Monthly Archives: July 2021

NPR Staff Read The Declaration Of Independence – NPR

Posted: July 7, 2021 at 3:15 pm

This image shows an 1876 engraving titled "Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1776" made available by the Library of Congress. On that day, the Continental Congress formally endorsed the Declaration of Independence. J. Trumbull, W.L. Ormsby/AP hide caption

This image shows an 1876 engraving titled "Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1776" made available by the Library of Congress. On that day, the Continental Congress formally endorsed the Declaration of Independence.

Over the past 32 years, Morning Edition has broadcast a reading of the Declaration of Independence by NPR staff as a way of marking Independence Day.

But after last summer's protests and our national reckoning on race, the words in the document land differently.

It famously declares "that all men are created equal" even though women, enslaved people and Indigenous Americans were not held as equal at the time.

What then follows is a long list of grievances and charges against King George III that outline the 13 North American British Colonies' intentions to separate from Great Britain.

The list, originally written largely by Thomas Jefferson, was edited by the Continental Congress. Among the Congress' changes: it deleted a reference to "Scotch & foreign mercenaries." It turns out there were members of Congress who were of Scottish descent. To win support from Southerners, the Congress removed criticism of the African slave trade.

Librarian of Congress James Billington points to a correction in the rough draft of the Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson, on July 2, 2010, at the Library of Congress in Washington. Imaging of the document confirmed that Jefferson originally wrote "subject" then changed it to "citizen." Susan Walsh/AP hide caption

Librarian of Congress James Billington points to a correction in the rough draft of the Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson, on July 2, 2010, at the Library of Congress in Washington. Imaging of the document confirmed that Jefferson originally wrote "subject" then changed it to "citizen."

But a racist slur about Native Americans stayed in.

The passage charges that King George III "excited domestic insurrections" among the colonists by Native Americans, who the founding document called "merciless Indian Savages."

Author David Treuer, who is Ojibwe from the Leech Lake Reservation, explains that this particular grievance refers to the idea that the British were, he says, ginning up discontent among Native people.

But a deeper look at history also shows that one of the reasons why the colonists wanted to rise up against the British and wage the Revolutionary War was over the question of who would try to colonize Native lands west of the colonies, Treuer tells Morning Edition. "The crown wanted that money for themselves. The colonists, understandably, would have preferred to have it for themselves. So the whole revolution was in large part fought over who got to take our stuff," he says.

He also notes that Native people helped the colonists in the Revolutionary War. "It was the Oneida people who broke the famine at Valley Forge, who taught the revolutionaries with George Washington, how to process Indian corn so that it was digestible and nutritious," he says. "So I think it's safe to say that war would been difficult to win without our help."

When it comes to how the declaration's words land among Native Americans, Treuer says that with more than 5 million people who identify as Indigenous, there is a diversity of opinion and thought.

"On one hand we are keenly aware of the ways in which this country has attempted to both take our homelands and to eradicate us. And yet a huge number of Native people are deeply patriotic. Native American people have fought in every war America has fought up until today," he says. "We remain committed to forcing this country to live up to its own stated ideals."

The declaration is a document with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies. It also laid the foundation for our collective aspirations, our hopes for what America could be.

So in that spirit, here again is the Declaration of Independence as read by NPR staff.

- Photo Illustration by Amna Ijaz hide caption

-

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.

A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us.

We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.

They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States;

that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved;

and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The punctuation and spellings here match those posted online by the National Archives.

This audio story was produced by Barry Gordemer and for the web by Heidi Glenn.

Read more:

NPR Staff Read The Declaration Of Independence - NPR

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on NPR Staff Read The Declaration Of Independence – NPR

With deep-sea mining, the Pacific Islands are caught between money and the environment – The Next Web

Posted: at 3:15 pm

While most Pacific islands haveescaped the worst of COVID-19, a cornerstone of their economies, tourism, has taken a big hit. By June 2020, visitor arrivals in Fiji, Samoa, Tonga and Vanuatu had completely ceased, as borders were closed and even internal travelrestricted. In Fiji, where tourism generated about 40% of GDP before the pandemic, theeconomy contracted by 19%in 2020.

One economic alternative lies just offshore. The Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) is a deep-sea trench spanning 4.5 million square kilometres in the central Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and Mexico. On its seabed are potato-sized rocks called polymetallic nodules which containnickel, copper, cobalt and manganese. These formed over centuries through the accumulation of iron and manganese around debris such as shells or sharks teeth.

There are estimated to be around21 billion tonnesof manganese nodules in this trench alone, and demand for these metals islikely to skyrocketas the world ramps up the development of batteries for electric vehicles and renewable power grids.

While much of the CCZ lies beneath the high seas where no single state has control, its adjacent to the exclusive economic zones of several Pacific island states, including the Cook Islands, Kiribati, Nauru and Tonga. Lacking the means to search for the metals themselves, these states havesponsored mining companiesto take out licences with the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which is responsible for sustainably managing the seabed in international waters. This would allow these companies to explore the seabed and determine how viable mining is likely to be, and its potential environmental impact.

To date, ISA hasapproved 19 exploration contracts, 17 of which are in the CCZ. A Canadian company,The Metals Company(formerly DeepGreen Metals) hascontractswith Tonga, Nauru and Kiribati.

With so little known about the biodiversity of this largely unexplored part of the ocean, its difficult to accurately predict how deep-sea mining willaffectspecies here. Environmental organisations and scientists havearguedfora moratoriumon mining until more extensive research can be done.

Some Pacific islanders, including The Alliance of Solwara Warriors, representing indigenous communities in the Bismark and Solomon Seas of Papua New Guinea,have protestedthe lack of information given to local communities about thepotential impact of mining. In April 2021, Pacific civil society groups wrote to the British governmentseeking support for a moratorium. Meanwhile, a former president of Kiribati, Anote Tong, has described deep-sea mining as inevitable and urged businesses to figure out how to do it safely.

But time is running out. Seven exploratory licences aredue to expire in 2021, making it imperative that either a moratorium is adopted internationally, or the ISA adopts a legal framework for determining the conditions under which extractive mining can take place.

Work towards this framework has been ongoing since 2014. Despite this, the 168 nations of the ISA assembly have yet to agree a code for regulating extractive mining contracts. The ISAs ambition to reach an agreement in 2020 was derailed by the pandemic, and its unclear whether meetings will go ahead in 2021. Its likely that exploratory contracts will expire in the meantime, increasing pressure on the ISA from mining companies and those states sponsoring them togrant exploitation licences. Exploratory licences are regulated by the ISA. Without an agreed code, extractive ones are not.

Even if a consensus were reached, enforcing environmental safeguards would be difficult. Pinpointing responsibility for the source of any pollution or environmental damage is tricky when mining takes place in such deep water. There are also few, if any, physical boundaries between one mining area and another. The effects of mining on different ecosystems and habitats might take time to manifest.

International consensus on a moratorium is unlikely too. Mining companies have ploughed a lot of money into developing technology for operating at these depths. They will want to see a return on that, and so will their investors. States which have sponsored mining contracts including some Pacific islands will want to reap the royalties they have beenpromised.

Pacific island states find themselves on the horns of a dilemma. They are among the countries most vulnerable to climate change and so support strong action. But unless alternatives are found, the developed worlds green transition will probably accelerate demand for metals resting peacefully in the deepest parts of the ocean surrounding these islands. It will be the people here who will bear the costs of deep-sea mining undertaken without sufficient caution, not the drivers of electric cars in the global north.

This article by Sue Farran, Reader of Law, Newcastle University,is republished fromThe Conversationunder a Creative Commons license. Read theoriginal article.

Go here to read the rest:

With deep-sea mining, the Pacific Islands are caught between money and the environment - The Next Web

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on With deep-sea mining, the Pacific Islands are caught between money and the environment – The Next Web

14 comedies, musicals, fairy tales and more to watch from Cape Cod & Islands theaters – Cape Cod Times

Posted: at 3:15 pm

ReviewsMusic, comedy ... and murder?

The show: "A Gentlemans Guide to Love and Murder," book and lyrics by Robert L. Freedman, music and lyrics by Steven Lutvak, and based on a novel by Roy Horniman; presented by College Light Opera Company

What it's about: Could there be a more unlikely place for a hilarious musical comedy to start than the jail cell of a condemned murderer? But thats where we first meet Monty Navarro (Ian C. Weber) as he pens a memoir chronicling his crusade to gain his rightful place as head of the noble DYsquith clan. He set out to eliminate the eight family members ahead of him in the line of succession. At the root of his murderous mayhem is his bid to win the heart and hand of the lovely Sibella (Emily Holguin), hence the title.

Highlight of the show: Hands down, its Jeffrey Laughruns portrayals of all eight of the ill-fated DYsquiths. (Honestly, I lost count of how many personas he had actually donned, so was glad to find the number in a show synopsis.) The characters ranged from a pretentious fop with animal skins around his neck, to a bumbling bishop, to a silent movie star. Each of Laughruns comedic characterizations is bang-on.

Fun fact: The uproarious comedy is actually based on the 1907 novel by Roy Horniman, Israel Rank: The Autobiography of a Criminal. The "Gentleman's Guide" show was the hit of the 2014 Broadway season, with an impressive 10Tony Award nominations and four wins, including Best Musical.

Worth noting: Sabrina Brush has an unenviablejob as the aged Miss Shingle, the bearer of the news that Monty has noble blood running through his veins. Its never easy for a young person to wear the cloak of advanced age, and Brush does it flawlessly. (All the members of the CLOC company are theater arts students or recent graduates.) Her portrayal brought to mind the quirky Mrs. Lovett in Sweeney Todd, The Demon Barber of Fleet Street.

One more thing: There is wonderful contrast between the glamorous and detailed Victorian-era costumes and the simple-but-effective set. In one scene, Monty, Sibella and Phoebe (Sophie Thompson) go back and forth through a simple door in an increasingly complex pattern that draws applause.

If you go: 7:30 p.m. through July 10 at Highfield Theatre, 58Highfield Drive, Falmouth, with a live-streaming option for the July 10 show. Tickets and information: http://www.collegelightoperacompany.com/.

Sue Mellen

A whale of a tale

The show: WHAT for Kids! presents The Tale of Ibis, written and directed by Jody O Neil

What its about:A talented young cast uses puppets, cardboard cut-outs, and just a touch of dramatic irony to recreate the inspiring true story of the successful whale-entanglement rescue that played out in Provincetown in 1984.

See it or not:The actors dramatize this harrowing true tale in a fun, accessible way that should appeal to young audiences. Still, the show is a tad short at just under 40 minutes. (Perhaps O'Neil and collaborators could adda scene or extendthe early section in whichthe quirky cast members trade wisecracks before they tell Ibiss story?)

Highlight of the show:Paige O Connors hysterically funny performance in not one, but two roles. As Ibis, the eponymous whale who survives an almost fatal encounter with a fishing net, shes deliciously over the top. As Ocean, the master of ceremonies, she delivers her witty one-liners with aplomb.

Fun fact:The play, originally created for the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies, is based on John Himmelmans 1990 childrens book Ibis: A True Whale Story, which retold Ibiss rescue.

Worth noting:Gage Anderson is hilariously clueless as Rafael, an enthusiastic yet hapless Ibis enthusiast. In one especially memorable exchange, Rafael wonders aloud what a Walkman is, and Ocean patiently reminds him that they were all the rage in 1984 when people still used cassette tapes.

One more thing:$2 of each ticket will benefitthe Center for Coastal Studies Entanglement Fund, which was established in response to the effort to free Ibis in 1984.

If you go:7p.m. Mondays and Tuesdays and 4 p.m. Wednesdays and Thursdays through Aug. 12at Wellfleet Harbor Actors Theater, 2357 Route 6; $12; http://www.what.orgor508-349-9428

Paul Babin

The show: The Seussification of Romeo & Juliet, by Peter Bloedel; directed by Karen Hepinstall

What its about: The famous Shakespeare tragedy about lovestruck teens (John OMeara and Alana Hartsgrove) whose future is complicated by their feuding families is told through comedy and Dr. Seuss-like rhymes and cadences. Since this is a lighthearted family show with whimsical costumes and sets, expect some key changes to the classic tale.

See it or not: The hourlong show is cleverly, poetically, sometimes tongue-twistingly written and imaginatively staged and acted as a fun diversion, with wacky touches a balloon duel likely to charm elementary-schoolers and up.

Highlight of the show: Director/actress Hepinstalls vision extends to her designing and constructing the costumes, and the colorful, fanciful, Seuss-inspired wigs and attire immediately create the dont-take-anything-seriously tone. Mark Rodericks bright sets continue that theme.

Fun fact: This Academy of Performing Arts production has been a year in the making, with the set ready since July 2020 for an envisioned online version that got stopped by technical and COVID-19-related complications.

Worth noting: Delightful purple-wigged narrators Emma Taylor and Frankie Schuman keep reminding us that this show is not connected to the real Dr. Seuss, with no official endorsement. But if youve read Seuss, the style will feel familiar.

One more thing: You might need to explain some of Bloedels early-21st-century references and language choices to the younger crowd, with mentions of Seinfeld, a PC computer, the pits, hot mama and the like.

If you go: 7 p.m. July 9-10 and 2 p.m. July 11 at the Academy Playhouse, 120 Main St., Orleans. Tickets and information: https://www.academyplayhouse.org/

Kathi Scrizzi Driscoll

The show: "Sleeping Beauty, Briar Rose," written by Max Bush, based on the stories by Charles Perrault and the Brothers Grimm

What it's about: This slightly updated version of the familiar tale about a sweet and sleepy princess, handsome prince and prickly and perilous spinning wheel is spiced up a bit to suit modern tastes. Theres a pair of bumbling palace guards (Shiloh Pabst and Tess OLeary), a delightfully evil wood sprite Erdu (Gracie OLeary) and just the right touch of drama from the reader/Fairie Queen (Carryl Lynn).

Highlight of the show: Its outside on the companys new outdoor stage. So theres the feeling that the setting a forest glade just continues endlessly. Talk about feeling like youre part of the show! Little ones in the audience might as well be up on the stage with the sweet and winsome princess (Olivia Thompson) and brightly costumed wood sprites.

Fun fact: In this version, Erdu is a stand-in for the villain par excellence Maleficent, who generations of youngsters have loved to hate (and adults have simply loved for her glorious wickedness) in the Disney version of this story.

Worth noting: The fairies' bright, satiny costumes offer a wonderful contrast to the muted tones of the set. And sprite Saru (Trenton Hatch) does some wonderful bits with a bright blue cape, making it look like flowing water.

One more thing: This is the companys 70th summer season, which it is terming its Renaissance Season, in recognition of its return from a period of semi-hibernation during the pandemic. Its so great to see Cape theater waking up and stretching its limbs.

If you go: 6 p.m. Tuesdays through Fridays through July 16th at Cape Cod Theatre Company/Harwich Junior Theatre, 105 Division St., West Harwich; $25 adults, $15 youth under 21; 508-432-2002 or http://www.capecodtheatrecompany.org

Sue Mellen

The show: The Cake, by Rebekah Brunstetter, directed by David Drake

What its about: This 2019 comedy is about a Bible-quoting North Carolina baker who reconsiders her longtime beliefs and her marriage after the daughter of her deceased best friend requests a cake for her wedding to another woman.

See it or not: The 90-minute script and production explore the ideas of identity and bigotry, and a topical controversy, with sometimes laugh-out-loud humor and touching earnestness.

Highlight of the show: While the relationship between fiancees Jen (Vanessa Rose) and Macy (Jackie Marino-Thomas) provides the plays heart, the marriage exploration between baker Della (Jennifer Cabral) and Tim (Ian Leahy) provides the hilarity in wooing scenes involving butter-cream frosting and mashed potatoes.

Fun fact: Townies Cabral and Leahy are married in real life, and their comfort with each other lends depth and likability to characters whose politics likely differ from many in the audience.

Worth noting: Fred Jodry creates a fun and memorable character only by voice as the flirty yet judgmental host of a reality baking show in Dellas fantasy life.

One more thing: Ellen Rousseaus confection of a set for the outdoor, park-like Playhouse in the Parking Lot (which she also designed) is all bright colors and cartoon-like images, with ingenious beds tucked into drawers that slide out to create non-bakery locations.

If you go: 7 p.m. Mondays through Thursdays through July 22 at Provincetown Theatre, 238 Bradford St.; $40 and $50; 508-487-7487 or https://provincetowntheater.org/

Kathi Scrizzi Driscoll

On the new garden outdoor stage at Wellfleet Harbor Actors Theater is Shipwrecked! An Entertainment The Amazing Adventures of Louis de Rougemont (as Told by Himself), by Donald Margulies. The epic tale was inspired by the true story of adventurous Louis de Rougemont telling Victorian London about his bravery and survival on the high seas with exotic islanders, flying wombats, giant sea turtles and a monstrous man-eating octopus.

Shows are at 7 p.m. Wednesdays through Sundays through July 25 in front of the WHAT theater, 2357 Route 6. Admission: $35, $15 students. Tickets and information: https://www.what.org.

Cape Rep Theatre is staying outdoors, too, repurposing the Outdoor Theatre usually used exclusively for family shows into an evening-under-the-stars experience for adults. With what promises to be an intriguing set, the company will present the farce Noises Off, the on- and off-stage antics of a hapless theatre troupe whoever more desperately tries to stage a British romp.

Shows are at 7 p.m. Wednesdays through Saturdays July 7-Aug. 21 at the theatre, 3299 Main St., Brewster. Tickets: $30. Reservations and information: 508-896-1888, caperep.org.

Cape Cod Theatre Project continues its month of virtual readings of new plays with Tiny Father, about a new father to a months-premature baby and an oversharing NICU nurse by Mike Lew (Teenage Dick), directed by Tony-nominated director, Moritz von Stuelpnagel (Present Laughter and Hand to God).

Guggenheim Fellow Lews slice-of-life comedy about parenthoodis based in part on personal experience, and was originally commissioned as part of Audibles Emerging Playwrights Fund. It will star Andy Lucien (on stage: City of Conversation and The Last Seder; on TV:The Blacklist and Daredevil); and Ali Ahn (Broadways The Heidi Chronicles and off-Broadways Twelfth Night; TV'sRaising Dion, and NeXt.)

Shows are online at 7 p.m. July 8 and 10, with audience talk-backs at the end to help develop the play. Tickets and information: http://capecodtheatreproject.org.

Actors at Chatham Drama Guild are staging Ken Ludwig's Leading Ladies, which they'd planned to produce in summer 2020. The plot is about two English actors who learn a wealthy American woman is dying and looking for her lost family members and decide they just might fit the parts.

Shows are at 7:30 p.m. Thursdays through Saturdays July 8-Aug. 8 (except July 31) and 4 p.m. Sundays at the guild theater, 134 Crowell Road, Chatham. Tickets: $22-$25. Reservations: 508-945-0510,https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ken-ludwigs-leading-ladies-tickets-159495482281.

Marthas Vineyard Playhouse in Vineyard Haven is staging Every Brilliant Thing, written by Duncan Macmillan with Jonny Donahue. Scott Barrow stars in the three-decade story of a boy who tries to cure his mothers depression by creating a list of the best things in the world. The playhouse describes the show as a heartbreaking and hilarious immersive theatrical experience that takes us on a life-affirming journey.

Shows are at 6 p.m. Thursdays through Sundays July 8-18 at Tisbury Amphitheater, Off State Road. Tickets: $20-$25. Reservations and information: 508-696-6300, info@mvplayhouse.org, https://go.evvnt.com/809302-0.

The musical revue Silver Threads is subtitled A Rockin Tribute To Linda Ronstadt, and will be the first indoor show at Cape Cod Theatre Company/Harwich Junior Theater since the pandemic shutdown. Sonia Schonning, Marcia Wytral and Sara Sneed accompanied by a band led by musical director Robert Wilder will explore the Ronstadt songbook through the decades.

Shows are at 7 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays July 10-Aug. 1 at Cape Cod Theatre Company / Harwich Junior Theatre, 105 Division St., West Harwich. Tickets: $15-$30. Reservations and information: 508-432-2002, capecodtheatrecompany.org.

Cotuit Center for the Arts will use its new outdoor stage to present the family-friendly The Brothers Grimm Spectaculathon, written by playwright Dan Zolidis. The WatermelonAlligator Theatre Company will seekto combine all 209 Grimm stories from famous tales like Snow White to obscure ones like The Devils Grandmother for a fast-paced comedy with lots of audience participation that moves from once upon a time to happily ever after.

Shows are at4 and 7:30 p.m. Sundays and 7:30 p.m. Mondays and Tuesdays July 11-20 at the center, 4404 Route 28. Tickets and information: artsonthecape.org or 508-428-0669.

The world premiere of writer/director Holly Erin McCarthys The Fantastical House of Maya Mouse will set up a summerlong residency at Cape Rep Theatres outdoor stage to tell the story of a mouse who would rather stay home and watch movies than go to the beach. Then she cant turn the movies off when her house is plunged into a cinematic universe, with giant and noisy objects, aliens and other foes to fight.

Shows are at 10 a.m. Wednesdays and Thursdays July 14-Sept. 2 on the outdoor stage at Cape Rep Theatre, Route 6A, East Brewster. Tickets ($12) and information: 508-896-1888 or http://www.caperep.org. Masks and social distancing will be required.

For the first of two outdoor shows this summer, Cape Playhouse will present "Lady Day at Emerson's Bar and Grill," revisiting one of singer Billie Holiday's final performances in 1959 Philadelphia. A dozen musical numbers are combined with reminiscences about Holiday's life.

Shows of the 90-minute musical are 8 p.m. July 14-24 on the grounds of Cape Playhouse, 820 Main St. (Route 6A), Dennis. Tickets ($59) and information: https://www.capeplayhouse.com/lady-day/

See the article here:

14 comedies, musicals, fairy tales and more to watch from Cape Cod & Islands theaters - Cape Cod Times

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on 14 comedies, musicals, fairy tales and more to watch from Cape Cod & Islands theaters – Cape Cod Times

The United States at 245 years: Celebrating the Declaration of Independence – NorthJersey.com

Posted: at 3:15 pm

USA TODAY Network| NorthJersey.com

Editor's note: In honor of Independence Day this year, we mark 245 years since the United States parted with Great Britain we present the nation's founding document, the Declaration of Independence.

Last year, against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Daniel Prude and the failures of the Trump administration, we shared our view that the United States has not always lived up to the Declaration's creed. Further, we believe the national conversation on racial equity and justice must force the nation to finally and truly embrace the notions of universal liberty and equality.

American can and must ensure that all its people, created equal, can embrace their inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natures God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Button Gwinnett

Lyman Hall

George Walton

William Hooper

Joseph Hewes

John Penn

Edward Rutledge

Thomas Heyward, Jr.

Thomas Lynch, Jr.

Arthur Middleton

John Hancock

Samuel Chase

William Paca

Thomas Stone

Charles Carroll of Carrollton

George Wythe

Richard Henry Lee

Thomas Jefferson

Benjamin Harrison

Thomas Nelson, Jr.

Francis Lightfoot Lee

Carter Braxton

Robert Morris

Benjamin Rush

Benjamin Franklin

John Morton

George Clymer

James Smith

George Taylor

James Wilson

George Ross

Caesar Rodney

George Read

Thomas McKean

William Floyd

Philip Livingston

Francis Lewis

Lewis Morris

Richard Stockton

John Witherspoon

Francis Hopkinson

John Hart

Abraham Clark

Josiah Bartlett

William Whipple

Samuel Adams

John Adams

Robert Treat Paine

Elbridge Gerry

Stephen Hopkins

William Ellery

Roger Sherman

Samuel Huntington

William Williams

Oliver Wolcott

Matthew Thornton

Originally posted here:

The United States at 245 years: Celebrating the Declaration of Independence - NorthJersey.com

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on The United States at 245 years: Celebrating the Declaration of Independence – NorthJersey.com

Happy 4th of July to all our readers – HamletHub

Posted: at 3:15 pm

The birth of our country is traditionally a grand celebration filled with family, friends, BBQs, and community fireworks. It feels quite different this year as we begin to pick our heads up and see the light after a pandemic that rocked our world.

Whether you are enjoying Independence Day in the comfort of your homes and backyards, or taking necessary steps to celebrate away from home,Happy July 4th!

- Your friends at HamletHub

The Declaration of Independence.

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Read more:

Happy 4th of July to all our readers - HamletHub

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on Happy 4th of July to all our readers – HamletHub

Yacht Or Not?: Sailing The Seas of Yacht Rock – Ultimate Classic Rock

Posted: at 3:15 pm

Louis Armstrong said, If you have to ask what jazz is, youll never know. Duke Ellington said, There are simply two kinds of music: good music and the other kind. Christopher Cross said, If you get caught between the moon and New York City, the best that you can do is fall in love.

What do these pieces of wisdom add up to? Music, like love, doesnt follow rules. Musicians as diverse as Armstrong, Ellington and Cross dont want to be boxed in by genre. They want to write, record and perform and not spend time deciding if they play bebop or hard bop, blues or Southern rock, funk or disco.

But as temperatures heat up and people think of sailing away to find serenity, yacht rock playlists start to float in on the breeze. And that means drawing boundaries with enough latitude that artists dont object to being boxed in andstill foster playlists with a sense of meaning, a sense of continuity and depth. Peaks and valleys must be smartly balanced against the total annihilation of a common aesthetic. (Yes, despite a fascination with sailing and pina coladas, yacht rock can be taken seriously!)

And so, much to Armstrongs chagrin, we have to ask, What is yacht rock? If it seems obvious, take a look at Spotifys recent Yacht Rock playlist. Spotify is a global streaming leader with some 350 million monthly users, an army of music experts and cutting edge artificial intelligence, and yet the company filled its playlist with songs such as Tears for Fears Everybody Wants to Rule the World, Rockwells Somebodys Watching Me, Van Morrisons Brown Eyed Girl and Bruce Hornsbys The Way It Is.

If somebody wants to create and enjoy a stack of songs that runs from tunes by the J. Geils Band, to thePolice, to Bad Company, to Talking Heads (yup, the company has all these artists on its playlist and even included Ray Parker Jr.s Ghostbusters), they should do that with gusto! It sounds like an evening full of classic jams and fun left turns so cheers to the endeavor. But if a major player in the music business wants to do that and call it yacht rock, we need to take a step back and consider what is and isnt yacht.

We know breezes, islands, keys, capes, cool nights, crazy love and reminiscing help define the yacht aesthetic (see works by Seals & Crofts, Jay Fergeson, Bertie Higgins, Rupert Holmes, Paul Davis, Poco, and Little River Band). But lets get beyond the captains caps and map the waters of this perfect-for-summer style.

Watch Bertie Higgins' Video for 'Key Largo'

Before 2005, people generally placed Totos Africa and Holmes Escape (The Pina Colada Song) in the soft rock genre. Maybe if they were getting fancy, theyd call them AM Gold. But in 2005, the online video series Yacht Rock debuted. It fictionalized the careers of soft rock artists of the late 70s and early 80s. The cheeky show capitalized on the building renaissance of artists such as Steely Dan and Michael McDonald, who embraced the silliness of the series.

When it came on I remember watching it pretty avidly, McDonald admitted in 2018. My kids got a huge kick out of it. We would laugh about the characterizations of the people involved. At this point its a genre of its own. Youre either yacht or you're not.

He might be right that youre either yacht or youre not. But calling it a genre doesnt quite work (more on that in a minute).

Listen to the Doobie Brothers' 'Minute By Minute'

By the late 60s, rock n roll had become art. The Beatles started as simple teen heartthrobs covering early rock n roll, but graduated to the supreme weirdness of theWhite Album. Chuck Berry gave birth to the Rolling Stones who gave birth to Led Zeppelin and the gonzo bombast of Babe Im Gonna Leave You. And all sorts of acts went wild from the Grateful Dead, to Pink Floyd, to Frank Zappaand beyond. The sunshine of 70s AM Gold came as a reaction to these wonderful excesses. Singer-songwriters aimed to take rock and pop back to the simple pleasures of tight, light tunes such as Beach Boys classics, Motown hits and Brill Building-crafted songs.

Hippies looking for revolution and Gen X-ers on the hunt for rage, irony and sharp edges bristled at the genuine lyrics of tenderness and heartbreak neatly packaged in finely-crafted Top 40. Where the stars and fans of '60s and 90s rock wanted arty and experimental music, anger and angst, yacht took listeners on a voyage powered by pure earnestness: think of the sincere and intense conviction of Dave Masons We Just Disagree, Captain & Tennille's "Love Will Keep Us Together," and Love is the Answer by England Dan & John Ford Coley.

(Which is why placing the Police or Talking Heads on any yacht mix doesnt work.)

Yacht rock embodies the final charge of unbridled, heartfelt pop.

I think these songs remain so popular because they are unabashedly pop,Nicholas Niespodziani, leader of the hugely successful tribute bandYacht Rock Revue,explains to UCR. Theyre not self conscious. You couldnt write a song like Africa now. What are they even singing about? Who knows? But its fun to sing.

Watch Captain & Tennille's Video for 'Love Will Keep Us Together'

Yacht rock doesnt just have an earnestness to its lyrics, the sax solos come with the same level of sincerity.

If the style was the last gasp of unadulterated pop, it was also the dying breath of jazzs influence on rock. Jazz rock started in the 60s with Zappa, Chicago, Santana and Blood, Sweat & Tears, but slowly simple drums and growling guitars stomped horn lines and rhythmic shifts into the ground. However, yacht rock features echoes of swingin saxophones, big band horns and Miles Davis fusion projects.

Yacht rock is very pop, but legitimate musical talents made those hooks. Chuck Mangione logged time in jazz giant Art Blakeys band then took what he learned and crushed complex harmonic ideas into the pop nugget Feels So Good, which is basically a Latin-bebop-disco-classical suite. (If you dig Feels So Good, dig deeper and groove to smooth jazz mini-symphony Give It All You Got.)

Nearly every classic from the style features either an epic sax solo or dazzling guitar part. For horn glory, go spin Little River Bands Reminiscing, Gino Vannellis I Just Wanna Stop or Grover Washington Jr. and Bill Withers Just the Two of Us." For six-string wizardry as astounding as anything Jimmy Page came up with (and much more economical), try Atlantic Rhythm Sections So Into You, Pablo Cruises Love Will Find a Way and pretty much every Steely Dan cut.

(Which is why placing Tears for Fears Everybody Wants to Rule the World and Rockwells Somebodys Watching Me on any yacht mix doesnt work).

Watch the Little River Band's Video for 'Reminiscing'

Being a style, a feeling, an aesthetic, a vibe means that yacht rock can pull a song from a wide variety of genres into its orbit. It also means that its not just a catalog of hits from bearded white dudes. Yes, Kenny Loggins, McDonald and both Seals and Crofts helped define yacht rock. But quintessential songs from the style came from the women and artists of color, soul singers, folk heroes and Nashville aces.

For every Loggins' tune in a captains hat, theres a Carly Simon track dressed up as your cruise director.Yes, there's Steely Dan's jazz influence,but alsoCrosby, Stills & Nash's folk legacy (Southern Cross remains definitively of the style). Yacht rock playlists should also be littered with appropriate R&B gems, such as the Raydios You Cant Change That (which features Ray Parker Jr.!), Hall & Oates Sara Smile and Kool & the Gangs Too Hot. Likewise, country acts of the era tried to go Top 40 while attempting to retain some twang and managed to make Love Boat music (see Juice Newtons Angel of the Morning, Eddie Rabbits I Love a Rainy Night, Dolly Parton & Kenny Rogers Islands in the Stream).

Its hard to tell if the Commodores Sail On is pop or R&B, harder still to know if George Bensons Give Me the Night is pop, R&B or jazz. But they both feel yacht.

(Which is why Santana can do psychedelic Latin music and can do yacht on Hold On, and why the Pointer Sisters can do new wave disco with Neutron Dance and yacht with Slow Hand.")

Spotify was right to think about diversity when making its playlist, though the company got the type of diversity wrong. Yacht has some pretty specific sonic parameters, but has no demographic restrictions when it comes to the kind of artists contributing to the styles catalog. That means when you hit the high seas of yacht, you dont need to be afraid to fight for your favorites to be included, just please dont have one of those favorites be Ghostbusters.

We began talking about drawing boundaries with enough latitude that artists dont object to being boxed in. The wide latitude yacht rock affords matters because music comes to define eras and outlines cultural trends (remember that yacht came in reaction to art rock and that says a lot about the swing from the late '60s to the early '80s). Calling Christopher Cross soft rock might feel right, but it doesn't tell us much about where he was coming from and what he was trying to accomplish. Calling Cross yacht rock, now that we know it's not a pejorative, illuminates his aesthetic.

Cross came out of the Texas rock scene that produced blues aces the Vaughan Brothers and guitar shredder Eric Johnson (who plays on a lot of his albums). He loves Joni Mitchell and that shows in his craft. He's jazzy but not jazz (see those horns and guitar on "Ride Like the Wind") with a vibe that's completely yacht -- developed from the scene that took '60s pop, updated it and sheltered it from the trends of punk, metal, new wave and hip hop.The same can be said forLoggins, McDonald, Simon, Lionel Ritchie and so many others.

Spotify needs to tweak itsalgorithm so it gets this right. Or, better yet, connect with the genre-crossing vibe that makes yacht so unique.

Read the original post:

Yacht Or Not?: Sailing The Seas of Yacht Rock - Ultimate Classic Rock

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on Yacht Or Not?: Sailing The Seas of Yacht Rock – Ultimate Classic Rock

Flex LNG shows it cares as loveboats bring young hearts closer – TradeWinds

Posted: at 3:15 pm

Young love can blossom anywhere even in shipping it seems but to be parted on the high seas must make any separation even more acute, except if you work for Flex LNG that is.

So when cadet Magda Pieniazek and her own true love Bartozs Cenarski went to sea, both with on different vessels for the John Fredrisken-controlled LNG shipowner they expected to be far apart for several months.

But the two youngsters, who had met and fallen in love while studying at the Faculty of Maritime Studies in Poland, had not banked on the romantic side of Captain Nenad Martinovic the Croatian master of 173,400-cbm Flex Artemis (built 2020) on which Cenarski is serving.

In late June as Flex Artemis paused for a Reunion crew change, while in ballast and heading for West Africa, sistership Flex Constellation (built 2019), with Pieniazek onboard was passing with a cargo bound for China.

Captain Martinovic, made a small and authorised diversion to facilitate an on-the-water, albeit at-a-distance, romantic rendezvous for the two young loves.

There was waving, flag-flying, the sound of the ships sirens and those all-important binoculars as the two vessels passed with the crew assembled on the bridge to witness and celebrate the encounter.

"The crew is proud and additionally motivated, and our young cadets are happy," Captain Martinovic told his local Croatian publication. "The respect expressed in this way by their older colleagues meant a lot to them.

Family, friends and colleagues, both on board and in the office, make us better. This is our way, the Flex LNG way," he said. "We train and educate our crew and future colleagues by our own example.

Read more from the original source:

Flex LNG shows it cares as loveboats bring young hearts closer - TradeWinds

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on Flex LNG shows it cares as loveboats bring young hearts closer – TradeWinds

‘Crossroads: Change in Rural America’ exhibit at the Waveland Ground Zero Hurricane Museum – WXXV News 25

Posted: at 3:13 pm

The Smithsonians Museum on Main Street, in cooperation with Mississippi Humanities Council, came together to showcase the Crossroads: Change in Rural America exhibit at the Waveland Ground Zero Hurricane Museum.

The exhibition will tour six communities in Mississippi and Waveland is the only host site on the Coast.

The exhibit explores how rural American communities changed in the 20th century. The interactive exhibit showcases six panels that each tell a different story.

Bernie Cullen, museum board chair and project director, tells News 25 the exhibit allows residents in Hancock County to learn about the rich and rural heritage. We really liked the fact that it was Crossroads: Changes in Rural America because you know we are rural, we got some city, we got some country in us but when we look at the information about this exhibit, when you look at change when you look at persevering, when you look at community, it just fit Waveland and it fit Hancock County. So, what we also decided to do as a board is we didnt just look at it as a Waveland project, we looked at it as a Hancock County project.

Crossroads: Change in Rural America will be set up at the Waveland Ground Zero Hurricane Museum until Saturday, August 14th. Admission is free.

More:

'Crossroads: Change in Rural America' exhibit at the Waveland Ground Zero Hurricane Museum - WXXV News 25

Posted in Waveland | Comments Off on ‘Crossroads: Change in Rural America’ exhibit at the Waveland Ground Zero Hurricane Museum – WXXV News 25

The Greatest Adventure by Colin Burgess review a history of human space exploration – The Guardian

Posted: at 3:12 pm

At the end of July the second richest man in the world, Amazons Jeff Bezos, plans to blast himself into space, a project that has prompted a satirical global petition asking him to stay there. If the history of human space exploration ended at that moment, with the phallic self-launch of a narcissistic tax avoider, it would be a bathetic endpiece to a remarkable story that began with Nazi weaponry and has encompassed arguably the greatest achievement to date of human civilisation.

It is nearly 50 years since people last walked on the surface of the moon the moon! in an age with no internet or smartphones, driven there in rattling tin cans at unimaginable speeds by huge controlled explosions. Boosters of the modern app economy love to claim that right now the pace of technological change is the fastest it has ever been, but they are somehow forgetting the period between 1957, when the USSR put the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into orbit, and 1969, when three men flew to the moon and two of them descended in a separate spacecraft, walked around collecting rocks, and then blasted off again, docking with the original spacecraft, before flying back to Earth and splashing down safely in the ocean.

The vehicle that had pushed them laboriously out of Earths gravity well was the Saturn V, still the largest rocket ever built, a 36-storey-high behemoth designed under the guidance of Nazi rocket scientist Wernher von Braun. The inventor of the V2 rocket, which terrorised London from late 1944, Von Braun surrendered to the Americans at the end of the war, was gratefully transported to safety in the US and put in charge of designing rockets for ballistic missiles with which to nuke the Soviets.

But Von Braun still dreamed of less unpleasant ways to use his rocket science. Between 1952 and 1954 he wrote a series of articles for Colliers Magazine under the rubric Man Will Conquer Space Soon! Then came Sputnik and, in 1961, the first human being in space: Yuri Gagarin. The US military was alarmed. A month later, President Kennedy announced that the Americans would put someone on the moon by the end of the decade, and the space race was on.

It is this era that forms the narrative core of Australian space historian Colin Burgesss book, with each and every Nasa mission in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programmes described in detail loving enough to thrill space nerds of all ages. But he also pays due homage to the remarkable achievements of the Soviets, who for much of the space races duration were still winning it, until suddenly they werent. This he attributes to the untimely death in 1966 of the Russian genius Sergei Korolev, an engineer who had survived two years in the Gulag after one of Stalins purges, worked on rockets during the war, and rose to become chief designer of the Soviet space programme.

It was Korolev who, in the mid-1950s, began firing dogs into the upper reaches of the atmosphere without asking them, to check the bio-effects of very high-altitude flight. In November 1957, just a month after Sputnik 1, Korolev launched the much bigger Sputnik 2, final home of the plucky cosmodog Laika, the planets first life-form to experience spaceflight, sent up there with bio-sensors to beam back data but no plans to bring her home. Dog lovers the world over protested at the cruelty of leaving her up there to circle the planet until her air ran out. The well-connected Burgess, though, has it on the authority of two Russian sources that Laika probably expired of heat exhaustion only a few hours into the flight, which might have been a relative mercy.

While the USSR were firing the first object, first animal, and then first human into space they got the first woman into space too, Valentina Tereshkova in 1963 the Americans were racing to catch up, eventually boosting a bunch of monkeys into the high atmosphere. In 1958 Nasa was formed, and the term astronaut (Greek for star sailor) officially adopted, the first American astronaut being a squirrel monkey named Miss Baker, who completed a short ballistic flight into space in 1959.

Burgess tells the subsequent tales of crewed spaceflight on both sides of the iron curtain with great verve, and a suspenseful narration of unheralded near-disasters. Gagarins spacecraft, for instance, only just avoided burning up on re-entry, as did John Glenns Friendship 7 craft on an early Mercury mission. Theres a nail-biting story of one cosmonaut whose suit ballooned and nearly prevented him from getting back through the airlock. On the Apollo 10 mission, the lunar lander nearly crashed because its radar locked on to the actual moon instead of the command module it was meant to rendezvous with. And Apollo 11 only landed safely because crack pilot Neil Armstrong overrode the automatic systems that were trying to set down on dangerous rocks and flew to a better landing zone with seconds of fuel left.

There are, too, sober analyses of the actual disasters, including the fatal fire in the command capsule of the first Apollo mission during a test on the ground, later found to be partly due to cost-cutting by a contractor (plus a change), and the loss of the space shuttle Challenger in 1986, owing to a frozen O-ring in a rocket booster. (Its silly no? / When a rocket-ship explodes / And everybody still wants to fly sang Prince a year later.)

Nasa now plans, though, to put people back on the moon by the middle of this decade, which rather prompts the question: why did moon-going stop nearly half a century ago? The answer seems to be, astonishingly in hindsight, that we just got bored of it. The sight of astronauts gleefully bouncing around in one-sixth gravity had become tiresome for many, Burgess notes, and public support for the space agencys lunar missions had plummeted.

So what has changed? Well, China landed a robot on the moon last year, and more recently announced plans to build a joint moon base with Russia. So some of Donald Trumps Space Force might want to be there jockeying for position too. But more generally space seems cool again, partly thanks to the antics of billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, of Tesla and SpaceX fame, who builds rockets for Nasa and used one of them to blast a red Tesla into orbit. (In the drivers seat is a mannequin called Starman, in homage to the David Bowie song.) Blinking in Musks authentic rocket exhaust are the minnows with vanity space companies, such as Bezoss Blue Origin and Richard Bransons Virgin Galactic, which is most notable for the fact that it has been promising its first tourist flights into space are just around the corner for more than a decade.

But does space exploration actually matter as something more than a dick-waving contest for plutocrats? Space exploration is a human imperative, Burgess writes, and travelling further afield in space is our undeniable destiny, but he might have offered a more full-throated defence of it. Some argue that space exploration is a waste of money while we still have problems to fix on our own planet, but that has never been an either/or proposition, just as it was not a binary choice for the UK between staying in the EU or spending more money on the NHS. The pure-science justification alone is strong, taking into account the cosmological discoveries that flowed from the Hubble telescope, and will do so from its successor, the James Webb space telescope, to be launched later this year.

But possibly the best reason is that, even if we decide to act as better stewards of the Earth, it could be rendered uninhabitable through no fault of our own. Perhaps a large asteroid strike, or a gamma-ray burst from a nearby star collapsing into a black hole, which would destroy the atmosphere. In that case, it might be nice to have a spare planet, and we might feel grateful to the pioneering space-sailors who helped make evacuation a possibility.

The Greatest Adventure: A History of Human Space Exploration is published by Reaktion. To support the Guardian and the Observer buy a copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

View post:

The Greatest Adventure by Colin Burgess review a history of human space exploration - The Guardian

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on The Greatest Adventure by Colin Burgess review a history of human space exploration – The Guardian

A shared vision for space exploration – Room: The Space Journal – ROOM Space Journal

Posted: at 3:12 pm

The last Apollo mission to the Moon was almost 50 years ago and in that time no human has set foot on any celestial body outside of Earth. In those intervening decades, we have made advances in space science, engineering and commerce but, when it comes to hands-on experience in exploring another world, humanity is only now about to break the half-century mark of inaction. The Artemis Program aims to establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon in preparation for missions to Mars and here Gabriel Swiney describes the journey to the creation of the Artemis Accords and why he believes these sometimes controversial commitments are vital for the long-term sustainability of Artemis.

The Artemis Program, first announced by the Trump Administration and endorsed in January 2021 by the Biden Administration, is a comprehensive plan by NASA to return humans to the Moon, build a sustainable architecture for lunar exploration, and leverage that experience to explore Mars.

Although the celestial destination is the same as Apollo, the programmes could not be more different. While Apollo was a purely US activity, Artemis will involve a coalition of partner countries and space agencies. Apollo hardware, from the Saturn V rockets to the lunar landers, was designed, owned and operated by the US government; for Artemis NASA is contracting commercial services, relying on private industry to design and provide the bulk of exploration hardware. The United States and its partners are not likely to be the only ones in the neighbourhood, as other countries, such as China and Russia, are also planning lunar exploration programmes.

Continue reading here:

A shared vision for space exploration - Room: The Space Journal - ROOM Space Journal

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on A shared vision for space exploration – Room: The Space Journal – ROOM Space Journal