The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: January 2020
How Fox News Influences and Covers the Impeachment Trial – Free Speech TV
Posted: January 25, 2020 at 2:10 pm
Sonali Kolhatkar speaks with Julie Millican, Vice President of Media Matters for America.
As the Senate impeachment trial against President Donald Trump continues this week there has been wall-to-wall media coverage of the historical event given that it is only the third time in the nations entire history that US Senators are being asked to consider removing a President from office. But one media outlet stands out in its coverage and that is, of course, the Presidents favorite: Fox News.
Fox News, which has a symbiotic relationship with the current White House, has not only mocked the case for impeachment as harshly as possible and claimed the Presidents innocence, but has also seen its own talking points reflected back by the President legal defense team.
Rising Up with Sonali is a radio and television show that brings progressive news coverage rooted in gender and racial justice to a wide audience.
Rising Up With Sonali was built on the foundation of Sonali Kolhatkar's earlier show, Uprising, which became the longest-running drive-time radio show on KPFK in Los Angeles hosted by a woman. RUS airs on Free Speech TV every weekday.
Missed an episode? Check out Rising Up on FSTV VOD anytime or visit the show page for the latest clips.
#FreeSpeechTV is one of the last standing national, independent news networks committed to advancing progressive social change.
As the alternative to television networks owned by billionaires, governments, and corporations, our network amplifies underrepresented voices and those working on the front lines of social, economic and environmental justice.
#FSTV is available on Dish, DirectTV, AppleTV, Roku, Sling and online at freespeech.org.
Donald Trump Fox Fox News Free Speech TV impeachment Impeachment Trial Julie Millican Media Matters for America Sonali Kolhatkar United States White House
Read more:
How Fox News Influences and Covers the Impeachment Trial - Free Speech TV
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on How Fox News Influences and Covers the Impeachment Trial – Free Speech TV
Facebook ‘on the side of free expression’ as EU steps up disinformation fight – EURACTIV
Posted: at 2:10 pm
Social media giant Facebook has warned against curtailing freedom of expression as the EU considers measures to clamp down on disinformation campaigns across online platforms.
In the online world, the scope of what we deem to be acceptable speech has narrowed over recent years, leading to potential erosions in freedom of expression, said Nick Clegg, Facebooks Facebooks VP for Global Affairs, at Romes LUISS Guido Carli University on Tuesday (21 January).
Even though other social media companies, such as Twitter, have committed to ban political advertising online, Facebook has repeatedly resisted pressure to take action against political advertising across its platforms.
In the end you need to be careful once you have curtailed free speech because once you have curtailed it you cant turn it back, he said, adding that Facebooks position is to err on the side of free expression where that fine line has to be crossed.
Despite Facebooks commitment to ensuring that free speech is allowed to continue across its platforms, Clegg renewed previous calls for regulation across four areas of its operation: harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability.
EU fight against disinformation
Meanwhile in Brussels, the European Commission revealed that the EUs Democracy Action Plan, set to be released later this year, will establish measures in the fight against disinformation while also attempting to ensure free and fair elections, as well as addressing media sustainability.
A project team on media pluralism and media freedom as part of the Commissioners Group on European Democracy has been established to work on issues related to sustainability in the industry, Vra Jourov, the Commissions Vice-President for Values and Transparency, said yesterday. Members of the group include Jourov and Executive Vice-President Vestager, as well as commissioners Breton, Gabriel, Reynders, and Vrhelyi. The first meeting of the collective has been planned for early February.
Throughout last year, and particularly in the run up to the May 2019 elections, the European Commission had attempted to do its part to quell the spread of fake news with the introduction of a code of practice against disinformation.
Thecode was a voluntary framework aiming to stamp out the spread of fake news online. Signatories to the set of measures included Facebook, Google and Twitter.
In October, as part of the release of the first annual self-assessments reports of the code, the European Commission highlighted substantial concerns regarding access to data for independent scrutiny of tech platforms efforts against disinformation.
In a statement, the Commission said tech platforms have not been permitting sufficient access to their data to meet the needs of independent scrutiny and there is an urgent need for platforms including Facebook, Twitter and Google to establish better relationships with researchers and fact-checkers looking to probe the work platforms conduct in order to stifle disinformation.
More broadly, at the start of this year, Facebook announced plans to stamp out political manipulation online ahead of the November 2020 US Presidential election, allowing users to turn-off certain ad-targeting tools.
The decision comes after serious concerns related to Russian interference in the 2016 election and the misuse of user data as part of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
[Edited by Frdric Simon]
Continue reading here:
Facebook 'on the side of free expression' as EU steps up disinformation fight - EURACTIV
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Facebook ‘on the side of free expression’ as EU steps up disinformation fight – EURACTIV
The answer to speech we don’t like is more speech – observer-me.com
Posted: at 2:10 pm
Principles are pretty easy to have. It doesn't take much effort to say that you believe in things like free expression, multiculturalism, religious tolerance, a limited government, social justice or fiscal austerity.
Principles are pretty easy to have. It doesnt take much effort to say that you believe in things like free expression, multiculturalism, religious tolerance, a limited government, social justice or fiscal austerity.
The problem, though, is that living out those principles is made quite difficult by our flawed, tribal, primate minds.
An evolutionary holdover of 200,000 years of human development we yearn for small, close-knit groups of us, that are distinct and better to the barbarians that are them.
This is why cliques form in high school. This is why many people join Greek organizations in college. Its why we join message boards for our favorite sports teams, and participate in social media. And yes, this is why people join political parties.
Man is a social creature, but he does not have a universal love of all his brothers. He craves a tribe.
So, when a persons supposed principles come into conflict with their tribal allegiances, the caveman DNA emerges and demands loyalty to the tribe, above that of the principle.
And so, as we have seen lately, supposed advocates of free speech are quite happy to attempt to shut up people they dont like. People that arent in their tribe.
For much of American history, there were brave groups of people that understood how important it was to place principle over tribe. There were those who were willing to set aside those tribal loyalties, in favor of the larger ideal.
The American Civil Liberties Union, for instance, rather famously defended the free speech rights of members of the Ku Klux Klan in the landmark Supreme Court case of Brandenburg v. Ohio.
The American Founders understood this. He that would make his own liberty secure, Thomas Paine once wrote, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Last week, here in Maine, we saw just how far we have fallen from Paines ideal, and the ACLUs example.
Michelle Malkin was invited to Maine to speak by the local chapter of the College Republicans at the University of Maine. She is a controversial speaker herself and has drawn fire from the left and the right for refusing to disavow America First nationalist Nick Fuentes for some of his more disgusting opinions. This was the reason cited for their faculty adviser, Amy Fried, withdrawing from the group, which decertified them with the university.
Then a maelstrom happened, whereby the group was forced to move the event not once, not twice, but three times, before finally settling at their fourth venue. The university says they did not pressure the venues to close the event, and after speaking with some of the venues in question myself, I actually believe that.
It was made clear to the venues that holding the event would be detrimental to their operations, and so they decided to cancel the events.
Look, Malkin has never really been my cup of tea, and I find Fuentes to be troubling and dangerous. But if you really have that much of a problem with either, the solution to speech you find so reprehensible should never be to shut it down. That only inspires resentment, and makes people more curious about what could be so scary about a speech, and aids in the message being spread.
The solution to speech is more speech. Have a protest, but do not threaten businesses for allowing people to speak. Make a speech of your own. Use social media and make a better case for why they are wrong.
In the end, any attempt to shut someone up merely makes their voice that much bigger, and yours smaller. So ditch the tribe, and fight for a principle we should all believe in for once, no matter how uncomfortable that makes us.
Matthew Gagnon of Yarmouth is the chief executive officer of the Maine Heritage Policy Center, a free market policy think tank based in Portland. A Hampden native, he previously served as a senior strategist for the Republican Governors Association in Washington, D.C.
See original here:
The answer to speech we don't like is more speech - observer-me.com
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on The answer to speech we don’t like is more speech – observer-me.com
An Executive Order against Antisemitism Is Being Used to Justify Censorship – National Review
Posted: at 2:10 pm
President Donald Trump holds up an executive order on antisemitism in the East Room of the White House December 11, 2019. (Tom Brenner/Reuters)Requiring the government to consider someones political views to determine whether their conduct is punishable leads to no good.
These are challenging times to be Jewish in America.
I attend synagogue, and my children attend Jewish day school, under the watchful eye of armed guards. When I explained to my young daughter why my husband was out the other night he attended a simulated security drill at our synagogue, where he serves on the board she asked whether I thought bad people might come to our synagogue and whether I would find her and protect her if they did. Needless to say, my heart broke into a million pieces.
Whats particularly distressing about the current moment is that the antisemitism feels like it comes from every direction. White supremacists and the progressive Left, for example, have practically nothing in common, yet members of both groups can be found trading in antisemitic tropes and stereotypes. Its a bit too much like that line from Tom Lehrers National Brotherhood Week, where he sings,
Oh the Protestants hate the Catholics,and the Catholics hate the Protestants,and the Hindus hate the Muslims,and everybody hates the Jews.
And yet, antisemitism often goes unacknowledged, particularly at Americas colleges and universities.Thats why, in December, many people cheered the presidents new executive order on antisemitism for addressing a problem that too many have turned a blind eye to: the rise of antisemitism on college campuses.
Last spring, for example, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill hosted a conference entitled Conflict Over Gaza: People, Politics, and Possibilities. The conference featured Tamer Nafar, a Palestinian rapper, performing what he proudly called an anti-Semitic song. Undercover video taken by filmmaker Ami Horowitz showed Tamer asking the audience to join in, saying, I cannot be antisemitic alone followed by audience members singing gleefully along as Tamer sang, Im in love with a Jew ... When confronted with the recording, UNC defensively stated that it misconstrued the breadth of discourse that took place at the conference. It is difficult to imagine such indifference from a university if similar rhetoric had been directed at almost any other group.
As both an advocate of free speech on campus and an observant, pro-Israel Jew, these problems have been on my mind a great deal. Unfortunately, the relief at finally having the reality on campus acknowledged has, for many people, obscured problems with the executive order that threaten everyones freedom of speech in the long run.
First, the good news: The order promises robust enforcement of campus anti-discrimination laws to prevent antisemitic harassment. The longstanding policy of the Department of Education is that discrimination against Jews is covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically its prohibition of discrimination based on national origin, and the portion of the executive order locking in this policy signaled the administrations commitment to robustly enforcing it.
But unfortunately, the executive order did not end there. Instead, it directed federal agencies, in considering whether conduct was antisemitic, to consider a very specific definition of antisemitism and very specific examples of it. Those examples include protected political speech, such as drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis and denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Many Jews may find these views noxious. And yes, some of the people who hold these views may, in fact, be antisemitic. But requiring the government to even consider someones political views to determine whether or not their conduct is punishable is a recipe for disaster and will ultimately only hurt the people it was intended to help. Do we really want the federal government defining all of the worlds -isms? What happens when President Joe Biden issues an executive order on Islamophobia directing the government to consider things like denying the Palestinian people their right to self-determination or drawing comparisons between Hamas and the Nazis as evidence of a prohibited anti-Muslim or anti-Arab motive? Or when opposition to affirmative action, or even a vote for Donald Trump, are legally considered evidence of racism?
When we open the door to drawing distinctions among speakers based on their political views, that door will not easily be closed again and all of our rights are at risk.
We are already seeing evidence that people are seeking to use the executive order to justify censorship of protected speech. For example, several Jewish organizations are demanding that the University of Michigan cancel an upcoming Youth for Palestine conference being hosted on its campus, and are citing the new executive order in support of their argument that the conference could lead to harassment of Jewish students. Now of course, if conference participants do harass Jewish students, that could indeed be grounds for a Title VI complaint. But the idea that the university should impose a prior restraint by canceling the conference because of the views of its organizers and attendees is wholly inconsistent with the most basic principles of free speech and association.
The fear that I and other Jewish people feel right now is real. But that fear cannot justify infringing on our most fundamental liberties. Instead, we should focus our energies on ways to fight antisemitism, on campus and beyond, without compromising freedom of speech. For example, we can support legislative efforts to forbid, at institutions of higher education, discriminatory harassment based on religion. We should also work diligently to expose campus antisemitism to public scrutiny, as Ami Horowitz did when he took and publicized video of the viciously antisemitic rhetoric at the UNC conference.
As Supreme Court justice and committed Zionist Louis Brandeis famously said, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
View original post here:
An Executive Order against Antisemitism Is Being Used to Justify Censorship - National Review
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on An Executive Order against Antisemitism Is Being Used to Justify Censorship – National Review
The Enemies of Writing – The Atlantic
Posted: at 2:10 pm
In 2015, PEN America, an organization I belong to and admire, gave its first Freedom of Expression Courage Award to Charlie Hebdo, the satirical French weekly. Four months earlier, two jihadists had slaughtered most of the papers staff at its weekly meeting in Paris. The award caused a lot of controversy among American writers. More than 200 PEN members denounced it, including some of the countrys most illustrious writers, and half a dozen table hosts refused to attend the awards ceremony. Charlie Hebdos satire, often juvenile, also took aim at intolerance in the Catholic Church and Orthodox Judaism, but the PEN writers found its crude caricatures of angry imams and the Prophet Muhammad beyond the pale. Theocratic Islam should be off-limits to satirists, the PEN writers argued, because French Muslims belonged to a marginalized, embattled, and victimized group. So do French Jews; so, at that moment, did French satirists. In fact, it took some nerve to argue that the balance of power between the heavily armed jihadists and the defenseless cartoonists was with the latter. These 200 writers wouldnt honor other writers who had paid the ultimate price for expression. They were members of an organization dedicated to free speech, but they wouldnt defend it in the face of murder. As Salman Rushdie said, I hope nobody ever comes after them. To its great credit, PEN held its ground.
Two years later, PEN gave the same Freedom of Expression Courage Award to the Womens March. This time there was no controversy, because PEN members overwhelmingly supported the cause. The next year the award went to three student gun-control activists, and the year after to Anita Hill. However admirable, however courageous, the winners were no longer writers, and the issue was no longer freedom of speech. Perhaps the searing experience of 2015the murders, the controversy that divided PEN, and then the incredibly tense awards ceremony, with riot police and bomb-sniffing dogs all around the Museum of Natural Historyhad taken some of the heart out of freedom of expression courage. After Charlie Hebdo, it became an award for American political activism. PEN was honoring heroes on its sidepublic figures whom the majority of American writers wholeheartedly support. The award became less about freedom than about belonging. As Charlie Hebdo showed, free speech, which is the foundation of every writers work, can be tough going.
Among the enemies of writing, belonging is closely related to fear. Its strange to say this, but a kind of fear pervades the literary and journalistic worlds Im familiar with. I dont mean that editors and writers live in terror of being sent to prison. Its true that the president calls journalists enemies of the American people, and its not an easy time to be one, but were still free to investigate him. Michael Moore and Robert De Niro can fantasize aloud about punching Donald Trump in the face or hitting him with a bag of excrement, and the only consequence is an online fuss. Nor are Islamist jihadists or white nationalists sticking knives in the backs of poets and philosophers on American city streets. The fear is more subtle and, in a way, more crippling. Its the fear of moral judgment, public shaming, social ridicule, and ostracism. Its the fear of landing on the wrong side of whatever group matters to you. An orthodoxy enforced by social pressure can be more powerful than official ideology, because popular outrage has more weight than the party line.
Read the rest here:
The Enemies of Writing - The Atlantic
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on The Enemies of Writing – The Atlantic
GSMP seeking community input on Vision 2025 – Hays Free Press
Posted: at 2:09 pm
The Greater San Marcos Partnership (GSMP), the non-profit economic development organization supporting all the communities in Hays County and Caldwell County, including Buda, Dripping Springs, Kyle, Lockhart, Lulling, San Marcos and Wimberley is requesting community input to help guide the Greater San Marcos regions economic development strategic plan for the next five years Vision 2025.
The Vision 2025 planning process will be conducted over a six-month period in collaboration with city and county governments, private businesses, educational institutions, local economic development partners and many other community members/stakeholders across the Greater San Marcos region. GSMP is leading this comprehensive process to assess and enhance the regions competitive position to support thoughtful, diverse, intentional and sustainable economic growth.
To ensure everyone in the region has the opportunity to provide input on Vision 2025, community members/stakeholders are being asked to participate in an online survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GreaterSanMarcos2025 through Friday, Feb. 7. The survey will take approximately 15 minutes to complete and responses are entirely anonymous. Participants will be asked to evaluate the regions strengths and challenges and provide suggestions as it relates to job creation and improving the economy. The online survey is managed by Market Street Services who is also facilitating the development of Vision 2025. Market Street Services is regarded as an industry leader in the development of economic development strategies for communities across the country.
As Co-Chairs of the Vision 2025 Strategic Planning Process, Dr. Denise Trauth, Mr. Anthony Stahl, Rep. John Cyrier and I greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete the Vision 2025 Greater San Marcos Community & Business Survey, said Patrick Rose, immediate past chair of the GSMP. The success of our regions economic growth within Hays and Caldwell counties, over the next five years, will depend upon an insightful and well-informed strategic plan. Your feedback on this survey will help us begin the strategic planning process with the best possible perspective. Thank you for your consideration, as we know and respect the value of your time.
Continued here:
GSMP seeking community input on Vision 2025 - Hays Free Press
Posted in Intentional Communities
Comments Off on GSMP seeking community input on Vision 2025 – Hays Free Press
Leading Civil Rights and Racial Justice Organizations Support and Applaud the WK Kellogg Foundation’s National Day of Racial Healing, January 21, 2020…
Posted: at 2:09 pm
New York, NY.With dailyrace motivated hate crimes happening globally,pausing to participate in a National Day of Racial Healing (#NDORH) is vitally important. On Tuesday, January21, 2020, many organizations, individuals, and communities will be taking collective action during the W.K. Kellogg Foundationsfourthannual National Day of Racial Healing to celebrate our racial diversity and reinforce and honor our common humanity. Among these organizations are the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Racial Equity Anchor Institutions (The Anchors). The Anchors will be creating space toexplore our common humanity and build the relationships necessary to create a more just and equitable world.
The racial equity groups have a formal partnership that has seen them work collaboratively over the past8years to clear barriers toa racially inclusive democracy, champion the humanity of undocumented communities and communities of color, organize to stop mass incarceration and end the criminalization ofNative, Black,Latino,and Asiancommunities.
The purpose of the National Day of Racial Healing is to:
1.Reinforce and honor our common humanity, while noting and celebrating the distinct differences of our various communities.
2.Acknowledge the deep racial divisions in America that must be overcome and healed.
3.Commit to engaging people from all racial and ethnic groups in genuine efforts to increase understanding, communication, caring and respect.
The racial equity organizations have participated in the National Day of Racial Healing since its inception in 2016. The day was established by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and its Truth, Racial Healing & Transformation grantees and partners. The day is a call to action to mobilize communities, organizations, and individuals across the United States in support of truth, racial healing and transformation.To participate in local events, please check theNational Day of Racial Healings website.Participate online by following the hashtag #HowWeHealor joining the national livestream.
TheAdvancement ProjectNational Office,Asian & Pacific Islander Health Forum,Demos,Faith in Action,National Congress of American Indians(NCAI),National Association for the Advancement of Colored People(NAACP),National Urban League,Race ForwardandUnidosUSare a collaborative of nine leading national racial equity anchor organizations supported by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Together, we work to promote racial equity, advance racial healing, and ensure that all children, families, and communities no matter the color of their skin have genuine opportunities to reach their full potential.
Advancement Project, National Office:
If we fail to confront racialized bigotry and hatred in our nation, our only expectation can be the perpetuation of the countrys racialized system of oppression. While we must acknowledge the fact that deep-seated racial divisions continue to propagate institutional injustices, we, like our ancestors must engage people from all backgrounds in sincere attempts to elevate the humanity of all people.
Judith BrowneDianis,Executive Director, Advancement Project, National Office
Asian andPacificIslanderAmericanHealthForum:
In an age when our country is divided, it is important to pause and reflect on our racial diversity, truth telling,and trust building. They are the foundation of our great nationfrom the Atlantic to across the Pacific, including our diversity, and shared history that continues to preserve and sustain our democracy. Today on the National Day of Racial Healing, we must come together as a nation and celebrate our successes and most importantly, remember that there is stillworkto be done to heal our communities from racial injustices. As we find solutions and act to bridge gaps in our communities, we move closer to a more equitable and prosperous country.
Kathy Ko Chin, President & CEO, Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum
We are in a critical moment in this country where the far-reaching roots of racism is breeding new virulent forms of white nationalism,said Demos President K. Sabeel Rahman. If we hope to realize the promise of a truly inclusive democracy, starting today we must be willing to engage in radical conversations about race, commit to dismantling systems of power that harm Black and brown communities, and together embrace a bold vision for racial equity.This is the only path to healing as a nation.
The National Day of Racial Healing sets in motion a constant reminder that we all are in need of healing, and that healing must begin by letting our collective guards down and opening our hearts and minds to understanding each other. This is a country whose potential to be great on all fronts is constantly hindered by our inability to get out of our own way and stop tripping over the false narratives that have held us back. Dr. King knew that in order to change legislation and make a better world for future generations, we needed to change how we see ourselves in order to help others. It is through healing that we can operate from a place of respect, faith, and love and begin to create a Beloved Community.
Rev. Alvin Herring, Faith in Action Executive Director
National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peoples:
In the face of rampant hate crimes that threaten the future of children across this nation, white supremacy and threats on our right to vote, now more than ever, it is crucial that people of color mobilize and voice their experiences in order for us to achieve a just America, saidDerrick Johnson, President and CEO of the NAACP.On this Day of Racial Healing, we encourage all people of color to share their stories and start the essential conversations needed to create a path towards an equitable society.
National Congress of American Indians:
Despite what some proclaim, Americas greatness depends not on the degree to which this nation advances policies of racial and economic inequality that privilege one group of people at the expense of all others. To the contrary, Americas greatness has always risen and fallen on the degree to which this nation embraces its incredible diversity and provides equal footing to all Americans to seize opportunities enabling them to realize their full potential. As the first peoples of this land, Native people are an integral part of the American mosaic, and we will not rest until we secure our rightful place in this countrys future, and equal opportunities to thrive.
Kevin Allis, CEO,National Congress of American Indians
We have been dismayed to see a devastating surge of racial tension and violence over the last few years, saidMarcMorial, President and CEO of the National Urban League. Finding a way to move forward with unity and respect for one another is a matter of survival for our national identity. National Day of Racial Healing is more than a way to embrace diversity and inclusion, but also an opportunity to confront the institutional biases that confront us at every turn. We at the National Urban League are grateful the opportunity to work together with our brother and sister partners in the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Racial Equity AnchorInstitutions, andcommitted to a robust and meaningful national dialogue.
In order for us to achieve racial justice, we must take steps towards a multiracial, democratic society, free from oppression and exploitation, in which people of color thrive with power and purpose,said Glenn Harris President of Race Forward. We must see through the intentional and structural efforts to divide our communities and work towards a shared understanding and shared liberation. This National Day of Racial Healing serves as a continued reminder that organizing is possible, that mobilizingenmasse is inevitable, and that racial equity is achievable, when we commit to trust, love, and the collective advancement of justice.
A few months after a shooter killed 22 people and wounded 24 others in El Paso, TX after being motivated by the white nationalist-inspired myth that Mexicans were systematically replacing White Americans, the need for racial healing in our country has never been greater. As the Kellogg Foundations National Day of Racial Healing recognizes, it is not enough for us to simply call out these and other racially-motivated rhetoric and incidents. We must also come together as Americans, and as human beings, to confront, engage and ultimately transcend the challenges of a diverse nation in order to fully benefit from its promise.
JanetMurguia,President and CEO ofUnidosUS
Read the rest here:
Posted in Intentional Communities
Comments Off on Leading Civil Rights and Racial Justice Organizations Support and Applaud the WK Kellogg Foundation’s National Day of Racial Healing, January 21, 2020…
Five overdose deaths so far this month have Portland on alert – Press Herald
Posted: at 2:09 pm
Portland police said Friday that there have been five deaths among 11 drug overdoses reported in the city so far this month, another sign that the opioid crisis still rages in Maine.
This is a concerning spike we felt necessary to advise the public about so that users and families know what resources and help are available to them, Police Chief Frank Clark said in a statement. We will continue to work with our law enforcement, public health, and prevention partners in hopes of turning the tide on this epidemic.
The recent victims were: a 49-year-old woman, a 22-year-old man, a 24-year-old man, a 35-year-old woman and a 24-year-old man. One of the deaths was an intentional overdose, police said, and all are still under investigation. Police said opioids are the suspected cause in at least two of the five fatalities, and methamphetamine and synthetic marijuana, or spice, were also involved.
On Thursday, state officials released new data that showed a slight increase in overdose deaths in Maine for the first nine months of 2019, reversing a 15 percent decline from 2017 to 2018. From January through September of last year, 277 people died from drug overdoses, putting the state on track for 369 fatal overdoses for the entire year. That would be a 4 percent increase over 2018.
Gordon Smith, the states first director of opioid response, said the statewide numbers are disheartening but many efforts to provide broader access to naloxone and expand needle exchange programs are only now getting underway. He also pointed to gaps in Maines response to the crisis, including a lack of recovery coaches and recovery houses to complement the availability of medication-assisted treatment.
Although few communities have been spared from the opioid crisis, Portland has carried a heavy burden 318 overdose deaths from 2008 through 2018.
Portland police said they are working to identify traffickers and highlighted a recent arrest that involved the seizure of 375 grams of fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid that has supplanted heroin as the most lethal drug.
Police also noted that the overdose-reversing drug naloxone, sometimes called Narcan, is available without a prescription at pharmacies. Portland Public Health also offers no-cost Narcan, as well as overdose recognition and response training. A community training and Narcan distribution event will be held Wednesday, starting at 4:30 p.m. at 103 India St. The training is free and open to the public.
Previous
Next
Read more:
Five overdose deaths so far this month have Portland on alert - Press Herald
Posted in Intentional Communities
Comments Off on Five overdose deaths so far this month have Portland on alert – Press Herald
The Trump Administration Is Clearing the Way for Housing Discrimination – The New York Times
Posted: at 2:09 pm
On Monday, the nation honored the towering legacy of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. But the progress he demanded remains unfinished, and nowhere more than in the deeply segregated neighborhoods many of us call home. Dr. King understood that where a person lives determines so many of their opportunities, including access to good jobs, schools, health care, food and safety. Barely a week after Dr. Kings assassination, Congress passed the Fair Housing Act with overwhelming bipartisan support in recognition of this truth.
In the more than 50 years since its passage, the Fair Housing Act has helped fight discrimination in mortgage lending, zoning restrictions that prevent people from being able to choose where to live, and local landlord abuses. In 1973, the United States government used it to charge Fred Trump and his son, our current president, with housing discrimination. Rather than fight those charges, the Trumps signed a consent decree requiring changes to the way they managed their properties. The Fair Housing Act was the only backstop for the people the Trump family discriminated against, and now the Trump administration is seeking to gut its protections.
Key to those protections are two principles established by Congress and enforced by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), where I was secretary under President Barack Obama. The first is disparate impact, which makes clear that policies or practices that discriminate against people of color or other protected groups are illegal even without proof they are intentional. For example, if white couples are regularly approved for mortgages but black couples with the same qualifications are rejected, the bank must fix their loan process, even if its employees didnt have racist intentions. Under disparate impact, its the results that matter.
The second is a mandate that communities affirmatively further fair housing, which requires government to promote greater opportunity and integration as well as fight discrimination. For example, if a citys affordable housing is all located in black neighborhoods with failing schools, limited transportation, and poor health care, that city must make an effort to fix the problems in those neighborhoods and build new affordable housing in other neighborhoods, in addition to ensuring theres no racial discrimination when any of the individual apartments are rented out.
Both of these principles come from the Fair Housing Acts recognition that outlawing intentional discrimination is not enough for people of color to overcome the consequences of centuries of oppression. This is especially true because the Federal Housing Administration and other federal agencies deeply embedded racial segregation into our neighborhoods through government-mandated redlining and other practices. Given this history, eliminating overt instances of intentional discrimination, while necessary, isnt enough.
At HUD, I codified and strengthened these principles. In 2013, the agency issued a formal disparate impact regulation based on decades of unanimous judicial consensus. And in the most important civil rights decision involving housing in a generation, the Supreme Court upheld the disparate impact principle in 2015, recognizing it as consistent with the central purpose of the Fair Housing Act. I also began improving HUDs approach to affirmatively furthering fair housing and my successor, Julin Castro, completed it with a regulation in 2015.
Unfortunately, the Trump administration is now taking steps to dismantle this progress. Last year, the administration issued a proposed regulation that would gut the disparate impact standard. The proposal imposes nearly impossible requirements on those who would bring a disparate impact claim, and insulates the insurance industry and other businesses that rely on technological algorithms in their decision-making, even when they generate bias.
And this month, HUD issued a proposed rule that would fundamentally undermine the affirmatively furthering standard. The proposal would largely strip away the expectation that communities provide housing that fights segregation and increases opportunity, weaken penalties and reinstate a discredited enforcement process. In addition to the obvious conflict of interest for a president who was prosecuted under the Fair Housing Act and stands to benefit personally from these proposed rules, they are reckless and wrong for three key reasons:
First, housing plays a key role in advancing economic opportunity and closing the wealth gap between people of color and white Americans. African-Americans and Latinos have less than one-tenth and one-eighth, respectively, of the household wealth of white Americans, and homeownership remains the largest source of wealth-building for most families. Moreover, where a family lives determines access to jobs, schools, and a healthy environment. If we believe our childrens futures shouldnt be determined by the ZIP code where they grow up, we need the disparate impact and affirmatively furthering standards to weed out and replace unjustifiable policies that limit opportunity.
Second, how we rent or buy a home is changing, as technology upends the traditional way we figure out where to live. From real estate apps to the hidden algorithmic box that determines credit scores and access to mortgages, our housing choices are increasingly driven by online tools and digital determinations. This makes it harder to understand if the creators of the algorithms intended to discriminate, even as research shows that bias is often built into them. By enabling us to test whether they lead to different outcomes, the disparate impact standard serves as a critical check to ensure that technological tools advance legitimate business and consumer interests without discriminating. The affirmatively furthering principle complements this protection by requiring that we go further than minimizing harm, by actively working to level the playing field and build more equitable communities.
Third, untested new rules that will no doubt be litigated for years can create chaos in our housing markets. The decades-long consensus on the disparate impact standard means that everyone with a stake in housing from residents and local governments, to real estate developers and the finance industry should know what to expect and how to conduct their business. And HUDs retreat from a focus on racial segregation in affirmatively furthering raises serious doubts about whether the new rule meets the basic mandate of Congress.
The Fair Housing Act was enacted with bipartisan support and championed by Democrats and Republicans alike over five decades because it aligns with fundamental American values: fairness, freedom of choice and opportunity for all. Instead of undermining these values, the Trump administration should honor Martin Luther King by withdrawing its proposed rules.
Link:
The Trump Administration Is Clearing the Way for Housing Discrimination - The New York Times
Posted in Intentional Communities
Comments Off on The Trump Administration Is Clearing the Way for Housing Discrimination – The New York Times
Sundance, SXSW and other major film festivals agree #TimesUp – The Hill
Posted: at 2:09 pm
Two years after the #TimesUp movement began, major film festivals are making a move to break into the majority white male ranks of Hollywoods gatekeepers.
The Sundance Film Festival, South by Southwest, Tribeca, Bentonville, Athena, ATX Television Festival and the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) will reserve a portion of their credentials for members of the Time's Up Critical database, according to an exclusive report from Variety. The opt-in database is comprised of entertainment journalists and critics from underrepresented groups.
By encouraging industry leaders to be more intentional about who gets invited to their press junkets, screenings, red carpets, and other events, this database is one way they can work to dismantle the systemic barriers for critics of color and other underrepresented individuals, Tina Tchen, president and CEO of the Times Up Foundation, told Variety. Together, we can ensure these voices are represented and heard.
In a review of critics of the top 300 grossing films between 2015 and 2017, The USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative found that 83 percent of them were white and 79 percent were male. Women of color made up the smallest demographic of critics at 4 percent.
The Time's Up Critical initiative seeks to increase the number of female and underrepresented critics and reporters in the entertainment industry by linking publicists directly with them. Started two weeks ago, the database has amassed about 400 listings, according to Variety.
Over the past two years, we have ramped up TIFFs efforts to invite new voices from underrepresented communities into the festival conversation as accredited journalists, Cameron Bailey, TIFF co-head and artistic director, told Variety. We stand with Times Up Critical in working towards a world where the people who interpret and assess our films reflect the diversity of the films themselves and the audiences who greet them.
Visit link:
Sundance, SXSW and other major film festivals agree #TimesUp - The Hill
Posted in Intentional Communities
Comments Off on Sundance, SXSW and other major film festivals agree #TimesUp – The Hill







