The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2021
The Trump Administration Feuded With State and Local Leaders over Pandemic Response Now the Biden Administr – Governing
Posted: August 4, 2021 at 2:23 pm
As the U.S. recovers from the pandemic, the Biden administration is working to rebuild relationships across levels of government, from the top to the bottom, that were strained during the presidency of Donald Trump.
In November 2020, Biden offered urban leaders a seat at the table in coronavirus recovery efforts, promising to avoid partisanship. Addressing the National League of Cities in March 2021, Harris praised urban leadership on COVID-19 cities like Seattle and New York were among the first to respond to the pandemic, developing testing protocols, tracking new infections and supplying equipment for hospitals and highlighted the administrations plans to help pay for improvements to local infrastructure.
The COVID-19 crisis highlighted the importance of government leaders working together.
But with the onset of COVID-19 in early 2020, tensions in this shared system boiled over. Instead of collaborating, the federal government rebuffed state and local governments desperate for critical information and lifesaving supplies.
States and cities competed over medical equipment, testing capacity and supplies and other needs. Densely populated cities, many feuding with the federal government, were hardest hit.
Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser called successfully in 2016 for raising the districts minimum wage to $15, stepping in where the federal government had failed to act. AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta
It has taken steps to give local policymakers more control over the allocation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccinations, while setting national policies to hasten the availability of vaccines.
Reasserting closer relationships between the federal government and state and local partners may signal a shift toward more collaboration in general.
The federal government can use its power and position to drive change at the local level. A more collaborative relationship can help the federal government understand communities needs, leading to new policies and priorities. Close partnership may also increase awareness of federal resources that are available, helping state and local governments identify programs to better support their residents.
But as our research shows, federal dominance can also be counterproductive.
But local governments deliver the most-used public services, including schools, transportation, parks and public health. As a result, local governments are perhaps the most important in peoples daily lives.
Local governments both make and implement policy. In areas where the federal and state governments are silent or inactive, local governments often innovate to address community needs. That freedom to innovate helps local governments generate policies that can work their way up and across the federal system.
For example, despite backlash from state and national leaders, various cities like Austin, Los Angeles, Virginia Beach and Washington, D.C. have led the way on social and environmental policies, adopting and advocating for higher minimum wages, fracking limitations, sanctuaries for Second Amendment rights and reducing law enforcement violence.
Scholars have noted changes in the dynamics of these relationships throughout history. During some eras, the federal government has more power over policymaking. At other times, state and local governments exert greater influence.
For example, President Lyndon B. Johnsons Great Society welfare programs Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps increased the federal governments influence on state and local governments. New federal requirements mandated spending on social programs, often requiring matching funds from state and local governments. And new state and local agencies had to be established to implement federal priorities.
Federal dollars shared with local governments to fight poverty came with strings attached. Examples include requirements to meet environmental standards and adopt nondiscrimination policies.
With the advent of welfare reform in the mid-1990s, the federal government relaxed some of these requirements. As a result, state and local governments were given more flexibility over policy and spending decisions.
Our recent research indicates the balance of power in the federal system affects government performance and the safety of Americans. During the COVID-19 response, the federal government failed to partner with state and local governments. As a result, there were problems finding and delivering crucial supplies like masks and ventilators, leading to needless deaths.
President Lyndon Johnson, shown here, expanded the authority of the federal government with his Great Society programs.AP Photo
Johnsons Great Society programs expanded the authority of the federal government. Federal agencies gained the power to create and manage the details of the effort to eradicate poverty, hunger and discrimination.
President Richard Nixons new federalism sent money in so-called block grants to state and local governments to carry out different federal initiatives. This allowed local governments some power over policy design and implementation.
President Ronald Reagans pragmatic federalism emphasized privatization using private-sector organizations to deliver services and decentralization. Reagan used markets to deliver government services through competitive contracts and grants.
In more recent years, scholars have accused Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama of returning to the more coercive federalism of Johnsons Great Society. To encourage state and local governments to adopt federal priorities, federal funds under these presidents again included strings, increasing tensions between these levels of government.
Under President Trump, these tensions reached an apex. Cities clashed with the federal government over immigration policy, law enforcement violence and health care and, ultimately, over how to handle the pandemic.
With the understanding that coordination among all levels of government helps address problems more effectively, one step Biden might take is to revive the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. This commission operated from 1959 to 1996, offering presidents and federal agencies guidance on issues that spanned the federal systems layers. The commission helped address abuses of power in the federal system and strengthened partnerships between governments.
As scholars, we know that policy issues are rarely independent. Global climate change affects local transportation policies, while health care issues are often closely linked to education and agriculture.
Local governments are important players in the federal system. Over the next year, they will be critical in continued efforts to vaccinate the American public and prepare for disasters like hurricanes and wildfires.
Given the complexity of modern policy problems, renewed consideration of how all levels of government can approach such big issues could help solve them.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Continued here:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on The Trump Administration Feuded With State and Local Leaders over Pandemic Response Now the Biden Administr – Governing
EPA, Army announce next steps for crafting definition of waters of the united states – Water Technology Online
Posted: at 2:23 pm
Mohammed Mohammed Ali | Dreamstime.com
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of the Army recently announced plans for upcoming community engagements to inform their efforts to revise the definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) to better ensure clean and safe water for all. EPA and Army are committed to developing a reasonable, effective and durable definition of WOTUS that protects public health, the environment and downstream communities while supporting economic opportunity, agriculture, and other industries.
We are committed to crafting an enduring definition of WOTUS by listening to all sides so that we can build on an inclusive foundation, said EPA administrator Michael S. Regan. Uncertainty over the definition of WOTUS has harmed our waters and the stakeholders and communities that rely on them. I look forward to engaging all parties as we move forward to provide the certainty thats needed to protect our precious natural water resources.
Our nations water resources are critical to support all of our communities, said acting assistant secretary of the Army for Civil Works Jaime A. Pinkham. Like the EPA, the Department of the Army recognizes the importance of this effort and we are committed to meaningful engagement with Tribes, states, local governments, and stakeholders to ensure that a revised definition of WOTUS reflects the experiences of, and input received, from all communities.
The agencies intend to revise the definition of WOTUS following a process that includes two rulemakings. A forthcoming foundational rule would restore the regulations defining WOTUS that were in place for decades until 2015, with updates to be consistent with relevant Supreme Court decisions. A separate, second rulemaking process would refine this regulatory foundation and establish an updated and durable definition of waters of the United States.
A durable definition of WOTUS is essential to ensuring clean and safe water in all communitiessupporting human health, animal habitat, agriculture, watersheds, flood management, local economies, and industry. Todays announcement marks an important step in the agencies efforts to restore protections and write a rule to define WOTUS that is grounded in science and the law, emphasizes effective implementation, and prioritizes collaborative partnerships with states, Tribes, local governments, and stakeholders. To help ensure that EPA and Army hear from diverse perspectives, future engagement activities will be developed in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The EPA and Army announced a series of engagement opportunities, including an opportunity for stakeholders and the public to provide written recommendations and a series of public meetings in August to hear perspectives on both rules. In addition, the agencies will initiate Federalism and Tribal consultations for the foundational rule. The agencies also intend to host a series of dialogues with state and Tribal co-regulators this fall to discuss both rulemakings.
Additionally, the previous rulemaking efforts have highlighted the regional variability of water resources and the importance of close engagement with stakeholders to understand the specifics of how they experience regulation under varying definitions of waters of the United States. To honor our commitment to listening and learning from diverse perspectives, the agencies plan to convene ten regionally focused and inclusive roundtables during the upcoming fall and winter. These roundtables will allow a full range of stakeholders to engage and discuss their experience with definitions of WOTUSincluding what has worked and what has not within their geographic areas. The roundtables will provide opportunities to discuss geographic similarities and differences, particular water resources that are characteristic of or unique to each region, and site-specific feedback about implementation.
For more information on submitting written recommendations or to register for the public meetings, see http://www.epa.gov/wotus.
Background
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972 with the statutory objective to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nations waters. One of the Acts principal tools in achieving that objective is a prohibition on the discharge of pollutants from a point source to navigable waters unless otherwise authorized under the Act. Navigable waters are defined in the Act as the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. Thus, waters of the United States is a threshold term establishing the geographic scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. The term waters of the United States is not defined by the Act but has been defined by EPA and the Army in regulations since the 1970s and jointly implemented in the agencies respective programmatic activities.
On June 9, 2021, EPA and the Department of the Army announced their intent to revise the definition of WOTUS to better protect our nations vital water resources that support public health, environmental protection, agricultural activity, and economic growth. Upon review of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule, the agencies determined that the rule is significantly reducing clean water protections.
Follow this link:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on EPA, Army announce next steps for crafting definition of waters of the united states – Water Technology Online
EPA outlines plan to expand wetland protections – E&E News
Posted: at 2:23 pm
The Biden administration laid out plans today for scrapping and replacing a contentious Trump-era Clean Water Act rule that pulled back federal protections for millions of streams and wetlands.
EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers said they will follow a two-pronged approach to revoke the Trump administrations Navigable Waters Protection Rule while revising the definition of "Waters of the United States," or WOTUS, which defines which waters fall under federal protection.
The rules fate and how quickly it can be rewritten are politically explosive for President Biden. It has pitted environmental groups against developers and farmers for decades and sparked partisan fights on Capitol Hill.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan in a release said his agency is committed to crafting an "enduring" definition of WOTUS by listening to all sides, while Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said farmers and rural Americans must have a "seat at the table and a voice in this process so that the rule responds to concerns and realities on the ground."
The Trump administrations rule significantly narrowed the laws reach, pulling back what wetlands and streams were jurisdictional by about 51% and 18%, respectively (Greenwire, Jan. 23, 2020).
Conservationists have challenged the Trump rule in multiple courts across the country.
The Biden administration last month convinced judges to remand the Trump rule to EPA while it writes a new one, but not to throw it out in the interim (E&E News PM, July 15).
Sources expect EPA to issue a draft rule pulling back the Trump regulation by years end. At that time, the agency would revert to the 1986 definition of WOTUS and rely on 2008 guidance from the George W. Bush administration about how to apply that definition.
Although its not clear when EPA will issue a rule to redefine WOTUS, the agency today laid out a series of more than a half-dozen meetings for consultation and engagement from Aug. 5 to Sept. 2, including discussions about federalism and tribal consultation.
EPA and the Army Corps said the meetings would allow stakeholders and the public to provide written recommendations and weigh in on how to establish a regulatory foundation and build on that foundation to craft a "durable" definition of WOTUS.
The agencies said they also intend to host a series of talks with state and tribal co-regulators this fall to discuss both rulemakings.
More here:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on EPA outlines plan to expand wetland protections – E&E News
Cameras Roll On David Cronenberg Sci-Fi Crimes Of The Future With Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart; More Cast Join – Deadline
Posted: at 2:22 pm
Filming is underway in Europe on David Cronenbergs Crimes Of The Future, starring Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart and Scott Speedman.
Joining the cast are Tanaya Beatty (Yellowstone), Nadia Litz (Big Muddy), Yorgos Karamichos (The Durrells), and Yorgos Pirpassopoulos (Beckett). Also previously announced were Welket Bungu (Berlin Alexanderplatz), Don McKellar (Blindness), and Lihi Kornowski (Losing Alice).
The film shoots in Athens, Greece until September 2021.
The film takes a deep dive into the not-so-distant future where humankind is learning to adapt to its synthetic surroundings. The evolution moves humans beyond their natural state and into a metamorphosis, altering their biological makeup. While some embrace the limitless potential of transhumanism, others attempt to police it. Either way, Accelerated Evolution Syndrome, is spreading fast.
As we begin filming Crimes Of The Future, just two days into this new adventure with David Cronenberg, it feels like weve entered a story he collaborated on with Samuel Beckett and William Burroughs, if that were possible, said Mortensen. We are being pulled into a world that is not quite like this or any other, and yet is one that feels strangely familiar, immediate and quite credible. I cant wait to see where we end up.
Produced by Robert Lantos, the film reunites Cronenberg with three-time Oscar nominee Mortensen in their fourth collaboration. The movie marks Cronenbergs first original screenplay since eXistenZ in 1999. The film is also the fourth collaboration between Lantos and Cronenberg.
Panos Papahadzis is producer for Athens-based Argonauts Productions and Steve Solomos is co-producer. Executive producers include Joe Iacono, Thorsten Schumacher, Peter Touche, Christelle Conan, Aida Tannyan, Victor Loewy, and Victor Hadida. Bonnie Do and Laura Lanktree are associate producers.
Production designer is Carol Spier (Crash) and composer is Howard Shore (The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy). Douglas Koch (Funny Boy) is cinematographer, with Mayou Trikerioti (Pari) as costume designer, Dimitris Katsikis (Fugitive Pieces) as art director, and Stefanos Efthymiou is sound recordist.
Pic will be distributed worldwide by distributors including Neon (USA), MK2|Mile End (Canada), Metropolitan (France), Weltkino (Germany, Austria and Switzerland), The Searchers (Benelux), Argonauts Productions (Greece), Front Row (Middle East), Capella (CIS/ the Baltic States), and Moviecloud (Taiwan). Rocket Science is handling international sales.
The Canada-Greece co-production is produced in association with Ingenious Media, Coficine, Telefilm Canada, Bell Media, CBC, and the Harold Greenberg Fund, with the support of EKOME and the GFC.
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on Cameras Roll On David Cronenberg Sci-Fi Crimes Of The Future With Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart; More Cast Join – Deadline
12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress – The Guardian
Posted: at 2:22 pm
Jeanette Winterson is not usually considered a science-fiction writer, yet her novels have always been concerned with alternative realities, and for more than two decades she has drawn on the imaginative possibilities offered by technological and digital advances. Her 2000 novel, The Powerbook, was an early exploration of the fluid identities and connections offered by virtual personae; The Stone Gods (2007) combined history with interplanetary dystopias and featured a relationship between a robot and a human. Her most recent fiction, Frankisstein, reworked Mary Shelleys story of an artificially created intelligence into a modern novel of ideas about the present and future limits of AI and the implications for art, love, sex and biology.
Now, in 12 Bytes, her first collection of essays since 1996s Art Objects, Winterson examines all these preoccupations without the mediation of fiction, though the narrative style is as conversational and erudite as youd expect from her, peppered with irreverent asides and mischievous flashes of wit (Dry as dust I dont do, she has said of the previous collection). The 12 essays here are grouped into four zones, loosely covering the past, the imagination, relationships and the future, and together offer an eclectic odyssey through the history of technological progress a history that for too long sidelined some of its most influential figures because they were inconveniently women or gay, and has only recently begun to restore their reputations. Winterson pays tribute here to the contributions of Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing, along with women such as Stephanie Shirley, the founder of all-female company Freelance Programmers, and the forgotten teams of female programmers during the second world war, their work unacknowledged for decades because it didnt suit a narrative of male expertise.
Winterson explains in her introduction that the essays are the product of a longstanding fascination with advances in machine intelligence, and that she approaches the subject as a storyteller with a modest aim: I want readers who imagine they are not much interested in AI, or bio-tech, or big tech, or data-tech, to find that the stories are engaging, sometimes frightening, always connected. Her primary interest is in what she calls the bigger picture: the metaphysical implications of our transhuman future, about which she appears surprisingly optimistic.
A hybrid form of human is certain, she asserts in the final essay, I Love, Therefore I Am. Homo sapiens might be on the way out And if that was to happen, how could we pass on the best of what we call human nature? How would we define it? This piece, in common with many of the others, is content to ask more questions than it answers; Winterson acknowledges the ambiguity inherent in so many of the ethical questions surrounding AI.
The technology to change the world for the better is the technology that is in place right now Its the best of times and the worst of times. Dystopia or utopia? Nothing could be simpler. Nothing could be harder.
But, while she argues for the primacy of the inner life the part of us that cant be fully known or monetised by Facebook algorithms in somewhat abstract terms, citing Larkins line What will survive of us is love, elsewhere she offers more practical solutions for an AI future that will serve the greater good. In the essay Jurassic Car Park she addresses the problem of the current white male dominance of tech and how this leads to ingrained bias (datasets are selective stories). As well as the obvious solution of more people of colour and women at the table, she writes: I would like to see established artists, and public intellectuals, automatically brought in to advise science, tech and government at every level, because the arts have always been an imaginative and emotional wrestle with reality a series of inventions and creations. Youd think this would be self-evident to the decision-makers, though it becomes harder to share her optimism, writing this on a day when further cuts to arts education have been announced.
For a relatively short book, the scope of its ambition is huge. Winterson whizzes through the history of the machine age, surveillance capitalism, Gnosticism, sex dolls and Greek philosophy, but she is at her most impassioned on the subjects that have been her recurring themes: gender, religion, art, feminism, love. She writes with a sense of urgency about this future that is already here, because the one thing she is insistent about is that we the storytellers, the artists, the readers who share her views on the inner life must not opt out and leave it in the hands of the tech bros: liberal resistance cant be anti-tech or anti-science. So much of it comes down to the old question of whose stories get to shape our reality. Shes right that aspects of this AI future are frightening, but for any non-scientists wanting to understand the challenges and possibilities of this brave new world, I cant think of a more engaging place to start.
12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next by Jeanette Winterson is published by Jonathan Cape (16.99). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply
See more here:
12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress - The Guardian
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on 12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress – The Guardian
Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup – Scoop.co.nz
Posted: at 2:22 pm
Monday, 2 August 2021, 10:11 amArticle: Robert J. Burrowes
For many people desperate to see a return to a life thatis more familiar, it is still easy to believe that theupheavals we have experienced since March 2020 and thechanges that have been wrought in their train aretemporary, even if they are starting to drag onsomewhat longer than hoped.
However, anyone who ispaying attention to what is taking place in the backgroundis well aware that the life we knew before 2020 has alreadyended and what is being systematically put in its place asthe World Economic Forum (WEF) implements its GreatReset will bear no comparison to any period prior to lastyear. See KillingDemocracy Once and for All: The Global Elites Coupdtat That Is Destroying Life as We KnowIt.
Of course, those of us who qualify asordinary people have had no say in the shape of whatis being implemented: that shaping has been the prerogativeof the criminal global elite which is now implementing aplan that has been decades in the making and built onhundreds of years of steady consolidation of elitepower.
Also, of course, there is nothing about thisshaping that is good for us. In simple terms, it isreshaping the human individual so that previouslyfundamental concepts such as human identity, human liberty,human rights (such as freedom of speech, assembly andmovement), human privacy and human volition are not justnotions of the past but are beyond the comprehension of thetypical transhuman. At the same time, the global eliteis restructuring human society into a technocratic dystopiawhich is a nightmarish cross between Brave New World,1984 and the Dark Age. See StrategicallyResisting the New Dark Age: The 7 Days Campaign to ResistThe Great Reset.
The only question remaining isthis: Can we mobilize adequatestrategic resistance that is,resistance that systematically undermines the power of theglobal elite to conduct this coup and restores power toordinary people to defeat this coup?
But beforeI answer that question, I wish to highlight just one elementof the elite coup that is taking place and outline theprofound changes that are being left in its wake unless westop them.
These changes are essentially related tothe capacities of computerized technologies to deprive us ofwhat little we have left of our financial autonomy,including because any notion of privacy is rapidlyvanishing.
One reason forhighlighting the issue of money is because while it is goodto see increasing critical attention being paid to theinjectables program, with its devastating consequencesfor humanity, far too little attention is being paid to theprofoundly important transformation being wrought undercover of the elite-driven narrative which has virtually allpeoples attention distracted from this deeper agenda. Andwhile this deeper agenda entails a great many aspects, onesubset of these is related to the way in which the globalfinancial system is being re-engineered to play its role infully controlling the human population.
In a series ofreports issued in early 2020, the Deutsche Bank claimed thatcash will be around for a long time. See the threereports accessible from Transitionto digital payments could rebalance global economicpower.
However, these reports arecontradicted by other research and the ongoing evidence thatcash is vanishing. Most importantly, there is no doubt aboutthe elite intention in this regard. They want cashgone.
The digitization of money has been occurring fordecades and it is now being accelerateddramatically.
Moreover, the World Economic Forum andother elite organizations have been actively working towardsachieving a cashless economy for years. To get a sense ofthis trend, see Whywe need a less-cash society and TheUS should get rid of cash and move to a digital currency,says this Nobel Laureate economist.
Notably, inthis respect, the BetterThan Cash Alliance has 78 members committed todigitizing payments. If you think that this is agrassroots initiative set up by people like you and me, youwill be surprised to read that the Bill & Melinda GatesFoundation is a Resource Partner to the initiativealong with some UN agencies, many national governments andcorporations such as Mastercard and Visa.
So while thetrend toward a cashless society has been progressingsteadily for some decades, with countries like Denmark,Norway and Sweden already virtually cashless and Indiarapidly moving in that direction see IndiasPM Modi defends cash ban, announces incentives the so-called Covid-19 pandemic was contrived partlyto provide a pretext for further accelerating the move fromcash to cards and apps, with increasing numbers of peopleusing the digital methods, even for small sums, partlybecause some people were scared into believing that thevirus could be transmitted by bills andcoins.
But there is more. In addition to measures notmentioned here, other plans include the use of a facial scanthat records your entry to a store and is linked toartificial intelligence that identifies you and your creditrating. This then enables, or otherwise, your ability to payfor goods and services based on this facialscan.
Does all of this matter, you might ask.Well the convenience of cards and apps has two significantcosts: your privacy and your freedom. You lose both simplybecause while paying with cash is anonymous, paying by cardor app leaves a digital trail that is as difficult to followas an elephant whose tail you are already holding. And thisdigital trail forms a vital part of the surveillance gridthat enables all of those who are tracking and documentingyour movement, your payments and your behaviour to do sowithout leaving the comfort of their chairs. For more detailon this, watch Cash or card will COVID-19 killcash? which is embedded in the article Cashor Card Will COVID-19 Kill Cash? Leaving a DigitalFootprint With Every Payment.
But it goesbeyond this. As touched on above in relation to privacy andexplained at some length by Whitney Webb, there is arelated push by WEF partners to tackle cybercrime thatseeks to end privacy and the potential for anonymity on theinternet in general, by linking government-issued IDs tointernet access. Such a policy would allow governments tosurveil every piece of online content accessed as well asevery post or comment authored by each citizen, supposedlyto ensure that no citizen can engage in criminalactivity online.
Notably, the WEF Partnershipagainst Cybercrime employs a very broad definition of whatconstitutes a cybercriminal as they apply this labelreadily to those who post or host content deemed to bedisinformation that represents a threat todemocratic governments. The WEFs interest incriminalizing and censoring online content has been madeevident by its recent creation of a new GlobalCoalition for Digital Safety to facilitate the increasedregulation of online speech by both the public and privatesectors. See EndingAnonymity: Why the WEFs Partnership Against CybercrimeThreatens the Future of Privacy.
But to getback to cash: Unfortunately for us, the global elite doesnot intend to leave the abolition of cash to ourpreference for the convenience of cards and othermoves to entice us to switch to digital payment. It fullyintends to force us to accept digital methods as the onlymeans of payment.
In part, this is because electronicpayments are extremely lucrative for banks and paymentservice providers, while the data broker industry is alsomaking huge revenues. See Cashor Card Will COVID-19 Kill Cash? Leaving a DigitalFootprint With Every Payment.
And in some ways,killing cash is simple. Two obvious ways of doing soare by removing ATMs (including from shopping centres) andclosing local bank branches so that cash is simplyunavailable. As has been happening for some time. See WhyAre ATMs Disappearing at an Alarming Rate after a Wave ofBranch Closures? and Australianbank branches and ATMs are vanishing.
But, inthis instance, even profitability is at the trivial end ofthe elite motivation spectrum.
Cash is being forcedout of existence because it undermines the elite agenda totake all power from ordinary people.
So, in parallelwith other regressions over the past 18 months as the elitecoup to take complete control of our lives has continued tounfold, there have been warnings from variousinstitutions including the World Economic Forum and theCarnegie Endowment for International Peace about thepossibility of an allegedly imminent cyber attack thatwill collapse the existing financialsystem.
Following a simulation in 2020, in whichthe World Economic Forum along with the Russian governmentand global banks conducted a high-profile cyberattacksimulation that targeted the financial industry, anothersimulation was held on 9 July 2021 involving the WorldEconomic Forum and the Russian government-owned Sberbank aswell as other key financial agents. See CyberPolygon and Cyber Polygon2021. In reality, of course, such a collapse of thefinancial system would constitute the final yet necessarystep to implement the World Economic Forums desiredoutcome of forcing a widespread shift to digital currencyand increased global governance of the internationaleconomy.
If this financial collapse happens, thesolution suggested by key agencies to unite thenational security apparatus and the finance industry first,and then use that as a model to do the same with othersectors of the economy will ensure that we lose whatlittle control is left in our lives, not just in relation toour financial resources but in all other domains as well.For a full explanation, see WEFWarns of Cyber Attack Leading to Systemic Collapse of theGlobal Financial System.
And for anotheraccount of the deeper agenda and its financial impactsalready, including its economic genocide, as well aswhat is yet to happen, watch this interview of CatherineAustin Fitts: GlobalistCentral Banking New World Order ResetPlan.
Beyond this, if you want some insightinto another key threat in the cybercrime realm, check outthis video by the Ice Age Farmer in relation to the cyberthreat to the power grid. See NextCrisis Bigger than COVID Power Grid/Finance Down WEFs Cyber Polygon.
Fortunately, there is some resistancealready.
In response to concerns in the United Statesthat businesses that refuse cash will disadvantagecommunities with poor access to traditional banking systems,there are signs that a national movement protectingconsumers ability to pay in cash may be emerging witha number of states and cities already outlawing cashlessoutlets. See Cashor Credit? State and City Bans on Cashless Retailers Are onthe Rise.
Realistically, however, given what isat stake, considerable elite pressure will be applied toreverse these decisions in time. So we need our defense tobe more rigorous and less reliant on agents who are unlikelyto be tough enough to defend our interests or will besidelined or killed for doing so, as at least two nationalpresidents who resisted the elite intention last year havesince been killed. See Coronavirusand Regime Change: Burundis Covid Coup and JohnMagufuli: Death of an African FreedomFighter.
Moreover, given the likelihood thatthe financial system will be deliberately crashed at somepoint and possibly soon we need to employ a varietyof tactics, that build resilience into our resistance, todefeat this initiative.
Hence, storing and paying withcash, moving your accounts to local community banks orcredit unions (and away from the large corporate banks) andmaking the effort to become more self-reliant, particularlyin food production, will increase your resilience, as willparticipating in local trading schemes, whether involvinglocal currencies or goods and services directly.
Aswith all elements of the defense we implement, it will needto be multi-layered and integrated into the overall defensestrategy. The elite intends to kill off many of us asthe depopulation measures within the coup, including thedestruction of the global economy throwing 500,000,000people out of work and killing millions as a result, as wellas the injectables program already killing tens ofthousands, make perfectly clear and enslave therest.
For an integrated strategy to defeat the elitecoup, see the We Are Human, WeAre Free campaign, which has 29 strategic goals fordefeating the coup including meaningful engagement withpolice and military forces to assist them to understand andresist, rather than support, the elite agenda.
But fora simpler presentation, see the 7Days Campaign to Resist The Great Reset. The Telegram groupis here.
One of the interestingchallenges about the current Covid-19 Crisis is thatit continues to very successfully distract most people fromawareness of the deeper agenda: the Global ElitesGreat Reset and related initiatives, such as thatdiscussed above in relation to money.
Hence, apartfrom the perennial problem of raising awareness andmobilizing resistance among those still believing theelite-driven propaganda, we face two key strategichazards.
The first hazard is a longstanding one: whilevirtually all people believe that elite agents in thiscase, governments are controlling events, muchresistance will focus on begging governments, throughsuch things as petitions and protest demonstrations, tofix it for us. The elite has long dissipated ourdissent by having us direct it at one or other of itsagents. This case is no different. And while we are notusing our occasional large rallies to inform people how toresist powerfully every day of their life, these rallies area waste of time whatever solidarity they build in the shortterm. History is categorically instructive on thatpoint.
A second strategic hazard we face is thatresistance to the vaccine and the vaccinepassport might be successful (in the sense thatconcerted actions stall some government implementation ofsome measures in relation to these two initiatives) andleave most people believing that they have won, whilethe deeper agenda remains in the shadows with virtuallyno-one resisting.
It is important, therefore, thatthose who are aware of the deeper agenda continue to provideopportunities for others to become aware of this too and thefundamental threat it poses to us all while also sharing howwe can resist its key dimensions in a way that makes adifference. It is not enough to complain about elite agents,such as governments, the medical and pharmaceuticalindustries, and the corporate media.
We muststrategically resist the elite coup itself with actions suchas those in the 7Days Campaign to Resist The Great Reset before we findourselves locked in a technocratic prison without thefree-willed minds necessary to analyze, critique, plan andact.
Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetimecommitment to understanding and ending human violence. Hehas done extensive research since 1966 in an effort tounderstand why human beings are violent and has been anonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of WhyViolence? His email address is flametree@riseup.netand his website is here.
Scoop Media
Become a member Find out more
More:
Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup - Scoop.co.nz
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup – Scoop.co.nz
Forum, Aug. 3: NH government back on a right-wing leash – Valley News
Posted: at 2:21 pm
NH government is back on a right-wing leash
As reported in the Valley News, and as summarized in Forum letters by state Rep. Laurel Stavis (Surreal, vicious measures in NH budget, July 28) and Beth Dingman (A total lack of concern for fellow citizens, July 30), recent retrograde actions by New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu and the Republican-dominated Legislature reversing progressive legislation passed by prior Democratic administrations appear to mark the vampire-like return of departed former Gov. Mel Thomson and publisher William Loeb, who kept New Hampshire state government on a tight, right-wing leash for several decades.
As Stavis noted, certain rights and groups are particularly favored by the current administration and legislators, especially Second Amendment zealots, who have been given the right to wave arms in many venues, while the right to free speech and unimpeded inquiry is undermined and women are compelled to undergo needless medical tests. And in addition to promoting a specious vaccine freedom that will land more New Hampshire residents in ICUs, Gov. Sununu rashly ended the vital mask mandate rather prematurely it would seem, now that the full threat of the delta variant is evident.
The cited letter writers omitted mentioning several other recent Scrooge-like actions by the Republicans, such as severely curbing state spending on sewer renewal projects and other useful infrastructure, loading more costs on local taxpayers. Consequently, to offset this, and in the same spirit, I advocate that the investors who are going to receive the rare boon of being compensated by the state treasury (i.e., taxpayers) be obliged to accept state bonds, with the savings used to improve sewers, rather than pour money down them.
JERRY ROTH
Enfield
A new school year is just around the corner, despite the shadow of coronavirus variants rising in our nation. There is another shadow hanging over the dedicated teachers of New Hampshire: The law regarding the propagation of divisive topics.
Really? At a time when public education is challenged economically and by a national pandemic, our teachers are forced to look over their shoulders when conducting their duties to educate our children because our politicians feel compelled to restrict what issues can be taught? Perhaps parents whose tax dollars are being used to support a watered-down education for their children might consider suing the state for its failure to provide a full and complete education for the dollars they are spending.
If we feel it is important for our youth to gain sound, comprehensive knowledge of our history, learn skills of understanding and managing their lives within the society they live and be equipped to compete in the business of the future, then our teachers need to be free to do the best possible job in their chosen profession. Having politicians dictate the depth and length of social issues that can and cannot be taught in our publicly funded educational institutions just will not, in my opinion, pass the litmus test for sound educational practices.
I want our educators in New Hampshire and all states to encourage and promote students to learn and grow beyond their abilities so that they are more suited to deal with the life they will face as adults. When the state says that teachers cannot do their jobs as educators, then we dont get our tax moneys worth, and our children will be participating in a fully dumbed-down educational system.
I hope students leave their education with a full toolbox of knowledge and skills for good and health-filled lives, both physically and mentally. New Hampshires divisive topics law robs our children of that gift in their learning experience.
Act to get your moneys worth for your children.
ROBERT KEENE
Hanover
It may be that the word systemic is losing its power through overuse, but I know no better term when trying to address the whole of this planet. Lets first consider the trivial case of the July 24 dust devil that interrupted a soccer match in Bolivia. Scale that up to the transcontinental smoke blown from the Western wildfires, darkening lungs back East. Were also beset by the coronavirus and its variants. Id let that burn itself out, being a single vector affecting very few species, primarily a deniers disease. Whatve we got to lose?
Regardless, could the commonality be that its just something in the air? Or could it be others who are to blame? If youre a Trumpist, the other could be Rep. Liz Cheney; if a historic separatist, the Church of Englands your foil; for rocks, theres hard places. Our ecologic situations bad enough, but politically it seems each party is more interested in obstructing the progress of the others than the needs of constituents.
A system is a network of nodes. In this model, the nodes are us and them, interwoven by our actions, fortunes, talents, shortcomings, ecosystem and governments, etc. When a change occurs, the signal reverberates across the system, downstream nodes reacting in accordance with their resonance, sometimes setting up feedback loops for the good or detriment of the system.
In the beginning, alls quiet. A cosmic strings plucked, delivering musica universalis. Chemical reactions aggregated into flora and fauna, in step with the law of the jungle. Paradise was then lost by a clever band of self-important naked apes, and the urgent need to act as good stewards now rapidly approaches the point of no return, negative feedback loops ever accelerating the speed and intensity of our ruin. This monkey business must stop!
In a parallel universe, the Union lost the War Between the States. Further, both sides agendas are realized: The Norths fully vaccinated populus has a 100% green economy, Miltons Paradise is recovered. And Atlas? Un-shrugged. One wonders the Alt-Confederacys fate.
KEVIN McEVOY LEVERET
White River Junction
I was surprised that Forum contributors Pam and Steve Skillman were triggered by recent Miss Manners columns, due to the advice being so outdated (Miss Manners advice seems out of touch, July 30). To trigger someone means to remind of past trauma, causing an intense emotional or physical reaction. And shes such a polite person! I remembered reading the column about accepting dinner invitations from single older men, read it again, and realized that these Gentle Readers hadnt understood what Miss Manners was saying at all. Oh dear.
Seeking to clarify this communication failure for myself, I found this quote from Emily Post: But etiquette also expresses something more, something we call the principles of etiquette. Those are consideration, respect, and honesty. These principles are the three qualities that stand behind all the manners we have.
Good to remember! With these principles, our manners are likely to stand the test of time, in all sorts of relationships and situations. Just ask yourself if you are acting with consideration, respect and honesty. Some things never go out of style.
GRETCHEN GRANER
South Strafford
See the rest here:
Forum, Aug. 3: NH government back on a right-wing leash - Valley News
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on Forum, Aug. 3: NH government back on a right-wing leash – Valley News
History of Virtual Reality | The Franklin Institute
Posted: at 2:21 pm
Todays virtual reality technologies build upon ideas that date back to the 1800s, almost to the very beginning of practical photography. In 1838, the first stereoscope was invented, using twin mirrors to project a single image. That eventually developed into the View-Master, patented in 1939 and still produced today.
The use of the term virtual reality, however, was first used in the mid-1980s when Jaron Lanier, founder of VPL Research, began to develop the gear, including goggles and gloves, needed to experience what he called virtual reality.
Even before that, however, technologists were developing simulated environments. One milestone was the Sensorama in 1956. Morton Heiligs background was in the Hollywood motion picture industry. He wanted to see how people could feel like they were in the movie. The Sensorama experience simulated a real city environment, which you rode through on a motorcycle. Multisensory stimulation let you see the road, hear the engine, feel the vibration, and smell the motors exhaust in the designed world.
Heilig also patented a head-mounted display device, called the Telesphere Mask, in 1960. Many inventors would build upon his foundational work.
By 1965, another inventor, Ivan Sutherland, offered the Ultimate Display, a head-mounted device that he suggested would serve as a window into a virtual world.
The 1970s and 1980s were a heady time in the field. Optical advances ran parallel to projects that worked on haptic devices and other instruments that would allow you to move around in the virtual space. At NASA Ames Research Center in the mid-1980s, for example, the Virtual Interface Environment Workstation (VIEW) system combined a head-mounted device with gloves to enable the haptic interaction.
Todays current virtual reality gear owes a debt of gratitude to the pioneering inventors of the past six decades who paved the way for the low-cost, high-quality devices which are easily accessible. Be sure to visit the VR flight simulators at The Franklin Institute to experience a virtual environment yourself!
Read the rest here:
Posted in Virtual Reality
Comments Off on History of Virtual Reality | The Franklin Institute
What is Virtual Reality? VR Definition and Examples | Marxent
Posted: at 2:21 pm
See some real examples ofVirtual Reality shopping apps; or fora look ahead, check out the5 top Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality technology trends for 2019. This post was last updated on June 7, 2019.
Virtual Reality (VR) is the use of computer technology to create a simulated environment. Unlike traditional user interfaces, VR places the user inside an experience. Instead of viewing a screen in front of them, users are immersedand able to interact with3D worlds. By simulating as many senses as possible, such as vision, hearing,touch, evensmell,the computer is transformed into agatekeeper to thisartificial world.The only limits to near-real VR experiences are the availability of content and cheapcomputing power.
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality are two sides of the same coin. You could think of Augmented Reality as VR with one foot in the real world: Augmented Reality simulates artificial objects in the real environment; Virtual Reality creates an artificial environment to inhabit.
In Augmented Reality, the computer uses sensors and algorithms to determine the position and orientation of a camera. AR technology then renders the 3D graphics as they would appear from the viewpoint of the camera, superimposing the computer-generated images over ausers view of the real world.
In Virtual Reality, the computer uses similar sensors and math. However,rather than locating a real camera within a physical environment, the position of the users eyes are located within the simulated environment. If the users head turns, the graphics react accordingly. Rather than compositing virtual objects and a real scene, VR technology creates a convincing, interactive world for the user.
Virtual Realitys most immediately-recognizable component is the head-mounted display (HMD). Human beings are visual creatures, and display technology is often the single biggest difference between immersive Virtual Reality systems and traditional user interfaces. For instance,CAVEautomatic virtual environments actively display virtual content onto room-sized screens. While they arefun for people in universities and big labs, consumer and industrial wearables are the wild west.
With a multiplicity of emerging hardware and software options, the future of wearables is unfolding but yet unknown. Concepts such as the HTC Vive Pro Eye, Oculus Quest and Playstation VR are leading the way, but there are also players like Google, Apple, Samsung, Lenovo and others who may surprise the industry with new levels of immersion and usability. Whomever comes out ahead, the simplicity of buying a helmet-sized device that can work in a living-room, office, or factory floor has made HMDs center stage when it comes to Virtual Reality technologies.
Convincing Virtual Reality applications require more than just graphics. Both hearing and vision are central to a persons sense of space. In fact, human beings react more quickly to audio cues than to visual cues. In order to create truly immersive Virtual Realityexperiences, accurate environmental soundsand spatial characteristics are a must. Theselenda powerful sense of presence toa virtual world. To experience the binaural audio details that go into a Virtual Reality experience, put on some headphones and tinkerwith this audio infographicpublished byThe Verge.
While audio-visual information is most easily replicated in Virtual Reality, active research and development efforts are still being conducted into the other senses. Tactile inputs such as omnidirectional treadmills allow users to feel as though theyre actually walking through a simulation, rather than sitting in a chair or on a couch. Haptic technologies, also known as kinesthetic ortouch feedback tech, have progressed from simple spinning-weight rumble motors to futuristic ultrasound technology. It is now possible to hear and feel true-to-life sensations along with visual VR experiences.
Follow this link:
What is Virtual Reality? VR Definition and Examples | Marxent
Posted in Virtual Reality
Comments Off on What is Virtual Reality? VR Definition and Examples | Marxent
What Is Virtual Reality? (+3 Types of VR Experiences)
Posted: at 2:21 pm
Escape into your own world with virtual reality technology.
The idea of interacting with a digital world isnt new, as movies like Tron (1982) and Spy Kids 3-D (2003) have brought conceptual technology to life on the big screen. But in todays world, those same consumers can now interact with their own digital space.
From gaming and social networking to education and marketing, there are many applications for this type of emerging tech. Youve probably already participated in a virtual reality experience and didnt even know it.
Unlike augmented reality, virtual reality is a fully digital experience that can either simulate or differ completely from the real world. The term virtual reality refers to a computer-generated, three-dimensional environment. In order to experience and interact with virtual reality, youll need the proper equipment, like a pair of VR glasses or a headset.
Virtual reality technology is used to create immersive experiences that can help educate and even entertain consumers. Outside of its popular gaming use case, virtual reality is applied in a variety of industries, such as medicine, architecture, military, and others.
Everything that makes up our perception of reality is due to our senses. So, in theory, everyones reality is unique to them. Taking that a step further, it would make sense that if you provided your sense with other simulated or computer-generated information, your perception of reality would change creating a new, virtual one.
Because VR tech creates a completely 3-D environment, you can imagine the amount of software involved. VR software works together with VR hardware to immerse the user into the virtual world. Developers also have to create interactive components within the environments that look and even feel like the real deal.
Virtual reality software can be used to build experiences for consumers to virtually test products, learn something new, or build something themselves. Believe it or not, there are even VR social platforms! Learn more about the types of software required to create these types of user experiences, like VR content management systems, SDKs, and more.
VR hardware is used in conjunction with the software to provide the illusion of being in a 3-D environment. Common hardware includes VR glasses, gloves, and other accessories to simulate other senses like touch.
There are three main types of virtual reality used today to transform the world around us, including non-immersive, semi-immersive, and fully-immersive simulations.
To get a better understanding of how the technology is used, lets break down the different types of VR and see examples of each.
Chances are when you think of VR, youre picturing a fully-immersive experience complete with head-mounted displays, headphones, gloves, and maybe a treadmill or some kind of suspension apparatus.
This type of VR is commonly used for gaming and other entertainment purposes in VR arcades or even in your home (empty, non-fragile room advised.)
Fully-immersive simulations give users the most realistic experience possible, complete with sight and sound. The VR headsets provide high-resolution content with a wide field of view. Whether youre flying or fighting the bad guys, youll feel like youre really there.
Semi-immersive experiences provide users with a partially virtual environment to interact with. This type of VR is mainly used for educational and training purposes and the experience is made possible with graphical computing and large projector systems.
In this example, the instruments in front of the pilot are real and the windows are screens displaying virtual content.
Its important to keep in mind that semi-immersive VR simulations still give users the perception of being in a different reality. This type of virtual reality is not always possible to experience wherever. Instead, physical environments are created to supplement the virtual reality.
Non-immersive simulations are often forgotten as an actual type of VR, honestly because its very common in our everyday lives.
The average video game is technically considered a non-immersive virtual reality experience. Think about it, youre sitting in a physical space, interacting with a virtual one.
These types of experiences have become more advanced in recent years with video games like Wii Sports, where the system actually detects your motion and translates it on screen.
People consume more content across more mediums today than ever before. As brands begin to leverage emerging technology like virtual reality, these experiences will start to take hold in our daily lives.
The possibilities for VR are endless, learn more about emerging trends in this area of tech.
Go here to read the rest:
Posted in Virtual Reality
Comments Off on What Is Virtual Reality? (+3 Types of VR Experiences)







