Daily Archives: June 3, 2022

Diversity return to Britain’s Got Talent to take the knee again – Manchester Evening News

Posted: June 3, 2022 at 1:03 pm

Former Britain's Got Talent winners Diversity returned to Britain's Got Talent to address the controversy and thank supporters following their powerful Black Lives Matter performance in 2020. The routine, which portrayed the death of George Floyd in America and the protests that followed, featured dancer, choreographer and BGT guest judge Ashley Banjo having his neck knelt on by a white police officer and the group taking the knee in a statement against racism.

The performance was accused by viewers of taking a political stance during a flagship family entertainment show and became one of the most complained about TV moments. ITV stood by its broadcast of the dance, which garnered around 24,500 complaints to the broadcasting regulator Ofcom.

Tonight (Wednesday) Diversity were back with another spellbinding performance about social media and connectivity during the third Britain's Got Talent semi-final show. And they took the knee again as a flashback scene and headlines about their much-talked-about Black Lives Matter routine were flashed on a big screen and rain poured down.

READ MORE: ITV Britain's Got Talent in 'weird start' as Simon leaves judging panel in row with David Walliams over dance act

A voiceover said: "Exposure to this type of connection can cause your entire outlook to change. It fills you with hope and joy. Sometimes it fills you with struggle and pain.

"You know what I've learned, you can't be angry at the rain. It simply doesn't known how to fall upwards this rain and sometimes people love you, sometimes they complain. You stand by what you believe in if you want to make change. Nothing but love for those that stood by our name."

@Sprincey1968 praised on Twitter: "Yet again another outstanding performance from @Diversity_Tweet. So glad they did a throwback to that performance where there was loads of totally stupid complaints. Keep on telling it like it is #BGT." @Alex05923602 wrote: "Big up Diversity for not changing their stance." @KiranLadva wrote: "Diversity are the best act to have ever walked out of Britains Got Talent - no arguments." And @dudeitsdivya wrote: "People who find Diversity boring or annoying for speaking out on race issues have the privilege of not having to worry about these issues in the first place #BGT so glad they stood their ground.

An ITV spokesman said at the time about their 2020 routine: "Britain's Got Talent has always been an inclusive show, which showcases diversity and supports strong storytelling in all forms and ITV stands behind the decision to broadcast Diversity's performance on BGT.

"Ashley and the group are a great example of the talent, creativity and diversity of modern Britain and their performance was an authentic, heartfelt response to many of the issues and events which have affected society in 2020."

Sharing examples of some of the vile comments he'd received, Ashley told his followers on Instagram: "No I dont mean 'criticism'... I mean 'Racism.' I mean hate ... I mean the very thing that makes every single second of that performance and every single complaint worth it."

Explaining the concept behind the performance, he said it was meant to round-up an extraordinary year including COVID-19, lockdown, the NHS and the spotlight shone on racism with the death of George Floyd and the protests that followed.

"Hindsight 2020 that is what the performance was about," he said. "It was something we wanted to bring to the stage to give people hope, not to shy away from the difficult conversations."

Go here to see the original:

Diversity return to Britain's Got Talent to take the knee again - Manchester Evening News

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on Diversity return to Britain’s Got Talent to take the knee again – Manchester Evening News

From anti-Asian hate to Black Lives Matter, how South Korean band BTS has spoken up for the right causes – Firstpost

Posted: at 1:03 pm

The seven-member band from South Korea doesn't shy away from speaking on social causes and is involved in multiple charitable causes. On Tuesday, they came together with the White House to raise the issue of crime against Asian-Americans

BTS band members, J-Hope, RM, Suga, Jungkook, V, Jin and Jimin , with US president Joe Biden at the White House. Image Courtesy: @bts_bighit/Twitter

The K-Wave was prevalent in the White House on Tuesday when BTS, South Koreas biggest pop sensation, met with President Joe Biden.

The band members J-Hope, RM, Suga, Jungkook, V, Jin and Jimin werent at the White House to show their dynamite moves, but to discuss the very serious issue of crime and intolerance against Asian-Americans that has persisted since the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

The bands visit to Pennsylvania Avenue coincided with the last day of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

A video, which has now received more 11 lakh likes, shared by the White House on Instagram shows the pop sensations meeting up with President Joe Biden, stating, Its an honour to meet you Mr President as the boys walk up to Biden in crisp black suits.

US president Joe Biden is heard saying, A lot of our Asian-American friends have been subject to real discrimination. Hate only hides, when good people talk about it, and say how bad it is, it goes down. So thank you.

Prior to their meeting with the US president, BTS had a press briefing with White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

Korean band BTS appears at the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing of the White House in Washington, as they visit to discuss anti-Asian hate crimes and discrimination. AFP

Speaking to the press through an interpreter, Suga said, Its not wrong to be different. Equality begins when we open up and embrace all of our differences.

Another member, V, added, We hope today is one step forward to understanding and respecting each and every one as a valuable person.

While the scene at the White House on Tuesday was that of fun, the issue that brought the group to the White House was not. The rise in anti-Asian hate crimes and discrimination since 2020 has included the March 2021 killing of eight people at Atlanta-area massage businesses, including six women of Asian descent.

Anti-Asian sentiment and violence in America have grown during the coronavirus pandemic in a phenomenon many blame on fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. Just in 2021, hate crimes against Asians shot up 339 per cent, according to the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism.

The South Korean sensations have been lauded for this effort, but its not their first. Through their careers, the band has had long-time involvement in charitable causes and have spread messages of hope and positivity worldwide.

The band has never been shy to speak about current social issues. Over the years, BTS has built a reputation as being one of the most socially conscious groups across the world. Their lyrics have touched on subjects such as mental health, consumerism and the education system.

BTS at the UNGA

In 2021, BTS delivered a thoughtful speech and then performed their hit single Permission To Dance at the 76th United Nations General Assembly, after they were appointed as the Special Presidential Envoy for Future Generations and Culture.

BTS addressing the youth said, We think that instead of the lost generation, a more appropriate name would be the welcome generation. Because instead of fearing change, this generation says, Welcome! and keeps forging ahead, they said.

They also mentioned the importance of getting vaccinated and closed the speech on a hopeful note.

We think the day we can meet again face to face is not far away. We believe that every choice we make is the beginning of change. We hope that in this nascent new world we can all say to each other, Welcome! they said.

UNICEFs Love Myself campaign

In 2017, the band joined forces with UNICEF to promote LOVE MYSELF an anti-violence campaign working to create a safer world so young people can live happier lives, without living in fear of violence.

It not only donated proceeds of their album to the cause, but also inspired their fans, known as the ARMY, to pitch in. As of November 2018, the campaign had officially raised $1.4 million in total for the cause.

Black Lives Matter

The seven men from South Korea also extended their lending hand during the Black Lives Matter Movement in 2020. America was witnessing massive protests and violence in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd with community members and activists demanding for justice.

It was then that the seven of them donated $1 million to the organisation.

Kailee Scales, managing director for Black Lives Matter, had reacted to the news, We are moved by the generosity of BTS and allies all over the world who stand in solidarity in the fight for Black lives.

Inspired by the groups action, the BTS Army set a #MatchAMillion goal and made it happen with donations to BLM that surpassed $1 million.

Adopting animals

In December 2018, the Korean Animal Welfare Association announced that Jin had made a birthday donation for animals in need. He had made a personal donation of 322 kg worth of pet food to the shelter.

Donating to Sewol Ferry victims

The group and their label donated $100 million Korean won (approximately $85,000) to the Sewol Ferry Disaster 416 Family Council in 2017, according to Soompi.

The move came following the devastating death of 250 students who drowned after the MV Sewol ferry capsized during a school trip in South Korea.

While this isnt an exhaustive list of all their donations, it clearly shows that the boys have their hearts in the right place and only want to bring about a positive change.

Rock on, BTS, rock on!

With inputs from agencies

Read all the Latest News, Trending News,Cricket News, Bollywood News,India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Read more:

From anti-Asian hate to Black Lives Matter, how South Korean band BTS has spoken up for the right causes - Firstpost

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on From anti-Asian hate to Black Lives Matter, how South Korean band BTS has spoken up for the right causes – Firstpost

At St. Pete Pride 2022, I hope to hear ‘Black Lives Matter’ being shouted just as loudly as ‘We Say Gay’ – Creative Loafing Tampa

Posted: at 1:03 pm

click to enlarge

Photo c/o St. Pete Pride

Tampa Leigh represents Blaque/OUT Magazin. a monthly digital publication that firmly centers Black and Brown Queer qulture worldwide.

Intersectionality became my life and was fated to also be my work. I am a native New Yorker, where LGBTQ+ laws and protections are groundbreaking on paper but not so profound in practice. Where just like the South or the West or anywhere in between, being Black as well as being Queer can get you killed.

I came to my new home armed with experience, passion and purpose. I was ready to take on my new Floridian world and to be entirely honest, St. Pete Pride. I had turned several other Prides and organizations. I, along with a team of dedicated staff and determined volunteers were able to change the look of entertainment, of staff, of the color of the people at the table. We had made the orgs we interacted with, for the most part, Blacker, broader, less cis and less male focused. I was determined that the same could happen in St. Pete. Each time we can make the big, queer world big enough to fit everyone, we make the world a better place.

Generally speaking, its easy when you are the big fish in the small pond to take up all the air, resources and recognition in the room. St. Pete Pride had intentionally or unintentionally done that for many years. But its often less malice and more lack of intentionality that causes such oversight and exclusion. I was actually told at one point last year that there were no people or programs that supported, represented or served the QTPOC community in this area. Over the last year I was honored and grateful to learn that wasnt true. As is everywhere, there are endless Black and Brown folks fearlessly doing the work to make that big queer world big enough to fit us all. Id like to introduce a few.

It matters. Who is at the table always matters.

It matters. Who is at the table always matters. Each of us carries blind-spots and without full representation in every space, something always goes unseen. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion work must come with overwhelming humility, the ability to name and acknowledge what you havent done and a sincere, fearless willingness to make it right. That must come even in the face of opposition, misunderstanding and embarrassment. For those who step in first to integrate that school, to come out in a crowd, to fight that legislation.... to take that seat, must do so fearlessly and in our community and working to embody the principles of our ancestors with grit and grace. Look them up, support their visions and if your party, panel, presentation or event that centers Queerness doesnt include one or all of themyou didnt try hard enough.

The corner St. Pete Pride is turning is long overdue. The letting go of we dont see color" and the adopting of celebrating, commemorating and uplifting a profound, important and inherently unique Black Queer qulture is a new one. This year St. Pete Pride will feature Ballroom (think POSE), one of the pillars of Black Queer qulture. There will be the first-ever official Juneteenth celebration to highlight Black, Queer history and a party to celebrate and honor Black Queer Woman in collaboration with the Tampa Bay Black Lesbians group.

Im proud to have played even a small part in that and I look forward to a future where its a conversation we no longer even need to have because its just what St. Pete Pride is. But even the baby steps matter. There is too much fighting that needs to be done in this state to be living in division. No one is free, until we are all free. And I hope to hear Black Lives Matter being shouted just as loudly as We Say Gay this Pride parade. May St. Pete Pride one day be the organization leading both of those chants.

BlaQQueer Unity Council Orgs & Members

Rocky Butler 9 Colors InitiativeThe 9 Colors Initiative supports youth by empowering the community through unity. Currently operating as a referral agent and community advocate for the LGBTQ community we strive to ensure equality, wholeness, & community engagement.

DeAndre Yummy BrownYummy translated his joy of dance into a storied career that has stretched 15+ years. Browns mastery of Ballet, Modern, Jazz, Lyrical, Vogue, Hip-Hop and other forms of dance were cultivated as a student at institutions such as The University of the Arts. Cultural-based training in churches and organizations like Hype Elite, YCDT with Traci Young-Byron, Iconic House of Ninja and Iconic House of Prodigy only served to enrich his style, versatility and range. In the next ascension of DeAndres dance life, he stepped into his most recent form of artistry within the Black Queer Ballroom scene. Browns passion for showcasing his art and educating at a worldwide level just fuels his quest for bigger and more transformative stages.

Cadin Small, Choya Randolph, Dominique Euzebe, Quin Killiings, Brook Carter The Blunt Space Incorporated A nonprofit corporation and media hub for art, advocacy, and culture. We aim to be a safe haven and provide resources to marginalized voices within the arts! Writers, Poets, Advocates, Journalists, Dreamers, Creators and Revolutionaries. They see the Council as an opportunity to truly be unified on one front about the events and initiatives that advocate for the intersectional identities of being Black and Queer. It means organizing, supporting, and communicating with one another to better serve the community we hold close to all of our hearts! Tamara LeighBlaque/OUT Magazine, Blaque/OUT Consulting & Tampa Bay Black Lesbians Blaque/OUT Magazine is a monthly digital publication that firmly centers Black and Brown Queer qulture worldwide. Blaque/OUT Consulting provides workshops, trainings, process and procedure evaluation and education for schools, businesses and orgs around creating safe spaces and understanding intersectionality. Tampa Bay Black Lesbians is a safe community space to build relationships, create and attend events with other Black Queer women in TB, Pinellas County and surrounding areas. You can find the group on FB, IG and TikTok.

Antonio MilesEvolve Tampa BayA passionate educator and sexual health advocate. He is also the proud Executive Director of EVOLVE Tampa Bay; Tampas unique non-profit organization, that provides empowering monthly events that uplift Black and Brown same-gender loving men. His work also reaches into the field of sexual health care, as the Program Manager for Positively U, Inc, a non-profit the focuses reducing the rates of HIV and other STIs through education, advocacy and care. Antonio, is laser-focused on creating connections across the bay area that foster creative, safe and affirming spaces for queer people of color.

Read this article:

At St. Pete Pride 2022, I hope to hear 'Black Lives Matter' being shouted just as loudly as 'We Say Gay' - Creative Loafing Tampa

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on At St. Pete Pride 2022, I hope to hear ‘Black Lives Matter’ being shouted just as loudly as ‘We Say Gay’ – Creative Loafing Tampa

Black Lives Matter Protestors Stand Trial Against Sheriff Accused of Racism and Corruption in Western Virginia – Digital Journal

Posted: at 1:03 pm

STAUNTON, VA, June 02, 2022 /24-7PressRelease/ Black Lives Matter protestors gathered outside of the Augusta County Sheriffs Office for nearly three months last summer in response to two police shootings in two weeks. For several weeks the police ignored the protestors who were permitted to protest without interference by the police, until reading explicit chat logs from the Sheriffs close friends child sex solicitation arrest, which was immediately followed by the sheriff ordering arrests. Each protestor who dared to speak out about the Sheriffs corruption found themselves in handcuffs.

I have never seen a case this ridiculous in my decades of practicing law. Ive never seen a prosecutor move to disallow a defendant to call any witnesses, said Amina Matheny-Willard, Counsel for the Accused, Owner and Managing Director of Amina Law. However, I have seen all too often the root cause of the cancer infecting the Augusta County Sheriff and Commonwealth Attorneys offices. Its a culture and practice of white supremacy and targeted acts of violence to assert and maintain dominance. It has absolutely no place in American policing.

On Friday June 3, 2022, the protestors will each stand trial in the Augusta County General District Court. Each of the protestors have plead Not Guilty and plan to fight the charges on June 3rd. The protestors will introduce evidence that the Augusta County Sheriff regularly uses racial epithets, that he lied to federal agents, and that he hid his close friend from arrest on drug distribution charges. Current and former police officers familiar with the Sheriffs corruption will testify at the trial. The Commonwealth fought to keep the Defense from calling any witnesses, fearing that the Sheriff might be embarrassed. A judge has already ruled that Defense witnesses must appear at trial.

I was arrested and jailed for saying a curse word but in fact I was arrested and jailed because I had the nerve to ask questions about the sheriffs association with a convicted human trafficker with arrests for child sex solicitation. Nothing in the Constitution permits the Augusta County Sheriffs Office to place someone in jail for speaking out against the governments own corruption. The Sheriff likes to call me and my friends the n word, said Cameron Turley, Accused Activist. I wish he would say it to my face. Racist cowards always find something to hide behind, and the sheriff hides behind his badge. If I dont fight now, then our very freedoms are at risk. How many people dont fight? Ive decided no matter the cost, I simply have to stand.

The trial details are as follows:

WHAT: Trial Commonwealth v. Turley et. al.WHEN: June 3, 2022 at 9 a.m.WHERE: Augusta County General District Court

Amina Matheny Willard and her clients are available for all media inquiries, including this Friday after the hearing.

About Amina Law

Amina Matheny-Willard PLLC stands apart from any other law firm in the country in that Amina specializes in fighting police corruption and misconduct. A fierce defender of the Constitution, Amina Matheny-Willard PLLC fights for justice and against systems of oppression to secure individual rights. You can learn more about Amina Matheny-Willard PLLC by visiting the firms website at http://www.aminalaw.com.

Press release service and press release distribution provided by http://www.24-7pressrelease.com

More here:

Black Lives Matter Protestors Stand Trial Against Sheriff Accused of Racism and Corruption in Western Virginia - Digital Journal

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on Black Lives Matter Protestors Stand Trial Against Sheriff Accused of Racism and Corruption in Western Virginia – Digital Journal

How a Lynching in New York 130 Years Ago Reverberates Today – TIME

Posted: at 1:03 pm

On June 2nd a gathering in Port Jervis, New York will witness the unveiling of a plaque memorializing the lynching 130 years ago, on June 2, 1892, of Robert Lewis, a local Black citizen. Though scantly remembered for most of the 20th century, the horrific incident was infamous in its time, seen as a portent that lynching, then surging uncontrollably below the Mason-Dixon Line, was about to extend its tendrils northward.

There had been a sharp rise in the reported number of Black people killed in this manner: 74 in 1885; 94 in 1889; 113 in 1891. The year 1892 would see the greatest number, 161, almost one every other day. The nations newspapers were rarely without news of a lynching somewhere, a barbaric crime that Black leaders such as Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and T. Thomas Fortune attributed to white resentment of African Americans social and economic advance toward equality and full citizenship, by the presumption that Black people were inherently criminal, and by white mens reflexive anxiety about Black male sexuality and white women.

But what perplexed white Port Jervians and other New Yorkers was why a lynching had occurred in a village near to New York City and with so modest an African American populationroughly two hundred men, women, and children, or 2 percent of its approximately nine thousand residents. Although Port Jervis was hardly free from the common social and economic inequities of the era, and its normalized racism, it had no flagrant history of anti-Black violence.

Situated at the confluence of the Delaware and Neversink Rivers, where the states of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania meet, it was a largely peaceful, orderly burg, surrounded by water and mountains, attractive to city folk who came in summer to fish for trout, canoe in the scenic Delaware, or enjoy a breeze on the verandas of the local boardinghouses.

Lewis, well-known in Port Jervis as the bus driver for a local hotel, was alleged to have beaten and sexually assaulted Lena McMahon, a young white woman, as she sat at the riverside reading a book. Before he was dragged up Suffolk to East Main and hanged from a tree by a white mob, Lewis reputedly confessed to attacking McMahon, but named her white boyfriend as an accomplice.

Sensational news stories of violent crime in large cities like Boston, Philadelphia, and Chicago might have been consumed by readers and as quickly forgotten. Not so with the troubling bulletin of a lynching at Port Jervis. Because such incidents occurred almost exclusively in the South, the fact that a lynching had taken place in a community only sixty-five miles and a two-hour train ride from Manhattan, and had attracted a crowd of two thousand people, brought immediate national condemnation.

In recent years, due to the efforts of a small group of current and former residents, and the influence of the Black Lives Matter movement, there has been new interest in the lynching, arguably the most troubling incident in the towns past. But years of silence about the crime have left many residents, Black and white, substantially unfamiliar with it. This collective lack of remembering (or remembrance) cannot but seem determined, a result of the towns shame over the lynching itself, as well as the ensuing humiliation when, after vowing to punish and hold to account those responsible, the local courts and community failed to do so. Lingering bitterness at having been singled out for national censure, and the lack of overt efforts by whites to mend relations with fellow Black citizens, have been exacerbated by a far more slow-motion calamitythe loss of Port Jerviss prominence as a Northeast rail and industrial hub.

The commercial district of Port Jervis today retains its low-rise, storefront appearance, with eaves and cornices out of the Victorian era. A twenty-minute walk will take one by many of the places involved in the Robert Lewis lynching, from the home of Lena McMahon to the banks of the nearby Neversink, where she was allegedly attacked; to the now-abandoned Delaware & Hudson Canal, along which Lewis was pursued and captured; and to the lynching site on East Main Street, where white merchants, railway workers, lawyers, doctors, hoteliers, and factory workers, most of whom knew one another, and many of whom knew Robert Lewis, beat him repeatedly and then hoisted by a rope until he was dead.

On a quiet summer morning, when no cars are about, it can seem that a portal to the past might open for a moment and beckon one through.

# # #

My research and writing on civil rights history have, since the 1980s, been guided largely by a confidence in the forward advance of racial progress, a faith never unanimous among citizens of the United States but for many years broadly assumed. While no one seriously believed Barack Obamas presidency would usher in a post-racial nation, there was a sense that the successes of the modern civil rights movement and the laws and policies it inspired, though not comprehensive and not attained without suffering and immense struggle, had at least moved the country to a place of enlarged racial understanding and opportunity.

Today, instead of guarded optimism, there is a weary pessimism that, as the Port Jervis lynching signaled in its time, the assault on and devaluing of the lives of Black Americans are neither a regional nor a temporary feature but a national crisis and, for the foreseeable future, a permanent one. Much like at the end of Reconstruction in the 1870s, when postCivil War idealism was supplanted by Southern whites bare-knuckle tactics of exclusion and intimidation, so now do we find ourselves confronting the abandonment of hard-won gains from the New Deal, the civil rights and environmental movements, and other progressive causes. Voting rights, gained courthouse to courthouse by Black Southerners and civil rights workers, have been gutted by the Supreme Court, and conservative forces continue to seek creative new ways to curtail and impede them, targeting Black people and other minorities, as one North Carolina judicial opinion noted, with surgical precision.

Each fortnight brings a new report of the killing of a Black person by police. Jim Crow, a term once seemingly relegated to the nations past, has found new purpose in expressing the harsh structural conditions of post-prison life for persons formerly incarcerated, as well as large-scale efforts by states to make voting inaccessible to Blacks and other minority citizens, while seizing ever-greater control of whose votes get counted. These elements of racism and white supremacy must be challenged and addressed in the name of moral decency, and to preserve the future of American democracy.

Nor can we look away from the connection between the nations lynching legacy and the recent resurgence of armed vigilantism in America. The crowds of whites who once amassed outside Southern jails demanding that sheriffs relinquish Black prisoners, or who forced their way inside to abduct them, have as their 21st-century counterparts the white militiamen, the Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, and Proud Boys, who invade state-houses and the Capitol in Washington, plot the kidnapping of elected officials, and seek to intimidate voters, legislators, and peaceful protesters. This mobocratic spirit, a phrase Abraham Lincoln used as early as 1838 to describe vigilantisms corrosive effect on America, frightfully insinuates that mob violence is a legitimate means of effecting political change.

These issues remain as deserving of our concern as they did 130 years ago, when America turned its gaze to Port Jervis.

Nothing illustrates the need to revisit the unfortunate history of the Port Jervis lynching more than the opening in 2018 of the National Memorial for Peace and Justice in Montgomery, Alabama, which honors the memory of more than four thousand African Americans killed by lynch mobs between 1877 and 1950. Lynching has for too long been associated exclusively with the South, of which Montgomery is a historic capital, and with images of Ku Klux Klan night riders and angry white crowds gathered outside rural courthouses. While the Southern lynching epidemic did not replicate itself fully in the North, as some feared, Port Jervis proved an augury of early twentieth-century white-on-Black terroristic violence in places as diverse as New York City, rural Pennsylvania, Chicago, southern Illinois, and Duluth, Minnesota. And it is impossible not to see lynchings vestiges in the biases of our own times: racial profiling and police brutality, the readiness to subject Black citizens to summary justice, as well as prejudice in the courts and in the nations penal system, including the use of the death penalty.

Today parts of the country are engaged in an effort to redefine the nature of policing, with the particular goal of stopping the far-too-numerous instances of deadly force used against African Americans by officers of the law as well as vigilantes. We say the names of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, Ahmaud Arbery, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Philando Castile, and many others. We must also acknowledge the traumatic and terroristic toll such murders and their endless online video repetition have on Black citizens, particularly children.

On June 10, 2020, in the immediate aftermath of the police killing of George Floyd, a peaceful, locally organized Black Lives Matter march took place in Port Jervis, attended by hundreds of Black and white residents and accompanied by local police. At the same event, members of a committee called the Friends of Robert Lewis spoke with marchers about the effort to establish in Port Jervis a memorial plaque and signage bearing details about the 1892 Robert Lewis lynching, as one step in a developing commemorative and educational effort.

There is no hero in this story, Ralph Drake, the groups white founder, who grew up in Port Jervis, observed of the long-ago tragedy. The town must become the hero, in confronting its legacy.

The Black Lives Matter march through the streets of Port Jervis, the work of the Friends of Robert Lewis group, and the Montgomery memorial, remind us that it is a national reckoning that is due, and that the historic confidence of any section of the United States in some immunity to racial injustice remains, as it was in Robert Lewiss time, a false faith indeed.

Adapted from A LYNCHING AT PORT JERVIS: RACE AND RECKONING IN THE GILDED AGE by Philip Dray

More Must-Read Stories From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

Originally posted here:

How a Lynching in New York 130 Years Ago Reverberates Today - TIME

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on How a Lynching in New York 130 Years Ago Reverberates Today – TIME

Opinion | The Age of Too Far – The New York Times

Posted: at 1:03 pm

She defended her position on Twitter in June of 2020, writing:

If sex isnt real, theres no same-sex attraction. If sex isnt real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isnt hate to speak the truth.

While Im firmly in the trans women are women camp, I am very much aware that not everyone not even all liberals is there with me.

I had a brief discussion at a cocktail party a few months back with a feminist who sees Rowling as a hero, saying things others dare not. This person also condemned the idea that trans girls should be allowed to compete against other girls on sports teams, because, until the point of transition, they were men whose bodies were being flooded with testosterone, the original performance enhancement drug.

Even the #MeToo movement now seems to be battered by allegations that it, too, has gone too far. Its not just that Johnny Depp won his defamation suit against his former wife Amber Heard on Wednesday. Even before that, Heard was being ripped to shreds on social media. As my colleague Michelle Goldberg recently pointed out, Heard was far from a perfect victim, and that made her the perfect object of a #MeToo backlash.

In a statement released after the verdict, Heard wrote that the disappointment she felt was beyond words, but that Im even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women. She continued: It is a setback. It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly shamed and humiliated.

In fact, that #MeToo backlash has been an issue of concern for years, and it was about more than a salacious celebrity story. In 2019, Harvard Business Review published an article on the results of research from the University of Houston that found:

More than 10 percent of both men and women said they thought they would be less willing than previously to hire attractive women. Twenty-two percent of men and 44 percent of women predicted that men would be more apt to exclude women from social interactions, such as after-work drinks, and nearly one in three men thought they would be reluctant to have a one-on-one meeting with a woman. Fifty-six percent of women said they expected that men would continue to harass but would take more precautions against getting caught, and 58 percent of men predicted that men in general would have greater fears of being unfairly accused.

Now we see some renewed energy emanating from the left on other issues, like abortion and gun control.

The fact that the Supreme Court seems poised to overturn Roe v. Wade is, for many, evidence that the conservative justices have gone too far. And the recent mass shootings, including the massacre at a Texas school, may have convinced some parents that the sheer ubiquity of guns in this country has gone too far.

See the original post here:

Opinion | The Age of Too Far - The New York Times

Posted in Black Lives Matter | Comments Off on Opinion | The Age of Too Far – The New York Times

Is Discussing the Consequences of Anti-Vaccine Disinformation Fun? – Science Based Medicine

Posted: at 1:01 pm

[Editors note: Dr. Gorski is on vacation this week, and Dr. Howard has agreed to cover. Dr. Gorski will return to his usual slot next week.]

A core theme of my writing is that people who spread disinformation about COVID are protected from the consequences of their words. I previously noted this distance allows them to pontificate on the virus as if were a game, a brand-building opportunity. In contrast, someone who works in an ICU will have more patients if they successfully discourage vaccination in young people. Of course, an ICU doctor may be wrong, and a random internet commentator may be right. Evidence matters, not credentials. But healthcare workers have skin-in-the game, and that counts for something.

With this in mind, lets revisit my article about Objectivists and COVID. Ive since discovered that some Objectivists have said some wise things. For example, Ben Bayer, a fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute, wrote a staunch pro-vaccine article in which he said:

The biggest sign that many vaccine refusers care too little about their own interests isnt their attitude toward their health or the well-being of others. Its their attitude toward the truth. Its actually pretty dubious that many vaccine refusers think that Covid is dangerous but simply dont care enough to protect their or their loved ones health against it. Many dont want to get vaccinated because they really believe that Covid is not a serious threat compared to the risks of the vaccine in the first place. This is actually the deepest root of the moral problem.

Because of their beliefs, vaccine refusers dont see that theyre recklessly letting their guard down against a serious threat. Because of their belief, they even mount crusades to convince others to join them.

Exactly. Disinformation has significant real-world consequences for our patients.

He also penned an homage to healthcare workers titled If Youre a Doctor or Nurse, Dont Feel Guilty for Quitting in which he sympathized with burnt-out healers for the abuse theyve suffered at the hands of belligerent unvaccinated patients. He said to such workers:

If you cant find a way to make the joy of solving medical problems overcome the pain of being treated with disrespect, you shouldnt blame yourself if you want to quit. I, for one, wont blame you if you do quit out of righteous indignation for being treated like chattel. I still hope you dont quit: many others and I may need your help. But you dont owe it to us.

Exactly. Disinformation has significant real-world consequences for us.

Mr. Bayer gets it. This is not a game.

Not everyone gets it.

In retrospect, my prior article understated the degree to which other Objectivists advanced the myth that Covid is not a serious threat compared to the risks of the vaccine. I previously discussed the symbiosis between the Atlas Society, which claims to value rationality, and the Brownstone Institute, which has spread copious amounts of anti-vaxx rubbish, sanctified natural immunity, and issued oblique threats to behead people they disagree with. This article, which was also posted at the Atlas Society sans guillotine, lamented that

Pfizer and people like Anthony Fauci are demanding 3rd and now 4th shots. Shots without end, always with the promise that the next one will achieve the goal.

Its no surprise its author is favorably featured on the website of anti-vaccine supercrank RFK Jr.

Beyond this, the Atlas Society also amplified radiologist Dr. Scott Atlas (read this), writer Dr. Naomi Wolf (read this), and who knows which other superspreaders of anti-vaccine disinformation. These are the people the Atlas Society legitimizes and amplifies during a pandemic.

Clinging to my teenage hope that leaders of the Atlas Society might actually care about rationality, I shared my previous article with Dr. Stephen Hicks a philosophy professor and Senior Scholar there. Maybe hes unaware of who his organization is promoting? Maybe hell want to learn more. Maybe hell care and even try do something about it.

Reader, I actually believed that about him and a few other people there for some stupid reason. Thats how nave I can be.

Dr. Hicks did disappoint, and though he did so in eminently predictable ways, his responses contain an important lesson: denying reality never ends well. Indeed, Dr. Hicks first attempted to deny reality by saying that I (and pretty much everyone I associate with) am pro-vaccines and anti-mandates. Even if they rushed to get vaccinated themselves, no one who is pro-vaccine would provide a friendly, warm forum for influential and outspoken anti-vaxxers to disseminate their disinformation.

After being presented with evidence the Atlas Society has done exactly this, Dr. Hicks rapidly pivoted to a new position that can be summarized as: Yes, we provide a friendly, warm forum for these people and thats good. He claimed that though he is pro-vaccine, Any intellectually honest organization *debates* complex issues.

Apparently Dr. Hicks believes its a complex issue whether or not young people should left vulnerable to a virus that has killed thousands of them when a safe and effective vaccine exists. After all, several honored Atlas Society interviewees believe that unvaccinated young people should be exposed to the virus, and theyve been very successful in their mission with inevitable results. Like I said, denying reality never ends well, even though its often not the denialists who pays the price.

Moreover, Dr. Hicks feels this complex issue should be decided via a debate. He thinks that anti-vaxxers and doctors who treat COVID patients should duke it out in a performance of sorts, where who is right and who is wrong is determined by who puts on the best show. Did the flu really kill more children than COVID, as scholars at the Brownstone Institute often claim? Only a debate can settle which number is really higher, 25 or 1,500. May the most polished speaker win.

Of course, Dr. Hicks completely misrepresented what the Atlas Society actually does. They dont sponsor *debates* with anti-vaxxers. That would require them to provide a friendly, warm forum to a knowledgeable vaccine-advocate, something theyve not done as best as I can tell. I doubt they even know any. Instead, they hand dishonest anti-vaxxers a microphone to answer softball questions from a sycophantic interviewer who selects her guests because theyll say exactly what she wants to hear: COVIDs threat is overblown and those who try to limit it are stupid and corrupt.

Thats why she doesnt push back when her guests say wild and wacky things.

For example, what happened when Dr. Wolf said that thanks to Bill Gates and pharma, we were no longer free to say the pandemic is over? Nothing. What happened when she likened current anti-vaccination discrimination to the historical evils of racism, sexism, and anti-Semitism? Nothing. What happened when Dr. Atlas falsely claimed the Delta variant was less lethal and that high-risk people are the ones who die from the Delta variant, not anybody else? Nothing. What happened when he said that children die from the flu at a higher rate than from COVID? Nothing. What happened when he fear-mongered about boosters and opposed vaccinating children by saying, when people have a low-risk for an illness, I dont understand the case for giving them a vaccine? Nothing.

In the interviewers defense, she likely didnt know that Dr. Atlas was both making stuff up and plagiarizing Dr. Andrew Wakefields cult, merely substituting COVID for measles. She may not have known that his brand of COVID denialism is exactly why healthcare workers have been attacked and why many are quitting. However, she should have known that Dr. Atlas would spread disinformation to further his goal of infecting unvaccinated young people.

Like, what else would he do?

He doesnt hide his intentions. Early in the pandemic, he said, Those who are not at risk to die or have a serious hospital-requiring illness, we should be fine with letting them get infected. Even though effective vaccines are now available, he continues to worship at the altar of so-called natural immunity. To pick one example, he said:

To me, its unconscionable that a society uses its children as shields for adults. Children do not have a significant risk from this illness Are we [as] a society, a civilization going to inject our children with an experimental drug that they dont have a significant benefit from, to shield ourselves?

Dr. Atlas believes that if he says children do not have a significant risk from this illness enough times that means its true. He cant grasp the simple fact that some children do have a significant risk from this illness, and so we vaccinate children to protect children. Again, this is who the Atlas Society legitimizes and amplifies in the middle of a pandemic. Doctors who treat sick kids and provide accurate information are excluded from this echo chamber.

Thanks to the Atlas Society, some people now believe that more dangerous variants are less lethal, that 25 is more than 1,500, and that its a good when unvaccinated young people contract COVID. This is information pollution, and like someone blowing an air horn during a concert, it destroys our ability to debate complex issues. While debates in medicine are important and healthy, a precondition for any meaningful discussion is a shared commitment to honesty and reality. One cant debate the optimal interval for vaccine doses with a prevaricator who denies the virus impacts young people at all.

And lets be clear about a few obvious things regarding vaccines for young people. It doesnt matter whether the flu or COVID is worse. It doesnt matter that most kids will be fine, that other things kill more kids, or that old people have a much higher risk. None of these factoids is an argument against vaccinating children, though that hasnt stopped writers at the Brownstone Institute from using them. Normal people dont want any young person to suffer or die from a vaccine-preventable disease. Of course, young people should be vaccinated against COVID. This is not a complex issue. It is a very simple issue, and doctors with skin in the game should not debate very simple issues with sheltered fabulists whose deceptions have ensured their ICUs were stuffed with low-risk patients.

Trying to have it both ways, Dr. Hicks said it was immoral to lie about vaccines but also that We need to celebrate our generations gadflies. Youll recognize that bit of sophistry as the Galileo gambit. Naturally, Dr. Hicks wasnt saying we need to celebrate gadflies who are brilliant vaccine-scientists. The Atlas Society undermines these people.

Dr. Hicks was also much more concerned about decorum towards anti-vaccine gadflies than the immoral lies they spread. He was very worried that anti-vaxxers were denied civility, a predictable deflection technique used by those who seek to shutdown debate by focusing on manners, not substance. Its just not nice to call someone a liar, I suppose, even when they claim 25 is larger than 1,500. In fact, we should celebrate such people, even when their disinformation leads to doctors getting punched in the face.

Using a meme of himself, Dr. Hicks implied that those who refute anti-vaxxers are akin to Nazi and Soviet disinformation boards and that not amplifying anti-vaxxers was akin to censorship, another predictable deflection technique. If someone feels Im the next Goebbels because I think its a bad idea to debate the premise that 25 is larger than 1,500, then thats a criticism Ill have to learn to live with.

At least Ive never called scientists I disagree with evil, corrupt, and criminal. I never said they were backpedaling and confessing to get ahead of the indictments. Dr. Wolf said all that and more that during her interview with the Atlas Society. Elsewhere, she claimed Dr. Fauci works for Israel, not Americans, something that could be straight out of a Nazi disinformation board actually. More recently, in an article at the Brownstone Institute of course, she revealed her fantasy to shave peoples heads and march them through the town square. She spoke about the need for Nuremberg Trials for Americas quislings and collaborators, noting that There is a reason treason is a capital offense.

Again, this is who the Atlas Society legitimizes and amplifies in the middle of a pandemic.

Unfortunately, Dr. Wolfs message resonates with a lot of angry, armed people. As a result, terrified public health officials have censored themselves by quitting en masse. Dr. Fauci has needed personal security from law enforcement at all times, including at his home. So have his daughters. If youre wondering about a source for such hatred towards Dr. Fauci, I suggest reading the article Who Will Be Held Responsible for this Devastation? on the Atlas Society webpage. It said that The carnage of lockdowns and vaccine mandates is unspeakable and will last a generation or two or more and asked Who is left to blame?

The most likely candidate here is Fauci himself. But I can already tell you his excuse. He never signed a single order. His fingerprints are on no legislation.

Anyone who actually cares about civility and opposes censorship knows that cranks who incite credible threats against scientists need to be exposed and marginalized, not amplified and celebrated.

Dr. Hicks further engaged in bothsideism by asking, How do we tally the costs/benefits of mistakes and lying on both sides? Apparently he sees little difference between Dr. Peter Hotez, who has received countless, vile threats for his vaccine-advocacy, and the anti-vaxxers who make and occasionally act on such threats. According to Dr. Hotez, the hate mail he received was filled with all sorts of Nazi imagery, Nuremberg hangings and terrible, terrible stuff. It was pretty upsetting. I wonder if any of the people who messaged Dr. Hotez heard Dr. Wolf call him a conflicted pharma shill during her interview with the Atlas Society.

Both sides, you see.

As a last resort, Dr. Hicks nursed grievances, saying he was a victim of a guilt-by-association. To paraphrase an assertion he made on multiple occasions: I never said anything about time-traveling via vaccine nanopatticles. So why should I be held accountable as a senior leader of an organization that legitimizes people who say such things?

Is this how Howard Roark would react if lazy workers with poor craftsmanship used the shoddiest materials to construct one of his buildings? As it crumpled to the ground, would he say, Hey, dont look at me, bro. I just made the drawings?

I dont think so.

These deflection techniques are very familiar to regular readers of SBM. However, it was what Dr. Hicks said at the end of the conversation that inspired this essay. Reflecting on the discussion, he said the whole thing was just a mostly fun Twitter thread on Covid and that he mostly enjoyed the wide-ranging discussion today.

And there is it. It was just a game the whole time.

Indeed, the pandemic has been little more than a game and brand-building opportunity for amoral disinformation groups and the grifters they promote. Having been informed that over 300,000 Americans died due to the type of anti-vaccine disinformation his organization legitimizes, Dr. Hicks could only reflect on how entertaining the whole spectacle was. The greatest mass death event in American history is just an intellectual puzzle, discussed in a state of purposeful ignorance regarding the real damage caused by some of its players.

Multiple people tried to impress upon Dr. Hicks that this wasnt just a conversation about which superpower is best. Despite our efforts, like all the people I write about, Dr. Hicks never showed any recognition that flesh-and-blood people, including children, have suffered as a consequences of anti-vaccine disinformation. I discussed previously how some contrarian doctors even shame those who dare to acknowledge any individual child lost to COVID.

In contrast, I believe that individuals matter, and so Ive made a point of recognizing them, including doctors who were friends and teachers of mine. I make an effort not treat people as mere numbers on a government website. Speakers at the Atlas Society do that.

Though the experience was mostly fun for Dr. Hicks, I dont think anyone else felt that way, especially the healthcare workers. They are burnt-out and checking-out as they are fed up with having to mop up the mess created by disinformation superspreaders. They are tired of sheltered talkers treating their lives and the lives of their patients as mere pawns on a chessboard, whose value must be weighed against the harms of offending delicate anti-vaxxers. I previously noted the irony of competent people quitting their jobs not despite Objectivists, but because of them. (Not you, Mr. Bayer).

At least I learned something valuable: Its a waste of time to engage with someone who treats healthcare workers like game pieces for their intellectual entertainment. I wont do it again. I certainly didnt have fun talking with Dr. Hicks. Not only did I grasp the stakes involved, but I was also frustrated that he was willing to debate anything except the only thing that mattered: Is it ethical to legitimize and amplify only dishonest anti-vaccine voices in a pandemic where over 1 million Americans have died?

I dont think it is.

Though I wont interact with Dr. Hicks on social media, Im always open to different perspectives. So, I really hope he pens a rebuttal to my piece titled: Those Who Believe in Time-Traveling via Vaccines With Nanopatticles and Other Essential Pandemic Voices. You see, I dont believe in time-traveling via vaccines with nanopatticles, my essays dont have pictures of guillotines, and Ive treated many COVID patients. If these character flaws arent disqualifying, Id be thrilled to give a talk at the Atlas Society titled This is What Ayn Rand Warned About.

And while its unlikely theyll platform someone whos willing to stand alone against a group, Im glad that Dr. Hicks and one of his critics found some common ground.

Dr. Jonathan Howard is a neurologist and psychiatrist based in New York City who has been interested in vaccines since long before COVID-19.

View all posts

Read the original here:

Is Discussing the Consequences of Anti-Vaccine Disinformation Fun? - Science Based Medicine

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Is Discussing the Consequences of Anti-Vaccine Disinformation Fun? – Science Based Medicine

Understanding right-wing populism and what to do about it – London School of Economics

Posted: at 1:00 pm

The rise of right-wing populism has been a feature of European politics over the last fifteen years. Drawing on a new report, Daphne Halikiopoulou and Tim Vlandas explain what we have learned about the appeal of right-wing populist parties, and what other parties can do to counter their success.

Following a varied and more subdued performance in the 1990s and early 2000s, the 2008 financial crisis and the 2015 refugee crisis spurred an increase in right-wing populist party support across Europe. Worryingly, these developments have taken place at the expense of the mainstream: while the average electoral score of right-wing populist parties has been steadily increasing over time, support for both the mainstream left and right has declined (Figure 1).

Figure 1: The rise of right-wing populist parties has come at the expense of both the mainstream left and right

This right-wing populist momentum sweeping Europe has three key features. First, there has been the successful electoral performance of parties pledging to restore national sovereignty and implement policies that consistently prioritise natives over immigrants. Many right-wing populist parties have improved their electoral performance over time, although there remain important cross-national variations (Figure 2).

The French Rassemblement National (RN), the Austrian Party for Freedom (FP), and the German Alternative for Germany (AfD) have all increasingly managed to mobilise voters beyond their support core groups, significantly increasing their support in their domestic electoral arenas. At the same time, countries previously identified as outliers because of the absence of an electorally successful right-wing populist party are no longer exceptional such as Portugal with the rise of Chega and Spain with the rise of Vox.

Figure 2: Cumulative share of right-wing populist party votes received in most recent election

Second, there has been an increasing entrenchment of these parties in their respective political systems through access to office. A substantial number of right-wing populist parties have either governed recently or served as formal cooperation partners in right-wing minority governments. Examples include the Lega in Italy, the FP in Austria, Law and Justice (PiS) in Poland, Fidesz in Hungary, the Danish Peoples Party (DF), and the National Alliance (NA) in Latvia. The so-called cordon sanitaire the policy of marginalising extreme parties has broken down even in countries where it has been traditionally effective, such as Estonia and Sweden.

Third, right-wing populist parties have increasingly gained the ability to influence the policy agenda of other parties. Parties such as the Rassemblement National, the Sweden Democrats and UKIP have successfully competed in their domestic systems, permeating mainstream ground and influencing the agendas of other parties. As a result, mainstream parties on the right and, in some instances, on the left have often adopted accommodative strategies mainly regarding immigration.

Understanding the rise of right-wing populist parties

What explains this phenomenon? Researchers and pundits alike tend to emphasise the political climate of right-wing populist normalisation and systemic entrenchment, where issues owned by these parties are salient: immigration, nationalism and cultural grievances. The importance of cultural values in shaping voting behaviour has led to an emerging consensus that the increasing success of right-wing populist parties may be best understood as a cultural backlash.

Figure 3: The demand, supply and policy levels

A sole focus on culture, however, overlooks three key issues at the demand, supply and policy levels, as illustrated in Figure 3 above. First, the predictive power of economic concerns over immigration and the critical distinction between galvanising a core constituency on the one hand and mobilising more broadly beyond this core constituency on the other. Second, the strategies right-wing populist parties themselves are pursuing to capitalise on multiple insecurities, including both cultural and economic. And third, the role of social policies in mitigating those insecurities that drive right-wing populist party support.

People

To address these issues, in a new report we examine the interplay between what we call the three Ps: people, parties and policies. With respect to people, a key question is how cultural and economic grievances affect individuals probability of voting for a right-wing populist party. Similarly, how are these grievances distributed among the right-wing populist party electorate?

We argue that the assumption that immigration is by default a cultural issue is at best problematic. Both cultural and economic concerns over immigration increase the likelihood of voting for right-wing populist party (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Predicted right-wing populist party vote for different levels of cultural and economic concerns over immigration

However, while cultural concerns are often a stronger predictor of right-wing populist voting behaviour, this does not automatically mean that they matter more for the success of right-wing populist parties in substantive terms because people with economic concerns are often a numerically larger group. The main issue to pay attention to here is size: as shown in Figure 5, many right-wing populist party voters do not have exclusively cultural concerns over immigration.

Figure 5: Distribution of immigration concerns

This suggests we must distinguish between core and peripheral voter groups. Voters primarily concerned with the cultural impact of immigration are core right-wing populist party voters. Although they might be highly likely to vote for right-wing populist parties, they also tend to be a numerically small group. By contrast, voters that are primarily concerned with the economic impact of immigration are peripheral voters. They are also highly likely to vote for right-wing populist parties, but in addition they are a numerically larger group. Since the interests and preferences of these two groups can differ, successful right-wing populist parties tend to be those that are able to attract both groups.

Figure 6: Hypothetical representation of difference between predictive power and substantive importance

What determines right-wing populist party success is therefore the ability to mobilise a coalition of interests between core and peripheral voters. As the hypothetical example in Figure 6 shows, it is possible that right-wing populist parties galvanise voters with cultural concerns over immigration, while at the same time their success is dependent on their ability to mobilise economically concerned voters more broadly.

Parties

What strategies do right-wing populist parties adopt to capitalise on their core and peripheral electorates? While we examine the success of parties that tend to be defined as right-wing populist, we are also sceptical about the analytical utility of the term populism to explain the rise of this phenomenon. Instead, we emphasise the importance of nationalism as a mobilisation tool that has facilitated right-wing populist party success. Right-wing populist parties have increasingly emphasised the national way of life (Figure 7).

Right-wing populist parties in Western Europe employ a civic nationalist normalisation strategy that allows them to offer nationalist solutions to all types of insecurities that drive voting behaviour. This strategy has two features: it presents culture as a value issue and justifies exclusion on ideological grounds; and focuses on social welfare and welfare chauvinism.

Figure 7: Value policy priorities of RWPPs in Western and Eastern Europe

Eastern European right-wing populist parties, on the other hand, remain largely ethnic nationalist, focusing on ascriptive criteria of national belonging and mobilising voters on socially conservative positions and a rejection of minority rights. Eastern European right-wing populist parties are also more likely to emphasise negative attitudes towards multiculturalism (Figure 7).

Policies

What type of policies can mitigate the economic risks driving different social groups to support right-wing populist parties? European democracies have operated in a context of falling economic growth rates over recent decades, with recurrent economic crises in the 1970s, early 1990s and from 2008 onwards.

Many advanced economies have in time recovered, but growth has often not returned to the level of previous decades and achieving low inflation has been a policy priority. Many governments have liberalised and activated their labour markets (Figure 8) often at the expense of a growing group of so-called labour market outsiders in precarious contracts.

Figure 8: Rising expenditures and liberalised labour markets in the context of falling growth and increased needs

In addition, accumulating debt is leading to a climate of permanent austerity while constraining the necessary physical and social investments that could underpin future growth. While economic developments obviously affect the life chances and insecurities of individuals, as well as the risks that they face, the degree of redistribution and the social insurance provided by developed welfare states shapes their prevalence and political consequences.

Welfare state policies moderate a range of economic risks individuals face. Our analysis illustrates that this reduces the likelihood of supporting right-wing populist parties among insecure individuals for example, the unemployed, pensioners, low-income workers and employees on temporary contracts.

Our key point here is that political actors have agency and can shape political outcomes: to understand why some individuals vote for right-wing populist parties, we should not only focus on their risk-driven grievances, but also on policies that may moderate these risks. This is consistent with a larger political economy literature documenting the protective effects of welfare state policies on insecurity and inequality.

What to do about it?

While this is a broad phenomenon, there is no single success formula for right-wing populist parties. Our analysis identifies regional patterns and different voter bases and grievances driving right-wing populist party success across Europe. Progressive strategies addressing those necessarily face different obstacles depending on the context. For instance, the Western European centre-left has a better chance of focusing on welfare expansion as an issue they own than many counterparts in Eastern Europe who have lost the ownership of those issues to right-wing populist parties that promote distorted nationalist and chauvinist versions of similar ideas.

Centre-left parties should not be fooled into thinking they can simply copy the right-wing populist party playbook by going fully populist and embracing restrictive immigration policies and questions of national identity. Instead, they should appeal to the economic insecurities that many peripheral right-wing populist party voters are concerned about, focusing on an issue the centre-left owns such as equality. After all, centre-left voters tend to be pro-immigration and a nationalist turn will likely alienate them.

Figure 9: Distribution of immigration concerns as a percentage of centre-left electorates

Successful centre-left strategies must attempt to galvanise the centre-lefts core voter base, addressing the (economic) grievances that concern much larger parts of the whole electorate. Therefore more energy should be invested into thinking about new social investment strategies, growth regimes and/or a universal basic income, rather than focusing purely on the cultural concerns of a small part of the electorate.

For more information, see the authors accompanying report

Note: This article gives the views of theauthors, not the position of EUROPP European Politics and Policy or the London School of Economics. Featured image credit: Presidenza della Repubblica (Public Domain)

See more here:

Understanding right-wing populism and what to do about it - London School of Economics

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Understanding right-wing populism and what to do about it – London School of Economics

Center-left government takes over from populists in Slovenia – ABC News

Posted: at 1:00 pm

Slovenias parliament has voted into office a new, center-left government, replacing a right-wing one that had pushed the moderate European Union nation toward populism

LJUBLJANA, Slovenia -- Slovenias parliament on Wednesday formally voted into office a new, center-left government, replacing a right-wing one that had pushed the moderate European Union nation toward populism.

Lawmakers voted 53-28 for the Cabinet of Robert Golob, head of the liberal-green Freedom Movement party and a former business executive who only recently entered politics.

Golob's Freedom Movement won April 24 elections in Slovenia, defeating the right-wing Prime Minister Janez Jansa and his Slovenian Democratic Party. Golob has formed an alliance with two left-leaning parties.

The new government is a combination of experienced politicians and experts, Golob told parliament earlier on Wednesday.

Im pleased we have such a good team and I look forward to the weeks, months, years and terms in office ahead, as I know this team will deliver good results," he said.

Golob has said the government would promote social equality, green energy transformation and reform. Slovenias citizens will be proud of their new government, he promised.

I think you can already feel it in the last few weeks that the mood is more relaxed, that tensions have eased, he added.

Golob was referring to political tensions under previous PM Jansa, who has faced accusations of fostering divisions and curbing democratic freedoms. A close ally of Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Jansa has denied the allegations.

Original post:

Center-left government takes over from populists in Slovenia - ABC News

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Center-left government takes over from populists in Slovenia – ABC News

Don’t let the cost-of-living crisis feed far-right populism – The Irish Times

Posted: at 1:00 pm

Though the political battle over gun reform laws in the US, after the latest school shootings in my home state of Texas, may seem like a faraway problem, its not. Even if events are happening across the Atlantic, we should be concerned by the intransigence of Republicans, who will not yield on their sanctification of the right to keep and bear arms. We should also be worried about other policy positions developed closer to home, such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbans 12-point plan for successful Christian Conservative politics in Western democracies or the French far rights desire to limit the rights of migrants.

We should be concerned because, despite geopolitical separation, political leaders on the far right are co-ordinating strategic objectives and policy programmes. The recent American Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held in Budapest highlighted the level of co-operation. As this coordination becomes more powerful, then small countries such as Ireland, whose social values are moving in a different direction, will be increasingly troubled. They will find themselves navigating the politics of allies who are moving not just further and further away from liberal democracy, but also toward highly unequal societies where information is biased, opposition is limited or repressed, those in power act with impunity, and prejudice and patriarchy are validated.

Whats missing, though, from the far-rights otherwise coherent agenda, is any notion of how economic policy is going to support this kind of society. The gap in thinking offers an opportunity for liberal democracies such as Ireland, who can link economic policy to an alternative trajectory of societal change, distinctive from the exclusionary, even violent vision of the far right.

Far right governments have often treated the economy as a political tool, providing handouts to political allies and supporters, and punishing businesses that express political views they dont like, for instance, about climate change. They also engage in wishful thinking about the effects of deregulation and lower taxes on economic growth and income distribution. During his presidency, Donald Trump embraced tax cuts for the wealthy and stripping worker rights. Correspondingly, income inequality grew, with the top 5 per cent benefiting the most, while poor management of the pandemic undid gains in employment and economic growth after he took office.

[Spiralling rents and mortgage costs pushing more into poverty, study finds]

The current cost of living crisis, as well as the war in Ukraine, offer the chance for a rethink on precisely how to reduce inequality, diversify the economy, and account for the impact of economic growth on the environment and society. In Ireland, the combination of long-term structural problems such as underinvestment in public services and rising costs is certainly placing unbearable pressure on lower income households, but its affecting middle income households as well. The OECD recently reported on falling real wages in Ireland, along with higher taxes on that income.

Certainly, the Government should help households in the short term. But they should be more ambitious in confronting the inequalities that undermine social cohesion and provoke political discontent. For instance, policymakers could ask how new initiatives such as the 90 million start-up fund as well as investment in infrastructure could help reduce regional inequalities and the decline of rural communities.

According to 2020 data, the gap between the average disposable income per capita at a national level and in the Northern and Western region, as well as the gap between Dublin and the Border region, have tripled since 2010. These inequalities are manifested in local resistance against national policy, for instance, the protests against the ban on turf cutting. Communities have called the ban unfair, citing its significance to their livelihoods and sustainability as a community. Some have called for developing community-owned assets, such as energy production, so that residents benefit economically and communities themselves can be rejuvenated. They reject investment from multinationals or large companies whose priority is profitmaking.

These protests echo those in other countries, where communities suffering from years of underinvestment and economic decline feel neglected by national governments. Leaders such as Orban have taken advantage of this dissatisfaction. Indeed, he argues in his 12-point plan that there is no conservative political success without well-functioning communities. The fewer the communities and the lonelier the people, the more voters turn to the Liberals. Whereas the more communities there are, the more votes we get. It is as simple as that. Yet can communities really function if people cannot find good jobs or earn enough money to pay the bills?

Ireland has a chance now to strengthen the connection between investing in local economies and community development, a connection that goes beyond building rural work hubs. Adoption of models such as community wealth building entails altering local public institutional spending in areas of high deprivation, for example, using procurement contracts to generate growth in local businesses, especially those that pay a fair wage.

The Government should go further by expanding use of public funds to bring together researchers, entrepreneurs and community stakeholders to cultivate centres of innovation that benefit local businesses and residents in regions suffering long-term downward economic trends. The reality is that communities will only become more functional if instead of uncertainty and decline, their members can now visualise a more vibrant future, where they can trust economic policy to increase local opportunities and improve community life.

Shana Cohen is the director of Tasc, the think tank for action of social change

See the original post:

Don't let the cost-of-living crisis feed far-right populism - The Irish Times

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Don’t let the cost-of-living crisis feed far-right populism – The Irish Times