Monthly Archives: April 2022

The Flash 811 Review Frost and Fire Reunited? – Batman-News

Posted: April 20, 2022 at 10:23 am

This seasons focus on Caitlin Snow continues this week right where it left off: with Caitlin facing down the black flame, which is talking to her using words spoken last by Ronnie, the husband she lost twicefirst in the shows premiere, and then again when he, as Firestorm, flew into a singularity to save everyone.Spoilersfollow forThe FlashSeason 8, Episode 11, Resurrection.

Barry (Grant Gustin) and Chester (Brandon McKnight) may have found a way to stop the Black Flame from hurting anyone else meanwhile Caitlin (Danielle Panabaker) decides to handle a situation on her own, possibly putting more innocent lives in danger.

In the final moments of last weeks episode,The Flashgave us a possible answer as to the cause of the Black Flame that has been murdering people throughout Central City. After first approaching Frost, the flame appeared before Caitlin Snow and spoke to her, convincing her immediately that Ronnie, her dead husband, was trapped inside the flame, but not in control of it.

This conclusion puts Caitlin at odds with the rest of the team. After the flame had worked so hard to trick Chester last week, it seems almost a given that it would do the same to Caitlin. Caitlin, though, is convinced that the spirit inside the flame is really her Ronnie. This sets off Barrys hypocritical side. The hero has a penchant for making moral exceptions for himself specifically when it comes to dramatic situations. Its okay for me to bend time and space to get Iris back, but you definitely cant go after Ronniethats dangerous.

The show brings this up but doesnt deal with it in what feels like a meaningful way. Caitlin goes off on her own to resurrect Ronnie while the show shifts between the modern-day and pre-Flash flashbacks. It is nice, admittedly, to have an Amell back in the Arrowverse, even if not for long. Ronnie is played by Robbie Amell, cousin to the Green Arrow himself, Stephen Amell.

Of course, Barry is right this time around, and Ronnie is soon taken over byor manifests his true identity asthe personification of death and grief, Deathstorm.

This character, despite its silly name, is one of the most comics-accurate characters to show up in the Arrowverse in some time. While his origin is a little differentthe comics one begins life as a Black Lantern version of Ronnie Raymondhes an almost 1:1 visual reproduction of the character. While many details are yet to be revealed, its cool to see such a faithful reproduction of a character on an Arrowverse show.

Hes pretty goofy in the comics; while Ronnie is in Firestorm mode, Deathstorm would taunt him and his other half, Jason. And he would say things like This is gonna be so boss. or Righteous! Will this version also quote Bill & Ted, or will he be darker and more serious? Either way, he presents a fearsome danger to the team, bringing all of Firestorms powers along with taking a genuine joy in killing.

Deathstorm presents a very cool-looking villain with a complicated history that will make him difficult for the team to even fight, let alone defeat. Are they fighting their old friend? Can they save him? Is he truly gone?

This is a unique villain that has both meaningful ties to the characters and feels fresh, giving us both the benefit of legacy and new ideas. Its up to the show to take it an interesting direction, but it continues the trend ofThe Flash being a significantly better show than it has in years (by which I mean, its pretty okay now).

Meanwhile, Iris has once again been disappeared, because if theres one thing we cant have, its the shows main couple being on-screen together. Truly, I cant wait until a few years afterThe Flash ends, if only so we can find out what the heck is going on with that.

Heres fingers-crossed that Deathstorm is an interesting new wrinkle to the show and not just another source of silly drama.

COMMENTS

See the original post here:

The Flash 811 Review Frost and Fire Reunited? - Batman-News

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on The Flash 811 Review Frost and Fire Reunited? – Batman-News

Scientists Used Brain Scans to See How Magic Mushrooms Battle Depression. Here’s What They Found – Singularity Hub

Posted: at 10:23 am

For depression, magic mushrooms may indeed be magic.

Over the past decade, a slew of pioneering trials found that just one or two doses of psilocybin, the main component in magic mushrooms, rapidly pulls people out of severe depression. The treatmentwhen coupled with behavioral supportacted lightning fast, even in those who hadnt responded to conventional antidepressants.

The results spurred intrepid neuroscientists to pursue psilocybin and other psychedelics as a dramatically new route to battle depression, even with their illegal status in most countries. Ketamine, the party drug and horse tranquilizer, won an early battle, gaining FDA approval in 2019 as the first fast-acting antidepressant and putting psychedelics on the therapeutic radar.

It may now be psilocybins time to shine. Despite their antidepressant potential, how magic mushrooms work their magic remained elusive, limiting their entry as a serious contender for mental health treatment.

A new study in Nature Medicine headed by psychedelic experts Drs. David Nutt and Robin Carhart-Harris at the Imperial College London may have cracked the enigma. Combining brain imaging results from two trials of people with severe depression treated with psilocybin, the study found that the chemical shakes up global neural networks in the brain, essentially rebooting how they communicate and forcing the brain out of its entrenched depressive funk.

These findings are important because for the first time we find that psilocybin works differently from conventional antidepressantsmaking the brain more flexible and fluid, and less entrenched in the negative thinking patterns associated with depression, said Nutt in a press release. This confirms psilocybin could be a real alternative approach to depression treatments.

Even more impressive, when compared toe-to-toe with Lexapro, a classic antidepressant, psilocybin acted faster at alleviating symptoms and retained its effect for weeks after stopping treatment.

This rework of the brains connections might not be limited to depression. One exciting implication of our findings is that we have discovered a fundamental mechanism via which psychedelic therapy works not just for depression, but other mental illnesses, such as anorexia or addiction, said Carhart-Harris.

Depression feels like dragging yourself through mud. All the willpower and pep talks to pull yourself up stumble and fail, because youre stuck in a monochrome bleakness that seeps into every corner of your life.

As is the brain.

The brain is often locked in a state of negative cognitive bias, which draws people to think more negatively with a rigid idea about themselves and their future. Its a type of fixation thats difficult to shake off, leading some to dub these episodes as attractor states, emotional states that depressed people naturally fall into, as if pulled by gravity.

This fundamental shift made some neuroscientists dig deeper: whats going on with brain networks that supports those negative outlooks? As it happens, there are quite a few involved. One is the default mode network, which covers wide-ranging connections of brain regions related to introspection and self-referential thinking and becomes overactive in depression. The executive network, which helps control and maneuver your thoughts based on your goalsfor example, switching your attention or focusing on the job at handis also disrupted. A final malfunctioning network is the salience network, which normally helps you hone in on relevant stimuli and supports communication and social interactions.

Unlike a healthy brain, one with depression is characterized by segregation, said Daws. This break in network function undermines a brains ability to flexibly switch between patterns of thinking and viewpoints.

In other words, depression makes the brains networks and information processing far more rigid. Unfortunately, most antidepressants today zone in on a different aspect of depressionthat is, lack of a brain chemical called serotoninbut dont necessarily target these network-level changes.

For the past two decades, Imperial College London has taken on the unpopular role of trying to revitalize psychedelics for mental health research. Although psychedelics were broadly banned in the 1970s, they were previously examined in thousands of trials for their impact on the brain two decades prior.

Much of Imperial College Londons work was funded philanthropically. Tapping into modern technology, including functional MRI (fMRI)a looking glass at how the brain reacts in real timethe studies hinted at psilocybins antidepressant potential. In the last 15 years, at least 6 separate clinical trials have reported impressive improvements in the depressive symptoms with psilocybin therapy, the authors wrote.

Among those were two clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of psilocybin treatment for depression under careful clinical care. One was open-labeled in patients with treatment-resistant depression and lasted six months. Another was a double-blind, randomized control trialneither the patient nor the doctor knew what the patient was gettingcomparing psilocybin with Lexapro.

In the new study, the team took advantage of brain scans from those two trials to uncover how magic mushrooms work in the depressed brain. Psilocybin rapidly decreased depression symptoms in both trials, based on a standardized questionnaire. With just two in-clinic doses, psilocybin reduced the patients depressive score by 64 percent after 3 weeks. In contrast, Lexapro dropped the score by only 37 percent 6 weeks after taking it daily. Patients treated with psilocybin scored low for depression even half a year after stopping treatment.

Peeking into their brains, the team analyzed the brain scans with a method dubbed network modularity, which looks at how connected or segregated different brain areas are. Comparing fMRI scans of peoples brains before and after psilocybin treatment, the team found increased connectivity just one day after psilocybin. Previously segregated networks re-formed their social networks, causing an increase in brain connectivity, especially in networks normally disrupted by depression.

Using a metric called dynamic flexibility, the team also found that brain networks treated with psilocybin changed their community allegiance more rapidly over time. This suggests that rather than their locked state in depression, the networks are shaken up to restructure their communications across the brain to alleviate depressive symptoms. Psilocybin doesnt dampen brain activityrather, it liberates the entrenched depressed brain, making it more integrated and flexible, wrote the editors of Nature Medicine.

In contrast, Lexapro didnt drive any network changes and only had modest effects on depression.

The team stresses that the study is just the first step in tearing off psilocybins veil for treating mental health disorders.

While theres growing evidence that psychedelic therapy is an option for psychiatry, our understanding of how it works remains rudimentary. Digging into its function will help bring forth a paradigm-changingand challengingtherapeutic model, with both scientific and political roadblocks along the way.

For now, we dont know what happens after treatment stops in half a year or longerthat is, whether the network shakeup lasts. And although long in the making, the study is still just a starting point. Its a little bit like looking out into the universe with a telescope and seeing interesting things and then starting to build theories based on that, said Dr. Stephen Ross at the NYU Langone Center for Psychedelic Medicine, who was not involved in the study.

Psilocybin phase 3 trials are underway to assess its safety and efficacy on a greater scale. The team especially highlights the need for replicationthat is, to see if the same dynamic brain connectivity changes happen in separate groups of people. Meanwhile, they strongly caution against DIYing treatment. The psilocybin trials took place in clinical settings with careful monitoring, and taking magic mushrooms in lieu of these guardrails to self-medicate for depression could be detrimental, if not outright dangerous.

While psychedelics havent yet fully proven themselves for therapy, the team is thankful for modern neuroscience technologies to start offering plausible models of their action on the brain.

It might sound trite to say, but I think psilocybin therapy opens up the mind, and thats its strength, said Carhart-Harris.

Image Credit: Hans / 20749 images

More here:

Scientists Used Brain Scans to See How Magic Mushrooms Battle Depression. Here's What They Found - Singularity Hub

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on Scientists Used Brain Scans to See How Magic Mushrooms Battle Depression. Here’s What They Found – Singularity Hub

Why Your Favorite Sugary Breakfast Cereal Is Suddenly Everywhere – Smithsonian Magazine

Posted: at 10:23 am

Sugary breakfast flavors have expanded beyond the cereal aisle. Illustration by Emily Lankiewicz

If youve ever eaten Capn Crunch Berries, smelled the leftover milk and thought:

Wow, Id like to smoke that, youre strangely not alone. Its the scent of the best-selling strain of legal marijuana in California: Cereal Milk by Cannabiotix. Cereal Milk is just one of dozens of weird and surprising cereal-themed products marketed to adults, many of which, like Cannabiotixs, are not officially associated with cereal brands. Froot Loops has inspired a vodka flavor (Loopy), Lucky Charms infuses an IPA beer (Saturday Morning), and vape liquid is scented like knock-off Frosted Cheerios (Frosted Os).

Cereal has become one of the go-to flavors in both unofficial cereal-adjacent products and official branded items like the scarlet-colored Fruity Pebbles syrup (which one Facebook user labeled as evidence of a health crisis in the USA), that you can drench your Lucky Charms pancakes in while swigging coffee topped off with Golden Grahams creamer. No cereal flavor is more ubiquitous than Cinnamon Toast Crunch, which is now available as a cake mix, popcorn, spice (Cinnadust), creamer, protein bar, frosting, oatmeal, milk, and ice cream (among other things). As the co-host of the cereal podcast The Empty Bowl, Justin McElroy joked in one episode, Before long we will reach a singularity where there is no longer the flavor of cinnamon sugar, no one will know what that flavor is, it is just all Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

So why cereal and why now? And are these products merely trying to recreate cereal flavor or the nostalgia that goes along with it?

According to the cereal companies themselves, cereal has become the ultimate nostalgia-driven comfort food, reminiscent of childhood and a pre-pandemic time when death and disease werent looming around the corner.

Because of the of the stress from the pandemic and everybody being cooped up at home, we saw this resurgence of nostalgia, kidult culture, to be on the rise, where people are looking back to familiar products, trusted brands, brands that take them to a happier simpler time, says Claudine Patel, the chief marketing officer at Post Consumer Brands, which manufactures Fruity Pebbles, Honey Combs and Waffle Crips, among other cereals.

A Mintel survey of 1,806 internet users on July 2021, found that over half of participants (58%) agreed with the statement that the flavors of cereal I enjoyed as a child are still my go to. So it makes sense that many of these cereal spin-offs feature kid-friendly flavors marketed in adult products, like Fruity Rings Vape liquid.

The trend started before the pandemic, but has accelerated during it. Since 2016, sales of cereal have been declining or stagnant, but cereal sales increased 10.4 percent in 2020, and cereal has become cool again, according to CNN Business. The reason cereal had been trending down in the years pre-covid wasyou can't carry a bowl with milk in it and eat it with two hands while you're driving, says Russell J. Zwanka, director of the food marketing program at Western Michigan University. [During the pandemic] everyone was finally home again, so they returned to eating a slower breakfast. While customers were noshing on cereal on home, a slew of new cereal products blossomed. Now that we've seen a resurgence of people coming back and loving cereal, we have to think about how do we make sure we look to the future as people are going back to work? How do we make sure the category stays relevant? asks Patel.

No products typify this cerealization trend more than the bright red Mrs. Butterworths Fruity Pebbles syrup, released earlier this year, which the company claims is perfect on pancakes and waffles, and suitable for birthday celebrations.

It's basically like the junk food equivalent of clickbaitMore thought is given to the spectacle of this vibrant red syrup and less thought is given to a. how it tastes and b. how many people are really going to want to use a whole bottle of the stuff? asks Daniel Goubert, co-host of The Empty Bowl podcast and creator of Cerealously. In a review of the syrup on his blog, he called it noxiouspestilent fetid and foul, and says It stains countertops and rankles tongues and soils pancakes with its atomic potency and I do not recommend it to anyone.

So why does such a product exist? Zwanka says it makes sense from a branding point of view: syrup and cereal are both breakfast foods that likely appear in the same aisle of the grocery store. And it makes sense for Mrs. Butterworth too. You could have called that strawberry tropical flavor. [But] it actually would have been more difficult for someone to understand, than if you just call it Fruity Pebbles. The majority of population knows what Fruity Pebbles tastes like, he says.

Not everyone dislikes the syrup, most notably the Cooking Goth, a YouTube food reviewer and cook who specializes in fast food, sweets, and cola. In a video titled, I Reviewed the New Fruity Pebbles and Didnt Get Diabetes, he bravely squirted the syrup into his mouth, triumphantly lifted the bottle into the air and declared, This is going to be a brand-new staple in my house for whenever I eat pancakes.

So naturally I had to buy some. I scoured the aisles of my local Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger and Publix and came up empty. I searched online and found it selling for $25 a bottle on eBay and referred to as rare. This was literally too rich for me, so I bought the closest product I found: Capn Crunchs Ocean Blue Artificially Maple Flavored Syrup, which was the same color and viscosity as Dawn dish liquid.

I tried the syrup on a buttered waffle, squirting it with abandon, turning my waffle into some kind of poor-mans edible Jackson Pollock homage. I hesitated before my first bite. In nature, bright colors signal poison and danger. But I reminded myself that in cereal spin-offs, the colors signal social media opportunities.

I bit into the syrup-drenched waffle, and the syrup tasted nothing like Capn Crunch, so, in desperation to make a connection, I gazed at the image of Horatio Magellan Crunch on the bottle, his googly eyes looking back at me, his blue hat and jacket matching the syrup color, his mouth agape, white moustache spread with approval. Then, I was hit by nostalgia, not just from the mascot, but also from the artificial maple syrup taste Id loved from childhood. So I kind of get the appeal, but not totally.

I asked Goubert to explain. Cereals that have spinoffs are the ones that have the cult appeal, the recognizable mascots and distinct flavors, he says. Grape Nuts syrup just wouldnt cause much of a furor on Instagram. Patel, however, argues, not quite convincingly, that the Mrs. Butterworths Fruity Pebbles syrup wasnt created for social media appeal. The rainbow cereal, which is over a half-century old, just happens to be an Instagrammable product because of the colors, movements, the fun, Patel said.

Spin-offs exist, she says, because we constantly have to think of fresh new ways to excite our consumers to make sure we continue to stay relevant with them, with culture. Post has to look beyond the cereal bowl, to do that, she said, which is why things like Fruity Pebbles Shake Ups, a Chex Mix-esque snack that features Fruity Pebbles boulders alongside pretzels and Waffle Crisp cereal, and Honeycomb Big Bites, a larger version of the cereal for snacking, exist.

But the spin-offs frustrate Goubert, because what he really wants is better, more interesting cereal. It seems like the more attention and creativity that's being given to these cereal-adjacent products, the less often we're seeing truly innovative and forward-thinking flavors for actual normal cereals, he says. He wants cereal companies to focus on innovations like General Millss CinnaGraham Toast Crunch, which brings graham flour to the forefront[Its] not as outlandish as something like a cereal-flavored syrup or anything, but it's a more intelligent and strategic innovation to take a different basic grain and put it in your cereal instead of using corn again, he says. New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie gave the cereal his first five-spoon review in a video for Serious Eats, saying it has the structural integrity of Golden Grahams and the flavor of Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

Some spin-offs are more natural than others. Cinnamon Toast Crunch baking mixes make a lot of sense just because cinnamon and cookies and cake are already natural complements to each other, Goubert says. He also thinks the ice cream spin-offs work. The upscale New York City-based Milk Bar has been making one for over a decade (grocery store versions just hit shelves earlier this year). Ice cream is perfect because ice cream is really just a carrier for whatever flavor you want to put on it, Zwanka says, adding that ice cream sales also increased during the pandemic.

I tried a bunch of cereal-adjacent products with mixed results: the Duncan Hines Epic Fruity Pebbles boxed cake, with its pebbles-infused frosting was delicious. Cinnamon Toast Crunch soft-baked bars were like food clouds of joy. Fruity Sandwich cookies from Kroger were blindingly neon and surprisingly tasty. But duds remained. Cinnamon Toast Crunch Popcorn was like Cracker Jacks on a bad day. Fruity cereal Kit-Kats were one-note boring sugar wafer sticks. The MetRX fruity cereal crunch bar was a chalky hunk of protein aftertaste and regret.

Whether these products will remain on shelves is unknown, but Zwanka is bullish on their chances. Kellogg's owns [a lot] of the shelf space in the aisle for cereal, but cereal doesn't give you a breakfast on-the-go, so they need something handheld. Mintel, too, predicts that as more people return to their workplaces physical offices, consumers will seek more portable cereal products, perhaps in the little remix packages that pair cereals with things like pretzels, or in the Carnation Instant Breakfast drinks, which are flavored like Froot Loops, Frosted Flakes, Golden Grahams and Rice Krispie Treats.

It may be, however, that its the more adult cereal products that have staying power, like Cereal Milk marijuana, which wasnt intended to smell like Cereal Milk. Cannabiotix co-founder and CEO Neema Samara says it started as a cross between two strains of marijuana: strawberry lemonade and mint cookies. The breeder grew 50 seeds from the cross-strain, and phenotype number 15 smelled like the after milk from Capn Crunch Berries. It first went on sale about two years ago, in the relatively early months of the pandemic.

Its popularity is driven by a number of factors, Samari thinks. The nostalgia of that milk when you're done with the bowl of cereal is something that everyone can relate to When you bring that name to something like a cannabis strain: it just caught fire right away, he says. But its not just the nostalgia thats driving customers, of course. Cereal Milk also has a unique aesthetic look it produces just these really chunky like green buds that are just so frosted in THC and so draped in resin [which results] in a high THC and resin content, which causes it to be very potent, consistently, he says.

Is Cereal Milk cannabis a good thing? It kind of skirts the rules about appealing to kids, Zwanka says, in reference to laws about advertising cannabis. (Californias Bureau of Cannabis Control, for example, writes that marketing may not be designed in any manner likely to be appealing to minors or anyone under 21 years of age.)

But, he added, if it's legally advertised and legal to have in their jurisdiction, then let the customer decide whether or not they should be partaking in it. We have so many products that can be misused, that it's a slippery slope to pick one and say this one is bad for you, he says. And perhaps Cereal Milk cannabis will lead to more sales of actual cereal. People are definitely smoking the cereal milk and maybe eating a bowl of Luck Charms afterwards, Samari says.

Recommended Videos

Follow this link:

Why Your Favorite Sugary Breakfast Cereal Is Suddenly Everywhere - Smithsonian Magazine

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on Why Your Favorite Sugary Breakfast Cereal Is Suddenly Everywhere – Smithsonian Magazine

Plans for massive skyscraper near the Shard could ‘block views of St Paul’s Cathedral’ – My London

Posted: at 10:23 am

Another giant skyscraper could be built next to the Shard despite fears it could block views of St Pauls Cathedral. Developer, Great Portland Estates, wants to construct a 26-storey office block near London Bridge station in Southwark.

A 1980s office block would be demolished to make way for the skyscraper. The tower would include shops and a rooftop garden. London Bridge station would also get a new entrance from Borough High Street under the plans.

The plans will go before the governments planning body, the Planning Inspectorate, in July after Southwark Council failed to approve or refuse the proposals in time. But the local authority has criticised the plans, saying the building would damage the areas history.

READ MORE:Old ITV studios will be bulldozed for massive South Bank office blocks

Council documents read: The tower would be a significant incursion into the borough view from Nunhead Cemetery to St Pauls Cathedral, as its location, scale and height significantly exceed that of the cathedral in that view. It would dominate and crowd the cathedral, and would contribute to the canyoning of the borough view.

Therefore the tower would not preserve or enhance the borough views of this significant landmark, nor enhance the composition of the panorama across the borough and central London as a whole.

Southwark says the tower would also block views of the UKs tallest building, the Shard. Council documents read: The poor relationship between the proposed tower and the surrounding townscape context includes its relationship with the Shard, a tall building of particular importance both in the local townscape and more widely.

In a number of important views the proposed development would reduce the primacy and visibility of the Shard in the local townscape, and its singularity on the wider London skyline. Unlike other existing buildings in the emerging cluster, the resulting formal and visual relationship between the proposed tower and the Shard would be discordant and unsympathetic."

As of 2018, buildings on the site of the proposed skyscraper were used by 900 workers. Under the plans, a new public square would be created next to the tower. Affordable workspace would be created in the listed Keats House, which sits on the same site as the planned skyscraper.

The planning inspectorate will decide on the application during a hearing starting in July. Great Portland Estates previously submitted plans for a 37 storey skyscraper on the same spot in 2018. Great Portland Estates and Southwark Council have been contacted.

See original here:

Plans for massive skyscraper near the Shard could 'block views of St Paul's Cathedral' - My London

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on Plans for massive skyscraper near the Shard could ‘block views of St Paul’s Cathedral’ – My London

Could aliens suck the energy from black holes with Dyson Spheres? – Big Think

Posted: at 10:23 am

What could be better than a super freaky idea from the edges of astrophysics?Try two super freaky ideas from the edges of astrophysics.

That is exactly what we get from a new paper that explores how an advanced civilization might build a Dyson Sphere around a black hole to extract titanic amounts of energy. Now, I realize that last sentence is pretty wild. Indeed, the paper, by T.Y. Hsiao and his collaborators from the Institute of Astronomy in Taiwan, brings us to the very edge of possibility itself. Lets unpack things a bit.

We can start with the Dyson Sphere. This would be a vast shell of energy collectors placed around a star to harvest its entire light output. Freeman Dyson proposed the idea in the early 1960s. When NikolaiKardashev later devised a scale for classifying advanced aliens based on their capacities to harvest energy, he used the Dyson Sphere as a signature of a Type II civilization. We now know that an actual sphere would be unstable; it would crash into the star. These days, astronomers talk instead about Dyson Swarms dense arrays of orbiting energy collectors. A Dyson Swarm around the sun that harvested most of its energy would yield power measured in the trillions upon trillions of watts.

Next come black holes, which are far more well known. Lets describe them nevertheless. A black hole forms when a large enough collection of mass comes together in a small enough space. Under the right conditions, the matters self-gravity overwhelms everything else, leading it to collapse into what we call a singularity where all the mass gathers in a single geometric point. (We need a theory of quantum gravity to really understand what happens at the singularity.) A black hole comprises this singularity and its event horizon, which is simply the black holes surface of no return. Anything that crosses the event horizon is lost forever from our Universe.

Okay, so we have our two super freaky ideas. The first describes vast, solar system-sized machines surrounding a star and built by a hyper-advanced civilization to harvest energy. The second outlines impossibly dense regions of space and time surrounded by boundaries that separate their interiors from the rest of the cosmos. Now lets put them together in the same way Hsiao et al did.

The first question you are probably asking is, how can you get any energy out of a black hole? After all, dont black holes swallow everything that falls into the event horizon, including light?

The answer is pretty simple.

While matter and energy that fall through the event horizon are lost, stuff that stays farther out can still radiate energy and escape. Hsiao and his team thought first about stellar-mass black holes that form a binary system with a normal star. In such pairings, the black hole pulls material away from the regular star. This material then forms a swirling disk of gas, known as an accretion disk, that spirals around the black hole and eventually passes through the event horizon. The accretion disk is pretty hot. It radiates a lot of energy. While the hot material stays beyond the singularitys event horizon, it can emit energy that radiates away into space.Accretion disks also routinely produce high-energy beams, or jets, of plasma that rocket away from the disk and the Black Hole at velocities close to the speed of light.

Hsiao et al considered putting a Dyson Sphere around this kind of binary system. This obviously involves some pretty extreme astronomical engineering. Building a Dyson Sphere around any star requires very advanced capacities. You would probably have to ground up whole planets just to get the material you need. Building one in the extreme environment around a binary system with a black hole would be even harder, especially if you wanted to capture energy from the jets.

But imagine indeed that you could build the black hole Dyson Sphere. It would produce far more energy than even a normal Dyson Sphere. The results depend on the assumptions put into the model, but this contraption could collect anywhere from hundreds to tens of thousands of times more energy. In this way, a single black hole Dyson Sphere could put the beings that built it on a path to becoming a Type III civilization one with the capacity to collect the energy equivalent of an entire galaxy.

Now, all of this is obviously the purest of pure speculation. There may not even be any other civilizations out there, advanced or otherwise. And even if there are other civilizations, the technologies needed to create Dyson Spheres may be impossible. The cool thing, however, is how astrophysics lets you envision what might be possible. If we want to dream, we might as well dream big.

Read more from the original source:

Could aliens suck the energy from black holes with Dyson Spheres? - Big Think

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on Could aliens suck the energy from black holes with Dyson Spheres? – Big Think

ALBUM REVIEW: Desecresy – Unveil In The Abyss – Ghost Cult MagazineGhost Cult Magazine – Ghost Cult Magazine

Posted: at 10:23 am

I have a long held belief that predictability is underrated, and it ties in here with the rise in credibility once more of the concept of mono-tasking rather than the futility of being merely competent in several disciplines there is something to be said in the mastery of a point of focus, and delivering again and again in that field. These words need to be framed with a context that this is not damning with faint praise or providing criticism, but acknowledgement that Unveil In The Abyss (Xtreem Music), the seventh full-length from doom / death stalwarts Desecresy, follows the patterns and symbols laid down by its predecessors, and does so to the expected standards sole contributor Tommi Grnqvist has long established.

With a deep-rooted sound, forged on the anvil of the late eighties and early nineties Finnish death metal (with a liberal grunt of Bolt Thrower poured into the molten mix) over the course of their discography, various productions have proven somewhat of an achilles heel to the Desecresy legacy. Unveil In The Abyss manages to side-step that particular trap, meaning the vision is untampered.

Churning lower fretboard riffs are the order of the day, harkening back to Karellian Isthmus era Amorphis and Abhorrence, while Grnqvist delivers a foetid line in swampy subterranean guttural vocals that add depth and murkily dwell in and amongst the riffs, and the first couple of tracks gurgle by. Cult of Troglodytes takes a different approach, easing in with an atmospheric synth before the gloom engulfs once more. There are shades to the dark, though, and Necrolevitation shifts, a barreling tank of a song based around a chromatic chuggery and a descending lead-pattern hewn from the early Peaceville days of before breaking down to charge back in. Dissolve Through Obscure Worlds returns us to the darkness.

The singularity of vision, the utmost focus, and the execution are all to be admired, as is Grnqvists ability to navigate around the tight space without things being too samey or repetitive. Unveil In The Abyss feels the most accurate representation of Desecresy to date, is the most consistent in terms of performance across all the instruments, the strongest sonically and in presentation of the art, and provides a monument to the timelessness of the traditional death doom sound of Finland.

Buy the album here: https://xtreemmusic.bandcamp.com/album/unveil-in-the-abyss

7 / 10

STEVE TOVEY

The rest is here:

ALBUM REVIEW: Desecresy - Unveil In The Abyss - Ghost Cult MagazineGhost Cult Magazine - Ghost Cult Magazine

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on ALBUM REVIEW: Desecresy – Unveil In The Abyss – Ghost Cult MagazineGhost Cult Magazine – Ghost Cult Magazine

What Is Protected Free Speech (and What Isn’t)? – Lifehacker

Posted: at 10:22 am

Photo: SOPA Images / Getty Images (Getty Images)

Lets talk about free speech: It is, after all, our constitutional right to talk about whatever we want, but since the Constitution imposes few limits on what we can say, people say inaccurate things all the timeincluding about the First Amendment. Lets clear some of that up since were, you know, allowed to.

First, heres what the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Cool, so what does all of that mean? Clay Calvert, a professor at the University of Florida, broke it down in a chat with Lifehacker, explaining that while most of us are familiar with our right to choose our own religion or the press right to report freely on current events, the rights to peaceful assembly or to petition the government for grievances often go overlooked.

Regarding the First Amendments wording, he added, Congress doesnt just mean Congress. The Supreme Court has told us it includes any local, state, or federal entity or official. So, no governing entity can make a law that restricts free speech, butand this is keythe First Amendment only protects us against censorship by government entities or officials.

G/O Media may get a commission

You can worship however you want, write whatever you want, and say whatever you want. The government cant punish or censor you. If you are a parent who wants to cause a bit of a scene at a school board meeting, its covered by your right to petition for redress of grievances. If you are a professional football player who wants to kneel in protest of police brutality and systemic racism, that counts as symbolic expression, and you are free to do that. If you are smartphone owner who wants to bang out a few tweets about how much representatives on one side of the aisle or the other suck, go right aheadeven when you insult government officials directly, they cannot penalize you.

In 1989, the Supreme Court even maintained that burning an American flag is a constitutional right, five years after a man named Gregory Lee Johnson did just that during the 1984 Republican National Convention. He was convicted of the desecration of a venerated object in violation of the Texas Penal Code, but when his case made it to the Supreme Court a few years later, they ruled in favor of him, not Texas.

So, to be clear, the government cant do anything to stop you from saying whatever you wantbut private companies can. The government couldnt do anything to Colin Kaepernick when he took a knee, but the National Football League could. Officially, the NFL didnt penalize Kaepernick at first, even when then-President Donald Trump called for the organization to punish him and other players who protested, but its widely believed he was blackballed for his anthem protests, and he filed a since-settled grievance claiming teams were colluding to keep him out of the league in the aftermath. In 2018, owners in the league ruled that players could no longer kneel during the anthem.

The NFL is not the government. It can make rules like that. Any private company can step in and make rules against what sort of speech is and is not allowed when using its products or services, representing it publicly, or otherwise engaging with it contractually, in fact. You know where this is going.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution only protects us against censorship by government entities and officials. Most people fail to realize or understand that key fact. Twitter is a private entity; it is not a government entity, Calvert said. Therefore, Twitter is not subject to the First Amendment when it chooses to deplatform individuals or to remove tweets that violate its terms of use or terms of service. Its really much more of a contractual matter that if, when an individual signs up to join Twitter, they must comply with the terms of service or terms of use that Twitter specifies. If they violate them, then Twitter can remove them or remove a tweet and there is no First Amendment issue or violation whatsoever in that case. I think thats really the biggest misconception that people have, that private entities can be regulated by the First Amendment.

There are a few things that are not protected when it comes to the government, too: Child pornography is not protected by the First Amendment, for instance, nor is speech that is integral to criminal conduct. Direct threats are not protected. Obscenity is also not protected, but there is a whole host of other modifications there that allow content like, say, artistic nude photography or pornography to continue to be made. Calvert noted that while obscene speech has to be determined to be patently offensive in order not to be protected, if it can be shown to have literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, its fine. Plus, that is all based on contemporary community standards, he said, and definitions of obscenity are always evolving.

Note, finally, that though you can say whatever you want and the government cant stop you, people can also react however they see fit. If you say something offensive to a relative, that person can decide not to talk to you without infringing on your rights. If you badmouth your company in public, your boss can choose to fire you. Your First Amendment rights dont shelter you from any personal consequences that arise from exercising them.

The First Amendment is extremely important. Calvert pointed to other countries, like Russia or China, which limit peoples ability to criticize the government. In other countries, there can be serious repercussions for that, but here in America, you can post nasty memes about Republican Sen. Ted Cruz or Democratic President Joe Biden all day long and, as long as youre not directly threatening them, youre allowed to do it. Trump, also a Republican, is out of office now, but if you post memes about him, he may not see them, as he was banned from Twitter and most social media sites in 2021which, again, is not a violation of free speech in any way.

The way free speech tends to be discussed, however, you might not realize that the deplatforming of a then-president wasnt an attack on the First Amendment at all.

Billionaire Elon Musk acquired a 9.2% stake in Twitter recently, then offered to buy it earlier this week, writing in his filing, I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy. However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.

The debate about free speech will continue to rage on, even though the First Amendment has been pretty clear about what it includes since 1971. You are, of course, free to engage in the debate, but its best to do that armed with the facts and the knowledge that, again, private companies are not regulated by the First Amendment.

Excerpt from:
What Is Protected Free Speech (and What Isn't)? - Lifehacker

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on What Is Protected Free Speech (and What Isn’t)? – Lifehacker

New Indiana law is meant to protect free speech at universities. It may do the opposite. – The Herald-Times

Posted: at 10:22 am

Editor's note:House Bill1190 prohibits universities from punishing a student organization if that organization requires its members to affirm their commitment to the organizations beliefs.The legislature'sprovision could help avoid a hecklers veto within student organizations and protect freedom of association.

Amidst a chorus of cheers, boos and "Let her finish" chants, conservative political commentatorAnn Coulter walked off the Whittenberger Auditoriumstage before college student Tara Layous finished asking her question.

Prior toits slightly fiery conclusion, the student action against Coulter'sappearance at Indiana University earlythis month was relatively restrained.There were no protesters picketing outside theevent. The nearby sidewalk's chalk work, sporting"Racist gathering" in bright pink letters with an arrow pointing toward the IMU, was the only prominent sign in the surrounding area. During Coulter's speech on the history of conservatism, the crowd's interruptions were sparse and far between.

More: IU waiting for instruction on Trump's campus speech order

It was only during the event's Q&A portion, when Coulter said Layous was taking too long to ask a question, that the mood shifted.

After a brief back and forth with a few audience members, Coulter left the stage. When asked why she was in such a hurry to shuffle along questions, Coulter responded she had a plane to catch. She noted the event, which was scheduled for 60 minutes, had already run over its allotted time.

Coulter later tweeted the event was "the funnest (sic)event I've done since COVID," with many questions from "the liberals, who were perfectly polite" until Layous' turn.

Immediately following the event, Layous, a senior at IU, told The Herald-Times she didn't come to the event as a protester. Layous said she didn't intend to prompt Coulter to leave and was disappointed the people after her didn't get to ask their own questions.

While Layous said she can't speak on whether free speech at Indiana University is protected as a whole, "I don't think it was (protected)today."

That's something state lawmakers sought to change during the most recent session of theIndiana General Assembly.Legislators intensified free speech protection oncollege campuses by passingHouse Bill 1190, which was later signed into law by Gov. Eric Holcomb.

Under this legislation, universities must create and publish clear policies on free speech rights and protections for students, faculty members and staff. Universities cannot prohibitprotected expressive activities atan outdoor, accessible area on campus,though they canenforce restrictions on the time, placeand manner.

The new law also requires universities to submit an annual report ofcomplaints to a higher education commission. If a student or student organization claims their right to free speech hasbeen violated on campus, theycan seek legal action, which could grant them upto $50,000, court costs andattorney's fees.

While the new law's stated purposeis to better protect speech, some have questioned whether its fine print will preserve or hinder a person's constitutional rights.

"The statute, whatever the intent of it might be, might actually chill protected speech instead of protect speech," said Joseph Tomain, a lecturer at IU's Maurer School of Law.

The legislation has drawn negative reactions from some IU faculty members, including Tomain.He describes himself as a fierce protectorof free speech and has dedicated his time both as a lawyer and educator to the topic.

"It's better to have some false speech be protected than it is to risk having truthful speech be unprotected. There is a cost to the United States' strong free speech protections, but ultimately, I think it's a cost worth paying in order to ensure that we have a functional democracy," Tomain said, noting that democracies work best when there's a free marketplace of ideas.

There are some aspects of the new law Tomain appreciates, such as requiring universities to have accessible free speech policies and attempting to bar counter-protesters from using a "heckler's veto,"which happens when a person or group who disagrees with a speaker's message is able to silence them through disruptive intervention.

Those positives aside, Tomain said he has some issues with the bill's language.

For example, the law defines"harassment" as speech or conduct that is unwelcome, severe, pervasive and "subjectively and objectively offensive" and results in a student being denied equal access to educational opportunities or benefits provided by the institution.

"The definition of harassment is most likely in violation of the First Amendment," Tomain said. According to Tomain, the First Amendment protects speech that is unwelcome, severe and pervasive while also noting "offensive" is too subjective to be used in this context.

Tomain isn't the only one who has voiced reservations about the law. Speaking with Indiana education-focused publicationChalkbeat,Sheila Kennedy, a professor emeritus of law and public policy at IUPUI's Paul H. ONeill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, said the legislation could encourage additional litigation and complicatethe legal precedent of the First Amendment.

Tomain also took issue with the law's granting of legal proceedings if a student or student organization feels their right to free speech has been violated.

"The remedial provision here has the potential to chill speech if people start to be afraid that they're going to be sued, and not only have to pay for their own lawyers, but also potentially pay for the lawyers of the other side and the court costs," Tomain said.

While the statute explicitly states the university wouldcover the plaintiff's attorney fees if proven to be at fault,the statute does not limit who can be sued, according to Tomain.

While constitutional rights are protected against federal or state infringement, such as police, schools or Congress, Tomain noted it's possible for claims of free speech violationsto be brought against private citizens or groups.

"I'm not certain that this is the best way to protect free speech," Tomain said.

IU's free speech policy is posted onlineatfreespeech.iu.edu. The webpage features a note about campus diversity as well as a separate page answering frequently asked questions. Students can also contact faculty members who are considered experts on the First Amendment.

IU spokesman Chuck Carney said the webpage has been up for several years and was created after IU students began asking similar questions about their rights on campus.

"We wanted to have a central location to point people to in case they had questions," Carney said.

Since 2017, IU has enlisted the Demonstration Response and Safety Team, which includes volunteerfaculty members and student affairs professionals, to attend demonstrations, rallies andprotests held on campus.

At least two team members try to be at any demonstration on campus. The team members are passive observers who are there to answer any questions about a person's rights to free speech. They also ensure there arenodisruptions, such as a heckler's veto, that preventfreedom of expression.

DRST is currently led byKathy Adams Riester, associate vice provost for student affairs and executive associate dean of students, and Katie Paulin, assistant dean for student support and outreach. John Summerlot, the university coordinator of military andveteran services, previously led the team and still acts as a volunteer.

According toSummerlot, the team's formation was inspired by political scientistCharles Murray'scontroversial visit to IU's campus in April 2017. Murray, who identifies as a libertarian, has been accused of promoting racist views.

More: The price of free speech: Murray's visit and accompanying protests cost IU nearly $15,000

"We didn't have anybody versed in freedom of speech on campus,"Summerlot noted.

According to Carney, the new law won't lead to any major changes at IU. The university already has some of the legislation's stipulations in place, such as the published free speech policy. The university also regularly updates its free speech policies and procedures to stay in adherence to best practices and guidelines, he said.

According to Carney, IU was ultimately supportive of the new law.

"We felt like this was something that we certainly were comfortable with, because we knew that we were already implementing many of the things that were put in place," Carney said.

Though the law could conceivably be challenged in court later on, it is currently in place foruniversities in Indiana.

Contact Rachel Smithat rksmith@heraldt.com or @RachelSmithNews on Twitter.

Read more:
New Indiana law is meant to protect free speech at universities. It may do the opposite. - The Herald-Times

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on New Indiana law is meant to protect free speech at universities. It may do the opposite. – The Herald-Times

Education Censorship, Book Bans, and Attacking Free Speech: Setting the Record Straight as Extremist Politicians in Florida, Alabama and Other States…

Posted: at 10:22 am

As extremist politicians like Florida Gov. Rick DeSantis seek to reignite a culture war, targeting LGBTQ+ youth by attempting to silence, erase, and isolate them through curriculum censorship, book bans, and other divisive tactics, people across the country are taking notice and pushing back. Poll after poll indicates that Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to these efforts to punish and target LGBTQ+ youth. While extremist politicians are seeking to advance an agenda of discrimination, theyre triggering a larger backlash against their actions in states across the country. Below is a brief snapshot of the issue including updated, previously unreleased data from HRC, and important context to better understand the current state of play, the impact of the policy, and the publics response.

STATE OF PLAY

WHAT THESE BILLS DO

These bills effectively aim to prevent the discussion LGBTQ+ issues or people in education settings.

This means teachers would be prevented from providing a safe, inclusive classroom for all students.

The Florida law blocks teachers from talking about LGBTQ+ issues or people, further stigmatizing LGBTQ+ people and isolating LGBTQ+ kids. It also undermines existing protections for LGBTQ+ students.

The Alabama law bans any acknowledgement of sexual orientation or gender identity in classrooms from kindergarten through fifth grade.

South Dakotas law prohibits state education officials from compelling either students or teachers to agree with "divisive concepts" meaning, acknowledgment of privileges and inequities in our society.

Youth living in states with enumerated antibullying laws that include sexual orientation and gender identity report less homophobic victimization and harassment than do students who attend schools in states without these protections.

LGBTQ+ students in schools with LGBTQ+ supporting clubs and sexual orientation & gender identity resources often report feeling safer and are less likely to report depressive symptom, substance use, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in comparison with students in schools lacking such resources.

86% of LGBTQ+ youth report they have been targets of bullying, harassment, or assault at school.

Studies have shown that bullying and harassment of LGBTQ+ youth contribute to high rates of absenteeism, dropout, adverse health consequences, and academic underachievement.

A recent Trevor Project survey showed that a startling 85% of transgender or gender non-binary youth say their mental health has been negatively affected by the current wave of legislative attacks.

AMERICANS OVERWHELMINGLY OPPOSE CENSORSHIP AND BOOK BANS

87% of Americans do not think books should be banned for discussing race or slavery. 85% do not think books should be banned for political ideas you disagree with. 83% do not think books should be banned for criticizing US history. [CBS poll, 2/15-18]

Seventy-one percent of likely voters including 66 percent of Independents and 64 percent of Republicans believe that local school boards should not have the authority to ban books from school curriculums. [Data for Progress poll, 2/11-13]

By a 60-point margin, Americans oppose banning books in public schools. When described as a growing push to remove certain books from schools across the country, including the graphic novel Maus about the Holocaust, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Color Purple, and 1984, more than three in four Americans oppose the banning of books in public schools (16 percent support 76 percent oppose). Opposition is strong across partisanship, with opposition from almost four in five Republicans (78 percent) and about three in four Democrats and Independents (74 and 76 percent, respectively). [Navigator poll, 2/17-22]

74% support adding more books in English classes by authors who are Black, Indigenous, or people of color. [PIE Network poll, 11/21]

Based on National Parents Unions national polling and meetings with parents all over the country, Keri Rodrigues, co-founder and president of the organization, says restricting how teachers can talk about race or gender "is really at the bottom of the list" of parental priorities. [National Parents Union]

STUDENTS, TEACHERS, PARENTS & LIBRARIANS ARE STANDING UP AND SPEAKING OUT

This bill is condemning the LGBTQ+ community to death. If you're telling a child that is gay or whatever sexuality, that they're going to hell, or that they need to be quiet and not share with the class, that's just going to cause so much inner trauma and conflict and if they don't have a support system to turn to ... what do you think is going to happen with this child? They're either going to pretend to be someone that they're not or they're going to go through depression and anxiety and even possible self-harm and suicide attempts. CJ Walden, a high school senior in Boca Raton, Florida [CNN, Apr. 1, 2022]

I ignored [my sexuality] for a really long time. And I think that as a young girl, if a book showed me that this is a life that could be lived, I could have had a lot more peace and coming to terms with bisexuality, high school senior Gabrielle Izu, at James E. Taylor High School in the Katy Independent School District, Texas [LA Times, Nov. 8, 2021]

When I first decided, like, oh, I dont really feel like a girl at all, or I dont always feel like a girl. I felt sort of like I didn't know how to feel about that. But when I realized that that was completely normal, having media that showed that was really helpful. Saffy Cousins, 6th grader in the Orange County Public School system, Florida [First Coast News, Dec. 7, 2021]

I really feel like, by them banning this book, its just spreading the message that its not OK to be gay, especially in school. For me, its not necessarily about the book. Its more about the message that banning the book spread. I just feel like they need to stop spreading the message that everybody has to be the same and being gay isnt OK. ... If I picked one thing to come out of this, its to have more of an accepting school. Alek Burgess, eighth grade student at Bayfield Middle School, Colorado [Durango Herald, Oct. 8, 2021]

I think that [placing an age restriction] creates a harmful environment in the school surrounding LGBTQ+ issues. It makes it seem as though gender expression and sexuality are issues reserved for adults, while there are many students at the school who identify with the LGBTQ+ community. Junior Kate Johnson, Lake Forest High School, Illinois [The Forest Scout, Feb. 25, 2022]

I'm straight. I've never gone through what my LGBTQ+ students have, but I know that they're at a higher risk of bullying, they are higher risk for suicide, and I can never imagine what they're going through. The only thing that I can do is just try to be someone on this campus who they know that I'm going to support them and be in their corner. Meghan Mayer, a middle school reading teacher in Sarasota, Florida [CNN, Apr. 1, 2022]

Jeanne Nettles, who teaches 7th and 8th grade in St. Johns County, Florida, said the bill could make some of her students such as those with two moms or two dads feel like they need to hide parts of themselves at school. Are they not allowed to talk about their home life? What are you trying to tell them by saying you cant talk about it? she said in an interview after the school day had ended. [The 19th, Feb. 9, 2022]

Austin Johnson, who teaches sociology at Kenyon College and studies LGBTQ+ health, said that, if he had been able to learn about what being transgender meant in high school especially from a teacher that would have alleviated the despair that enveloped him; despair that he couldnt understand or find words for on his own. I think it would have totally changed my life, he said. I think that I would have made different choices in terms of self care. I didnt know myself, so it was hard to care for myself. [The 19th, Feb. 9, 2022]

For Clinton McCracken, who has taught art for 21 years at Howard Middle School Academy of Arts in Orlando, this law feels like a hateful, personal attack. McCracken points to a 2021 survey from the Trevor Project, a nonprofit suicide prevention organization for LGBTQ youth, which found that 42% of LGBTQ youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year. "I can tell you as someone who grew up as a gay boy, how real that statistic is," he says, "and how dangerous it is that these Republican legislators are playing with the safety of our vulnerable youth. This is a created culture war from [Gov. DeSantis] so that he can achieve his political ambitions. That's all this is. So yeah, I'm not teaching kids how to be gay in my classroom, but I'll tell you what I am doing. I am trying with all my power to teach kids to be OK with who they are." [NPR, Mar. 30, 2022]

They are creating policies restricting the freedoms for students to be themselves biding with families that insist their heterosexual or cisgender children should feel comfortable in the school environment, essentially by never interacting with beliefs or people who are at odds with their own. We do not debate the existence of groups of people or their right to exist because they exist whether we believe they do," she added. "We should not be prioritizing one student's comfort over another student's very existence. Mae Christiansen, sociology teacher at H.G. Hill Middle School in Tennessee [The Tennessean, April 14, 2021]

I think that the LGBTQ community has consistently tried to make the life of LGBTQ people who come after them better. What I hope will continue to happen now that this bill has become a law, is that people will rise up, people will speak up, families like mine will step further into the light. We know what it's like to have to fight for this. And this family that we have, we're incredibly proud of it and nobody is going to silence us. Nobody is going to make us hide." Janelle Perez, a wife and mother living in Miami, Florida [ABC News, Mar. 30, 2022].

It is suicide prevention, in my view. You know, a lot of LGBTQ+ kids arent comfortable coming out to their parents, theyre scared. And so having a book like this in the school library is giving them a lifeline. Jen Cousins, mother of nonbinary 6th grader in Orange County Public School system, Florida [First Coast News, Dec. 7, 2021]

It is our job as parents to make sure these books do not disappear, Stephana Ferrell, Orange County, Florida, mother [First Coast News, Dec. 7, 2021]

We havent seen or heard of challenges like these probably in the last 40 years. Its definitely become politicized. Shirley Robinson, executive director of the 5,000-member Texas Library Association [LA Times, Nov. 8, 2021]

Banning a book is, in my opinion, never justified. If a library or district has a strong collection development policy and a certified professional librarian in charge of that, banning should never be necessary." San Antonio, Texas, middle school librarian Carrie Damon [LA Times, Nov. 8, 2021]

Freedom to read is a right that must be protected in our schools and public libraries, and we must not give in to the vocal few that want to speak for the many, Austin, Texas, Public Library Director Roosevelt Weeks [LA Times, Nov. 8, 2021]

That one family may choose not to read something does not determine whether or not it's appropriate for another family. Jaime Prothro, Wichita, Kansas, director of libraries [The Kansas City Beacon, Nov. 30, 2021]

Not only do librarians face the challenge of ensuring that all students are able to see a reflection of themselves in the books they read, but they are also charged with the responsibility of helping explore worlds outside of their own and develop empathy for others. Davina Sauthoff, the Executive Director of the Utah Education Library Media Association [Fox13 Salt Lake City, Dec. 14, 2021]

The Human Rights Campaign is Americas largest civil rights organization working to achieve equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people. HRC envisions a world where LGBTQ+ people are embraced as full members of society at home, at work and in every community.

Follow this link:
Education Censorship, Book Bans, and Attacking Free Speech: Setting the Record Straight as Extremist Politicians in Florida, Alabama and Other States...

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Education Censorship, Book Bans, and Attacking Free Speech: Setting the Record Straight as Extremist Politicians in Florida, Alabama and Other States…

University settles with professor in free speech case over pronoun use – Washington Examiner

Posted: at 10:22 am

A Shawnee State University professor has settled for $400,000 in a lawsuit against his employer, arguing it was within his First Amendment rights to refuse using the preferred pronouns of a student who identifies as female.

Nicholas Meriwether, a Shawnee philosophy professor, was issued a written rebuke after a 2018 Title IX investigation into the situation, prompting the lawsuit, which was originally dismissed in February 2020, when a lower district court found there were no broader societal concerns, but revived by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Shawnee State University, located in Portsmouth, Ohio, agreed to settle the case Thursday. Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Meriwether, released a statement saying the university agreed to pay $400,000 in damages and Meriwethers attorneys fees. Additionally, considering the 6th Circuits ruling, the university is rescinding the written warning it issued Meriwether.

Shawnee State University issued a statement saying its decision to settle was made for economic reasons.

"Though we have decided to settle, we adamantly deny that anyone at Shawnee State deprived Dr. Meriwether of his free speech rights or his rights to freely exercise his religion," the statement said. "Over the course of this lawsuit, it became clear that the case was being used to advance divisive social and political agendas at a cost to the university and its students. That cost is better spent on fulfilling Shawnee States mission of service to our students, families and community."

WATCH: POPE FRANCIS CALLS FOR PEACE IN 'EASTER OF WAR MESSAGE

ADF praised the outcome, noting that the university has agreed that Meriwether has the right to choose when to use, or avoid using, titles or pronouns when referring to or addressing students. Significantly, the university agreed Meriwether will never be mandated to use pronouns, including if a student requests pronouns that conflict with his or her biological sex."

In the case, Meriwether argued he was standing by his Christian beliefs in refusing to use the preferred pronouns of the student and that he instead offered to call his students by either Mr. or Ms. and their last name, or simply by their last name.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Dr. Meriwether went out of his way to accommodate his students and treat them all with dignity and respect, yet his university punished him because he wouldnt endorse an ideology that he believes is false, ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barham said. Were pleased to see the university recognize that the First Amendment guarantees Dr. Meriwether and every other American the right to speak and act in a manner consistent with ones faith and convictions.

Read the original:
University settles with professor in free speech case over pronoun use - Washington Examiner

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on University settles with professor in free speech case over pronoun use – Washington Examiner