The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2021
The Battle in Congress for Cryptocurrency Tax Reporting Rules Who Will Win? – eisneramper.com
Posted: August 24, 2021 at 10:24 am
For the last several years, the IRS has effectively had carte blanche on governing cryptocurrency (crypto) tax rules, even though nothing specific to crypto has ever been written into law. By virtue of the ongoing negotiations of the infrastructure bill, Congress has finally come around to writing crypto tax law into the Internal Revenue Code by revising the outdated language of the term broker and also providing a definition for digital assets. While the proposed definition of digital assets was fairly self-explanatory and not controversial, the finagling with the term broker when it comes to crypto has effectively started a war.
Initially, the thought of having clear, common sense regulations of tax reporting by various crypto exchanges was not a surprise. To many it was widely expected. However, those non-threatening expectations came crashing down once the bill language was released to the public on the expanded definition of a broker to determine which crypto businesses would have to prepare burdensome year-end tax reporting requirements to its customers (e.g., 1099s), similar to regular equity investment brokers. The expanded broker definition included the following insertion: any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets."
The uproar from this proposed language was deafening from the individual bitcoin miner to the largest corporations and household-name business leaders. Pro-crypto senators on a largely bipartisan basis expressed outrage at the broad language of this provision through various media interviews and tweets. For those that understand the intricacies of blockchain, they realize that it is not just about buying and selling digital assets similar to standard stock trading. There are multiple noncustodial services of a blockchain that could technically fall into the above definition such as crypto miners and validators, smart contract service providers, DeFi platforms, non-fungible token (NFT) marketplaces, and even certain software and protocol developers. Many of these businesses obtain their consideration through fractional shares of certain crypto (such as Bitcoin or Ether), and not direct compensation from a known customer. The prospect of having all of these industries provide year-end tax reporting to each individual involved in a crypto transaction (such as dates, cost basis and proceeds of each transaction) would not only be oppressive, but would unwind several privacy and confidentiality elements one of the pillars of blockchain. Some lawmakers have cautioned it could suffocate innovation in the U.S. or push crypto businesses to look elsewhere. Ironically, such tax reporting requirements on all ancillary crypto businesses may not even contribute one dollar of income tax revenue, which runs counter to a key funding goal of the infrastructure bill.
As the conflict raged on and senators heard the pleas from the crypto universe, a hero amendment emerged from the fog. The Senate came to an apparent unanimous consent to update the language of the broker crypto addition that essentially puts the proposed tax reporting requirements in the hands of crypto exchanges, such as Coinbase, and non-exchange crypto businesses would be largely exempt, including miners, validators and software developers. When it appeared certain that all 100 senators would vote in favor of the new amendment, which is required in this case and not merely a majority, it was defeated by Richard Shelby (R-AL) who would not vote in favor of the amendment without getting an extra $50 billion of new military infrastructure spending a separate request that was ultimately denied. Although senators shook their heads at this move, there was nothing that could be done in accordance with Senate rules. Therefore, the bill could only pass with the original crypto language (as shown above) and we are back to square one in the battle as the House now takes over.
The good news is that although the Senate failed to amend the broker provision regarding crypto exchanges, the Congressional Blockchain Caucus in the House (made up of about 30 members) has already stated they are prepared to roll up the sleeves and update the broker language so it gets included in the eventual House version of the bill. Assuming passage in the House, the bill would then go to Conference Committee, where the Senate and House work out any language differences on each version of the bill. Knowing that 99 Senators already voted yes to the amended crypto tax reporting language to focus on exchanges, there would appear to be a low chance of failure.
Even if the crypto tax reporting rules ultimately stay broad in the final version of the infrastructure bill, the tax reporting changes are not slated to take effect until 2024. This scenario would allow plenty of time for a new bill to be crafted that could revive the more favorable amendment noted above, or at least provide crypto companies with a necessary time cushion to prepare. If Congress fails to act, it could act as a catalyst for crypto companies to look outside the U.S. and setup operations in friendlier locations.
View post:
The Battle in Congress for Cryptocurrency Tax Reporting Rules Who Will Win? - eisneramper.com
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on The Battle in Congress for Cryptocurrency Tax Reporting Rules Who Will Win? – eisneramper.com
1 Smart Way to Invest in Dogecoin Without Buying Cryptocurrency – The Motley Fool
Posted: at 10:24 am
Dogecoin (CRYPTO:DOGE) investors have been on a wild ride this year. Between January and May, its price skyrocketed over 15,000% to a little over $0.74, only to lose more than half of its value just weeks later. But as of this writing, Dogecoin is still up about 6,700% year to date, and the price has been climbing consistently over the past month.
Investors may see this as an opportunity -- perhaps the Shiba Inu is finally back on track to reach the moon! But before you make any decisions, it's important to consider the risks and weigh all of your options. For instance, there are ways to get Dogecoin exposure in your portfolio without actually buying any cryptocurrency. Let's dive in.
Image source: Getty Images.
Dogecoin started as a joke, but it has garnered a substantial following on social platforms like Reddit and TikTok. In fact, earlier this year, Dogecoin surpassed Bitcoin to become the most mentioned cryptocurrency on Twitter. And of course, Elon Musk added fuel to that fire with a series of amusing tweets mentioning Dogecoin.
But here's the problem: Dogecoin's value is based solely on its popularity, and popularity is fickle. The tide can quite literally turn overnight, and that's exactly what happened in May. More to the point, despite a huge social following, Dogecoin is still worth a fraction of Bitcoin's total market value, and it doesn't offer the programmability of other blockchains like Ethereum. In short, nothing significant differentiates Dogecoin from the thousands of other cryptocurrencies that now exist.
There's also another problem: Dogecoin is difficult to value. Investors use metrics like revenue, earnings, and discounted cash flows to value stocks. But Dogecoin isn't a cash-generating business, nor is it an interest-generating asset like a bond. For that reason, speculating on Dogecoin's future price is more akin to gambling.
Of course, that doesn't mean its price is going to plummet. Someone always wins the lottery, and a year from now, Dogecoin could be worth 10 times what it is today. Or it could be worth less than $0.01, just like it was nine months ago. Regardless, it's a very risky investment.
Image source: Getty Images.
Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) helps its clients participate in the cryptoeconomy, the burgeoning ecosystem that includes assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin, as well as non-fungible tokens (NFTs), smart contracts, and decentralized financial (DeFi) applications.
The company serves 68 million users, including retail investors, institutions, and ecosystem partners. Its platform offers a range of products such as analytics software, developer tools, and mobile wallet services. However, Coinbase is primarily a brokerage, and 85%of its revenue came from transaction feesduring the most recent quarter.
Put another way, Coinbase thrives when the crypto market is volatile: Higher trading volume means more transaction fees, and that means more revenue for the company. So, if you're interested in Dogecoin -- or any other cryptocurrency -- Coinbase can help you capitalize on that volatility, whether the price is moving up or down.
For instance, consider the company's financial performance through the first half of 2021. As Dogecoin and the broader crypto market soared in the first quarter, then crashed in the second, Coinbase posted incredible growth on both the top and bottom lines.
Metric
H1 2020
H1 2021
Change
Revenue
$377 million
$4.03 billion
969%
Earnings per share
$0.15
$9.60
6,300%
Source: Coinbase SEC Filings. Note: earnings per share is based on diluted share count.
More importantly, Coinbase has differentiated itself from other brokerages through significant investments in cybersecurity and regulatory compliance. In fact, it secures clients' funds with the largest hot wallet crime program in the insurance market. And the company currently holds $180 billion in assets on its platform, or 11.2% of all existing crypto assets, making it a trusted brand name. As a result, some Wall Street analysts see significant upside for shareholders.
Here's the bottom line: Coinbase is by no means a risk-free investment. Since its initial public offering in April, the stock has plunged over 30% from its opening price. But I do think it's less risky than buying Dogecoin outright, simply because Coinbase is a cash-generating business that doesn't depend on the success of any single cryptocurrency.
That's why this stock looks like a smart way to get Dogecoin exposure in your portfolio without actually buying any Dogecoin.
This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the official recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. Were motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.
See the article here:
1 Smart Way to Invest in Dogecoin Without Buying Cryptocurrency - The Motley Fool
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on 1 Smart Way to Invest in Dogecoin Without Buying Cryptocurrency – The Motley Fool
America Is Behind on Cryptocurrency Adoption: Report – The Daily Hodl
Posted: at 10:24 am
HodlX Guest PostSubmit Your Post
The US has one of the lowest cryptocurrency adoption rates, according to Finders global cryptocurrency adoption report, which compares ownership rates across 27 countries.
A survey of over 42,000 people across the 27 countries reveals that just 9% of Americans report owning cryptocurrency, which is 10% less than the global average of 19%. In fact, the only other country with a lower adoption rate than the US is the United Kingdom at 8%.
How do these low numbers compare to the rest of the world? Lets take a look at some major markets.
Countries in Asia took the top five spots in the adoption rankings list:
Of the European countries included in the study, Belgium had the highest percentage of adults who reported owning cryptocurrency (26%). Italy and the Netherlands are the only two other European countries to have an above-average adoption rate. Germany, on the other hand, is far below average with an 11% reported adoption rate.
The three North American countries surveyed the US, Canada and Mexico all have below-average cryptocurrency adoption rates. Canada and Mexico are both sitting at 14%, which is lower than the global average but higher than the USs rate.
In line with global trends, men in the US are much more likely to own cryptocurrency than US women, with 12% of US men having reported owning cryptocurrency compared to just 6% of women, according to the report.
Of all the coins included in the study, the gender gap is most pronounced for Bitcoin (7% for men versus 2% for women). This is similar to a trend that can be seen across tech, but hopefully a push for more women in STEM fields will balance this over time.
Younger Americans are the most likely to own cryptocurrency, according to the report. Those between 25-34 years of age reported the highest ownership rates at 14%, followed by those aged 18-24 and those aged 35-44 (13% each).
The indication that younger adults are the most likely to own cryptocurrency is also reasonably consistent with global trends.Whether that is driven by a distrust of traditional systems, a quicker adaptability to new tech or something else entirely is currently unknown.
Zak Killermann is a writer atFinderwhos been specializing in cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology for four years, covering everything from ICO booms to crypto winters, memecoins and more. Hes mined and minted cryptocurrencies, and remembers the days when DOGE was just for fun. Zaks focus is on breaking down technical concepts (like yellow papers) for average folks to digest on their morning commutes. Before diving into all things crypto, Zak contributed to Finders money transfers vertical.
Follow Us on Twitter Facebook Telegram
Featured Image: Shutterstock/Color4260
Read more:
America Is Behind on Cryptocurrency Adoption: Report - The Daily Hodl
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on America Is Behind on Cryptocurrency Adoption: Report – The Daily Hodl
These are the three things you need to know before investing in cryptocurrency – Euronews
Posted: at 10:24 am
Investing in cryptocurrency can be as easy as a few taps on your phone, and with crypto all over the news and coming up in conversations with friends, it's tempting to dive right in.
However, depending on your financial situation and appetite for investment risks, crypto might not be appropriate for you right now - or ever.
"I am the biggest crypto hippie you'll talk to in a very long time," says Tyrone Ross, CEO of Onramp Invest, a cryptoasset platform for registered investment advisors. And yet, he cautions against it. "I don't think the general public should be investing in crypto".
Picture your finances as an ice cream sundae, with crypto as the cherry on top. It makes up a small proportion of the overall sundae, and not everyone wants one.
And before you fish that cherry out of the jar, you need to assemble the rest of your dessert. In non-ice-cream terms, that means creating a strong financial foundation and learning everything you can about crypto before you put any real money in.
First and foremost, you need to prepare for those times when things don't go as planned.
Over the past year, workers who lost income because of the pandemic had to tap into savings, take on debt or enter into hardship programs to afford their bills. This time has been a stark reminder of the importance of having an emergency fund.
"When you're young, you can feel like Superman or Superwoman, but when the bubble happens, you could easily be out of a job for nine to 12 months," says Theresa Morrison, a financial planner in Tucson, Arizona in the US. "Don't underestimate systemic shocks to the market".
Morrison recommends saving up six months of living expenses if you're single, or around three months if you share expenses with a working spouse or partner. But stashing away even a few hundred dollars can be helpful when you're faced with an unexpected expense. And if you have any high-interest debt, like credit card debt, paying this down can further strengthen your financial position.
Review your insurance coverage, too, because these policies can provide much-needed money during difficult times. Life insurance can be especially important if you have dependents.
Once you have money set aside for emergencies, begin thinking about your short, medium and long-term financial goals. Retirement is, of course, a big thing to save for, so contribute to retirement accounts (especially if you have access to a plan with an employer match). But set specific savings goals for other major life steps.
"Most people want to travel every year, buy a house in 10 years, get married in 10 years. These things cost money," Morrison says.
"Put down how much it'll cost in today's terms and figure out how much to save out of your paycheck every month. From my experience, that alone can be $1,000 (1,164) a month".
You've got the money and you're ready to jump on the crypto bandwagon, only you have no idea how someone even buys crypto. Or how it will fit into your overall financial plan. Or if it's too risky for you.
Time out. Don't do anything with your money that you don't understand. Dedicate some time to learning everything you can about crypto.
Understanding the mechanics is important, but so is learning what kind of investor you are, because that also affects the kinds of investments that would be a good fit for you.
"There's a process you have to go through to determine if this new asset class is right for you. What's your plan? How old are you? What are your goals? How tech-savvy are you? Do you understand what it means to hold these assets and have them not be insured? If something happens to you, who in your family knows about this stuff to retrieve it?" Ross says.
"People don't do the right due diligence before dumping money into something. I know that's not the sexy answer, but it's the truth".
Once you have a grasp on how it all works, you can begin to think about allocating some of your excess cash (after you pay your bills and meet your monthly savings goals) toward crypto. But keep your investment totals small and manageable. Ross recommends investing up to $500 (582) or so. This way, even if you lose it all, it's an amount you specifically budgeted.
"If you invest in crypto, think of it as dead money. Money you'll never get back," says Danny Lee, a financial planner in Denver.
"At the end of the day, it's going to be a speculative investment".
See the article here:
These are the three things you need to know before investing in cryptocurrency - Euronews
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on These are the three things you need to know before investing in cryptocurrency – Euronews
Quick 10 Ways to Protect Cryptocurrency Investments from Hacks – Analytics Insight
Posted: at 10:24 am
With demand for cryptocurrency, there also began a surge over cryptocurrency hacking. And since Bitcoin and Ethereum are gaining popularity, hackers are targeting these currencies to take advantage of the valuable assets. But how to keep your cryptos safe is the point here. So, the article discloses quick 10 ways to protect cryptocurrency investments. Lets quickly dive into the article to know more.
As online wallets are growing day by day, the chances of hacking your digital wallet also tend to grow. So using offline wallets should be used to store the majority of the users cryptocurrency by just placing a bit of currency in the online wallet.
Most people reuse passwords across their accounts, this method can put you at risk since the hackers may take advantage of your vulnerability. So setting a strong and unique password that is unlike the passwords of other accounts can secure your cryptocurrency account to a great extent. Also, it is vital to use two-factor authentication to be enabled for reducing the risk of getting hacked. This is one of the ways to protect cryptocurrency investments safely.
Before directly investing in cryptocurrency platforms, investors should also take a look at the security features that the platform is offering to secure their data. Choose a notable cryptocurrency wallet that has multifactor authentication and encryptions before making transactions.
Several investors of the cryptocurrency use mobile apps to manage it, and here your account can be hacked due to mobile phishing stealing your mobile credentials. So using antivirus software for their smartphones and tablets has been increasing due to people realizing its importance.
A crypto wallet is just not data and code but holds great value in terms of assets and money. So be aware of how you use it for the transactions and ensure that the networks and systems are not compromised in any case. This is one of the ways to protect cryptocurrency safely.
As most people investing in cryptocurrency have no firm technical background in the field, it is your responsibility to protect your money since banks are not at all responsible for it. The three most vital components to learn regarding cryptocurrency are secret key protection, recovery seed protection, and crypto-miner malware protection. These components can help you to a great extent.
The secret keys are personal, at any cost, this must not be disclosed to any people. The safe way to store your private key is through cold storage. It is printing your keys and erasing all the traces of the digital ways.
The other means of stirring bitcoin are through wallets on either laptops or desktops. Avoid using wallets hosted by the providers this can sometimes result in hacking by taking control of your cryptocurrency account. So rather use a hardware wallet to store private keys and details.
As cold wallets are entirely offline, they are required to write down the private address on the paper to which the owner has access to secure stored cryptocurrency. Here the drawback of a cold wallet is constantly transferring funds between exchanges and this can incur repetitive withdrawal fees too.
Retail investors using hot wallets can make things easier but this also resulted in the loss of significant funds following the successful breach of an exchange. The number of funds they need access to should also be closely monitored and evaluated. As hackers targets will always be retail investors, they should use proper storage processes to avoid hacking threats.
Share This ArticleDo the sharing thingy
The rest is here:
Quick 10 Ways to Protect Cryptocurrency Investments from Hacks - Analytics Insight
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on Quick 10 Ways to Protect Cryptocurrency Investments from Hacks – Analytics Insight
Cryptocurrency Predictions: What Is Pivot Point and How Is It Calculated – Gadgets 360
Posted: at 10:24 am
There is no dearth of technical terms in cryptocurrency trading. One of the reasons for this is the relatively new nature of the market. However, in many ways, trading in cryptocurrency is similar to trading in equities or stocks. Both are speculative with a varying degree of risks and investors in both markets often depend on their reading of a few parameters to gauge the overall trend. One of these parameters is pivot points. Investors calculate these points based on the high, low, and closing prices of previous trading sessions to see whether they should stop or double down on their investments.
A pivot point is found through technical analysis and is an indicator of the overall trend of the market. It is simply the average of the high, low, and closing prices from the previous trading day or session. If the market the next day runs above the pivot point, it is considered that the market is showing bullish sentiment. If not, it could be time to stop and rethink your investment strategy.
When pivot points are combined with other technical tools, they throw up a broad picture about an asset, as well as the support and resistance levels during a short-term trading session.
Pivot points can be calculated in several ways. But the most common of them is a five-point system. This method uses the previous session's high, low, and close data along with two support levels and two resistance levels. Using these price points, a pivot point is calculated. The equation for calculating a pivot point is given below.
Pivot Point = (Previous High + Previous Low + Previous Close) divided by 3
Support 1 = (Pivot Point x 2) Previous HighSupport 2 = Pivot Point (Previous High Previous Low)
Resistance 1 = (Pivot Point x 2) Previous LowResistance 2 = Pivot Point + (Previous High Previous Low)
These results are used to plot a course for five levels: two resistance levels, two support levels, and a pivot point. Collectively, the method is known as the five-point system. This system allows traders to define an area where the price seems most sensitive and is likely to cause a shift in the market sentiment.
The common practice is to use pivot points for smaller time frames at most for 4-hour charts and for as small as 15-minute charts.
There are five types of pivot points. Apart from the pivot point finding method discussed above (Standard Pivot Point), there are Camarilla Pivot Point, Denmark Pivot Point, Fibonacci Pivot Point, and Woodies Pivot Point.
Instead of relying on the current price movement, the pivot point system makes use of the previous day/ session's price data. This approach provides traders with an early signal of the things to come so they can plan accordingly. The pivot points remain static until the start of the next trading session.
Experts say pivot points are suited only for intra-day trading as they are based on simple calculations and may not hold true during swing trading. Also at times, volatile price movements can completely disregard pivot point predictions. When volatility is high, experts say it's best not to depend on pivot points as price fluctuations are rapid and wide for any predetermined calculation strategy.
Follow this link:
Cryptocurrency Predictions: What Is Pivot Point and How Is It Calculated - Gadgets 360
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on Cryptocurrency Predictions: What Is Pivot Point and How Is It Calculated – Gadgets 360
WTF is cryptocurrency? – The Spinoff
Posted: at 10:24 am
Theres one question on the lips of every cyber surfer trying to gauge the crypto wave: does anyone actually know what a blockchain is? Shit You Should Care About tries to answer this question and many others.
On January 3rd 2009 the genesis block the first ever block of bitcoin was born. Just a few days later Captain Chesley Sullenburger would land a plane on the Hudson River. In a few months the swine flu pandemic would begin. That makes bitcoin 12 years old, Gen Z, and a Capricorn.
Ah, Bitcoin. The technology, the philosophy, the ecological nightmare. Over the past couple of weeks the Instagram wunderkinds at Shit You Should Care About have taken us Extremely Online to explain the mysteries behind cryptocurrency specifically, bitcoin. Here, we condense their findings.
What is bitcoin?
Its money. At the time of writing, one bitcoin is currently worth about NZ$70,500. You do not have to buy or sell one whole bitcoin. If a dollar is a bitcoin, a cent is a Satoshi one Satoshi is currently worth NZ$0.00071072.
What is the blockchain?
OK, youve got me there. Bitcoin isnt just money, its also technology blockchain technology. Basically, every time you send a bitcoin, that transaction is recorded. Its recorded as a block which becomes part of a chain of blocks. You can follow this chain of blocks all the way along and see every transaction that bitcoin has ever been involved in. This is the blockchain, a public ledger of transactions.
Although the ledger is public, what youve done with the bitcoin is private. If you bought an apple, that wont appear on the ledger. Instead you would see code in its place. Thats why bitcoin is used on the dark web people can see that youre buying, but they cant see what youre buying.
Who invented it?
The mysterious person or persons known only as Satoshi Nakamoto. Was it economic sociologist Vili Lehdonvirta? Award-winning mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki? Inventor of the Silk Road (and subsequent convicted felon) Ross Ulbricht? Cryptographer Nick Szabo? Were they all in some kind of tech supergroup together?
It could be a systems engineer actually called Satoshi Nakamoto, or the guy who lived a few blocks down the road who happened to receive the first ever bitcoin.
Long story short: we dont know, and we might never know.
Why was bitcoin invented?
Embedded inside the genesis block was a recent news headline: The Times Jan/03/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks. This has been interpreted as a criticism of the current banking system.
Bitcoin and other currencies like it known as cryptocurrencies because the technology is born from a field of work known as cryptography are part of something called cypherpunk. Its like cyberpunk but less cool. Think more Dan Brown than Johnny Mnemonic.
Cypherpunks believe currencies like bitcoin will return power to the people by taking finance out of the hands of central banks and governments. With bitcoin, you dont need to send money to someone via Kiwibank or BNZ you can just type their wallet address right into your phone. This is called decentralisation.
Some people see crypto as a safe haven because fiat currency (what we normies use) is subject to endless inflation.
But its not a safe haven for the roughly 40% of people that dont have access to the internet; and its not able to be spent in many places. We dont even know how to properly tax it yet. Maybe one day the decentralised dream will be realised, but now is not that time.
How do bitcoins come into existence?
Bitcoins are mined using computers, with a process called proof-of-work. The computers try to guess what a mysterious number is, and the first one to guess it receives the bitcoin reward block. They did some work, and got a coin.
Using technology means, obviously, using power. Thats why in one year, worldwide bitcoin mining operations use the same amount of energy as the entire electricity consumption of Sweden.
The reward block contains multiple bitcoins, and these are usually spread out amongst many miners whove chosen to pool their efforts and combine computer power. The genesis block, also known as block zero, was the first block to be mined. It had a reward of 50 bitcoins. This would now be worth over NZ$2.6 million.
Every 210,000 blocks mined, or roughly every four years, the block reward is cut in half. This is called the halvening, and there have been three so far: one on 28 November 2012 (25 bitcoins per block), one on 9 July 2016 (12.5 bitcoins per block), and one on May 11 2020 (6.25 bitcoins per block). There are 21 million bitcoins in total, and the final one will most likely be mined around 2140.
What does all this have to do with that dog I keep seeing on coins?
Meme coins, sometimes called shitcoins, are cryptocurrencies too. Theyre kind of like bitcoin but shit. Well, thats subjective. Elon Musk can tweet and send dogecoin skyrocketing in value, but hes also done the same with bitcoin.
Some cryptocurrency users arent in it to stick it to the man. For some its a get-rich-quick scheme by buying into volatile coins like dogecoin as though theyre stocks and shares. For others, taking the crypto plunge is an acknowledgment that, really, no money is real. Its all ridiculous.
Subscribe to The Bulletin to get all the days key news stories in five minutes delivered every weekday at 7.30am.
Read the original here:
WTF is cryptocurrency? - The Spinoff
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on WTF is cryptocurrency? – The Spinoff
When the Big Bang Was Just a Theory – The New York Times
Posted: at 10:22 am
FLASHES OF CREATIONGeorge Gamow, Fred Hoyle, and the Great Big Bang DebateBy Paul Halpern
The universe is changing. But scientists didnt realize that a century ago, when astronomers like Edwin Hubble and Henrietta Leavitt discerned that other galaxies exist and that theyre hurtling away from the Milky Way at incredible speeds. That monumental discovery sparked decades of epic debates about the vastness and origins of the universe, and they involved a clash of titans, the Russian-American nuclear physicist George Gamow and the British astrophysicist Fred Hoyle.
In his new book, Flashes of Creation, Paul Halpern chronicles the rise of Gamow and Hoyle into leaders of mostly opposing views of cosmology, as they disputed whether everything began with a Big Bang billions of years ago.
Halpern, a physicist himself at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, skillfully brings their fascinating stories to light, out of the shadow of the overlapping quantum physics debates between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, which Halpern has written about in an earlier book. Halpern also poses fundamental questions about how science should be done. When do you decide, for example, to abandon a theory? Ultimately, his book seeks to vindicate Hoyle, who in his later years failed to admit his idea had lost.
Until these two bold theoreticians arrived, astrophysics had been stuck at an impasse. Scientists werent sure how to interpret Hubbles observations, and no one understood how the universe created and built up chemical elements. It is clear that the intuitive, seat-of-the-pants styles shared by Gamow and Hoyle were absolutely needed in their time, Halpern writes.
Gamow and Hoyle make for a challenging joint biography, Halpern acknowledges, in part because their parallel stories so rarely intersected. They had only one significant in-person meeting, in the summer of 1956 in La Jolla, Calif., where Gamow had briefly served as a consultant for General Dynamics, the aerospace and defense company. They discussed many ideas in that coastal town, hanging out in Gamows white Cadillac, but for the most part, their debates took place in the pages of physics journals, newspapers and magazines, including Scientific American.
They also frequently appeared on early television and radio programs, becoming among the first well-known science communicators, paving the way for Carl Sagan, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Carolyn Porco, Pamela Gay and others today. Hoyle wrote the science fiction novel The Black Cloud and the television screenplay A for Andromeda, while Gamow produced One, Two, Three Infinity and the Mr. Tompkins series, whose main characters predicaments illustrated aspects of modern science.
For years, their dueling theories a Big Bang origin of matter and energy (championed by Gamow) versus a steady-state universe that created matter and energy through quantum fluctuations (championed by Hoyle) remained highly speculative. Initially, the Big Bang theory predicted a universe only a couple billion years old, which conflicted with observations of the sun and other stars, known to be much older. Physicists were evenly divided between the two.
But that changed as more evidence emerged, and a key discovery eventually seemed to settle the debate. In 1964, the astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson noticed a constant signal of radio static with the Holmdel Horn Antenna in New Jersey. After ruling out possible experimental sources of noise (including pigeons and their droppings on the antenna), they deduced that the radio hiss had a cosmic origin. They and their colleagues eventually realized the signal came from relic radiation from the hot fireball of the early universe.
After that, the Big Bang theory quickly became consensus in the field. While Hoyles steady-state idea eventually failed, he made many other significant contributions, especially involving stellar processes and supernova explosions, which he showed could fuse chemical elements into heavier atoms and produce nitrogen, oxygen, carbon and more. In explaining this, and throughout the book, Halpern provides many helpful metaphors and analogies. He also reminds readers that Hoyle, Gamow and their fellow theoretical physicists made these accomplishments well before the heyday of supercomputers.
Halpern doesnt shy away from the characters flaws. In particular, he shows how Hoyles work later in life lay on the fringes of physics, including his controversial panspermia hypothesis, that organic material and even life on Earth came from colliding comets, and his unsuccessful attempts to revive steady-state theory. But this shouldnt cast a pall over his legacy.
Hoyles investment in the theory raises important philosophical and sociological questions about when we should consider an idea proven. Its also the sort of quandary that threads its away through contemporary debates among physicists: about dark matter versus modified gravity theories; about what dark energy is and how the universes inflation happened moments after the Big Bang; and about a persistent discrepancy in measurements of the universes expansion rate, known as the Hubble tension. Halpern unfortunately gives only brief mention to these active areas of research, which owe a lot to Gamow and Hoyle.
At one point in the book, Halpern relates a conversation he had with Geoff Burbidge, a colleague of Hoyles who also continued to support a steady-state model. Cosmology needed alternatives, he argued, not lemmings following their leader over a cliff.
View post:
Posted in Quantum Physics
Comments Off on When the Big Bang Was Just a Theory – The New York Times
Theoretical physicists think humans are screwing up the universe’s plan – The Next Web
Posted: at 10:22 am
The universe started with a Big Bang. Everything that was ever going to be anything was compacted into a tiny ball of whatever-ness and then it exploded outward and the universe begin expanding.
At least, thats one way of looking at it. But emergent new theories and ages-old philosophical assertions are beginning to find a foothold in cutting-edge quantum physics research. And its beginning to look more and more like we might actually be the center of the universe after all.
Thats not to say Earth or the Milky Way is at the geographical center of the universe. Itd be arrogant to make such a literal assumption.
Im saying humans are the figurative center of the universe. Because, theoretically, were gods.
This is a two-parter. First we need to establish that the universe is conscious. It might not be, but for the sake of argument lets say we agree with the growing number of scientists who support the theory.
Heres a quote I found in Mind Matters News that explains it nicely. Its from Georgia Techs Tim Andersen, a quantum physics researcher:
The key to understanding Will is in examining our own sense of consciousness. We have, in a sense, two levels of consciousness. The first is of experience. We experience a flowers color and smell. Therefore, we are conscious of it. The second is that we are aware of our consciousness of it. That is a meta-consciousness which we sometimes call reflection. I reflect on my awareness of the flower.
Andersens referring to Will as an underlying force in the universe thats analogous to consciousness.
The gist is that everything is capable of experience. If you kick a rock it experiences force, velocity, and gravity. It cant reflect on these experiences and, thus, the rock itself is capable of changing nothing on its own.
Its conscious because it exists. And, because it sort of doesnt exist. Its not actually a rock, but a bunch of molecules smashed together. And those arent molecules, really. Theyre particles smashed together. And so on and so forth.
Eventually you get to whatever the quantum version of bedrock is, and the whole universe is just an infinite amount of pretty much the same stuff it was the exact moment before the Big Bang happened.
So our rock is a rock, but its also not a rock because we can clearly see its just regular universe material if we look close enough. A tree, a rock, a Volvo, an AI reporter named Tristan: theres not much difference between these things in the quantum realm.
Its kind of like Minecraft. No matter what you build its all just ones and zeros on a computer chip.
Heres where things get cool. The rock, for whatever reason, doesnt appear to experience secondary consciousness. As Andersen explains it, the rock cannot reflect on its experience.
But humans can. Not only can we experience, for example, falling, but we can also reflect on that experience and create change based on that reflection.
Whats even more interesting, cosmically speaking, is that we can internalize the experiences of other humans and use those to inform our decision-making. Were capable of reflecting on the reflections of others.
This implies that human free will is the sole known entity in the universe capable of eliciting change based on conscious reflection.
The rock can never choose not to fall, but humans can. We can even choose to fly instead.
The result of our existence is that the universes entire trajectory is, potentially, changed. Whatever the particles in the universe were going to do before humanity emerged, their course has been altered.
Who knows what changes weve wrought upon the cosmos. Weve only been around for a few million years and our planet already looks like a frat house after a kegger.
What will the galaxy look like when we can travel to its edges in a matter of months or weeks? What happens when we can traverse the universe?
Its possible theres an intelligent creator there somewhere chuckling right now. Or perhaps the universes plan always included the inception and evolution of humans.
But the evidence, of which theres admittedly very little, says otherwise.
Quantum physics makes a strong argument for universal consciousness and, if thats the case, its hard to define the human experience without separating everything capable of reflection from those things only capable of experience.
If it turns out were the only entities capable of producing a secondary reality out of the universal consciousness, well, that would be something.
Im not saying youre the God, Im simply pointing out that youre the only thing in the entire universe that we can show evidence for having free will and the capacity to reflect on its experiences.
Perhaps our ability to reflect on consciousness itself is what allows experiential reality to manifest. We think, therefore everything is.
Further reading:
New research tries to explain consciousness with quantum physics
Scientists may have found the missing link between brain matter and consciousness
New MIT brain research shows how AI could help us understand consciousness.
Excerpt from:
Theoretical physicists think humans are screwing up the universe's plan - The Next Web
Posted in Quantum Physics
Comments Off on Theoretical physicists think humans are screwing up the universe’s plan – The Next Web
We finally have a working supersolid. Here’s why that matters. – Popular Science
Posted: at 10:22 am
Imagine an intact diamond whose innards move with no friction, or a formed ice cube whose tightly-packed contents effortlessly flow. These might sound strange, or even impossible. But to physicists, theyre not too far removed from something theyve recently created: a strange state of matter called a supersolid.
For the past several years, scientists have been creating supersolids at very tiny scales in the lab. Now, a group of physicists have made the most sophisticated supersolid yet: one that exists in two-dimensions, like a sheet of paper. They published their results in Nature last Wednesday.
Its always been a sort of outstanding goal to bring [supersolids] into two dimensions, says Matthew Norcia, a physicist at Innsbruck University in Austria, and lead author of the Nature paper.
So what exactly is a supersolid? At its base, it contains properties of two different states of matter, one mundane and another quite esoteric.
The first of those states is a solid, which is among the most mundane forms of matter. Chances are that youre touching one at this very moment. Importantly, To physicists, a solid is interesting because the atoms inside are held in a rigid structure. Its why you dont, normally, see solid objects flowing like water.
But the second is a state of matter youve probably seen somewhat less: a superfluid. A quirk of quantum mechanics, a superfluid is a substance that acts like a fluid with zero viscosity. Scientists have caught glimpses of superfluids by cooling helium to temperatures barely above absolute zero. They can, and will, effortlessly crawl up walls or slide across surfaces.
A supersolid combines both a solid and a superfluid into one package: a solid that flows like a fluid with no friction, no resistance. If that sounds strange, its all perfectly natural. Its simply a product of quantum mechanics, the peculiar sort of physics that governs the cosmos at the very smallest scales.
To picture a supersolid, consider an ice cube immersed in liquid water, with frictionless flow of the water through the cube, wrote Bruno Labruthe-Tolra, a physicist at Sorbonne Paris North University in France who was not involved with the latest paper, in Nature News & Views that accompanied the new study.
It isnt an entirely new idea; physicists have been proposing it since the 1960s. But for many decades, it wasnt clear if we could make a supersolid on Earth. Only in the 2010s did scientists start making concrete progress towards creating a supersolid in the laboratory.
[Related: What the heck is a time crystal, and why are physicists obsessed with them?]
At first, scientists tried looking for supersolids in supercooled helium. Superfluids occur in helium, whose atomic properties make it ideal, so it seemed logical that you might find supersolids in them, too. But that effort has yet to bear fruit.
Later in the decade, physicists began turning to other elements such as rubidium and lanthanum. When you trap a small number of gaseous atoms and chill them down to fractions of a degree above absolute zero (the very coldest possible temperature, at around -460 degrees Fahrenheit), they condense into a whole suite of quantum weirdness. Thats called a Bose-Einstein condensate.
So, to create a supersolid, you first trap some atoms, then cool them, then play with their interactions. If you tune those correctly, and you tune the shape of the trap correctly, you can get a supersolid, says Norcia, the lead author.
Using this method, in 2019, researchers began to create a basic, one-dimensional supersolid: essentially, a thin supersolid tube in a straight line.
Thats what Norcia and his colleagues at Innsbruck University and the Austrian Academy of Sciences have now done. By tinkering with the device they used to trap atoms and the process they used to condense the atoms, they were able to extend their supersolid from one dimension into two: from a tiny tube into a small sheet.
This demonstration is a key advance because one direct way to prove that a system exhibits superfluidity is to study its properties under rotation, writes Labruthe-Tolra, and this analysis cannot be achieved if the system has only one dimension.
Now that researchers have created a supersolid in two dimensions, can they make one in three dimensions? Can they make a proper supersolid that you can touch?
Probably not soon, according to Norcia, though he says its a question that has crossed physicists minds. Currently, hes uncertain how they would do that with the technology they have.
Instead, for now, the researchers want to study the supersolid theyve created. Even though theyve successfully created a supersolid, physicists still know so little about it.
Follow this link:
We finally have a working supersolid. Here's why that matters. - Popular Science
Posted in Quantum Physics
Comments Off on We finally have a working supersolid. Here’s why that matters. – Popular Science







