Category Archives: Google

A year after introducing its entry-level wireless earbuds, the Pixel Buds A-series (review), Google has forayed into the premium segment in India with the Pixel Buds Pro. These are late arrivals, but good things come to those who wait. On offer is a long list of features, including active noise cancellation and wireless charging, complemented by snug fit, ease of use, and uniformity across Android devices that lift the user experience a notch above other wireless earbuds.

Contributing to the experience is the simple but practical design of the earbuds and charging case. Starting with earbuds, these are oval-shaped units with sloped circular heads on the top side (facing outward) and angled in-ear tips at the bottom on the backside. The earbuds look big, but they fit accurately in ears and do not look like mushrooms coming off ears. Moreover, the earbuds are light in weight and offer a snug and secure fit for comfortable experience even after extended use.

Like the earbuds, the charging-cum-storage case has a simple but functional design. It is a pebble shaped-unit made of plastic with matte texture, which is good for grip and thus aids handling. On the front, the case has an LED that blinks when the buds are in a pairing mode or the case is open. The LED light turns orange if the case is running low on battery. It doubles up as a charging indicator and shows white colour when the case and earbuds are fully charged. Speaking of charging, the case has a USB-C port at the bottom for wired charging. The Pixel Buds Pro supports wireless charging, which takes significantly longer time (about four hours) to charge the case and buds compared to wired charging (about ninety minutes). Nevertheless, it is a meaningful addition to the mix, especially for those who use smartphones with reverse wireless charging feature.

ALSO READ: Google Pixel 6a review: Smooth experience makes up for tiny imperfections

The design is good, but it is the audio performance and ease of use that the Google Pixel Buds Pro has going for it. Starting with audio performance, the earbuds default sound signature is balanced with deep bass, clear vocals, and fine treble. Importantly, the audio signature does not change with active noise cancellation enabled or disabled. Speaking of ANC, it is good but not the best. Complementing the earbuds, however, is the transparency mode--the ambient noise does not get unnecessarily amplified or filtered. Instead, it sounds clear and natural, thus, delivering a novel experience.

The Pixel Buds Pro are good for listening to music, and so for attending voice calls. With ANC, the voice call experience is top-notch even in noisy ambient environments. Irrespective of the ambient noise conditions, the microphones pick voice with clarity and on no occasion struggle to deliver quality experience.

Coming to ease of use, it is enabled by Google Assistant. Just say Ok, Google and the earbuds are ready to take voice command. The earbuds even read back notifications. This is something that makes life easy, especially if you are part of the Google product ecosystem. Besides Google Assistant, it is the intuitive touch and gesture controls on the earbuds that add to the convenience. Tap your earbud once to play/pause audio or to answer calls, twice to move to the next audio track or to reject call, or thrice to go back to the previous audio track. Along with tap, there is tap and hold touch control which is customisable toggle ANC or talk to assistant. Besides these, there are gesture controls for volume swipe forward and backward to raise and lower the volume, respectively.

Rounding up the package is a modest on-battery time of about five hours with ANC enabled and nine hours with ANC disabled. Not exceptional, but it is on par with the best ANC wireless earbuds in its segment.

Verdict

Priced at Rs 19,990, the Google Pixel Buds Pro is a well-rounded package with most of the features one expects in a premium active noise cancelling wireless earbuds. However, the earbuds get nothing novel from Google to innovate the segment. Moreover, their arrival seems late with competition from established brands such as Samsung, Sony, OnePlus, OPPO, et al, already pushing the boundaries beyond fundamentals with features like adaptive ANC, customisable sound profiles, and Dolby Atmos. What works for the Google Pixel Buds Pro, however, is the smooth experience and ease of use. Besides, these are among the few wireless earbuds that deliver uniform experience across Android devices. Smooth experience and ease of use are two factors to consider the Pixel Buds Pro. Otherwise, the segment has better propositions on offer for the price.

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Excerpt from:

Google Pixel Buds Pro review: Late, but good things come to those who wait - Business Standard

We have seen drastic changes in the media industry over the last two decades. Between 2008 and 2021, more than 450 news outlets closed across Canada and at least one-third of journalism jobs disappeared.

The digital platform giants notably Google and Facebook are very much part of this media ecosystem, but are they positive contributors?

By reproducing or linking to articles they dont create, but earn ad revenue from they claimed 80 per cent of online ad revenues, or almost $10 billion, in 2020 these big tech companies seem to deprive news publishers their rightful due. So should publishers be compensated for the use of their content?

Many countries have debated this question; few have acted. In 2019, the European Union instituted a so-called link tax essentially a licensing fee that search engines and news aggregators have to pay publishers for using their content. In 2021, Australia brought in a law that compels Google and Facebook to negotiate deals with the countrys news publishers.

Now, Canada is weighing in. In April, the federal government tabled legislation that channels Australias approach. Bill C-18, the Online News Act, is a sharp-elbowed nudge to get the dominant digital platforms to negotiate mutually-acceptable agreements with Canadas online newspapers, magazines and TV and radio broadcasters.

If they cannot come to terms, the parties would have to enter a binding arbitration overseen by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), the arms-length regulator. If enacted, would Bill C-18 contribute to the sustainability of the news market, as the government promises?

Read more: A paltry number of Canadians are paying for online news

Its true that news outlets have struggled to make money ever since the internet upended their gravy train classified ads and print subscriptions. But its also true that search engines and aggregators have expanded the online news market. They direct substantial traffic to the publishers websites, particularly traffic from casual readers that otherwise would not take place.

There is no evidence that shows news outlets are worse off because of Google, Facebook and other aggregators. If anything, evidence (and lots of it) shows that, overall, news outlets would be in worse shape without these digital platforms.

Thats what I found in a study I undertook with economist Joan Calzada of the link tax imposed by Spain (before the EU-wide directive was instituted in 2019).

In 2014, Spain began forcing aggregators such as Google News to pay a link fee to original publishers. Google responded by shutting down its Spanish edition. We found that after the shutdown, Spanish news outlets experienced a reduction in the number of daily visits of between eight and 14 per cent.

To add insult to injury, advertisers stopped placing ads on their sites, causing a collapse in ad revenues. Particularly hard hit were smaller news publishers lower-ranked sites with a larger share of casual readers.

During the same period, Germany instituted a link fee as well. In this case, Google News required German publishers to waive the linking fee. A study from the University of Munich found that publishers deciding to opt out from Google indexing faced disastrous consequences: daily visits to their sites significantly dropped and traffic was diverted to competing sites that opted into indexing.

These and other studies show news publishers benefit from the Googles of the world. So would Bill C-18, as it currently stands, really change anything for the better?

The current debate is based on a false premise, that news outlets are not already being compensated, instead of focusing on the rightful split of joint revenues between the platform and the content creator.

If Bill C-18 passes, we can expect big publishers to receive most of the funds thats what happened in Europe and Australia. Smaller media outlets with low brand awareness will suffer unless they band together and bargain collectively with the digital giants.

We can expect Google, Facebook and their ilk to adjust their market behaviour. What would stop them, for example, from tweaking their algorithms to benefit news publishers offering the most favourable arrangements?

Recent evidence shows Google Australia started recommending less expensive content after the law was passed in Australia.

Alternative policy responses must be considered. In the past, when Google faced similar legal trouble, France and Belgium set up lump sum funds that were shared by news publishers based on a predetermined formula. Such an approach ensures a fair distribution of funds across content creators and doesnt distort market behaviour of the platforms involved.

Bill C-18 is just one of three pieces of legislation now being considered by the House of Commons. There is also a proposed bill that addresses hate speech and other online abuses and another that brings online streaming services under the Broadcasting Act.

Its clear Canadians approve; polling shows a majority support greater government regulation on the internet. While its good to be on the right side of public opinion, its better to be on the right side of policy.

See the original post here:

Why Ottawas efforts to get Google and Facebook to pay for news content misses the mark - The Conversation

The Pixel 6A may have only been released last Thursday, but Google is wasting no time in bringing the latest beta version of Android 13 to its new midrange device. 9to5Google reports that Android 13s latest beta, version 4.1, is now available for the Pixel 6A. The software was first released last Monday, when it was initially available for the Pixel 4 through 6 Pro.

Android 13 is shaping up to be a relatively minor update for Googles mobile operating system. It builds on some of the design changes seen in last years Android 12 update with expanded support for theming app icons, and also adds support for the new Bluetooth LE Audio standard, as well as new privacy features.

You shouldnt have long to wait for Android 13 to be officially released if you dont want to get your hands dirty with beta software. Google said its fourth public beta, released last month, would be its final major beta and that Android 13 was just a few weeks away. Subsequent details reported by 9to5Google suggest we could see the update arrive in September. For context, Android 12 released last October, while Android 11 released in September 2020.

If you dont mind running beta software and want to give Android 13 a try a little early, head over to Googles developer site for instructions on how to install it.

See original here:

Android 13s beta can now be installed on the Pixel 6A - The Verge

Until recently, one of the most convenient ways to set a timer was to simply search for one on Google. Punch in a query like 10 minute timer, and, hey presto, youd get a ten-minute timer. But last month, reports started to emerge that this feature had disappeared from Google without warning. Search Engine Roundtable was among the first to cover the missing timer on July 20th, citing tweets from around July 18th. The feature is still missing today.

It turns out that Google hasnt decided to remove the handy feature without warning. In a tweet, the companys public search liaison Danny Sullivan confirmed that the feature is temporarily unavailable because of an unspecified problem. We have an issue that weve been looking [into], Sullivan tweeted in response to this story, we expect to have it back fairly soon.

Although there is no shortage of timers elsewhere on the web (or provided as stock apps on iOS and Android) Googles built-in version is a simple, accessible alternative. And, as well as the timer, there was also a stopwatch feature built into the same widget for when you need to count up rather than down. The feature dates back almost a decade, having been introduced in 2013.

Googles Danny Sullivan first said hed look into the issue on July 21st. Almost a week later, on July 27th, the team was still checking on it. It seems whatever issue is causing the features absence is proving tricky to squash.

Initially, concerns were raised that Google had removed the feature intentionally, although that would have been a strange move given the company has spent much of the last decade building more features natively into its search results page, rather than removing them. What started out as a simple list of hyperlinks now includes everything from rich snippets that attempt to answer your search query directly to a dedicated box for news stories and even more specific features, like a built-in price comparison tool for airplane flights. None of these appear to be going anywhere.

And, in case youre wondering, Google Searchs built-in metronome is still alive and ticking thank goodness.

Update August 1st, 12:15PM ET: Updated throughout to reflect response from Googles Danny Sullivan about the features return.

Correction: August 1st, 9:33AM ET: This article originally erroneously referred to the site Search Engine Roundtable as SEO Roundtable. We regret the error.

Link:

Google Search's built-in timer has disappeared but it should be returning soon - The Verge

Google is trying to cut down on annoying, unskippable ads in Android apps and overall bad behavior in the Play Store (via TechCrunch). The company announced wide-ranging policy changes on Wednesday that update rules across several categories to be more specific, clamping down on loopholes developers may have used to skirt existing rules.

One of the changes that will impact your everyday phone usage the most is for ads. Google says its updated guidelines, which will go into effect on September 30th, help ensure high quality experiences for users when they are using Google Play apps. The new policy tells developers that apps cant pop up a full-screen ad that wont let you close it after 15 seconds. There are some exceptions if you voluntarily choose to watch an ad to get some sort of reward points, or if they pop up during a break in the action, those rules wont necessarily apply.

Googles current policy says ads must be easily dismissible without penalty and that you have to be able to close out of full-screen ads, but the 15-second benchmark is new. While thats still a bit of a wait, it does make it so that you wont have to sit through a two-minute long ad where the (tiny, hard to see) x only appears after 70 seconds, right in the middle of a game or while trying to do something else.

The new rules also specify that ads shouldnt be unexpected, popping up right after you load a level or article. Again, the current rules already say that surprise disruptive ads arent allowed, but the new rules give additional concrete examples of violations.

Its worth noting that the ad policies for apps made for children are stricter. While Googles not changing a ton about what types of ads developers can show to kids, it will be making some changes to the tools that developers use to deliver those ads, starting in November.

Googles also making changes to how apps can implement and use Androids built-in VPN (or virtual private network) tools. Apps wont be allowed to implement their own VPNs to collect user data unless they get explicit permission from the user, nor will they be able to use VPNs to help users bypass or change ads from other apps. Mishaal Rahman, a technical editor for Esper, pointed out on Twitter that this could help clamp down on ad fraud where users pretend to be clicking on ads from one country while actually being in another but says that it could also affect things like DuckDuckGos privacy-focused app tracking protection.

Googles new rules include several other changes as well. For example, developers will be required to link to an easy-to-use, online method for canceling subscriptions in their app if their app sells subscriptions the company does say that linking to Google Plays subscription center counts. Googles also cracking down on health misinformation, adding a section that says apps cant contain misleading information about vaccines, unapproved treatments, or other harmful health practices, such as conversion therapy.

The update also makes some changes to the language around monitoring apps, or stalkerware, saying that any app made to track people has to use a specific flag telling Google what its doing and that apps have to say that they can monitor or track you in their Play Store description. (These sorts of apps are still only allowed to track employees and children Google explicitly says using these apps for tracking someone else, like a spouse, is banned, even if the user claims the person being tracked is aware of it.)

Theres one slightly humorous tidbit in the updated Impersonation section in addition to other companies, developers, and organizations, Googles new rules say that developers cant try and trick people into thinking that their app is associated with an entity if its not. As an example of what this means, Google shows an app with iconography that could trick users into thinking its associated with a government or cryptocurrency project. (Theres also a funny line about how you cant name your app Justin Bieber Official unless youre actually Justin Bieber or have his permission, but it was already in the existing guidelines.)

This example appears to be perfect timing on Googles part. While the policy wont go into effect until the end of August, the company announced it just a day before Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) sent it a letter asking for more information on scammy crypto apps on the Play Store.

See more here:

Google's new Play Store rules target annoying ads and copycat crypto apps - The Verge

This seems to be a significant, yet largely buried element within GooglesTAG Bulletin reports, which provide an overview of all of the coordinated influence operations that its team has detected and shut down over time.

As we reported back in May, at the time of Googles Q1 TAG Bulletin, Google removed more 31,000 YouTube channels linked to Chinese-based influence operations between July last year and March 2022, a huge amount, which far outweighed any other element.

And today, Google has shared its Q2 Tag Bulletin, which, along with its various efforts to combat Russian-backed misinformation efforts about the invasion of Ukraine, also details that it shut down another 7,169 YouTube channels linked back to China in the last three months.

For comparison, Google removed 231 YouTube channels, in total, in connection to the Ukraine conflict.

As explained by Google:

These channels mostly uploaded spammy content in Chinese about music, entertainment, and lifestyle. A very small subset uploaded content in Chinese and English about China and U.S. foreign affairs.

Which is the explanation Google has provided for all of these removals, a templated, and somewhat vague summary of whats going on with these channels.

So what is going on, exactly?

Theres not a lot of detail provided, but it seems that the main purpose of these channels is to first build an audience in the app by posting engaging, light content, which grabs viewer attention. The channels then eventually use that reach to sprinkle in some pro-China sentiment, in order to seed such among broader audiences.

That then enables the CCP, and/or related groups, to potentially sway public opinion through subtle means, by gently nudging these viewers towards a more positive view of Chinas activities.

And the scale of the operation is significant in total, over the past year, Google has now detected and removed more than 50,000 YouTube channels (not individual videos, mind you, channels) connected to this effort.

Thats a lot, and if you look at the data, the program seems to have ramped up significantly this year, which likely suggests that whoever is behind it sees YouTube as a powerful vector for influence.

The data further underlines the importance of social platforms taking proactive, definitive steps to stop such programs before they can gain traction, while also pointing to how state-based actors are looking to utilize the scale of social networks to influence global opinion.

Which is also a concern linked to the rise of TikTok, with many security experts warning of the potential dangers of the Chinese-owned app gathering information and/or enabling pro-China narratives to proliferate.

Indeed, TikTok has come under scrutiny on several occasions over its perceived efforts to suppress anti-China content, and with recent analysis also showing that the app is becoming a key news and information resource for younger users, that may well become a bigger issue over time.

Add to this the fact that the Chinese Government continues to clash with other world leaders, on various fronts, and theres clearly reason for some concern there.

And with pro-China groups also looking to infiltrate YouTube at this scale, there does appear to be some important trends emerging within the broader flow of news and information online.

Weve asked Google for more information on exactly whats going on with these YouTube removals, and well add to this story if/when we hear back.

UPDATE: Google has referred us to this Twitter thread, on a China-linked group named DragonBridge, for more context on the removals.

Visit link:

Google's Removed Over 50k YouTube Channels Linked to Influence Operations Originating from China - Social Media Today

Googles search engine business is demonstrating resilience in the face of a slowing economy and rising inflation, but its other businesses have not been able to escape a downturn in online advertising.

Googles parent company, Alphabet, reported on Tuesday a net profit of $16 billion in the second quarter, down 14 percent from a year earlier, while revenue climbed 13 percent to $69.7 billion. The earnings were below analysts estimates of $17.5 billion in profit on $69.9 billion in revenue, according to data compiled by FactSet.

Lifted by retail and travel advertisers, the companys search ad sales grew more than 13 percent to $40.7 billion, above analysts expectation of $40.2 billion. Ad sales for Googles search engine a crucial gateway to the internet proved less vulnerable to economic conditions than YouTube, which Google owns, and the companys network division that places digital ads on various sites across the internet.

Tuesdays earnings report provides more evidence that Google search ad revenue is reasonably recession-resistant, Mark Mahaney, an analyst at Evercore ISI, said in an interview.

Even with the financial cushion of its popular products, Google must contend with a raft of uncertainties that have roiled global markets in recent months. These include slowing economic growth and rising inflation in the United States and other major economies, which influence advertising budgets and consumer behavior both crucial to Googles business. The company must also navigate effects from a persistent pandemic and Russias invasion of Ukraine.

Alphabet, known for its rapid personnel expansions, has exercised caution in response to the macroeconomic environment, saying it will slow hiring for the rest of the year and put a priority on the roles it needs.

Shares of Alphabet rose 5 percent in after-hours trading.

Ruth Porat, Alphabets chief financial officer, had warned that Alphabets growth may appear more modest because of unfavorable comparisons in the second quarter. In the previous spring, financial results were indicative of a recovery since the early days of the pandemic, when advertisers were spooked. The most recent quarter also reflected the companys decision to halt business in Russia because of the war. In 2021, Russia contributed 1 percent to Googles total revenue.

Ad revenue for YouTube, the most popular destination for online videos, grew 5 percent in the three months that ended on June 30, to $7.3 billion. This was a decline from 14 percent growth in the first quarter. Besides weaker spending from advertisers, Ms. Porat said, YouTubes results appeared more meager because of difficult comparisons from a year earlier.

The pullback in spending on YouTube and Googles advertising network by some advertisers in the second quarter reflects uncertainty about a number of factors, Ms. Porat said on a call with financial analysts.

The companys profit was dented by rising costs and losses on some investments. Ms. Porat said Google had spent more on data centers and hiring in the second quarter. The company also recorded a $790 million loss from debt investments, and a $251 million loss from stock holdings.

Alphabet said it now had 174,014 employees, an increase of more than 10,000 from the figure it reported in April. Like many of its peers, the company has since said it will slow hiring.

Googles cloud computing unit posted a 36 percent increase in revenue, though it lost $858 million in the second quarter. A year earlier, the division posted a loss of $591 million. The unit still lags behind rival services from Amazon and Microsoft.

View original post here:

Alphabets Profit Dropped 14 Percent in the Second Quarter - The New York Times

Weve been tracking the progress of Googles interface refresh for Gmail since February, and as promised, the company says its now becoming available for all Gmail users. The rework pulls Meet, Chat, and Spaces closer together as part of the overall experience and includes elements from Googles Material Design 3.

Its not stopping there and says that, later this year, we should see improvements to Gmail for tablet users, better emoji support, and more accessibility features, among other upgrades.

If you use Gmail for work, it may have already rolled out to your account. For those who just cant stand the change, you can opt out and switch back to the old look, at least for now. If you dont have Chat enabled, youll still get the new look, but in a Gmail-only view by default, and if you dont use some or any of those apps, you can disable or enable them from the Quick Settings menu.

If you want to switch back, Googles instructions are pretty easy to follow:

The updated UI moves Mail, Meet, Spaces, and Chat buttons into one list at the top of the left rail instead of showing several conversations from each one in a list. Theyre still easily accessible without having everything on the screen at once, and you can quickly jump into a conversation in any one section, as a list will pop out when you hover over its icon.

The changes are a part of Googles overall new approach to the Workspace suite (including Docs, Sheets, etc.) thats supposed to provide a more unified style and new AI-powered features like the Gmail search improvements that were just announced.

Original post:

Google is switching your Gmail interface to this new look - The Verge

When most people think of TikTok and Instagram they picture selfies, dance videos, and the occasional "TikTok Challenge".

Generation Z sees these two social networks all-together differently. They're using them for shopping and searching.

According to a report in TechCrunch, 40% of Gen Z'ers say TikTok and Instagram are the apps they primarily use for searching.

This is kind of a shock because Google doesn't often lose out to other companies. According to many Generation Z'ers, Google is sort of 'old school. 'Rather than "googling" something, they find it easier to just search within the app they are using.

The surprising findingcomes from Google itself, showing that when Gen Z is looking for a place to eat or something to do, they hop on TikTok or Instagram to see what other users recommend. And those social networks are coming after an even larger percentage of online searchers.

Instagram added a map function this week to its 'explore' tab. If someone searches for "restaurants in Baltimore," or "food trucks in Austin," images appear on a map posted by other users. There are also reviews, phone numbers, business hours, and everything someone needs to know before deciding where to eat, sleep or have fun.

When I searched "hotels in San Francisco" on Instagram, I found millions of relevant results. I could see what users posted and where they posted from. You can zoom in on the map for even more recent posts.

Search is similar on TikTok. When I searched for "things to do in Denver with kids," I found not only recent videos and recommendations, but questions and answers from other TikTok'ers.

Many of the results are from influencers and paid posts so reviews aren't always trustworthy. While many of us may still Google things we're looking for, it's clear young people are using TikTok and Instagram for everything.

TikTok is already threatening YouTube, with some predicting TikTok's advertising revenue will surpass YouTube in less than 2 years something no one could foresee just a couple of years ago.

See more here:

What The Tech: Are Instagram and Tiktok the new Google? - WPSD Local 6

Figures from Canalys (see chart) show that both Google and Azure are growing faster than the industry average, while AWS is tracking the global industrys growth rate of 33%.

The total global market for cloud services in the second quarter of 2022 was US$62.3 billion, says Canalys in its report.

The market is driven by a range of factors, including demand for data analytics and machine learning, data centre consolidation, application migration, cloud-native development and service delivery, says Canalys.

The growing use of industry-specific cloud applications also contributed to the broader horizontal use cases seen across IT transformation. In a global economy rife with inflation, rising interest rates and recession, demand for cloud services remains strong.

In terms of market share, AWS accounted for 31% of total cloud infrastructure services spend in the second quarter of 2022, making it the leading cloud service provider.

Azure was the second largest cloud service provider, with a 24% market share. Google Cloud accounted for a market share of only 8%.

The hyperscale battle between leader AWS and challenger Microsoft Azure continues to intensify, with Azure closing the gap on its rival, says Canalys.

Fuelling this growth, Microsoft pointed to a record number of larger multi-year deals in both the $100 million-plus and $1 billion-plus segments.

The analyst said that a diverse go-to-market ecosystem, combined with a broad portfolio and wide range of software partnerships is enabling Microsoft to stay hot on the heels of AWS.

Canalys VP Alex Smith commented: Cloud remains the strong growth segment in tech. While opportunities abound for providers large and small, the interesting battle remains right at the top between AWS and Microsoft. The race to invest in infrastructure to keep pace with demand will be intense and test the nerves of the companies CFOs as both inflation and rising interest rates create cost headwinds.

Both AWS and Microsoft are continuing to roll out infrastructure, said the Canalys report. AWS has plans to launch 24 availability zones across eight regions, while Microsoft plans to launch 10 new regions over the next year. In both cases, the providers are increasing investment outside of the US as they look to capture global demand and ensure they can provide low-latency and high data sovereignty solutions.

Smith said: Microsoft announced it would extend the depreciable useful life of its server and network equipment from four to six years, citing efficiency improvements in how it is using technology. This will improve operating income and suggests that Microsoft will sweat its assets more, which helps investment cycles as the scale of its infrastructure continues to soar.

Canalys said that, beyond the capacity investments, software capabilities and partnerships will be vital to meet customers cloud demands, especially when considering the compute needs of highly specialized services across different verticals.

Most companies have gone beyond the initial step of moving a portion of their workloads to the cloud and are looking at migrating key services, said Canalys research analyst Yi Zhang. The top cloud vendors are accelerating their partnerships with a variety of software companies to demonstrate a differentiated value proposition. Recently, Microsoft pointed to expanded services to migrate more Oracle workloads to Azure, which in turn are connected to databases running in Oracle Cloud.

See the original post:

Google Cloud growing 45% a year, with Azure at 40%, says Canalys - Capacity Media