Monthly Archives: May 2017

NSA says it was not origin of ransomware that hit Microsoft’s Windows – USA TODAY

Posted: May 17, 2017 at 1:34 am

20

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

The National Security Agency has an answer to Microsoft blaming it for the attack that hit 150 countries.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

These simple steps will help keep your computer from becoming the next ransomware target. USA TODAY

A screen shot of the page computers infected with the WannaCry ransomware variant display.(Photo: Proofpoint)

SAN FRANCISCO The National Security Agency has an answer to Microsoft blaming it for a global ransomware attack.

In a White House press briefing onMonday,U.S. homeland security adviser Tom Bossert said the code "was not a tool developed by the NSA to hold ransom data. This was a tool developed by culpable parties, potentially criminals or foreign nation-states."

He did not address the issue of whether the original exploitable flaw the ransomware was based on came from NSA cyber tools.

How U.S. dodged a bullet in Friday's massive global ransomware attack

Microsoft on massive ransomware attack: nations must not hoard cyberweapons

Symantec later said there were indications the ransomware-inspired attack was associated with the Lazarus group, which is tied to North Korea.

On Sunday, the software giant said the WannaCry malware program that spread to more than 200,000 machines in 150 countries last weekendwas the latest example of what happens whenvulnerabilities stockpiled by organizations such as NSA escape into the virtual wild.The malware behind WannaCry was reported to have been stolen from the NSA in April.

"We have seen vulnerabilities stored by the CIA show up on WikiLeaks, and now this vulnerability stolen from the NSA has affected customers around the world," Brad Smith, Microsoft's chief legal counsel, said in a blog post. "Repeatedly, exploits in the hands of governments have leaked into the public domain and caused widespread damage."

The ransomware relies on a flawin the Windows 10 code for whichMicrosoft issued apatchon March 14.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2qlKHqp

Read this article:
NSA says it was not origin of ransomware that hit Microsoft's Windows - USA TODAY

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on NSA says it was not origin of ransomware that hit Microsoft’s Windows – USA TODAY

NSA leakers to offer monthly ‘wine’ club for stolen hacking tools – The Hill

Posted: at 1:34 am

The group that released the likely NSA-designed hacking tool used in the international "Wanna Cry" ransomware attack announced a monthly subscription service Tuesday for its remaining cache of stolen documents.

The anonymous ShadowBrokers, who have been periodically releasing source code and documents believed to have been stolen from the National Security Agency since the summer, announced the new monetizationscheme in a post early Tuesday morning. The message was written in broken English typical of the group.

"Is being like wine of month club. Each month peoples can be paying membership fee, then getting members only data dump each month. What members doing with data after is up to members," the Brokers wrote.

Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts a target's files, with the attacker providing the decryption key only after a ransom is paid, usually in bitcoins.

ShadowBrokers first leaked files in August it claimed were from a vaunted NSA-affiliated hacking operation known as the Equation Group, advertising an auction for the files. The files contained previously unknown, working techniques to bypass security hardware from major manufacturers. The release lead to a scramble to patch those products.

The Intercept reported that evidence within the leaked source code showed that the Brokers were correct about the files' provenance.

Though the files appeared to be real, ShadowBrokers failed multiple times to sell the tools, in part because of the lopsided terms they required for potential buyers.

In January the group sent a goodbye post, but returned in April to release a package of Windows hacking tools that included the one used in Wanna Cry. The April release was presented as a protest against President Trump for becoming more centrist and turning his back on the hard-right base that got him elected. In it, the Brokers claimed to be Trump voters.

In their Tuesday post, the Brokers say data from that hacking operation and from other high-profile hacking operations might be included in the "wine of the month" club.

Tuesday's post, titled "OH LORDY! Comey Wanna Cry Edition," also takes shots at Windows network administrators that did not update their software in time to stave off Wanna Cry noting that the group announced early on in their campaign what files it had to release, giving people some notice to patch their systems.

"TheShadowBrokers is feeling like being very responsible party about Windows dump. Do thepeoples be preferring theshadowbrokers dump windows in January or August? No warning, no time to patch? this is being theshadowbrokers version of alternative facts," wrote the group.

Read this article:
NSA leakers to offer monthly 'wine' club for stolen hacking tools - The Hill

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on NSA leakers to offer monthly ‘wine’ club for stolen hacking tools – The Hill

Stolen NSA tools used in international cyberattack – Salon.com – Salon

Posted: at 1:34 am

An international cyberattack that occurred during the weekend is believedto have been perpetrated with tools that were stolen from the National Security Agency.

The so-called ransomware attack impacted more than 200,000 computers in more than 150 countries by freezing hard drives and servers until a ransom was paid, according to a report by The Week. The main victim was theRussian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab, which has caused consternation among many Russian officials.

As Frants Klintsevich, a high-ranking official in the Russian Senates defense committee, told the state-run news agency Tass, Humanity is dealing here with cyberterrorism. Its an alarming signal, and not just a signal but a direct threat to the normal functioning of society, and important life-support systems.

Russian officials are divided as to whether the United States government was responsible for the attack. Some claim that it was retaliation for the alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election (which the Russian government denies), while others argue that the United States wouldnt engage in actions that would so clearly be considered an act of war.

Either way, the perpetrator of the attacks is believed to have used NSA tools that were stolen from the American agency. Most of the damage inflicted by the cyberattacks occurred in Europe and Asia.

The recent attack is at an unprecedented level and will require a complex international investigation to identify the culprits, said Europol in a statement. The Joint Cybercrime Action Taskforce (JCAT), at EC3 is a group of specialist international cyber investigators and is specially designed to assist in such investigations and will play an important role in supporting the investigation.

Read more here:
Stolen NSA tools used in international cyberattack - Salon.com - Salon

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on Stolen NSA tools used in international cyberattack – Salon.com – Salon

Edward Snowden Slams NSA Over Ransomware Attack – Newsweek

Posted: at 1:34 am

The U.S. National Security Agency could have headed off the global ransomware attack that has crippled hospitals, train stations and other infrastructure around the world, according to Edward Snowden, the former CIA contractor and whistleblower.

They knew about this flaw in U.S. software, U.S. infrastructure, hospitals around the world, these auto plants and so on and so forth, but they did not report it to Microsoft until after the NSA learned that that flaw had been stolen by some outside group, Snowden said Monday.

Related: What is ransomware? Computers around the world infected by malware demanding money

Subscribe to Newsweek from $1 per week

The fugitive former private security contractor made his remarks during a speech on privacy and security delivered via satellite from Moscow to a Washington, D.C., conference on big data. The conference, organized by a former Google executive, Travis Jarae, founder and CEO of One World Identity, has drawn 800 industry experts from data collection and cybersecurity firms, as well as government lawyers, to discuss questions about online identity, security and privacy.

Snowden in 2013 downloaded and then publicized an estimated 1.7 million documents related to global and domestic U.S. surveillance programs, which the Pentagon has said is the largest trove of American secrets ever purloined. Federal prosecutors subsequently charged him with theft and Espionage Act violations. Since 2013, he has been living in Moscow.

Beamed by satellite onto huge screens in the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, a federal building a few blocks from the White House, Snowden blamed the NSA for the unprecedented power of the so-called wannacry virus, which is being blamed for the worlds biggest cyberattack, affecting 150 countries so far. Among the affected in the U.S. have been Fedex and Nissan; in China, colleges and gas stations; in India, the state police; in Russia, the Central Bank, Russian railways and the Interior Ministry; and in the U.K., at least 16 National Health System hospitals.

It is still unclear who released the virus or exactly why.

Had the NSA not waited until our enemies already had this exploit to tell Microsoft, [so that] Microsoft could begin the patch cycle, we would have had years to prepare hospital networks for this attack rather than a month or two, which is what we actually ended up with, Snowden said.

Members of the audience submitted questions to the 33-year-old. One asked for his number one piece of advice for balancing privacy and security. Snowden said companies should opt for the bare minimum in determining what information they harvest and save about customer behavior, and urged them provide users with an opt-out from data collection upfront. He accused companies that say they are collecting data to improve products and services of using a legal fiction to collect data in order to monetize it, generating an extra source of revenue.

He compared the psychological effects of unchecked mass data collection to an errant high school kid being threatened that certain behavior would remain on his or her record. In a world of mass tracking and commercial and government data collection, he said, you have a permanent record that can never be erased.

A child thats born in this world wont have the same benefit you had of saying something stupid that they can move on from, he said. When people can be tracked and have no way to live outside this chain of records, what we have become is a quantified spiderweb. Its a very negative thing for a free and open society. Now, everybody in the world will think twice before they even open their mouth. That is a very, very dark future. But its not inevitable. You should reflect: Is that something we can do? Or should do?

See more here:
Edward Snowden Slams NSA Over Ransomware Attack - Newsweek

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on Edward Snowden Slams NSA Over Ransomware Attack – Newsweek

BRIEF-John Bean Technologies enters into fourth amendment to credit agreement dated as of Feb 10, 2015 – Reuters

Posted: at 1:33 am

May 15 John Bean Technologies Corp

* John Bean Technologies- on May 9, co, John Bean Technologies B.V., others entered into fourth amendment to credit agreement dated as of Feb 10, 2015

* John Bean Technologies - credit agreement allows co to temporarily increase maximum allowable leverage ratio under credit agreement from 3.5x to 4.0x

* John Bean Technologies - fourth amendment amends leverage ratio increase option to expand qualifying event, was previously single permitted acquisition having consideration in excess of $100 million Source: (bit.ly/2pBKXSP) Further company coverage:

* SAYS JV WITH INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS HAS SIGNED CONTRACT FOR 5 YEARS FOR THE FSO AFRICA AND FSO ASIA IN DIRECT CONTINUATION OF THE CURRENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICE

May 17 The following are the top stories on the New York Times business pages. Reuters has not verified these stories and does not vouch for their accuracy.

* Downbeat U.S. housing data offsets strong manufacturing report

Go here to read the rest:
BRIEF-John Bean Technologies enters into fourth amendment to credit agreement dated as of Feb 10, 2015 - Reuters

Posted in Fourth Amendment | Comments Off on BRIEF-John Bean Technologies enters into fourth amendment to credit agreement dated as of Feb 10, 2015 – Reuters

Second Amendment Case Peruta vs. California May Be Heading to … – Fox News

Posted: at 1:33 am

By Steve Kurtz, Georeen Tanner | Fox News

The Second Amendment is only 27 words, but Americans have used millions of words arguing over what it means. It guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. But which people, what arms, and under what circumstances?

Two milestone cases involving the Second Amendment that reached the Supreme Court are District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), declaring an individual has a right to own a firearm, and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), affirming the Second Amendment applies to state law.

Now, if the Supreme Court decides to hear it, there may be a third major case in a decade: Peruta v. California.

At issue is the right to keep and bear arms outside the home. The Heller case specifically applies to situations within the home. Those who have petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case are hoping the justices will see it as a logical extension of their earlier opinions.

Continued here:
Second Amendment Case Peruta vs. California May Be Heading to ... - Fox News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Second Amendment Case Peruta vs. California May Be Heading to … – Fox News

Weekend rallies protected by First Amendment, including torch burning – The Charlottesville Newsplex

Posted: at 1:32 am

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (NEWSPLEX) -- The First Amendment, at its core, protects all forms of speech. That includes hate speech.

So while people are taking issue with the rallies this weekend in Charlottesville over the Robert E. Lee Statue, under the First Amendment, those rallies are protected even from city permits.

"Under the First Amendment, free speech is free," explained John Whitehead from The Rutherford Institute.

Whitehead said the creation of the First Amendment was to empower people to speak up, and protect people from their own government.

"The government cannot target one specific group or several groups and say 'You don't have the right to speech because we don't agree,'" he said.

According to Whitehead, even though certain forms of speech make people uncomfortable like hate speech, it is still protected by the Constitution.

"You can say 'I hate this. I hate that. I don't like these people.' Whatever, but that's protected," Whitehead said.

The reason for allowing hate speech, explained Whitehead, is because that type of speech can actually drive a conversation about an issue.

"If I say something to you that really offends you out there listening to this program, it makes you think. It makes you want to debate. And that's what the founding fathers wanted," he said. "They wanted a debate."

However, Charlottesville city code states people should get permits for large gatherings like Saturday's alt-right rally in Lee Park.

"People are suppose to get permits when they do these things on public property," said City Councilor Bob Fenwick. "No permit was applied for. It was an ambush, a sneak attack. It was one of the dumbest things I have seen in my life."

Regardless, the First Amendment lets demonstrators hold rallies without getting the proper permission from localities.

"While we prefer protesters get permits like any other event, such assemblies are protected by the First Amendment and we do not interfere unless we perceive a legal or safety issue," added a Charlottesville city spokesperson.

But there is a point at which the First Amendment stops protecting speech.

"If you're advocating violence, that's where it stops," said Whitehead. "In other words, you're saying 'Lets go out, blow them up, lets shoot them, kill them,' That's no longer protected under the law."

Reflecting on the rallies over the weekend, Whitehead said people who did not like what they saw should speak up and express their opinions. He said that is why the First Amendment was created.

View post:
Weekend rallies protected by First Amendment, including torch burning - The Charlottesville Newsplex

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Weekend rallies protected by First Amendment, including torch burning – The Charlottesville Newsplex

Pronouncing Shakespeare’s Words, First Amendment Challenges and Other Sabbaticals Announced – CSUF News

Posted: at 1:32 am

Studies into how Shakespeare's words were pronounced, how the First Amendment was used to challenge government censorship in the 1950s and how Proposition 13 impacted household property tax burdens and tax revenue are just a few of the proposed projects being undertaken during sabbaticals awarded to Cal State Fullerton faculty for the 2017-18 academic year.

Fifty-two sabbaticals have been granted from a pool of 86 applications, according to Faculty Support Services.

In addition to research, faculty members from across campus also are developing new courses, completing books and articles, and performing across the country. Recipients include:

Huiran Pan, assistant professor of economics Dennis Siebenaler, associate professor of music Danielle Zacherl, professor of biological science

Alfonso Agnew, professor of mathematics Joao Barros, associate professor of kinesiology Evelyn Case, lecturer in theatre and dance Grace Cho, professor of secondary education Robert Davis, professor of cinema and television arts Nancy Fitch, professor of history Andrew Galpin, associate professor of kinesiology John Gleaves, associate professor of kinesiology Charles Grieb, professor of art John Haan, associate professor of of chemistry and biochemistry William Hoese, professor of biological science Larry Howard, associate professor of economics Karen Ivers, professor of elementary and bilingual education Jeff Kuo, professor of civil and environmental engineering MyungJung Kwon, associate professor of political science Kathleen Preston, associate professor of psychology Prasada Rao, professor of civil and environmental engineering David Sandner, professor of English, comparative literature and linguistics Jason Shepard, associate professor of communications Douglas Swanson, professor of communications Dara Vazin, lecturer in health science Jim Volz, professor of theatre and dance Shawn Wang, professor of computer science Yingdi Wang, associate professor of finance

Martin Bonsangue, professor of mathematics Robert Castro, professor of criminal justice Amybeth Cohen, professor of biological science Mark Ellis, professor of secondary education Jean Ferrandis, professor of music Anthony Fellow, professor of communications Adrian Fleissig, professor of economics Natalie Fousekis, professor of history Amy Foust, associate professor of criminal justice Eugene Fujimoto, associate professor of educational leadership Julian Jefferies, assistant professor of literacy and reading education Karyl Ketchum, associate professor of women and gender studies Min Jung Kim, associate professor of human communication studies Mikyong Kim-Goh, professor of social work Matthew Lancellotti, professor of marketing Maria Linder, professor of chemistry and biochemistry Stacy Mallicoat, professor of political science Ruth Mielke, associate professor of nursing Thanh Nguyen, associate professor of finance Nicholas Salzameda, associate professor of chemistry and biochemistry Terri Snyder, professor of American studies Georgia Spiropoulos, associate professor of criminal justice Lisa Tran, professor of history Lenny Wiersma, professor of kinesiology Joshua Yang, associate professor of health science

Link:
Pronouncing Shakespeare's Words, First Amendment Challenges and Other Sabbaticals Announced - CSUF News

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Pronouncing Shakespeare’s Words, First Amendment Challenges and Other Sabbaticals Announced – CSUF News

Critics of proposed legislation on First Amendment rights at Wisconsin public universities say it goes too far – Inside Higher Ed

Posted: at 1:32 am


Inside Higher Ed
Critics of proposed legislation on First Amendment rights at Wisconsin public universities say it goes too far
Inside Higher Ed
He also praised a new free speech law in Tennessee that's been lauded by FIRE and other groups for strengthening the First Amendment on campuses without requiring punishments for disrupters. The bill abolishes designated free speech zones for ...
Is free speech fading at colleges? - Chicago Law BulletinChicago Daily Law Bulletin

all 5 news articles »

Here is the original post:
Critics of proposed legislation on First Amendment rights at Wisconsin public universities say it goes too far - Inside Higher Ed

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Critics of proposed legislation on First Amendment rights at Wisconsin public universities say it goes too far – Inside Higher Ed

Offending the First Amendment – City College Times

Posted: at 1:32 am

UC Berkeley's decision to reschedule conservative political commentator Ann Coulter's visit raises questions about freedom of speech

Stock image: Freedom of speach

Stock image: Freedom of speach

Reginald Webb, Times Staff May 16, 2017 Filed under Opinion

Share on Facebook

Share via Email

The Republican students at UC Berkeley are undoubtedly crafty in sparking a debate about free speech on their campus, but they are completely wrong about the First Amendment as it relates to them as students and the colleges obligation. Many, like Bernie Sanders, mistakenly believe as progressives they have to agree in their freedom to have whomever they want on campus to speak.

On the contrary, institutions should have some discretion as far as criteria for speaking at institutions of higher learning. Tim Wise, who spoke April 20, at San Jose City College, is an example of one who has certainly had his share of controversy, nevertheless was a wonderful choice to speak on a college campus.

Despite his admirers and detractors, he starts a conversation on a campus about timely issues of race and inequality that should take place in robust fashion on a college campus. While, he frames a lot of historical facts and statistics to argue his point of view, he is dealing with facts that require critical analysis of students. There is a base of facts from which the debate is being carried on.

Ann Coulter is not a reliable source of inspiration for healthy debate. She chooses to use shock and offensive rhetoric to incite anger and bigotry. Identity politics and dividing people is her priority as it sells her books and maintains her presence in the news and on television.

Entertainment is good and even on campus diverse entertainment should be allowed. However, Coulters brand of it can be so toxic. It instigates anger and potential violence deliberately. Free Speech was not meant to protect speech for the sake of insult and offense. First Amendment rights explicitly protects the American public from government censure it relates to religious freedom and worship, freedom of the press, and assembly. It does not mandate that as a result of these protections a University has to simply accept anyone to speak on a campus. Safety is a legitimate consideration as is the social value the college may gain from hosting the speaker. Also,the overall well-being of the colleges students, faculty, and employees must be considered. Civility and mutual respect for one another is essential with regard to campus life.

The students at UC Berkeley no full well the history of their institution as it relates to social justice and political activism. Using Ann Coulter to express hypocrisy with regard to the First Amendment really insults that legacy and reveals how polarized the greater society has become. Just the idea that the Republican students organizations would want to raise their profile on campus and in the news through Ann Coulter is sad and might warrant their parents getting a refund on their tuitions.

If campus life there has not inspired them to strive for vigorous critical analysis and a zest to make their beliefs and points of view more concise and clear then they are certainly not experiencing the UC Berkeley the world has come to know nor are they receiving the world class education UC Berkeley has been known to provide.

Original post:
Offending the First Amendment - City College Times

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Offending the First Amendment – City College Times