The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: May 11, 2017
Lebanon: Hedonism and War – Center for Research on Globalization
Posted: May 11, 2017 at 12:38 pm
Palestinian refugee camps are up in flames, across the country, a result of the disputes between the rival factions, but also of unsavory influences from abroad. As everyone knows here, there are, for instance, the Al Qaida-affiliated militants hiding in the South.
There are Israeli incursions into Lebanon, both by land and by water. There are also drones, flying habitually from Israel into and through the Lebanese airspace.
There is great tension between Israel and Hezbollah, over Syria, but not only.
Lebanese forces are fighting DAESH, mainly in the Northeast of Lebanon, on the mountainous border with Syria. Hezbollah is fighting DAESH, too, but independently.
In the 7th year into the war in Syria, there are still more than 1 million Syrian refugees living on Lebanese territory, some in awful conditions and many with extremely uncertain future. The exact number is unknown (UNHCR stopped the registration of all new arrivals approximately 2 years ago), but is believed to fluctuate between 1 and 2 million.
There is mounting tension between the Syrian and the Lebanese communities, as they are now competing for already sparse jobs and public services (including such basic utilities like water), while Palestinian refugees have been stranded in Lebanon already for decades, with very little social, political and economic rights.
There is a drug epidemic, from its production (mainly in the Bekaa Valley), to its unbridled consumption in Beirut.
A new government has finally been formed in December 2016, after more than 2.5 years of absence of any functioning administration. However, the Prime Minister is a Sunni Muslim, Saad Hariri, who is openly hostile to Syria and has directly expressed support for the recent US attacks against the neighboring country. Mr. Hariri has long been accusing Hezbollah and Syria of assassinating his father, Rafik Hariri, in February 2005. Mr. Hariri has dual citizenship, that of Lebanon and also of Saudi Arabia where he was born (in Riyadh). On the other hand, the President of Lebanon is now a Maronite Christian, 83-years old Michel Aoun, who came to power thanks to the unfailing support given to him by Hezbollah, the fact that puts him at odds with the Prime Minister.
There is an ongoing struggle, even deadlock, amongst the political parties (in Lebanon often synonymous with sectarian divisions), over such varied issues as the electoral law, waste management, international political alliances, foreign military funding, gender-based discrimination, employment as well as all basic social services (or acute lack of them).
* * *
Lebanon is literally surrounded by perpetual conflicts. Syria, the country in great agony is right next door, north and east of tiny Lebanon, while mighty and aggressive Israel is threatening the country from the south. The United Nations troops are patrolling the so-called UN 2000 Blue Line or the de facto border between Lebanon and Israel. In fact, UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force In Lebanon) has for years been covering a large part of the countrys territory. It all feels like a war zone.
In fact the region consists of a series of temporarily dormant conflicts that are ready to explode again, at any moment, with destructive, murderous force.
The occupied and devastated Golan Heights is just across the borderline, too. Officially, The Golans are still part of Syria, but the Israelis have already purged most of its population, resettling it with their own citizens. During my visit, some 4 years ago, the situation was already dire, the area scarred by barbed wires, with Israeli military posts and vehicles everywhere. Many local houses were destroyed, as punishment. If you drive to the geographical extreme, you can see the Golan Heights from Lebanon. You can also see Israel, while Syria is always there, right behind the majestic and bare mountains.
The UN peacekeepers come from all parts of the world, including South Korea, Indonesia and Europe. Right before the Coastal Highway ends, near the city of Tyre, the motorists pass through the last Lebanese checkpoint. The UNIFIL protected area begins, with armored vehicles, sandbags and watchtowers. It reads, on the concrete blocks intended to slow down the traffic:
Peace to Lebanon, Glory to Korea!
Palestinian refugee camps are overflowing. Syrian refugees (some in awful conditions) are working like slaves in the Bekaa Valley, begging for money in Sidon and Beirut, or if they are wealthy, renting lavish seafront condominiums on the Corniche of the capital city.
* * *
Despite all the bravado, Lebanon is scared; it is petrified.
Everybody knows that Israel could hit at any moment, again. It is said that Israelis are already stealing Lebanese oil from the seabed, but the weak and almost totally defenseless country can do almost nothing against one of the mightiest military forces on Earth.
All over the country, there are dormant cells of ISIS (DAESH) and of other extremist militant groups, overflowing from war-torn Syria. The ISIS is dreaming about a caliphate and the access to the sea. Lebanon is right there, a perfect location.
Both Russia and China are keeping a relatively low profile here, not too interested in operating in this divided and uncertain political climate. In Lebanon, there are very few permanent loyalties left;allegiances are often shifting andare frequently dependent on outside funding.
Saudi Arabia and Iran are always present here, and so is the West. Hezbollah (on several lists of the terrorist organizations of the West) is the only pan-Lebanese force capable and willing to provide at least some basic social services for the poor, as well as determined military and ideological defense against Israel.
Many political analysts are predicting that Lebanon will collapse, totally, and soon. But it is still here, determined and defiant. How, nobody knows. For how long, is a total mystery!
Patrolled by the UN, overflowing with refugees, Lebanon is shining into the night. Its Ferraris are roaming through its streets, without mufflers, until early morning hours. Its nightclubs are seducing hedonist visitors from the Gulf. Its art cinemas are as good or even better than those in Paris. At the AUB Medical Center, the best Middle Eastern surgeons are treating the most horrid war injuries from the area.
Here, war and self-indulgence are living side by side. Some say it is nothing else other than a bare cynicism. Others would argue:
No, it is life! Life of the 21st century world; exposed, brought to the extreme, but in a way honest.
Andre Vltchekis a philosopher, novelist, filmmaker and investigative journalist. He has covered wars and conflicts in dozens of countries. Three of his latest books are revolutionary novel Aurora and two bestselling works of political non-fiction: Exposing Lies Of The Empire and Fighting Against Western Imperialism. View his other books here. Andre is making films for teleSUR and Al-Mayadeen. Watch Rwanda Gambit, his groundbreaking documentary about Rwanda and DRCongo. After having lived in Latin America, Africa and Oceania, Vltchek presently resides in East Asia and the Middle East, and continues to work around the world. He can be reached through hiswebsite and his Twitter.
See the original post here:
Lebanon: Hedonism and War - Center for Research on Globalization
Posted in Hedonism
Comments Off on Lebanon: Hedonism and War – Center for Research on Globalization
35 Years Ago: Duran Duran Invents the ’80s on ‘Rio’ – Diffuser.fm – Diffuser.fm
Posted: at 12:38 pm
Subscribe to Diffuser.fm on
When Duran Duran convened to record the balance of Rio at George Martins storied AIR Studios in the beginning of 1982, they couldnt have known the major leap they were about to make both in their own career and in pop music as a whole. The sound and stance the album represented would help push them toward the worldwide superstardom that came to full fruition with 1983s Seven and the Ragged Tiger, and would provide a payoff on the aspirations of the New Romantic movement in the bargain.
The bands self-titled 1981 debut album made them stars in the U.K. but they had yet to beat a path to the top in America. As the poster boys for the New Romantic movement that took over England in 1980-81, they started out by mixing post-punk edge with German-influenced electronics, glam influences, and a solid disco-informed groove (early on they cheekily described their sound as a blend of Chic and the Sex Pistols).
They also fully embraced the New Romantic anti-punk ethos that valued aspirational hedonism over gritty anarchismthey wanted to be pop stars living the high life. But despite having hooks aplenty, their first album still bore trace elements of their underground beginnings and lacked a full-on pop production sheen. It felt more like music for the emerging dance-rock club culture than the work of a world-beating pop phenomenon.
But even before the album was out, Rios first single, My Own Way (released in late 81) signaled a shift. Its swooping strings, soaring choruses, and do-or-die production pointed towards the glittering prize of Duran Durans worldwide pop-star future, even if an altered version was eventually cut for the album release.
You didnt even need to pull the LP out of its sleeve to get a whiff of what the band was aiming for on Rio. For the album cover, Duran Duran enlisted the talents of Patrick Nagel, sort of an American Alberto Vargas, best known for his glossy images of women for Playboy magazine. The explosive colors, sleek lines, and glamour-gal image contrasted sharply with the starkly framed band shot adorning Duran Durans debut.
The inner-sleeve image of the band followed suit. Instead of the flowing, foppish New Romantic gear they sported on the first albums cover, the boys presented a sort of proto-Miami Vice look, nattily attired in expensive-looking suits and looking better suited for celebrity hobnobbing than cultish clubbing.
And of course, the visuals set up a batch of songs equally invested with a shiny, stylish flair. Rio is an ode to the idealized title figure, an aspiring international playboys dream girl. A guest sax solo from Andy Hamilton added to the sophisticated Roxy Music vibe, and the tracks combination of elegant melodic flow and danceable groove was the mixture that would hit pay dirt for the band.
That song and Hungry Like the Wolf solidified this second phase of Duran Durans evolution and lodged themselves and the band firmly into the pop pantheon forevermore. A generous helping of power chords from guitarist Andy Taylor mixes with John Taylors (no relation) thumb-slapping bass lines and Nick Rhodes frothy, burbling synths. But Simon Le Bons suave delivery of his feral, randy lyrics probably did more than anything to aid in the bands burgeoning sex-symbol status. The singles Top 5 placement on both the U.K. and U.S. charts served notice of Duran Durans increased commercial clout as well.
The videos the band made for these tunes had no small role in establishing Duran Durans new image either. In Hungry Like the Wolf theyre Indiana Jones-like adventurers in exotic locales. The Rio video finds them alternately sunning themselves on a yacht and engaged in beachside antics in tropical climes, clad in the same sort of well-tailored suits seen in the album art. Not only did these ubiquitous clips solidify the bands superheroes-of-hedonism persona, they changed the game for the entire music video industry.
Watch the Video for Rio
Subscribe to Diffuser.fm on
But Duran Durans intercontinental stardom had its downside too. John Taylor was, at least in Le Bons view, leaping a tad too wholeheartedly into the whole hedonism thing, taking full advantage of the bands lofty perch to overindulge in every conceivable way. On one level, its simply whats expected of a certain sort of rock star, but Le Bon worried that instead of burning the candle at both ends, Taylor was taking a blowtorch to the middle and endangering himself in the process. In lieu of a frank discussion, Le Bon decided to channel his concerns into the lyrics for Hold Back the Rain, which he actually slipped under Taylors door after finishing them. Decades later, Le Bon said Taylor never offered up any response, but if nothing else, it all ended up in one of Rios most potent, propulsive tunes.
By the albums end, the other side of Duran Durans sound popped its head up. The records last two tracks were like a long, wistful sigh following the urgent momentum of the rest of Rio. The delicate Save a Prayer floats on a bed of lush bed of synths as its tender, romantic sentiments unfold into one of the most emotionally impactful ballads in the entire Duran Duran oeuvre.
And on the albums final track, The Chauffeur, the band taps into something downright transcendent that has nothing to do with the pursuit of pop perfection but instead speaks to their credibility as true artistes. Its a poetic, wistful evocation of romantic yearning riding on a fragile, arty framework. Rhodes graceful keyboard lines support Le Bons evocative lyrics in an arrangement thats unconventional without being inaccessible. The drums dont even enter the scene until halfway through the track, turning up in time to help propel the songs long, atmospheric ride-out and achieving a feel somehow closer to a 60s Godard film than an 80s pop record.
Watch the Video for The Chauffeur
Subscribe to Diffuser.fm on
But artful detours aside, ultimately, Rio proved that both Duran Duran and the entire British new wave realm from which they emerged could be refitted for more pop-friendly purposes and take over the world in the process.
Duran Duran Albums Ranked in Order of Awesomeness
Next: Revisit Duran Duran's Self-Titled Debut
Link:
35 Years Ago: Duran Duran Invents the '80s on 'Rio' - Diffuser.fm - Diffuser.fm
Posted in Hedonism
Comments Off on 35 Years Ago: Duran Duran Invents the ’80s on ‘Rio’ – Diffuser.fm – Diffuser.fm
Animal testing is a complex issue, taking good care of test organisms is not – Dailyuw
Posted: at 12:38 pm
On January 8, a pigtail macaque monkey died of dehydration at the UW primate research lab after going an estimated three days with no water. The tube that connected the water supply to the monkeys cage had become disconnected, cutting off its source of drinking water. A technician was responsible for monitoring the cages and equipment, including the water line, twice a day. They had neglected to check the water supply for several days, until they noticed that the monkey was lethargic and weak, by which point it was too late to revive the animal.
Was this merely a freak case of neglect and irresponsibility?
The disheartening truth is that this is merely the latest manifestation of something that runs much deeper. The number of primate skeletons in the labs closet have been piling up for decades.
Before delving into the case further, some background information is appropriate.
Research conducted on animals has been going on since before Socrates and Aristotle fathers of the study of ethics walked the earth. While unsavory to think about, it is beyond argument that animal testing has contributed to uncovering the secrets of mammalian anatomy, as well as the discovery of numerous treatments and procedures like artificial hearts, pacemakers, and anesthetics, to name a few.
Even today, the medical world is making steady strides to treat malaria, breast cancer, multiple sclerosis, and schizophrenia, which were all dependent, at one stage or another, on animal testing. The UW primate lab has historically focused much of its research to advance research for an AIDS vaccine. These are the facts.
But all these beneficial contributions, ostensibly made possible in part via animal testing, must be weighed against another fact: 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for animal testing. Of that figure, about 85,000, or seven percent, were used in studies that caused pain or suffering which could not be relieved.
Such a statistic cannot be swept under the rug. Do all of these animals even the ones that are spared intensely painful, traumatic experiments play unequivocally vital functions in the direct advancement of human well-being by eradicating insidious diseases or in developing life-saving vaccinations? If not, then we are confronted with some rather thorny questions. Have we allowed the notion of scientific progress to embolden us to treat animal testing with a skewed ethical code, and to perpetuate senseless cruelty?
Even into the 1980s, the notion that animals couldnt experience pain the way humans can was widespread. The roots of this notion can be followed back to the philosophy of Rene Descartes.
Brilliant though he was, Descartes was operating on a strictly philosophical plane, not a biological or medical one. Further, his pioneering idea of rationalism has long been superseded by empiricism within the scientific community. Most biologists today would argue that many animals possess at least some basic level of consciousness. Clearly then, something is massively off-kilter with our outlook on animal welfare.
The case of the macaque monkey death in the UW primate research lab is yet another disturbing manifestation of this outlook. If this was an isolated, one-off incident, it would be deeply disheartening and saddening. However, its not an isolated, freak incident.
Not even close.
For literally decades, various UW animal research programs have come under investigation, been the target of a slew of lawsuits made by animal rights organizations, and been cited on numerous occasions for failing to comply with animal welfare standards.
In 1995, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) found the UWs previous primate research center guilty of the deaths of five baboons that had been neglected. The facility had been a former mental institution and had been shown in multiple cases to be unsuitably equipped to house monkeys.
In 1996, a macaque died of dehydration in an incident nearly identical to the one that occurred this past January, also prompting an investigation by the USDA, which ended in a $20,000 settlement.
In 2001, an animal rights group filed a complaint against the UW, stating that the primate lab had failed to uphold a law requiring any instances of prolonged pain and suffering to be reported to the USDA. The group claimed that the lab confined macaques to a chair for hours, chained by a collar.
The obscene list of the labs dirty laundry goes on and on.
In 2008, researchers were cited by the USDA for performing unauthorized experiments on monkeys. In 2011, the USDA fined the university over $10,000 for allowing another macaque to starve to death. In 2014, the lab was cited when workers placed three juvenile monkeys in a cage with older, aggressive males, who tore the younger monkeys to pieces.
Despite all of this, another three monkeys were killed in 2015 while undergoing a previously unattempted experiment. According to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), under all-too-familiar circumstances, a macaque also died in 2016 of dehydration after being neglected for several days.
The investigation that was prompted by the death of the macaque this year also found that 17 of the primate cages hadnt been cleaned in at least two weeks.
Morgan Rawson, a student and leader in Campus Animal Rights Educators (CARE), smoothly ties together the significance of these accusations.
From my own personal research, I have noticed very consistent patterns of negligence on behalf of the primate lab, along with a strong tendency toward justification through accreditation, where they take advantage of their prestige as a highly regarded research university to justify severe mistreatment of animals, Rawson said.
From CAREs perspective as an intersectional club, the treatment of the monkeys is without a doubt unacceptable, she continued. Further, the very fact that the university still heavily relies on outdated research methods involving model organisms, when so many universities have moved to alternative methods, is perplexing.
What is the takeaway from all of this? The UW is one of the most heavily federally funded universities in the United States. For proof of this, look no further than the brand-new, $124 million dollar underground primate facility being constructed on campus right now. The primate lab can afford to take better care of its research organisms if it chooses to.
And it has no reason not to.
Animals that are starving, dehydrated, or with otherwise generally compromised immune systems, are of far less use in experiments. The side effects from a novel drug being tested are likely to be more pronounced on a weak individual. And besides, primates are among the most expensive model organisms. Flippantly wasting money on primates to replace neglected ones is a serious slap in the face to those that could actually benefit from the labs medical advancements.
If this wasnt enough, animal rights organizations are never far behind and are willing to expose the misdeeds of the lab. This should be a glaring indicator that the primate research lab needs to find a new paradigm for its treatment of animals, especially if it hopes to contribute with breakthroughs in medicine.
Reach writer Tony Sciglianoat opinion@dailyuw.com.Twitter: @earthtotones
Go here to see the original:
Animal testing is a complex issue, taking good care of test organisms is not - Dailyuw
Posted in Rationalism
Comments Off on Animal testing is a complex issue, taking good care of test organisms is not – Dailyuw
Pope’s message to Latin American hierarchy: listen to the laity – Catholic Culture
Posted: at 12:38 pm
Catholic World News
May 11, 2017
In a message to the Catholic hierarchy of Latin America, Pope Francis has underlined the importance of listening to the laity, and being willing to join them in their struggle to live the Gospel in a troubled world.
The full text of the Popes message to the Latin American Episcopal Council (CELAM) was made public by the Vatican on May 11. In it the Pope remarks that this weeks meeting of CELAM leaders, taking place in El Salvador, occurs against the background music of the celebration of the 300th anniversary of the Brazilian shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida. He remarks: Our Lady of Aparecida makes us grown, and places us on the path of the disciple. Aparecida is above all a school of discipleship.
Recalling that the image of Our Lady of Aparecida was discovered by fishermen, the Pope says that fishermen have to contend with the uncertainty of the catch and the occasional inclemency of the weather. This is the plight of most working people, he said: working with the insecurity of not knowing what the result will be. The Holy Father went on to denounce the corruption that is prevalent in many Latin American countries:
And what hurts the most is seeing that, almost regularly, they go out to face the inclemency generated by one of the gravest sins that currently afflicts our Continent: corruption, that corruption that sweeps through lives, submerging them in the most extreme poverty. Corruption that destroys entire populations, subjecting them to precariousness.
Pope Francis urged the bishops of the region to appreciate the faith and the work of the laity. Learning to listen to the People of God, he said, means to rid ourselves of our prejudices and rationalism, our functionalist mindsets, so as to understand how the Spirit acts in the hearts of so many men and women who with great zeal do not cease to throw nets and to fight to make the Gospel credible. He told the prelates that they should not be afraid to get dirty for our people.
References:
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
There are no comments yet for this item.
See the original post:
Pope's message to Latin American hierarchy: listen to the laity - Catholic Culture
Posted in Rationalism
Comments Off on Pope’s message to Latin American hierarchy: listen to the laity – Catholic Culture
Tennessee Free Speech Bill Signed Into Law – Inside Higher Ed – Inside Higher Ed
Posted: at 12:37 pm
The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription) (blog) | Tennessee Free Speech Bill Signed Into Law - Inside Higher Ed Inside Higher Ed A free speech bill backed by state Republican lawmakers in Tennessee became law there this week. Tennessee Law Is Hailed as Offering Unprecedented Protection of ... |
Go here to read the rest:
Tennessee Free Speech Bill Signed Into Law - Inside Higher Ed - Inside Higher Ed
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Tennessee Free Speech Bill Signed Into Law – Inside Higher Ed – Inside Higher Ed
Tennessee Passes Bill To Protect Free Speech On Campus – The Daily Caller
Posted: at 12:37 pm
Bipartisan Tennessee lawmakers passed a free speech law Tuesday that protects students First Amendment rights on college campuses.
GOP Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam signed the Campus Free Speech Protection Act after the states House of Representatives passed it in a85-7 vote and the Senate unanimously approved it,Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)reported Wednesday.
The law will ban the establishment of free speech zones, used by administrators to confine controversial speech to specific areas on campus.
It will also force colleges to treat student-on-student harassment in accordance with the United States Supreme Court ruling on Davis vs. Monroe County Board of Education, which defined harassment as conduct so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive, and that so undermines and detracts from the victims educational experience, that the victim-students are effectively denied equal access to an institutions resources and opportunities.
Universities will also no longer be able to retract invitations to speakers or make it harder for student organizations to express their viewpoints by imposing speaking fees.
Six out of the seven Tennessee universities cataloged by FIRE have either yellow-light or red-light free speech ratings, meaning those schools operate with policies that either moderately or severely impair the free speech rights of their students. While one of the schools catalogued, University of Tennessee Knoxville, has a green-light rating.
[The law] is the most comprehensive state legislation protecting free speech on college campuses that weve seen be passed anywhere in the country, Robert Shibley, executive director for FIRE, said in a statement. It is gratifying to see the Tennessee legislature take decisive action to protect the expressive rights of students and faculty, especially in light of the number ofrestrictive speech codes across the country and the recent controversies over speech on campus.
The Daily Caller News Foundation reached out to Haslam and Tennessees two red-light universities for comment, but received none in time for publication.
Follow Rob Shimshock on Twitter
Connect with Rob Shimshock on Facebook
Send tips to [emailprotected].
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].
See the original post here:
Tennessee Passes Bill To Protect Free Speech On Campus - The Daily Caller
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Tennessee Passes Bill To Protect Free Speech On Campus – The Daily Caller
Flip side of free speech is a willingness to listen – The Register-Guard
Posted: at 12:37 pm
Recent Register-Guard editorials about campus free speech underscored a consequence for radical disregard of that fundamental right: violence. By identifying four recent instances of mayhem and destruction three on campuses, one not the editors waggled a finger at the mostly ... left wing protesters with the unutterable gall to provoke violence.
It was a message I would expect from a local newspaper, and likely from most Americans who cherish the right to convey a message without fear of violence.
The editorials echoed the words of civic leaders 50 years ago who decried the upwelling of race riots and campus protests. The long, hot summer of 1967 sparked 159 race riots, while campuses across the land seethed with war resisters and threats of violence. Free speech clashes at the University of California, Berkeley, back then prompted then-Gov. Ronald Reagan to ask, How far do we go in tolerating these people and this trash under the excuse of academic freedom and freedom of expression?
No matter the public outrage, radical speech escalated, sometimes accompanied by violence, and always the rebukes.
In April three years later, the University of Oregon was rocked by the bombing of the ROTC building, a Students for a Democratic Society riot, and the Johnson Hall sit-in, each event portrayed as an unruly and destructive act. They were. Violence is antithetical to a civil society. Disperse the crowd, jail the perpetrators, and act surprised the next time it happens.
We cherish our right to speak, but what of our responsibility to listen and engage in honest dialogue? Can we even be bothered? The media bristle with stories about a nation divided by religion, global warming and lifestyles. East of here, some folks nail up huge signs proclaiming Trump Country; in Eugene, many refuse to speak his name. Are those folks past the point of talking?
The communication faculty at Lane Community College say no, we can do better. This Saturday from 9 a.m. to noon, the public is invited to LCCs first Speak-Out featuring a free workshop on deliberative dialogue led by University of Washington professor Kara Dillard.
In his essay, Thinking Together: The Power of Deliberative Dialogue, Scott London describes the process as differing from other forms of discourse like debate and negotiation because the objective is not so much to talk together as to think together, not so much to reach a conclusion as to discover where a conclusion might lie. Thinking together involves listening deeply to other points of view, exploring new ideas and perspectives, searching for points of agreement, and bringing unexamined assumptions into the open.
Rather than objectifying the opposition as a way to justify dysfunctional conflict including violence the deliberative dialogue process brings us closer to the reality of how people struggle with issues.
As a contrast (and ironic compliment), the morning workshop is followed by three rounds of fun, lively flash debate over Donald Trump quotes. This extemporaneous exercise simply requires the capacity to see both sides of an issue and the courage to engage in lively, civil discussion. The debates, which run from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. are open to any participant as a speaker or observer.
The Speak-Out concludes at 4 p.m. with a guided demonstration of the deliberative dialogue process involving any interested participants.
Campus violence is neither endemic nor the fault of a single partisan group, but rather a reflection of the pain and isolation that arise from a pervasive sense of hopelessness. Consider the civil alternatives by attending this event at LCC to be held on the fourth floor of Center Building.
Have hope speak out!
Daniel Henry (henryd@lanecc.edu) is an instructor of communication at Lane Community College.
More Guest Viewpoint articles
Read more here:
Flip side of free speech is a willingness to listen - The Register-Guard
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Flip side of free speech is a willingness to listen – The Register-Guard
Perdue issues policy on USDA ‘religious liberty, freedom of speech’ – Fence Post
Posted: at 12:36 pm
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue on Tuesday affirmed the U.S. Department of Agriculture's "renewed dedication to religious liberty and freedom of speech," USDA said in a news release.
In a policy statement released to all USDA employees, Perdue said, "Today, I want to reestablish this department's commitment to safeguarding every American's First Amendment rights, particularly the right to free speech and the right to religious free exercise. USDA is committed to protecting both."
In a statement that a news release said was "highlighting the need for a climate of mutual respect and tolerance," Perdue added, "I expect each and every USDA employee to uphold their fellow Americans' First Amendment freedoms. Whether we are inspecting private businesses for compliance with food safety laws or protecting our public lands for recreation, cultivation, and preservation, we must set the example of our nation's highest ideals. These are lessons we learned as children that we should be kind to others and treat them with respect. Doing so is not optional, and it is not discretionary."
USDA said the "policy memo comes on the heels of President Donald J. Trump issuing the executive order on Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty last week."
According to a White House press pool report, Perdue was present when Trump signed the executive order on free speech and religion. It was unclear Tuesday evening just what Perdue was trying to address at USDA and what impact it would have on the department.
A former USDA lawyer told The Hagstrom Report, "I'm not sure what he's after with it. I know there were some issues in the past about religious exemptions to food safety rules. Possible school lunch stuff. Not really sure. Could also just be a feel-good statement that doesn't mean much."
Trump's order was not particularly well received by either the left or the right, The Washington Post reported last week.
Read more here:
Perdue issues policy on USDA 'religious liberty, freedom of speech' - Fence Post
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on Perdue issues policy on USDA ‘religious liberty, freedom of speech’ – Fence Post
GOP religious freedom bill restores free speech, not ‘dark money’ – The Hill (blog)
Posted: at 12:36 pm
The House Oversight and Government Reforms Subcommittees on Government Operations and Health Care, Benefits, and Administrative Rules recently held a hearing, Examining a Churchs Right to Free Speech.
I had the opportunity to serve on the panel with Catherine Engelbrecht, of True the Vote, Christiana Holcomb, of Alliance Defending Freedom, and Rabbi David Saperstein, who served in the Obama administration as Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom.
Congressional Republicans are not calling for a full repeal of the Johnson Amendment. In fact, Representative Jody Hice (R-Ga.), who served briefly as chairman for purposes of the hearing, introduced the Free Speech Fairness Act with House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.), in order to roll back a problematic part of the Johnson Amendment.
The idea behind the Free Speech Fairness Act is to restore the First Amendment freedom of speech to pastors and other 501(c)(3) organizations leaders, while ensuring churches and other non-profits do not become about dark money or transition into political action committees. The Free Speech Fairness Act is all about speech. It does not allow 501(c)(3) organizations to begin purchasing political campaign ads, or to otherwise create a cash flow of dark money for politicians.
"Trumps religious freedom executive order can be successful" https://t.co/PlSJl1skqc pic.twitter.com/kUCuECLiAv
During the course of the hearing, Rabbi Saperstein raised an interesting objection that is not directly addressed in the Free Speech Fairness Act, and that is the question of whether people can donate money to 501(c)(3) organizations for endorsements.
Theres a two-part response to that question: First, in their individual capacities, pastors and 501(c)(3) leaders can already make endorsements and, technically, could make a personal endorsement in exchange for a donation today. However, under the Free Speech Fairness Act, because 501(c)(3) organizations cannot spend money on campaigns, liberal mega-donor George Soros and the libertarian mega-donor Koch Brothers will likely continue to contribute their millions of dollars to political action committees and other 501(c)(4) organizations in order to directly impact candidates and their campaigns.
There can, quite simply, be little bang for a political buck to a 501(c)(3) organization under the Free Speech Fairness Act.
Rabbi Saperstein also raised a question about whether churches actually want changes to the Johnson Amendment. The answer is an emphatic yes! In fact, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention submitted a statement of support for the Free Speech Fairness Act for the record at the hearing. While ERLC may have concerns about churches becoming too political, they understand that it is fundamentally not the governments job to make that decision for churches.
The fact is, churches who do not wish to engage in political speech or to endorse political candidates will not be forced to do so after the Free Speech Fairness Act becomes law; rather, churches who do wish to engage politically will no longer be unfairly forced by the government to remain silent.
"What does Trump's religious freedom order actually do? Not much..." https://t.co/vXLPcxN279 pic.twitter.com/7NFcqfeNXc
The United States has a long history of pastors being involved politically. Since the birth of our nation, pastors and churches have been at the forefront of shaping public debate and voters choices regarding their public servants. This began with the Black Robe Regiment of pastors who also served as military leaders during the American Revolution and was forged during the civil rights movement of the 1960s when pastors like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., spoke out forcefully from the pulpit on political matters.
For almost 200 years, the religious, educational, and charitable work of 501(c)(3) organizations, and their tax exempt status, did not compromise their ability to engage on political candidates and issues. The free speech rights of 501(c)(3) organizations and their leaders should be restored, and the Free Speech Fairness Act is the precise vehicle for creating a proper balance in which pastors are liberated without allowing churches to become political action committees.
Mandi Ancalle, Esq. is General Counsel for Government Affairs at the Family Research Council.
The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.
Read the rest here:
GOP religious freedom bill restores free speech, not 'dark money' - The Hill (blog)
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on GOP religious freedom bill restores free speech, not ‘dark money’ – The Hill (blog)
Why Is China’s Xi Cracking Down on Free Speech? – Newsweek
Posted: at 12:36 pm
This article first appeared on the Cato Institute site.
Chinas market economy with socialist characteristics rose from the ashes of Mao Zedongs failed experiments with central planning. Under that repressive regime, private enterprise was outlawed and individuals become wards of the state.
When Deng Xiaoping became Chinas paramount leader, he abandoned Maos class struggle as the centerpiece of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and embarked on economic liberalization. There was hope that greater freedom in trading goods and services would also lead to a freer market in ideas.
Subscribe to Newsweek from $1 per week
That hope was dashed when troops cracked down on protesters in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. Dengs famous Southern Tour in 1992 resumed economic reformand China has become the worlds largest trading nationbut protectionism in the market for ideas remains intact.
Under President Xi Jinping, who advocates globalization but has cracked down on the free flow of information, China has become less free.
Donald Trump welcomes Chinese President Xi Jinping to the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Florida, on April 6, 2017. James Dorn writes that Xi appears not to grasp that for a free market to work there must be a free exchange of ideas. JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty
In the just released World Press Freedom Index , published by Paris-based Reporters sans Frontires (RSF), China is ranked 176 out of 180 countries, just a few notches above North Koreaand President Xi is referred to as the planets leading censor and press freedom predator. In preparation for the 19th CCP Congress later this year, there has been an uptick in the war on free speech.
Without notice, in January the Beijing Municipal Cyberspace Administration shut down the internet of the Unirule Institute of Economics, one of Chinas leading free-market think tanks, co-founded by Mao Yushi, a strong critic of the one-party state and the lack of a free market in ideas. Without access to the global flow of ideas, Unirules work has been all but cut off.
Other internet sites have been shut down and Chinas cyber bullies have gone after virtual private networks (VPNs) that allow users to circumvent the Great Firewall.
Beginning on June 1, new rules governing the news content permitted on various internet platforms will be implemented, and editors will be subject to stronger oversight by the state and the Party. Cyber security law is intended to ensure that the CCPs overriding objective of stability and order is realized. Yet that goal conflicts with the creation of a dynamic civil society and with innovation and globalization.
Xi Jinping, in his belief that freedom is the purpose of order, and order the guarantee of freedom, fails to understand a basic tenet of liberalismnamely, that individual freedom is the source of an emergent order.
That idea was known in China long before it was stated by Adam Smith in 1776. In the 6th century BC, Lao Tzu explained that when the ruler leaves people alone (the principle of noninterference or wu wei ), people are spontaneously transformed and increase their wealth. They do so through voluntary market exchanges under a just rule of law.
China has allowed greater economic freedom, which has enabled millions of individuals to lift themselves and their families out of poverty, but the CCPs monopoly on power has prevented a corresponding expansion in freedom of the presseven though Article 35 of the PRC Constitution states that Citizens enjoy freedom of speech.
Top-down control of ideas must eventually clash with bottom-up economic reform. China cannot become a global financial center, like Hong Kong, without the free flow of information.
Insulating the political elite from the competition of ideas is not a recipe for long-run prosperity and peace. As Liu Junning, an independent scholar in Beijing, has noted, Whether China will be a constructive partner or an emerging threat will depend on the fate of liberalism in China.
The Western liberal ideas that President Xi and the CCP reject place the individual before the state and see the state as the protector of individual rights, including free speech. A just rule of law is designed to limit the power of government and enhance individual freedom. By expanding marketsboth in goods and ideassuch an institutional arrangement increases the range of choices open to people, which is the true measure of development.
If China is to become a beacon for globalization and free trade, as President Xi advocated at the Davos World Economic Forum, there will have to be movement toward a free market in ideas. China cant continue to be near the bottom in terms of freedom of the press and speech without losing ground in the information age.
James A. Dorn is vice president for monetary studies, editor of the Cato Journal, senior fellow, and director of Catos annual monetary conference.
Link:
Why Is China's Xi Cracking Down on Free Speech? - Newsweek
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on Why Is China’s Xi Cracking Down on Free Speech? – Newsweek