Monthly Archives: June 2021

LV Prasad Eye Institute, global partners explore impact of vision care to achieve SDGs – BSI bureau

Posted: June 13, 2021 at 12:55 pm

The study has received funding support of 3.5 million from the Wellcome Trust and Chen Yet-Sen Family Foundation

LV Prasad Eye Institute in collaboration with the Queen's University of Belfast, along with nearly 30 other partners from the US, the UK, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and India, is working on a suite of studies to explore the impact of vision care on the global level to achieve Sustainable Development Goals in low and middle-income countries. The study has received funding support of 3.5 million from the Wellcome Trust and Chen Yet-Sen Family Foundation.

Led by Professor Nathan Congdon of Queens University Belfast (QUB) in the UK and Dr Rohit Khanna of the LV Prasad Eye Institute (LVPEI), various universities, schools non-government organisations, public health bodies, government ministries, institutions and patient groups are part of the multi-disciplinary study team. From LVPEI, Senior Public Health Specialists Dr Srinivas Marmamula and Asha Latha Metla and Senior Retina Consultant - Dr Raja Narayanan are also part of the study.

The other collaborators from India include Dr Suvarna Alladi from NIMHANS at Bengaluru, Dr Pallab Maulik from The George Institute for Global Health India at New Delhi and ShashidharKomaravolu from the Alzheimers and Related Disorders Society of India, Hyderabad Deccan Chapter.

Termed as ENGINE (Eyecare Nurtures Good-health, Innovation, driving-safety and Education), it is a five-year project designed to leverage high-quality research results to drive lasting policy change and achieve an improved quality of life for people in low and middle-income countries. ENGINE comprises four research trials in India, Vietnam, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, to examine the impact of glasses on promoting better living, from childhood to old age, and the impact on multiple SDGs, says Dr Rohit Khanna, Director, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye care (GPR ICARE), LV Prasad Eye Institute.

The four research projects that are part of this study are:

CLEVER (Cognitive Level Enhancement through Vision Exams and Refraction) that supports the Indian governments strategy of finding scalable, low-cost means of preventing dementia. This project is built upon the work done in homes for the aged project funded by Wellcome Trust India Alliance.

STABLE (Slashing Two-wheeler Accidents By Leveraging Eyecare) that will assist local partners, including the Vietnamese Ministry of Transport, to combat Vietnams twin epidemics of uncorrected short-sightedness and motorcycle crashes in the young.

ZEAL (Zimbabwe Eyecare and Learning) will work with local partners who currently implement the Zimbabwe governments national school vision project to explore how targeting long-sighted children with the novel, low-cost screening can add to the academic impact of the programme.

THRIFT (Transforming Households with Refraction and Innovative Financial Technology) that will capitalise on the Bangladesh governments novel and forward-looking plan to digitise all social safety net payments to the elderly by providing free glasses and training to help them better cope with unfamiliar smartphones, thus improving financial independence.

More here:

LV Prasad Eye Institute, global partners explore impact of vision care to achieve SDGs - BSI bureau

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on LV Prasad Eye Institute, global partners explore impact of vision care to achieve SDGs – BSI bureau

The G7 must place women at the heart of build back better agenda – Thomson Reuters Foundation

Posted: at 12:55 pm

* Any views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

By Bogolo Kenewendo, an economist, a member of the UKs Gender Equality Advisory Council, the formerMinister of Investment, Trade and Industry of Botswana and the managing director of Kenewendo Advisory, an economic advisory firm based in Botswana

There is an African saying: empower a woman and empower a community.

As the G7 leaders meet in Cornwall, the acknowledgement of this simple truth has never been more vital.

The UN estimates that the COVID-19 pandemic has dumped 47 million more women and girls below the poverty line. Women are particularly vulnerable to the pandemics impact because they tend to work and run businesses in the informal economy where there is no state-provided safety net of any sort.

This disproportional impact extends to access to capital. In sub-Saharan Africa, 40% of businesses are owned by women but only 20% of that number have access to institutional finance. Thats a funding gap of $42 billion. As risk averse private financial institutions retrench in the wake of the pandemic, this situation is getting significantly worse, causing what could be termed a she-cession.

In order to lessen the impact of the pandemic and potential of economic scarring, governments have to employ transformative economic recovery plans that focuses on inclusion through building womens economic agency. This is where gender-lens investing comes in. In simple terms, gender-lens investing is about deploying capital in people and companies with the specific goal of supporting women.

Gender lens investing wont only assist in reaching the UNs Sustainable Development Goal on gender equality, but is also a catalyst for achieving all of the other SDGs. The economic, business, as well as the social case, for investing in women is obvious. Among many different metrics which support this argument is a recent study by McKinsey estimated that if women's economic participation rates were the same as men it would be worth an additional $28 trillion to the global economy by 2025. By anyones standards, these numbers are huge and underline the scale of both the problem and the opportunity to invest in women.

The 2X Challenge, founded by the development finance institutions of the G7 nations to increase investment in women, has a set of qualifying criteria for investments which serve as a very useful guide for what this means in practice.

There are hundreds of examples of businesses that have benefited from gender lens investment. PEG Africa, a solar power company providing home systems to customers in West Africa has received $12.5 million of 2X investment from the UKs CDC Group. As a result, the company has doubled the number of women in leadership positions from 22% to 44%.

The success of the 2X Challenge, which is set to raise a further $15 billion over the next two years for investing in women in the developing world, is very welcome. And that success underlines the vital importance of development finance institutions, such as DFC in the US and CDC Group in the UK, in encouraging global private financial institutions to adopt gender lens criteria.

As a member of the Gender Equality Advisory Council (GEAC),set up by the UK government to look at how we support women as part of the build back better agenda, we will be pressing the G7 leaders to place women and gender equity at the heart of plans to build back better. They have an opportunity an opportunity to provide leadership in building inclusive economies that prioritise women and their children.

The G7 can play a key role in providing access to capital and labour markets for women. This is a crucial component of economic empowerment, and central to womens financial independence globally. Women more often face barriers to securing finance, insurance and business ownership, thereby hindering entrepreneurship.

We need to encourage financial stakeholders to leverage the power of capital markets and movements of resources to steer responsible business conduct and foster inclusive corporate cultures.

Job creation initiatives should be pivoted to increase support for women-led industries and policies tailored to support women-owned micro, small and medium sized enterprises (MSMEs).

We require existing and new Aid for Trade initiatives to include the tools for crafting gender-responsive trade policies, to support women in programmes that foster trade and economic empowerment and to work directly with women-owned businesses in developing countries.

The stakes could not be higher, nor the opportunity greater.

Read this article:

The G7 must place women at the heart of build back better agenda - Thomson Reuters Foundation

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on The G7 must place women at the heart of build back better agenda – Thomson Reuters Foundation

Digital Guardian’s Susan Walker Named a Boston Business Journal 2021 CFO of the Year – Business Wire

Posted: at 12:54 pm

WALTHAM, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Digital Guardian, a leader in data loss prevention (DLP) and managed detection and response (MDR), today announced that the Boston Business Journal (BBJ) has named its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Susan Walker, 2021 CFO of the Year in the Midsize Private Companies category.

Honoring the best in local finance, the BBJs CFO of the Year Awards program recognizes 10 chief financial officers whose work and commitment has helped make a difference in their companies, organizations, and communities. This years awards, like last years, are especially meaningful as these business executives have helped steer their organizations through the coronavirus pandemic and unprecedented financial challenges.

Since joining Digital Guardian in 2019, Walker has transformed the companys financial infrastructure, including helping to migrate its customer base from perpetual licensing to a SaaS subscription model. In addition, she was instrumental in guiding the companys smooth transition to remote work, and in streamlining reporting and other critical business processes. Notably, Walker also helped develop an innovative mid-market program that delivers prescriptive data protection to a historically underserved customer base. Launched in April, the industrys first DLP-as-a-service solution for mid-market enterprises has already generated a robust slate of closed deals and a growing revenue pipeline.

Accomplished and accountable, Susan combines financial creativity with fiscal rigor to help drive corporate and customer success, said Mordecai (Mo) Rosen, Chief Executive Officer, Digital Guardian. During the early days of the pandemic, she spearheaded a COVID-19-adjusted corporate plan that prioritized financial independence to help preserve both cash and jobs. Her vision and leadership propelled Digital Guardian to record employee retention and to one of the best years in company history. Along with everyone else at Digital Guardian, I am thrilled she is being recognized with this prestigious and well-deserved honor.

Charged with leading Digital Guardians HR department and fostering its corporate culture, Walker has helped boost employee retention to an all-time high. As a result, the company has earned impressive accolades, including being named a Top Place to Work in Massachusetts by The Boston Globe and a Top Place to Work in the USA by Energage.

I am excited to celebrate my two-year anniversary at Digital Guardian with this wonderful honor, said Walker. The recognition reflects the collective efforts of an incredible leadership team that has positioned Digital Guardian as the leading provider companies go to for protecting their critical data and IP from the endpoint to the cloud. As we transition to the post- COVID-19 era, I am energized to continue collaborating with Mo and the executive team in helping Digital Guardian reach even higher heights in 2021 and beyond.

We are thrilled to celebrate our 13th year of honoring local CFOs and their accomplishments, said BBJ Market President and Publisher Carolyn M. Jones. Strong financial stewardship and strategic leadership have never been as important as the past year and a half, and we look forward to honoring and recognizing the importance of the role of the CFO.

The 2021 BBJ CFO of the Year Awards program will be held virtually on Wednesday, July 14. For more information, including event registration and the complete list of winners, please visit: https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/event/166534/2021/cfo-of-the-year-virtual-event.

About Digital Guardian

Digital Guardian is no-compromise data protection. The companys cloud-delivered data protection platform is purpose-built to stop data loss by both insiders and outsiders on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems. The Digital Guardian Data Protection Platform performs across the corporate network, traditional endpoints, and cloud applications. For more than 15 years, we have enabled data-rich organizations to protect their most valuable assets with a choice of SaaS or fully managed deployment. Digital Guardians unique policy-less data visibility and flexible controls enable organizations to protect data without slowing the pace of their business. To learn more please visit: https://digitalguardian.com/.

All product and company names herein may be trademarks of their respective owners.

See more here:

Digital Guardian's Susan Walker Named a Boston Business Journal 2021 CFO of the Year - Business Wire

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Digital Guardian’s Susan Walker Named a Boston Business Journal 2021 CFO of the Year – Business Wire

PETE THE PLANNER: As pandemic eases, lifestyle spending will increase – Indianapolis Business Journal

Posted: at 12:54 pm

In September 2020, I wondered aloud in this very column what the financial sensibility of Americans would be like when the pandemic was over.

I surmised that Americans would potentially experience a renaissance of resourcefulness, stoked by the powers of scarcity. This, according to my theory, would lead to modesty over consumerism and a healthy savings rate that could persist for years.

Hahahaha. What a noob.

I remember the first time I heard someone say YOLO. I had no idea what they were talking about until it was explained that it was simply an acronym for You Only Live Once.

From what Ive seen over the last three months, I believe one of the primary cultural side effects of COVID-19 will be unadulterated spending in the spirit of YOLO. If Im gonna be miserable, I might as well be comfortable, is the tale currently being told.

The housing market is red-hot, the travel industry is on the verge of poetic justice earned by a year lost, and certain consumer goods are increasingly difficult to find (and not just because of large boats getting stuck in man-made waterways in Egypt.)

I did acknowledge pent-up demand could lead to a robust economic recovery, but I didnt expect people to spend their feelings so hard. But on some level, I get it. I found myself telling my wife I wanted a new shirt to run in this past weekend. Might as well be comfortable, I heard myself say, with utter disrespect to the two to three dozen other T-shirts in my drawers.

I now believe the 24-month period ending February 2022 will result in an increase in lifestyle spending as opposed to an increase in the savings rate. My assertion last September was that people would be scared straight, then save. Instead, now I believe people will seek comfort in comfort, as opposed to pragmatism.

That is whats actually at the heart of my thinking right nowa reimagining of financial pragmatism. Ive long believed people should put their financial future before their financial present. To me, thats the essence of financial pragmatism.

Hope is great, but its not a financial strategy. Saving the correct amount of money before you spend any money honors math and illuminates the impracticality of hope. But, and this is a giant but, there might be more art than science when it comes to financially thriving.

As you likely know, my classic definition of thriving revolves around a dependable and sustainable financial plan that perpetually wards off instability. However, indulging in comfort along the way, whether for mental wellness or simple joy, seems to have gained ground in the face of the pandemic and the recession. And I think thats OK.

Just as workers have attempted to shift the paradigm of work/life balance to an arguably more appropriate life/work balance within the last year, maybe thats where long-term financial planning is headed, too. Maybe, just maybe, people will figure out how to have a more significant financial lifestyle in their working years, then recast their lot to a more modest and sustainable post-work financial existence.

Dont get me wrong, thats exactly what millions of people unwittingly do now, without the math to support the theory. But Im suggesting that people might harness the powers of being more mentally well now and fight harder to make the math work indefinitely.

Its actually a reasonable evolution. At first, there was the modest working-years lifestyle that created a reasonable nest egg. Then the F.I.R.E. (financial independence, retire early) movement convinced us a spartan existence during the work years can lead to a long and comfortable retirement. Now, after a year of anguish and languish, its possible people will figure out how to have their cake and eatit, too.

Which, by the way, is a tough promise mathematically. Will people really be able to spend aggressively during their working years, then glide into a more modest retirement?

Im not holding my breath.

My gut tells me this grand experiment goes out with a whimper in mid- to late-2022. Youll know this is the case when consumer debt levels begin to rise exponentially once again. Debt levels are already rising, and I think the savings rate that rose briefly in 2020 will make its way back into the cellar. Yet there is some appeal and practicality to giving mental health more influence in our financial decision-making process.

Check back with me again in nine monthswho knows what Americans will be doing then?

__________

Dunn is CEO of Your Money Line powered by Pete the Planner, an employee-benefit organization focused on solving employees financial challenges. Email your financial questions to askpete@petetheplanner.com.

Continue reading here:

PETE THE PLANNER: As pandemic eases, lifestyle spending will increase - Indianapolis Business Journal

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on PETE THE PLANNER: As pandemic eases, lifestyle spending will increase – Indianapolis Business Journal

Did you really think Meghan Markle and Prince Harry offended the Queen by naming newborn daughter Lilibet? – Kardashian Dish

Posted: at 12:54 pm

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry welcomed their newborn daughter, Lilibet Lili Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, on Friday, June 4 in Santa Barbra, California, and announced the happy news and gorgeous name of their daughter that honours the Queen of England and the late Princess Diana the following Sunday (June 6). Since the announcement, tons of media reports have claimed that the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex offended the Queen by using her childhood nickname for their newborn, with some reports even going as far as claiming that Harrys grandmother was deeply hurt and angry by Meghan and Harrys choice, but is that truly the case?

According to reports, the name Lilibet has been the Queens nickname among her family members since she was a young child and originated from her own struggle to pronounce her name at an early age.

It was also revealed previously on Netflixs The Crown,that the nickname was often used by her late husband Prince Philip, who only passed away in April just months from his 100th birthday, so this particular name should invoke fond memories for the Queen.

Following the announcement of the birth, Buckingham Palace issued a statement to congratulate Meghan, Harry and Archie on their new addition to their family! Which was shortly followed by a sweet message from the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge on their Instagram page. Check out the post below.

And although it seemed that Lilis name was accepted by the royals, the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who were already parents to two-year-old Archie Harrison, were later forced to issue a statement after their daughters name caused quite the online stir with royal watchers and commentators.

Despite the sentimental nod to both Prince Harrys grandmother and late mother, Princess Dianna, some have criticised Harry and Meghan for the decision. Some suggesting that Harry and Meghandidnt approach the Queen for permission to use the personal name.

Whilst others have claimed that this is an attempt to smooth things over with the Royal Family, after a year of turmoil, following their decision to step down from their duties as senior members of the Royal Family in March 2020 in order to pursue financial independence, as well as their more recent explosive tell-all interview with journalist Oprah Winfrey.

Whatever their reason for using the sweet and sentimental name, the couple made sure to set the record straight on those wild claims.

A spokesperson told UK publicationThe Independent:

The Duke spoke with his family in advance of the announcement. In fact, his grandmother was the first family member he called.During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she [Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth] not been supportive, they would not have used the name.

Currently, no pictures of baby Lili have been released, and were not expecting any from the notoriously private couple for some time still, but it seems were not the only ones that are waiting to catch a glimpse of the newborn.

Kate Middleton who attended the G7 Summit expressed her excitement for the new addition to the family but confessed she has yet had the opportunity to meet her niece, even over facetime, although she hoped she would meet Lilibet soon.

More here:

Did you really think Meghan Markle and Prince Harry offended the Queen by naming newborn daughter Lilibet? - Kardashian Dish

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Did you really think Meghan Markle and Prince Harry offended the Queen by naming newborn daughter Lilibet? – Kardashian Dish

House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants …

Posted: at 12:53 pm

A House antitrust panel on Friday unveileda bipartisan agenda made up of five bills that would give regulators greater authority to rein in the power of tech giants.

The billsput forwardby leaders of the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee followa blockbuster report released by the Judiciarypanel last year alleging ways that Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and Facebook abuse their market power. The report was approved on a party-line vote earlier this year.

Each of the five bills unveiled on Friday includes a Republican co-sponsor.

A bill sponsored by subcommitteeChairman David CicillineDavid CicillineHillicon Valley: House targets tech giants with antitrust bills | Oversight chair presses JBS over payment to hackers | Trump spokesman to join tech company | YouTube suspends GOP senator House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants On the Money:Tech giants face rising pressure from shareholder activists |House Democrats urge IRS to reverse Trump-era rule reducing donor disclosure |Sen. Warren, Jamie Dimon spar over overdraft fees at Senate hearing MORE (D-R.I.) and co-sponsored by Rep. Lance GoodenLance GoodenHillicon Valley: House targets tech giants with antitrust bills | Oversight chair presses JBS over payment to hackers | Trump spokesman to join tech company | YouTube suspends GOP senator House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Roy introduces bill blocking Chinese Communist Party members from buying US land MORE (R-Texas) would prohibit tech giants from self-preferencing their own products on their platforms, targeting alleged anti-competitive behaviorfrom Apple in its App Store and Amazon on its digital marketplace.

Another bill, sponsored by Reps. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalNew Alzheimer's drug sparks backlash over FDA, pricing Hillicon Valley: House targets tech giants with antitrust bills | Oversight chair presses JBS over payment to hackers | Trump spokesman to join tech company | YouTube suspends GOP senator Simmering Democratic tensions show signs of boiling over MORE (D-Wash.) and Gooden, would eliminate the ability of dominant platforms to use their control over multiple businesses to self-preference or disadvantage competitors in ways that undermine free and fair competition.

Rep. Hakeem JeffriesHakeem Sekou JeffriesPelosi signals no further action against Omar House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Wray grilled on FBI's handling of Jan. 6 MORE (D-N.Y.) and ranking member Ken BuckKenneth (Ken) Robert BuckHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Roy introduces bill blocking Chinese Communist Party members from buying US land Conservative group pressuring lawmakers with financial ties to tech giants MORE (R-Colo.)are sponsoring a bill that would prohibit platforms from acquiring competitive threats by dominant platforms.

This bill comes as Facebook is facing a lawsuit from theFederal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general that targets its acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, and similar criticism has been raised over Googles deal to buy fitness tracking company Fitbit.

Another bill sponsored by Reps. Mary Gay ScanlonMary Gay ScanlonHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants House Democrats to Schumer: Vote again on Jan. 6 probe Democrats introduce bill seeking to protect voting rights of people in subsidized housing MORE (D-Pa.) and Burgess Owens (R-Utah) would require online platforms to lower barriers for users and businesses to switch data to other services.

The final bill introduced Friday by Reps. Joe NeguseJoseph (Joe) NeguseHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Overnight Health Care: House Democrats pressure Biden to expand Medicare | Intel community: Competing COVID-19 origin theories not 'more likely than the other' | WHO: Africa in 'urgent need' of 20 million second vaccine doses 70 percent of House Democrats pressure Biden to expand Medicare in American Families Plan MORE (D-Colo.) and Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) would increase the filing fees paid to antitrust agencies for merger reviews. Its a companion bill to one introduced by Sens. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Democrats reintroduce bill to create 'millionaires surtax' Senate Democrats befuddled by Joe Manchin MORE (D-Minn.) and Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Iowa governor questions lack of notice on migrant children flights to Des Moines Senate crafts Pelosi alternative on drug prices MORE (R-Iowa) that was added to the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act that the upper chamber passed Tuesday.

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have been critical of the market power of tech giants, but House Republicans had been hesitant to back some of the recommendations outlined by Democrats in last years report.

Although the report did not receive GOP support, Buck at the time released a separate GOP-backed report that agreed with the majoritys staff views of the effects of big techs market dominance but opposed some of the recommendations.

In a statement announcing the legislation Friday, Buck underscored the need for immediacy on the issue.

These companies have maintained monopoly power in the online marketplace by using a variety of anticompetitive behaviors to stifle competition. This legislation breaks up Big Techs monopoly power to control what Americans see and say online, and fosters an online market that encourages innovation and provides American small businesses with a fair playing field. Doing nothing is not an option, we must act now, Buck said.

Cicilline touted the bills as a way to level the playing field.

Right now, unregulated tech monopolies have too much power over our economy. They are in a unique position to pick winners and losers, destroy small businesses, raise prices on consumers, and put folks out of work. Our agenda will level the playing field and ensure the wealthiest, most powerful tech monopolies play by the same rules as the rest of us, he said in a statement.

The bipartisan bills are already facing pushback from the tech industry.

Adam Kovacevich, CEO of Chamber of Progress, a self-described center left tech industry coalition, arguedthe legislation could lead to banning conveniences for consumers from Amazon, Apple and Google.

Instead of focusing on helping families, these proposals inexplicably target a bunch of technological conveniences that most people really like, Kovacevich said in a statement.

But other companies that have been critical of the leading tech giants, such as Spotify and Roku, cheered the proposed legislation.

The agenda comes as thebiggest tech firms are also facing increased legal challenges over allegations of anti-competitive behavior.

In addition to the case the FTC and many states are beginning against Facebook, Google is facing a series of antitrust lawsuits from states and the DOJ.

Last month, Washington, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine (D) filed an antitrust lawsuit against Amazon, alleging the e-commercebehemothhas engaged in anti-competitive business practices.

The companies have all defended themselves against the allegations of anticompetitive behavior.

Apple is also facing antitrust allegations, but from the developer behind the popular Fortnite game, Epic Games.

The lawsuit in California federal court wrapped up last month and a decision is expected from the judge next month. The case revolves around Apples 30 percent commission fees for apps, and its requirement for developers to use the Apple in-app payment system.

Apple has defended its policies, arguing that it helps maintain privacy and security for users.

Updated at 3:27 p.m.

Read the original post:

House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants ...

Comments Off on House unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants …

House Bills Seek to Break Up Amazon and Other Big Tech …

Posted: at 12:53 pm

House lawmakers proposed a raft of bipartisan legislation aimed at reining in the countrys biggest tech companies, including a bill that seeks to make Amazon.com Inc. and other large corporations effectively split in two or shed their private-label products.

The bills, announced Friday, amount to the biggest congressional broadside yet on a handful of technology companiesincluding Alphabet Inc.s Google, Apple Inc. and Facebook Inc. as well as Amazon whose size and power have drawn growing scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators in the U.S. and Europe.

If the bills become lawa prospect that faces significant hurdlesthey could substantially alter the most richly valued companies in America and reshape an industry that has extended its impact into nearly every facet of work and life.

One of the proposed measures, titled the Ending Platform Monopolies Act, seeks to require structural separation of Amazon and other big technology companies to break up their businesses. It would make it unlawful for a covered online platform to own a business that utilizes the covered platform for the sale or provision of products or services or that sells services as a condition for access to the platform. The platform company also couldnt own businesses that create conflicts of interest, such as by creating the incentive and ability for the platform to advantage its own products over competitors.

A separate bill takes a different approach to target platforms self-preferencing. It would bar platforms from conduct that advantages the covered platform operators own products, services, or lines of business over those of another business user, or that excludes or disadvantages other businesses.

Continue reading here:

House Bills Seek to Break Up Amazon and Other Big Tech ...

Comments Off on House Bills Seek to Break Up Amazon and Other Big Tech …

Congress unveils bills to dismantle tech giants – Axios

Posted: at 12:53 pm

Lawmakers on Friday debuted bipartisan bills that could fundamentally change how Big Tech does business in the U.S.

Driving the news: If passed, the bills could force Apple to change how it runs its app store, break apart Amazon's control of its marketplace and halt Facebook and Google from buying smaller rivals in an effort to remake the online ecosystem.

Why it matters: The legislation is the latest attempt by the government to curb the power of tech giants.

Details: House lawmakers have sponsored five bipartisan bills that represent the culmination of a years-long inquiry into the power of Big Tech.

What they're saying: A White House official tells Axios the administration will work with Congress as the process moves forward.

1. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act, led by Democratic Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island, who helms the antitrust subcommittee, and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Tex.), is meant to prevent dominant companies from unfairly disadvantaging rivals, such as preventing smaller companies from establishing their own prices for goods and services.

2. The Platform Competition and Opportunity Act, led by Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), bans major online players from buying competitive threats. The bill is also supported by Reps. Cicilline, Nadler, Buck, Cawthorn, Gooden along with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl).

3. The Ending Platform Monopolies Act, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash) and supported by Reps. Cicilline, Nadler, Gooden, Cawthorn and Buck, could break up Amazon by making it illegal for the company to both own the platform and offer competing services on it.

4. The Augmenting Compatibility and Competition by Enabling Service Switching (ACCESS) Act, led by Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa), and supported Reps. Cicilline, Nadler, Buck, Cawthorn and Burgess Owens (R-UT) is meant to increase competition by forcing companies to give consumers the ability to switch data between platforms.

5. The Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act, led by Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Co) and supported by Reps. Buck and Cawthorn along with Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Tex.), would give enforcement agencies more teeth and resources by requiring higher fees for mergers valued at $1 billion and more.

Go deeper:

Murdoch empire pushes Republicans to back tech antitrust bills

Lawmakers ready antitrust bills to take on Big Tech

New tech antitrust hurdle: GOP divisions

What the Big Tech hearings really accomplished

House Judiciary's tech antitrust report urges sweeping legal changes

Editor's note: This story has been updated with more co-sponsors who signed onto the bills and a statement from the White House.

Continued here:

Congress unveils bills to dismantle tech giants - Axios

Comments Off on Congress unveils bills to dismantle tech giants – Axios

How Tech Giants Are Evolving Their Remote Work Stances – Tech.co

Posted: at 12:53 pm

One of the biggest changes the COVID pandemic brought to the business world was the rapid evolution of remote work. What was once a mere perk no one could count on immediately turned into a core part of how white collar work took place.

Now, with the pandemic on the decline in the US, businesses are eager to rev up the capitalist machine. This raises a question: Should they keep full-time remote work open as an option or instead try to stick the cork back in the remote access software bottle? Or pick a compromise somewhere between the two, requiring two or three days back in the office per week?

There's no rulebook to follow, and major tech corporations haven't yet to agree. Just in the last week, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon have all updated their opinions. Spoiler alert, they're not on the same page.

For a company that just announced great new upgrades to its Facetime software, Apple sure doesn't seem to want its employees using it. The company's stance, revealed last week, is that all employees must come into the office on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays, with an additional two weeks of fully remote work per year.

It's an expansion of their pre-pandemic policy, but still establishes an expectation of in-person attendance that won't accommodate anyone who needs to spend most of the week remote. The $2 trillion tech giant is clashing with its own employees over the matter, according to an internal letter:

We would like to take the opportunity to communicate a growing concern among our colleagues, says the letter, reported on by The Verge, That Apples remote/location-flexible work policy, and the communication around it, have already forced some of our colleagues to quit. Without the inclusivity that flexibility brings, many of us feel we have to choose between either a combination of our families, our well-being, and being empowered to do our best work, or being a part of Apple.

The letter comes with a series of formal requests, with the biggest being that Apple considers remote and location-flexible work decisions to be as autonomous for a team to decide as are hiring decisions.

Check out your top remote access software options over here

Just today Amazon revealed in an internal memo that office workers can now stay remote for two days out of each week, with an additional allotment of four weeks per year in which to work fully remote. It's the same as Apple's policies (with an extra two weeks of remotely working), but it's a shift towards remote work from Amazon's previous stance.

It is the first big update to the company's position on the remote work issue since March 2021, when Amazon said it would be returning to an office-centric culture. The clarification follows a backlash from employees who didn't want to leave their remote lifestyles, the Seattle Times notes.

We may see more compromises like this, as company cultures push for in-office work on one side while employees ask for more flexibility on the other. Then there's Facebook.

Facebook has been steadily leaning into the remote work ethos. It initially said in May 2020 that only senior and experienced employees could request permanent remote work, although CEO Zuckerberg said at the time that 50% of the company might be working remotely in another decade.

Facebook announced yesterday that all full-time employees can now work from home, as long as their jobs can be done remotely. They can even request to work across international borders, though there's no word on how likely they are to be approved. Those who choose to work in-person will be asked to come into that physical office at least half the time.

It's the most lenient new policy of those announced in the last week though it might not be as good as it sounds. One potential catch went unmentioned: Facebook has previously mentioned reducing the pay of those who move to cheaper areas.

The post-pandemic rules aren't set in stone, and we can expect to see plenty more employee letters arguing the case for expanded flexibility in the near future.

Excerpt from:

How Tech Giants Are Evolving Their Remote Work Stances - Tech.co

Comments Off on How Tech Giants Are Evolving Their Remote Work Stances – Tech.co

Amazon Joins Other Tech Giants in Setting "3 & 2" Workweek – The Motley Fool

Posted: at 12:53 pm

Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN) announced on Thursday that it is following the lead of a number of other tech companies and recalling workers to the office, but only for three days a week. Employees will be allowed to continue to work out of their homes the other two days.

As the economy continues reopening after the pandemic, companies that allowed employees to telecommute to their jobs have begun opening their offices again, but are doing so tentatively, only for a few days a week.

Among those who have moved to the 3-and-2 schedule of office and home working include Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Google, IBM (NYSE:IBM), and salesforce.com (NYSE:CRM).

Image source: Getty Images.

In a post on the aboutamazon.com site, Amazon said it is trying to balance what provides flexibility for its employees, but also what works best for customers.

As a result, some employees like hardware engineers and those in frontline operations will continue to work from the office, just as they always have, while others, such as sales and customer service employees, can continue working from home. Everyone else will adopt a hybrid schedule, though exceptions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

Conversely, corporate employees will have the option to work remotely for up to four weeks out of the year with no expectation they need to show up at the office.

While many would view the flexibility companies are offering as a benefit, some employees still see it as a burden. Apple employees recently sent CEO Tim Cook an open letter demanding they be allowed to continue working from home, expressing disappointment he didn't take into account their feelings about returning to the office.

They said Apple's record earnings show a remote workforce works, and they should be able to work from home if they want.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the official recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. Were motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

See the original post:

Amazon Joins Other Tech Giants in Setting "3 & 2" Workweek - The Motley Fool

Comments Off on Amazon Joins Other Tech Giants in Setting "3 & 2" Workweek – The Motley Fool