Daily Archives: May 26, 2017

CF-18 pilot ‘luckiest guy’ – Brantford Expositor

Posted: May 26, 2017 at 4:10 am

Preparations are in full swing for the takeoff of the revamped Community Charity Airshow on Aug. 30 at the Brantford Municipal Airport.

In a transition year, the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum in Hamilton has stepped in to run the show with help from the Rotary Club of Brantford, which last November announced that it was stepping away from organizing the annual event. The club took over sponsorship of the show from the Brant United Way in 2009.

The transition of the show's organization to the museum from Rotary has been seamless, the event's co-chairs Sherry Kerr, Rotary president, and Dave Rohrer, president and CEO of the museum, said at a media reception on Thursday morning at the museum, where they highlighted details of the fundraising event.

This year's show will features several museum aircraft, including the Avro Lancaster - making Brantford its only airshow appearance of the 2017 season. Other highlights include the Canadian Forces Snowbirds and a demonstration of a CF-18 decorated in a striking paint scheme based on the official Canada 150 logo.

"It's a great relationship from the start," said Kerr.

"They are able to provide us with some great aircraft for people to view on the tarmac. And getting the legendary Lancaster bomber is a big plus," she said.

Rohrer said the museum is "thrilled to be part of this great community event that raises funds for local children.

"We have participated in the Brantford shows for many years and have seen the enthusiasm from the crowds. To be able to help continue that magic is an honour for us, and we hope to make the community proud.

"The show is a real gem."

Also at Thursday's announcement was RCAF Capt. Matthew "Glib" Kutryk, who will fly the Canada 150 CF-18 in shows across the country, including in Brantford.

"I feel like the luckiest guy in the air force to be able to fly this plane," Kutryk said in an interview.

"My goal has always been to fly a CF-18. To get to fly the Canada 150 CF-18 is a great high. It's the prettiest bird in the fleet."

He explained that the Canada 150 logo forms foundation of the overall design. The stylized maple leaf has 13 points shaped as diamonds, the celebratory gem. Four points represent Confederation's original provinces - Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia - and the other nine are for the six other provinces and three territories.

The rest of the design plays off the logo.

The logo was designed in 2014 by Ariana Cuvin, then a global business and digital arts student at the University of Waterloo. The CF-18's paint job was designed by Jim Belliveau of 4 Wing Cold Lake.

"Seeing this incredible jet in person has made me even more motivated to share it with Canadians," Kutryk said when the painted aircraft was unveiled in April.

"I hope that this jet will inspire all Canadians to chase their dreams as I did, because that is what Canada is all about."

Kutryk explained Thursday that paint job means that. when the pilot flips the plane over in midflight, spectators suddenly will see an explosion of red and white.

"This is a unique paint job," Kutryk said. "We will never see one that good again."

The name "Glib" is not a nickname, It is Kutryk's call sign when he flies. It's a tradition in the RCAF going back to the First World War. Once a pilot flies a first mission, the call sign sticks with that person for the rest of the career.

Kutryk's said he flew several times with the ISIS Mission in Iraq and Syria.

He will fly in 25 shows across Canada this year, for a total 55 performances because some events have multiple flights.

On the other side of the museum's display space, a mechanics were working on various parts of the Lancaster, ensuring it will be ready for the Brantford show.

The show's format remains the same as in past years. On Aug. 29 there will be a fundraising dinner with the pilots present. The show runs on Aug. 30.

The event is free with a request for a voluntary donation at the entrance.

Parking costs $20.

MMarion@postmedia.com

Twitter.com/EXPMarion

Brantford Expositor 2017

Originally posted here:

CF-18 pilot 'luckiest guy' - Brantford Expositor

Posted in Cf | Comments Off on CF-18 pilot ‘luckiest guy’ – Brantford Expositor

Texas Sheriff Blames Manchester Attack On Gun Laws And Political Correctness – HuffPost

Posted: at 4:09 am

Sheriff Tracy Murphree in Denton, Texas, isnt backing down from a Facebook rant that blamed Mondaysterrorist attack at a concert in Manchester, England, on gun control laws and political correctness.

I ran on a conservative Republican platform,he told the local CBS station. I dont think it should be any surprise to anyone.

Police in Manchester say the attack, which left 22 dead and dozens injured,was the work of a suicide bomber.

Murphree, however, pointed his finger in a number of other directions.

This is what happens when you disarm your citizens. When you open your borders without the proper vetting, he wrote on Facebook on Monday. When you allow political correctness to dictate how you respond to an enemy that wants to kill you.

Murphree, who has threatened to assault members of the transgender community for using the restroom, claimed the left wants to submit to an ideology that treats women as property, kills gays and women and christians with complete impunity.

Folks this is an enemy hell bent on killing you. Committed to forcing you to convert or die. This enemy will strap bombs to their own body and blow themselves up killing children. Im sick of it. You better wake up America. While you are distracted by the media and the crying of the left, Islamic Jihadist are among us and want to kill you. What will it take? This happening at a concert in Dallas or a school in Denton County? If we dont do something quick this country will die of political correctness and the fear that someones feelings may be hurt. It may very well be to late for Europe.

The comments drew a sharp response from the local chapter of the Council on AmericanIslamic Relations, which called it anIslamophobic rant.

We call on Sheriff Murphree to reaffirm his pledge, and that of his officers, to serve and protect all Denton County residents regardless of their faith, ethnicity or national origin, Nikiya Natale, the chapters civil rights director, wrote on Facebook.We are concerned that someone obligated to provide equal justice for all holds such inaccurate, stereotypical and divisive views.

And while some of Murphrees supporters agreed with his comments, other residents were disturbed by them.

I was shocked, Denton resident Sarah Gramblin told the local NBC station. I dont trust that hes going to treat everyone equally under the law, and that really worries me.

Murphree had called his earlier comments on assaulting transgender people in restrooms a mistake, told the NBC station that his post was directed at terrorists and not the Muslim community.

I stand by everything I said in that post, he added. Im not backing off any word of it.

See original here:

Texas Sheriff Blames Manchester Attack On Gun Laws And Political Correctness - HuffPost

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Texas Sheriff Blames Manchester Attack On Gun Laws And Political Correctness – HuffPost

In North Carolina NBA and Political Correctness Win – Church Militant

Posted: at 4:09 am

RALEIGH (ChurchMilitant.com) - The National Basketball Association (NBA) is announcing Charlotte, North Carolina will host the 2019 All-Star Game, after dropping the city from consideration in 2017 owing to the state's so-called transgender bathroom law.

Adam Silver, NBA commissioner, made the announcement at a press conference on May 24 that North Carolina could again host the 2019 All-Star Game since the highly-controversial House Bill 2 (HB2) was overturned in March 2017.

Passedin March 2016 by Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, HB2 mandated that so-called transgender people must use the bathroom coinciding with the sex on their birth certificate. It raised a massive uproar among LGBT activists, causing celebrities,businessesandlawmakersto boycott the state over "transphobia."

In July 2016, the NBA announced it was moving its 2017 All-Star game from Charlotte to New Orleans, Louisiana in protest against HB2.

McCrory lost re-election in December to Democrat Roy Cooper, who promised to overturn HB2. As attorney general under McCrory, Cooper commented that HB2 made the state a "national embarrassment" that "will set North Carolina's economy back if we don't repeal it." He even refused to represent North Carolina when the Obama administration threatened to file a lawsuit against the state.

In March 2017, Cooper repealed HB2 but instituted a bill that LBGT activists claim keeps the "worst part" of HB2 intact. He approved HB142, which critics suggest Cooper rammed through the state legislature, is more "restrictive" than HB2 ever was since it bans cities and localities from instituting transgender bathroom policies for nearly four years as opposed to 180 days legislated in HB2.

A critic with the Charlotte Observer called HB142 "[A] betrayal of the promises the governor made to the LGBT community and a doubling down on discrimination by Republican legislators who have backed it all along," adding it "literally does not do one thing to protect the LGBT community and locks in HB2's most basic and offensive provision."

Silver noted that critics of HB142 may have a point but noted it "eliminates the most egregious aspects of the prior law." He added that all businesses associated with the 2019 All-Star Game are required to "apply a set of equality principles to ensure that every All-Star event will proceed with open access and anti-discrimination policies."

People, however, are growing weary of having politics mixed into sports. It has been reported that ESPN has been losing millions of viewers over hyper-politicization of its sports coverage had laid off over 100 people including on-camera talent.

Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

Like our work? Support us with a donation.

See the article here:

In North Carolina NBA and Political Correctness Win - Church Militant

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on In North Carolina NBA and Political Correctness Win – Church Militant

Fired Marquette U. Professor Will Fight Court Ruling, ‘Political Correctness’ – The Cardinal Newman Society

Posted: at 4:09 am

In a new interview with The Cardinal Newman Society, Dr. John McAdams vowed to fight a courts ruling that upholds Marquette Universitys right to fire him for defending a students freedom to speak moral truths. McAdams also accused Marquette of embracing political correctness before its Catholic mission.

In a ruling early this month, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge David Hansher dismissed McAdams claims against the university.The tenured political science professor was fired after he publicly criticized a philosophy instructor for preventing one of her students from voicing disagreement with same-sex marriage in an ethics class. The university claims McAdams crossed a line, because the instructor was a graduate student and off limits from public criticism.

In his interview with the Newman Society, McAdams explained to the Newman Society that he has a long history of criticizing the University and sometimes other faculty members for events he finds contrary to Marquettes Catholic identity. He has been writing actively on his blog,Marquette Warrior, since 2005 and has drawn attention to numerous abuses of Catholic identity.

Although the university has claimed its Catholic identity is flourishing, a number of faculty and staff members haveexpressed concernabout Marquettes dwindling Catholic identity and instances of Catholic teaching being discouraged and even silenced.

If you look at the institution itself, anytime secular political correctness conflicts with Catholic teaching, they go with secular political correctness, McAdams said.

Others agree with him. The Louis Joliet Society, a group of alumni that supports renewed Catholic identity at Marquette, released a statement on its Facebookpageand posed the question: Why is it that academic freedom, the shield that has been used to protect heretical faculty (particularly tenured faculty) at Catholic colleges and universities for nearly 50 years, is now suddenly the sword used to slay a professor who has consistently and publically stood up for truth, academic integrity and authentic Catholic identity?

McAdams, who is being represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, told the Newman Society that he will appeal the ruling.

Excerpts from McAdams interview with the Newman Society is below.

The Newman Society: Whats the next step for your case?

McAdams: Well appeal.

It wasnt a matter of a poor, green graduate student in her first class not knowing how to handle a discussion. It was an instructor who was simply intolerant of a certain viewpoint, who made it clear she would suppress it

The Newman Society: Considering the precedent, how are you feeling about the appeal?

McAdams: I fully expect to be vindicated by a higher court.

The Newman Society: What would you say is the state of Marquettes Catholic identity?

McAdams: Its little more than a marketing ploy.

You can find online the religious views of freshmen coming in. I think its still the case that a majority are Catholic, although not all of them.

Theres nothing wrong with a non-Catholic attending a Catholic university, but thats relevant because the average freshman coming in is going to have more Catholics as cohorts than they would at a state-run university today. On the other hand, not all Catholics are particularly serious Catholics, just as not all Protestants are particularly serious Protestants.

But if you look at the institution itself, anytime secular political correctness conflicts with Catholic teaching, they go with secular political correctness.

The bureaucracy is shot through with political correctness. There are tons of bureaucrats that have multicultural or diversity or inclusion in their titles, and theyre all committed to bringing politically correct speakers to campus, punishing people for politically incorrect speech.

The Newman Society: From your perspective as somebody whos taught in a Catholic university, what kind of discussions should be happening in classrooms at Catholic universities?

McAdams: For a real Catholic university, the center of gravity should be in the direction of Catholic teaching. That is to say, there should be a majority of faculty that accept Catholic teaching about marriage. There should be a majority of faculty that accept Catholic teaching about abortion or transgenderism.

The center of gravity has to be in a Catholic direction. But, if the center of gravity is in a secular direction such that people are scared to say that they think homosexual acts are sinful, that is dangerous.

The Newman Society: What can professors do to ensure that students can feel comfortable voicing Church teachings in the classroom?

McAdams: We can send the message that yes, you can have different opinions in my class. When I get reinstated which I certainly expect to be I will tell my students that. Academia generally sends the message that you can get in trouble if you say anything politically incorrect.

The Newman Society: What would be the main reason a professor at a Catholic university would not permit discussion in the classroom about things that are in line with the faith, i.e., opposition to same-sex marriage?

McAdams: Political correctness. [They] increasingly believe that opinions they dont like should be shut up.

The Newman Society: Would you teach at a Catholic university again?

McAdams: Sure. I love the students!

See more here:

Fired Marquette U. Professor Will Fight Court Ruling, 'Political Correctness' - The Cardinal Newman Society

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Fired Marquette U. Professor Will Fight Court Ruling, ‘Political Correctness’ – The Cardinal Newman Society

Clint Eastwood: ‘We are killing ourselves’ with political correctness – Washington Times

Posted: at 4:09 am

Legendary actor and film director Clint Eastwood told a crowd at the Cannes Film Festival Sunday that political correctness is killing the entertainment industry.

The Western film icon, who was visiting the festival in southern France for a 25th anniversary screening of his 1992 film Unforgiven, said Americas obsession with political correctness started around the time of the release of his 1971 movie Dirty Harry,according to The Hollywood Reporter.

It was far-out at that time, so I brought it to [director] Don [Siegel], and he liked it, Mr. Eastwood said. A lot of people thought it was politically incorrect. That was at the beginning of the era that were in now with political correctness. We are killing ourselves, weve lost our sense of humor. But I thought it was interesting and it was daring.

Mr. Eastwood made the comments during a master class conducted by Los Angeles Times film critic Kenneth Turan. Mr. Eastwood, who went to Cannes to introduce the screening of Unforgiven, said he initially hadnt planned to sit through the entire movie.

I thought Id just sit through the first five minutes, but after a while I thought, This isnt so bad, so maybe Ill stay for it, he said, THR reported. I enjoyed it. I saw a lot of things that Id forgotten.

Mr. Eastwoods current movie project is The 15:17 to Paris, the Warner Bros. Pictures retelling of the 2015 heroics of three Americans who stopped an Islamic State attack on a train from Brussels to Paris.

Mr. Eastwood, who describes himself as libertarian, has been outspoken against political correctness in the past.

He told Esquire magazine in August that then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had been so successful in his campaign because everybodys getting tired of political correctness, kissing up.

Thats the kiss-ass generation were in right now. Were really in a p- generation. Everybodys walking on eggshells, the director said at the time.

View original post here:

Clint Eastwood: 'We are killing ourselves' with political correctness - Washington Times

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Clint Eastwood: ‘We are killing ourselves’ with political correctness – Washington Times

Difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism | Major Differences

Posted: at 4:06 am

The evolutionary idea contributed proposed by Charles Darwin called Darwinism or Natural selection theory, explaining the mechanism of evolution is clearly stated in his book Origin of species.

The important postulates of the theory are: Over production, Struggle for existence, Variations, Survival of the fittest, and Origin of species.

Darwinism vs Lamarckism

Darwinism

1. It does not believe in the internal vital force.

2. They do not form part of Darwins natural selection theory.

3. An organ can develop further or degenerate only due to continuous variations.

4. Struggle for existence is very important in this theory.

5. Only useful variations are transferred to the next generation.

6. Darwins natural selection theory is based on survival of the fittest.

Lamarckism:

1. This theory states that there is an internal vital force in all organisms.

2. It considers new needs or desire produce new structures and change habits of the organism.

3. According to this theory if an organ is constantly used it would be better developed whereas disuse of organ results in its degeneration.

4. It does not consider struggle for existence.

5. All the acquired characters are inherited to the next generation.

6. Lamarckism does not believe in survival of the fittest.

See the article here:

Difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism | Major Differences

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on Difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism | Major Differences

Assessment task: Social Darwinism in Australia | South …

Posted: at 4:06 am

Assessment task: Social Darwinism in Australia

In 2002 a movie called Rabbit Proof Fence was released. It tells the story of three Aboriginal girls in Australia who escape from a detention centre after being taken from their homes to be trained as domestic workers. They set off on a trek back home, using the rabbit proof fence to help them keep moving in the right direction. Read these two very different reviews of the same movie, and then answer the questions that follow. (suggested answers appear below the questions).

Review 1

Based on true events, "Rabbit-Proof Fence" is a moving story of racial prejudice, and amazing endurance as three girls walk 1,500 miles to find their mothers in 1930s Australia.

Special detention centres were set up across the continent to keep the mixed race children from "contaminating" the rest of Australian society, and orders were given to forcibly remove "half-caste" children from their families. It was a disastrous, racist policy that brought about the misery of the so-called "stolen generations".

With an epic journey ahead of them, three girls set out to find their way back home by following the rabbit-proof fence that stretches across the Outback.

By highlighting the realities of this hidden genocide (unbelievably, the policy continued until the early 70s), "Rabbit-Proof Fence" stands as a powerful, worthy testimony to the suffering of the stolen generations.

- Adapted from http://www.bbc.co.uk

Review 2

A hit movie based on myth and misunderstanding, by Peter Howson (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs 1971-72)

The Australian film Rabbit Proof Fence presents a dramatic story about three young half-caste Aboriginal girls who ran away from a Western Australian settlement in which they were placed in 1931. Two girls are portrayed as returning to their mother's community by the almost super-human feat of walking for nine weeks along 1500 miles of rabbit proof fence. After being diverted from the other two, police returned their cousin to the settlement.

The story of the separation of the rabbit proof fence girls rests only on a story told 35 years later by one of the girls to her daughter.

When he received reports these girls were being allowed to run wild amongst whites and were in danger, Neville (Chief Protector of the Aborigines) acted responsibly to assist with the serious problem of child neglect. Only those judged most in need of care were removed.

- Adapted from an article in The Australian, 11 March 2002

Questions

Read the two very different movie reviews of 'Rabbit Proof Fence'.

1. Which review says that 'Rabbit Proof Fence' was historically reliable? (1)

2. Which review says that 'Rabbit Proof Fence' was historically unreliable? (1)

3. Do you think the BBC review is accurate to refer to what happened to Australian Aborigines as 'genocide'? (2)

4. Give a reason why Review 2 defends the policy towards the Aborigines. (1)

Extended writing

From what you have learnt about Social Darwinism in Australia, write an essay in which you argue with Reviewer number 2 and Explain the other evidence there is to support Review number 1. (30)

Suggested answers

1. Review 1

2. Review 2

3. Yes. Definition of genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group (x1)

Yes, Aborigines almost exterminated by European conquest and colonisation (X1)

4. Reason, the reveiw was written by a Minister of Aboriginal Affairs

Extended writing

Outcome: Need to develop a coherent argument - need to explain the concept of Social Darwinism and then explain how it affected Aborigines.

Content selection:

The author of Review 2 implemented a paternal attitude towards Aborigines.

He thought 'they' were different, and had to be 'looked after' to avoid 'them' being a danger to themselves.

Definition of Social Darwinism

19th century western science Darwin/evolution

Applied falsely to human beings

Physical characteristics linked to mental and behavioural characteristics

Classified into 'races'

Europeans regarded as superior

Justification for colonialism and conquest

Regarded the 'other' as primitive and uncivilised

Not unique to Australia

British colonised Australia

Found people living there

Saw Australian aboriginal as inferior 'race'

Europeans had weapons

Exterminated, hunted and killed 90% died

Discriminatory Laws controlled Aborigine's lives

Examples of laws

Stolen generation

Children of mixed descent removed from parents

Link:

Assessment task: Social Darwinism in Australia | South ...

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on Assessment task: Social Darwinism in Australia | South …

The Evolution of Game of Thrones Characters – IGN

Posted: at 4:06 am

Share.

With the countdown to Game of Thrones' seventh season underway (check out the first full trailer here), we should probably all take a look back at the savage and arduous journeys that the show's main characters have been through since the show premiered back in 2011.

We've watched the mighty fall, the weak get powerful, and children literally grow up before our eyes. Sellswords have become knights, pimps have risen to Lordships, and honored daughters have become rogue assassins. The Game of Thrones gallery is rife with change and many of these characters have endured torture and harsh horrors that worked to shape and mold them through the series.

Below you'll find a slideshow of the series' remaining (still living) main characters, spotlighting their looks through the years and giving you a glimpse at how much they've changed while trying to play the Game of Thrones. Just click right through the images to see the differences, and obviously spoilers for all the past seasons follow!

Game of Thrones' Season 7 premieres July 16th on HBO.

Matt Fowler is a writer for IGN and a member of the Television Critics Association (TCA). Follow him on Twitter at@TheMattFowlerand Facebook atFacebook.com/MattBFowler.

Read the original:

The Evolution of Game of Thrones Characters - IGN

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on The Evolution of Game of Thrones Characters – IGN

Evolution of the aviation threat, TSA response – Fox News

Posted: at 4:06 am

The Transportation Security Administration introduced new screening protocols for carry-on bags at a number of airports across the nation on Wednesdayas the Department of Homeland Security considers expanding a ban on large electronics in the cabins of U.S.-bound flights.

The TSA selected about a dozen U.S. airports to begin testing the new security program, which could potentially expand to other airports nationwide. The program will require travelers to place any electronics larger than a cell phone in a separate bin for X-ray screening. According to the TSA, officials at the security checkpoints may also advise travelers to place other carry-on items in separate bins.

TSAs top priority is to protect the traveling public, and every policy and security procedure in place is designed to mitigate threats to passengers and the aviation sectorwhich we know our adversaries continue to target, a TSA official told Fox News.

U.S. transportation, specifically the aviation system, has been a top terrorist target since 9/11, and as part of the TSAs counterterrorism efforts, the agency adjusts security screening procedures to stay ahead of evolving threats.

TSA was created in 2002, after the September 11thattacks. Since then, U.S. homeland security officials have faced an ever-changing threat to the aviation system.

Before 9/11, baggage wasnt screened, so we really had a Herculean task, TSA Chief of Staff Chad Wolf told Fox News. Wolf began working with the TSA at the agencys inception, and stayed through 2005. After working in the private sector for 11 years, Wolf is back on the frontlines of aviation security.

9/11 was a game changer, Wolf said. Weve watched the threat evolve from there, so our measures of security has evolved and changed to anticipate and respond.

Here is a timeline of some of the most significant terror attempts targeting U.S. air travel since 9/11:

December 2001: Shoe Bomber

Plot: In December of 2001, months after the September 11thattacks on the World Trade Center, British citizen Richard Reid attempted to ignite a show bomb on a flight from Paris to Miami.

Response: TSA now requires at security checkpoints that passengers remove their shoes to go through X-ray screening.

August 2006: Liquid Bomb Plot

Plot:Abdulla Ahmed Ali, Tanvir Hussain, and Assad Sarwar, among others, plotted to place liquid explosives on 10 commercial airlines traveling from the United Kingdom to the U.S.

Response:TSA now has a 3-1-1 liquids rule: 3.4 ounces or less per container fit into one quart-sized clear plastic bag, and one bag per passenger.

James Norton, who was Deputy Assistant Secretary at the DHS during the time of the liquid plot, told Fox News the department took an all hazards approach after the plot. The terror attempt also inspired the Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreement between the U.S. and the European Union, which made it possible to transfer passenger data so officials could identify passengers in the cabin before takeoff.

The 2006 plot was kept under wrapsit was essentially, a secret operation, Norton told Fox News. Even though we had the majority of the bad actors, DHS still went ahead and implemented the liquid ban to ensure safetyfor security folks, they always act on the side of caution.

December 2009: Underwear Bomb Plot

Plot:On Christmas Day, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian engineering student, flew from Amsterdam to Detroit and attempted to detonate a bomb hidden in his underwear as the plane began to land.

Response:TSA officials said they deployed Advanced Imaging Technology, including millimeter wave and general-use backscatter x-ray systems.

Others plots against U.S. aviation include:

A fuel bomb plot in June of 2007, when Russel Defeitas, Abdul Kadir, Kareem Ibrahim, and Abdel Nur plotted to blow up a jet fuel infrastructure near John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City.

An October 2010 plot inspired by Al Qaedas Anwar al-Awlakitwo packages of explosives were found on separate cargo planes heading from Yemen to the U.S.

A 2012 underwear bomber copycatwhen authorities in the Middle East seized an underwear bomb, catching a suspect who intended to attack a Western-bound aircraft.

Insider Threats

U.S. officials and lawmakers have become increasingly concerned with the prospect of insider threatsmeaning airport employees could pose a risk based on their ability to bypass traditional screening requirements that travelers undergo.

The House Subcommittee on Transportation and Protective Security, led by Rep. John Katko, R-N.Y., released areportin February outlining attempts by airport employees to detonate a bomb at an airport, as well as smuggling guns and drugs. Some employees even became involved in terrorist activities overseas.

The baggage handler, the mechanic- all of these workers behind the scenes, could post a threat, the committee aide told Fox News. We could have a problem on our hands.

But Wolf told Fox News the insider threat is always something the TSA is concerned about.

When you talk about an insider threat, we have a good visibility on aviation workers here domestically, so we do a number of things to vet those individuals, but internationally its different, Wolf said.

U.S. Travelers adapting to TSA security measures

According to Norton, informing the public is a crucial part in thwarting plots and disrupting threats.

This is part of the disruption process, and a way to let potential bad actors know that we are aware of this threat, Norton told Fox News.

In March, DHS implemented anelectronics banon flights to the U.S. from 13 international airports due to reports of increased terror threats that suggested Al Qaeda and other groups were still looking to smuggle explosive material onboard planes. DHS is currently considering expanding the ban to more international airports with U.S.-bound flights.

Wolf told Fox News that the TSA believes the traveling public certainly understands the threat, but also faces an inconvenience.

Our number one priority is to make travelers safe, and we are going to make sure we put in place all measures possible to do this, Wolf told Fox News. The public adapts, whether its taking off their shoes or restricting their liquids, they understand and the vast majority of them want TSA to take these measures.

Fox News' Jake Gibson contributed to this report.

Brooke Singman is a Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews.

The rest is here:

Evolution of the aviation threat, TSA response - Fox News

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Evolution of the aviation threat, TSA response – Fox News

The 240-Year Evolution of the Army Sidearm – Popular Mechanics

Posted: at 4:06 am

Perhaps one of the most famous uses of the M1911 came when Alvin York won the Congressional Medal of Honor. In October 1918, during the battle of Meuse-Argonne, York was charged by a squad of Germans. As they came into pistol range, York drew his M1911 and killed six attackers. That day he single handedly killed a total of 25 German soldiers and captured 132 more.

This painted scene depicts Alvin York at the Battle of Meuse-Argonne with an M1911 pistol in hand.

Frank Schoonover

In 1926, after some lessons learned during World War One, Colt overhauled the M1911 by including a shorter trigger and frame cut-outs behind the trigger, a longer spur on the pistol grip safety, an arched mainspring housing, a wider front sight, and a shortened hammer spur. Following these changes, the pistol was designated the M1911A1, a weapon that would also fight a world warjust like its predecessor.

The Colt soldiered on into the 1980s until the U.S. launched the Joint Service Small Arms Program, which aimed to select a new pistol that could be used by all of the armed services. After a tough competition between designs from Colt, Walther, Smith & Wesson, Steyr, FN, and SIG, a winning design was selected, the Italian Beretta 92. The Beretta formally replaced the M1911A1 in 1986 as the M9.

Even though the military had found its new gun, the 1911 still remains in use by some units such as the U.S. Marine Force Recon Units and Special Operation Command as the refurbished M45, surpassing a century of service.

Marine Corps students using the M9 during rapid-fire drills, 2005.

Justin Lago/Marine Corps

But the M9 beat out the venerable Colt because it fired the smaller 9x19mm round, which made learning to shoot easier, and it had a much larger magazine holding 15 rounds while using a single-action/double-action trigger. While some complained it lacked the 1911's .45 ACP stopping power, the M9 served the U.S. military well for over 30 years.

It has seen hard service during the Gulf War, the War in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War. In March 2003, during Operation Iraqi Freedom Marine Corporal Armand E. McCormick won the Silver Star when he drove his vehicle into an Iraqi position before dismounting and clearing enemy defenses with his M9.

But as technology advanced and new pistol designs emerged, the Army needed a new sidearm to match the times. In the early 2000s, a series of trials led eventually to the Modular Handgun System program. The Army wanted a lighter, more adaptable pistol which could be fitted to individual soldiers. After several years of testing entries from Glock, Beretta, FN, and Smith & Wesson, the SIG P320 won out.

The U.S. Army's newest pistol, the SIG P320.

Sig Sauer

The new pistol, designated the M17, is lighter, more compact, has a standard 17-round magazine capacity, and is fully ambidextrous. It has a fiberglass-reinforced polymer frame with an integrated Picatinny rail to allow lights and lasers to be mounted, much like the M9's slide-mounted manual safety.

But the most innovative aspect of the M17 is its modular design. The pistol's frame holds an easily removable trigger pack, which along with the barrel and slide, can be removed and simply dropped into another frame. This gives troops in different roles with different requirements some much needed flexibility.

The SIG P320 is completely unrecognizable from M1775, held in the hands of American founding fathers. Much like America itself, the soldiers' handgun has evolved massively over the last 240 years, but the principle of the sidearm remains the samethe absolute last line of defense.

Wars may not be won with pistols, but a soldier's sidearm can still be the difference between life and death.

Read more:

The 240-Year Evolution of the Army Sidearm - Popular Mechanics

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on The 240-Year Evolution of the Army Sidearm – Popular Mechanics