Monthly Archives: April 2017

After Middlebury incident, UVM discusses free speech – BurlingtonFreePress.com

Posted: April 19, 2017 at 9:50 am

A panel discussion on free speech had professors from Middlebury College and UVM discussing Charles Murray's March 2, 2017 talk. NICOLE HIGGINS DeSMET/Free Press

Jade Ye, Champlain College senior gave a talk on campus in April which will be shared on social media about free speech and the responsibilities of students in the classroom.(Photo: NICOLE HIGGINS DeSMET/Free Press)Buy Photo

Events at Champlain College and the University of Vermont had students and faculty talking about freespeechand who is responsible for decidingthe rules of engagement.

"From grade school onward,people use free speech as an excuse when they say ignorant or hateful things in a classroom," junior Jade Ye, apublic relations major and student ambassador at Champlain College, said last week.

Ye's April 6talk focused on the responsibilities of the students in the classroom.

Following the shouting down of author Charles Murray at a scheduled talk March 2 on the Middlebury College campus and the violent confrontation as Murray left,students and faculty are debating the definition of freespeech.

Erik Bleich, professor of political science, race and politics at Middlebury College with David Miranda Hardy, a Chilean film maker, Assistant Professor of Film & Media Culture at Middlebury on April 11 at a UVM round table on academic freedom and free speech on campuses.(Photo: NICOLE HIGGINS DESMET/Free Press)

The discussion reaches beyond Vermont. Recently, author Heather Mac Donald wasshouted down by college students atUniversity of California at Los Angeles. Boston College students were disciplined in January for unregulated protests following the election of President Donald Trump.

But the trend for protesting has been ongoing for at least a few years. In the BerkshiresIn 2014International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde withdrewfrom speaking atSmith College's commencement because ofplannedprotests by faculty and students.

UVM had in thepast two months twoforums Black Board Jungle, a symposium to discussfree speech and hatespeech, anda professor round table that centered on the students who protested Murray.

RELATED:

UVM professor Major Jackson spoke up at a round table discussion on free speech to point out language that replicates divisions instead of building bridges on April 11, 2017 at the UVM round table on free speech.(Photo: NICOLE HIGGINS DeSMET/Free Press)

Round table co-organizerMeaghan Emery mentioned in her introduction that a reason many faculty members chose not to attend was the continuing controversy surroundingMurrray's talk. Assistant professorswere feeling too vulnerable without tenuretoexpresstheir opinions on the topic.

Moderator Helen Morgan-Parmettbegan by askingwho gets todefineracism and the conversation jumped from there to free speech.

Middlebury College professor Erik Bleichargued that, even in countries with more regulations on free speech, Murray's talk would still have been protected.

Hardycounteredthat perhaps Murray's talk wasn't illegal but asked if the administration did a disservice to the student body by validating the speakerwith a platform.

Some students stand with their backs turned away from author Charles Murray as he attempted to address the group on March 2, 2017 at Middlebury College. The woman reading from the paper was one of the first students to interrupt Murray as he began his speech.(Photo: NICOLE HIGGINS DeSMET/Free Press)

"No one is saying remove [Murray's] books from the syllabus. I see our students of color engage in the most difficult questions on a daily basis. To pretend that students of color dont face ideas of white supremacy on a daily basis is ridiculous," Hardy said after aMiddlebury professor who attended the talk brought up The Atlantic's September cover story"The Coddling of the American Mind," in which the authorsdescribe college students demanding protection from ideas they don't like.

"I don'tsee it. I see a movement from the right to co-opt the right of free speech," Hardy said in defense of his students' abilities to broach difficult subjects. Bleichagreed.

Nevertheless, the argument came backaround to the beginning.

"The free exchange of ideas issacrosanct on a college campus, even the ones people find unethical," UVM professor Major Jackson said after the talk. "And yet freedom of speech has been weaponized against members of our community who are the most vulnerable."

A grad student in social psychology from UVM at the April 11 round table on academic freedom and free speech on campuses.(Photo: NICOLE HIGGINS DeSMET/ Free Press)

A student who identified herself as a UVM social psychology graduate student brought the conversation back to the classroom.

"When you saygive me your gut level reaction you are liable to hear everything. Thats when the safe classroom becomes unsafe and you lose control of the classroom and students," she said."Maybe thisisnt about free speech, it's about creating a coherent argument."

Ye at Champlain College took a similar stance.

"Both on the part of the school and on the part of the students,we have a responsibility to empower students, so they feel like they can seek out reliable sources and take responsibility for things they say in the classroom," Ye said.

Ye offered her own guidelines: Always stand up for what youthink is right.You can learn a lot if yousit back and listen. Do research to find accurate sources like you would for a paper.

"The most important thing is the listening side of communication," Ye said.

The talks at UVM andChamplain College will be shared online as soon as they are edited, according to the schools.

Contact Nicole Higgins DeSmet atndesmet@freepressmedia.com or 802-660-1845. Follow her on Twitter@NicoleHDeSmet.

Read or Share this story: http://bfpne.ws/2oPNjf5

Go here to see the original:
After Middlebury incident, UVM discusses free speech - BurlingtonFreePress.com

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on After Middlebury incident, UVM discusses free speech – BurlingtonFreePress.com

Letter: Free Speech can be tricky – Montgomery Advertiser

Posted: at 9:50 am

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

An issue has come up regarding whether or not white racist Richard Spencer should be allowed to speak at Auburn University.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

Montgomery Advertiser Published 11:11 a.m. CT April 18, 2017 | Updated 18 hours ago

Send letters to the editor to letters@montgomeryadvertiser.com. Maximum length 250 words. Please include name, address and daytime telephone number for verification. Only the writers name and city will be published.(Photo: Monica Rodriguez/Getty Images)

I remember back in Louisiana around 1970 Louisiana State University had a "Free Speech Alley" where students could express themselves on any subject from any point of view.

One of the speakers who showed up was David Duke, dressed in a Nazi uniform, including a swastika armband.Despite the unpopularity of his message, the university allowed him to speak, and did not pretend that his views were their own.

The same issue has come up this week regarding whether or not white racist Richard Spencer should be allowed to speak at Auburn University.The university has denied him use of its facilities because it did not want his racist comments to be interpreted as its own.

ALABAMA VOICES:Up with bureaucracy

The question is, since the university refused to allow any of its facilities to be used for the expression of unpopular ideas, is there freedom of speech on the campus? How does a university allow freedom of speech without appearing to advocate speech that is abhorrent?

Daniel Haulman Montgomery

Send letters to the editor toletters@montgomeryadvertiser.com. Maximum length 250 words. Please include name, address and daytime telephone number for verification. Only the writers name and city will be published.

CRIME:18-year-old accused carjacking, robbing women at gunpoint

Eric Thayer/Getty Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court on April 7 and this week will take part in deciding whether he and his fellow justices will hear the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuits ruling which upheld Californias good cause requirement for concealed carry. Judge Diarmuid OScannlain wrote the majority opinion for the 2014 decision and The San Francisco Chronicle quoted from that opinion, saying, The right to bear arms includes the right to carry an operable arm outside the home for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Wochit

Read or Share this story: http://on.mgmadv.com/2oRYqo1

0:50

1:40

1:49

1:18

1:25

0:55

0) { %>

0) { %>

Read the original here:
Letter: Free Speech can be tricky - Montgomery Advertiser

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Letter: Free Speech can be tricky – Montgomery Advertiser

New Study Suggests U.S. Has A Lot Of ‘Closet’ Atheists | The … – Huffington Post

Posted: at 9:48 am

U.S. surveys in recent years have calculated atheists make up between 3 percent and 10 percent of the population.

But the percentage may actually be much higher, because the stigma surrounding disbelief in God likely prevents people from honestly answering pollsters questions about their beliefs, according to a newreport by University of Kentucky psychologists Will Gervais and Maxine Najle.

Theres a lot of atheists in the closet, Gervais said in a recent interview with Vox.

Gervais and Najles report, to be published in the next issue of the journalSocial Psychological and Personality Science, concluded the true number of American atheists may be as high as 26 percent of the population.

This stands in stark contrast to surveys conducted by Pew Research Center and Gallup highly reputable polling operations. A 2014 Pew survey found the percentage of Americans who said they were atheists to be just over 3 percent, with 9 percent of adults reportingthey didnt believe in God, which is the definition of atheism.

A 2016 Gallup pollfound that 10 percent of Americans reported they did not believe in God.

Gervais isnt buying that data.

We shouldnt expect people to give a stranger over the phone an honest answer to that question, Gervais told Vox.

The University of Kentucky study aimed for a more accurate analysis using whats called the unmatched count technique.Gervais and Najle sent a poll to two nationally representative samples of 2,000 adults.Instead of asking respondents directly about their belief in God, the researchers asked participants to read through a list of statements, including things like, I own a dog, and I enjoy modern art. One group of respondents had the statement, I believe in God, included on their list.

The participants were asked to write down the number of statements that were true for them. Gervais and Najle operated on the assumption that the two groups should have roughly the same number of dog owners, art lovers, et cetera.Any major differences would account for those who dont believe in God.

Gregory Smith, associate director of research at Pew Research Center, was skeptical of the new report. I would be very reluctant to conclude that phone surveys like ours are underestimating the share the public who are atheists to that kind of magnitude, Smith told Vox.

But there is social stigma surrounding atheism in the U.S., which Gervais argued may lead people to tell pollsters they believe in God even if they dont. A January 2017 Pew survey asked respondents to rate different groups on a feeling thermometer ranging from 0 to 100. On average, atheists received a rating of 50, the second-lowest rating for a religious group, after Muslims.

An analysis of datafrom the 2014 Boundaries in the American Mosaic Survey found that 42 percent of U.S. adults say atheists dont share their vision of American society.

Given the centrality of religious belief to many societies, and the degree to which many equate religious belief with morality, there are profound social pressures to be or at least appear religious, Gervais and Najle wrote in the report.

Continued here:
New Study Suggests U.S. Has A Lot Of 'Closet' Atheists | The ... - Huffington Post

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on New Study Suggests U.S. Has A Lot Of ‘Closet’ Atheists | The … – Huffington Post

It’s time for atheists to speak up – The Gazette: Eastern Iowa Breaking News and Headlines

Posted: at 9:48 am

By Justin Scott, guest columnist

Apr 18, 2017 at 11:39 am | Print View

After this month, hopefully its a little easier to be an atheist in Iowa.

On April 5, I proudly stood in the Iowa State Capitol and delivered what is believed to be the first ever atheist prayer (aka secular invocation) in the peoples house. Atheism was finally given the same platform and respect that had been extended to other religions and worldviews for years to start off a session of the Iowa Legislature.

The historic invocation garnered headlines across Iowa putting the words atheism and atheist front and center for many lawmakers and communities across Iowa. It also put our state government on notice that not all Iowans are Christians or even religious and that we deserve the same access to our statehouse.

While Im not so naive to believe that achieving an equal voice at the statehouse and the subsequent attention it gained for atheism in and of itself will end bullying, bigotry and discrimination against atheists in Iowa, it is my belief yes, atheists believe in some things, just not in the supernatural sense that Iowans will begin to better understand that atheists are an essential part of the Iowa experience.

Atheists are presidents of companies, theyre doctors and surgeons, they may even be your childs public school teacher. Heck, they very well could be the pastor of your church and just havent admitted to themselves and their congregation that they simply no longer believe what it is that they have made a career preaching about.

Dont just take my word for it. Studies by the Pew Research Center continue to show the increase in the number of atheists and people leaving religion, declaring that they are religiously unaffiliated. They also show the rapid decline of religion and religious affiliation. Its been reported that one out of every three millennial considers themselves a religious none. Add that to the number of us known as religious dones that grew up in religion but have studied our way out of it (like me) and you now have one of the largest and most influential groups in the country, one that will likely influence public policy and our society for generations to come.

And while I fully understand and admit that this doesnt mean that these nones and dones dont necessarily identify as atheists, theyve already taken the first step to embracing atheism (which is simply the rejection of the god belief). Having future generations that exclusively use what I described in my invocation as the holy trinity of science (a phrase that was originally coined back in the 1850s by the infamous Great Agnostic Robert Ingersoll) the human race can finally break free from the chains that have been holding down scientific discovery and advancement for centuries.

Just like the LGBTQ movement of the 1970s, the atheist movement is starting to grow legs and become better organized and galvanized both here in Iowa and across the country. Atheist groups like mine, the Eastern Iowa Atheists, continue to appear and network with other groups, creating a powerful force of godless citizens that are committed to demanding atheist rights while defending the Constitutional Separation of religion and government. (Keep your theocracy off our democracy thank you very much!)

Theres a tidal wave of atheism and secularism thats been building for years and its about to crash onto the shores of religious America. If youre an atheist or on the fence about your religious beliefs or upbringing, now is the time to own who you are and come catch the wave with other Iowa atheists!

Justin Scott is the founder and director of Eastern Iowa Atheists. More information: http://www.facebook.com/easterniowaatheists

We make it easy to stay connected:

More here:
It's time for atheists to speak up - The Gazette: Eastern Iowa Breaking News and Headlines

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on It’s time for atheists to speak up – The Gazette: Eastern Iowa Breaking News and Headlines

Ethical Implications of Human Genetic Engineering | SAGE

Posted: at 9:46 am

DNA editing techniques have been available for decades and are crucial tools for understanding gene functions and molecular pathways. Recently, genome editing has stepped back into the limelight because of newer technologies that can quickly and efficiently modify genomes by introducing or genetically correcting mutations in human cells and animal models. These tools include Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the most recent player to join the ranks, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic repeats (CRISPR) (here, here). In a short time span, CRISPR/Cas9 has completely revolutionized the understanding of protein function, disease modeling, and potential therapeutic applications.

BACKGROUND on CRISPR/Cas9

The CRISPR/Cas9 system functions similarly to ZFNs and TALENs, it also takes advantage of a cells DNA repair machinery to delete (knock-out) or add in (knock-in) sequences of DNA. However, CRISPR/Cas9 offers several advantages: it is easier to target a specific gene of interest since designing the required CRISPR component is simple and efficient, whereas generating ZFNs and TALENs is more time consuming; it is often more proficient in generating the desired recombination results; and it is exponentially more cost effective, so almost any laboratory in the world can use it. CRISPR/Cas9 has been shown to work in several model organisms, and consequently researchers are keen to apply this technology for modifying genetic mutations in humans with uncured diseases as well as in human embryos, which arouses many scientific and ethical considerations.

Human embryonic gene editing

Genome editing technologies have come a long way and have already advanced towards mammalian models and clinical trials in humans. Recently, genetic modification of human embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 technology was achieved by the Huang laboratory in China in April 2015. They genetically modified un-viable embryos obtained from an in vitro fertilization clinic. These embryos were fertilized with two different sources of sperm, thus impairing their development. In this study, the Huang group repaired a mutation in the human -globin gene (HBB) that causes the blood disorder -thalassaemia. The CRISPR/Cas9 system and a donor DNA sequence containing the normal, healthy version of the HBB were injected into 86 embryos. A total of four embryos successfully integrated the corrected version of the HBB at the appropriate site. However, the authors reported a high number of off-target effects, meaning that CRISPR/Cas9 modified other locations in the genome; a non-ideal situation that could cause the disruption of other essential gene functions. The study demonstrated two important findings: genetic engineering is possible in human embryos and the CRISPR/Cas9 system requires essential improvements before it can be used in future studies on human embryos. More importantly, these results force scientists to question the future and the implications of such a powerful technology. Should we accept genetic engineering of human embryos? If yes, when and in what capacity should we accept it?

Current guidelines and regulation

Scientists in the United States are addressing the need for regulation of human embryonic gene editing. On April 29th, the US National Institute of Health (NIH) director, Dr. Francis Collins, released a statement emphasizing the bureaus policy against funding research involving genome editing of human embryos and the ethical concerns regarding this technology. However, the policy does not necessarily cover privately funded projects.

Safety regarding genetic engineering is a major concern and Huangs publication highlights this point. However, this publication forces the community to address whether scientists should use non-viable or discarded embryos to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was developed for human genome targeting in 2012 and since then has seen rapid improvements. If it is decided that unviable embryos can be used for this type of research, the next step for US lawmakers is to evaluate new guidelines for the funding and safety of genetic engineering in these embryos.

Ethical concerns

While the interest and use of CRISPR/Cas9 has exploded since its discovery in 2012, prominent scientists in the field have already initiated conversations regarding the ethical implications that arise when modifying the human genome. Preventing genetic diseases by human genetic engineering is inevitable. The slippery slope is when/if we start to use it for cosmetic changes such as eye color or for improving a desired athletic trait. A perfect example is surgery, which we have performed for hundred years for disease purposes and is now widely used as a cosmetic tool. Opening the doors for genetic engineering of human embryos could with time lead to manipulate genetics for desirable traits, raising the fear of creating a eugenic driven human population.

Who are we to manipulate nature? However, for all those who suffer from genetic diseases the answer is not so simples; if we can safely prevent severe genetic diseases and create healthy humans, why not manipulate nature? Have we not already done this in other animal populations? At this time the long term effects of genome editing remain unknown, raising additional questions. As the field progresses, with appropriate regulations and guidelines it will eventually co-exist alongside other major controversial topics including nuclear power and genetically modified organisms. Since ethics are different across the world, creating international guidelines will be a challenge, but a necessity. Strict regulations are in place for nuclear power, the same should be possible for genetic engineering of human embryos. To outlaw genetic engineering entirely will be potentially declining a place at the discussion table, as the further utilization of CRISPR/Cas9 technology is unlikely to be abandoned.

This fall The National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine, together with CRISPR/Cas9 discoverers Dr. Jennifer Doudna, Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier, and other leading scientist within the field are organizing an international summit to consider all aspects (both ethical and scientific) of human genetic engineering to develop standard guidelines and policies for practicing human genome editing. The NIH already has guidelines in place, and will potentially add more as a result of this summit. It is expected that other countries will have varying guidelines for human genomic engineering. Also, to avoid fear and misunderstanding, scientists will need to convey human genome editing in a responsible manner to the general human population. This summit is a step in the right direction encouraging caution and regulations. Hence, there is now a need for a timely but thoughtful set of guidelines for the general scientific community as well as for the broader human community.

Excerpt from:
Ethical Implications of Human Genetic Engineering | SAGE

Posted in Human Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Ethical Implications of Human Genetic Engineering | SAGE

Interplanetary Transport System – Wikipedia

Posted: at 9:46 am

The Interplanetary Transport System (ITS),[1] formerly known as the Mars Colonial Transporter (MCT), is SpaceX's privately funded development project to design and build a system[2] of spaceflight technology and remote human settlements on Marsincluding reusable launch vehicles and spacecraft; Earth infrastructure for rapid launch and relaunch; low Earth orbit, zero-gravity propellant transfer technology; and extraterrestrial technology to enable human colonization of Mars. The technology is also envisioned to eventually support exploration missions to other locations in the Solar System including the moons of Jupiter and Saturn.[3]

Development work began in earnest before 2012 when SpaceX began design work for the large Raptor rocket engine to be used for both the ITS launch vehicle and spacecraft (ITS tanker and Interplanetary Spaceship). New rocket engine designs are typically considered one of the longest of the development subprocesses for new launch vehicles and spacecraft. By June 2016, the company publicly-announced conceptual plans[4] that included the first Mars-bound cargo flight of ITS launching no earlier than 2022, followed by the first ITS Mars flight with passengers one synodic period later in 2024,[5] following two preparatory research launches of Mars probes in 2018 and 2020 on Dragon/Falcon Heavy equipment.[6] SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveiled details of the system architecture at the 67th International Astronautical Congress on September 27, 2016.[7]

As publicly discussed, SpaceX is concentrating its resources on the transportation part of the project including a propellant plant that could be deployed on Mars to make methalox rocket propellant from local resources. However, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is championing a much larger set of long-term interplanetary settlement objectives, ones that go far beyond what SpaceX will build and that will ultimately involve many more economic actorswhether individual, company, or governmentto facilitate the settlement to build out over many decades.[8][9][10]

As early as 2007, Elon Musk stated a personal goal of eventually enabling human exploration and settlement of Mars,[11][12] although his personal public interest in Mars goes back at least to 2001.[10] Bits of additional information about the mission architecture were released in 20112015, including a 2014 statement that initial colonists would arrive at Mars no earlier than the middle of the 2020s.[13] Company plans as of mid-2016 continue to call for the arrival of the first humans on Mars no earlier than 2025.[5][14]

Musk stated in a 2011 interview that he hoped to send humans to Mars's surface within 1020 years,[12] and in late 2012 he stated that he envisioned a Mars colony of tens of thousands with the first colonists arriving no earlier than the middle of the 2020s.[13][15][16]

In October 2012, Musk articulated a high-level plan to build a second reusable rocket system with capabilities substantially beyond the Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy launch vehicles on which SpaceX had by then spent several billion US dollars.[17] This new vehicle was to be "an evolution of SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster ... much bigger [than Falcon 9]." But Musk indicated that SpaceX would not be speaking publicly about it until 2013.[13][18] In June 2013, Musk stated that he intended to hold off any potential IPO of SpaceX shares on the stock market until after the "Mars Colonial Transporter is flying regularly."[19][20]

In August 2014, media sources speculated that the initial flight test of the Raptor-driven super-heavy launch vehicle could occur as early as 2020, in order to fully test the engines under orbital spaceflight conditions; however, any colonization effort was reported to continue to be "deep into the future".[21][22]

In January 2015, Musk said that he hoped to release details of the "completely new architecture" for the system that would enable the colonization of Mars in late 2015 but those plans changed and, by December 2015, the plan to publicly release additional specifics had moved to 2016.[23] In January 2016, Musk indicated that he hoped to describe the architecture for the Mars missions with the next generation SpaceX rocket and spacecraft later in 2016, at the 67th International Astronautical Congress conference,[7] in September 2016.[24][25] Musk stated in June 2016 that the first unmanned MCT Mars flight was planned for departure in 2022, to be followed by the first manned MCT Mars flight departing in 2024.[5][6] By mid-September 2016, Musk noted that the MCT name would not continue, as the system would be able to "go well beyond Mars", and that a new name would be needed: Interplanetary Transport System (ITS).[1]

On 27 September 2016, at the 67th annual meeting of the International Astronautical Congress, Musk unveiled substantial details of the design for the transport vehiclesincluding size, construction material, number and type of engines, thrust, cargo and passenger payload capabilities, on-orbit propellant-tanker refills, representative transit times, etc.as well as a few details of portions of the Mars-side and Earth-side infrastructure that SpaceX intends to build to support the flight vehicles. In addition, Musk championed a larger systemic vision, a vision for a bottom-up emergent order of other interested partieswhether companies, individuals, or governmentsto utilize the new and radically lower-cost transport infrastructure to build up a sustainable human civilization on Mars, potentially, on numerous other locations around the Solar System, by innovating and meeting the demand that such a growing venture would occasion.[8][9]

The Interplanetary Transport System consists of a combination of several elements that are keyaccording to Muskto making long-duration beyond Earth orbit (BEO) spaceflights possible by reducing the cost per ton delivered to Mars:[26][27][28]

The super-heavy lift launch vehicle[30] for the Interplanetary Transport System will place up to 300 tonnes (660,000lb) (reusable-mode) or 550 tonnes (1,210,000lb) (expendable-mode)or carry 380 tonnes (840,000lb) of propellant on an ITS tankerto low Earth orbit.[29]

The ITS launch vehicle will be powered by the Raptor bipropellant liquid rocket engines on both stages, using exclusively densified liquid methane fuel and liquid oxygen oxidizer on both stages.[29][30] The tanks will be autogenously pressurized, eliminating the need for the problematic helium gas pressurization.[29]

The ITS launch vehicle is reusable, making use of the SpaceX reusable technology that was developed during 20112016 for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.[29][2]

On all Earth-away launches, the long-duration spacecraft (tanker or spaceship) will also play a role briefly as the second stage of the launch vehicle to provide acceleration to orbital velocity, a design approach unusual in other launch vehicles.

The Interplanetary Spaceship is an interplanetary ship with a carbon-fiber primary structure propelled by nine Raptor engines operating on densified methane/oxygen propellants. It is 49.5m (162ft)-long, has a maximum hull diameter of 12 m, and is 17m (56ft)-diameter at its widest point, and is capable of transporting up to 450 tonnes (990,000lb) of cargo and passengers per trip to Mars, with on-orbit propellant refill before the interplanetary part of the journey.[27][29] Early flights are expected to carry mostly equipment and few people.[13]

As of September 2016, there is no name for the class of spacecraft beyond the descriptor Interplanetary Spaceship. Musk did indicate however that the first of those ships to make the Mars journey might be named Heart of Gold[1] in reference to the ship carrying the Infinite Improbability Drive, from the novel The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.[31] Although it was noted that the number of first-stage engines seemed to be inspired by The Answer,[32] Musk didn't allude to such a connection.

The transport capacity of the spaceship from low Earth orbit to a Mars trajectorywith a trans-Mars trajectory insertion energy gain of 6km/s (3.7mi/s) and full propellant tanksis 450 tonnes (500 tons) to Mars orbit, or 300 tonnes (330 tons) landed on the surface with retropropulsive landing. Estimated Earth-Mars transit times vary between 80150 days, depending on particular planetary alignments during the nine discrete 20202037 mission opportunities, assuming 6 km/s delta-v added at trans-Mars injection.[27]

The spaceship is designed to enter the Martian atmosphere at entry velocities in excess of 8.5 km/s and allow aerodynamic forces to provide the major part of the deceleration before the three center Raptor engines perform the final landing burn. The heat shield material protecting the ship on descent is PICA 3.0, and is reusable. Entry g-forces at Mars are expected to be 46 g's during the descent.[27] The spaceship design g-load would be 5G's nominal, but able to withstand peak loads 2 to 3 times higher without breaking up.[33]

Energy for the journey is produced by two large solar panel arrays, generating approximately 200kW of power while at the distance of Earth from the Sun, and less as the journey progresses and the Sun is farther away as the ship nears Mars.[26]:19:38

The spaceship may use a large internal water layer to help shield occupants from space radiation, and may have a cabin oxygen content that is up to two times that which is found in Earth's atmosphere.[13] The initial tests of the spaceship are not expected prior to 2020, with the ITS booster to follow only later.[14]

According to Musk, the spaceship would effectively become the first human habitat on Mars.[34]

A key feature of the system is a propellant-cargo-only tanker: the ITS tanker. Just as the spaceship, the tanker would serve as the upper stage of the ITS launch vehicle during the launch from Earth. The vehicle is designed exclusively for the launch and short-term holding of propellants to be transported to low Earth orbit for re-filling propellants in the interplanetary ships. Once on orbit, a rendezvous operation is effected with one of the Interplanetary Spaceships, plumbing connections are made, and a maximum of 380 tonnes (840,000lb) of liquid methane and liquid oxygen propellants are transferred in one load to the spaceship. To fully fuel an Interplanetary Spaceship for a long-duration interplanetary flight, it is expected that up to five tankers would be required to launch from Earth, carrying and transferring a total of nearly 1,900 tonnes (4,200,000lb) of propellant to fully load the spaceship for the journey.[27]

The ITS tanker is the same physical dimensions as the Interplanetary Spacecraft: 49.5m (162ft)-long, maximum hull diameter of 12 m, and is 17m (56ft) at its widest point. It will also be powered by six vacuum-optimized Raptor engines, each producing 3.5MN (790,000lbf) thrust, and will have three lower-expansion-ratio Raptor engines for flight maneuvering and Earth-return landings.[35][29] Following completion of the on-orbit propellant offloading, the reusable tanker will reenter the Earth's atmosphere, land, and be prepared for another tanker flight.[27] The tanker could also be used for cargo missions.[citation needed]

A key part of the system Musk is conceptualizing to radically decrease the cost of spaceflight to interplanetary destinations is the placement and operation of a physical plant on Mars to handle production and storage of the propellant components necessary to launch and fly the Interplanetary Spaceships back to Earth, or perhaps to increase the mass that can be transported onward to destinations in the outer Solar System. Coupled with the Earth-orbit tank filling prior to the journey to Mars, and the fully reusable launch vehicles and spacecraft, all three elements are needed to reduce the transport cost by the multiple orders of magnitude that Musk sees as necessary to support sustainable colonization of Mars.[27]

The first Interplanetary Spaceship to Mars will carry a small propellant plant as a part of its cargo load. The plant will be expanded over multiple synods as more equipment arrives, is installed, and placed into mostly-autonomous production.[27]

The propellant plant will take advantage of the large supplies of carbon dioxide and water resources on Mars, mining the water (H2O) from subsurface ice and collecting CO2 from the atmosphere. A chemical plant will process the raw materials by means of electrolysis and the Sabatier process to produce molecular oxygen (O2) and methane (CH4), and then liquefy it to facilitate long-term storage and ultimate use.[27]

The initial launch site for the launch and rapid reuse of the ITS launch vehicle will be the SpaceX leased facility at Launch Pad 39A along the Florida space coast. While originally thought to be too small to handle the ITS launch vehicle, the final optimized size of the Raptor engine is fairly close to the physical size of the Merlin 1D, although each engine will have approximately three times the thrust. Falcon Heavy will launch from 39A with 27 Merlin engines; ITS LV will launch with 42 Raptor engines.[29]

Musk indicated on September 27, 2016 that the ITS launch vehicle would launch from more than one site. A prime candidate for the second launch site is somewhere along the south Texas coast.

As of March 2014[update], no launch site had yet been selected for the super-heavy lift rocket and the then-named "Mars Colonial Transporter." SpaceX indicated at the time that their leased facility in Florida at Launch Pad 39A would not be large enough to accommodate the vehicle as it was understood conceptually in 2014, and that therefore a new site would need to be built in order to launch the >10-meter diameter rocket.[36]

In September 2014, Elon Musk indicated that the first person to go to another planet could possibly launch from the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site,[37] but did not indicate at the time what launch vehicle might be used to carry humans to orbit.

Musk has indicated that the earliest SpaceX-sponsored missions would have a smaller crew and use much of the pressurized space for cargo. The first cargo mission of the Interplanetary Spaceship would be named "Heart of Gold" and would be loaded with equipment to build the propellant plant.[33]

The first crewed Mars mission would be expected to have approximately 12 people, with the primary goal to "build out and troubleshoot the propellant plant and Mars Base Alpha power system" as well as a" rudimentary base." In the event of an emergency, the spaceship would be able to return to Earth without having to wait a full 26 months for the next synodic period.[33]

Before any people are transported to Mars, some number of cargo missions would be undertaken first in order to transport the requisite equipment, habitats and supplies.[38] Equipment that would accompany the early groups would include "machines to produce fertilizer, methane and oxygen from Mars' atmospheric nitrogen and carbon dioxide and the planet's subsurface water ice" as well as construction materials to build transparent domes for crop growth.[13]

The early concepts for "green living space" habitats include glass panes with a carbon-fiber-frame geodesic domes, and "a lot of miner/tunneling droids [for building] out a huge amount of pressurized space for industrial operations." But these are merely conceptual and not a detailed design plan.[33]

SpaceX the company is concentrating its resources on the transportation part of the overall ITS project as well as an autonomous propellant plant that could be deployed on Mars to produce methane and oxygen rocket propellants from local resources. If built, and if planned objectives are achieved, then the transport cost of getting material and people to space, and across interplanetary space, will be reduced by several orders of magnitude. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is championing a much larger set of long-term interplanetary settlement objectives, ones that take advantage of these lower costs to go far beyond what the company SpaceX will build and that will ultimately involve many more economic actorswhether individual, company, or governmentto build out the settlement over many decades.[8][9]

In addition to explicit SpaceX plans and concepts for a transportation system and early missions, Musk has personally been a very public exponent of a large systemic vision for building a sustainable human presence on Mars over the very long term, a vision well beyond what his company or he personally can effect. The growth of such a system over decades cannot be planned in every detail, but is rather a complex adaptive system that will come about only as others make their own independent choices as to how they might, or might not, connect with the broader "system" of an incipient (and later, growing) Mars settlement. Musk sees the new and radically lower-cost transport infrastructure facilitating the build up of a bottom-up economic order of other interested partieswhether companies, individuals, or governmentswho will innovate and supply the demand that such a growing venture would occasion.[8][9]

While the initial SpaceX Mars settlement would start very small, with an initial group of about a dozen people,[33] with time, Musk hopes that such an outpost would grow into something much larger and become self-sustaining, at least 1 million people. According to Musk,

Even at a million people youre assuming an incredible amount of productivity per person, because you would need to recreate the entire industrial base on Mars. You would need to mine and refine all of these different materials, in a much more difficult environment than Earth. There would be no trees growing. There would be no oxygen or nitrogen that are just there. No oil.

Excluding organic growth, if you could take 100 people at a time, you would need 10,000 trips to get to a million people. But you would also need a lot of cargo to support those people. In fact, your cargo to person ratio is going to be quite high. It would probably be 10 cargo trips for every human trip, so more like 100,000 trips. And were talking 100,000 trips of a giant spaceship.[39]

Musk expects that the journeys would require 80 to 150 days of transit time,[40] with an average trip time to Mars of approximately 115 days (for the nine synodic periods occurring between 2020 and 2037).[27] In 2012, Musk stated an aspirational price goal for such a trip might be on the order of US$500,000 per person,[13] but in 2016 he mentioned that long-term costs might become as low as US$200,000.[40]

As of September 2016[update], the complex project has financial commitments only from SpaceX and Musk's personal capital. The Washington Post pointed out that "The [US] government doesn't have the budget for Mars colonization. Thus, the private sector would have to see Mars as an attractive business environment. Musk is willing to pour his wealth into the project" but it will not be enough to build the colony he envisions.[41]

The overview presentation on the Interplanetary Transport System given by Musk on 27 September 2016 included concept slides outlining missions to the Saturnian moon Enceladus, the Jovian moon Europa, Kuiper belt objects, a fuel depot on Pluto and even the uses to take payloads to the Oort Cloud.[29] "Musk said ... the system can open up the entire Solar System to people. If fuel depots based on this design were put on asteroids or other areas around the Solar System, people could go anywhere they wanted just by planet or moon hopping. 'The goal of SpaceX is to build the transport system ... Once that transport system is built, then there is a tremendous opportunity for anyone that wants to go to Mars to create something new or build a new planet.'"[10] Outer planet trips would likely require propellant refills at Mars, and perhaps other locations in the outer Solar System.[40]

The extensive development and manufacture of much of the space transport technology has been to date (through 2016), and is being, privately funded by SpaceX. The entire project is even possible only as a result of SpaceX multi-faceted approach focusing on the reduction of launch costs.[29]

As of 2016[update], SpaceX is expending "a few tens of millions of dollars annually on development of the Mars transport concept, which amounts to well under 5 percent of the companys total expenses",[40] but expects that figure to rise to some US$300 million per year by around 2018. The cost of all work leading up to the first Mars launch is expected to be "on the order of US$10 billion"[40] and SpaceX expects to expend that much before it generates any transport revenue.[9]

Musk indicated in September 2016 that the full build-out of the Mars colonialization plans will likely be funded by both private and public funds. The speed of commercially available Mars transport for both cargo and humans will be driven, in large part, by market demand as well as constrained by the technology development and development funding.[9][40]

Elon Musk has said that there is no expectation of receiving NASA contracts for any of the ITS system work. He also indicated that such contracts, if received, would be good.[42]

In September 2016, Musk presented the following high-level, forward-looking, fabrication cost projections, given a set of assumptions. Those assumptions include: Cost of propellant: US$168/tonne; Launch site costs: US$200,000/launch; Discount rate: 5%; Cargo delivered: 450 tonne per single Interplanetary Spaceship; and full reuse. All assumptions are about a single mission once thousands of launches and hundreds of flights to Mars are a realistic prospect. They do not apply to costs for the much smaller number of early missions envisioned for the 2020s. Given these assumptions, Musk presented the following long-term mission cost projections:[31][27]

Calculated result: total average cost (based on the life cycle of the system, included costs of the initial fabrication, propellant, maintenance and company's amortization) of one Interplanetary Spaceship transported to Mars: US$62 million; or less than US$140,000 cost per tonne of mass transported to Mars.

SpaceX plans to fly its earliest missions to Mars using its Falcon Heavy launch vehicle prior to the completion, and first launch, of any ITS vehicle. Later missions utilizing ITS technologythe ITS launch vehicle and Interplanetary Spaceship with on-orbit propellant refill via ITS tankerwould begin no earlier than 2022. The company is planning for launches of research spacecraft to Mars using Falcon Heavy launch vehicles and specialized modified Dragon spacecraft. Due to planetary alignment in the inner Solar System, the launches are typically limited to a window of approximately every 26 months. Originally (in June 2016), the first launch was planned for Spring 2018, with an announced intent to launch again in every Mars launch window thereafter. In February 2017, however, the first launch to Mars was pushed back to 2020.[43] The early missions will collect essential data to refine the design of the ITS, and better select landing locations based on the availability of extraterrestrial resources such as water and building materials.[6]

The original tentative mission manifest (now outdated) included two Falcon Heavy missions to Mars prior to the first possible flight of an ITS to Mars in 2022:[6]

As of February 2017[update], the first launch is planned for 2020 and it's unclear whether the overall schedule is kept intact, but pushed back by 26 months, or if other adjustments will be made.

Italics indicate unflown vehicles and future missions or sites. denotes failed missions, destroyed vehicles and abandoned sites.

Read more here:
Interplanetary Transport System - Wikipedia

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Interplanetary Transport System – Wikipedia

Hubble telescope captures stunning image of starbursts in Virgo … – Geo News, Pakistan

Posted: at 9:46 am

Interested in galaxies? We have got something for you.

Images of a galaxy turning gas into newborn stars were shared online and the internet just couldn't handle itself.

The galaxy seemed to be turning gas into newborn stars faster than it can replenish its gas supply and is churning out new stars at a prodigious rate.

The stunning new images were captured by the Hubble Space Telescope suing Hubble's wide field camera 3.

NGC 4536 is found within the Virgo constellation, 50 million light-years from Earth. The galaxy boasts several regions of intense star formation. The star formation frenzies within NGC 4536 are bolstered by an intense concentration of gas.

Astronomers aren't sure exactly how the galaxy came to possess so much gas. It's possible NGC 4536 acquired it during a galactic collision.

Stars born in starburst regions tend to burn fast and die young, consuming large amounts of gas very quickly. This makes them easy to identify. Their insatiable appetite gives off massive amounts of ultraviolet light, which excites nearby hydrogen atoms and turns nearby gas clouds into a kaleidoscope of blues and yellows.

Read the original here:
Hubble telescope captures stunning image of starbursts in Virgo ... - Geo News, Pakistan

Posted in Hubble Telescope | Comments Off on Hubble telescope captures stunning image of starbursts in Virgo … – Geo News, Pakistan

NEW WORLD DISORDER – WND.com

Posted: at 9:45 am

Most of you will know what I mean when I note how old you begin to feel when the football players and the cops are younger than you are. How old do you think I feel now that the son of my best friend in Norway his son, mind you is the secretary general of NATO?

I met Secretary General Jens Stoltenbergs father, Thorvald, through international student politics in Columbus, Ohio, in 1953. His career skyrocketed through mayor of Oslo, defense minister, ambassador and foreign minister. Thorvald never got the top job of prime minister. Jens did. If youre one of those awful family scorekeepers please note that, owing to the vagaries of Norwegian politics, this doesnt mean that the son is a better politician or a stronger vote-getter than the father. It all depends on timing and which party is in power. Father and son are conceded to reside together at the top of Norwegian politics.

I was a firsthand, close-up witness to father Thorvalds risking his own life to rescue a group of 40 Hungarian refugees fleeing the Communists in 1956. As I read Thorvalds autobiography, I turned the pages breathlessly, eager to read his account of what took place on Christmas night on the border where Hungary and Austria meet. But Thorvald left that entire incident out! That quietly but totally illustrates the difference between Norwegian politicians and their glory-starved, glory-seeking and glory-thieving American counterparts.

Ive never met Jens, but I have fantasies of attending one of his press conferences somewhere and staggering him with my inside knowledge of things like the terrible car accident the family was involved in when Thorvald was ambassador to Yugoslavia, and the brutality of those fat-needle Yugoslav hypodermics they were subjected to, and was he aware at the time that the doctor had told Thorvald that Jens might not make it through the night?

As I watched Jens Stoltenbergs press conference with President Donald Trump last week it occurred to me that Norway, Denmark and the Baltic states are what I call the Never-Again wing of NATO, or the orthodox wing. Unlike Canada, the U.K., Spain, Turkey and other NATO members, those Scandinavian, Baltic and other members are true believers in collective defense, having been in this lifetime helpless against the bullying aggression and occupation by much stronger powers.

The question literally asks itself: Can NATO stop an aggressive Russia?

It depends on which Russia were talking about. If we mean the Stalinized Red Army with its real generals purged by a paranoiac Stalin and replaced with combat-illiterate Communist stooges, and if by Russia we mean that Red Army that ridiculized itself by the terrible time it had subduing little Finland, a country with a population half that of Chicago, then Yes, NATO will prevail. If, however, we mean the well-trained, winterized and well-led Siberian Red Army Stalin didnt bring into the war with Germany until his best spy in Japan assured him Japan had no intention of attacking the Soviet Union, and if by Russia we mean that army that stormed out of the far east and cut through the demoralized Nazi lines like a hot knife through oleomargarine, then we have a problem!

Oh, how Id love to be one of those legendary journalists whose whispered wisdom wins wars and saves nations. Im afraid I have but one little chiclet of advice for Jens and NATO.

I say get busy and popularize the mastery of firearms in all the NATO lands. I fired my first shots at the YMCA camp near Greensboro, North Carolina, at the age of 9! New York high schools used to have rifle teams! Switzerland not a NATO member but a NATO role model holds the annual Knabenschiessen, the German word for a boys shooting match (at which, since 1991, girls have competed also).

School the civilian population in firearms, and teach them to shoot not to kill, but to wound. It takes five enemy personnel to care for each wounded aggressor!

NATO has never been tested. A cobweb is as good as a cable if theres no strain upon it. Didnt Sun Tzu say that the supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting?

Theres only one thing that would make me prouder than having Jens, Trump and the other good-guy leaders hold a triumphant parade after defeating a Russian attempt on NATO members.

And that would be for the Russians to take one look at NATOs readiness and capabilities and conclude that such an attempt would be a bad idea, or as a Lower East Side Sun Tzu might say, Fuggedaboudit!

And Putin can go to the gym and show us a few pushups instead!

Media wishing to interview Barry Farber, please contact media@wnd.com.

More here:
NEW WORLD DISORDER - WND.com

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on NEW WORLD DISORDER – WND.com

Trump to Paul Ryan: Get NATO to ‘Pay Their Bills’ – Breitbart News

Posted: at 9:45 am

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Tuesday in Kenosha, WI at the world headquarters of Snap-on Inc., President Donald Trump called on House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), who is on a bipartisan congressional trip visiting NATO countries, to get members of NATO to pay their bills.

Trump said,And although he could not be here today, my thanks go to Speaker Ryan whos represented the city for nearly two decades in Congress. And you know where he is? Hes with NATO. And so he has a good excuse. And I said Ron, make sure these countries start paying their bills a little bit more, you know. Theyre way, way behind. We have to do well Im going to talk to you about that, Ron. But Paul, youre over with NATO, get them to pay their bills. I think that and Ron you have to work on that too.

Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN

Continued here:
Trump to Paul Ryan: Get NATO to 'Pay Their Bills' - Breitbart News

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on Trump to Paul Ryan: Get NATO to ‘Pay Their Bills’ – Breitbart News

Kaptur part of U.S. delegation headed to NATO countries – Toledo Blade

Posted: at 9:45 am

Share

Share

Email

Print

U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Toledo) is on her way to Germany, Italy, and Poland as part of a bipartisan delegation aimed in part at relieving European concern about the United States commitment to NATO.

The group that left Tuesday morning will be on hand as the first American personnel rotate into a battle group set up to defend North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries from Russia.

The group is led by U.S. Rep. Paul Cook (R., Calif.), vice chairman of the House Committee on Armed Services.

Miss Kaptur said delegation members will stress the importance of the NATO Alliance and bilateral relationships with Poland, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

VIDEO: Blade Briefing on U.S. Rep. Marcy Kapturs trip to Europewith bipartisan delegation

Particularly now, with the executive branch making contradictory statements about U.S. resolve toward NATO, it is incumbent the U.S. not leave any doubt in the minds of our friends, or foes, as to our nations firm commitment to defending liberty and upholding our historic alliance with Europe, Miss Kaptur said.

As a candidate, Donald Trump called NATO obsolete and accused other countries of not paying their fair share of the alliances bills. Last week, Mr. Trump gave his full support to NATO, reaffirming the U.S. commitment to the alliance and saying he no longer considers it obsolete.

Delegation members plan to meet with European officials to discuss European Union cohesion, European security, territorial integrity, and financial and economic stability, according to a statement from Miss Kapturs office.

Lawmakers will visit U.S. Department of Defense facilities, and meet with military leaders and service people.

In Poland the delegation will witness the American role in leading NATOs Poland battle group as part of the alliances enhanced Forward Presence initiative, she said.

NATO nations agreed in 2016 to deploy four multinational battle groups to NATO members most at risk of a possible Russian attack. The group will be present as the first rotation of U.S. military personnel begins its NATO deployment.

Miss Kaptur is the ranking member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water and also co-chairs the Congressional Ukraine, Poland, and Hungary caucuses.

The focus in Germany will be Americas military relationship with NATO, including engagements with leadership and soldiers at the U.S. 7th Army Training Command Joint Multinational Simulation Center in Grafenwoehr.

In Italy, the delegation will meet with defense, economic, and foreign ministry officials as well as representatives of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Miss Kaptur is scheduled to return to Ohio on Saturday.

A spokesman for Mr. Cook said she was not allowed to give any information about the trip to Europe. Representative Cook is a retired Marine Corps colonel and was awarded combat medals during the Vietnam War.

Other delegation members include ranking members and vice chairmen on U.S. House of Representatives subcommittees on the Western Hemisphere and National Security, members and staff serving on the Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees, and officials in the U.S. Army.

Contact Tom Troy:tomtroy@theblade.comor 419-724-6058 or on Twitter @TomFTroy.

Follow this link:
Kaptur part of U.S. delegation headed to NATO countries - Toledo Blade

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on Kaptur part of U.S. delegation headed to NATO countries – Toledo Blade