The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: May 2017
Does the Second Amendment really keep us safe? | Letters – Sun Sentinel
Posted: May 18, 2017 at 2:02 pm
It saddens me to see the amount of gun violence in this country, and it is even worse to see there is nothing being done to stop it. After every shooting, we discuss the horrific event, and we mourn the victims, but when will anything change? Discussion about gun violence and the Second Amendment is great, but when will we take initiative?
Seeing news about shootings or acts of gun violence should never be something to which we become accustomed. These events will keep happening if the amendment is not questioned. I would rather see more regulation in the Second Amendment than feel unsafe everywhere I go. The Bill of Rights was written over 200 years ago, and maybe the Second Amendment was more applicable during that time. Currently, I feel that it's depriving me of my safety rather than giving me the ability to protect myself.
Carly Novell, Parkland
Here is the original post:
Does the Second Amendment really keep us safe? | Letters - Sun Sentinel
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Does the Second Amendment really keep us safe? | Letters – Sun Sentinel
Acting Appropriately Is Key to Second Amendment Advocacy – Newsmax
Posted: at 2:02 pm
One of my main criticisms of many in the gun rights community is that sometimes they act like anti-gunners. Name-calling. Mockery. Screaming. Unprofessionalism. Violence. These are the weapons of the left. Our main arsenal should only consist of the Constitution, the writings of the Founding Fathers, logic, reason, and respect.
Those who follow my Facebook.com/2ndAmendmentUSA page have seen me criticize inappropriate behavior and remove those using harsh profanities against others. I also get upset by irrational claims and outright lies that hurt the firearms community, but I always try to take a breath, collect my thoughts and reply respectfully with logic (The Liberal Bane Cocktail).
Believe it or not, merely acting in a calm professional manner will win more undecideds to our side than all the homicide statistics or constitutional arguments that you can quote.
Last week, the Second Amendment supporting community lost a huge advocate. Bob Owens, founder and editor of BearingArms.com took his own life. Many of his friends, fans and followers were shocked to hear the news. It appears that some on the left celebrated the tragedy.
Jake Tapper of CNN, tweeted For family and friends of @bob_owens so sorry for your loss. Horrible news. For an anchor at a liberal 24-hour news network, this was very professional and respectful. However, his simple thoughtful tweet drew the ire of some of his cohorts. Here are some of the mean-spirited tweets:
Yes Jake, this is indeed a terrible loss. (Followed by a link to a story where Ownes called Trayvon Martin a thug)
-@willmenaker (podcaster/blogger)
Youre making a lot of fun new white supremacists friends Jake! Great place to plant your flag.
-@jacobtierney79 (Writer and director)
When Mr. Tapper tried to stop the spiteful trend, it only got worse.
Jake is crying because were being mean to his dead racist friend
-@leyawn (Internet artist)
Mr. Tapper eventually relented the argument with I didnt know him. Im just an adult. Again, this didnt stop the attacks, insults or mockery.
It seems Jake Tapper may have gotten a small realization of the attitude and hatred of those with his political leanings. Hopefully, he has the guts to stand up to it and possibly even decry it to try to make a change, but its doubtful that will ever happen.
I do not want to give any indication that I think conservatism has won a convert in Jake Tapper. I merely wanted to use an example of why we should be professional and respectful in our demeanor when discussing gun rights with others. Any behavior that is on par with the disrespectfulness mentioned above will surely drive away people who may be on the fence about Second Amendment rights.
Our arguments should not even be arguments. They should be discussions or informative facts. Dont drive away potential converts or supporters by acting like a jerk. You will drive them straight into the arms of Every Town for Gun Safety.
The old saying goes that you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. In your 2A advocacy, be sweet and smooth. Let the leftists be salty and bitter.
John Cylc is an eight year U.S. Army veteran. He is also a contributor to LifeZette. To read more of his reports Click Here Now.
2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Read this article:
Acting Appropriately Is Key to Second Amendment Advocacy - Newsmax
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Acting Appropriately Is Key to Second Amendment Advocacy – Newsmax
Michigan House Considers Bill to Make 2nd Amendment Your … – Breitbart News
Posted: at 2:02 pm
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
It is already legal to carry a handgun openly without a permit in Michigan. The situation is as it was in New Hampshire, where law-abiding citizens could carry their handguns openly without having to ask governments permission but were suddenly obligated to ask government before carrying if their jacket or sweatshirt hung down over the gun.
New Hampshire lawmakerspassed legislation abolishing their concealed carry permit requirement earlier this year and Gov. Chris Sununu (R) signed the bill on February 22. North Dakota followed suit and abolished their concealed permit requirement on March 24, 2017. Now Michigan lawmakers are pushing to make the same change.
The Detroit Free Press reports that Rep. Michele Hoitenga (R-Manton)a sponsor of the permitless carry billsuggested the only reason a permit exists is so the state government can collect fees for the exercise of natural rights.
Hoitenga said:
It is currently legal in the state of Michigan for a law-abiding person to openly carry a firearm on their person without any training classes, fees or state bureaucracy. It only becomes illegal when a person puts on a coat because the gun then becomes concealed. Our Second Amendment should not be used as a money grab for permit fees
Michigan Open Carry president Tom Lambert echoed Hoitenga, equating the fee for a concealed carry permit with a coat tax.
Presently, law-abiding Michigan residents have to pay about $100 to the state and take a class before being allowed to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense. This burdensome fee will be done away with if Hoitengas bill passes and is signed into law.
AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of Bullets with AWR Hawkins, a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.
Read more from the original source:
Michigan House Considers Bill to Make 2nd Amendment Your ... - Breitbart News
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Michigan House Considers Bill to Make 2nd Amendment Your … – Breitbart News
Mec-Gar Introduces Second Amendment 1911 Magazines – Shooting Illustrated (press release) (blog)
Posted: at 2:02 pm
Mec-Gar USA announced the introduction of its latest eight-round 1911 magazine, designed to offer support to Second Amendment organizations.
"We have always been strong supporters of the right of people to own and possess firearms," said David Larson, Mec-Gar USA national sales manager. "We are offering this magazine because we see the 1911 as America's gun and are donating a portion of the proceeds to ensure Second Amendment rights are protected."
The magazine is designed for .45 ACP-chambered guns only and features the full text of the Second Amendment engraved on the body of the magazine. The magazine is constructed using carbon steel and features heat treatment for added strength, as well as a blued finish to prevent corrosion.
The magazine spring is made using Type D music wire, and the magazine's construction is finished of with a polymer baseplate that is designed to withstand high-impact treatment. The baseplate is also easily removable for cleaning.
Mec-Gar is donating 10 percent of the profits from the sale of each of these Second Amendment 1911 pistol magazines to organizations that fight for the right to bear arms. The suggested retail price on the new magazines is $29.20.
Read the rest here:
Mec-Gar Introduces Second Amendment 1911 Magazines - Shooting Illustrated (press release) (blog)
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Mec-Gar Introduces Second Amendment 1911 Magazines – Shooting Illustrated (press release) (blog)
Sean P. Means: Trump’s attacks on First Amendment aren’t just saber-rattling – Salt Lake Tribune
Posted: at 2:01 pm
On Tuesday, protesters outside the Turkish embassy in Washington were beaten up, allegedly by security guards for Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Video showed protesters being kicked and stomped, sometimes in the head. Eleven people were injured, including a D.C. police officer. Two men were arrested, and police are seeking more suspects though if they are members of Ergodan's security detail, they may have diplomatic immunity. The Trump administration has stayed silent on the violence in the nation's capital.
Also Tuesday, in The New York Times' bombshell story about then-FBI Director James Comey being asked by Trump to lay off the investigation over Russian meddling in the 2016 election, there was this disturbing tidbit: Trump, an associate of Comey's said, told Comey to think about putting reporters in prison for publishing classified data. Marty Baron, executive editor of The Washington Post, told The Times that Trump's request was "an act of intimidation."
On Wednesday, after a speech to the graduating class of the Coast Guard Academy in which he complained about his treatment by the media, Donald Trump was presented with a ceremonial saber. With the mic still on, John Kelly, Trump's Homeland Security secretary, joked to Trump, "Use that on the press, sir." Trump laughed.
Each of these examples, in isolation, would be troubling coming from "the leader of the free world," as we often call the president of the United States. But these are just the latest examples of a clear pattern of disrespect and distrust from a man who has called the press an "enemy of the people."
PEN America, the human-rights organization that defends writers, recently issued a report detailing the attacks on the press in the first 100 days Trump has been in office. For lovers of free expression and good journalism, it reads like something by Stephen King.
In the report, PEN America listed 76 instances of Trump or his people undermining the press by attacking either the media in general or specific outlets as "fake news," or by restricting access to government officials. The administration has placed gag orders on government employees, threatening them with their jobs if they talk to reporters.
Other actions don't just affect journalists, PEN America reports. The administration has removed information from government websites. It has accused people at marches, rallies and town halls of being paid professionals, an effort to delegitimize peaceful protest. It requires travelers to give U.S. border agents access to their electronic devices, including passwords to their social media which could have a chilling effect on free expression.
The reason these attacks from Trump are so dangerous is the same reason the Founding Fathers made the press the one profession mentioned in the Bill of Rights. It's because without a free press, vigorously keeping a check on the government, there would be no democracy and no United States of America.
Sean P. Means writes The Cricket in daily blog form at http://www.sltrib.com/blogs/moviecricket. Follow him on Twitter @moviecricket. Email him at spmeans@sltrib.com.
Read more from the original source:
Sean P. Means: Trump's attacks on First Amendment aren't just saber-rattling - Salt Lake Tribune
Posted in First Amendment
Comments Off on Sean P. Means: Trump’s attacks on First Amendment aren’t just saber-rattling – Salt Lake Tribune
Democrats Think Their First Amendment Is Different (And Superior) – The Daily Caller
Posted: at 2:01 pm
Representative Val Demings may be the first Democrat to admit to how the left views the First Amendment. The Florida Congresswoman replied to a critical comment by saying, My First Amendment Right is different from yours. Any honest political observer has to admit that this is a salvo in the war the left and Democrats are currently waging on free speech. They try their best to silence any speech that does not fit their dogma, and Demings, intentionally or not, just revealed the game plan.
Whether it comes in the form of campuses silencing speakers who offend their student snowflakes or via government officials regulating elections, efforts to stop or limit opposing viewpoints should be deeply troubling to all. Most troubling are the movements being led by Democrat lawyers and liberal law professors, the very people who traditionally have been defenders of the First Amendment.
The American legal system tells us that Justice is blind, but someone should tell that to the Democrats who propose election speech initiatives that only benefit their side. A great example is Sen. Chuck Schumers, and other Senate Democrats, sponsorship of the very-misnamed We the People reform package. This package would restructure the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to include three members of the Presidents party and two of the opposition party, a change from its current composition of three Democrats and three Republicans with the possibility of deadlock as a check on power.
The FEC is set up to limit partisan restrictions of speech by one party or the other by making the FEC evenly split between the parties, with the votes of four commissionersa minimum of bipartisan agreementrequired for it to take any action. This legislation was an obvious effort by Schumer and Democrats to chill or limit the political speech of Republicans, libertarians, Green Party members, and even non-establishment Democrats when they thought Hillary Clinton was a lock to win the White House. It comes as no surprise they have not reintroduced the proposal under President Trump.
No one should doubt the lefts ideals on speech go only one way. Democrat members on the FEC went after Fox News for get this too much speech in allowing too many candidates in a Republican primary debate the network hosted, while ignoring CNN when it did the same thing. Fortunately, the three Republicans on the commission blocked their colleagues, followed the law and were ideologically consistent in opposing efforts to go after CNN and Fox, so nothing came of the Democrat witch hunt.
One of those Democratic commissioners, Ann Ravel, who has since resigned, even proposed regulating the internet, including individual Facebook and blog posts. She even voted to regulate internet speech despite a longstanding FEC policy not to regulate such speech. Is there any doubt that three Democrat commissioners under the Schumer FEC plan would fine and regulate Republican posts while ignoring Democrat posts? (In fairness, Democrat party leaders would also go after an outsider candidate like Bernie Sanders over an establishment candidate like Hillary Clinton. Remember the leaked DNC emails?)
More frightening than limiting and regulating the speech of everyday Americans trying to speak on political issues is government seeking to punish and prosecute those who want to speak out against them. Make no mistake, the IRSs political targeting of Tea Party and other conservative non-profit groups beginning in 2010 was an attempt to silence opposition voices that were not friendly to Democrats or government power.
The left continues to double down and stop opposing speech even among its own members. Consider the liberal outcry against the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Yes, Democrats oppose integrity in the electoral system, apparently.
Marc Elias, Hillarys lawyer and now the lawyer of choice in Democrat fights against free speech, leveled a warning to any Democrat who serves on a commission to study vote fraud and how to make elections better. He said: No Democrat should serve on Trumps new voter suppression commission. Period. Similarly, Bob Bauer, President Obamas lawyer and Elias current colleague, said: [E]lection administration experts should keep their distance from the commission. Professor Rick Hasen, promoter of liberal talking points, wrote on his Election Law Blog Not sure what Democrat or election professional would be on a commission with Secretary of State Kris Kobach or former Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. Hasens probably correct: its safe to assume few Democrats are courageous enough to cross Elias.
And remember, freedom of association is part of our First Amendment rights. But according to Elias, Bauer, and Hasen, a Democrat cannot even associate with Republicans without repercussions.
Fortunately for the country, some Democrats are willing stand up to the bullying from the Democrat legal establishment. The commission does include Democrats, including arguably the most qualified election official in the country and longest-serving Secretary of State, William Gardner of New Hampshire, the only truly purple state in the Northeast. Gardner has done such a good job in the opinion of the people of New Hampshire that he has survived the changing tides of Republican and Democrat leadership.
The real problem for Elias, Bauer, and Hasen is they fear that Gardner will be an honest broker, not a blind partisan, who will look past who is President and how much the results of the commission benefit Democrats. He will assess the true state of elections in this country, determine public confidence in election results, evaluate election integrity, and very likely not simply regurgitate Democratic talking points.
One wonders if the establishment left fears free speech in our electoral process so much because in a free debate, they will lose. And lets not forget that Democrats, including Elias, are privately very concerned about ineligible voters, but only when their favored candidates victories are at stake.
To his credit, Bernie Sanders showed that at least some Democrats still support free speech and intellectual discussion, even if they are increasingly outsiders within their own party. Sanders condemned the successful effort to stop Ann Coulter from speaking at UC Berkeley: But you know, people have a right to . . . give a speech, without fear of violence and intimidation. . . . To me, its a sign of intellectual weakness . . . . Confront her intellectually. Booing people down, or intimidating people, or shutting down events, I dont think that that works in any way.
Of course, that sort of intellectual discussion and competition is what establishment Democrats fear most. Dissent is not allowed among todays establishment Democrats, which may be why they rigged the primary to defeat Sanders and continue to fight every effort to protect the right to speak freely regardless of political party or ideology.
View post:
Democrats Think Their First Amendment Is Different (And Superior) - The Daily Caller
Posted in First Amendment
Comments Off on Democrats Think Their First Amendment Is Different (And Superior) – The Daily Caller
Toasting the First Amendment – Boise Weekly
Posted: at 2:01 pm
On May 3, Desiree A. Fairooz, of Virginia, was convicted of disorderly conduct for laughing during the Jan. 10 confirmation hearing of U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
On May 10, reporter Dan Heyman, of Public News Service, was arrested after questioning U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price at the Charleston, S.C., Capitol building. Police charged Heyman with misdemeanor willful disruption of state government processes after he repeatedly asked Price whether domestic abuse would qualify as a preexisting condition under President Donald Trump's health care reform bill. Heyman said he was simply being persistent after the secretary refused to answer.
Meanwhile, also on May 10, Trump met with top Russian officials in the Oval Office, but prohibited U.S. reporters from entering the room. Instead, a photographer from state-run Russian news agency TASS was permitted to serve as witness. Since Trump's closed-door chat with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, it has been reported Trump divulged sensitive intelligence information, further rocking his already tempest-tossed administration.
On May 14, in one of his customary crack-of-dawn Twitter meltdowns, Trump pooh-poohed the idea that his "surrogates" should be expected to speak to the press with "perfect accuracy," and suggested he may "cancel all future 'press briefings'" in favor of prepared, written statements.
If the events of the past two weeks or so have you feeling a little jittery about the safety of the First Amendment, it probably means you've been paying attention. In this edition of Boise Weekly, we have two stories that deal with free speech.
The first, on Page 6, digs into yet another lawsuit filed against Idaho State Police for busting a burlesque show, ostensibly because it mingled "obscenity" with alcohol. The second, on Page 8, highlights a recent legal victory over ISP for conducting just such a sting, and how artists will be celebrating with a risque cabaretfeaturing plenty of libations with which to toast the mighty First Amendment.
Zach Hagadone
Continued here:
Toasting the First Amendment - Boise Weekly
Posted in First Amendment
Comments Off on Toasting the First Amendment – Boise Weekly
Online privacy guide for journalists – Radioinfo (subscription)
Posted: at 2:01 pm
This is not an easy time for journalists all over the world, with the discoveries of surveillance on citizens, which includes journalists and their sources.
The old-fashioned promises Im not going to reveal my sources identity or give up my notes are kind of empty if youre not taking steps to protect your information digitally, says Barton Gellman of the Washington Post, whose source, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, helped uncover the scope of the NSAs and British GCHQs operations.
Senior journalist Michael Dagan believes that it is possible to make it difficult for anyone to intercept your emails, the text messages youre sending or your phone calls, using a range of methods.
He has written a guide to his colleagues all over the world, which can help them protect their work and fulfil their mission.
Here are some of his tips to ensure that a journalists sources and data are secure and well. Access to the full guide is at the link below.
1. Beware of big names:Presume that large companies encryption systems and possibly even big name operating systems (proprietary software) have back doors that secret services in their country of origin (at least in the US and the UK) can access.
2. Always encrypt everything:Security experts use simple math to make their point: as you raise the cost of decrypting your files (say, for intelligence agencies like the NSA), you automatically increase the degree of effort expended on following you. If youre not Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, or Edward Snowden and if you werent involved in active surveillance around Trump Tower apartments, they may give up the effort even if your encrypted communications were stored. And should anyone decide to track you despite your efforts, it will be more of a headache if you use strong encryption like AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and tools like PGP or open VPN, which are the strongest widely available encryption methods (VPNs are used by the US government itself). But if you want bullet-proof security, you will need more than the AES encryption method. P.S. if you want to discover the year your information landed at the NSAs hands, just have a peekhere.
3. Perform full disk encryption:This is done just in case someone gets their hands on your computer or phone. Full disk encryption can be done usingFileVault,VeraCryptorBitLocker. Putting a computer to Sleep (instead of Shutdown or Hibernate) may allow an attacker to bypass this defense. Here,Mika Leegives a complete guide for encrypting your laptop.
4. Avoid chatting with sources on the phone:All phone companies store data related to the caller and the receivers numbers, as well as the location of the devices at the time calls were made. In the US and several other countries, theyre required by law to disclose information on registered calls in their possession. What can be done? You should use a secure call service, such as the one the Signal app which was tested repeatedly for security possesses. Although this may mean that both the source and the editor need to download the appas well, the process takes just a few minutes. Here is aguideon how to use it. Just for the hang of it, check out how many of your non-journalist friends are hanging out there. However you choose to communicate with your source, do not bring your mobile phone to sensitive meetings. Buy a disposable device and find a way to convey its number to the source in advance. The source needs to have a disposable safe device too. Authorities can track your movement through cellular network signals and its advised to make it harder on them to locate you retroactively in the exact same cafe where the source was sitting. If you fail to follow this rule, all local authorities will be required to do is ask (politely and legally) for the video filmed by the cafs security camera at the time of your meeting.
5. Choose secure messengers:your calls (cellular ones and via landlines) can be monitored by law enforcement agencies and each SMS is like a postcard all text is fully visible to those who may intercept it. Therefore, use Messengers that allow for secure end to end call: signal, which was already mentioned above, and Telegram are considered to be the safest (although Telegram as well as WhatsApps web apps were compromised once and then fixed). According to some experts, you can also consider using SMSSecure, Threema and even Whatsapp.The Signal Protocol has been actually implemented intoWhatsApp,Facebook Messenger, andGoogle Allo, making conversations using them encrypted. However, unlike Signal and WhatsApp, Google Allo and Facebook Messenger do not encrypt by default, nor notify users that conversations are unencrypted but offer end-to-end encryption in an optional mode. You should also keep in mind that Facebook messenger and WhatsApp are both owned by Facebook.Adium and Pidgin are the most popular Mac and Windows instant messaging clients that support the OTR (Off the Record) encryption protocol and Tor the webs best encrypted browser, which we will get to in detail later (See how to enable Tor in Adiumhereand in Pidginhere). Naturally, you could also use the Tor Messenger itself, which is probably the safest of them all.Two final notes on texting: A cyber security expert Ive discussed this with, says you should also have a working hypothesis that text is encrypted but the fact that these specific two individuals are talking, at this present time, might not go unnoticed.The second note is you should also remember to delete the messages in your phone (although this may not be enough to withstand a forensic check), just in case your device falls in the wrong hands, toavoid exposingthem.
6. Do not use organizational chats:Slack, Campfire, Skype and Google Hangouts should not be used for private conversations. They are easy to break in, and are exposed to disclosure requests for courts use, to resolve legal issues at the workplace. Therefore, its best to avoid them, not only when it comes to conversations with sources, but also conversations between colleagues, editors, etc., when you need to pass information received from your source, whose identity must be kept under cover. Many popular VoIP services like Jitsi have built-in chat features, and several of them are designed to offer most of Skypes features, which make them a great replacement.
7. In extreme cases, consider using aBlackphone:This phone, which strives to provide perfect protection for web surfing, calls, text messages and emails, is probably the best substitute for a regular phone if you are about to topple your government or getting ready to publish secret military files. An anti-bullet vest may also come in handy. Alternatively, try to do without a cell phone, Or opt for a cellular phone RFID signal-blocking bag. Theres always an option that even the Blackphone can be tracked using its IMEI (the mobile phones ID).
8. Protecting Data on your computer:Its very easy to break regular passwords, but it can take years to break passphrases i.e., random combinations of words. We recommend trying secure password management tools like: LastPass and 1Password and KeePassX. Youll need to remember only one password, versus too many Passwords. And still, when handling important services such as your email, do not rely on password managers: Just make sure you remember the password.In aninterviewto Alastair Reid in journalism.co.uk, Arjen Kamphuis, an information security expert, recommended that for encrypted hard drives, secure email, and unlocking laptops, one should choose a password of over 20 characters. Of course, the longer the password, the harder it is to crack but the harder it is to remember too. Thats why he recommends the use of a passphrase. It can be anything, like a line of your favorite poetry, Kamphuis says, maybe a line from something you wrote when you were nine that no one else will know about.Reid reports this thought provoking calculation, using theGibson Research Corporations password strength calculator: A password like F53r2GZlYT97uWB0DDQGZn3j2e, from a random password generator, seems very strong, and indeed it is, taking 1.29 hundred billion trillion centuries to exhaust all the combinations even when the software is making one hundred trillion guesses per second.
9. Two-factor authenticationis also a very good idea. In a regular two-stage authentication you sign in with your password and receive a second code, often via a text message to your smartphone. You can use Yubikey, as well as hardware tokens to further secure sensitive files on your computer. For more information, read the7 golden rules for password security.
10. Assign a computer for inspecting suspicious files/attachments:The easiest way to distribute malware and spyware is through installation via USB or through attachments and email links. It is recommended therefore you use one air-gapped computer to examine these threats under quarantine. With this computer, you can freely use a USB and download files from the Internet, but do not transfer the files to your regular computer or re-use that USB.
11. How to buy your own secured computer:Security expert Arjen Kamphuisrecommendspurchasing a pre-2009 IBM ThinkPad X60 or X61. These are the only modern enough laptops with modern software systems, which enable replacing low level software. Another point to take into account is that you should not buy your computer online, as it may be intercepted during delivery. Kamphuis recommends buying it from a second-hand store for cash. He also points out that you should abolish all connectivity: Remove all Ethernet, modem, Wi-Fi or Bluetooth capabilities. Personally, I know security experts who wouldnt trust such a computer.
12. Educating your Sources:Its possible that by the time the original and valuable information reaches you, its already too late. Your source may have made every possible mistake, leaving behind a trail of evidence. But beyond the need to secure the information once its in your hands, you should strive to teach your sources how to hide the information: store it securely and communicate safely via safe devices. Most people have no clue how to handle sensitive information, and in general what theyre up against the moment they get in touch with you.
13. Use a designated secure system for receiving documents:Replace Dropbox or Google Drive and use something less popular but more secure. For example,SecureDropis a designated system allowing you to receive files from anonymous sources and to safely scan and check them. Edward Snowden described Dropbox as hostile to privacy and recommendedSpideroakinstead. OnionShare is another free service that allows transferring files easily and anonymously.
14. Dont keep notes:neither on a laptop, nor calendars or contact lists on your cellphone or computer or in the cloud do not keep record of your sources name, initials, phone number, email or user name in messengers. Just dont.
15. Visual tracking:On the way to sensitive meetings, avoid using public transportation and guide your source to do the same. You should also avoid meeting places such as modern malls, where video cameras are spread all over the place.
16. Evading social media:Some people prefer to opt for radical anonymity. If for some reason, you need to vanish from the face of the earth without leaving a fully blown profile behind on every social media, totally delete your accounts. Its different from deactivating them, a state in which all your info is stored and can be re-activated.
17. Make friends among hackers:This will help you avoid big mistakes, save time and headaches and keep you up to date on the technological arms race.
18. Payment method:Pay for everything in cash, consider using Bitcoins buy them anonymously (use thisBusiness Insiderguide for that purpose) and, if you have somebody willing to accept them at the other end of the transaction, useDarkcoin. A pre-paid credit card from an online store is also an option.
19. Scribble wisely:If you jotted down information on a piece of paper, what they used to call a note in the Precambrian world, destroy it. And dont forget even that wrinkled one at the bottom of your pocket. Yes, right next to that gum.
You can see the eBook PDF-version of this guidehere.
See the rest here:
Online privacy guide for journalists - Radioinfo (subscription)
Posted in Jitsi
Comments Off on Online privacy guide for journalists – Radioinfo (subscription)
AvaTrade Adds Ethereum, Dash and Ripple Cryptocurrency CFD Trading – Finance Magnates
Posted: at 1:58 pm
The massive recent cryptocurrency rally is not going unnoticed by the online trading industry. The multi-regulated international forex and CFD brokerAvaTradeannounced today that it is adding threerising altcoins, Ethereum, Dash and Ripples XRP, to its trading portfolio.
The London Summit 2017 is coming, get involved!
The choice of these specific blockchain tokes is not very surprising considering the incredible returns they generated in 2017 which must have brought a lot of interest, and pressure on the broker from its clients to add them.Ripples XRP now has a market cap of $13.5 billion, up from $1.5 billion in early April.Ethereum and Dash already jumped before that in the previous cryptocurrency price explosion.
The latest political and financial events have changed the trading world, and we work hard to ensure we stay on the top of our game, and always remain an industry leading brokerage, says Mr. Dire Ferguson, CEO of AvaTrade. We are proud to be the first to introduce these exciting cryptocurrencies to our impressive instruments selection.
Ireland-basedAvaTradewas founded in 2006 and offers more than 250 financial instruments, multiple trading platforms and mobile apps. It is regulated in the EU, Japan, Australia, South Africa andthe British Virgin Islands.AvaTrade first introduced Bitcoin CFD trading back in 2013, both on the popular MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and on its proprietary platform.
The cryptocurrency ecosystem has been on fire this year. Most of the 700+ blockchain assets traded around the world are up significantly this year. In total, the combined value of the entire market is now at a record $62 billion. Leading the pack is still Bitcoin with a price of over $1840 and a market cap of $30 billion.
View post:
AvaTrade Adds Ethereum, Dash and Ripple Cryptocurrency CFD Trading - Finance Magnates
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on AvaTrade Adds Ethereum, Dash and Ripple Cryptocurrency CFD Trading – Finance Magnates
Cryptocurrency Trading Startup CryptoPing Launches ICO – FinSMEs – FinSMEs (blog)
Posted: at 1:58 pm
The Merkle | Cryptocurrency Trading Startup CryptoPing Launches ICO - FinSMEs FinSMEs (blog) CryptoPing, a new venture for cryptocurrency traders, has announced the launch ot its ICO on May 25, 2017, to finance further project improvement. Take Advantage of Altcoin Price Fluctuations With CryptoPing The ... |
See the original post:
Cryptocurrency Trading Startup CryptoPing Launches ICO - FinSMEs - FinSMEs (blog)
Posted in Cryptocurrency
Comments Off on Cryptocurrency Trading Startup CryptoPing Launches ICO – FinSMEs – FinSMEs (blog)







