Category Archives: Democrat

One of the two Democrats vying to represent north Portland in the Oregon House dropped out of the race earlier this week.

Still, Eric Delehoy will still appear on the May ballot and in the government-issued Voters Pamphlet because he didnt end his campaign before the states deadlines to withdraw from consideration.

Delehoy, a college counselor, sought to be appointed to the House seat formerly held by Tina Kotek, the former speaker now running for governor. Travis Nelson, a registered nurse who now works full time as a union representative with the Oregon Nurses Association, won the appointment and is running for election with the full backing of FuturePAC, the political action committee for House Democrats.

No Republicans are running for the seat. Candidates from minor parties have later filing deadlines.

Delehoy told supporters Monday evening that he realized over the weekend that he couldnt compete with Nelsons structural advantages.

We knew this would be a difficult race when we entered, yet we took that challenge because we believed strongly that people in our district are suffering and that they deserve more than they are currently getting, Delehoy wrote on Facebook.

Its unusual, though not unheard of, for candidates to drop out but remain on the ballot. Oregons late presidential primaries meant Democrats in 2020 and Republicans in 2016 cast ballots for candidates who dropped out before Oregonians had a chance to vote. In 2018, a state House candidate from Bend who ended her campaign in September still received more than 15% of the vote in November.

Delehoys campaign manager, Henry Pratt, said in an email that Delehoy tried to remove himself from the Voters Pamphlet and ballot but was unable to because deadlines passed. Candidates had until March 10 to finalize their Voters Pamphlet statements and March 11 to withdraw.

The campaign has about $40,000 left in its bank account, and Delehoy will pay campaign staff through the May primary.

He plans to write a memoir about his campaign experience.

Here is the original post:

Portland Democrat drops out of House race, still will appear on ballot Oregon Capital Chronicle - Oregon Capital Chronicle

Democrats efforts to combat inflation are stuck in limbo because of internal divisions over a range of proposals aimed at lowering the cost of gas, health care and child care.

The latest idea that some Democrats are rallying around is a proposed tax on the windfall profits of major oil companies that would raise an estimated $45 billion to be returned to consumers in the form of energy rebates.

Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerA movement is underway to ban lawmakers from trading stocks in office Biden signs .5 trillion government funding bill with Ukraine aid Bottom line MORE (D-N.Y.) highlighted oil companies profits on the Senate floor Thursday and announced that oil and gas company executives will be called to testify about why they are buying back stocks instead of keeping prices lower for average Americans.

It is nothing short of repugnant for oil companies to be touting what are truly dizzying profit margins, while soaking American families with these exorbitant prices, Schumer said.

But Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe ManchinJoe ManchinEnergy & Environment Ruling blocking climate accounting metric halted GOP pushes to add Russian oil ban into trade bill The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - What now after Zelensky's speech? MORE (W.Va.), the biggest swing vote in the Democratic caucus, isnt yet sold on the idea, and Republicans say they think theres little chance hed vote "yes."

Manchin told The Hill Thursday that he wants to have a hearing on the idea to find out the facts.

Other key Democrats, such as Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Tom CarperThomas (Tom) Richard CarperLobbying world Democrats divided over proposal to suspend federal gas tax Graham signals he's a likely 'no' on Biden SCOTUS pick MORE (Del.) and Senate Commerce Committee Chairwoman Maria CantwellMaria Elaine CantwellTech advocates criticize FCC nomination delays Democrats hit limits with Lujn's absence Hillicon Valley Presented by Cisco Media industry divided over Big Tech bill MORE (Wash.), havent taken a position on the proposal either.

Even if the measure, which is sponsored by Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseGas prices lead to tensions within Democratic Party Senate unanimously approves making daylight saving time permanent Carole King to discuss forest fires before Oversight subcommittee MORE (D-R.I.), got the support of all 50 members of the Democratic caucus, it has no chance of getting 10 Republicans to overcome a filibuster, and theres been no serious talk of putting it in a budget reconciliation package to circumvent GOP opposition.

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiSenate panel advances Biden Fed nominees to confirmation votes Biden signs reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - All eyes on Zelensky today MORE (Alaska), the ranking Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, predicted not a single Republican would vote for the move and questioned whether even Manchin would back it.

I cant see any Republican supporting it. I dont see that it gets any traction and for lots of good reasons. If you want to send a positive signal to producers that they might want to be doing more, the worst thing you can do is threaten them with a windfall tax, she said.

Manchin told The Hill that hes more interested in spurring oil producers to bring more product to market.

I just want people to produce the products we need to get us through this crisis, he said.

Another proposal to soften the impact of rising gas prices suspending the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax until next January has also divided Democratic senators.

The idea is spearheaded by two vulnerable Democrats facing tough reelection races, Sens. Mark KellyMark KellyMark Kelly says White House should characterize Putin as a war criminal Senate votes to nix mask mandate for public transportation Bipartisan group of senators press Mayorkas on US readiness for Russian cyberthreat MORE (Ariz.) and Maggie HassanMargaret (Maggie) HassanSenate votes to nix mask mandate for public transportation Democrats divided over proposal to suspend federal gas tax Equilibrium/Sustainability Biden presses ahead, bans energy imports MORE (N.H.), but its getting pushback from colleagues who are worried about cutting off a key source of revenue for the Highway Trust Fund.

We have for as long as I can remember ... embraced the principle that those who use roads, highways and bridges have an opportunity to help pay for them. We are not even coming close to paying for the roads, highways and bridges that we need, Carper told The Hill last week.

Other members of the Democratic caucus such as Sen. Angus KingAngus KingBipartisan group of senators press Mayorkas on US readiness for Russian cyberthreat Democrats divided over proposal to suspend federal gas tax Live coverage - Zelensky thinks Russia will talk; 6,000 Russian troops dead MORE (I-Maine) havent taken a position yet on the gas tax holiday but wonder aloud how to replace lost revenue to fund highways and bridges after Congress passed a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package last year.

Democrats also remain divided over the core elements of President BidenJoe BidenRepublican senators introduce bill to ban Russian uranium imports Energy & Environment Ruling blocking climate accounting metric halted Fauci says officials need more than .5B for COVID-19 response MOREs Build Back Better agenda, which the White House argues would help fight inflation by lowering families costs.

Biden told lawmakers during his first State of the Union address: I have a better plan to fight inflation. Lower your costs, not your wages.

The president called on Congress to make permanent the subsidies for health care premiums Congress enacted last year through the American Rescue Plan and enact proposals to fight climate change that he said would cut energy costs for families by an average of $500 a year.

He also called for federal subsidies to cut the cost of child care and access to pre-kindergarten for every 3- and 4-year-old.

All of these will lower costs, Biden declared.

But Manchin walked away from the speech unconvinced.

Ive never found out that you can lower costs by spending more, he said.

The following day, Manchin sketched out a proposal to build a package around tax reform, prescription drug reform and a group of measures to combat climate change. He left out expanded child care, home health care for seniors and the disabled, the child tax credit and other social spending initiatives.

Manchin also proposed setting aside half the revenue raised from tax reform and prescription drug reform to reduce the deficit and fight inflation.

More liberal Democrats would be happy to spend that money to fight inflation if it means spending it on programs to reduce families costs, but theres not much appetite for paying down the debt when they have a list of higher social spending priorities.

Senate Democrats acknowledge their internal divisions over how to combat inflation, but they argue that at least theyre putting forward ideas and criticize Republicans for just complaining about rising prices from the sidelines.

While many on the other side of the aisle have spent a lot of time giving floor speeches and presenting floor charts about rising costs, where are their actual proposals? We dont hear what they do to solve the problems, Schumer said last month.

Republicans should step up and say what their plan is to fight inflation, not just pointing fingers, he added.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP talking point could turn to Biden's 'underwhelming' Russia response The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - What now after Zelensky's speech? Capito to make Senate GOP leadership bid MORE (R-Ky.) has told colleagues he wont release a legislative agenda before the midterm elections outlining what Republicans would do if they won back control of the Senate.

Republicans have since responded by calling for more access to oil and gas drilling on public lands, reauthorizing the Keystone XL pipeline and other proposals to spur domestic energy production and reduce fuel costs.

Were producing 1.4 million barrels [of oil] less a day than we were right before the pandemic, Sen. John BarrassoJohn Anthony BarrassoRepublican senators introduce bill to ban Russian uranium imports Capito to make Senate GOP leadership bid Manchin delays vote on Interior nominee, citing energy crisis MORE (R-Wyo.) told reporters Tuesday.

One inflation-fighting idea that Democrats are completely unified behind is the proposal negotiated last year to reduce the cost of many prescription drugs. The deal would cap out-of-pocket drug expenses for seniors at $2,000 and set a cap on the price of insulin at $35 a month.

It would also give the government limited authority under Medicare to negotiate lower prices for the 10 most expensive drugs.

Democrats, however, havent decided whether they will stick with that deal or try to craft something more expansive to give the federal government more power to drive down drug costs.

Manchin this month proposed modeling Medicare and Medicaid prescription drug programs on the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The organization that does the best job is the VA, the veterans administration gets some of the lowest prices. Maybe we should look at them, he told reporters after Bidens speech.

The prescription drug proposal remains stalled as Democrats debate whether it should be broadened and the strategy for passing it.

At last weeks Senate Democratic retreat, members discussed moving the proposal under regular order in an attempt to secure 10 Republican votes to get past a filibuster.

The other option would be to move it under the special budget reconciliation rules, which allow the majority party to pass major legislation with 51 votes. But the problem with this path is theres no consensus among Democrats about what else to include in the reconciliation package.

Progressives such as Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairwoman Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayOvernight Health Care White House steps up COVID money warnings Senate panel advances pandemic preparedness bill on bipartisan vote Five COVID-19 challenges on the two-year anniversary of the pandemic MORE (D-Wash.) say they're not giving up on including legislation to expand access to child care in the reconciliation bill.

I still think that child care is one of the most critical things we can do to help people lower their costs and take a barrier away so they can go back to work and help our economy, she said.

Here is the original post:

Democrats divided over how to deal with rising inflation | TheHill - The Hill

KALAMAZOO, MI Carol Heflin will be remembered as someone who was an ardent supporter of women, for helping those less fortunate and as someone who never shied from standing up for causes she believed in.

The former chair of the Kalamazoo County Democratic Party, Heflin died at the age of 67 on Tuesday, March 15, just three weeks after being diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer, her family and friends confirmed earlier this week.

Heflins husband of 30 years, David Heflin, preceded her in death after succumbing to early onset Alzheimers disease in January 2021.

Carol was just a furiously strong and ardent advocate for women, said Michelle Zukowski-Serlin, a friend of Heflins for 35 years.

She worked alongside Heflin on numerous causes such as supporting Medicaid-funded abortion, making marital rape illegal and participating in organizations like the National Organization of Women (NOW) and events such as the Kalamazoo Area Womens Festival.

Whatever she believed in, she put her whole self into, Zukowski-Serlin said. Whether it was feeding the homeless in Bronson Park, taking people into their home when they were in need, fighting for human rights. Carol was there and she didnt have to be asked. She was always fighting for people.

Heflin, who is survived by six children, was involved in numerous political campaigns throughout her life and met her first husband while attending an anti-war rally in the 1970s when she was in her late teens, her daughter Lynneea Brown told MLive.

Growing up, it didnt take long before Brown, now 35, realized her mother was different from most other moms.

One of the first tell-tale signs, Brown said, was when she was just 5, and her mother pulled her out of school to meet President Bill Clinton. That same year, Brown also recalls standing on the steps of Kalamazoo City Hall alongside current city commissioner Don Cooney, carrying a sign for living wages.

Nobody elses kids were out knocking on doors, handing out flyers, Brown said. She was born politically active, something she got from my grandmother, and now she has six kids and 21 grandkids who are doing or going to be doing the same thing.

Heflin worked on national, statewide and local campaigns. They included, among many others, those of former attorney general candidate Amos Williams, former Gov. Jennifer Granholm and former state Rep. Ed LaForge.

Its hard to remember all the things she was involved with, said LaForges widow, Ann LaForge, one of Heflins closest friends and a former business partner. She was never too busy or had so much on her plate that she would not reach out and help someone who needed it.

Heflin and Ann LaForges friendship began when the two worked together at a small community newspaper east of Kalamazoo. At the time the paper folded, they had been working on a project focused on the rise of women-owned businesses.

LaForge recalls Heflin asking their boss if the two could take the work they had done with them and use it for another project. That project became known as WomaNet, a publication the two produced for a few years in the mid-late 90s that served as a directory for women-led businesses and organizations in Southwest Michigan, as well as a community resource guide for women in need of crisis intervention or who may be experiencing domestic violence.

Her passion for helping those in need did not stop with her political voice, or the publication.

She had a much expanded version of what family is, said her son, Shawn Malone, 45. It wasnt just blood. Anybody who was down on their luck, in a marginalized community. She was the first person to bring them into the family. Growing up, I cant think of an Easter or Thanksgiving where there wasnt somebody who was there that we didnt know.

At one point, we had a young woman living with us with her child, who had been been abused by her boyfriend. She stayed with us a few months until mom was able to help her get on her feet. Thats just who she was. She was all about How can we really make a difference in peoples lives every day?

That commitment carried over to catering meals for the homeless, both when there was an encampment at Bronson Park in 2018, and for months afterward when the encampment was no longer visible, said her friend Cheri Bell, an Oshtemo Township trustee.

Without fanfare, she reached out to congregations and people she knew cared about that issue, organized, cooked and delivered meals for weeks for the people in Bronson Park, Bell said. The issue of whether or not that was an appropriate place for the encampment, what did it mean for the city, none of that mattered.

Her care and concern was about the individuals suffering on the ground, and that is where she came from as a human being.

That care is what also led Carol and David Heflin to open their Dowagiac restaurant Foodies Fresh Caf that they owned and operated for about seven years on holidays and prepare free meals for community members in need, Brown said. Her mother would also routinely hire people who were in the early stages of recovery and try to help them up.

Champions and heroes sometimes are the people doing the work that you dont see, Bell said. And Carol Heflin, while sometimes she had a more public persona than others, she was always doing the work to lift up people in need whether she was out front or not.

A memorial service for Heflin will be held at 11 a.m. May 21 at the band shell in Portage.

Also on MLive:

Whippet crackers would be classified as drug paraphernalia in Michigan under proposed legislation

Peregrine falcon chicks could hatch before your eyes, on live cam high above downtown Kalamazoo

Walk to End Homelessness will support Kalamazoo nonprofits $100K fundraising goal

View post:

Kalamazoo County Democrat Carol Heflin remembered as advocate for women, those less fortunate - MLive.com

The Wyoming Democratic Party criticized lawmakers Thursday for how they redrew legislative district lines during the 2022 budget session. The party denounced the Legislature for prolonging the redistricting process into the late hours of the final day of the session despite having several months to work on the issue.

Even more disturbing are the concerns that much of it was motivated by lawmakers attempting to pick their own voters, including family members in some cases, instead of focusing on creating districts that made sense and offered fair equal representation, Wyoming Democratic Party Chairman Joe Barbuto said in a statement.

Despite those concerns, the party said it will not take legal action on behalf of underrepresented voters in Sheridan and Johnson Counties. The party also said it was not aware of others planning any kind of legal action.

Why it matters: The final redistricting map passed by lawmakers put districts in Sheridan and Johnson counties out of deviation, which means they fall out of legally permissible district proportions. This violates the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and puts the state at risk of legal challenges by those who are not properly represented.

The Wyoming Democratic Party said they were concerned they lacked legal standing.

We do not feel that it is the place of the state political party to tell Sheridan County voters what relief, if any, they should seek in this matter, Nina Hebert, communications director for the Wyoming Democratic Party, said.

Who said what: There is no reason that legislators should be conducting business behind closed doors, Hebert said in regard to lawmakers completing much of the redistricting work in caucus and other private meetings during the last week of the session.

What else you should know: While the party will not file a lawsuit, it does plan to pursue other, more long-term action. That includes pushing for an independent commission to handle redistricting when Wyoming will need to do it again in 10 years. The state is required to do so every decade during the first budget session following a completed U.S. census. Sen. Mike Gierau (D-Jackson) brought a bill this session to establish such a commission, but it failed an introduction vote.

Next up: Gov. Mark Gordon has yet to sign the bill. Earlier this week, Gordon said he would not sign it until his attorney general had reviewed it. That review has been completed, according to Michael Pearlman, Gordons spokesperson. No legal challenges can take place before Gordon takes action on the bill. He has until March 26 to do so.

Read this article:

Wyoming Democratic Party will not sue over redistricting - WyoFile

Democratic leaders worry that far-left lawmakers are stepping on the partys message by prodding President Biden to declare a climate emergency and clamp down on U.S. oil production.

A policy wishlist recently unveiled by the House Progressive Caucus called on Mr. Biden to declare a national climate emergency and executive action including invoking the Defense Production Act, ending new drilling leases on federal lands and in U.S. waters, reinstating a crude oil export ban and eliminating subsidies for oil companies.

The proposals if invoked would blunt domestic energy production and likely boost energy costs higher.

That doesnt jibe with Democratic leaders plans. They are promising voters various ways to reduce record-high gasoline and energy prices that have become a top issue just months before the midterm elections.

I cant speak for the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said Rep. Pete Aguilar of California, vice chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. What I can tell you is the House Democratic Caucus is focused on delivering results and relief to people who need it, people who are feeling the pinch of higher gas prices.

The lawmaker in charge of making sure Democrats over in the Senate win elections had a similar message.

With whats going on in Ukraine, we want to make sure were able to keep prices stable, said Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. I think that should be our focus right now.

While Mr. Biden is not expected to bow to the demands of the Progressive Caucus, it opens the entire party to criticism and questions about their stance on energy in an already difficult election year for Democrats.

The partys far-left wing, however, insists presidential executive action is necessary to deliver on promises to combat climate change and expand the social safety net. Those promises stalled in the 50-50 split Senate with Mr. Bidens $1.75 trillion Build Back Better Act.

Some progressives rejected the notion that doubling down on climate change puts their colleagues in a difficult position with voters, despite current energy prices. Others admitted that it very well could.

Rep. Mark Pocan, Wisconsin Democrat and a leader of the Progressive Caucus, said theyre not necessarily calling on Mr. Biden to act imminently, despite wanting a climate emergency declaration.

These are all good things the president could do. Clearly, timing is going to come into play with everything, Mr. Pocan said. But I think the impetus was since Build Back Better doesnt appear to be moving very fast, what aspects could we get done?

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat and member of the far-left Squad on Capitol Hill, conceded that the pivot to cleaner energy would cause a headache for her colleagues if high gasoline prices persist.

Of course, if we are in the same situation with these kinds of policy positions [come October], it could be a messaging problem, she said.

Though oil prices have recently dipped from record-highs, gasoline prices remain near record territory, leading many Democrats to accuse big oil companies of price gouging and a desire to haul executives in for congressional testimony. Historical trends show that its normal for gasoline costs to reduce at a far slower pace than oil in a volatile energy market.

The national average for a gallon of unleaded fuel was $4.27 on Friday, down just six cents from a week ago. Oil, meanwhile, has seen a roughly 20% dip to around $105 per barrel compared to brief peaks last week around $130 or higher.

Democrats also blamed fossil fuel companies for the thousands of unused federal drilling leases but have more recently come around to more aggressively pushing executives to ramp up production.

Republicans jumped at the opportunity to hammer Democrats and Mr. Biden for what they describe as a concerted effort to limit domestic energy production to raise the price of fossil fuels and push consumers toward clean energy. Republican lawmakers point to actions taken by Mr. Biden and his administration, such as canceling the Keystone XL pipeline or significantly reducing the number of new federal drilling permits, as evidence.

Every day before Biden has been in office, every time he took an action that was going to harm the energy industry, we showed you the prediction of what would happen. Well, that day has come, said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, California Republican. Im sorry, theyre out of excuses. Every action theyve taken has put us in this place.

Excerpt from:

Democrats wince at progressives' push to limit domestic energy production - Washington Times

When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke to members of Congress on Wednesday and pointedly highlighted President BidenJoe BidenRepublican senators introduce bill to ban Russian uranium imports Energy & Environment Ruling blocking climate accounting metric halted Fauci says officials need more than .5B for COVID-19 response MOREs role in helping to stop the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, some Democrats worried that he was handing Republicans a new talking point.

Despite there being an uncommon bipartisanship in Washington for wanting to help the Ukrainians, Republicans have tried for months to drive a narrative of Biden being a weak leader, and Zelenskys words, even Democrats acknowledge, could become fodder in the midterm election season.

I think its a very real possibility, said one Democratic strategist. I know we keep saying were doing everything we can, but clearly theres a lot more we could be doing, and Im not just talking about sending in troops.

You could easily see Republicans making hay out of it, the strategist added.

During the final moments of his virtual speech to lawmakers on Wednesday, Zelensky switched to English for emphasis when speaking directly to Biden: You are the leader of the nation, of your great nation. I wish you to be the leader of the world. Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

Since the start of the Russian invasion last month, Democrats and Republicans have been more united on Ukraine than any other issue in recent memory. During Bidens State of the Union address, for example, supportfor the war-torn country was one of the few issues that received rousing applause from both sides of the aisle.

But some Republicans have tried to cast Biden as weak in his response to the crisis and continued to do so after Zelenskys address to lawmakers in the Capitol.

Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyLouisiana Democrat running for US Senate smokes marijuana in campaign ad MORE (R-La.) accused Biden of having a Bambis baby brother moment, while Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGOP talking point could turn to Biden's 'underwhelming' Russia response Capito to make Senate GOP leadership bid Graham to meet with Biden's Supreme Court pick Tuesday MORE (R-Texas) said, The Biden administrations timidity in the face of this evil needs to end.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP talking point could turn to Biden's 'underwhelming' Russia response The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - What now after Zelensky's speech? Capito to make Senate GOP leadership bid MORE (R-Ky.) said following the Ukrainian presidents address that Biden needed to step up his game, a day after singling out what he dubbed the administrations hesitancy and weakness in the face of Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinRepublican senators introduce bill to ban Russian uranium imports Hillicon Valley Invasion complicates social media policy Defense & National Security Blinken details Russia's possible next steps MORE.

Putin has not pulled his punches as a thank you to President Biden for pulling his punches, McConnell said in remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday.

The conservative-leaning New York Post also ran a headline: In lesson for Biden, Zelensky shows what true leadership looks like.

Republican strategist John Feehery, a contributor to The Hill, said Zelenskys comments do dovetail with the Republican narrative forming around Biden on the issue of Russia-Ukraine.

I think there will be a lot of Republicans who ask for the White House to be more forceful based on Zelenskys comments, Feehery said. The president hasnt been very forceful and throughout this whole thing he had decent intelligence and they didnt do anything about it. He said were going to do sanctions and they kind of sucked. Everything is underwhelming.

Republicans will jump on this, Feehery continued. I think Biden is, in many ways, congratulating himself for his restraint and the aid hes given, but its cold comfort to the Ukrainians.

Feehery added that it isnt a closed question about how Republicans handle Bidens perceived weakness on Ukraine in the months ahead.

Usually in wartime, the country comes together and the president gets a boost, and I dont think it's happening this time, he said. The country has come together but Biden hasnt gotten a boost, and I think it's because he's leading from behind.

Still, Biden has gotten relatively strong public support for his handling of the Ukraine situation and particularly his responses to Russia such as imposing sanctions.

A Pew Research Center survey released earlier this week found that 47 percent of Americans polled approve of the Biden administrations handling of the Russian invasion, while 39 percent disapprove and 13 percent are unsure. A whopping 85 percent of surveyed Americans support maintaining strict economic sanctions on Russia, the survey found.

Biden responded to Zelenskys address Wednesday by announcing a robust shipment of military assistance to Ukraine, including drones, small arms,and anti-aircraft systems, and he said his administration is helping Ukraine acquire longer range air defense systems.

Meanwhile, the administration has thus far resisted calls to send to Soviet-made fighter jets to Ukraine due to the possibility of it escalating the conflict, and the U.S. and NATO have rejected Zelenskys pleas for a no-fly zone for similar reasons.

How President Biden makes decisions is through the prism of our own national security, White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiHealth Care Pelosi shoots higher on COVID-19 funding Defense & National Security Blinken details Russia's possible next steps Biden says US is open to help Ukrainian refugees MORE told reporters during a briefing Wednesday. And as we've said before, a no-fly zone would require implementation, it would require us potentially shooting down Russian planes, NATO shooting down Russian planes. And we are not interested in getting into World War III.

Republicans have also had to grapple with divisions in their party over how to handle Putin, after four years during which former President TrumpDonald TrumpGOP talking point could turn to Biden's 'underwhelming' Russia response House Oversight Committee opens investigation into New Mexico 2020 election audit Hunter Biden paid off tax liability amid ongoing grand jury investigation: report MORE talked warmly of the Russian leader. Many GOP lawmakers have pushed back on Trumps more recent comments about Putin being smart and savvy. Trump was also impeached in 2019 for withholding military aid from Ukraine as he sought an investigation into Biden and his son.

Some say Republicans need to tread lightly in their criticisms of Biden.

I think Republicans need to walk a careful line between showing Putin that our country is united while criticizing Bidens approach, added Alex Conant, a Republican strategist. Thats why most of the criticism has been very muted to date.

Republican strategist Doug Heye said its possible Zelenskys words about Biden could come up in political ads.

But he said its dependent on two things: Events in Ukraine and what Congress is willing to do.

So far, he said, in the early days of the war, the Russian invasion of Ukraine has only come up in one ad in a North Carolina Senate GOP primary and is focused on a candidates words about Putin.

Others in the GOP say its unlikely that Republicans delve into that territory.

One never ceases to be amazed at the imagination of attack ads, but I doubt Zelenskys clarion call for U.S. assistance will redound to Bidens disadvantage, said Richard Fontaine, the chief executive officer at the Center for a New American Security who served as a foreign policy adviser to the late Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainGOP talking point could turn to Biden's 'underwhelming' Russia response Graham invokes McCain in latest call to take out Putin Juan Williams: Biden must rebut GOP attacks on war MORE (R-Ariz.). The reality is that the administration has done a great deal for Ukraine and is prepared to do even more.

Anyone casting the response as somehow weak should specify what theyd do instead and the benefits and risks that alternative proposals would generate, Fontaine added. Otherwise its just empty criticism.

Continue reading here:

Democrats worry Zelensky offered GOP key talking point | TheHill - The Hill

When I was growing up in the 2000s, the Republican party was associated with a muscular foreign policywhat George W. Bush in his second inaugural address dubbed the concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy. Democrats, on the other hand, tended to put more faith in diplomacy and international organizations, believing that soft power was more effective.

For two or three generationssince Eugene McCarthys challenge in 1968, probablythese views of foreign affairs were a more or less consistent cleavage between the parties. The Taftian isolationism that had long ago been a major strain of GOP thought had never entirely disappeared, but it had shrunk considerably, and post-Reagan, post-Gulf War, post-9/11 Republicans tended to believe that the United States should use its power to preserve the liberal global order and to protect democracies. Post-9/11 Democrats, more skeptical about how American power could be used effectively and morally, tended to prefer what one Obama adviser called leading from behind.

How things have changed.

Two focus groups I recently observed with Republicans and Democrats from Texas suggested the ways in which the parties have been undergoing a realignment on foreign policy.

Here are some statements from members of the two groups. Try to guess which is the Republican group and which is the Democratic group.

Heres the first Texas group, where six of the ten participants were in favor of sending American troops to Ukraine.

Moderator: What would the situation there need to look like for everybody, personally, to feel comfortable or want to send troops over? Nobodys brought that up.

Texas Voter 1: I would have already.

Texas Voter 2: I think he should have done a preemptive thing. As soon as they started doing it, he should have done it. . . .

Texas Voter 1: Bullies are gonna bully until theyre stopped.

Texas Voter 3: Exactly. Yeah.

And heres the other Texas group, where only three of nine were in favor of sending troops to Ukraine:

Texas Voter 4: When you go into battle, you look at the enemy. Hes got 100,000 troops waiting to invade Ukraine with everything under the sun, except nuclear. What would Biden send? 2,000? 5,000? Against 100,000. Im opposed to our young men getting slaughtered. And thats what it would be if it was a war. . . .

Texas Voter 5: I do agree with that, yes. . . .

Texas Voter 6: I was just gonna say, I think we should support Ukraine with troops, temporarily. And I emphasize that word temporarily because I think we have to call Putins bluff. I think its a bluff myself.

Texas Voter 7: I do too.

At this point Im sure you can guess the trick: The hawkish first group was made up of Democrats, and the more dovish second group was the Republicans.

These trends have been developing for a while. A Pew analysis from 2019 showed a steady reversal in what had been the dominant Republican and Democratic attitudes on foreign policy:

Today, the Republican partys leader calls Vladimir Putin a genius and whitewashes his carnage in Ukraine as the strongest peace force Ive ever seen. Meanwhile, the Democratic party is led by a president who, unlike his predecessor, did not hesitate to call Putin a killer and helped assemble the free world to enact crippling sanctions on the Russian economy.

Its a strange shift.

Podcast March 18 2022

Sarah and JVL talk about free speech, cancel culture, and whether or not we have

But the strangest change from the politics of the 2000s is that prominent Republicans and conservativesmajor figures in the pro-Trump righthave turned out to be actively pro-Putin. From Tucker Carlson becoming a Kremlinpropaganda fixture to Candace Owens regurgitating Putins propaganda about Ukrainian history to Madison Cawthornsuggesting that Volodymyr Zelensky is a thug, the rhetoric of the right has clearly shifted away from support for a foreign policy explicitly promoting human dignity in the face of an authoritarian Russian regime.

But to what extent are the views of those conservative elites also held by rank-and-file Republicans? Lets turn to the data.

In anAP-NORC poll conducted in mid-Februarythat is, just prior to the invasion of Ukraine22 percent of Republican respondents thought the United States should play a major role in the Ukraine conflict. For Democrats, the number was 32 percent.

A post-invasion Navigator survey of registered voters conducted from March 3 to March 7 found that Democrats were more supportive than Republicans of sanctions on Russia and of sending Ukraine military aid including arms and air support:

The Navigator survey showed that Republicans and Democrats alike held unfavorable views of Russia and Putin and favorable views of Ukraine and Zelensky.

A Pew poll conducted last week appears to suggest that Republicans may be returning to their post-9/11 outlook, finding that 49 percent of Republican respondents believed the United States was not providing enough support to Ukraine, compared to Democrats who felt the same at 38 percent:

To some extent, Republican views of U.S. policy toward Ukraine must be understood through a partisan lens rather than an ideological one. The Pew poll found that 67 percent of all Republicans, including 74 percent of all conservative Republicans, disapproved of the Biden administrations response, compared to 17 percent among Democrats. Which raises the question of what, then, Republicans are in favor of doing that the Biden administration is not already doing?

Not sending troops. In a Monmouth University poll conducted from March 10 to March 14, 78 percent of Democrats say they are in favor of sending troops to support our European allies as a deterrent to keep Russia from invading those countries, compared to 65 percent of Republicans. This backs up a striking finding from the Navigator poll: Democrats had a much more favorable view of NATO than Republicans, by 50 to 24. The Pew poll, too, found more Democrats than Republicans favoring a large U.S. military presence in NATO countries neighboring Ukraine.

As far as sending troops to fight specifically in Ukraine, the Monmouth poll showed Democrats almost evenly split, with 46 percent in support and 49 percent opposed. But among Republicans, only 37 percent say they support deploying troops to Ukraine, while 62 percent are against.

Imagine going back in time to 2003 and telling Dick Cheney or Trent Lott that in about twenty years, more Democrats than Republicans would want to deploy U.S. troops abroad in response to a major foreign crisis. Theyd think you were crazy.

Some of this shift can be chalked up to the partisanship surrounding Russia that went along with the Trump era. But there are deeper forces at work, too, having to do with the aftermath of the 9/11 era, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the changing nature of our political coalitions.

Because of those forcesand because of how Donald Trump remade the GOPRepublican voters abandoned their longstanding commitments to free trade, small government, public morality, and the rule of law.

The crisis in Ukraine can be seen as a test of how entirely Republicans have abandoned muscular foreign policy as well.

Continue reading here:

Democrats Are Now the Party of American Leadership in the World - The Bulwark

Austin, TX On Saturday, March 19, Democrats across Texas will set the stage for one of the biggest showdowns in Texas politics, the 2022 midterm election. The Democratic County and Senate District conventions will bring together County party chairs, precinct chairs , candidates, elected officials, and activists to unite behind themission of winning in November.

Important party business will be discussed, resolutions for Democratic state platform will be submitted, state delegates will be elected, and mobilization strategies will be determined as Democrats gear up for a big fight in November. Our Democratic County Conventions will pave the way for the Texas Democratic Party Convention on July 14-16 where Texas Democrats will elect a slate of Democratic leaders who reflect our Texas values and who will fight to better serve all Texans.

Texas Democratic Party Chair Gilberto Hinojosa issued the following statement:

Texas Democrats are mobilized and ready to win! And from now until November, we are preparing at all levels to make sure Texans are heard and that they finally get the leadership they deserve.

Because our fight to take back Texas starts with our local precincts and counties, our county conventions are a critical part of laying the groundwork for a winning slate, and a strong platform.

Saturdays meetings will set the foundation for our state party convention in July, where we will again come together in full force to work towards electing Democrats up and down the ballot in November 2022.

###

Originally posted here:

Democrats Across the State will Unite at This Year's 2022 Democratic County and Senate District Conventions - Texas Democratic Party

The Biden Administration has just passed an executive order furthering research into crypto assets in view of regulating them, but politicians within the ruling Democrat party remain deeply divided on digital currency.

The lack of consensus among Democrats could mean that a progressive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies could still be a long way off but also makes it more likely the eventual regulations wont be too harsh thanks to the work of crypto-friendly representatives. The crypto community is familiar with the names cropping up time and time again in the digital asset debate.

On the one side, you have vehemently anti-crypto politicians such as Democrat Senators Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown, and in the pro-innovation camp are the likes of Democrat Congress members Ritchie Torres and Jim Himes.

The division runs deep, and political wrangling could further delay any regulatory processes in the United States.

Senator Warren recently crafted a bill to restrict crypto exchanges to prevent digital assets from being used for sanctions evasion. However, it has been widely reported that Russia will not switch to cryptocurrencies to circumvent sanctions, even if so individual Russians do.

Warren has continued her war on crypto with letters to the Treasury urging further crackdowns on the industry. According to reports, she recently criticized the banking system, adding in reference crypto:

Fortunately, several Democrat lawmakers favor the crypto industry and the innovation it will bring to the U.S. financial system. One such policymaker is New York representative Ritchie Torres who said, the project of radically decentralizing the internet and finance strikes me as a profoundly progressive cause, before adding:

Related: Bidens executive order promises great things for the crypto industry Eventually

Democrat Josh Gottheimer, who represents New Jersey, has pushed plans to regulate cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Last month, he put forward the Stablecoin Innovation and Protection Act, stating at the time that the expansion of cryptocurrency offers tremendous potential value for our economy.

Four Democrats put their names to a bipartisan letter sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16. Gottheimer, and Torres signed of course, along with Florida representative Darren Soto and Massachusetts Congressman Jake Auchincloss.

Republican congressman Tom Emmer drafted the letter, which was also signed by three other Republicans, addressing the issue of overburdening crypto companies with excessive reporting requests and increased scrutiny of the industry by the agency.

View original post here:

Democrat division over crypto isnt all bad news for regulation - Cointelegraph

What Cheney doesnt know until now is that a band of Trump-loving Republicans will be on hand to greet her. They snapped up roughly a quarter of the 350 tickets, at $10 apiece, to give the embattled congresswoman a piece of their minds.

I was here when the Democrats dragged her fathers effigy down a village road behind a truck at one of their rallies, and those are the people who are supporting her now, that shes embraced, an angry Rebecca Cloetta, 66, said over breakfast at a greasy spoon called the Virginian.

Can you believe it? Charging for a ticket! Its a slap in the face, said Rebecca Bextel, 41, another Trump-backing Republican planning to attend the voting event. We have one person representing us Wyoming has a single House member and she shows up in town and it costs $10 to see her. Its embarrassing.

She is not, Bextel vowed, going to get reelected.

Bextel may well be correct. Though theres been scant public polling of her primary campaign against Trump-backed Harriet Hageman, its apparent that Republicans in Wyoming which voted for Trump over Joe Biden, 70 to 27 percent, in 2020 have turned against Cheney en masse since Jan. 6, 2021.

Republican U.S. House candidate Harriet Hageman talks to a supporter at a campaign event on March 7, 2022, in Cheyenne, Wyo.|Mead Gruver/AP Photo

Just as obvious is that Cheney needs Democrats and independents to change their party registration and cast their vote for her in the Aug. 16 primary. Her campaign is loath to talk strategy publicly, but the math doesnt lie and neither do Cheneys actions on the ground here in recent months.

She has shunned town halls and other voter forums in Wyomings overwhelmingly red counties in favor of controlled events. At the March 22 event, which is being hosted by Issue One, a bipartisan organization that advocates for sweeping reforms to fix our broken political system, Cheney will answer pre-selected questions.

When Cheney was censured by the state Republican Party in February 2021, three of the eight votes against the move were by officials from Teton County, which encompasses Jackson. The dissenters included Mary Martin, now the countys GOP chair.

Since then, however, Martin has soured on Cheney. She said the congresswoman is rarely in the state, despite having been urged to explain why she voted to impeach Trump.

She was absolutely invited to come and present what her facts were, to defend why you are doing this and instead she opted to call the Republicans radicals, which has made people upset within the party, Martin said from the Jackson mansion of Nancy Donovan, a prominent Republican donor in Wyoming.

Shes not in the state, she has not been anywhere, maybe one or two places, Donovan echoed. She doesnt show up shes very entitled. Her parents have events at their house, Ive spent money to go to her house to fund her. I truly will never vote for her again. Donovan and Bextel are both members of Hagemans grassroots leadership team.

Martin went further, calling Cheneys work on the Jan. 6 committee duplicity.

Shes been MIA since Jan. 6. And what we all truly believe is that the Wyoming seat is a stepping stone to running for president in 2024 and she needs to get Trump out of the way. And to raise money, shes using the anti-Trump commentary, Martin speculated.

An empty chair labeled "Representative Cheney" sits in front of a meeting room in Rawlins, Wyo., on Feb. 6, 2021. The Wyoming Republican Party central committee voted to censure Rep. Liz Cheney for voting to impeach President Donald Trump. Republican officials said they invited Cheney, but she didn't attend.|Mead Gruver/AP Photo

Cheney declined to be interviewed for this story. But she told The New York Times last month that she will not openly court Democrats by supporting a Democrats for Cheney group or encourage an existing political action committee, dubbed Switch for Wyoming, that encourages Democrats to vote in Republican primaries.

Without an aggressive campaign strategy to win over Democrats, it might seem like a tough sell: Cheney, after all, voted with Trump 93 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight. But some Democratic voters in Jackson are embracing her. They appreciate Cheneys work in Congress prosecuting Trump and theyre ready to switch parties to vote for her.

Even if theyre not ready to admit it publicly.

I think her politics are crap, but I like how much hate she gets from the people of Wyoming, said a 27-year-old event planner who will register as a Republican for the first time to vote for Cheney. He asked not to be named because its a small town.

There are a lot of things about her that dont appeal to me as a gay man, he said. She was not supportive of her sister until it came out in the news, and that is a big red flag. At the same time, its Wyoming, a population of 500,000. Every vote counts. Wyomings population is just under 579,000, according to U.S. Census figures.

Pete Jenkins, 54, a contractor whos lived in Wyoming for three decades, said he identifies personally as a Democrat he did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020 but is registered as a Republican just to have some influence in Wyoming politics. He said he intends to vote for Cheney and has heard from lots of other Democrats planning to do the same.

I think its a fairly popular thing, he said of the party-switchers-for-Cheney movement.

Cheney needs as many of them as she can get.

Wyoming political strategists say the only path to victory for Cheney is with the help of Democrats and independents. The states 2018 Republican primary for an open governors seat is instructive. Mark Gordon, the GOP state treasurer at the time, was facing stiff competition from the right. More than 10,000 voters switched parties or registered as Republicans for the first time between the primary and general elections.

Gordon won the primary by 9,000 votes against candidates that included Hageman. Turnout was 116,000 and Gordon received just shy of 39,000 votes.

While Cheney has yet to overtly court Democrats, her decision to aggressively investigate Trump as a leader of the select Jan. 6 House committee naturally appeals to voters who detest the former president.

Cheney allies are hopeful that crossover voters will bail her out this time. They are counting on a primary with at least two pro-Trump GOP candidates that will divide the anti-Cheney vote. With the help of even half of the 73,000 Democrats who voted for Biden in 2020, they believe Cheney could pull it off.

That theory isnt lost on House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who has told members that hes worried that the numbers add up for Cheney and that she might be back in Congress next session, according to a source with direct knowledge of the discussions. McCarthy did not respond to a request for comment.

Trump, too, is worried that Democrats will help reelect Cheney. He backed a bill in the Wyoming legislature that would have barred voters from switching parties on the day of a primary election in order to vote for a candidate of another party.

But that proposal died in the Wyoming legislature last week.

At an event in Cheyenne earlier this month where nearly 200 people in cowboy hats and boots showed up to support Hageman, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) urged voters to call their legislators to back the measure.

Ill tell you this, theres only one way Liz Cheney wins, and thats if you let Democrats vote in your primary, so you need to call your state rep and let them know, he said just days before the bill died.

After the event, Hageman told reporters, Im fully confident I can win this race whether the crossover bill happens or not. Its something thats been an issue in our state for many years, its not just 2020.

A progressive organizer who helped get the Democratic vote out for Gordon in 2018 crunched the numbers based on a hypothetical three-way race between Hageman, Cheney and Republican state Sen. Anthony Bouchard. The person said Bouchard because he remains popular among the MAGA set even after Trump endorsed Hageman could play spoiler by drawing as much as 15 percent of the vote.

That could open the door just enough for Cheney to slip through, the organizer said.

It will depend on Cheneys on-the-ground voter engagement not high-priced advertising campaigns that will quickly saturate Wyomings small markets, the person said. We know at least some of these voters will vote if they think their vote will make a difference in a race that means something to them.

More here:

Liz Cheney turns to Democrats to save her hide - POLITICO