Now those yard signs are at the center of a Middlesex Superior Court suit filed by the Jacksons against the city of Newton, which currently imposes limits on when and for how long signs with political messages may be displayed.
I feel very strongly about freedom of speech and freedom of expression rights on my private property, Martina Jackson said in an interview. She said the citys ordinance is inherently a violation of freedom of speech and expression.
The city has rescinded the order against the Jacksons, and a city spokeswoman said Monday that officials are working on a new proposed sign ordinance. In January, a city attorney told a group of city councilors that the current regulation is unconstitutional.
Nearly 50 cities and towns in Greater Boston curb when and for how long such signs are allowed on private property, according to a Globe review of local ordinances. Some communities, including Newton and Malden, go further and prohibit obscene language on signs.
Most of the communities refer to political signs in their local laws, while some, including Newton, use the term election signs. Maldens regulations refer to personal expression signs.
Eugene Volokh, the Gary T. Schwartz distinguished professor of law at the University of California Los Angeles School of Law, warned that such regulations violate the First Amendments free speech protections.
If an ordinance says no political signs, or political signs only [within] 30 days of an election, or an ordinance says, no signs with vulgarities, that is unconstitutional, Volokh said in a phone interview.
Justin Silverman, the executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition, said political speech is at the very top of the spectrum of protection under the Constitution.
Under the First Amendment, they as government officials should not be in a position where theyre deciding what is, or is not, permissible speech, Silverman said.
I feel very strongly about freedom of speech and freedom of expression rights on my private property.
Courts have long upheld peoples right to post signs with political messages on their property. In a 1994 Supreme Court decision, the court struck down as unconstitutional a Missouri communitys rule prohibiting homeowners from displaying many kinds of signs.
The Supreme Courts ruling in a 2015 case this one involving an Arizona communitys sign regulations imposed tight limitations on so-called content-based regulation of speech.
In 2019, a Holyoke regulation that placed restrictions on lawn signs displayed on private property was declared unconstitutional by a federal judge in Boston.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts challenged the Holyoke regulation in court, and that same year, released an open letter to cities and towns urging them to scrap similar ordinances.
Ruth Bourquin, the organizations senior and managing attorney, said that even with social media and the Internet, a yard sign with a political message remains an important way to communicate.
Expressing ones views from ones own home is one of the most fundamental ways people can express their views on political and social matters, Bourquin said in an interview.
In 2015, the town of Concord ordered a local family to remove a Black Lives Matter sign they posted on a strip of town-owned land in front of their home. Concord had a regulation that controlled the display of political signs on town-owned land. Following widespread public criticism, Town Meeting removed the rule the following year.
In a recent Globe interview, Johnny Cole said his family has continued to display a Black Lives Matter sign in front of their Concord home.
Putting a sign up like that is a way to say, We are going to put our values out in front, so that people know where we stand, Cole said.
Not everyone believes cities and towns have no role in determining what is acceptable speech in public spaces.
Malden Mayor Gary J. Christenson defended his citys regulations for personal expression signs, which may not be displayed longer than 60 days per year. Malden also prohibits signs with obscene or pornographic subjects and the city itself determines what is allowed, according to its regulations.
The city aims to protect the rights of all residents, including parents who dont want to expose their children to some language, according to Christenson.
With his response to the Globe, Christenson included a photograph of a sign displayed outside a Malden residence that criticized President Biden along with a series of expletives.
There are certain words which are inarguably obscene, Christenson said. Personal expression is not regulated, obscenities are.
In Winthrop, Terence Delehanty, who serves as police chief and acting town manager, said the town suspended enforcement of its sign regulations due to free speech concerns.
I think the First Amendment is the most important amendment and it should be saved and it should be preserved. People who dont stand up for it are going to lose it.
Joe Casieri, a Plymouth resident ordered by the town to remove his signs criticizing President Biden.
Plymouth is now working to eliminate its political sign regulations, after the states ACLU branch interceded last year in a case where the town ordered resident Joe Casieri to remove signs critical of Biden. The towns rules at the time limited when signs could be displayed, and prohibited insulting language in public areas.
Casieri, in an interview, said that after the town ordered the signs removed, he contacted his attorneys and the local ACLU. The organization, in an open letter, called on the town to repeal those regulations.
Residents have a constitutional right to post signs on their own property expressing their political views, according to the letter.
Plymouths Town Meeting is expected to vote on changes to its sign ordinance in April, according to Lee Hartmann, the acting town manager. Plymouth dropped its prohibition against insulting language last fall.
Casieri said he currently displays a sign that criticizes Biden outside his home.
I think the First Amendment is the most important amendment and it should be saved and it should be preserved, Casieri said. People who dont stand up for it are going to lose it.
In Newton, Jackson said she kept her yard signs up to reflect the work it took to achieve campaign victories in 2020, particularly Bidens presidential win.
Democracy is absolutely crucial and worth fighting for, and that sign seemed, to us, such a validation of our beliefs and our efforts, Jackson said.
The citys ordinance regarding election signs allows people to display them no sooner than 45 days before an election, and they must be removed within a week after the vote.
Newtons election sign regulation including the time restriction was included in the citys Candidate Guide for its 2021 municipal election.
Yes, election signs are authorized in residential districts, however they are strictly regulated, the guide said.
The municipal law community has understood there are First Amendment issues regarding election sign ordinances, Maura OKeefe, then a Newton assistant city solicitor, told city councilors in a January meeting.
The 2015 Supreme Court decision supported the Newton Law Departments contention that the citys sign ordinance was indeed unconstitutional, OKeefe said. The city attempted to replace the ordinance in 2018, but the measure was never adopted.
Jackson said she and her husband were ordered to remove their signs twice under the ordinance in 2021, after the city received a written complaint. They received a verbal order May 6 from a city official who visited their home, and a written notice of violation dated June 28 that ordered removal of the signs.
The couple moved to defend themselves on free speech grounds, but the city abruptly changed course. The removal order was rescinded Aug. 6, according to the city, but Jackson said the city didnt clear them of violating the ordinance. And when the city zoning board declined to hear their appeal in September, it did not address the First Amendment issues.
Peter Harrington, an attorney representing the couple, told the board: The Jacksons have the right to have their name cleared.
The Jacksons complaint, which was filed in November, asks the court to require Newtons zoning board to hear their appeal. Meanwhile, their signs remain in place outside their home.
Newtons Planning Department, in consultation with the Law Department, is working on a new proposed sign ordinance to be docketed as its own zoning amendment, according to Ellen Ishkanian, a city spokeswoman.
The City is only aware of one enforcement effort of the election sign ordinance since the 2015 Reed decision, which was subsequently rescinded, Ishkanian said in a statement.
On a recent weekday morning, yard signs were visible outside several homes in Newton. Some signs backed Black Lives Matter, others had messages of support for firefighters and law enforcement officers.
Silverman, with the First Amendment Coalition, said that generally, governments shouldnt be setting the rules for free speech.
If there is a bedrock principle to the First Amendment, its that government should not be determining for us what is offensive, what is vulgar, and what speech should not be said, Silverman said.
John Hilliard can be reached at john.hilliard@globe.com.
- Here's what the law says about protesting on Texas college campuses - The Texas Tribune - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- The awkward truth about sex and free speech | Nina Welsch - The Critic - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Get the Facts: How far does the First Amendment go? - WDSU New Orleans - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- NC school adopts free speech policy after firing professor who opposed critical theory - ADF Media - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Biden's Government Takeover of the Internet Threatens Freedom of Speech - RealClearPolicy - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Professor tackles subject of limiting freedom to express - Yahoo News Canada - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Louisiana Tech earns top rating for free speech - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Freedom of speech 'under assault' at Palestine protests in US universities - The National - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Is TikTok Protected Speech Or Threat To Americans? Wyoming Legislators Split - Cowboy State Daily - April 25th, 2024 [April 25th, 2024]
- Free Speech Aids Racial Justice. Activists Must Defend It. | Opinion - Harvard Crimson - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Progressives Are Ditching Free Speech To Fight 'Disinformation' - Reason - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- There is a way out of cancel culture but it's not free speech - Times Higher Education - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Editor's take: Limiting hate speech not a First Amendment violation - The Pajaronian - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Israel's Proposed 'Terror Incitement' Law Is a Dangerous Threat to Freedom of Speech - Haaretz Editorial - Haaretz - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Colorado bill tasking attorney general to study online 'misinformation' sparks First Amendment debate - coloradopolitics.com - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- 10 Worst Censors: 2024 | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Harvard University's Lifetime Censorship Award: Impact on Freedom of Speech and Journalism - Medriva - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Reading is freedom of speech, says 'ABCs of Book Banning' director - KCRW's This...Is Interesting - Podcast en iVoox - iVoox - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Freedom of speech or lack of civility? Resident perturbed by others berating Killeen City Council and mayor - The Killeen Daily Herald - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Harvard Students Should Know Freedom Of Speech Is Not Freedom From Consequences - The Federalist - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- FIRE launches six-figure free speech campaign with primetime ... - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- UGS responds to free speech concerns on campus - The Stanford Daily - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- UCI Year of Free Speech kicks off with virtual event - UCI News - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Book review: A Constitution To Keep: Sedition And Free Speech In ... - Maktoob media - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Protestors, supporters gather on HUB lawn for Riley Gaines' Free ... - The Daily Collegian - October 16th, 2023 [October 16th, 2023]
- Editorial: When is free speech not free on college campuses? - TribLIVE - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- How do you handle free speech issues in higher education, popular discourse? - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Free speech protections are under threat in Texas Legislature - The Dallas Morning News - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Should Irish universities introduce mandatory free speech classes? - The Irish Times - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Florida House approves bill that would change rules around campus ... - WUFT - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Free speech bill 'could protect extreme views' - Times Higher Education - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Ronald Collins and Ronnie Marmo: Comedy clubs are free speech ... - Independent Record - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- A notable foundation for freedom of speech - Newsday - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Troy, Alabama A&M receive poor 'red' rating from campus free ... - 1819 News - April 27th, 2023 [April 27th, 2023]
- Freedom of Speech Pros and Cons: What Both Sides Think - March 8th, 2023 [March 8th, 2023]
- What is the freedom of speech? - Alliance Defending Freedom - January 25th, 2023 [January 25th, 2023]
- freedom of speech | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute - January 25th, 2023 [January 25th, 2023]
- First Amendment: Freedom of Speech | LII / Legal Information Institute - January 25th, 2023 [January 25th, 2023]
- Freedom of speech online: What are the Florida and Texas laws the US top court could hear a challenge to - The Indian Express - January 25th, 2023 [January 25th, 2023]
- Elon Musk says new Twitter policy is freedom of speech & not freedom ... - January 4th, 2023 [January 4th, 2023]
- CNN Calls Freedom of Speech 'Nonsense' in Moronic Rant - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- Ex-CNN journo and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa explains why ... - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- Hate speech - Wikipedia - November 27th, 2022 [November 27th, 2022]
- Freedom of Speech and Expression | CSCE - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- Why Is Freedom Of Speech Important? The Relevance Explained - November 25th, 2022 [November 25th, 2022]
- 'Freedom Of Speech, But Not Freedom Of Reach': Musk Reinstates Kathy Griffin And Jordan Peterson Amid New Policy But Not Trump Yet - Forbes - November 21st, 2022 [November 21st, 2022]
- Freedom of speech is in jeopardy - The Ridgefield Press - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- The Alex Jones trap: How 'owning the libs' can turn into a self-own for conservatives - Washington Examiner - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Just released: The 2022-2023 College Free Speech Rankings - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Russian Court's Ban of Newspaper Novaya Gazeta is a Punch in the Face of Freedom of Speech - Novinite.com - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Bangladeshi Editor Rifat Munim Supports Salman Rushdie's Freedom Of Speech: 'Why React To The Book Or The Cartoons In This Childish Way? Why Show... - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Crikey! The exclamation of Free Speech - RadioInfo Australia - Radioinfo - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Batley row 'shows how extremists are using blasphemy to attack free speech' - The Telegraph - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- Expansion of Title IX Tramples First Amendment - California Globe - September 7th, 2022 [September 7th, 2022]
- BRACK: S.C. Senate is poking free speech bear on abortion Statehouse Report - Statehouse Report - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- Will AG Ken Paxton join the fight for freedom of speech? - Wilson County News - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- The UK Government Wants to Scrap the Human Rights Act. Here's What to Know. - Global Citizen - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- Cancel culture empowers the powerful at everyone elses expense - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- Repressive executive order from UNC Chapel Hill student government cuts off funding for pro-life individuals, causes - Foundation for Individual... - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- Editorial: Alex Jones' lessons on the First and Sixth Amendments - CT Insider - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- NEW for 7/29: How abortion now works in S.C., and more Statehouse Report - Statehouse Report - July 29th, 2022 [July 29th, 2022]
- Why Does The State Panic Over Free Speech? - The Friday Times - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- How to Fix the Bias Against Free Speech on Campus - The Atlantic - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- Universities are in denial over the free-speech crisis - Spiked - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- Who Really Benefits From the First Amendment? - Tablet Magazine - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- Legal Eagle: Is free speech abused to flout others rights? - Free Press Journal - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- Free speech 'stifled' as universities cancel record number of speakers - The Telegraph - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- The Online Safety Bill could lead to the biggest curtailment of free speech in modern history - The Telegraph - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- LAWSUIT: Professor sues University of Washington after admins punish him for 'inappropriate' opinion - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- VICTORY: Art institute reverses expulsion for student who retweeted sexual art - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - July 17th, 2022 [July 17th, 2022]
- Twitter and Freedom of Speech | News, Sports, Jobs - The Mining Gazette - Daily Mining Gazette - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- Amber Heard, the ACLU, and the Future of Free Speech - Reason - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- In my view: Freedom of speech is important - Slough and Windsor Observer - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- New AGB Resource Prepares Higher Education Board Members to Balance Freedom of Speech with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion - PR Web - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- 'What's the point inviting me on!' Piers Morgan and student erupt in free speech row - Express - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- Binance CEO says 'free speech is very hard to define' - Business Insider - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- The Deeper Significance of Justice Thomas's Second Amendment Opinion - The Epoch Times - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- Twitter and freedom of speech - Washington Times - June 22nd, 2022 [June 22nd, 2022]
- Bill of Rights to strengthen freedom of speech and curb bogus human rights claims - GOV.UK - June 22nd, 2022 [June 22nd, 2022]
- Twitter and the freedom of speech | Opinion | journal-spectator.com - Wharton Journal Spectator - June 22nd, 2022 [June 22nd, 2022]