Monthly Archives: July 2021

Youth step into the world of a veterinarian AgriLife Extension camps give ‘hands-on’ experience to future professionals – MyParisTexas.com

Posted: July 21, 2021 at 12:48 am

More than one kid has wrapped the leg of their understanding pet, pretending to be a veterinarian. But to help move this game of pretending to a profession in later years, theTexas A&M AgriLife Extension Servicecreated the 4-H Veterinary Science Camps.

The goal of the 4-H Veterinary Science Camp is to provide experiential learning opportunities for students participating in theVeterinary Science Certificate Program, VSCP, where they can learn basic clinical skills for small animal and large animal veterinary medicine under the direction of a veterinarian.

More than 275 youth applied this year from 11 states and one territory for the opportunity to participate in one of the three-day camps, and only 75 spots were available, said Tyler Vogel, AgriLife Extensionprogram specialist in theDepartment of Animal Sciencewithin theCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciencesand one of the events facilitators.

These camps are an event that can provide hands-on veterinary experiences to those students who have said since they were 6 years old that they want to be a veterinarian when they grow up, said Susan Culp, DVM, AgriLife Extension veterinarian and event facilitator in the Department of Animal Science. These camps have given the kids, especially those from urban areas with little livestock experience, the opportunity to experience things that maybe they have never had the opportunity to experience. These kids desperately want the hands-on opportunities with animals.

Expanding the camp opportunities

The first camp was in 2014, when Joe Mask, Ph.D., the AgriLife Extension youth veterinary science specialist at the time, felt youth going through the certified veterinary assistant curriculum needed something more.

The first camp was hosted at Texas A&M University in conjunction with 4-H Roundup to allow the youth to go through the camp and then compete at the Skillathon. This path was followed for two years before a second camp was added at West Texas A&M University, WTAMU, in Canyon.

In 2018, Vogel was hired, allowing for the expansion and growth of the program. And in 2019, a third camp was planned in partnership with Christine Hoskinson, a licensed veterinary technician and assistant director for the Veterinary Technology Program at the Texas A&M University-Kingsville.

Christine hit the ground running, planning for the 2020 camp, but then COVID-19 happened, and the first camp that was scheduled there was canceled, Culp said. This year, we are holding all three camps for the first time: June 7-9 in Kingsville, June 14-16 at College Station and July 12-14 at WTAMU.

Camper selection

The camps are aimed at junior high and high school students, Vogel said. These students gain access to hands-on veterinary skills taught by industry leaders in education, animal science and veterinary medicine. Initially, they were only open to 4-Hers.

This year, though, he said they opened it to all students 13-18 years old and not just from Texas, as the camps are rapidly becoming a signature event and garnering far greater interest than camper spots available.

Because there is so much interest, weve developed a blind application process, and campers are selected and assigned to a camp, based on their answers to their questions, Vogel said. Its very objective to recognize the students who are very interested in the information and animal experience.

The camps are 90% veterinary science-focused, with the remainder being certifications in Beef Quality Assurance, BQA, and Pork Quality Assurance Plus, PQA Plus, he said.

We want these students to understand why we do the things we do. We also talk about animal welfare and animal rights; the goal is to make sure these kids know why these are important issues, what the truth is, and how they can help defend against misinformation.

Skills learned in the 4-H Veterinary Science CampStudents attending camp deal with a variety of animals, including livestock and smaller animals, Vogel said.

When studying cattle, they learn about chute safety, cattle handling, physical exams, dystocia, pulling calves, large animal instruments and when and how they are used. The equine portion discusses how to safely interact with horses, stalls, leg bandaging, physical exams, aging and injections.

When students move to the small animal side of things, the camp uses stuffed animals to allow them to learn how to interact with clients, ask the right questions, conduct physical exams, use small animal instrumentation, and discuss fecal examinations and why they are necessary.

In addition to the three-day overnight camps, two one-day camps were offered in El Paso on June 30 and July 1 that attracted another 59 youth.

This is the first time that we are expanding our footprint out to the El Paso area, Culp said. The one-day camps provide both large and small animal experience and veterinary skills lessons, but also offer a different keynote speaker each day, focusing on advocacy and leadership.

Culp said that the reception from the entire El Paso veterinary medical community has been overwhelmingly positive, and she hopes that they can return to El Paso every year, possibly even offering more opportunities in the future.

Determining a path forward

These camps can help youth make better-informed decisions about a career path in the veterinary profession, and it helps them make that decision sooner, Culp said.

These camps are so formative to the participants lives. We wish we had the staffing to offer 10 or more veterinary science camps every year, as the demand is certainly there.

By Kay Ledbetter with AgriLife Today here.

Photo: Outdoor pen and chute-side discussion at the 4-H Veterinary Science Camp on June 15 in College Station. (Texas A&M AgriLife photo by Sam Craft)

Likeand followMyParisTexas.comonFacebook, and share this story Reporting local news in Paris and Lamar County, Texas.

Read the original post:

Youth step into the world of a veterinarian AgriLife Extension camps give 'hands-on' experience to future professionals - MyParisTexas.com

Posted in Life Extension | Comments Off on Youth step into the world of a veterinarian AgriLife Extension camps give ‘hands-on’ experience to future professionals – MyParisTexas.com

Johnson & Johnson Innovation announces extension of innovation partnering office at Monash University in collaboration with Victorian State…

Posted: at 12:48 am

You are here:

14 July 2021

-Victorian State Government extends financing ofJJIPO@Monashfor an additional two years

-Extension will further boost Victorian hub for researchers and early-stage companies to connect with industry experts and deliver novel healthcare solutions

MELBOURNE, Australia,July 15, 2021/PRNewswire/ -- Johnson & Johnson Innovation announced today the extension of the Johnson & Johnson Innovation Partnering Office at Monash University'sClayton CampusinMelbourne(JJIPO@Monash) in collaboration with the Victorian State Government.

This joint initiative between Johnson & Johnson Innovation, the Victorian Government and Monash University will be extended for approximately two years throughJune 30, 2023. The agreement will allowJJIPO@Monashto continue connecting with the Victorian innovation ecosystem, nurturing and accelerating innovative research, new product development and commercialisation for a global market, as well as boost local job creation inVictoria.

"Our collaboration with Monash University represents Johnson & Johnson Innovation's ongoing commitment to foster diverse healthcare ecosystems acrossAustralia. This extension will further help connect life-science innovators inVictoriato accelerate their healthcare solutions across the globe," saidStacy Feld, Regional Head, Johnson & Johnson Innovation LLC,West North America,Australia&New Zealand.

Since 2012, Johnson & Johnson Innovation has played an active role in establishing connections with key stakeholders in theAustralialife-science ecosystem, including academia, government and venture capitalists, to enable public-private collaboration and support early-stage entrepreneurs and academic researchers.JJIPO@Monashwas originally launched in 2018 to provide crucial support to researchers and companies in the Victorian life-science sector as part of the Government's commitment to the medical technologies and pharmaceuticals sector one of eight priority growth sectors. The public-private partnership between Johnson & Johnson Innovation, Monash University and the Victorian Government is one of only three such offices located across the world.

"Victoriahas one of the world's largest life science clusters composed of medical technologies (medtech), biotechnologies and pharmaceutical industries. It's home to a vibrant commercial sector, key R&D infrastructure and advanced manufacturing expertise making it a highly sought-after destination by global healthcare companies," saidJaala Pulford, Minister for Innovation, Parliament ofVictoria. "This is why we are delighted to extend our joint agreement with Johnson & Johnson Innovation to maintain the partnering office at Monash."

"This contract extension demonstrates the valuable work that is taking place atJJIPO@Monash," saidKathy Connell, Senior Director, Early Innovation Partnering, Australia&New Zealand, Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd. "Several high impact Victorian healthcare collaborations have been signed since our launch, including those novel medical technologies and treatments for neurodegenerative and autoimmune conditions, and solutions for significant unmet needs in global public health including maternal mortality and infectious diseases."

Since its inception in 2018,JJIPO@Monashhas provided a platform for major life-science collaboration inVictoriato strengthen the healthcare ecosystem and enable future impact, including:

Monash University Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Senior Vice-President (Enterprise & Governance), ProfessorKen Sloan, said the contract extension will further raiseVictoria'sreputation as a global innovation hot spot.

"This partnership is helping to bridge the gap between academic research and industry application by driving cross-industry conversations, leading to project innovations and investment. I am excited to see what we will achieve in this new phase," said Professor Sloan.

JJIPO@Monashprovides mentoring, training and networking with emerging healthcare companies and academic researchers at no financial cost to life science stakeholders acrossVictoriato help nurture the next generation of innovators. Commercialisation training, mentoring and networking support is provided to accelerate translational life science research along the path to commercialisation and to connect Victorian innovators with stakeholders from Johnson & Johnson Innovation's vast global networks. These activities are part of Johnson & Johnson Innovation's ongoing commitment to strengthenVictoria'shealthcare innovation ecosystem and to accelerating the opportunity for locally developed technologies to receive investment dollars, to reach patients faster, and to realize a fair return on investment.

The Victorian Government's renewed financial support will continue to strengthen the partnership. The program of activities offered throughJJIPO@Monashwill ensure Johnson & Johnson Innovation has an ongoing and active presence inVictoriaand will continue to build a commercially viable bio-medtech innovation network, create sector employment and ultimately deliver Victorian-originated healthcare solutions to people inAustraliaand around the world.

Originally posted here:

Johnson & Johnson Innovation announces extension of innovation partnering office at Monash University in collaboration with Victorian State...

Posted in Life Extension | Comments Off on Johnson & Johnson Innovation announces extension of innovation partnering office at Monash University in collaboration with Victorian State…

A Right-Wing Dark Money Group Created This ‘Big Tech Funding’ Chrome Extension – VICE

Posted: at 12:48 am

Image: American Principles Project

On Monday, an interesting new tool called Big Tech Funding went live on the Chrome Web Store. The browser extension allows Twitter users to see disclosures on the profiles and tweets of users who "are affiliated with think tanks, academic centers, and advocacy groups that are funded by Big Tech, but many users are unlikely to realize that its being funded by far-right political operatives.

Behind the project is a far-right advocacy group funded by dark money known as the American Principles Project, which has the main goal "to make the family the most powerful, well-represented special interest group in Washington, D.C." To that end, the organization supports a variety of family-oriented political objectives like opposing Black Lives Matter, abortion access, LGBTQ rights, the bogeyman of critical race theory, and more.

The extension appends peoples Twitter profiles with a disclaimer: "Disclosure: This person is affiliated with an organization funded by, followed by the organizations theyre purportedly involved with. Most of the people sharing the tool online initially were not aware of the connection to the American Principles Project.

The extension relies on publicly-available data sources, compiled by staff at American Principles Project, including company funding disclosures, nonprofit annual reports, IRS documents, and news stories. The information is available in aggregate at BigTechFunding.org, the apps store page notes.

The American Principles Project did not immediately respond to Motherboards request for comment.

Big Tech Funding is the latest example of how right-wing interests have glommed on to criticism of large tech companies, albeit usually because of concerns over supposed censorship of conservatives rather than the many substantive issues pointed out by progressives and the left over the years. Indeed, while politicians like Republican Senator Jim Jordan decry the power of Big Tech companies, they also throw a fit and descend into conspiracies when someone (i.e. FTC Chair Lina Khan) tries to address the real issues around competition.

The American Principles Projects other interests read like a laundry list of current fixations of the conspiratorial right-wing. For example, the organization claims that Black Lives Matter was a rhetorical Trojan horse that was injecting dangerous ideas into the country and fomenting revolution.

"Black Lives Matter isn't about saving Black livesit's about staging a political and cultural revolution," one report by the group reads. "It's about shredding the Constitution and overthrowing our Republican form of government. It's about abolishing the rule of law and replacing it with an identiarian race-based caste system."

The organizations stances on other issues, such as abortion, are no more measured. "I am personally opposed to killing abortionists," founder Robert P. George wrote as a contribution to a 1994 symposium titled Killing Abortionists. "However, inasmuch as my personal opposition to this practice is rooted in a sectarian (Catholic) religious belief in the sanctity of human life, I am unwilling to impose it on others who may, as a matter of conscience, take a different view. George goes on with a tongue-in-cheek contribution that compares abortion to the murder of doctors who perform abortions.

In September, ahead of the general election, the group and its PAC proudly announced a $4 million ad campaign aimed at exposing the "transgender radicalism" of Democratic candidates. Three digital ads were released this week in Michigan drawing attention to Joe Bidens and Sen. Gary Peters support for policies which would allow biological males to compete in womens sports and push children into dangerous, life-altering sex-change sterilization procedures at young ages, said a press release by the group at the time.

The group is also concerned about another popular bogeyman for conspiracy-minded right-wingers: the proliferation of critical race theory. It endorsed Tom Cotton's Stop CRT Act which would stop federal funding for schools that "promote CRT" or "compel its adoption" as well as stop federal agencies or contractors from "indoctrinating employees in CRT."

CRT is a pernicious ideology which holds that Americans should not look at each other as equals but rather see one another as fundamentally different, with some being oppressors and others victims based on the color of their skin, said APP president Terry Schilling in a statement. And it also denies that Americas founding ideals were truly central to our country, instead telling us that the U.S. was and still is an inherently racist society.

Why is a group like this so keen on speaking out about Big Tech? As it turns out, most of the groups opposition to Big Tech has pertained to concerns about Big Tech censorship of conservativesspecifically by reforming Section 230. We have yet to see from this group, or really any major right-wing network, a condemnation of monopolies in and of themselves except those that are great rhetorical targets.

Take the telecom industry, which is largely dominated by anti-competitive firms that wield their enormous power to kill public alternatives, hijack prices, lay off scores of workers, and generally degrade the quality of their products and services. The telecom industry routinely engages in this exact behaviour. As attention has fixated on the perils of social media and big tech mergers, wave upon wave of anti-competitive, price-hiking telecom mergers have sailed through the bipartisan approval process, telecom reporter Karl Bode wrote for Motherboard in 2019. A few examples: Comcasts superunion with NBC, Spectrums acquisition of Time Warner Cable, AT&Ts acquisition of DirecTV, or T-Mobiles looming merger with Sprint.

In fact, in its press release announcing the new tool, the group's top lobbyist, Jon Schweppe, reiterated that the groups main point of contention is supposed censorship of conservatives.

Last fall, powerful Big Tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google waged an all-out attack on our democracy by suppressing news stories, banning users, blocking advertisements, and manipulating algorithms to promote one political party over another, Schweppe said in a statement. America wont survive long if large swaths of our population are cheated out of participation in the public square. At this point, reining[sic] in Big Tech needs to be a litmus test in the Republican Partyif youre not with us, youre against us.

Given the sort of society American Principles Project is fighting fora deeply reactionary, exclusionary, and bigoted oneits hard to imagine why anyone should want to be with the us they claim to be fighting for.

Read more:

A Right-Wing Dark Money Group Created This 'Big Tech Funding' Chrome Extension - VICE

Posted in Life Extension | Comments Off on A Right-Wing Dark Money Group Created This ‘Big Tech Funding’ Chrome Extension – VICE

Armyworms starting to appear; what you need to know – Runnels County Register

Posted: at 12:48 am

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service| Runnels County Register

Runnels County Texas A&M Extension Service Agent Marty Vahlenkamp says that he has received calls regarding Army Worms starting to show up:

"I just received a call from a homeowner and from what he described it sounded like he has Army Worms. I had heard a report from other areas of Texas where they were seeing them. This is the first I have seen or heard in Runnels County. With the cooler temperatures and wet weather we have seen (more Fall like) I would encourage people to be on the lookout for them. If they are observed in a lawn homeowners should treat immediately. They generally will not kill a lawn, but will make it look bad for a while.

The below article on Army Worms was written by Chris Sansone, Rick Minzemayer, and Mike Merchant Extension Entomologists, Texas AgriLife Extension Service.

Armyworm outbreaks are difficult to predict but infestations seem to occur in portions of the state every year especially after early fall rains. Common species of armyworms present in Texas include: the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda; the yellowstriped armyworm, Spodoptera ornithogalli; the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua; and the true armyworm, Mythimna (=Pseudaletia) unipuncta. The fall armyworm is the insect that causes the most problems in golf courses and home landscapes.

Biology

The fall armyworm has four life stages: egg, larva, pupa and adult. The fall armyworm has not shown the ability to diapause so its ability to survive winter depends on the severity of the temperature. The fall armyworm does overwinter in the southern regions of Texas in the pupal stage. The adult is a moth that migrates northward as temperatures increase in the spring. Armyworm eggs and larvae are also sometimes transported from one part of the state to another on grass sod intended for residential and commercial turf.

The adult fall armyworm moth has a wingspan of about 1.5 in. The hind wings are white; the front wings are dark gray, mottled with lighter and darker splotched. On male moths each forewing has a noticeable whitish spot near the extreme tip.

Eggs are very small, white laid in clusters of 50 or more and are covered with grayish, fuzzy scales from the body of the female moth. The eggs are seldom seen and are laid at the base of appropriate host plants.

Larvae hatch from the eggs and when full-crown larvae are green, brown, or black and about 1 to 1.5 in. long when full grown. The larva has a dark head capsule usually marked with a pale, but distinct, inverted Y. Along each side of its body is a longitudinal, black stripe, and along the middle of its back is a wider, yellowish-gray stripe with four black dots on each segment. The larvae have five stages or instars and usually hide in debris on the soil surface in the middle of the day. When full grown, larvae will enter the soil and form the pupal stage. Adult moths emerge from pupae. Moths mate and lay eggs, thus starting the life cycle over again. Lush plant growth is preferred by the adults for egg laying.

Several generations (A generation is the development from egg to adult stage.) occur each year and typically the life cycle from egg to adult takes 28 days. The life cycle can be extended if cooler temperatures occur and can last up to several months. Armyworms in the spring and summer occur in more distinct groups than later in the season. Fall populations of larvae often blend together several generations and may appear to be continually occurring.

When feeding, larvae strip foliage and then move to the next available food. High populations appear to march side by side to the new food. Thus, the name armyworms has been applied.

Armyworms attack many different kinds of plants. When food is scarce, they will move to plants that are not normally attacked. Thus, armyworms can be found on nearly any plant as they migrate in search of edible foliage. Besides warm-season turfgrasses, plants attacked by armyworms include grain and forage sorghum, corn, small grains, sweet potato, beans, turnip, clover, tobacco, spinach, cucumber, potatoes, tomatoes, cowpeas, cabbage, bluegrass and others.

Damage consists of foliage consumption. The small larvae will chew the green layer from the leaves and leave a clearing or window pane effect. The first three instars do very little feeding while the last two instars consume 85% of the total foliage consumed.

Although armyworms outbreaks are memorable when they occur, in reality, the outbreaks are usually small in scope. Weather and multiple natural enemies usually act together to keep populations under control. Parasites such as wasps and flies are very effective against armyworms. Predators, such as ground beetles, are also effective in limiting outbreaks. Birds, skunks and rodents also consume large numbers of larvae and pupae. Diseases such as insect viruses and fungi can also be important.

Sometimes weather conditions occur that favor armyworms. High egg survival of fall armyworms is favored by above-average rains in August and September. Because armyworm moths are strong fliers, outbreaks can also occur when storms move the moths and allow them to escape natural enemies. Armyworms should be controlled when they occur in large numbers or plant damage is becoming excessive.

Armyworms should be controlled when they occur in large numbers or plant damage is becoming excessive. This will be apparent in turfgrass by examining the grass blades. Damaged areas of lawns appear off-color and eventually turn brown as damage progresses from small windowpane strips of damaged leaf tissue to destruction of entire leaves. Armyworms feed any time of the day or night, but are most active early in the morning or late in the evening.

Treat with a labeled insecticide when leaf damage becomes evident and large numbers of caterpillars are visible. Effective, low-impact insecticides include halofenozide (small caterpillars only) and spinosad. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) products are widely available and will selectively control small armyworm larvae without harm to beneficial insects; however, Bt residues does not last on turf for more than 1-2 days. Conventional insecticide choices for armyworms in lawns include bifenthrin, carbaryl, esfenvalerate, permethrin and others.

For more information about armyworms in agriculture, refer to Extension fact sheet B-1220, Managing Insect and Mite Pests of Texas Sorghum; B-1251, Managing Insect and Mite Pests of Small Grains; B-1401, Integrated Pest Management Guide for Texas Forage Crops.These publications, and help with additional questions about armyworms or other pest problems, can be obtained by contacting your county Extension office.

See more here:

Armyworms starting to appear; what you need to know - Runnels County Register

Posted in Life Extension | Comments Off on Armyworms starting to appear; what you need to know – Runnels County Register

Le Sueur County Extension: Plants need to make right bets to survive drought – Southernminn.com

Posted: at 12:47 am

Throughout my studies in school, there were a handful of a-ha moments. For me, that was when I learned that plants have a budget. Instead of cash and bitcoins, theirs was measured (mostly) in water and energy. With this historic year of drought, a plant should make smart gambles, or its budget and life will shrivel.

Using what senses they have, plants make educated guesses about the situation. Unlike animals, a plant cannot walk to Lake Tetonka to take a drink. During this unprecedented drought, a plant must increase its odds where it is sown.

Often there is plenty of sun during drought. If left unchecked, photosynthesis can get out of control, using all the water the plant is trying to squirrel away. Just like us humans, plants need water for other things. So, one goal of many plants is to slow photosynthesis down, often by closing stomata. These stomata allow gases needed to make energy move in and out of the plant. When stomata close, water vapor also stops flowing out, helping the plant somewhat. A plant may also increase or at least maintain its root systemusually at the expense of leaves. Obviously, slowing photosynthesis causes issues, such as reduced growth. Yet, depending on the cards the plant is dealt, playing conservative and taking a hit in the future might pay off.

You have probably seen examples of a plant toning down photosynthesis in other ways. Corn was the easiest to spot this summer. When under drought stress, corn leaves seem to curl and stiffen rather than simply wilt. This curling process limits the sunlit area of the leaf, which puts a lid on photosynthesis. Within the curl, the air tends to be more humid too, preventing more water loss by wind.

However, a few species might decide to cash in their chips and sprint to the finish line. Also known as drought escapers, these plants live fast. By accelerating flower growth, drought escapers aim to get at least a few of their seeds in the ground before dying. Many annual flowers in the desert practice this, and even crops such as wheat can be bred to act more like a drought escaper.

Other plants plan for longer periods of dryness and have evolved ways to cope. Common purslane, for example, is living its best life right now. If you notice a rubbery, creeping weed with yellow flowers driving you nuts in your yard, chances are it is purslane. This plants fleshy leaves store water for later use, sort of like a cactus. Purslane can also choose between two types of photosynthesis, one better for harsh drought and another perfect for typical summer days. Because of this flexibility, purslane can save water and still grow, giving it a leg up on its wilting neighbors.

Whether a plant holds its cards, goes big, or has an ace up its sleeve, plants can have multiple strategies to survive. We will see who comes out on top this dry year.

Shane Bugeja is the extension educator for Blue Earth and Le Sueur counties Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources.

Read the original here:

Le Sueur County Extension: Plants need to make right bets to survive drought - Southernminn.com

Posted in Life Extension | Comments Off on Le Sueur County Extension: Plants need to make right bets to survive drought – Southernminn.com

GUEST VIEW: Diversity is the spice of life – Niagara Gazette

Posted: at 12:47 am

While shopping at Wal-Mart, I saw a gentleman wearing what I believed to be a Pakistani hat (I looked up hats and found "kufi" hats in the library computer yay library!) and complimented his wife on her clothing. I will never know what nationality they were it is politically incorrect to ask but we shared the common language of a smile for a compliment given and accepted.

Near the service desk at the front of the store, a gentleman was dressed in a kilt. I was compelled to walk over and compliment him. Again, we shared smiles.

I often listen to the Spanish speaking workers, and the flowing musicality of the speech pleases my ear. I admit to finding it a bit annoying, but that is only because I worked with bilingual people who spoke English better than I speak Spanish. One of them said something, then they all turned and laughed in my direction, an indication that perhaps I should at least learn some rudimentary Spanish!

On my way out of the store, I was politically incorrect. I asked the young worker where he was from (lovely accent) and he replied he is from Mexico originally. He didn't seem to mind when I told him I was writing an article in favor of diversity, and did not mean to be politically incorrect, but wanted to share the adventure.

What adventure can one find at the stores? People not like me. Different dress, different colors, different accents.

Other cultures may be a bit odd in my view, but I'd win the bet they think I'm odd, too! We may not totally understand one another, but I believe we should try to enjoy diversity.

I do not know about anyone else, but I would find it deadly dull to have nothing but people exactly like me in the world. It may lead to differences, but a totally calm life is, I feel, boring beyond belief.

Nan Hassall resides in Lockport.

How about this ...

Eat white bread

morning, noon and night

but no butter.

It is yellow.

and

Drink purified water,

morning, noon, and night,

but no cherry Kool-Aid.

It is red.

Or

Drink cold milk

morning, noon, and night

but not chocolate.

It is brown.

And

Eat sweet candy,

morning, noon, and night,

But not licorice.

It is black.

and

Isn't that menu

just

Too, too restrictive

And damn bloody

Boring?

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

View original post here:
GUEST VIEW: Diversity is the spice of life - Niagara Gazette

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on GUEST VIEW: Diversity is the spice of life – Niagara Gazette

Inside the Chaotic Early Days of ‘The Daily Show’ – Daily Beast – The Daily Beast

Posted: at 12:47 am

Comedy Central was in a tight spot. With Bill Mahers Politically Incorrect moving to ABC, the fledgling network was in desperate need of a talk-show replacement. And so, on July 22, 1996, The Daily Show was born.

Co-created by Lizz Winstead and Madeleine Smithberg, who had worked together on the short-lived The Jon Stewart Show, it was a novel concept: a parody of newscasts delivered with deadpan panache by ex-ESPN anchor Craig Kilborn and a roving team of kooky field correspondents, including Stephen Colbert and Lewis Black. It began as a blend of politics and pop culture but tensions between Winstead and Smithberg and Kilborn came to a head two years in, culminating with a deeply sexist Esquire interview wherein Kilborn called the staff bitches and said of Winstead, If I wanted her to blow me, she would.

That was the final straw for Winstead, who walked away from the show in 1998. The following year, Jon Stewart took over as host of The Daily Show, and the rest is history.

If it had never gotten on the path, it would have been difficult to walk away. But it was on the path. It was going. It was all happening, explains Winstead.

Winstead would go on to co-found Air America Radio, which helped launch the careers of Rachel Maddow and Marc Maron, as well as Abortion Access Front, an organization fighting for womens reproductive rights. On July 19, Winstead, Smithberg, and a number of original Daily Show correspondents will reunite for a talk in honor of the shows 25th anniversary, with proceeds benefitting AAF.

Weve never all been together and told these stories publicly before, so its going to be a lot of fun, offers Winstead.

But first, she spoke with The Daily Beast about the early days of The Daily Show and how she and her team laid the groundwork for 25 years of groundbreaking comedy.

Its crazy that its been 25 years of The Daily Show. What goes through your mind when you hear that?

It feels surreal in the sense of how, 25 years ago, we created a show because our media wasnt doing its job, and through all the iterations of how the media wasnt doing its job, weve landed now in 2021 where the media finally started doing its job and right-wing conspiracy theorists have decided that the media isnt doing its job because its doing its job. Its really wild. But the thing thats the coolest for me is, the one thing you have in this worldyou as a journalist, me as a comic, writer, and produceris if your instincts are right, it keeps you going forever. And just to know that all the instincts I had about that showthe framework, who to hire, what subjects to tacklepaid off in spades to the point where you could bring in new hosts, and new casts, and new writers and have a foundation so solid that they could reimagine it while the basic structure held up.

Youd worked on The Jon Stewart Show just prior to co-creating The Daily Show, and I remember when that show ended, David Letterman came on as one of the final guests and basically said, This is only the beginning for you, Jon.

And then Letterman signed up Jon for a development deal for two years, and we launched The Daily Show with Craig Kilborn. I think Letterman saw Jon as a threat because of his talent, and thought, What if I locked this guy up with a deal and kept him off the market for a while? I remember how Letterman came on the show and was enamored with how young the audience was, and how youthful the staff was. He really seemed to like the vibe and I think he really liked Jon a lot.

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty

Well, we know he was generally enamored of youthful staff. With The Daily Show, Comedy Central was looking for a replacement for Bill Mahers Politically Incorrect, right?

Yeah. They wanted a replacement for Politically Incorrect, and they wanted a show that was responding to the world. What was interestingand lucky for us, and crazywas that they recognized that, in developing a show that was going to be on five nights a week, just doing a pilot wasnt going to work, so they gave us a year without a pilot in order to allow us to grow on the air. What Madeleine and I knew for sure was that the media and the news had to be a character on the show, and we had to do everything in our power to not be some extended version of Weekend Update. So, in order to hold a mirror up to the media, we hired people from the media who were writing at magazines, producing at TV news, and working as correspondents on TV news. We realized that we had to bring the news and be funny, so we formatted the show each day as you would in a newsroom. And people forget, this is before YouTube and Google, so I think we stole a LexisNexis account from somebody, had the AP wire, and would get dozens and dozens of newspapers delivered to the office every day, with producers divided into regions. It was really ragtag and really fun. We only had six writers at the beginning. It was insane.

And Comedy Central were the ones who chose Craig Kilborn to be the host, right?

Yup. [Viacom President] Doug Herzog loved SportsCenter and wanted this kind of SportsCenter vibe, so Kilborn filled the role. When the show launched, the show was more like Colberts original show [The Colbert Report], in that there wasnt anyone who was really the voice of the peopleeverybody was in characterand Craig looked and sounded like every local news anchor, and was a person where everybody wondered, Are you in on the joke? Or are you not in on the joke? And we never wanted to give that part away, because that was part of the magic of the show.

I had read how in the early days there was this tension between Comedy Central and Craig, who wanted it to be more pop culture-focused, and yourself and Madeleine, who wanted it to be more of a riff on media, politics, and the news.

Yes. Its no secret that the core creative team fought very hard against prioritizing pop culture. A) They wanted to have celebrity guests on, and we thought, Why are we shitting on Hollywood if you want to have these people on our show?, and B) An entertainment satire of Entertainment Tonight is called Entertainment Tonight. I cant make that show any more hilarious than it already is. We certainly did not make lasting friendships by fighting tooth and nail against this, but I would argue that if Madeleine and I had not fought as hard as we did to keep politics front and center, I dont think wed be having a conversation about the 25th anniversary of The Daily Show. I dont think we would have created a show that Jon would have wanted to step into. People werent getting information from the news, and to be able to point that out was a real catharsis for people.

As you said, you, Madeleine, and your staff were responsible for laying the foundation. And a big way you did that was through hiring people like Stephen Colbert, Lewis Black, and a number of other folks.

Stephen Colbert was on Good Morning America doing these interviews, and I was watching one morning and went to Madeleine, Stephen Colbert is on Good Morning America and he is winking to us, and I think we should talk to him and see if he wants to come over here. So, we got him over here. Stephen Colbert, Lewis Blackand Brian Unger is the reason you know what a Daily Show correspondent is. He came from CBS News and literally trained every correspondent on how to do that ridiculous, skeptical, know-it-all, Stone Phillips-y kind of thing. Right when I was leaving Carell came on, and Madeleine shepherded through him and a bunch of other people.

I think Stephen observed a myriad combination of the OReillys, the Hannitys, and that self-important, bombastic thing, and he ran with it.

What was Colbert like when he arrived? Had he developed that Colbert persona yet?

When I saw him on Good Morning America, it already seemed like he knew how to be a journalist, and hes also a really funny comedic actor, so I dont think he needed a whole bunch of coaching. I just think that every single person came in thinking about how they were gonna be, and as the news stars of cable emergedFox News came into the realm in October of 1996, and we launched in Julypaying attention to these personas that were being built and what he wanted to take on, I think Stephen observed a myriad combination of the OReillys, the Hannitys, and that self-important, bombastic thing, and he ran with it.

I wanted to talk to you about the falling-out with Craig.

Oh, I dont ever talk about that. You can google it and write about it.

I re-read the things that he has said at the time and it was pretty shocking.

Yeah. It wasnt great. But I worked in television at a time when shit happens, and I think things would have been very different if it had happened now.

Did you tell Comedy Central, Him or me? And how difficult was it to walk away from your creation?

You know, I think anybody whos got any confidence and who says, I made this thing, I can make a lot of other things Truth be told, it was in me to say, There cant just be one of these shows. I could stay here forever and do this show, or I could go out there and try to do other things so that the media landscape starts to get populated with cool stuff. So, I left there, and then Brian Unger and I did a pilot that I wish wouldve gotten picked up, which was a satire of a news magazine, and then went off to launch Air America. When I look at Rachel Maddow, and Marc Maron, and Sam Seder, they all leapt out of that. I got to write a book, and now Im running a reproductive rights organization thats talking about abortion in a way thats really provocative, and edgy, and funny. I just feel like Ive been following my path, and all the while doing stand-up as it was happening.

Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart #JonVoyage on August 6, 2015, in New York City.

Brad Barket/Getty

Did you have a hand in Jon Stewart ultimately getting the gig, given your past with him on The Jon Stewart Show?

Everybody would have loved for Jon to not be in a development deal with Letterman, because we loved working with him. So, it was just a perfect storm where when Craig was leaving, Jons development deal with Letterman was coming to a head, so people thought, Lets see if he wants to come in and do this. And when he did, it was such a good transition because I think the show just grew. Having somebody in the chair who was the voice of the viewer allowed him to bring the antics in the field back to the reality of what they were satirizing, and when you have somebody as profound in their own persona to be able to fill that chair, it was an incredible direction and ended up bringing the show to the next level. He asked me to come back, and at that point I was like, You know what? Youre filling the role that I was doing and youre also in the chair, so good. You just do that. What would I do? It would just be like having two brains there. I feel so lucky that, in the iterations of this show, people made really good decisions about who was going to be in that chair.

Lastly, lets talk about Abortion Access Frontyour organization that the Monday Daily Show reunion is benefiting.

Its a relentless fight. For the amount of bad stuff thats happening, the lack of media coverage around it is staggering. The fact that Roe v. Wade is probably going to be overturned in 2022and thats not hyperbole, that is factsand theres been hardly any cable news coverage around it, I was like, you know what? I want to hold these people accountable and bring information to the people. We go out on the road and do shows with comedians and musicians, have conversations with local abortion providers and activists on the ground, make hilarious videos that are really poignantour TikTok is blowing upand were launching our own YouTube talk show in October called Feminist Buzzkills Livebasically, if there was a talk show that discussed real issues in a real way around patriarchy, and women, and abortion, with really great comics and musicians, as well as experts and providers in the field. Its not talked about enough, and is so stigmatized, that were just going to blow the roof off the motherfucking abortion building.

Follow this link:
Inside the Chaotic Early Days of 'The Daily Show' - Daily Beast - The Daily Beast

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Inside the Chaotic Early Days of ‘The Daily Show’ – Daily Beast – The Daily Beast

Gutfeld! Is The Right’s Inevitable Answer to Stephen Colbert – PRIMETIMER

Posted: at 12:47 am

Greg Gutfeld on the set of his late-night Fox News show. (Photo: Fox News)

The new late-night vehicle for longtime Fox News Channel contributor Greg Gutfeld, excitedly named Gutfeld!, is the ratings surprise of the year. Since debuting this spring it has routinely finished second in the ratings to Stephen Colberts Late Show and, despite being on cable instead of network, it often comes in second to Colbert among all shows inthe 25-to-54 demo hour. This is entirely appropriate, because Gutfeld! islargely an answer to the partisanship of Colberts show.

Before you reach for your keyboard: I didnt say it was like Colberts show. If youre a big fan of Colberts show, youll probably hate Gutfeld! But its arrival was inevitable. In the current politicized atmosphere of American entertainment, having a right-wing answer to Colbert was too tempting for Fox News to pass up.And Gutfeld was the obvious choice to host, since he had experience running Foxs overnight yukfest Red Eye from 2007 to 2015. On that show Gutfeld would review offbeat news stories and the foibles of Democrats with a panel that included comedians, entertainment writers, and other not-obviously-right-wing-shills. Imagine Chelsea Handler as a Republican and youd be close.

But the new Gutfeld! is less like Red Eye and more like The Five, Fox News answer to The View. There are fewer wacky news items and more harangues.The panelists all seem like they were vetted by Hannitys people. Disillusioned ex-Red Eye panelists say they hate the new show. Gossip stories portray Gutfeld as a Lonesome Rhodes type, a onetime folksy dude who let success go to his head and now specializes in alienating those around him. (If you thought Meghan McCain leaving The View was dramatic, that was a model of decorum compared with Juan Williams leaving The Five reportedly because he couldnt take any more of Gutfeld.)

All of this may be true, but I also have to admitthat I kind of like Gutfeld! The host has an appealingly weird personality. I met Robert Bork once, he offered during a recent roundtable. Best smoker I ever saw. And yes, the flashes of anger are undeniable, but every comic will tell you thats part of the package. We should start calling Jen Psaki Miss Information, Gutfeld said, archly raising his eyebrowsin the direction of radio host Lauren Chen. How do I come up with this stuff, Lauren?

And once you get beyond the tactlessopening bit unfunny cold opens are a specialty of the Colbert show as well the banter is relatively amusing. And the panelists do score some not unfair points about the usual suspects, which these days includewoke Hollywood, woke Biden, woke protestors, woke cities and woke CNN anchors. Also, I miss seeingRepublicans in late night. Theyve been almost completely shut out. Jimmy Kimmel has COVID denier Adam Carolla on his show occasionally, but that feels more like the times David Letterman would have comic George Miller on his show, not because hes funny but because you dont give up on your old friends.

Its part of a wider politicization of late-night TV that Ive bemoaned before. But this is not the national crisis that Trumpists make it out to be. Most of the people who have been canceled are still making bank. Theyre even burnishing their brands with appearances on shows like Canceled in the USA. The real problem is that entertainment is now subject to the same echo-chamber effect as news. Colbert has his anti-Trump parody videos, so it was only a matter of time before Gutfeld! came along and started doing pro-Trump parodies.

What I really miss is the sound of interesting clashes between conservatives and liberals. And there once was a show that featured that and did it well. It was called Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher and it was literally canceled by ABC. Maher had carefully cultivated a following for his show featuring the likes of Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter sparring with lefty celebrity types. It graduated from Comedy Central to ABC, which paired it up with Nightline. All was going well until six days after 9/11. With the Twin Towers still smoking and Americans still reeling, one of Mahers guests, the conservative provocateur and future Trump pardonee Dinesh DSouza, pushed back against President Bushs characterization of the 9/11 attackers as cowards. Au contraire, said DSouza, they were warriors because they were willing to be slammed into concrete for their cause. Maher completely agreed, adding that Americans had been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. In the outrage that followed, sponsors and affiliates began dropping Politically Incorrect and ABC parted ways with Maher.

About a year later heemerged on HBO as host of his currentshowReal Time. I interviewed him early on (oddly at the same offices and studio hed been using for Politically Incorrect). Maher promised he would continue to have pro-Bush as well as anti-Bush viewpoints represented on his new show. He even wanted to try to balance the number of Democrats and Republicans in his studio audience. But that didnt last long. The Great Sort was underway, and soon it became clear the only people who wanted to be in his audience were Democrats. Maher, no dummy, went with the flow.

And now, all these many years later, we have Gutfeld! with a pro-Fox News studio audience, pro-Fox News panelists, pro-Fox News punchlines, and presiding over it all, the former overnight sensation turned company man, a fellow who used to fulminate at his fellow panelists for excessive Trumpsplaining who now cant Trumpsplain enough. (Why the hysteria over January 6 as opposed to the ongoing violence in Portland, Atlanta, San Francisco, L.A., New York, Seattle? he ranted the other night. Oh, I dont know, maybe because one of those types of violence is ongoing and the other is unprecedented?) It's in lockstep withthe Fox News base, just as Colbert's showiswith his liberal base. I guess we can be thankful some Fox smart-aleck didnt name itPolitically Incorrect with Greg Gutfeld!

Gutfeld! airs weeknights on Fox News at 11:00 PM ET/8:00 PM PT

Aaron Barnharthas written about television since 1994, including 15 years as TV critic for theKansas City Star.

Continue reading here:
Gutfeld! Is The Right's Inevitable Answer to Stephen Colbert - PRIMETIMER

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Gutfeld! Is The Right’s Inevitable Answer to Stephen Colbert – PRIMETIMER

An alphabet soup of the Indian economy pre-reforms, and after – Moneycontrol.com

Posted: at 12:47 am

Indian industry did not like all aspects of the economic reforms, particularly the reduction in import duties and the sudden opening up of the economy. The Bombay Club refers to a lobby of leading industrialists who wrote to the government demanding a level playing field for Indian companies. B is also for Bank Nationalisation. In 1969, an increasingly left-leaning Prime Minister Indira Gandhi nationalised 14 big commercial banks. The Reserve Bank of Indias history of the Indian economy calls it the single most important economic decision taken by any government since 1947. Yes, even more momentous than the reforms we are celebrating.

B also stands for Broad Banding. This has nothing to do with the internet age. It was a policy that allowed companies to switch production between similar product lines such as trucks and cars. Also check out BICP (Bureau of Industrial Costs and Pricing), and BIFR (Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction), which still exist in one form or another.

Go here to see the original:
An alphabet soup of the Indian economy pre-reforms, and after - Moneycontrol.com

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on An alphabet soup of the Indian economy pre-reforms, and after – Moneycontrol.com

The Oil Industry Is Borrowing Again, But This Time It’s Different – Markets Insider

Posted: at 12:47 am

Two years ago, Wall Street banks were on their way out of a long-term relationship with the oil industry. Now, with oil prices over $70 for the first time in three years, big bond buyers are snapping up oil bonds once again.

Only there is a condition this time.

The Wall Street Journals Joe Wallace and Collin Eaton wrote this week that Wall Street was buying bonds from non-investment-grade U.S. energy companies, which took advantage of record low interest rates to raise some $34 billion in fresh debt in the first half of the year.

Thats twice as much as the industry raised over the same period last year. But investors dont want borrowers to use the cash to drill new wells. They want them to use it to pay off older debt and shore up balance sheets.

It makes sense, really, although it is a marked departure from how banks normally react to oil industry crises. The 2014 oil price collapse, in hindsight, may have been the last normal crisis. Oil prices fell, funding dried up, supply tightened, prices went up, banks were willing to lend again, and producers poured the money into boosting production.

Since then, however, the energy transition push has really gathered pace and banks have more than one reason to not be so willing to lend to the oil industry. With the worlds biggest asset managers setting up net-zero groups to effectively force their institutional clients to reduce their carbon footprint and with the Biden administration throwing its weight behind the push for lower emissions, banks really have little choice but to follow the current. Their own shareholders are increasingly concerned about the environment, too.

Yet business is business, and nowhere is this clearer than in banks dealings with the oil industry. Bank shareholders may be concerned about the environment, but they certainly would be more concerned about their dividendand part of that comes from income made from lending to oil. And the higher oil prices go, the more willing banks will be to lend to those that produce it.

When they were unwilling to lend to the oil industry, other lenders stepped in. Last year, alternative investment firms scooped up hundreds of millions in oil industry debt from banks that were cutting their exposure to the politically incorrect industry. Hedge funds and other so-called shadow lenders dont seem to have banks misgivings about profiting from oil and gas.

Now banks have mellowed towards oil somewhat, but it is an interesting twist that the current loans come with the condition of not boosting output. Again, it makes sense. For years, the shareholders of U.S. shale oil companies have been complaining about poor returns as the companies put everything into output growth. Now its payback time, and shareholders want their returns.

So do lenders, apparently.

Per the WSJ article, this year, bond buyers want to see companies repairing their balance sheets and delivering to creditors and shareholders rather than plowing money into new wells.

This, by the way, would strengthen the borrowers themselves, positioning them better for whenever they can afford to start boosting production again. This may happen before too long. The International Energy Agency said earlier this month it expected oil demand to hit 100.6 million bpd next year, and OPEC this week predicted that demand will top 100 million bpd in 2022. Thats a lot of additional oil, and some of it will come from those same non-investment-grade borrowers from the U.S. shale patch.

In the meantime, however, oil companies restraint is helping to keep prices where they are and add upward pressure on them. U.S. oil production as of July 9 stood at 11.4 million bpd. That was 100,000 bpd higher than in the previous week and 400,000 bpd higher than a year ago. It was, however, way lower than the 12.3 million bpd for the week to July 10, 2019.

Production restraint, then, is paying off in more than one way. On the one hand, it has kept prices highereven if some shale producers failed to benefit fully from them as they hedged their 2021 production too soon. On the other, these higher prices are making banks more willing to lend to oil companies again. On a third hand, the shareholders of these companies are finally being made happy with the new prioritization of returns and debt repayment.

The U.S. shale oil industry after the worst of the pandemic appears to have become leaner, again, but also healthier in terms of balance sheet strength. This is particularly true for those who are preparing themselves for a world where demand for oil would be much lower and prices would also be lower, according to industry insiders cited by the WSJ reporters. Investor interest in oil, then, is still alive and kicking, despite the ESG investment rush and all that. It is a simple example of the basic principle of how markets work: if there is money to be made from something, money will be made from that something, regardless of its reputational standing in the public eye.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Read this article on OilPrice.com

This story originally appeared on Oilprice.com

Read the original post:
The Oil Industry Is Borrowing Again, But This Time It's Different - Markets Insider

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on The Oil Industry Is Borrowing Again, But This Time It’s Different – Markets Insider