Monthly Archives: May 2017

Aureus, the First Bitcoin-Backed Cryptocurrency to Issue Monthly Dividends in Bitcoin – PR Newswire (press release)

Posted: May 17, 2017 at 1:30 am

LUXEMBOURG, May 16, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --Cryptocurrency solutions provider, Cryptocrest has announced a new dividend structure for its Aureus (AUR) cryptocurrency. The dividends are offered on a monthly basis, in Bitcoin, to all Aureus token holders through the Aureus Bitcoin Trust (ABT). The Aureus cryptocurrency operates on Bitcoin's proven blockchain protocol but with superior transaction speeds at lower fees in comparison to the Bitcoin network. The cryptocurrency has a close connection with Bitcoin as the ABT is backed by a reserve of 15000 BTCs.

Aureus is a unique blockchain based cryptoassetthat derives its value from both cryptocurrency and real-world economies. Modeled on the highly successful Bitcoin protocol, AUR combines the flexibility, liquidity, and accessibility of cryptoassets with returns derived from the real-world economy.

The cryptocurrency platform's aim is to enable all types of investors from around the globe to invest in local economies via the proven power of blockchain, but this time, with monthly Bitcoin dividends issued to the holders of the cryptocurrency. This way of investing will attempt to offer investors superior returns than traditional market investments while maintaining a low level of calculated risk.

As the initialAureusseed BTC belongs to the members of a failed community lending program, the initial distribution of AUR will be allocated to the existing community members that are contained within a closed ecosystem.

Like Bitfinex' BFX Tokens, AUR is then distributed proportionately to each member in a systematic time delayed manner. The longer a member holds on to their AUR, the more AUR they will receive periodically. This would allow AUR to be introduced to the open cryptocurrency economy in a gradual manner whilst retaining the value for the community in the long term, reducing the risk of inflation or over-supply when AUR is transferred out of the community.

Cryptocrest manages the distribution by creating a Treasury Reserve (TR) designed to hold and distribute AUR for the community's benefit.

Aureus is essentially valued through the ABT, a fund initially consisting of 15,000 bitcoins held for low-risk investment. Cryptocrest's consultancy management team controls the investment strategy with a present focus on low-risk peer-to-peer Bitcoin margin lending in top exchanges.

The 15,000 bitcoins are held by a reputable independent custodian and can only be returned proportionately to the AUR owners when amajority of the owners votes for liquidation. Votes are calculated by the number of AUR each individual hold. This mechanism allows the community to decide the path of ABT if Bitcoins reachunprecedented prices.

Cryptocresthas already proven its experience in the regular economy, with an impressive investment management history, primarily in lending. It benefits investors in two ways as they stand to profit from not only the increase in the value of Aureus but also the value of ABT. Returns generated by the ABT are distributed among the AUR holders, providing them with multiple sources of gains.

Aureus Tokens

The Aureus cryptotokens are entirely pre-mined with a fixed supply of 21,000,000 AUR (21 million). However, unlike other pre-mined cryptocurrency tokens, monthly supplies of AUR will be allocated into the ecosystem until the maximum cap is eventually reached.

The platform has already issued 3,600,000 AUR (17.14%) out of the total supply to 70,000 Citizens, A Treasury Reserve (TR), formed for the stewardship of capital for the community, will receive 500,000 AUR monthly, and it will always maintain a minimum balance of 100,000 AUR.

Aureus Wallets

Aureus will offer online wallets to its Citizens, enabling them to store, send and receive the AUR cryptotokens. The wallet is available for Android-powered devices on Google Play Store. It will be made available for iOS devices soon along with a hardware wallet. The digital wallets are created using Bitlox' technology.

About Cryptocrest

The Cryptocrest team helps clients by tackling problems together and crafting reliable solutions for their cryptocurrency business, from app development, tech architecture, financial models, marketing & PR.

Learn more about Aureus at http://aureus.cc/ Learn more about Cryptocrest at http://www.cryptocrest.com/ Aureus Press Conference http://aureus.cc/?page_id=4484 Whitepaper http://aureus.cc/?page_id=4500 Youtube channel here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuxAe2t0JrrZLWhuyYhqyzg

Media Contact

Contact Name:Jarrah Lim Contact Email:contact@cryptocrest.com Company Name:Cryptocrest Location:Luxembourg City Contact Phone Number:+60173042536

Cryptocrest is the source of this content. Virtual currency is not legal tender, is not backed by the government, and accounts and value balances are not subject to consumer protections. This press release is for informational purposes only. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest.

Related Links

Bitcoin PR Buzz

Aureus

Related Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40Mk3YksMm0

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aureus-the-first-bitcoin-backed-cryptocurrency-to-issue-monthly-dividends-in-bitcoin-300458716.html

SOURCE Cryptocrest

Follow this link:
Aureus, the First Bitcoin-Backed Cryptocurrency to Issue Monthly Dividends in Bitcoin - PR Newswire (press release)

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on Aureus, the First Bitcoin-Backed Cryptocurrency to Issue Monthly Dividends in Bitcoin – PR Newswire (press release)

Cryptopia launches first NZD-pegged cryptocurrency – CryptoNinjas

Posted: at 1:30 am

New Zealand cryptocurrency exchange Cryptopia, which is based out of Christchurch has announced New Zealands first cryptocurrency pegged to the New Zealand dollar. Similar to the USD, EUR, and JPY created by companyTether.to which uses Omni Protocol, an open-source software that interfaces with blockchains to allow for the issuance and redemption of cryptocurrency tokens, like such tethers above.

Tether Platform currencies are claimed to be 100% backed by actual fiat currency assets in the companys reserve account. Tethers are redeemable and exchangeable pursuant to Tether Limiteds terms of service. The conversion rate is 1 tether USD equals 1 USD.

As to the move for Cryptopia to develop the recently launched the NZed (NZDT), the first cryptocurrency token tethered to the New Zealand dollar. The motive for the NZed came from several speakers at The Blockchain NZ conference, including cloud accounting software Xeros Head of Government Relationships Grant Anderson, who raised the need for Kiwis to have a crypto-based New Zealand dollar that could be traded with most of the benefits of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

Users believed it would be useful to have an easier way to settle bitcoin transactions quicker and easier for the New Zealand dollar, without being subject to BTC risk.

The Cryptopia developer team created the new currency and within eight hours had orders on the exchange for more than $40,000 NZDT.

Currently, total tokens available are limited to $100,000 NZDT, an amount Cryptopia can easily back from reserve funds.

Cryptopia CEO Rob Dawson toldBizEDGE NZ, while thats not enough liquidity to allow widespread adoption, it gets the ball rolling with a challenge to government, and to the broader industry that blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies are here to stay.

Right now, we can only accept cash deposits for tokens from overseas clients, although pending regulatory confirmation we expect to be able to offer the full service to Kiwis shortly.

We need to get moving if we want to establish New Zealand as a global leader in this space, says Dawson.

Cryptopia has over hundreds of coins listed andprovides a mining pool, auction house and marketplace, several stable nodes on the network, and a support framework for each coin accepted on the site.

Read the original here:
Cryptopia launches first NZD-pegged cryptocurrency - CryptoNinjas

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on Cryptopia launches first NZD-pegged cryptocurrency – CryptoNinjas

Bitfinex Now Processing One Time USD Withdrawals – Bitcoin News

Posted: at 1:30 am

Online cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex announced May 12 they are resuming fiat withdrawals for specific customer profiles in certain jurisdictions.

Read more:Research Paper Suggests Bitcoin Volatility Will Match Fiat in Two Years

They are processing these requests in descending order for customers who intend to withdraw alarge quantity of funds.These withdrawals will beon a one-time basis until more options for the company arise.

The exchange also mentioned they started moving many of their funds outside of Taiwan. Between this action and other channels opening up to the company, Bitfinex noticed the price spread between them and other exchanges begin to narrow. Their press release also said,

As noted in our prior announcement, US correspondent banks continue to block international wires. USD, however, continues to flow domestically in Taiwan and other channels have been slowly ramping up as evidenced by the price spreads narrowing between Bitfinex and other exchanges.

However, the press release stated for time being the company can only process transactions over $50,000 until more channels for transactions become available and viable.

This news comes after several weeks of halted fiat currency withdrawals at Bitfinex, which have caused fear and doubt to spread across the bitcoin ecosystem.Many actors in the crypto-space have compared the price spread engendered by Bitfinexs policies as similar to what happened at Mt. Gox prior to its insolvency and subsequent fall from grace.

Jamie Redman, writing for bitcoin.com, echoed these sentiments: Traders dont feel confident in the market because of the 2013 Mt Gox scandal which shook the bitcoin community to the corePrice spreads began to happen slightly then picked up when Mt Gox suspended USD withdrawals.

Nonetheless, the price spreads are starting to balance out alongwith Bitfinexsannouncement. At the time of writing this, Bitfinex was sitting at $1812, with most other exchanges hovering around the mid to upper $1700 range.

These prices, however, do not mean that there are no bubbles propping up the bitcoin cap or price or artificially incitinga bull market. There could be a market run, but no one can guess whether that is true or not. Most of the time, market trends are impossible to predict. All the variables that influence value and price change regularly and rapidly.

Nonetheless, it appears that Bitfinex is poised to get their exchange running properly. They promised customers they are solvent, and said they merelyencountered legal and technical difficulties. Their mission is still to allow the fluid exchange of currencies across disparate crypto-spaces.

Bitfinex thanked their customers for the dedication and patience they have shown while the company tries to overcome a myriad of hurdles. They said,

We are deeply grateful for the patience and forbearance that our customers and shareholders have shown us as we work to restore normal operations. We apologize for the inconvenience and look forward to resolving these problems in the coming weeks.

What do you think about Bitfinex and these price differences? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock and BTC Report app

Do you have an easy and fast way to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check out our tools section.

See the original post here:
Bitfinex Now Processing One Time USD Withdrawals - Bitcoin News

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitfinex Now Processing One Time USD Withdrawals – Bitcoin News

Watch the WannaCry bitcoin ransom trickle in – CNET

Posted: at 1:29 am

The WannaCry ransomware made on average $23,333 a day. Monday was its most successful payday.

In just four days, the WannaCry ransomware reeled in enough money to buy 8,750 servings of avocado toast (or maybe a modest house, if you're into that sort of thing). And now the ransom has doubled.

The global ransomware plague started infecting computers on Friday, abusing an exploit discovered by the NSA that was leaked to the public by the Shadow Brokers hacker group. It breached computers through phishing emails and then spread through networks using a Server Messaging Block vulnerability on outdated Windows computers.

Before it was accidentally (and only temporarily) shut down, WannaCry had locked down more than 200,000 computers in more than 150 countries, affecting banks, universities and hospitals, with a demand that the targets pay $300 worth of bitcoins by May 20. On Tuesday, the ransom doubled from $300 to $600, and the tally of WannaCry victims had reached more than 374,000 computers.

In the last 72 hours, more than 261 people have decided they would rather pay the ransom than lose their important files forever, according to trackers analyzing the three known bitcoin wallets. (You can track the amount yourself here.) A majority of the payments came on Monday, just hours before the first deadline passed and the ransom rose.

In total, the hackers behind WannaCry made $69,535 by Tuesday morning, as payments continued to flow in. While the original ransomware has been slowed down, patched variations of the malware -- pointing to the same bitcoin wallets -- have appeared, this time without a kill switch.

If every ransom ends up being paid, the hackers could make more than $1 billion from the breach. One risk analysis firm estimates that WannaCry could cost the world's economy $4 billion in damages and losses.

It's unclear who is behind the massive attack, but researchers have found clues in the code linking the ransomware to North Korea.

First published May 16 at 9:19 a.m. PT. Updated at 11:52 a.m.: Added details about the potential economic loss from WannaCry.

CNET Magazine: Check out a sampling of the stories you'll find in CNET's newsstand edition.

It's Complicated: This is dating in the age of apps. Having fun yet? These stories get to the heart of the matter.

Originally posted here:
Watch the WannaCry bitcoin ransom trickle in - CNET

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Watch the WannaCry bitcoin ransom trickle in – CNET

What you need to know about bitcoin after the WannaCry ransomware attack – Washington Post

Posted: at 1:29 am

Bitcoin is in the news again after Friday's worldwide ransomware attack. The malicious software locks down victims' computers and refuses to grant themaccess to their files unless they agree to pay at least $300 in bitcoin. Which may have you wondering: What is bitcoin? And why do the attackers want payment in that currency?

Here's a refresher on bitcoin and how it's connected to the ransomware threat.

What is bitcoin?

Bitcoin is a kind of digital currency. You can buy it with dollars or euros, just like you can trade any other currency. You store it in an online wallet. And with that wallet, you can spend bitcoin online and in the physical world for goods and services. Even PayPal supports bitcoin.

And, of course, bitcoin has a valuation, which you may have heard aboutbecause bitcoin's price has fluctuated up and down.

[How to protect yourself from the global ransomware attack]

What's different about bitcoin?

Usually, if you pay for something on the Internet, you use a credit or debit card. That card is connected to information about you, such as your name and billing address.

You can use bitcoin the same way, but unlike with a credit card, the transactions you make with the currency are completely anonymous. They can't be used to identify you personally. Instead, whenever you trade in bitcoin, you use a "private key" associated with your wallet to generate a bit of code called an address that is then publicly associated with your transaction but with no personal identifying information. In that way, every transactionis recorded and securely signed in an open ledger that anyone can read and double-check.

So you can use bitcoin to protect your privacy. Is that why the WannaCry attackers picked it as a form of payment?

Possibly. Bitcoin has certainly gained prominence in the news mediaas a technology that can facilitate crime. But even though the identities of people in a bitcoin transaction may be hidden, the public ledgerhas increasingly helped law enforcement trace the movement of bitcoins from place to place.

The Justice Department has successfully prosecuted online criminal operations that used bitcoin.In 2013, the government arrested Ross Ulbricht, the founder of a major underground drug market, and seized more than $3.5 million worth of bitcoin. Two undercover FBI agents associated with the investigation werelater accused of stealing some of thatcurrency.

Could law enforcement wind up doing something similar with WannaCry?

The government is already investigating. On Monday, White House homeland security adviser Tom Bossert told reporters that attribution the process of figuring out who was responsible for the crime is generally pretty tough incomputer attacks. Often, the attackers are located beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement or have shrouded their activities behind multiple layers of security. But, Bossert said, I don't want to say that we have no clues.

How much money have the attackers collected?

So far, it looks to be about $55,000, according to a bot designed by the news site Quartz that is tracking the amount of money in the attackers' wallets.

Considering that Europol, the European Union law enforcement agency,has said that more than 200,000 computers have been infected with the malware, that doesn't seem like a lot of money.Still, the value of a single bitcoin has risen steadily in recent years. Hours before WannaCry began spreading last week, the price of one bitcoin hit an all-time high of $1,830. Some analysts predictthat it could break $3,000 by year's end although the price fell by $200 after the attack was revealed.

In light of how cheaply and easily hackers can push out ransomware, winning even a handful of bitcoins and holding onto them for a while could make the cyber-thieves a large sum of money.

Link:
What you need to know about bitcoin after the WannaCry ransomware attack - Washington Post

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on What you need to know about bitcoin after the WannaCry ransomware attack – Washington Post

All About Bitcoin, the Mysterious Digital Currency – The New York … – New York Times

Posted: at 1:29 am


New York Times
All About Bitcoin, the Mysterious Digital Currency - The New York ...
New York Times
What is Bitcoin and where did it come from? Here is information about the electronic currency that hackers behind the global ransomware attack are demanding.
AP Explains: What is bitcoin? A look at the digital currencyABC News

all 96 news articles »

Read more here:
All About Bitcoin, the Mysterious Digital Currency - The New York ... - New York Times

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on All About Bitcoin, the Mysterious Digital Currency – The New York … – New York Times

Recent ransomware attacks raise the question: Is bitcoin only for cybercriminals? – Salon

Posted: at 1:29 am

In the past few weeks,a widespread and coordinated international cyberattack seized control of hundreds of thousands of computers in 150 countries. Those affected by the cyberattack would see a window pop up on theirscreen telling them that their files were inaccessible, then demanding payment of a ransom lest their files bedeleted. But the ransomers in this attack werent demanding gold bars, a parachute or sacks of unmarked bills delivered to a secure location. They wanted bitcoins.

Bitcoin iswhat is known as a cryptocurrency, a digital currencythat is distributed without any kind of centralized bank. The mechanism of distribution is complicated you can read a full rundown but basically bitcoin relies onusers distributed computing power to ensure the viability of transactions.Running the software to keep track of transactions takes resources, and users who do so are motivated by the prospectof earning bitcoins in exchange for theircomputers assistance in keeping track of abitcoin ledger.

Boosters ofbitcoin see the currency ashaving many strengths compared to regular money: Cryptocurrencies have no central bank managing and issuing them and their use remainsmostly anonymous when transactions occur. (This latter point is arguable, as Ill discuss momentarily.) And unlike regularmoney, which usually moves across the world via banks or financial agencies, cryptocurrencies can move around through digital wires unhindered by processing fees or taxes.

The perceived strengths of bitcoin as an alternative to fiat money that it moves around pseudonymously and thus is much harder for government officialsto track or seize accounts isalso its weaknesses. Indeed, these characteristics have made bitcoin the currency of choice for ransomware hackers as well as illicit online marketplaces like AlphaBay (and the now-shuttered Silk Road) allowingbuyers and sellers to trade black-market goods like drugs and credit card numbers alongside quotidian, traditional online marketplace goods such as clothes and books. Yet the ethereal aspects of bitcoin you dont need to store itin a bank andit doesnt exist on paper but ismerely a string of numbers means its the ideal tool for a digital ransom.

I think [bitcoins] association with malware and ransomware signals that it has a problem because bitcoin investors and developers and pardon this terrible term bitvangelists dont want that,Julian Gottlieb, an associate professor of politics at the University of Oregon who studies cryptocurrencies, told Salon.

Institutional investment gives cryptocurrencies like bitcoin a patina of legitimacy, Gottlieb explained. In Japan right now, because of some economic stagnation, theres been an effort for investors to diversify their portfolios, and theyve been encouraging people to diversity portfolios and invest in bitcoin, he said.

The value of a single bitcoin, currently about $1,700, rises and falls depending on how many people invest in the currency meaning how many people buybitcoin in exchange forreal money.

So is bitcoin to blame for enabling these digital ransomers? Many bitcoin enthusiasts scoff at this idea. Becky Metivier, in a blog for Sage Data Security, argued that bitcoin is not to blame for ransomware. Metivier pointed out that poor security policies and practices are just as much to blame for ransomware as encryption and bitcoin.

Metivier wrote, Because of its association with ransomware, bitcoins benefits have been obscured by a cloud of misconception.

Part of that misconception is the notion that bitcoin use is really anonymous. Because all transactions are recorded in the blockchain basically an ever-growing ledger theres some ability to track bitcoin transactions.Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous, saysCharles Bovaird, lead markets writer for CoinDesk, a cryptocurrency news site. The cryptocurrencys transactions involve transfers betweenbitcoin addresses, which arestrings of letters and numbers.Every time a bitcoin transaction takes place, it gets recorded on the blockchain, where it is linkedto the addresses involved.

Added Bovaird: Over time, a bitcoin address can develop user history. If one of these addresses is associated with several transactions,it makes it easier to track the user of that address.

Outside of enthusiasts, who share information about cryptocurrencies in many different online forums and news sites, the average person might hear about bitcoin only when its in the news for something like a cyberattack or ransomware story. Bitcoin has shown its promise for a lot of illicit activities, like hacking for pay, large-scale heists online, said Gottlieb. The semi-anonymity of the technology does lend itself to that.

Gottlieb sees a problem in the way that the media industry covers bitcoin:Since the currencyis decentralized, no central voice candefend bitcoin when a news story portrays it in a negative light.

If Chase Bank were hacked, they would have a PR community, Gottlieb said. But [bitcoin] is a fractionalized community; theres no way to respond to something like this en masse.

One might draw a similarity to the Occupy Wall Street movement: Because ofthe inherently decentralized nature of bitcoin transactions, one bad apple say, a man climbing a public art structure and refusing to dismountat a protest reflects poorlyon the entire organization, with no point person in the PR department to run damage control.

For his part, Gottlieb sees bitcoin as having more populist possibilities that extend beyond itspotential as a tool for cybercriminals. The same thing that makes it possible for hackers to hold digital assets hostage and extract wealth from people with bitcoin also allows it to be a potential source of power for activists in authoritarian regimes, he said. It can keep people anonymous, protect their identity.

View post:
Recent ransomware attacks raise the question: Is bitcoin only for cybercriminals? - Salon

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Recent ransomware attacks raise the question: Is bitcoin only for cybercriminals? – Salon

WCry ransomware worm’s Bitcoin take tops $70k as its spread continues – Ars Technica

Posted: at 1:29 am

WCry, the National Security Agency exploit-powered ransomware worm that began spreading worldwide on Friday, had reportedly affected hundreds of thousands of computers before the weekend, but the malware had only brought in about $20,000 in ransom payments. However, as the world returned to the office on Monday, those payments have been rapidly mounting, based on tracking data for the three Bitcoin wallets tied by researchers to the malware. As of noon Eastern Time on Monday, payments had reached an estimated $71,000 since May 12. So far, 263 payments have been made to the three wallets linked to the code in the malware.

The payment history for each wallet shows individual transactions ranging mostly between 0.16 and 0.34 Bitcoin (approximately $300 and $600, respectively), with the number of larger payments increasing over time. Different ransom amounts have been presented to victims, and the price of Bitcoin has climbed dramatically over the past week, causing some variation in the payment sizes.

According to researchers at Symantec Security Response, tracking ransom transactions would have been much more difficult if not for a bug in code that was supposed to create an individual bitcoin wallet for each victim:

Because the code failed, it defaulted over the three preset wallets. This, along with the "killswitch" code that was left in the initial wave of WCry malware, may be an indication that the malware wasn't yet fully tested when it was launched.

Excerpt from:
WCry ransomware worm's Bitcoin take tops $70k as its spread continues - Ars Technica

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on WCry ransomware worm’s Bitcoin take tops $70k as its spread continues – Ars Technica

Bitcoin Price Drops After "WannaCry" Ransomware Taint – Investopedia

Posted: at 1:29 am

Bitcoin Price Drops After "WannaCry" Ransomware Taint
Investopedia
Bitcoin price has undergone a price revision following the WannaCry cyber-attack. Current speculation is that this is related to the fact that the attackers have requested that the ransom be paid in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. Bitcoin has enjoyed ...

and more »

See original here:
Bitcoin Price Drops After "WannaCry" Ransomware Taint - Investopedia

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitcoin Price Drops After "WannaCry" Ransomware Taint – Investopedia

NASA’s Worst Plan Yet – National Review

Posted: at 1:28 am

At the recent Space Foundation conference held in Colorado Springs, NASA revealed its new plan for human space exploration, superseding the absurd Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM) championed by the Obama administration. Amazingly, the space agency has managed to come up with an even dumber idea.

In the early months of the Trump administration, some lunar advocates spread the rumor that the new president would seek a return to the Moon within his first four years, thereby dramatically making America great again in space. That is not the plan.

Nor is the plan to send humans to Mars within eight years, something that I think we could achieve. Nor is it to send human missions to explore near-Earth asteroids, as then President Obama suggested in 2010, nor is it even to send humans to a piece of an asteroid brought back from deep space to lunar orbit for study, as called for in the ARM.

No, instead NASA is proposing to build a space station in lunar orbit. This proposal is notable for requiring a large budget to create an object with no utility whatsoever.

We do not need a lunar-orbiting station to go to the Moon. We do not need such a station to go to Mars. We do not need it to go to near-Earth asteroids. We do not need it to go anywhere. Nor can we accomplish anything in such a station that we cannot do in the Earth-orbiting International Space Station, except to expose human subjects to irradiation a form of medical research for which a number of Nazi doctors were hanged at Nuremberg.

If the goal is to build a Moon base, it should be built on the surface of the Moon. That is where the science is, that is where the shielding material is, and that is where the resources to make propellant and other useful things are to be found. The best place to build it would be at one of the poles, because there are spots at both of the Moons poles where sunlight is accessible all the time, as well as permanently shadowed craters where water ice has accumulated. Such ice could be electrolyzed to make hydrogen-oxygen rocket propellant, to fuel both Earth-return vehicles as well as ballistic hoppers that would provide the bases crew with exploratory access to most of the rest of the Moon. Other places on the Moon might also work as the bases location, because while there is no water in nonpolar latitudes, there is iron oxide. This can be reduced to produce iron and oxygen, with the latter composing 75 percent or more of the most advantageous propellant combinations.

In contrast, there is nothing at all in lunar orbit: nothing to use, nothing to explore, nothing to do. It is true that one could teleoperate rovers on the lunar surface from orbit, but the argument that it is worth the expense of such a station in order to eliminate the two-second time delay involved in directly controlling them from Earth is patently absurd. We are on the verge of having self-driving cars on Earth, for crying out loud, that can handle conditions in New York City and Los Angeles. Theres a lot less traffic on the Moon.

Explaining his winning strategy for war with Austria, Napoleon Bonaparte once said, If you want to take Vienna, take Vienna. Well, if you want to go to the Moon, you should go to the Moon. You dont go 99 percent of the way there and then hang out in orbit where you can do nothing.

So, the question is: If we could put a man on the Moon, why cant we put a man on the Moon?

Heres the answer: During the Apollo program, the NASAs mission-driven human spaceflight program spent money in order to do great things. Now, lacking a mission, it just does things in order to spend a great deal of money.

Why is NASA proposing a lunar-orbiting space station? The answer to that is simple. Its to give its Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion capsule programs something to do. The utility of such activity is not a concern. As a result, nothing useful will be accomplished.

The problem is lack of leadership. From a technical point of view, we are much closer today to sending humans to Mars than we were to sending men to the Moon in 1961, and we were there eight years later. Moreover, we clearly have the technology required to send humans back to the Moon, because we had it half a century ago. So a program of returning to the Moon in four years and reaching Mars in eight is clearly technically feasible. It is also financially feasible. NASAs budget in the 1960s was a larger share of the federal total, but that was because the rest of the budget was much smaller than it is now. In inflation-adjusted terms, the average NASA budget over the 19611973 period was about $21 billion in todays money, only about 10 percent more than the $19 billion the agency will receive in FY 2018. So the funds are there. What is lacking is intelligent direction.

NASA didnt get to the Moon by fishing around for things it could do with stuff created by a random set of constituency-supported programs. It got there by a strong presidential directive to accomplish a mission of importance within a specified period of time. From the mission came the plan. From the plan, came the vehicle designs. From the vehicle designs came the technology-development programs. Thats how it worked, not the reverse. We didnt go to the Moon in order to have something to do with our Lunar Excursion Modules. We developed the LEM in order to go to the Moon.

The American human-spaceflight program is in very bad shape right now. It is operating without a coherent and rational goal, and unless we embrace such a goal and set forth an intelligent plan to achieve it, the drift and waste will only continue until the taxpayers, losing patience, put it out of its misery.

If the current administration wants to make America great again in space, it is going to have to step up to the plate and offer real leadership.

In the beginning was the Word.

Robert Zubrin is the president of Pioneer Energy and the Mars Society and the author of The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must. The paperback version of his book, Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudoscientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism was recently published by Encounter Books.

Visit link:
NASA's Worst Plan Yet - National Review

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on NASA’s Worst Plan Yet – National Review