Monthly Archives: April 2017

Around Ascension for April 27, 2017 – The Advocate

Posted: April 27, 2017 at 2:24 am

Alzheimers center

A free virtual tour and information session for the new Charlies Place II Activity and Respite Center in Ascension Parish will be held at 6 p.m. Thursday in the Sister Vernola conference room at St. Elizabeth Hospital.

The program is meant to provide a purposeful day for adults with mild to moderate Alzheimers or memory-related dementia while providing their caregivers a break.

No registration is required.

Help in the fight against cancer by participating in the American Cancer Societys Relay for Life at 6 a.m. Saturday at the Lamar-Dixon Expo Center 4-H Building in Gonzales.

To register or learn more, visit relayforlife.org, call (800) 227-2345 or Lexie Grush at (985) 788-7982 or email lexie.grush@cancer.org.

Capital Area United Way, St. Elizabeth Hospital and The Church of Donaldsonville are hosting a free Day of Caring community health event from 9 a.m. to noon Saturday at the church, 810 Martin Luther King Drive, Donaldsonville.

The event includes health screenings, information about community resources and food.

Ascension Parish Librarys Lego Club for children of all ages meets at 11 a.m. Saturday at the Donaldsonville Branch.

Legos will be provided, as well as Duplo Blocks and Mega Bloks for younger children. Young builders should leave their own Legos at home.

Call (225) 473-8052 for details.

Ascension Parish will participate in the National Day of Prayer on May 4 with the eighth annual National Day of Prayer Luncheon at the Lamar-Dixon Expo Center. Lunch will be served at 11:30 a.m., followed by the program at noon.

Visit nationaldayofprayer.com to learn more about the National Day of Prayer.

The TOPS, or Taking Off Pounds Sensibly, weight-loss support group meets Thursdays at Carpenter's Chapel Church, 41181 La. 933, Prairieville. Weigh-in starts at 5 p.m. and ends when the meeting begins at 6 p.m.

Call Sylvia Triche at (225) 313-3180 for details.

Learn about holistic psychotherapy and how it may be integrated into psychotherapy sessions during a workshop from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. May 5 at the Red Cross building, 4655 Sherwood Common Boulevard, Baton Rouge.

The workshop is sponsored by Ascension Counseling Center.

Child Advocacy Services is in need of volunteers to advocate for abused and neglected children through its CASA program. Training begins May 22 and consists of 30 hours of combined classroom and independent study.

Volunteers spend an average of 10 hours a month gathering factual information to help a child reach a safe, permanent home.

Call (225) 647-2005 to set up an informational session with a CASA recruiter.

The Class of 1977 of East Ascension High School will gather for its 40th class reunion at 6 p.m. Aug. 19 at the Clarion Conference Center in Gonzales.

All East Ascension High graduating classes are invited to the celebration, which includes food, a cash bar, dancing and music by Kenny Fife.

Cost is $50 per person in advance or $55 at the door. Registration forms will be emailed upon request. Email trudybates@yahoo.com or l.rhett.bourgeois@gmail.com for details.

Contact Darlene Denstorff by phone, (225) 388-0215 or (225) 603-1996; or email, ascension@theadvocate.com or ddenstorff@theadvocate.com. Deadline: noon Monday.

See the original post here:

Around Ascension for April 27, 2017 - The Advocate

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Around Ascension for April 27, 2017 – The Advocate

Ascension Parish Civil Court Cases for April 10-13, 2017 – The Advocate

Posted: at 2:24 am

Ascension Civil Court cases filed in Ascension Parish between April 10-13:

Blake Michael Martin v. tutorship.

University of Louisiana System Board and University of New Orleans v. Chenetra Lynette Hall, promissory note.

Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Edward Raymond Pfeiffer aka Eddie Raymond Pfeiffer, executory process.

Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Daniel S. Saxon, executory process.

Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC v. Darlene White, open account.

Gas Pipeline Acadian v. Alfredo Ott III, Aubrey Marchand aka Aubrey Delisa, Charmaine Marchand Stiaes, Claudia Udah, Curtis Marchand, David Julien, Debra M. Domio, Desiree Marchand Shelling, Dianne Jupiter, Donnata Antoine aka Donata Julien, Eileen M. Julien, Eric Johnson, Francine Ott, Gail Iheke, George Marchand Sr., Gerald Johnson, Geraldine J. Wardlaw aka Geraldine Julien aka Geraldine Julien Black, Harold L. Julien LLC, Henry P. Julien Jr., Janet Julien Brown, Janvier Pierre Marchand, Keith Theard, Kenneth Johnson, Lynn Julien Hoggard, Michael Johnson, Paul Bertrand Jr. aka Paul Julien Jr., Paul Marchand Jr., Paulette M. Lundy, Reginald Ott, Ricardo D. Marchand, Roslyn Johnson Smith, Sandra Julien Wheeler, Sharon Johnson, Sheila M. Richards, Sylvia Marchand Moore, Theodore Marchand, Walter Johnson Jr., Warren Johnson, Wayne Julien, West Riley III, Wanda Williams, Kendall Marchand, Heirs of Percy Marchand Jr., Heirs of Paul Marchand, Heirs of Gerald Marchand, Heirs of Clytie Marchand, Heirs of Doris Marchand Riley, Heirs of Alfredo Ott Jr., Heirs of Edward P. Julien and Heirs of Henry P. Julien, expropriation.

Bank of America NA v. Samantha S. Thibodeaux, open account.

Bank of America NA v. Glen Fournet, open account.

Beverly Hill v. Kmart Corp. and Kellermeyer Bergensons Services LLC, damages.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Clorissa Curtis v. Beatrice Johnson and Equity Insurance Co., damages.

JPMorgan Chase Bank National Assoc. v. Derek B. Polk, executory process.

JPMorgan Chase Bank National Assoc. v. Sherman L. Anderson Jr. aka Sherman Lee Anderson Jr., executory process.

JPMorgan Chase Bank National Assoc. v. Stacey L. Rome and Lowell P. Rome, executory process.

Barbara Bush and Paire Bush v. Pat Arceneaux and Liberty Personal Insurance Co., damages.

Allison M. Dickey v. Geico Advantage Insurance Co. and Joseph Wang, damages.

Kenneth J. Diaz v. Jenny L. Bassford, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Safeco Insurance Co. of Oregon, damages.

Our Lady of The Lake Ascension dba St. Elizabeth Hospital; Stephen Manale, MD; and James Williams, MD v. Medical Review Panel and Raymond Liotto Jr., medical review panel.

Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Nicki Merrill Spillman aka Nicki M. Sanchez Picou aka Nicki M. Spillman Picou aka Nicki Merrill Landry, promissory note.

Citimortgage Inc. v. Jesse Lee Hawkins Jr. and Joanus Riley, executory process.

Neighbors Federal Credit Union v. Jalisha Anderson and Talisha Anderson, executory judgment.

Bank of New York Mellon FKA and Bank of New York v. Angela Matthews aka Angela M. Smith aka Angela D. Matthews, executory process.

Bradley Morris v. Geico Casualty Co. and Chante Ballard, damages.

James Oxner v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Co., damages.

Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Steven J. Gilbert, executory process.

GMFS LLC v. Brett Courtney, executory process.

Jarius Carey v. Hope Haven Marble and Granite LLC, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Geico Casualty Co. and Mona Rodrigue, damages.

Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Linda Daniel Deglandon, executory process.

Kimberly Howard v. Mack Wayne Black, injunction.

Darlene Braud v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., damages.

Cavalry Spv I LLC v. Juanita Clarke, executory judgment.

Monica E. Fernandez v. Francisco Ricardo Fernandez, divorce.

Leisa Bennett v. Joseph Bennett, divorce.

Brandi Johnson and state Department of Children and Family Services v. Lonnie Johnson Jr., child support.

Brynn Lambert Brown v. Adam Michael Brown, divorce.

Stacy H. Stanley v. David Scott Stanley, divorce.

Todd Andrew Atkins v. Dani Varnado Atkins, divorce.

Ronald Christopher Gonzales v. Mona Lisa Sanchez Gonzales, divorce.

Nicholas M. Breaux v. Mallory Dupree Breaux, divorce.

Ellen Anne Maree Carpenter v. Cody T. Carpenter, divorce.

Nohemi Granados and state Department of Children and Family Services v. Barron Jones, paternity.

Yves Joesph Sheets v. Terra Mancuso Sheets, divorce.

Succession of Robert Earl Bergeron

Succession of Kevin D. Michelli

Succession of Warren Joseph Burns, Patricia Delatte Burns

Succession of Deborah Gautreaux Brenn

Succession of Margaret Babin Burns

Succession of Mae Dell Sevier Galloway

Succession of Emile Johnson

Succession of Jewelers Inc. dba Sterling, Jewelers Kay

Go here to read the rest:

Ascension Parish Civil Court Cases for April 10-13, 2017 - The Advocate

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Ascension Parish Civil Court Cases for April 10-13, 2017 – The Advocate

Ascension Crime Briefs – Donaldsonville Chief

Posted: at 2:24 am

Hayed Pleads Guilty to 2014 Armed Robbery

On April 17, 2017, Kenneth Hayes III of 8056 Gus St. New Orleans, 20, pled guilty to Armed Robbery following the 2014 robbery of a convenience store in Gonzales. Hayes was prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Joni Buquoi, and presiding over this matter was the Honorable Judge Jessie LeBlanc. This guilty plea was the result of a plea agreement with prosecutors.

On September 21, 2014, members of the Gonzales Police Department were dispatched to the Murphy Express convenience store located on S Airline Highway in Gonzales. Through the course of the investigation, detectives learned that two black males armed with guns approached a store clerk and two customers outside of the store. One of the customers was able to flee the area, but the store clerk and other customer were held at gunpoint. The two subjects escorted the clerk and customer back into the store, and the clerk was forced to take the money from the register and place it into a backpack, all while still at gunpoint. Both subjects fled the area in a 2003 Jeep. The same jeep used in the Gonzales robbery had been stolen during a carjacking in New Orleans approximately 1 hour prior to the robbery. Approximately 30 minutes after the subjects fled the Murphy Express in Gonzales, the two subjects committed another armed robbery at Birdies Food and Fuel located on Belle Terre Blvd. in Laplace. Shortly after fleeing the area of the Laplace robbery, St. John Parish Sheriffs Deputies were able to locate the getaway vehicle and engaged in a high speed pursuit. T

Upon entering a guilty plea to the above charge, as per the plea agreement with prosecutors, Judge LeBlanc ordered that Hayes be committed to the Louisiana Department of Corrections at hard labor for a period of 15 years with credit for time served. It was further ordered that the imposed sentence is to be served without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

Guilty Pleas

During the week of April 17-21, the following defendants pled guilty to various charges and were sentenced in the 23rd Judicial District Court, Parishes of Ascension, Assumption, and St. James.

Ascension Parish

Mark Burke, 4715 Point Claire St., St. Gabriel, 47, pled guilty to Felony Hit and Run and was sentenced to three years with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served, to be suspended, and placed on three years supervised probation.

Kenneth Hayes III, 8056 Gus St., New Orleans, 20, pled guilty to Armed Robbery and was sentenced to 15 years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served. The imposed sentence is to be served without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

Christopher Hendricks, 430 W Minor St., Gonzales, 25, pled guilty to Attempted Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon and was sentenced to three years with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served. The imposed sentence is to be served without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

The above cases were prosecuted by Assistant District Attorneys Joni Buquoi and Steven Tureau. Presiding over these matters was the Honorable Judge Jessie LeBlanc.

Kamron Kelly, 37144 La. 942, Darrow, 35, pled guilty to Possession of a Schedule IV Controlled Dangerous Substance and Possession of a Schedule I Controlled Dangerous Substance. Kelly was sentenced to four years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served on each count. The imposed sentences are to run concurrent with one another.

Donnell Bates, 103 Grisaffe Lane, Belle Rose, 28, pled guilty to Simple Burglary and was sentenced to five years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served.

Justin Hill, 616 Holly St., Bunkie, age 32, pled guilty to Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle and was sentenced to 18 months with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served, to be suspended, and placed on 18 months supervised probation.

Michael Jenkins, 9298 La. 22 St. Amant, 43, pled guilty to Forgery and was sentenced to 18 months at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served, to be suspended, and placed on 18 months supervised probation and was also ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $3,200.

Russel Daigle, 3090 Laifton Lane, Port Allen, 26, pled guilty to Principal to Simple Burglary of an Inhabited Dwelling and was sentenced to four years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served.

Robyn Grosse, 43083 Weber City Road, Gonzales, 33, pled guilty to Attempted Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon and was sentenced to seven years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served.

Jay Johnson, 41065 La. 42 Prairieville, 35, pled guilty to Felony Carnal Knowledge of a Juvenile. Per Judge Turner, Sentencing was deferred Pending a Pre-Sentence Investigation.

Michael Roddy, 14015 Mazoch Road, Gonzales, 45, pled guilty to Simple Burglary and was sentenced to 18 months with the Louisiana Department of Corrections with credit for time served, to be suspended, and placed on 18 months supervised probation.

The above cases were prosecuted by Assistant District Attorneys Kenneth Dupaty and Shawn Bush. Presiding over these matters was the Honorable Judge Alvin Turner Jr.

Read the original post:

Ascension Crime Briefs - Donaldsonville Chief

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Ascension Crime Briefs – Donaldsonville Chief

Ascension gov’t may cut flood victims some slack, amid complaints – WBRZ

Posted: at 2:24 am

ASCENSION PARISH - Homeowners who were flooded out of their home and moved to another property may catch a break.

After receiving several complaints, parish officials are considering waiving the transportation impact fee.

"I just feel let down, I feel let down by the parish that they're imposting this on us," said Denise LeBlanc, who moved two miles away from her flooded Prairieville home.

LeBlanchad to pay a $1,700 transportation impact fee before she could move her home onto the new property.

"We've already lost so much," said LeBlanc.

The fee goes toward road maintenance. LeBlanc says she's paid enough already just to move back to Ascension Parish.

"We could have stayed where we were," said LeBlanc."We could have rebuilt in EBRparish but we wanted to come back home."

Parish officials said they are trying to address the issue and plan to go before the parish council to waive the fee for flood victims who were residents before August 2016.

Go here to see the original:

Ascension gov't may cut flood victims some slack, amid complaints - WBRZ

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Ascension gov’t may cut flood victims some slack, amid complaints – WBRZ

Ascension Athletics for April 27, 2017 – The Advocate

Posted: at 2:24 am

Gators, Griffins and Spartans make nonselect Class 5A bidistrict playoffs

All three 5-5A Ascension Parish high schools qualified for the nonselect division of the 5A playoffs. The No. 17 Dutchtown Griffins played at No. 16 Ouachita Parish, the No. 19 St. Amant Gators at No. 14 Ruston and the No. 22 East Ascension Spartans at No. 11 New Iberia. were scheduled to play on Tuesday, before this column's deadline.

East Ascension finished its season with doubleheader victories against the Broadmoor Buccaneers. The Spartans finished the season 17-17 overall and 5-5 in 5A district play.

The Dutchtown Griffins and the St. Amant Gators wound up regular season playing each other twice. In the opening game on April 18, Blayne Enlow pitched a complete game and only allowed two hits in a shutout performance to lead the Gators to a 2-0 win. Both teams were tied for second place in District 5-5A.

The Gators scored their two runs in the first and third innings. Ivan Prejeans started the two-out scoring with a double to left field. The next batter drew a walk and Zane Zeppuhar lined a single to right, scoring Prejean. Multisport star Briggs Bourgeois led off the third inning with a home run to left to give the Gators their final 2-0 score.

Dutchtown had a chance in the top of the third when Reid Bouchereau led off with a single. A sacrifice bunt was laid down and Bouchereau made it to second base. Enlow got a strikeout followed by a ground out to end the inning and strand the runner at second base. The Griffins had another opportunity in the sixth inning when Enlow hit a batter. He then walked the next batter with one out. Enlow pitched out to the jam with a fly ball and a strike out.

Dutchtown was held to two hits while the Gators scored their two runs on four hits. Joey Rodrigue and Bouchereau were 1-3 for the game for the Griffins while Bourgeois was 1-3 with a home run. Zeppuhar was1-3 with an RBI and Prejean was 1-2 with a double.

In the second game on April 20, the Griffins took it to the Gators by the score of 11-1. St. Amant was held to one run on three hits by winning pitcher Austin Bankert. Dutchtown scored their 11 runs on 10 hits led by Zach Merrifield who had a 3-4 performance at the plate with a double and 4 RBIs. Cameron Sibly add to the offensive effort with 3-4 on the night with a double and 3 RBIs.

St. Amant defeated Northshore 8-1 on Friday in the regional round of the Class 5A nonselect state softball playoffs. The Gators, 21-3, advance to the state tournament in Sulphur with the victory. The third-seeded Lady Gators will have to take on the No. 11 Live Oak Eagles in the state quarterfinals at Frasch Park in Sulphur at 2:30 p.m. Friday on field 16.

St. Amant opened the scoring with three runs in the third inning on three hits. Freshman Alyssa Romano (who also earned the win on the mound) started things off drawing a walk. A sacrifice bunt moved the runner up to second. With one out, Jadyn Rumfellow smashed a double to left field, scoring Addie Bourgeois to give the Gators a 1-0 advantage. Junior shortstop Taylor Tidwell added two runs with a homer to make it 3-0 for the Gators.

The Gators had a 4-1 lead going to the sixth inning and put the game out of reach with a four-run barrage. Senior left fielder Abby McKey hit a two-out grand slam to put the game away. McKey went 1-4 at the plate with a homer and 4 RBIs. Rumfellow went 2-3 with a pair of RBIs and Taylor Tidwell went 1-4, with 2 RBIs.

The Ascension Catholic High Bulldogs made the LHSAA softball quarterfinals and will be playing at 2:30 p.m. Thursday against Vermilion Catholic on Field 17 in Division IV.

GIRLS TRACK: 4x100 relay: third, Donaldsonville, 51.14.

GIRLS FIELD: high jump: third, Quinntyrce Bell, Donaldsonville, 4-08.

BOYS TEAM TOTALS: seventh, Donaldsonville, 49

BOYS TRACK: 100 meter: second, Christian Bell, Donaldsonville, 11.10; 4x100 relay: second, Donaldsonville, 43.96; and 4x200 relay: second, Donaldsonville, 1:30.77

BOYS FIELD: shot put: first, Davon Wright, Donaldsonville, 54-02; and discus: third, Davon Wright, Donaldsonville, 131-00.

BOYS TEAM TOTALS: second, Dutchtown, 127.5; third, St. Amant, 73; and fourth, East Ascension, 58.5.

BOYS FIELD: long jump: 4, Carlon Cayette, East Ascension, 20-1; shot put: second, Kyle Sarrazin, Dutchtown, 50-3 ; javelin: third, Haven Bruce, St. Amant, 140-5; fourth, Myles Dandridge, East Ascension, 133-0; high jump: first, Jerome Turner, St. Amant, 6-2 and second, Kelvin Reddix, Dutchtown, 5-10; pole vault: third, Wyatt Bercegeay, East Ascension, 10-6 and fourth, Lee Broussard, Dutchtown, 10-0; discus: third, Jordan Zuppardo, Dutchtown, 142-3 and fourth, Adrian Voisin, St. Amant, 132-6; triple jump: second, Jaylin Tran, Dutchtown, 39-2 , third, Kelvin Reddix, Dutchtown, 39-2 and fourth, Carlon Cayette, East Ascension, 39-0

BOYS TRACK: 4x200-meter relay: first, Dutchtown, 1:30.30, second, St. Amant, 1:30.65 and fourth, East Ascension, 1:31.77; 1,600 meters: third, Kaleb Chanet, East Ascension, 4:37.65 and fourth, Alex Snell, Dutchtown, 4:41.00; 110 hurdles: second, Noah Gray, Dutchtown, 14.88, third, VanShon Grayson, Dutchtown, 16.62 and fourth, Cameron Hollies, St. Amant, 18.56; 100 meter: third, Austin Simmeneaux, St. Amant, 11.22 and fourth, Tajhe Jones, St. Amant, 11.22; 800 meter: first, Parker McBride, Dutchtown, 1:55.68 and fourth, Zach Hatfield, Dutchtown, 2:01.69; 4x100 relay: first, East Ascension, 42.77, second, Dutchtown 42.95 and third, St. Amant, 43.05; 400 meter: first, Bryce Moore, Dutchtown, 49.15; 300 meter hurdles: fourth, VanShon Grayson, Dutchtown, 43.39; 200 meter: second, Tajhe Jones, St. Amant, 22.51 and third, LeShawn Simon, East Ascension, 22.56; 3,200 meter: third, Kaleb Chanet, East Ascension, 10:50.95 and fourth, Elliott Miles, Dutchtown, 10:56.89; and 4x400 relay: third, Dutchtown 3:31.16

GIRLS TEAM TOTALS: third, Dutchtown, 103; fourth, St. Amant, 92.5 points; and sixth, East Ascension, 8.

GIRLS FIELD: long jump: first, Leah Scott, Dutchtown, 18-7 ; third, Angely Rodriguez, Dutchtown, 16-5 ; shot put: fourth, Mia Gaines, Dutchtown, 33-7 ; javelin: second, Morgan Tidwell, St. Amant, 119-1; pole vault: third, Natalie Wilder, Dutchtown, 7-6 and fourth, Jillian Parks, St. Amant, 7-6; discus: third, Mia Gaines, Dutchtown, 111-6 and fourth, Eva Crochet, St. Amant, 98-11; and triple jump: first, Leah Scott, Dutchtown, 37-2

GIRLS TRACK: 4x200-meter relay: second, St. Amant, 1:46.15 and fourth, Dutchtown 1:48.27; 1,600 meter: third, Tara Stuntz, Dutchtown, 5:21.05; 100 meter hurdles: third, Nyah Williams, Dutchtown, 16.12 and fourth, Regan West, St. Amant, 16.51; 100 meter: first, Madison Glasby, St. Amant, 12.80 and third, Laiya Palmer, St. Amant, 12.92; 800 meter: fourth, Phoebe Poche, Dutchtown, 2:22.58; 4x100 relay: first, St. Amant 50.44 and fourth, East Ascension 55.29; 300 meter hurdles: first, Regan West, St. Amant, 48.22, second, Nyah Williams, Dutchtown, 48.95 and third, Hannah Laplace, St. Amant, 49.19; 200 meter: second, Laiya Palmer, St. Amant, 27.04, third, Madison Galsby, St. Amant, 27.14. and fourth, Brittany Lewis, Dutchtown, 27.20; 3,200 meter: second, Tara Stuntz, Dutchtown, 11:44.59 and Melissa Landry, Dutchtown, 13:19.56; and 4x400 relay: third, Dutchtown 4:10.62 and fourth, St. Amant, 4:26.15

Leah Scott, from Dutchtown, was awarded the Outstanding Field Performer.

Last Friday found me and Goosie Guice heading up north a bit to the Lake Larto/Saline complex in Jonesville, just above Marksville. Portions of the complex are located in Catahoula, LaSalle, Avoyelles and Rapides parishes. It includes Larto Lake, Saline Lake, Shad Lake and numerous interconnecting bayous and smaller lakes. It takes in regular backwater flooding from Red River, Black River and Little River.

We met a good friend and former guide in Grand Isle, Jeff Brumfield, to try our luck at catching some sac-a-lait. Jeff moved his guide service Flamin Hooks Guide Service back home and takes out folks to catch sac-a-lait, bream and bass.

This was my first experience fishing on this vast expanse of fishable water and I can honestly say I was impressed. Its basically undeveloped and its pristine beauty is worth the trip.

The method of choice in this area for sac-a-lait is called spider-rigging. When all the rods are set up, it looks like a spider on the front of the boat. The number of rods is determined by the capabilities of the boat and how many hooks and baits you want to fool with.

Jeff opted for eight rods. I know this sounds a little crazy, but he can pull it off easier than it looks or sounds. Twelve-foot rods are fitted with a crappie reel and his boat is designed with two rod holders that can hold four rods on each side of the troll motor. A weight is on the bottom of the line with two hooks about 4 feet up.

A remote control troll motor is a must because the speed can be set electronically and it holds perfect. All 16 hooks were baited, Jeff manned the remote control and we were off to the races.

The trick is to match speed, water depth and the depth of the baits. We started off going two-tenths of a mile an hour (thats very slow) fishing in 9 feet of water and the baits down about 5 feet deep. The action was steady but we were catching lots of small fish.

About an hour and a half later, Jeff sped up to four-tenths of a mile an hour and raised the baits up in the water column to about 4 feet. That turned out to be the magic numbers as our catch rate picked up along with the size of sac-a-lait we caught.

After catching 70 or more sac-a-lait, we headed to another spot to catch some bream. We found some on the beds getting ready for the spawn and in a matter of 30 minutes we caught 50 or 60 really big bluegills. We kept 45 of the sac-a-lait and 37 bream and ended up with a nice box full of panfish.

Lyle Johnson covers sports for The Ascension Advocate. He can be contacted at reelman@eatel.net or ascension@theadvocate.com.

Originally posted here:

Ascension Athletics for April 27, 2017 - The Advocate

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Ascension Athletics for April 27, 2017 – The Advocate

High Achiever of the Week: Ascension Episcopal’s Alyse Cormier – The Daily Advertiser

Posted: at 2:24 am

Ascension Episcopal's Alyse Cormier(Photo: Courtesy of Ascension Episcopal)

With only a doubles and singles match to go to decide the state title, Ascension Episcopal freshman Alyse Cormier stepped up to the plate and knocked it out of the park for the Lady Blue Gators.

Well not really, this is tennis after all.

But facing tremendous pressure, Cormier closedher undefeated season in spectacular fashion, winning the singles title and earning the Lady Blue Gators their second-straight team state championship in the process.

"She clinched the state title for us," said Ascension Episcopal coach Buck Bobo. "She's only in ninth grade and she had to come up clutch for us and she did."

Not many athletes can step up in a similar pressure-packed situation and perform, much less a ninth grader.

Bobo said Cormier's personality helped her come through in the end.

"She's pretty strong mentally and off the court she is a great kid. Very bubbly, very easy to get along with, but she really hates to lose," Bobo said. "It got a little tight in the middle, but she bared down and pulled through and won the second set. With 50-60 people watching you and a state championship on the line it was good for her to come through in the clutch."

Cormier wasn't the only champion from Ascension Episcopal, former High Achiever Jacob Abdella won the doubles state title with his partner Mustafa Alam.

See the original post:

High Achiever of the Week: Ascension Episcopal's Alyse Cormier - The Daily Advertiser

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on High Achiever of the Week: Ascension Episcopal’s Alyse Cormier – The Daily Advertiser

Charlie’s Place II opens in Ascension Parish – Weekly Citizen

Posted: at 2:24 am

Brandie Richardson

Alzheimers Services of the Capital Area has opened a second location for their adult day center right in the heart of Ascension Parish, offering numerous services for adults suffering from Alzheimers and Dementia.

The non-profit organization held a ribbon cutting for Charlies Place II last week, which marked the official opening of the location on Purpera Road in The Arc of East Ascensions building in Gonzales.

Ascension Parish has been extremely assertive in asking for a Charlies Place, said Alzheimers Services of the Capital Area Executive Director Barbara Auten. Ascension Parish is probably the second most populous in attending our programs, they really use the services and there tends to be an awful lot of Alzheimers down there.

The new Respite and Activity Center provides caregivers a much needed six hour break and offers numerous activities in a home-like setting such as gardening, interactive games, exercise, arts and crafts and music.

We provide a purposeful day for the Alzheimers affected individual," she added. "We engage them in purposeful activity during the day that uses both cognition and socialization that helps them remain active in their disease. From the time they get there until they time they get picked up they will have social time where they are engaged in something."

Funding for Charlie's Place II was made possible through a $100,000 donation from the Lamar Family Foundation and the Lamar-Dixon Foundation, which covered start up costs and the first year expenses. Both foundations challenged Alzheimers Services of the Capital Area to meet their donation, which was completed in 10 months through various foundations.

Currently the facility is only open on Tuesdays and Thursdays and can accommodate up to 15 people a day. As enrollment increased more days will be added.

For more information about Charlie's Place, visit alzbr.org or call (225) 334-7494.

Excerpt from:

Charlie's Place II opens in Ascension Parish - Weekly Citizen

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Charlie’s Place II opens in Ascension Parish – Weekly Citizen

Ascension Christian breaks through with first baseball playoff victory – The Advocate

Posted: at 2:24 am

GONZALES They lined up Wednesday for one final team photo at home to commemorate the moment.

A year after a heartbreaking one-run setback on their home field, Ascension Christian celebrated its first postseason victory a 10-5 Division IV regional victory over St. Frederick with a joyous photo opportunity in front of the left field scoreboard.

Its the best feeling in the world, Ascension Christian catcher Landon Ortego said. We made history.

The No. 8 Lions (21-9) travel to No. 1 and defending Class 1A state champion Central Catholic of Morgan City, a 9-0 winner over False River, for a quarterfinal at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 3.

Ascension Christian hosted a playoff game for the second straight year, this time looking to make amends for a 5-4 loss to St. Edmund.

The Lions trailed 2-0 after two innings after a potential big inning ended in a double play.

When we got down at the beginning of the season, we kind of put our heads down and kind of gave up, ACHS first-year coach Conrad Gayle said. Our motto was from the first pitch until the last one: (every) pitch with a purpose.

Ascension Christian responded in the third by batting around, taking a 6-2 lead they never relinquished.

Mason Braud drove in the Lions, first run and a throwing error enabled Jacob Antie to tie the game at 2. Losing pitcher Weston Swanner balked in Braud and Ortego homered for the second time this season a two-run shot to left.

No. 9 St. Frederick (18-11) made it 8-4 with a pair of runs in the fourth, but winning pitcher Nic Montalbano limited the Warriors to only one run in the sixth thereafter.

Montalbano (7-3) allowed seven hits and five runs (three earned), walked one and struck out eight.

ACHS, which piled up 12 hits led by Ortego (3-for-3) and shortstop Peyton Bahlinger (3-for-4, three stolen bases, RBI), stretched its lead to 10-4 with two runs in both the fourth and fifth.

Ortego drove in his third run with a long single to right in the fourth, while a safety squeeze bunt from Josh Diez scored courtesy runner Jacob Bruder and Antie added an RBI single in the fifth.

This was a great team win, Gayle said. Im so proud of every, single one of these guys and for this program because I knew we could take the next step and we took it.

Read this article:

Ascension Christian breaks through with first baseball playoff victory - The Advocate

Posted in Ascension | Comments Off on Ascension Christian breaks through with first baseball playoff victory – The Advocate

Superintelligence and Public Opinion – NewCo Shift

Posted: at 2:24 am

Throughout 2017, I have been running polls on the publics appetite for risk regarding the pursuit of superintelligence. Ive been running these on Surveymonkey, paying for audiences so as to minimize distortions in the data. Ive spent nearly $10,000 on this project. I did this in about the most scientific way I could. It is not a passed around survey, but rather paid polling across the entire American spectrum.

All in all, America can perhaps be best characterized as excited about the prospect of a superintelligence explosion, but also deeply afraid, skeptical, and adamantly opposed to the idea that we should plow forth without any regulation or plan. This is, it seems to me, exactly what is happening right now.

You can view the entire dataset here. I welcome any comments. Im not a statistician, dont have a research assistant, and have a full-time job, so my ability to proof-read and double-check things is limited (though I have tried). If you have comments, you can tweet at me @rickwebb.

This is not an essay debating the likely outcome of humanitys pursuit of superintelligence. This is not an essay trying to convince you that its going to turn out one way or another. This is an article about democracy, risk, and the appetite for it.

Furthermore, this is not an essay about weak artificial intelligenceyour Alexa, or Siri, or the algorithms that guide you when using Waze. Artificial Intelligence comes in three flavors:

Virtually all of the public policy discussions, news, and polling has centered around the first type of AI: weak AI. This is the one that will make the robots that will take your jobs. The Obama administrations report on artificial intelligence, for example, dedicated only perhaps 3 paragraphs across its 45 pages to SAI. This was part of a larger push by the Obama administration, who also hosted several events. The primary focus there, too, was on weak AI. What little polling done on AI has been done primarily on weak AI.

But it is superintelligence that arguably poses the much larger risks for mankind. And we are further along than most people realize.

Let me ask you a question: if you were in the ballot booth, and you saw the following question on a ballot, how would you answer?

The situation is this: in the next 100 years or so, theres a chanceno one is sure how good of a chancethat humanity will develop machines that achieve, and then surpass, humans in intelligence levels. When we do that, most experts agree, there are two potential paths for humanity:

Theres a lot of hyperbole and terminology around the debate about pursuing human-level artificial intelligence. It can be confusing. To get up to speed, I strongly recommend you read this two-part primer on the AI dilemma by the wonderful blog Wait But Why (part 1, part 2). Please consider taking a moment to read some of the articles linked above (or bookmark them for later). However you feel about the topic, its probably worth it as a citizen to get up to speed on both sides of the debate, since arguably it will effect us all (or our children).

Now, if youve read all that, I suspect you have one of two responsesmuch like those outlined in the article. Youll read all the good stuff and get really into it and think that sounds great! I think that will happen!

Or you will read all the bad stuff and think that sounds terrible and plausible! I dont want that to happen!

And guess what! Good for you, because whichever side youve taken, there is some super genius out there agreeing with you.

Ive discussed these articles with lots of people. Heres what Ive found: by and large, enthusiasm in favor of AI depends on an individuals belief in the worst-case scenario. We, as humans, have a strange belief that we can predict the future, and if we, personally, predict a positive future, we assume thats the one thats going to happen. And if we predict a negative future, we assume thatll happen.

But if we stop and take a moment, we realize that this is hogwash. We know, intellectually, we cant predict the future, and we could be wrong.

So lets take a moment and acknowledge whats really going on in this scenario: experts pretty much see two potential new paths for humanity when it comes to AI: good and bad.

And the reality is there is some probability that each one of them may come true.

It might be 100% likely that only the good could ever happen. It might be 100% likely only the bad could ever happen. In reality, the odds are probably something other than 1000 or 0100. The odds might be, for example, 5050. We dont really know.

(There is, of course, the likelihood that neither will happen, in which case, cool. Humanity goes on as it was, and this article becomes moot. So we are ignoring that for now).

Furthermore, because of the confusion around weak AI, human-level AI, strong AI/Superintelligence and what have you, I decided I would boil down for the public the central debate to its core: hey, theres a tech out there, it might make us immortal, but it might kill us. What do you think? This is, after all, the core dilemma. The nut. The part of the problem that most calls for the publics input.

So, in the end, were right back to where we started from:

Now, in the question above, Im making up the 1 and 5 probability numbers. It might be one in 100. It might be one in two. We just dont know. NO ONE KNOWS. Remember this. Many, many people will try and convince you that they know. All they are doing is arguing their viewpoint. They dont really know. No one can predict the future. Again, remember this.

We are not arguing over whether or not this will happen in this essay. We are accepting the consensus of experts that it could happen. And we urge consideration of the fact that the actual likelihood it will happen is currently unknown.

This is also not the forum to discuss how we could ever even know the liklehood of an event in the future. Forecasting the future is, of course, an inexact science. Well never really know, for sure, the likelihood of a future event. There are numerous forecasting methodologies out there that scientists and decision-markers use. I make no opinion here. With regard to superintelligence, the Wait but Why essay does a good job going over some of the methods weve utilized in the past, such as polling scientists at conferences).

Ive been aware of the potential of this issue for decades. But like you, I thought it was far off. Not my generations problem. AI researchlike many areas of research my sci-fi inner child lovedhad been stalled for the last 3050 years. We had little progress in space exploration, self driving cars, solar power, virtual reality, electric cars, car planes, etc. Like these other areas, AI research seemed on pause. I suspect that was partially because of the brain drain caused by building the Internet, and partially because some problems proved more difficult than expected.

Yet, much like each of these fields, AI research has exploded in the last fiveten years. The field is back, and back with a vengeance.

Up to now, AI policy has been defined almost exclusively by AI researchers, policy wonks, and tech company executives. Even our own government has been, by and large, absent from the conversation. I asked one friend knowledgeable about the executive branchs handle on the situation and he said, in effect, that theyre not unaware, but they have more pressing matters.

A massive amount of AI research is being done, and most of humanity has no idea how far along we are on the journey. To be fair, the researchers involved often have some good reasons for why they are not shouting their research from the rooftops. They dont want to cause unnecessary alarm. They worry about the clamping down on their ability to publish what they do publish. The fact remains, that the public is, by and large, being left in the dark.

I believe that when facing a decision that affects the entirety of humanity at a fundamental levelnot just life or death but the very notion of existencewe all should be involved in the decision.

This is, admittedly, democratic. Many people believe in democracy in only a limited manner. They fret over the will of the masses, direct democracy, making decisions in the heat of the moment. This is all valid. Reasonable people can have a debate about these nuances. I do not seek to hash them all out here. Im not saying we need a worldwide vote.

I am, saying, however, that all of humanity should have a say in the pursuit of breakthroughs that put its very existence at risk. The will of the people should be our guide. And the better informed they are, the better decisions they will make.

There is a distinction between votes and polling. Polling guides policy, and voting, in its ideal form, affects behavior. A congresswoman may be in office because, say, 22% of all non-felon adults in her district put her there. She may then govern by listening to the will of the people as a whole through polls. Something similar should be applied here.

If this were classical economics, and humans were what John Stuart Mill dubbed homo economicusor perfectly rational beings, with all the relevant knowledge at handhumanity could simply calculate the risk potential and likelihood and measure that against the likelihood of potential benefits. We would then come up with a decision. Reality is more complex. First, the potential downside and upside are both, essentially, infinite in economic terms, thus throwing this equation out of whack. And secondly, of course, we do not actually know the likelihood that SAI will lead to humanitys destruction. Its a safe guess that that number exists, but we dont know it.

Luckily our very faultsthat we are not homo economicusalso leads to our strength in this situation: we can deal with fuzzy numbers and the notion of infinity. Our brains contain multitudes, to borrow from Walt Whitman.

What, then, is the level of acceptable risk that will cause humanity to, at least by consensus, accept our pursuit of superintelligence?

It came as a shock to me, then, that the population at large hasnt really been polled about its views on the potential of a super intelligence apocalypse. There are several polls about artificial intelligence (this one by the British Science Association is a good example), but not so many about the existential risk potentially inherent in pursuing superintelligence. Those that exist are generally in the same mold as this one by 60 Minutes, inquiring about its audiences favorite AI movies, and where one would hide from the robot insurrection. It also helpfully asks if one should fear the robots killing us more than ourselves. One could argue that this is a leading question, and in any case, its hardly useful for the development of public policy. Searching Google for superintelligence polling yields little other than polling of experts, and searching for superintelligence public opinion yields virtually nothing.

On the academic front, this December 2016 paper by Stanfords Ethan Fast and Microsofts Eric Hovitz does a superb job surveying the landscape, relying primarily on press mentions and press tone, while acknowledging that the polling is light, and not specifically focused on superintelligence. Nonetheless, it is a fascinating read.

All in all, though, data around the existential risk mankind may face with the onset of superintelligence, and Americans views on it, is sparse indeed.

So I set out to do it myself.

You can view my entire dataset here.

First, I set out to ask some top level questions about superintelligence research. Now, I confess, I am not a pollster. I know these questions are sort of leading. I did my best to keep them neutral, but Ive got my own biases. Nonetheless, it seemed worthwhile to just go ahead and ask a bunch of Americans what they think about the risks and potentials of superintelligence.

We asked four top-level questions regarding superintelligence research of 400 individuals:

At a top level, Americans seem to find the prospect of superintelligence and its benefits exciting, though it is not a ringing endorsement. Some 47% of Americans characterized themselves as excited on some level.

Again, I caution that this data is limited. Furthermore, I am not a statistics expert, so I cant say (for example) the margin of error when you poll a lot of people but at across many income levels and then analyze the subsets by income, but I suspect that its not as high as the base poll.

It would be awesome if someone started polling about this stuff. This is just one snapshot. Polls are more accurate over time.

And it would be amazing if people started polling other countries. Originally when I planned this research, I wanted to poll across countries, but Surveymonkey didnt have such functionality. Since I started in January, theyve begun offering some international polling. I hope someone gets on that. I am tapped out.

It would be great if people ran these polls at larger numbers, with better margins of error. Especially the poll of black Americans. Other subgroups, tooSurveymonkey doesnt offer much when it comes to Asian Americans, Hispanics and other minority groups.

So. What does all this mean? After all, its not like god will come down from on high and say Hey Americans! right now you have an 80% likelihood of not dying if you give this superintelligence thing a go! We will never, really, know the likelihood. But what this does tell us is that Americans are relatively risk averse in this regard (though the math is a bit wonky when we are dealing with infinite risk and infinite reward). This is not surprising. Modern behavioral economic research has shown that humans value what they have over what they might gain in the future.

We also see from the dataset that Americans are more skeptical of institutions pursuing superintelligence research on their own. I suspect if Americans knew the true extent of whats being done on this front, these trust numbers would continue to decline, but thats just a hunch. In any case, this data could be useful in institutions debating how and when to disclose their superintelligence research to the publicthere may some ticking time bombs surrounding the goodwill line item on some of these companies balance sheets.

America can perhaps be best characterized as excited about the prospect of a superintelligence explosion, but also deeply afraid, skeptical, and adamantly opposed to the idea that we should plow forth without any regulation or plan. This is, it seems to me, exactly what is happening right now.

Whatever your interpretation, its my hope that this can help spawn some efforts by policymakers, researchers, corporations and academic institutions to gauge the will of the people regarding the research they are supporting or undertaking. I conclude with a quote from Robert Oppenheimer, one of the inventors of the atomic bomb: When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it, and you argue about what to do about it only after you have had your technical success. That is the way it was with the atomic bomb.

I pulled the Oppenheimer quote from a recent New Yorker article about CRISPR DNA editing and the scientist Kevin Esvelts efforts to bring the research into the open. We really need to think about the world we are entering. He says elsewhere, To an appalling degree, not that much has changed. Scientists still really dont care very much about what others think of their work.

Ill save my personal interpretation of the data for another essay. Ive tried to keep editorializing to a minimum. This is not to say that I havent formed opinions when looking at this data. I hope you do too.

Read this article:

Superintelligence and Public Opinion - NewCo Shift

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Superintelligence and Public Opinion – NewCo Shift

Apple’s Tom Gruber, Co-Founder of Siri, Spoke at TED2017 Today about Augmented Memories and more – Patently Apple

Posted: at 2:24 am

Thomas Robert "Tom" Gruber is a computer scientist, inventor, and entrepreneur with a focus on systems for knowledge sharing and collective intelligence. He did foundational work in ontology engineering and is well known for his definition of ontologies in the context of artificial intelligence. He's better known to Apple fans as the co-founder of Siri Inc that Apple acquired in 2010. One of the earliest patents from Gruber for Apple regarding Siri and Active Ontology dates back to 2010. One of the key patent figures is presented below. Gruber spoke today at TED2017 being held in Vancouver, Canada.

Tom Gruber asked the audience, "How smart can our machines make us? What's the purpose of artificial intelligence? Is it to make machines intelligent, so they can do automated tasks we don't want to do, beat us at complex games like chess and Go and, perhaps, develop superintelligence and become our overlords? No, says Gruber instead of competing with us, AI should augment and collaborate with us." Gruber added that "Superintelligence should give us superhuman abilities."

Taking us back 30 years to the first intelligent assistant he created, which helped a cerebral palsy patient communicate, to Siri, which helps us do everything from navigate cities to answer complex questions, Gruber explained his vision for "humanistic AI" machines designed to meet human needs by collaborating with and augmenting us. Gruber invites us into a future where superintelligent AI can augment our memories and help us remember the name of everyone we've ever met, every song we've ever heard and everything we've ever read.

Gruber further noted that "We have a choice in how we use this powerful tech. We can use it to compete with us or to collaborate with us to overcome our limitations and help us do what we want to do, only better. Every time a machine gets smarter, we get smarter."

Gruber believes that AI could one day play a role to assist those with dementia and Alzheimer's be able to retain more memories so that those afflicted could have a life of dignitiy and connection instead of a life of isolation.

When Grubers full TED talk is publicly made available, we'll post a follow-up report in the coming months.

About Making Comments on our Site: Patently Apple reserves the right to post, dismiss or edit any comments. Those using abusive language or behavior will result in being blacklisted on Disqus.

Go here to see the original:

Apple's Tom Gruber, Co-Founder of Siri, Spoke at TED2017 Today about Augmented Memories and more - Patently Apple

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Apple’s Tom Gruber, Co-Founder of Siri, Spoke at TED2017 Today about Augmented Memories and more – Patently Apple