Imagine I told you in 1970 that I was going to invent a wondrous tool. This new tool would make it possible for anyone with access and most of humanity would have access to quickly communicate and collaborate with anyone else. It would store nearly the sum of human knowledge and thought up to that point, and all of it would be searchable, sortable and portable. Text could be instantly translated from one language to another, news would be immediately available from all over the world, and it would take no longer for a scientist to download a journal paper from 15 years ago than to flip to an entry in the latest issue.
What would you have predicted this leap in information and communication and collaboration would do for humanity? How much faster would our economies grow?
Now imagine I told you that I was going to invent a sinister tool. (Perhaps, while telling you this, I would cackle.) As people used it, their attention spans would degrade, as the tool would constantly shift their focus, weakening their powers of concentration and contemplation. This tool would show people whatever it is they found most difficult to look away from which would often be what was most threatening about the world, from the worst ideas of their political opponents to the deep injustices of their society. It would fit in their pockets and glow on their night stands and never truly be quiet; there would never be a moment when people could be free of the sense that the pile of messages and warnings and tasks needed to be checked.
What would you have thought this engine of distraction, division and cognitive fracture would do to humanity?
Thinking of the internet in these terms helps solve an economic mystery. The embarrassing truth is that productivity growth how much more we can make with the same number of people and factories and land was far faster for much of the 20th century than it is now. We average about half the productivity growth rate today that we saw in the 1950s and 60s. That means stagnating incomes, sluggish economies and a political culture thats more about fighting over what we have than distributing the riches and wonders weve gained. So what went wrong?
You can think of two ways the internet could have sped up productivity growth. The first way was obvious: by allowing us to do what we were already doing and do it more easily and quickly. And that happened. You can see a bump in productivity growth from roughly 1995 to 2005 as companies digitized their operations. But its the second way that was always more important: By connecting humanity to itself and to nearly its entire storehouse of information, the internet could have made us smarter and more capable as a collective.
I dont think that promise proved false, exactly. Even in working on this article, it was true for me: The speed with which I could find information, sort through research, contact experts its marvelous. Even so, I doubt I wrote this faster than I would have in 1970. Much of my mind was preoccupied by the constant effort needed just to hold a train of thought in a digital environment designed to distract, agitate and entertain me. And I am not alone.
Gloria Mark, a professor of information science at the University of California, Irvine, and the author of Attention Span, started researching the way people used computers in 2004. The average time people spent on a single screen was 2.5 minutes. I was astounded, she told me. That was so much worse than Id thought it would be. But that was just the beginning. By 2012, Mark and her colleagues found the average time on a single task was 75 seconds. Now its down to about 47.
This is an acid bath for human cognition. Multitasking is mostly a myth. We can focus on one thing at a time. Its like we have an internal whiteboard in our minds, Mark said. If Im working on one task, I have all the info I need on that mental whiteboard. Then I switch to email. I have to mentally erase that whiteboard and write all the information I need to do email. And just like on a real whiteboard, there can be a residue in our minds. We may still be thinking of something from three tasks ago.
The cost is in more than just performance. Mark and others in her field have hooked people to blood pressure machines and heart rate monitors and measured chemicals in the blood. The constant switching makes us stressed and irritable. I didnt exactly need experiments to prove that I live that, and you probably do, too but it was depressing to hear it confirmed.
Which brings me to artificial intelligence. Here Im talking about the systems we are seeing now: large language models like OpenAIs GPT-4 and Googles Bard. What these systems do, for the most part, is summarize information they have been shown and create content that resembles it. I recognize that sentence can sound a bit dismissive, but it shouldnt: Thats a huge amount of what human beings do, too.
Already, we are being told that A.I. is making coders and customer service representatives and writers more productive. At least one chief executive plans to add ChatGPT use in employee performance evaluations. But Im skeptical of this early hype. It is measuring A.I.s potential benefits without considering its likely costs the same mistake we made with the internet.
I worry were headed in the wrong direction in at least three ways.
One is that these systems will do more to distract and entertain than to focus. Right now, the large language models tend to hallucinate information: Ask them to answer a complex question, and you will receive a convincing, erudite response in which key facts and citations are often made up. I suspect this will slow their widespread use in important industries much more than is being admitted, akin to the way driverless cars have been tough to roll out because they need to be perfectly reliable rather than just pretty good.
A question to ask about large language models, then, is where does trustworthiness not matter? Those are the areas where adoption will be fastest. An example from media is telling, I think. CNET, the technology website, quietly started using these models to write articles, with humans editing the pieces. But the process failed. Forty-one of the 77 A.I.-generated articles proved to have errors the editors missed, and CNET, embarrassed, paused the program. BuzzFeed, which recently shuttered its news division, is racing ahead with using A.I. to generate quizzes and travel guides. Many of the results have been shoddy, but it doesnt really matter. A BuzzFeed quiz doesnt have to be reliable.
A.I. will be great for creating content where reliability isnt a concern. The personalized video games and childrens shows and music mash-ups and bespoke images will be dazzling. And new domains of delight and distraction are coming: I believe were much closer to A.I. friends, lovers and companions becoming a widespread part of our social lives than society is prepared for. But where reliability matters say, a large language model devoted to answering medical questions or summarizing doctor-patient interactions deployment will be more troubled, as oversight costs will be immense. The problem is that those are the areas that matter most for economic growth.
Marcela Martin, BuzzFeeds president, encapsulated my next worry nicely when she told investors, Instead of generating 10 ideas in a minute, A.I. can generate hundreds of ideas in a second. She meant that as a good thing, but is it? Imagine that multiplied across the economy. Someone somewhere will have to process all that information. What will this do to productivity?
One lesson of the digital age is that more is not always better. More emails and more reports and more Slacks and more tweets and more videos and more news articles and more slide decks and more Zoom calls have not led, it seems, to more great ideas. We can produce more information, Mark said. But that means theres more information for us to process. Our processing capability is the bottleneck.
Email and chat systems like Slack offer useful analogies here. Both are widely used across the economy. Both were initially sold as productivity boosters, allowing more communication to take place faster. And as anyone who uses them knows, the productivity gains though real are more than matched by the cost of being buried under vastly more communication, much of it junk and nonsense.
The magic of a large language model is that it can produce a document of almost any length in almost any style, with a minimum of user effort. Few have thought through the costs that will impose on those who are supposed to respond to all this new text. One of my favorite examples of this comes from The Economist, which imagined NIMBYs but really, pick your interest group using GPT-4 to rapidly produce a 1,000-page complaint opposing a new development. Someone, of course, will then have to respond to that complaint. Will that really speed up our ability to build housing?
You might counter that A.I. will solve this problem by quickly summarizing complaints for overwhelmed policymakers, much as the increase in spam is (sometimes, somewhat) countered by more advanced spam filters. Jonathan Frankle, the chief scientist at MosaicML and a computer scientist at Harvard, described this to me as the boring apocalypse scenario for A.I., in which we use ChatGPT to generate long emails and documents, and then the person who received it uses ChatGPT to summarize it back down to a few bullet points, and there is tons of information changing hands, but all of it is just fluff. Were just inflating and compressing content generated by A.I.
When we spoke, Frankle noted the magic of feeding a 100-page Supreme Court document into a large language model and getting a summary of the key points. But was that, he worried, a good summary? Many of us have had the experience of asking ChatGPT to draft a piece of writing and seeing a fully formed composition appear, as if by magic, in seconds.
My third concern is related to that use of A.I.: Even if those summaries and drafts are pretty good, something is lost in the outsourcing. Part of my job is reading 100-page Supreme Court documents and composing crummy first drafts of columns. It would certainly be faster for me to have A.I. do that work. But the increased efficiency would come at the cost of new ideas and deeper insights.
Our societywide obsession with speed and efficiency has given us a flawed model of human cognition that Ive come to think of as the Matrix theory of knowledge. Many of us wish we could use the little jack from The Matrix to download the knowledge of a book (or, to use the movies example, a kung fu master) into our heads, and then wed have it, instantly. But that misses much of whats really happening when we spend nine hours reading a biography. Its the time inside that book spent drawing connections to what we know and having thoughts we would not otherwise have had that matters.
Nobody likes to write reports or do emails, but we want to stay in touch with information, Mark said. We learn when we deeply process information. If were removed from that and were delegating everything to GPT having it summarize and write reports for us were not connecting to that information.
We understand this intuitively when its applied to students. No one thinks that reading the SparkNotes summary of a great piece of literature is akin to actually reading the book. And no one thinks that if students have ChatGPT write their essays, they have cleverly boosted their productivity rather than lost the opportunity to learn. The analogy to office work is not perfect there are many dull tasks worth automating so people can spend their time on more creative pursuits but the dangers of overautomating cognitive and creative processes are real.
These are old concerns, of course. Socrates questioned the use of writing (recorded, ironically, by Plato), worrying that if men learn this, it will implant forgetfulness in their souls; they will cease to exercise memory because they rely on that which is written, calling things to remembrance no longer from within themselves but by means of external marks. I think the trade-off here was worth it I am, after all, a writer but it was a trade-off. Human beings really did lose faculties of memory we once had.
To make good on its promise, artificial intelligence needs to deepen human intelligence. And that means human beings need to build A.I. and build the workflows and office environments around it, in ways that dont overwhelm and distract and diminish us. We failed that test with the internet. Lets not fail it with A.I.
Read the original post:
Opinion | Beyond the Matrix Theory of the Human Mind - The New York Times
- Artificial Intelligence And Jobs: No Signs Of Worker Fear And Loathing - Forbes - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Houston area man is accused of using artificial intelligence to create child pornography - KENS5.com - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- China-led resolution on artificial intelligence passes in United Nations - South China Morning Post - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Voyager Space and Palantir Announce Strategic Partnership Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Drive Innovation in ... - PR Newswire - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Embracing the Future: Understanding Artificial Intelligence and Its Expanding Role - Montgomery County Newspaper - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Here Is My Top Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Right Now - Yahoo Finance - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- MicroStrategy boosts HyperIntelligence with artificial intelligence - CIO - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Moschino uses artificial intelligence to train its retail teams - Luxus Plus - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Another Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Split Is Coming. Could Broadcom Be the Next Nvidia? - The Motley Fool - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- 1 Top Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Before It Soars 70%, According to Loop Capital - Yahoo Finance - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Wall Street Thinks These High-Flying Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Headed Lower (Hint: Nvidia Isn't 1 of Them) - The Motley Fool - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- SCSU Team Accepted Into Prestigious Artificial Intelligence Prog. - WJON News - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- His Brother Said Artificial Intelligence Would Eliminate His Side Hustle And Then Got Laid Off, So He Responded That ... - Twisted Sifter - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Forget Sora, Runway is the AI video maker coming to blow your mind - TechRadar - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- This Is My Top Artificial Intelligence (AI) ETF to Buy Right Now - 24/7 Wall St. - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Can Be Risky, but Here's a Fantastic Way to Do It - The Motley Fool - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Marine Corps - War On The Rocks - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- For artificial intelligence, is long-term in the near future? - Aspen Daily News - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Thailand's homegrown AI project aims to resist U.S. tech giants - Nikkei Asia - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Bill Maher Talks Artificial Intelligence, Bidens Brain, And Guys Who Need Game - Deadline - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Fueled Market Gains in the First Half. Is the Best Yet to Come? - The Motley Fool - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Lil Wayne Reacts to 1950s Version of A Milli Made With Artificial Intelligence - Complex - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Princeton Professor Who 'Picks Apart Artificial Intelligence Hype' Honored by Mozilla - TAPinto.net - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- AI advertising may repel as well as attract - Marketplace - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Opinion: As artificial intelligence rises, data-centre costs spiral. Quantum is the solution - The Globe and Mail - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Looking for a Home-Run Artificial Intelligence (AI) Investment? Consider This AI Stock That Nvidia Is Investing In. - Yahoo Finance - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Are Elon Musk's concerns of AI-surged unemployment a real concern? - The Jerusalem Post - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- 3 Magnificent Vanguard ETFs to Buy That Are Loaded With Top Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks - Yahoo Finance - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- AI's Impact on B2B Marketing Spotlights Value of Automation - PYMNTS.com - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- How Many Chips Could You Buy With $74 Billion? - PYMNTS.com - July 3rd, 2024 [July 3rd, 2024]
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Chiari Malformation Type 1 Recurrence After Posterior Fossa ... - Cureus - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Fritz Lang First Depicted Artificial Intelligence on Film in Metropolis (1927), and It Frightened People Even Then - Open Culture - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Dehumanizing the Wars: Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in the Warfare - Modern Diplomacy - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Google Parent Alphabet Is Selling Shares of 2 Hypergrowth Stocks and Piling Into a Promising Artificial Intelligence (AI ... - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Meta AI Head: ChatGPT Will Never Reach Human Intelligence - PYMNTS.com - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Waiting for Alexa: When Will Amazon Strike Up the AI Conversation? - PYMNTS.com - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Artificial intelligence town halls? House committee weighs new approach before writing AI rules - Washington Times - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Inventing AI: Tracing the diffusion of artificial intelligence with U.S. patents - United States Patent and Trademark Office - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- UM6P to Host High-Level Forum on Artificial Intelligence, Development in Africa - Morocco World News - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- DHS warns of threats to election posed by artificial intelligence - ABC News - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Artificial intelligence, great wealth transfer: Why this financial analyst sees a rosy time ahead for stocks - CNBC - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- As S&P 500 reaches fresh highs, experts say generative artificial intelligence will create new investment opportunities - CNBC - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Google Parent Alphabet Is Selling Shares of 2 Hypergrowth Stocks and Piling Into a Promising Artificial Intelligence (AI ... - MSN - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- The Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) ETF to Invest $1,000 in Right Now - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- How To Land A Job In Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Forbes - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Madhumita Murgia On The Good, Bad And Ugly Of Artificial Intelligence In Our Daily Lives - Forbes India - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Researchers use artificial intelligence to classify brain tumors - Voice of America - VOA News - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- BBVA steps up its plans in artificial intelligence by signing an agreement with OpenAI - BBVA - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Study including WVU and Marshall analyzes cyber threats to Artificial Intelligence systems - West Virginia MetroNews - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Stock-Split Watch: 5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Look Ready to Split - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- 2 Spectacular ETFs That Can Help You Capitalize on the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Boom - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- NASA pledging responsible use of artificial intelligence | National | khq.com - KHQ Right Now - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- 1 Stock Down 11% to Buy Before Artificial Intelligence (AI) Could Supercharge Its Growth and Send It Soaring - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Alphabet Goes All In on Artificial Intelligence (AI). Is It Time to Go All In on the Stock? - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- A Once-in-a-Generation Investment Opportunity: Here's 1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy in May and Hold Forever - Yahoo Finance - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Offer Dividends and Long-Term Returns - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Forget Nvidia: Billionaires Are Selling It and Buying These 2 Supercharged Artificial Intelligence (AI) Growth Stocks ... - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- 1 Ridiculously Undervalued Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist - Yahoo Finance - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Missed Out on Nvidia's Ginormous Gains? Here's an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock You Can Buy Right Now. - The Motley Fool - May 23rd, 2024 [May 23rd, 2024]
- Researchers create innovative verification techniques to increase security in artificial intelligence and image processing - European Research Council - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Who in Europe is investing the most in artificial intelligence? - Euronews - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- 4 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Members of Congress Can't Stop Buying (and Nvidia Isn't 1 of Them!) - The Motley Fool - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- The Standard Names Porter Orr Second Vice President of Artificial Intelligence Strategy and Development - NRToday.com - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Meet Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, the man behind the $2 trillion company powering today's artificial intelligence - CBS News - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- This Warren Buffett Dividend King Stock Just Invested $1.1 Billion Into Artificial Intelligence (AI) - The Motley Fool - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Joe Rogan Reveals What Could Be 'Game Over for the Human Race' - Newsweek - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- LegalTech Artificial Intelligence Market to Soar to $6.4 Billion by 2028: Global Long-term Forecast to 2033 - Strategic ... - Yahoo Finance UK - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Artificial Intelligence Tokens Stumble Again! Is The AI Hype Over? - Coinpedia Fintech News - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- CISA unveils guidelines for AI and critical infrastructure - FedScoop - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- IBM's Webinar: Cybersecurity In The Era Of Artificial Intelligence Keynotes - AiThority - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Being and becoming a good doctor in the age of artificial intelligence - Firstpost - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Pope to take part in G7 summit in June to talk Artificial Intelligence - Crux Now - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Pope Francis to attend G7 summit to speak on artificial intelligence - Catholic News Agency - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- 1 Unstoppable Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy and Hold Forever - Yahoo Finance - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Pope to bring his call for ethical artificial intelligence to G7 summit in June in southern Italy - The Associated Press - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Elon Musk Called Tesla an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Robotics Company. Does That Make It a Buy? - The Motley Fool - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Emulating neurodegeneration and aging in artificial intelligence systems - Tech Xplore - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- Pope Francis to participate in G7 session on AI - Vatican News - English - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]
- A Once-in-a-Generation Investment Opportunity: 1 Bill Ackman Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist ... - Yahoo Finance - April 29th, 2024 [April 29th, 2024]