Monthly Archives: April 2017

Culinary Hedonism at You & Yours Distilling – Eater San Diego

Posted: April 28, 2017 at 2:53 pm

EAST VILLAGE A new food and drink collaboration kicks off on Thursday, April 27 at You & Yours Distilling Co. when Culinary Hedonism will bring its Supper Club pop-up to the distillery. The six-course meal, prepared by Culinary Hedonisms chef Peter Calley, will be paired by mini cocktails from You & Yours including the Side Salad made with Y&Y Vodka, green bell pepper, basil, lime, honey, sea salt, and olive oil; the dinner the first in a series of events that will be hosted at the tasting room. A small amount to seats remain open for the intimate dinner, which focuses on seasonal cuisine and locally-sourced ingredients, starts at 6 p.m. and is $150 per person. [EaterWire]

PACIFIC BEACH The Grass Skirt is ushering in the fresh releases on its spring cocktail with a tiki shindig scheduled for tomorrow, April 26. Expect drummers, dancers and music to celebrate the new menu which includes a must-see custom punch bowl from Tiki Farm filled with two helpings of Aku-Aku Lapu, a cocktail with The Grass Skirts signature rum blend, Demerara 151, lemon, pineapple, grapefruit, passionfruit, falernum, and demerara. A special $8 price will be offered all night on the other new drink additions ranging from The Martinique Banana Trading Co. with XO Rhum Agricole, banana liqueur and allspice bitters to the Melbourne Manhattan, a mix of bourbon, sweet vermouth, coffee-infused bitters, and tiki allspice bitters. [EaterWire]

LA JOLLA On Monday, May 22, George's California Moderns culinary director/partner Trey Foshee and chef de cuisine Jonathan Bautista will welcome Justin Cogley into their kitchen for a special collaborative dinner. Currently executive chef of Aubergine at LAuberge Carmel, Cogley worked at Charlie Trotters in Chicago for four years and has been awarded "Grand Chef Relais & Chteaux" and Best New Chef by Food & Wine Magazine. Guests will be able to mingle with all three chefs through the dinner; reservations begin at 6 p.m. for the $130, nine-course menu with optional beverage pairings. Call 858.454.4244 extension 129 for reservations. [EaterWire]

Read more from the original source:

Culinary Hedonism at You & Yours Distilling - Eater San Diego

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on Culinary Hedonism at You & Yours Distilling – Eater San Diego

Faith is concrete – L’Osservatore Romano

Posted: at 2:53 pm

What does it mean to truly experience Easter; what is the Easter spirit?. The question is essential, because for a Christian there is a risk of idealization and of forgetting that our faith is concrete. In the chapel at Santa Marta on Monday morning, 24 April, in the first Mass Pope Francis celebrated after the Easter celebrations, he outlined the path to be followed: to go along the paths of the Holy Spirit without compromises, witnessing to the truth with courage and frankness.

Understanding this life plan requires a passage of mentality, freeing oneself from the snares of realism and adhering to the freedom of the Spirit. This is what Jesus explained to Nicodemus in the well-known Gospel narrative of the nighttime visit (Jn 3:1-8), which the Pontiff analyzed in the days liturgy.

This Pharisee, the Pope said, was a good man. He was restless; he did not understand. His heart was in its darkest hour. However, this darkest hour was different from that of Judas, because this dark hour led him to draw near to Jesus, while that of Judas led him to distance himself. When Nicodemus went to Jesus to ask for explanations, he received a response that he did not understand. It almost seemed as if Jesus wanted to complicate things or embarrass him. Indeed, Jesus replied: truly, I say to you, unless one is born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God. Nicodemus asked: How can a man be born anew?. It seemed, Francis noted, rather ironic, but it is not so. It is instead the expression of great interior torment. Thus, Jesus explained that it entailed a passage from one mentality to another, and with much patience, with much love, He helped this man of good will in this passage.

The Pontiff reflected on Jesus response, asking, what does it mean to be born of the Spirit? What is the meaning of you must be born anew. The wind blows where it wills, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know whence it comes or whither it goes; so it is with every one who is born of the Spirit?. The Pope then emphasized a perceptible air of freedom contained in this message.

It is a difficult discourse, however, and in order to better understand it, the Pope suggested, the first reading enlightens us. In the days reading from the Acts of the Apostles (4:23-31), there is indeed the finale of a narrative that the liturgy proposed throughout Holy Week. The story of the healing, by Peter and John, of the lame man who had been brought each day to the Temple Gate called Beautiful, to ask alms. The reading of this episode sheds light on the discussion with Nicodemus, Francis explained. He pointed out that all the people were there at Solomons gate; they had seen and were astonished. It was that very sentiment more than a sentiment: that state of mind which makes the Lord present in us. Astonishment. The encounter with the Lord leads to astonishment.

In response to this, the leaders, the high priests, the doctors of the law, were scandalized and, knowing that the miracle had been performed in public, asked themselves: What do we do?. The same thing happens, the Pontiff stated, when Jesus heals the man born blind. Then, those who were present asked: What can we do to cover this up? Because people have seen, people believe, we have proof.... How can this be hidden?. Indeed, they had seen that lame man who, according to the narrative, danced for joy in order to make them understand that Jesus had healed him. The doctors of the law agreed to call the two Apostles and to tell them to speak no more, to preach no more. Peter, who had denied Jesus three times, responded: No! We cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard. And thus, we shall continue.

This is the detail that clarifies everything. The two words that John later uses to begin the first letter: what we have seen and heard. It is, the Pope indicated, a matter of concreteness. The concreteness of a fact. The concreteness of faith. The concreteness of the incarnation of the Word.

In this context, the Pontiff continued, the leaders want to enter negotiations in order to reach compromises. But the Apostles, do not want compromises. They have courage. They have frankness, the frankness of the Spirit. It is a frankness that means speaking openly, with courage. Therefore, Francis explained, this is the point: the concreteness of faith. A conclusion which involves every Christian. Indeed, Francis recalled, at times we forget that our faith is concrete: the Word became flesh, he did not become an idea: he became flesh. For this reason, when we recite the Creed, everything we say is concrete: I believe in God the Father, creator of heaven and earth; I believe in Jesus Christ, who was born, who died.... They are all concrete things. The Creed does not say: I believe that I must do this, that I must do this, or that things are for these.... No! They are concrete things. And the concreteness of faith leads to frankness, to witnessing to the point of martyrdom, which is contrary to compromises or the idealization of faith. One might say that for those doctors of the law, the Word did not become flesh: it became law. For them it was only important to establish: one must do this up to this point and no more; one must do this.... And thus they were trapped in this rationalistic mentality. However, the Pope cautioned, this mentality does not end with them. In fact, many times in history, the Church that condemned rationalism, enlightenment, is also one that fell into a theology of can and cannot, up to this point, up to that point, and forgot the strength, the freedom of the Spirit, this being born anew of the Spirit which gives you the freedom, the frankness of preaching, the message that Jesus Christ is Lord.

According to this key understanding, the Pontiff emphasized, one can also understand the history of persecution. Indeed, the first reading states: The kings of the earth set themselves in array, and the rulers were gathered together, against the Lord his Anointed for truly in this city there were gathered together against thy holy servant Jesus, whom thou didst anoint, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel.

Thus this lesson is still timely: Let us ask the Lord for this experience of the Spirit who comes and goes and leads us forward, of the Spirit who gives us the anointing of faith, the anointing of the concreteness of faith.

Thus, Jesus words to Nicodemus echo once again: Do not marvel that I said to you, You must be born anew. The wind blows where it wills, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know whence it comes or whither it goes; so it is with every one who is born of the Spirit. One who is born of the Spirit hears the voice, follows the wind, follows the voice of the Spirit not knowing where he will end up. Because he has chosen the option of the concreteness of faith and being born anew in the spirit.

Thus, Pope Francis concluded with a prayer: May the Lord give us all this Easter Spirit, to go along the paths of the Spirit without compromise, without rigidity, with the freedom to announce Jesus Christ as He has come: in the flesh.

View original post here:

Faith is concrete - L'Osservatore Romano

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Faith is concrete – L’Osservatore Romano

Faith leads to freedom, not compromise, pope says at morning Mass – My catholic standard

Posted: at 2:53 pm

Pope Francis celebrates his morning Mass April 24 in the chapel of the Domus Sanctae Marthae at the Vatican. (CNS photo/L'Osservatore Romano)

Christian faith is belief in the concrete work of God and leads to concrete witness and action by believers, Pope Francis said.

The Christian creed details concrete events because "the Word was made flesh, it was not made an idea," the pope said April 24 during his morning Mass in the chapel of Domus Sanctae Marthae.

"The creed does not say, 'I believe I must do this, that I must do that' or that 'things are made for this reason.' No! They are concrete things," such as belief in God who made heaven and earth or believe in Jesus who was born of Mary, was crucified, died and was buried, the pope noted.

The concreteness of faith "leads to frankness, to giving witness to the point of martyrdom; it is against compromises or the idealization of faith," he said.

Pope Francis reflected on the day's first reading from the Acts of the Apostles, which recalled Peter and John's release after they were imprisoned by the Sanhedrin following the miraculous healing of a cripple.

Noting their courage in the face of persecution, the pope said that their defiance of the Sanhedrin's order not to preach in the name of Jesus was an example of the concrete nature of faith, "which means speaking the truth openly without compromises."

The "rationalistic mentality" shown by the Sanhedrin, the pope added, did not end with them, and even the church at times has fallen into the same way of thinking.

"The church itself, which condemned rationalism, the Enlightenment, many times fell into a theology of 'you can do this and you can't do that,'" forgetting the freedom that comes from the Holy Spirit and gives believers the gift of frankness and of proclaiming that Jesus is Lord, the pope said.

"May the Lord give us all this Easter spirit of following the path of the Spirit without compromise, without rigidity, with the freedom to proclaim Jesus Christ as he came: in the flesh," Pope Francis said.

Read the original:

Faith leads to freedom, not compromise, pope says at morning Mass - My catholic standard

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Faith leads to freedom, not compromise, pope says at morning Mass – My catholic standard

How Meme Culture Is Getting Teens into Marxism | Broadly – Broadly

Posted: at 2:53 pm

On social media, youths are seizing the memes of production to prove that continental philosophy isn't just an academic abstraction.

During his final year of high school, Myles was voted "Comedian of the Year," an accolade he received for being an admin on his school's Facebook meme page. Under his careful curation, inside jokes and gossip ran rampant, earning him the title.

Now 18 and studying journalism, Myles is a part of the growing movement of teenagers worldwide creating and sharing their own esoteric, leftist political memes on Facebook, Reddit, and Tumblr. "I love the way memes can brilliantly explain a huge political issue in a simple way," says Myles.

Read More: Why We Need to Trust Teens to Teach Each Other Sex Ed

"I mean obviously memes aren't the be-all and end-all of political engagement, but they can often help explain and engage young people in a discourse that they get shut out of. I once saw this great meme from Sassy Socialist Memes that epitomized a really thoughtful criticism of economic rationalism.

"It was one of those 'funny because it's true' moments."

There is much dispute and criticism around the use of so-called dank memes in the political arena; some feel they are overbearingly layered with irony, or prone to re-appropriating theory out of context. On the flip side, as Myles points out, they make political theory digestible. Memes are also undeniably accessible and democratic: memers make content on their own terms, and in doing so seize "the means of production."

Images courtesy of Facebook/SassySocialistMemes

"A lot of people don't have time to write a whole article or make a whole stand-up special really getting into the grit of political conversations," agrees Susie, 18, an English Literature student and LGBTQ activist. "But most people have time to make a meme.

"Also, a lot of political meme culture I follow incorporates stuff that I already know about, or values I already have, so it's nice to have like an in-joke with a lot of peoplewhich is where a lot people find the fun in it."

"Like the political cartoon, which goes back two centuries to Punch magazine in the 1850s, political memes are a way for people to look at politics but to look at it askance, a little bit off centre, and that is pleasurable," writes Professor Marshall of Deakin University. "They offer a sense of personal connection and a way to instantly show your interest in an issue from a slightly removed point of view."

James*, 27, is an admin for Crunchy Continental Memes, a Leftist philosophy meme page. "If there's a takeaway for young people or activists looking at our page, it's that that continental philosophy isn't just academic abstraction," he says. "It can inform and reinforce leftist political practice in a really vital way."

For More Stories Like This, Sign Up for Our Newsletter

The whole thing does sometimes conflict with his worldview, though. "The problem with being an admin is that you end up seeing other people less as individual comrades, and more as potential engagements with your content, so the 'average' memer you see fades into an amorphous multitude whose only function is to reward your toil with precious likes."

Susie (not an admin) isn't worried about that. "Tagging a mate in a meme helps ease into a chat, you know?" she says over Facebook. "Memes are the opener now I guess lmao but that seems pretty good to me."

See more here:

How Meme Culture Is Getting Teens into Marxism | Broadly - Broadly

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on How Meme Culture Is Getting Teens into Marxism | Broadly – Broadly

A requiem to free speech – Campus Reform

Posted: at 2:52 pm

The progression of a terminal illness is never a pretty thing to witness.

We had a diagnosis after the infamous Milo Yiannopoulos had to flee his scheduled speech at UC Berkeley earlier this year for fear of physical harm at the hands of leftist rioters, and the condition deteriorated when the administration put up roadblocks to prevent David Horowitz from coming to campus.

For the leftists on campus, its always 'free speech for me, but not for thee.'

Wednesday afternoon, at approximately 12:45 PM Eastern time, free speech passed away due to complications from the threat of violence as Ann Coulter announced she would not be speaking at the university.

Free speech had a good run, of course; back in the 1960s, there was even an entire movement supporting the ideaBerkeleyput up a website to celebrate its 50th anniversary (though how much the movement was actually about free speech as the average American would recognize the concept is debatable, as Jonah Goldberg points out here).

Now? Heaven forbid that you host a man who is as flamboyantly anti-leftist as he is gay; marauders will set fires and vandalize businesses because they cant bear the thought of residing in the same zip code as Yiannopoulos. Try to bring a woman to campus who has been physically assaultedduring her speechifying before, and the mere threat of violence will force the cancellation of her talk.

Thats just the new status quo these days. For the leftists on campus, its always free speech for me, but not for thee. Dildo jugglingis a valid form of protest, but hosting a panel of non-leftistswill bring the shrieking ninnies out.

They never call it censorship, of course; the left never does something as objectionable as that. They merely no-platform the speaker. They exercise the hecklers veto. Then they justify it by saying theyre opposing violence.

Yes, violence. Literal violence. Hadnt you heard? Speech is violence, especially hate speech, which is defined as anything they dont like. According to this bizarre worldview, since speech is violence, physical violence is justified in return. Theyll even say so in so many words.

The key to restoring free speech is simply law and order. Auburn University, even though it recently had to host the repulsive Richard Spencer, didn't see the same sort of violence that Berkeley has seen. Why?

Because law enforcement unmasked the so-called "antifascists" on a judges orderssummoning the courage to sucker punch someone is a lot harder when you know your actions will be forever linked to your face.

The judge who ruled that Spencer must be allowed to speak declared that "Discrimination on the basis of message content cannot be tolerated under the First Amendment." Would that Berkeley were under his jurisdiction!

So, for now, free speech is dead at Berkeley. Well see if it rises, Lazarus-like, later this year when Milo Yiannopoulosreturns with an army, as he has vowed to do. Well see, but Im skeptical.

It will take more than an army. Itll take a paradigm shift. And Berkeley hasnt changed in decades.

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @SterlingCBeard

Go here to see the original:
A requiem to free speech - Campus Reform

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on A requiem to free speech – Campus Reform

Free Speech at N.Y.U. – The New York Times – New York Times

Posted: at 2:52 pm


Townhall

More:
Free Speech at N.Y.U. - The New York Times - New York Times

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Free Speech at N.Y.U. – The New York Times – New York Times

Colbeck Introduces Bill to Crack Down on Campus Free Speech Infringements – Michigan Capitol Confidential

Posted: at 2:52 pm

State Sen. Patrick Colbeck

State Sen. Patrick Colbeck, R-Canton Township, has introduced two bills he says would require state universities to adopt policies that protect free speech and intellectual debate on campus and ensure that invited speakers would be allowed to speak.

The text of the legislation, embodied in Senate Bills 349 and 350, has not yet been posted on the website of the Michigan Legislature. Colbeck calls his proposal the campus free speech act.

The concept of free speech under the First Amendment is one of our core values as Americans, Colbeck said in a press release. The right to free speech at our schools is a particularly important piece of the fabric of our country. It is at this time that many of our younger citizens first start to realize the true importance of both their individual voice and the ability to learn from the differences of others.

The release says universities and colleges would have to adopt policies that prioritize both the dissemination of knowledge and the importance of peaceful free expression. However, illegal speech such as defamation, sexual harassment and true threats of violence would not be allowed.

Constitutional experts agree that the litmus test for when free speech should be barred has little to do with whether others believe it is objectionable, Colbeck said. In fact, that is why we need the First Amendment. We do not need a First Amendment to protect against the speech we agree with. Groupthink is the last thing we want to see on our campuses.

Nationwide, conservative and libertarian speakers invited to college campuses have had their events canceled and in some cases faced violent protests.

In Michigan, students at Kellogg Community College filed a lawsuit this year against the college after they were arrested and jailed for refusing to stop handing out pocket copies of the U.S. Constitution on campus.

Michigan Capitol Confidential has highlighted colleges in Michigan with questionable free speech policies through a series of stories earlier this year.

Colbecks legislation would also make all public areas on campus open as public forums to allow the same terms to any speaker, according to the press release.

If campus leaders believe some speech creates a safety concern because of unruly audience members wishing to use violence, they must police those who would break the law in order to stifle free speech, and not punish speakers by taking away their voice, Colbeck said. Intellectual freedom on our campuses must not be bullied into silence.

State Board of Education member Tom McMillin said he supports Colbecks bills.

I hope it covers handing out Constitutions at community colleges, McMillin said in an email. The left so often wants to silence speech they dont like. Taxpayer dollars should not go to such institutions. I actually think he should put the free speech provisions in the budget. If higher education institutions want tax dollars, they must eliminate all anti-free speech policies. Put them in boilerplate.

Related Articles:

Rights and Responsibilities Collide: Student Free Speech Bill Struggles

Henry Ford Community College Gets 'Yellow Light' Rating for Speech Code

DeVos Attacked For Supporting Free Speech, Due Process On Campus

Repressive Speech Codes At Michigan Community Colleges Model PC Universities

Official Bias Response Enforcers Stifle Michigan Universities

Read the original post:
Colbeck Introduces Bill to Crack Down on Campus Free Speech Infringements - Michigan Capitol Confidential

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Colbeck Introduces Bill to Crack Down on Campus Free Speech Infringements – Michigan Capitol Confidential

Campus free speech bill now heads to NC Senate – News & Observer

Posted: at 2:52 pm


News & Observer
Campus free speech bill now heads to NC Senate
News & Observer
Dubbed Restore/preserve campus free speech, House Bill 527 is a mandate for North Carolina's public universities to ensure the fullest degree of intellectual freedom and free expression and to guarantee campuses be open to all speakers. The bill ...

and more »

Read the rest here:
Campus free speech bill now heads to NC Senate - News & Observer

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Campus free speech bill now heads to NC Senate – News & Observer

How Ann Coulter cashed in on a ‘dark day for free speech’ – The Mercury News

Posted: at 2:52 pm

In a perfect world, Ann Coulter would have given a speech Thursday, at UC Berkeley, as originally scheduled. She would have spoken on immigration and no doubt aroused passionate reaction ranging from rabid applause to sputtering apoplexy.

Its her schtick, peddling provocation from about as far right as you get. And she is very good at what she does.

She was invited to appear at UC Berkeley on Thursday, and in a perfect world the speech would have gone off without a hitch. But before Thursday could get here, the city of Berkeley was rocked by three politically themed violent demonstrations in three months. UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, prudently fearing the worst, asked Coulter to reschedule for May 2.

One assumes the date wasnt picked at random. May 2 is the beginning of a dead week before finals, a time when the campus would be a ghost town. Coulter, for whom an audience is like oxygen, declined.

It is a dark day for free speech in America, she said in a tweet.

By the letter of the Bill of Rights, she is correct. The First Amendment is a bedrock principle of our country. And Coulter was denied her right to speak at the time and venue of her choosing.

Heres the irony:

Denied her right to free speech, she has spent the better part of a week on a filibustering First Amendment-fest. Seriously, she hasnt shut up. She has been omnipresent, making dozens of posts on her Twitter and Facebook accounts and making the media rounds. For all we know, she churned out another of her New York Times best-sellers between tweets. No one could possibly wonder what she is thinking.

And she is thinking.

She not only kept the narrative of this nonevent alive, she drove it with skill and dexterity, keeping her fans, detractors and the press sprinting from one shiny object to the next.

She bashed UC Berkeley:

She exhibiteddefiance:

She even found time for a little self-promotion:

She hinted that she would show up for the originally scheduled event, insisting it was up to police to keep me safe. Then backed off and confirmed it was canceled. Then said she might show up Thursday to stroll around the graveyard of the First Amendment.

In short, she occasioned a brilliant bit of branding, delivering her message in spades and reaping a priceless windfall of free publicity along the way certainly more attention than she would have generated from a speech.

She is such an astute messenger that it was hardly a surprise early Thursday afternoon when, despite the cancellation, groups of all stripes and agendas began trickling into Berkeley. As of 3 p.m., the most prominent feature of the gathering was a bubble-blowing machine. Perhaps fittingly, the nonevent generated a nonviolent assembly.

As if to underscore that point, a Twitter post included a photo of a plane towing a banner above the gathering. The banner read,Dont take the bait, rise above the hate!!

A nice thought. But theres no money in that.

The rest is here:
How Ann Coulter cashed in on a 'dark day for free speech' - The Mercury News

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on How Ann Coulter cashed in on a ‘dark day for free speech’ – The Mercury News

Wisconsin Republicans push college free speech bill that would punish hecklers – Chicago Tribune

Posted: at 2:51 pm

University of Wisconsin students who disrupt speeches and demonstrations could be expelled and campuses would have to remain neutral on public issue under a bill Republican legislators are pushing this week.

The bill comes as free speech issues have grown more contentious on college campuses across the country. Conservatives are worried that right-wing speakers aren't given equal treatment as liberal campus presenters and some students have complained about free expression fanning racial tensions.

In Madison, home to the University of Wisconsin's flagship campus, students shouted down and traded obscene gestures with ex-Breitbart editor and conservative columnist Ben Shapiro during a presentation in November. This week, supporters of conservative commentator Ann Coulter rallied behind her after the University of California-Berkeley cancelled her speech citing concerns that violence could erupt.

The bill is based on a model proposal the conservative Arizona-based Goldwater Institute put together to address campus free-speech issues. Legislation based on the model has been enacted in Colorado, with others being considered in five states, including Michigan, North Carolina and Virginia, according to the institute.

The lawmakers sponsoring Wisconsin's bill said it represents Republicans' promise "to protect the freedom of expression on college campuses."

"All across the nation and here at home, we've seen protesters trying to silence different viewpoints," Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, one of the bill's chief sponsors, said in a news release Thursday. "Free speech means free speech for everyone and not just for the person who speaks the loudest."

UW-Madison's policy already calls for facilitating free speech equally and objectively, school spokesman John Lucas said. Mandating sanctions eliminates the ability of a disciplinary committee to consider all the circumstances of the situation, he said.

"We urge the Legislature to work with the Board of Regents to identify policies that will address the free exchange of ideas and need for order while respecting the existing student conduct process that has served institutions well for many years," Lucas said in an email.

University of Wisconsin System spokeswoman Stephanie Marquis said the system is committed to ensuring freedom of speech at its institutions.

Scot Ross, executive director of liberal advocacy group One Wisconsin Now, called Vos and the bill's other authors, Reps. Jesse Kremer and Dave Murphy and Sen. Sheila Harsdorf, "fragile snowflakes."

"These Republicans want to make our campuses safe spaces for Republicans to be free of criticism and subject students to legal sanctions if they speak out," Ross said.

The legislation would require regents to quickly adopt a policy requiring each campus to remain neutral on current public controversies. It wasn't immediately clear whether the bill would bar chancellors and faculty members from expressing their viewpoints or if university lobbyists' work would be forbidden.

Vos clarified that portion during a brief interview Thursday, saying he believes chancellors and faculty should be allowed to express their personal opinions but universities shouldn't take sides. He said a description of what qualifies as a university would be part of the process as the bill moves through the Legislature.

The policy also would have to include a range of disciplinary sanctions for students and faculty who engage in "violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, obscene, unreasonably loud, or other disorderly conduct" that interferes with someone's free speech rights. The bill doesn't define what constitutes any of that behavior.

Students would be entitled to a disciplinary hearing and appeals. Any student found to have interfered with someone's free expression twice would be suspended for a semester or expelled. And anyone who feels his or her free speech rights have been violated can bring a lawsuit within a year to stop the violation.

Larry Dupuis, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Wisconsin chapter, said the neutrality provisions are so vague they could prevent universities from promoting tolerance for people and opinions.

Suspending or expelling hecklers, Dupuis added, is "unnecessarily draconian."

Here is the original post:
Wisconsin Republicans push college free speech bill that would punish hecklers - Chicago Tribune

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Wisconsin Republicans push college free speech bill that would punish hecklers – Chicago Tribune