The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: April 2024
Google’s Find My Device network has finally launched and the Pixel 8 gets special tracking powers – TechRadar
Posted: April 12, 2024 at 5:52 am
Googles long awaited Find My Device network is finally rolling out, so youll be able to track your devices, even when theyre offline.
According to a Google blog post, this is a worldwide rollout, starting with the US and Canada, so if you live elsewhere you might be waiting another few days or so. Still, it should be worth the wait, as this looks to be a powerful upgrade to the company's pre-existing Find My Device functionality.
Previously, youd only be able to use Find My Device to track your phone if it was connected to the internet but if it was offline (i.e. without a network connection) youd be out of luck.
Now though, with the company's new Find My Device network, you can track offline devices too; as the network can leverage over a billion Android devices worldwide to locate any lost devices that are within Bluetooth proximity, including new trackers from Chipolo and Pebblebee.
Better yet, if youre looking for a Google Pixel 8 or a Pixel 8 Pro, thanks to specialized Pixel hardware youll be able to find your phone even if its shut down or the battery is dead.
Presumably, this feature will come to the Google Pixel 9 and other future Pixel phones too, and we wouldnt be surprised if other brands also get in on the action, but for now its a Pixel 8-exclusive perk.
The new Find My Device network also works with Bluetooth tags from Chipolo and Pebblebee, while support for tags from additional brands are set to be added later this year. As a result, if you attach one of these tags to a wallet, your keys, or any other item that doesnt have its own Bluetooth signal, youll be able to track those too.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
Just as with the concerns around Apple's 'Find My' network, Googles Find My Device network was built with privacy and security in mind, so youll also get unknown tracker alerts if you appear to be being followed by a Bluetooth tag that you havent registered.
The network isnt just designed for tracking distant items either. Theres also a Find nearby button that will help you pinpoint the exact location of nearby items, and if youve lost an item in your home, then you can also see its proximity to any Nest devices you have.
Additionally, there's the option to share tracking for a device with friends or family members, so you can all track and locate the item when lost. But unless you choose to share, everything is kept private and secure with features like end-to-end encryption of location data and aggregated device location reporting.
It has been a long wait for all these features. Google originally planned to roll out its new Find My Device network around the middle of 2023, but then delayed it to give time for Apple to fully roll out unknown tracker alerts (so that people couldnt use the Find My Device network to track iPhone users without them being alerted). Said unknown tracker feature finally lands with iOS 17.5, which is currently in beta, leaving Google once again free to launch its upgraded Find My Device network.
The big question now is, if and when well see Google AirTags or in other words, the companys rival to the Apple AirTag. As with such a powerful-sounding Find My Device feature now available, it would make sense for Google to introduce its own Bluetooth tracker a device we've already heard rumor of.
Visit link:
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Google’s Find My Device network has finally launched and the Pixel 8 gets special tracking powers – TechRadar
Alphabet Stock Rises Amid Introduction of AI Products – PYMNTS.com
Posted: at 5:52 am
Alphabets stock is reportedly headed toward a $2 trillion market value, driven by investors becoming more optimistic about the companys strategy in the artificial intelligence (AI) field.
Reaching the $2 trillion milestone would be a record for the tech company and would place it among the three U.S. firms that have already topped that market value:Microsoft,AppleandNvidia, Bloombergreported Thursday (April 10).
Alphabets stock is up 12% this year, after seeing a drop in March due to investors concerns that it was falling behind on AI, according to the report.
The company has experienced some setbacks with its consumer-facing AI tools, and its strategy for monetizing AI is unclear, but it displayed its enterprise-focused AI model at an event this week and investors see a growth opportunity around its role in generative AI products, the report said.
During its cloud computing conference this week, Alphabet showed the capabilities its Gemini AI product has when it comes to advertising, cybersecurity, short videos and podcasts, per the report. In addition, Alphabet-ownedGoogleunveiled a chip designed for AI.
Alphabets stock has also benefited from reports that Apple is considering using Gemini to powerAI servicesfor its devices, according to the report.
Google unveiled a slew of newAI-powered capabilitiesTuesday (April 9) during a keynote presentation at its annual Cloud Next event.
Among them were Google Vids, an addition to Google Workspace that allows users to create and edit videos collaboratively using AI-powered features, and Gemini Code Assist, which is an enterprise-level AI code completion tool designed to rival GitHubs Copilot Enterprise.
The announcement of these and other business-focused AI updates to Google Workspace came at a time when the impact ofAI software for B2B applications is top of mind for companies looking to modernize their workflows, PYMNTS reported Wednesday (April 10).
Googles ambition with its enterprise AI products is not just to streamline tasks, but to automate processes.
With these advances, enterprises can do things today that just werent possible with AI before, Google CEOSundar Pichai said during the Cloud Next event.
Read the original:
Alphabet Stock Rises Amid Introduction of AI Products - PYMNTS.com
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Alphabet Stock Rises Amid Introduction of AI Products – PYMNTS.com
Google’s Gemini Pro 1.5 can now hear as well as see what it means for you – Tom’s Guide
Posted: at 5:52 am
Google has updated its incredibly powerful Gemini Pro 1.5 artificial intelligence model to give it the ability to hear the contents of an audio or video file for the first time.
The update was announced at Google Next, with the search giant confirming the model can listen to an updloaded clip and provide information without the need for a written transcript.
What this means is you could give it a documentary or video presentation and ask it questions about any moment, both audio and video, within the clip.
This is part of a wider push from Google to create more multimodal models that can understand a variety of input types beyond just text. The move is possible due to the Gemini family of models being trained on audio, video, text and code at the same time.
Google launched Gemini Pro 1.5 in February with a 1 million token context window. This, combined with the multimodal training data means it can process videos.
The tech giant has now added sound to the options for input. This means you can give it a podcast and have it listen through for key moments or specific mentions. It can do the same for audio attached to a video file, while also analysing the video content.
The update also means Gemini can now generate transcripts for video clips regardless of how long they might run and find a specific moment within the audio or video file.
The new update is part of the middle-tier of the Gemini family, which comes in three form factors the tiny Nano for on-device, Pro powering the free version of the Gemini chatbot and Ultra powering Gemini Advanced.
Upgrade your life with a daily dose of the biggest tech news, lifestyle hacks and our curated analysis. Be the first to know about cutting-edge gadgets and the hottest deals.
For some reason Google only released the 1.5 update to Gemini Pro rather than Ultra, meaning their middle-tier model now out performs the more advanced version. It isnt clear if there will be a Gemini Ultra 1.5 or when it will be accessible if it launches.
The massive context window starting at 250,000 (similar to Claude 3 Opus) and rising to over a million for certain approved users means you also dont need to fine tune a model on specific data. You can load that data in at the start of a chat and just ask questions.
The update also means Gemini can now generate transcripts for video clips regardless of how long they might run and find a specific moment within the audio or video file.
I imagine at some point Google will update its Gemini chatbot to use the 1.5 models, possibly after the Google I/O developer conference next month. For now it is only available through the Google Cloud developer dashboard VertexAI.
While VertexAI is a powerful tool for interacting with a range of models, building out AI applications and testing what is possible it isn't widely accessible and mainly targeted at developers, enterprise and researchers rather than consumers.
Using VertexAI you can insert any form of visual or audio media such as a short film or someone giving a talk and add a text prompt. This could be "give me five bullet points summing up the speech" or "how many times did they say Gemini".
Google's main audience for Gemini Pro 1.5 is enterprise with partnerships already in the works with TBS, REplit and others who are using it for metadata tagging and creating code.
Google has also started using Gemini Pro 1.5 in its own products including the Generative AI coding assistant Code Assist to track changes across large-scale codebases.
The changes to Gemini Pro 1.5 were announced at Google Next along with a big update to the DeepMind AI image model Imagen 2 that powers the Gemini image-generation capabilities.
This is getting inpainting and outptaining where users can remove or add any element from a generated image. This is similar to updates OpenAI made to its DALL-E model recently.
Google is also going to starts grounding its AI responses across Gemini and other platforms with Google Search so they always contain up to date information.
The rest is here:
Google's Gemini Pro 1.5 can now hear as well as see what it means for you - Tom's Guide
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Google’s Gemini Pro 1.5 can now hear as well as see what it means for you – Tom’s Guide
Google Wallet on Wear OS isn’t as convenient as it could be – Android Police
Posted: at 5:52 am
Summary
Of all the tech-enabled conveniences we've come to take for granted, tap-to-pay in wearables is, for my money, one of the most satisfyingly futuristic the very idea of using your wristwatch to pay for something flatly didn't exist until relatively recently. Even now, nearly a decade into living with watches that are also wallets, I still get a little techy satisfaction any time I pay for something using my Pixel Watch. But as much as I appreciate the ability to use my wrist computer to pay for coffee, I think the Google Wallet experience on Wear OS could be significantly improved with what seems to me like a simple UX tweak.
As it stands today, buying something with Google Wallet on Wear OS requires you to open the Google Wallet app before tapping your watch to a contactless payment terminal. Different watches work differently, but in the case of the Pixel Watch 2 I'm typically wearing, you can most easily fire up Wallet by double-tapping the watch's digital crown. Once it's open, tap-to-pay is ready. All told, it's hardly an inconvenient system as is.
But having to get the app open first introduces just a little extra friction that makes the experience feel less seamless than it could. On mobile, provided you have a default card set in Wallet and aren't using the Pixel 7 Pro's wonky face unlock feature, tapping your unlocked phone to a payment terminal will initiate a payment with your default method, whether or not you have the Wallet app open. Essentially, I want to see that approach on Wear OS, too.
That may sound risky, but hear me out. Just like on a phone, using Google Wallet on Wear OS requires that your watch has a screen lock set. Once you've unlocked your watch, it stays unlocked until you take it off, at which time it immediately locks again. Having to manually open Wallet before making a payment does further mitigate some risks, like making a tap-to-pay payment you didn't intend to or having your payment information read without your permission by nearby bad actors. But given NFC in smartwatches only has a range of a couple of inches, I feel those threats are very remote.
Personally, I'd be willing to chance it for the option to use tap-to-pay any time my watch is unlocked. Physical credit cards have no payment method-side authentication for contactless payments at all, so compared to that, my watch locking when it's off my wrist already feels plenty secure without the additional step of opening Google Wallet first.
In light of NFC's range limitations and Google Wallet's inherent security the digital cards on your watch have numbers unique from your physical cards I feel like the risk in allowing easier contactless payments on Wear OS would be pretty minimal. Still, I'd be perfectly happy to see what I'm proposing here as an option while the status quo stays the default. Heck, Google could even throw in a strongly worded warning when you change the setting.
As it stands, though, using Google Wallet on your watch takes two hands, which runs counter to the purpose of a feature that should be all about convenience. You can fish a phone out of your pocket, unlock it, and tap it to a card reader all without setting down your coffee (or your shopping bags, or your child, et cetera) but one-handed payments aren't possible on Wear OS. It's a niche complaint, but I'd love to see it addressed, even if recent changes abroad make it seem like Google is increasingly prioritizing security over flexibility when it comes to payments.
More:
Google Wallet on Wear OS isn't as convenient as it could be - Android Police
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Google Wallet on Wear OS isn’t as convenient as it could be – Android Police
Google Workspace gets a game-changing security feature – Android Police
Posted: at 5:52 am
Summary
The ability to share Google Docs, Sheets, and other Workspace products makes it quicker and easier for teams to collaborate, regardless of where members may be working. However, it can become difficult to keep track of all of your files once several people have access. Admin permissions can help you manage the changes made to your files, but the vetting process can be daunting, depending on how many you need to mitigate. Now, Google is rolling out a new feature for Workspace subscribers that may help relieve any concerns about security issues that could emerge.
According to a Workspace update from Google, users will now have access to a feature that requires sensitive actions to be approved by multiple admins. The actions that have been deemed sensitive are two-step verification, account recovery, advanced protection, Google session control, login challenges, and passwordless login. If the new security feature is enabled, any changes to these settings will need to be submitted by an admin to a designated super admin for approval.
On the admin dashboard, there is a new Multi-party approval option under the Authentication section of the Security menu. Upon tapping into Multi-party approval, admins will see expanded details on requests that have been made. Some of the information that can be viewed is a list of collaborators who will be affected by the changes, the date that the request was made, and what will happen after the changes are implemented. The feature is still being rolled out, meaning users may not see it immediately. However, Workspace users with Enterprise Standard, Enterprise Plus, Education Standard, Education Plus, and Cloud Identity Premium subscriptions can all expect access.
Although Google has been pouring its time and resources into AI specifically Gemini as of late, its other products and services have not been left behind. In fact, Workspace is one example of an initiative that the company has continued to improve, and its even done so through the integration of AI. Recently, Google announced that it was planning to roll out a slew of AI-based features for Workspace subscribers, such as summary generation and automatic live translation. As the companys ventures into AI continue to evolve, new features may continue to be centered around the technology in the future.
Go here to read the rest:
Google Workspace gets a game-changing security feature - Android Police
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Google Workspace gets a game-changing security feature – Android Police
Google Photos on Android seems primed to pick up a ‘recover storage’ option – Android Central
Posted: at 5:52 am
A new option hidden within the code for the Google Photos app teases a familiar space-saving function.
According to PunikaWeb, courtesy of AssembleDebug, the latest 6.78 version of Photos contains information regarding a coming "Recover Storage" option. The feature was discovered within the "Account Storage" section, under "Manage Storage." Upon tapping, the Android app showed an addition to the page that would let users "convert photos to Storage saver."
Google's description says the saver will "recover some storage" by reducing the quality of your previously cloud-saved items to save space. This method involves all of a user's photos and videos they've saved via the cloud.
A subsequent page states Photos will not touch the original quality of items stored in Gmail, Drive, or YouTube. Additionally, other items on a user's Pixel device may not be roped into this either.
The publication states Google's continued development of Recover Storage has brought in more information about photo/video compression. The company will seemingly warn users in-app that compressing their older items to a reduced quality "can't be reversed."
Users should also be prepared to wait a while as the app does its thing, which could take a few days.
Image 1 of 2
If this feature sounds familiar, it's because the web-based version of Photos already offers this space-saving option. The good thing is that compressing your older media won't affect your future uploads, as stated on its support page. So, if you're running out of space (again), you can always try to compress your files again.
Get the latest news from Android Central, your trusted companion in the world of Android
There's speculation that Google could roll out its Recover Storage option to Android users soon as its functionality seems nearly done. Moreover, it seems it will arrive for iOS devices in conjunction with Android.
Yesterday (Apr. 10), the company announced that a few powerful AI editing tools will soon arrive in Photos for free. Beginning May 15, all users can utilize Magic Eraser, Photo Unblur, Portrait Light, and a few more without a subscription. Eligible devices include those running Android 8 and above, Chromebook Plus devices, and iOS 15 and above.
King of the Androids
The Google Pixel 8 Pro arrived with a paradigm shift in tow. The device features loads of Google's AI software such as Gemini and other tools for editing up blemishes in our photos. Moreover, the Pixel 8 Pro delivers an immersive display for smooth scrolling, great haptics, and more.
Read more here:
Google Photos on Android seems primed to pick up a 'recover storage' option - Android Central
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Google Photos on Android seems primed to pick up a ‘recover storage’ option – Android Central
Former Google Deepmind Researchers Assemble Luminaries Across Music And Tech To Launch Udio, A New AI … – PR Newswire
Posted: at 5:52 am
Backed by a16z, with participation from angel investors like will.i.am, Common, Kevin Wall, Tay Keith, Steve Stoute's UnitedMasters, Mike Krieger (Cofounder & CTO of Instagram) and Oriol Vinyals (head of Gemini at Google), Udio enables everyone from classically trained musicians, to those with pop star ambitions, to hip hop fans, to people who just want to have fun with their friends to create awe-inspiring songs in mere moments
NEW YORK, April 10, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Udio, a company that leverages AI to easily create extraordinary and original music, today announced the public launch of its app at udio.com. Previously only available in closed beta, where the app was regularly played with by some of the biggest names in the music industry, Udio was developed by former Google DeepMind researchers with a mission of making it easy for anyone to create emotionally resonant music in an instant. Whether it is recording a cherished memory in song, generating funny soundtracks for memes, or creating full length tracks for professional release, Udio will expand how everyone creates and shares music.
"There is nothing available that comes close to the ease of use, voice quality and musicality of what we've achieved with Udio - it's a real testament to the folks we have involved," said David Ding, Co-founder and CEO of Udio. "At every stage of development, we talked to people in the industry about how we could bring this technology to market in a way that benefits both artists and musicians. We gathered feedback from some of the most prolific artists and music producers likewill.i.am, Common and Tay Keith, to ensure that everything they thought would enhance the experience would be available. We hold ourselves to the highest standards and we believe we have achieved something truly remarkable, so we can't wait to get Udio into the hands of music lovers worldwide."
With a superior sound quality and musicality that meets professional standards, Udio was designed to make song creation as easy as possible. In just a few steps, users simply type a description of the music genre they want to make, provide the subject or personalized lyrics, and indicate artists that inspire. In less than 40 seconds, Udio works its magic and produces fully mastered tracks. Once a track has been created, users can further edit their creations through the app's "remix" feature. This enables iteration on existing tracks through text descriptors, turning everyday creators into full-blown producers. It even enables users to extend their songs, edit them to have different sounds and use them as the basis of inspiration for their next creation.
Once finished, users can then share their new creations with the app's built-in community of music lovers, for feedback and collaboration.
"This is a brand new Renaissance and Udio is the tool for this era's creativity-with Udio you are able to pull songs into existence via AI and your imagination," said will.i.am, multi-platinum artist and producer.
While in beta, Udio has also inspired some of the most prolific musicians, producers and artists with their next creation. Designed to be artist friendly, Udio helps musicians not only create songs faster, but test and play around with lyrics in an all new way. Through its extensive network, Udio also is in discussions with a number of artists who want to leverage AI in their workflows and find new ways to monetize through its tech.
"Good music stirs up deep emotions in all of us, and connects us to each other through shared experiences. Nothing will ever replace human artists and the unique connections they make with their fans," said Matt Bornstein, Partner at Andreessen Horowitz. "But we think Udio - with its incredible musicality, creativity, and vocals - is a brand new way for us to create and enjoy music together. We're thrilled to back this stellar group of researchers in their mission to make AI music a reality."
Udio's team is working alongside artists on all aspects of product and business development. The company has also secured leading investors in the seed round including a16z, as well as prominent tech and music angels like Mike Krieger (Cofounder & CTO of Instagram) and Oriol Vinyals (head of Gemini at Google).
"I've always been drawn to music and creation tools, and after I demoed Udio, I was blown away," said Mike Krieger. "It's early days but just like Instagram brought photography sharing to the masses, I believe Udio has the power to bring music creation to the masses as well. I'm thrilled to be a product advisor on their groundbreaking journey."
"UnitedMasters embraces cutting-edge technology that can unlock unprecedented opportunities for independent artists, and AI is reshaping how we create, consume, and experience music. As we embrace this transformative technology, we must ensure it amplifies creativity, empowers artists, and enriches the music industry without compromising ownership. It's imperative that we champion transparency, accountability, and ownership in how this technology benefits artists, shaping a future where innovation and creativity can thrive," said Steve Stoute, CEO and Founder of UnitedMasters.
Udio was founded by David Ding, Conor Durkan, Charlie Nash, Yaroslav Ganin, and Andrew Sanchez.
For more information on Udio and how to access, please visit udio.com.
About Udio
Udio is a company that leverages proprietary AI to make amazing sound creation fun. Founded in New York in December 2023 by former Google DeepMind researchers, Udio's mission is to bring world changing products to market. With the launch of its new app of the same name, Udio is lauded by many in the industry as being the first to democratize song creation. To learn more about Udio, its founders and where to access the app, please visit udio.com or on its social channels at Twitter: @udiomusic, Instagram: udiomusic, tiktok: @udiomusic, Youtube: @udio_music
Notice: If your editorial policy requires the use of full legal names,will.i.am's is William Adams. All others shown in Wikipedia and previously published stories are incorrect.
Media Contact: Rachel Rogers 310-770-4917
SOURCE Udio
See more here:
Posted in Google
Comments Off on Former Google Deepmind Researchers Assemble Luminaries Across Music And Tech To Launch Udio, A New AI … – PR Newswire
Why Congress Must Reform FISA Section 702and How It Can – brennancenter.org
Posted: at 5:52 am
This article first appeared at The Dispatch.
Editors note:This article is part of aDispatchdebate series. Kevin Carrollmade the casefor reauthorizing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Acts Section 702.
This week, the House of Representatives is set to vote on whether to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which will expire on April 19 unless renewed by Congress. This controversial law is unique, but the ways intelligence agencies have abused it to violate Americans civil liberties are not. The solution to this problem is familiar, too: Congress must not renew Section 702 without protecting Americans Fourth Amendment rights by requiring the government to get a warrant before reviewing Americans private communications.
How section 702 is abused to spy on Americans.
Enacted shortly after 9/11, Section 702 allows intelligence agencies to collect the phone calls, emails, text messages, and other communications of almost any non-American located outside of the United States without a warrant. Agencies such as the CIA and NSA must ensure that a significant purpose of the collection is to acquire foreign intelligence, a term FISAdefinesexpansively to include any information that merely relates to the conduct of foreign affairs. Otherwise, they face no substantive restrictions. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC)approves the general rulesgoverning surveillance, but it has no role in approving individual targets.
Section 702 authorizes warrantless surveillance to be targeted only at non-Americans abroad, but Americans communications are inevitably captured too. The reason is simple: We talk to family, friends, and colleagues who are located abroad, generally for entirely innocent reasons. Recognizing this reality, Congressdirectedintelligence agencies to minimize the retention and use of Americans information collected under Section 702. Yet, despite this clear mandate, officials from the FBI, CIA, NSA, and National Counterterrorism Center perform more than 200,000 warrantless backdoor searcheseveryyearto find and review Americans private phone calls, text messages, and emails.
Lax rulesadopted by agencies allow intelligence officials to perform backdoor searches whenever they have reason to believe the query will return foreign intelligence (or, for the FBI, evidence of a crime). Given FISAs capacious definition of foreign intelligence, this low bar should be easy to clear, but officials have repeatedly stumbled over it. Government reports indicate that in 2022, the FBI performed close to4,000backdoor searches that violated even its own permissive rules. In another recent one-year period, the FBIviolatedthe rules governing searches of FISA databases 278,000 times.
These violations include alarming abuses. Amongmanyother examples, the government has performed baseless searches for the communications ofmembers of Congress,journalists, and19,000 donors to a congressional campaign. The FBI has performed tens of thousands ofunlawful searchesrelated to civil unrest, including searches targeting141 peopleprotesting the murder of George Floyd and more than20,000 peopleaffiliated with a group suspected of involvement in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Most recentlyand despite procedural changes implemented by the FBI to stem abusesFBI agents performedimproper searchesfor the private communications of a U.S. senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations by a police chief to the FBI.
Outraged by these abuses, many lawmakers on both sides of the aisle havevowednot to reauthorize the law without significant reforms. The key reform under consideration is to require the government to obtain a warrant before examining Americans private communications captured through Section 702 surveillance. After all, under the Fourth Amendment, these communications can be obtained without a warrant only because the government is targeting foreigners abroad for surveillance. Backdoor searches, though, are intended specifically to findAmericanscommunications. Recentpollingfrom YouGov shows that more than 75 percent of Americans favor this measure.
The government argues that warrantless searches are necessary for national security. But according to anexhaustive reviewof Section 702 recently undertaken by the independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, the government has provided little justification on the relative value of the close to 5 million [backdoor] searches conducted by the FBI from 2019 to 2022. In the few instances in which backdoor searches proved useful, Board Chair Sharon Bradford Franklinobservedthat the government either would have been able to get a warrant or could have invoked one of the standard exceptions to the warrant requirement. A warrant requirement would thus protect Americans Fourth Amendment rights whileensuringthat intelligence agencies retain the tools they need to obtain critical foreign intelligence.
History repeats itself.
There is nothing novel or radical about this proposed reform. To the contrary, warrantless searches for Americans communications are flagrantly inconsistent with longstanding constitutional values. Moreover, the abuses that backdoor searches have enabled mirror those that have historically occurred when those values are not honored.
The Fourth Amendment recognizes the sanctity of Americans private communications. Beginning in the 1960s, the Supreme Court held that the government needed a warrant, not just to seize a persons papers, but to surveil phone calls incriminalanddomestic national securityinvestigations. But the court did not settle whether a warrant is needed to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance, meaning surveillance of Americans intended to uncover the activities of foreign powers or their agents.
A decade later, Congress answered that question. Congressional investigations by the Church and Pike Committees revealed in 1976 that the FBI, CIA, and NSA had illegally spied on civil rights and anti-war advocates for decades based on tenuous claims of Soviet influence. Most notoriously, the FBI spied on and attempted to blackmail theRev. Martin Luther King Jr.But King was just one of thousands of people targeted by federal agents, who employed a wide variety ofillegal tactics, including: attacks on speaking, teaching, writing and meetings; interference with personal and economic rights; abuse of government processes; factionalization; [and] propaganda. In response to these egregious abuses, Congress implemented a series of reforms, one of which was the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
FISA authorized and strictly regulated foreign intelligence surveillance inside the United States. It was carefully structured to ensure that intelligence agencies had the tools they needed to counter foreign threats without violating Americans Fourth Amendment rights. Under the law, if the government wanted to engage in domestic collection of Americans communicationsincluding their communications with foreign targetsit would have to get a court order, similar to a criminal warrant, from the newly created Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
This system worked for a time. But after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President George W. Bushs administration wanted to collect communications of suspected foreign terrorists, including their communications with Americans, and it did not want to wait for FISC approval before doing so. So, it didnt. In violation of FISA, the NSA began a massive, warrantless electronic surveillance program that collected large numbers of Americans international communications. It was not until this program wasrevealedby theNew York Timesthat the Bush administration went to Congress seeking legislative approval for the spying.
Ultimately, Congress acceded. The result was the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, of which Section 702 was a key component. As noted, Section 702 allows the government to collect foreign targets communications without a warrant, even if they may be communicating with Americans. But Congress never intended or envisioned that this would lead to literally millions of warrantless backdoor searches for Americans communications collected for foreign intelligence purposes. This undermines both the Fourth Amendment and the principle underlying FISA itself. And it is no surprise that we are again seeing the types of abuses that predatedand promptedFISAs enactment.
The need for safeguardsmoving forward.
With Section 702 set to expire on April 19, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has scheduled a vote this week in the House on the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Despite its name, thebillis not a serious reform proposal. Amongmany other defects, the bill does not contain a warrant requirement for backdoor searches. And the modifications it does make, such as codifying the FBIs recent internal rule changes, would do nothing to prevent the intelligence agencies pervasive abuses of Americans Fourth Amendment rights under Section 702. So it is critical that members amend this bill to include the necessary safeguards for Americans rights.
A warrant requirement for backdoor searches is not the onlysurveillance reformthat would improve the bill. Congress should close other legal loopholes that intelligence agencies exploit to gain warrantless access to Americans Fourth Amendment-protected information, such as bypurchasing itfrom commercial data brokers. But a warrant requirement is a necessary part of ending the flagrant abuses of Americans Fourth Amendment rights that are regularly perpetrated in the name of foreign intelligence.
When Congress learned in the 1970s that intelligence agencies had repeatedly abused their authority by spying on Americans without a warrant, it enacted FISA to close the gaps in the law those agencies had exploited. Today, Congress knows that intelligence agencies have repeatedly abused their authority by spying on Americans without a warrant, exploiting legal loopholes that allow them to do so. The solution now is the same as it was then: If intelligence agencies want access to Americans private communications, they must first get a warrant.
Read the original here:
Why Congress Must Reform FISA Section 702and How It Can - brennancenter.org
Posted in Fourth Amendment
Comments Off on Why Congress Must Reform FISA Section 702and How It Can – brennancenter.org
CIA wants more power to spy on Americans – Washington Times
Posted: at 5:52 am
OPINION:
Americans need to be aware of the unbridled propensity of federal intelligence agencies to spy on all of us without search warrants as required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.
These agencies believe that the Fourth Amendment which protects the individual right to privacy regulates only law enforcement and does not apply to domestic spying.
There is no basis in the constitutional text, history or judicial interpretations for such a limiting and toothless view of this constitutional guarantee. The courts have held that the Fourth Amendment restrains government all government. Last week, the CIA asked Congress to expand its current spying in the United States.
Here is the backstory.
When the CIA was created in 1947, members of Congress who feared the establishment here of the type of domestic surveillance apparatus that the Allies had just defeated in Germany insisted that the new CIA have no role in American law enforcement and no legal ability to spy win the U.S. The legislation creating the CIA contains those unambiguous limitations.
Nevertheless, we know that CIA agents are present in all 50 of our state legislatures. They didnt arrive there until after Dec. 4, 1981. Thats the date that President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12333, which purports to give the CIA authority to spy in the United States supposedly looking for narcotics from foreign countries but keeps from law enforcement whatever it finds.
Stated differently, while Reagan purported to authorize the CIA to defy the limitations imposed upon it by the Constitution and by federal law, he insisted on a wall of separation between domestic spying and law enforcement.
So, if the CIA using unconstitutional spying discovered that a janitor in the Russian Embassy in Washington was really a KGB colonel who abused his wife in their suburban Maryland home, under E.O. 12333, it could continue to spy upon him in defiance of the Fourth Amendment and the CIA charter, but it could not reveal to Maryland prosecutors who can use only evidence that was lawfully obtained any evidence of his domestic violence.
All this changed 20 years later when President George W. Bush demolished Reagans wall between law enforcement and domestic spying and directed the CIA and other domestic spying agencies to share the fruits of their spying with the FBI.
Thus, thanks to Reagan, Mr. Bush, and their successors looking the other way, CIA agents have been engaging in fishing expeditions on a grand scale in the U.S. for the past 20 years. Congress knows about this because all intelligence agencies are required by statute to report the extent of their spying secretly to the House and Senate intelligence committees.
This, of course, does not absolve the CIA of its presidentially authorized computer hacking crimes; rather, it gives Congress a false sense of security that it has a handle on whats going on.
Whats going on is not government lawyers appearing before judges asking for surveillance warrants based upon probable cause of crime, as the Constitution requires. Whats going on is CIA agents going to Big Tech and paying for access to communications used by ordinary Americans. Some Big Tech companies told the CIA to take a hike. Others took the CIAs cash and opened the spigots of their fiber-optic data to the voracious federal appetite.
If government lawyers went to a judge and demonstrated probable cause of crime for example, that a janitor in the Russian Embassy was passing defense secrets to Moscow surely the judge would have signed a surveillance warrant. But to the government, following the Constitution is too limiting.
Thus, by acquiring bulk data fiber-optic data on hundreds of millions of Americans acquired without search warrants the government avoids the time and trouble of demonstrating probable cause to a judge. But that time and trouble were intentionally baked into the Fourth Amendment so as to keep the government off our backs.
Not to be outdone by its principal rival, the FBI soon began doing the same thing: gathering bulk data without search warrants.
When Congress learned of this, it enacted legislation that banned the warrantless acquisition of bulk data. Apparently, Congress is naive enough to believe that the CIA, the FBI and the National Security Agency, their cousin with 60,000 domestic spies, will actually comply with federal law.
Last week, that naivete was manifested front and center when the CIA sent a letter to both congressional intelligence committees addressing its spying on foreign persons and the Americans with whom they communicate, and asking to expand that reach in the U.S.
The timing of the CIAs letter coincides with a decision Congress must make in the next 10 days whether to reenact Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allow it to expire on April 19 or expand it as the CIA has requested. Section 702 permits warrantless spying on foreigners and the Americans whom intelligence agencies suspect communicate with them. Section 702 is an unconstitutional free pass for domestic spying.
So, notwithstanding the persistent efforts of members of Congress from both parties to limit and in some cases to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of bulk data by the CIA from Americans, the practice continues, the CIA defends it and presidents look the other way.
Congress created the CIA monster, which today is so big and so powerful and so indifferent to the Constitution and the federal laws its agents have sworn to uphold that it can boast about its lawlessness, have no fear of defying Congress and always escape the consequences of all this largely unscathed. Even President Harry Truman, who signed the 1947 legislation into law, later acknowledged as much and condemned what the CIA had become.
I suspect the CIA and its cousins will get away with this because they spy on Congress and possess damning personal data on members who regularly vote to increase their secret budgets.
When will we have a government whose officials are courageous enough to uphold the Constitution?
To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.
See the article here:
CIA wants more power to spy on Americans - Washington Times
Posted in Fourth Amendment
Comments Off on CIA wants more power to spy on Americans – Washington Times
Serfdom Reform vs. Liberty The Future of Freedom Foundation – The Future of Freedom Foundation
Posted: at 5:52 am
One of the fascinating phenomena in the libertarian movement for the last several decades has been the division of libertarians into those who have decided to settle for advocating welfare-warfare-state reform and those of us who have decided to continue trying to achieve liberty.
The reformers have thrown in the towel with respect to achieving liberty. They have concluded that liberty is simply too difficult, even impossible, to achieve. The federal and state welfare state and the warfare state have become too massive, too well-established, too ingrained in peoples minds, and too powerful. There is no reasonable possibility, the libertarian reformers have concluded, of achieving freedom and so there is no point in wasting our time, energy, and resources trying to achieve freedom. Better to do what is practical work within the system to make our serfdom better and more palatable.
After all, its important to keep something in mind: Freedom necessarily entails a dismantling of infringements on freedom, not the reform of infringements on freedom. If all we do is reform infringements on freedom, the most we accomplish is an improved serfdom, but we dont achieve freedom.
Think about 19th-century American slaves. A group of reform-oriented libertarians in 1855 Alabama exclaim, Slavery is too deeply ingrained in Alabama life. Its protected by the state constitution as well as by the U.S. Constitution. Popular sentiment, especially here in Alabama, is in favor of continuing slavery. We have to be practical. We are not going to get rid of slavery any time soon. We need to devote our efforts to reforming slavery, making it better and more palatable. We need to promote legislation that will bring about fewer lashings, shorter work hours, better food and healthcare, and even a modicum of education for the slaves.
The liberty-minded libertarians say otherwise. They say, Slavery is wrong. We need to end it, not reform it. It doesnt matter how deeply established it is or how popular it is. We need to continue standing squarely against it. Constitutions, both state and federal, can be amended. We need to continue making the case for immediately ending slavery. We cannot settle for reform.
Serfdom is not exactly like slavery, but it comes pretty close. In 1944, Friedrich Hayek wrote his popular book The Road to Serfdom. People can debate on when the end of that road was achieved for Americans but there is no doubt that by the time the late 1960s arrived, Americans had become full-fledged serfs on the U.S. welfare-warfare-state plantation. Ever since, Americans have lived their lives to support the welfare-warfare state. Thats our role in life to work and toil to maintain the structure of serfdom under which everyone is born and raised and under which they ultimately die.
Libertarians who have thrown in the towel on achieving freedom say to those of us who are still fighting for freedom, Whats the big deal? You all can continue fighting for freedom while the rest of us have settled for reform of our serfdom. What difference does it make?
It makes a huge amount of difference!
Lets hypothesize. Lets say that we need 125,000 libertarians who want freedom to bring about a paradigm shift to freedom. Lets assume that we currently have 100,000 libertarians. Theoretically, we need to find only 25,000 more to achieve the genuinely free society.
But lets assume that out of those 100,000 libertarians, 90,000 have thrown in the towel and have decided to settle for reform. Obviously, that makes it much more difficult for those of us 10,000 who are still fighting for freedom. We now have to find an additional 90,000 libertarians plus an additional 25,000 libertarians to reach the 125,000 critical mass that will bring us freedom.
Now, lets turn things around. Lets say that out of those 100,000 libertarians, only 10,000 have thrown in the towel in favor of serfdom reform and 90,000 are still committed to achieving freedom. That means that those 90,000 only have to find an additional 10,000 libertarians plus an additional 25,000 libertarians to achieve freedom. Moreover, with 90,000 libertarians making the case for freedom, rather that reform, it becomes a much easier task to find those additional 35,000 libertarians who want freedom.
One thing is for certain: The more libertarians who throw in the towel and settle for serfdom reform, the more diminished becomes the libertarian light of freedom. If 100 percent of libertarians decide to settle for serfdom reform, the possibility of achieving freedom is virtually nonexistent. In that case, the libertarian light of liberty is extinguished.
See original here:
Serfdom Reform vs. Liberty The Future of Freedom Foundation - The Future of Freedom Foundation
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on Serfdom Reform vs. Liberty The Future of Freedom Foundation – The Future of Freedom Foundation