Monthly Archives: April 2017

Welcome MMA bettors, speculators, and gambling lurkers! Were back at it again for another week of comprehensive gambling analysis from your friends at MMA Fighting.

For those of you who are new, this aims to be an exhaustive preview of the fights in context with the odds, and doubles as a breakdown of where you can find betting value. The number after the odds on each fighter is the probability of victory that those odds imply (so Cub Swanson at -650 means he should win 87 percent of the time). If you think he wins more often than the odds say, you should bet it because there's value in the line.

All stats come from FightMetric and all the odds are from Best Fight Odds. Net Value means how much money you would have made if you bet $100 on that fighter in every one of his/her fights that odds could be found for. Doubly as always, I'm trying to provide the most thorough guide I can for those who want to legally bet or who just enjoy following along. If you are a person who chooses to gamble, only do so legally, responsibly, and at your own risk.

Now with all that out of the way, lets go.

Breakdown

The main event this weekend is the strangest one yet in the WME-IMG era of UFC ownership. Featherweight title hopeful Cub Swanson takes on the man best known for being Conor McGregors training partner, Artem Lobov. Swanson is on an impressive three-fight win streak, and his situation is a paradox...as in, a win does almost nothing for him while it could also earn him the next featherweight title shot. A win for Lobov would be by far the biggest of his career and get him his first UFC ranking.

Swanson is primarily a striker who relies on good footwork and angles to set up stinging punching combinations. Hes one of the better athletes in the division and you can see that in the way he explodes into punches. Hes also is a thudding kicker and a dangerous counter-puncher when hes in the pocket. Though sometimes he can be drawn into ill-advised brawls, hes fast enough and powerful enough to come out ahead in those too.

Aside from striking, Swanson is a well-established veteran who can compete in all phases. Hes an underrated offensive wrestler with a variety of finishes and on top hes a pretty solid control player. If Swanson has a semi-glaring weakness, it has been his defensive wrestling, but that doesnt figure to come into play much here.

Lobov gets a fair amount of criticism for his uninspiring record (13-12-1,) but hes actually a pretty solid fighter whose record is more reflective of the tough competition hes faced than anything else. Lobovs a striker by trade, and his style looks more and more like McGregors each time out, featuring non-standard movement and rhythm. Hes marketed as a power puncher, but thats not entirely his game nor is he what you might consider a volume striker. Rather, hes a combination boxer with some pop in his hands and an aggressive, countering style. While he has found a way to make this work for him, it also puts him in range to be hit and his defense isnt very good, as he tends to be overly reliant on his chin.

Beyond striking, there isnt much to Lobovs game. Hes an above average defender of takedowns and a competent offensive wrestler on occasion but that is about the extent of it.

Cub Swanson is just a much better fighter than Artem Lobov in every area of the game. Even if Swanson brawls with Lobov (the best chance Lobov has to emerge victorious), Swanson is still likely to win and if he fights a precise, technical fight. If Cub does that, this is all one-way traffic from the jump. The only fear here is that Swansons battle with Doo Ho Choi irrevocably altered his career (a thing that has been known to happen with post-Fight of the Year candidates). However, I dont think thats likely since the bulk of that fight was, in actuality, Swanson putting the wood to Choi.

The pick is Swanson by third-round knockout, but theres very little meat on these bones so better to pass on betting.

Breakdown

The co-main event of the evening is also a strange one. Al Iaquinta, a man who retired from MMA recently (and may or may not really want to keep fighting), faces Diego Sanchez, a stalwart from the first TUF (who seemingly wants to keep fighting past what is good for him). A win for Iaquinta puts him back in the top-15 position, while a win for Sanchez lands him in the vicinity of that conversation as well.

When last we saw him, Iaquinta had developed into one of the more technical boxers in the division. He pumped a frequent jab and had solid footwork, allowing him cut angles for his excellent counter-punching game. Assuming hes still the same guy, Iaquinta mixes his levels of attack well and works his combinations at a good pace. He also has pretty sharp defense anchored by strong head movement in the pocket. He ties everything together with stalwart takedown defense that can thwart all but the very best wrestlers.

Sanchez is one of the most well-known commodities in the UFC. Hes a high-octane southpaw who is more than happy to throw hands, but does his best work as a top position grappler. On the feet Sanchez presses forward and throws hard combinations, but hes not much of a technician, and his lack of defense means his willingness to brawl is more of a liability than a benefit. What his brawling mentality does accomplish is win rounds in the eyes of the judges, despite sometimes getting out-landed. His age and deteriorating durability make this a much more dangerous gambit than it used to be.

Sanchez really butters his beak as a wrestler and grappler though. As you can see from the stats, hes not a particularly deft finisher of takedowns, but he is tenacious. When you continually shoot shot after shot, your percentage is going to be low. Once on top, Sanchez can really start going to town, working the opponent over with punches and control and racking up damage in short order.

The biggest question in this one is this: How is Iaquinta going to look after two years away from competition? Sanchez is in his twilight, but hes still not a fighter you want to face if your heart isnt in it; there are very few men who want it more than Sanchez.

All that said, this is a dreadful style matchup for Sanchez. Ragin Al is a much better striker and Lionheart wont be able to get him to the mat. Expect Iaquinta to box Sanchez up for 15 minutes before taking a wide decision, but be mindful of putting money on a guy coming back from a two-year layoff and facing a man whos won a questionable decision or two in his time.

Breakdown

In the evenings only light heavyweight contest, former interim title challenger Ovince Saint Preux takes on the hard hitting Marcos Rogerio de Lima. Saint Preux is in desperate need of a win to stop his three-fight losing streak, while de Lima is looking to notch the biggest win of his career and announce himself as a force in the ultra-thin 205-pound division.

Saint Preux is a former University of Tennessee football player, and as you might expect, hes a phenomenal athlete. In fact, I've often felt he resembles a Jon Jones from earlier in his career. Saint Preux has similar ridiculous physical gifts that allow him to perform funky, unpredictable offensive feats. However, unlike Jones, OSP hasnt built up the fundamentals that create a cohesive and threatening fighter. The end result is that OSP might pop off and ruin anyones day, but he might just as easily lose fights he should win on paper.

As a striker, OSP is huge and rangy with an 80-inch southpaw reach. He has an awkward striking game built around power and speed and hes a good counter-puncher because of his timing. He's not a phenomenally technical wrestler, but he's explosive enough and physical enough to score takedowns and his top game includes potent striking and unorthodox submissions. His biggest weakness other than inconsistency in process is his cardio which takes the sting out of his offense after a couple of rounds.

Cardio isnt a strong suit for de Lima either because the Brazilian is an all-out fighter. De Lima throws caution to the wind from the opening bell and unloads vicious punches and kicks, breaking opponents under the ferocity of his attack. Because hes an enormous, powerful man, this strategy has proven effective, though its always a gamble. If his opponent can weather the storm, de Lima is basically dead in the water. Furthermore, as the numbers would suggest, de Lima is a horrid defender of takedowns, and that given his cardio troubles make him a dangerous, if easily exploitable, fighter.

This is basically a question of whether or not you think de Lima can bulldoze Saint Preux early. While its entirely possible that he can, de Limas defensive wrestling gives me pause that he will. OSP isnt the best wrestler in the world but hes good enough to take de Lima down. The pick is OSP by TKO, late in the first round, and if he dropped to the -150 range, I like him for a bet.

Breakdown

One of the few fights with real stakes on the card, former flyweight title contender John Dodson is looking to rebound from his controversial split decision loss to John Lineker by taking on former bantamweight title challenger Eddie Wineland in a fight that will keep the winner relevant in the divisional title picture.

Dodson is one of the best pure athletes in MMA. Among the fastest men at flyweight since moving to 135 pounds, Dodson is a blur to most of his opponents. It isnt just his blinding speed though; Dodsons also one of the pound-for-pound biggest punchers in the entire sport. With the recent retirement of Anthony Johnson, you could argue he now occupies the top spot.

But Dodson's hyper-athleticism and power are a double-edged sword. Like Yoel Romero, Dodson is often confoundingly inactive, lying in wait for the moment to go hyper-dynamic on his opponent. Dodson has the speed, technique, and skill to beat anyone at 135 pounds and below, but his suspect cardio and poor decision-making have cost him time and again. That said, in his last fight Dodson put forth a focused, intelligent game plan that should have been enough for him to get the win. If Dodson has finally learned to put some process behind his natural talents, the rest of the division better watch out.

Wineland is also a striker though far less dynamic than Dodson. Hes a sharp boxer that operates behind a stiff, punishing jab. From there he moves laterally and cuts angles to find openings for his combinations. Hes defensively solid if you can get over the fact that he carries his hands low, but like Dominick Cruz, he does this to goad opponents into head hunting where his excellent head movement and footwork allows him to slip and counter with power. Hes also a stalwart defender of takedowns which lets him operate in his preferred phase of attack. Thats mostly the extent of the 32-year old Winelands game, and though hes on a winning streak there are legitimate concerns that, after 15 years of fighting, he may be on his decline.

The last time Wineland fought a powerful striker who was faster and more athletic than him, he was marking up Renan Barao before catching a shotgun blast to the face. That is more or less how I see this fight going. Wineland is a skilled striker and his size and technique can create problems for the diminutive Dodson but eventually The Magician is gonna plunk him in the side of the head and thatll be the ball game. I like Dodson to win by second-round KO. Betting Wineland is actually justifiable but if youre going to do so, only go small.

Breakdown

Joe Lauzon meets Stevie Ray in a competitive lightweight scrap that doesnt have much divisional relevance but should be fun nonetheless.

Aggression is the name of Lauzon's game. He's a powerful puncher and wrestler who comes out of the gate like hell on wheels, leading to him being one of the all-time leaders in bonus award wins. That aggression also has the downside of meaning he tends to fade pretty hard in fights if one can weather the storm (he has two decision wins in a 39-fight career). However, he has lately been pacing himself more and remaining competitive past the 8-minute mark.

On the feet, Lauzon mostly throws big power strikes, moving forward and either shooting a takedown or grabbing the clinch. His defense is poor (look at those stats), but hes got a good chin and his pressure makes up for it. Hes a nasty clinch fighter, and on the floor, hes a fierce transitional grappler with excellent ground and pound.

Ray is a southpaw striker and a fairly deft one at that. He prefers to throw in one and two punch salvos, dictating pace and distance with one-two's and lead left hands. He also has an array of kicks but those are most thrown as a way to set the range and not as a real damaging attack. Ray is constantly moving on his feet, circling and resetting the distance to look for his preferred angle of attack. This style of attack means his volume is a little low, but when he does sit down on his punches they have some good pop. Beyond that, theres not much else to Rays game. His takedown defense is still a work in progress, and on the mat, hes a competent grappler but not really a threatening one.

This fight mostly depends on how well Ray can stay on his feet. If Lauzon can work takedowns, he should maul Ray on the mat. If Ray has improves his defensive wrestling enough, Lauzon is too hittable to win the rounds. The former seems much more like and Lauzon can at least compete on the feet until he can get his wrestling going. Also, Lauzon should own the clinch here. The only worry for Lauzon really is getting hit coming in, and while he has a lot of miles on him, Lauzons still proven to be a durable guy and Ray isnt a huge threat to finish. This pick is Lauzon to win a decision and I like him for a bet at these long of odds.

Breakdown

A potential banger of a welterweight matchup opens up the FS1 main card. Jake Ellenberger is coming off a slightly controversial loss to Jorge Masvidal whereas Mike Perry tasted defeat for the first time in his most recent outing against Alan Jouban. Both men need a win here to remain relevant in the division, and while Perry is looking to take down the first real name fighter of his career, Ellenbergers job may be on the line here.

Ellenberger is one of the more frustrating fighters in the world. Hes a great athlete with all the tools to excel in the upper echelons of MMA (and, for a time, he did just that) but the last four years have been plagued by inconsistency for the Nebraskan. When hes on point, power is the name of the game for Ellenberger. He blends some of the hardest punching in the division with an explosive wrestling game. However, more often than not it looks like Ellenberger doesnt want to be in the cage and his lack of urgency has been anathema to victory for the one-time title hopeful.

On the other side, a lack of fight enthusiasm is certainly not Perrys problem. Perry turned heads with his boisterous debut last year, knocking out Hyun Gyu Lim at UFC 202 after some antics at the weigh-ins beforehand. While his personality has made Perry a guy the UFC is keen on, his skills are not to be overlooked. Though still young in his career, Perry has many of the hallmarks of a fighter with a bright future. He's a great athlete with tremendous speed and power and he pushes a very high pace. His striking game is narrow relying mostly on a left hook and overhand right, supplemented by leg kicks and he doesn't try to get too far outside his wheelhouse but his natural timing and sense of when and where openings should be exploited makes him highly effective. There is a depth to his game that belies his young age and given some development, Perry could be a legitimate threat in the division.

As is always the case with Ellenberger, this fight isnt so much a matter of if he has the skills to win he does but does he really want to compete? Even if he does, Perry is a pretty tough style matchup for him as durability and volume have never been strong suits for The Juggernaut. Ellenberger has the wrestling chops to make Perry work but in a contest between a fighter with questionable intensity and one with multiple face tattoos, you have to go with the latter. Perry scores a knockout at the end of the first round and he should probably be in the -200 to -220 range so I like him for a bet.

Thales Leites (-115/53%) vs. Sam Alvey (-105/51%)

Leites has been in MMA long enough to have skills in all phases. On the feet, hes a good counter-puncher with legitimate power but he butters his bread as a top position grappler. He's a solid chain-wrestler from the clinch and once he's on top he has a great pass and punch game to go along with his elite submissions. Alvey is a relatively slow-paced (though he throws more than Leites) southpaw with big power and outstanding takedown defense. His biggest weakness is that he relies almost entirely on the counter which means he is prone to giving rounds away due to inactivity.

This is a pretty rough style matchup for Leites. Alveys stellar defensive wrestling mean Leites will mostly be forced into striking where his pressuring game puts him right in the wheelhouse of Alveys counters. But if Leites chin can hold up something it has been doing a good job of against stiff competition then his pressure might be able to win rounds from Alvey who is taking a pretty big leap up in competition. Still though, this is a fight between guys trending in opposite directions and in those situations, hitch your wagon to the rocket not the anchor. The pick is Alvey by third-round knockout and I like him for a bet.

Dustin Ortiz (-190/66%) vs. Brandon Moreno (+170/37%)

Ortiz is a talent flyweight who has only lost to the best in the division; it just so happens that three of his last five fights have been against Wilson Reis, Jussier Formiga, and Joseph Benavidez. Hes a scramble-based grappler who can exchange on the feet as well but hes not the best athlete or technician and thats why he has fallen short against the elite of the division. Moreno is an up-and-coming flyweight who has impressed in the UFC after getting bounced early from TUF 24. Hes dangerous in all phases with good combination boxing and a talent for sneaking to the back.

Ortiz struggles against guys who are more athletic than him and can win the scrambles, two categories under which Moreno falls. Moreno also has a five-inch reach advantage and hes more active on the feet. This will be a fun, back and forth affair but Moreno should come out ahead more often than not. The pick is Moreno by decision and I love him for a bet at these odds.

Scott Holtzman (-380/79%) vs. Michael McBride (+320/24%)

Holtzman can fight everywhere though none of it will wow you. Hes physically strong and a decent athlete, with solid wrestling and top control as well as good elbows in the clinch. McBride doesnt have a lot of tape on him other than the kicking he suffered at the hands of Nik Lentz his last time out. Hes a tall lightweight who prefers to grapple and his striking needs a good deal of work.

The athletic gulf in this contest looks to be substantial. Holtzman is hittable on the feet but he throws competent combinations with some pop on them whereas McBride leaves his head on a tee and throws from his hips. Holtzman is a good enough wrestler to keep things standing and in the clinch and at range, he should bust up McBride. The pick is Holtzman by TKO in the latter half of the fight but since I still havent seen a ton of McBride, I wouldnt bet this.

Jessica Penne (-130/57%) vs. Danielle Taylor (+110/48%)

Penne is a former title challenger whos made her way based on her grappling skills. On the feet, she has solid technique but she doesnt sit out on here punches and shes far too hittable, though she is shoe leather tough. On the mat, shes a potent combination of sweeps from the bottom and passing + control from the top. Taylor has a background in Muay Thai and shes still a striker in MMA but at 5 feet tall, shes adapted her game to a more fitting style. Taylor prefers to stay at range before leaping in for single-shot punches that are thrown with power. Shes speedy and mobile with this plan and her right hand packs a wallop, but its a low volume attack that doesnt score well with judges unless she connects with something clean.

The simple truth is, Taylor is an atomweight and she isnt just slightly undersized, shes wildly undersized at strawweight. Penne will have a 5-inch height advantage and a 7-inch reach advantage come fight night. Moreover, Taylor has been muscled around in the clinch before as a result of her diminutive stature, and Penne is likely to do the same here and on the floor. The pick is Penne by submission in the third round and shes a fine bet at these odds.

Alexis Davis (-300/75%) vs. Cindy Dandois (+250/29%)

Davis is a jack of all trades fighter who fought for the UFC bantamweight title once upon a time, getting obliterated by Ronda Rousey in 16 seconds. Despite that quick failing, Davis is a very durable fighter who works aggressive, combination boxing on the feet and a swift, lethal attack on the floor.

Dandois is basically like if a blind person with only a loose grasp of MMA tried to build Ronda Rousey in create-a-fighter mode on a UFC game. Shes a judoka of some accomplishment on the European circuit and that is the beginning and end of her game. She uses head throws and her long legs to attack while on the ground.

Once she makes her debut, Dandois will possibly be the worst striker in the modern era of the UFC. Davis isnt Sugar Ray but shes a spirited boxer and an excellent grappler in her own right and I would be shocked if she didnt put the wood to Dandois here. Then again, Dandois has managed wins over Marloes Coenen and Megan Anderson so I guess anything is possible. Still, Davis by TKO in the middle of the fight, and if you want to throw her in a parlay, go for it.

Bryan Barberena (-320/76%) vs. Joe Proctor (+265/27%)

Barberena is a rugged, durable fighter who lacks the athleticism to compete at the highest levels of the sport but is a tough out for anyone. He pressures in combination on the feet and hes good in the clinch and on top but he rarely looks to take it to the ground. Proctor hasnt competed in over a year due to injury. Hes a striker with good power and an aggressive submission game when things hit the floor or he has an opponent hurt.

This fight figures to be a good, old-fashioned dust up between two guys with no interest in taking the other down. Proctor is faster and has more power but Barberena is more durable and throws more volume as well as being the better clinch fighter. Barberenas toughness means he should walk through Proctors early offense and take control in the clinch and at range where Proctor is hittable. The pick is Barberena by decision but the odds are long on him so pass on a bet.

Hector Sandoval (-125/56%) vs. Matt Schnell (+105/49%)

Sandoval is a squat, athletic wrestle-boxer from Team Alpha Male. His offense is built around slinging heavy overhand rights and following them up with lefts to the body or explosive double-leg shots. Schnell is tall for the division at 5-foot-8 and he uses his length to his advantage, snapping off combinations that he punctuates with leg kicks on the feet and using his long legs to attack relentlessly from the bottom with armbars and triangles.

Things dont look good for Sandoval here. Hes giving up six inches of height and six inches of reach to Schnell and his tendency to stand outside of his opponents and then explode forward wont work nearly as well with that much distance to cover. Even if he does succeed with his takedowns, Schnell is too tricky off his back and will have Sandoval playing defense all night. The pick is Schnell by submission in the second round. And I like him for a bet at plus money.

That's all folks. We had a good showing last weekend, going 3-2 on our bets with two of those being underdogs for a total earning of +227. Hopefully we will do as well this week. For those of a more auditory inclination, I broke down fights with Nick Baldwin and Wes Riddle on Before The Battle, so heres that.

Otherwise, enjoy the fights everyone, good luck to those who need it, if you've got any questions, feel free to hit me up on Twitter @JedKMeshew.

(Editor's note: All of this advice is for entertainment purposes only.)

See the rest here:

UFC Fight Night 108 odds, gambling guide - MMA Fighting

Roxanne Brown @DC_SLP_roxbrown

EUSTIS The City of Eustis has reason to believe that at least two businesses in town may be running illegal gambling operations.

At a city meeting Thursday, City Commissioners said they want none of that going on in the city.

To make it clear, commissioners directed staff to come up with an ordinance that would prohibit the use of simulated gambling devices.

The ordinance will be considered at a meeting on June 15.

Currently, the city code only addresses Amusements & Entertainment, but does not specifically prohibit or regulate gambling devices.

A Florida State Statute does not allow them, officials said.

Technically, based on state statute, they are operating illegally," Eustis City Manager Ron Neibert said of such facilities.

"But with a local ordinance, we can get in there, enforce the violation and shut them down easier. That is why we are trying to do this, he added.

At the meeting, Development Services Director Lori Barnes outlined some of the challenges the city is facing with illegal operations and devices, calling it a new, old topic.

Development services and the police department have observed a resurgence of amusement centers utilizing simulated gambling devices that are reminiscent of internet sweepstakes cafes of the past, said Barnes.

She said there are at least two businesses in the city suspected of actively operating illegal gambling facilities.

She also pointed out an increase in robberies at such places, including one in Eustis last month. She said neighboring cities are having similar problems.

In the last few years, inquiries to operating senior amusement facilities in our city have increased. A number have opened without review and approval of development services or under false pretenses, describing their businesses as engaging in activities such as computer repair or business centers that are for legal documents like copy, fax or western union, Barnes said.

Commissioners expressed views indicating that, for the most part, prohibiting gambling devices or facilities is the way to go.

Still, they raised questions about whether other cities in Lake County had similar ordinances.

Barnes reported that Mount Dora prohibits gambling devices, Leesburg strictly regulates gaming establishments, only allowing them in certain zoning districts and Howey-in-the-Hills, who adopted a moratorium in 2011 against them, took no action when the moratorium expired.

Barnes said they are using Seminole Countys ordinance, which prohibits them, as a guideline.

No one from the public spoke on the matter, but commissioners weighed in a little regarding their views.

Im for a total prohibition in line with Mount Dora and Seminole County, Commissioner Anthony Sabatini said.

Commissioner Linda Durham Bob simply said, This is a family town.

After the meeting, Mayor Bob Morin said he believes ridding the town of such establishments would be good for the city, but also for the people who frequent them.

"The majority of people that go to these Internet Cafes are low income or down on their luck and trying to get to the point of making some fast, easy money. But it doesnt always work that way or to their benefit, Morin said. We also dont want to have problems with robberies targeted at these types of places in our city.

Neibert said suspicions surrounding businesses in question arose when city officials in the process of conducting allowable inspections, such as fire or building inspections, noticed uses going on that seemed suspicious.

But they weren't in violation of current code.

An ordinance prohibiting the uses however, would place businesses involved in that type of activity in jeopardy.

They will immediately become illegal and would need to cease and desist, Neibert said.

Neibert also said every potential new business in town is required to fill out a business tax receipt, which includes a summary of services.

The city, he said, does as much as it can to ensure each new business sticks to the services they disclosed.

When these businesses filed their tax receipts, their classifications indicated they were legitimate businesses. We take that in good faith, but now, we have reason to believe that they are operating illegally and inconsistent with their business tax receipts, Neibert said.

See more here:

Eustis cracking down on illegal gambling - Daily Commercial

Fort Worth Star Telegram

Are Texas lawmakers ready to expand gambling in Texas? | Fort ... Fort Worth Star Telegram Lawmakers have filed plans to legalize fantasy sports, casinos, eight-liners, machines at horse tracks and more. Will any proposals pass before the session ends ... and more »

Read the rest here:

Are Texas lawmakers ready to expand gambling in Texas? | Fort ... - Fort Worth Star Telegram

Reading Eagle

A look at Pennsylvania casino gambling revenue Sacramento Bee Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering an expansion of casino gambling to help the state's deficit-ridden finances. Here is a look at the existing commercial gambling industry in Pennsylvania: ___. REVENUE. Pennsylvania is the nation's No. 2 commercial ... Pennsylvania eyes leap to internet for casinos, lotteryPocono Record all 6 news articles »

Read more here:

A look at Pennsylvania casino gambling revenue - Sacramento Bee

The Florida Senate will open the bidding in negotiations between House and Senate members over new gambling legislation.

A conference including six state representatives and six state senators will take place at 4 p.m. Thursday, during which the Senate will make a formal offer to House negotiators, state Sen. Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, confirmed.

Galvano is the conference chairman and is experienced in gambling legislation. He did not respond to questions about what exactly the Senate would offer.

Both the Senate and House passed gambling bills earlier in the legislative session, but the bills are vastly different, hence the negotiations.

The Senate bill would grant the Seminole Tribe the right to offer craps and roulette at its casinos; pari-mutuels in Broward and Miami-Dade counties would get blackjack; and pari-mutuels across the state would win the right to have slot machines if county voters approve of it. So far, eight counties outside of Broward and Miami-Dade, where slots are already legal, have done so.

The Senate bill would also allow pari-mutuels to stop racing animals and simply operate as casinos.

The House bill does none of those things. In fact, it states that pari-mutuels halting races would violate an agreement between the Seminole Tribe and the state.

That agreement is at the heart of both versions of the gambling legislation. A new agreement with the tribe is needed because provisions of the original 2010 deal that granted the Seminoles the right to offer blackjack have lapsed. The tribe continues to have the game because of a court order.

The state allowed pari-mutuels to operate designated player games such as three-card poker. The tribe maintained that these games were too similar to blackjack, thus violating the agreement. A court agreed, and a provision of the agreement allows the tribe to offer blackjack for the complete, 20-year duration of the agreement in the case of such a violation.

The tribe has come out against both the Senate and House versions of the gambling legislation. It wants the craps and roulette offered in the Senate version, but does not favor the increased competition the bill would create. And the House version has the tribe paying more money to the state but getting no new games in return.

dsweeney@SunSentinel.com, 954-356-4605 or Twitter @Daniel_Sweeney

Get Dan Sweeneys daily political newsletter, the Power Lunch, here.

Originally posted here:

Senate to open negotiations at Thursday gambling conference - Sun ... - Sun Sentinel (blog)

Saturday April 22 2017

A man gambles at Githurai estate in Nairobi on November 27, 2015. PHOTO | FILE | NATION MEDIA GROUP

A vicious battle between big industry players and smaller ones based in the countiesfor control of the betting, gaming and gambling sector has been going on even as government seeks to raise taxes of their earnings.

The big companies business model is carried in onlineand mobile platformswhile the small players have slot machines, mostly imported from China and targeting low-income earners.

On September 19 last year, the Betting Control and Licensing Board, the market regulator, wrote to all County Commissioners and directed them to mount a major crackdown, confiscate gaming machines and arraign the operators in a court of law.

The owners, fearing that they may be pushed out of business, and indicated they had licences from county governments, quickly moved to court challenging the legality of the regulators letter.

They were issued with temporary orders by Justice John Mativo. The judge directed the government, its officials and agents not to conductany crackdown on business premises where the slot machines are situated. He also directed themnot to suspend the business or close them until the hearing and determination of the suit. The suit is ongoing at the High Court.

The view of the bigger players appears to have been indicated two weeks ago when Mr Ronald Karauri, the chief executive of SportsPesa, arguably the biggest company today in the industry, waded into the debate by lauding President Uhuru Kenyatta for identifying the gambling machines as illegal.

We fully support President Uhuru Kenyattas concerns last Monday over the rising problem of underage gambling associated with illegal gambling machines, he said in press statement.

He went on to say they have previously raised the same concerns with the regulator and county governments constantly requesting them to curb this menace which has tarnished the industrys image and stands to ruin the lives of our children.

He seemed to have been reacting to the Presidents comments, during the launch of the Jubilee administration portal, on the proposed 50 per cent tax announced in the budget and the industry in general.

We were very concerned about the rise in betting especially among the school going children.

This technology has been had a positive impactbut it also had its downside. We felt as responsible government we needed to ensure we needed to make it more difficult for people to bet and those who wanted to bet that that money will go to causes that are social in nature and beneficial,: the president had said.

The president promised to ask Treasury to liaise with parliament to engage the industry players on the taxes but insisted they will not come too low.

Mr Sam Kahia, chairman of the slot machinesumbrella body, Kenya Counties Amusement and Gaming Society, said there is need to regulate the industry just like in Tanzania, Zambia and Malawi.

We commit to promote responsible gambling with interest of Kenyans coming first. Remember, Kenyansinvest and are protected by theConstitution. We went to BCLBoffices for licence but they declined so wewent to county offices and obtained licences only for the board to come later and term the operation illegal, he said.

He also claimed the machine operators employ may Kenyans and does not allow underage clients.

Board Chairman Kimani Kungu said the authority has been following the law.

Unscrupulous business people operate gaming premises with Chinese machines whose integrity cannot be verified and most have no importation documents nor evidence of payment of necessary taxes. It is mandatory that imported gaming equipment has to be authorised by Betting Control and Licensing Board, he said.

Kenya Revenue Authority is to impose a 20 per cent withholding tax on winnings

The repeat nominations will now be held on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

The doctors began their strike on December 5 last year paralysing the public health sector.

Read the original here:

Big industry players fight over billions in gambling - Daily Nation