There is much at stake in the shift from the present to the past and so it is with Timothy Brennans recent Chronicle essay, What Was Deconstruction? In the headlines formulation, the end of deconstruction is a starting point, and it is from this safe distance that Brennan works through what he takes deconstruction to have been. Brennan begins his essay with an account of an exchange he witnessed between Derrida and Ernesto Laclau after a Laclau lecture on Antonio Gramsci. Brennan tells us he understood frustratingly little which, retrospectively, he took to reveal the vacuity of deconstruction or Derrida or both.
But anecdotes are fickle, and I could counter with my own experience attending Derridas lectures at the University of California at Irvine and seminars where I found him to be a generous and informed teacher. He carefully and patiently guided me to a better understanding of a Dostoevsky story via a discussion of Kierkegaard. Derrida, with his quizzical eyes and faint smile (as Brennan puts it) helped me to understand a lot. But what do either of these anecdotes reveal about what deconstruction was or is?
Brennans piece is ostensibly a review of Gregory Jones-Katzs excellent work of intellectual history, Deconstruction: An American Institution (University of Chicago Press, 2021), and if Brennans use of the past tense were restricted to Jones-Katzs account of the history of deconstruction in America it would be warranted. But Brennans essay is not really a book review. It is a new iteration of four oft-repeated broadsides against deconstruction that moves beyond the purview of Jones-Katzs historical analysis. These critiques are not new but they are persistent, and variants of each have been enlisted recently across the political spectrum from Deconstruction Goes Mainstream in the right-leaning National Review in 2020 to the Marxist scholar Gabriel Rockhills The CIA Reads French Theory: On the Intellectual Labor of Dismantling the Cultural Left in a Los Angeles Review of Books subchannel in 2017. They have also been employed by Daniel Dennett, Steven Pinker, and Jordan Peterson in their respective critiques of postmodernism. Brennans piece is exemplary, however, insofar as it mobilizes all four critiques at once.
In broad strokes, these are the four critiques: First, that deconstruction is undefinable and obscure, in Brennans words, a style of thought more complained about than understood, less outrageous than deliberately elusive. Second, that deconstruction is pernicious because it leads to radical skepticism, relativism, and ultimately post-truth: There are no answers, no origins, no past, no perpetrators. Third, that deconstruction neutralizes activist politics in the service of the status quo (Deconstruction seems most American in giving repressive tolerance philosophical dignity.) And fourth and finally, that deconstruction is right-wing thought disguised as progressive philosophy: Deconstruction won credence for the left by enlisting the European philosophical right.
The last two of these critiques can be traced back as far as 1969 when the French philosopher Jean-Pierre Fayes Le Camarade Mallarm" attacked the structuralist journal Tel Quel and the work of Derrida published in it as enemies of the French left. The brunt of the attack was the allegation that Tel Quel had facilitated the introduction of a language derived from Germanys extreme-right which had been displaced, unknown to all, and introduced into the Parisian left. For Faye, Derrida was indicative of le malheur Heideggerien, the Heideggerian misfortune, which is the appropriation of a right-wing (ultimately National Socialist) philosophy by an ostensibly left-wing philosopher. According to Faye, despite its pronounced support for left-leaning political action and affiliation with the French Communist Party, Tel Quel through the work of Derrida was surreptitiously leading French youth toward right-wing extremism.
Fredric Jamesons Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism offered a variation on this theme in New Left Review in 1984, and in 1994, Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt, and Margaret Jacob appropriated the same critique in their book Telling the Truth About History. In this version, deconstruction was deemed inappropriate for the study of history because it ostensibly leads to relativism but also because Derrida and deconstruction were influenced by Nietzsche and Heidegger who both made notoriously antidemocratic, anti-Western, and antihumanist pronouncements and were associated sometimes fairly, sometimes not, with anti-Semitism. The authors are then quick to point out that Hitler cited Nietzsche in support of his racial ideology, and Heidegger himself joined the Nazi Party. As with Faye and Jameson, the association with Heidegger is sufficient to stop the analysis.
Brennan himself echoed Fayes argument in a 2006 Chronicle article:
Brennan more recently argues that,
In doing so, he links Fayes argument about deconstructions right-wing DNA (Critique 4) to a separate dismissal based on the idea that deconstruction leads to radical skepticism and total relativism (Critique 2). This latter argument also appears in the Appleby, Hunt, and Jacob book; in Bruno Latours famous 2004 essay Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?, and in Rita Felskis 2015 The Limits of Critique. These are each slippery slope arguments: The critical apparatus of deconstruction, they hold, necessarily slides into a realm of endless critique that blurs the lines between fact and fiction, good and bad, or right and wrong. Works of deconstruction are like Trojan horses: Open Derridas Of Grammatology and watch out! little Nazis will come hopping out. On this line of argument, scholars who work with deconstruction are aiding and abetting the enemy and ultimately enabling authoritarianism. What is neglected in such attacks and dismissals is of course any discussion of deconstruction itself as mode of discourse or interpretative approach.
GRARD RONDEAU, REDUX
Jones-Katzs book does not tackle this issue directly but it does offer a powerful and convincing historical narrative about how deconstruction took root in America as well as accounts of the intellectual figures and institutions that allowed it to do so. Brennan tethers his dismissal of deconstruction to the institutions and charismatic figures discussed in the book and by doing so he avoids the question he sets out to answer: What, indeed, was deconstruction? Instead, he decries the damage deconstruction is doing to this day as a conduit for right-wing thought that undermines credibility while deactivating emancipatory politics. The accusation is bolstered by descriptions of actual academics culled from Jones-Katzs book but ultimately serves as justification for not engaging with works of deconstruction by Derrida or Paul de Man or current scholars.
Counterintuitively, in addition to deconstruction being a dangerous philosophy, its critics also tell us it is a silly one because it remains a style of thought more complained about than understood, less outrageous than deliberately elusive (Critique 1). The rhetorical trick of this dismissal is that it allows those making it to avoid defining deconstruction by asserting that it is impossible to define. To be sure, deconstruction, like much philosophy, is difficult and requires study but does this make it deliberately elusive? What is deconstruction? To me it is quite clear.
The deconstructive strategy is to approach a text as a site of contestation and struggle where one tendency in that text asserts itself as the source of order and thus establishes a hierarchy of meaning. The hierarchy is constructed in an oppositional binary that is presented as neutral and thus conceals the organizing principle (good and evil is a simple one). The intention of the author is rendered irrelevant for the deconstruction because the construction of the text may very well lie on unconscious, unquestioned, naturalized, or implicit assumptions that are at work in the ordering process. The deconstruction exposes the binary construct and arbitrary nature of the hierarchy by revealing an exchange of properties between the two tendencies. Whats more, much can be gleaned by what is left out of the text, and this, too, can be used to unsettle authoritative pronouncements. I should also note that each of these goals and practices is accepted under different guises by all the critics of deconstruction.
In my book Haunting History (Stanford University Press, 2017) I argue for the utility of deconstruction as an approach to the past, and in Emmanuel Levinass Talmudic Turn (Stanford, 2022) I applied that approach. Far from Brennans assertion that deconstruction holds an aversion toward situating the movement in its time and place, I contend that deconstruction allows one to grapple with the ways that ideas and concepts drift over time and place leaving traces behind that we later take as original. Deconstruction reveals the moment of decision when the story or argument is structured according to a hierarchical ordering that privileges certain possibilities and discounts others (clear/evasive, stable/relative, modern/postmodern).
In this way, deconstruction reveals the legitimizing strategies of the author while upsetting the authority of any one particular telling. Deconstruction is not itself evasive but it enables us to recognize that much of what we know and even are is. Deconstruction is not the source of post-truth but it is a powerful tool to recognize and analyze the instability of truth regimes. This includes the very real possibility that the current conception of truth and facts as secured by the credibility and unquestioned authority of the expert, the scientist, the historian, has waned such that the epistemic fabric which held this conception of truths and facts firm in relation to the authority of science has become loose, or even undone. In this light, Brennan and other critics of deconstruction are blaming the messenger while doing nothing to address the crisis they ascribe to it. By exposing instability, deconstruction opens the possibility for a response, be it through revision, re-interpretation, or re-evaluation.
Deconstruction is not a circumscribed period of time or grouping of thinkers, even though a history of deconstruction such as Jones-Katzs can tell a story of deconstruction in that way. Instead, I see deconstruction as a perpetually futural gesture toward what comes after our now. It is a strategy of looking forward and beyond where we are that does not disregard the past but neither does it fetishize it or finalize it as a what was. The fiction of a stable past is the fiction of a stable present. If we shift our gaze toward the future, and accept the unstable nature of the present, we see that the deconstructive approach equips us to engage our current climate in a way that looks forward instead of back.
Yes, this entails the decentering of the subject as the locus of stable meaning, but it opens up fields of scholarship and politics to actors (human and nonhuman) who/which had previously been excluded because they did not match the criteria of what a subject should be or how a subject should look. Because the subject is decentered, the hierarchy of subject position cannot be simply inverted (which could replicate the initial logic of exclusion). The sober recognition that truth and facts are socially constructed, thus historically and culturally contingent, likewise forces scholars to consider the way systems of knowledge change or differ across space and time and thus are not cast in stone. The diagnosis of systems of power and the role they play in determining which subjects, truths, and facts are privileged and which are not, likewise provides an entrance into analysis, critique, resistance, or support.
In each case scholars are no longer able to rest on naturalized suppositions of what counts (as subject, fact, truth, authority) based on what was but are forced to construct arguments in defense of such assertions that are sufficiently convincing to counter competing claims by looking to what is. Yes, these arguments too can be deconstructed, but therein lies the possibility of dialogue even at the cost of recognizing instability and questioning credibility.
See the rest here:
Deconstruction Isn't Dead - The Chronicle of Higher Education
- Streaming, Politics, & Philosophy | Destiny (Steven Bonnell II) - The Daily Wire - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- Jordan Peterson Proposes Using AI to Determine Whether Hitler Was Right-Wing Because He Cant Figure It Out Himself - Mediaite - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- News round-up: Radical expats, Church of England anti-whiteness, and Jordan Peterson - UnHerd - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- Jordan Peterson & Sam Harris Try to Find Something They Agree On - The Daily Wire - December 27th, 2023 [December 27th, 2023]
- Discussing Communism in All its Glory | Michael Malice - The Daily Wire - December 27th, 2023 [December 27th, 2023]
- Tammy Peterson's journey to Catholic conversion is really a ... - Florida Catholic - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- The hairy beer belly of the Tradwife movement - The Michigan Daily - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- How to Kill a Literary Genre | Jaspreet Singh Boparai - First Things - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- Men, Masculinities and Memes: The Case of Incels GNET - GNET - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- An Alternative to Western Nihilism | His Excellency Saeed Al Nazari - The Daily Wire - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- The Future of Canada | Josh & Nick Alexander - The Daily Wire - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- Thanks within Thanks - The Catholic Thing - November 28th, 2023 [November 28th, 2023]
- Here's Everything Jordan Peterson's Daughter Mikhaila Has Said ... - TheThings - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Kansas football recruiting: Jayhawk commit adding substantial offers - Through the Phog - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Have children, save the world? The right's push for the right kind of ... - Salon - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Sound of Freedom anti-sex trafficking "hero" charged with sex crimes - Daily Kos - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Jordan Peterson, explained - Vox - April 17th, 2023 [April 17th, 2023]
- UFC Champ Israel Adesanya Gives His Surprising Take On Masculinity, Lauds Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson: They Are the Ones Who Are Really Pushing Men... - April 17th, 2023 [April 17th, 2023]
- Andrew Tate Again Loses Romanian Detention Appeal: His Human Trafficking Charges Explained And A Timeline Of The Social Media Stars Controversies -... - February 2nd, 2023 [February 2nd, 2023]
- Rex Murphy: If CBC cared about diversity, it would host Jordan Peterson global warming talk - National Post - January 31st, 2023 [January 31st, 2023]
- Jordan Peterson event in Ottawa that coalition tried to cancel goes off without trouble - Toronto Sun - January 31st, 2023 [January 31st, 2023]
- Andrew Tate Detained In Romania For Another Month: His Human Trafficking Charges Explained And A Timeline Of The Social Media Stars Controversies -... - January 22nd, 2023 [January 22nd, 2023]
- Free speech isn't what Jordan Peterson thinks it is - Canada's National Observer - January 10th, 2023 [January 10th, 2023]
- Andrew Tate Appears In Romanian Court: His Human Trafficking Charges Explained And A Timeline Of The Social Media Stars Controversies - Forbes - January 10th, 2023 [January 10th, 2023]
- Read the court filing by Jordan Peterson against the College of Psychologists of Ontario - Ottawa Sun - January 10th, 2023 [January 10th, 2023]
- Jordan Peterson and Bjorn Lomborg: Hunger is more pressing than ... - National Post - December 16th, 2022 [December 16th, 2022]
- Kathy Griffin on How Elon Musk Reinstated Her Twitter Account: Dont Put My Name in the Company of White Supremacists - Hollywood Reporter - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- Usman, Khamzat, Gaethje and Cejudo Visited a Chechen Dictator But: Robert Whittaker & His Wife Sofias Appearance With Controversial Figure Jordan... - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson | Events - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- Elon Musk begins reinstating banned Twitter accounts, starting with ... - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- Olivia Wilde says Jordan Peterson inspired Chris Pines terrifying ... - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson Returns To Twitter, Immediately Demands The Site Censor Anonymous Trolls - Forbes - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- Jordan Petersons 5 most controversial ideas, explained - October 28th, 2022 [October 28th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson: Id Rather Die Than Delete Truthful Tweet For Cancel ... - October 25th, 2022 [October 25th, 2022]
- Opinion: MRA and Incel Red Flags - Houston Press - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Arizona Governor Candidate Kari Lake: 'There's No Such Thing as Toxic Masculinity' - Jezebel - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Olivia Wilde Responds to Claims She 'Abandoned' Her Children - 22 Words - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos by Jordan B. Peterson - Goodreads - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Looking for advice on masculinity? Try St. Joseph rather than Jordan Peterson - National Catholic Reporter - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson Cried Discussing How Dont Worry Darling Incel King ... - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Remember When Jordan Peterson Was a Thing? - thetriad.thebulwark.com - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Conservative stars Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro address sellout crowd in Jerusalem - JNS.org - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- "Might be the greatest promotion on Earth" - Twitter erupts after Bloodline member takes a shot at Andrew Tate on WWE SmackDown premiere -... - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Quiet, everyone! Megyn Kelly has thoughts about Jordan Peterson and Super Bowl vaginas! - The Independent - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- The Untold Truth Of Don't Worry Darling - Looper - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson Breaks Down in Tears When Asked About Olivia Wilde Calling Him a Hero to the Incel Community: Sure, Why Not? - Variety - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- Who is Jordan Peterson and what is his net worth? - AS USA - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- THE WEEK AHEAD: Jews mark the holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur; Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro speak in Jerusalem; and 'The Rosenberg Report'... - October 2nd, 2022 [October 2nd, 2022]
- OPINION: Ego is the main problem of our political polarization - N.C. State University Technician Online - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- What is Jordan Petersons 'grandma dream'? Story goes viral 23 years on - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- Canada's Trump - The Week - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- 100-year-old Wythenshawe man one of the last to receive birthday card from Queen Elizabeth II - The Manc - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- How Marcus Mumford turned torment into healing on solo album - Los Angeles Times - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Olivia Wilde on creating the most controversial film of the year - Sydney Morning Herald - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- The Sacred Heart of Uvalde - The Texas Observer - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Dr Jordan Peterson Launches Greek Focused Masters Programme On The Island Of Samos - GreekCityTimes.com - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Conservative Party Leader Eric Duhaime Teases An Interview With Jordan Peterson On Twitter - MTL Blog - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Jordan Peterson says he would rather die than delete his 'hateful ... - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- Who is Jordan Peterson, the alt-right darling of YouTube? - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- Sci-Fi Writer Patrick S. Tomlinson Instructs His Followers To Mass Report Dr. Jordan B. Peterson For "Transphobia And Dead-Naming" -... - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- The top 10 audiobooks on Audible.com - Star Tribune - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- I Read Robert Greene's Best-Selling Books And This Is Why I Recommend Them To Every Woman In My Life - Evie Magazine - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- Beverly Peterson | News, Sports, Jobs - The Daily news - Iron Mountain Daily News - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- Wingstop launches their own chicken sandwich in 12 flavors - USA TODAY - August 30th, 2022 [August 30th, 2022]
- Freeze Your Eggs: The Worst Advice Ever - The Stream - August 29th, 2022 [August 29th, 2022]
- Is Scott Galloway the Howard Stern of the Business World? - The New York Times - August 2nd, 2022 [August 2nd, 2022]
- Stephen Harper may have picked the wrong horse again - Al Jazeera English - August 2nd, 2022 [August 2nd, 2022]
- The Daily, American Dream, Emily DiDonato & Jordan Millington Liquorice Celebrated The August Cover With A Fun-filled Family Fte At The Maidstone... - August 2nd, 2022 [August 2nd, 2022]
- Reality's revenge: The return of stagflation | Columns | timesnews.net - Kingsport Times News - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- America's heart of darkness: Making sense of the nonsensical allure of MAGA - Salon - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- Letters to the editor: Irony and inspiration in Pope Francis's visit - National Post - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- Charles Barkley Thinks Bob Myers is the 'Second-Best Thing' to Happen to Golden State - Sports Illustrated - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- Can Q&A lead us out of the opinion wars its helped to fuel? - The Conversation - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- The World and Everything in It: July 29, 2022 - WORLD News Group - July 31st, 2022 [July 31st, 2022]
- Wisdom of the Ages: Email, Jordan Peterson, and a Latte - Patheos - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]
- Learn from these heroic saints who lived against the grain - Fox News - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]
- Vegans need to stop exaggerating the health benefits of a plant-based diet - Fast Company - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]
- Remembering the honest and natural voice of Amy Winehouse - The Daily Star - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]
- The Barstool Bros' Split Over Abortion Could Determine the Future of the GOP - POLITICO - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]
- From The Mailbag - The American Conservative - July 25th, 2022 [July 25th, 2022]