Monthly Archives: August 2021

LCS 21 (Minneapolis-Saint Paul) Christening and Launch on June 15, 2019.

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. The Navy is putting Littoral Combat Ship Minneapolis-Saint Paul (LCS-21) back together after completing a repair to beef up the complicated gearing mechanism that links the ships gas turbines to its diesel engines, service officials told USNI News on Monday.

In January, the Navy stopped taking delivery of the Freedom-class from Lockheed Martin after determining the RENK AG-built combining gear was under-engineered following a string of high-profile failures. In total, 13 Freedom-class LCS require the fix to the complicated gearing mechanism deep in the heart of the hulls.

The ships affected are now restricted by Naval Sea Systems Command to using either the ships diesel engines or its MT-30 gas turbines, but not both keeping the ships from their 40 knot top speed.

The Navy, Lockheed Martin and RENK AG tested a fix for the gearing in March in Germany and are finalizing the repairs on Minneapolis-Saint Paul at Escanaba. Mich., where the ship was taken to free up space at Fincantieri Marinette Marine in Wisconsin.

Its a very complex fix to replace the bearings on the combining gear. Its a very tight space, theres a lot of interferences that have to be removed, said LCS deputy program manager Howard Berkof on Monday. We completed that, were in the process of putting the ship back together and we will conduct at-sea testing of LCS 21 in the September timeframe.

The Navy, RENK and Lockheed Marin have devised three ways to potentially repair the gear. One requires a hull cut in the middle of the ship, while a second unvalidated repair replaces the bearings without removing the gear. The third, which was used on Minneapolis-Saint Paul, involved dropping the gear to the mission bay where the ships small boats will reside and removing the gear through the door in the aft of the hull, officials told USNI News.

The next steps will be to test the fix in the Great Lakes by putting the repaired gear through a series of elaborate propulsion drills for both Minneapolis-Saint Paul and under-construction USS Cooperstown (LCS-23). The goal would be to validate the repair on both ships and leave the Great Lakes before the path to the Atlantic freezes.

We expect to validate the combininggear year effects at sea and at which point we will continue to implement with providing our fix across new construction and in-service ships in that, that those details are still being worked, Berkof said.

The repairs will be included in the under-construction USS Marinette (LCS-25), USS Nantucket (LCS-27)

Beloit (LCS-29), thefinal Freedom-class ship, USS Cleveland (LCS-31), will be outfitted with a fully corrected combining gear.

How the rest of the fleet of Freedoms will be repaired and who will pay for it is still an open question. The complexity of the repair, as currently devised, will take years to trickle into ships already in the fleet, Berkof said.

While the contract repair for the yet-to-be-deployed ships has been determined, the Navy and Lockheed Martin are still negotiating how the fixes will happen and how they will be paid for, he said.

The two Freedoms not affected by the NAVSEA restrictions are USS Freedom (LCS-1) and USS Fort Worth (LCS-3). The two original hulls were built with a different mechanism, built by U.S. company Philadelphia Gear, to join their turbines and diesels.

The Navy has asked to decommission both ships, with Freedom slated to leave the fleet in September.

Related

Read more here:

Navy Will Test Freedom-class LCS Gear Fix Next Month; Years Before Repair Reaches Rest of Fleet - USNI News - USNI News

The saying, Everything in moderation, including moderation, has taken on new meaning since Facebook outsourced responsibility for content moderation to its Oversight Board following the violenteventsthat occurred at the United States Capitol back onJan. 6, 2021. First conceived in November 2018 as Facebooks Supreme Court for public appeals, the social media giants Oversight Board was officially enacted on Oct. 22, 2020.

In its time since, the Oversight Board has overturned many of Facebooks own decisions on what is and is not free speech. Some of the boards rulings include overturning decisions meant to limit hate speech and false pandemic claims. While this all sounds quite formal and matter-of-fact, nuance lurks beneath the surface.

In 2016, an internal Facebook presentation claimed that 64% of all extremist group joins are due to our recommendation tools. Two years later, another Facebook presentation confirmed that their algorithms exploit the human brains attraction to divisiveness. If Facebooks own research indicated valid, science-based reasons for reform, why outsource the responsibility to a new independent legal structure in the first place?

Related: Social media giants must decentralize the internet... Now!

While it is not my job to wade into the politics of what happened, Facebook should be responsible for developing content recommendation and moderation strategies that do not exacerbate political polarization for profit.

For example, last month Facebook issued a haphazard attempt to model community moderation after Nextdoor, the controversial neighborhood app. While Nextdoor has had fewer moderation problems than Facebook globally, its ongoing localized issues with misinformation, in-fighting and accusations of biased community moderators still set a low bar for private group moderation as a whole. This borrowed band-aid needs serious reconsideration.

In terms of content moderation, Reddit represents a step in the right direction by using a community-based upvote/downvote system on fora like r/wallstreetbets. Reddit CEO Steve Huffman claims that Reddits moderation system has not seen any nefarious behavior take place in r/wallstreetbets, showing the power of community action.

Related: Robinhood and GameStop proved we need a new financial system

Despite presenting a content moderation system thats slightly better than that of Facebook, the centralized nature of Reddit still poses a threat to open discourse and the marketplace of ideas. As a result of centralization, Reddit communities are not entirely self-governed or self-regulated. This means that practices such as shadow banning may occur, which can be seen as blatant violations of free speech in certain circumstances.

The new era of social media platforms must uphold the values of decentralization, democratization and transparency all of which are the driving forces behind crypto. Embodying these values, crypto social applications present a powerful alternative to Facebook and Reddit by enabling decentralized decision-making, where no authority can reign supreme and where blind trust is not a prerequisite for participation. They are designed by open-source communities around the globe to improve the status quo for the purpose of social good. These crypto social applications rely on bottom-up and middle-out governance instead of Facebooks top-down hierarchical power structures. And they do it in the name of crypto social justice.

Related: Is a new decentralized internet, or Web 3.0, possible?

Based on public blockchain technologies, these crypto social applications empower a new era of dont trust, verify and provide a practical way to do so. Examples of crypto social organizing include decentralized autonomous organizations, or DAOs. These headless organizations operate based on community-derived rules that are employed to vote new features and functionality in and out of use.

Many DAOs feature governance tokens which give DAO members financial incentives to vote on proposed actions. Voting is done by staking your financial claim to a proposed action. If the action passes, the new feature is implemented by the community. If the action fails, staked governance tokens are returned to DAO members. However, if a member acts in a way that breaks the community-set rules, their governance tokens are slashed and voided from having any financial or functional value. These are the basic rules of financially incentivized DAOs. Ideally, some of the same DAO mechanics can be used for content moderation more broadly.

Related: Decentralized technology can help protect democracy around the globe

Along with DAOs, another solution to problematic moderation practices can be found in content creation platforms decentralized, user-owned, crypto-based networks. By joining such platforms, users become their co-owners. This means that the power rests in the hands of consumers as opposed to an out-of-touch corporate board, thus better upholding the rights and responsibilities of the community.

Critically, crypto does not solve all the problems that content moderation has experienced historically. What it provides is a technological basis with which community mechanics can be organized from a bottom-up and middle-out perspective that empowers free speech in safe ways.

Related: Social applications are the next big trend in crypto

While the onboarding process to participate in DAOs has been historically difficult, there are new crypto social applications that seamlessly streamline the experience to improve accessibility. Moreover, by equipping users with pseudonymous usernames, these new onramps can cut off unproductive ad hominem attacks at the source, providing fairer opportunities for all.

Giving people the tools they need to interact civilly and productively opens up opportunities for online inspiration and collaboration. Designing these tools together is what makes DAOs and crypto social both uniquely powerful and just.

In an October speech of 2019 at Georgetown University, Mark Zuckerberg said:You cant impose tolerance top-down. It has to come from people opening up, sharing experiences, and developing a shared story for society that we all feel were a part of. Thats how we make progress together.He was right, but for the wrong reasons. Crypto social applications can help right those wrongs.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Jonathan Zerah joined Status Network, an encrypted messenger, in 2017 to lead marketing and communications, spearheading the messengers Web 3.0 ecosystem and the challenges it faces in marketing. Before Status, he worked at leading digital agencies crafting campaigns, activations and building digital products for global companies including Nike, Samsung, Audi and Google.

See the article here:

Crypto social governance will lead to online freedom - Cointelegraph

WASHINGTON Sadly, we are approaching a time in America during which our elected public officials will assault the liberties we have hired them to protect. Whatever the cause, the government will soon blame its failures to contain a virus on a small portion of the population and then impose restrictions on the inalienable rights of all of us.

We cannot permit this to happen again.

During the Civil War, when President Abraham Lincoln thought it expedient to silence those in the northern states who challenged his wartime decisions by incarcerating them in military prisons, he was rebuked afterward by a unanimous Supreme Court. The essence of the rebuke was that no matter the state of difficulties whether war or pestilence the Constitution protects our natural rights, and its provisions are to be upheld when they pinch as well as when they comfort, in good times and in bad.

Whether COVID-19 is coming back or not, our central planners have panicked. We do not have a free market in the U.S. in the delivery of health care; rather, we have thousands of pages of statutes, regulations and controls at the federal, state and local levels.

Those controls were revealed as manifestly deficient the last time around. The feds were so protective of their control of health care an area of governance that the Supreme Court has ruled is nowhere delegated to them in the Constitution and, but for their power to tax those who defy them, is nonexistent that they insisted that only the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta could be trusted to test for the virus.

It took weeks of begging by governors and mayors and health care professionals for the feds to relent. Of course, once they acknowledged that labs throughout the country were as competent as theirs, they realized that their incompetence had deprived all physicians as well as most private sector and state government-owned labs of the test kits themselves.

We all know how central economic planning diminishes freedom, produces scarcity and adds to the cost of products. Now we know that central micromanagement of health care kills people.

But these mayors and governors were not to be outdone by the feds in their totalitarian impulses. Many of them issued decrees that are as profoundly unconstitutional as Lincolns efforts to silence dissent.

They ordered the closing of most businesses and nearly all retail establishments. They acted as if they, and not we, owned our faces. They shuttered religious institutions. It took a year for the courts to interfere partially with this madness.

The fulfillment of these totalitarian impulses put millions out of work, closed and destroyed thousands of businesses and impaired the fundamental rights of tens of millions all in violation of numerous sections of the Constitution that the totalitarians swore to uphold.

And now they are threatening to do this again.

The Contracts Clause of the Constitution prohibits the states from interfering with lawful contracts, such as leases and employment agreements. The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits the states from interfering with life, liberty or property without a trial at which the state must prove fault. The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation when the state meaningfully interferes with an owners chosen lawful use of his property.

Taken together, these clauses reveal significant protections of private property in the Constitution. Add to this the threat of punishment that accompanied these decrees and the fact that they were executive decrees, not legislation, and one can see the paramount rejection of basic democratic and constitutional principles in the minds and words and deeds of those who have perpetrated them.

Add to all this the protection in the First Amendment of the rights to worship and associate, and elsewhere the judicially recognized right to travel, and it is clear that these nanny state rules were profoundly unconstitutional, indisputably unlawful and utterly unworthy of respect or compliance.

Why is this happening again?

Throughout history, free people have been willing to accept the devils bargain of trading liberty for safety when they are fearful. We supinely accept the shallow and hollow offers of government that somehow less liberty equals more safety. It doesnt. This is the governments dream dominance without resistance.

This happened here with the Alien and Sedition Acts in the 1790s when the Federalists feared a second revolution and punished speech critical of them, during the Civil War when Lincoln feared dissent and Congress feared defeat and they locked up innocents, during World War I when President Woodrow Wilson punished the speech he hated and feared, and during the Great Depression when President Franklin D. Roosevelt feared economic calamity and seized property without compensation. And, after 9/11, fearing another attack, Congress secretly crafted the Patriot Acts circumvention of the Fourth Amendment and authorized the creation of the total surveillance state.

Of course, just one year ago, we free people were all in lockdown a word used to describe confining prisoners to their cells.

This sordid history came about when the public was fearful of the unknown and trustful of the governments bargain. But the liberty that was sacrificed for the safety that was promised is being taken away again.

Liberty is natural and personal. You can sacrifice yours, but you cannot sacrifice mine. Thus, personal liberty the Declaration of Independence calls our rights inalienable, and the Ninth Amendment reflects freedoms nature as limitless is insulated from totalitarian and even majoritarian interference.

Today, the fear of contagion again gives government cover for its assaults on freedom and poses a question the government does not want to answer: If liberty can be taken away in times of crisis, is it really liberty; or is it just a license, via a temporary government permission slip, subject to the whims of the politicians in power?

We cannot permit this to happen again.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

See more here:

Freedom in the coming time of madness | News, Sports, Jobs - Escanaba Daily Press

The Beyond the Bridge Freedom Festival will be held this weekend.

The event starts at 10 a.m. Saturday and ends at 3 p.m. Admission is free and will be held on Washington Street, Water Avenue, Selma Avenue Alabama Avenue and Franklin Street.

The event was scheduled for Junteenth under the name Junteenth Freedom Fest, but it got postponed because of weather.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 will be a big part of Beyond the Bridge

Beyond the Bridge Freedom Fest is hosted by TRHT Selma in partnership with the Selma Center for Nonviolence and Black Belt Community Foundation, the City of Selma and Selma City Schools.

Co-hosts Collins Pettaway III and Lydia Chatmon will be among the speakers.

Pettaway said hes looking forward to the event.

This is an excellent opportunity to bring the community out to not only commemorate a momentous occasion, but to bring together people from all walks of life to simply have a great time, Pettaway said.

Chatmon said its an honor to participate in the event.

We are excited to share resources and information with families from across the Black Belt as we honor the signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and promote the importance of education, Chatmon said.

Eric Marable Jr. and Jahman Ariel Hill,, co-executive directors of The Flourish, Inc.are also scheduled to speak.

A health village will be part of the festival, with free health screenings, healthy snacks, preventive care resources and COVID vaccines. All are free.

The rest is here:

Beyond the Bridge Freedom festival will be held on Saturday - The Selma TimesJournal - Selma Times-Journal

Steve Bates drove from Northbrook to Forest Park on July 10 to attend a vanlife roundup, convened by Scott Watson.

Bates, a former Forest Park resident, explained that a roundup is a meeting attended by those interested in buying a vehicle, like his 21-foot 2019 Winnebago Travato GL self-contained camper van, and in hearing about his nomadic journey, which began in February 2019. Since then he has visited 40 states, lived in his van, and worked full time online from almost anywhere that has access to Wi-Fi.

The eight people from all over the Chicago Metro area attending the roundup had all caught the vanlife bug and were at various stages of turning their fantasies into reality. Bates, for example, had been a tent camper for many years but at this stage of life was interested in transitioning to something more comfortable.

Last winter he rented what is called a teardrop because of its profile a 4-by-4-foot camper trailer and headed out to Yellowstone National Park. He laughed as he reported that it snowed while he was there. Those camping in tents wished they had even a small camper like mine, he said, while I wished that I had a bigger camper like the van Scott has.

Seated around the table at Louies was the whole spectrum of vanlife enthusiasts. A woman named Deborah had just started exploring the possibility of buying a van while a man named Greg already owned a van similar to Watsons Winnebago. JB and Christine presently have a Winnebago Solis with a pop top roof and are thinking about upgrading.

The roundup turned out to be less a lecture by Watson and more of a seminar with all of the attendees chipping in their insights.

Many were interested in Watsons model of working while on the road, which required the nomad to have a job that can be done online. Suma couldnt do that because she is a veterinarian.

Two participants reported that hospitals tend to be short of nurses and will agree to commitments as short as three months, and that some even have electrical hookups in their parking lots to accommodate people living in campers. When Suma brought up the challenge of licensing in different states, she learned there are third-party companies that can do it for you.

Bates mentioned that on his recent trip to Yellowstone, it seemed like every business had a now hiring sign in its window.

Regarding electrical power, Watson raved about the ability of lithium batteries to hold a charge. Campgrounds like KOA have hookups but charge something like $30 a night to park. In addition, some campgrounds dont allow generators to run after a certain time in the evening. Malcom Smith was interested in buying a piece of land somewhere off the grid and parking a van or trailer there for long periods of time, so he asked questions about solar power.

There are campgrounds, of course, but at $30 a night the cost can mount up. Some towns allow parking on the street while others, like every municipality in Michigan, will give you a ticket.

With freedom come periods of being alone. Watsons solution is to be outgoing. When he parks in a campground, he immediately gets to know his neighbors, and discovers right away that they have vanlife or a variant thereof in common. When visiting a town, he introduces himself to the people in the diner or gas station or library and has learned that many locals like sharing their stories and show interest in his lifestyle.

As it turns out, there is a whole online community of vanlife enthusiasts which can be plugged into. Watson posts two stories a week on his website, Go Small. Live Large! and on YouTube under the same name. The subtitle on the website explains the content: Sharing stories about interesting places, fascinating people, Vanlife in a Travato GL, and working as a digital nomad.

Read the original here:

Living the fantasy of freedom on the open road - Forest Park Review

Yes, Taiwan will fight

Donald Trump was never pro-Taiwan. What I mean by that is that he never saw the nation as an asset in our struggle with China.

Some believe that Taiwan is a liability for America. They fear that China will inevitably swallow the democratic island of 24 million people by force, and that while the United States should try to deter such a calamity, there is no need to risk World War III by fighting the Chinese over an island in their backyard.

The pro-Taiwan camp differs. It holds that Taiwan puts the lie to the entire reason for existence of the Chinese Community Party (CCP). The CCP says the Chinese people need the iron fist of the Party to stave off the chaos and the humiliation at the hands of foreigners that marked Chinas chaotic modern history. In Taiwan, ethnically Chinese people live in freedom, govern themselves democratically, and have the rule of law. Theyre also better off economically: according to the Central Intelligence Agency, Taiwan has a per capita income of $24,502, compared to $16,117 for China.

To put it another way, the pro-Taiwan crowd sees the country as an invaluable political warfare tool in the Free Worlds struggle with Beijing. Knowledge of Taiwans success is one of several factors eroding support for the CCP, and the CCP knows it.

But Trump didnt. To his credit, he eventually had some political appointees beneath him who were very pro-Taiwan. This feature may have been unintentional, given Trumps galactic incompetence with personnelan eighth wonder of the world. But it worked out for Taiwan. Trumps secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, gave strong verbal support to Taiwan, approved several arms packages for the country, including new F-16 fighters, and sent his under secretary to visit the nation. He also dropped pointless and insulting curbs on diplomatic engagement with Taiwan that had often led U.S. and Taiwanese officials to meet in coffee shops. Pompeo was also tougher on China than any secretary of state since John Foster Dulles, if not ever. Pompeo heralded an end to blind engagement of Beijing and condemned Chinas military aggression and human rights abuses.

But the rub for Trump was a belief that Taiwan wouldnt fight in a war, at least not for long. An interesting feature of Washingtons feckless national security establishment has been a stark shift in views on China, from a belief that its threat to Taiwan was overblown to an assumption that it will eventually conquer the island. In part because of a lack of communication between top levels of both nations militaries (in contravention of law), and thanks to decades of pre-Trump neglect of getting adequate U.S.-made arms to Taiwan, there is a view that the country would fold rapidly in a conflict with China. If we wake up one Sunday to learn that China has plastered Taiwan with hundreds of conventional missiles, with paratroopers presumably on the way, and the Chinese navy dominating the Taiwan Strait, will the Taiwanese even hold out long enough for Washington to marshal its too-few ships and aircraft in the Pacific for a fight?

I think they will.

First, there is the political angle. While the Free World lost Hong Kong to the CCP, its people, who struggle on through more subdued means, did not lose their freedom in vain. Supposedly concerned only about money, the people of Hong Kong, through protest and resistance, showed that free ethnically Chinese people will not surrender their freedom without a fight. While this now seems obvious, it was in doubt before Hong Kongs Umbrella Movement in 2014 and much broader protests of 2019 and 2020. This sentiment was echoed on Taiwan, where the tough-on-Beijing ruling party and president achieved resounding success in 2020 elections and relegated to a fringe the old voices that still entertained union with China under the CCP.

Then there is the military angle. Under Trump, officials at the State Department, National Security Council, and Pentagon accelerated quick, simpler arms sales to Taipei, which in turn increased its defense spending. They set aside costly options like the F-35 fighter, and instead moved pragmatic aircraft and other weapons like tanks, drones, missiles, and missile-defense systems to the countryall paid for by Taiwan. Just this week, the Biden administration continued the trend by notifying Congress it intended to export M109 self-propelled howitzers to Taiwan. The country is developing its own electric submarine, which could help the U.S. Navy and Air Force sink a Chinese invasion force.

Taiwan can hold out, given it has the both the political will and military means to fight for its freedom. Beijing likely suspects this, and should understand that the risks it would face in attacking Taiwan are too great, especially since failure would destabilize the Chinese government.

Washington could make the world a safer place by acknowledging this reality as well, and dispensing with the defeatist, pessimistic view of Taiwan. Furthermore, it is negligent that our two militaries do not drill together and have a unified military command, ideally with Japan involved as well. By taking these steps, Taiwan can be an even greater asset in our deterrence of China and struggle against CCP aggression.

Christian Whiton, a senior fellow at the Center for the National Interest, is the author ofSmart Power: Between Diplomacy and War. He was a State Department senior advisor during the George W. Bush and Trump administrations.

Image: Reuters.

Go here to read the rest:

Taiwan Will Fight China in a War For Its Freedom - The National Interest

High vaccination rates, combined with some curbs on our behaviour, provide our best chance to ease the worst aspects of this pandemic. But it is crucial that Australians understand that, despite much-vaunted vaccination take-up freedom thresholds, we will only know the actual number when the day arrives. In the meantime, we must aim for the highest possible vaccination rates including among very young children and start taking this lockdown more seriously.

Vaccination rates must be maximised before we can consider significant relaxation of restrictions.Credit:AP

This American summer provides a real-time cautionary tale that should prompt us not to get ahead of ourselves. Despite having only 50 per cent of the population fully vaccinated against the SARS-COV-2 virus, related restrictions were eased prematurely in the United States. On Cape Cod, hundreds crowded into the popular holiday area and the virus had a field day. Most alarmingly, 74 per cent of the infections occurred in fully vaccinated individuals. Most experienced only minor symptoms and significantly none died. But those infected were carrying very high viral loads and were, of course, infectious.

We have known for many months that vaccination does not stop one from carrying viruses in ones respiratory secretions but this event finally persuaded the American Centres for Disease Control and Prevention to call for the vaccinated to wear masks when indoors and to maintain social distancing.

You may have followed the negative reaction from many that followed. Just when they thought vaccination would provide freedom from the scourge of COVID, they were once again told to wear masks and practise social distancing. Incredibly, some governors decided this was intolerable and actually banned mandatory mask-wearing.

We immunologists expected this situation. While the vaccines we use do reduce the carriage of virus in our respiratory secretions by, on average, 50 per cent, none produce what is called sterilising immunity, a state where the immune system will not allow viruses to reside in those secretions.

Scott Morrison at Wednesdays announcement of the Doherty Institute modelling for vaccination rates. Credit:Alex Ellinghausen

We have a purpose-evolved mucosal immune system with special skills to protect our inner skin, the mucous membranes that line noses, throats and intestines. This system is poorly activated by vaccines injected into the body. Hence, injected vaccines only effectively protect our vital internal organs, and thankfully they do that very well. Dozens of laboratories are hard at work trying to produce vaccines that can be administered by nasal sprays or taking a tablet.

At the moment Australians are studying the governments four-stage plan to end our COVID suffering. Enormous emphasis is being given to some definitive figure for vaccination uptake that, on arrival, will set us free. Various models suggest 70-90 per cent vaccination rates will be required. The truth is that we will only know the true figure when the smouldering embers of the pandemic can readily be dowsed by our contact tracers for the few cases we will encounter.

That figure is certainly a very high one. My point in discussing the carrier status of the vaccinated is to make it clear that for much of 2022 even with the majority of us vaccinated mask-wearing and social distancing will still be required by all us to avoid lockdowns and to protect the unvaccinated. Surely Australians would not accept the appalling proposition that we and our government have no duty of care to those who refuse vaccination.

View post:

Vaccination is critical, but it will not alone unlock our freedom - Sydney Morning Herald