 1963.

- Babies born in the last century: 541,277- 2019 popularity rank: #1,696 (122 babies born)- Peak year: 1954

The name Janet was originally inspired by a shorter version of the name Jane, which itself comes from the French for Jehanne.From early Hollywood starletsJanet Gaynor and Janet Leigh to singer-songwriter Janet Jackson, Janets have been making entertainment headlines for the last century.

- Babies born in the last century: 637,347- 2019 popularity rank: #19 (9,349 babies born)- Peak year: 1927

Historically and in folklore, Jack is often used to represent a charming, clever, if not slightly off-kilter characterthere's Jack Frost, Jack of Jack and Jill,Jack with his infamous beanstalk, and even Capt. Jack Sparrow. The name tends to represent the success of the common man, although of course has been lent to some darker figures like Jack the Ripper, as well.

You may also like: Baby names that gained the most popularity the year you were born

- Babies born in the last century: 542,250- 2019 popularity rank: #940 (279 babies born)- Peak year: 1947

The popularity of Carolyn steadily increased throughout the 1930s, rocketing from the #41 spot in girl baby names in 1933 to #10 in 1942. From there, however, its cache began to decrease once again. Carolyn was ranked as 841st in 2017. Well-known Carolyns include actor Carolyn McCormick ("Law and Order," "You Know my Name") and Carolyn Cassady, an American writer who was married to Neal Cassady and was a major character in Jack Kerouac's classic memoir "On the Road."

- Babies born in the last century: 663,725- 2019 popularity rank: #206 (1,870 babies born)- Peak year: 1964

Saint Patrick himself was vastly responsible for both the Christianization of Ireland and bringing the name Patrick into vogue. However, the name was not used much on the Emerald Isle before the 17th century, as it was seen as too sacred for everyday use.

- Babies born in the last century: 546,309- 2019 popularity rank: #191 (1,529 babies born)- Peak year: 1985

A name is truly part of the cultural zeitgeist when it's linked to a particular hairstyle, but the name Rachel far outdates Jennifer Aniston's lovely locks on Friends.Rachel was a biblical figure, appearing in Genesis as the wife of Jacob, and mother of Joseph and Benjamin.

You may also like:The best streaming services in 2021

- Babies born in the last century: 666,982- 2019 popularity rank: #11 (11,230 babies born)- Peak year: 1993

Early popularity of Alexander can almost certainly be traced back to Alexander the Great, the Macedonian ruler who established one of the largest empires of the ancient world. The name remains beloved and for several years throughout the 1990s, nearly 1% of male babies took the name Alexander. In 2019, the name did not crack the top 10 but was still a fairly common choice.

- Babies born in the last century: 548,279- 2019 popularity rank: #3,068 (52 babies born)- Peak year: 1955

Debra, a variant of the name Deborah, has strong Jewish origins. In Hebrew, devorahtranslates to bee,and Deborah is also the name of a Book of Judges figure in the Old Testament, who leads the Israelites to safety away from the Canaanites. Deborah was later adopted by the English.

You may also like: Most popular baby names from the Gilded Age

- Babies born in the last century: 679,913- 2019 popularity rank: #328 (1,011 babies born)- Peak year: 1924

Though there are still new Raymonds being born in the U.S., the name reached its height of popularity several decades ago. It was the 15th most popular baby name in 1918 and held a ranking close to that for several years. By 1949, Raymond was ranked #30 for boy's names and generally continued to fall from there.

- Babies born in the last century: 550,466- 2019 popularity rank: #243 (1,299 babies born)- Peak year: 1956

Catherine has lost popularity by a slim margin to a very similar-looking cousin: Katherine. However, Catherines everywhere can take solace in the fact that they have more than one legendary figure among their group; for example, Catherine of Aragon and Catherine the Great. While the latter Russian empress is often remembered for her romantic activity, she also organized the coup that brought her to power.

- Babies born in the last century: 706,987- 2019 popularity rank: #390 (798 babies born)- Peak year: 1962

Gregory stems back to Greek roots, with the name itself indicating watchfulness. The name has also belonged to many a pope, beginning with Gregory I, who was commonly known as Saint Gregory the Great and is considered afounding figure of the medieval papacy.

- Babies born in the last century: 563,333- 2019 popularity rank: #922 (285 babies born)- Peak year: 1952

It likely comes as no surprise that Christine comes from Christian origins. The name's meaning, with Latin roots, is commonly understood as follower of Christ. The popularity of this name was highest in 1952 but has fallen since.

- Babies born in the last century: 707,244- 2019 popularity rank: #403 (768 babies born)- Peak year: 1918

Frank most certainly falls into the category of simple, classic boys names that once experienced a boom but have taken a dive in popularity in recent years. However, there's a chance that Frank could come back in a slightly different form. In 2018,Todaynoted that avintage naming trend was on its way back: using boyish nicknames such as Frankie for girls.

You may also like: These baby names are going extinct

- Babies born in the last century: 563,391- 2019 popularity rank: #231 (1,335 babies born)- Peak year: 1920

Ruth has one of the earliest peak years of any name on this list, having reached its apex in 1920. The name has biblical roots, but the most notable modern-dayRuthis likely RuthBader Ginsburg, who was born in 1933 and served asassociate justice of the Supreme Court.

- Babies born in the last century: 710,086- 2019 popularity rank: #22 (9,237 babies born)- Peak year: 2001

Samuel, a name with extensive historical origins, has consistently ranked in the 21st century as one of the most-favored name choices for baby boys. Samuel is originally derived from the Hebrew name Shemuel. Important historical figures bearing this name include Samuel the Prophet, a revered figure in Judaism.

- Babies born in the last century: 570,150- 2019 popularity rank: #2 (17,102 babies born)- Peak year: 2003

Though the origin of the name Emma dates back earlier than the 18th century, the rise of its popularity may be connected to the 1709 Matthew prior poem called Henry and Emma.Of course, Jane Austen's Emma,published in 1815, probably didn't hurt either. The name hit its peak in 2003one year after Rachel and Ross named their daughter Emma on Friends.

- Babies born in the last century: 730,425- 2019 popularity rank: #7 (12,942 babies born)- Peak year: 1989

The name Benjamincomes from the Hebrew name Binyamin, which translates to son of the south. Benjamin hasmade a strong showing in recent years, increasing in popularity from the #22 most popular baby name in 2010.

- Babies born in the last century: 574,858- 2019 popularity rank: #121 (2,431 babies born)- Peak year: 1990

The name Katherine has Greek origins and translates to pure.Famous Katherines, both real and otherwise, include Katherine of Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew and actress Katherine Heigl.

You may also like: Baby boomer baby names that have gone out of style

- Babies born in the last century: 759,155- 2019 popularity rank: #140 (2,671 babies born)- Peak year: 1992

Throughout England, Brandon is the name of several small towns and parishes. There are Brandons located in Warwickshire, Suffolk, and elsewhere. The meaning, derived from the Old English brom and dun, translates closely to the hill where broom grows.

- Babies born in the last century: 576,029- 2019 popularity rank: #80 (3,351 babies born)- Peak year: 1990

In the decade leading up to Samantha's peak popularity year, Molly Ringwald played Samantha Sam Baker in the 1984 film Sixteen Candles andSamantha of immense American Girl Doll fame was initially released in 1986.From 2000 to 2019, Samantha fell from #7 to #80 on the list of most popular girl baby names in the U.S.

- Babies born in the last century: 769,663- 2019 popularity rank: #527 (536 babies born)- Peak year: 1971

The name Scott, unsurprisingly, has a centuries-long Scottish history. Early records of Scott as a last name date back to the 12th century in Roxburgh, Scotland. However, there is also evidence of the Old English word scottidenoting Gaels whose conquered land (in the fifth century and earlier)eventually became Scotland.

- Babies born in the last century: 588,265- 2019 popularity rank: #228 (1,355 babies born)- Peak year: 1985

Like neon spandex and big, permed hair, Nicole goes hand-in-hand with the 1980s. The name remained close to the top-10 most popular girl names from 1978 to 1988. During the absolute peak of Nicole mania, more than 1% of female babies born were given the name.

- Babies born in the last century: 777,285- 2019 popularity rank: #155 (2,516 babies born)- Peak year: 1988

Between 1971 and 1972, the name Justin saw a massive increase in popularity amongst baby boys, climbing from #103 to #60. Though the best year for Justin was 1988, in which it was the 17th most popular boys name, Justin was solidly in the top 100 boys names every single year from 1972 to 2014. Of course, two of the most prominent Justins today were born within this time frameJustin Bieber, in 1994, and Justin Timberlake, in 1981.

You may also like: Baby names that have faded into obscurity

- Babies born in the last century: 592,694- 2019 popularity rank: #1,496 (145 babies born)- Peak year: 1954

The U.S. Social Security website's records of Pamela stop in 2011, during which there were only 266 little Pams brought into the world. However, during the 1950s, Pamela was quite a popular name. One of the earliest usages of the name occurred in the 16th century, in Sir Philip Sidney's The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia.

- Babies born in the last century: 802,430- 2019 popularity rank: #757 (311 babies born)- Peak year: 1947

Larry was originally shorthand for Lawrence or Laurence. Larry reached its height of popularity in the 1940s, and was most popular in 1947the year comedian Larry David was born. Other famous Larrys include TV and radio host Larry King, born in 1933, and basketball player Larry Bird, born in 1956.

- Babies born in the last century: 606,286- 2019 popularity rank: #1,069 (235 babies born)- Peak year: 1957

Brenda saw sustained popularity throughout the mid-20th century. Though the exact origin of this name is up for speculation, some guess it may be linked to the Old Norse word brandr, meaning sword. Singer Brenda Lee first gained national fame as a childin 1956when she appeared onABCs Ozark Jubileetheyear before the name hit peak popularity.

- Babies born in the last century: 840,005- 2019 popularity rank: #311 (1,084 babies born)- Peak year: 1952

Like another pair on this list (Catherine and Katherine), Stephen and Steven are in a bit of a battle. Unfortunately for the pcontingent nationwide, it's the other spelling that has maintained a little more consistent popularity. But it's not all bad newsStephen was popular throughout the middle of the 20th century, and gets to claim quite a few famous namesakes.

- Babies born in the last century: 629,400- 2019 popularity rank: #63 (3,807 babies born)- Peak year: 1918

Anna has been one of the most consistently well-liked names of the past century. In 1900, Anna was the third most popular baby girl name in the country, and the lowest it ever dipped since then was to 106th place, in 1971.

You may also like: Stories behind the 50 most popular baby names for girls

- Babies born in the last century: 844,121- 2019 popularity rank: #64 (5,418 babies born)- Peak year: 1988

Jonathans have maintained their place in the top 100 most popular boys names every year from 1962 to 2019. Originally derived from a Hebrew name pronounced Yonatan,meaning Yahweh has given,Jonathan is recognizable from the Old Testament.

- Babies born in the last century: 652,923- 2019 popularity rank: #429 (737 babies born)- Peak year: 1918

While the name Helen peaked in American popularity a full century ago, there are quite a few famous or influential Helens to keep its legacy alive. Between mythological figure Helen of Troy, the incredible Helen Keller, and the iconic Helen Mirren, the name Helen will certainly remain on peoples' lips.

- Babies born in the last century: 877,492- 2019 popularity rank: #176 (2,187 babies born)- Peak year: 1970

Eric, derived from Old Norse origins, is said to mean eternal ruler. Eric is one of few names with the distinct honor of being linked to a Disney prince (although there are some who contend that Prince Eric was, well, not exactly the best.

- Babies born in the last century: 658,437- 2019 popularity rank: #256 (1,266 babies born)- Peak year: 1971

Angela from The Officeinfamously wore American Girl doll clothes made for large colonial dolls,but not all Angelas are quite so eccentric. The name Angela has a rich history, perhaps the most exciting part of which is the name's link to, you guessed it, angels.

- Babies born in the last century: 891,818- 2019 popularity rank: #78 (4,601 babies born)- Peak year: 1995

Nicholas is a 1990s mainstay through and through. The name remained in the top 10 for most popular baby names for boys throughout most of that decade and into the early 2000s, but has taken a fall since then. Nicholas is derived from nike, meaning victory.

You may also like: Most popular gender-neutral baby names

- Babies born in the last century: 668,154- 2019 popularity rank: #1,487 (146 babies born)- Peak year: 1935

Shirley Temple (the person, not the drink), can perhaps be thanked for this name's 1935 popularity peak, as some of her early hit films, like Curly Top,were released around this time.

- Babies born in the last century: 899,858- 2019 popularity rank: #773 (302 babies born)- Peak year: 1952

Though the name is not immensely common amongst babies today, it did see an impressive span of high popularity. Gary began to gain popularity in the early 1930s, and maintained a spot in the top 30 boy names from 1937 all the way to 1966.

- Babies born in the last century: 680,682- 2019 popularity rank: #203 (1,471 babies born)- Peak year: 1975

Amy wasn't just popular in the 1970s; it was a smash hit, cracking the top two most popular girl baby names four years in a row. Interestingly, the name seems to have caught on in the U.K. slightly later. Amy was the 23rd most popular girls name in England in 2007 while it only landed at #119 that same year in the U.S.

- Babies born in the last century: 925,412- 2019 popularity rank: #13 (10,679 babies born)- Peak year: 1998

Like many other names on this list, Jacob can be traced back to biblical roots. Jacob, the Hebrew patriarch, serves as the traditional ancestor for the people of Israel. According to Genesis, Jacob was incredibly cunning and quick-witted, and eventually fathered 13 children.

- Babies born in the last century: 689,366- 2019 popularity rank: #940 (279 babies born)- Peak year: 1951

Kathleen has a mighty impressive record. The name remained among the top 100 baby names for girls for seven decades, all the way from 1920 to 1990. Kathleen is of Irish origin, as an alteration on the name Caitlin.

You may also like: Most popular baby names in the 21st century

- Babies born in the last century: 937,629- 2019 popularity rank: #54 (6,087 babies born)- Peak year: 1985

Ryan is a newcomer in the name game. According to SSA data, there's no record of the name, or the amount was negligible in the U.S. prior to 1946. Ryan then made a giant leap in popularity from 1970 to 1971, moving from #139 to #51 on the list of most popular boys names. Ryan remained extremely popular for the next 30 years.

- Babies born in the last century: 705,685- 2019 popularity rank: #748 (373 babies born)- Peak year: 1957

Though some have contested that the name Cynthia has long lived in the shadow of its assumed nickname, Cindy, it has still found plenty of time to stand on its own. Cynthia was extremely popular through much of the 1950s and 1960s.

- Babies born in the last century: 975,104- 2019 popularity rank: #364 (876 babies born)- Peak year: 1962

See the original post:
Most popular baby names in the last 100 years - WWNY

A man whose career is all about explaining science will make a presentation about the importance of communicating science at Nanaimo Astronomy Societys first meeting of the fall.

Matthew S. Williams will present Why Science Communication Matters on Thursday, Sept. 23, when he will explore why a science communicators job of making science accessible to the general public has become ever more important in a time when misinformation and data fatigue are making it increasingly difficult to sift fact from fiction.

In addition to making scientific concepts more easily digestible, its also the science communicators responsibility to be a trusted source who can make important information more engaging, according to a press release from the society.

Williams lives on the Island and is a regular contributor to space and astronomy news site Universe Today and to Interesting Engineering and is director of media communication for Mars City Design. He is also author of The Formist Series of hard science fiction works The Cronian Incident, The Jovian Manifesto and The Frost Line Factor.

Williams is co-author of podcast series The Martian Dispatches, which will premire on Space Channel this fall. In 2022 he and co-author Paul Patton will release The Fermi Paradox, a book that explores the mysteries of why humanity has yet to make contact with alien life.

His articles have also appeared in Phys.org, HeroX, Popular Mechanics, Business Insider, Gizmodo, I09, ScienceAlert, Knowridge Science Report and Real Clear Science.

Williams, who presented to the Nanaimo Astronomy Society in 2016 about Mars colonization and in 2017 about exploring ocean worlds in the Solar System, will give his talk following Nanaimo Astronomy Societys annual general meeting.

The societys meeting, via Zoom, runs 7-9 p.m. Non-members are welcome to attend one NAS meeting for free. Non-members interested in Williamss presentation are asked to e-mail info@nanaimoastronomy.com.

For more information, visit http://www.nanaimoastronomy.com.

photos@nanaimobulletin.comLike us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Nanaimo News Bulletin

See the rest here:
Nanaimo Astronomy Society's first meeting of the fall focuses on science communication BC Local News - BCLocalNews

|

With a breadth of overwrought melodrama and an unfortunate and exhausting ending, X-Men: The Trial of Magneto #2 does nothing to honor its title or its underlying story, instead of driving all over the road like a drunken motorist at 3 AM. Cliches and pointless action scenes make this a big splashy mess.

Magneto is under suspicion for the murder of Wanda Maximoff in the closing acts of the equally overwrought Hellfire Gala, a huge party held to announce the colonization of Mars and exert mutant diplomatic muscle. Despite the title, there is no trial for the Master of Magnetism no motions, no representatives, no case. With some very reluctant help, Chuck Xavier is investigating the psyche of his oldest friends, looking for answers.

You might be thinking, "Seems like a trial is putting the cart before the horse, isn't it?" That's not an unfair guess to be discussing even the idea of a trial with an incomplete investigation, but let's skip ahead to the lies. Instead of coming through a gate, the Avengers have flown to Krakoa (instead of coming through a gate, as they did for the Hellfire Gala) to bring back Wanda's body. This was approved for some reason, despite gigantic efforts to keep the concept of mutant resurrection a secret. Where is Wanda's body? Oh, it's where they resurrect mutants, of course. Could the mutants have moved it? Maybe. Did they? Of course not; that would have cut out the overwrought, anxious cover-up scene where Iron Man steps back 30 years in his characterization into some lecherous, almost Pepe Le Pew caricature. Okay.

All of this is without getting to the just plain upsetting ending. This Leah Williams script is wildly problematic here, and while there was a great showing of craft by Lucas Werneck, Edgar Delgado, and Clayton Cowles, the pretty pictures can only do so much. This is not going well. RATING: NO. JUST NO.

X-Men: The Trial Of Magneto #2By Leah Williams, Lucas WerneckHABEAS CORPSES! Heroes of the Marvel Universe came to Krakoa for a memorial. Now they've got a fight. Magneto pushes Krakoa and the Council to the brink! Also there's something wrong with the body

X-Men: The Trial Of Magneto #2

Review by Hannibal Tabu

4/10

Mutants are out of order, Avengers are out of order, and no one seems to be bringing any of these tedious miniseries back in.

Editors

Akira Yoshida, Jake Thomas, Jordan D. White, Shannon Andrews Ballesteros, Lauren Amaro

Original post:
X-Men: The Trial Of Magneto #2 Review: A Big, Splashy Mess - Bleeding Cool News

Martian or moon dust can be used to make a kind of concrete with a protein from human blood and a component of urine, sweat or tears, which may even be malleable in a 3D printer. A British research group found this out and thus possibly showed how one of the necessary raw materials could be produced if the moon and Mars were to be colonized in the future. Such an alternative is necessary because the transport of earthly building materials is far too expensive, as they explain. It would cost more than 1.5 million euros to bring a single brick to Mars, they explain.

Like the group around materials scientist and chemist Aled Roberts from the University of Manchester now explained, they were able to make simulated lunar or Martian dust more pressure-resistant than ordinary concrete by combining it with human albumin. This protein is found in human blood. By adding urea, they could have increased the compressive strength significantly to values of almost 40 megapascals, substantially more than with ordinary concrete. In addition, they calculated that a crew of six people on Mars could use their blood, sweat and tears to produce 500 kilograms of this building material.

In the past, blood from animals was used in the manufacture of mortar, explains Roberts: It is exciting that one of the greatest challenges of the space age could be solved in a technology that was inspired by the Middle Ages. Since the transport costs to other celestial bodies are so immensely high, the question of the building material for dwellings there is one of the most important. So far, the search for answers has been limited to the material on site and overlooked one resource the crew themselves. If the bodys own substances actually help in the production of a concrete substitute, that could be another piece of the puzzle for the colonization of Mars. The research work is in the trade magazine Materials Today Bio appeared.

In the technical article, the team also listed possible alternatives to their concrete replacement. The great advantages of their material are the low energy consumption and the presence of additives in the crew itself. If they had to deliver, it could have negative consequences for their well-being, they admit. An alternative would be a protein made from animal blood, but Bringing cows to Mars is not feasible with current technology. It is said that material with a massively higher compressive strength could also be produced with completely different processes. But this also requires a lot or even a lot more energy. Composite materials with spider silk are conceivable, but not yet ready.

(mho)

Article Source

Disclaimer: This article is generated from the feed and not edited by our team.

Read the rest here:
Colonization of Mars: Concrete replacement developed from blood, sweat and tears - Market Research Telecast