Monthly Archives: January 2022

Bible-Thumping Bills – Word and Way

Posted: January 19, 2022 at 10:51 am

In 1612, Thomas Helwys published the first book in English arguing for true religious liberty for all people. One of the two founders of the first Baptist church (of the world) formed just three years earlier, Helwys went beyond the normal demand that persecution cease towards ones own sect to insist on religious liberty for everyone, even Jews, Muslims, and atheists. Radical stuff even in a radical age.

He then sent the King of England a copy ofA Short Declaration on the Mistery of Iniquitythat included a blistering critique of state-church alliances, like the one enjoyed by the Church of England. Helwys even scrawled a note inside: The King is a mortal man, and not God, therefore he hath no power over the mortal soul of his subjects to make laws and ordinances for them and to set spiritual Lords over them.

The king didnt like that too much. He threw Helwys and some other Baptists in jail, where Helwys died a few years later. The king kept ruling over both the nation of England and the churches in the land for another decade. Who was this royal figure?

King James.

Perhaps youve heard of him. Maybe check an old Bibles cover for a reminder. As Helwys in 1611 crafted hisMistery of Iniquityto call for religious liberty for all that led to his persecution and death behind bars, King James released the authorized version of the Bible. Apparently His Majesty, metaphorically smited on thy right cheek by Helwys, missed the admonition in Matthews Gospel to turn to him the other also.

So, we find it a bit ironic that a Baptist in Oklahomaintroduced a bill in the state legislature this month to mandate the use of the King James Bible as the translation for use in public schools. Senator George Burns wants classes that teach the Bible as a historical text to no longer primarily use a multi-translation book. Instead, his legislation requires that the Authorized Version of the Bible, which is more commonly known as the King James Version of the Bible, shall be the primary text of the course. In addition, his bill making the KJV the Oklahoma Authorized Version includes a provision that each school district library in this state shall include the Authorized Version of the Bible, more commonly known as the King James Version of the Bible.

Burnss bill doesnt just mandate a specific translation. It also attempts to marshal state power to force his religious beliefs on public schools. Hes amemberof Lukfata Baptist Church in Broken Bow, which includes in its 4,265-wordstatement of beliefsone bolded, underlined sentence: The King James Version of the Bible shall be the official and only translation used by this church. It then adds for clarity, Special note: the King James Version and the New King James Version are two different translations, and only the King James Version will be the accepted translation used by Lukfata Baptist Church. No word on if the pastor preaches in Shakespearean verse (or if theyve decided to go full 17th century and try to survive a plague without vaccines).

Burnss move would make King James proud but likely spark a harsh response from his Baptist ancestors. Trying to codify ones own convictions into law is just the kind of state infringement of religious liberty that would inspire Helwys or other historical Baptist figures like Isaac Backus to protest even to the point of imprisonment (though well note that Burns isnt proposing to send any wayward teachers or librarians to jail though others have alreadygone there).

While the Sooner State considers this extreme and clearly unconstitutional bill, lawmakers in other states have similarly sought to to authorize official Bible classes in public schools. In this issue ofA Public Witness, we study the political effort behind the Bible blitz. We also quiz this movement to consider the pedagogical and religious problems with such legislation.

Dont miss the next issue ofA Public Witness. Sign up now for this e-newsletter on faith, culture, and politics!

Dismissing Sen. Burnss legislative antics as insignificant would be a mistake for at least two reasons. First, seven states havealready passedsimilar bills (minus the King James requirement). Second, the introduction of these measures is not an accident. Rather, it is part of a concerted campaign to use political power and public resources to teach sectarian beliefs.

Originally deemed Project Blitz, the effort involved a constellation of individuals and groups on the Christian Right who saw state legislatures as an easy avenue for chipping away at church-state separation. Borrowing the approach of conservative business interests and others, the campaignprovidesstate legislators with model legislation to be introduced on a range of topics as innocuous as license plates to more contentious measures around human sexuality.

Its kind of like whack-a-mole for the other side; itll drive em crazy that theyll have to divide their resources out in opposing this, is how the controversial, self-styled historian David Bartondescribed the strategy. [The model bills are] going to be things that people yell at, but they will help move the ball down the court.

Virginia House of Delegates. (Brian Kaylor/Word&Way)

Perhaps due to the negative publicity generated by the push, Frederick Clarkson the researcher who helped first bring it to light documenteda more covert approach by the coordinating groups over the last two years. Critics see that realityas botha sign their pushback is working and cause for continued alarm.

What remains quite noticeable is the impact on our public life. Fromsupportive tweetsby then-President Donald Trump to teachers in Kentuckyteachingmoral lessons explicitly drawn from Christian scripture, the foundational idea that public education is offered to everyone regardless of identity or creed remains under concerted attack.

Bryan Kelley, an education policy researcher, told us that bills proposing Bible classes be taught are inherently controversial to some extent, and some are definitely more controversial than others.

Its also obvious that states introducing bills to teach the Bible in public schools arent doing the same thing with the sacred texts of other faiths and that Bible courses can certainly be taught poorly/unconstitutionally, Kelley added.

He cautioned that while theres not a particularly big wave or prominent trend in state legislatures yet this session, it could be an important area to watch amid the surge of bills looking to ban critical race theory or other topics from public school curriculum.

Help sustain the ministry ofWord&Wayby subscribing toA Public Witness!

Two Bible literacy bills are pending before committees in Missouri this year. For the third time in four years, Republican Rep. Ben Baker filed abillto encourage schools to create an elective social studies course to teach students knowledge of biblical content, characters, poetry, and narratives that are prerequisites to understanding American history and culture, including literature, art, music, mores, oratory, and public policy. And in the other chamber, Democratic Sen. Karla May introduced for the second year in a row an identicalbill.

The Missouri bills claim that such a class on the Bible shall not endorse, favor, or promote, or disfavor or show hostility toward, any particular religion or nonreligious faith or religious perspective. Yet, both sponsors are Christians and have been outspoken in previous years about their desire for more people to understand and follow the Bible. Baker is even a lay Assemblies of God minister and former dean of students at Ozark Bible Institute (he was also the sponsor of the unsuccessfulbillwe referenced earlier to imprison librarians). Their passion for the Bible rightly comes not from its historical impact but from their own faith.

Both versions of the Missouri bill also insist that a student in the course shall not be required to use a specific translation, though as Senator Burns in Oklahoma shows that provision would be vulnerable to an amendment in a later legislative session.

Back in 2010, Democratic Gov. Brad Henry signed intolawOklahomas bill encouraging Bible literacy classes. This put the state well ahead of the curve, predating the nationwide Project Blitz push on this topic by several years. Now the decade-old status quo appears no longer good enough.

Our Founding Fathers relied heavily upon the scriptures in the formation of our country, and the Bible they used was the King James Bible, which makes it an important historical document, Burnsarguedas he introduced his bill to amend Oklahomas Bible classes.

Burns insisted to us that hes not pushing mine when it comes to translations but pushing the most historical document as far as the Bible goes. He added that he reads several different versions, but noted his pastor helped him put this together.

Im mainly doing it to preserve the Bible, he told us.

Burns also connected his bill to the threat he sees from critical race theory, especially because he thinks people pushing critical race theory will also oppose the KJV Bible.

Youve heard of critical race theory going on right now, right? In Oklahoma, were trying to protect ourselves from the federal government wanting to destroy the 10 Commandments, all the monuments of our presidents, and that type of stuff, he explained. Its our history. Theyre trying to get rid of our history.

Burns bill would also amend current law so that an ordained or licensed member of the clergy may be selected by the school district to teach a course offered pursuant to this section. We seem to be moving away from the claim these courses are just about historical influence and more accurately acknowledging this is about using the public school system to indoctrinate and evangelize.

Thats why Amanda Tyler, executive director ofBaptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, told us these Bible literacy courses promote Christian nationalism.

The idea that one must know the Bible in order to be an educated American silently implying that other religious texts are not as important perpetuates that insidious ideology that merges American and Christian identities, Tyler explained. If a public school wants to teach about religion in order to further religious literacy, there is a better path: use a religiously-neutral curriculum that includes diverse religious texts. In practice, these Bible literacy courses could easily morph into devotional religious instruction, which violates a fundamental principle of religious freedom: the state should never try to do the job of the church.

Lawmakers in other states where the Bible blitz has thus far failed havent yet filed new bills this year. But its early in some legislative sessions, and the pandemic has altered the focus of many of the church-state fights.

There is, however, a bill in Mississippi from a Democratic state representative (and Sunday School teacher at a Baptist church) tonamethe Bible as the official state book. A similar billfailed(again) last year in Tennessee after being pushed by a Republican state representative (and former Baptist pastor). If both states were to pass such a resolution we might need old Solomon to help us split the baby for custody. While King James would likely be sad to see we gained independence from England, we suspect hed probably be pretty pleased with these legislative efforts.

Get cutting-edge analysis and commentary like this in your inbox every week by subscribing today!

One of us (Brian) has testified six times over the last three legislative sessions against these Bible literacy bills in the Missouri legislature and we suspect hell be back at the state Capitol soon for another round. In addition to invoking Thomas Helwys and other Baptists, his testimony noted that what the bills push for cannot truly be implemented without violating the First Amendment. Heres the core of that testimony about whats wrong with these bills.

First, the legislation singles out the Bible as the sole sacred text worthy of study in public school classrooms.Are there no other religious writings of significant historical and literary influence? A course surveying the impact that a variety of religious texts have had on our culture and society would make far more sense, given the stated purposes of the legislation. To single out the Bible as the only one worthy of study seems designed to sneak Christian teaching into public school classrooms. This looks more like evangelism than education.

Second, you have to determine what Bible will be taught.The proposed bills in Missouri say that no requirement shall be made by the district on the text translation students must use. And thats the standard in Oklahoma (unless Senator Burns gets his KJV-only way) and other states that have already passed similar legislation. But those pushing these bills dont seem to understand that the very concept of the Bible remains contested. One teacher could not possibly teach a course on the Bible to students who are simultaneously reading from the Jewish Tanakh (that doesnt include any of the New Testament), the 66 books in most Protestant Bibles, the 73 books considered authoritative by the Roman Catholic Church, or the 80 books included in the Orthodox Church of Americas Bible.

If a teacher picks just one list of books as the Bible, the state will be choosing winners and losers when it comes to religion and faith. But to teach all of the various lists as books of the Bible is to undermine the faith teachings of parents and churches that pick a particular list for profoundly religious reasons. Either the supporters of this bill have not considered this problem or they are making an assumption that their preferred version of the Bible is most likely to be used as seen by the fact that the bills only use explicitly Christian language to describe the Hebrew scriptures.

A related problem is the identity of the teacher leading the course. What happens when a non-Christian is assigned to teach about the Bible? Theoretically, any social studies or English teacher is qualified to educate students about the historical and literary role of the Bible. Would the legislators pushing these bills (and the constituents supporting their efforts) really accept an avowed atheist designing the syllabus and offering the lectures?

Perhaps well see more bait-and-switch amendments like the one in Oklahoma that will keep making these classes more sectarian. Regardless, the result will be alienated students, offended parents, and a violation of constitutional principles.

Brian Kaylor testifying in Missouri hearings against Bible literacy bills.

Third, we cannot separate the historical and literary elements of the Bible from its supernatural claims.The resurrection of Jesus features heavily in our cultural imagery because of its widespread belief among Christians. How can a course consider the Bibles impact without talking about the resurrection? If taught as a supernatural act, that would be unconstitutional. But equally problematic would be to undermine the historicity of the resurrection. We can already imagine the outrage and the headlines that will emerge when the views of the teacher come into conflict with the convictions of students and parents.

That gets us to the heart of the issue: The Bible cannot be reduced to an elective social studies class. Yes, this collection of religious texts has impacted literature, politics, history, culture, and so much more. But the reason for its influence is due to peoples belief in what the Bible reveals. This is notMoby DickorA Tale of Two Cities. The Bible is not influential because it is great literature but because so many people believe it is the word of God.

That is certainly our belief. The Bible is the foundational text of our faith. It is how we learn about God. It teaches us what it means to follow the Lords commands and worship our Creator. This book is inherently religious and pretending otherwise is foolish. Stripping away its sacredness under the pretext of treating this text as just good literature is to profane the Bible.

We need the state to teach our young sons reading, writing, and arithmetic. It would be nice if they could also cover basic computer science, critical reasoning, foreign languages, the arts, and a few vocational skills. We neither want nor trust the government to educate them about the Bible. Thats the job of our churches and families.

We need state lawmakers to stop failing this basic test of religious and constitutional logic.

As a public witness,

Brian Kaylor & Beau Underwood

See the rest here:

Bible-Thumping Bills - Word and Way

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Bible-Thumping Bills – Word and Way

Uniqlo international boosts sales and profit at the Fast Retailing Group – FashionUnited India

Posted: at 10:51 am

The Fast Retailing Groups revenue and profit both increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2022 with consolidated revenue totalling 627.3 billion yen, up 1.2 percent and operating profit reaching 119.4 billion yen, up 5.6 percent.

The company has attributed this strong performance to large increases in both revenue and profit at Uniqlo operations in South Asia, Southeast Asia & Oceania (Southeast Asia, Australia, and India), North America, and Europe.

Meanwhile, the groups Uniqlo operations in Japan and the Greater China region (Mainland China market, Hong Kong market, and Taiwan market) and our GU business segments reported declines in the first quarter revenue and profit.

First-quarter pre-tax profit rose to 134.2 billion yen, up 25.2 percent and profit attributable to owners of the parent increased to 93.5 billion yen, up 33 percent

Uniqlo Japan reported significant declines in revenue and profit in the first quarter of fiscal 2022, with revenue totaling 226.4 billion yen, down 10.8 percent and operating profit totaling 48.7 billion yen, down 18.8 percent. First-quarter same-store sales declined by 7.7% year-on-year.

This performance, the company added, was being compared to a strong result in the previous year when stay-at-home demand and sales of Airism masks were particularly buoyant. In addition, the large number of persistently warm days from September through to the middle of October stifled sales of fall winter ranges. Sales of outerwear and thermal innerwear did strengthen once the weather turned colder from the middle of October and sales exceeded previous year levels during the Uniqlo anniversary sale in November.

Ecommerce sales declined 0.2 percent with online sales totaling 36.6 billion yen, however, this figure represented an approximate 50 percent increase compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2020, so ecommerce is still trending on a favorable expansion track. Uniqlo Japans gross profit margin improved by 0.5 point.

Uniqlos international segment reported revenue increase to 299.7 billion yen, up 15 percent and operating profit expanding to 59.9 billion yen, up 44.6 percent year-on-year. This was fueled primarily by strong sales and large increases in both revenue and profit at Uniqlo operations in the S/SE Asia & Oceania, North America, and Europe regions. Meanwhile, first-quarter revenue declined marginally and first-quarter profit declined significantly for the Greater China region.

The Hong Kong and Taiwan markets generated significant increases in both revenue and profit and Uniqlo South Korea reported a rise in both revenue and profit. S/SE Asia & Oceania reported higher revenue and profit as the region recovered the level of performance it had enjoyed two years ago prior to Covid-19. Uniqlo USA generated a rise in revenue and moved into the black in the first quarter. Uniqlo Europe also achieved increases in both revenue and profit as falling temperatures and a rising consumer appetite for shopping created a buoyant sales environment.

The GU business segment reported a decline in revenue and a considerable contraction in profit in the first quarter, with revenue falling to 69.8 billion yen, down 8.7 percent and operating profit contracting to 8.9 billion yen, down 34.5 percent. The company added that persistently warm weather stifled sales of fall winter items and delays in production and distribution also delayed the launch of winter ranges. GUs gross profit margin declined by 1.7 points.

The Global Brands segment reported a rise in revenue and a move back into the black in the first quarter of fiscal 2022. The segment generated revenue of 30.7 billion yen, up 9.5 percent and an operating profit of 2.5 billion yen compared to a 0.2 billion yen loss recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2021.

Theory operation generated strong increases in both revenue and profit, thanks primarily to a recovery in performance and a move back into the black for Theory in the United States.

PLST reported a decline in both revenue and profit as that operation struggled to attract customers during the Covid-19-related state of emergency in Japan. The companys France-based Comptoir des Cotonniers operation reported higher revenue and a move back into the black after it was able to avoid temporarily closing any stores due to Covid-19.

Read this article:

Uniqlo international boosts sales and profit at the Fast Retailing Group - FashionUnited India

Posted in Oceania | Comments Off on Uniqlo international boosts sales and profit at the Fast Retailing Group – FashionUnited India

Anthem Quotes by Ayn Rand – Goodreads

Posted: at 10:49 am

And my happiness needs no higher aim to vindicate it. My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose...

I am a man. this miracle of me is mine to own and keep, and mine to guard, and mine to use, and mine to kneel before!

I do not surrender my treasures, nor do I share them. The fortune of my spirit is not to be blown into coins of brass and flung to the winds as alms for the poor of the spirit. I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom.

I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.

I am neither foe nor friend to my brothers, but such as each of them shall deserve of me. And to earn my love, my brothers must do more than to have been born. I do not grand my love without reason, nor to any chance passer-by who may wish to claim it. I honor men with my love. But honor is a thing to be earned.

I shall choose my friends among men, but neither slaves nor masters. And I shall choose only such as please me, and them I shall love and respect, but neither command nor obey. And we shall join our hands when we wish, or walk alone when we so desire. For in the temple of his spirit, each man is alone. Let each man keep his temple untouched and undefiled. Then let him join hands with others if he wishes, but only beyond his holy threshold. Ayn Rand, Anthem

Go here to see the original:

Anthem Quotes by Ayn Rand - Goodreads

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Anthem Quotes by Ayn Rand – Goodreads

The Fountainhead Reading Group with Andrew Bernstein – The Objective Standard

Posted: at 10:49 am

Heres an opportunity to enrich your life with a deep dive into Ayn Rands soul-fueling novel The Fountainhead.

Its the story of Howard Roarkan independent thinker, architect, and innovator, who refuses ever to compromise his principlesand his battle against the collectivist, tradition-oriented, authority-worshiping status quo. Its theme, as Rand put it, is individualism versus collectivism, not in politics, but in mans soul.

Relevant today, wouldnt you say?

Beginning January 24, renowned Rand scholar Dr. Andrew Bernstein will lead a series of weekly discussions about this rich book and its powerful ideas. Whether youre reading it for the first time or the tenth, youll deepen your understanding and enjoyment of Ayn Rands ode to individualism.

Join Dr. Bernstein and readers from all over the world for a series of fun and enlightening discussions about this path-breaking book.

Full scholarships are available to students and young adults aged 29 and under.

For details or to enroll in The Fountainhead Reading Group, click here.

I hope youll join the discussion!

Craig is cofounder and editor in chief of The Objective Standard, cofounder and director of education at Objective Standard Institute, and executive director of Prometheus Foundation. He is the author of Loving Life: The Morality of Self-Interest and the Facts that Support It; Rational Egoism: The Morality for Human Flourishing; and the forthcoming Moral Truths Your Parents, Preachers, and Teachers Dont Want You to Know. He is currently working on his fourth book, Thinking in Principles. For updates on his work, join his mailing list atCraigBiddle.com.

Read the original:

The Fountainhead Reading Group with Andrew Bernstein - The Objective Standard

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on The Fountainhead Reading Group with Andrew Bernstein – The Objective Standard

Bice: U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson blames LBJ and Great Society for high percentage of out-of-wedlock births – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Posted: at 10:49 am

If U.S. Sen. Ron Johnsonmade a New Year's resolution to take a more measured approach when discussing public policy, it didn't take him long to break it.

Because the state's most polarizing politician is already back to offering his often wild and controversial take on things in 2022.

Johnson who last year advised using mouthwash to combat COVID-19 and labeled Social Security a Ponzi scheme has already roped God into his bizarre take on vaccines and againquestioned the seriousness of last year's Capitol riot.

Now he's taking on a new topic: out-of-wedlock births.

And who's to blame for the rate of unmarried childbearing in the U.S.? Former President Lyndon Baines Johnson, the architect of the Great Society.

LBJ, of course, died nearly 50 years ago.

"You know, we had a booming economy and people were lifting themselves out of poverty (in the 1960s). But then we instituted the Great Society programs," the second-term Wisconsin Republican told Lou Dobbs' on "The Great America Show" podcast last week.

The Great Society was an alphabet soup of social and antipoverty programs that Johnson, a Democrat, pushed through Congress in the 1960s. They includedfood stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, Head Start, federal educational funding, housing assistance andincreased welfare spending.

But Johnson the Wisconsin senator, not the former president said the programs did little to eliminate poverty.

"But you know what skyrocketed? Out-of-wedlock birth rates," Johnson told Dobbs. "Back in the mid-'60s, probably on average, somewhere between 5%and 10%of births were out of wedlock. Now, nationally, we're over 40%."

Johnson, a devotee of libertarian writer Ayn Rand,wasn't done giving his take on the Great Society.

"Why aren't we looking at that and, gee, what caused that?" he said. "You know, could it be the Great Society programs that made it possible for, you know, single motherhood?That actually discouraged fathers from being present in the home, because you won't get the benefits then.

"You have to look at the cause and effect of these things, as opposed to just the intentions," he concluded.

If it were only that simple.

Yes, 40% of all births were to unwed mothers in 2019, the latest year for which data is available, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The percentage is actually down slightly from its high in 2009 and has been largely flat for a decade.

And it's true that the percentage of children born out of wedlock is way up from 1960, shortly before the Great Society proposals were enacted. The figure was only 5% back then.

But just because there has been a rapid increase in unmarried births since LBJ launched his "war on poverty" doesn't mean the two are connected.

"Correlation does not mean causation," said Timothy Smeeding,professor of economics and public affairs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In other words, if two variables run parallel historically, it doesn't mean the one is causing the other.

A number of factors have contributed to the rise in out-of-wedlock births, he said.

There has been a rise in cohabitation, more permissive sexual mores, a decline in shotgun weddings, easier divorce laws, a drop in manufacturing jobs formales without college degrees andgreater financial independence for women.

And that's just for starters.

The good thing, he said, is the decline in teenage pregnancies around the country. He said more and more parents are thinking about what they are doing and making better choices.

"Can you just attribute it to the Great Society programs?" Smeeding asked. "No."

One other mistake Johnson is making is conflating welfare with Johnson's Great Society. Some of the largest welfare programs, such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children, were created under then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1930s.

Douglas J. Besharov, a public policy professor at the University of Maryland, said the Wisconsin senator may be focusing on the Great Society because Black families were not allowed on most federal welfare programs before the 1950s and 1960s.

Some southern states, for instance, didn't permitfamilies to receive welfare benefits during picking season, effectively kicking Blacks off the welfare rolls.

In addition, Besharov said, a number of states enacted so-called "man-in-the-house"rules, which disqualified families from receiving welfare benefits if there wasanadult male present in the household. He said this ended updiscouragingfemale welfare recipients from seeking to get married.

So, in short, there may be some basis for what Johnson is saying.

But Besharov said, in truth, many other factors have drivenup the percentage of out-of-wedlock births over the last 60 years, ranging from changing attitudes about marriage and sex to the misuse of contraceptives that lead to unplanned pregnancies.

"What I'm really trying to say to you is," he said, "there are loads of reasons."

As it turns out, this isn't exactly a new issue for Johnson.

In 1997,Johnson,who has assets worth between $16.5 million and $78.1 million, set up a trust for his three children, according to a 2016 story on Salon.com. Most of the document is boilerplate.

Butunderthe section labeled"termination of benefits," Johnson and his wife said theirchildren could be cut off from receiving their share of the trust if they engaged in criminal behavior, such as two unrelated felonies,or had "more than one child"without being married.

"As it reads, it seems that his kids are allowedone felonyorone child out of wedlock, and after that, they'recut off," the Salon story said. "While there's no way to know how big Johnson'strust is, odds are that it's huge;heis a very wealthy man, after all."

Contact Daniel Bice at (414) 313-6684 ordbice@jrn.com. Follow him on Twitter @DanielBiceor on Facebook atfb.me/daniel.bice.

Our subscribers make this reporting possible. Please consider supporting local journalism by subscribing to the Journal Sentinel at jsonline.com/deal.

Originally posted here:

Bice: U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson blames LBJ and Great Society for high percentage of out-of-wedlock births - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Bice: U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson blames LBJ and Great Society for high percentage of out-of-wedlock births – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Who is Ray Epps? Who is John Galt? – Washington Times

Posted: at 10:49 am

OPINION:

Sen. Ted Cruz, in a Senate hearing, questioned the FBIs Jill Sanborn about the identity and activities of a man, Ray Epps, who was caught on video calling for Jan. 6, 2021, protesters to physically enter the U.S. Capitol; who was catcalled by others on Capitol Hill that day as a fed; and who was mysteriously listed then delisted from the bureaus wanted for questioning-slash-arrest list of Jan. 6 offenders. Good questions. But for the answer, it was mostly crickets.

Who is Ray Epps? Cruz asked.

Who is John Galt? might as well have been Sanborns answer.

Thats like saying, a la Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged-like, Who knows? or Why ask me how would I know?

The left wants it believed that Epps is a figment of far-right conspiracy theory imaginations.

House Jan. 6 Committee debunks Capitol riot conspiracy theory around obscure rallygoer, USA Today wrote.

Jan. 6 Committee Knocks Down False Flag Conspiracy Pushed by Tucker [Carlson, of Fox News] and Cruz, The Daily Beast wrote.

Jan. 6 committee dismisses Ray Epps conspiracy theory, issues new subpoenas, NBC News wrote.

Jan. 6 Panel Seeks to Debunk Unfounded Theory About F.B.I. Role in Riot, The New York Times wrote.

Yet, video clearly shows Epps instructing others in the Jan. 6 crowds last year on Capitol Hill to go into the congressional building by saying, at one point, I dont even like to say it because Ill be arrested. Ill say it. We need to go into the Capitol, and at another point, we need to go into the Capitol, into the Capitol. The crowd, as captured on video, then chants at Epps, fed, fed, fed. Another video shows Epps yelling at a different crowd, OK, folks, spread the word. As soon as the president is done speaking, we got to the Capitol. The Capitol is this direction.

FBI plant?

A false flag event?

Epps denies he was a plant. The Democrats Jan. 6 committee scoffs at both notions Epps as a plant; Jan. 6 as fueled by the FBI and dismisses such talk as right-wing conspiracy.

But his name was removed from the Justice Departments Jan. 6 suspect list. And Americans arent told why.

Federal prosecutors have charged more than 700 for inciting riots, disorderly conduct, civil disorder and other reasons but Epps, videotaped calling for crowds to enter the Capitol, is not among the 700. Epps, videotaped for doing basically what Democrats say President Trump did incite illegal and criminal acts of violence is not among the 700. Why? Why not?

Who is Ray Epps?

Who is John Galt?

Unfortunately, Cruzsaid in the aftermath of his unsuccessful questioning of Sanborn, under Joe Biden, we have seen an incredibly partisan Department of Justice. And both the Department of Justice and the FBI have an arrogance that they are not accountable to anyone, that they can stonewall.

Ahem, Russia collusion.

Gesundheit, Steele dossier.

The Justice Department is hardly blind or nonpartisan. Asking questions about Ray Epps, in this definitely partisan atmosphere, in this day and age of weaponizing the Deep State for political gain, certainly seems in line with both Americanism and logic. Given what we know about the use of federal law enforcement to tap journalists records, to fabricate Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court documents, to spy on American citizens, itd actually be less sane to not raise questions about Epps.

Trusting in government is just not called for at this point.

Cruz asks what all the American people who arent obedient sheep and tools of the left want to know: Did federal agents or their informants commit crimes on Jan. 6? Did agents or informants encourage others to commit crimes? Was Ray Epps a fed?

Sir, I cannot answer that question, Sanborn said.

Sir, I cannot answer that question, Sanborn said again.

Why not? Why not just say yes or no and put an end to the debate?

Who is John Galt?

The duck and dodge from our I am zee law public servants continues.

Cheryl Chumley can be reached atcchumley@washingtontimes.comor on Twitter, @ckchumley. Listen to her podcast Bold and Blunt byclicking HERE. And never miss her column; subscribe to her newsletter byclicking HERE. Her latest book, Socialists Dont Sleep: Christians Must Rise Or America Will Fall, is available byclickingHERE.

View original post here:

Who is Ray Epps? Who is John Galt? - Washington Times

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Who is Ray Epps? Who is John Galt? – Washington Times

Meet the anti-conservation Republican vying to unseat Cheney – E&E News

Posted: at 10:49 am

Rep. Liz Cheneys Republican primary challenger is leaning on her decades of legal fights against the federal governments natural resources policy in her battle against the incumbent.

Harriet Hageman, an attorney, entered the race for Wyomings sole House seat in September on a platform of complete alignment with former President Trump, amid Cheneys outspoken opposition to the former president over his involvement with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building and other actions.

But Hageman is also presenting herself as the better candidate to fight what she sees as overreach by President Bidens administration. Shes pointing to her legal work, battling against policies like Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves and conservation of national forests, to show that shes the candidate to represent Wyomings interests.

"Ive taken on the EPA, Ive taken on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Ive taken on the USDA," she said last month on "Bannons War Room," the podcast hosted by former Trump strategist Steve Bannon.

Asked whether she could handle when Cheney "plays hardball," Hageman said shes shown shes ready.

"So does the federal government. So does the EPA. They play to win," she said. "One of the things about going up against, say, the EPA is that they have unlimited resources. And when theyre going out and doing a test case, for example, trying to take over irrigation in northern Wyoming, theyre going to throw everything that they have at it to do that," she continued.

Hageman and her campaign didnt respond to requests from E&E News for an interview or to expand on her legal work.

Hageman currently is senior litigation counsel for the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a group that takes on conservative legal causes to fight against environmental regulations, Covid-19 mitigation measures, campaign finance restrictions, taxes and more.

Her work has almost always put her on the opposite side of the conservation community.

"Although Harriet Hageman more recently is known for her flip-flop to support Trump and challenge her previous confidant Liz Cheney, she has a long history with environmental and conservation groups," said Dan Smitherman, Wyoming state director at the Wilderness Society.

"Most of her work was with private property, water and grazing rights, but she forged a legitimate reputation as an anti-public lands sagebrush rebellion lawyer and pro-ranching, anti-wolf advocate," he said.

Hageman said last month on the radio show "Wake Up Wyoming" that her first big case after she launched her own law firm in 2001 was representing the state of Wyoming in challenging the U.S. Forest Services roadless rule, when was written in the final days of President Clintons administration. The case resulted in a 2003 federal court injunction, which the administration of President George W. Bush didnt appeal.

Smitherman estimated that the roadless rule litigation had "the most significant impacts" on conservation.

In another notable case, Hageman represented David Hamilton, a Wyoming landowner, in his battle against EPAs 2007 determination that an irrigation ditch violated the Clean Water Act. "After a two-week trial, we prevailed in that case, and the EPA lost. Because we were right. The Clean Water Act does not apply to his activities," she said on "Wake Up Wyoming.

Hageman worked for many years for an industry coalition in Wyoming to get the gray wolfs Endangered Species Act protections removed, and in 2009 fought the Department of Agricultures determination that certain cattle transported between states need electronic tags.

At times, however, her legal work on behalf of industry has been in opposition to local decisionmakers. In one case, she successfully represented a gravel company in challenging a Wyoming countys decision to block a gravel mine operation, according to the Wyoming Tribune Eagle.

More recently, shes been sounding the alarm on Bidens "30 x 30" initiative, also known as "America the Beautiful," which aims to conserve 30 percent of the nations land and waters by 2030 (E&E Daily, Dec. 20, 2021). She argues its a "land grab," a threat to Wyoming and an attempt by Democrats to hasten the decline of rural America.

"The federal government under Joe Biden and radical Democrats are intent on taking over and federalizing our private property rights under the auspices or claim of combating climate change. This is a U.N.-driven, unlawful land grab that would be devastating to the economy in this country and dramatically alter the very nature of private property rights and who and what the United States is," she said on the "Working Ranch Radio Show."

The Biden administration has fought back against similar arguments, saying the conservation efforts are completely voluntary and the government is not seeking to take anyones land.

Hageman grew up on a ranch near Fort Laramie, Wyo., where she said she and her siblings had to move cows, fix fences and do other work on a regular basis. She studied at the University of Wyoming, where she got both a bachelors degree and a law degree.

Between her legal and advocacy work, Hageman has been active in Republican politics and campaign finance. She was a previous Republican National Committee representative for Wyoming and ran unsuccessfully for governor in 2018.

She was also an ally to Cheney previously and was a critic of Trump, working in 2016 to stop his presidential nomination. But she later became an ally to him, and Cheneys increasing estrangement from him led her to abandon the lawmaker.

"We sent her to Washington, D.C., to be an ally of Donald Trump, and shes turned into a mortal enemy of not just Donald Trump but the America First agenda, she told Bannon.

Hageman cites her work not only to show her dedication to ranching, oil and natural gas, and other industries, but also to argue that Cheney has abandoned Wyomings priorities.

For example, she says its malpractice that Cheney isnt on the House Natural Resources Committee. She was on the panel in her first two terms.

"The Natural Resources Committee this is one of the first times in our history that we dont have anybody on that all-important committee. That tells you where her priorities are," Hageman said on Bannons show.

Cheneys campaign declined to respond to Hagemans comments.

When she met with Trump last year to ask for his endorsement before launching her campaign, Hageman brought up energy and regulations as two of her top priorities.

"The two primary issues I discussed with him were energy independence and what he did in terms of regulatory reform. I thanked him for his work in that regard," she said.

Myron Ebell, who used to work for a think tank launched by former Republican Wyoming Rep. Malcolm Wallop, said hes gotten to know Hageman through her New Civil Liberties Alliance work. Hes hopeful that she can win, get a spot on the Natural Resources Committee and be a champion for industries like agriculture and energy.

"She is a hardcore conservative. But she also has establishment Republican connections, which I think will serve her well," said Ebell, who leads energy and environment policy at the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute and led Trumps transition team for EPA.

"She has the expertise thats needed on the committee on a lot of federal lands issues. And shes very strong on property rights and the rights of federal land users."

Cheney, Ebell said, had a good Republican voting record on Natural Resources but "wasnt really interested in those issues."

Ebell expects Hageman will follow in the mold of "some of the really strong people" on Natural Resources, like GOP Reps. Tom McClintock of California, Matt Rosendale of Montana, Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Paul Gosar of Arizona, who lost his spot on the panel last year when Democrats stripped him of his committee assignments.

Cheney has projected confidence in the face of Hagemans challenge and hasnt backed away from her Trump criticism.

She continues to pursue action on energy and other key Wyoming industries, and has argued that her record of fighting against regulations and for increased oil and natural gas production, among other priorities, puts her ahead in the race (E&E Daily, Sept. 10, 2021).

Cheney has also been active in fighting Bidens energy and natural resources policies. Shes introduced legislation to combat the "30 x 30" conservation plan, worked to block Bidens executive actions targeting fossil fuels and proposed to compensate states for any revenue they lose due to Bidens fossil fuel policies.

She was also aligned closely with Trumps deregulatory and energy agenda. She was the lead sponsor of the 2017 legislation that Trump signed to undo former President Obamas "BLM Planning 2.0" rule that sought to overhaul how the Bureau of Land Management oversees its vast acreage which Cheney and other opponents said would have curtailed local voices in land decisions (E&E News PM, March 27, 2017).

The primary is scheduled for Aug. 16, ahead of the Nov. 8 general election. The winner of the primary is expected to easily win the November race.

See more here:

Meet the anti-conservation Republican vying to unseat Cheney - E&E News

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Meet the anti-conservation Republican vying to unseat Cheney – E&E News

Police break up fracas at Southern California Republican meeting – The Mercury News

Posted: at 10:49 am

Police were called to step in after a group of conservatives wearing orange shirts that said RINO hunters, with crosshairs making a target of the O, tried to storm a Republican Party of Orange County meeting in Costa Mesa on Monday night.

The group was led by Nick Taurus, a self-proclaimed American Nationalist who last year spearheaded a protest during a town hall for Rep. Katie Porter, D-Irvine, that turned violent. After provocation from Taurus group, a Porter supporter threw a punch and was arrested.

Taurus, R-Laguna Hills, is now challenging GOP Rep. Young Kim in the CA-40 House race. Hes labeled Kim, whos been endorsed by the OCGOP as a RINO, a derogatory name used by the far-right for more moderate politicians who they deem Republican in name only.

The clash reflects a growing schism in the Republican party, pitting those who strive to elect GOP candidates in purple areas like Orange County, and those on the far right, who remain fiercely loyal to former President Donald Trump.

The party said on Jan. 12 that because of the coronavirus surge attendance at Monday nights OCGOP meeting which was aimed at endorsing candidates for the 2022 election cycle would be limited to members of the Central Committee due to the coronavirus surge.

There are important endorsement requests that must be voted on, but we recognize the spike in covid cases across Orange County, the announcement said. It is important that we as a party take care of business, but we must also take care of ourselves and each other.

But some local Republicans didnt agree with that decision.

Photos and videos shared to social media show a couple dozen people wearing orange RINO shirts in the lobby of the building where the meeting was being held. A witness told the Register one member tried to push past people at the door, grabbing at the handle to get inside. Police then are seen directing the protestors outside, while other people are waved by and allowed into the meeting room.

Once outside, Taurus is seen in videos, wearing a make America great again hat, arguing with GOP Latino activist Jesse Suave over amnesty for undocumented immigrants. Taurus supporters and Suave engaged in verbal clashes, with shouts to back the f up and saying what are you going to do?

Costa Mesa Police say they were called to the meeting at 6:39 p.m. Monday on reports that a group of about 20 demonstrators were refusing to leave the private political meeting, according to department spokesperson Roxi Fyad. Officers contacted the demonstrators, told them to take it to the sidewalk, and they complied, Fyad said.

No one was detained, she said, and police werent aware of any physical altercation.

A spokesman for the county GOP offered a written statement that included this:

The Costa Mesa Police Department was called when (a) group continued to disrupt our meeting and the business of the venue.

As a party, we welcome a healthy debate of ideas. That cannot occur in the manner these individuals conducted themselves. The safety of our members, guests and staff are of the utmost importance to our organization.

Taurus has been involved in multiple protests that have turned physical in the past, including free speech rallies at Cal State FullertonandOrange Coast College in 2017. Videos circulating on social media also show him disrupting a 2020 racial justice protest in Yorba Linda. In that video he is seen stealing and ripping up someones Black Lives Matter sign. His social media posts tout conspiracy theories about the Clinton family, the gay mafia and anti-White racism.

After the incident at Porters town hall, Taurus said in a live Instagram video that someone from the Republican Party of Orange County sent an invitation for his group to attend the Democrats town hall and press Porter about what shes doing to help eastern O.C.s 45th District. Now, Taurus said via social media, his group is being shut out by the same party.

Brian Burley, an OCGOP Central Committee member whos running against Porter in the new 47th District, said the crowd was loud but calm when he walked into the meeting. He said he never had any safety concerns, and everyone was gone by the time he left at 9:45 p.m.

Burley had asked party Chair Fred Whitaker in a public letter Jan. 5 to postpone the endorsement meeting following the death of party leader Kelly Ernby. He clashed with Whitaker last election cycle, when he was facing Michelle Steel in the CA-48 race, over the party making early endorsements of establishment candidates.

Ernby had been planning to run for the 72nd Assembly District before her death early this month from COVID-19. On Monday night, the OCGOP endorsed Diane Dixon for the seat.

Staff writer Eric Licas contributed to this report.

See the rest here:

Police break up fracas at Southern California Republican meeting - The Mercury News

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Police break up fracas at Southern California Republican meeting – The Mercury News

Dietz Files as Republican for 65th House District Seat – The River City News

Posted: at 10:49 am

Edgewood attorney Stephanie Dietz announced her candidacy Tuesday for the 65th House District seat.

The seat is currently held by Democrat Buddy Wheatley, of Covington.

Dietz, a Republican, would be a new resident of the 65th though she has lived in Edgewood for 25 years.

Newly drawn legislative maps, already approved by the Republican-dominated Kentucky General Assembly, shifts the currently urban-centric 65th to more suburban parts of Kenton County, including Edgewood and Crestview Hills.

The legislation approving the new House districts has not yet been signed or vetoed by Democratic Governor Andy Beshear.

We need a representative who will work collaboratively with Republicans and Democrats to ensure Kenton County continues to be a safe, vibrant community where

parents can raise a family and where economic opportunities exist for everyone," Dietz said in an announcement. "I have spent over two decades working for Kenton County families and look forward to standing up for all of our communities if I am fortunate enough to serve in Frankfort.

Dietz operates Dietz Family Law and was an unsuccessful candidate for Kenton County Family Court judge in 2014. She has practiced law for more than 27 years. She is currently vice president of the Northern Kentucky Bar Association and is the current president of the Academy of Northern Kentucky Collaborative Law Professionals, an organization that she said she helped found.

Dietz is a certified family law mediator and coached the mock trial team at Covington Catholic High School.

Northern Kentucky is a conservative area. However, the 65th district representative does not reflect those values in Frankfort and that is why I am running," Dietz said. "I have spent my life and career serving others, and hope to continue that service in Frankfort. This campaign will be about who best represents the 65th district and who can be most effective in Frankfort and I look forward to the opportunity to meet even more of my fellow Northern Kentuckians on the campaign trail.

Wheatley, who is serving his second term representing the 65th District, has filed for reelection. He is one of two Democrats in the Northern Kentucky Legislative Caucus. Rep. Rachel Roberts (D-Newport) has also seen her 67th House district redrawn, and observers have argued that it also would become more Republican-friendly.

Dietz is a graduate of the University of Kentucky and Northern Kentucky University's Salmon P. Chase College of Law. She and her husband, Jim, have two college-aged sons.

Correction:An earlier version of this story reported that the 65th House District would include Lakeside Park as part of its new boundaries. That is not correct. The article has been updated to reference Crestview Hills instead.

-Michael Monks, editor & publisher

Photo provided

More:

Dietz Files as Republican for 65th House District Seat - The River City News

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Dietz Files as Republican for 65th House District Seat – The River City News

Republican anger, progressive concern combine in push to ban political spending by utilities – Fauquier Times

Posted: at 10:49 am

Legislative proposals to curb Virginia utilities political contributions may be gaining new traction in Richmond as old resentments over a 2015 utility rate freeze law combine with progressive Democrats skepticism of utility influence and Republican anger over Dominion Energys contributions to a shadowy PAC attacking Gov. Glenn Youngkin during the 2021 elections.

Del. Lee Ware, R-Powhatan, said proposals by him, Sen. Chap Petersen, D-Fairfax, and Sen. Richard Stuart, R-Stafford, have a very good chance at clearing the Republican-controlled House of Delegates. Petersen said he expects the support of a portion of Democrats in the Senate they narrowly control.

I cant get them all. I certainly cant get the ones that are more senior in leadership, said Petersen during a news conference Monday with Ware. But I can get a portion of my caucus.

Garren Shipley, a spokesperson for House Republicans, said party members havent discussed [the bills] at length yet as a caucus.

State Sen. Chap Petersen, D-Fairfax City.

Petersen also called on Youngkin to throw his support behind the proposals. Both he and Ware said they had spoken to the new governor, with Ware indicating Youngkin sees some affinity with their goals, but the administration has taken no public stance on the legislation.

The commonwealth needs the new governor to take a firm stand on this issue, and my hope is that will change the dynamic, said Petersen.

Political contributions by utilities have been a hot-button issue in Virginia in recent years largely due to Dominion, the states largest electric utility and for many years the biggest corporate donor in state politics. Many of the loudest voices for reform have come from an influx of progressive Democrats starting in 2017, who in a lot of ways moved the needle on this issue, said Petersen, an early proponent of restrictions on public service corporation political giving.

In last years race for governor, the company sparked particular outrage among Republicans by bankrolling amysterious PAC effortmeant to depress turnout for Youngkin in rural areas. At the time, Dominion claimed it was unaware of the PACs activities, but post-election financial disclosures show the utility and its executives provided almost half the money the PAC received,according to Cardinal News.

Factions of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed discomfort with what they describe as Dominions outsize influence over the General Assembly, which has passed a series of laws favorable to the utility over the past decade, including a controversial rate freeze in 2015 that remained in place until 2018 and broughtin hundreds of millions of dollarsin excess profits, according to state regulators.

While utilities such as Dominion are great companies, Ware said Monday, they need to be responsible to the State Corporation Commission and not use massive lobbying monies and a large lobbying corps to get around and get what they want from the assembly.

Similarly, Petersen described a scenario where you have a state monopoly, a state utility thats not just donating money to campaigns, but also doing so in a way that frankly can be devious, that can be perhaps intended to mislead voters as opposed to inform voters, where again you have a monopolistic company that has a captive audience that is spreading money around the General Assembly and using that to structure the state law.

Asked about its stance on Petersen and Wares legislation and Petersens comments, Dominion spokesperson Rayhan Daudani said in an email that campaign finance laws should apply to all equally.

The anti-Youngkin ads Dominion helped finance have also inspired a push to tighten state laws on when PACs have to report their spending activity.Legislationsponsored by Sen. David Suetterlein, R-Roanoke County, would require PACs to report large pre-election expenditures of $1,000 or more, bringing more immediate transparency while votes are being cast rather than after an election is over.

In a floor speech Monday, Suetterlein said the Dominion-backed ads, which portrayed Youngkin as soft on guns, were most unusual.

There is no excuse for what happened, he said. We need more disclosure in this commonwealth.

Last year, Youngkins campaign responded to the ad controversy by suggesting entrenched interests were rallying behind his opponent, former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, because they were afraid of his outsider status. However, after Youngkins victory, Dominion donated $50,000 to his inaugural committee,according to the Virginia Public Access Project.

Asked Monday where the governor stands on reining in utility donations, Youngkin spokesperson Macaulay Porter said: The governor will review all legislation that comes to his desk.

See more here:

Republican anger, progressive concern combine in push to ban political spending by utilities - Fauquier Times

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Republican anger, progressive concern combine in push to ban political spending by utilities – Fauquier Times