Monthly Archives: June 2021

Paddy Power Poker Makes Twitch Team with Three Rising Stars – CardsChat.com

Posted: June 24, 2021 at 11:24 pm

Paddy Power Poker is upping its streaming game by signing three Twitch personalities to host its weekly broadcasts.

Paddy Power is better known to most as an Irish bookmaker thats not afraid to push the boundaries in the name of self-promotion. In addition to being an irreverent betting site, its been in the poker business for more than a decade and is a stablemate of PokerStars under the Flutter Entertainment banner.

Now, with online poker enjoying a renaissance due to COVID-19 restrictions, Paddy Power is raising the stakes with a new team of Twitch streamers.

While Paddy Power has been around for a long time, its fair to say that the iPoker-based site isnt ranked among the biggest in the industry. Thats something the promo team is looking to change.

With other online poker sites showing whats possible on Twitch, Paddy Power has drafted three British pros to host its weekly stream. Conor ODriscoll (ccoonnoorrr), Mark Bennett (MBen10_), and Tom Parsons (PredPoker) will go live on Twitch every Tuesday at 8pm GMT.

The trio primarily play low and mid-stakes MTTs and cash games, which suits the sites general demographics.

It's official, I am a PaddypowerPoker ambassador !

Will be streaming this evening and we have our twitch club game with 20 added prize going to everyone who final tables

this Tuesday evening twitch club game is going to have some exciting prizes in the very near future. https://t.co/vIp6i9T4js

Conor O'Driscoll (@hammemrs) June 22, 2021

Irelands ODriscoll is the most established of the three pros. He has live tournament cashes dating back to 2010 and more than $870,000 in prize money on PokerStars under the screenname ccoonnoorr. Bennett, who hails from Wales, is a rising star on the British poker scene and as much of a personality on the felt as he is away from it.

Rounding out the new recruits is Northern Irelands Parsons. The politics graduate shot to prominence in 2019 at PokerStars Lex Live 2 event in London. As a follower of poker pro and Twitch streamer Lex Veldhuis, Parsons took part in a special scavenger hunt. The Irishman completed his tasks before everyone else and won a $25,000 PokerStars Platinum Pass. That was the boost he needed to focus on his poker career and his Twitch channel.

All three ambassadors will take part in Paddy Power Poker Twitch Club games on Tuesday nights. In addition to broadcasting their exploits in real-time, the pros will chat to viewers, offer tips, and run competitions and giveaways.

A Twitch team is unlikely to make Paddy Power the leading online poker site in the world. However, there is a clear desire for streaming content. PokerStars and Partypoker have been pushing their streaming services for the best part of three years, as have pros such as Veldhuis and Jaime Staples. Twitch has also become a go-to resource for live and online tournament coverage.

With its latest move, Paddy Power will add to the flow of streaming content and, potentially, boost its presence within the poker industry at the same time.

Written by

Daniel Smyth

Dan Smyth is a poker media journeyman who politely reminds CardsChat readers that poker is played all around the world, not just America.

Share this story

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discuss all the latest poker news in theCardsChat forum

See the original post:

Paddy Power Poker Makes Twitch Team with Three Rising Stars - CardsChat.com

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Paddy Power Poker Makes Twitch Team with Three Rising Stars – CardsChat.com

Germany Approves Controversial Turnover Tax on Online Slots and Poker – GamblingNews.com

Posted: at 11:24 pm

Germanys controversial 5.3% turnover tax on online slots and poker received the approval of the parliament earlier this week.

Back in March of this year, Germanys new State Treaty on Gambling (GlNeuRStv) was approved by lawmakers. Since then, the new regulation has received the approval of all federal states in Germany. Set to come into effect on July 1, the new State Treaty on Gambling would legalize online casino games, but not everyone is excited.

Although the legalization is long-awaited, the new treaty comes with restrictions as well. Under the treaty, a $1.19 (1) stake limit per spin is introduced for online slots. Furthermore, earlier this week, the Bundestag voted in favor of a stake tax, which already proved to be controversial. The stake tax which is also referred to as turnover tax introduces a 5.3% tax on all online poker and slot stakes. In addition, the tax plans to affect both licensed gambling, as well as unlicensed operators.

During the vote of the controversial tax, lawmakers from Die Linke refrained from placing a vote. On the other hand, representatives from the Free Democratic Party (FDP) and Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD) voted against the stake tax. In the end, the tax received the approval of the Christian Social Union (CSU), the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Green Party. As a result, the controversial tax was approved.

Although the new turnover tax received the approval of the German parliament, a recent online survey discovered that the proposed level of stake tax may push a lot of players to offshore operators. The study conducted by Goldmedia on behalf of Entain, Flutter Entertainment and Greentube in April interviewed 619 online slot players. Of that total, 49% admitted that they would choose an alternative option via an unregulated website. Furthermore, 54% of the players that participated in the survey responded that the payout percentage is the most important factor when choosing a gambling website.

Besides the worrying results of the survey, the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) has also spotted an issue with the tax. EGBA filed a complaint with the EU back in May, saying that the turnover tax is illegal. Furthermore, the Association suggested that the controversial tax may be favoring brick-and-mortar casinos over online gambling.

See the original post:

Germany Approves Controversial Turnover Tax on Online Slots and Poker - GamblingNews.com

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Germany Approves Controversial Turnover Tax on Online Slots and Poker – GamblingNews.com

Poker Player Accused of $88 Million Healthcare Scam – PokerTube

Posted: at 11:24 pm

08:1524 Jun

Billy Joe Taylor, a 42-year-old poker player from Arkansas, has been indicted for defrauding the US healthcare system of an eye-watering $88 million. The guy once described as a special kind of fish is one of the suspects in a $143 million case.

The man nicknamed Bildo was well-known in poker circles for his starring role in a $5,000 NL cash game that was streamed on TCH Live. He was seen as an action player who didnt appear to have much in the way of skill, to put it mildly. But if he was making so much from his healthcare testing exploits then it probably didnt bother him too much! Damn shame hes going to have to pay it all back now.

Dating back as far as November 2017, names and social security numbers were acquired of people who were eligible for government-funded tests and then fraudulent invoices were billed to Medicare. Many of these people had already died when the alleged tests were supposed to have taken place, and names of doctors were used for tests that were never even requested.

The US Department of Justice claims that of the $88 million sum, $42 million was for COVID-19 tests that took advantage of government incentives. These tests likely did not take place, as one of the labs didnt even have the equipment necessary to perform the tasks.

Acting US Attorney David Clay Fowlkes said:

Did you like this article?

Continued here:

Poker Player Accused of $88 Million Healthcare Scam - PokerTube

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Poker Player Accused of $88 Million Healthcare Scam – PokerTube

Hellmuth and Negreanu Face Off for $400000 in High Stakes Duel II – PokerNews.com

Posted: at 11:24 pm

June 23, 2021Jason Glatzer

Off the heels of Phil Ivey defeating Patrik Antonius for an exciting conclusion of the WPT $25K Heads Up Poker Championship, the poker world is geared up for yet another exciting heads-up battle Phil Hellmuth and Daniel Negreanu for a $400,000 prize pool in Round 3 of High Stakes Duel II on June 23-24 at the PokerGO Studio at the ARIA Resort and Casino.

Poker fans will be able to follow long on this epic battle between two players that have withstood the test of time at the subscription-based PokerGO at 8 p.m. EDT.

Remember, an annual subscription to PokerGO costs $99.99, but you can save $10 off by using promo code PokerNews at checkout. Once you're signed up, the entire saga of Negreanu vs. Hellmuth can be viewed on PokerGO.

The critics are always after Phil Hellmuth due to his unorthodox style of play but there is no denying the 15-time WSOP bracelet winner has gotten it done time and time against for more than three decades.

Before facing off against Negreanu, Hellmuth was pitting against another poker legend in Antonio Esfandiari in the inaugural High Stakes Duel. Esfandiari was the betting favorite with the poker community once again underestimating the formidable Hellmuth.

Hellmuth went on to win the first $50,000 heads-up match against Esfandiari and won against when the stakes doubled when each player ponied up $100,000. Esfandiari threw in the towel after Hellmuth won the third match featuring a $200,000 to win $350,000 in the three matches.

Meanwhile, Negreanu was just off an expensive crash course in advanced heads-up play after imfamously facing off against Doug Polk. Polk was dominate throughout and eventually won $1.2 million in the challenge against Negreanu.

Negreanu was looking for new challengers after that goading several players on social media into a high-profile battle. Hellmuth took the bait and was once again an underdog.

The first match featuring a $50,000 buy-in in April between Hellmuth and Negreanu was a story for the ages. Negreanu had Hellmuth on the ropes with 97,000 chips to his opponent's 3,000 chips. If there were live lines on the match, they would have been likely pulled off at this point as it seemed that Negreanu would easily seal the deal.

However, Hellmuth stormed back to win the match and Negreanu immediately invoked the option to double the stakes to a $100,000 buy-in. That match took place in May and ended on a bad beat when Hellmuth's ace-four got there against pocket eights.

The High Stakes Duel format starts off with two players by ponying up $50,000 each for a $100,000 initial match.

The event mimics a deep-stacked cash game early in the action with players starting with 200,000 chips and blinds at 50/100 and increasing every 30 minutes. The action will move along quickly as each player has 30 seconds to act with five 60-second time banks available for the tough decisions.

The losing player has the first option to challenge at double stakes. If they decline, a new challenger can post up and take on the double-stake match within 30 days, or the series ends and the winner cashes out.

The winner can also cash out after three consecutive wins, or two consecutive wins if they occur later in the series when the stakes have doubles several times already.

If Hellmuth can pull off another victory, he can cash out even if Negreanu wants to play on for double the stakes. If Negreanu ends his losing streak, Hellmuth will have the option for a rematch which Negreanu will have to accept.

"High Stakes Duel" is available for PokerGO subscribers. If youre not currently subscribed, you can get a monthly subscription for $14.99, a three-month plan for $29.99, and an annual subscription for $99.99. You can also save $10 off an annual subscription by using promo code PokerNews at checkout.

Photos courtesy of PokerGO

Go here to read the rest:

Hellmuth and Negreanu Face Off for $400000 in High Stakes Duel II - PokerNews.com

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Hellmuth and Negreanu Face Off for $400000 in High Stakes Duel II – PokerNews.com

What has Lane County changed a year after protests for racial justice? – The Register-Guard

Posted: at 11:23 pm

Jordyn Brown and Tatiana Parafiniuk-Talesnick, Eugene Register-Guard, and Elizabeth Gabriel, KLCC| Eugene Register-Guard and KLCC

Protests against police violence and racism occurred on a near-daily basis last summeracross Lane County, prompted by the murder of George Floyd.

Companies,school districtsand local governments publicly expressed support for racial justice as the crowds of voices calling for change grew. Some Lane County police departments announced they would make immediate changes, public health agencies began to tackle the pandemic through a lens of racial justice and Gov. Kate Brown called for a special session to pass police accountability legislation.

But a year later, some activists are left wondering if any substantial changes have been made.

While some remain optimistic about where last summers wave of energy will take communities, for some that have witnessed moments like this before, theres a feeling of deja vu.

The only difference is I see is more young white people and even some older white people involved, said Eugene resident Henry Luvert. Back in the day, it was Black folks, so they would shoot you (for protesting), whereas now sometimes they'll come out with rubber bullets.

Luvertwas a president of the local NAACP for about 20 years and was involved with civil rights movements in the area since the 1980s; he's pulled back his involvementin recent years for his health. He had a computer store,a construction company and served as a firefighter in the '80s where he says he faced racism from his peers as one of the first and only Black firefighters.

It's more of the same, Luvert said. What happens is you take one or two steps forward, you get pushback.

The core issue driving protests last summer was police use of force, fueling calls for defunding and abolishing police departments across the U.S.

Around Lane County, therewas animmediate response of possible solutions and suggestions.

Schools reevaluated having armed, uniformed police on campus. The Eugene School Board voted 6-1to remove police from schools, being the only one of the three major metro school districts in Lane County to do so.

And some policy changes were made at the Eugene and Springfield police departments after several use-of-force incidents in the past few year.

Eugene Police Department responded to the first week of protests and the initial May 29 riot with pepper balls, tear gas, arrests and curfews, which prompted two lawsuits.

Eugene Police Chief Chris Skinner took some immediate steps, scaling back police involvement at protests, banning the use of chokeholds a few weeks ahead of state reforms. EPD also has a section of its website devoted to "8 Cant Wait," a police reform campaign thatprovidesalist of policy changes that can be quickly enacted,with the department committing to six of the eight reforms.

Skinner announced that as ofJune 14, EPD will report to the public displays of force such as pointing a taser, firearm and using K9s to gain compliance in incidents as well as uses of force.

Across the river in Springfield, however, changes in policing this year were not prompted by department initiative, but various use-of-force lawsuits and whistleblower complaints.

One wrongful death lawsuit was settled in 2020 on behalf of Stacy Kenny, who was killed by police during a traffic stop in 2019. The lawsuit, which noted a toxic warrior culture within the department, was settled by the city of Springfield for a record $4.55 million. An independent review released this year also found police "immediately resorted to force." As part of the settlement, the city agreed to a plan laid out by the Kenny family to correct this culture, which includedthe independent review and requiring SPD to annually report its use-of-force incidents and make several changes to policies, such as prioritizing de-escalation.

In response to the "8 Cant Wait" campaign, then-Springfield Police Chief Richard Lewis told city councilors in November he views the eight changes as unreasonable because they don'tmake an exception for officers arriving at immediately threatening scenes.He said SPD officers would still be allowed to use otherwise prohibited use-of-force tactics if their lives or others were in danger.

Lewis was placed on paid administrative leave at the end of March,during a still-ongoinginvestigationinto a complaint from a former recruit that he falsified information about her. He announced his retirement on May 19.

Springfield hired a new interim police chief, Andrew Shearer, who had 28 years with the Portland Police Bureau, which has had its own lawsuits and federal orders related to repeated incidents of use-of-force against protesters this last year.

Shearer said when taking the job he saw the various headlines about SPDs issues and wasnt deterred, seeing it as a chance for change and improvement.

I'm always up for a challenge, he told The Register-Guard.

Activismmoved from the Eugene and Springfield streetsto its board rooms last year. Protesters and activists gave public comment at city council and county board meetingsand protested atcity leaders homes at night. They were met with resolutions and words pledging change.

Unlike its neighboring communities, Springfields city council has notissuedany formal resolution. Springfield Mayor Sean VanGordon, who was appointed to the position in January and has been on the council since 2011, did denounce white supremacy in his State of the City address.

We didn't pass a resolution against racism, but we did talk about the fact that political violence isn't welcome here, VanGordonsaid. Maybe it's a different venue than taking a formal action, but as mayor, thats actually the biggest megaphone I have.

The only tangible change that came from council action wasintroducing body-worn cameras for allSpringfield officers.

A year ago, facing budget concerns because of COVID-19, the council and budget committee planned to eliminate the funding set aside for police body cameras. When people gathered outside city hall to protest the decision, cameras were put back into the budget.

... To drive transparency, (we decided) that as a city this size, we've got to have body cameras, and we have got to figure out how to make it work, VanGordon said.

VanGordon said the best way he found to gather information about how people are feeling over the last year was to have one-on-one talks.

Over that summer, I had a lot of coffee, he said, adding he talked with about six people, not necessarily people of color. Those one-on-one moments and phone calls are really how you gather the feeling about where the community is.

We're a community of 60,000 people that goes all the way from the farthest point on the leftto the farthest point on the right, he said, about his takeaways from those conversations. Overall, it's always meaningful to have those types of conversations.

VanGordon announced last week that he will be holding quarterly conversations with community members via Zoom, calledVisit With Mayor VanGordon, with the first one happening Tuesday, June 22.

Meanwhile,Eugenecity leaders continued to face the question of what "public safety really is.

The City Council unanimously passed resolutions in 2019 and again in 2021that denounce white nationalism, alt-right and extremist groups. Eugene has had a police auditors office and body cameras for officers for years, but the protests called for more accountability.

Nationally, advocates made clear the call wasnt reform police,but defund police.

In Eugene, community members called on city officials toconsider changing the way revenues from the community safetypayroll tax, passed by voters inJune 2019, are spent. The taxis intended to generate $23.6 million annually to provide long-term funding for community safety services.

As originally proposed, more than half of those Community Safety Initiative funds would go to the citys police departmentincluding more than 50 new officers and other police staff, a street crimes unit and 10 additional jail beds, while a combined 10% would go to crime prevention and services to address homelessness.

Locally, the calls for "defund police" areeven more specific: reallocate and fund CAHOOTS,a 32-year-old emergency response program that continues to receive nationwide attention as a potential alternative to policing. In 12-hour shifts, teams made up of unarmed medics and crisis workers respond to medical or psychological emergencies in Eugene and Springfield. In 2019, CAHOOTShandled about 24,000 calls for service.

CAHOOTS wasn't included in theCommunity Safety Initiative fundingdespite the city touting CAHOOTS as a community service on thewebsite advertising the initiative.

InJuly 2020 the council voted to create an Ad Hoc Committee on policing and reevaluate the Community Safety Initiative by gathering more public input on the funding uses, especially from BIPOC residents.

After 46 hours of focus groups, listening sessions andonline surveys, the Ad Hoc Committee on May 17 offered the council 50 recommendations for changes.

Part of the feedback given tocity officials supportsthe use of alternatives to law enforcement, such as CAHOOTS.

According to the committee's report, CAHOOTS was a dominant example and one that was highly praised. Italso notes that CAHOOTS funding is "absent in the (Community Safety Initiative)" and says many focus group participants asked for the city to make funding explicit while others suggested separating CAHOOTS funding from EPD funding.

Some survey respondents and participants in the listening sessions directly asked for an increase in CAHOOTS services.

Following the report's findings, CAHOOTS requested $1.8 million from the cityso it could offer competitive wagesand wrote a letter to the City Council asking for direct funding from the Community Safety Initiative.

For now, the budget committee recommended the City Council add $125,000 of one-time funding for CAHOOTS in the next fiscal years budget from reserve funds to maintain an additional five hours per day of service, according to city spokesperson Laura Hammond.The committeeis also consideringincludingCAHOOTS in Community Safety Initiative allocations inthe fall.

One of the things that we learned from the Community Safety Initiative engagement, was a different framing… people were saying, We don't want you to talk about community safety, we want you to talk about community well-being, Eugene Mayor Lucy Vinis said. That's a profound shift.

When asked whether these steps taken this year were enough, Vinis said she believes the council has done excellent work.

I think these two initiatives the ad hoc committee and the going back with another round of engagement on the Community Safety Initiative were excellent ideas. And from those reports, I would say we have learned a lot, she said.

I won't say that, in every respect, it was perfect, Vinis said. There was no model to follow and we responded in a climate of urgency that we needed to act … Sometimes when you move very quickly, you don't anticipate all of the ways in which there might be unintended consequences from your actions. But I think that both of those reports really set the groundwork for us.

County leaders were called on for larger change last summer, including taking action to rename the county.

The county is named after Joseph Lane, the first governor of Oregon Territory and a slaveowner. A petition circulated calling for a change to the countys name, which the Board of Commissioners discussed last August, but in the end the board kept the name, KLCC reported.

The board instead issued resolutions. The first was in June 2020 in support of Black Lives Matter. The second came in February 2021, when the county acknowledged its role in evicting and demolishing the citys first black neighborhood Ferry Street Village in 1949. The third was to acknowledge racism as a public health crisis this April.

Resolutions are interesting things in and of themselves, they don't do squat…unless they engender action and change they don't mean much you might as well put them on a shelf and forget them, said Board Chair Joe Berney. "But what that does is it gives staff a green light.

These declarations told county staff to prioritize equity in their work, Berney said, with actions such as opening up a sixth Community Health Center, prioritizing financial support for minority and women-owned small businesses, and bettering hiring practices.

We targeted recruitment for the jobs we were creating to populations that have been historically excluded from full workforce participation in those jobs, which in the building tradeswas women, people of color and veterans, Berney said. We were not attached toLane County government should look like Lane County. We were attached to, Lane County government should look far more diverse than Lane County what Lane Countys hopefully going to become.

Lane County Public Health set aside COVID-19 vaccine doses during distribution to ensure access for people who may have strained relationships with the medical system, including people who are experiencing homelessness as well as some people of color.

We're fighting racism as a public health crisis, and back in 2020 we weren't … we were fighting against police brutality, but police brutality is also a piece of racism it's also a piece of this public health environment that we have, said Martin Allums, protester-turned-BIPOC Community Liasion for LCPH.

Allums also pointed to the statewide passage of Measure 110, which decriminalizes small quantities drugs in Oregon and will potentially decrease yearly convictions for possession by 90%.

When the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission analyzed the racial and ethnic impacts of the measure, it found that Black Oregonians were overrepresented in the number of people convicted of drug possession, and that the passage of Measure 110 would eliminate the disparity.

With COVID, even though it's set us back so far in terms of the hustle and bustle of society, it gave us an opportunity to really stop and look around and really see how we treat each other and how we treat our communities, Allums said. You didn't have an option to turn away and ignore it, because you were forced to quarantine, you were forced to stop and see how you treated yourself and how you treated your community.

Even with these changes, theres still more to do to make a significant cultural shift to addressing racism, Berney said.

Its never enough, he said. Anyone that says its enough shouldn't be where they're at. It's never enough.

Seven police reform bills passed the Legislature during two special sessions called last summer, and at least eight more passed at the latest session, along with several other non-policing bills aimed at racial justice.The Oregon Legislature banned police use of chokeholds during the 2020 Special Legislative Session for pandemic and police accountability. The state alsoestablished the duty for other officers to intervene in a use-of-force situation.

Have we moved the needle? I think considerably. Is there more to do? There is much more to do because we're talking about years of systemic racism, Sen. James Manning Jr., D-Eugene said. We're talking about a system that was designed systemically to oppress and hold Black people people that look like me.

Manning, a former police officer and Army veteran, represents Oregon Senate District 7, which includes north Eugene, west Eugene, Santa Clara and Junction City. Hehas been involved with the creation and passage of many recent bills meant to reform policing in Oregon.

Manningsaid that even as protests have died down, the political will to make change has not.

All of my colleagues understand," he said, "that it's time for reform.

Editors' note: This project is a collaboration between The Eugene Register-Guard and KLCC public radio.

Editor's note: The original version of this story incorrectly stated how many calls CAHOOTS responded to in 2019. It has been corrected to reflect the correct amount.

Contact reporter Jordyn Brown at jbrown@registerguard.comand on Twitter @thejordynbrown; reporter Tatiana Parafiniuk-Talesnick atTatiana@registerguard.com and on Twitter@TatianaSophiaPT; andreporter Elizabeth Gabriel ategabriel@klcc.org andon Twitter@_elizabethgabs.

Visit link:

What has Lane County changed a year after protests for racial justice? - The Register-Guard

Posted in Alt-right | Comments Off on What has Lane County changed a year after protests for racial justice? – The Register-Guard

The Smallest Capitals in the World – Statista

Posted: at 11:23 pm

Hearing the word capital makes most people think of bustling metropolises that house millions of people, but there are also many capitals in the world that seem lightyears away from that image. The smallest capitals in absolute terms can be found in microstates and island nations. The smallest in relative terms shine a light on another phenomenon purpose-built capitals.

Vatican City leads the list with just around 1,000 inhabitants, which are all appointees of the Catholic church or their immediate family and lose citizenship once the appointment ends. The set-up of the state that is considered a sovereign nation also means that 100 percent of the Vaticans inhabitants live in the states capital, Vatican City.

Other capitals that make the list according to U.N. data are Vaduz, the sleepy town of 5,000 inhabitants that serves as the capital of Liechtenstein, or Tuvalus Funafuti, whose 7,000 inhabitants squeeze onto a palm-fringed atoll of a maximum width of 200 meters. While for some island nations, the capital city houses more than half of the population, the share is as low as 6.2 percent in Micronesias capital Palikir no wonder as the countys 113,000 inhabitants are scattered across 65 inhabited islands.

Six out of the top 8 of the worlds smallest capitals in relative terms share the trait that they were purpose-built to serve the function. The smallest of the bunch are Dodoma, a modest administrative center in central Tanzania, and Islamabad, the more flashy purpose-built Pakistani capital designed by Greek star architect C. A. Doxiadis. The two cities have so far failed to attract more than 0.5 percent of their respective countrys population. However, they represent the two major reasons for countries to rebuild a capital elsewhere: Trying to bring development to an underserved part of the country, most often inland regions, or creating a utopian city representing the countrys ideals. A third reason, appeasing competition between cities vying for the capital position, is represented by Australian capital Canberra and U.S. seat of government, Washington D.C.

Because of the sheer size of both countries, the capitals of India and China also appear on the list. With its nearly 20 million inhabitants, Beijing residents still make up only 1.4 percent of the 1.4 billion people living in China.

Except for city states and other micronations, the countries where the largest share of residents lives in the capital were Iceland (64 percent live in Reykjavik), Uruguay (around 50 percent live in Montevideo), Mongolia (48 percent reside in Ulan Bator) and Paraguay (46 are at home in Asuncion).

The list excludes non-sovereign states, states with multiple capitals and de-facto capitals.

See the rest here:

The Smallest Capitals in the World - Statista

Posted in Micronations | Comments Off on The Smallest Capitals in the World – Statista

What Do Biologists Really Know About Macroevolution? – Discovery Institute

Posted: at 11:21 pm

American Museum of Natural History, by Ingfbruno / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0).

When evolutionist Colin Patterson asked at the American Museum of Natural History in 1981, Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, any one thing, that is true? his colleagues were aghast. Why, the origin of species that leads to macroevolution is an accepted truth! One does not question accepted truths. Of course they knew about evolution! The evidence is everywhere. Its here, its there, its well, evolution is a fact, and if the evidence isnt available today, it will be tomorrow.

A recent paper in Science allows us to hold the magnifying glass up to claims of observable evidence supporting macroevolution. Gustavo Burin et al., in Macroevolutionary stability predicts interaction patterns of species in seed dispersal networks, published in the journal Science, use the word macroevolution 32 times. Burin and two colleagues from Brazil studied 468 bird species in 29 seed dispersal networks. From the data, they claimed to see evidence for macroevolution evidence so secure, it allows them to make predictions about evolution. This should be a good case study. Do they really know about evolution, or is their exercise a detailed construction of a house of cards?

Two reviewers, Carolina Bello from Switzerland and Elisa Barreto from Brazil, gave their perspective about the paper, also in Science. As evolutionists, they were pleased to see the effort by Burins team showing The footprint of evolution in seed dispersal interactions.

The footprint of evolution should be obvious. Fruit-eating (frugivorous) birds eat the fruits with the seeds, then fly away, leaving seeds widely dispersed for the good of the plant. Widespread distribution of favorite plants is also good for the birds. One bird species will often feed on multiple fruits, and plants will often host multiple species of birds. A complex network of bird and plant interactions should result. Over time, the symbiotic relationships should persist even as the players evolve or go extinct. Bello and Barreto use the word macroevolution 7 times in three paragraphs, and yet their piece betrays a persistent undertone of doubt about what Burin et al. showed indeed, what all such macroevolutionary studies have been able to show. Here are some of the problems they mention:

Their support for the Burin paper is, in the final analysis, only faint praise:

Accurately estimating speciation, and particularly extinction rates, from phylogenies composed solely of extant species is still a challenge, making it hard to detect the footprint of evolutionary dynamics on species interactions. [Emphasis added]

After reading the Burin paper, therefore, Bello and Barreto are not entirely sure the authors know what they claim to know.

One thing Darwinism has going for it: it sure generates a lot of busy work. But so does constructing a house of cards; whether effort corresponds to knowledge is a separate question. With their 32 mentions of macroevolution, can Burins team demonstrate knowledge about it? Even in the case of watching birds eat fruit, is the evidence clear? The authors are offered a fair chance to convince a skeptic as we dive into the text and supplemental materials.

They face challenges at the outset. They cannot watch extinct birds eating fruit, obviously, so whats up with that?

Starting from a molecular phylogeny (Fig. 1A), we estimated rates of speciation, extinction, net diversification rate (speciation minus extinction), and extinction fraction (extinction divided by speciation rate) for all species in the networks. We then estimated species interaction patterns (how they were connected) within each of the 29 networks (Fig. 1B), using three different network descriptors to characterize interaction patterns of each species, which were then combined into a single descriptor index for each species by using principal component analysis (PCA). We then used a hierarchical Bayesian phylogenetic framework to test for relationships between macroevolutionary stability and interaction patterns of bird species (Fig. 1C).

The circularity of their reasoning escapes them. They assume macroevolution (molecular phylogeny) to learn about macroevolution. They estimate speciation rates and extinction rates based on their belief in macroevolution. They place each bird into a network and connect all the assumed data points into a phylogenetic framework. Nowhere do they mention fossils, like finding a fossilized dove eating a fossilized apricot. Essentially, they use evolutionary assumptions to demonstrate facts about macroevolution! Do they know how many species originated, and how many went extinct? No! They only estimate how many must have evolved, based on their Darwinian mindset.

We found that central bird species in seed dispersal networks tend to belong to macroevolutionarily stable lineages. Standardized speciation and extinction rates show, respectively, positive and negative associations with species patterns of interaction (Fig. 2A). Hence, central species are more likely both to persist in time (negative correlation with extinction rate) and to belong to clades that are more likely to provide a replacement species if one goes extinct (correlations with extinction fraction and diversification rate).

Any skeptic of Darwinism would call foul here (no pun intended). One cannot simply assume that evolution will provide new species for ones that bow out by extinction, when they have no fossil evidence that that is what happened. Their powers of suggestion lead them into fantasyland:

This suggests that the macroevolutionary sorting mechanism acts at a regional scale, sorting the species within each region through their relative rank of stability, rather than on absolute values of speciation, extinction, extinction fraction, or net diversification rates. Our results indicate that representatives of important seed-dispersers groups across multiple localities indeed have high relative macroevolutionary stability, as the result of either fast species accumulation (e.g., thraupid genera, such as Tangara and Thraupis) or long-lived lineages (e.g., species of Turdidae). Ecological factors such as species abundance distributions and the presence of invasive species also influence network organization. Unfortunately, the lack of data prevents us from further testing if macroevolutionary consequences to network structure are modulated by those factors.

The paper is built on assumptions .

They also used an arguably vacuous measure of phylogenetic signal called Pagels Lambda, a value between 0 and 1 that infers that species that resemble each other are more closely related. There are obvious exceptions among species with strong sexual dimophism and in cases of alleged convergence.

Phylogenetic correction was used because the network descriptors showed significant phylogenetic signal (mean value for Pagels lambda = 0.537 but note that for each tree the corresponding lambda value was used).

At least one ecologist, Carl Boettiger at UC Berkeley, has argued that its time to retire Pagels Lambda, because it relies on biological nonsense and doesnt measure what it claims to measure. Whatever one thinks of its usefulness, its a statistic that relies on Darwins tree concept, therefore circular.

So Bello and Barreto were right to express doubts. Its hard to detect the footprint of evolutionary dynamics on species interactions. Estimating speciation and extinction rates from extant species is still a challenge. Burin et al. took a leap to merge macroevolution and interaction networks. Whether they found a consistent and robust effect, even when accounting for the uncertainty of the rate estimates and the phylogenetic hypothesis, is in the eye of the beholder, considering all the assumptions, questionable techniques and circular reasoning involved.

And so, in the end, Colin Pattersons question echoes through the decades: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, any one thing, that is true?

Continued here:

What Do Biologists Really Know About Macroevolution? - Discovery Institute

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on What Do Biologists Really Know About Macroevolution? – Discovery Institute

Opinion | UA should embrace critical race theory – The Crimson White – The University of Alabama Crimson White

Posted: at 11:21 pm

On June 10, Florida became the most recent state to ban critical race theory in its classrooms. The ban was enacted by the Florida State Board of Education, which defined critical race theory as the theory that racism is not merely the product of prejudice, but that racism is embedded in American society and its legal systems in order to uphold the supremacy of white persons.

Contrary to the talking points and fearmongering of some conservative lawmakers, critical race theory is not focused on attacking white people for their whiteness. Instead, it exposes the disenfranchisement and oppression of people of color by American systems that are based in the nations indubitably racist past.

The idea that America is fundamentally racist may be difficult to sit with, but it is impossible and dangerous to ignore this reality. One needs only to examine the many instances of systemic injustice that exist within our country to accept this fact.

One needs only to see how Black K-12 students have far less access to college-ready courses than white students. One needs only to question why Black youth are disproportionately stopped by police in comparison to the rest of the youth population. If not for systemic racism, then why does the average white family have at least 10 times more wealth than the average non-white family?

It is impossible to overcome a problem that isnt acknowledged as truth. If not educated on this nations past, how can students promote equality as the leaders of tomorrow?

These bans enable racist ideologies and stereotypes through their dismissal of systemic racism. If economic inequality, racial profiling by police, and educational inequality are not embedded in the very fabric of America, then why are people of color disproportionately poor, uneducated and imprisoned in the U.S. compared to their white counterparts?

What should this debate mean to the students and staff of The University of Alabama?

First, we must acknowledge that the University is both a prominent institution in Southern education and an establishment literally built by Americas racist past. The University owned and enslaved African Americans from its inception until it was destroyed by Union troops in 1865.

We live, work and learn at an establishment rooted in racism. Denying the oppression that is fundamentally woven into our lives would degrade the University into an institution that is delusional, hypocritical and misinformed.

The University holds weight in this conversation. State Rep. Chris Pringle, R-Mobile, recently pre-filed a bill for the next legislative session that would ban Alabama public schools from teaching critical race theory.

From its inception, The University of Alabama has served as a guiding force for the state, bringing jobs, resources and education to Alabama. This is a chance to continue to utilize its leadership role for good.

If the University is truly the home of educational excellence that we all believe it to be, then it will not simply denounce any attempt at banning the critical race theory in Alabama. It will go further to preserve the spirit of education, supporting critical race theory as an honest and accurate tool for educating Americans.

To preserve the teaching of critical race theory, the University must distinguish itself from lawmakers and institutions that buy into the notion that racism in this country is an antiquated phenomenon. In the quest to combat institutionalized racism, there is no such thing as being too thorough.

One means by which the university can combat current rhetoric on race is by continuing to expand UAs course catalog to implement the teaching of critical race theory in a substantial way. We cannot allow controversy or eurocentric thinking to prevent us from teaching accurate and inclusive portraits of our past and present. Courses highlighting the experiences of people of color should be limited to electives or minors. It belongs in our core curriculum.

Since racism is pervasive in every atmosphere, critical race theory must not be isolated to a select few courses of history or political science. In the discussion of evolution, how can we ignore the history of Social Darwinism? Courses of all disciplines must commit themselves to tackling racism in whatever way it presents itself.

Perhaps most importantly, the University must bridge the gap between campus and the greater Alabama community. The University Does not exist in a vacuum. We represent the state of Alabama and vice versa. Students and professors must communicate with local representatives, urging them to vote against bills like Pringles that protect racist ideology.

If the University wants to promote itself as a forward-thinking institution, then we must fight against regressive policies that threaten to keep Alabama from moving toward a more just future. We must make it known that the University will not stand idly by when lawmakers attempt to halt progress in our state, especially when it comes to education.

If we advocate for critical race theory as a policy and actually implement it in our own community, we can signal to both the state of Alabama and the nation as a whole that we are setting an example. It will be shown that no matter what comes out of Pringles bill, the University is on the side of equality, inclusion and honest education.

Our nations relationship with racial injustice is not easy to stomach, but as some conservatives themselves like to say: facts dont care about your feelings and the fact of the matter is, we still have a long way to go. Lets start now.

Original post:

Opinion | UA should embrace critical race theory - The Crimson White - The University of Alabama Crimson White

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on Opinion | UA should embrace critical race theory – The Crimson White – The University of Alabama Crimson White

Leaked UN Climate Report: The Apocalypse Is Almost Here – Futurism

Posted: at 11:21 pm

"The worst is yet to come, affecting our children's and grandchildren's lives much more than our own."Doomsday Report

A draft climate change report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issues a dire warning that we are on the cusp of planetary destruction thanks to the myriad dangers of worsening climate change.

The report, which was leaked to Agence France-Presse, is 4,000 pages long but its central message can be summarized very clearly: Humanity has screwed up the planet, and well be reaping what weve sown very, very soon.

Specifically, the report predicts even more mass extinction, dangerously high temperatures, increased disease outbreaks, rising sea levels, and the collapse of entire ecosystems within the next few decades.

The worst is yet to come, reads the report, affecting our childrens and grandchildrens lives much more than our own.

The report is slated for release next February, which AFP notes is too late for it to influence any of the upcoming UN summits on climate change, biodiversity, and food security. Thats too bad, because it lays out the very real possibility that humanitys time as stewards of the planet could be coming to an end.

Life on Earth can recover from a drastic climate shift by evolving into new species and creating new ecosystems, the report says. Humans cannot.

While some countries have made progress toward climate goals like the 2015 Paris Agreement, the report suggests that the wheels of climate-related devastation have already been set in motion. To slow them down, the entire world will need to take aggressive and immediate action on all fronts, lest we pass a point of no return.

We need transformational change operating on processes and behaviors at all levels: individual, communities, business, institutions, and governments, the report says. We must redefine our way of life and consumption.

READ MORE: Crushing climate impacts to hit sooner than feared: draft UN report [Agence France-Presse]

More on climate change: Global Warming May Be Way Worse Than We Thought, Scientists Say

As a Futurism reader, we invite you join the Singularity Global Community, our parent companys forum to discuss futuristic science & technology with like-minded people from all over the world. Its free to join, sign up now!

Read more here:
Leaked UN Climate Report: The Apocalypse Is Almost Here - Futurism

Posted in Futurism | Comments Off on Leaked UN Climate Report: The Apocalypse Is Almost Here – Futurism

First Patient Injected With Cancer Vaccine in Phase II Trial – Futurism

Posted: at 11:21 pm

The pharmaceutical company BioNTech has officially begun injecting participants with an experimental cancer vaccine in a new phase II clinical trial.

Preclinical and earlier clinical data showed that the vaccine is safe enough to progress along the clinical research pipeline, according to Clinical Trials Arena. So now, BioNTech plans to measure how well the vaccine, in concert with the medication Libtayo, works as a treatment for severe cases of skin cancer and thats a big deal, because the hopeis that it will be able to treat patients who would have previously been considered terminal.

Just like the COVID-19 vaccine that BioNTech developed in collaboration with Pfizer, the experimental cancer vaccine relies on mRNA technology to teach a patients immune system how to fight off cancer. But there are some key differences between testing a vaccine for cancer and a highly-infectious virus.

Namely, it wouldnt make sense to test a vaccine on healthy patients and then wait around to see if they happen to eventually develop severe cancer. Rather, BioNTech is recruiting existing patients with stage three or four melanoma and then tracking their progress after theyre inoculated.

Our vision is to harness the power of the immune system against cancer and infectious diseases, BioNTech cofounder zlem Treci said in a press release. We were able to demonstrate the potential of mRNA vaccines in addressing COVID-19. We must not forget, that cancer is also a global health threat, even worse than the current pandemic.

As a Futurism reader, we invite you join the Singularity Global Community, our parent companys forum to discuss futuristic science & technology with like-minded people from all over the world. Its free to join, sign up now!

See more here:
First Patient Injected With Cancer Vaccine in Phase II Trial - Futurism

Posted in Futurism | Comments Off on First Patient Injected With Cancer Vaccine in Phase II Trial – Futurism