The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: April 2022
Donald Trump Jr. warned on Jan. 6 that riot fallout could ‘f–k’ his father’s ‘entire legacy’ – The Week
Posted: April 29, 2022 at 4:00 pm
A cache of 2,319 text messages sent and received by former President Donald Trump's White House chief of staff Mark Meadows between Election Day 2020 and President Biden's inauguration shows a group of Republican lawmakers and operatives working to overturn the election and scrambling to respond to the chaotic events of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
The messages, obtained by CNN and released on Monday, include texts from Trump's daughter Ivanka Trump, son-in-law Jared Kushner and son Donald Trump Jr. They also include "White House and campaign officials, Cabinet members, Republican Party leaders, January 6 rally organizers, Rudy Giuliani, My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell, Sean Hannity and other Fox hosts," writes CNN. There are also texts with "more than 40 current and former Republican members of Congress," including Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) and Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio), Mo Brooks (Ala.), and Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.).
On Jan. 6, as rioters breached the Capitol, Donald Trump Jr. texted Meadows, warning that "[t]hey will try to f--k [my father's] entire legacy on this if it gets worse." Others who urged Meadows to have Trump call off the rioters included former White House chiefs of staff Mick Mulvaney and Reince Priebus and Reps. William Timmons (R-S.C.) and Greene, who wrote to Meadows that he should "tell the President to calm people" and that "This isn't the way to solve anything."
See the rest here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Donald Trump Jr. warned on Jan. 6 that riot fallout could ‘f–k’ his father’s ‘entire legacy’ – The Week
Is Donald Trump finally getting weaker? Don’t believe the hype – Salon
Posted: at 4:00 pm
If someone doesn't know what questions to ask, they'll never get answer. If they don't know whom to ask, thechallenge is even greater. But an even worse error is to decide on an answer before even asking the question and then refusing to hear any answers that don't confirm what they've already decided.
America's political class, especially the pundits and commentators, are guilty of all of these errors (and many more) as they continue to willfully not understand the Age of Trump and how America arrived at this democracy crisis. The Republican-fascist movement is winning because so many people who are supposed to know better continue to view simple questions as puzzling and mysterious, and continue to ignore the obvious answers.
Many such voices among the high priesthood of the church of the savvy and the other professional smart people have concluded that the Republican Party is in the midst of a "civil war" or is in "disarray" in the aftermath of Donald Trump's presidency. That's not true: The Republican Party is "evolving" just as other fascist and authoritarian movements have historically done, largely by purging those who disagree with the Great Leader and his vision.
RELATED:Here's why Trump won't run in 2024 and why the Trump cult ultimately can't win
Many of the same voices also announce that Trump's hold on the Republican-fascist Party and movement is weakening because of diminished attendance at his rallies, or because of rumors and "revelations" about internal resistance surrounding Trump's coup plot of Jan. 6, 2021. Those are significant details and facts, but they do not override the basic reality that Trump continues to be the leader of the Republican Party and the larger neofascist movement. He received millions more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016, and until he decides otherwise he is the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee.
Republican voters and right-leaning independents continue to view Trump and what he represents as the identity and brand name of today's Republican Party and "conservative" movement. Moreover, the 2024 election is more than two years away and traditional barometers of Trump's popularity cannot be seen as reliably predictive.
Maybe the media's worst misreading is the claim that Trump led the Republican Party astray. In fact, he set it free to follow its worst impulses.
But those questions pale compared to the grandest misreading of all: the claim that Trump and Trumpism led the Republican Party astray from its core values, and by doing so "sabotaged" it. Reality is quite different: Trump and his neofascist right-wing populist movement set modern-day Republican leaders and voters free to embrace their antisocial, anti-human, anti-democratic, reactionary, racist, sexist, plutocratic, theocratic, conspiracist, anti-intellectual and anti-rational values and beliefs. Trumpism was not suddenly born ex nihilo in 2015; it has been at least 30 years in the making.
Ultimately, what America's political class, the punditry and most of the mainstream news media refuse to understand is that Donald Trump is simultaneously a man, a symbol, and a cult-leader who embodies a form of freedom specifically, the freedom to indulge in the worst aspects of human behavior and then to wallow in the chaos and pain and suffering that result. Like other forms of fascism, Trumpism is exhilarating for followers and believers; it gives their lives purpose, meaning and a sense of community, largely by inflicting pain for those designated as its enemies.
In a recent column at Salon, longtime White House reporterBrian Karem summarizes Trump's hold over his followers and their devotion to him:
Trump has played it close to the vest as he has traveled across the country to a variety of rallies, pitching baubles and trinkets to dazzle and amaze those of simple minds and limited funds. Buy a hat. Buy a shirt. Buy an ornament. Buy an autographed picture. Buy anything Trump is selling probably up to and including autographed underwear.
Millions continue to support him by buying his cheap and tawdry knickknacks. It makes me wonder what these homes look like. "Come in. clean your feet on the Trump doormat, hang up your coat on the Trump coat rack. Have a seat and a complimentary beverage out of our Trump lemonade pitcher, poured lovingly into a Trump autographed mug."
Meanwhile, you can take a look at a phone video shot by Donald Trump Jr. inviting you to visit a "top secret" rally with his father and, gosh, even get a chance to meet Dad! What the hell is a top secret rally? Isn't that what the KKK used to do?
The following observation is no doubt a challenging concept for those still wedded to "normal politics" and other obsolescent ways of thinking: "Donald Trump" is of immense symbolic importance, but Donald Trump the human being barely even matters.As I detailed in an earlieressay for Salon, "Donald Trump is no longer a mere person. Indeed, to some extent the human being behind the Trump persona has become irrelevant." In other words, Trump is integral to the American neofascist project but he is also disposable and can be replaced as the situation demands.
Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.
If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. For too many people in America's political class and the news media, especially, the only lens available to interpret politics is through horserace-style coverage, centrism bias, outmoded notions of balance and fairness, questions about who has "coattails" and is piling up "endorsements," and of course the results of public opinion polls and focus groups. To acknowledge that these habits and tools no longer have the explanatory power they once did (not very long ago) would be an enormous psychological leap, approaching epistemic collapse.
Here are three examples of how strongly Donald Trump's power endures, whatever the hope-peddlers, professional centrists and others among the commentariat would like us to believe:
1. The Republican Party announced last week that it will no longer participate in the 2024 presidential debates hosted by the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates.
Debates serve an important function in a democracy and as such have played a key role in many elections. They are especially important for helping low information, independent and relatively apolitical voters decide whom to support. Beyond that, participation in a debate signals a commitment to democratic norms and institutions. Debates also reaffirm a shared belief in the principle that truth exists outside of partisanship and ideology.
Fascists and other authoritarians reject such consensus values. By rejecting the presidential debates, and replacing them with some type of right-wing propaganda theater, the Republican Party is choosing to protect Donald Trump (or his successors) from public scrutiny.Paul Waldman of the Washington Post offered this context:
The Republican Party has just offered us a glimpse of the hell they're going to put us all through in 2024. What might appear to be a petty argument about the conditions under which general election debates will or won't be held is actually much more. But it's also a sign that the Republican strategy will again feature chaotic, Trumpian whining that is meant to delegitimize the entire presidential campaign process from start to finish, culminating in an attempt to take back the White House by theft if the voters don't vote the "right" way.
Let's remember that while Trump performed well in the 2016 primary debates when he was on stage with a collection of empty suits, he did poorly in every one of his debates with Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. By the fall of 2024, he'll be 78 years old; the idea that he'll be more disciplined and focused than he was in the past is far-fetched. Everything Americans dislike about him would be on vivid display in a debate, before the largest audience the candidates will have.
If Republicans announce now, two-and-a-half years in advance, that they're refusing to participate in the debates, it could save them a last-minute act of cowardice. But the more important reason they're doing this is to reinforce the idea that every institution and practice associated with the presidential campaign must be considered corrupt and biased against Trump and therefore illegitimate, whether it's the news media, the debates, maybe even the weather and especially the vote counting.
2. Republicans are enthusiastically doing the bidding of Donald Trump and his fascist project.
We see this through growing support for the Jan. 6 coup attempt and the Capitol attack, the escalating assault on democracy and voting rights, the moral panic around "critical race theory"; anti-LGBTQ bigotry and related conspiracy theories, the campaign to roll back reproductive rights and freedoms, the assault on free speech and other fundamental civil and human rights, the war on reason and critical thinking, the Big Lie, and the support (covert or otherwise) for right-wing authoritarians such as Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbn.
The embrace of racism and the attack on reproductive rights and LGBTQ equality are not "top-down" politics. Republican voters overwhelmingly embrace those views.
This is not a story of "top-down" politics, or elites otherwise imposing their values on a public. Republican voters overwhelmingly support these policies and the values they embody. Donald Trump is a gifted political entrepreneur; he understood that many tens of millions of Americans yearn for fascism or some other form of authoritarian rule.
3. To this point, Republican leaders and candidates are still in thrall to Trump. They must prostrate themselves before him and seek his blessing as a pathway to power.
In a recent article for theNew York Times, Shane Goldmacher details how Trump continues to rule the Republican Party and the larger neofascist movement from his Mar-a-Lago retreat:
For 15 months, a parade of supplicants senators, governors, congressional leaders and Republican strivers of all stripes have made the trek to pledge their loyalty and pitch their candidacies. Some have hired Mr. Trump's advisers, hoping to gain an edge in seeking his endorsement. Some have bought ads that ran only on Fox News in South Florida. Somebear gifts; othersdish dirt. Almost everyone parrots his lie that the 2020 election was stolen.
Working from a large wooden desk reminiscent of the one he used in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump has transformed Mar-a-Lago's old bridal suite into a shadow G.O.P. headquarters, amassing more than $120 million a war chest more than double that of the Republican National Committee itself. ...
And while other past presidents have ceded the political stage, Mr. Trump has done the opposite, aggressively pursuing an agenda of vengeance against Republicans who have wronged him, endorsing more than 140 candidates nationwide and turning the 2022 primaries intoa stress test of his continued sway. ...
"Party leaders have never played the role that Trump is playing," said Roger Stone, an on-and-off adviser to Mr. Trump since the 1980s who has been spotted at Mar-a-Lago of late. "Because he can and he's not bound by the conventional rules of politics."
Goldmacher raises the question of whether Trump's "big public profile" will be "a potent turnoff for swing voters" in the fall election, which remains to be seen. But in Republican primaries, "few serious candidates are openly breaking" with him. Former Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn says Trump's conquest of the party "has been so complete ... that even the RINOs are attempting to talk MAGA."
"Few see an expiration date" on Trump's dominance of the Republican Party, Goldmacher concludes, "until and unless he declines to run again in 2024 or is defeated." GOP chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has reportedly told Trump, "We need you."
Is that a portrait of a fascist leader whose power is in decline? With a war chest estimated at $120 million and a right-wing disinformation media machine largely at his command, at this momentDonald Trump is the Republican Party. The fact that some members of the political and media classes read Goldmacher's story as announcing the end of the Trump era only reflects the biased and distorted view of reality that led America to this ugly situation in the first place.
According to traditional Christian theology, the devil's greatest trick was to convince the people of the world that he does not exist. Trump is perhaps only a lesser demon. But do not be fooled by the claim that he is no longer a threat. If America's political elites fall for that trick, it will likely mean the end of the country's democracy.
Read more on our 45th president:
See the original post here:
Is Donald Trump finally getting weaker? Don't believe the hype - Salon
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Is Donald Trump finally getting weaker? Don’t believe the hype – Salon
Mary Trump: Donald Trump is a ‘black hole of need’ – MSNBC
Posted: at 4:00 pm
IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.
UP NEXT
Jan. 6 committee announces plan for public hearings in June02:30
The challenges ahead for Elon Musk at Twitter04:59
'Learn from Zuckerberg': House member has advice for Musk03:43
Maddow: Right-wing war on journalism part of a tactic worth recognizing06:10
Legendary courtroom artist Art Lien heads toward retirement with powerful legacy01:08
Exclusive interview with Wall Streets top cop05:46
Lawrence: Ron DeSantis is $1 billion stupider than we thought05:57
Chris Hayes: Why Mitt Romneys take on student debt is oddly comforting02:58
Humiliating: See Trump candidate demolished by his own words on TV10:56
Biden asks Congress for additional military, humanitarian aid to Ukraine04:06
'He jumped in and he held on': A look at JFK in the presidency09:16
Jonathan Capehart: I felt Mallory McMorrow's speech in my soul05:48
'She was so incredible': Morning Joe remembers Madeleine Albright08:51
Donald Trump no less dangerous for being a ridiculous buffoon06:46
Deposition transcript reveals Trump fear of flying fruit06:19
The Last Thing: Boeings bad deal02:07
Madeleine Albright's daughters eulogize their mother at National Cathedral02:52
How Jon Tester is trying to lower your grocery bill while helping farmers05:22
Joy Reid: Madeleine Albrights legacy as champion of democracy couldn't be more relevant today11:14
Hayes: How the right disguises their quest for power as free speech protest07:16
Mary Trump, psychologist, author, and niece to Donald Trump, joins MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell to discuss Trump's strange return to the campaign stump where he complained about being called "stupid" and got distracted by seeing himself in a video monitor.April 26, 2022
UP NEXT
Jan. 6 committee announces plan for public hearings in June02:30
The challenges ahead for Elon Musk at Twitter04:59
'Learn from Zuckerberg': House member has advice for Musk03:43
Maddow: Right-wing war on journalism part of a tactic worth recognizing06:10
Legendary courtroom artist Art Lien heads toward retirement with powerful legacy01:08
Exclusive interview with Wall Streets top cop05:46
Read the original here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Mary Trump: Donald Trump is a ‘black hole of need’ – MSNBC
Donald Trump Doesn’t Think Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Marriage Will Last: ‘It’ll End Bad’ – Showbiz Cheat Sheet
Posted: at 4:00 pm
People around the world have been weighing in on Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussexs relationship since they began dating. Now, former U.S. President Donald Trump is giving his thoughts on the royal couple.
In an interview with Piers Morgan, Trump claimed Harry is being led around by his nose by Meghan. Harry is whipped, Trump said. Harry is whipped like no other person I think Ive seen.
Im not a fan of Meghan, he continued. Im not a fan and I wasnt right from the beginning. I think poor Harry is being led around by his nose. And I think hes an embarrassment. And I think she spoke badly of the royal family but in particular the Queen.
Trump met Queen Elizabeth while he was serving as president and says they got along very well: She liked me and I liked her.
The former president also said he thinks Harry and Meghan should lose their royal titles because of their behavior toward the royal family.
I would [take their titles away], he said. The only thing I disagree with the Queen on probably one of the only things ever is that I think she would have said, If thats your choice, fine. But you now longer have titles. You know?
I think that [Harry] has been so disrespectful to the country, and [the UK is] a great country, Trump continued. I own a lot of things there.
Trump also gave his thoughts on the state of Harry and Meghans marriage, saying he thinks it wont last because of the stress they both have endured due to their exile from Harrys native United Kingdom.
So, I want to know whats going to happen when Harry decides hes had enough of being bossed around, he mused. Or maybe when she decides that she likes some other guy better. I want to know whats going to happen when it ends, OK?
I do [think the relationship will end], Trump concluded. Ive been a very good predictor, as you know. I predicted almost everything. Itll end and itll end bad. And I wonder if Harrys gonna go back on his hands and knees, back into the beautiful city of London and say, Please. You know, I think Harry has been led down a path.
Trumps feelings about Meghan might be because of a more personal reason. When he traveled to England to meet with the royal family in 2019, she was noticeably absent from the events.
Some pointed to the fact that she was technically still on maternity leave after giving birth to her first child, Archie. Others thought it was probably due to the fact that Meghan had previously made it clear she disagreed with Trumps politics. In 2016, she even went so far as to say she might move to Canada after he was elected president.
While there are many rumors about Harry and Meghans marriage, Trumps comments on the pair seem unfounded; they appear to be enjoying their time away from the life of the royal family.
RELATED: Donald Trump Invited Meghan Markle to One of His Golf Courses Before She Joined the Royal Family
Read more here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Donald Trump Doesn’t Think Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Marriage Will Last: ‘It’ll End Bad’ – Showbiz Cheat Sheet
Former President Donald Trump tries to tip the scale in the reconfigured 7th congressional districts Republi – cleveland.com
Posted: at 4:00 pm
WADSWORTH, Ohio -- Former President Donald Trumps continued sway over the Republican party in Northeast Ohio looms large over a four-way primary to pick its candidate to run in a reconfigured congressional district that includes western and southern Cuyahoga County, Medina and Wayne counties, and northern Holmes County.
Instead of weathering fire from Trump, the two GOP incumbents who currently represent the 7th congressional districts new turf decided against seeking re-election.
Rep. Anthony Gonzalez of Rocky River announced his retirement in the wake of voting to impeach Trump after last years Capitol Hill riot by Trump supporters who wanted to overturn results of the 2020 presidential election. Blowback against Gonzalez was swift. A former White House aide to Trump -- Max Miller -- launched a campaign against Gonzalez with Trumps endorsement. The Ohio Republican Party called on Gonzalez to resign and Trump held his first rally during the election cycle in Lorain County to back Miller.
The GOP congressman who represents the next highest proportion of its territory -- Rep. Bob Gibbs Holmes County -- decided to retire after a district map was released that lumped him in with Miller and others who got into the race to challenge Gonzalez. Gibbs released a statement that criticized the circus redistricting has become in Ohio. Trumps camp announced his Miller endorsement would carry over to a primary against Gibbs, even though Gibbs was a loyal Trump supporter throughout Trumps lone term.
The reconfigured district is 53.61% Republican, according to Daves Redistricting App, which means the winner of the GOP primary between Miller, non-profit founder Jonah Schulz, small business owner Charlie Gaddis of Medina, and Berea social worker and podcaster Anthony Leon Alexander has a strong chance of winning in the congressional seat in November.
The sole candidate in the Democratic primary is Bay Village podcast producer Matthew Diemer. The two other Democrats who filed paperwork to run for the seat suspended their campaigns.
In addition to having Trumps endorsement, Miller has a huge cash advantage over his competitors.
As of April 13, Miller had raised almost $2 million for his campaign, and spent slightly over $1.5 million, filings submitted to the Federal Election Commission indicate. The campaign had $456,633 in the bank, and owed $550,000 in loans to the candidate, who is a grandson of Forest City Enterprises founder Sam Miller.
Schulz has raised $73,898 during the election cycle and spent $68,811. His campaign had $6,765 in the bank, and showed a $2,500 loan from his father. Gaddis reports show hes raised $23,606 for his campaign -- including a $19,356 loan he made from personal funds -- and spent $14,686. His campaign account balance was most recently listed as -$8,512.19. Alexander has not filed paperwork at the Federal Election Commission to indicate that hes raised money.
Democrat Diemer has raised $109,067 so far, spent $103,507 and had $5,560 left. He has loaned $38,600 to his campaign.
Trump highlighted his support for Miller and other Ohio candidates hes endorsed at a rally last weekend in Delaware County.
Hes a great guy, going to be a tremendous congressman, Trump said of Miller, who was known as the Music Man at the White House because his tasks included playing Trumps favorite show tunes, such as Memory from Cats, to calm him down when he was upset. Im proud of him. Hes like, my boy.
Miller applauded Trump as the greatest president of our lifetimes, and described himself and the other Trump-endorsed candidates as America first fighters that are always going to work for you.
People have it backwards in DC, Miller continued. We know very well that our main job is that we work for you and you dont work for us.
Miller also paid his respects to the Trump family a few days before the rally at a Lincoln Day Dinner in Wadsworth. Donald Trump, Jr., was the headline speaker at the event to benefit Medina Countys Republican Party. A Make America Great Again hat autographed by the former president sold for several thousand dollars at a fundraising auction at the event, as did several guns.
In an interview after he met behind closed doors with the younger Trump, Miller said primary voters should support him because of his experience working for Trump. He said sitting down with Congress members and governors in that capacity convinced him most are there to manipulate the system and line their own coffers. If elected, he said he would not take a federal pension and would give part of his salary to community charities that help homeless veterans and alleviate the opioid epidemic.
If he becomes a member of Congress, he says he would fight inflation by stopping the Federal Reserve from pumping more money into the financial system, would support U.S. energy independence, and would work to establish a merit-based immigration system. He opposes abortion with no exceptions.
Miller describes Trumps endorsement as the greatest political endorsement that politics has ever seen, and says the former president has 92 percent support among Republicans in the district, but insists hes not relying on it to win support. He said he has put in the hard work to campaign in his district, established relationships in the community and knocked on voters doors.
Millers Trump ties come with baggage. The Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol says Miller helped plan the Trump rally on the Ellipse that preceded the riot and subpoenaed his testimony. Miller describes the probe as a complete sham and political persecution, but says he answered the committees questions.
He says members of the committee asked him if the Deep State was real, even though its subpoena said theyd ask him about his role planning the rally.
I told them that it was every career federal bureaucrat who was sitting on the call, and Republican elected official who had been in Congress for more than three terms, you are the deep state, he said. And I also told them that theyre on a wild ice fishing expedition up in the Arctic, and they dont know what fishing hole to go to, because they have nothing.
In addition to addressing the January 6th commissions inquiries, Miller is fending off allegations that he physically abused a former girlfriend, ex-White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham, who aired her grievances in a book published last year and a Washington Post column she authored when the book was released. Miller filed a defamation suit against Grisham in Cuyahoga County over her abuse allegations, which he says are false. Grisham asked to have the case dismissed on the grounds that none of the alleged abuse happened in Ohio. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Emily Hagan declined to dismiss the case.
Jonah Schulz of Cleveland is running s a Republican in Ohio's 7th congressional district.
The other three candidates in the race are doing their best to round up support from local Republicans without Millers advantages.
As he worked the crowd at the Lincoln Day Dinner in Wadsworth, Schulz discounted the impact of Trumps endorsement in the race. He said many political endorsements are based on who you know, connections or your financial situation, and dont necessarily boost the best candidate. He said that while Miller attended Trumps rally far from the district in Delaware County, Schulz and his campaign team would be knocking on doors in Wooster.
Everybody that I have talked to is saying Im going to do my own research, Im going to do my own homework and make my own decision, Schulz said. Weve seen the results of blindly following endorsements and blindly following money for a long time and that hasnt done us any favors.
The founder of a charity that transforms neglected baseball fields in underprivileged communities into state-of-the-art ballparks, Schulz describes himself as the only candidate who will challenge the status quo on both sides,. He says he would not be swayed by special interests, big donors, or corporations, because his campaign is 100% funded by individual contributions.
He says hes a grassroots candidate who is in touch with voters because hes been meeting with them for months. Since launching his campaign 15 months ago, Schulz says hes knocked on over 60,000 doors, attended over 300 campaign events, distributed over 1,000 yard signs and has large signs up on heavily trafficked areas throughout the district. The campaign is also doing mailers, texting and radio ads -- everything that we can possibly do short of TV ads, says Schulz.
He says GOP voters were most concerned about election integrity and coronavirus-related mandates and lockdowns when he initially began campaigning, and now care most about inflation and rising gasoline prices that are straining family budgets. If elected, he said he would support an all of the above energy approach and promote oil and gas drilling in the United States.
He argues that both political parties contributed to runaway spending, and said he backs a balanced budget amendment to ensure that we are not spending trillions of dollars over what we are bringing in as tax revenue. He said he supports constructing a border wall to keep immigrants from entering the United States illegally, holding businesses accountable if they hire illegal workers who undercut the wages paid to U.S. citizens, and ending the welfare system that attracts illegal immigrants here in the first place.
Charlie Gaddis is a small business owner in Medina County.
Gaddis, who runs a business that provides project management services to large U.S. companies, says hes the best candidate for the district because of his decades of business experience and creative problem solving abilities. He also discounts Trumps endorsement of Miller, telling conservative radio host Bob Frantz that while many of Trumps policies are fantastic, some of the people hes endorsed were bad choices and Trump would like the policies Gaddis supports
He wants to bring down gasoline prices by going forward with the Keystone pipeline, purchasing more oil from Canada, suspending the federal gas tax, and stopping price gouging investigations of oil companies.
Our energy policy needs to be about stability and independence domestically, as we morph to a greener economy. and internationally about denying bad actors excessive profits to wage war and mayhem, said a statement from Gaddis.
He supports abandoning the income tax, and instead instituting consumption-based taxes on consumers who buy products. He argues that taxing products as theyre built and embedding those taxes in the costs that consumers pay for goods puts U.S. products at a cost disadvantage to foreign goods that dont face such taxes, and has contributed to the decline of the U.S. industrial base.
In addition to completing the physical border wall that Trump sought to keep illegal immigrants out of the United States, Gaddis said hed like to impose a virtual wall that would require proof of citizenship to access banks, hospitals, schools, gain employment or receive government benefit.
He describes himself as a big fan of rugged individualism, and supports smaller government with greater opportunities for businesses and individuals.
The more freedom we have, the better we do, says Gaddis.
Anthony Leon Alexander of Berea is a Republican candidate in Ohio's 7th congressional district.
Alexander, who works as a site supervisor for an organization that helps people with developmental disabilities and also does podcasts, says hes running for office because he thinks the current crop of politicians who represents his area dont listen to voters or have empathy to build the community and to decide whats in the best interests for the people that voted for you.
I want to be one of those people who tries to make a difference, says Alexander, who serves on Bereas planning commission and on its tax incentive review council.
If elected, he said hed support increasing the minimum wage to help people cope with out-of-control costs, as well as providing controlled stimulus checks. He said some people who took stimulus checks could have been working and he takes offense when I hear stories about people who would rather sit back and collect the check when they could go to work.
He says immigrants must enter the country legally and go by our rules to stay.
He says hed support expanding insurance to have mental-health coverage, and taking other steps to help those who are hurting.
Being a single parent, Ive seen the opportunities and hardships that affect everyday families, Alexander says. From housing, to education, from living paycheck to paycheck. Ive lived and am still living like most families.
What voters say
In addition to securing Trumps endorsement, Miller is endorsed by Cuyahoga Countys Republican party. Executive committee chair Lisa Stickan said hes gone to several GOP clubs and community events in the county since last year, and built lots of support in the area.
Strongsville GOP board member Rob Winwood says his club endorsed Miller because its members liked his youth and Washington experience. Volunteers from the group are canvassing on Millers behalf, added board member Beverly Jones.
Lisa Woods, who runs the Medina County friends and Neighbors Republican group said her organization has not issued an endorsement, but around half her members like Miller and the others like Schulz.
People are real passionate about one or the other, Woods reports.
Republican voters interviewed before Donald Trump, Jr.s Wadsworth speech were divided between backing Schulz and Miller. Former U.S. Rep. Jim Renacci, who chairs Medina Countys Republican party and held the congressional seat before Gonzalez, declined to say who he thought was ahead.
The districts just got set, said Renacci, whose gubernatorial campaign signs lined the street outside the event. Max is endorsed by Trump. Jonah is a good guy.
Craig Wanko of Seville said he backs Schulz because of his opposition to illegal mandates that were imposed after the coronavirus pandemic. He said Trumps endorsement of Miller doesnt matter to him, even though he enjoys attending Trump rallies and wore a red MAGA cap to the dinner.
I support Trump, but not all his endorsements, said Wanko.
Elaina Zgrabik of Hinckley also said shell vote for Schulz.
He has been hitting the pavement hard and I think he will do a lot of good for the area, she said.
Gary Fox of Wadsworth said hell vote for Miller because of his service in the Trump administration and his background as a U.S. Marine Corps reservist.
I like Jonah a lot, but I think Max is more qualified, Fox added.
Read more:
Former Northeast Ohio boxer has drug sentence commuted by President Joe Biden
Democrats Shontel Brown and Nina Turner face off again in redrawn 11th congressional district; Eric Brewer and James Hemphill seek GOP nod
President Biden and First Lady will honor 2022 National Teacher of the Year Kurt Russell of Oberlin High School at the White House
Congressional committees target Ohio in election disinformation inquiry
U.S. Rep. Dave Joyce faces two Republican primary challengers who question his conservatism
Many Northeast Ohio candidates for Congress spending their own cash on campaigns, reports show
Former U.S. Attorney Steve Dettelbach of Ohio expected to head Joe Bidens ATF
Ohio gets $259 million in federal transit money for 2022
House of Representatives passes bill to provide more restaurants with coronavirus relief money
Link:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Former President Donald Trump tries to tip the scale in the reconfigured 7th congressional districts Republi – cleveland.com
Exorcisms: Giving Witness to the Resurrection – Relevant Radio
Posted: at 3:56 pm
Recently on Morning Air, Glen Lewerenz had Monsignor Steve Rossetti on the show to talk about bearing witness to the Resurrection from the perspective of an exorcist and why that relationship is so important.
Msgr. Rossetti began by telling the story of one particular exorcism he was performing with another priest. Once the demon had revealed its presence within the victim, the priests commanded that it leave by the power of Christ and His Resurrection. The demon began exclaiming, We won! We won! He didnt rise. The other priest looked shocked as Msgr. Rossetti turned to him agreeing, This demon needs a history lesson.
But why not ignore that statement? What bearing does the Resurrection really have on an exorcism? At first glance, they may seem unrelated. In reality, just as the Resurrection is the linchpin of Christianity, it is integral to power over the demonic. As Msgr. Rossetti said, If Jesus simply died and didnt rise, how could you possibly cast out demons? There would be no triumph over death, no confirmation of Gods unlimited divinity and power over sin, and evil would have truly won. It would have successfully vanquished God.
Some of the most common parts of exorcisms involve a crucifix and/or the sign of the cross. We embrace and call upon God by reminding ourselves of the way in which He died because we know that He conquered it.
Its interesting to note that Satan and his demons will use any and everything to draw people away from God, including atheism or agnosticism. Even though Satan knows that God exists and Jesus is the Son of God, he will not lead people to that truth if it means they will gravitate towards God.
Once a demon has taken a hold of somebody, its not entirely up to the priests to get rid of it. Theyre not there to perform a magic trick and voila, the demonic presence is gone. According to Msgr. Rossetti, 70% of it is up to the person to undergo this personal conversion. They must rid themselves of the spirit through confession and the sacraments so that their life can no longer be a haven for evil.
One practice that embodies the essence of that personal conversion is the renewal of ones baptismal vows. Msgr. Rossetti says he uses it very often because of the explicit words of affirmation used in it:
Do you reject Satan? And all his works? And all his empty promises? Do you believe in God, the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth? Do you believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, was crucified, died, and was buried, rose from the dead, and is now seated at the right hand of the Father? Do you believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting?
I do.
God, the all-powerful Father of our Lord Jesus Christ has given us a new birth by water and the Holy Spirit, and forgiven all our sins. May he also keep us faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ forever and ever.
Amen.
We renew these vows every Easter as a minor form of exorcism and as a participation in this celebration of life conquering death. The Resurrection bears such importance to us as Christians in our theology and in our lives as we face temptation, evil, and the demonic. We have nothing to fear as long as we remain fervent believers in the truth that by the power of God, we have power over sin and death.
Tune in to Morning Air weekdays at 5am CT
See the article here:
Exorcisms: Giving Witness to the Resurrection - Relevant Radio
Posted in Atheism
Comments Off on Exorcisms: Giving Witness to the Resurrection – Relevant Radio
The Answer to Ayla’s prayer – The Catholic Weekly
Posted: at 3:56 pm
Reading Time: 5 minutesAyla Casey (centre) joined by two other candidates being received into the Church at the Easter Vigil at St Marys Cathedral in Sydney. Photo: Giovanni Portelli.
When Ayla Casey asked for a sign to let her know God is real, she didnt expect it to be an actual sign.
Early in her two-year journey from atheism to Catholicism the 30-year-old apprentice jeweller had been praying, reading the Bible, and asking questions about the Catholic faith. Then one day, walking through the city engrossed in thought, she suddenly decided to ask God to indicate in some way that he was real.
The second that I finished that prayer, across my field of vision went a person carrying a sign that read Jesus loves you. It was too obvious for me to take seriously, I thought it was hilarious, she told The Catholic Weekly.
In the following weeks, Ayla prayed twice more for some confirmation that God was hearing her prayers. Again, the response was immediate; she was handed a Christian pamphlet, and then saw a skywriters message proclaiming Gods love.
At that point I had to say, this is no longer a coincidence.
Theres only so much that is given to you before you realise, oh, I dont need any more signs, I have all the information I need to do something about this.
I think a lot of people have experienced this in their lives in some way, you dont need to ask for a sign, God gives us many things to show us the path to take but many people choose not to see it.
She identifies one of her TAFE teachers, a practicing Catholic who answered many questions about the faith, as the biggest influence on her journey to the Church. Her sponsor has been a great help as well in helping her to think about how to express her Catholicism in everyday life.
Aylas also considered other Christian churches, but believes only the Catholic Church holds to the faith in its fullness. Her two-year journey saw her take up praying the rosary daily and giving up listening to heavy metal music because it wasnt helping her spiritual life.
It was one of my favourite genres, and Paula Flynn (St Marys Cathedral RCIA coordinator) introduced me to St Hildegard because she knew I love music. Now since thinking about and praying to her I havent had a problem not listening to it. I think people forget that the saints can guide you in a really easy way and put you in the right direction without being oppressive.
Ayla was one of hundreds of catechumens and candidates who received sacraments of initiation in the Catholic Church across the Archdiocese of Sydney this Easter.
Paula said this year there was a noticeable uptick in people seeking to enter the Church at St Marys Cathedral parish this year of different ages and backgrounds.
Definitely there were people who might never have come to us except that they were sitting at home during lockdowns with not much to do, people increasingly wondering through the pandemic about the meaning of life, she said.
Also enjoying Easter for the first time in a deeper way were engaged couple Andrew Pham, 26, and Salina Tain, 23. This year they have been learning more about the Catholic faith in preparation for Salina to enter the Church in June at Our Lady of Victories in Horsley Park, when Andrew will also be confirmed.
The couple say they were heavily influenced by their friend who had recently become Catholic.
While I hadnt been really taking my faith seriously for about four years I knew that it was true, said Andrew.
I realised that in proposing to Salina I was stepping into this realm of being a husband and potentially a father. And I realised that I had to start taking my faith more seriously otherwise I wouldnt be able to fulfil my duties as a husband to love Salina as Christ loved the Church, nor would I be able to fulfil my duty as a father to lead my family towards Christ.
Salina found Andrews change of heart initially hard to accept as they had been worshipping as Protestants together for a long time.
I had a very surface knowledge about Catholicism and a lot of misconceptions about it, so I was really hesitant when he started exploring that side of things, she said. I didnt know how we could continue towards marriage and raise children with such different orientations about faith.
Discovering the Churchs teaching about the Eucharist through the Gospel of John gave her peace.
That was so profound for me. Jesus could not have made any clearer that he meant the bread and wine he would offer would literally be his body and blood.
Knowing that only the Catholic Church can give the actual body and blood of Christ is all that matters to me; I want to be close to Jesus and if that is really Jesus then I have to be Catholic.
I dont understand a lot of the rest of the stuff about Mary, the saints statues and everything but I dont need to right now. I believe in the Eucharist and that is something I need to partake in.
Knowing that only the catholic church can give the actual body of christ is all that matters to me; i want to be close to jesus and if that is really jesus then i have to be catholic.
Ayla says that she was always spiritual in a sense.
I knew something was there. I just didnt know what to name it. The world gave me every solution to this longing in my heart, but I realised it was God calling me home the whole time.
Im so excited to now be part of the Catholic community and have people alongside me on a life-long journey.
Would you like to know how to accompany others interested in becoming Catholic?
If so, please join us and bring others who have a desire to renew their parish community for the RCIA Certification Course at the Archdiocese of Sydney. Over six sessions beginning on 10 May you will learn to live and share the faith with those you encounter.
Contact Simon Yeak at [emailprotected] and 02 9307 8477or 0427 536 356.
See the article here:
The Answer to Ayla's prayer - The Catholic Weekly
Posted in Atheism
Comments Off on The Answer to Ayla’s prayer – The Catholic Weekly
Book Review: Can Scientists Be Religious? The Wire Science – The Wire Science
Posted: at 3:56 pm
Praying Hands, a 30-tonne and 60-ft tall bronze statue at Oral Roberts University, Oklahoma. Photo: C. Jill Reed, CC BY-SA 2.0
While religion has had, and continues to exert, an outsize influence in shaping the trajectory of our polity and society, the role played by science is not readily visible to the common man. Though Jawaharlal Nehru, our first prime minister, laid enormous emphasis on the potential of science to solve the countless problems faced by a newly independent, impoverished nation, and followed it up with significant outlays towards building a vast network of research laboratories, institutions and government agencies, public recognition of the contribution made by Indian science and scientists has been somewhat muted.
It is only with time, after landmark programmes like the Green Revolution, the advent of a multi-purpose domestic satellite system, the successful development of long-range weapons-delivery systems and the laurels won by some of our outstanding scientists, that a measure of respect for our science and technology establishment has emerged in the public domain.
At this moment in history, when a regime that swears by religious/cultural nationalism is attempting to take our scientific pursuits in bizarre, faux scientific directions, anything that contributes to a clearer picture of our scientists as they are, without the distorting lens of political agendas and power politics, should be more than welcome.
One such timely effort is Science and Religion in India: Beyond Disenchantment, based on an ethnographic study by Renny Thomas on the religious faith and practices of scientists in a laboratory situated in a research institute in Bangalore. Thomas teaches sociology and social anthropology at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal. For this book, he was part of the laboratory for the better part of a year, interacting formally and informally with the scientists in a variety of settings. The book is a presentation of his findings, contextualised at every stage with felicitous references to relevant science-and-religion discourses in India and the west.
Any study of science and religion in India must come to grips with the popular notion that they are in irreconcilable conflict with each other. The trope of a rocket scientist breaking a coconut to please the Gods before a launch was the subject of much public outrage. This book debunks such notions as shallow and looks at how scientists in India live their religious and non-religious life beyond a disenchanted life of rationality and scientific modernity. In its own words, it seeks to answer the following questions:
Why is it that the grand narrative of the conflict between science and religion dominates the popular imagination? Do scientists really see conflict between their religious and scientific life? How do they interpret their religious views and life? What does it mean to be a religious scientist?
The answers are never less than fascinating.
We learn that the idea of a constant ideological struggle between science and religion was manufactured in Europe in the last quarter of 19th century, specifically to wrest control over all levels of education from theologians in the light of Darwins theory of evolution. It was the consequence of a move to secularise science. The notions of objectivity and rationality associated with science created the misunderstanding that scientists should be objective, rational and critical of religion. Though this notion persists to this day, it is easy to see that it need not necessarily apply to other societies dealing with very different contexts.
Also read: The Scientific Temper and Irrational Beliefs Often Live Together
In their autobiographies, stalwarts of Indian science like Raja Ramanna and C.N.R. Rao held religion to be a way for human consciousness to attain a higher reality than the natural world. Faith in god was an aid to living a better life, as a better human being. Other scientists thought that science was incapable of explaining all reality and science was not the only reality in this world. Religion could not be conceptualised from an objective point of view since religion and science belonged to different realms. At the same time, they were not opposed to each other because religious beliefs and practices helped them to do better science.
Scientists often distinguish themselves from lay-believers by distancing themselves from temple visits and rituals, the material manifestations of religious faith, considering their faith to be spiritual. In comparison to other belief systems, spirituality provides scientists with rational alternatives. Using culture interchangeably with spirituality, they are able to accommodate their faith and practice their profession without contradiction.
Many among the scientists also identify as atheists, but their atheism is often not the godlessness of the west. Some hold that science is a religion that believes in logic and is open to questions and criticism. On the contrary, religion is a science which blindly believes what is preached. They cant blend. Its foolish if one tries to blend them. There are others who invoke the ancient Samkhya tradition, which postulated that the world came into being from primeval matter without the agency of any efficient cause altogether, resulting in a resolutely atheist following.
Yet another section of atheists claim to follow a flexible and non-institutional religion which enables them to dovetail both realms of belief and unbelief seamlessly. By identifying certain religious practices as traditional culture, they are able to participate in religious functions and rituals while scripting their own understanding of unbelief and maintaining an identity distinct from believers.
I found the final chapter of the book, Caste, religion and the laboratory life, somewhat disappointing, however. Thomas is right to point out that there is a preponderance of Brahmins among Indian scientists, and it is not because of a natural ability of people belonging to the community but is the outcome of its early access to western education and the attendant cultural capital.
His observation that the representation of OBC, SC and ST communities in such laboratories is meagre to non-existent is also highly pertinent. Diversity is a wider problem of society, which can potentially be handled through existing and new public policy interventions. Given the lack of diversity, his ethnographic findings on the community in the laboratory setting raise many important questions.
Also read: Dalit Scientists Face Barriers in Indias Top Science Institutes
In the study, Tamil Brahmins emerge as people who are privileged and possess enormous cultural capital, but are blissfully unaware of both. They exhibit a predilection for Carnatic music and vegetarian food, which serve as caste markers that are again deployed without a trace of self-consciousness. Being the majority community in the institute, they also set the norms for institutional culture and science practice to which the non-Brahmins must conform if they want to succeed. Even their self-image, as people who were generally poor starting out but came up through a single-minded focus on education, comes in for criticism.
I think such a discourse is avoidable for two reasons. A single laboratory in an institute is not a sufficient basis for the inferences drawn. Second, if our line of inquiry is the role played by caste in science institutions, we need to study a representative sample of institutions in which different (privileged) castes set the institutional norms by dint of being in the majority. Such institutions shouldnt be hard to find. Representation is always a good idea for all contexts.
Overall, this is an illuminating study that throws light on an area that has remained largely unexplored. It shows up the notion of an intractable opposition between religion and science/rationality as false dogma. The author does an excellent job of marshalling past and present discourses to contextualise his findings and make them more meaningful. We should perhaps take a kinder view in future of scientists who pray.
N. Kalyan Raman is a Chennai-based translator of contemporary Tamil fiction and poetry.
More:
Book Review: Can Scientists Be Religious? The Wire Science - The Wire Science
Posted in Atheism
Comments Off on Book Review: Can Scientists Be Religious? The Wire Science – The Wire Science
Adam Granduciel of the Grammy-winning band The War on Drugs finds musical inspiration on the course – GolfDigest.com
Posted: at 3:55 pm
Now Im finally feeling free Im living down by an old par 3/You know Ill be playing
The last lyric that came to Adam Granduciel for the latest The War on Drugs album is the one hes most proud ofand the one he most enjoys singing. But the frontman and creative force behind the Grammy-winning rock band didnt need to take any artistic license in coming up with it.
Granduciel actually lives down by an old par-3 course, and it played a crucial role in his bands most recent creation. After moving to the Studio City area of Los Angeles in 2020, Granduciel stumbled onto Weddington Golf Course while on a walk with his then infant son, Bruce (named in part for one of Granduciels music idols, Bruce Springsteen). It soon became a place to unwind after the baby was put to bed, but it also morphed into an important part of his creative process, both for the bands fifth studio album, I Dont Live Here Anymore, and for the albums 10th and final track, Occasional Rain, on which he sings about his golf oasis.
Id go at night and just park the car behind the huge net and sit there listening to the music we were working on or voice memos of ideas I had and watch people tee off, says Granduciel, whose band won a Grammy for best rock album in 2018. It was just real meditative, and it was a nice routine I had.
As with many others, the pandemic played a role in Granduciel getting (back) into golf. The future rocker first fell in love with the game as a sixth-grader caddieing at Wellesley Country Club outside of Boston, taking advantage of Monday playing privileges while using his dads old set of clubs. As a teen he cobbled together his own setin some cases by ordering parts and using a blowtorch in the basement.
But Granduciel stopped playing when he was too old for the junior golf rateby then he was spending nearly all his free time playing guitar anyway. He thought about getting back into the game after college until his father informed him that his clubs had been thrown away. (Empty nesters like that nest empty.) A few decades later, the 43-year-olds latest move not only brought him close to that par 3 but to a neighbor who happened to be looking for a fourth.
It was just such a great thing to do every week, Granduciel says, to get outside and forget about whatever was going on, and I just really love it. And it was just great to connect with something from when I was younger.
Granduciel raves about the public golf courses in the L.A. area, even if he has to pay full freight these days. His Friday game has become a fixture on his calendarwell, when hes not touring, like during a recent two-month stretch that included his first time playing Madison Square Garden in January. He says the next steps in his golfing evolution are converting his bandmates and bringing his clubs on the road.
What a great way to see a city, too, or a town, Granduciel says. A couple years ago youd go to the local record store or youd find the great coffee shop or restaurant. But now, Im just going to try to find the great course.
In the meantime, Granduciel is just happy to have found the game again after all these years.
You cant really choose the things you get obsessed with. It was the same feeling I had when I was in sixth grade, and my friend invited me over to his house to jam for the first time . . .I couldnt wait for him to invite me over again, Granduciel says. I dont even know what Im doing out there half the time, but its the getting there thats the fun part.
Granduciel calls playing the guitar an extension of himself, but he says his golf game is very much a work in progress. After recently shooting a career-best 84, though, hes at least begun entertaining the possibility of playing the celebrity pro-am circuit.
When you see these highlights, and there are thousands of people watching you hit a 6-iron out of a fairway bunker to two inches, I cant even imagine how that feels, Granduciel says. You must feel like a god or something.
Of course, most people think the same thing about rock starseven rock stars who just bought their first pair of golf shoes. Yep, theres no turning back now. Adam Granduciel is all in as a golferjust listen to his lyrics.
We just played in L.A., so my golf buddies all came to the show, and I sang the line, and I pointed to them, Granduciel says. So it was a cool, full-circle kind of event.
See more here:
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Adam Granduciel of the Grammy-winning band The War on Drugs finds musical inspiration on the course – GolfDigest.com
Is Colorado Bringing Back the War on Drugs? – 5280 – 5280 | The Denver Magazine
Posted: at 3:55 pm
Yessenia Chavez died on July 16, 2021, after ingesting a Percocet pill that, unbeknownst to her, was laced with fentanyl. Her life could have been saved if anyone in that house knew how to prevent the situation, her mother, Jessica Chavez, told Colorado lawmakers on April 12 during the first public hearing over the Fentanyl Accountability and Prevention bill. [The police] did not question anyone in the house about the drugs. They took nobody [into] custody.
Chavezs testimony was followed later in the day by Laura Cash, whose son also died of an overdose. She warned against instituting harsher penalties that could lead to felony murder charges for an overdose victims friends and family. My son would have never wanted another life ruined because of his choices, Cash said.
Chavezs and Cashs children are only two of the 1,436 Coloradans who have died after overdosing on a deadly synthetic opioid known as fentanyl since 2020, according to data from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Its an alarming statistic that inspired members of the Colorado House of Representatives to introduce a piece of legislation entitled Fentanyl Accountability And Prevention, or HB22-1326, this session. The bill seeks to enact tougher punishments for fentanyl possession while also putting money toward treatment and harm reduction.
Debate around the bill intensified after the April 12 hearing, when lawmakers considered, and ultimately passed, an amendment to make the law more punitive: Now, should the bill pass the General Assembly, it would be a felony to knowingly possess one gram or more of fentanyl (or a one gram compound with just a smattering of the deadly opioid) for personal use. For addiction and drug policy experts alike, the change raises the questionwho will be impacted by the proposed legislation and widened police drag net?
Critics, including Elisabeth Epps, executive director of the Colorado Freedom Fund and a candidate for Colorado House District 6, testified that the bill would essentially reignite the war on drugs, a government-led initiative that began in the 1970s and which disproportionately impacted Black communities through aggressive policies of policing, prosecution, and sentencing. State Representative Rod Bockenfeld, a Republican member of the Judiciary Committee, took issue with Epps characterization: You mentioned the failed war on drugs. However, what were seeing is that, once we started defelonizing possession, that our use and deaths have doubled, tripled, maybe quadrupled in this country? Is it possible that maybe the war on drugs had some check and balance?
Its likely no shock that politicians on opposite sides of the aisle come down on opposite sides of the issue. What is surprising to many on Epps side is the number of Democrats who are crossing the aisle to join Bockenfeld. People are putting their seats or their votes before peoples lives, says Democratic state Representative Leslie Herod, who questions the amendments potential to harm vulnerable communities for generations to come.
In the end, the Judiciary Committee voted 7 to 4 to allow the amendment. Five Democrats voted in favor. On Monday, April 25, the Colorado House voted 42 to 20 to pass the bill, which will now move to the Colorado Senate for consideration before the legislative session ends May 11. There are strong political forces weaponizing criminal justice reform, says ACLU of Colorados director of advocacy and strategic alliances Taylor Pendergrass. Its not a good faith debate about how to protect people from harm or save lives, but really just a wedge issue during a very highly charged political year. In other words: Fix the fentanyl problem, or lose the election.
Former President Richard Nixon declared war on drugs in June 1971, calling drug abuse public enemy number one. He allocated funds to strengthen federal drug control agencies and pushed through mandatory sentencing, stop and frisk, and no-knock warrants, which allowed police officers to enter a suspects home without first announcing themselves.
But historians say U.S. drug prohibitions have been as much about the people who use substances as the substances themselves. Americas first opioid crisis began just after the Civil WarUnion Army doctors issued nearly 10 million opium pills to wounded soldiers, and an untold number went home addicted.
Opioids in the 1890s continued to go unregulated and were prescribed for a wide range of maladies, including menstrual cramps, according to historian David T. Courtwright, author of Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America. It wasnt until the 1870s, when Chinese immigrants introduced opium smoking to the United States, that popular sentiment regarding opioid use changed. No longer a soothing tincture for little old ladies, the drug instead was associated with young toughs who frequented Chinese laundries. That association fueled a wave of anti-Chinese immigration laws and, by 1914, recreational use of opium was banned nationally.
Other narcotics have a similar social history: Cocaine was banned when it became commonly used by Black Americans. (In February 1914, the New York Times highlighted the racial hysteria in an article titled, Negro Cocaine Fiends Are A New Southern Menace.) Marijuana took on a similar racial bias in a 1917 U.S. Treasury Department report concerned that, Mexicans and sometimes Negroes and lower class whites who smoked marijuana might assault upper-class white women while under the influence. These fears coincided with an influx of war refugees and political exiles seeking safe harbor in the U.S. during the Mexican Revolution.
And then there were the Reagan years, when Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. The law established the first mandatory minimum sentences based on specific quantities of cocaine, and put in place tougher criminal sentences for offenses involving crack cocaine than powder cocaine. For example, a person distributing five grams of crack received the same amount of jail time as someone distributing 500 grams of blow. Because crack was relatively cheap and accessible for poorer drug users, the sentencing disparity hit Black communities hardest. Before the 1986 law, the average drug sentence for African Americans was 11 percent higher than for whites. Four years later, it had jumped to 49 percent higher.
Republicans werent the only ones to enact such policies. Former President Bill Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which ushered in new statutes for gang-related crime and instated the three strikes rule, which mandated life imprisonment after three felony convictions. The law only served to accelerate the imprisonment of Black Americans: Although Black Americans make up 13 percent of the population, they represent 40 percent of all prison inmates, according to the Massachusetts-based think tank, Prison Policy Initiative.
Criminal justice reformers saw the pendulum swing their way beginning in 2010, when Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act. Signed into law by former President Barack Obama, the law eliminated a five-year mandatory sentencing for simple possession of crack cocaine over its powder formending a distinction that legal scholars assert led to the disproportionate arrest and incarceration of Black drug users.
That same year, harm reductionists celebrated when Congress reversed a decades-long ban on federally funded needle exchange programsa concept that involves providing unused, sterile syringes to people who inject drugswhich public health advocates have long pushed as an effective way to prevent the spread of HIV and hepatitis C. A reversal in that ban only highlighted its effectiveness: In 2012, a Republican-led Congress reinstated the ban in response to the growing number of heroin overdoses, as people who had been overprescribed prescription painkillers like OxyContin turned to injecting the drug. Just two years later, more than 200 people contracted HIV after sharing syringes in one Indiana county alone.
Now, state Republicans and many members of law enforcement, including Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen, assert that Denvers rise in car thefts, homicides, and overdoses spanning the past two years is due to several statewide criminal reform laws passed in 2019. Those statutes, which include a bond reform and a law reclassifying the possession of less than four grams of schedule I and II drugs (like heroin and cocaine) as a misdemeanor, were meant to reduce human and financial costs associated with the mass incarceration of nonviolent offenders.
Those statutes may have been the victim of bad timing. Drug reclassifications went into law on March 1, 2020, just as the novel coronavirus sent the country into lockdown. Though murders spiked that summer, a 2020 crime data analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice concluded that jumps in crime occurred across the country, including in cities that had not implemented any reforms. Crime analysts point to possible contributing factors, including the economic and mental health toll of the pandemic, as well as civil unrest after a Minnesota police officer murdered George Floyd. Ultimately, the Brennan Center for Justice concludes, the reasons for the crime increase cant be squared with any one narrative.
Fear sparked by rising crime in Colorado and the alarming rate of fentanyl overdoses, however, has obscured much of that nuance. Its a source of frustration to lawmakers intent on pursuing less-punitive measures. This is not a new conversation, says Democratic state Representative Leslie Herod, who previously voiced support for the bill before the amendment felonizing fentanyl possession was added.
Herod is chairwoman of the Black Democratic Legislative Caucus of Colorado, whose nine members will take individual positions on the bill as it evolves. What I will say is the Black caucus stands united in fighting against punitive measures that just relive the war on drugs and the failed policies of the past, Herod says. When asked if her support for the bill had shifted after the amendment, she responded that lawmakers were still working through additional amendments. The reduced possession threshold in House Bill 1326 was passed through the House Appropriations Committeewhich is chaired by Herod and received her yes voteon Friday.
Increasing the penalties for fentanyl possession isnt the only goal of the legislationthe bill currently earmarks $26 million for harm reduction efforts like Narcan and fentanyl testing strips. Several Democrats have said it was these measures that earned their support. Democratic state Representative Kerry Tipper told 5280 via email that her yes vote was solidified with adding robust guardrails and off-ramps for people to get the help they need. For state Representative Adrienne Benavidez, who also gave 5280 her statement via email, her yes vote was contingent upon including language that requires that the individual knew or should have known that they were in possession of contained fentanyl.
Democratic Speaker of the House Alec Garnett, who is in support of HB22-1326, believes the harm reduction aspects of the bill are being overshadowed by the felony amendment. Its kind of amazing how much attention the possession piece is garnering, Garnett says. In low level drug possession cases, you know, one [gram] is still 10 pills, but [the statute] provides space for a plea down to a misdemeanor and flexibility on how the system goes about focusing on that drug felony.
Still, both Epps and Herod expressed fears that the legislations more punitive measures would disproportionately impact the Black community. Those concerns arent unfoundedracial disparities in drug-related charges remain in the Centennial State. A Department of Public Safety report released in 2021 showed that even after legalization, Black Coloradans were still twice as likely as whites to be arrested on marijuana-related charges. Such disparities have led to higher incarceration rates for Colorados Black community: A 2017 report by the ACLU of Colorado found that Black Coloradans, who made up only four percent of the state population, consisted of 13 percent of those imprisoned.
Should the fentanyl bill follow this trend, it would mean the very community most harmed by the dangerous drug would also see the worst punishment. In February 2022, the nonprofit advocacy group Families Against Fentanyl found that in the past two years, fentanyl-related deaths had increased five-fold in Colorado. The same report also found that Black and Indigenous Americans are more likely to die from fentanyl-related overdose than any other racial groups.
Activists and academic literature on the war on drugs say it is enforcement, not possession amounts, that yield disparities. The worry is that police and prosecutors, because of biases and because of other social factors, are just going to be more likely to use these criminal statutes against defendants from marginalized communities, says Benjamin Levin, associate professor of law at the University of Colorado Boulder. Levin contends that statutes that use criminal law to regulate drug use indicate that the war on drugs is very much alive.
The worry is, if you continue to use possession crime as a way of addressing these issues, youre just creating incentives for police to stop more people, says Levin. Based on decades of evidence, theres reason to think that thats less likely to happen to white students at CU than it is to happen to Black drivers or pedestrians in lower income communities.
The data backs him up: A 2020 study by social scientists in New York Universitys Steinhardt School found that Black drivers were about 20 percent more likely to be stopped than white drivers. The same study found Black drivers were searched twice as often as white driverseven though they were less likely to be carrying drugs, guns, or other illegal contraband compared to their white peers.
Black pedestrians dont fare any better. When the Vera Institute analyzed 125,000 pedestrian stops by police in New York City, they found Black New Yorkers were stopped more than 23 percent more often than white New Yorkers, representing over half of the stops and only 26 percent of the citys population. Some activists say pretextual stopswhen police stop a driver or pedestrian for a minor violation and use that stop to investigate something else, without a warrantgive law enforcement too much leeway in whom to stop. Police insist its a useful tool to investigate drug possession, hoping to catch that big dealer.
According to Levin, concerns about disparities in enforcement scale up to every step of the criminal justice system, from surveillance and arrest, to prosecution and sentencing. Black defendants tend to be treated worse than white defendants, and are more likely to face sentencing enhancements. Theres an immense reliance on individual discretion at the policing level, the prosecutorial level, and in the sentencing phase with judges. If were relying on that kind of discretion, and we accept the fact that people have biases, says Levin, theres always going to be a risk that defendants perceived as scarier, or riskier, or less sympathetic are going to be people from an outgroup.
Community members working in harm reduction, an umbrella term for a suite of public health policies that decrease the dangers of drug use, believe there are better ways to reduce fentanyl deaths. They have been working behind the scenes since last November to convince lawmakers to only rely on evidenced-based approaches while crafting the bill. What we should be talking about is safe supply and managed use, says Lisa Raville, executive director of Harm Reduction Action Center, a nonprofit that provides resources to users in a non-judgmental space and advocates for evidence-based drug policy at the local and state levels.
Both strategies have seen success: Safe supply, providing substance users with a product that isnt laced with any unknown adulterants with a known potency, was shown to be effective when it was used in Vancouver. And managed use, a harm reduction principle that acknowledges that people have and will always use drugs, has led to policies like safe injection sites. At these facilities, a person may use drugs under the watchful eye of a person trained to respond to an overdose. One such site opened in New York City last year and has seen zero deaths from an overdose.
To Raville, safe supply and managed use are no different to how we currently administer cannabis, or even alcohol proof. But people have a very hard time talking about that if youve never had a good conversation about those drugs. Its always reefer madness.
And that reefer madness has led to policies that most evidence says simply do not work. A 2018 policy analysis of state corrections and public health data by the Urban Institute found no relationship between imprisonment rates and rates of drug use, overdose deaths, or arrests for drug law violations. In other words, evidence shows the ineffectiveness of felony convictions to deter drug use or mitigate the harm it can cause. Decades of research points in the opposite direction, according to the National Institutes of Health, which stated in May 2021 that addiction is a medical conditiona treatable brain disordernot a character flaw or a form of social deviance.
Unfortunately, some say this expert advice continues to go unheeded. Its not about the policy, its about politics, says Denise Maes, policy analyst for Servicios Sigue, a behavioral health organization serving the Denver Latino community. I think there is the sense that the Dems have to pass something now for their political survival in November.
Lawmakers, regardless of political affiliation, have expressed that they want to see an end to the overdose crisis. While tough-on-crime policies have long been associated with Republicans and conservatives, Levin is quick to remind us that it isnt so red or blue: Its really important to recognize that one of the reasons were in this place, in terms of incarceration and criminal law in this country, is because of a lot of support from Democrats.
But public opinion among Colorado voters is changing. The Colorado Criminal Justice Coalition released a poll this month that found most voters oppose law enforcement officials recent calls to re-felonize simple drug possession. A majority believe lawmakers should focus more on prevention and treatment and less on punishment and incarceration. I think the voters are ahead of the legislators in some respects on this, says the ACLUs Pendergrass. And I think people whose lives have been directly impacted by substance use know in their bones that jail doesnt work. They want to see prevention and treatment prioritized, and I hope that the legislature can catch up to them.
Maes and Raville also take issue with language that creates an additional criminal charge if they introduce or dispense any drug with any amount of fentanyl that leads to death. Its a drug-induced homicide piece that essentially makes every overdose death a murder investigation, says Raville. Thats only going to increase overdose deaths because no ones gonna want to call 911. The bill also requires a court to order a defendant into drug treatment, something Raville says doesnt work. Thatll be incredibly problematic, too. So, no. I am not a fan of this bill at all.
While Herod, Maes, and Pendergrass expressed support for the bill before it was made more punitive, all agreed the public debate would have been better spent giving air to progressive harm reduction efforts.
Whether House Bill 1326 becomes law with harsher penalties for fentanyl possession remains to be seen. The question of whether the criminal statutes will deter substance use and sweep the Centennial State of large amounts of fentanyl is yet unanswered. One thing is certain: Coloradans will soon know for certain if harm reduction efforts will take a backseat to politics in an election year. And in November, legislators will find out for themselves at what cost these efforts came. But the bearers of the most collateral damage in this crisis will continue to be those communities most at risk of overdose deathBlack and Indigenous communities.
Go here to read the rest:
Is Colorado Bringing Back the War on Drugs? - 5280 - 5280 | The Denver Magazine
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Is Colorado Bringing Back the War on Drugs? – 5280 – 5280 | The Denver Magazine