The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: May 2017
Australian Government’s Crackdown on Offshore Gambling Sparks Interest in Bitcoin – newsBTC
Posted: May 17, 2017 at 2:23 am
BITCOIN faces a unique opportunity in the wake of the Australian governments decision to crack down on offshore gambling.
The IGA Amendment Bill 2016 is expected to be finalised in the coming months, clamping down on offshore gambling sites which offer their services to Australians.
Some of the measures being debated include harsh penalties for businesses and individuals who market gambling products to Australians, plus politicians have vowed to investigate the possibility of payment blocking to unregulated sites.
This opens up doors for bitcoin to be more widely used as a deposit method at gambling sites as Australians continue to look offshore for better odds and the ability to wager larger amounts.
So why is bitcoin going to get a shot in the arm? Well it comes down to:
The bill to amend the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 was introduced last year after former New South Wales Premier, Barry OFarrell, released a report called the Review of Illegal Offshore Wagering.
The report addressed the ambiguity surrounding the gambling laws in Australia and while online gambling is not legal, it is not illegal either.
The review garnered a lot of publicity and politicians scrambled to alleviate the loopholes.
This resulted in the Minister for Human Services, Alan Tudge proposing the Interactive Gambling Amendment Act 2016 which makes it illegal to gamble at offshore sites.
Problem gambling was cited as the reason behind the bill, despite online gaming sites offering as many, or more protective measures than land-based venues.
Online casinos and bookmakers allow punters to set deposit and wagering limits as well as time restrictions. Operators also can easily keep track of spending habits and are alerted instantly to any unusual behaviour.
Land-based gambling laws in Australia relies on busy staff to notice problem gambling behaviour.
The bill has passed through the House of Representatives and was then debated by the Senate where secondary amendments were added.
Instead of looking to regulated markets, such as the UK Gambling Commission for inspiration, Australian politicians, egged on by anti-gambling bodies, vowed to crack down on offshore sites.
In reality they are clamping down on legitimate businesses with legitimate licensing from countries like the United Kingdom, which has one body regulating online casinos, poker, sports betting sites and any other type of wagering.
It soon became clear this was about the governments inability to tax offshore gambling sites, not about protecting the well-being of Australians.
One Senator called it how it is.
Screw the government and get a VPN, David Leyonhjlem said, after introducing an amendment bill which would have excluded poker and blackjack from the amendments.
Senator Leyonhjelms amendment was thrown out by politicians who have a guillotine hanging over their heads, brandished by staunch anti-gambling advocate and South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon.
This has forced many businesses out of the Australian market because they can not run the risk of falling foul of their own government regulation, if Australian authorities put pressure, for instance, on a UK or Malta regulated casino.
Gambling giants 888 and 32Red are just a few of the big name companies who have left the Australian market, while others with huge business bases in Australia like Pokerstars and Fortune Affiliates, who manage casinos like Royal Vegas and 7Sultans expected to follow suit.
This opens up the Australian market for the less government-scared bitcoin businesses.
Bitcoin gambling is already a blossoming industry with 100s of online sportsbooks and casinos operating online from various parts of the world, with huge business coming from Asian countries like China, where the people are traditionally tech savvy and face strict gambling laws.
In the 2014-15 financial year Australians spent almost $23 billion on gambling making them the biggest spenders per head on wagering in the world. This figure increased seven per cent on the previously monitored period and showed the extent of gambling in this country.
With Australian-licensed bookies facing more restrictions on advertising, offering lines of credit and the banning of in-play live betting, all services bitcoin bookies can offer, more and more people will turn to the digital currency.
The peer-to-peer nature of bitcoin means players are largely playing at these sites anonymously they simply sign up transfer the desired amount to the gambling site and begin playing. When they are finished they withdraw back to their e-wallet and carry on.
The Australian situation is potentially worth millions of dollars with many online poker enthusiasts, casino players and sports bettors vowing to continue to bet with whomever they like, spurred on by Senator Leyonhjelms verdict.
The funny thing is, the government is going to make the use of bitcoin a lot cheaper for Australian players.
The 2017 budget revealed from July 1, bitcoin and similar digital currencies will no longer be subjected to double taxation.
At the time of writing, users of the digital currency bear GST twice and while the government did not intend to change this for gamblers, it will make it cheaper for us to deal in cryptocurrency.
Continue reading here:
Australian Government's Crackdown on Offshore Gambling Sparks Interest in Bitcoin - newsBTC
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Australian Government’s Crackdown on Offshore Gambling Sparks Interest in Bitcoin – newsBTC
Australasian Casino and Gambling Regulators’ Conference – Scoop.co.nz
Posted: at 2:23 am
Speech New Zealand Government
The regulation of gambling has received a lot of attention over many years, and there have been concerted efforts to devise effective legislation and regulations, which are the tools of your trade.Hon Peter Dunne Minister of Internal Affairs
17 May 2017 Speech
Opening address: Australasian Casino and Gambling Regulators Conference
Pullman Hotel, Auckland
Tena koutou katoa
Ka mihi kit e iwi manawhenua
Ka mihi hoki ki nga manuhiri no te Ao Rau rangatira maa, tena koutou, tena koutou, tena koutou katoa
It is a pleasure to open this years Australasian Casino and Gambling Regulators Conference.
Today, I will briefly share with you some thoughts about your Conference theme regulatory excellence.
But first, I want to reiterate the warm welcome provided by the mihi whakatau and waiata.
Thank you all for joining us in Auckland, especially our international guests and speakers who have travelled from across Australasia and further afield to be here.
We welcome you with great pride to the unique mix of cultures, long history and beautiful landscapes of Tmaki Makaurau.
I would also like to give particular acknowledgement to Graeme Reeves, Chief Commissioner of the New Zealand Gambling Commission.
I would also like to acknowledge Peter Cowsill, the Manager of the Casino Compliance team in Auckland, who is retiring in two weeks time after 20 years of service to the casino sector.
Peter was a Gambling Inspector for the Department of Internal Affairs when New Zealands first casino opened.
He has provided a strong customer-centric approach and contributed to significant changes in the approach to regulation over those years.
Peter is in the audience today and I thank him for his service.
And I would like to acknowledge all of the speakers who will share expertise during the Conference.
Thank you for your willingness and enthusiasm in taking the time to be here.
Role as Minister to oversee gambling regulation
As the Minister of Internal Affairs, I am responsible for the New Zealand Governments gambling policy and the legislation that provides the regulatory framework for gambling activity.
The regulation of gambling has received a lot of attention over many years, and there have been concerted efforts to devise effective legislation and regulations, which are the tools of your trade.
As you will all be aware, the regulation of gambling continues to engender strong feelings, both for and against, and this is an important part of the environment in which we all operate.
Whether we like it or not, gambling is a highly emotive issue to many people for a variety of reasons.
New Zealands Gambling Act balances the community benefits from gambling against the harm that can result from gambling.
It has a broad range of objectives, including: controlling the growth of gambling; minimising problem gambling; ensuring that gambling is fair; minimising opportunities for crime; and ensuring that money from gambling benefits communities.
The balance between harm and return from gambling
According to a report published in The Economist earlier this year, Australia wins the jackpot of having the biggest gambling losses per resident in the world an estimated $990 per resident in 2016.
This figure is around 40% higher than Singapore, the runner-up, and around double the average of other countries featured in the report, including the United States, Canada and Britain.
New Zealand came in at sixth place.
About 80 per cent of the New Zealand population participates in gambling at least once a year.
Around $2 billion is spent on the four main forms of gambling TAB betting; Lotto; casinos; and gaming machines located mainly in pubs and clubs.
It is within this context that gambling regulation in New Zealand aims to enhance the positive dimensions of gambling, and to reduce its negative dimensions.
An example of gamblings positive impact is the special Lotto draw that raised over $2.7 million in funds for the regions affected by the Kaikoura Earthquake in November 2016.
This generosity and community spirit in the face of adversity fits with Lottos goal of raising money for the community.
On the other hand, we are all familiar with the potential for addiction to gambling and the destructive behaviour that can result from it.
Its impact on individuals, families and communities is something we all have to consider in our roles.
I know that you face this same tension in your respective jurisdictions the need to enhance the positive aspects of gambling and reduce its negative aspects.
Regardless of whether this is recognised in your governing legislation, balancing the economic and entertainment value of gambling with the social harm that can accompany it is a challenge all our societies face.
Minimising harm from gambling is a topic I take particular interest in as I am in the fortunate position of also being Associate Minister of Health, with responsibility for gambling as a public health issue.
This provides me with a holistic perspective and enables me to keep a broad overview of the wider gambling environment and harm minimisation issues.
This hopefully helps our policy responses to be more consistent and better coordinated.
Professor Max Abbotts presentation about the past, present and future of gambling and gambling-related harm in New Zealand will also provide a host of relevant information on this important topic.
I hope you will all take away some valuable insights.
Class 4 review
While New Zealands Gambling Act is considered to be working generally well, we are looking at how Class 4 gambling operates that is, gambling in pubs and clubs on electronic gaming machines.
In New Zealand, the net proceeds from gaming machines return to local communities to help fund a wide range of activities.
Every year approximately $300 million is returned to the community, to the direct benefit of sports clubs, community groups, events and recreational facilities.
Gaming machine use has been in decline since the introduction of the Gambling Act in 2003.
While the decline has slowed in the past three years, the future of this class of gambling, and therefore community funding, remains uncertain.
The review of gaming machine gambling is looking at how the level of community funding can be sustained.
The review will consider whether we should concentrate our efforts on changes within this class of gambling, or whether there is potential to increase community funding through other avenues within the gambling portfolio.
I see that on Friday, Bruce Robertson, Chair of the Class 4 working party, will be sharing his thoughts on working with the community.
The Class 4 working party is a technical reference group that represents a large part of the industry in New Zealand and has built collaborative relationships with the regulator.
I welcome its establishment and the input that it has been able to have to date, and I look forward to that continuing in the future.
The Class 4 review is an example of the constant need for exploration of whether legislative frameworks are fit-for-purpose, and whether the regulatory regimes sitting beneath them are cost-effective.
Such exploration is especially necessary as gambling participants have increasing potential to move away from traditional forms of gambling, like electronic machines, to online and digital platforms.
It is essential that regulators and regulatory systems are equipped to accommodate any changes to the future of gambling.
Regulatory excellence
This brings me to the theme of this years conference, regulatory excellence.
This is an important topic and a crucial part of realising the purposes of the Act.
Achieving regulatory excellence is a significant goal, and both regulators and the parties they regulate have important roles to play.
The New Zealand Government expects that a regulatory system should deliver a flow of benefits to the country that exceeds its costs, and that a regulatory system should be an asset, not a liability.
Assets require maintenance and it is important that we maximise the long-term value of regulatory systems.
This means ensuring that systems are flexible; proportionate; fair; and easy to access and understand.
The Government expects regulatory agencies to adopt a whole-of-system view that incorporates a proactive, collaborative approach to monitoring existing systems, and which supports regulatory change.
A crucial element in doing this is to include regulated stakeholders, through supporting them to understand and meet their regulatory obligations, and by promoting opportunities for engagement and collaboration.
I am aware that efforts to achieve regulatory excellence are making a positive difference.
I am sure that this focus is continuing to be welcomed by stakeholders in the casino and Class 4 gambling sectors.
This helps to achieve negotiated outcomes and a problem-solving approach to improving compliance with regulations.
Working with our stakeholders in these ways, where appropriate, means that regulatory intervention can be better designed and unintended consequences are avoided.
Regulatory stewardship
This treatment of regulation as an asset to be sustained over the long-term reflects the concept of regulatory stewardship.
It involves looking at our environment, understanding what the future might look like, and assessing whether our regulatory systems can cope with that future.
It is a whole-of-system, lifecycle view of regulation that focuses on how we regulate, rather than the detail of what we regulate.
Shared challenges and interests
This whole-of-system approach is a way of thinking about regulatory excellence and provides a foundation on which to acknowledge our common interests and problems.
I recognise that many of the issues currently facing the casino and Class 4 gambling sectors in New Zealand are not unique.
There are many challenges and opportunities you share as regulators from across the Australasian region.
Technology in the digital age
I note that a number of the sessions will focus on digital and online forms of gambling, which is a very relevant topic in light of our shared interest in the digital space.
A regulatory future-focus is integral to responding to unprecedented, rapid growth in technology and digital forms of gambling.
While this growth creates opportunities, it also demands refined thinking about how the ways we regulate casinos and Class 4 gambling, to ensure they are fit for the future.
Despite the advantages of technological progress, the pace of change creates significant challenges for regulatory agencies.
Such tensions can expose the prescriptive nature of legislation, and may lead to more principle-based, technology-neutral legislation in the future.
Increasingly cyber-savvy customers and regulated parties expect sophisticated, easy-to-use transactions with government.
Regulators also need to be agile to respond to increasingly sophisticated use of technology by criminals and those who wish to evade regulatory requirements.
A particular challenge in the digital age will be how regulators minimise the harm that gambling can cause.
More people have the potential to access gambling outside of traditional boundaries, through digital platforms.
This is shaping the likely future of gambling.
As regulators, it is important that we have the right skills to respond to this evolution.
While online gambling is already firmly established in many other jurisdictions, we are somewhat behind the trend in New Zealand.
To be candid, we are not sure why this is and are trying to better understand the pattern.
Concluding remarks
Any thinking about regulatory excellence and establishing best-practice needs to take account of shared expertise and collective experience.
This conference is an excellent opportunity for you to connect, communicate, and learn from each other as you share your knowledge and experiences.
I encourage you all to make the most of this valuable opportunity and wish you all the best for a productive and informative few days.
I also hope you will have the chance to enjoy the sights, food and activities Auckland has to offer.
Thank you for your attention this afternoon.
Read more from the original source:
Australasian Casino and Gambling Regulators' Conference - Scoop.co.nz
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Australasian Casino and Gambling Regulators’ Conference – Scoop.co.nz
Coleen Nolan says Wayne Rooney ‘definitely has a gambling problem’ after he loses 500k in two hour casino spree – The Sun
Posted: at 2:23 am
COLEEN Nolan thinksWayne Rooney has a gambling problem after he lost 500,000 at a casino in two hours.
The Man United and England star, 31, who has spoken about his gambling fears in the past, ran up the bill on roulette and blackjack as he desperately chased his losses.
ITV
Today on Loose Women, Coleen expressed her worry for the football ace as the panel discussed his excessive betting spree.
She said: To me that suggests he does definitely [have a problem] because its not the first time weve been told about his gambling.
Its a problem, its not just him going, You know what Im just gonna blow half a million pounds, to me it suggests its a problem.
Getty Images
However fellow panellist Stacey Solomon said shes struggles to sympathise with Wayne who earns 300,000 a week.
She explained: Its hard for me to feel sorry for someone who can walk into a place and blow half a million pounds dont care about it.
But Coleen said his wealth shouldnt be a factor when it comes to sympathy.
You say that Stace, she said.
But what about people who go and lose 1,000 in a month and putting their whole family at risk?
Because Wayne earns a lot of money he doesnt have sympathy.
LOOSE WOMEN
The presenter then went on to reveal that she met Wayne while on holiday and he told her he rarely goes out due to the stick he gets from the public.
She explained: We got speaking to him we were staying at the same hotel, we were talking and we were saying whered you go out in Manchester and he said I dont go out because he gets so much stick
He spends most of his time at home on the XBox so a lot becomes his adrenalin rush.
On Sunday The Sun revealed he frittered away more than 4,000 a minute on blackjack and roulette during the casino losing spree.
One witness at Manchesters 235 Casino said: He was gambling a lot on red and seemed to be in his own world.
Link:
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Coleen Nolan says Wayne Rooney ‘definitely has a gambling problem’ after he loses 500k in two hour casino spree – The Sun
888 Holdings subsidiary under investigation by Gambling Commission in UK – World Casino Directory
Posted: at 2:23 am
Consumer protection is on the mind of the Gambling Commission, a group that is currently placing their focus on online gaming operator 888 Holdings. It was announced yesterday that a subsidiary of 888 Holdings Plc is under investigation in regard to consumer protections and if the licensee is doing their part, staying in line with UK regulations.
The Gambling Commission will use the review to determine if the 888 run business is following the social responsibility requirements by having the proper procedures in place to help bettors manage their gambling activities. One tool that should be included is a self-exclusion option where players have the ability to prevent themselves from gambling for a specific amount of time. This time frame is usually set for around six months.
The time-out feature is another tool that should be implemented, which provides gamblers with the option to take a time-out and not be able to gamble for a set period of time, like 24 hours, one week, one month or as long as six weeks.
The announcement that 888s subsidiary is under investigation has taken a toll on shares within the company. 7% was wiped away from shares taking the company down to 278p once the investigation was revealed. In regards to the review by the UKGC, 888 stated that they are dedicated to providing players with a responsible and enjoyable gaming experience and the subsidiary will be proactively engaged in the process.
Brokerage firm Peel Hunt commented on the review stating that they believe 888 to be a responsible operator but still expect the company to face a fine and changes to be made to the business in question due to the review. According to the brokerage, it seems the public process is the way the Commission prefers to regulate the gambling industry as of late. The firm feels that fines and bad publicity are part of the cost of doing business.
The Gambling Commission has been quite busy as of late revving up their focus on responsible gaming and has started to reviewoperators and even affiliates in regard to whether such regulations are being followed. Earlier this month, BGO Entertainment was given a 300,000 fine due to a review by the Commission which found nine misleading advertisements used by BGO within their website as well as on affiliate websites.
The Commission ruled that the advertisements were run from July 2015 until the same month in 2016 on their site as well as 14 affiliates sites from February 2016 until October 2016.
The License Conditions and Codes of Practice within the Commission have required that all licensed gambling operators avoid misleading customers about promotions since May of 2015 and it seems the Commission is now focusing efforts on individual companies to see if they are holding true to these requirements.
As far as the 888 investigation is concerned, the company plans on making further announcements on the matter as soon as information is made available.
888 Holdings subsidiary under investigation by Gambling Commission in UK was last modified: May 16th, 2017 by Marie Kelley
UK Gambling CommissionUKGC888 Holdingsself-exclusionresponsible gaming
Go here to read the rest:
888 Holdings subsidiary under investigation by Gambling Commission in UK - World Casino Directory
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on 888 Holdings subsidiary under investigation by Gambling Commission in UK – World Casino Directory
Will MGM Move The Needle With Its New NJ Online Gambling Platform? – NJ Poker Online
Posted: at 2:23 am
MGM Resorts International is already in the New Jersey online gambling market via its ownership of Borgata. That gives the casino giant oversight of its online gambling and poker platforms in the state.
But now, MGM is bringing its own branded site to New Jersey gamblers. Will that change the dynamics for NJ online gambling sites?
First, heres what we know about MGM and online gambling.
The companyalready operates online casino and poker via its Borgata brand. It also has offerings via Pala(casino) and PartyPoker NJ.
That apparently isnt enough for MGM, however, as it has plans to roll out a site branded as playMGM. It will be much like the current Borgata platform, just with MGM branding. The site should go live some time later this year.
Its a big deal, because outside of some small-scale online slot tournaments in Nevada, MGM has never offered online gambling under the flagship banner. More from an MGM presser:
This is a historic moment for MGM Resorts to be launching real money online casino and poker under the MGM brand for the first time, said Corey Sanders, chief operating officer of MGM Resorts. GVC has been a first-rate partner for us, and we are excited about the possibilities of extending that partnership as regulated markets open up in the U.S.
The NJ iGaming marketplace already has a lot of different operators. Golden Nugget currently leads the way, while Caesars, Harrahsand Tropicana are among the best-known brands in the market.
Well, theres always room for more operators; the question is whether the effect will simply take away from existing sitesor have an additive effect. Theanswer is somewhere in the middle.
PlayMGM will cannibalize some of the existing online gambling revenue in New Jersey; a lot of existing customers are likely to move their play to the new site.
At the same time, the MGM brand is widely known in the US and in New Jersey, even without a casino bearing its name in the state. That brand recognition could create and attract new customers that didnt exist before.
The online casino market has set records for revenue in the past two months, so theres certainly a chance that the industry isnt done growing. And the addition of playMGM could spur more growth.
Weve seen new brands come into the market and succeed in the past few years; undoubtedly MGM can do the same. It simply comes at a point where the industry is more mature than during other sites entry points.
Visit Virgin
With Deposit
Overall Grade 4.6
MGMs move in New Jersey is important at the micro level. However, its even more important from a wider angle.
MGM is saying pretty loudly that it wants to be in the online gambling business in New Jersey. That means it probably wants to be in other legal and regulated markets, should the opportunity present itself. For one, it probably has its eye on Pennsylvania, which is considering legalization of iGaming.
The presence of MGMin online gambling could mean big things for the spread of online gambling beyond New Jersey. Legalizationefforts couldbenefit from MGMs lobbying.
For now, however, well look to see how MGM fares with its coming offering in the Garden State.
Go here to read the rest:
Will MGM Move The Needle With Its New NJ Online Gambling Platform? - NJ Poker Online
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Will MGM Move The Needle With Its New NJ Online Gambling Platform? – NJ Poker Online
Gambling on a new casino at the Rideau Carleton Raceway a timeline – Ottawa Sun
Posted: at 2:23 am
Ottawa Sun | Gambling on a new casino at the Rideau Carleton Raceway a timeline Ottawa Sun March 2012: OLG president Rod Phillips hints Ottawa could get one of two new casinos planned in a major modernization of gaming in the province aimed at boosting provincial coffers, noting he sees a lot of Ontario plates at the Gatineau casino. Rideau Carleton Raceway set to become the Hard Rock Casino Ottawa Hard Rock International Expands Casino Operations in Ottawa |
Read the original post:
Gambling on a new casino at the Rideau Carleton Raceway a timeline - Ottawa Sun
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Gambling on a new casino at the Rideau Carleton Raceway a timeline – Ottawa Sun
Assisted dying: states rally as bills offer chance to legalise voluntary euthanasia – The Guardian
Posted: at 2:22 am
Under legislation proposed in New South Wales, residents would have the legal right to end their own lives if terminally ill and likely to die within 12 months. Photograph: Alamy
In New South Wales and Victoria this week, two draft bills are being hailed by right-to-die advocates as the two best chances to legalise voluntary euthanasia in Australia in 20 years.
Sponsored by a cross-party coalition of five MPs, a draft version of the NSW voluntary assisted dying bill was unveiled on Tuesday, while in Victoria an independent ministerial advisory panel chaired by neurosurgeon and former Australian Medical Association president Brian Owler is due to release an interim report on Wednesday morning.
Both are scheduled to be presented to parliament in August with a good chance that one or both states will become the first jurisdiction to legalise euthanasia since the Northern Territorys assisted dying laws were overturned by the federal government in 1997.
In South Australia, a bill last November was defeated by one vote. In Western Australia, the recent Labor election victory has delivered a new premier and health minister who are openly calling for their laws around euthanasia to change.
As legislative momentum builds and community attitudes change, each state is approaching the issue in its own way.
The director of Dying with Dignity NSW, Shayne Higson, says the draft bill presented in Sydney on Tuesday is the most watertight in the world.
It will have the tightest eligibility criteria in the world and the highest safeguards for assisted dying, she says. It has a good chance of passing. I cant imagine what else they could do to safeguard it they have designed a bill that addresses all those concerns.
The result of collaboration between Liberal MP Lee Evans, Nationals MLC Trevor Khan, Labor MLC Lynda Voltz, Greens MLC Mehreen Faruqi and independent MP Alex Greenwich, the voluntary assisted dying bill is a rare example of cross-party support that has Higson personally optimistic about its chances.
Under the proposed legislation, New South Wales residents would have the legal right to end their own lives if terminally ill and likely to die within 12 months. They would have to be over 25 and suffering severe pain or physical incapacity to an extent deemed unacceptable to the patient.
This would need to be verified by both a primary medical practitioner, and an independent specialist.
Higson also said the NSW bill was unique in further insisting the person must be examined by an independent psychiatrist or psychologist to determine if they are of sound mind and if their choice is voluntary.
The bill would also enable a close relative of the patient to apply to the supreme court for a judicial review and would force a 48-hour cooling off period in case they wanted to change their mind.
Khan said he was confident the working group had enough votes that we can shift across the aisle, despite noted opposition from the Christian Democrats.
We wouldnt be going forward unless we thought there was a chance, he said.
Like all recent and proposed euthanasia bills, the NSW bill would be up for a conscience vote, allowing MPs to vote unbound by party lines.
Victorias proposal has slowly but unfalteringly inched towards a conscience vote since the government announced in December 2016 that a bill would be put before parliament.
This would have the best chance of any of the bills up to date, because this it is a government bill.
Unlike in other states, the push in Victoria is directly sponsored by the premier, Daniel Andrews, and the health minister, Jill Hennessy. The planning has been rigorous and drawn out but the government support means euthanasia advocacy groups are confident the bill will be successfully passed by mid-year.
The process is currently being overseen by an advisory panel, who are following the recommendations of a June 2016 parliamentary committee inquiry into end of life choices.
It is likely that the final form of the bill will follow the June 2016 report but the advisory panel has been tasked with consulting stakeholders and providing more specific advice for the government.
On Wednesday, the committees interim report is set to be released, which contains feedback but no firm recommendations. A final report with recommendations is expected in July, which will then inform the final form of the bill, to be presented in August.
It is likely that the Victorian bill will apply to Victorian residents over the age of 18, who are suffering from a serious and incurable condition which is causing enduring and unbearable suffering that cannot be relieved in a manner the patient deems tolerable.
While the parliamentary committee recommended patients must be at the end of their life, the interim report found there was no clear consensus as to what timeframe this entailed and was still considering a range from six, 12 and 18 months.
In terms of safeguards, it is likely that doctors who are conscientious objectors could not be forced to assist patients end their life. Dementia or disability alone would also be excluded as an eligible condition in any final version of the law.
The patient will also need to be assessed by two doctors and they will be able to rescind the request at any time.
Higson said the Victorian bill had been the most thorough process in the history of this movement.
On the face of it, this would have the best chance of any of the bills up to date, because this it is a government bill. There are more the resources behind it, they have appointed an expert panel led by Brian Owler and the process that theyve followed has been impeccable.
Following Labors election win in March this year, WAs new health minister, Roger Cook, has been pushing for voluntary euthanasia to be legalised.
I support voluntary euthanasia and I think we need to legislate to enable people to take control of their lives in their final stages, he said, weeks after his win.
Despite refusing to endorse it as Labor policy, the WA government has been encouraging the Labor agriculture minister, Alannah MacTiernan, to introduce reform as a private members bill, along with the Greens MLC Robin Chapple.
Chapple said in March that they were waiting on the outcome of Victorias inquiry before progressing.
The premier, Mark McGowan, has also previously spoken in favour of euthanasia laws and it is likely a conscience vote would be allowed.
In November last year, South Australias bill to legalise euthanasia was dramatically defeated by the Speakers casting vote despite support from both the premier, Jay Weatherill, and the opposition leader, Steven Marshall.
Both leaders voted in favour of the Death With Dignity Bill, with Weatherill saying he was gutted by the outcome and the bills original mover, Duncan McFetridge, vowing to continue pushing the issue.
The November vote was the parliaments 15th attempt at the bill and the first time any euthanasia legislation had made it past a second reading vote.
However, after a conscience vote, a 23-23 tie had to be broken by Speaker Michael Atkinson in the early hours of the morning.
Atkinson then told ABC radio that if the bill had been considered during daylight hours ... over several days, it may have been carried.
Similar to the NSW bill, the proposed law would only affect those suffering from terminal illness with unbearable pain and would require the affirmation of two doctors.
Go Gentle Australia nevertheless called it an historic moment for advocates of legalised euthanasia in Australia.
The voluntary assisted dying bill 2016 is tabled to be debated in the Tasmanian lower house on 24 May.
Moved on 17 November 2016 by former Labor premier Lara Giddings, and supported by Cassy OConnor, leader of the Tasmanian Greens, it follows a bill in 2013 that was defeated at the second reading stage by only 2 votes.
The bill only applies to patients with a serious incurable and irreversible medical condition. It also requires the approval of two doctors and would create an office of an independent registrar with powers to monitor and review all asssisted deaths.
Chances of the new bills success have not been publicly discussed, but Dying with Dignity Tasmania noted that the make-up of parliament has changed since the last vote, with two new Labor, five new Liberal and two new Greens MPs.
Queensland is the only state to never have had a voluntary euthanasia bill introduced to its parliament.
Queensland speaker Peter Wellington called for a parliamentary inquiry into voluntary euthanasia last year following the Victorian announcement, but the Queensland parliamentary health committee declined to initiate one.
In 2013, a parliamentary inquiry was held into palliative and community care, but it did not cover issues of euthanasia or assisted death.
Here is the original post:
Assisted dying: states rally as bills offer chance to legalise voluntary euthanasia - The Guardian
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Assisted dying: states rally as bills offer chance to legalise voluntary euthanasia – The Guardian
Euthanasia debate: NSW Parliament to consider drafted legislation on assisted dying – ABC Online
Posted: at 2:22 am
Updated May 16, 2017 09:27:27
New South Wales is a step closer to allowing terminally ill people to voluntarily end their lives, with a draft bill with cross-party support being released today.
The Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill has been drafted by a parliamentary working group made up of members from the Coalition, Labor, Greens and an independent.
The draft bill would give a person over the age of 25 the right to request assistance from a medical practitioner to end their life.
They must be experiencing severe pain or physical incapacity, and be likely to die within 12 months.
Patients must be assessed by their primary doctor, then a specialist, as well as a psychologist or psychiatrist.
Patients would then be allowed to self-administer a lethal substance to end their lives. They may also be assisted by a medical practitioner or nominated person.
The process would include a cooling-off period of 48 hours, which starts once a request for assistance certificate has been completed.
The bill would also enable a close relative of the patient to apply to the Supreme Court for a judicial review.
Nationals MP Trevor Khan said it was a cautious bill with "a range of safeguards to meet the inevitable criticisms that a bill such as this will face when it's introduced into Parliament".
"I'm expecting that we'll be treated thoughtfully and that the issue, as a whole, will be free of the politics that can infest these debates," he said.
He said he would urge his parliamentary colleagues to think of their own family members and vote with their conscience.
Mr Khan said assisted-dying legislation had significant public support.
"The overwhelming majority of Australians and people who live in NSW want some action on this subject," he said.
Labor MP Lynda Voltz said politicians needed to listen to community support for end-of-life legislation.
"I go and walk my dog and people talk to me about it, I go out to community meetings and people talk about it," she said.
"There is a lot of community support out there for a bill of this nature and parliaments can no longer stick their head in the sand and ignore that community expectation."
Ms Voltz said it had taken about 12 months to create a draft bill "that meets the community's expectations, legal expectations and medical expectations".
The legislation will face a conscience vote when it's finalised and then introduced to State Parliament.
Topics: state-parliament, euthanasia, nsw, sydney-2000
First posted May 16, 2017 08:43:31
Go here to see the original:
Euthanasia debate: NSW Parliament to consider drafted legislation on assisted dying - ABC Online
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Euthanasia debate: NSW Parliament to consider drafted legislation on assisted dying – ABC Online
Is euthanasia assisted suicide? – Malta Independent Online
Posted: at 2:22 am
The right to end one's life when pain and immobility become unbearable has seen many swords clash during the past decades.
To delve deeper into this issue, I asked 18 students from the University of Malta and noted the arguments by the Rev. Prof. Emmanuel Agius, Dean of the Faculty of Theology, and Pierre Mallia, Professor of Family Medicine, who both lecture at the University, during an interview on Campus FM.*
Students defined euthanasia as: the killing of seriously-ill patients to be relieved from pain; a patient's right to end his life painlessly; mercy killing; the withdrawal of treatment; and assisted suicide.
Euthanasia, however, holds a wider definition. Prof. Mallia defined it as 'voluntary homicide', generally referring to a sick person but not necessarily one close to death. He made a net distinction between active euthanasia: when the physician helps end the patient's life with intended means; and passive euthanasia: when treatment is purposely withheld to let the patient die.
Prof. Agius noted the difference between killing and letting die, saying that only the first action is considered as euthanasia and not "when a patient refuses to take treatment". When I asked students about this, four agreed with Prof. Agius, saying that you are just letting nature take its course. Six claimed to be both a form of euthanasia or else an indirect method.
Prof. Mallia said that although when one speaks of such moral rights, one tends to incorporate the importance of autonomy, one cannot oblige society to end one's life, especially in cases of heartbreak or just because you got ill. So, when can euthanasia be justified? Thirteen of the students felt that euthanasia can only be justified when the person's life deteriorates, when not able to live independently and when one loses complete control of one's body. Five said that ending a life can never be justified because each and every human life is precious, invaluable and humans don't have authority over it.
Mallia referred to the pre-legality state, observing that Parliament is trying to turn ethics into statistics, which is impossible, because the passing of a law doesn't depend on whether the law is morally right or wrong; rather on the agreement reached by MPs.
According to Agius, one should look into the social conditions which induce a person to consider such a step that goes against the fundamental right to live. What induces a person to opt for euthanasia? Students listed endless pain, concern for others such as concern of being a burden to one's family, lack of hope, lack of support from relatives and friends and lack of understanding of value of life.
Seven students disagreed with the fact that the right to live and the right to die are contradictory, insisting that they are similar human rights which every person should be entitled to. One rejected euthanasia as a right, claiming that we are not the master of our lives. Eight agreed while two said that life should be protected at all times; otherwise the right to live would be meaningless. The rest were undecided.
In order to analyse what leads people to want to take their own lives, one ought to consider palliative as well as spiritual care, Agius said. Out of 18 students, 16 agreed with Agius, that euthanasia should be a last resort after spiritual/emotional support. Also, that authorities should make sure people who are giving such support are competent, well-trained, pro-life and of good morals. The rest said it's difficult once a person has made up his mind.
I asked the students if the moral implications are any different between an old person and a child/teenager/young adult who opts for this procedure. Seven said that age should not make any difference. One said it's true that a young person is seen as the one who has a longer future but if life was extended to both, they might end up with a positive outcome i.e. changing someone else's life or giving a life-changing contribution to society. Five students said that there is a difference because while the old person lived his/her life, the young one is still at the beginning of life.
When it comes to the effects on the physician, students mentioned guilt, especially if a bond has been created with the patient. Others said it depends on the physician's values - especially spirituality - because if he/she is pro-life, shame might ensue for having assisted in the procedure. Four students disagreed that such attached emotions could follow since, for physicians, they encounter such losses while others might be blinded by its lucrative side.
So, should euthanasia become legal or not? Apart from the four students that responded "undecided", the number was even. Seven agreed to the extent that strict regulations should be applied, for example, when the patient is in a good state of mind, when it's the patient's decision and when the patient is terminally ill. The other seven students disagreed, saying that authorities cannot keep referring to themselves as 'Christians' if they opt to go against the fundamental and core values of Christianity. One said that with the improvement of medicine, euthanasia should not be considered.
Ten students were concerned that if euthanasia is legalized, we would be running the risk of people abusing of such an option and sick people will opt for the easy way out i.e. refuse treatment. Three said this depends on the emotional support the patient receives. The rest were undecided.
"If we want to make our island more merciful and be first in Europe, we have to be the country where we give the most palliative care and whoever will be found in this situation wouldn't need to ask for euthanasia because we have psychological, emotional, spiritual support and a good system where we give these patients their dignity," Agius added.
*The programme, 'Mhux l-aar Kelma', led by the Rev. Dr Joe Borg and Professor Maryanne Lauri is broadcast on Campus FM. 103.7
Excerpt from:
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Is euthanasia assisted suicide? – Malta Independent Online
‘Tragic’ euthanasia law must be fought, Cardinal Mller tells Canadian audience – The Catholic Register
Posted: at 2:22 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled, Parliament has legislated and provinces have set up new systems. For most Canadians the assisted suicide debate is last years news story. But Cardinal Gerhard Mller, head of the Catholic Churchs theological watchdog-agency, begs to differ.
We shall prevail, Mller told an audience of bioethicists, theologians, doctors and nurses at Torontos St. Michaels Cathedral May 15.
The prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith called Canadas turn to legalized euthanasia tragic.
Euthanasia not only constitutes a grave wrong in itself, but its legalization creates toxic and deadly social pathologies that disproportionately afflict the weakest members of society, Mller declared.
The cardinal was in Toronto to deliver the keynote address at a Canadian Catholic Bioethics Institute conference dedicated to the conscience rights of health care professionals. Muller urged members of the CCBI to persuade Canadian citizens to take the necessary steps to reverse the dangerous legal error of your Supreme Court and Parliament, and in the meantime, to protect the rights of conscience of health care providers who refuse to take the lives of those that they have sworn to treat and comfort.
Fr. Leo Walsh, who heads up the CCBI branch at Assumption University in Windsor, Ont., called the cardinals address dramatically important.
While its true that those who oppose physician-assisted death have lost the debate up to this point and the law is unlikely to change soon, that doesnt mean the debate is over, Walsh said.
We dont give up, he said. We have to keep pushing it. We have to invite them (politicians and assisted suicide advocates) to see this good.
In bringing Mller in to argue against legalized euthanasia, the CCBI is tapping a deep well of Catholic thinking and the highest authority on Catholic teaching. In a recent book-length interview, the cardinal argues for a brand of theology that isnt satisfied with merely internal Church arguments. Mller believes Catholics have something to say and must say it publicly, whether its popular or not.
Amid so much irrationality and frivolity, we must seek out the enemy nihilism, agnosticism and skepticism so widespread in our society because of its loss of realism and humanity and, with the help of the riches of the magisterium of the Church, fight it systematically, Mller said in The Cardinal Mller Report, a 2016 volume from the American Catholic publisher Ignatius Press. Everything is reinvented, anything goes. In society, we can only expect the wind that blows us this way and that. In society, we can only seek the comfort of being always on the side of the majority and not that of the brave witness we bear by swimming against the current when we must.
The former bishop of Regensburg, Germany, Mller began his priestly life as an academic expert on Protestant theologian and Second World War martyr Dietrich Bonhoeffer. He is a personal friend of Pope Benedict XVI, who first appointed him to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Mller is the founder of the Pope Benedict XVI Institute in Regensburg charged with publishing the complete works of Joseph Ratzinger.
The next step for Canadians who oppose medicalized killing must be to legally protect the conscience rights of doctors who refuse to refer their patients on to medical aid in dying (MAID) assessments, Mller said.
No one who trains and takes an oath to care for the sick should be pressed into ending the lives of the very people that they have promised to serve, Mller told about 200 people who had gathered at St. Michaels Cathedral for evening prayer, followed by the cardinals address.
Doctors who regard sending their patients on to be assessed for euthanasia as tantamount to signing their death warrant arent asking for an exemption to an otherwise legitimate regime based on unique and particular beliefs or values, Mller said.
Refusal to engage in euthanasia represents basic fidelity to the very medical art that the physician professes, he said. To compel a doctor to participate in any manner in euthanasia is to force him to cease being a doctor and to betray the very profession to which he has given his life.
Any law that forces a physician to act against what he knows to be the most basic good of the patient the preservation of his very life either directly or indirectly, is unjust.
The rest is here:
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on ‘Tragic’ euthanasia law must be fought, Cardinal Mller tells Canadian audience – The Catholic Register







