Image: Getty Images
"History owes an apology to LGBTQIA+ people and their families for the ignominy and ostracism they have faced"
Since April 18, all eyes have been on the Supreme Court of India as it hears a batch of petitions seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriage in India, or seeking equal marital rights.
A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Chief Justice of India DYChandrachud, and Justices SKKaul,RavindraBhat,HimaKohli, and PSNarasimha, is hearing the petitions had been hearing the said petitions since last week.
Online live hearings have so democratised a normally opaque process with unconfirmed reports suggesting that viewership on Netflix, the OTP platform has dipped as a result!
Same-sexand queercouples from around the country have approached the Supreme Court with a plea stating that same-sexand queermarriages should be legalised under the Special Marriage Act that currently allows for inter-religious marriages amongst others.Through this petitions, rights ancillary to marriage, such as family insurance, divorce, adoption, maintenance, succession are also being demanded by a number of petitioner.
The petitioners have made their arguments before the bench, and the union governments arguments are still being heard. It is worth noting thatthe two days before the bench was scheduled to hear the petitions, theCentre hadsubmitted a102-page documentopposing thepetitionsfiled by couples seeking equal marital rights, deeming itan "urban elitist concept far removed from the social ethos of the country." The Modi-led union government told the Supreme Court that the petitioners were advancing "mere urban elitist views for the purpose of social acceptance" by demanding equal marriage rights. According to this untested stance, neitheruncodifiedpersonal laws nor codified statutory laws recognise oraccept marriage between two individuals who are not biologically male and female. The union government hadalso stated that if the demands of the petitioners are heard and met, itwill wreak "complete havoc" on the delicate balance of personal laws and accepted societal values. Finally, the union government representated by none less than its blue eyed boy, Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta argued that the issue cannot be decided by a Court of Law and that it is up to the legislature to amend the law, if at all.
JamiatUlama-iHind, a representative of Muslims, has also filed theirobjections against the petitions, claiming that the pleas of the petitioners are an attack on the family system and violate all personal laws. "This concept of same-sex marriage goes to attack the family system rather than making a family through this process," it had said.Jamiatis being represented by Senior AdvocateKapilSibal, and is yet to be heard.
Even though this case is still being heard, the opposition views being expressed against the equal marriage rights petitionsare no longerlimited to the courtor the parties to the petitions, withmany groups voicing their opposition, making baseless claims in desperation, and asking the Supreme Court to simply, not hear the said petitions.
While the petitioners, queer community and LGBTQ+ activists have to hear the misinformed, downright derogatory arguments being made by the the union government, vociferously if ridiculously put by Solicitor GeneralTusharMehta, there is another lively debate being conducted outside of the court wheregovernmentagencies and mouth pieces, far-rightreligious leadersand groups of citizenry arestrongly opposingthe expansion of equal marital rights.
Opposition by the Bar Council of India
On April 23, a Sunday, the Bar Council of India (BCI) passed a resolution opposing legal recognition of same-sex and queermarriages, requesting that the Supreme Court refer the matter to Parliament because it would have far-reaching implications for socio-religious traditions.The BCIself-appointed themselvesto be the "mouthpiece of the common man," claiming that the legislature is "truly reflective of the will of the people" and that "more than 99.9% of the people in the country" oppose same-sexand queermarriage. The resolution further said that any decision by the Supreme Courtin favour of the petitioners in the case will be "treated as being against the country's culture and social religious structure."
Now, the BCI is a statutory bodywhosregulatory and representative mandate for the legal profession includes, among other things, establishing standards for professional conduct as well as protocol for advocates, protecting advocates' rights, privileges, and interests, and advocating for and promoting law reform. The council has so far not been pro-active in carrying out its function of promoting and supporting any sort or kind of legal reform by issuing this unnecessary and misinformed resolution with unsubstantiated claims. In doing so, the statutory body has not lived up toits mandate under the Advocates Act of 1961. More importantly, it questioned the Supreme Court's fundamental role in preserving constitutional principles in their true spirit and entirety. Furthermore, the BCI's lobbying of legislative primacy in the matter condemns its own queer members, some of whom are openlyqueer and have had to deal with homophobia indenial of being offered a judgeship, such as AdvocateSaurabhKripal, as well as the larger LGBTQIA+population, to suffer a deprivation of freedoms and rights as a consequence of legislative inaction.
The Council also departed fromits responsibility to promote law reform by opposing a judicial review of marriage laws, specifically the Special Marriage Act, which sought to recognise unions that did not conform to what different communities held to be "acceptable".The said resolution was criticised by many groups and individuals. Queer collectives from 36 Indian law schools, including National Law University Delhi, Faculty of Law, Delhi University and Gujarat National Law University,comprising of more than 600 students,condemned the BCI resolution as "ignorant, harmful, and antithetical to our Constitution and the spirit of inclusive social life," demonstrating the BCI's lack of understanding of its mandate. In a document titled "Representation against the bar council of Indias resolution on marriage equality", the students said they strongly condemn the BCIs "regressive andqueerphobicresolution on marriage equality. The statement also added: "It (BCI resolution) attempts to tell queer persons that the law and the legal profession have no place for them. We, the undersigned, are queer and allied student groups across Indian law schools."
A strong worded critique of the BCIs resolution was also expressed byTrinamoolCongress MPMahuaMoitrawho slammed theBCI for urging the Supreme Court not to hear the same-sex marriage caseand for its 99 percent Indians opposing it remark.Moitraaddressed the BCI in a series of tweets, saying you are oath-bound to protect constitutional morality, and not popular sentiment. Gentlemen - have you truly lost your minds? Even if 1 persons freedom is encroached on, SC is bound to hear it, the TMC MP said. She also brought forth the male-dominated culture of the BCI and wrote in another tweet, India worlds largest democracy with 49% women population. Bar Council of India however, is an all male body which hasnt held elections for the longest time. And BCI lecturing the Supreme Court on what 99% of Indians want Gentlemen, enough already. Zip it. She also said, Maybe if BCI held timely elections you wouldn't even be in your seats in your little boy's club with no women. Shame!
On April 28, the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) also passed a resolution condemning the Bar Council of India's statements opposing same-sex and queermarriage legalisation, as well as the hearing and decision-making process taking place in the Supreme Court of India. In their resolution, the SCBA stated that it was "highly inappropriate of the Bar Council of India" to oppose the same sex case hearing because it is the Supreme Court's right to decide whether the matter should be adjudicated by court or left to parliament.
Opposition by other parties and agencies
It is essential to note that while theSupremeCourtis not bound to consider the resolutionof the BCI,its corrosive effects cannot beignored.The openly homophobic resolution passed by the BCIrolled the stone, and soon enough, more agencies and organisations came in support of the BCI and the government. A day after the issuance of the BCI resolution, the Delhi's District Court Bar Associations also expressed their displeasure on the day-to-day proceedings on a batch of petitions presently examined by the Constitution Bench of Supreme Court pertaining to 'marriage equality rights for LGBTQIA+community'.It said that the social ramifications of the proceedings before the Supreme Court are colossal and have the potential for an unintended impact on the social fabric.
In a rare show of unity, leaders from all of India's main religions (the male leadership that us!) - Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Sikh and Christian -also opposed same sex union, with several of them insisting that marriage "is for procreation, not recreation".
TheVishwaHinduParishad(VHP), a far-right extremist group, with a record for aggression and violence against minorities, even causing disharmony, also took it upon themselves to criticise the Supreme Court, said the "haste" with which the Supreme Court is disposing of the petitions for legal recognition of same-sex marriages is not appropriate. The Hindu-tva body, which has the support of the current government at the centre, said the apex court should have sought the opinion of religious leaders and experts from diverse fields before launching on this constitutional challenge!
End April 2023, to top it all,21 retired high court judgeswrote an open lettersaying allowing same-sex marriage would have a "devastating impact on children, family and society".They added that it could increase incidence of HIV-Aids in India and expressed concern that it could "negatively affect the psychological and emotional development of children raised by same-sex couples".
On April 27, more than 120 eminent citizens, including retired high court judges and former bureaucrats, wrote to PresidentDroupadiMurmuto express their opposition to what they called "highly objectionable attempts" to legalize same-sex and queer marriages. They claimed that same-sexbehavioralinstitutions are irrational and unnatural in Indian society and culture.
Former CAG RajivMehrishi, former home secretary L CGoyal, former foreign secretaryShashank, former RAW chiefSanjeevTripathi, Justice (retired) S NDhingra, and Justice (retired)LokPal Singh were among those who signed the letter.
They stated that it was critical toadvisethe Supreme Court of the precise estimate and outcome of such a "culturally disastrous" step in the name of a "ground-breaking approach." They claimed that discussion about human institutional relations such as marriage is "essentially a legislative function," and that courts should "refrain" from creating, recognising, or demolishing the institution of marriage through judicial interpretation or by striking down or reading down the existing legislative framework for marriages.They also stated in the said letter that it was "widely appreciated" that same-sex relationship "can't create long-term or stable institutions".
On April 26, the Union Law MinisterKirenRijijualso said that an important matter like the institution of marriage should be decided by people of the country and that courts are not the forum to settle such issues. Referring to the Constitution bench of the top court hearing the matter,Rijijusaid, "If five wise men decide something which is correct according to them -- I cannot make any kind of adverse comments against them -- But if people do not want it, you cannot impose thingson the people..."
The views of the law minister came asno surprise as he has been indulging in an aggressive power battle with the highest judiciary, having the backing of the BJP government, with the current CJI of India. But what isdisappointing isthat, with the exception of the CPI(M), all the political opposition parties are keeping a prudent silence on the issue of legalising same-sex and queermarriages.
While it is necessary to keep in mind the opposing views being put forth and language being used to when it comes to expanding basic right to a community which has existed as a part of India since time immemorial, it is also essential to focus on the ones showing the community support while they fight this fight.
The support shown for the petitioners in their fight for marriage equality and ancillary rights
The petitioners for marriage equality received a significant boost when the Indian Psychiatric Society (IPS), the country's leading mental health group representing over 7,000 psychiatrists, issued a statement in their support.
"Homosexuality is not a disease," the IPS stated, adding that discrimination against LGBTQ+ people could cause furthermental health issues in them."
The Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) also supported the petition, stating that the federal and state governments should take steps to raise public awareness about the "normalcy" of same-sex family units. Multiple studies on same-sex parenting have shown that same-sex couples can be good parents, according to their report. The statement of the IPS carries a certain amount of weight because the Supreme Court referred to a similar statement supporting gay sex decriminalization in its decision in 2018.
On April 25, a group of over 400 parents from Sweekar-The Rainbow Parents wrote to Chief Justice of India (CJI) D YChandrachudurging that their LGBTQIA++ wards be granted the right to marriage equality. Sweekar-The Rainbow Parents is a group formed by the parents of Indian LGBTQIA++ wards with the aim of supporting each other to accept ones child fully and be happy as a family.
We are appealing to you to consider marriage equality, the letter said. The letter also said that We desire to see our children and children-in-law find final legal acceptance for their relationship under the Special Marriage Act in our country. We are certain that a nation as big as ours which respects its diversity and stands for the value of exclusion, will open its legal gate of marriage equality to our children too. We are growing old. Some of us will touch 80 soon, we hope that we will get to see the legal stamp on the rainbow marriage of our children in our lifetime.
The full letter of support can beread here:
Conclusion
A human rights issue has become a central debate in our country now, where one set of persons are demanding legal recognition and support as a marginalised community. This community is demanding equal and basic rights from the court, while the other side is demanding for their continued oppression and suppression in the name of culture and marital sanctity. The Indian Constitutiongives all citizens the right to marry a person of their choice and prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and their petition should be allowed since "constitutional morality is above social morality.
And yet, the queer community has had to approach the highest court of law and hear people oppose their demands stridently. They are making an impassioned please for simply, equal rights.
Related:
The question of diversity and inclusivity in the Indian judiciary
Transgender Woman is a Bride under Hindu Marriage Act: 2019 Judgement, Madras HC
No proposal for affirmative action in education or employment fortransgenders:Govt
Independent Views, Gender Orientation must not affect candidacy for judgeship: SC
SC Collegium recommends elevation of first openly gay judge to Delhi HC
Madras HC bats for LGBTQIA+ again, issues more directions to police, media
MtraGovtmoves HC against MAT Order directing inclusion ofTransgendersin police recruitment
Supreme Court directs Centre to frame policy on jobs for transgender persons
Transgender Activists Say UP Cop Beat Them up for Sheltering Trans Son inGurugram
Madras HC expresses dismay and anguish as NCERT removes report on gender non-conforming, transgender children
Same sex marriage is not an elitist concern:AkkaiPadmashali
Read more:
Equal marriage rights: A deep dive into the resistance, showcasing ... - SabrangIndia
- Government Oppression Of Climate Protesters Is Rampant. Are You Next? - CleanTechnica - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Invasion Day protests oppose oppression of indigenous Australians, genocide in Gaza - WSWS - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Florida's 'hostile' laws? Five laws NAACP listed in travel advisory. - St. Augustine Record - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Iran Faces A Huge Budget Deficit It Tries To Conceal - - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Satyendar Jain taken to Safdarjung Hospital after losing 35 kgs - The Statesman - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Opinion: Reassessing the approach to Israel | DW | 22.05.2023 - DW - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Reality Adventure - TIME - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- In Conversation with Stan Grant - Honi Soit - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Rep. Bare: Assembly Republicans' local government funding plan is ... - WisPolitics.com - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Never Again Is Right Now in Palestine - Jacobin magazine - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- UF community condemns bill defunding DEI initiatives - The Independent Florida Alligator - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Prices of basic commodities and foods have gone insane in Sierra ... - Sierra Leone Telegraph - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Don't cancel Gladstone. He was a true friend of freedom at home ... - The Telegraph - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- If you want to do things like gender ideology, go to Berkeley: DeSantis bans diversity, equity and inclusion in Florida colleges - The Mercury News - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- TikTok: The new frontier for political info-wars - DAWN.com - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Israeli Apartheid - The Legacy of the Ongoing Nakba at 75 [EN/AR ... - ReliefWeb - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- PPP's CEC condemns attacks on army installations, calls for ... - Pakistan Today - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Tim Scott says Im running for president of the United States in announcement speech live - The Guardian US - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Opinion | America's Poverty Is Built by Design - POLITICO - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- 'Pity these oppressed random attackers': Inside the thoughts of Canada's bail system - National Post - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- How Can We Resist Book Bans? This Banned Author Has Ideas. - Truthout - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Owners of Nigeria and their multiple worlds - Guardian Nigeria - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- When People Decide They Want Change, They Will Bring in Change - The Wire - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- 5 Interesting Facts about Simon Bolivar - The Collector - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- China Built Over A Million Uyghurs "Re-Education Camps" In 6 Years: Report - NDTV - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Queer folk, the hour to save ourselves has come - Daily Maverick - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- Preposterous! Book ban adds bureaucracy and removes parents ... - IndyStar - May 22nd, 2023 [May 22nd, 2023]
- End Jew Hatred: Fight for social justice must be above political fray - The Jerusalem Post - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Political strife, not protest anymore - The Korea JoongAng Daily - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- 'A Man Without a Gun Is Not a Citizen' - The Texas Observer - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- State Department Report Says China Oppressed Tibetan Buddhist ... - Central Tibetan Administration - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Facing Reality on South Africa - Council on Foreign Relations - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Federal Charges of Political Activists Show the Racist and ... - Left Voice - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Age of Disorder || Pakistan on the Brink: Down with Capitalist PDM ... - International Socialist - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Tim Stevenson | Living with the Long Emergency: Rising Fascism ... - Brattleboro Reformer - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Members of new City Council weigh in on water bills - CBS Chicago - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- DIIR Statement on 28th Anniversary of Enforced Disappearance of ... - Central Tibetan Administration - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- KAN-WIN shares timeline of gender-based violence toward Asian ... - Daily Northwestern - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Alleged leaker fixated on guns and envisioned 'race war' - The Washington Post - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Employment and Labour pays tribute to Dr Dennis George - South African Government - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Opinion | Trump Cannot Be Unseen - The New York Times - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Toronto to rally against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia ... - NOW Toronto - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Election 2023: Te Pti Mori accuses Prime Minister Chris Hipkins of 'oppression' for telling parties to 'be careful' with demands - Newshub - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- What's the current state of LGBTQ rights in Europe? - Euronews - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Baptist Health Foundation Receives $3 Million Gift from the Jos ... - South Florida Hospital News - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- The Politics and Moral Economics of Seun Kutis Police Assault - Tekedia - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Is a temporary coalition of anger against the old regime a basis for ... - Sierra Leone Telegraph - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Mexico: against 'neoliberalism' or capitalism? The final year of ... - In Defence of Marxism - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- White Christian Nationalism and the 2023 Montana Legislature ... - Daily Montanan - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Left-wing lawmakers press for federal reparations for Black Americans: 'We're here to demand it' - Fox News - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Underground cyphers are helping young Kashmiris reclaim their ... - Huck Magazine - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Tory MP uses controversial term connected to antisemitic conspiracies - The Jerusalem Post - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Fijis 1987 coup: Why did Prime Minister Rabuka apologise to the Indo-Fijian community? - The Indian Express - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Declaration on the Migrant Crisis: Socialists From the U.S., Mexico ... - Left Voice - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- WNBA star Brittney Griner standing and listening to national anthem - Gainesville Sun - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Imran Khan to unveil next plan of action at a rally on Thursday - ANI News - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Delta Youths Threaten Showdown Over Exclusion In Multi-Billion ... - SaharaReporters.com - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Remarks by Homeland Security Advisor Dr. Liz Sherwood-Randall ... - The White House - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Are some human rights more important than others? Religious ... - Jacksonville Journal-Courier - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Postcolonial Plague: The Legacy of Apartheid South Africa in ... - Brown Political Review - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- UN expert urges Japan to step up pressure on Myanmar junta - OHCHR - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- CSIS confirms to MP that he and family were targeted by China - The Globe and Mail - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Opposition leader says govt sent a bureaucrat to talk with calan - Duvar English - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- The Badger Herald Editorial Board: The bounds of free speech The ... - The Badger Herald - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- AIbom NLC to Set up Monitoring Team on Petroleum Products - THISDAY Newspapers - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Amplifying Iranian Voices: The Call for Freedom and Democracy ... - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- As inequality deepens, who will rewrite the rules? - Al Jazeera English - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Discover the Brilliance of George Orwell: Books That Will Inspire You - Economic Times - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Nature has way of settling scores, says UP CM Yogi Adityanath on Atiq Ahmad's turf - Times of India - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Tens of thousands hold Labor Day rallies nationwide - The Korea Herald - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Incoming Nigerian Government Must Improve Poverty Wage ... - SaharaReporters.com - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Can the European Union Tackle Afghanistan's Crises? - The Diplomat - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Iran sees nationwide protests, night rallies marking Int'l Labor Day | - The Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- G20: Responsibilities of the people of PoK - ANI News - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- From IWD to May Day: Connecting working women's struggles - Spring Magazine - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- 1 May 2023 || The Working Class is Back! ISA - International Socialist - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Are the Marxists on to something? Catholic World Report - Catholic World Report - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Manoj Kumar Jha and Ghazala Jamil write: Why Pratap Bhanu Mehta is wrong about social justice politics and caste census - The Indian Express - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Generational crimes are being committed thick and fast. No wonder Australian kids dont vote conservative - The Guardian - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- A Proclamation on Jewish American Heritage Month, 2023 - U.S. ... - US Embassy and Consulate in Poland - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]