The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: July 2021
How Facebook And Big Tech Wage Publicity Wars Through Close Ties With Small Businesses – Forbes
Posted: July 7, 2021 at 3:03 pm
Getty Images
When Facebook wanted to turn up the heat on Apple earlier this year in a dispute about ads and data privacy, Facebook brought some ringers to the fight. In a prominent online ad campaign, it featured several small businesses discussing how Apples decision to allow users to turn off data collection would not only eat away at Facebooks trillion-dollar market cap, it would hurt the little guys, too, limiting the effectiveness of Facebooks targeted ads.
The marketing tugged at the heartstrings, highlighting the imperilment of what seemed like ordinary mom-and-pop-type companies. But at least two of the featured small businesses, Morgan Miller Plumbing in Grandview, Missouri, and Enlightened Marketing in Windsor, Colorado, actually have deep connections to Facebook, part of a familiar Big Tech strategy to use relationships with small businesses and pro-small-business lobbyist groups in public-policy PR campaigns, according to new research from the nonpartisan Tech Transparency Project.
They're portraying these as sort of an upswelling of grassroots, small-business support for Big Tech rather than what they really are, which is this very highly cultivated group of mouthpieces, says Katie Paul, the Tech Transparency Projects director.
In the recent example of Facebooks campaign, Morgan Millers founder, Jeff Morgan, says in his official bio on his company website that he has had the privilege of visiting Facebook headquarters to share ideas. Meanwhile, Enlightened Marketing founder Jeremy Howie belongs to Facebooks Small Business Council, an advisory group set up by the social network to help it better understand its small business customers. Moreover, Howie, on his companys website, says hes also visited Facebook HQ several times, met with Facebook Chief Operating OfficerSheryl Sandberg and has taken part in several internal Facebook beta tests.
Moreover, the researchers point out, both Morgan Millers CEO, Stella Crewse, and Enlightened Marketings founder, Howie, sit on the board of the Connected Commerce Council. The pro-small-business lobbying group, known as 3C, counts Amazon, Google and Square as official partners; Facebook was also one until recently, a 3C spokesman says. (3C appreciates the investment of our partner companies in our education programs and general support of 3C member companies, the lobbying groups website reads.)
To be clear, theres nothing illegal about creating ad campaigns that could strike some viewers as less than wholly authentic. Facebook makes no apologies for working directly with some of the 200 million businesses on our platform to showcase how they are able to reach new customers and create jobs in their communities, a Facebook spokesperson says. We are public about our efforts, including creating opportunities for small businesses to give feedback and advice to us and to each other. We will continue to offer free services and affordable advertising that used to only be available to the biggest advertisers.
But it is illustrative of the tightly coordinated inner workings of Big Techs fights in these public policy battles. Back when the antitrust movement against Big Tech started up in 2019, 3C produced pro-Big Tech marketing aimed to sway Congress that featured Myles Hagan, the owner of Geoffs Farmhouse Tables in Travelers Rest, South Carolina, and several other small businesses, according to an earlier Tech Transparency Project report. Without companies like Facebook, Google and Amazon, I would not have been able to find a customer base beyond the borders of my beloved Palmetto state, Myles Hagan said in one press release. Small businesses like mine tend to get hurt when Congress goes after the big guys. And sometimes these small businesses even get recycled: While Morgan Miller appeared most recently in a Facebook campaign, it also appeared in a 2020 and a 2021 Google marketing campaign heralding the benefit of its tools for small businesses.
3C was founded in 2018 by Jake Ward, a former public relations executive and, briefly, a press secretary for Sen. Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican. In the past, 3C has submitted comments from small businesses to the FTC that supported digital tools from Big Tech like digital payments and videoconferencing; flown other small businesses into Washington to meet with regulators and legislative staff; and assembled press statements like this one, in which it argued against the governments new antitrust cases against Big Tech and included quotes from small businesses praising those large companies.
3C, which wouldnt comment for this story, isnt the only firm devoted to helping Big Tech defend itself in this manner. Another active lobbying group identified by the Tech Transparency Project is the Small Business Roundtable, a Washington, D.C.-based organization founded by two Democratic political operatives, Rhett Buttle and John Stanford. Last May, the Small Business Roundtable and Facebook partnered on a report, State of Small Business. The document cited findings drawn from a survey of 68,000 small businesses already active on Facebook. Given this background, their main conclusion isnt too surprising, that digital tools had been crucial in shoring up their failing companies. Sandberg publicly promoted the report in a press release and through op-eds, and the company also used it in paid advertising campaigns online.
Big Tech has got this group of small businesses that they can tap, and theyre pre-vetted: They know theyre going to be on message, says Paul, the Tech Transparency Project director. Its just very easy for them to keep going back to that well because these guys are part of the team.
Go here to see the original:
How Facebook And Big Tech Wage Publicity Wars Through Close Ties With Small Businesses - Forbes
Posted in Big Tech
Comments Off on How Facebook And Big Tech Wage Publicity Wars Through Close Ties With Small Businesses – Forbes
Big Tech executives find new frontier in FreightTech – FreightWaves
Posted: at 3:03 pm
The supply chain industry has accepted its technological revolution.
Investors have flooded supply chain tech startups with billions in capital $7.7 billion in Q1 alone, a 355% increase year-over-year to address the inefficiency that has historically plagued the industry.
These same startups have seen increasing valuations around 100% year-over-year for late-stage startups, as questions on supply chain resiliency flood earnings calls, while government administrations call on specialized task forces to address supply chain disruptions.
All of this attention is attracting Big Tech executives to the industry, filling roles in product development and capital deployment to consult the innovators behind this technological insurgence.
Many of these leaders gravitate toward the opportunity to be a part of the supply chains own version of the 1990s Information Revolution and the industrys startup founders are welcoming these assets with open arms.
Inefficiencies allow value creation
The fragmentation of the supply chain industry is one of the leading factors attracting Big Tech executives to one of the last industries yet to embrace the technology needed to eliminate its inefficiencies.
Mark Hoyt, former chief financial officer of Groupons Europe, Middle East and Africa finance function, spoke with FreightWaves about his transition last month to Loadsmart, a digital freight brokerage, as the companys new CFO.
Im [working] on the floor with everybody else and Im able to hear whats actually happening with our shippers and carriers, he said. My eyes have been opened to how much commerce takes place in the US and how important logistics is to the entire underpinning of the US economy. There are opportunities for us to step in and help make this overall process more efficient.
With Loadsmarts $90 million Series C raise from late 2020, Hoyt will be able to take his experience at the two-sided marketplace Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) and apply it to the same business model Loadsmart is building for its customers.
With our healthy balance sheet and the cash infusion we raised in November, we are putting capital to work, he said. We are starting to add new solutions to our platform and looking to leverage other outside technologies that would take us 18 to 24 months to build. When we combine all of that within our platform, you can create this multiplier effect where we can generate more value for our customers.
Convoys recent Big Tech recruits have found the same attraction to the inefficient industry. Mark Okerstrom, the president and COO and acting CFO of Convoy described to FreightWaves the challenges of the industry that mirrored the problems he helped solve during his tenure at Expedia Group (NASDAQ:EXPE) and Vrbo.
Its similar to what we did with Vrbo at Expedia, he said. Small hotels were unable to compete with a lot of the big hotels because they didnt have the big marketing budgets and other assets that they have.
We democratized all of that. We found the same on the carrier side, small owner-operators dont have big marketing budgets. They dont have big sales teams to go and sign up freight from around the country, so they sign up with Convoy and we give them full access to that.
Solving these inefficiencies in a groundbreaking way is something that fuels these innovators.
Coming to Convoy is bringing me back to my roots, said Dorothy Li, past vice president of Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and newly appointed CTO of Convoy.
What Convoy is doing is really democratizing the set of services for smaller companies. What I have been doing at Amazon Web Services is really making data and analytics very accessible to even nontechnical people. Its a combination of building a user interface thats friendly, but also building platforms that allow other people to build on top of our services as well.
Revolution of the human experience
Li wasnt just attracted to innovating an industry desperately needing innovation. What brought her real joy was being a part of a revolution that affects the lives and habits of people around the world.
Convoy has this bold and big mission of transporting the worlds goods with a network of endless capacity and zero waste, she said. I think about this mission and I think about the fact that if we fulfill this mission, the world is better off and not many opportunities have that. The bigger the company is, the better it is for the planet.
Christian Lee shared similar thoughts after joining the team at Transfix, a transportation solutions provider.
I think what we are doing at Transfix goes much deeper than providing transportation services in the sense that the fundamental premise of the business model is less waste, the former CFO of WeWork told FreightWaves. Its a massive win for everyone involved.
That is the very definition of the business were building is one that reduces waste in every aspect of the transportation ecosystem. That gets me really excited because I think theres a way to tell that story and investment in that just continues to have benefits for literally every part of society.
Supply chain needs them
As lucky as the industry is to be going through an attractive technology revolution, industry leaders need these individuals to help strategize the development, deployment, and ultimately, the recruitment of individuals to build these solutions.
Ben Eachus, co-founder and CEO of the warehousing and fulfillment platform Flowspace, explained to FreightWaves the importance of bringing on the companys new chief product officer, Sam Daoud.
We want to build one of the biggest fulfillment networks in the country and to do that you need people who have both seen what that looks like and have done it themselves, he said. Sams experience building a successful e-commerce business from the ground in the Middle East and at Amazon is the reason we felt strongly about bringing Sam on to the team.
He explained that the experience building teams to create this innovation is a big piece of the equation as well.
We are trying to solve a really big problem in fulfillment and in order to do that you want the best, Eachus said. I think people get excited about being around people with a track record of success. That in turn has helped us recruit even more people with track records to solve these problems.
Dan Lewis, the founder and CEO of Convoy, described the similar reasoning behind recruiting Li to build innovative teams to build tools for problems that have been deeply rooted in transportation for decades.
Amazon Prime and the Kindle were groundbreaking and they set the stage for many other companies to try to build similar tools, he said. I think a big part of her experience is thinking about these problems that are uncharted and figuring out how to get people whove been doing it the same way to do them differently.
Whats the value of FreightTech patents? For Omnitracs, maybe nothing.
Carriers bet on Capacity-as-a-Service
More long-haul drivers eyeing final mile
Go here to read the rest:
Big Tech executives find new frontier in FreightTech - FreightWaves
Posted in Big Tech
Comments Off on Big Tech executives find new frontier in FreightTech – FreightWaves
Honoring Richard Lewontin, Famed Evolutionary Biologist and Sometime Critic of His Own Field – Discovery Institute
Posted: at 3:02 pm
Photo credit: Casey Luskin.
As Paul Nelson noted here already, Richard Lewontin, the famed Harvard zoologist, has passed away. He was 92. Lewontin was an extremely influential evolutionary biologist in the 20th century, having pioneered many new ideas and techniques in evolutionary studies. Though he was an explicit critic of intelligent design and a strong defender of evolutionary thinking in science, he was also brave and willing to criticize his own field when he thought it was appropriate.
One of Lewontins most famous contributions to science came in a 1979 paper he co-wrote with Stephen Jay Gould, titled The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. The paper critiqued the standard Darwinian viewpoint that every feature of life must have an adaptive benefit. They introduced the term spandrel into evolutionary biology based upon the gaps between supportive arches common in medieval architecture as a feature that is not immediately adaptive but a natural byproduct of other features (which may be adaptive). Lewontins article with Gould was heavily critical of the adaptationist programme and its credulity, the tendency to embrace weak tales to explain the origin of features:
We fault the adaptationist programme for its failure to distinguish current utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this will not explain why they got so small); for its unwillingness to consider alternatives to adaptive stories; for its reliance upon plausibility alone as a criterion for accepting speculative tales; and for its failure to consider adequately such competing themes as random fixation of alleles, production of nonadaptive structures by developmental correlation with selected features (allometry, pleiotropy, material compensation, mechanically forced correlation), the separability of adaptation and selection, multiple adaptive peaks, and current utility as an epiphenomenon of non-adaptive structures. [E]volutionary biologists, in their tendency to focus exclusively on immediate adaptation to local conditions, do tend to ignore architectural constraints and perform just such an inversion of explanation. We wish to question a deeply engrained habit of thinking among students of evolution. We call it the adaptationist programme This programme regards natural selection as so powerful and the constraints upon it so few that direct production of adaptation through its operation becomes the primary cause of nearly all organic form, function, and behaviour. We all say that not everything is adaptive; yet, faced with an organism, we tend to break it into parts and tell adaptive stories as if trade-offs among competing, well designed parts were the only constraint upon perfection for each trait. It is an old habit. Too often, the adaptationist programme gave us an evolutionary biology of parts and genes, but not of organisms. It assumed that all transitions could occur step by step and underrated the importance of integrated developmental blocks and pervasive constraints of history and architecture.
They cite many examples of spandrels in biology which defy simple adaptationist explanations, including the zig-zag grooves, ribs, and, colors on clam or brachiopod shells; horns, antlers, and tusks in various vertebrates; colors and shapes of snail shells; and others. One would be hard pressed to find an adaptive purpose for the beautiful graphic texture on a sea snail shell (see above; I believe it belongs to Darioconus auricomus) that I bought as a gift for my wife last year.
We are sometimes told that the term Darwinism is pass and no longer used, but in an essay, The evolution of Charles Darwin, written for the bicentennial celebration of Darwins birth, Lewontin used this term and explained precisely why it remains appropriate:
Why do we call the modern theory of organic evolution Darwinism? Charles Darwin certainly did not invent the idea of evolution, that is, of the continuous change in time of the state of some system as a fundamental property of that system, or even the idea that a process of evolution had occurred in the history of life. By the time of the appearance of the Origin, the physical sciences had become thoroughly evolutionary. By the younger Darwins time, the idea of organic evolution had become a common currency of intellectual life. Two years before the publication of the Origin, Herbert Spencer argued for a belief in organic evolution on the basis of the agreed-upon universality of evolutionary processes
The answer to Lewontins question of course is that it was Darwin who proposed natural selection as the primary mechanism driving evolution. He thus notes: The Darwin-Wallace explanation of evolution, the theory of natural selection, and Darwins ideas in Origin of Species had immediate success because the theory purported to explain the adaptive complexity of life. But Lewontin simultaneously noted that explanations based upon natural selection often amount to stories that dont always have a high level of inferential strength. He criticized Jerry Coyne, writing:
Where he [Coyne] is less successful, as all other commentators have been, is in his insistence that the evidence for natural selection as the driving force of evolution is of the same inferential strength as the evidence that evolution has occurred. So, for example, he gives the game away by writing that when we examine a sequence of changes in the fossil record, we can determine whether the sequences of changes at least conform to a step-by-step adaptive process. And in every case, we can find at least a feasible Darwinian explanation.
But to say that some example is not falsification of a theory because we can always find (or invent) a feasible explanation says more about the flexibility of the theory and the ingenuity of its supporters than it says about physical nature. Indeed in his later discussion of theories of behavioral evolution he becomes appropriately sceptical when he writes that imaginative reconstructions of how things might have evolved are not science; they are stories.
While this is a perfectly good argument against those who claim that there are things that are so complex that evolutionary biology cannot explain them, it allows evolutionary theory to fall back into the category of being reasonable but not an incontrovertible material fact.
Lewontin reiterated criticisms of the strength of selection-based explanations in 2010, when he published a review of What Darwin Got Wrong by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini in The New York Review of Books. He said that natural selection fails to explain many things:
The trouble with this outline is that it does not explain the actual forms of life that have evolved. There is an immense amount of biology that is missing. It says nothing about why organisms with the evolved characteristic were more likely to survive or reproduce than those with the original one. Why, when vertebrates evolved wings, did they have to give up their front legs to do it? After all, insects can have two pairs of wings and six legs, so there cannot be any deep general biological constraint on development. Why dont birds that live in trees make a living by eating the leaves as countless forms of insects do instead of spending so much of their energy looking for seeds or worms?
Lewontin even criticized the standard peppered moth story, saying: One unfortunate feature of this case is that the caterpillars of the dark-winged forms also have a slightly higher survival rate than those of the speckled-wing form, even though they are not black, so something more is going on, but this fact is not part of the curriculum.
In the 2010 essay, Lewontin expressed concern that To a degree never before experienced by the current generation of students of evolution, evolutionary theory is under attack by powerful forces of religious fundamentalism. He noted that What Darwin Got Wrong got the attention of evolutionary biologists because in it two accomplished intellectuals make the statement Darwins theory of selection is empty. Because of existential threats to evolutionary biology, he wrote, they thereby generate an anger that makes it almost impossible for biologists to give serious consideration to their argument. But Lewontin agreed with Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini that evolutionary explanations are often insufficient to generate certain scientific knowledge:
Even biologists who have made fundamental contributions to our understanding of what the actual genetic changes are in the evolution of species cannot resist the temptation to defend evolution against its know-nothing enemies by appealing to the fact that biologists are always able to provide plausible scenarios for evolution by natural selection. But plausibility is not science. True and sufficient explanations of particular examples of evolution are extremely hard to arrive at because we do not have world enough and time. The cytogeneticist Jakov Krivshenko used to dismiss merely plausible explanations, in a strong Russian accent that lent it greater derisive force, as idel specoolations.
Even at the expense of having to say I dont know how it evolved most of the time, biologists should not engage in idle speculations.
These are intriguing statements, for they show that Lewontin was an honest scientist who said what he really thought and was willing to buck the trend in his own field. But the quote for which Lewontin has become best known appeared in his 1997 review of Carl Sagans book Billions and Billions of Demons, also in The New York Review of Books. In this famous passage he acknowledged that modern evolutionary science assumes materialism is true, regardless of the state of the evidence:
Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that miracles may happen.
Methodological naturalism (MN) is the idea that when practicing science we must assume that there are no intelligent and/or supernatural forces that can interfere with the natural world. To do otherwise, according to defenders of MN, subjects scientific investigation to the whim of a deity, as biologist John A. Moore put it. It also protects science against the God of the gaps mistake, where we initially attribute something to intelligent causes only later to discover a natural cause.
But what if there were a reliable, predictive method to detect intelligent causation? What if we could detect when an intelligent agent was at work by using reliable scientific methods just as reliable as the methods we use to detect material causation? This would bring intelligent agency back into science proper. William Dembski explains that this is exactly what the theories of design detection provided by the intelligent design research community provide for us:
Scientists are beginning to realize that design can be rigorously formulated as a scientific theory. What has kept design outside the scientific mainstream these last 130 years is the absence of precise methods for distinguishing intelligently caused objects from unintelligently caused ones. For design to be a fruitful scientific theory, scientists have to be sure they can reliably determine whether something is designed. Johannes Kepler, for instance, thought the craters on the moon were intelligently designed by moon dwellers. We now know that the craters were formed naturally. This fear of falsely attributing something to design only to have it overturned later has prevented design from entering science proper. With precise methods for discriminating intelligently from unintelligently caused objects, scientists are now able to avoid Keplers mistake.
Lewontin was right to see science as based upon reliable methods that produce some degree of certainty. And he tried to be fair, applying these requirements not just to intelligent design but also to evolutionary biology. But if Dembski is correct, then the modern theory intelligent design has developed rigorous methods for detecting the prior action of an intelligence, based upon predictable and regular features we observe when intelligent agents are at work. This makes intelligent causation a proper subject for scientific study, and it threatens to make intelligent design a legitimate competitor to Darwinism.
I have no doubt that Lewontin would have disagreed that intelligent design deserves a place in science. But I would argue that like Darwinian evolution, intelligent design is a historical science. Because historical sciences deal with events of the past, their inferences are often weaker than in empirical sciences that study modern-day processes. Lewontin recognized this weakness in explanations citing natural selection (or other evolutionary mechanisms). But if Lewontins criticisms of evolutionary just-so stories are correct, and if Dembskis statements about the robustness and reliability of the design inference are correct, then I believe ID could satisfy Lewontins concerns about including intelligent agency in science.
Perhaps saying so is the best way an ID theorist can honor him.
See the original post:
Posted in Darwinism
Comments Off on Honoring Richard Lewontin, Famed Evolutionary Biologist and Sometime Critic of His Own Field – Discovery Institute
You Cant Kill The Indies (Guest Blog) – Yahoo Entertainment
Posted: at 3:02 pm
hollyblog guest blog banner
Consolidation is built into the nature of corporations. If some little upstart is eating into your market, it is easy enough to buy the upstart and add its market share to your own. Capitalism is a lot like Darwinism put a little fish in the path of a big fish, and the big fish is compelled by its nature to eat it.
But even as little fish are absorbed into big fish, more little fish are being born.
There was a time in contemporary music when there were dozens of iconic record labels, each of which had a distinct identity. Even people who dont follow music know what a Motown record sounded like. Asylum Records meant LA singer/songwriters (Jackson Browne, The Eagles, Linda Rondstadt); Stax Records was Memphis soul (Booker T. & the M.G.s, Rufus Thomas, Otis Redding); Island Records began as a reggae label (Bob Marley, Jimmy Cliff); and Sire Records practically owned New York punk (Talking Heads, Richard Hell and the Voidoids, Ramones).
Compare that to today, when Universal Music Group owns Capitol, Geffen, A&M, Interscope, Republic, Def Jam, Caroline, Decca, Verve as well as the catalogs of the long-gone Chess, Blue Thumb, 20th Century Fox, ABC, Chrysalis, Dot, Dunhill, Fantasy, IRS, Imperial, Mercury, MCA, MGM, EMI, Uni, Paramount, Shelter, Virgin and dozens more.
But while Universal and the other two majors Sony and Warners dominate the market, they are operating in a world where the barriers to entry have fallen away. In the 20th century, the majors stayed major because they controlled the means of distribution. To even get their records into many parts of the country, Indies had to make distribution deals with the majors.
In the 21st century, pressing plants and trucks dont count for much. Music is distributed through the internet and there is a recording studio in every laptop. If you are Adele or Bruno Mars, it makes sense to be on a major label. But in a TikTok world, the next hit single can come from anywhere YouTube, a Spotify playlist or a video game.
Story continues
It works that way across all media. Marvel Comics has been absorbed into Disney, as a feeder and R&D division, as DC Comics has been swallowed by WarnerMedia. The move of those old pulp businesses into international entertainment conglomerates has only encouraged small comic book companies to enter the marketplace. You never know where the next Hellboy or The Walking Dead is going to come from.
The accepted history of post-Bonnie & Clyde Hollywood is that the old studio bosses did not understand a world where Easy Rider did better than Hello Dolly! and in their confusion opened the door to a generation of rebels Martin Scorsese, Robert Altman, Terrence Malick who revitalized American cinema for a few years until Jaws and Star Wars introduced the mass-release summer blockbuster and the revolution was squashed.
But was the underground really defeated? There are always new generations bringing new revolutions. Independent voices continued to emerge: Spike Lee, Jim Jarmusch and the Coen Brothers in the 80s; Allison Anders, Steven Soderbergh, Quentin Tarantino, Paul Thomas Anderson and Wes Anderson in the 90s. They often got their shots through new independents like Miramax and New Line, spiritual successors to BBS Productions and American Zoetrope.
The cycle of art reflects the cycle of life those who are rebels in their twenties may elect, by age 40, to join the system (Scorsese), drop out (Malick) or accept financial compromises in order to continue to work on the margins (Altman). There will always be new rebels, as long as there are new people turning 20, and dumbass bull-headed entrepreneurs willing to risk it all for odds-defying, out-of-the-box creative ideas!
Our studio, named after a lyric from a fiercely independent artist, Aimee Mann, is seeing and hearing these unapologetic voices emerge in the AVOD, podcast, short-form and even the SVOD space. In the sci-fi and horror genres (typically dominated by old white men with all due respect to that genre of human), Gunpowder & Sky has global FAST channels DUST and ALTER that both exhibit cinematic short films by widely diverse filmmakers from South Korea to Colombia. These novel pieces of IP are now migrating, and spinning off, to wider audiences in partnership with icons of the genres from Sam Raimi to James Wan to Stephen Spielberg who are recognizing how these creators are reminiscent of their own, louder, less categorizable selves.
I hope we, collectively, dont forget to provide a roof, the appropriate stimulants and fast food for the unmanageable freaks that will inevitably surprise and scare us. Sort of the way Steve Golin did with Propaganda, and David Geffen did with Asylum and Martin Goodman did with Marvel. These indie voices buoy diversity, move culture along and ultimately fill the pipes that feed content into homes worldwide. After all, if Spike Jonze had been justifiably ushered out of whatever workspace he was provided, I couldnt have helped make the Oscar-nominated (yes, no kidding) Jackass series and movies and lets be honest, the world wouldve been a sadder place without Steve-O.
Read original story You Cant Kill The Indies (Guest Blog) At TheWrap
Go here to read the rest:
Posted in Darwinism
Comments Off on You Cant Kill The Indies (Guest Blog) – Yahoo Entertainment
Slavery Is Still Legal in the United States
Posted: at 2:59 pm
This article first appeared on the Cato Institute site.
When most Americans learn about the 13th Amendment in high school, the teacher will cursorily remark that "the 13th Amendment ended slavery in the United States," and move on to the 14th Amendment.
This oversimplification is a fiction. Slavery is still legal in the United States, so long as it is pursuant to a criminal conviction and if it is limited to compulsory uncompensated laborand indeed that is precisely the system America maintains today.
The 13th Amendment, as enacted, reads "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Slavery is neither a cruel nor unusual punishment according to the Supreme Law of the Land, nor historically has it been considered that. In the 1700s and early 1800s, Americans viewed compulsory labor as a way to fight vagrancy and to rehabilitate such idleness.
However, the states began to understand the potential for revenue generation from prisons in the 1800scompulsory labor and the sale of prison products became a means to offset state costs. To be sure, the Virginia Supreme Court in Ruffin v. Commonwealth (1871) declared that prisoners were the "slaves of the State" within a compulsory labor system.
This "Punishments" clause allowed for the birth of the "convict-lease" system in the South after the war. Many Southern states passed anti-vagrancy "black codes," criminalizing the status of being unemployed. Citing cost reasons, states would then lease out their prisoners to private persons to work under slave-like conditions.
As Frederick Douglass noted, "companies assume charge of the convicts, work them as cheap labor and pay the states a handsome revenue for their labor. Nine[-]tenths of these convicts are Negroes."
Since the 1860s, courts have interpreted the 13th Amendment as it plainly reads. "Once individuals have been duly tried, convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned, courts will not find 13th Amendment violations where prison rules require inmates to work."
For example, in Mikeska v. Collins (1990), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held that "any unjustified refusal to follow the established work regime is an invitation to sanctions."
The compensation of prison labor today reflects this history. In Georgia and Texas, the maximum wage in dollars per day is $0. In Nevada, prisoners make $0.13 an hour. The average wage is between $0.93 a day and $4.93 a dayless than an hour of work at minimum wage. Conservative estimates put the value of output from prison labor at $2 billion annually.
Indeed, much like the Southern states claimed after the Civil War, "states facing growing budget deficits are increasingly turning to inmate labor to produce additional revenue, or at a minimum, offset the cost of imprisonment." "At least 37 states have legalized the contracting of prison labor by private corporations that mount their operations inside state prisons."
While amending the Constitution to fix a $2 billion a year compulsory labor industry is politically unlikely, Congress may take measures to ensure that rehabilitative compulsory labor is not uncompensated, like compelling the payment of a federal minimum wage. State legislatures also could apply minimum wage rules to prisoners.
Prisoners are often indigent upon release; allowing them to save money for their transition back to society seems only logical if the goal is the reduce recidivism. Paying prisoners fair wages allows them to afford housing and sustenance while transitioning back to being a productive member of society. Additionally, the availability of compulsory, cheap labor to private companies undercuts domestic industry itself.
America must change its practice of not compensating prisoners for their labor. While work has rehabilitative benefits, rehabilitation of the wards of the state should not convert them to the "slaves of the State." Fair wages should follow compelled work.
Randal John Meyer is a legal associate in the Cato Institute's Center for Constitutional Studies.
Read more:
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Slavery Is Still Legal in the United States
Inside the raids revealing the appalling reality of modern slavery in UK carwashes – iNews
Posted: at 2:59 pm
With a petrified look in his eyes, the carwash worker dropped his soapy sponge and ran down the street in panic when he saw police vans surround the forecourt. The only thought in the young mans mind was to flee yet he was one of the people the officers were there to potentially rescue.
For the specialists whose job is to find, stop and prevent modern slavery, this car-wash workers reaction is a common sight when they descend on the scenes of suspected exploitation.
The uppermost worry for many potential victims is being prosecuted themselves, especially if they are an illegal immigrant and sometimes they have been indoctrinated by their bosses.
The freshest exclusives and sharpest analysis, curated for your inbox
He looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights, said Martin Plimmer, of the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA), which led Operation Bronco at a car wash in Liverpool, last Wednesday.
i joined his team on its raid after it received a tip-off about suspected exploitation of workers. The allegations included that the employees were not being paid adequately, were being controlled by their bosses and had their identification documents takenaway.
The operation, supported by police officers from Merseyside Police, culminated in three suspected victims in their late teens and twenties being safeguarded and taken to a reception centre where they are continuing to receive specialist support.
Two men a 31-year-old Iranian national and a 24-year-old Iraqi national were arrested on suspicion of committing forced or compulsory labour offences under the Modern Slavery Act. The GLAA also conducted searches of their addresses. They have since been released but remain underinvestigation.
With victims afraid to speak out, modern slavery is one of the most serious crimes but also one of the hardest to investigate. Police records revealed that the number of modern slavery offences increased by more than 50 per cent from 3,412 cases in 2018 to 5,144 cases in 2019.
This coincided with a 68 per cent increase in calls to the modern slavery helpline in the same period of time. However, this is believed to be the tip of the iceberg as many other cases go unreported.
There are myriad reasons why potential victims of modern-day slavery run as soon as they see police or members of the GLAA, explains Ian Waterfield, the organisations head of enforcement.
Victims, particularly those who havent got a regulated immigration status, are fearful of authority, he says.
They think were only interested in their immigration status. But thats not the case. First and foremost, they are victims and thats all Im interested in. We want to know their situation and how we can help them. Some of the stories we hear are truly horrendous.
The tip-off came via a call to the Modern Slavery Helpline. The people working at this car wash have no protective equipment or waterproof clothing, Waterfieldsaid.
Our intelligence shows they are working 10 to 12-hour days, seven days a week with no breaks. We think there have been at least 12 workers here at various points. If you look at the number of cars coming through and the money coming in, it doesnt add up.
After the GLAA and the police surrounded the Liverpool carwash, the teams first priority was to separate potential victims from suspected exploiters. Customers were asked to leave and the man believed to hold a supervisory role showed his anger as he was taken inside to be questioned.
One worker recounted to investigators how he had been transported to the UK in the back of a lorry, then the boot of a car, before beginning work at the Liverpool car wash.
We ask carwash workers how they were recruited, how they came to this country, what they are paid and how they are treated at work, said Martin Plimmer, a senior investigating officer for the North West.
Two men were found guilty of running a modern slavery ring at a carwash in Carlisle last month.
Defrim Paci, 42, of Nottinghamshire and Sitar Ali, 33, of Carlisle, brought Romanian workers to the UK and made them work long hours for little pay, Carlisle Crown Court heard.
The workers at Shiny Car Wash told how they had their identity cards taken from them until their travel-cost debt was repaid and said they were living in very dirty, crowded accommodation with only 20 in their pockets after working 11 hours a day, six days a week.
Some workers described having no breaks and having skin burned by cleaning chemicals and of receiving no protective clothing.
Paci and Ali have been remanded in custody for sentencing on 30 July.
Some of them have come from war-torn countries, from very difficult circumstances, and we hear some awful tales. There are people who die in the backs of lorries or freeze to death. The conditions are horrible as they are concealed to avoid detection and have very little air, water or food.
Exploiters are very clever and manipulative, and target workers who are vulnerable.
This is a sad reality across thecountry, Waterfield said. I cant imagine how appalling it must be to come on an incredibly long journey, bundled in the back of a lorry, separated from friends andfamily.
They are sold a dream of life in the UK but are just used for cheap labour and as a money-making mechanism. Some owe money to their exploiters and are trying to pay that off while others are trying to send money home to family.
Fear is instilled into exploited workers. They may be instructed to run if they see police or authority figures or are given a rehearsed script to follow, Plimmer said. We often find victims are told lies by the exploiter so they are fearful of the police and terrified of being arrested and taken to prison.
Even if theyve done nothing wrong, exploiters build on their fear and tell them that if they see the police, to run away or say nothing. Or they give them a very detailed script, saying they are working the correct number of hours for the correct money. Exploiters know the minimum wage, so they feed them the figures.
For the workers, theres often a fear of violence to them or their families. They are spun stories of police and authorities being corrupt and how they are having to pay them. Unfortunately, in some of the war-torn countries people come from, police corruption does exist, so they believe them.
Other tactics that exploiters sometimes use are taking identity documents, such as birth certificates, from workers or getting them to pay a fee perhaps around 200 to cover sick pay. Taking away ID documents stops them working anywhere else and ties them to that business, Plimmer said.
Without them, they cant go to a legitimate business, so they are stuck and controlled.
It is estimated there are around 8,000 to 10,000 carwashes in the UK. While many are legitimate operations, Ian Waterfield says the problem is that they are unregistered and unregulated, leaving them open to abuse.
Workers are prone to exploitation because they are unregulated businesses that pop up on waste ground or the forecourts of closed petrol stations.
The pandemic and lockdowns mean that the workforce may have dispersed into other sectors and now that consumer demand is to increase, additional workers are needed. We believe there are significant levels of exploitation within hand carwashes. Waterfield tells i.
Anyone can set up a carwash, it is a cash business and theres a lot of casual labour. We often find people sleeping on the premises in places like this and being controlled.
Workers are exploited by not being paid properly, working long hours and some working conditions may be unsafe. In many cases, they are charged a fee to come into the UK and are put into work at a car wash to pay off their debts.
Victims are predominantly male and between the ages of 18 and 35. They are unlikely to be paid the National Minimum Wage and the carwashes may offer competitive prices, but employ many workers. On average, this is around five, but can be as many as 40 in larger businesses.
Withheld wages, excessive working hours and debt bondage are alsoreported.
The ultimate goal of the GLAA is to prevent and stop modern slavery and to help victims but the team says it cannot do this without the publics help. If a car wash is really cheap, there is a reason and in these circumstances, it is at the expense of a person, warns Waterfield.
If people spot workers at a car wash looking bedraggled, with no protective equipment, or are worried they are being exploited, wed urge them to contact us. As human beings, everyone seems to want everything for the cheapest possible price but if it looks too good to be true, it probably is.
He adds: We want to make the UK a place where the opportunities to exploit people for their labour are eradicated and people are paid a fair days wage for an honest days work in the safest possible conditions.
Report any concerns or suspicions about car washes or modern slaveryto:
The GLAAs intelligence team Mon to Fri from 9am to 5pm on: 0800 4320804 or e-mail: intelligence@gla.gov.uk
Call the Modern Slavery helpline run by the charity Unseern which runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week on: 08000 121 700
Use the Unseen app
Visit the Safe Car Wash app developed by the Clewer Initiative
Call Crimestoppers on: 0800 555111
Read this article:
Inside the raids revealing the appalling reality of modern slavery in UK carwashes - iNews
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Inside the raids revealing the appalling reality of modern slavery in UK carwashes – iNews
Nikole Hannah-Jones rejects UNC tenure offer to take position at Howard University, backed by millions in foundation funding – WSWS
Posted: at 2:59 pm
New York Times Magazine staff writer and 1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones announced in an exclusive interview on CBS This Morning with co-host Gayle King that she was rejecting an offer of tenure from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).
Instead, Hannah-Jones explained that she would accept a tenured professorship at Howard University in Washington D.C. as the Knight Chair in Race and Reporting at the Cathy Hughes School of Communication.
Hannah-Jones will join writer Ta-Nehisi Coates (who wrote We Were Eight Years in Power about the Obama administration) in founding the Center for Journalism and Democracy at Howard. The center will be financed with $20 million from the Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, the Ford Foundation and an anonymous donor.
According to a university press release, the new center will focus on training and supporting aspiring journalists in acquiring the investigative skills and historical and analytical expertise needed to cover the crisis our democracy is facing.
The 1619 Project was published by the New York Times in August 2019 and has been promoted with millions of dollars in funding and a school curriculum developed by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. It falsely roots American history in an enduring racial conflict between blacks and whites.
Hannah-Jones lead essay, for which she won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary, argued that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery against the British monarchy and that President Abraham Lincoln was little more than a garden-variety racist.
new wsws title from Mehring Books
The New York Times 1619 Project and the Racialist Falsification of History
A left-wing, socialist critique of the 1619 project with essays, lectures, and interviews with leading historians of American history.
The response of preeminent American historians Gordon Wood, James McPherson, James Oakes, Clayborne Carson, Victoria Bynum and others exposed the New York Times' effort to reinterpret American history. The World Socialist Web Site, in addition to interviewing these historians, has thoroughly refuted the falsifications of the 1619 Project and the lead essay written by Hannah-Jones.
Her other writings have descended into outright racism against whites. The historical falsifications which she promotes and her limited journalistic record since beginning to write for the Times in late 2014just 23 articleswould certainly qualify as red flags in her application for tenure.
The announcement of Hannah-Jones decision came less than a week after the Board of Trustees at UNC voted 9-4 in a closed session to grant her a lifetime appointment as the Knight Chair in Race and Investigative Journalism in the Hussman School of Journalism and Media.
Hannah-Jones, who is African American, had threatened to sue UNC for discrimination based on her political views, race and gender after it came to light in May that the board had set aside a vote on her tenure application for further consideration. Hannah-Jones declared that she would not accept the post without being granted tenure, even though she initially accepted a five-year tenure-track position.
However, last weeks vote did not satisfy Hannah-Jones. And so to be denied it, and to only have that vote occur on the last possible day, at the last possible moment, after threat of legal action, after weeks of protest, after it became a national scandalits just not something that I want anymore, she told King. The process which had led to her being granted tenurea protection granted to a shrinking share of academicshad been too embarrassing for her to teach at UNC, she said.
Hannah-Jones explained to King that she had chosen Howard University after fielding a number of offers from other universities because it is one of the United States' historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) where a majority of the faculty and student body are black.
Ive spent my entire life proving that I belong in elite white spaces that were not built for black people, she explained. I decided I didnt want to do that anymore. That black professionals should feel free, and actually perhaps an obligation, to go to our own institutions and bring our talents and resources to our own institutions and help to build them up as well.
In Depth
The New York Times 1619 Project
The Times Project is a politically-motivated falsification of history. It presents the origins of the United States entirely through the prism of racial conflict.
In a letter published Tuesday. the Hussman faculty declared their support for Hannah-Jones decision to reject the tenure offer, saying that her treatment was humiliating, inappropriate, and unjust, and racist.
It is highly unlikely that the Hussman School and UNC officials were unaware that Hannah-Jones was entertaining lucrative offers from other schools. As with her journalism, which focuses on making race the fundamental issue in American society, it is clear that the main issue for Hannah-Jones was not getting tenure at UNC but promoting racialist politics and using race and claims of racism as leverage for a better position and more money.
In an ironic twist, the history of Hannah-Jones chosen perch, Howard University, flies in the face of her claim in the 1619 Project that African Americans have fought alone to advance democratic rights in the United States.
The schools white namesake, founder and president from 1867 to 1873, General Oliver Otis Howard, was a commander for the Union Army during the Civil War. He participated in multiple bloody battles against Confederate forces, including the First Battle of Bull Run, Antietam and Gettysburg. Howard led forces in Shermans March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah in 1864, a campaign which saw thousands of slaves liberated.
Howard also served as the head of the Freedmens Bureau from May 1865 until July 1874, overseeing a federal agency responsible for integrating former slaves into the wage labor system and providing them with rations, medical care, schools and courts. Howard pushed for confiscated and abandoned land in the South to be redistributed to freed blacks but was quickly overruled by Democratic President Andrew Johnson.
There is a debased and foul character to the whole campaign over Hannah-Jones tenure at UNCthe insistence that Hannah-Jones, no matter her qualifications, deserved a tenured position; the immediate charges of racism against anyone who raised questions about the campaign; the threats of lawsuits if she was denied tenure; and then the announcement that she would not accept it anyway in favor of another position funded with $20 million.
In its own way, it sums up a central purpose of the racialist narrative that the Times 1619 Project promotes, namely, to advance the aspirations of privileged sections of the upper middle-class for positions of power and wealth, which has absolutely nothing to do with the interests of workers of any race.
View original post here:
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Nikole Hannah-Jones rejects UNC tenure offer to take position at Howard University, backed by millions in foundation funding – WSWS
GLAA operation rescues three from hand car wash in Liverpool – Recruiter
Posted: at 2:59 pm
GLAA officers were joined by Merseyside Police and HM Revenue & Customs National Minimum Wage team for the operation on Wednesday 30 June in Wavertree, Liverpool.
The potential victims, the youngest in his late teens, with the other two in their 20s, were safeguarded and taken to a reception centre set up for the operation where they received specialist support.
Two men a 31-year-old Iranian national and 24-year-old Iraqi national were arrested at the car wash on suspicion of committing forced or compulsory labour offences under Section 1 of the Modern Slavery Act.
GLAA officers also conducted searches of the car wash and addresses of the two suspects.
Information received via the Modern Slavery Helpline earlier in the year combined with the GLAAs own intelligence gathering indicated that workers at the site were not being paid the National Minimum Wage, had identification such as birth certificates taken off them, and were constantly monitored on site, suggesting a level of coercion and control.
GLAA senior investigating officer (SIO) Martin Plimmer said: This operation demonstrates the importance of members of the public being able to spot the signs of modern slavery and more importantly reporting their concerns so we can take action.
Elsewhere, more than 300 farm workers were spoken to by the GLAA as part of an open day event across two agricultural sites in Kent.
GLAA officers were joined by Kent Police for the engagement visits to Mansfields farms near Canterbury last week.
Workers were given the opportunity to speak to the GLAA at the end of their shifts, with information provided to them about their rights in the workplace and how to contact the GLAA or police if they have concerns about labour exploitation.
Mansfields specialises in the growing, picking and packaging of top, stone and soft fruit, harvesting more than 25,000 tonnes of fruit a year across its 3,000 acres of farmland.
Workers are supplied to the business by Pro Force, a GLAA-licensed recruitment agency which provides workers to businesses across the regulated sector of agriculture, horticulture and food production.
GLAA SIO Jennifer Baines said: We were pleased that the workers reported no issues and were happy with their working conditions.
Providing workers with information about their rights and what to do if something is not right is crucial in raising awareness and educating what are potentially vulnerable people about the signs of modern slavery and labour exploitation.
Its also really positive to see first-hand businesses and recruitment agencies take these issues seriously and actively encourage their workers to speak to us so that any problems can be identified and addressed swiftly.
Comment below on this story. Or let us know what you think by emailing us at [emailprotected] or tweet us to tell us your thoughts or share this story with a friend.
Originally posted here:
GLAA operation rescues three from hand car wash in Liverpool - Recruiter
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on GLAA operation rescues three from hand car wash in Liverpool – Recruiter
Two arrested on suspicion of keeping slaves at Liverpool carwash – Free Radio
Posted: at 2:59 pm
Three potential victims were freed by the police
Two men have been arrested at a Liverpool car wash in conntection with modern slavery.
A 31-year-old Iranian national and 24-year-old Iraqi national were arrested at the car wash on suspicion of committing forced or compulsory labour offences under Section 1 of the Modern Slavery Act.
Three potential victims of modern slavery and labour exploitation were also escued during a raid by the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA).
GLAA officers were joined by Merseyside Police and HM Revenue and Customs National Minimum Wage team for the operation on Wednesday, June 30 in Wavertree.
The potential victims, the youngest of whom is in his late teens, with the other two in their 20s, were safeguarded and taken to a reception centre set up for the operation where they received specialist support
Both suspects, who were also arrested for suspected immigration offences, were interviewed by the GLAA before being released under investigation later that day.
GLAA officers also conducted searches of the car wash and addresses of the two suspects.
Information received via the Modern Slavery Helpline earlier in the year combined with the GLAAs own intelligence-gathering indicated that workers at the site were not being paid the National Minimum Wage.
It's also thought they had identification such as birth certificates taken off them and were constantly monitored on-site, suggesting a level of coercion and control.
Hear all the latest news from across Merseyside on the hour, every hour, on 96.7FM, DAB, at radiocity.co.uk, and on the Radio City app.
See the original post:
Two arrested on suspicion of keeping slaves at Liverpool carwash - Free Radio
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Two arrested on suspicion of keeping slaves at Liverpool carwash – Free Radio
Key signs to look out for when getting your car washed to avoid funding crime – Liverpool Echo
Posted: at 2:59 pm
Modern Day Slavery is present in every area of the UK, with thousands of cases being referred each year.
Officers were joined by a team from the Gangmasters and Labour Authority for a raid at Splash Car Valeting car wash in Picton Road, Wavertree yesterday.
The team arrested two people on suspicion of forced labour and immigration offences.
READ MORE: Boat company in court after dad falls into Mersey and dies
Officers found two people working at the site who they believed were the victims of modern slavery.
A tweet from the Merseyside Police South Liverpool team said these two people had now been protected from such exploitation.
Merseyside drivers were left 'devastated' after the car wash raid, but how can you spot the signs of modern day slavery?
Is there a cash-only policy?
If a car wash only accepts cash, offers no receipt or only the manager handles money, it could be a sign the business is not paying tax and national insurance or paying workers properly.
Its more likely a car wash operating outside of the tax regime will be willing and able to exploit its workers.
Are children working on site?
Although employing children of 13 and above is not illegal, their young age and the low-cost of their labour makes them increasingly vulnerable to exploitation.
Children under the age of 16 are not entitled to the national minimum wage, while those over the age of 16 are covered by the legislation but are only entitled to a wage that is significantly lower than the national minimum wage.
Do workers look fearful?
Workers looking fearful could be a sign of the various methods used to control workers who are being exploited, such as threats, intimidation, physical violence, coercion, debt bondage and withholding wages.
The Liverpool Echo sends newsletters on a wide range of topics - including our daily news bulletin, now going out three times a day.
There are others on what's on, politics, court news, Knowsley, Wirral, and arts & culture, as well as both Liverpool FC and Everton FC.
Signing up is free and it only takes a minute for you to get the biggest stories, sent straight to your inbox.
How to sign up for an Echo Email Update
1) Go to our dedicated newsletter page at this link.
2) Put your email in the box where indicated
3) Tick as many boxes as you like, for each newsletter you want.
4) Press Save changes and that's it!
Do workers have access to suitable clothing?
Health and safety regulations require employers to take practical steps to reduce the risk of harm to their workers, which includes providing protective clothing such as gloves, boots and overalls.
Some hand car washes use harmful chemicals such as hydrochloric acid when washing vehicles.
No protective equipment could be a sign that employers are in breach of health and safety rules.
Are there signs workers are living on the car wash site?
A report on the nature of exploitation in the hand car wash sector found that its not uncommon for workers to be living on the car wash site in accommodation provided by the employer.
Signs such as containers, caravans, bedding and mattresses, which indicate that workers were living on the car wash site.
Here is the original post:
Key signs to look out for when getting your car washed to avoid funding crime - Liverpool Echo
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Key signs to look out for when getting your car washed to avoid funding crime – Liverpool Echo







