Monthly Archives: February 2020

The Oscars 2020: do they really matter? – HeraldScotland

Posted: February 10, 2020 at 2:43 am

The Academy Awards are tonight but are they just an opportunity for the rich and famous to slap each other on the back, or do they really say something important about the world? Writer at Large Neil Mackay takes a closer look

ITS Oscars Night. The world will stop this evening to watch a carnival of wealth, adulation, fame, talent, glamour and most of all power. It is a night bestowed with global significance. Millions around the planet see it as the cultural and artistic heart of the year. Were told that the Oscars matter.

But is that true? Do the Oscars say anything about the world we live in, about our culture, our society? Or is it all, as the cynics believe, just an empty, gaudy show that signifies nothing?

Who decides?

First of all, lets be clear what the Oscars are. Like their British equivalent, the Baftas, the Oscars are an expression of how a very narrow sliver of society sees both culture and the world at a specific moment in time. When it comes to the Oscars, that sliver of society is the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

It is the academys roughly 7,000 members who hand out the gongs. All members are part of the film industry directors, cinematographers, producers but actors make up the biggest proportion, 22%.

Of the academys active voters, 94% are white, 77% male and 54% over 60, and about one-third are former Oscar nominees and winners. Given were in Hollywood, the academy also has a liberal bias. Right-wing movies unless youre Clint Eastwood dont get far.

For such a youthful art form as cinema, the old, white, wealthy, male demographic is jarring and it lies at the heart of the Oscars diversity problem, with not enough black or female artists up for awards.

The question of race

The movie Green Book, which won Oscars in 2019 for Best Picture, Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor for Mahershala Ali, is a good case study when it comes to liberalism and diversity.

In an elevator pitch it sounds the perfect pro-diversity film: a white, working-class man learns to be a better person by working for an intellectual black man.

The only problem is the film was hammered for its white saviour narrative. In the film, the black guy only learns about himself thanks to

the white guy. Green Book was criticised for perpetuating a fantasy that racism only happened in the

past its set in the 1960s rather

than today.

Green Book is a perfect example of Hollywood trying to be liberal, but falling on its face with a story about black life filtered through white eyes. If the academy wanted to hand the Best Picture Oscar to a good film about race last year it could have awarded BlacKkKlansman by Spike Lee.

American power

So the Oscars represent a very narrow worldview. They also represent a very American worldview. Of course, America is the planets cultural powerhouse, but the Oscars crowd out the vast majority of films which dont come from the English-speaking world.

The rules have a built-in bias against foreign films. Any contender for the big awards Best Picture, Actor, Actress, Director, Screenplay must play for seven nights in LA. That might be hard for a brilliant but broke filmmaker from Africa or Asia.

The nominee for Best Foreign Film doesnt have to open in America but it does have to be its countrys official selection, which in itself is a mountainous task of networking, campaigning and schmoozing.

The schmooze

Speaking of schmoozing thats the other problem which erodes belief in the Oscars having real cultural significance. If you want your film to win you need deep pockets.

Winning an Oscar is all about campaigning and campaigning costs. In 1967, Doctor Dolittle was a turkey. Over budget, critically hated and a box office disaster, it still managed to get a Best Picture nomination, and eventually won Best Song and Visual Effects after 20th Century Fox launched a champagne-fuelled charm offensive for Academy members.

In 1999, the schmaltzy Shakespeare In Love beat Saving Private Ryan when Harvey Weinsteins studio Miramax spent an unheard-of $15 million on an Oscar campaign.

Money, however, does not buy cultural significance, or lasting appeal. Who cares about Shakespeare In

Love today?

The golden age

So the Oscars have more than their fair share of problems and its hard

to argue that the awards, as a whole, have something consistently significant to say about the world, culture

and society.

However, that doesnt mean individual Oscar-winning films arent important. Many speak directly about societys big issues, the problems confronting the world and the changing shape of culture. When the Academy gets it right which isnt often it gets it very right.

The seventies is a good era to explore after all, its the golden age of modern cinema. In 1979, Kramer vs Kramer swept the boards, winning five Oscars including Best Picture. It stars Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep, and tells the story of their divorce. The film focuses a lot on their child, Billy, caught in the middle.

Billy was a symbol of generation X the first generation to grow up with divorce normalised. The film explores gender roles who should raise a kid and why? womens rights, fathers rights, the growing demands of corporate careerism, work-life balance and single parenthood. Kramer vs Kramer was socially astute and culturally ahead of its time.

That same year Apocalypse Now won two technical Oscars Cinematography and Sound. Today, its Francis Ford Coppolas film which has stood the test of time much more than Kramer vs Kramer.

Divorce is no longer a zeitgeist subject, but Apocalypse Now continues to say something culturally significant: that Western power is dangerous. Often it is films which are nominated for Oscars, but dont scoop the Best Picture award, which make the most interesting cultural statements. In 1980, the academy basically replicated what happened the year before it gave four big gongs to another family drama, Ordinary People.

However, Raging Bull hailed as one of the greatest movies ever made, and a film which has easily outlasted its Oscar rivals only won two awards, including Best Actor for Robert De Niro as the boxer Jake LaMotta. It was a study in toxic masculinity decades before the term was coined.

Sometimes, though, the academy just goes a bit mad like in 1976 when it gave four Oscars to Network but still handed the Best Picture award to Sylvester Stallones Rocky. Network is a brutal, brilliant satire, which still says something culturally significant about the media and society.

War: where it all began

If we go right back to the first Oscars, in 1929, we see the Best Picture winner, the war film Wings, struggling to make sense of the First World War. The US Library of Congress has listed Wings, which starred early screen idol Clara Bow, as a film of cultural significance because it was a real pioneer in the industry.

The following year, 1930, saw cinema still wrestling with the aftermath of war and looming danger in Europe. All Quiet On The Western Front was the big winner. After protests by the Nazi Party in Germany, the film proved its cultural significance by promptly getting banned.

The Second World War profoundly affected the Oscars as neutral America tilted towards Britain. Gone With The Wind although racially unsettling today made clear that war was monstrous. It beat The Wizard Of Oz to the Best Picture award in 1939. Oz, though, summed up better the sense of dislocation, confusion, fear and nostalgia sweeping a world facing global conflict.

In 1942, British and American culture fused when Mrs Miniver which tells the story of an ordinary English housewife during wartime took six Oscars, including Best Picture, Director and Actress (for Greer Garson). Casablanca won Best Picture the following year with a clear message about Americas attachment to Europe: well always have Paris.

The big issues

As the years march on, we see that so many Oscar nominees were commercially successful but artistic non-entities. The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button, anyone?

Still, a few of the Best Picture winners stand out, capturing perfectly the spirit of the times in which they were made. On The Waterfront, which won Best Picture in 1954, looks at life from a uniquely 20th-century working-class perspective. West Side Story in 1961 used the cover of a musical to tackle immigration.

In 1962, though, To Kill A Mockingbird a film fuelled by the US civil rights movement lost out to Lawrence Of Arabia. David Leans epic is a visual delight, but its a clunking and colonial take on the Arab world.

In The Heat Of The Night, the 1967 drama starring Sidney Poitier as a black detective in the Deep South,

won Best Picture and put African-Americans front and centre. In 1969, homosexuality was explored in Midnight Cowboy, although the film is critiqued for homophobia today.

Mental illness was the theme in

1975 when Best Picture went to One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest. Gandhi in 1982 turned attention to colonialism. Rain Man in 1988 looked at autism albeit in an exceptionally misinformed way. And American Beauty in 1999 grappled with the crisis in masculinity.

Identity

From the turn of the millennium, it is often who the filmmaker is rather than the film theyve created which makes the biggest cultural statement. The Hurt Locker took six Oscars in 2009 and made history when Kathryn Bigelow became the first woman to win Best Director. An emotionally astute war film, it signalled the power dynamic between the sexes shifting both in Hollywood and across the west.

Then, in 2016, Moonlight took Best Picture. Its a film about being black, gay and poor, by a black writer-director, Barry Jenkins, and with an all-black cast. Its one of those films which crystallised the time in which it was made in Moonlights case right in the middle of Black Lives Matter.

In 2017, the bizarre fairy tale The Shape Of Water won Best Picture. Beneath the surface lay an examination of female sexuality, with all its quirks and wonders laid bare. Its central character, played by Sally Hawkins, may be mute but the story is about women finding their voice in the world of men.

This years nominees

So what of tonights Best Picture nominees? Do they speak to our times? Certainly some do. Joker is perhaps

the film with most cultural clout.

Some see it as a comment about

the left-behind, gun nuts, socially awkward losers and the alt-right.

Thats mistaken, but even if it were

true it would show a film unafraid of tackling the big social questions.

What Joker really explores is the increasing isolation of modern life, the breakdown of community, the corruption of decency in an amoral world. In the era of social media, hate, and disinformation, Joker couldnt be more of its time. It speaks directly to the experience were all going through right now.

However, its unlikely Joker will win Best Picture though Joaquin Phoenix should be a cert for Best Actor. Joker is too edgy for the academy to give it the top prize.

The most likely winner is 1917. Wartime heroism wins awards think Schindlers List and The Pianist. The only thing that wins more awards than wartime bravery is Meryl Streep nominated a record 21 times.

Sam Mendes First World War film does speak of something prevalent in our society nostalgia for a glorious past. The veneration of the past lurks within the rise of Western populism. Thats not to say 1917 isnt a good film, it is its just that it says something a little disturbing about our current cultural obsessions.

The gangster epic The Irishman sees Martin Scorsese return not just to form but also old ground as he rummages through the undergrowth of toxic masculinity again. Jojo Rabbit, a dark fairy tale about life in the Hitler Youth, may seem quirky (the Fuhrer is our childhood protagonists goofy imaginary friend) but its also back on safe Oscar territory: wartime heroism.

Like Greta Gerwigs multi-nominated Lady Bird in 2017, Little Women (also by Gerwig) continues

the rebalancing of the cultural scales

by telling stories specifically about women and by women. The Netflix movie Marriage Story is essentially a Kramer vs Kramer reboot for millennials.

Ford v Ferrari finds itself in the slot marked well-made film that no-one particularly cares about. Still, it had enough star power to ensure nominations. In terms of cultural import, its functional. Think The Big Short from 2015 nominated for five awards, won one. In a decade, few will remember it.

Quentin Tarantinos Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is fun, but its really just an in-joke for Tinsel Town. For comparison, theres Robert Altmans 1992 movie The Player it too was Hollywood on Hollywood and earned a clutch of nominations. Again, few remember or care today.

Parasite is the oddball in the mix. Firstly its foreign and although foreign films rarely make it into the Best Picture category, the last few years saw things change with The Artist, which inexplicably won in 2011, and Roma, which inexplicably lost to Green Book last year.

Could a South Korean comedy-horror win Best Picture? If were judging a film on what it says about culture and society then Parasite should be a leading contender. If you want a movie which explores lifes inequalities and the deadly nature of the rich-poor divide, then pick Parasite.

Who emerges as top dog all depends on whether this is a year when the academy gets it right, and rewards a film which explains where we are right now when it comes to culture and society or if the academy gets it wrong and just slaps a gold star on what it thinks is an important film, but is in reality just an ephemeral piece of entertaining fluff which says nothing about the world.

See the rest here:

The Oscars 2020: do they really matter? - HeraldScotland

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on The Oscars 2020: do they really matter? – HeraldScotland

Parasites Easiest Image Oscar Is Historical. Is This the Starting of a New Generation in Movie? – MR Invasion

Posted: at 2:43 am

When Bong Joon-Ho went onstage to simply accept the Academy Award for Easiest Global Movie for Parasite on the 2020 Oscars, he concept his night time used to be achieved. Im able to drink this night till subsequent morning, he stated gleefully. He had already gathered one Oscar sooner than that, for Easiest Authentic Screenplay.

However as an alternative, Bong would go back to the degree to gather two extra trophies: one for Easiest Director, making him the second one Asian to win that award, after Ang Leeand one for Easiest Image. Parasites disappointed win within the greatest class of the night time, over frontrunner 1917, made it the primary overseas language movie ever to win Easiest Image throughout 92 years of Oscar historical past.

I believe like an overly opportune second in historical past is occurring at this time, one of the crucial movies manufacturers, Kwak Sin-ae, stated whilst accepting the award.

bong joon ho watching an oscar in awe percent.twitter.com/s2SjwHZUUW

Kathryn VanArendonk (@kvanaren) February 10, 2020

Long past are the times when overseas movies most effective stood a possibility of opening to coastal cinephiles. Parasite has proven that overseas language movies may also be unifying blockbuster occasionsand its good fortune is evidence of the truth that, as director Bong Joon-Ho himself stated on the Globes, If you triumph over the one-inch tall barrier of subtitles, youre going to be offered to such a lot of extra superb movies.

Launched at the same time as with many structural adjustmentstogether with the arrival of streaming and concerted fashionable efforts to champion rangeParasites runaway good fortune may mark a pivotal turning level for overseas language movies, and particularly Asian ones, in The united states. It is a massive breaking of a mental barrier, Janet Yang, a veteran Hollywood manufacturer, tells TIME. This wall weve constructed, wherein non-English language motion pictures had been restricted no longer simply in liberate or field place of work however in folkss minds, is being cracked.

However Parasites good fortune additionally arose from an overly explicit set of instances that is probably not simply replicable. And in Korea and somewhere else, a brand new crop of Asian filmmakers is operating laborious to be sure that Parasite isnt only a temporary bout of glory however the get started of a brand new international generation.

Issues had been very other for overseas language movies initially of Yangs multi-decade profession. When she arrived in Hollywood within the 80s, Asian-language movies, specifically, werent even thought to be an opportunity for mainstream broad liberate. Theyd be advertised differently. It used to be all about getting the Asian target market out, along side the distinctiveness pageant crowd, she says. Indie vendors that are actually lengthy long past, like New Yorker Motion pictures and Circle Motion pictures, funneled world movies to theaters like New Yorks Movie Discussion board, the place they discovered good fortune with erudite and adventurous audiences.

However those movies had been most commonly low-budget, low-grossing distinctiveness affairs that hardly made a dent on the field place of workand obtained even much less popularity from the Academy Awards. Whilst Hollywood likes to consider itself as the middle of the movie global, 92 years of Oscar nominations strengthen Bongs declare that the Oscars are very native. Simply 12 overseas language movies have ever been nominated for Easiest Imageand maximum of the ones movies depicted a enormous historic tournament or determine, whether or not its the Holocaust (Lifestyles is Gorgeous), Global Warfare II (Letters from Iwo Jima) or Pablo Neruda (Il Postino). The Academys possible choices pointed to the concept electorate valued the fashionable lives of folks around the globe not up to their historic or American opposite numbers.

In 2000, Ang Lees Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon exploded to $128 million on the North American field place of work, turning into the highest-grossing overseas language movie produced in a foreign country on the American field place of work. The 18th-century martial arts movie, the primary Asian-language film and most effective different one but even so Parasite to land a Easiest Image nod, confirmed that audiences can be keen to learn subtitlesbut additionally bolstered the concept the one overseas movies price taking note of had been those who instructed unique or historic tales. Over the following couple of years, different martial arts movies like Hero and Kung Fu Hustle effectively replicated Crouching Tigers good fortune, however did little to make bigger the scope of overseas language movie in The united states.

Whilst Lee used to be stringing in combination a run of multilingual epics, a brand new technology of Korean filmmakers used to be in the middle of its personal golden age. Emboldened by means of the rustics increasing democratic rights and flush with money from chaebolshuge family-run conglomeratesa bunch of auteurs led by means of the trio Bong Joon-Ho, Kim Ji-woon and Park Chan-wook rose within the 90s with movies like The Quiet Circle of relatives, Joint Safety Space and Barking Canine By no means Chew. In 2004, Parks Oldboy turned into the primary Korean movie to win the Grand Prix at Cannes.

But it surely used to be Bong, specifically, who would chart a trail towards world stardom via a suite of savvy strategic possible choices. Hes ready to suppose 10 years forwardhe understands the trade very, rather well, Jason Bechervaise, an leisure professor at Korea Soongsil Cyber College who additionally wrote a Ph.D. thesis on Bongs paintings, instructed TIME. In 2013, Bong crossed over to Hollywood with Snowpiercer, his first English-language movie, which raised eyebrows for being one of the crucial first movies to return to streaming quickly after theatrical liberate. In 2017, his bilingual movie Okja led to a firestorm at Cannes when target market individuals objected to the inclusion of a Netflix manufacturing within the pageant.

This chaos is all excellent information for Bong as a result of they speak about him, and extra folks turn out to be conscious about who hes, Bechervaise says. Having won a global profileand plenty of top profile pals and admirers like Tilda Swinton and Quentin TarantinoBong ensured that after he returned to Korea to make an absolutely overseas language movie, the sector would nonetheless be paying consideration.

On the similar time, American audiences had been additionally seeing extra faces of colour on their monitors because of the erosion of conventional gatekeepers in movie and tv. In 2015 and 2016, #OscarsSoWhite exploded on Twitter after two consecutive years of all-white performing nominees, main the Academy to announce an initiative to double their selection of feminine and minority individuals by means of 2020. In 2018 and 2019, social media campaigns helped carry Black Panther and Loopy Wealthy Asians to very large field place of work returnsor even non-blockbusters like Roma (in Spanish) and The Farewell (in Mandarin and English) fared higher than anticipated because of insistent strengthen from communities of colour.

All of those successes confirmed manufacturing corporations and vendors that larger illustration used to be, if not anything else, a wise financial transfer. It used to be on this local weather that the distributor Neon got here to the fore as a emerging powerhouse that invested each in English and non-English movies. In 2019, they launched 4 well-received overseas language movies, together with Parasite, Honeyland and Portrait of a Woman on Fireplace.

Whilst conventional movie manufacturing corporations and vendors warmed to a broader vary of releases, in addition they obtained a push from streaming products and services, whose doable subscribers may come from any place on the planet. In 2016, Netflix put a stake down in South Korea, spearheading no longer simply Okja however the zombie collection Kingdom and the romantic teenager drama Love Alarm. Their set of rules positioned Okja in the similar style cluster as Mad Malesthat means that audience with out a enjoy with overseas language movies would possibly nonetheless be triggered to observe it, and provides it a possibility from the relief in their sofa. Within the coming years, the Jap truth display Terrace Area and the Spanish language drama Narcos: Mexico would turn out to be international phenomena.

In Would possibly, Parasite opened at Cannes to an eight-minute status ovation, sooner or later successful the pageants peak prize. In October, the movie opened within the U.S.and because of rapturous critiques, word-of-mouth campaigns that integrated the efforts of Gold Areaan Asian American group that had shaped in 2018 to spice up Loopy Wealthy Asians on the field place of workand the entire components discussed above, Parasite claimed the biggest-ever opening for a global movie within the U.S.

In fact, it used to be no longer simply those exterior components that drove Parasites good fortune, however the high quality of the movie itself. Whilst the film is distinctly Korean in its solution to horror and humor, its incisive exploration of inequality hit the zeitgeist on the actual proper second. Asymmetric distribution of wealth is a illness all of us reside with, anyplace youre, Suk-Younger Kim, a theater and function research professor at UCLA, tells TIME. Its one thing we will be able to all relate to. This topic subject material increased the movie from a neighborhood Korean tale into a bigger wave of films exploring the similar topicfrom Burning to Us to Joker.

And it may possiblyt have harm that the film used to be shot in a emerging middle of tradition and type because of the expanding dominance of Okay-pop. Seoul is a cultural hub: a modern position that extra folks wish to consult with and learn about, Kim says.

Due to a shrewd rollout from Neon, Parasite endured to excel on the field place of work right through the autumn and achieve momentum into awards season. The awards season good fortune of Roma the yr sooner than had eased the trail, as had the the larger range throughout the ranks of the Academy. Since 2015, the proportion of feminine Academy electorate has risen from 25 to 32 %, whilst the selection of minorities has doubled from eight to a nonetheless paltry 16 %. This yr, the invitees hailed from 59 nations.

However the films momentum used to be additionally carried by means of Bong Joon-Ho who led the way in which as a witty and charismatic presence at the circuit. He temporarily turned into the principle tournament at many Oscars events and generated headlines for his extraordinarily quotable speeches. Its not possible to not be charmed by means of him, evidently, Yang says.

In January, Parasite turned into the primary overseas language movie to ever win the SAG Award for absolute best forged of a movement image. Behind the scenes, Choi Woo-shik, who performs Ki-woo, used the platform to open the door for the following technology. Instead of us, there are such a large amount of legends available in the market in overseas nations, he stated. I truly in point of fact hope that once this second, possibly subsequent yr, we will be able to see extra foreign-language movies and Asian movies.

Whilst the SAG Awards had been a thrilling bit of popularity, the Oscars had been any other topic. It used to be broadly anticipated that Parasite would fall to the closely appreciated 1917, that means that the primary non-English Easiest Image winner must wait a minimum of any other yr. However Parasite pulled out a shocking disappointed, a lot to thrill of many on-linewho christened themselves the #BongHiveand the celebs within the target market. When the manufacturers attempted to show the lighting fixtures out on a display that ran part an hour extra time, the gang roared at them to let Parasites group end.

I dont truly consider in God however God bless Tom Hanks for main the price to stay the lighting fixtures on in order that Bong Joon-Ho and the #Parasite team may end talking and completely experience their victory. #Oscarspic.twitter.com/hawx8PKMcL

Jay Thomas (@ThisJayThomas) February 10, 2020

However Parasites absolute best image win does no longer ensure lasting alternate. The Korean movie trade has not too long ago turn out to be stagnantwith admissions plateauing since 2013and top-heavy, with many blockbusters taking over an expanding quantity of house at theaters. (Ultimate yr, a Korean Movie Council find out about stated that on any given day, 67.5% of all screenings can be occupied by means of the 3 maximum screened movies).

And whilst any film by means of Bong, Park and Kim draws fashionable pastime, the remainder of the rustics filmmakers are a long way much less identified around the globe. The trade, globally a minimum of, is closely reliant at the auteurs, Bechervaise says. He worries that the instances that ended in their ingenious upward push arent replicableand that younger filmmakers is not going to most effective need to deal with the trios lengthy shadow, however festival from the onslaught of world content material arriving in Korea because of streaming products and services.

However for some Korean filmmakers, Parasites good fortune is already inflicting a trickle-down impact. On the 2020 Global Movie Pageant Rotterdam remaining week, the director Kim Yong-hoon spotted a transformation in the way in which folks had been having a look at his new movie Beasts Clawing at Straws. I for sure felt this larger international pastime, no longer most effective from the pageant programmer however from the target market, he wrote in an e mail to TIME via a translator. Those world movie trade folks now realize that there are many excellent filmmakers in Korea.

Beasts Clawing at Straws received the pageants particular jury award, whilst any other Korean movie, Yoon Dan-bis Transferring On, received the Shiny Long term prize. At Sundance, Lee Isaac Chungs Minari, which is about in Arkansas however spoken most commonly in Korean, made a giant splash, successful the Target market Award and the Grand Jury Prize for the dramatic class. The Steven Yuen-led movie, produced by means of Brad Pitts corporate Plan B Leisure, can be dispensed by means of A24, which effectively introduced motion pictures like Moonlight and Woman Chicken.

So any person hoping to search out the following Parasite receivedt have to seem a long way. The Fact, Hirokazu Kore-edas first non-Jap-language movie, stars two French legends in Catherine Deneuve and Juliette Binoche and arrives in March. On streaming, Alan Yangs Tigertail, which is most commonly delivered in numerous Chinese language dialects, will arrive on Netflix, whilst an adaptation of Min Jin Lees Pachinko in Jap and Korean is within the works at Apple. Due to Parasite, all of them find a way to make an have an effect on no longer simply at Movie Discussion board however throughout america and the sector.

I believe Parasite is usually a milestone and on the similar time a motivation to the following technology filmmakers, Kim Yong-hoon says. It is a massive alternative.

More:

Parasites Easiest Image Oscar Is Historical. Is This the Starting of a New Generation in Movie? - MR Invasion

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on Parasites Easiest Image Oscar Is Historical. Is This the Starting of a New Generation in Movie? – MR Invasion

Warner Bros. and HBO Max Team Up on New Label to Produce Movies for the Streaming Service – IndieWire

Posted: at 2:42 am

HBO Max and its corporate sibling Warner Bros. announced today theyre teaming up to launch a new label that will produce movies for WarnerMedias HBO Max streaming service. The label, Warner Max, will produce eight to 10 films annually for the service, which launches in May, with the first titles dropping on the platform at some point this year.

The label will deal in mid-budget releases, the kind of films that have increasingly disappeared from theaters in favor of streaming-only distribution. Its a strategy already being employed by Disney with its four-month-old Disney+ service: The studio remains committed to theatrical tentpoles like the upcoming Marvel title Black Widow, while giving a streaming debut to mid-budget fare like the live-action Lady and the Tramp.

Warner Max hasnt yet made its slate public, but its likely some previously announced projects, like the Melissa McCarthy vehicle Superintelligence, will be among the first films to bear the labels name. Director Ben Falcone earlier this year said the film would not get a theatrical release, a wise financial decision given the downward trend in McCarthys box-office grosses, like the most recent Falcone-McCarthy collaboration Life of the Party.

With a $65.85 million gross on an estimated $30 million budget, it was their poorest-performing film to date. While a McCarthy-starring film may not be enough to drive people to theaters in droves, the comedian remains popular and a recognizable name: The film will be an attractive addition to HBO Maxs slate as streamers have doubled down on their commitment to exclusive, high-quality content. Thats a trend thats played out at Netflix, which just extended its deal with Adam Sandler to produce more streaming-only movies.

However, the company says Warners and New Line Cinema will each continue to release mid-budget movies for theatrical distribution, while Warner Max will create a new pipeline for filmmakers looking to make a particular type of film or connect with a specific audience that would be best reached in the streaming environment.

Awards hopefuls were among the mid-budget movies released by Warner Bros. in theaters last year, including Clint Eastwoods Richard Jewell, which earned an Oscar nomination for supporting actress Kathy Bates, and Edward Nortons Motherless Brooklyn, which got a Golden Globe nod for original score.

Day-to-day operations at the label will be handled byJessie Henderson, executive VP of original feature films for HBO Max, who will jointly report to Warner Bros. Pictures COO Carolyn Blackwood and HBO Maxs Head of Original Content Sarah Aubrey. HBO Maxs Chief Content Officer Kevin Reilly and Warner Bros. Pictures Group Chairman Toby Emmerich together share greenlight responsibility for Warner Max films.

In the streaming wars, ensuring quality is not sacrificed in the name of quantity is the name of the game. Just Tuesday, Disney CEO Bob Iger highlighted several times on the companys Q1 earnings call that quality original films and series played a big part in making Disney+ such a huge success.

Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

Go here to see the original:

Warner Bros. and HBO Max Team Up on New Label to Produce Movies for the Streaming Service - IndieWire

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Warner Bros. and HBO Max Team Up on New Label to Produce Movies for the Streaming Service – IndieWire

Quibi Trailers: Kiefer Sutherland Chases a New ‘Fugitive’, Forte and Olsen Get ‘Flipped’, and Idris Takes the Wheel in ‘Elba vs. Block’ – /FILM

Posted: at 2:42 am

We made fun of its name when it was first announced, but it looks like Quibi might get the last laugh.

The mobile-only streaming service, which has over $1 billion to throw around, the support of every single major Hollywood studio, and deals in place with tons of top-tier filmmakers, is going to debut this April, and trailers for its shows are beginning to make their way online. Weve gathered the first few below, and this is only the tip of the iceberg.

Kiefer Sutherland is back in Jack Bauer mode in a new iteration of The Fugitive, in which hes playing the Tommy Lee Jones-esque authority figure hunting down a man (Boyd Holbrook) who seems to have committed a crime. This isnt a straight remake of the 1960s show or the 1993 Harrison Ford movie, but instead puts a modern spin on that classic innocent man on the run premise. Scorpion creator Nick Santora is behind this version. Heres the shows official synopsis:

When a bomb rips through the Los Angeles subway train hes riding on, blue-collar Mike Ferro (Holbrook) just wants to make sure his wife, Allison, and 10-year-old daughter, Pearl, are safe. But the faulty evidence on the ground and tweet-now, confirm-later journalism paint a nightmarish picture: it looks to all the world that Mike was responsible for the heinous act. Wrongfullyand very publiclyaccused, Mike must prove his innocence by uncovering the real perpetrator, before the legendary cop (Sutherland) heading the investigation can apprehend him.

Will Forte (The Last Man on Earth) and Kaitlin Olson (Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia) star in Flipped, which Id never heard of before today. Forte and Olson are incredibly gifted comedic performers, and idea of aspiring reality stars finding a stash of money, making their dreams come true, and having the cartel catch up with them sounds like it has a lot of potential. Flipped is created and written by Damon Jones and Steve Mallory (Superintelligence), and directed by newcomer Ryan Case.

Idris Elba has experience starring in an adventurous reality show (check out 2017s Idris Elba: Fighter), but now hes trying to best professional driver Ken Block in a new series that looks like itll be lots of fun for people who care about the intersection of mainstream actors and precision driving.

And lets not forget about the revival of MTVs Punkd, which was formerly hosted by Ashton Kutcher but is now in the capable hands of Chance the Rapper.

Quibi, which is banking on audiences getting hooked on bite-sized chunks of content that last ten minutes or less, will cost$4.99a month with advertising and$7.99without. The service will feature three distinct sections of programming:

Excerpt from:

Quibi Trailers: Kiefer Sutherland Chases a New 'Fugitive', Forte and Olsen Get 'Flipped', and Idris Takes the Wheel in 'Elba vs. Block' - /FILM

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Quibi Trailers: Kiefer Sutherland Chases a New ‘Fugitive’, Forte and Olsen Get ‘Flipped’, and Idris Takes the Wheel in ‘Elba vs. Block’ – /FILM

How Private Companies Are Changing The Future Of Space Exploration – WAMU 88.5

Posted: at 2:41 am

  1. How Private Companies Are Changing The Future Of Space Exploration  WAMU 88.5
  2. Back to Space: President Trump pushes to fund space exploration  WLOX
  3. Trump's NASA Budget Will Earmark 12% Boost for Agency in 2021  The Wall Street Journal
  4. Trump touts Space Force, moon and Mars plans in State of the Union address  Space.com
  5. Are we in the middle of a new space race for this century?  MIT Technology Review
  6. View full coverage on Google News

The rest is here:

How Private Companies Are Changing The Future Of Space Exploration - WAMU 88.5

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on How Private Companies Are Changing The Future Of Space Exploration – WAMU 88.5

The biggest threat to space commerce is the sun – Bowling Green Daily News

Posted: at 2:41 am

On the list of bad stuff that could happen, a massive plasma ejection from the sun isnt an everyday worry, falling somewhere between an irrevocably warming climate and a shortage of soy milk in the office fridge.

Yet our stars output plays a critical role in space weather, which carries potentially large implications for satellites, mobile phones, airlines and electrical grids in other words, the underpinnings of 21st century society. In March 1989, a solar storm that struck Earth zapped the grid in Quebec, causing most of the province to lose electricity and doing billions of dollars in damage.

Three decades on, a similar solar outburst could do a lot more damage. Even the U.S. National Intelligence Council in 2012 called such an event, if severe enough, one of its black swans, along with nuclear war, a global pandemic, collapse of the European Union and U.S. disengagement.

Scheduled for liftoff Sunday from Cape Canaveral in Florida, a joint $1.5 billion mission by the European Space Agency and NASA is aimed at expanding our understanding of the sun at a critical time for both space exploration and space commerce. Safely negotiating the solar system rife with radiation and other highly charged particles is essential for any long-duration human endeavors in deep space.

Along with protecting vulnerable systems on the ground, a more thorough understanding of space weather may also allow us to better protect flocks of new satellites (not to mention the 2,000 satellites already up there) filling up the night skies.

The probability of an extreme solar event striking Earth is akin to a 100-year flood, with a 12 percent chance over a decade, according to a 2014 research paper by Peter Riley, a co-investigator on the Solar Orbiter mission and senior scientist at Predictive Science Inc., a San Diego-based solar astrophysics research firm.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations Geomagnetic Storm Scale rates such events on a five-level scale, with a G5, or extreme storm, having the capacity to cause electrical grid collapse or blackouts and degraded satellite navigation.

For perspective on how expensive such disruptions could be, tallies of the economic cost of the electrical outage in the northeastern U.S. in August 2003 (courtesy of a utility software bug) range as high as $10.3 billion, according to ICF Consulting Services.

As a result, theres a definite case for protecting against future outages of the sun-made variety. Theres one big problem, however: Enormous scientific mysteries remain about how the sun operates.

Everything is driven by the sun, said Nicola Fox, director of NASAs heliophysics division. So we really, really want to understand this star.

The Solar Orbiter carries 10 instruments and will become the first spacecraft to capture images and other data from the suns poles. It will fly as close as 26 million miles from the solar surface (the Earth is, on average, about 93 million miles away). The orbiter will work in concert with another NASA mission, the Parker Solar Probe, to provide complementary measurements and context on the data.

Solar Orbiter is scheduled to launch aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket configured with only a single solid booster to optimize for the thrust needed to head toward the sun. The probe will collect data starting in May with its primary mission beginning in November 2021.

The sun is considered a yellow dwarf star. Scientists began paying close attention to its sunspots back in 1755, using 11-year activity cycles that alternate between periods of minimal and maximal sunspot activity. Increased sunspot activity is usually a harbinger of solar flares and coronal mass ejections. These can in turn cause magnetic storms that could affect Earth.

The current cycle has been one of the least active. In December, the U.S. Space Weather Prediction Center forecast an average intensity for Cycle 25 (predicted to begin this year) that may include about 115 solar storms. Maximum intensity for this cycle is seen occurring around July 2025.

The largest extreme solar event to strike Earth occurred in 1859. Called the Carrington event, it caused telegraph lines to catch fire and made the Aurora Borealis visible as far south as Cuba and Australia. A similar-sized coronal mass ejection July 23, 2012, though not aimed at Earth, served as a warning for many of the potential global economic catastrophe that could result.

It even got Wall Streets attention, via a prominent mention in a 2014 investor letter from New York hedge fund Elliott Management.

If that had hit the Earth, Riley said, there would have been major consequences.

While the Solar Orbiter is aimed at conducting science without any real-time monitoring functions, the mission will indirectly help us to understand extreme solar events, he said.

Rileys work involves the crafts magnetometer, which will make detailed readings of the magnetic fields at and near the sun.

The research will also inform work on how to forecast solar activity more precisely, with one of Solar Orbiters key goals to try to learn how coronal mass ejections form and how theyre accelerated into space.

I am excited about this mission because its going to address some really basic science questions, Riley said.

Originally posted here:

The biggest threat to space commerce is the sun - Bowling Green Daily News

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on The biggest threat to space commerce is the sun – Bowling Green Daily News

The space where Jeff Bezos will spend his money after space exploration is clear – Somag News

Posted: at 2:41 am

Apart from Amazon, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos also owns a space research company called Blue Origin. Although Bezos says that the only way to evaluate its financial resources in the past period is space research, it is currently oriented towards different investments. Lets take a closer look at Jeff Bezos new target.

Approximately 1 week ago, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, who managed to add $ 13.5 billion to his fortune in just 15 minutes, is now the richest person in the world, according to Forbes. Bezos, who owns Blue Origin and Washington Post as well as Amazon, is a name that evaluates its financial resources quite interestingly.

Jeff Bezos, one of the billionaires who spent their money on extraordinary things, said Space travel is the only option in response to a question posed to him how he could use his assets in the past period. Bezos, who made a serious investment in Blue Origin in accordance with his response, seems to be turning to different investments these days.

The new goal of Jeff Bezos; Bel Air and Beverly Hills mansions:According to the New York Post, Bezos and his girlfriend Lauren Sanchez went on a manor hunt in the Bel Air and Beverly Hills areas of the USA. It was stated that a manor built on an area of 40,000 square meters is on the agenda and the price of this manor is determined as 225 million dollars.

Bezos, who bought 3 different properties in Manhattan after the Amazon could not agree to open a second center in New York, is thought to direct its investments to the real estate area. Of course, these developments do not mean that Bezos will cut Blue Origins budget because Bezos sees this company as a means of realizing his dreams.

Bezos, who bought two artworks in 2019: $ 52.5 million and the other $ 18.5 million, may want to create a collection in this area as well. The fact that Bezos wealth is growing day by day seems to trigger the desire to invest in different fields. We will be sharing with you by following the developments on the subject. Stay tuned to avoid missing.

Read more:

The space where Jeff Bezos will spend his money after space exploration is clear - Somag News

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on The space where Jeff Bezos will spend his money after space exploration is clear – Somag News

Eyes to the skies: Rocket launch to be visible in DC region – WTOP

Posted: at 2:41 am

NASA Wallops Flight Facility is scheduled to launch a rocket tonight that will be visible to the DMV as it climbs into the sunset sky.

NASA Wallops Flight Facility is scheduled to launch a rocket tonight that will be visible to the DMV as it climbs into the sunset sky.

The facility hopes to launch the 13th Northrop Grumman resupply mission to the International Space Station (ISS) at 5:39 p.m. near sunset. The Cygnus cargo ship (spacecraft) is the S.S. Robert H. Lawrence, named for the first ever African American selected as an astronaut.

The launch and mission will be carried live by NASA.

Depending on where you are in the DMV, you might be able watch the rocket ascending into the sky with your own eyes. The visibility map for our area covers quite a bit of territory.

Launch updates can be obtained via NASA Wallops Flight Facility Twitter and Facebook. There is also a nifty launch app, NASA WFF MISSION STATUS CENTER, you can check.

Weather prospects are promising for the launch and should allow most a chance to see the rocket in flight.

It is possible to see the launch from Wallops Visitor Center and surrounding areas but traffic is typically heavy during these occasions. I will be watching and photographing from Hampton Roads, Virginia, which means I should see the Antares rocket about 60 seconds after launch. Ill post any pics or video that I get on my Twitter.

On Monday, I will be participating in NASAs agency wide State of NASA at Langley Research Center (LaRC). The all day event will be a behind the scenes look at LaRC and what the Center is doing to support NASAs Artemis program. Ill be posting on my Twitter feed so follow along.

Follow my Twitter @SkyGuyinVA and daily blog to keep up with the latest news in astronomy and space exploration. You can email me at skyguyinva@gmail.com.

Like WTOP on Facebook and follow @WTOP on Twitter to engage in conversation about this article and others.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

2020 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Visit link:

Eyes to the skies: Rocket launch to be visible in DC region - WTOP

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on Eyes to the skies: Rocket launch to be visible in DC region – WTOP

From internet satellites to moon landings, the space race is on – VentureBeat

Posted: at 2:41 am

The 21st-century space race cranked up a gear this week, with satellite launches, IPOs, investments, and moon landings all on the global agenda.

Yesterday, London-based OneWeb kicked off the first in a series of regular microsatellite launches from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. The company actually launched its initial six satellites last February to gain what it called first mover advantage, but as it commits to creating a constellation of 648 satellites to deliver high-speed internet connectivity from low-Earth orbit in the coming years, its looking to deploy batches of satellites on a near-monthly basis.

The successful manufacture, delivery, and launch of this batch of 34 satellites is the latest proof point of the OneWeb plan, said CEO Adrian Steckel. Importantly, todays mission also brings us closer to our next step, realizing our ultimate vision of providing access to high-speed, reliable internet to everyone, everywhere.

In terms of how these satellites will help people on Earth, OneWeb has already hinted at the kinds of services its infrastructure will support, including a commercial broadband service covering the entire Arctic region that it expects to launch later this year. A full global service is expected to follow in 2021.

OneWeb hasraised north of $3 billion over the past seven years from big-name investors that include Japans SoftBank, but it is just one of several companies endeavoring to monetize regions beyond Earth.

Elon Musks SpaceX last month launched its fourth batch of satellites into orbit, and it now claims some 240 Starlink satellites in space. While SpaceX itself has remained a private company throughout all its rocket launches and space tourism plans, news emerged yesterday that it plans to spin Starlink into a standalone public company. Right now, we are a private company, but Starlink is the right kind of business that we can go ahead and take public, said SpaceX chief operating officer Gwynne Shotwell.

Elsewhere, Amazon is planning a network of low-orbit satellites, though it hasnt yet announced a time frame for the effort. Last week, the company asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to grant it expeditious approval to launch its Project Kuiper satellite network after it missed a November 2016 licensing deadline to access the necessary radiowaves.

SpaceX and OneWeb oppose the petition and are are lobbying the FCC to not give their rival any special treatment, but Amazon seems bent on entering the microsatellite fray. As part of this push, it announced yesterday that it would create 15,000 new roles in Bellevue, Washington, a significant increase on the 2,000 Amazonians currently based there. The new hires will be spread across several Amazon units, including devices, Amazon Web Services, and Project Kuiper.

Also yesterday, Toulouse, France-based Kinis a spinout from aeronautics giant CLS announced that it has raised $110 million to create a constellation of nanosatellites aimed squarely at the internet of things (IoT). The constellation will enter orbit in 2021, and the company said it plans to connect several million objects globally within a decade.

With the funds needed to launch our constellation, we are now free to focus entirely on satellite manufacturing and commercial deployment, said Kinis president Alexandre Tisserant in a statement.

Back in the U.S., NASA is entering a critical phase in meeting the Trump administrations ambitious plans to put the first woman and next man on the moon in 2024 four years earlier than initially scheduled. This would be the first time any human has set foot on the lunar surface in over 50 years. Looking further into the future, the Artemis program will be used as a launchpad for the next phase of space exploration, which could include sending astronauts to Mars.

The tight turnaround for the Artemis program, and the resources required to meet the deadline, have sparked widespread skepticism, but for now the plans remain firmly in place. Yesterday, NASA announced a major media event that will be hosted at its Silicon Valley Ames Research Center on Monday, February 10. Here, journalists will be invited into the Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel complex to view NASAs aircraft testing facility.

The very same day, the White House will release its fiscal year 2021 budget proposal, which will reveal how much NASA thinks it needs to complete the Artemis program by 2024. This disclosure will either invite more criticism or serve to rally support behind the project and help obtain backing from Congress. During his State of the Union address on Tuesday, President Trump sought to drum up support for Artemis, and for the idea of making the U.S. the first country to put a human on Mars.

In reaffirming our heritage as a free nation, we must remember that America has always been a frontier nation, Trump said. Now we must embrace the next frontier: Americas manifest destiny in the stars. I am asking Congress to fully fund the Artemis program to ensure that the next man and first woman on the moon will be American astronauts, using this as a launching pad to ensure that America is the first nation to plant its flag on Mars.

Whatever happens next, its clear were entering an exciting new phase for space exploration. Richard Bransons Virgin Galactic launched its first test passenger into space last year, and tourists flights are widely expected to commence this year. Jeff Bezos side project Blue Origin is also preparing to go to the moon, with hopes of launching its first manned flight into space in 2020.

If the 20th-century space race was a proxy for the Cold War between the former Soviet Union and the U.S., the 21st-century contest can perhaps be characterized as taking place in a billionaires playground. Entrepreneurs like Musk, Bezos, and Branson, alongside government bodies such as NASA and a slew of well-financed startups, are opening a whole new era for space exploration and commercialization. Regardless of the outcome, the space race is very much on.

Visit link:

From internet satellites to moon landings, the space race is on - VentureBeat

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on From internet satellites to moon landings, the space race is on – VentureBeat

What the Hell Is China Doing on the Dark Side of the Moon? – The Daily Beast

Posted: at 2:41 am

One year ago last month, a Chinese robot touched down on the dark side of the moon.

It was the first probe to land on the side of the moon that permanently faces away from Earth as both bodies circle around the sun. And if Beijing realizes its ambitions in coming years, it wont be the last time it makes historyand threatens U.S. dominance in space.

The Change 4 probe and the Yutu 2 rover it carried have stayed busy photographing and scanning minerals, cultivating cotton, potato and rapeseeds, growing yeast, and hatching fruit-fly eggs in the moons low gravity.

The experiments are intriguing in their own right, but Chinas real agenda is more than scientific. For decades, Beijing has been building the infrastructure for an eventual manned mission to the moon, effectively duplicating what the United States achieved in 1969 and hopes to achieve again before 2024.

The reasons for this latter-day space race are clear, experts said, even if the real-world pay-off isnt.

Space has always been symbolic of leadership, through prestige, that translates into strategic influence, Joan Johnson-Freese, a space expert at the Naval War College in Rhode Island, told The Daily Beast. China seeks to be acknowledged as the technology leader in Asia, and there is no more visible place to do that than space.

While the current, high-profile U.S. moon mission is mired in Trump-era politics, Chinas keeps plodding forward with fewer bold pronouncements and more actual accomplishments.

As Change 4 and Yutu 2 work away, the China National Space Administration is quietly planning a follow-up probe. Change 5 could blast off this year. Unlike the one-way Change 4, which is limited to bouncing back data via a relay satellite, its successor is designed to collect samples and bring them back to Earth.

Meanwhile, the Chinese space agency has resumed work on its Tiangong 3 space station and is also testing a new manned capsule for deep-space missions.

When the 22-year-old, U.S.-led International Space Station finally craps out some time in the late 2020s or early 2030s, Tiangong could become the only permanent habitat in low Earth orbit. If the United States wants to maintain a significant human presence over Earth after the ISS, it might have no choice but to ask China for permission to embark.

That would make Tiangong the de facto international space station, Johnson-Freese argued. Neither NASA nor the Chinese space agency responded to requests for comment.

China is in a no-lose situation, Johnson-Freese added via email. It can beat the U.S. (back) to the Moonor notbut soon thereafter be able to say anything the U.S. can do, we can do, too.

To be clear, the United States isnt standing still in space. NASA still leads the International Space Station and in recent years convinced Congress to keep the station in service as long as its basic components were safe and economical.

The U.S. space agency is also deploying a new space telescope and sending probes across the solar system as part of an ever-expanding search for extraterrestrial life.

And then theres the moon. NASA for years has mulled returning human explorers to the lunar surface for the first time since 1972. Not only is there plenty of science to be done, but the moon could also function as a staging base for astronauts heading to Mars. To say nothing of the commercial value of the moons minerals.

Last year, the Trump administration slapped an arbitrary 2024 deadline on a new manned lunar landing. That year, of course, represents the close of a possible second term for Trump. Experts actually tend to agree 2024 is possible, but only if Congress coughs up $30 billionand if there are zero problems developing all the hardware a moon landing requires. Tools like a new heavy rocket, a manned capsule, and a lander.

Rather than flying astronauts directly to the moon, NASA wants to build a lunar space station that could support both moon landings and future Mars missions. That complicates an American return to the moon and underscores the difference between the U.S. and Chinese approaches to space exploration.

What China has that the U.S. has not, is long-term program-sustainability, Johnson-Freese said. The U.S. human exploration program has been operating in fits and starts because each new administration wants to put its stamp on whatever exploration program is announced, with a timetable, but often missing the necessary budget to make it actually feasible.

Trumps Moon shot has already shown signs of falling apart. Developing the manned lander was always the riskiest part, according to John Logsdon, a professor emeritus of political science and international affairs at George Washington University and a former NASA adviser. NASA hasnt built one in nearly half a century.

Wary of throwing good money after bad, Congress approved only half of the billion dollars NASA wanted for the mission in 2020. Our appetite doesnt match our allocations, Logsdon told The Daily Beast.

Chinas more deliberate journey into space could be an attractive model for other, smaller space-faring countries. For decades, the United States has been the world leader in space, organizing other nationsincluding rivals like Russiato explore the galaxy for the benefit of all humankind.

That could change as the competing moon missionsand the geopolitical fault lines they reflectcome into clearer focus.

As U.S. leadership continues to erode under President Trump, other nations, especially Japan and the E.U., may begin to consider acting more independently and join China in more substantial cooperative space projects, Gregory Kulacki, a space expert with the Massachusetts-based Union of Concerned Scientists, told The Daily Beast.

It could be decades before the end-game is clear, Christopher Impey, a University of Arizona astronomer, told The Daily Beast. If you take the long view, which the Chinese always do, in 50 to 100 years we will be living in the solar system and there will be a substantial economic activity off-Earth, he said.

They want to be first, Impey added of the Chinese, and they want to be in the drivers seat for that future.

See original here:

What the Hell Is China Doing on the Dark Side of the Moon? - The Daily Beast

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on What the Hell Is China Doing on the Dark Side of the Moon? – The Daily Beast