On a muggy evening last week at a golf course in southern Brooklyn, more than 200 Democratic Party judicial delegates packed into a large white tent. Theyd been elected in June from across the borough to be the peoples voice at the annual convention where the party decides on its nominees for Brooklyns Supreme Court.
In reality, however, their choices were predetermined.
Two days earlier, Kings County Democratic Party executives had hashed out a single slate of 12 candidates for the delegates to vote up or down on, leaving them no chance to weigh individual contestants for the bench.
Standing at the front of the tent with a microphone, Jeffrey Feldman, a longtime party operative in a black suit and light blue tie, read off the pre-selected names, and asked for the delegates to say AYE or NAY.
After hearing shouts from both sides for a few seconds, the party functionary had made up his mind. The ayes have it, he told the crowd to applause.
Feldman was still reading off a sheet of paper ratifying the vote, when Katie Walsh, a first-time judicial delegate from Sunset Park, walked up to a microphone stand in the crowd and interrupted him.
You havent got evidence that the nays were the minority so you have to go and do a roll call vote, she said.
Motion for roll call vote, Walsh continued. Motion for roll call vote!
Within seconds, her mic was cut off.
The brief public spectacle that got those 12 names on the November ballot for Brooklyn Supreme Court offers only a hint of the true nature of the process which began behind closed doors months before the official convention.
It featured significant sums of money moving between campaign and committee accounts, phone calls from party leaders strategizing on how to best get their picks through, and even near fisticuffs at a private meeting of party executives deciding on the candidates.
And this was a relatively harmonious year.
From the outside, the process couldnt appear more democratic: judicial screening panels, elected delegates, and a public vote on which names make it to the general election ballot.
But in practice, critics have contended for decades, its a system thats been designed to allow the Brooklyn Democratic Party leaders to hand-pick the boroughs Supreme Court justices, who preside over life-changing cases for residents ranging from criminal felony charges to intra-party election disputes to high-dollar civil matters.
While the party nominees still have to win on the general election ballot in November, in blue Brooklyn, convention endorsements almost guarantee candidates a seat on the bench.
Its a little skit, a little theater skit, where the party leaders essentially with different criteria thats known only to themselves select people, and delegates just go along, said Margarita Lopez Torres, a former Brooklyn Surrogates Court judge who challenged the process in a failed lawsuit that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2007.
Its certainly not the best way to select judges, she added. Were all kind of stuck with it.
Two days before the convention, the real decisions were hashed out at Nicks Lobster House, an old-school seafood joint on Brooklyns southeastern shoreline.
There, over plates of calamari and chicken wings, party executives haggled over their preferred candidates for the bench many of whom had hobnobbed at their local political clubs, helped them with their candidate petitions, and made more than $108,000 in combined campaign contributions to party leaders election accounts and clubs in the months and years beforehand.
Cheryl Gonzales, a Housing Court judge whom party executives decided to reward with a nomination that day, had previously shelled out nearly $12,000 in campaign contributions to party leaders, the party committee and affiliated Democratic clubs.
She received 40 votes from party leaders, more than any other candidate in the pack.
Aaron Maslow, a former election attorney for Brooklyns Democratic party boss, Flatbush Assemblymember Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn, also got the nod from the executive committee.
Over his career as an attorney, Maslow had spent more than $30,000 on mailers and campaign contributions to help party executives close to the establishment with most of it going to his wife, a former party leader who last year chose to resign from her post over her racially charged comments about Chinese and Palestinian people.
And in the months leading up to the June primary, the election attorney had also worked to help numerous establishment-backed Democrats, including some of the party leaders weighing in that day, with their signature petitions.
If you had your petitions filed this year they were done by Aaron Maslow for free night after night, said Frank Seddio, an influential party executive from Canarsie, speaking on Maslows behalf at the secret pre-meeting.
Seddio, who clashed with progressives in his previous role as party boss, closed his speech for Maslow by noting that the party chairs former election attorney would be an outstanding judge especially in the election part, a reference to the courtroom where establishment and progressive Democrats litigate pivotal intra-party disputes.
Other district leaders, hailing from self-styled reform clubs, immediately pushed back during the meeting, pointing out that Maslow was vying for the Supreme Court nomination despite having never served as a lower court judge a typical stepping-stone position.
We have a list of people who have served in the civil court for a length of time with stellar records who arent being considered, said Doug Schneider, a party executive from Park Slope and a civil rights attorney by trade, to the gathering. And theyre not being considered because Aaron Maslow did a lot of favors for people.
Those arguments coming from the reform faction didnt move the majority of party executives allied with Bichotte Hermelyn, all of whom voted him in.
Despite considerable alignment between the Democratic establishment and party dissidents on most of the other candidates, the night ended with Seddio having to be held back from fighting another outgoing party leader, David Schwartz.
Schwartz had recently lost his seat as district leader in a close race after facing considerable opposition from party boss Bichotte Hermelyn and her ally Mayor Eric Adams, after Schwartz endorsed Andrew Yang rather than Adams in last years mayoral race.
That night at Nicks Lobster House, Schwartz questioned whether Seddio had misrepresented which nominees were backed by a party leader who was absent from the meeting. Following the meeting, Seddio had to be restrained from physically going after him, video of the incident shows.
What I am is a fucking Sicilian who will take your fucking heart out, the septuaginarian shouted as Schwartz pointed his cell phone camera at him. You should only suffer a terrible death.
Seddio and Schwartz didnt respond to voice messages seeking comment.
A number of witnesses said the group was kicked out of the restaurant after the blowup.
The restaurant staff was like, Everyone needs to leave, recalled Julio Pea III, a Sunset Park party executive affiliated with the New Kings Democrats, a dissident progressive caucus. Its embarrassing that were resorting to violence and aggression at that level.
Two days later, hundreds of judicial delegates ventured out to the Marine Park Golf Course for the official vote.
As the proceedings began, Seddio congregated on the left side of the clubhouse with the dozen pre-selected nominees while the delegates who were nominally voting on the candidates went to the right from the clubhouse, noisily filling more than 200 white folding chairs assembled neatly in rows.
The quicker we can get started the quicker we can leave, party leader Joe Bova said shortly after 6:30 p.m. in a bid to hush the crowd.
In an oddity of the rules governing the evenings process, the attendees were required to spend more than 45 minutes conducting a roll call vote to nominate the person who would chair the convention vote. The meeting chair, Feldman, was approved by a vote of 167 to 38.
But there was no count of votes for the actual nomination of judges, despite Walshs subsequent attempt to request one from the crowd of delegates.
How can you possibly take this vote of something that is so critically important, like voting for New York State Supreme Court judges, and do it in such a way that its based on the loudest yelling of voices? Walsh said in a subsequent interview with THE CITY.
The entire affair including thank you speeches by most of the nominees concluded in 99 minutes.
Afterward, in a press release, party spokespeople declared the convention was a success, with delegates civically engaged in a fair and transparent process, and pointed to the historic diversity of the nominees.
The final slate included the nomination of six Black female candidates including one who is likely to be the first ever Haitian-American on the bench in Brooklyn.
Congratulations to all the nominees, who have proven track records of progressive judicial and courtroom achievements and will continue to help bring fairness and impartiality to the courts, said party chair Bichotte Hermelyn. Im ecstatic to see these groundbreaking nominations happen under my leadership, and Im confident Brooklyns judicial system will remain in extremely capable hands when the nominees are elected in November.
The formal process for landing a nomination begins earlier in the year with screenings that determine which candidates are eligible for the partys approval but the glad-handing, schmoozing and campaign donations are a years-long endeavor.
Some good government groups have also questioned the makeup of the judicial screening panel, whose attorneys sometimes land paid assignments from sitting judges whose qualifications they review.
Former judge Lopez Torres filed her lawsuit challenging the process for picking Supreme Court nominees in 2004 after she was repeatedly prevented from participating in the partys screenings and encountered obstacles in her bid to identify the names of judicial delegates whom she might convince to nominate her to a seat.
While the lawsuit ultimately failed in the countrys highest court, the Brooklyn federal district court ruling unequivocally agreed with Lopez Torres that the process was rigged to preclude any challenges from judges not endorsed by party leaders.
The plaintiffs have demonstrated convincingly that local major party leaders not the voters or the delegates to the judicial nominating conventions control who becomes a Supreme Court Justice and when, wrote former federal judge John Gleeson in a January 2006 ruling. The result is an opaque, undemocratic selection procedure that violates the rights of the voters and the rights of candidates who lack the backing of the local party leaders.
Gleeson found that while technically there were other paths to the ballot available to candidates not backed by county leaders including petitioning to get on the ballot themselves or convincing judicial delegates to nominate them from the convention floor the obstacles were such that these options were practically impossible in the real world.
He noted in his ruling granting a preliminary injunction that in the four decades prior, no one recommended for the ballot by county leaders had failed to secure a nomination by the judicial delegates.
Reasonably diligent candidates who lack the support of entrenched party leaders stand virtually no chance of obtaining a major party nomination, no matter how qualified they are and no matter how much support they enjoy among the registered voters of the party, he wrote.
Lopez and self-styled party reformers thought Gleesons blistering decision, which was subsequently affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, signaled the end of Brooklyns top-down convention process.
But two years after that initial victory, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the lower court findings.
The question of whether New Yorks convention system ensured judicial candidates had a fair shot was for the legislatures, not judges, to determine, noted Justice Antonin Scalia in the 9-0 opinion.
Wrote Scalia: Party conventions, with their attendant smoke-filled rooms and domination by party leaders, have long been an accepted manner of selecting party candidates.
Get THE CITY Scoop
Sign up and get the latest stories from THE CITY delivered to you each morning
Thank you for your submission!
Continue reading here:
Holding Court: How Brooklyns Democratic Party Execs Select the Judges on Your Ballot - THE CITY
- Sen. Chris Murphy urges Democrats to follow Tom Suozzi and go on the offensive on the border - NBC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New Mexico's Democrat-led House rejects proposal for paid family and medical leave - The Seattle Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats see 2024 blueprint in N.Y. election that centered on immigration - The Washington Post - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats cheer New York win as good omen for November. But is it enough to calm anxiety over Biden? - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Leaning Into Migrant Woes, Suozzi Paves Election-Year Path for Democrats - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York Special Election Live Results: Tom Suozzi Wins George Santos's Seat - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats win another special election, and 4 more takeaways from New York's House race - ABC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- NY Special Election Winner Tom Suozzi to Fill Santos Seat - Bloomberg - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Suozzi wins special election to replace Santos in New York - NPR - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New House lines in New York would boost 2 Democrats and a Republican - POLITICO - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats win back George Santos seat in hotly contested election - POLITICO - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats and Republicans hold Black History Month celebrations with an eye on November's election - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- NY-03 Special: Four Takeaways from Suozzi and Democrats' Decisive Win - The Cook Political Report - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York special election results: The Democrats flipped George Santos' old seat. But here's the real story. - Slate - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- West Virginia bill defining gender is transphobic and 'political rubbish,' Democrats say - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Biden isn't leaving the 2024 race, but how would Democrats pick a nominee if he did? - ABC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Proposed TikTok ban dies in Virginias Democratic-controlled House - The Hill - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | Tom Suozzi Makes the Democrats Look Good for a New York Minute - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Tom Suozzi buoyed by higher Democratic turnout, decline in GOP voting - Newsday - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- We asked young Black voters about Biden and the Democrats. Here's what we learned - NPR - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York Special Election: Tom Suozzi Wins House Seat Vacated by George Santos - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Tom Suozzi to replace republican George Santos in U.S. House of Representatives - 13newsnow.com WVEC - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Who is Tom Suozzi, Democrat in New York's special election - The Washington Post - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Tom Suozzi wins special election to fill George Santos's House seat. Here's why it matters beyond New York. - Yahoo News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Wins Special Election for George Santos' House Seat Mother Jones - Mother Jones - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Not an Ordinary Special Election, and Yet a Typical Result - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Trump slams Democrat Nikki Haley on home turf ahead of South Carolina primary: Shes finished - Washington Examiner - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Senate Democrat calls GOP hostage-taking in debt ceiling deal making dangerous: This cannot be the norm - The Hill - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Scoop: Dems told to say debt ceiling bill rejects GOP's "extreme demands" - Axios - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Debt Ceiling Is First Big Test for Hakeem Jeffries, the Top House Democrat - The New York Times - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Does the debt deal have enough GOP support? This Democratic senator says he's worried. - POLITICO - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Delbert the Democrat and his friends in the liberal media - leader-call.com - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Why I believe RFK Jr. will be the 2024 Democratic nominee - The Hill - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Republican blitz on LGBTQ issues exposes fractures among Texas ... - The Texas Tribune - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Texas Passes Bills Targeting Elections in Democratic Stronghold - The New York Times - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- The Rise of Religious 'Nones' Won't Save Democrats - New York Magazine - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Democrats trade insults over bill at committee meeting - Spectrum News NY1 - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Kentucky Democrat Who Lost Bid to Unseat McConnell Fined $10K ... - Heritage.org - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Mississippi Democrats improperly excluded candidate for governor ... - The Associated Press - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Asian voters in the U.S. tend to be Democratic, but Vietnamese ... - Pew Research Center - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Gilbert, Mesa lawmakers unimpressed with Democrat's reason for ... - Daily Independent - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Former Republican and Democratic Governors from Alabama ... - Death Penalty Information Center - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- 3 Tennessee Democrats face removal from office in Thursday vote after gun control protest on state House floor - CNN - April 6th, 2023 [April 6th, 2023]
- Democrat or Republican: The Official Differences | Merriam-Webster - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- Truck driver who upset top N.J. Democrat in 2021 faces GOP primary challenge in big election year - NJ.com - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- A top Democrats radical plan to deal with Trumps worst judge and protect abortion rights - Vox.com - February 20th, 2023 [February 20th, 2023]
- About the Democratic Party - Democrats - February 7th, 2023 [February 7th, 2023]
- Democratic Party (United States) - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ... - February 2nd, 2023 [February 2nd, 2023]
- Democrat NYC Mayor Adams calls on federal government to play more proactive role to secure border - Fox News - January 17th, 2023 [January 17th, 2023]
- Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin announces he has 'serious but curable form of cancer' - CNN - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Sen. Sinema's switch to Independent will not impact Democrats' control of the chamber, representatives say - CNBC - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- 'People are fed up': As NC Democrats reflect on election missteps, a party shake-up is underway - WRAL News - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- What is a Democrat? (with pictures) - Historical Index - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- This is the late message some Democrats believe could make a difference in close elections - CNN - November 1st, 2022 [November 1st, 2022]
- Dylan Roberts in his words: The Democrat running for a seat in Senate District 8 promises to focus on living affordability, the environment and rural... - October 25th, 2022 [October 25th, 2022]
- POLITICO Playbook: Where Democrats can find some good news - POLITICO - POLITICO - October 21st, 2022 [October 21st, 2022]
- Kill the babies to curb inflation? Democrats are the real abortion extremists - Washington Examiner - October 21st, 2022 [October 21st, 2022]
- The vote to subpoena Trump shows Democrats have found their fighting spirit - The Guardian US - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Cameron Smith: Is the worst Republican better than the best Democrat? - AL.com - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Inflation report is bad news for Democrats - The Hill - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats try to break through on drug pricing message - The Hill - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Meet the Black Republican whos aiming to flip a Democratic held House seat in heavily blue Connecticut - Yahoo News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats Worry They're Being Overshadowed in Arizona's Governor Race - Yahoo News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats suggest shifting weapons from Saudi Arabia to Ukraine - The Guardian US - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- WATCH: Voters react to Nancy Pelosi claiming Democrats will win midterm elections without Trump on the ballot - Fox News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard says she is leaving the Democratic Party - NPR - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Oregon could elect a non-Democrat governor for the first time in 40 years - Statesman Journal - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- 'The Great Realignment': Democrats Leave Party in Droves, and What It Could Mean for GOP in November - CBN.com - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Texas Democrat uses edited photo of GOP opponent in campaign ad that makes her appear more aggressive - Washington Examiner - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- This Democrat Living On Nearly $400,000 Is Frustrated By Inflation - Washington Free Beacon - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Why Kansass Democratic Governor Isnt Talking About Abortion But Her GOP Opponent Is - FiveThirtyEight - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Can Democrats Win 52 Senate Seats And Kill The Filibuster? - FiveThirtyEight - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Ricky Jones: Black men are not the problem for Stacey Abrams and Democrats - Courier Journal - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- How Democrats are trying to counter a wave of GOP attacks on crime - POLITICO - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Why Democrats' midterm optimism could be misguided - The Hill - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Will The Polls Overestimate Democrats Again? - FiveThirtyEight - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Lauren Boebert's Democratic opponent forgot he was previously registered as a Democrat - Washington Examiner - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Democrats' No. 1 fall goal: Try not to 'poke the bear' - POLITICO - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Is This When Democrats Finally Learn How to Message? - The New Republic - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Meet the Democrat on a Six-Figure Income Who Cant Afford To Buy Her Kids Shoes - Washington Free Beacon - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]