The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2023
10 Best Books on Artificial Intelligence | TheReviewGeek … – TheReviewGeek
Posted: August 2, 2023 at 7:10 pm
So, you want to dive deeper into the world of artificial intelligence? As AI continues to transform our lives in so many ways, gaining a better understanding of its concepts and capabilities is crucial. The field of AI is vast, but some books have become classics that every curious reader should explore. Weve compiled a list of 10 groundbreaking books on artificial intelligence that will boost your knowledge and feed your fascination with this fast-growing technology.
From philosophical perspectives on superintelligence to practical applications of machine learning, these books cover the past, present, and future of AI in an accessible yet compelling way. Whether youre a beginner looking to learn the basics or an expert wanting to expand your mind, youll find something inspiring and thought-provoking in this list. So grab a cup of coffee, settle into your favourite reading spot, and lets dive in. The future is here, and these books will help prepare you for whats to come.
Nick Bostroms Superintelligence is a must-read if you want to understand the existential risks posed by advanced AI.
This thought-provoking book argues that once machines reach and exceed human-level intelligence, an intelligence explosion could occur. Superintelligent machines would quickly become vastly smarter than humans and potentially uncontrollable.
Max Tegmarks thought-provoking book explores how AI may change our future. He proposes that artificial general intelligence could usher in a new stage of life on Earth.
As AI systems become smarter and smarter, they may eventually far surpass human intelligence. Tegmark calls this hypothetical point the singularity. After the singularity, AI could design even smarter AI, kicking off a rapid spiral of self-improvement and potentially leading to artificial superintelligence.
The Master Algorithm by Pedro Domingos explores the quest for a single algorithm capable of learning and performing any task, also known as the master algorithm. This book examines the five major schools of machine learningsymbolists, connectionists, evolutionaries, Bayesians, and analogizersexploring their strengths and weaknesses.
Domingos argues that for AI to achieve human-level intelligence, these approaches must be combined into a single master algorithm. He likens machine learning to alchemy, with researchers combining algorithms like base metals to produce gold in the form of human-level AI. The book is an insightful overview of machine learning and its possibilities. While the concepts can be complex, Domingos explains them in an engaging, accessible way using colourful examples and analogies.
In his book The Future of the Mind, theoretical physicist Michio Kaku explores how the human brain might be enhanced through artificial intelligence and biotechnology.
Kaku envisions a future where telepathy becomes possible through electronic implants, allowing people to exchange thoughts and emotions. He also foresees the eventual mapping and understanding of the human brain, which could enable the transfer of memories and even consciousness into new bodies.
In his 2012 New York Times bestseller, futurist Ray Kurzweil makes the case that the human brain works like a computer. He argues that recreating human consciousness is possible by reverse engineering the algorithms of the brain.
Kurzweil believes that artificial general intelligence will soon match and eventually far surpass human intelligence. He predicts that by the 2030s, we will have nanobots in our brains that connect us to synthetic neocortices in the cloud, allowing us to instantly access information and expand our cognitive abilities.
Martin Fords Rise of the Robots is a sobering look at how AI and automation are transforming our economy and job market. Ford argues that AI and robotics will significantly disrupt labour markets as many jobs are at risk of automation.
As AI systems get smarter and robots become more advanced, many human jobs will be replaced. Ford warns that this could lead to unemployment on a massive scale and greater inequality. Many middle-income jobs like cashiers, factory workers, and drivers are at high risk of being automated in the coming decades. While new jobs will be created, they may not offset the jobs lost.
In Homo Deus, Yuval Noah Harari explores how emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and biotechnology will shape the future of humanity.
Harari argues that humanitys belief in humanism the idea that humans are the centre of the world will come to an end in the 21st century. As AI and biotech advance, humans will no longer be the most intelligent or capable beings on the planet. Machines and engineered biological life forms will surpass human abilities.
Kai-Fu Lees 2018 book AI Superpowers provides insightful perspectives on the rise of artificial intelligence in China and the United States. Lee argues that while the US currently leads in AI research, China will dominate in the application of AI technology.
As the former president of Google China, Lee has a unique viewpoint on AI ambitions and progress in both countries. He believes Chinas large population, strong technology sector, and government support for AI will give it an edge. In China, AI is a national priority and a core part of the governments long-term strategic planning. There is no shortage of data, given Chinas nearly 1 billion internet users. And top tech companies like Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are investing heavily in AI.
This classic book by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig established itself as the leading textbook on AI. Now in its third edition, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach provides a comprehensive introduction to the field of AI.
The book covers the full spectrum of AI topics, including machine learning, reasoning, planning, problem-solving, perception, and robotics. Each chapter has been thoroughly updated to reflect the latest advances and technologies in AI. New material includes expanded coverage of machine learning, planning, reasoning about uncertainty, perception, and statistical natural language processing.
This book provides an accessible introduction to the mathematics of deep learning. It begins with the basics of linear algebra and calculus to build up concepts and intuition before diving into the details of deep neural networks.
The first few chapters cover vectors, matrices, derivatives, gradients, and optimizationessential math tools for understanding neural networks. Youll learn how to calculate derivatives, apply gradient descent, and understand backpropagation. These fundamentals provide context for how neural networks actually work under the hood.
There we have it, our list of 10 best books on AI. What do you think about our picks? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below:
Read the original:
10 Best Books on Artificial Intelligence | TheReviewGeek ... - TheReviewGeek
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on 10 Best Books on Artificial Intelligence | TheReviewGeek … – TheReviewGeek
Decentralized AI: Revolutionizing Technology and Addressing … – Fagen wasanni
Posted: at 7:10 pm
The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides, but many still struggle to grasp its implications. The terms narrow AI, superintelligence, and artificial general intelligence (AGI) are now commonly used, alongside machine learning and deep learning. Companies across industries have embraced AI to streamline their operations, benefitting businesses and individuals alike.
However, as AI becomes more advanced and desired, concerns about centralization and its potential risks arise. It is feared that a few organizations with access to AI could control its development, leading to negative consequences. To address these concerns, the concept of decentralized AI has emerged.
Decentralized AI allows individuals to have more influence over the AI products they use and offers a wider range of models to choose from. By incorporating blockchain technology, decentralized AI ensures security and transparency. Public blockchains, governed by the community rather than a central authority, foster trust and code enforceability. There are already over 50 blockchain-based AI companies, with exponential growth expected in the future.
Decentralized AI also empowers the community to participate in the development and direction of AI models. Democratic governance gives users a say in how AI models operate, a crucial difference from centralized AI. Engaging the community eases concerns and fosters comfort with AI technology.
While there are challenges, such as the opacity of AI models and the lack of transparency, solutions are emerging. Explainable AI (XAI) and open-source models offer potential ways to address the black box problem of decentralized AI, promoting transparency and trust.
Decentralized AI offers several benefits, including enhanced security through blockchain encryption and immutability. It proactively detects anomalies in data, alerting users to potential breaches. Decentralization, with data distributed across multiple nodes, minimizes vulnerability to unauthorized access and tampering.
Decentralized AI is revolutionizing technology and addressing concerns by empowering individuals, ensuring transparency, and enhancing security. By embracing decentralized AI, society can harness the full potential of AI while mitigating risks associated with centralization.
Read more from the original source:
Decentralized AI: Revolutionizing Technology and Addressing ... - Fagen wasanni
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on Decentralized AI: Revolutionizing Technology and Addressing … – Fagen wasanni
An ‘Oppenheimer Moment’ For The Progenitors Of AI – NOEMA – Noema Magazine
Posted: at 7:10 pm
Credits
Nathan Gardels is the editor-in-chief of Noema Magazine.
The movie directorChristopher Nolansays he has spoken to AI scientists who are having an Oppenheimer moment, fearing the destructive potential of their creation. Im telling the Oppenheimer story, he reflected on his biopic of the man, because I think its an important story, but also because its absolutely a cautionary tale.Indeed, some are already comparing OpenAIs Sam Altman to the father of the atomic bomb.
Oppenheimer was called the American Prometheus by his biographers because he hacked the secret of nuclear fire from the gods, splitting matter to release horrendous energy he then worried could incinerate civilization.
Altman, too, wonders if he did something really bad by advancing generative AI with ChatGPT. He told a Senate hearing, If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. Gregory Hinton, the so-called godfather of AI, resigned from Google in May saying part of him regretted his lifes work of building machines that are smarter than humans. He warned that It is hard to see how you can prevent the bad actors from using it for bad things. Others among his peers have spoken of the risk of extinction from AI that ranks with other existential threats such as nuclear war, climate change and pandemics.
For Yuval Noah Harari, generative AI may be no less a shatterer of societies, or destroyer of worlds in the phrase Oppenheimer cited from the Baghavad Gita, than the bomb. This time sapiens have become the gods, siring inorganic offspring that may one day displace their progenitors. In a conversation some years ago, Harari put it this way: Human history began when men created gods. It will end when men become gods.
As Harari and co-authors Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin explained in a recent essay, In the beginning was the word. Language is the operating system of human culture. From language emerges myth and law, gods and money, art and science, friendships and nations and computer code. A.I.s new mastery of language means it can now hack and manipulate the operating system of civilization. By gaining mastery of language, A.I. is seizing the master key to civilization, from bank vaults to holy sepulchers.
They went on:
For thousands of years, we humans have lived inside the dreams of other humans. We have worshiped gods, pursued ideals of beauty and dedicated our lives to causes that originated in the imagination of some prophet, poet or politician. Soon we will also find ourselves living inside the hallucinations of nonhuman intelligence.
Soon we will finally come face to face with Descartess demon, with Platos cave, with the Buddhist Maya. A curtain of illusions could descend over the whole of humanity, and we might never again be able to tear that curtain away or even realize it is there.
This prospect of a nonhuman entity writing our narrative so alarms the Israeli historian and philosopher that he urgently advises that sapiens stop and think twice before we relinquish the mastery of our domain to technology we empower.
The time to reckon with A.I. is before our politics, our economy and our daily life become dependent on it, he, Harris and Raskin warn. If we wait for the chaos to ensue, it will be too late to remedy it.
Writing in Noema, Google vice president Blaise Agera Y Arcas and colleagues from the Quebec AI Institute dont see the Hollywood scenario of a Terminator event where miscreant AI goes on a calamitous rampage anywhere on the near horizon. They worry instead that focusing on an existential threat in the distant future distracts from mitigating the clear and present dangers of AIs disruption of society today.
What worries them most is already at hand before AI becomes superintelligent: mass surveillance, disinformation and manipulation, military misuse of AI and the replacement of whole occupations on a widespread scale.
For this group of scientists and technologists, Extinctionfrom a rogue AI is an extremely unlikely scenario that depends on dubious assumptions about the long-term evolution of life, intelligence, technology and society. It is also an unlikely scenario because of the many physical limits and constraints a superintelligent AI system would need to overcome before it could go rogue in such a way. There are multiple natural checkpoints where researchers can help mitigate existential AI risk by addressing tangible and pressing challenges without explicitly making existential risk a global priority.
As they see it, Extinction is induced in one of three ways: competition for resources, hunting and over-consumption or altering the climate or their ecological niche such that resulting environmental conditions lead to their demise. None of these three cases apply to AI as it stands.
Above all, For now, AI depends on us, and a superintelligence would presumably recognize that fact and seek topreservehumanity since we are as fundamental to AIs existence as oxygen-producing plants are to ours. This makes the evolution of mutualism between AI and humans a far more likely outcome than competition.
To assign an infinite cost to the unlikely outcome of extinction would be akin to turning all our technological prowess toward deflecting a one-in-a-million chance of a meteor strike on Earth as the planetary preoccupation. Simply, existential risk from superintelligent AI does not warrant being a global priority, in line with climate change, nuclear war, and pandemic prevention.
Any dangers, distant or near, that may emerge from competition between humans and budding superintelligence will only be exacerbated by rivalry among nation-states.
This leads to one last thought on the analogy between Sam Altman and Oppenheimer, who in his later years was persecuted, isolated and denied official security clearance because the McCarthyist fever of the early Cold War cast him as a Communist fellow traveler. His crime: opposing the deployment of a hydrogen bomb and calling for working with other nations, including adversaries, to control the use of nuclear weapons.
In aspeechto AI scientists in Beijing in June, Altman similarly called for collaboration on how to govern the use of AI. China has some of the best AI talents in the world, he said. Controlling advanced AI systems requires the best minds from around the world. With the emergence of increasingly powerful AI systems, the stakes for global cooperation have never been higher.
One wonders, and worries, how long it will be before Altmans sense of universal scientific responsibility is sucked, like Oppenheimer, into the maw of the present McCarthy-like anti-China hysteria in Washington. No doubt the fervent atmosphere in Beijing poses the mirror risk for any AI scientist with whom he might collaborate on behalf of the whole of humanity instead of for the dominance of one nation.
At the top of the list of clear and present dangers posed by AI is how it might be weaponized in the U.S.-China conflict. As Harari warns, the time to reckon with such a threat is now, not when it is an eventuality realized and too late to roll back. Responsible players on both sides need to exercise the wisdom that cant be imparted to machines and cooperate to mitigate risks. For Altman to suffer the other Oppenheimer moment would bring existential risk ever closer.
One welcome sign is that U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo acknowledged this week that no country or company can shape the future of AI alone. [O]nly with the combined focus, ingenuity and cooperation of the international community will we be able to fully and safely harness the potential of AI.
So far, however, the initiatives they propose, essential as they are, remain constrained by strategic rivalry and limited to the democratic world. The toughest challenge for both the U.S. and China is to engage each other directly to blunt an AI arms race before it spirals out of control.
Read more:
An 'Oppenheimer Moment' For The Progenitors Of AI - NOEMA - Noema Magazine
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on An ‘Oppenheimer Moment’ For The Progenitors Of AI – NOEMA – Noema Magazine
The Implications of AI Advancements on Human Thinking and … – Fagen wasanni
Posted: at 7:10 pm
With the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), there is growing concern about the potential consequences for human thinking capabilities. According to a report from investment bank Goldman Sachs, AI has the potential to replace approximately 300 million full-time jobs, leading to speculations about AI replacing humans in various fields and jeopardizing the uniqueness of human abilities.
Some AI developers claim that their tools can write, draw, and create content for users. However, there are concerns that this may hinder humans from thinking uniquely and creatively. For instance, there are worries that AI could harm English creative writing as it may be seen as a shortcut. Ishfaq Raazi, a 21-year-old poet who writes in Urdu, believes that AI can never fully grasp the depth of knowledge required for poetry, including various genres and meters.
Virtual learning platforms like Udemy offer courses to learn about Chat GPT, an AI-powered tool. While these platforms aim to attract more users, Raazi warns that using Chat GPT may diminish human passion and curiosity, as it takes away the instigative and pondering aspects of creative writing.
AIs impact on professions is also evident, with copywriters like Emily Hanley losing their jobs to AI-generated work. Hanley states that the collapse of her profession is just the beginning, as artists and creatives are not immune to automation. If a robot can do a job more cost-effectively, it is likely to replace human workers.
However, some individuals firmly believe that AI can never completely replace the human mind. Short story writer Rehana Shajar argues that AI lacks genuine emotions and empathy, which are crucial for creative writing. She suggests that AI can be embraced as a tool by writers, similar to past technologies that have been used for self-improvement.
The use of AI in journalism raises complex ethical questions, particularly regarding transparency, bias, and the role of human journalists. Trust, accuracy, accountability, and bias remain major ethical concerns in AI development. The possibility of replacing reporters with chatbots in newsrooms is becoming more plausible, with many news organizations already introducing virtual newscasters for social media.
Vijay Shekhar Sharma, CEO of PayTm, expressed concerns over the potential dangers of superintelligence. The arrival of superintelligence within this decade could have significant impacts on humanity.
As AI continues to advance, it is crucial to carefully consider its implications. While it may have numerous benefits, there are legitimate concerns about its impact on human thinking and creativity.
See original here:
The Implications of AI Advancements on Human Thinking and ... - Fagen wasanni
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on The Implications of AI Advancements on Human Thinking and … – Fagen wasanni
Focusing on Tackling Algorithmic Bias is Key to Ethical AI … – Fagen wasanni
Posted: at 7:09 pm
AI ethicist Alice Xiang argues that while killer robots and superintelligence may be concerns for the future, the immediate and insidious harms being caused by artificial intelligence (AI) lie in algorithmic biases and inequalities. Xiang emphasizes the need to address existing biases in AI systems that entrench societal biases and perpetuate inequalities. Biased algorithms have been found to discriminate against marginalized groups such as women and people of color, often due to skewed training data. Xiang warns that as AI becomes more pervasive in high-stakes domains like healthcare, employment, and law enforcement, these biases can compound and create a more unequal society.
Xiang suggests that it is crucial to prioritize addressing these algorithmic biases over speculative long-term threats. She believes that preventing existential threats is achieved by identifying and mitigating the concrete harms that currently exist. Despite efforts by industry players to establish ethical practices for AI development, algorithmic bias remains a persistent problem that has not been systematically fixed. Xiang highlights incidents like Googles mislabelling of photos and biased recruitment algorithms as examples of ongoing bias in AI systems.
Xiang also raises concern about the representational biases found in generative AIs, which reproduce stereotypes present in the training data. She points out that if image generators are biased, it can influence creators who use them for inspiration in creative fields. Efforts to prevent these harms are still in the early stages, with companies relying on varying levels of self-governance due to the lack of comprehensive government oversight.
To address these issues, Xiang emphasizes the need for companies to prioritize AI ethics from the early stages of development. She calls for increased investment in the underfunded field of AI ethics to ensure that developers have the necessary knowledge and tools to address biases and make ethical decisions. By focusing on tackling algorithmic bias, the industry can work towards developing more ethical AI systems that serve all members of society.
Continue reading here:
Focusing on Tackling Algorithmic Bias is Key to Ethical AI ... - Fagen wasanni
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on Focusing on Tackling Algorithmic Bias is Key to Ethical AI … – Fagen wasanni
Discover This SUPER Early AI Crypto Gem – Altcoin Buzz
Posted: at 7:09 pm
Dont Miss this again! Last week we shared this massive IDO opportunity with you. I am not sure how many of you got in early but those who did Congrats! Your bag pumped 782.6%.
Now that the coin has already pumped why am I talking about it? Because for those who did not get in, I dont want you to miss this early gem opportunity again.Take a look at this. At IDO, $SOPH, Sophiverse token was $0.03. Now its trading close to $0.20 which is a 643% price pump. But, still an early stage to get into it because Sophiverse is about to SHOCK the crypto industry. Lets discover more about this AI crypto gem.
When the legendary actor Will Smith could not resist the Charm of Real Sophia Robot, how could we resist Sophiaverse? The futuristic metaverse allows you to interact with your own personal Sophia as she grows with you and forms a unique personality.
That looks so futuristic! But is it just another AI gimmick or is something really shocking coming up? The next couple of sections are all from a research perspective. But if you want to know my honest opinion watch the video till the end.
For those of you who dont know let me explain Sophiaverse to you in the simplest possible way. Without knowing what the project is about, you cannot understand the actual potential of the $SOPH token.SophiaVerse is an NFT and game-based marketplace for integrating games into the metaverse.
Essentially, a gaming platform supported by AI technology that seeks to enable human interaction with superintelligence facilitated by the SOPH utility token. Simply put, Sophiaverse is like a whole game where you can teach Sophia, learn from her, and even monetize your data through NFTs.
Imagine having your own unique Sophia AI companion that you can customize and train based on your preferences. And the best part is, you can trade and sell your Sophias traits to others.
In short, Sophiverse brings in two most bullish crypto narratives. AI + Web3 Gaming together for a Super bullish future.
We know the AI crypto narrative has kind of cooled off. Then why did Sophiverse such catch massive attention? It is because the Sophiverse ecosystem was developed by David Hanson, the creator of Sophia, the humanoid robot, and Ben Goertzel, a cognitive scientist who developed the explosive AI Blockchain project SingulairtyNET,SingularityDAO, and Hansan Robotics. They are allpartners of Sophiaverse.
So definitely, the project is backed by successful leaders and when I looked at the roadmap, undoubtedly Sophiverse will shock us all.
Before I tell you all about the utility of $SOPH, we need to understand what is there in the Sophiaverse ecosystem. The Sophiaverse ecosystem includes:
SOPH staking is already live and for some pairs like ETH and BNB, the APR is as high as 159%, 379%.
Now we can understand the SOPH tokens utility. Because unless a token has lots of utility in its ecosystem, it doesnt pump even if the ecosystem is growing. Now, here are 6 major utilities in the Sophiverse ecosystem:
All in all entire Sophiverse ecosystem revolves around the SOPH token which means as the ecosystem becomes popular and grows trading of $SOPH will increase and hence $SOPH has quite a high chance of going to the moon in the coming bullrun. But wait will Sophiverse really catch up and become popular?To understand that, lets take a look at its roadmap:
Venture Capitalist have been investing in this segment for some time. Investor interest means a big opportunity lies there. Some of the direct competitors to Sophiverse include Ultiverse, a direct competitor funded by Binance Labs. Other competitors include Altered Stae Machine. It will be interesting to see how this segment evolves.
The project seems solid with collaborations from renowned AI developers and partnerships with Hanson Robotics and Singularitynet. They share the goal of open-source and accessible AI. The utility of the token looks promising too, serving as in-game currency, a means for upgrades, and more.
Interesting to see how theyre making AI fun and accessible for all ages and skill levels. The idea of cross-media and cross-game compatibility is itself very intriguing to me. Their successful launch and 7 million market cap show theres genuine interest in the project.
Im really bullish on this whole Singularity net ecosystem, and I cant wait to see how the Sophiverse unfolds. But make sure you do your own research before making any investments.
For more cryptocurrency news, check out theAltcoin BuzzYouTube channel.
Our popularAltcoin Buzz Access group generates tons of alpha for our subscribers. And for a limited time, its Free. Click the link and join the conversation today.
See the rest here:
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on Discover This SUPER Early AI Crypto Gem – Altcoin Buzz
Mayor Bruce Harrell Shares His New Pitch for the War on Drugs – The Stranger
Posted: at 7:09 pm
On Monday Mayor Bruce Harrell shared what could become Seattles new drug ordinance, which includes increased funding for treatment services and a request for the Seattle Police Department to direct cops to pick diversion over jail in most cases where they catch someone carrying drugs or using in public. However, people who criticized a similar bill in June remain wary of the Mayors plan to address the opioid crisis using the criminal legal system, and the people who wanted to see a drug war reboot didnt say anything bad about the bill.
Public Safety Committee Chair Lisa Herbold said she planned to hear the bill in her committee before the council recesses on August 21.
Harrell said hed issue an executive order next week with more guidance on how SPD should apply the law, including a way to decide when drug possession requires an arrest, as well as how the City plans to measure success in responding to public drug use. If cops do arrest somebody under the state's new gross misdemeanor statute, then the City wants cops to say why.
The order and the new law both come out of a workgroup Harrell created in the aftermath of a June council meeting, during which the Council declined to pass an ordinance allowing Republican City Attorney Ann Davison to prosecute people for drug possession and public drug use.
Up until 2021, the King County Prosecuting Attorney handled drug possession cases under the state felony law. That year, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that law unconstitutional in State v. Blake. For next two years, the state operated under a temporary stopgap measure that effectively decriminalized drug possession. In a May special session, the Washington State Legislature passed a new law that made drug possession and public drug use a gross misdemeanor punishable by up to 180 days in jail for a first or second offense and 364 days for any additional offenses.
In June, Council Members Sara Nelson and Alex Pedersen sponsored an ordinance to adopt that new state law. Council Member Andrew Lewis cast the deciding no vote at that meeting, saying he wanted a full understanding of how the City planned to handle drug possession cases and therapeutic courts. This bill doesn't give him those courts, but over the phone Monday Lewis said his time on the Mayors workgroup assured him the City intends to front-load treatment rather than send people to jail.
The new proposed ordinance Lewis plans to cosponsor includes a promise of $27 million in funding for addiction treatment facilities and programs, with $7 million coming this year from capital funding. The City plans to direct the money toward post-overdose care, opioid secession medication delivery, health hub services, long-term addiction care, and drop-in support, according to a release from the Mayors office.
The Mayors office expects to share more details about those services after providers go through a competitive bidding process for that funding. The remaining $20 million comes from opioid lawsuit settlements and goes toward continuing to expand these programs in the long term. The lawsuit settlements spread out that money over 18 years and equates to about $1.14 million per year, according to the Mayors office.
The organizations that opposed the bill in June remain critical of the Mayors proposal, despite giving some begrudging kudos to the Mayor for finding additional treatment funding. King County Public Defenders Union President Molly Gilbert wanted to empower Seattle Municipal Court judges to divert cases when cops arrest someone, but instead the bill leaves all the power to dismiss charges in the hands of the City Attorney.
The ACLU of Washingtons Smart Justice Policy Program Director Jazmyn Clark said the proposal still echoes War on Drugs policies by relying on the criminal legal system to connect people with these services.
Leading with criminal sanctions are, and always have been, rooted in public shaming and do little to save lives, Clark said.
No critique came from the people who supported the original bill in June. Seattle Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Rachel Smith issued a statement encouraging the Council to pass the bill.
In an emailed statement Monday, Nelson basically said the bill does what she wants by making public drug use and drug possession a gross misdemeanor with the goalnot the requirementof diverting people into treatment.
At the same time, Purpose Dignity Action Co-director Lisa Daugaard, who sat on the Mayors task force and also co-founded LEAD (Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion), a framework that encourages cops to divert people prior to arrest, said people shouldnt dismiss the significance of Harrells coming executive order, as it would put on record that the he wants pre-arrest diversion in most drug possession and public use cases.
Editor's note: This story was fixed to reflect that the Council has not yet set a date to hear the drug ordinance in committee.
See the original post here:
Mayor Bruce Harrell Shares His New Pitch for the War on Drugs - The Stranger
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Mayor Bruce Harrell Shares His New Pitch for the War on Drugs – The Stranger
Illinois Governor Signs Supervised Release Bill To Help Drug War … – Marijuana Moment
Posted: at 7:09 pm
I have expunged more than 800,000 low-level cannabis arrest records We have invested hundreds of millions of dollars to lift up communities most harmed by the failed war on drugs.
By Andrew Hensel, The Center Square
A law now on the books in Illinois looks to make it easier for individuals who have been released from prison to smoothly reenter society.
Senate Bill 423 supports the reintegration of individuals into the community while aiming to lower the possibility of recidivism and increasing public safety.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) signed the measure into law on Friday.
In just a few minutes, I am going to sign legislation that focuses our mandatory supervised release system on creating successful outcomes for those who were formerly incarcerated and improves the safety and peace of our communities, Pritzker said.
According to the latest data from the Illinois Department of Corrections, Illinois has 29,672 people incarcerated. Thats down from 36,910 in March 2020.
The law Pritzker signed Friday is intended to help individuals who have been affected by the war on drugs.
I have expunged more than 800,000 low-level cannabis arrest records on top of pardoning an additional 26,000 people who committed nonviolent offenses, Pritzker said. Illinois has reduced our prison population by more than 26 percent in the last four years. We have invested hundreds of millions of dollars to lift up communities most harmed by the failed war on drugs.
A news release said the measure, which goes into effect January 1, 2024, aims to promote public safety and community success by implementing criminal justice reforms the governors office said include improving education credits while streamlining early termination processes and increasing government transparency by standardizing review timelines and encouraging officers to recommend early termination.
The law will also provide an individualized approach to each persons unique circumstances, focusing on addressing the root causes of crime and enhancing public safety, the governors office said. The measure also limits what the governors office said is unnecessary drug testing and expands virtual reporting permanently for remote check-ins for all forms of supervision.
Ive always said, Im open to commonsense, bipartisan criminal justice reform which offers people a second chance as long as we maintain accountability, state Rep. Mike Marron, R-Fithian, told The Center Square. I think this bill actually meets that standard and had broad bipartisan support. I agree with the governor on this one and just wish he would follow this way of bipartisan policy-making more often.
This story was first published by The Center Square.
Lawmakers Vote To End Pre-Employment Marijuana Testing For Most Government Jobs In U.S. Territory
Continue reading here:
Illinois Governor Signs Supervised Release Bill To Help Drug War ... - Marijuana Moment
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Illinois Governor Signs Supervised Release Bill To Help Drug War … – Marijuana Moment
Activist: Automatically expunging cannabis convictions is step … – MPR News
Posted: at 7:09 pm
Tens of thousands of Minnesotans are getting past drug crimes wiped from public record, thanks to the same law that legalized recreational cannabis on Tuesday.
Low-level marijuana convictions are being automatically expunged by law enforcement, and higher-level sentences will be reviewed by a Bureau of Criminal Apprehension-led expungement board.
Elizer Darris community leader, business owner and motivational speaker was a guest on Morning Edition. As a juvenile, he spent time in prison but later had his life sentence reversed on appeal. Since then, hes worked to end mass incarceration in Minnesota and around the country.
I advocate for any laws, policies, or any movements that would be criminalized and that would allow people the opportunity to step into day-to-day life without being chained down, Darris said. Because of that, I recognize the impacts that the War on Drugs have within my community and advocate in order to help to reverse some of those harms.
MPR News is supported by Members. Gifts from individuals power everything you find here. Make a gift of any amount today to become a Member!
Elizer Darris
Darris Group, LLC
Black Minnesotans are 5.4 times for more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than their white counterparts, despite similar rates of use, according to data from the American Civil Liberties Union.
Darris says the legalization of marijuana for recreational use is a step toward equity, but says more action is needed to right past wrongs.
Clearly, we need to continue to go further, Darris said. The very mechanism that many businesses, corporations and individuals are about to find their wealth with, its the same mechanism that very strategically perniciously wreaked havoc within our community.
Many convictions mean exclusion from federal benefits, like Pell Grants for secondary education.
Were talking about the ability to go to college to advance your life. And as many of you who would have applied for that type of assistance to go to college would have read right on the application itself. It says if you have a drug conviction, do not apply, Darris said.
Also under consideration: The difficulty of landing a job due to background checks.
Darris says this is particularly important when former drug users are unable to be hired or barred from licensure to help people struggling with substance abuse, despite probably [being] in the best position to help others escape the throes of addiction.
Before Aug. 1, the onus was on the individual to get marijuana convictions expunged, which took several months and carried a financial burden. Darris called the new automatic expungement outstanding as it shifts that responsibility to the government.
Hes advocating for some resources and tax revenue that will emerge from the business of marijuana to go toward restorative justice programs and investments in minority communities most impacted by the War on Drugs.
Attempting to write some of these wrongs is a step in the right direction, Darris said. Its not far enough.
Read this article:
Activist: Automatically expunging cannabis convictions is step ... - MPR News
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Activist: Automatically expunging cannabis convictions is step … – MPR News
What the crack epidemic reveals about America – The Boston Globe
Posted: at 7:09 pm
Lenny Woodley is a substance abuse counselor and recovered crack addict who started using when she was a young teen. Shawn McCray is a former crack dealer who came of age at a time when a kid from Newark could make more money selling drugs than from a college degree. Elgin Swift found himself selling crack after his dad got addicted and left him to fend for himself. Kurt Schmoke was the mayor of Baltimore during much of the epidemic, advocating for a public health approach when everyone else in power called for tougher policing.
I talked to Ramsey about lessons we can take from the systemic failures of the crack era and how community care is at the center of preventing future drug epidemics.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.
Alex LaSalvia: Can you describe the perfect storm of conditions that created the crack epidemic?
Donovan X. Ramsey: First you have, on the substance level, young people. I was able to discover a group of students in the Bay Area who were cocaine enthusiasts in the 70s, who experimented with that substance and came up with the formula for freebase cocaine. That is a chemistry term for separating the base of the compound from its other elements, which is scientific and complex, but basically it makes cocaine smokeable, but also super accessible.
You also have, at the same time, a glut of cocaine being shipped into the United States, trafficked from South and Central America. And thats really going uninterrupted by the U.S. government, which was more focused on a war on drugs that targeted users and dealers at home.
But then I would also say that you had really tremendous disaffection across the country, especially in Black and Latino communities in big cities. There was a feeling of hopelessness and real despair about some of the failures of the civil rights movement and not clear direction on where we would go next. So I think that its those things: Its a lot of cocaine in the U.S.; the scientific innovation that created freebase, or crack cocaine; and then also this tremendous desire among people to check out, to escape using the substance.
How did you decide to structure the book episodically around these core characters?
The structure of the book really is a reflection of how the story of the crack epidemic played out. You have the meta history of cracks rise and fall from beginning to end, and then you also have the way that crack touched the lives of these individuals.
It was really important for me to go to history that was both official, but also personal. The four people that I ultimately included in the book, it was after a long process, a year of traveling the country trying to find people who are representative of different experiences of the crack epidemic. So there is a former user, a former dealer, a former mayor, and the son of a user who became a dealer. It seemed to me that those four different experiences would create the most complete picture of how the crack epidemic came and went.
Lenny tells you she feels like decades of her life during her addiction are simply inaccessible to her now. Do you think this sense of lost time is true more broadly for communities who were impacted by the crack epidemic?
I think so. One thing we know about trauma is that it can affect the memory on the individual level. There are a lot of people who, individually, have lost years because of either the trauma of addiction, the violence that accompanied the drug trade, or the police violence that was a response to it.
But also, on a social level, a part of the reason why the crack epidemic is misunderstood is because we try not to think about it. We havent done the work of turning memory into history. And thats a part of what I hope this book does: it takes these four people, who are in many ways representative of different experiences within the crack epidemic, and it tries to turn their memories into a proper history. Otherwise that moment is lost, and theres no opportunity to learn from it.
Do you think the government and society learned lessons from the crack epidemic, especially in the more recent response to the opioid epidemic?
The average person has more empathy for drug addicts. And I think that is a part of just increased understanding of addiction, and also the fact that the vast majority of the folks impacted by opioids today are White. Our country tends to humanize things once theyre in White bodies, and addiction is no different.
Now that Black and Latino men are leading in overdose deaths because of fentanyl, I am again concerned whether or not those feelings will harden, that people will go back to having less empathy for addicts.
I dont think we are smarter as it relates to policy. I could point to something like the disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine, and although it was reduced from 100-to-1 which was the original law under the Reagan administration, and it continued on until 2010, when former President Barack Obama reduced it to 18-to-1 I would say the fact that theres still a disparity in sentencing between these identical substances shows that we havent learned our lesson, that we are still holding on to some of that crack era mythology and fear that ultimately created that that policy.
Also, when I look around at the response to harm reduction policies as it relates to opioids and fentanyl in particular, people are creating a level of panic and hysteria around fentanyl that is causing them to turn away from really smart harm reduction policies. And thats a shame.
The face of this more recent epidemic has been largely White and rural, although that is changing.
Yes, it is. And that makes me more concerned about what the future is of our drug policy because there was some hope with the fact that fentanyl was impacting the most valued Americans. Now that Black and Latino men are leading in overdose deaths because of fentanyl, I am again concerned whether or not those feelings will harden, that people will go back to having less empathy for addicts, and if we then will turn back to those hard-on-drugs, tough-on-crime policies.
How would you say the tough-on-crime policies and the war on drugs have distorted our views of how to actually make our communities safer?
I think back to my experience growing up in a neighborhood that was hard hit by crack the so-called high-crime neighborhood. I remember being a kid and being afraid of the violence, the random violence in my neighborhood. I remember being sad about the people that were clearly drug addicted and being afraid of having our house broken into, but I was also afraid of the police. All of those things were traumatizing forces in my growing up.
The system we have now this incredibly broken system of policing, in particular is a result of the crack epidemic. Policies like stop-and-frisk are about finding drugs or guns on peoples bodies. Broken windows policing, this idea that you can interrupt small crimes as a way of ultimately stopping bigger crimes, the bigger crimes theyre ultimately afraid of were ones related to the drug trade.
Our criminal justice system ballooned during that period because we created policies like mandatory minimum sentences that not only put people in jail, but kept people in jail for really long periods of time. We as a nation decided our best option was to warehouse people during the crack epidemic. Instead of trying to eliminate the causes of the crack epidemic, we said, Lets just lock people up for as long as possible. And the fact that the crack epidemic ended, not because of that but because of the choices individuals made, I think gives people the wrong idea that it worked.
Could you go into what you found to be the real reasons the crack epidemic ended?
The Bureau of Justice Statistics did a lot of studies in the early 90s to actually look at why the crack epidemic ended. What they concluded was that it was simply the choices made by the next cohort of young people, people 18 to 25, who would be experimenting with drugs decided not to pick up not only crack, but no hard drugs. Rates of hard drug use for Black and Latino youth completely plummeted in the early 90s. And it was because of the devastation they saw firsthand.
I want to underline that we have Black and Latino people to thank for ending the crack epidemic in our big cities. And we didnt celebrate that. We didnt applaud that in the same way that those folks were demonized. What that goes to show is that these things are trends, that they come and that they go, and that they come because of all the factors weve discussed, the social conditions that make them popular for a time. What that suggests to me is that harm reduction is so important because our goal should be to keep people alive, to keep communities safe long enough for the storm to pass.
Some people are adamant that the crack epidemic was orchestrated by the U.S. government to disrupt communities of color. Others call that a conspiracy theory. What did you find? Was the government at least complicit in the spread of drugs?
I want to point out that I did not find the smoking gun, and I looked very hard for it. When you are talking about this kind of thing, its important to make distinctions because it is a big thing to accuse the U.S. government of intentionally creating the crack epidemic. I didnt find any evidence of that.
But what I did find evidence of was federal agencies the CIA, the FBI that turned their head the other way again and again when there was evidence that there were large amounts of cocaine being trafficked into the U.S. by groups that we were friendly with namely, the Contras, the Nicaraguan rebels that were attempting to overthrow the government there. That is something that we supported, that we were not able to support with funding, because Congress would not allow that.
So it seems as though we allowed them to fundraise by trafficking cocaine into the U.S. These were actions that were known to those three-letter agencies like the FBI, the CIA, that were interrupted. I dont have to characterize that most people can look at a situation like that and draw their own conclusions.
It is remarkable to see the U.S. government turning a blind eye to trafficking of cocaine into the U.S. at the same time that it is criminalizing the use of cocaine in the U.S., and to really drastic consequences for communities of color.
You mentioned at the end of your book this fear you got after writing this book that the next drug epidemic could be right around the corner at any time. Where does that fear come from?
After reporting the book and getting an idea of the factors that facilitated the crack epidemic, it was clear to me that we had not done enough as a nation to shore up the social forces the poverty, the terrible housing, the political disenfranchisement that make people feel hopeless. That is something that continues to exist in communities all across the country today.
Our idea is that we want people to just stop, but I think that we have to think hard about how we can keep people alive long enough for them to stop.
I was also very disappointed that our response hadnt gotten better, that we did not, as a result of the crack epidemic, create healthier systems for dealing with people who have addiction. Today, for example, if you saw somebody standing on the street who was leaning and completely out of it because they were high on maybe an opioid, who could you call besides the police? For me, its a shame we went through that big devastating time and our options are still the same.
And Ive had that experience. When I started writing this book, I was living in Brooklyn. I had a neighbor, a man that lived on the street, who was clearly high and having a moment, and I called 911. I called 311, [but] 311 told me to call back 911, and I didnt want to criminalize that man, but there was nothing I could do. There was nothing in place, at least on a social level, that I could do.
What that meant was I had to leverage community care, the thing that actually saved us and kept us alive. It meant going over to him and saying, Sir, are you OK? Have a seat. Let me get you some water. You know, trying to actually care for him on an individual level. But on a social level, we havent gotten any better at that.
What can we do now to shore up that community care to make our communities more resilient to new threats of drug epidemics?
I want to see more investment in community organizations that are actually doing the work, that people trust and look to, that are embedded within communities and know the people who need help: churches, activist organizations, hospitals, individual hospital systems that help people into recovery. Its super important to look at whos already doing it, and thats where we put our resources.
I would also like to see more investment in harm reduction programs around the country that do things like distribute Narcan, the life-saving drug that interrupts overdose. Fentanyl test strips, [because] a lot of the fentanyl that is causing overdoses is laced. Other drugs are laced with fentanyl because its super cheap, and its a way of taking something like powder cocaine and stretching it [by putting] little bit of fentanyl in there. People should be testing drugs.
I want to see distribution of clean syringes that keep people from contracting diseases like HIV AIDS while theyre doing intravenous drug use. This is not something we like to talk about in this country, that people are going to do drugs. Our idea is that we want people to just stop, but we have to think hard about how we can keep people alive long enough for them to stop.
Harm reduction programs should go hand-in-hand with recovery programs that our hospital systems should be funded for and trained to see patterns of drug abuse to actually be able to disrupt them and funnel people into treatment. Those two things together create a system where you keep people alive long enough for them to get treatment, and then you give them treatment. And if they relapse and go back into drug use or drug abuse, you can keep them alive long enough for them to get treatment. Its a cycle that has to be interrupted, and we havent created the space to interrupt it.
There are people who want to decriminalize drugs, and I think hard about that because I am so afraid of a potential increase in overdose deaths, if drugs are readily available. That is a big goal we can work toward once those other policies are in place.
Donovan X. Ramseys book, When Crack Was King, is available now wherever books are sold.
Alex LaSalvia is the Digital Producer for The Emancipator. He can be reached at alexla@bu.edu.
See the article here:
What the crack epidemic reveals about America - The Boston Globe
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on What the crack epidemic reveals about America – The Boston Globe