The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: June 2017
Donald Trump is destroying America’s standing in the world and may end up destroying the world – Salon
Posted: June 8, 2017 at 11:45 pm
During his recent announcementaboutthe United Stateswithdrawalfromthe Paris climate agreement which makes our nation the third in the world to not be part of the accord, along with Syria and Nicaragua President Donald Trump repeatedly insistedthathis decision had to do with simple fairness. It was the same kind of sentiment that he frequently conveyed during his presidential campaign: The rest of the world has been disrespecting, mistreating and, worst of all, laughing atus for years.
At what point does America get demeaned? asked the president. At what point do they start laughing at us as a country? We want fair treatment for its citizens and we want fair treatment for our taxpayers. We dont want other leaders and other countries laughing at us anymore, and they wont be.
Like candidate Trump, President Trump seems to hearsnickering voicesin his head (presumablyforeign, non-English voices) and believes they are laughing at him and his country. In Trumps paranoid mind, every nation on the planethastaken advantage of America in one way or another, and the Paris agreement is just the latest example of this abuse.Ironically, the insecure man who constantlydemands respect from the rest of the worldis actually in the process of driving his countrys reputation into the ground, and the Paris exit is simply the latestembarrassment.
It is often said it is easier to destroy than to create, and over the past months Donald Trump has proven this maxim correct when it comesto governing. Trumps presidency has been like a violent wreckingball demolishing everything in sight. And nothing has been more grievously damaged by Trump than the United States credibility in the world. Americas global image has collapsed in record time, and with the presidents decision to pull out of the Paris agreement, the most powerful country in the world is well on its way to becoming an international pariah. As the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson,declared,The U.S. reneging on its commitment to the Paris Agreement renders it a rogue state on the international stage.
As Americas standing in the world crumbles, many people will no doubt recall how Republican politicians regularly claimed during the previous administration that the country was no longer respected under the leadership of President Barack Obama. As with mostRepublican positions,this was flat-out delusional, and polling revealedthat the countrys global image steadily improved under Obama after having fallen to historic lows during George W. Bushs presidency.
One of the most vocal proponents of this fallacious line of attack was, of course, a conspiracy theorist named Donald Trump, who was convinced that everyone was laughing at his country because it had twice elected a Muslim foreigner as president. Today that unhinged man-child is making the world feel somewhat nostalgic for George W. Bushs America. According to Pew Research Center, countries around the world have almost no confidence in Trump(compared to theirhigh confidence in Obama), and the freshman presidenthas turnedthe U.S. intoalaughingstockthat can no longer be trusted by its allies, asGermanys Chancellor Angela Merkelindicatedlast week.
Of course, President Trump continues to maintain that he is restoring the countrys status in the world after the U.S. has been mistreated (and laughed at!) for so many years. For example, he claimed in his exit speech that the Paris agreement gives other countries an economic edge over the United States and handicaps the United States economy in order to win praise from the very foreign capitals and global activists that have long sought to gain wealth at our countrys expense. Not only that, continued Trump, but the nations that are asking America to stay in the agreement (that is, the rest of the world) are countries that have collectively cost America trillions of dollars through tough trade practices and in many cases lax contributions to our critical military alliance. Like most of his speeches, this one was full of falsehoodsand exaggerations, and the president cited industry-funded studies and misinterpreted other onesto make his harebrained case.
The great irony of Trumps begrudging speech (and his parochial worldview in general) is that America has long been the worlds leading imperialist force. If any country qualifies as a bully that has treated other nations unfairly over the past halfa century, it is the United States. This is evidencedby the many overseas coupsthat have been orchestrated by the U.S. government,often to serve the interests of American business,withthe classic case involvingthe United Fruit Company and Guatemala. The majority of Americans have not benefited personally from U.S. foreign policy; it has been themultinational corporations and the power elite, as C. Wright Millsonce called the countrys political and corporate establishments, that have benefited from such interventions.
Consider Americas economy, which Trump claims has been losing for decades because other countries have treated us horribly, stealing our jobs and thenlaughing at us to add insult to injury. This view is so facile and childishit seemsunworthy of comment. But, alas, it is espoused bya very powerful man. Itgoes without sayingthat American workers have suffered over the past 40 years due to numerous factors, including globalization andcorporatetrade deals; that doesnt mean the United Stateshas been losing to other countries. In fact, American businesses have done exceedingly well over the past three decades, as havethe top 1 percent of earners. Only working- and middle-class Americans have been losing in any real sense of the word and not because foreign governments are so cunning and inconsiderate but because of our capitalist economy.
In addition to arguing that the Paris agreement is designed to hurt Americaseconomy, Trump bitterly complained that it was unfair to the U.S. ascompared withthe fate of less-developed countries like China and India. China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years, said the president, claiming that the Chinese will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. The president then declared that the agreement doesnt eliminate coal jobs; it just transfers those jobs out of America . . .and ships them to foreign countries. This, in typical Trumpian fashion, is extremely misleading. China isactuallyin the process of canceling projects to build coal plants, and its coal consumption has declined since 2013, but such pesky facts are unwelcome in Trumps reactionary, zero-sum worldview.
Once again, the irony here is that America has contributed more than any other country in the worldto climate change and is responsible for nearly a third of the excess carbon that has built up in the atmosphere.In cumulative terms, we certainly own this problem more than anybody else does, saidclimate scholar David G. Victor to The New York Times. Furthermore, Americas per capita carbon emission is more than double that of China (and about eight times that of India).If one were truly interested in fairness, as Trump has claimedto be, thenthe U.S. would be doing much more than it agreed to in the Paris accords.
Withdrawing from the Paris agreement not only erodes Americas credibility and standing in the world, but is an importantstep toward dooming the planet or more accurately dooming the human species. It is somewhat fitting that the United States, under the leadership ofa vulgar and self-absorbedman who epitomizes the ugly American, may end up ensuring the collapse of human civilization. During the election campaign, many speculated that the narcissistic Trump was running for president because he had realized in old age that he would quickly be forgotten after he died. Whether that was true,Trumpwill doubtless be remembered now as the man who signaled the end of the American epoch and perhaps the human era as well.
Read more:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Donald Trump is destroying America’s standing in the world and may end up destroying the world – Salon
Tell Your Senators: Don’t Let Donald Trump Take Our Cuba Policy Backwards – The Nation.
Posted: at 11:45 pm
Abipartisan group of senators has introduceda bill that would guarantee Americans the right to travel to Cuba.
Eric, 3, waves the V sign while posing in front of the Cuban and United States flags in Havana, Cuba, March 25, 2016. (Reuters / Ueslei Marcelino)
In late May, the conservative media outlet The Daily Caller reported that President Donald Trump was planning to make good on his campaign promise to terminate the Obama administrations opening of engagement with Cuba. Just two and a halfyears after the United States finally took steps to end more than a half-century of hostility and restrictions on trade and travel, President Trump wants us to go backward.
Luckily, theres some momentum pushing back. Lawmakers in Congress recently reintroduced the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act (Senate Bill 1287). The bipartisan bill now has 55 cosponsors and would guarantee Americans the right to travel to Cuba.
We need to expand, not contract, our engagement with Cuba. As Peter Kornbluh reported at The Nation, the economic impact of increased restrictions on travel would be dramatic: He cites a study that says the travel industry alone could lose $3.5 billion and over 10,000 jobs. And the damage goes far beyond that, as Kornbluh writes:
Trump is threatening to undermine years of concerted effortinside and outside of governmentto establish a civil, peaceful coexistence with an island neighbor after more than half a century of intervention, embargoes, and assassination plots. At stake is a model of responsible US foreign policyto be emulated, not repudiated.
1. The Nation is partnering with theLatin America Working Group to demand that senators cosponsor the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act. Click here to join us by writing to your senators today.
2. To have an even greater impact, call your senators about the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act. You can reach them at 202-224-3121 or find their direct numbers here. Follow our script below or craft your own message.
SCRIPT: I am calling to urge you to co-sponsor the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act. Currently co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of fifty-five senators, the bill would guarantee Americans the right to travel to Cuba.
Public opinion polls show that 81 percent of Americans support free travel to Cuba. A recent letter to Congress signed by 46 travel agencies stressed the economic benefits of free and increased travel to the country, claiming that it would lead to them hiring more American workers. They also asserted that tightening restrictions on travel, as the Trump administration is threatening to do, would lead to significant layoffs.
I hope that youll make a commitment to co-sponsoring the Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act.
3. Read and share Peter Kornbluhs latest at The Nation, Trump Threatens to Rescind Obamas Cuba Engagementand Activists Fight Back. In it, he cites studies on the economic impact of restricting travel to Cuba and lays out the importance of resisting this wrongheaded change. Already read it? Share the article on Facebook or Twitter.
Read this article:
Tell Your Senators: Don't Let Donald Trump Take Our Cuba Policy Backwards - The Nation.
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Tell Your Senators: Don’t Let Donald Trump Take Our Cuba Policy Backwards – The Nation.
Donald Trump Proposes Covering Mexican Border Wall With Solar Panels – Futurism
Posted: at 11:45 pm
In BriefAccording to sources, U.S. President Donald Trump has pitchedthe idea of building a wall along the Mexican border using solarpanels, which would generate clean power for the surrounding area.The announcement has proven extremely divisive. Trumps Solar Wall
President Trump has proposed using solar panels in the construction of a wall along the 3,200 kilometer (1,988 miles) border separating Mexico and America a key point in his election campaign. According to three individuals who have direct knowledge of the meeting with Republican leaders, Trump claimed he wanted to cover the wall segments with solar panels so theyd be beautiful structures.
Trump cited the walls economic benefits as well as its environmental ones. Thomas Gleason, managing partner of Gleason Partners LLC, the company that proposed the design, told Business Insider that each solar panel on the wall would produce 2.0MWp per hour of electricity, and, because of this, the wall would pay off the cost of its construction in 20 years through the energy it sells.
The cost of solar panels has decreased rapidly over the last nine years, from around $8 per watt in 2009 to roughly $1.50 per watt in 2016, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, and Gleason believes the cost will continue to diminish over time.
While the bottom of the wall would still be built out of stone, the solar panels situated on the Mexico-facing side would be double tiered, with the upper layer moving to capture maximum sunlight.
Though any wall between Mexico and the United States is likely to still be controversial, one equipped with solar panels would have benefits on both a small and large scale. It would provide those on both sides of the border, which is currently underserved by electricity companies, with greater access to power. On a larger scale, it would contribute to the amount of electricity the U.S. generates from clean energy sources, which would in turn contribute to fighting climate change.
Opinions on the proposal are split.
Wunder Capital CEO Bryan Birsic told Business Insider, While we would prefer a different location and purpose for a large solar installation, we strongly support all additional generation of clean power in the U.S.
Meanwhile, Nezar AlSayyad, a UC Berkeley professor of architecture and planning, told The Guardian that the wall was still indefensible and that trying to embellish it with a technical function or a new utility is a folly. Political theorist Langdon Winner was even more outspoken in his criticism: Im wondering what the solar electricity would be used for? Electrocuting people who try to climb the wall?
Although the wall itself is controversial, any move by the U.S. government to promote solar energy is positive as it would lessen the countrys own carbon footprint and help the world combat climate change.
Read the rest here:
Donald Trump Proposes Covering Mexican Border Wall With Solar Panels - Futurism
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Donald Trump Proposes Covering Mexican Border Wall With Solar Panels – Futurism
British Kids Provide The Most Adorable Takedown Of Donald Trump – HuffPost
Posted: at 11:45 pm
George Washington had to have been the American President most hated by the British, but Donald Trump may giving the first president a run for his continentals (continentals being a term for dollars in Washingtons young country).
According to a poll by The Guardian around the time of Trumps inauguration, around 50 percent of British responders believed that Trump was dangerous.A GFK poll later found that around 60 percent of Brits disapproved of his presidency. This still tracks with the nearly 60 percent of Americans who currently disapprove of President Trumps job performance, according to Gallup.
Given this,it makes sense that it wouldnt be hard to find a group of British kids with negative opinions about Trump. And as British children have British accents, such a group would also inevitably be strangely cute.
For a Chelsea episode that will air on Netflix this Friday, Chelsea Handler visited England and successfully interviewed British children about the American president.
Most notable in this clip provided exclusively to HuffPost was a kid named Charlie, who first responded to Handlers question, What do you know about Donald Trump? with the line, Well, for start, hes got an orange face.
I know he doesnt like people with brown skin.
Thats right, Handler responded. You know what thats called?
Another kid started ooh-ing and tried to get Handlers attention. After he raised his hand, the kid matter-of-factly answered, Racism.
Never have you seen a more adorable takedown of the president. Stephen Colbert might be nuanced and biting in his attacks, but hell now need to get a British accent and reverse his age a few decades to compete in the anti-Trump late-night arena.
Heres Handler with the group of kids:
Netflix
More:
British Kids Provide The Most Adorable Takedown Of Donald Trump - HuffPost
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on British Kids Provide The Most Adorable Takedown Of Donald Trump – HuffPost
Creditors seek to force bankruptcy of Tinley Park firm – Chicago Tribune
Posted: at 11:45 pm
Creditors of a Tinley Park real estate brokerage who claim they are owed hundreds of thousands of dollars are trying to force the firm into bankruptcy.
Oak Park Avenue Realty Ltd. is an affiliate of Mack Industries, also based in Tinley Park, which filed for Chapter 11 restructuring in late March. Oak Park Avenue wasn't included in that bankruptcy filing.
Mack Industries built its business purchasing homes that had been foreclosed on, fixed them up and then found renters for them. Homes were also sold to investors, and Mack in turn would guarantee them a steady income stream by finding renters.
Owners of the homes are owed at least $433,000 by Oak Park in unpaid rents and security deposits collected by the firm from renters, according attorney Brian Jackiw, who is representing them in the petition, filed May 31, seeking involuntary Chapter 11 for the company.
Locally, one creditor, from Orland Park, is owed $153,000, and other property owners are from Frankfort and New Lenox as well as states, including California, Colorado and Virginia. Jackiw said he is being contacted by other property owners who may join the case.
A call left for Oak Park seeking comment was not immediately returned.
Forcing the company into bankruptcy could result in assets being identified that could be sold off to repay Oak Park's creditors, Jackiw said.
He said the investors he so far represents own, collectively, about 125 properties, mainly single-family homes.
Are the amounts as far as unpaid rents owed cover a specific time period?
Jackiw said some of the creditors are owed two months' rent and some are owed for four months. He said Oak Park would generally send property owners monthly account statements showing information, such as how much rent was collected and what management fees were charged by the company, but that, in most instances, Oak Park stopped sending out those reports about two months ago.
In connection with Mack Industries' bankruptcy, allegations of fraudulent financial transactions have been aired against Mack and its founder and chief executive, James K. "Mack" McClelland, who is an owner of Oak Park Avenue Realty.
American Residential Leasing, the largest unsecured creditor in the case, had asked the court to name a receiver a request since approved by the judge to oversee Mack's operations, alleging there have been "several million dollars' worth of potentially fraudulent" fund transfers and distributions among Mack insiders and affiliated companies.
Separately, lender Colony American Finance sued McClelland individually, alleging he owes more than $19 million to the company for defaulting on a December 2015 loan agreement, the proceeds of which were used to buy and rehab properties. In its complaint, filed just weeks after Mack Industries' Chapter 11 filing, Colony American states $9.8 million was advanced to McClelland for rehab work and alleges that some of that money was "misappropriated, misapplied and converted" for other uses.
The trustee in the Mack bankruptcy case recently won court approval to hire a forensic accountant who spent years as an FBI special agent investigating money laundering and fraud schemes.
In explaining in a court filing the need to bring on someone with specialized skills, the trustee noted a "complex history of opaque financial and business dealings" among Mack, its numerous subsidiaries and company principals.
Twitter @mnolan_J
Original post:
Creditors seek to force bankruptcy of Tinley Park firm - Chicago Tribune
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on Creditors seek to force bankruptcy of Tinley Park firm – Chicago Tribune
Vikki Lindemuth favors appointment of trustee to handle husband’s bankruptcy – Topeka Capital Journal
Posted: at 11:45 pm
Saying her husband, Kent Lindemuth, had interfered with attempts to sell properties to help resolve the Lindemuth bankruptcy case, Vikki Lindemuth supports a federal judges appointment of a trustee to direct his part of the couples bankruptcy.
Appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee to take control of Kent Lindemuths interests will stop Kent from disrupting the debtors business operations, Vikki Lindemuth said in a response to U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Bergers preference to appoint the trustee.
Berger gave the parties 20 days to respond to the plan to appoint a trustee. He issued the decision May 25 rather than ordering liquidation to repay debts.
Berger also has issued an order granting Vikki Lindemuths motion to sever the couples joint bankruptcy case. The Lindemuths are in the middle of a divorce.
Kent Lindemuth hasnt responded to the judges plan to appoint a trustee for him. His wife, however, said appointing a trustee on his behalf will restore and preserve the confidence of the debtors creditors, vendors, lessees, potential lessees and others that the reorganized debtors will be able to meet their continuing obligations under their respective plans.
As part of the Lindemuths bankruptcy reorganization plan, James B. Lloyd, who has power of attorney, has managed the debtors businesses based on the bankruptcy reorganization plans.
But Kent Lindemuth has progressively undermined Lloyds authority by representing to the debtors vendors, lessees, potential lessees, and others that he is in control of the debtors businesses and properties, Vikki Lindemuth wrote in support of appointing a trustee.
Vikki Lindemuth contends six automotive and moving and storage businesses owned by Kent Lindemuth havent paid all the rent owed on the Lindemuth property they occupy ostensibly because they didnt have sufficient income. The rent shortfalls have caused the debtors to default on some real estate taxes, Vikki Lindemuth said.
However, income from two of the moving and storage businesses was more than enough to make their rent payments, Vikki Lindemuth said.
She also contended Kent Lindemuth has actively interfered with Lloyds attempts to market and sell some properties to reduce past taxes owed, debt and preserve the debtors remaining assets.
Kent Lindemuths pending federal criminal charges have been widely publicized, and have caused great consternation among the debtors creditors, vendors, lessees, potential lessees, and everyone else who is or may become involved with the debtors business operations, Vikki Lindemuth wrote.
Some current lessees are questioning whether to extend their leases, and the Lindemuths have lost opportunities to lease some property, Vikki Lindemuth said.
Berger scheduled June 22 as the date he would appoint a Chapter 11 supervisory trustee for Kent Lindemuth.
Kent Lindemuth is charged with 107 counts of bankruptcy fraud, six counts of money laundering, two counts of receipt of firearms, and one count each of perjury and receipt of ammunition.
Lindemuth, 65, is scheduled to face trial beginning Sept. 12 before U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree in Topeka.
Contact reporter Steve Fry at (785) 295-1206 or @TCJCourtsNCrime on Twitter.
Visit link:
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on Vikki Lindemuth favors appointment of trustee to handle husband’s bankruptcy – Topeka Capital Journal
Breaking: American Solar Direct Files for Bankruptcy – Triple Pundit (registration) (blog)
Posted: at 11:45 pm
The growth of home solar has been unstoppable in recent years. According to the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA), solar sales nearly doubled in 2016, with more than 14 GW installed. For many, the projections for stellar growth in rooftop solar and other sectors of the industry seemed unshakable.
And nothing speaks more to that growth than the cost of home solar installations. In 2016, the cost related to those rooftop gems dropped 29 percent, says SEIA, which notes that a drop in hardware sticker prices helped lead the way to cheaper prices overall.
But while the cost of solar has been plummeting, there have been troubling indications for several years now that the home solar sector may not be as resilient as say, the community sector. Since 2011, more than 100 solar-related companies have shut their doors, either restructuring, selling or going out of business altogether.
Plus, a running list on GreenTechMedia from 2015 indicates that the turnover is by no means limited to solar installers. Parts manufacturers face their own challenges, with falling prices impacting the industry across the board and industry advances making it hard for others to keep up. Consumers however, notice it most when the installer they have contracted with doesnt turn up to finish the installation and wont answer the phone.
Still, it was the most recent spate of failed solar installers that made us ask: Is the problem a vast divide between what companies are promising consumers and what (they find later) it costs to run the business? Is it profit projections vs. profit reality? Or is it an indication that home solar is really unsustainable?
To get a sense of the problem, TriplePundit delved into the history of some of the most recent and largest installers that have called it quits. We bent an ear to what they said when they sent out their press announcements and took a look at what solar analysts feel is really the issue. Lastly, we took a speculative look at one company that earlier this year was struggling, but felt it had positive momentum to overcome until it went off the radar altogether.
Most of the solar installers that have unfortunately landed on the list of company closures have been forthright, letting their customers know that there would be contract changes on the horizon, whether it meant an outright sale, a bankruptcy or a shifting of corporate priorities.
But according to Mel Burns, executive director of energy concierge services at MyDomino, thats not the case with American Solar Direct, which gained a great reputation after it burst on the scene in 2009 and disappeared earlier this year without a whisper. MyDomino, based in Oakland, networks with consumers to help them with their clean energy concerns.
In 2014 they were like gangbusters. They were one of the fastest growing solar companies and now, poof! theyre gone, said Burns. They really [went] off of the radar very quickly and without notice.
And it was that lack of heads-up and follow-up that caught the attention of two solar customers, whose well-honed experience in research told them that something was amiss when their new solar installer not only didnt finish the job, but didnt file the paperwork to get paid by the loan company. Paul SanGiorgio is a physicist [his wife, Jen Boynton is the editor-in-chief of TriplePundit.]
I totally understand if they are going out of business that they dont really care about my side paneling or fixing the electrical panel, said SanGiorgio, but it just seems totally bizarre that they have shown zero interest in actually getting paid for the work that they did.
According to SanGiorgio, the couple reached out to MyDomino last September when they decided they wanted to install solar panels on their home. At their request, MyDomino sent a list of companies that had been screened and had been operating in the SanGiorgios geographic area. The SanGiorgios reviewed the choices and eventually settled on American Solar Direct. [American Solar Direct] sent some people out to look at our roof and make sure our roof was OK. They gave us the final OK sometime in October or November. So we signed the contract and they started doing the work.
But the couple soon found that the process wasnt going to be as straight-forward as it looked. SanGiorgio said the construction crew responsible for upgrading the electric box and installing the panels would turn up without the right contractor to do the work, with the wrong equipment, or with no equipment at all. In January, some three months after signing the contract, the installers announced the job was ready to be approved by a local inspector.
Thats when the SanGiorgios discovered that in order to install a new, higher grade electric panel, the installers had torn off some of the siding on their house presumably just before the record winter storms had set in, leaving the insulation exposed to rain and erratic temperatures. According to the city inspector, they had also failed to waterproof one of the electricity boxes, a requirement before the city would agree to OK the work.
SanGiorgio said the representative from American Solar Direct who was present at the inspection promised that if the inspector would sign off on the job, he would run over to Home Depot and buy a tube of calk and come right back. The inspector accepted the promise and signed off on the new solar panel array.
And thats the last time I ever saw anyone from American Solar Direct, said SanGiorgio.
According to both SanGiorgio and Burns, it was also the last time either of them heard from the company.
Burns said her first solid indication that American Solar Direct may have gone under was a phone call from Sighten, a solar quoting platform that is an essential component to large-scale solar installations. Sighten had called to let her know that the company seemed to have disappeared from the network and was no longer using their services.
Thats a telling sign, said Burns. They had been a large-volume player. Burns said it would have been virtually impossible for the company to operate without using the quoting platform.
Since our interviews with SanGiorgio and Burns, TriplePundit has learned that American Solar Direct has filed bankruptcy, adding its name more officially to those companies that couldnt compete with an aggressive market climate. According to its Chapter 7 filing, the company owed between $10 million and $50 million and by the time it called quits on June 2 had less than $60,000 in assets.
That kind of disparity between liabilities and assets is a familiar scene these days that has been played out repeatedly over the home solar landscape, where both new and seasoned solar companies, driven by the demand to corner the market and as Burns puts it, reach the holy grail of grid parity compete with unsustainably low prices and promises of record-speed installations.
The names of failed home solar companies these days read like a whos who of solar fame: Sungevity, Solyndra, SunEdison, Verengo, HelioPower, One Roof and Vivint, some of which were forced into bankruptcy, and some of which had the better fortune to be acquired by hopeful companies, spell a troubling picture for an industry that has garnered the interest of investors and the excitement of homeowners who see affordable payments as a way to beat the increasing costs of the electricity grid.
Comments left on Glassdoor by Sungevity employees are as telling as the reasons that other companies have given for their downfall. According to Sungevity employees, cash management procedures and lack of foresight contributed to why a successful, name-brand solar company ended up being sold off for assets. The same story could be heard from its competitors like mega-giant SunEdison, which later found itself under investigation for overstating its worth.
But from Burns point of view the issue is even simpler. It has to do with managing how much you charge against how much you really need to pay your overhead.
Nine years ago, [the cost of solar] was roughly $8 or $9 a watt, explained Burns, who began made her career in clean energy working for Sungevity when if first launched. Today that cost is around $3 to $4 a watt. Thats a 60 percent drop. Thats wonderful.Thats really triggered the solar explosion and made it possible for a lot of people to get solar [for whom] that was never possible before.
Except the overhead hasnt shrunk or kept pace, said Burns. That new, basement floor price must still pay for hard costs solar panels, inverters, etc. and soft costs labor, installation, design and a staggering list of in-house expenditures, government taxes and permits that now all must be met with lower revenue.
Can a 60 percent drop in price still pay for all those things?, Burns asked.
As far as MyDomino is concerned, Burns said, the closure of American Solar Direct is a wake-up call for an industry that fervently believes in clean energy, but also relies on its partners to be transparent. She said she is taking the time to study and learn as much as she can about what caused American Solar Direct and others to become insolvent.
I still believe in residential solar, Burns reassured adamantly. It is still going to do well. It is still going to have great growth. But it is in a period of transition. And that transition may entail a few more years of growing pains.
As to the SanGiorgios, they are still waiting for American Solar Direct or someone in its stead to bill their loan company. SanGiorgio said the loan company wont start the payments until they receive a bill from the installer, which so far has been unreachable.
As far as I can tell, it has basically stopped functioning, said SanGiorgio, who echoed Burns observation that the companys bidding price and lack of operational management may have had a role to play in the companys fate, like so many before it.
I dont know why, but they [were] not bidding well and they [were] not organizing their projects well and this is the end result: They are going out of business.
Flickr images: brian kusler; Russell Neches; Wayne National Forest.
Original post:
Breaking: American Solar Direct Files for Bankruptcy - Triple Pundit (registration) (blog)
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on Breaking: American Solar Direct Files for Bankruptcy – Triple Pundit (registration) (blog)
Creating a Better Economy with Data Science – Stanford Social Innovation Review (subscription)
Posted: at 11:45 pm
We believe in the power of information. We also believe in markets and capitalism as a force for good. The two are inexorably linked, because markets dont work well without open access to reliable data and information, and the insights and perspectives they drive. Within the impact investing world, this is doubly so because of the desirethe needto generate both financial and social returns.
As long-time practitioners in the space, we know that the soft underbelly of the impact investing movementwhich for the purposes of this article also includes mission-related, sustainable, socially responsible, and environmental social and governance (ESG) investingis the measurement, modeling, and demonstration of actual social impact. The world of philanthropy has suffered from a similar shortcoming. Hundreds of billions of dollars flow every day into companies, projects, products, and investment vehicles dedicated to making the world a better place; yet it is still highly challenging to measure many of the social, environmental, and economic benefits these investments produce.
How should we optimize for both impact and financial return? Where can capital generate the greatest beneficial outcome? What actions can companies and investors take today to maximize the odds of successful impact outcomes tomorrow? The lack of reliable, meaningful, data-driven insights relating to performance is materially hampering progress, and making it difficult to build the models we need to refine cost-benefit analyses and inform decision-making about capital allocation. And by making it harder to account for impact success, it is also constraining the flow of additional resources into the sector.
Lest we get too despondent, we should remember that traditional financial accounting has had more than 500 years to evolve since Franciscan friar Luca Pacioli first invented double entry bookkeeping back in 15th-century Venice. And even now, financial performance measurement can still be as much art as it is science. Nonetheless, there is little doubt that measuring and recording impact and philanthropic outcomes with the same discipline we use to assess financial performance is a prerequisite to driving a more just form of capitalism at scale.
One of the most widely held views in the impact sector is that there is actually a surfeit of data relating to impact performancethat the real problem is too much data, and what the field really needs is universal standards and metrics to drive data convergence and enhance the value of available data. There is some truth to this, and organizations such as the Sustainable Accounting Standards Board (SASB) are leading the charge of standards for disclosure on material sustainable issues across industries. But in our experience, there are still two more fundamental challenges facing the impact (and philanthropic) space: actual access to data and knowledge of how to process it to produce the desired outcome.
The Challenge of Data
Currently, impact data ranges from anecdotal, unrepresentative stories from idiosyncratic experiences and situations, to mega-scale government databases focused on highly specific themes and impenetrable to most human beings. But even in areas where data is readily available and accessible, there are challenges.
Take environmental issues. Government agencies, corporations, ESG data vendors, nonprofits such as the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), and rating companies have amassed vast quantities of comparable, specific performance data on all sorts of issues ranging from greenhouse gas emissions to water consumption. Yet impact investors still find it difficult to pinpoint how to most efficiently allocate capital to produce both a cleaner, healthier environment and the desired financial outcome. Its a similar situation in the realm of corporate governance, leadership, and ethics. Thanks to the US Securities and Exchange Commission disclosure requirements, and the work of organizations such as Institutional Shareholder Services, BoardEx, and others, we are replete with excellent data and analysis on a wide range of traditional corporate governance metrics, such as board share of ownership, percentage of independent directors, and board diversity. Even so, defining how these things combine to ensure that a company is well run, maintains a high standard of leadership integrity, and produces outstanding long-term results is not obvious.
When it comes to tracking social issues, the picture is less encouraging. Here, standards and metrics abound, yet reliable, consistent, meaningful performance data is scarce. And when it does exist, it is either incomplete, inconsistent, or difficult to access. How do you know, for example, whether a company really pays a fair wage? Or treats its employees and customers with respect? Or helps the communities where it operates become stronger so that working families can build a better future? The answer is, you dont. Typically, whatever information is available relates either to company policies (such as promoting gender pay equity or supporting the health of workers), or specific and overt actions by individual (usually highly proactive) companies. Actual system-wide performance data is rare, and analysis and insights on outcomes is even rarer.
Technology and the demand for greater transparency are helping. The pool of customer sentiment and product quality data from social media, for example, is vast and growing in utility. Employee pay and opinion data provided by crowdsourced websites such as GlassDoor (a JUST Capital partner) is also increasing rapidly. Information on community health, county-level economic and income conditions, local environmental conditions and pollution vectors, job quality and labor conditions, and myriad other aspects of socio-economic conditions around the country is becoming more widely available. Many companies are taking the lead on making data available. All this is raw material for impact-oriented data science exploration.
Enter Data Science
Notwithstanding the difficulties of collecting relevant performance data, the real problem becomes taking existing raw data and converting it into interpretable and actionable informationthat is, doing the hard work of data science, and extracting real meaning from the data.
This is no cookie-cutter task. Take the problem of low wages, for example. How can we most effectively raise pay above living wage levels to produce the greatest beneficial impact for those at the bottom of the wage pyramid? Data science for impact cant simply collapse performance into a single reductive metric (such as the number of workers not paid a single universal wage threshold in relation to profitability), as this could miss important contributing factors (like geographic location or workers family situations) and lead to impractical and potentially ineffective solutions (such as raising pay of all workers by a fixed dollar amount). In truth, living wage levels are calculated at local levels, and have to take into account all sorts of things particular to the specific circumstances of individual workers if they are to carry real meaning. What data science can do is enhance predictive power by injecting the much-needed human dimension; for example, beyond simply raising wages, what specific combinations of actions can a company take, and in which communities, to generate the most enduring positive impact on the lives of their employees and their families. Now thats a real data challenge!
In our work in this area, we seek to use data and data science to shine a light on how companies can best address the real priorities of the American people, including: investing in building healthier communities, optimizing both social outcomes and financial performance, alleviating the pressures on the working poor, addressing environmental stresses while generating jobs, and isolating which social impact metrics are most powerful in predicting future business performance. But this is just the beginning. The sector desperately needs both data and data science to make impact investing more outcome driven. By collecting and making disparate performance data more readily accessible, the industry can help provide the necessary raw ingredients. And by crowdsourcing the best data science talent, we can turn those raw ingredients into truly valuable analyses that hopefully bend the curve of capitalism in the right direction.
Read more here:
Creating a Better Economy with Data Science - Stanford Social Innovation Review (subscription)
Posted in Socio-economic Collapse
Comments Off on Creating a Better Economy with Data Science – Stanford Social Innovation Review (subscription)
Important meeting for our nation’s future | Deniliquin Pastoral Times – Deniliquin Pastoral Times (registration) (blog)
Posted: at 11:44 pm
A meeting that could play a significant role in the future of Australias food and fibre production will take place in Canberra this month.
On Friday, June 16 the Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council (MINCO) will discuss the suite of projects that could be used to recover additional water under the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.
Wakool Rivers Association chairman John Lolicato said this could be a ground-breaking meeting for our nation, especially rural communities.
The adverse impact the Basin Plan is having on rural communities is starting to get some recognition, and I expect will be highlighted further in socio-economic reports to be delivered this year, Mr Lolicato said.
To stop any further damage it is imperative that water recovery comes from efficiency and complementary projects.
The MINCO recognised this at its March meeting in Mildura, and it must continue to be the focus at this months meeting.
The June ministerial council meeting will discuss projects, known as sustainable diversion limit adjustment mechanism projects, and make a final determination on these by the end of the year.
Our nation, in particular regional communities that rely on food and fibre production, need all states to approach the SDLs with a commitment and willingness to agree on an implementation schedule that will recover additional water without further social and economic damage, Mr Lolicato said.
At its March meeting the ministerial council agreed to a pathway to implement the Basin Plan that included reaching the water recovery target of 2,750 gigalitres using the SDL adjustment mechanism, and recovering the additional 450GL, referred to as up water with neutral or improved socio-economic outcomes.
We firmly believe the additional 450GL should be taken off the table because there is little scientific proof that it is needed for the environment, Mr Lolicato said.
There is no evidence to show it is needed, so why would we try to recover it? It doesnt make sense.
Mr Lolicato said ministers also need to recognise an indisputable fact attempting to squeeze large volumes of water through the Barmah and Millewa chokes trying to deliver the original 2,750GL will continue to collapse the river banks in the mid-section of the Murray and Edward Rivers, and the suggestion of an additional 450GL would be sheer madness.
The compensation which would have to be paid to landholders under this scenario would be astronomical, let alone the cost to rehabilitate the damage to the river and adjoining environment, Mr Lolicato said.
We trust ministers will accept this reality and take a balanced, common-sense perspective at the June meeting.
We mustnt forget that communities were promised a plan that delivered the so-called triple bottom line, which gave equal prominence to social, environmental and economic outcomes.
Unfortunately to this point the environmental aspect has been the primary consideration, to the detriment of rural communities.
Lets hope this months meeting is another step towards delivering what our communities were promised.
More here:
Posted in Socio-economic Collapse
Comments Off on Important meeting for our nation’s future | Deniliquin Pastoral Times – Deniliquin Pastoral Times (registration) (blog)
Cracks appearing in the tyranny of global oppression – Quad City Herald (blog)
Posted: at 11:43 pm
It was only a few weeks ago that I published an opinion warning about the threat to our freedom posed by the climate change/global warming insanity.
The problem is that our government and our media have become addicted to the concept that humans are causing irreparable harm to our environment. Harm they claim will inevitably make life on earth unsustainable. For government zealots it is a perfect storm. Only government can create the regulations and laws needed to protect us from this external threat to our existence.
The result is that many uniformed and fearful subjects have fallen prey to the tyrants, government zealots and their enablers around the globe.
If the science were solid they would have case to support their position. But the science is not settled. Climate change zealots claim a consensus of scientists agree, but science is not settled by a vote. Science is settled by incontrovertible facts.
A growing number of well qualified scientists have begun to question the science. Some have even gone so far as to call it a hoax. That includes Ian Plimer, Professor Emeritus of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne, and Patrick Moore, a former President of Greenpeace. According to Wikipedia Moore holds a PhD in ecology from the University of British Columbia.
Both Plimer and Moore have been vilified as misguided individuals who have turned their back on science to become paid spokesmen for the oil industry. Notice that they do not challenge the scientific facts Plimer and Moore use to make their case against global climate change.
First of all, Plimer and Moore both say carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. In fact they both make the case that carbon dioxide levels are at the lowest level in the history of the planet. Moore says that plant life is currently on a starvation diet when it comes to carbon dioxide. He points out that many farmers today have to pump carbon dioxide into their greenhouses to encourage the plants to grow.
Years ago basic high school biology taught us that plants breath in carbon dioxide and release oxygen. The climate zealots want us to believe that we must reduce carbon dioxide by abandoning our use of fossil fuels like oil and coal. Logically, that means reducing carbon dioxide will ultimately reduce the levels of oxygen as plants begin to die.
If carbon dioxide levels were at historically high levels then the climate change folks would have a valid concern, but both Plimer and Moore dispute that underlying premise. Also, if greenhouse gasses were at historically high levels plants would be thriving without the addition of carbon dioxide as posited by Moore. Zealots ignore these serious challenges to their scientific facts.
Political talk show hosts Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin both pointed out this week that the programs promoted by the climate change lobby fall heaviest on the poor. Patrick Moore also has made the point that the solutions proposed by the climate change zealots hit the poor harder than the rich and powerful. Their programs result in higher energy costs, higher food costs and fewer job opportunities.
The reality is we all want a cleaner environment. We dont want polluted air or lead in the water supply. Levin says people who are better off financially are more likely to support real solutions to cleaning up our environment.
Quite frankly it is insulting when liberals accuse conservatives of destroying the planet for our children and grand children while they saddle our progeny with a debt they cannot possibly pay.
President Trump got it right when he stood up to the pressure and withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate change accord. Unfortunately he did not do it because the entire underlying global warming/climate change agenda is nothing more than an fraud perpetrated by liberal elites who want to steal your freedom.
Free, educated and industrious people can find new creative solutions to the problems that we all face. Our founding fathers understood that government rarely does. Have government solutions gotten any smarter since they wrote the constitution?
See the original post:
Cracks appearing in the tyranny of global oppression - Quad City Herald (blog)
Posted in Government Oppression
Comments Off on Cracks appearing in the tyranny of global oppression – Quad City Herald (blog)







