The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: May 2017
Ron Paul Unleashed: Former Candidate Excoriates Trump and Congress On One Issue After Another – IVN News
Posted: May 6, 2017 at 3:08 am
Dr. Ron Paul, who served 12 terms in the US Congress and became famous when he ran on a libertarian platform for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, has been on a rampage this Spring, excoriating both President Trump and the Republican-held Congress on one issue after another.
Carol Paul must be putting something in her husbands coffee, because the libertarian firebrand (who turns 82 this year) spent the month of April challenging the political establishment with the kind of gusto and pointed criticisms that gained him a devoted global following when he ran for president in 2008 and set two records for the most online donations in a single day to a political candidate in US history.
On the latest government shutdown drama over appropriations, which has become more banal with each passing year since 1995, Ron Paul accused Congress members of using a dysfunctional policy-making process as an excuse for why Washington keeps spending exponentially more of Americans money as time goes on:
This type of brinkmanship has become standard operating procedure on Capitol Hill. The drama inevitably ends with a spending bill being crafted behind closed doors by small groups of members and staffers and then rushed to the floor and voted on before most members have a chance to read it. These omnibus spending bills are a dereliction of one of Congresss two most important duties allocating spending
Congresss dysfunctional spending process is an inevitable result of the governments growth. It is simply unrealistic to expect Congress to fund the modern leviathan via a lengthy and open process that allows individual members to have some say in how government spends their constituents money. The dysfunctional spending process benefits the many politicians eager to avoid accountability for government spending.
Never one to shy from a near-total rebuke of the entire US federal government as critically dysfunctional, Ron Paul ended his editorial by more or less calling Washingtons bluff about the catastrophe of an imminent shutdown and saying it would be great for America if Congress were to shut down most of the federal government, leaving only the departments and agencies that are specifically enumerated in the Constitution.
Regarding rising tensions with North Korea, yet another perennial song and dance like the government shutdown drama, a stable instability spanning decades, Ron Paul contended in a short video that Washington foreign policy deliberately keeps North Korea unstable so that it can play the role of international boogeyman:
Weve been doing this all this time and its almost like [it is] to keep it unstable The instability is [because] we have promised the South Koreans that, We are going to take care of you. We are going to provide your weaponry. We are going to provide your indirect subsidies. We are going to take care of you and were going to make sure that North Korea is held in check. Dont ever talk to them. Dont ever have an open-door policy We need an enemy and for that part of the world, it is North Korea. They serve as the monster in that area.
Interestingly enough, even after candidate Donald Trump promised to save US taxpayers a fortune by making other countries pay for their own national defense, as president he has fallen in line with the foreign policy status quo of extending the US military umbrella to cover South Korea and neighboring countries.
On April 24, just a couple days before publishing a 30-minute interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, Ron Paul took President Trump to task for his complete 180 degree turn from the campaign trail to the Oval Office on WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, government transparency, and a free and independent media as a check on political corruption and malfeasance:
Back then he praised Wikileaks for promoting transparency, but candidate Trump looks less like President Trump every day. The candidate praised whistleblowers and Wikileaks often on the campaign trail. In fact, candidate Trump loved Wikileaks so much he mentioned the organization more than 140 times in the final month of the campaign alone! Now, as President, it seems Trump wants Wikileaks founder Julian Assange sent to prison
There is a word for this sudden about-face on Wikileaks and the transparency it provides us into the operations of the prominent and powerful: hypocrisy.
On the other hand, Ron Paul praised Julian Assange and whistleblowers for their role in bringing transparency to government, and called them heroes deserving of respect and admiration, urging Americans not to allow the president to declare war on those who tell the truth.
Long a critic of the US central banking system under the Federal Reserve, Ron Paul took to CNBC on April 29th to warn as he has in the past that the massive increase in the monetary base by the Federal Reserve, which lends the money at a discounted interest rate to large banks, incentivizes massive malinvestment in under-performing sectors of the economy and that a major market correction is due. Before you scoff, remember Ron Paul predicted the Great Recession five years before it happened in 2003:
The special privileges granted to Fannie and Freddie have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital that they could not attract under pure market conditions. Like all artificially created bubbles the boom in housing prices cannot last forever. When housing prices fall homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss. These losses will be greater than they would have otherwise been
had government policy not actively encouraged over investing in housing. Because so many people will invest in housing the damage will be catastrophic.
This past week on CNBC, Ron Paul said that interest rates held too low for too long will eventually catch up with the economy and cause serious consequences for the stock market. When challenged about that assertions in the wake of Nasdaqs 6,000 point milestone last month, the Texas libertarian pointed out that the Nasdaq was at 5,000 points in the year 2000, and balked, Now its all the way up to 6,000, after what, 17 years? Paul added that his investments in gold have gone from $300/oz in the year 2000 to $1200/oz today.
Every presidential election cycle theres a candidate for one or both of the two major parties nominations who gives voice to the antiwar and foreign interventionism bloc in the US electorate. In 2000 that candidate was George W. Bush ironically enough. In 2004 it was Howard Dean. In 2016 it was Bernie Sanders. Both times Ron Paul ran for president in 2008 and 2012, it was Ron Paul. True to form, Ron Paul came out swinging against the airstrikes in Syria earlier last month:
They needed a so-called excuse to go into Iraq so they concocted stories, and all kinds of things. Thats what this is a part of. If all of this is true, I dont know why they couldnt wait and take a look at it. Right now, I dont see conceivably it doing what they claim because right now its helping ISIS, its helping al-Qaeda, its helping the enemy were supposedly fighting.
The former congressman was referring to the fact that there was very little clear evidence that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the deadly sarin gas attack that happened in Syria, prompting the Trump administration to launch airstrikes. For Ron Paul, who sees the ongoing US involvement in foreign conflicts since World War II as an excuse for big government and a lucrative situation for war profiteers, recent events in Syria look like more of the same:
Theyre terrified that peace was going to break out! Al-Qaeda was on the run, peace talks were happening, and all of a sudden, they had to change, and this changes things dramatically! I dont expect peace talks anytime soon or in the distant future.
Photo Credit: Albert H. Teich / shutterstock.com
Read the original:
Ron Paul Unleashed: Former Candidate Excoriates Trump and Congress On One Issue After Another - IVN News
Posted in Ron Paul
Comments Off on Ron Paul Unleashed: Former Candidate Excoriates Trump and Congress On One Issue After Another – IVN News
The Chief’s Thoughts: Moving Away From Libertarianism? – Being Libertarian (satire)
Posted: at 3:08 am
Most of us remember the moment we became libertarians. Its quite unlike becoming a progressive or a conservative, as in either of those cases one usually grows up with that value system or adopt it over a period, such as at university. For many libertarians, however, our conversion was when we came to a particular realization about the nature of government, force, or man.
My ah-hah! moment was when I read The Ethics of Liberty by Murray Rothbard in 2013, and for the first time understood how property rights came to be. Rothbard explained it logically and clearly, starting with the lone Crusoe, adding Friday, and building up to a complex society. He explained how the vesting of property does not change as society becomes more complicated, and that it is in fact the role of property rights to regulate the outcomes of situations in this complex society. Property rights, he explained, would exist and vest whether we explicitly recognize them or not. I was a socialist one day, and a libertarian the next.
From that point onward, how I viewed society changed at a fundamental level. While many of my associates in public policy complain endlessly about inefficient government or inconvenient lacunae in law, I see everything as a struggle between the individual and the State. Something as simple as a new guideline issued by the Financial Services Board in South Africa essentially comes down to an organ of state appropriating for itself more say or influence in a given matter, regardless of what the private individual or entity thinks about it. When Stefan Molyneux was still a libertarian in a former life, he said that the law is nothing more than an opinion with a gun, and this was an apt insight which I relied on in my university course on legal philosophy as well as my bachelors/honors thesis.
The rise of the social justice left, and the consequent rise of the alternative right brought about an interesting phenomenon, however.
Libertarians, myself included, nearly-universally condemn the authoritarianism of the social justice left, however, we do not make our opposition to them the defining feature of the movement. Having worked freelance, and now full-time, in South African public policy for about two years, I can comfortably say that the petulant children masquerading as advocates for social well-being are not our biggest concern. And, from what Ive seen and heard from my colleagues in Europe and North America, neither are the SJWs the biggest problems there. They are a big problem but not the biggest one. Government still enjoys that distinction, regardless of whether its a conservative or progressive administration. After all, Donald Trump has shown us that its going to be more or less business as usual, despite the drain the swamp rhetoric.
I believe much of the alternative right consists of former libertarians who felt libertarianism was not an adequate answer to leftist Critical Theory. These former libertarians, who have always had a conservative streak, were likely amazed when they realized libertarianism does not mandate that bathrooms be segregated according to sex; indeed, libertarianism is firmly agnostic in this regard. Similarly, these former libertarians could likely not bear the thought that their chosen philosophy did not regard Third World individuals as default others. In other words, the revelation that libertarianism does not have a particular country, or an identity, or a volk or nation, proved concerning, giving way to their base instincts.
There used to be a time when I thought once you became a libertarian and truly understood the concepts and theory of libertarianism it is impossible to un-know your newfound insights and regress away from libertarianism. However, these last two years have proven that it is, indeed, possible for individuals who used to accept economic concepts like value subjectivity to suddenly believe they can dictate the value of certain things from their pedestal. Individuals who used to understand that it is essentially self-defeating to not be an individualist, became collectivists. Imagine my surprise when I saw supposed former libertarians jumping with joy at the thought of import tariffs and a ban on the Muslim burka in some places.
And when you push them, they will turn around and say lolbertarians have not succeeded in anything and are ignorant about the importance of culture in public affairs. It is all very convenient: once theyve left libertarianism, suddenly libertarians become ignorant, naive, and idealistic. As if our collective state of stupidity was metaphysically delayed until these individuals decided that theyve had enough of being calm and reasonable about public policy. Seemingly out of nowhere, and quite arbitrarily, those insights these former libertarians had about government, force, and man, are gone.
This post was written by Martin van Staden.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Martin van Staden is the Editor in Chief of Being Libertarian, the Legal Researcher at the Free Market Foundation, a co-founder of the RationalStandard.com, and the Southern African Academic Programs Director at Students For Liberty. The views expressed in his articles are his own and do not represent any of the aforementioned organizations.
Like Loading...
Read more:
The Chief's Thoughts: Moving Away From Libertarianism? - Being Libertarian (satire)
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on The Chief’s Thoughts: Moving Away From Libertarianism? – Being Libertarian (satire)
Pope Francis’s attack on "libertarian individualism" not about … – Crux: Covering all things Catholic
Posted: at 3:08 am
In a recent message by Pope Francis to the Pontifical Academy of Social Science he outlines some moral concerns about a phenomenon he sees as invading (his term) high levels of culture and education in both universities and in schools, namely libertarian individualism.
On the first day of my philosophy classes, the professor admonished us that if we want to have an intelligent discussion or debate, we must begin by defining our terms. Exchanges can become heated and rambunctious but ultimately pointless without observing this first step in clarity.
So lets consider the popes own definition of what he is criticizing. Like the word capitalism, the word libertarian is encrusted with numerous definitions, broad and narrow as well as nuanced and blunt. What, then, is the pope talking about?
When the pope speaks of libertarian individualism, he has in mind something which he says exalts the selfish ideal, whereby it is only the individual who gives values to things and interpersonal relationships and where it is only the individual who decides what is good and what is bad.
This, he says, result is a belief in self-causation, which I take to mean the denial of any givenness in human nature in favor of a radical autonomy in which morality is no longer a question of free adherence to the truth about good and evil but rather simply a matter of whatever I will it to be.
All of this, the pope contends (and I agree), denies the common good. One could add that it also denies the entire tradition of natural law via an exaltation of subjectivity and the detachment of conscience from the truths knowable via faith and reason.
But the most interesting part of Pope Franciss comments arise when he states that libertarian individualism denies the validity of the common good because on the one hand it supposes that the very idea of common implies the constriction of at least some individuals, and the other that the notion of good deprives freedom of its essence. This, then, is anti-social at the root.
At one level, the pope is expressing concern about the type of mindset that denies that there are conditions which enhance human flourishing (which is how the Catholic Church understands the common good) through the acceptance of common constraints (the rule of law being a good example).
He also seems to be critiquing any ethical system that sees freedom, in the sense of absence of constraint, as its own end and finality. For Catholics and other Christians, liberty is more than just negative freedom or the capacity to will X rather than Y.
All this is standard Catholic teaching. The question that remains is whether the pope is offering a fair or accurate definition of libertarianism.
Consider, for example, that there are many schools of libertarianism Lockean libertarians, bleeding heart libertarians, Nozickian libertarians, Hayekian libertarians, Randian libertarians, even Rothbardian anarcho-capitalists, to name just a few.
By no means do they agree about everything. As interesting as it might be to examine the differences between these positions, I think it is more productive to outline some concepts to which I suspect all serious believers could subscribe and see if these can provide an alternative to the specific kind of libertarianism the pope is denouncing but also inoculate us against collectivist alternatives that some might believe the pope could be advocating.
Human beings are not simply individuals, even if we colloquially employ this word to describe people. Certainly, human beings enjoy the kind of legitimate liberty and distinctiveness which some (e.g., Aristotle and Aquinas among others) refer to at times as an expression of individuality.
Even the Vatican IIs Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes speaks of private property as conferring on everyone a sphere wholly necessary for the autonomy of the person and the family, and it should be regarded as an extension of human freedom.
We also know, as a matter of natural reason and natural science, that from the moment of conception, each human being is biologically distinct from his father and mother. Their DNA, for instance, is different. Yet at the same time, that very same individual human being is in relation to his mother and father.
In short, the human person is both individual and social simultaneously. Perhaps in this light it is better to speak of human beings not so much as individuals but as persons.
The social reality of persons to persons is what constitutes a human community. This is a bond one which certainly comes with some constraints, but one which cant be reduced to constraints.
This brings me to the popes concern about bonds and constraints in relation to human freedom. In this regard I have long found the writings of the sociologist Robert Nisbet to be helpful, particularly the distinction he draws between power and authority.
Both power and authority are forms of constraint, Nisbet explains. Power is a form of constraint external to the person. This means that a constraint is forced upon a person without regard to that persons free will, such as an act of violence to conform anothers behavior.
Authority, on the other hand, is a form of constraint interior to the person, some overarching code that the person himself believes in and to which he acquiesces, as begrudgingly as the case may be, such as abstaining from meat on Friday.
Most of us freely submit to all sorts of authority, in Nisbets sense of the word, and rightly resent what Nisbet regards as impositions of power.
Another form of authority long recognized by the Church is, of course, legitimate law and the legitimate acts of sovereign governments. Law and government certainly impose constraints upon people but they also create particular bonds between particular groups of people.
From this standpoint, we start to see that many of the debates engaged in by people of all political persuasions including self-described libertarians concern when a bond has become an illegitimate constraint; or where a constraint, however necessary, is mistaken for a bond.; or when societies are relying too heavily on constraints to do the work of what is normally undertaken by bonds.
Alexis de Tocqueville summed this up in one succinct question when he asked, How is it possible that society should escape destruction if the moral tie is not strengthened in proportion as the political tie is relaxed?
These are the questions which are, and should be, engaged in by societies that seek to take liberty, justice, and the common good seriously. They are also perpetual works in progress.
The irony, however, is that we live in a time when a concern for liberty especially in the specifically Christian sense of the term far from invading our cultures, is under siege.
In some parts of the world, it is threatened by the type of populism that has done so much damage in Pope Franciss Latin America (and is presently destroying Venezuela). In other countries, it is being slowly strangled by the bureaucracies which rule European social democracies.
Then there is the jihadism that is destroying the freedom of many, and literally killing thousands of Christians ever year.
So while the popes warnings against the radical individualism against which the Catholic Church has always cautioned are important, lets hope that his words dont distract attention from some of the profound violations of freedom occurring across the world.
Father Robert A. Sirico is president and co-founder of the Acton Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Read the original:
Pope Francis's attack on "libertarian individualism" not about ... - Crux: Covering all things Catholic
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on Pope Francis’s attack on "libertarian individualism" not about … – Crux: Covering all things Catholic
The truth behind America’s libertarianism – Chicago Tribune
Posted: at 3:08 am
Unfortunately, Dennis Beard's letterto the Tribune is a completely distorted view of libertarianism. He equates that philosophy with Russian nihilism. American libertarians are anything but nihilists. They have strong beliefs. First, and foremost, they believe in individual freedom, not anarchy. They are strong supporters of the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
While libertarians believe in the rule of law, they also believe in limited government. The Declaration states that people have the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It doesn't include the words only if the government says it's OK. As Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Notes on the State of Virginia, The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others.
Regrettably, many Americans now believe, and it appears that Mr. Beard may be among them, that government has a right, through numerous taxes and regulations, to tell us how to lead our daily lives. Do the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington and Springfield really know what's best for us?
Finally, Beard stated that in America it was the rich ... who were longing to get rid of government. He provides no facts to support that statement.
Perhaps he should do more reading in American history and in libertarian philosophy. I suggest he start with The Libertarian Mind by David Boaz.
Robert Angelica, Downers Grove
Visit link:
The truth behind America's libertarianism - Chicago Tribune
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on The truth behind America’s libertarianism – Chicago Tribune
What happens when billionaires seek immortality – Livemint
Posted: at 3:07 am
Death is an old technology but, like the umbrella, it has endured. Will the concept of death, an ingenious idea of nature, ever be replaced by a more advanced science invented by a species?
Many have suspected that such a moment may miraculously arrive in their own lifetime. Among them are a group of people who have the best reasons to go on livingbillionaires. They have funded companies, started trusts and announced awards to solve the problem of death. The efforts would, in our age, lead to unnatural longevity at the very least. And if mankind achieves an escape velocity of longevity, where lifespans are so long, say 200 years, advancing and maturing technologies would stretch them even further. Then, one scientist says, people might live for 1,000 years. Aubrey de Grey, the British gerontologist, says 1,000 years because it is a famous round number. He would not be able to argue why the figure is not 2,000 years instead, or why people would die of natural causes at all.
Not all the billionaires of the world are investing in science to live long. Some Indian billionaires, for instance, pray to God. Most of the billionaires who have waged the war against ageing and death are from Silicon Valley because they are the sort of people who have been trained to believe that a problem, because it is a problem, must have a solution. Unity Biotechnology, one such effort funded by Jeff Bezos of Amazon and the venture capitalist Peter Thiel, among others, has declared, Our medicines could make many debilitating consequences of ageing as uncommon as polio.
There is a hypothesis, endorsed by the World Health Organisation (WHO), that the eradication of polio involved a beautiful transaction in society: Children who were fortunate to receive the oral polio vaccine would excrete the virus, and children who lived by the sewers, too, could, by chance, receive immunity from the disease. The rich and the poor have always lived this way, exchanging maladies and favours without intending to. The quest of the super rich to live long, too, would deeply affect those downstream. Whether most of the world wants it or not, longevity is going to be thrust down their soul.
The search has many strands. The National Academy of Medicine in the US has announced a $25 million (around Rs160 crore) prize for scientists who find breakthroughs. Google and the chairman of Apple, Arthur Levinson, have founded California Life Company, or Calico, which hopes to end the many diseases associated with ageing. In the grip of the science of longevity, scientists are experimenting on themselves. They are taking medication that might be prescribed for the general public only years later.
Writer and podcaster Timothy Ferriss, in his book Tools Of Titans, which reveals the philosophies and processes of very interesting and successful people, states that several people he has interviewed, including scientists, the rich, and fitness freaks, take Metformin, a drug that is usually prescribed for type 2 diabetes. They take the drug because it is believed to have the ability to prevent or kill cancer. Ferriss also documents a diet that is taking over some circles of Americas successfulthe high-fat ketogenic-diet, whose goal is to make the body burn fat instead of carbohydrates, a process known as ketosis. This results in weight loss without significantly reducing muscle mass, improves mental alertness and creates other circumstances that are generally recognized as omens of a long, healthy life. The diet requires a person to fast for about 16 hours instead of the usual 8-10 that most of us observe in the form of sleep, and to eat foods that contain nearly 80% fat and almost no sugars. Malayalees may be delighted to know, and north Indians who live with them alarmed, that the odorous coconut oil is a venerated hero of this diet. Ferriss recommends adding it to coffee, instead of milk, but then do you love longevity that much?
Despite our reverence for science and the optimism of the tech billionaires, we really do not believe in immortality. There are, of course, some (almost) immortal (almost) living thingsbacterial spores, for instance. There is a view that life on earth itself was seeded by immortal organic matter that travels across space on asteroids. But still, the body is the problem. It is very poorly designed for immortality. The mind, we suspect, can go on.
Googles most famous computer scientist, Ray Kurzweil, believes that the next stage in the evolution of man is anthropogenic, or consciously influenced by humanswhen we upload our minds to a computer. This is the only meaningful way, at least from the understanding that we have, that man can become immortal and the machine can have sense. Immortality and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a single phenomenon.
The tech super rich have been obsessed with AI for reasons other than mere business potential. They are a breed of people who are not oppressed by any human. But, it appears, the human mind is lost without an oppressor. Hence their deep interest in AI, and often, its power to destroy the world. But Kurzweils theory, and Elon Musks more concrete attempt to upload the mind, make AI more endearing to the billionaires because it turns out AI is going to be, after all, us.
Kurzweil has predicted that machines and humans would merge in 2045. So, Dmitry Itskov, a Russian billionaire who made his money in journalism (strange things happen in Russia), has created the 2045 Initiative which aims to create technologies enabling the transfer of an individuals personality to a more advanced non-biological carrier, and extending life, including to the point of immortality.
Itskov recognizes the general grouse that such non-biological carriers would be only for the rich, so he has offered to make cheaper carriers. A Nano of sorts for the poorer minds.
Immortality might be hard to achieve in the next few decades, but exceptional longevity spanning two centuries might be probable. It would create new problems. Are the tech billionaires going to destroy all industries, all human jobs and then make everyone live thrice as long as now? What are most people supposed to do for, say, 200 years? Some, like the billionaires and me, would enjoy the extra century, but most people would be lost in the gigantic ocean of life. They are even now. And how tragic would it be then if one dies at 80. Also, what if one wishes to opt out at 90, saying this is enough: would that be suicide or wisdom?
Manu Joseph is a journalist and a novelist, most recently of The Illicit Happiness Of Other People.
First Published: Fri, May 05 2017. 04 43 PM IST
See more here:
What happens when billionaires seek immortality - Livemint
Posted in Immortality Medicine
Comments Off on What happens when billionaires seek immortality – Livemint
Study Shows Cancer-Causing Virus Masters Cell’s Replication, Immortality – Scicasts (press release) (blog)
Posted: at 3:07 am
Durham, NC (Scicasts) Viruses are notorious for taking over their host's operations and using them to their own advantage. But few human viruses make themselves quite as cozy as the Epstein-Barr virus, which can be found in an estimated nine out of ten humans without causing any ill effects.
That is, until this virus causes mononucleosis in adolescents or various cancers of the lymph nodes, including Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, in immune compromised people.
In a paper appearing in the open access journal eLife, a team of researchers from Duke's School of Medicine details just how the Epstein-Barr virus manages to persist so well inside the immune system's B cells, a type of white blood cell that is normally responsible for recognizing and responding to foreign invaders.
"The challenge is that it's a really efficient pathogen," and evades the host's immune system well even when it's recognized as an invader, said Micah Luftig, an associate professor of molecular genetics and microbiology and co-author on the new study.
Luftig's team has found that with a few select chemical signals used early in the course of an infection, Epstein-Barr mimics the beginning of the B cell's normal response to an infectious agent. From within, the virus manages to ramp up the B-cell's reproduction of itself, while at the same time helping the cell resist its own self-destruct signals.
"The virus actually taps into the B cell's normal protection against apoptosis," the programmed cell death that takes B cells out of circulation, Luftig said.
Once the infection is established, Epstein-Barr prefers to hide out in what are known as "memory B cells," relatively slowly reproducing cells that circulate throughout the body. "All of this is about establishing latency," Luftig said, or the ability to hide quietly in plain sight.
Using a new technique developed elsewhere called BH3 profiling that allowed them to test the critical cellular pro- and anti-apoptosis proteins individually, the team was able to see which of these the virus was controlling and then watch the transition from an uninfected cell to the active early infection phase to the latent infection in an immortal cell. The key piece they've uncovered is a viral protein called EBNA3A which manages apoptosis resistance in infected B cells.
The risk for cancers "is largely an issue if you're immune suppressed," Luftig said. But, for example, a recent National Cancer Institute study found that children who receive organ transplants have a 200-times higher chance of getting Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, one of the cancers caused by Epstein-Barr.
The team thinks BH3 profiling could prove useful in guiding treatment decisions on Epstein-Barr associated cancers such as these.
Article adapted from a Duke University news release.
Publication: Epstein-Barr virus ensures B cell survival by uniquely modulating apoptosis at early and late times after infection. Alexander M Price et al. eLife (2017): Click here to view.
See the original post here:
Study Shows Cancer-Causing Virus Masters Cell's Replication, Immortality - Scicasts (press release) (blog)
Posted in Immortality Medicine
Comments Off on Study Shows Cancer-Causing Virus Masters Cell’s Replication, Immortality – Scicasts (press release) (blog)
Transhumanism and cheap laughs: podcasts of the week – The Guardian
Posted: at 3:07 am
Dearest reader, this week has been much better for me, many thanks for all the condolence emails about Bosley. Not only have I managed to retain the life of my one remaining cat, HMS Tiny Pudding, but Ive also registered for postal voting, thus honouring the nameless women and men who gave their lives for our democracy. Its also been national hedgehog week so, honestly, what more could I ask for in my simple life? More podcasts of course!
Now Ill admit, I love a bit of theology, so this podcast, written by Meghan OGieblyn, leapt from my screen, through my ear tubes and sat squashily and cosily in my brain. This is theology and then some. Like all the best podcasts it mixes personal stories with learning: it begins with Meghan, a former evangelical Christian with dreams of becoming a missionary, losing her faith. She could no longer ratify a benevolent God with all the suffering in the world. But she still longed for there to be a plan, a purpose to being alive, but she also needed evidence, and for most people that evidence is the very broad term of science. Whilst latching on to this notion of science she found herself religiously following the theories of transhumanism.
Transhumanism offered a vision of redemption without the thorny problems of divine justice. It was an evolutionary approach to eschatology, one in which humanity took it upon itself to bring about the final glorification of the body and could not be blamed if the path to redemption was messy or inefficient.
Meghan submerged herself into the various subgroups of transhumanism: the idea that we are all in a computer simulation run by future beings recreating the past, of robots gaining souls, and eventually culminating in Meghan finding Christian transhumanism.
Christ had said to his disciples: Whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these. His earliest followers had taken this promise literally. Perhaps these prophecies had pointed to the future achievements of humanity all along, our ability to harness technology to become transhuman.
What a wobble of a circle that is.
Often we find ourselves listening or watching stories like this with a tone of mockery but that isnt the case here. Its easy to see how Meghan fell into transhumanism in the religious sense, it could just as easily happen to any one of us. These things make sense if you really want them to, you just have to have a little faith.
God in the Machine is a rollercoaster of a listen prepare yourself for information overload. I had to listen to it three times before it all went in, but each time was as good as the first. Though I must admit, I stopped playing the Sims when I was a little girl because of the stress that maybe, just maybe, they were real and I was God.
Another podcast that brought my week oodles of joy was Beginner. Its the story of Misha, a 24-year-old Pakistani-American immigrant, learning to do the things she didnt get to do as a child. When she came to the US she was top of her class, but quickly she began to lose her identity. The show follows her story as she learns to belong by living out a childhood she never had, and it begins with something synonymous with childhood learning to ride a bike.
Sadie Mae wrote in to tell me why she loved it so much:
Beginner shot right to the top of my favourites list, the trailer alone had me in tears, hearing the love and kindness between Misha and her brother. I could relate to almost every part of the first episode, even though I was born in the States. Im an older sister that has had to navigate new places and new things on my own, faking it while I figured out what was right. Mishas storytelling is veracious, drawing you in, and inviting you to be part of her journey. Her vulnerability and honest self-introspection is relatable and captivating, setting this millennial coming of age podcast apart from the rest as it resonates across the board.
We can all relate to that fear of not knowing something we feel we should, the fear of doing it wrong, the fear of feeling out of place, the walls that we build and the hacks we use so we can fit in. Mishas desire for authenticity drives her to confront her fears and explore breaking away from them as she tackles being a beginner. I know this is new but seldom does a budding podcast come off so well-polished and with such a captivating start.
Mishas charm from episode one has me rooting for her and I look forward to hearing more of her adventures, triumphs and potential failures. This storytelling podcast truly is one to add to your podcast subscription list. Who knows, maybe itll inspire you to be a beginner again.
When Ed Boff wrote in to tell me about his absolute favourite podcast Cheapshow, I was initially sceptical, but after a couple of listens I completely understood why. It made me howl with laughter at some points, its really fantastic.
It is an anarchic comedy podcast celebrating the best of the cheap and cheerful. Its a mix of standup, chat show and twisted games and challenges all based around the hunt for long-lost treasures or bargain basement deals. Cheapshow aims to find the humour among the bric-a-brac of charity shops, junk sales and Poundlands in the UK. And honestly, they have achieved it and then some. This is what Ed had to say:
Two guys talking about stuff found in pound stores, charity shops, and/or car boot sales, while occasionally descending into a shouting match. That may not sound like much on its own however, its a question of personality. Hosts Paul Gannon and Eli Silverman bring a lot of themselves to this, both in terms of character and experience.
Cheap discoveries often include items with a strong nostalgia factor (like their recent special on TV game show-based board games), and this is where Paul shines. Eli, with his work as a DJ, provides a love of all things music, particularly vinyl records. So theres plenty to talk about, including Elis spectacular tales from the dance floor. Not that this is purely a dry exercise in consumer analysis the comedy here runs from merciless mockery of the concepts at work, to often sheer surrealist confusion. Quite a lot of the stuff on cheap eats will make you wonder for what species this foodstuff was meant for. The hosts are never exactly above the level of what they look at, they self-deprecate (and deprecate each other) mercilessly, such as calling out Pauls own brand of spoonerisms, Gannonisms.
There is nothing amusing about austerity when times are tough, places like Poundland may be your only option so its good to know theres someone out there braving the culinary delights they have to offer, before you go in blind ... If they dont end up killing each other in one of their arguments first! Highly recommended.
Visit link:
Transhumanism and cheap laughs: podcasts of the week - The Guardian
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on Transhumanism and cheap laughs: podcasts of the week – The Guardian
From a 16th-Century Book to a Robot-Assisted Performance, Artists Explore the Legend of the Golem – Hyperallergic
Posted: at 3:07 am
Miloslav Dvoak, Le Golem et Rabbi Loew prs de Prague (1951), oil on canvas, 244 x 202 cm (Prague, idovske Muzeum Jaroslav Horejc) (all images courtesy of muse dart et dhistoire du Judasme, Paris, unless noted)
Noise-math philosopher Norbert Wiener once aptly compared the old Jewish myth about the golem with cybernetic technology. Viewed through that lens, everything from transhuman artificial life cyborgs to anthropomorphic robots to humanoid androids to posthuman digital avatars bear the mystical mark of an artificial body madly turning on its creator. This oily tale is the oldest narrative about artificial life and is now subject of the exhibition Golem! Avatars dune lgende dargile at Muse dart et dhistoire du Judasme.
The golem was first mentioned in passing as in the Bible in Psalm 139:16, but the first golem story was spun by the 16th-century Talmudic scholar Rabbi Loew ben Bezalel. In it, he supposedly used Kabbalistic magic, Hebrew letters, paranormal amulets, or mystical incantations to conjure into existence the Golem of Prague: a colossal figure built from mud or other base materials, who protected the Bohemian Jews of the country from the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II. Though initially a savior, the Golem of Prague eventually became harmful to those he had saved and had to be destroyed. There are myriad subsequent versions of the story, with many variations and contradictions. It is generally agreed that what animated this mystical entity was an inscription either applied to its forehead or slipped under its tongue, and the golem has largely been understood to be an artificial man that is part protector and part monster, but many other differences abound. This specious aspect makes the golem particularly interesting to artists because such contradictory vagueness yields opaque and elusive visual iconography.
The legend spread in the late 19th century, popularized by the 1915 novel The Golem by Gustav Meyrink and three movies by Paul Wegener: The Golem (aka The Monster of Fate) (1915), The Golem and the Dancing Girl (1917), and The Golem: How He Came into the World(1920). An essential general reference for the golem-phile is Idel Moshes 1990 book Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid, published as part of the Judaica: Hermeneutics, Mysticism, and Religion series by the State University of New York Press in Albany. In it, Moshe maintains that the role of the golem concept in Judaism was to confer an exceptional status to the Jewish elite by bestowing them with the capability of supernatural powers deriving from a profound knowledge of the Hebrew language and its magical and mystical values.
I first encountered this titillating thesis mixing creation and destruction at Emily Bilskis 1988 show Golem! Danger, Deliverance and Art, which she curated for The Jewish Museum in New York City. I still remember seeing Louise Fishmans fine painting Golem (1981) there, and I was disappointed that the plucky street performance artist Kim Jones (aka Mudman) wasnt included.
This show in Paris follows on the heels of the Golem exhibit at The Jewish Museum Berlin. Both venues had the idea for an exhibition on the golem at the same time, and the institutions cooperated on loans and exchanged ideas. The Muse dart et dhistoire du Judasme show has 136 works, including paintings, drawings, photographs, cinematic clips, literature, comics, and video games by the likes of Charles Simonds, Boris Aronson, Christian Boltanski, Joachim Seinfeld, Grard Garouste, Amos Gita, R.B. Kitaj, and Eduardo Kac. Animated films included are Jan Svankmajers masterful Darkness Light Darkness (1989), Jakob Gautels First Material (1999), and David Musgraves Studio Golem (2012). But the best dramaturgical presentation is the humanoid robotic metaphor of an awakening of posthumanity in School of Moon (2016), a dance choreographed by Eric Minh Cuong Castaing for the Ballet National of Marseille in conjunction with digital artist Thomas Peyruse and roboticist Sophie Sakka. Their impish portrayal blurs our perception of the human and the nonhuman by mixing ballet dancers with children and anthropoid robots.
The show kicks off with a large straightforward illustrative painting by Miloslav Dvoak, Le Golem et Rabbi Loew prs de Prague (1951) but soon turns weirder with a 1964 Dennis Hopper photograph of the great beatnik Wallace Berman. Berman is known for his underground film Aleph (195666), in which he uses Hebrew letters to frame a hypnotic, rapid-fire noise montage into a bit of wonder. Moving on, I was fascinated by an odd printed book page from the Sefer Yetzirah (Book of Creation) (1562), in which Kabbalists, wishing to bring a golem to life, looked for the aid of alphabetic formulae. Other powerful pieces include Lionel Sabattes redolent sculpture Smile in Dust (2017), Philip Gustons cartoonish painting of a cuddly Ku Klux Klanner In Bed (1971), Anselm Kiefers crusty stout block Rabi Low: Der Golem (19882012), Antony Gormleys rusty condensed sculpture Clench (2013), and Niki de Saint Phalles swashbuckling Maquette pour Le Golem (1972), her model for the architecturally scaled triple-tongued monster slide Le Golem (1972), which she built in Jerusalem, that represents the three monotheistic religions plummeting from a golem-monsters merry mouth.
One of the more delightful displays was the room full of Ignati Nivinskis 1924 watercolors made for the costumes of the 1925 theatre piece The Golem, on loan from the Russian National Archives of Literature and Art. The play was based on the 1921 text The Golem: A Dramatic Poem in Eight Scenes by H. Leivick, a Yiddish poet and political radical who served jail time in Siberia. On the other hand, I was startled and disturbed to see Walter Jacobis distasteful 1942 book Golem, a flagrant anti-Semitic propaganda text concerning a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory within the Czech Jewry, issued during the Nazi occupation of Czechoslovakia. Seeing it made me think that a Trump-era cyber-golem would busy himself with public relations, propaganda, market research, publicity, disinformation, counter-facts, censorship, espionage, and even cryptography (which in the 16th century was considered a branch of magic).
The show winds down wonderfully with Walter Schulze-Mittendorffs sculpture Robot from Fritz Langs film Metropolis (1926), which was recreated by the Louvre in 1994, standing in front of Stelarcs Handwriting: Writing One Word Simultaneously with Three Hands (1982). The combination of these works suggests that golems have to do with an abiding conviction that cold and inert matter may be brought to life through the correct application of words. But rather than a sign of human accomplishment, the golem casts a sour shadow onto our gleaming technological age. The power of human language to summon golems to artificial life is experienced as hubris in this exhibit. This vanity enhances the sexy love-hate of spooky computer-robotics we feel at the root of Alex Garlands 2015 film Ex Machina, a poster for which is on display. We cannot and do not escape the triumphal attraction of the golem here, as we are confronted (again) with the fetid fact that a determinative force in human life is the virtual merging with the actual. As such, the golem is the minotaur at the heart of our viractual labyrinth.
This brave new word-world was suggested back in 1965 by Kabbalah philosopher Gershom Scholem, when he officially named one of the first Israeli computers Golem I. Because just as the golem is brought to life by combinations of letters, the computer (which is behind any artificially intelligent robot) only obeys coding language. And that coded situation slots us back into Norbert Wieners excited trepidation toward machine learning. While learning is a property almost exclusively ascribed to self-conscious living systems, AI computers now exist that can learn from past experiences and so improve their operative functions to the point of surpassing human capabilities. This posthuman transcendence raises concerns both aesthetic and ethical, casting around the art in this show an apologetic air heavy with ambivalence toward human cunning and trickery and seductive art and technology.
Golem! Avatars dune lgende dargile continues at Muse dart et dhistoire du Judasme (Htel de Saint-Aignan, 71, rue du Temple, 3rd arrondissement) through July 16.
The rest is here:
From a 16th-Century Book to a Robot-Assisted Performance, Artists Explore the Legend of the Golem - Hyperallergic
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on From a 16th-Century Book to a Robot-Assisted Performance, Artists Explore the Legend of the Golem – Hyperallergic
Stephen Hawking just moved up humanity’s deadline for escaping Earth – Washington Post
Posted: at 3:06 am
In a July 2015 speech, Stephen Hawking explained "Breakthrough Listen," an initiative aimed at discovering intelligent extraterrestrial life. (Breakthrough Initiatives)
In November, Stephen Hawking and his bulging computer brain gave humanity what we thought was an intimidating deadline for finding a new planet to call home: 1,000 years.
Ten centuries is a blip in the grand arc of the universe, but in human terms it was the apocalyptic equivalent of getting a few weeks' notice before our collective landlord (Mother Earth) kicks us to the curb.
Even so, we took a collective breath and steeled our nerves.
So what if there's no interplanetary Craigslist for new astronomical sublets, we told ourselves, we're human the Bear Grylls of the natural order. We've already survived the ice age, the plague, a bunch of scary volcanoes and earthquakes, and the 2016 election cycle.
We got this, right? Not so fast.
[The Doomsday Clock just advanced, thanks to Trump: Its now just 2 minutes to midnight.]
Now Hawking, the renowned theoretical physicist turned apocalypse warning system, is back with a revised deadline.In "Expedition New Earth" a documentary that debuts this summer as part of the BBCs "Tomorrows World" science season Hawking claims that Mother Earth would greatly appreciate it if we could gather our belongings and get out not in 1,000 years, but in the next century or so.
You heard the man a single human lifetime. Is this nerd serious?
Thanks, Steve.
Professor Stephen Hawking thinks the human species will have to populate a new planet within 100 years if it is to survive, the BBC said with a notable absence of punctuation marks in a statement posted online. With climate change, overdue asteroid strikes, epidemics and population growth, our own planet is increasingly precarious.
In this landmark series, Expedition New Earth, he enlists engineering expert Danielle George and his own former student, Christophe Galfard, to find out if and how humans can reach for the stars and move to different planets.
The BBC program gives Hawking a chance to wade into the evolving science and technology that may become crucial if humans hatch a plan to escape Earth and find a way to survive on another planet from questions about biology and astronomy to rocket technology and human hibernation, the BBC notes.
The cosmologistlives with themotor neuron disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or Lou Gehrig's Disease.As the disease has progressed, he has become almost entirely paralyzed. And in 1985, after contracting pneumonia, Hawking underwent a tracheotomy that left him unable to speak. He communicates using the assistance of a voice-producing computer.
In recent months, Hawking has been explicit about humanity's need to find a "Planet B." In the past, he has also called for humans to colonize the moon and find a way to settle Mars a locale he referred to as the obvious next target in 2008, according to New Scientist.
Remaining on Earth any longer, Hawking claims, places humanity at great risk of encountering another mass extinction.
We must continue to go into space for the future of humanity, the 74-year-old Cambridge professor said during a November speech at Oxford University Union, according to the Daily Express.
I dont think we will survive another 1,000 years without escaping beyond our fragile planet, he added.
[Why Stephen Hawking believes the next 100 years may be humanitys toughest test]
During the hour-long speech, Hawking told the audience that Earth's cataclysmic end may be hastened by humankind, which will continue to devour the planets resources at unsustainable rates, the Express reported.
His wide-ranging talk touched upon the origins of the universe and Einstein's theory of relativity, as well as humanity's creation myths and God. Hawking also discussed M-theory, which Leron Borsten of PhysicsWorld.com explains as proposal for a unified quantum theory of the fundamental constituents and forces of nature.
Though the challenges ahead are immense, Hawking said, it is aglorious time to be alive and doing research into theoretical physics.
Our picture of the universe has changed a great deal in the last 50 years, and I am happy if I have made a small contribution, he added.
Some of Hawking's most explicit warnings have revolved around the potential threat posed by artificial intelligence. That means in Hawking's analysis humanity's daunting challenge is twofold: develop the technology that will enable us to leave the planet and start a colony elsewhere, while avoiding the frightening perils that may be unleashed by said technology.
[We would need 1.7 Earths to make our consumption sustainable]
When it comes to discussing that threat, Hawking is unmistakably blunt.
I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race, Hawkingtold the BBCin a 2014 interview that touched upon everything from online privacy to his affinity for his robotic-sounding voice.
Despite its current usefulness, he cautioned, further developing A.I. could prove a fatal mistake.
Once humans develop artificial intelligence, it will take off on its own and redesign itself at an ever-increasing rate, Hawking warned in recent months. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded.
Thanks again, Steve.
MORE READING:
Unchecked fake news gave rise to an evil empire in Star Wars
A scientist who studies protest says the resistance isnt slowing down
The tea plant has a whopper genome, four times that of coffee, scientists find
View original post here:
Stephen Hawking just moved up humanity's deadline for escaping Earth - Washington Post
Posted in Post Human
Comments Off on Stephen Hawking just moved up humanity’s deadline for escaping Earth – Washington Post
The Human Rights Council Can’t Handle Sri Lanka – Huffington post (press release) (blog)
Posted: at 3:06 am
During the 34th session of the UN Human Rights Council (which ended in late March), a cosponsored resolution on Sri Lanka was passed. The resolution which deals largely with human rights and transitional justice is the fifth country-specific Sri Lanka resolution since 2012.
Leading up to, during and after the session a range of commentary has been published on this topic and one thing really stands out. Many have referred to Sri Lanka being granted more time to move ahead with its transitional justice process. We have been told that Colombo has been given more time or been allowed to proceed.
Its true that the Council will monitor Sri Lankas transitional justice process for another two years. However, something truly odd is going on here. Why are people intimating that there was some other (more drastic) option looming during the Councils 34th session?
The passage of another resolution on Sri Lanka was basically staged theater, a foregone conclusion before the session had begun. More resolute action simply wasnt on the table.
In a recent Washington Examiner piece, I looked at Sri Lankas relationship with the Council in more detail. Heres a paragraph from the article:
Sri Lanka has basically been disregarding Council resolutions for the past five years. The current administration is more than happy to keep this dance at the Geneva-based body going, because its ensures that they can at least for an international audience remain publicly committed to a lot of reforms that they have virtually no intention of ever implementing.
The inescapable reality is that the international community, particularly the U.S. and its allies, have completely caved. Colombos promises have not been met with significant tangible action and the smart money says things wont look that different in the coming years.
The current state of affairs in Sri Lanka is being manipulated for various reasons: including the desire for a success story, perceived geopolitical exigencies and fundamental misunderstandings about the country.
So, lets be clear and candid about whats happening.
See more here:
The Human Rights Council Can't Handle Sri Lanka - Huffington post (press release) (blog)
Posted in Post Human
Comments Off on The Human Rights Council Can’t Handle Sri Lanka – Huffington post (press release) (blog)







