Monthly Archives: October 2019

In ACT Theatre’s New Production of Dracula, the Hunter Becomes the Hunted – TheStranger.com

Posted: October 24, 2019 at 10:43 am

Brandon ONeill as Dracula. Not pictured:the cellist, the blood, the smoke. Rosemary Dai Ross

Count Dracula is one of the most enduring monsters in literature, which either is ironic or makes perfect sense, considering his immortality. Bram Stoker's vicious yet refined vampire nobleman has weathered more than a century of rebirths and reimaginingshe's spurred more interpretations than any other classical monster (there are more than 200 films based just on his story).

He is the pop-culture darling of the ages, a supernatural villain we love to fear in all his many forms. He'll be breathed to life yet again when playwright Steven Dietz's adaptation of the Stoker tale (which is the most produced version for the stage, and which Dietz wrote in the mid-1990s in Seattle) is revived and revised specifically for ACT Theatre, which is producing the play through November 17.

But it's not all about the Count. In this Dracula, the focus shifts to Mina Murray Harker. Her character has always been ripe for a reckoning or a refresh, or both, and has enjoyed many alternate paths in modern retellings. She is the source of endless fascination, because she is an obvious heroine in Stoker's novel, pure of heart and mind, and yet she's just as much a casualty of Dracula's desires as her poor friend Lucy, even if Mina ultimately fares better.

No matter how many gender norms Stoker challenged, it was still the Victorian era. Mina could be given only so much agency. "But to simply make her a victim was super unsatisfying to all of us," director John Langs explained. "So Steven has done some reworking of the story, and she really comes to the forefront. The hunted becomes the hunter in this particular adaptation."

He describes it as a ritualistic retelling of the play that they're calling "the death of Dracula at the hands of Mina Murray." According to Langs, "Whenever we take on a classical work at ACT Theatre, we're trying to reframe it in the contemporary context."

In Dietz's Dracula, relevant themes are exploredlike the costs of hiding your secret life from the people you love most and the way corruption takes root. But as Langs put it, they also want "to tell a good monster story about power in this day and age, as a great allegory for the fear that is being generated by certain parts of society that has us all very, very worried. It's been really satisfying to drive a stake into the heart of a monster every day, and we hope that our audience feels that macabre pleasure with us."

The actors are core ACT Theatre members, many of whom took part in a yearlong workshop, which means they are intimately familiar with the material and its changes. Among them are actors who've gotten glowing praise from our critics, including Khanh Doan as Mina, Brandon O'Neill as Dracula, and Basil Harris as Renfield. Langs said about Harris: "He has such a unique and off-center quality to him, that I thought him taking on that pivotal role was just a perfect get for us."

There will be a live cello player onstage throughout the evening, and, Langs said, "gallons of blood, tons of smoke, lots of choreography, singing, sharp teeth... Even in our, maybe, erudite pursuits, we haven't shied away from making it great entertainment."

Read the original:

In ACT Theatre's New Production of Dracula, the Hunter Becomes the Hunted - TheStranger.com

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on In ACT Theatre’s New Production of Dracula, the Hunter Becomes the Hunted – TheStranger.com

The Shining Sequel Doctor Sleep Coming To Theaters Early In Time For Halloween – Geeks of Doom

Posted: at 10:43 am

The upcoming adaptation of Stephen Kings sequel to The Shining, Doctor Sleep, isnt arriving in theaters until November. A bit of a bummer for those who were wishing they could see it this Halloween season.

But now some people will have a chance to see it early. Its been announced that Fandango is bringing the movie to theaters early for one night only, and just in time for Halloween.

SYNOPSIS:

Doctor Sleep continues the story of Danny Torrance, 40 years after his terrifying stay at the Overlook Hotel in The Shining. Ewan McGregor, Rebecca Ferguson and newcomer Kyliegh Curran star in the supernatural thriller, directed by Mike Flanagan, from his own screenplay based upon the novel by Stephen King.

Still irrevocably scarred by the trauma he endured as a child at the Overlook, Dan Torrance has fought to find some semblance of peace. But that peace is shattered when he encounters Abra, a courageous teenager with her own powerful extrasensory gift, known as the shine. Instinctively recognizing that Dan shares her power, Abra has sought him out, desperate for his help against the merciless Rose the Hat and her followers, The True Knot, who feed off the shine of innocents in their quest for immortality.

Forming an unlikely alliance, Dan and Abra engage in a brutal life-or-death battle with Rose. Abras innocence and fearless embrace of her shine compel Dan to call upon his own powers as never beforeat once facing his fears and reawakening the ghosts of the past.

Doctor Sleep stars Ewan McGregor (Star Wars: Episodes I, II & III, T2 Trainspotting) as Dan Torrance, Rebecca Ferguson (the Mission: Impossible films, The Greatest Showman) as Rose the Hat, and Kyliegh Curran, in her major feature film debut, as Abra. The main ensemble cast also includes Carl Lumbly, Zahn McClarnon, Emily Alyn Lind, Bruce Greenwood, Jocelin Donahue, Alex Essoe and Cliff Curtis.

Trevor Macy and Jon Berg produced the film, with Roy Lee, Scott Lumpkin, Akiva Goldsman and Kevin McCormick serving as executive producers.

Flanagans behind-the-scene creative team was led by director of photography Michael Fimognari (The Haunting of Hill House), production designers Maher Ahmad (Get Hard) and Elizabeth Boller (Hush), and costume designer Terry Anderson (Den of Thieves). The music score is composed by The Newton Brothers (The Haunting of Hill House).

The only bad news is that the special early screening is only going to be on about 400 screens, so not everyone will have the opportunity to see it. Tickets for the event are on sale now, and you can head over to Fandango to see if itll be in your area.

After the early screening, Doctor Sleep will be released in theaters everywhere on November 8th. You can click right here for trailers and more if you missed anything.

[Source: via Bloody Disgusting]

Follow me on Twitter.

Originally posted here:

The Shining Sequel Doctor Sleep Coming To Theaters Early In Time For Halloween - Geeks of Doom

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on The Shining Sequel Doctor Sleep Coming To Theaters Early In Time For Halloween – Geeks of Doom

A Pair of World Series Homers Puts the Nationals on the Right Track – FanGraphs

Posted: at 10:43 am

In 1911, the city of Houston finished construction on a $5 million train station that overshot its original budget by $4 million. The city had been so jacked up to build this thing that they had swatted the home of a former Houston mayor and a prominent synagogue out of the way to get it up.

When people had grown bored and disgusted by trains in the mid-70s, Union Station was abandoned for a shiny new Amtrak facility. But instead of knocking it down or blowing it up, as the city had done with the buildings that had been in Union Stations way initially, it was granted immortality by the National Park Service on the National Register of Historic Places.

When the Astros started muttering about getting a new stadium in 1995, and were actually threatening to leave Houston and become the new Washington franchise against which they are currently playing in the World Series, it was eventually determined that Union Station would make the perfect starting point for construction of their new facility.

Given the historic choo-choo depot that now serves as its main concourse, it makes sense that Minute Maid Park would incorporate a train into the ballparks home run celebrations. The train is piloted at 2.5 mph but still has an emergency brake, just in case of a horrifying accident occurring at a speed that many doctors consider an ideal pace for walking.

Juan Soto, who you may have heard is only 20 years old and already has three home runs in the postseason, went up to meet that train last night, bashing a home run to a part of Minute Maid Park where baseballs arent supposed to go. In the top of the fourth inning, he sent a Gerrit Cole fastball onto the unlit track of the silent Astros train, and the two inanimate objects became a pair of unwitting companions for the remainder of the game.

It was a pure, glorious moment for a sport that had been mired all day in important, unavoidable conversations regarding the hateful and idiotic rhetoric of an Astros assistant GM. For the several seconds it took for Sotos home run to reach the train tracks, all we could do was marvel at his skill, at his youth, and at the fact that hes a member of the Nationals, a franchise that has been trying to get to this moment since 2012.

In fact, it was earlier in the game that the Nationals had witnessed their first ever World Series home run, and it borders on cliche that it was hit by 35-year-old Ryan Zimmerman.

Zimmerman knows how to hit a postseason home run. Hes a tenured professor in home run-hitting, and in the scattershot of Nationals playoff appearances since 2012, hes knocked a few out. His journey to cutting the Astros early 2-0 lead in half with a solo shot goes back seven years, to when hed already been on the Washington roster for seven years.

Zimmerman and Adam LaRoche went back-to-back off Lance Lynn to give the Nationals a much-needed power surge in Game 2 of the 2012 NLDS. Unfortunately, they were down 7-1 at the time and would go on to lose by eight runs. Zimmerman didnt muscle another home run out until Game 5, when he would once again go back-to-back in run-scoring plays, following a Bryce Harper RBI triple with a two-run jack to give the Nationals an early 3-0 lead in a game they wound up losing 9-7.

Two years later, when the Nationals returned to the postseason, Zimmerman was naturally still with them, but by this point, his body had been set upon by the sport of baseball: It had chewed on his hamstring and bludgeoned his shoulder to the point that they would shift the third baseman and outfielder over to the NLs DH spot, first base, when the season was over.

But during the NLDS, Zimmerman was still called upon to swing a bat as a pinch hitter, despite being hurt enough not to play, as he would say later. After all, swinging a bat requires things like muscles and tendons, and Zimmermans werent in great shape: dashing from third to home on a play near the end of the season had been enough to keep him out of the lineup for three days.

Fortunately for Washington, he was playing in the bottom of the eighth of Game 2 in 2014 against the Cubs. Bryce Harper had just tied the game at 3-3 with a two-run bomb and it was Zimmermans job to win it. His three-run tater gave the Nationals a 6-3 lead that they used to beat the Cubs, and for the first time in Nationals history, Zimmerman had homered in a postseason game that his team would actually win.

In a tied Game 4 of the 2017 NLDS, the Dodgers watched Julio Uras give up a run and the lead, as well as a couple of base runners, before yanking him so Zimmerman would have to face a fresh Pedro Bez. Zimmerman didnt seem to mind, pounding a three-run blast on the second pitch of the at-bat. It was the last time anybody scored in that game and the Nationals won 6-1.

Even though each of the Nationals postseason campaigns have ended the same way, each of Zimmermans postseason homers have shown an evolution of sorts, going from garbage time RBIs, to game-winning blasts, to last night, when he fired the inaugural shot of Nationals World Series run-scoring. In baseball, the stories dont always present themselves as clearly as we think, and we have to look back, sift through some box scores, find a few quotes, and decide that, yes, here is the beginning, middle, and end. Its a need we have to box every part of this sport into a three-act structure, despite so much of it being so dumb and so meaningless.

But for Zimmerman to hit the first home run of the series for the Nationals, and for Soto to follow him with a bomb on the train tracks, gives us such a clear glimpse of what it took for Washington to get here and of what lies ahead for a franchise with a 20-year-old superstar. Theyre still not World Series champions, but after Game 1, they appear to be on right track.

Read more from the original source:

A Pair of World Series Homers Puts the Nationals on the Right Track - FanGraphs

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on A Pair of World Series Homers Puts the Nationals on the Right Track – FanGraphs

Halloween costume ‘do’s and ‘don’t’s – The Spectator USA

Posted: at 10:43 am

Halloween is a holiday we all look forward to, and in the correct setting, provides us with many opportunities to express our unique identities. However, it is also a minefield for those of us who have the threat of cultural appropriation looming over us like Harvey Weinstein leering at a casting couch. If you are devoid of progressive sensibilities, you might very well end up stepping on an unseen hazard (because of the minefield metaphor), hearing a brief yet sinister tutting sound, before the devastating explosion of offense erupts around you.

Nevertheless, have no fear (no pun intended), and allow me to take you by the hand (consent pending) and guide you deftly through the minefield (of which I previously referenced twice in the opening paragraph of this article), with the intention of avoiding the perils of the- look, Im going to stop using the minefield analogy now because I feel like Ive gone as far as I can go with it, but basically this is about Halloween costumes and how not to piss off minorities et cetera.

The obvious ones have been highlighted many times (Sombrero Man, Red Indian, Sexy Anne Frank etc). Therefore, I am going to flag up a few of the lesser-known problematic costume ideas.

Research the history of your chosen outfit. OK, so youve decided to dress up as a sexy witch however could that upset anyone? STOP! Witches are part of the pagan religion and as such are protected from being marginalized by non-pagans. Also, years ago, women were burned at the stake for practicing witchcraft and so these outfits could have a devastatingly negative effect on the ancestors of those persecuted in the 1700s. Only dress up as a witch if you know how to perform at least ten Wiccan rituals and can recite the entire script of Hocus Pocus off by heart.

Assume that fantasy monsters are an acceptable costume. Your friend has told you they plan to attend the campus Halloween Ball as a zombie from The Walking Dead, hey what a cool idea! WRONG. Do you think leprosy is cool? Well is it? Also, dressing up as someone who is technically dead is a huge trigger for anyone who has lost a beloved relative. Tell your friend to rethink this horrendously insensitive notion and encourage them to create a more appropriate monster costume, for instance Bad Orange Man, Bad Orange Man Supporter or Pro-lifer.

Consider how your costume might affect the people around you. While browsing amazon, you came across the perfect outfit. Mary Poppins! Who could possibly have an issue with this adored and respected Disney character? Well if you were to ask me this question, I would have to respond with an indignant Do you find being ignorant easy, or have you had to put in literally hours of practice in order to become this oblivious to people less privileged than yourself? Mary Poppins is not only a symbol of white misogyny; she is also a jarring reminder for the 99 percent of people out there who cannot afford childcare that the financial disparity between the haves and the have nots grows deeper by the day in Trumps America. To be honest, I am aghast that I am even having to explain this in 2019.

Dress as an animalunless you are a member of the noble Furry community. Dont dress as Freddy Krueger unless youve been convicted of child molestation. Dont dress as a demonic nun unless youve attended at least one satanic black mass in which you gave your body and soul to the Dark Lord. Dont dress as a vampire if you have no experience of being afflicted with anaemia and/or immortality. I could go on, but surely by now, you get the general idea.

All of this is pretty straight-forward, but unfortunately it stills needs to be repeated. Almost any costume has a risk of causing offense. To anyone who is still unsure, I would suggest simply dressing up as yourself. However, to play it completely safe this year, Im going as Blackface Justin Trudeau.

Read the original post:

Halloween costume 'do's and 'don't's - The Spectator USA

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Halloween costume ‘do’s and ‘don’t’s – The Spectator USA

More All Hallows’: Damnation to Demons, Grace to All People – Patheos

Posted: at 10:43 am

Halloween, All Hallows, is coming and, being Christian, we are preparing to pray and party.

Why?

All Hallows Eve is a celebration, deeply Christian, aholiday of creative mothers,when adults party,and devils are defeated,when we are unafraid, awash in love.

This is a day in the West of the World where we face common fears and cross ourselves and have a laugh. I have visited many holy places where the dead, skulls, bones, and the incorrupt, are there to see. The first time I saw such things, I thought: Yikes! What is this? My guide, very wise, said something like this: They were here in life and now they are with us in death. The good pray for us, the dead gibber their excuses, the bodies? They are here to remind us.

Those men I have known who have seen demonic evil: prison and concentration camps in Nazi Germany, atheist gulags in China or the Soviet Union, have not been light about evil. They also do not fear evil. When you have been sent to shovel human excrement by men with endless, ugly, hatred of saints, angels, and God, then you lose fear. They never lost their memory of pain and pity for the victims, both prisoners and guards, but perfect love had cast out all fear.

If you find a religious person who is afraid, who sees demons behind every jack-o-lantern, even if carved by a puckish grandchild, then you will see a man more susceptible to demons, than the trick-or-treater.

Evil be to he who thinks evil of trick-or-treat. Honor our righteous dead, pray for deliverance from evil, and then party as children kept safe by the Almighty. All is well and all will be well as Omnipotence makes every broken thing whole one the course of eternity.Nothing can frighten absolute love.

The Beloved is so good, true, and beautiful that He casts out all fear.

Much of what becomesevil to us or bad for us is not because of the nature of thing or event itself, but our intent. There are actions that are always evil, burning a stand of sequoia for fun, but most of the things we do are not this way. Most of life is good, if we would make it so. As one professor put it for most of our actions: Intent is the content of morality.

Few things are so base they cannot be good, there are generally ten.

Few things are so good they cannot be base, there are seven such virtues.

Demons?

They are already damned.

Monsters?

They are real, but will, over the long work of God over time, be defeated.

The dead?

If they love us, they can pray for us. If they hate us, they cannot harm us. We pray for them and we ask for their prayers: in Gods economyno soulis forever gone.

No denying that evil twists, turns, torments any jollification to make that good vile. A good luck symbol becomes a the Nazi swastika in diabolical hands. Purity becomes purity culture in priggish minds.

All Hallows is a recognition that death is sad: a severe mercy. When we were broken by the bad choices of our ancestors, we could not retain immortality. Nobody wise would wish to be immortal as we are: boredom without end, Amen. Death moves us fromthis life where we are broken to the possibility of the world to come where we are whole.

All Hallows is the day to recall not choosing damnation, but paradise. We pray for our dead, our own souls, and then we rejoice. The party is an image of the wedding feast to come. We wear costumes either to mock our usual false fronts or to memorialize our deepest wishes. Hidden in the costume, we areknown but unknown.

This makes us the very image of God: Known, but Unknown.

Halloween?

We cant wait at Saint Annes: prayers and then a party. Thats human history summarized.

See the article here:

More All Hallows': Damnation to Demons, Grace to All People - Patheos

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on More All Hallows’: Damnation to Demons, Grace to All People – Patheos

Battery + Storage Podcast Episode II – With Mike Hopkins, CEO of Bakken Midstream, Lead Director of Plus Power and previously long-time CEO of Ice…

Posted: at 10:43 am

Click here to listen to the audio.

In Episode 2, the Troutman Battery + Storage team interviews Mike Hopkins, CEO of Bakken Midstream, who is, objectively, destined for immortality on Storage Mt. Rushmore; (2:40), (although, as he adamantly tells the team, he is still, very much alive). While focusing on storage, Mike provides a 360 degree view of the evolution of North American energy markets including his intimate background with the Canadian natural gas industry in Alberta (6:30), and how that experience shaped his thoughts about the role of government and regulatory intervention in markets (in particular, with respect to Californias involvement in fostering the in-state battery and storage markets)(16:00). He says that if government intervention is required they should . . . as soon as possible, return to what I would think of as normal regulatory policy which is about ensuring that resources are fully valued and the value is efficiently extracted. The podcast covers how the Energy Storage Act in California was revolutionary for storage, taking the asset from an R&D concept to the facilitator of a tradable commodity. We hear about Mikes experience as a first-mover storage proponent with Ice Energy in SCEs revolutionary 2014 all-source RFP, his views on the future of project finance and PPAs for battery resources, his views on how battery project development is funded in 2019 (and investor risk assessments of the same efforts), the future of repeatable C&I battery deployment (like rooftop solar), the importance of communication and control systems on the distribution grid to facilitate commercial values (and the need for price transparency), the necessity of reflecting customer demand in product development, and details regarding ICE Energys storage technology and its market success.

See original here:

Battery + Storage Podcast Episode II - With Mike Hopkins, CEO of Bakken Midstream, Lead Director of Plus Power and previously long-time CEO of Ice...

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Battery + Storage Podcast Episode II – With Mike Hopkins, CEO of Bakken Midstream, Lead Director of Plus Power and previously long-time CEO of Ice…

SCOTUS to Review Appeals of Credible-Fear Denials – Immigration Blog

Posted: at 10:41 am

The Supreme Courtlast week agreed to review the Ninth Circuit's decision in Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.I wrote about the case in a March post captioned "Ninth Circuit Rules Expedited Removal Review Violates the Constitution: Expect more appeals, fewer negative credible fear findings, and more entries". The Supreme Court's ultimate decision, regardless of how it rules, will have significant ramifications for the administration's attempts to expand expedited removal.

The alien in that case, a Sri Lankan national, entered the United States illegally on February 17, 2017, and was arrested by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer 25 yards north of the border. He was placed in expedited removal proceedings, and referred for a credible fear interview with an asylum officer after he claimed a fear of persecution. His credible fear claim was denied, and he requested a review of that decision by the immigration court. The immigration judge subsequently affirmed the asylum officer's negative credible fear determination.

Thuraissigiam then filed a petition for habeas corpus with the district court, which was dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction in accordance with the statute governing judicial review of expedited removal orders, section 242(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) . The district court also rejected his constitutional claims under the suspension clause, discussed below.

The alien's petition for review to the circuit court asserted that the credible fear screening he was provided by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) deprived him "of a meaningful right to apply for asylum" and protection under article 3 of the Convention against Torture (CAT). He also asserted that the asylum officer and immigration judge violated his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Specifically, the alien alleged that the asylum officer had "failed to 'elicit all relevant and useful information bearing on whether [he had] a credible fear of persecution or torture.'" He also alleged that there were "communication problems" between him, the asylum officer, and the translator, as well as similar issues during the credible fear review hearing before the immigration court. Finally, Thuraissigiam claimed that he did not know whether the information he had given to the asylum officer and immigration judge "would be shared with the Sri Lankan government."

The statute governing judicial review in expedited removal proceedings strictly limits the scope of the questions the Article III court can consider and the relief it can grant. In particular, it allows review in habeas corpus proceedings, but this review is limited to determining whether the petitioner for habeas corpus is an alien, whether the petitioner was removed under the expedited removal provisions of the INA, and whether the petitioner could "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that [he or she] is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence", a refugee, or an asylee.

The circuit court concluded that this statute violated the Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution. That clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution states: "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." The circuit court described the procedural protections in the judicial review provisions governing expedited removal cases as "meager", and found that that this was "compounded by the fact that" the review provision "prevents any judicial review of whether DHS complied with the procedures in an individual case, or applied the correct legal standards."

It should be noted that Congress went to great pains to limit the availability of judicial review of expedited removal determinations, consistent with the "expedited" nature of those proceedings. Simply put, Congress expected that aliens who entered the United States illegally would be quickly returned (with extremely limited exceptions), not that their cases would linger in the courts for years.

It is not a surprise that the Supreme Court agreed to hear this case for a number of reasons (including the clear restriction on the review authority of Article III courts from expedited removal proceedings set forth in the relevant statute), but perhaps the most significant is the fact that Thuraissigiam created a "circuit-split", that is, a disagreement with a decision in a different circuit, a fact I alluded to in my March 2019 post.

Specifically, in finding that the suspension clause was violated by the review procedures Congress had allowed in expedited-removal cases, the Ninth Circuit explicitly rejected the analysis of the Third Circuit in Castro v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., which I described in significant detail in an April 2017 post.

The Third Circuit there held that 28 different petitioners could not invoke the Constitution because each was apprehended shortly after entry, and therefore deemed an alien seeking initial admission to the United States, limiting their constitutional rights. In April 2017, the Supreme Court rejected a petition for writ of certiorari filed by the petitioners in that case.

Thuraissigiam has not yet been set for argument. The Court's decision, however, will have significant ramifications with respect to the appeals rights of aliens in expedited removal proceedings.

This is especially true if the September 27, 2019, injunction issued by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the U.S. District for the District of Columbia is stayed or dissolved. That injunction blocked an attempt by DHS to expand expedited removal under section 235(b) of the INA to any alien who is apprehended after entering the United States without admission or parole and who has not been physically present in the United States for two years, in accordance with authority provided by Congress under section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii)(II) of the INA.

Should the Supreme Court find that the judicial review limitations in section 242(e) of the INA satisfy the constitutional rights of an alien like Thuraissigiam, who was apprehended shortly after he entered the United States, the question will then be whether they also satisfy the constitutional rights of an alien who has been in the United States for just less than two years. It is doubtful that the Court will directly answer this question even if it reverses the Ninth Circuit (and Judge Jackson's injunction is no longer in effect), but it will likely provide clues as to its ultimate conclusions on the issue.

See the original post:
SCOTUS to Review Appeals of Credible-Fear Denials - Immigration Blog

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on SCOTUS to Review Appeals of Credible-Fear Denials – Immigration Blog

Day 3: Will Lewis testifies in his own defense – FOX Carolina

Posted: at 10:41 am

Greenville, SC (FOX Carolina) - On Wednesday, suspended Greenville County Sheriff Will Lewis told his side of the story when he testified in his defense.

The state called their final witness Wednesday morning and the defense began laying out their case after the lunch break.

Day 3 of the trial followed a day that included emotional testimony from Lewis' former assistant Savanah Nabors.

Nabors spent four hours on the stand Tuesday. During her testimony, Nabors outlined the alleged extra-marital affair Lewis is accused of using taxpayer funds to to pay for. She also described how Lewis allegedly assaulted her in her hotel room on that trip.

Lewis has maintained that their relationship was completely consensual.

Prosecutors called former Greenville County Sheriff's Office Public Information Officer Drew Pinciaro to the stand.

Pinciaro testified that before Lewis took office, the role of Savanah Nabors was mostly filled by sheriff Loftis' secretary Jackie Cooper. Pinciaro said that previously in his role as PIO, he, Ryan Flood, and Cooper took care of scheduling meetings for the sheriff, writing speeches.

Pinciaro said that he would describe the relationship between Savanah Nabors and Sheriff Lewis as that of a big brother and little sister. He went on to say while most employees under Lewis referred to him as sheriff, Nabors always addressed him as Will.

According to Pinciaro, he never noticed anything unusual until the day he said Nabors failed to show up for a fallen Spartanburg officer's funeral. Previously it had been agreed that she, Lewis, Flood and himself would attend the funeral together, but was told by Lewis she had left to go to Florida.

According to Pinciaro Lewis, Flood, and himself all attended the church service, but when they arrived for the graveside service for the officer, Lewis stayed in the car on the phone with Nabors.

Pinciaro went on to say he was told by Sheriff Lewis that Nabors had quit or was going to quit and that he told he and Ryan Flood, "If I was you, I wouldnt talk to her.

Pinciaro was also questioned about Nabors involvement at a crime scene and asked why should would be there. According to Pinciaro, he never saw Nabors predecessor at a crime scene and didn't know why she would be there.

The state called a SLED forensic investigator Lt. David Britt Dove, who specializes in mobile devices, to the stand. After establishing the investigator as an expert witness in his field, he testified that he performed an extraction on Sheriff Lewis' phone.

According to the investigator, the extraction reveals text messages, call logs, apps, and locations of the phone's user.

The witness confirmed that the messages between Nabors and Lewis presented in this trial did in fact come from Lewis' phone. He also went on to explain why phone calls between Nabors and Lewis did not appear in the extraction.

The final witness to take the stand in the state's case was Major Ty Miller. Miller was at the time, and still is, the highest ranking female deputy in the sheriff's office and on the GCSO command team.

Miller testified about the relationship between Lewis and Nabors saying their relationship was very giggly and fun, going on to say Nabors addressed the sheriff by his first name and said they seemed very comfortable together.

When questioned about the perceived favoritism towards Nabors, Miller said it caused some contention in the office that she got a new car and new phone when there wasn't money in the budget for some deputies to get new vehicles.

Around April 22, Miller said she received a message from Nabors stating she needed to talk to her. Miller met with Nabors, who told her that she and the sheriff had kissed and played her a recording she had made of Lewis talking about a possible trip to Reno in which they would stay together.

According to Miller, she couldn't understand a reason that Nabors would need to go to a sheriff's school training trip funded by taxpayer dollars, stating that there was no reason for her to be there.

At a later date, Miller says Sheriff Lewis admitted to her and Marcus Davenport that he'd had a sexual encounter with Nabors and was going to have a press conference to address it.

After Miller left the stand, the state played the press conference and rested their case.

The defense took over shortly before noon.

Attorney Rauch Wise entered a number of motions that the judge said he would consider during the lunch break.

The judge also advised Lewis of his rights, his right to testify and the protections offered under the Fifth Amendment.

Willis told the judge he intended to testify.

After the lunch break, the judge said he felt both indictments against Lewis contained very similar charges.

Solicitor Kevin Brackett argued however that the indictments were for different charges that go hand-in-hand, but they are not the same crimes.

The court agreed to that for time being.

Savanah Nabors' former boyfriend from the Greenville County Sheriff's Office was the first witness called by the defense.

Chad Ayers answered questions about his relationship with Nabors, which he admitted was kept hidden from the sheriff's department.

Ayers answered several questions about text messages exchanged between Nabors and himself.

Martine Helou, a former Greenville County Sheriff's Office employee was next up for the defense.

Helou testified that she was hired to help with community outreach and to create new programs from the sheriff's office.

During the cross-examination, Helou said she had expressed interest in working for Lewis while the suspended sheriff was campaigning. She was hired the month after Lewis won the election.

Helou said the left the sheriff's office in May 2019 after her position at the sheriff's office was eliminated.

Two more witnesses testified for the defense, a paralegal and an attorney at the law firm where both Nabors and Lewis worked previously, before Lewis took the stand.

Lewis's testimony began by outlining his military and law enforcement experience before he ran for office.

Lewis said Nabors was hired before he took office in accordance with the county pay scale for an administrative coordinator. During cross-examination, the solicitor questioned the salary range Lewis gave, but Savanah's initial salary was in the upper end of the salary range the solicitor provided.

Lewis said Nabors was actually his third choice for the position after a male candidate and a longtime paralegal who he had worked with previously did not take the offers.

Lewis wanted someone who could keep him on track, read his e-mails, and document closed-door meetings on his behalf. He said he was looking for someone flexible who could be on-call at all hours, and someone put together who could handle his calendar and schedule.

Lewis said he identified major needs for new vehicles, equipment, and radios when he took office. He said the normal annual increase in the sheriff's office budget was not enough to cover it, so he reached out to Councilman Joe Kernell for advice.

Lewis testified that he recalled it was Kernell who suggested they schedule a meeting out of town since they could not initially get their schedules to jive.

This suggestion led to the budget meeting in Charlotte.

Lewis rebutted some of Nabors' claims when he testified about the weekend gathering.

He admitted to taking a bottle of liquor on the trip.

Its not uncommon for us to take a bottle of wine or a bottle of liquor with us when we go out of town," Lewis said.

Lewis said the bottle would not fit in his suitcase, so he placed it on top of Nabors' zipped bag.

He admitted that after the first night's activities, he returned to Nabors' hotel room for a nightcap.

He said they began talking and then kissed, which Lewis said surprised him.

The kiss led to them both taking off each other's clothes and intimacy, but said nothing was done without Nabors' consent.

Lewis also denies that Nabors was unconscious during the sexual encounter.

Afterwards, he said, "A million things went through my head. I knew that I had violated my oath to my wife. I was very bothered that I had cheated on my wife."

He then claims he went back to his room, alone, and that was the end of the sexual contact between them on the trip.

Lewis said he and Nabors

had no problems personally or at work when they returned from Charlotte. He said their sexual encounter was talked about briefly, but more in the context of shame for Lewis.

He admitted that he continued to pursue Nabors, and referenced a conversation between them that was recorded.

I pursued on audio and it was evidently clear that I was just dumb for pursuing a relationship with a woman who was not my wife.

Lewis said he never cussed Nabors out or threatened her but claims they had "boyfriend-girlfriend squabbles, like back in high school.

Through Wise's questioning, Lewis maintained that he never improperly spent any company money.

When wise asked if Lewis ever spent any inappropriate money on Nabors, he replied, "No."

Lewis said that once news of his affair broke, a councilmancalled for audit of the sheriff's office's finances. Lewis said that audit yielded no findings of misuse of money.

During the cross-examination Lewis stated, "I would not have hired Savanah if I knew we would've had an affair."

Lewis denies that he once told deputies he and Nabors never had sex.

"My attorney at the time told me not deny having sex but that I could deny the rape and sexual assault."

Lewis said he only denied those allegations when he spoke to his staff. He maintained in his testimony that he still denied those allegations.

He did admit to asking Nabors, "What happens in Charlotte stays in Charlotte, right," because he did not want his wife to learn about the affair.

Recordings were played in which Lewis told Nabors he was not manipulating her but could if he wanted to.

Im completely capable of manipulating you, but I choose not to," Lewis said in the recording.

He maintained he was not manipulating Nabors, but was instead trying to "convince her" to go to a conference in Reno, NV with him "to continue an adulterous relationship."

Shortly before 6 p.m. the judge announced that he would dismiss the jury for the day and the solicitor's cross-examination will resume at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday.

View post:
Day 3: Will Lewis testifies in his own defense - FOX Carolina

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Day 3: Will Lewis testifies in his own defense – FOX Carolina

Independent Directors Have To Fulfill These Criteria From December 2019 – Inc42 Media

Posted: at 10:41 am

The new guidelines are issued under Companies (Accounts) Amendment rules 2019

IICA to conduct self-assessment test for independent directors

The move ensures the competence of the director

The ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) on October 22, issued a notification stating that the board of directors will now be liable to provide the details of the independent directors (hired during the year) integrity, expertise and experience to the shareholders.

The new notification is a part of Companies (Accounts) Amendment rules 2019, which will be effective from December 1, 2019.

An independent director is one of the members of the board of directors, who do not have any stake in the company. The director is expected to guide and mentor the company to improve corporate credibility and governance standards by working as a watchdog and help in managing risk.

Moreover, MCA also clarified that that independent directors will have to pass a self-assessment test to prove their competence. IICA has also been authorised to maintain a list of candidates, who are eligible to become independent directors. Through this, the ministry wants to ensure that the independent directors are up to the task to protect the interests of the minority shareholders.

The test will be conducted by the Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA), which is a part of MCA.It will evaluate the directors based on their knowledge of the Companies Act, securities law, basic accountancy and other subjects that are required for the individual to perform as an independent director.

A separate notification called Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Fifth Amendment rules, 2019 states that anyone willing to become independent director should apply for inclusion of their name within three months of the new rules coming into force or before getting hired as one.

After getting their names included in the list, the individual will have one year to pass the self-assessment test. However, the individuals, who have been working for over 10 years as directors or at any key managerial position in a company with INR 10 Cr or more paid-up capital, do not need to take the test.

Link:
Independent Directors Have To Fulfill These Criteria From December 2019 - Inc42 Media

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Independent Directors Have To Fulfill These Criteria From December 2019 – Inc42 Media

Zuckerberg on Chinese censorship: Is that the internet we want? – TechCrunch

Posted: October 23, 2019 at 9:46 am

China is exporting its social values, political ads are an important part of free expression and the definition of dangerous speech must be kept in check, Facebooks CEO Mark Zuckerberg argued today in a speech at Georgetown University.

He criticized how American companies that do business with China were becoming influenced by the countrys values. While our services like WhatsApp are used by protestors and activists everywhere due to strong encryption and privacy practices, on TikTok, the Chinese app growing quickly around the world, mentions of these same protests are censored, even here in the U.S.! Zuckerberg said. Is that the Internet that we want?

Because Facebook couldnt come to an agreement with Chinese censors and thereby doesnt operate in the nation, Now, we have more freedom to speak out and stand up for the values that we believe in and fight for free expression around the world. While he didnt mention Apple, the NBA and Blizzard, which are amidst scandals about cowing to Chinese policy, the shade thrown at them was clear.

Zuckerberg spoke today for 40 minutes at Georgetown University and then did a Q&A to share his thoughts on speech and how we might address the challenges that more voice and the internet introduce, and the major threats to free expression around the world. He discussed how We want the progress of free expression without the tension, leading people to advocate for pulling back on free expression. Where do you draw the line?

Zuckerberg says that Facebook now has 35,000 people working on security, and the companys security budget is higher now than the whole revenue of the company when it IPOd, which was $5 billion in 2012. Facebook removes or downranks content that is objectively dangerous. Still, he says that he doesnt want to let the definition of what is dangerous expand beyond whats absolutely necessary.

Coining a new phrase, Zuckerberg noted that People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world a Fifth Estate alongside the other power structures of society.

On allowing political ads on Facebook even if they carry misinformation, Zuckerberg argues that political ads can be an important part of voice, especially for local candidates, up and coming challengers and advocacy groups that the media might not otherwise cover. That way they can get their voice into the debate. While that may be true, the same system allows whichever group or candidate has the most funding to dominate the narrative.

I recently argued that Facebook should drop all political ads until regulation to prevent their use to spread misinformation was passed. President Trump is spending more than many of his Democratic party rivals combined while using lies about them planning to remove the second amendment to raise money.

Still, Zuckerberg argues, Banning political ads favors incumbents and whoever the media chooses to cover. He did not address who spends the most or how Facebook could still offer free expression of candidates to their own followers even if it banned political ads. He essentially drew no distinction between freedom of speech and freedom of reach aka paid amplification through ads. Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri echoed this sentiment, equating ads and speech, tweeting I believe that people deserve to hear what politicians are saying and make up their own minds. After some discussion, though, Mosseri admitted I often wish we could ban political ads, but said it would be complex to define what did and didnt qualify as one.

Relying on favoring incumbents argument ignores how President Trump has spent $4.9 million on Facebook ads this year compared to $9.6 million spent by the 23 Democratic candidates combined, and that Trump had outspent them all put together as of March. Banning political ads wouldnt prevent candidates from saying what they want and being judged, but it would stop richer candidates speech from having more weight.

Overall, Zuckerberg sounded more passionate and empathetic than in his recent testimonies on Capitol Hill. He seemed to take on some of the cadence and tone of former President Barack Obama, pitching up his voice to stress the urgency of challenges facing democracy. However, the speech format allowed Zuckerberg to avoid immediate pushback on his points, such as why political advertising favors challengers if its incumbents with the most money to spend. Zuckerberg did hold a Q&A after his speech, but the stream of that wasnt broadcast from his Page like the prepared remarks, and he mostly reiterated points from the speech.

Zuckerberg drove home one important theme threaded throughout the talk, though. He attempted to link the idea of U.S. companies potentially policing free expression to protect safety and elections with how China censors speech. And while other companies like the NBA and Blizzard that do significant business with the country try to downplay its influence, Zuckerberg spoke up about how the tentacles of Chinas values are choking off speech far beyond its borders.

See the rest here:
Zuckerberg on Chinese censorship: Is that the internet we want? - TechCrunch

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Zuckerberg on Chinese censorship: Is that the internet we want? – TechCrunch