Monthly Archives: August 2022

When Sperm And Eggs Are Monetized, Existence Is Transactional – The Federalist

Posted: August 6, 2022 at 7:34 pm

A viral video of a gay couple discussing how they chose an egg supplier to create a child shows how the process of commissioning life using reproductive technologies can be easily reduced to a transaction that takes physical features and behaviors into account with little regard for the well-being of the supplier.

We wanted [the egg donor] to have lovely big eyes. I wanted her to have really thick hair because Ive had two hair transplants. I wanted her to have a really wide nice smile and just look like a kind person. And we wanted her to be creative because we love the arts, the same-sex couple explained in a video posted to their TikTok account.

The video was later reposted to Twitter by a user who compared the mens account of choosing an egg supplier to picking out a dog in a pet store.

As Ive documented in previous articles, reproductive technologies such as supplying eggs and sperm with no strings attached are morally problematic because they sideline the natural right children have to a mother and father to accommodate the desires of adults. Processes such as in vitro fertilization and surrogacy may have started as a means to assist couples struggling with infertility but theyve morphed into a multibillion-dollar industry that lets anyone and everyone who can afford it pay to create embryos, most of which will likely later be abandoned or discarded.

Among other issues, incentivizing the supply of gametes with money can lead to the normalization of deeming certain genetic traits and behaviors as favorable.

Sound familiar? Thats because thats the same kind of thought that governed the Nazi party of Germany and prompted Margaret Sanger to found and operate abortion giant Planned Parenthood.

If society endorses commissioning babies that look or act a certain way, whats stopping that same society from justifying killing off other kinds? Unfortunately, justifying abortions based on the babys sex, race, or assumption that the baby or mothers quality of life might not be worth giving birth is still all too common.

In addition to having an ethically gray history plagued with breaches of scientific trust and method, the process of supplying sperm and eggs to a buyer requires dozens of physical and psychological screenings to determine eligibility. Those characteristics are then put on display for shoppers who are interested in creating a baby and want to pick and choose how its done.

Essentially anyone who wants to pay thousands of dollars for eggs and sperm to use in an IVF and possible surrogacy pregnancy can walk into a fertility clinic with a laundry list of physical features, health history, and behaviors they desire in a child and choose suppliers that they believe reflect those traits.

Being picked from a catalogue doesnt feel great, one egg supplier admitted in an article for Fashion Magazine in 2020. And you have to deal with the designer baby dilemma.

Designer babies are children whose features such as sex, eye color, and race are handpicked by the people that commissioned their existence. Even if the intention is to create a baby that looks like the intended parents, choosing certain physical traits in a child easily borders on eugenics.

Handpicked breeding has long been under scrutiny for multiple reasons, but that hasnt stopped the trend of choosing a childs sex from becoming a normalized part of the reproductive technologies scene.

Not only does monetizing gametes embolden the eugenics movement, but it also entraps young people who, as the egg supplier in Fashion Magazine put it, wouldnt have done this if I didnt need the money.

A Wired article in 2019 detailed how fertility centers seemingly target young cash-strapped women in college with tailor-made advertisements touting helping couples complete their family.

It takes a special woman to consider helping someone in such a generous way. Your kindness is appreciated, one ad from A Perfect Match, an egg supply company, stated.

What those ads dont describe, however, is the lack of data surrounding the effects of egg supplying, the physically and mentally strenuous screening processes suppliers must undergo, and pain that can include excessive bleeding, abdominal swelling, and discomfort, plus potential weight gain, nausea, infection, and problems urinating, which young women can experience after exchanging their eggs for payment. In some cases, that pain can lead to hospitalization and, in rare cases across the globe, death.

Thats in addition to theemotional tollboth sperm and egg suppliers, especially those whose brains are not yet fully developed, could feel after realizing they will share theirDNA with a child they likely wont know or raise.

The sperm and egg supplier process encourages the intentional creation and destruction of embryos, predestines babies to be separated from at least one biological parent, and can reduce the men and women who exchange their gametes for currency to statistics on a piece of paper instead of the human beings they are.

Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.

Unlock commenting by joining the Federalist Community.

View original post here:

When Sperm And Eggs Are Monetized, Existence Is Transactional - The Federalist

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on When Sperm And Eggs Are Monetized, Existence Is Transactional – The Federalist

Historian shares history of the dark ending of the diverse Malaga Island community – Press Herald

Posted: at 7:34 pm

Historian Kate McBrien will highlight the story of the diverse community of Malaga Island in the late 1800s, which was destroyed through eviction and racist policies of the state.

McBrien, Maine State Archivist and historian for the Malaga Island community, will visit the Patten Free Library at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 10, as part of the Maine Humanities Councils Maine Speaks program.

McBrien will give a 40-minute presentation and discussion which explores the true history of the community who lived on Malaga Island, off the coast of Phippsburg, in the late 1800s. The program examines the individuals who were part of this community and the states actions to evict them from their homes through the complex history of racism and eugenics in Maine.

This is a really important piece of our local history, said Program and Outreach Manager Hannah Lackoff. We know it is of great interest to our community, and we are grateful to the Maine Humanities Council for bringing us a speaker with such incredible expertise.

Maine Speaks supports individuals and organizations bringing people in their community together to learn from a speaker who shares their expertise and lived experience in engaging ways. This program is presented live and on Zoom. Registration is required to watch via Zoom only, at bit.ly/pflisland.

Previous

Next

See original here:

Historian shares history of the dark ending of the diverse Malaga Island community - Press Herald

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Historian shares history of the dark ending of the diverse Malaga Island community – Press Herald

Why We Are Not ‘In This Together’ – LA Progressive

Posted: at 7:34 pm

I have multiple sclerosis, a disease in which the immune system attacks the central nervous system. The myelin sheath that surrounds the nerve endings hardens during these attacks, preventing nerve impulses from traveling where they should. These hardened nerve endings, or lesions, accumulate on the brains and spinal cords of people with MS. Because the central nervous system regulates the other bodily systems, MS lesions can cause an endless list of debilitating symptoms including fatigue, numbness, spasticity, pain, incontinence, blindness, cognitive dysfunction, paralysis, difficulty swallowing and breathing, and death. MS is unpredictable, progressive, and there is no cure. Frankly, it's terrifying.

I have been on several medications to slow the progression of my MS. Some have worked for a time, others not at all. I currently receive infusions that eliminate B cells, making me immunocompromised. Because of my treatment, I did not form antibodies from any of the four Covid-19 vaccines I've received. The absence of B cells and antibodies leaves me without two of three pillars of immunity against Covid-19 and puts me at risk for severe illness or death. I am between a rock and a hard place, or more precisely, between protecting myself from a devastating, incurable neurological disease and a deadly and ever-mutating virus.

Such paradoxes aren't rare for vulnerable people in the United States. The horrors of chronic illness and disability under capitalism are too numerous to count, even in the best of times. And despite our country's intense political divisions, everyone seems to agree that in the worst of times, vulnerable people are casually expendable for the sake of the economy. Under the leadership of both Republicans and Democrats, public health policy in the US consistently espouses eugenics. The Biden administration's Covid-19 policy is no different: it culls sick, disabled, and immunocompromised people from the population as part of its pledge to "return to normal."

The Biden administration's failure to protect vulnerable people from Covid-19 is evident in CDC director Rochelle Walensky's comments from January 7, 2022: "The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So really, these are people who were unwell to begin with. And yes, really encouraging news in the context of Omicron."

Walensky's comments caused widespread outrage in the disability community but they only hint at the magnitude of this administration's cruel and normalized failure to protect vulnerable lives. In response to our outrage, the CDC, Biden, and their Covid-minimizing pundits continue to insist that our deaths are unfortunate, but inevitable. At the same time, they wage an ongoing campaign to convince the public that implementing simple measures to protect us would be too great a burden. In lieu of protecting the high-risk community with substantive public health policy like universal masking, improved ventilation, and adequate isolation periods, the CDC has assured us that it is "committed to continuing the dialogue," and "working to help reduce health disparities with initiatives including providing accessible materials and culturally relevant messages."

Even in the wake of Biden's own diagnosis, his administration maintains that it doesn't need to mandate policy that would prevent Covid-19 health disparities because it "has the tools" to fix them. Yet the CDC's accessibility toolkit for people with disabilities and the White House's latest fact sheet for managing BA.5, the now dominant variant, offer the high-risk community little more than a regurgitation of their vaccination-only strategy. This is a strategy that relies on outdated vaccines that don't provide protection for many immunocompromised people and that are more easily evaded as the virus evolves. The CDC and Biden frame non-pharmaceutical interventions like masking and distancing as an imperative for the vulnerable and a choice for everyone else. Of course, non-pharmaceutical interventions are far less effective when only some members of the community use them. And allowing personal choice to guide public health behavior conditions people to believe that good outcomes are possible whether they choose to participate in the interventions necessary to achieve those outcomes.

Two of the administration's pharmaceutical "tools," the Paxlovid test to treat program and the monoclonal antibody Evusheld, were broadcast as panaceas for high-risk people when they were rolled out in December. But shortages, confusing guidelines, and uneven distribution have made these treatments inaccessible to many in the high-risk population. Recent data on Evusheld shows it is markedly less effective against Omicron sub variants, and growing evidence suggests that a five-day course of Paxlovid may not be enough to clear some infections, contributing to relapsing Covid-19. Sick, disabled, and immunocompromised people have been left with nothing to rely on but our ability to navigate a system that is indifferent to our deaths.

Meanwhile, Biden and the CDC have worked very hard to convince Americans that the demise of vulnerable people is an acceptable byproduct of the expression of their civil liberties. They've reassured the well and abled public that a performative gesture of pity for their sick, disabled, and immunocompromised neighbors mitigates the impact of hanging out at a bar or going maskless to the grocery store. But Biden and the CDC have also worked very hard to conceal the risks that Covid-19 poses to well and abled people. Not only has the public been convinced that it's reasonable to return to "normal" at the peril of the vulnerable, they've also been convinced that it's reasonable to return to normal at their own peril.

In May 2021, Biden announced that the CDC no longer recommended masks for vaccinated people, despite the rise of the highly contagious Delta variant in India and the UK. Then, in July 2021, he claimed that vaccinated people would not get Covid-19, and in October 2021 he claimed that vaccinated people cannot spread Covid-19. Neither of those claims are true, but Biden's comments enabled vaccinated people to base their behavior on a (misinformed) assessment of their own safety rather than the safety of their communities. Given official permission, much of the public abandoned mitigations like masking and distancing which were previously understood to be a civic responsibility.

Scroll to Continue

Earlier this year, the CDC changed its default map metric from "community transmission levels", which reflects current cases, to "community levels'', which reflects hospital admissions. But data on hospital admissions can lag by weeks, resulting in maps that obscure, unsurprisingly, transmission at the community level. Currently, 93.14% of the US is experiencing high community transmission levels and hospital admissions have been on the rise since April. Biden and the CDC have consistently claimed that we are in a "pandemic of the unvaccinated" while 40% of those who died in February and March 2022 were, in fact, vaccinated (15% and 18% boosted, respectively). And BA.5 is 4.2 times more vaccine resistant than BA.2, which was the dominant in February and March when the data was collected. It is unforgivable for our government to hide such vital information when we've already lost more than one million Americans to Covid-19.

Although the CDC has finally published findings that one in five people who get COVID-19 in the US will get Long Covid, data that should have set off alarms to put stronger protections in place has been largely ignored. Our government officials have made little effort to educate the public about the fact that even a mild case of Covid-19 can lead to potentially devastating, multi-organ, multi-system complications, including those of the heart, brain, and lungs. The Biden administration and the CDC have put the onus on individuals to assess risk without giving them adequate information to calculate that risk.

As guidance from our government continues to perpetuate the myth that the pandemic is over for anyone who wishes it to be, life-saving community mitigations have all but disappeared. Perhaps this administration's most horrific act of negligence is its refusal to acknowledge that abandoning these mitigations is what ensures the continuing cycle of death and suffering from Covid-19. It has been devastating to watch the public use our government's monstrous guidance as an excuse to devalue vulnerable lives. Ending public health protections because sick and disabled people are disproportionately dying from Covid-19 is, unquestionably, eugenics.

Unfortunately, in the US, eugenics isn't just a monstrous policy choice. It's an American ideal. The notion that individual choice can somehow be substituted for public health policy has been seamlessly integrated into our country's deep-rooted doctrine of exceptionalism. The "urgency of normal" to go to brunch has replaced the moral imperative to protect others from death and disability. This open disregard for human life has been presented by our government as a uniquely American obligation to respect each other's "choices". But having a neurological disease and compromised immune system during a pandemic is not a choice. Death and suffering have been normalized to such a horrific extent that the vulnerable are now expected remain "civil" when asking not to be disposed of so that others can keep social plans intact. The moral vacuum of the current moment is shocking.

Those at high risk have been left to fend for ourselves. Most of us are hiding at home, looking for a meaningful way to divide up the 20,400 hours and counting we've spent trying to dodge Covid-19. Many of us have been forced to forgo essential medical care, isolate ourselves from our families and social networks, and choose between our lives and our livelihoods. In the absence of any financial support, many high-risk people who've been told that they should stay home can't afford to do so. The physical, psychological, and financial stress is overwhelming.

In May, the Biden administration issued a statement that we could see 100 million Covid-19 cases this fall and winter due to a lack of funding. Days later, Biden urged states to spend "leftover" Covid-19 relief on funding the police. Biden and the CDC continue to acknowledge the rise in Covid-19 cases as if there is nothing that they, the arbiters of public health policy, can or should do about it.

Our government has abandoned its responsibility to protect its citizens by blaming its failures on the very individuals it was elected to protect. This has been at the core of the Biden administration's message: bad Covid-19 outcomes are the result of individuals' bad choices. But as recent history has shown us, the most vulnerable people in our society, despite behaving the most responsibly on an individual basis, suffer the most. Biden's faulty pretext normalizes suffering by attributing it to the moral failings of its victims. The moral failure is of those in power, not those who suffer under that power.

As we approach a winter in which one third of the U.S. population could contract Covid-19, I suspect that well and abled people will once again feel that their lives are threatened by the consequences of their irresponsible, albeit misguided, behavior. They will return to performative allyship, and to news feeds full of clichs like "we're all in this together." Public health relies on compassionate, collective commitment from the public. In our current moment, it relies on the public's commitment to holding those in power accountable. Until the public demands accountability from those in power and from one another, we are most certainly not in this together.

Crossposted from Common Dreams

See the original post here:

Why We Are Not 'In This Together' - LA Progressive

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Why We Are Not ‘In This Together’ – LA Progressive

How Close Are We to War with China? | Guests: Rep. Chris Stewart & Eric Schmitt | 8/2/22 – The Glenn Beck Program – iHeartRadio

Posted: at 7:34 pm

Is Disney trying to erase founder Walt Disney by removing a speech he made? Glenn reads an article exposing how the Nazis were able to implement eugenics and how similar practices are currently happening in America. Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah) joins to discuss House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan and the actions China may take. Glenn Beck's chief writer and researcher Jason Buttrill shares his insight on the seriousness of China and Taiwan and what America's response would be in various scenarios. Former President Donald Trump has endorsed senate candidate Eric in Missouri, but which Eric? U.S. Senate candidate Eric Schmitt joins to share how he's the endorsed candidate, not rival Eric Greitens. As China is already planning its retaliation, Glenn and Stu go over what repercussions Nancy Pelosi should face.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Originally posted here:

How Close Are We to War with China? | Guests: Rep. Chris Stewart & Eric Schmitt | 8/2/22 - The Glenn Beck Program - iHeartRadio

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on How Close Are We to War with China? | Guests: Rep. Chris Stewart & Eric Schmitt | 8/2/22 – The Glenn Beck Program – iHeartRadio

New futuristic diner replacing The Crest on Parsons – 614NOW

Posted: at 7:33 pm

A brand-new restaurant concept serving up a blast from the pastand from the futureis coming soon to Schumacher Place.

The Mercury Diner, a futuristic diner serving up throwback restaurant fare with a twist, is tentatively slated for an October opening at 621 Parsons Ave. The space, at the corner of Livingston Ave. and Parsons Ave., formerly housed The Crests second location.

Like The Crest and the nearby Alchemy Kitchen at 625 Parsons Ave., The Mercury Diner is owned by A&R Creative Group.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY

The Mercury Diner will feature space-age interior decoration, complete with intergalactic murals, all while serving up variations on classic diner fare from eras past.

Inside it will feel like youre eating in 3022, but youre really eating in 1922, said Managing Partner Justin Wotring.

According to Wotring, A&R wanted to capitalize on the daytime traffic at the location from its proximity to Nationwide Childrens Hospital and German Village.

The Mercury Diner will function as more than just a restaurant, however.

The Parsons Ave. spot will likely host different after-dark pop ups and cook-off events, and it even boasts a small stage that Wotring envisions opening up to local creatives and musicians. It will also act as a restaurant incubator for A&R employees with food dreams of their own.

We have a lot of creative people working for us, a lot of people with ambition, Wotring said, And we wanted to give them a launching pad.

Want to read more? Check out our print publication, (614) Magazine. Learn where you can find a free copy of our new August issuehere!

Read the rest here:
New futuristic diner replacing The Crest on Parsons - 614NOW

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on New futuristic diner replacing The Crest on Parsons – 614NOW

A prehistoric Disneyland attraction created futuristic technologies at the park – SFGATE

Posted: at 7:33 pm

The groundbreaking 1964 New York Worlds Fair was a creative playground for Walt Disney and his Imagineers, a chance for the greatest visionaries of the time to experiment before a global audience.

Three of Disney parks most iconic attractions came from the event: Its a Small World, Walt Disneys Carousel of Progress and Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln. A fourth Disney exhibit at the fair never fully made it to parks, but millions have passed by one of its most impressive elements every year at Disneyland.Primeval World, a diorama that is part of the historic Disneyland Railroad, is something that many casual guests pass by without a second thought. You cant miss the staggering heights and breathtaking size of these three-dimensional, audio-animatronic dinosaurs, but many overlook their historical significance.It all goes back to the 1964 Worlds Fair held in Queens, New York a hotbed of inspiration and a promising peek at the future where technology merged with creativity and passion. Fueled by some of the biggest corporations at the time, it was also a pivotal moment for Disney as it was his first big reach to the East Coast, years before Walt Disney World was built, and a chance to flex his creative muscles.At the Fair, Disney spearheaded the creation and design of four exhibits that would lay the groundwork for much of what Disney parks offer today. This ultimately set the trajectory for theme park innovation as we know it.During the planning stages of the Worlds Fair, Ford Motor Company was looking to partner with a pioneering visionary for a unique exhibit that would showcase its new automobiles. Naturally, they thought of Walt Disney and his Imagineers at WED Enterprises, who were making waves at the time for the technologies used at Disneyland.

Primeval World was taken from the 1964 World's Fair attraction Ford Magic Skyway.

They really wanted something to show off their cars particularly, said Ted Linhart, a Disney and Worlds Fair expert behind Disney Docs. This exhibit would also be the debut of the highly-anticipated Ford Mustang, which further solidified the pressure to make a big splash.

They needed a showman, Linhart added. Something to really make a pop.

The result was Ford Magic Skyway, an attraction narrated by Disney himself, that would transport guests aboard actual Ford motor vehicles as they time traveled to different periods, including the era of the dinosaur.The partnership at the Worlds Fair would not only prove to be beneficial for Ford, but for Disney as well. He used the opportunity for his Imagineers to research new technologies and never-before-seen storytelling methods, on the dime of the mega-corporation. It was a big undertaking for Disney, but allowed them to expand their Imagineer technology and audio-animatronic technology, Linhart said.His grandest display of showmanship? Forty-six towering dinosaurs, marking one of the earliest and grandest displays of audio-animatronics.Some 15 million people attended the show during its two-year run. For many, this was the first time they saw audio-animatronics with their own eyes. This new and groundbreaking entertainment medium showed guests the most life-like dinosaurs they had ever seen before, which moved and even grunted.

Walt Disney reportedly referred to these brontosauri as Huey, Dewey and Louie.

Walt realized that the Worlds Fair would be a great place to expand that technology, expose it to many more people, enhance it and get it more out there, added Linhart. The dinosaurs would revolutionize theme park technology as we know it, setting a precedent and introducing guests to figures on the grand scale that they would come to expect from Disney parks attractions.The use of synchronized movement and sound was first on display, although to a much smaller degree, with Walt Disneys Enchanted Tiki Room. The total immersion of the senses displayed in the dinosaur scenes on Ford Magic Skyway, though, was a new level of storytelling that would soon be used at forthcoming Disneyland attractions, like Pirates of the Caribbean and the Haunted Mansion.The dinosaurs were a big hit, Linhart said. They seemed realistic to people. The whole pavilion was a huge smash. Documents show that guests would wait hours to ride the attraction for a glimpse of the dinosaurs.

Industry standards were also set beyond the dinosaurs. Disney and Ford were tasked with learning how to manage the flow of people, marrying ride capacity with guests' demands. A new ride vehicle system was developed that would later be used at Disney parks. One of the technologies they created for the Fair would allow the car to move at the same speed as the track it was on so that people getting in it could get in the car without having injuries, shares Linhart. This vehicle propelling technology, developed for the Ford Magic Skyway, would be used with the now iconic PeopleMover attraction first at Disneyland and now at Walt Disney World.The success of Disneys dinosaurs and all of his exhibits collectively boded new confidence for the companys expansion to Florida and provided the groundwork for beloved attractions seen today. While the three other exhibits made their way to Disney parks fully intact, only Walts popular dinosaurs were rescued from the Ford exhibit.

The diorama culimnates in a fight between a Tyrannosaurus Rex and a Stegosaurus.

They were brought to Disneyland in 1966, where they have entertained millions for the last 56 years. Guests experience these dinosaurs aboard the Disneyland railroad between the Tomorrowland and Main Street, U.S.A. stations.

On this journey, the train passes through the Grand Canyon before coming face to face with these figures in the multi-set Primeval World diorama. The cavernous scenes were inspired by the classic film Fantasia with a soundtrack provided by the roaring dinosaurs and the Primeval World Suite.

During the ride, guests can spot a brontosaurus and three babies; Walt playfully called them Huey, Dewey and Louie. After appearances by pteranodons and triceratops, the final scene finds two dinosaurs, a tyrannosaurus rex and a stegosaurus, battling it out before an erupting volcano.Today, paleontologists have questioned Disney for discrepancies found within the attraction, like the physical attributes of the dinosaurs and conflicting eating habits. What cant be disputed is their impact on theme park innovation and technology.While Primeval World never made it to Walt Disney World, it was reimagined at Tokyo Disneyland and similar life-like dinosaurs seemingly roam the earth or attractions in popular Universal Studios park rides today. It also inspired the now-defunct opening day Epcot attraction, Universe of Energy and Primeval Whirl, another defunct ride in the Dinoland area of Disneys Animal Kingdom in Orlando. (That park made much more realistic dinos on its Dinosaur ride, which uses the same ride track as Indiana Jones Adventure in Disneyland, although riders are escaping extinction, and not a giant stone ball.)The Ford show was designed as a time machine to immerse you in different parts of the past and the future, Linhart added. It does seem like theres a very strong connection from that ride to the iconic rides of today.

For now, the dinosaurs are safe and sound, remaining a beloved part of Disneylands colorful fabric. Only time will tell if they, like so many attractions of yesteryear, will one day roar into extinction.

Read the original here:
A prehistoric Disneyland attraction created futuristic technologies at the park - SFGATE

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on A prehistoric Disneyland attraction created futuristic technologies at the park – SFGATE

Crevice Gardens: A Futuristic Way To Save the Environment? – Nature World News

Posted: at 7:33 pm

It's great that gardens with an eco-conscious aesthetic are popular. The harmony of a successful landscape with its surroundings, in terms of its flora, planting style, and general mood, is one of its defining characteristics.

However, it is important to be aware that the widespread interest in plant naturalism that exists now is a very new trend.

Gardeners have sought distinctly alien plants and strikingly unusual for at least a century; examples include non-native varieties of lilies, roses, azaleas, and hostas.

(Photo : Annie Spratt/Unsplash)

It's a rock garden that has been carried to the very limit; an extreme design that draws inspiration from improbable, dramatic locations like mountain peaks, windswept seacoasts, and sun-baked deserts, as per The New York Times.

To understand the underlying principle closer to home, all you have to do is glance down. See that lone dandelion with its grip in a tiny crevice between curbstones or sidewalk pavers, with no soil in sight? Its colorful blossoms shout in opposition to everything gardeners believe they know about what plants desire, just like a Saxifraga or Silene clinging to tiny crevices in a wide, rocky environment do.

The Crevice Garden: How to Make the Perfect Home for Plants from Rocky Places," a new book, exhorts us to imitate the processes that take place in such settings, both big and tiny.

Rock-garden designers Kenton J. Seth of Colorado and Paul Spriggs of British Columbia are its authors. They occasionally work together.

They have established themselves as de facto crevice gardening ambassadors, drawing in a larger and younger audience with their ambitious lecture schedule, their Facebook group, Modern Crevice Gardens, which has more than 5,000 members, and now a book.

In contrast to flat gardens, crevice gardens typically have berm-like contours that give the appearance of a natural outcrop and allow the roots of the plants to swell deeply (although not very far sideways).

These gardens may be scaled down to fit in a trough or up for a botanical garden or park. They range from naturalistic to high modernist art.

A preliminary design that the men are frequently requested to come up with is a little larger than a container garden. It's maybe a three by three-foot mound that Mr. Seth described as "a little garden" or Mr. Sprigg described as "a modest outcrop."

Instead of being an eyesore that you wish you didn't have to see, a crevice garden transforms this vacant area into a focus point.

No matter the scale, Mr. Seth suggested that the goal may just be to "create a lovely element in a xeric environment that can elevate plants a bit closer to the observer" or sustain plants that you would not otherwise be able to grow in your environment.

Read more:Species Biodiversity: Rare Plants in Urban Gardens Can Also Attract a Rare Biodiversity of Bees and Birds

In the early parts, they utilized very little soil and a lot of PermaTill, a horticultural-grade aggregate.

Many plants, including 588 hardy cactuses and agaves, did not survive the winter.

This caught everyone off guard because the only thing that keeps somewhat hardy plants alive over the winter is the lack of moist soil.

The growth medium was excessively open, and chilly air was penetrating the ground, Tony Avent and Jeremy Schmidt, the botanic garden's supervisor of grounds and research, and rock garden designer Kenton Seth, of Fruita, Colorado found.

Avent claims that the soil temperature in the crevice garden was just four degrees warmer than it was 18 inches below the surface when it was winter.

The growth mix was modified in later parts to incorporate compost and some native soil to address the issue.

More agaves, resilient cacti, delosperma, arabis, and draba are among the 1,500 species that are now flourishing in the garden; these plants would definitely not survive in typical garden beds in central North Carolina.

The waves created by the undulating crevice slabs lend motion to a rigid medium. Schmidt claims he used a skid-steer loader to lower them over their designated spot, then utilized gravity to assist position them.

There is a pleasant tension seeing seemingly fragile, unique beauty like globularia bloom against such imposing settings, with its chive-like flowers.

This served as an organizing principle for the design, but according to Avent, his fissure garden provides a paradigm of urban sustainability by bringing beauty to the wasteland of repurposed concrete.

According to Seth, it's a fantastic method to green cities, prevent waste from going to the landfill, and introduce people to a wide variety of new plants. "I'm hoping this will serve as an example for cities all across the world," as per Independent.

Related article:5 Essential Things for a Well-Kept Garden

2022 NatureWorldNews.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Originally posted here:
Crevice Gardens: A Futuristic Way To Save the Environment? - Nature World News

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Crevice Gardens: A Futuristic Way To Save the Environment? – Nature World News

Ambitious Researchers Want to Use AI to Talk to All Animals – Futurism

Posted: at 7:33 pm

"Were species agnostic."Kingdom Come

A group of researchers are looking to use machine learning to translate animal "languages" into something humans can understand and they want to apply it to the whole animal kingdom, a highly ambitious plan to say the least.

AsThe Guardian reports, California-based nonprofit Earth Species Project (ESP) which was founded in 2017 with the help of Silicon Valley investorslike LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman plans to first decode animal communication via machine learning, and then make its findings available to all.

ESP co-founder and president Aza Raskin says that the group, which published its first paper in December 2021, doesn't discriminate and is looking to help humans communicate with, or at least understand, as many species as possible.

"Were species agnostic," Raskin told The Guardian, adding that the translation algorithms the ESP is developing are designed to "work across all of biology, from worms to whales.

In the interview, Raskin likened the group's ambitions to "going to the Moon," especially given that, like humans, animals also have various forms of non-verbal communication, like bees doing a special "wiggle dance" to indicate to each other that they should land on a specific flower.

Despite the seemingly insurmountable challenges the group is facing, the project has made at least some progress, including an experimental algorithm that can purportedly detect which individual in a noisy group of animals is "speaking."

A second algorithm reportedly can generate mimicked animal calls to "talk" directly to them.

"It is having the AI speak the language," Raskin told The Guardian, "even though we dont know what it means yet."

While there are certainly exciting implications to this kind of research, particularly when it comes to conservation and convincing skeptics that animals are worth saving, Raskin admits that AI likely won't be the only answer to saving them.

"These are the tools that let us take off the human glasses," he concluded, "and understand entire communication systems."

READ MORE:Can artificial intelligence really help us talk to the animals? [The Guardian]

More on animal AI:Smart Pet Door Uses Facial Recognition to Keep Strange Animals Out

Original post:
Ambitious Researchers Want to Use AI to Talk to All Animals - Futurism

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Ambitious Researchers Want to Use AI to Talk to All Animals – Futurism

Horror stories of cryonics: The gruesome fates of frozen bodies – Big Think

Posted: at 7:33 pm

Several facilities in the U.S. and abroad maintain morbid warehouse morgues full of frozen human heads and bodies, waiting for the future. They are part of a story that is ghoulish, darkly humorous, and yet endearingly sincere. For a small group of fervent futurists, it is their lottery ticket to immortality. What are the chances that these bodies will be reanimated? Will baseball legend Ted Williams frozen head be awakened to coach fighter pilots or fused to a robot body to hit .400 again?

Cryonics attempting to cryopreserve the human body is widely considered a pseudoscience. Cryopreservation is a legitimate scientific endeavor in which cells, organs, or in rare cases entire organisms may be cooled to extremely low temperatures and revived somewhat intact. It occurs in nature, but only in limited cases.

Humans are particularly difficult to preserve because of the delicate structure in (most of) our heads. Deprived of oxygen at room temperature, the brain dies within minutes. While the body may be reanimated, the person who lives is often in a permanent vegetative state. Cooling the body may give the brain a bit more time. During brain or heart surgery, circulation may be stopped for up to an hour with the body cooled to 20 C (68 F). A procedure to cool the body to 10 C (50 F) without oxygen for additional hours is still at the experimental research stage.

After a while, he let the bodies thaw out inside the capsule and left the whole thing festering in his vault.

When a cryonic patient dies, a race begins to prepare and cool the body before it decays and then to place it inside a Dewar: a thermos bottle full of liquid nitrogen (LN). The inner vessel of the Dewar contains a body, or bodies, wrapped in several layers of insulating material, attached to a stretcher, and suspended in LN. The head is oriented downward to keep the brain the coldest and most stable.

This vessel lies within a second outer vessel, separated by a vacuum to avoid heat transfer from the outer room-temperature vessel wall to the cold inner vessel wall. Heat gradually transfers across anyway and boils away the LN, which must be periodically refilled. Bodies were originally, and may still be in some cases, cooled and frozen in whatever condition they were in at death, with better or worse preservation, as we shall see.

The early years of cryonics were grisly. All but one of the first frozen futurists failed in their quest for immortality.

Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday

Small freezing operations began in the late 1960s. While the practice of storing bodies has become more sophisticated over the past 50 years, in the early days, technicians cooled and prepared corpses with haste on dry ice before eventually cramming them into Dewar capsules. By in large, these preservations did not achieve preservation. They were nightmarish, gruesome failures. Their stories were researched and documented by people within the field, who published thorough and frank records.

The largest operation was run out of a cemetery in Chatsworth, California by a man named Robert Nelson. Four of his first clients were not initially frozen in LN but placed on a bed of dry ice in a mortuary. One of these bodies was a woman whose son decided to take her body back. He hauled (his dead mother) around in a truck on dry ice for some time before burying her.

The bodies in the container partially thawed, moved, and then froze again stuck to the capsule like a childs tongue to a cold lamp post.

Eventually, the mortician was not pleased with the other bodies sitting around on beds of ice, so a LN Dewar capsule was secured for the remaining three. Another man was already frozen and sealed inside the capsule, so it was opened, and he was removed. Nelson and the mortician then spent the entire night figuring out how to jam four people who may or may not have suffered thaw damage into the capsule. The arrangement of bodies in different orientations was described as a puzzle. After finding an arrangement that worked, the resealed capsule was lowered into an underground vault at the cemetery. Nelson claimed to have refilled it sporadically for about a year before he stopped receiving money from the relatives. After a while, he let the bodies thaw out inside the capsule and left the whole thing festering in his vault.

Another group of three, including an eight-year-old girl, was packed into a second capsule in the Chatsworth vault. The LN system of this capsule subsequently failed without Nelson noticing. Upon checking one day, he saw that everyone inside had long thawed out. The fate of these ruined bodies is unclear, but they might have been refrozen for several more years.

Nelson froze a six-year-old boy in 1974. The capsule itself was well maintained by the boys father, but when it was opened, the boys body was found to be cracked. The cracking could have occurred if the body was frozen too quickly by the LN. The boy was then thawed, embalmed, and buried. Now that there was a vacancy, a different man was placed into the leftover capsule, but ten months had elapsed between his death and freezing, so his body was in rotten shape no pun intended from the get-go and was eventually thawed.

Every cryonic client put into the vault at Chatsworth and looked after by Nelson eventually failed. The bodies inside the Dewar capsules were simply left to rot. Reporters visited the crypt where these failed operations had taken place and reported a horrifying stench. The proprietor admitted to failure, bad decisions, and going broke. He further pointed out, Who can guarantee that youre going to be suspended for 10 or 15 years?

The worst fates of all occurred at a similar underground vault that stored bodies at a cemetery in Butler, New Jersey. The storage Dewar was poorly designed, with uninsulated pipes. This led to a series of incidents, at least one of which was failure of the vacuum jacket insulating the inside. The bodies in the container partially thawed, moved, and then froze again stuck to the capsule like a childs tongue to a cold lamp post. Eventually the bodies had to be entirely thawed to unstick, then re-frozen and put back in. A year later, the Dewar failed again, and the bodies decomposed into a plug of fluids in the bottom of the capsule. The decision was finally made to thaw the entire contraption, scrape out the remains, and bury them. The men who performed this unfortunate task had to wear a breathing apparatus.

Out of all those frozen prior to 1973, one body remains preserved. Robert Bedford was sealed into a Dewar in 1967. Instead of leaving the body to meet a horrific fate under Nelsons care, Bedfords family took custody of the capsule, meticulously caring for it at their own expense. The body was handed off between professional cryonics operations, occupying multiple frozen tanks and facilities for 15 years or so. Eventually it ended up in the hands of the founders of Alcor a modern cryonics outfit one of whom wrote a heartfelt, slightly creepy piece about the body.

Credit: Jeff Topping / Getty Images

Alcor is the leading example of the current state of cryonics. While the ugly events above suggest that your remains might well end up as tissue sludge scraped out of a can, the professionalism of companies like Alcor may offer an increased chance for long-term preservation. This 501(c)(3) organization hosts researchers who work on methods to improve the freezing process, possibly increasing whatever slight odds exist that human popsicles will ever be brought back to life. At a more fundamental level, it appears to be stable and to have deep pockets, so there is a better chance that your corpse will be around long enough for some distant future doctor to recoil in horror at it.

The U.S. industry has consolidated around two main organizations. If not Alcor, your other choice is the Cryonics Institute, which has more than 200 bodies stored in giant tanks and accepts dozens more each year. Apparently, ten years ago, head storage alone at Alcor cost $80,000, while full body storage at the Cryonics Institute was only $30,000. There are international options as well. A Russian cryogenics company stores not only people but pets, including one entry under rodents, a deceased chinchilla named Button.

Modern cryonic preparations at Alcor employ a multistep process to prepare the body for storage. First, they begin to cool the body while anti-clotting agents and organ preservation solutions are injected into the bloodstream and circulated under CPR. The body is then transported to the companys main facility, where the original fluid is replaced with chemicals that vitrify turn to glass the bodys organs. This offers some hope for cutting down on structural damage during the subsequent cooling and storage. Then the body is entombed in its Dewar capsule.

That all sounds scientific and careful. But is it really science or just applying scientific tools to a fantasy proposition? Is it possible to freeze the human body and revive it decades later? Currently, its not remotely plausible. Will it ever be? Thats probably an open question. As it stands now, cryonics is a bizarre intersection of scientific thinking and wishful thinking.

Credit: Annelisa Leinbach / Big Think

While cryonic preparation is now more advanced, the laws of physics demand that the structure of the body will break down rapidly after death, catastrophically upon freezing, and gradually over time, even while frozen. Think of how badly frozen food ages in your freezer. If the medical technology of the future becomes advanced enough, perhaps these corpses can be revived. But thats a big if. Lets say your body remains frozen until the 25th century. Then, lets say that future doctors are interested in reviving you. How much work will they have to do to fix you once youre thawed? The answer lies in the condition of the bodies once theyre thawed. Strangely enough, we know something about this.

In 1983, Alcor needed to lighten three cryonauts, reducing them from bodies to simply heads. (In one transhumanist conception of the future, medical science will be able to revive the brain and then simply make a new body or robot to which to attach it. Neuropreservation is cheaper and easier too.) The three corpses were removed from their Dewar capsules so that the heads could be cut off still frozen, so requiring a chainsaw and stored separately. Once the heads were sawed off and put away, Alcor employees got to work medically examining the state of the bodies. They wrote up their findings in great detail.

At first, things looked reasonably good. While the bodies were still frozen, their skin was only moderately cracked in a few places. But once the bodies thawed, things started to go downhill.

The organs were badly cracked or severed. The spinal cord was snapped into three pieces and the heart was fractured.

Cracks appeared in the warming bodies, cutting through the skin and subcutaneous fat, all the way down to the body wall or muscle surface beneath. One patient displayed red traces across the skin following the paths of blood vessels that ruptured. Two of the patients had massive cutaneous ruptures over the pubis. The soft skin in these areas was apparently quite susceptible to cracking.

While the external damage was extensive, the internal damage was worse. Nearly every organ system inside the bodies was fractured. In one patient, every major blood vessel had broken near the heart, the lungs and spleen were almost bisected, and the intestines fractured extensively. Only the liver and kidneys werent completely destroyed.

The third body, which had been thawed very slowly, was in better condition externally, with only a few skin fractures and no obvious exploded blood vessels. However, the inside was even more annihilated than the others. The organs were badly cracked or severed. The spinal cord was snapped into three pieces and the heart was fractured. The examiners injected dye into an artery in the arm. Rather than flow through blood vessels and into muscles, most of it pooled under the surface in pockets and leaked out of skin fractures.

The medical examiners extensively detailed the content of the blood, the texture of the muscles, and the extent of the damage. They included pictures. And they earnestly stated their conclusion up front: The tremendous tissue deterioration will require incredibly advanced medical technology to fix. Worse, the probable destruction at the cellular level may require rebuilding the body at the molecular level. Perhaps future medicine might be able to inject swarms of nanobots into your body to repair every bit of tissue, but dont bet on it happening any time soon.

Modern cryonics practices may ward off the horrific failures of the past. And we cant entirely rule out future medicine somehow finding fixes for the terrific damage incurred by the body in freezing, sitting, and thawing. But theres one more hurdle for the future revivification of your frozen form, the last great danger to your immortality: your crazy relatives. Several cases demonstrate the problem.

The family of a man frozen in 1978 eventually got tired of paying for him. The facility offered to cut off his head and store it for free, but the family turned them down. Instead, the body was thawed, submerged in a vat of formaldehyde like a laboratory specimen, and buried in that condition. Two further men were stored by their sons, one of whom had his father thawed, removed, and buried. The other son eventually buried his dads capsule in its entirety with the remains still inside.

Relatives can also go to court and battle over what happens to your corpse. Richard Orvilles family buried him against his wishes and was eventually forced by an Iowa court to dig up his body for preservation. A Colorado womans family went to court to fight Alcor for their mothers head. Alcor eventually got the head, to preserve as best they could. Conversely, another womans will stated that she did not want to be frozen. Her husband froze her anyway, and after a four-year court battle, the State of California ordered that she be thawed and buried.

One particularly well-known family affair is the story of a frozen Norwegian man who was initially stored at a California facility that worked with Alcor. He was removed by his daughter, who stored him in an ice shed behind her house in Colorado. The body was discovered when she was evicted from the property. The small town of Nederland, Colorado now has a Frozen Dead Guy Days celebration every year.

While the chances of immortality may be slim, dozens of people still commit their bodies or brains to cryonics each year. If their remains arent mismanaged or allowed to disintegrate, and if their relatives dont go to court over the body, there is now a good chance that they will remain frozen for decades. Unfortunately, they will come out of the process cracked into a million pieces, and the prospect of putting them back together again is purely science fiction for the foreseeable future. Its a grim practice with ghoulish results; at least it makes for some fascinating stories and a bit of dark humor.

See the original post here:
Horror stories of cryonics: The gruesome fates of frozen bodies - Big Think

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Horror stories of cryonics: The gruesome fates of frozen bodies – Big Think

Hyundai Reveals Futuristic Smart City With Automated Transport – IoT World Today

Posted: at 7:32 pm

Hyundai Motor Group has presented a dramatic vision for a smart city of the future where all the transport is automated.

The innovative concept was exhibited at the World Cities Summit in Singapore, developing an idea first explored by the automaker at CES in 2020.

The latest HMG Smart City is said to be inspired by a honeycomb pattern and is a hexagonal-shaped urban community with a human-centered surface layer and a function-centered underground layer.

Nature is prioritized in the human layer, with parks and forests at the center of the city encircled by buildings, which will decrease in density the closer they are to the greenery.

But its the underground layer where Hyundais thinking gets more radical. This is where the road infrastructure is located. The idea is that all goods and services are transported underground via autonomous mobility to a particular areas automated logistics hub, where autonomous robots make the final delivery.

Travel between respective smart cities is by advanced air mobility (AAM). AAM vehicles take off and land from a series of Hub 2.0 Towers, which combine residential and office areas with AAM ports at the top of the building.

According to Hyundai Motor Group President and Chief Innovation Officer Youngcho Chi, the smart city shows how urban communities can be rejuvenated. In the future smart cities, our ambition is for humankind to live with nature while embracing technology, he said. Our air and ground mobility solutions will redefine urban boundaries, connect people in meaningful ways, and revitalize cities.

We will continue to work with governments around the globe to bring our smart city vision to reality, while rapidly advancing capabilities in future mobility solutions.

The Smart City certainly provides added perspective to some of the ideas and tech announced by Hyundai in recent months as the company looks to a future where smarter, more sustainable mobility will be integral.

Driverless robotaxis are being aggressively pursued by the Group, with a self-driving Hyundai Ioniq 5 co-developed with Boston-based Motional due to start operations in Las Vegas next year and another Ioniq 5 featuring the brands own in-house autonomous tech recently undergoing tests in Gangnam, Seoul.

Its also earmarked billions of dollars to develop a new type of transport in so-called electric Purpose-Built Vehicles, which range in size from unmanned micro-sized vehicles for deliveries to larger shuttles.

In May, it announced a massive $5 billion investment in its U.S. operation to support its work in robotics, AI tech, AAM and autonomous driving.

And it is becoming an increasingly high-profile presence in the burgeoning eVTOL (electric vertical take-off and landing) flying taxi industry via its AAM offshoot Supernal. It recently unveiled a concept eVTOL vehicle at Englands Farnborough International Airshow and at the same event confirmed a deal with Rolls-Royce to work on electric propulsion and fuel cell tech for air taxis.

Follow this link:
Hyundai Reveals Futuristic Smart City With Automated Transport - IoT World Today

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Hyundai Reveals Futuristic Smart City With Automated Transport – IoT World Today