Daily Archives: April 27, 2017

NATO exercise last deployment for Hill F-16s – Minuteman

Posted: April 27, 2017 at 1:46 am

ALBACETE AIR BASE, Spain --

Eight F-16 aircraft and more than 200 Airmen from the 388th Fighter Wing and 419th FW from Hill Air Force Base, Utah, are currently at Albacete Air Base, Spain, to participate in the NATO Tactical Leadership Programme through May 19.

TLP is an annual NATO Mission Commanders School training program and is designed to provide joint training to increase NATO air defense with participating allies.

The Tactical Leadership Program is a good opportunity for all the participating nations to work together, said Master Sgt. Daniel LaBrake, Combined Aerospace Logistics Coordinator and the only enlisted member from the U.S. Air Force stationed at the Spanish air base.

Hills fighter wings will participate in training with NATO allied air forces from ten other countries.

This is excellent training with some intense air operations and top of the line NATO jets from our coalition allies, said Lt. Col. Surya Frickel, 466th Fighter Squadron commander.

During the large force exercise, the Hill AFB pilots will fly alongside 20-30 allied aircraft daily and against as many adversaries. Part of the learning that goes on is how to operate safely with the different aircraft and unfamiliar environments, as well as different languages and procedures.

This exercise is a good example of the United States cooperation and long-lasting commitment to the security of Europe and maintaining readiness with our NATO allies, Frickel said.

Though the wings have been on several training deployments together, this is the first time Utahs 419th and 388th FWs are participating in TLP.

Traditionally, squadrons stationed in Europe participate in TLP, LaBrake said. So it has been a new challenge to coordinate all of the moving parts so these Airmen can come overseas and get this experience.

The deployment marks the last time the iconic multi-role fighter is scheduled to deploy from Hill AFB. F-16 aircraft from Hill's fighter wings have been flying over the skies of northern Utah for nearly 40 years.

This is the last time the F-16 will deploy with the Hill designator HL painted on its tail, said Col. Michael Miles, 388th Maintenance Group commander. We are extremely proud of the job we have done with the F-16 and we must do our best here at TLP to preserve the memory of the aircraft that is so dear to our hearts.

Hills fleet of F-16s is being replaced by the Air Forces newest fighter jet, the F-35 Lightning II. The first operational F-35As arrived at Hill AFB in October 2015. Hill currently has 20 F-35As and will eventually be home to three operational squadrons by the end of 2019. The 388th and 419th FWs fly and maintain the aircraft in a Total Force partnership, which capitalizes on the strength of both components.

View post:
NATO exercise last deployment for Hill F-16s - Minuteman

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on NATO exercise last deployment for Hill F-16s – Minuteman

The NSA Is Building the Countrys Biggest Spy Center (Watch …

Posted: at 1:45 am

vF7wI%j%,DJjDJfu<}&I]U(pqVL@Ua=?_z|{y}{!{Jf^tK-T{Sx_nth5a4}~2%cRO8"U{AYn}2LU3rwf?M>]kzzQqU4]y2_ 2EAUA.2_NuziUA"E"%Ss-sO[{zlJDan1 Tgy=P@3>a !r2>XZ;<*Md Wo>ye5G%e3'q9iTx=LT8eYc?.TzluvZ'fcJ>:f_RM8qY>hJ$8[a>tyd7{?moyV L}W!3x/zG?O6B4~ujlb{o@I{M#}c" wT2]9 ^: 3 ~e8J.TzmT B EX0% ^?P^=a18=PQ~uy_U?xI@V6oQ }_&1|XkiblQ)0BgMw[OiNJc' t'a^l@ ;?p^sV{^^`zCi',s7{yrL*88*X_|~=nyH[h=:=q==_38?+/D/G9Q$!`(nAgVNxf_JRTr{qk;hJO

<"f6$j(0E'$(NUM4 /*V5lx[g]}xCew}wT;&u#wOT0P0M-wE.A.Cka}_0|R[f]HN-Oj0?5S!Mrj[#*kV?]% qwfw0nPPadgJ}@ W?Ks&2v5w8; 2Q>'Icop:$CLAN t!q(L@ KGP$$# )#2U1K3'p1II&@7< #uLKwKl6Vx9PyN0,Tq<;4?qh7[.Z|IkePV 16?;wD/1UBIoxsvTyP 32SBmw2e>[NDX#y>;=3T`/|hKOcM/7a?sbEk>N7 R t'dCX|e.~0(fUUN.~jy68YhB9`!v,e9]Ia'q(MIhi]B%qQpmF .A{ : z>pWs=Mkl&lA# * Q+eK]R.o.h ";oY'&^;8VG&rm)_|bNJ5,f}e k+K2ScdxkzV%5b~:{'mLA, pD>B.Mog=Gyx@TF7LAi5?? x1G.jnxllVlLtz9)o3} 4e8W,~TO-4~|{Z OHG1`OUq(!EYnlnnYG&a& p9=|%BynppVb_oFK%&= j)Xjg;+kF2QUK`:+yIX 9_$8+tn5G8&P2j<{kV?b@i]hzvi)C(@AlQD*RG)'z7Ds*w&ahi1z&w8U>T2$=dwc$$xYJ>0C/8s8`vL'}i6w4,m6`-Eg+c!hge38rjNW1'[Gx&ZaXm;BDF0.4:SqQz A]>b!BeC6r@NPAn 8#%zlzuW(QJ$,T]5G ~0*pBd# s{9E)@>cBQMz4Nzis4?rb[Q fspO4)EoD cfr6:XFuUl t{J[n9Y7`Saao`aAJFXl(CY{e,MSY4}=&h6k&xU-Fj USAX="336$7G(&K:l{Cd9}cKD`Hq4Npak~5%+8tfM>>|GN^~6;gu 9?9AkK(&qYh,~{Lbi-MQYd"ZBr$,$@x'>, U|82i=_?1\a/czak@ly<0)[gFiUN&KD{4fG#]m)^zo[X]i.B@l=Yrnx?ERR6`z@E_DE>> WfNI9PL'>RZng)/Gt9[dG9G 8{Slrs1(9GEK5mxLdTX|X&yFlXf(lO1nNc,wlX2LMA2!wL0j ,NCvlK.`!:6LrouO+M$;UI{qkjq>G{wi>dlnD%n9pU(lTK#Ag+0nGUo5]qKocOKaf4AuW.:VEW^TblWZx:>RnV6:)_c|c(lCm'%W]z2=~*;.Fk*=UC[YDB+% &:IYRMb6lhM8S!1a?I'aGpq#nHYkng}a?OzVo ={27H0U<0'IU)ZfCB;P`9>gZ3}M+lwE2{PHiB?}Y|$KS#e#!2{9I2>r`tuwh2s>U 0P#lt=&~s"=.0I/1S<.)ZO-g[8>MMH [C?q&OcbjxM|)&|`tyVT?uV 9UiBdycBUESDJ?@;$nnzSv?dK6'CD70"?,)C

yE5=zn6hCL&~b{bK&7LdU'ff% )->NMW[{X>Z9G m 0wq8UI43y>}t`Y%yo2y{ft,dc6(?`#E)ybBzUT D>!=jFuL1$}$$H)Tvv?9"byhESg@drk)<*?gJw$&?Wj(SMx.e,@j{sM `[U.iHbZ-?%AD'LcmFHqHged7iB*i~,6$*lK'"'%^@ |BP:0M9nG#H D'}Yi,BA&iHIL2%KcPpmBu$!Mx+ Fp8/OTp0 gG'P>IDH%1Q7F< B%q;W9+:F2)"F $8} :$>]Ph#3c(~0 cb)r'asMDF1'~L,"$Xz'7x@lE)pVBvgN4ezAzj&3}HB0brFhDh,13cAPzMsa"PdObJU}IUEid9JX?=!%"74 Xz#9f9bQoJ1BfO:LH+H0JOC$:}tY$C[6Cd14 z$~Hi!tH>A=CFv /e*vXK<8lD9!/&S9c`cK//cUj~w">BN !hSLg# HK{4$gF89rbX@Zs@/FEoL-czkQ"|(JSxKx^ff6P-}"y,HKfkOID#ls/7#8r,>8B-8qBcp4 iY3"?>/389dpk&)jQq2`+QZ{{g5Kt_O 9V!73Q}ZY*.*&;p8U 6vEV[d=W-$LB3{ppn|^SaHL4+F^;fh(sd4f1`v|k98)wPRlEa3KDYXv^I/IJcVi_4W/QEuW1}2{yeen*PX r%1cGpS~45QpsWU5 ;`s }r $Mz9 V*"*wBt'D=IaWqim*P5t@F9[O ykCz~ADL'z5JH[%Lr4i H$}p:7G9Q_CHzf!QT027R)P89M:NaYp%8s&'>i+;xUUs(1{*aKVnLdDO@{Sdt08 IFS'dg'An 1tj,}-$tF4#B-XW3.XsI12(Se%3fCi0,f`PXR"uv!:t)c:u-@y< j%50>;G eH@$F*Xb"3aM@DX%|6XJ ccJ iqa=1F:/X>ScGX|#c D2 AD+"a(D!~ vfNQ(lV0 tCc5b>S1)/W&"7'iXGflpr( :{I`SeP!7!6Ajl0+&H<{o-5UpRaKiz1'q7S,$HdNb66dlRHLW;>S!F Q[G!a|t.D@=&h[G$9Py^PH@GGcKrDa`F-q$oK8%:h 1"/ Cf$CA_p ?N[6"XGs 9q>JK[ISGF:96 +'-X,A|Dx[5ZJ1i9P>bthm fnK#l`; HI.]XX:e$lux H1 #as=#{qhpb cf?u4'|6kmh=N'$BN{2rL~"q}`&Rd9D.pq};e@01#9Q,Q$? ;z^y8b ,l13rQJOAO &HfE0sgflv=I{#@!KIOLYWAP,sRY+]K$SsOH5Gt -*Rq~?VG{DgZI D0ccF04Qb0Y$YL9D]aHK9Y>xt+_@0Pp ~6Vw9of-1, ,.3_6As%8o<:7i8Jm^?GJ boM&h!kH ,..h _#zrco8V{GFt6+%>0LY YY';hj:>Dbx6+QS8_gC/HCb"yQPp#Xy~+xSdtBbmli$p$$L#ZN0P~Eqk@Q&_g82rC x)DZY )ll2,7|(g| b"yggI#:HFktDghtyUe#4j1._dTJc:)-Cm_0(S f=ja-jDXqY'D9O^>=}4NvaK4HM!-Z"4@`+=Iamc6WjFU=9%hD z(b(qu#fBr(k^rE6b uK'V9v$:rL/ydL3!BhiJa /PvuVt9T:FOPfe2Ge{q9 JO4 c'&,E:X$,"qYM{h,;d9+hdr,k.`*"XSi.V e$&N}lhJ+Om"?(>*k`|u7qNIVVkU$BITf((~I7Ti".h9w EGa'QB@L>/3kC>X%rF&MGX0RQS#~wk;H$_T!!TlgN>hWwhc$!B`~iU8GzyM 's)5I9Q5LQH)|em{O`s@:(:^pJ E] $A>&R>[HsJ<_:JI@B|Em| >9>+qQ mG+9+w{fk&%'Sb^Kz'0$?T__ ^+So;]Gct%9AsR ]fF+% _ZdpJEi Bk{iB4uUY%^PjJSK0IkA,ZN"XMO(Sq 2tfj(Jkkw7S<#qv:JWI&$%b M*DENlvIT5% Q%}].'p{j]Kz.=_*pa,&{L3)_P^LzFlb6XZ$!)L.$q,&gA3 {K '3mfX9kT k)NR)s[qd+d6S] E.mb4FN|.W:F+o:n$2Z;k.5R:tL,w6d@ AbikAxw"* $5.cqC6 ~sHNfH8L60I(0kZSEO8[`1r b8/i!5sC= 1#IN+ 5WE}^wv.v%$o9+}arBSlYZrFb6)cY>3l>Nl@f%Dis#Hb`%FYj9%G*,*"`I|^ HpS,)u+b s r1c!q*?l]1FN0BQQ]>h2?%)$p=RHD.dHr<.'I|3{zM)SvEOSkRq %PbTfk n#s%LVI9@8}xKSDN+t!tMsQs)l#1gkMA|C?iS"#DiBq9n4X CK7%)27q>;jKx 9;+]wzEq_:sEuJ!6vsc4~Zn >ltecuiU^Eyy7Q<8lqAnd1:m t=8* /=wZ:81][I1QfKc9}jrm-'n?')d%sFWg .6tUf %Mu(a:Z(}S!MfM;IRK"4~q${OPi!}UFbzL+YN9*Y`s,Lqqz6q-',$glDTF4`?I:l9?ZARb/vpX - =(TVRpH\xP/YYmRG .%Ij]"q(^R0F U3>ZPmXq`@8:g Tg8-IMXY/r gr%UyEwI/ KP43M-i^U -2li6BCA<}ud%@bhc1(E8""O2Nrx) RfR=z:a_HNj7Ut@)c1wiQzu( +Lmr_$aAz&fLp)K78LMo]JCwDb_~/klTxZs- d3`CxUQ "n UXc>Z85&a9'Rsnd=V 0NW&jrT MZv@RO D1YtA!b%WjcWJs4q>INCD))Sq*ZmOJ )E=&'u}:zR=CG b6KBrhS "QPxgVA3FjIUI}!fbdnA ^w[ 7 qa KFaPk43[an&&4'I7.(h,V:3vqmpcxkJ NK$TI )/3#7R4W =7$JY1D: 5Zjg,uIWtS{moFnuHn0'}V;I>_3^VH<9-U!y29xfa2VE r*8vK^(AD:GGv9K:*Wz U 4]`-6T:S B;hMqllt jt kG;._g)|ujP;b)<>q cs)V31bw/C Rp f0S]tC!W<8<5$= AHd0u;hF8.UNF6|hFOG+sS avg12Q4&c j4eJ K&*),nIfXu-&qB63BD,Q^QDikW3v'|HbD:]"S..(No04 E%#1 bL):r K{a"-]&#U/9>45W]S! 3FB- kwcG{UCjox5pXT$`6mnKYBp#[-^#yy Hz? [T`}XH% %!P (T"i=7>T/,IKngX cAPI}xT}]i]RU+vcdy46UY"*b1*fKfzYHzuN.#m0PT+PLk?QFmUYTHi^~=y7M|mrY )fnu^GP rqx)!8U2 Jf-taTLX@NRD6:/Gu>p!%&v2p9bV;$X^(?2U7l6t$gF,g `Id*<@qR1g/8uK#js~'q8R^b&s"3HI6&l*&UXx4JSl)YR"HsWW6V&J/kjdRRv^nbHOOu)`JA }4c=s*2{,f3d>97>dcR#;tK};VKBs3P$&2Svsi' JfLqO]L^eu0i4SVjRV% Cu"/wu1V.%,lLl9o c;2GHj4uOpWivX [M7W}CFZ"PuO8b IF.0p+KxM`zP]X#StK$Ue*C_1*"LH#Qn$H3|12vEHT(m`|qJs(:VTep1WY&yn>'eEJ6p 'J,;] "K-e&QRTb] 5:+^b1iVZ*l|l 86]<1}-WJ1iqJE3;Vjx/DF(* Zixm+g$b17>RSxTvLK;EQ pBUf+1v9)% ncG&4_ZujI0 =`b*E)m}T:a:)R'&x B:AJ3dBr1*%%N>/#sZP?N3<(3&bpmG9*$(l9% Y-w3%a~9~CTL)gi &e(`*pZ6Yv]`8 mr W W.H9+v;#hJf!cU76+]c{PDlme&BO4vVbiI'JA4A!$?0hHnrt8aKGm|P'o.8{s`K9T_6[c#qs[nPAin.T4I 7e]&la9+D~sm3 z#qQx^1aKPILvu=Hmwt-8M}.Y-zl,M%"}_r2ib>]i,>b- eq)8pu=iyGtnQXH|5`/)9w0Dtn"Io/P&)rm{(1r-I` vtVFutk1Mo77s4>BmwD[ t;-bTc&_; xj#Gi;;cX}TjdYDI}0I krgrj].hJNUu"]kox $(Ee]7eumR^}oQ"n2(1gmkT*sBsJD*j@URH7V2&o]#U0&o;!3?>UgL^AEmOk|)59ZBybGCSNG'lU[:he%nyZw&(l]s3&[dfsB9SfF.64#H37K{hq"#PR-8!2k^y;d"]mR$e:)t[uJ6;ZLB1d9?N;gIv+tX4i#>*a`6ZGA9hK2[{[-qjF&HVs)<%3yq(8gw7#6sjRt/h^b1a!x)& Sy-P$mU$g$Nr+"{|~q l(%hl'jtw@7ax<'6Llp- 0aIJ%/v_!27(s^J&O/}09|yEt;3IfG.AF=va(gIm:!YsmbqF$d`|G-|COB$&=t(]1C=Xe+`wS/_E<-]tf%Jux=! f_pm2C%]3{ >8$#/Wo}8|BEXD}n3c}t':_G9cs}~W4Oa|+G|H8]PUHjId +bTqZI-$,yE9 L{CW"m0ikX$5cFiuZMOf!!h|,#2# z!i_qG$478W2t=UF^/Ua}OfC;B#C]COh_tRDAt/b%tcItR8C"XdGoAO(-LbEI?O'}>l{A]eAVf)j3,?Y(,";:Y9BRkUwl")~CY}i5L&SSmc5ny%Rj)pFC0>]f#Zf)1z(-:H.,k(|=!pQfcM4 Ua iq m~ZS~'{|l)4*!e@_&UC0Qq:[t!=R;Nv-onB<{=z/Tkz "bn3A7d?>%//7:[ 2b;?4[?4ZM]Bf- Id TpF`,GA_EBA2ysBuZc knfsk>m6'^%lvt??un~hG=g>ILSb2/>M2#:}Rcc3QUMlF-du761F1dH$a;=[:kF*:[RyR)3k8BS}zdEpo@{B(4 Q1'1C;~IVfF{g!(,-z4(3vJKHOQmuW?XyoJ)rIN:?NT#xGfktfN}xVI[OHcV

See the original post here:
The NSA Is Building the Countrys Biggest Spy Center (Watch ...

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on The NSA Is Building the Countrys Biggest Spy Center (Watch …

NSA blimp spied on US citizens – TRUNEWS

Posted: at 1:45 am

April 26, 2017

An NSA spying blimp known as the Hover Hammer was seen by several residents of Maryland, according to The Intercept.

To residents of Maryland, catching an occasional glimpse of a huge white blimp floating in the sky is not unusual. For more than a decade, the military has used the state as a proving ground for new airships destined for Afghanistan or Iraq. But less known is that the test flights have sometimes served a more secretive purpose involving National Security Agency surveillance.

Back in 2004, a division of the NSA called the National Tactical Integration Office fitted a 62-foot diameter airship called the Hover Hammer with an eavesdropping device, he continued, adding that The agency launched the three-engine airship at an airfield near Solomons Island, Maryland.

From there, the blimp was able to vacuum up international shipping data emanating from the Long Island, New York area,' Gallagher explained, citing a classified document published on Monday. The spy equipment on the airship was called Digital Receiver Technology a proprietary system manufactured by a Maryland-based company of the same name which can intercept wireless communications, including cellphone calls.

The report continuedby saying, Unsurprisingly, privacy groups have expressed concerns about the prospect of the blimps being used domestically to spy on Americans. However, military officials have often been quick to dismiss such fears.

TRUNEWS copy/TRUNEWS analysis

Donate Today!

We believe Christians need and deserve their own global news network to keep the worldwide Church informed, and to offer Christians a positive alternative to the anti-Christian bigotry of the mainstream news media

More here:
NSA blimp spied on US citizens - TRUNEWS

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on NSA blimp spied on US citizens – TRUNEWS

Russian Cybercriminals Are Loving Those Leaked NSA Windows … – Forbes

Posted: at 1:45 am


Forbes

Here is the original post:
Russian Cybercriminals Are Loving Those Leaked NSA Windows ... - Forbes

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on Russian Cybercriminals Are Loving Those Leaked NSA Windows … – Forbes

The NSA’s Eye in the Sky: Blimp Spies on Americans – The New American

Posted: at 1:45 am

The surveillance hawks it would appear are never satisfied. When it comes to harvesting the data of American citizens, their mantra seems to be too much is never enough. The most recently revealed tool in the considerable arsenal of the surveillance state is a three-engine blimp equipped with eavesdropping apparatus.

As the online magazine The Intercept is reporting, the 62-foot diameter airship ominously named the Hover Hammer was fitted with an eavesdropping device back in 2004. The Intercept published a classified document on Monday as part of the Snowden Archive. That classified document shows that the Hover Hammer can be manned or remotely piloted and has already done demonstration flights up to 10,700 feet including a test in which the airship launched from an airfield near Solomons Island, Maryland and was able to intercept international shipping data emanating from the Long Island, New York area, including lines of bearing. Just to clarify, both Maryland and Long Island, New York, are in the United States, so the fact that the Hover Hammer intercepted international shipping data is considerably less than the whole story. In sweeping up that data, the Digital Receiver Technology model 1301 receiver onboard the airship undoubtedly also picked up domestic communications including mobile phone calls, texts, mobile data traffic, and presumably WiFi and other signals.

Moreover, since the document dated August 9, 2004 also says that other experiments were being conducted at that time including the use of onboard imagery sensors, it is a foregone conclusion that the past 13 years have been a heyday of domestic surveillance for the NSA (which operates the aircraft) and other three-letter-agencies that make up the surveillance state. After all, imagery sensors is just tech jargon for cameras. It is to be expected that these imagery sensors would include heat signature sensors as well as infrared sensors. This aircraft even as it existed in 2004 is a surveillance dream come true and a privacy living nightmare.

Of course, it is certain that the aircraft is not what it was in 2004; technology never stands still. In fact, the classified document leaked by Snowden and only recently published by The Intercept as part of the Snowden Archive shows that in 2004, the craft was already being sized up for more changes than just the addition of onboard imagery sensors:

The current plans are to develop the airship for unmanned operations at altitudes of approximately 20,000 feet for up to 48 hours. Future variants are planned to be 200 feet in diameter and will operate at 68,000 feet with mission durations of up to six months. NTIO and S3's Tactical Platforms are already collaborating on options for deploying SIGINT systems on this platform.

So, bigger is better in the darkened minds of the surveillance hawks. If the Hover Hammer could read signals from Maryland to Long Island being a mere 62 feet in diameter and topping out at flights reaching just under 11,000 feet, imagine what could be done with a 200-foot diameter craft flying at 68,000 feet.

And, as The Intercepts Ryan Gallagher pointed out in the article linked above, these eyes in the sky are big business for the surveillance state, which has big plans for them:

In recent years, airships or aerostats, as they are formally called have been a source of major military investment. Between 2006 and 2015, the U.S. Army paid Raytheon some $1.8 billion to develop a massive missile-defense blimp called the JLENS, which is equipped with powerful radar that can scan in any direction 310 miles. (Thats almost the entire length of New York state.) In October 2015, the JLENS attracted national attention after one became untethered amid testing and drifted north from Maryland to Pennsylvania before it was brought back under control. In 2010, the Army commissioned another three airships called Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicles as part of a $517 million contract with Northrop Grumman. The company stated that the airships would shape the future of the militarys intelligence-gathering capabilities and provide a persistent unblinking stare from the sky.

Of course, the surveillance hawks are not the least bit above misleading or even outright lying to the American people for whom they presumably work. As The Intercept article says:

Unsurprisingly, privacy groups have expressed concerns about the prospect of the blimps being used domestically to spy on Americans. However, military officials have often been quick to dismiss such fears. In August 2015, Lt. Shane Glass told Baltimore broadcaster WBAL that the JLENS blimps being tested in Maryland were not equipped with cameras or eavesdropping devices. There are no cameras on the system, and we are not capable of tracking any individuals, Glass stated.

Even if that were true and considering the fact that the surveillance state is populated by pathological liars, that would be a thin limb to go out on it is irrelevant. JLENS is small fries compared to the Hover Hammer, and there are likely other such aircraft that we know nothing of yet.

While Americans have known about much of what the three-letter-agencies of the surveillance state have been up to, the truth, it turns out, is even darker than many may have imagined. The surveillance hawks have built their Panopticon; they just built it in the sky. The all-seeing eye giving them a persistent unblinking stare means that when the surveillance hawks in both the intelligence community and Congress have complained about the problem of terrorists and other criminals going dark, they were lying.

This does of course underscore the importance of encrypting as much of your data and communications as possible. Encryption truly is the great equalizer in the battle for digital privacy. As this writer has said time and again: encrypt everything. If the surveillance hawks are going to take to the skies to harvest your data, make them waste their time (and your money) harvesting unintelligible gibberish that does them no good (and you no harm) without the decryption keys.

Image: Screenshot of YouTube video of Raytheon JLENS airship

Follow this link:
The NSA's Eye in the Sky: Blimp Spies on Americans - The New American

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on The NSA’s Eye in the Sky: Blimp Spies on Americans – The New American

EXCLUSIVE: Only 2 House Dems Have Examined Those Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Docs – Daily Caller

Posted: at 1:45 am

5618254

Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes is the only Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence other than Rep. Adam Schiff, the panels ranking minority member, to review intelligence files showing former White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice unmasked aides to President Donald Trump during his transition to the Oval Office, The Daily Caller News Foundations Investigative Group has learned.

The apparent lack of interest among the remaining seven Democrats on the intelligence panel is in striking contrast to their earlier vocal demands that they see the documents after committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes disclosed he had read them at the White House complex.

According to a source with knowledge of congressional visits to the National Security Agency, the classified documents have been available to committee members for three weeks, but Himes and Schiff are the lone Democrats to review them.

Unmasking refers to what happens when somebody reveals a previously redacted name of an American citizen who was incidentally overheard by U.S. intelligence assets while talking to a foreigner.

Rice, who worked for President Barack Obama, was authorized to request such redacted names, but it is a criminal offense to make the name public or to ask another person to do so. Penalties include up to $10,000 and as many as five years in prison.

Im scheduled to go to one of our agencies tomorrow to view those documents, Himes toldCNNs Wolf Blitzer April 5.The lawmaker did not disclose where he would review the documents, but the source confirmed toTheDCNF that Himes did so at the NSAs Ft. Meade, Maryland, facility.

Schiff, who is fromCalifornia, especially slammed Trump administration officials for allowing Nunes to review the documents before other committee members were allowed to do so.

Were still trying to get those documents for the full committee, Schiff saidin an April 6 CNN interview.We would like the White Houses help if they are sincere about wanting to share this information. But as yet we have not been able to make those documents available to the full committee.

The absence of Democrats from the NSA reading room extends to their committee staffs. Both Democratic and Republican House intelligence committee staff were cleared to view the intelligence at Ft. Meade.

A large contingent of Republican staff have camped out at the NSA Headquarters reviewing the documents.

The Republican side staff is heavily engaged for weeks, the source told TheDCNF. Republican staffers have been spending all day at NSA, three days a week. The minority (Democratic) staff have been there a fraction of that time.

Two Republican members of the committee other than Nunes have since reviewed the documents, but the source declined to reveal their names. Nunes has since recused himself on the Russia meddling issue but is still the lead on the Rice issue. Texas Rep. Mike Conaway is fulfilling the chairmans duties on the Russian probe.

Ron Hosko, a 30-year FBI veteran and its former assistant director, condemned Democrats for not reviewing the documents, telling TheDCNF that it may be a reflection of hypocrisy that we see coming out of this committee.

Hosko also suggested, This could be information they do not want to possess. They dont want the facts to get in the way of what theyre saying publicly. So now theyre avoiding it.

White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II invitedSchiff March 30 to examine the documents at the NSC. The next day the congressman traveled to examine the files at the NSC offices on the White House grounds.

Since then, Schiff has been uncharacteristically mum about what he has seen. He has said nothing about what he saw in the files.

In deciding to share the NSA intelligence with all House intelligence committee members, the Trump administration broke tradition set in 1947 and upheld by every president since then.

The 1947 National Security Act limited intelligence sharing with Congress to only eight leaders of the House and Senate: the Speaker of the House, the House minority leader, the Senate majority and minority leaders, along with the chairmen of the House and Senate intelligence committees.

Previous chief executives have since fully informed Congress of intelligence matters by limiting the classified material to the group, which is informally known as the Gang of Eight.

It was McGahns March 30 invitation to Schiff that broke the precedent. Then the Trump administrations opened the door to unprecedented heights, allowing all members of the House intelligence committee to view the NSA intelligence.

Follow Richard on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].

View original post here:
EXCLUSIVE: Only 2 House Dems Have Examined Those Susan Rice 'Unmasking' Docs - Daily Caller

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on EXCLUSIVE: Only 2 House Dems Have Examined Those Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Docs – Daily Caller

Jeremy Johnson to invoke Fifth Amendment in campaign scheme lawsuit – Salt Lake Tribune

Posted: at 1:45 am

On Tuesday, as the FEC case restarted in Salt Lake City's U.S. District Court, Johnson's attorney said his decision not to cooperate with the government stems in part from the Swallow case.

Johnson was ordered to a 30-day jail sentence for refusing to testify and has been held in solitary confinement since he was returned to a California federal prison where he is serving an 11-year sentence for his conviction in another case.

"He had not been in this situation until after he refused to testify in the John Swallow case," Kara Porter told U.S. District Judge Dee Benson. Johnson understands that failing to respond to the FEC's demands for evidence comes with consequences, Porter said, but he doesn't trust the government.

FEC attorney Kevin Hancock said Johnson should have to explain with specificity just why he fears the government if he plans to invoke the Fifth Amendment.

Porter disagreed and said she wasn't aware of any requirement for defendants to "identify their fear level." Johnson, she said, has good reason for his caution. Past promises of immunity offered to Johnson by federal prosecutors in exchange for information in other cases were ignored, triggering both the criminal case brought against him and the FEC civil action, she said.

Any missteps or statement he makes could be seen as inconsistent by government attorneys and grounds for new criminal charges.

"Mr. Johnson is understandably skeptical about the federal government's intentions toward him," Porter said.

Swallow's attorney Scott C. Williams told Benson he believes Johnson has cause for concern. The FEC case, he told Benson, is based largely on supposedly confidential statements Johnson was "incentivized" to make in 2013 interviews with state and federal agents investigating alleged acts of corruption by Swallow and his predecessor Mark Shurtleff.

Since then, Johnson has told the Swallow defense team that his statements to agents are "not reliable" and that if deposed or called to testify he would deny that Swallow had aided and abetted him in any election-fraud scheme.

Benson sided with the FEC's attorneys, however, ordering Porter to file a response to the government's motions for evidence that offers some explanation of Johnson's refusals.

Johnson and Swallow have denied involvement in any scheme or effort to illegally bundle campaign contributions.

FEC attorneys say the funds went to the campaigns of U.S. Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Harry Reid, D-Nev., as well as Shurtleff during the 2009-2010 election cycle.

Court papers say all the money came from Johnson, once a successful internet marketer, who was directed by Swallow to push the money through conduit contributors.

Under FEC rules, individual campaign contributions are capped at $2,400.

On Tuesday the FEC said it is preparing subpoenas for each of the individuals they believe were repaid by Johnson or his companies for making contributions.

jdobner@sltrib.com

See the original post:
Jeremy Johnson to invoke Fifth Amendment in campaign scheme lawsuit - Salt Lake Tribune

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Jeremy Johnson to invoke Fifth Amendment in campaign scheme lawsuit – Salt Lake Tribune

The Uber engineer accused of stealing 14000 documents from Waymo can’t use the Fifth Amendment to stop Uber from … – Quartz

Posted: at 1:45 am

Anthony Levandowski, the Uber executive and former Waymo employee at the center of a trade-secrets lawsuit between the two firms, wont be able to use the Fifth Amendments protections against self-incrimination to prevent Uber from turning over documents in the case, an appellate court ruled today.

Levandowski is the key figure in the suit that Waymo, the self-driving car unit spun off by Google parent Alphabet, filed in February. Waymo has accused Levandowski of stealing 14,000 files, amounting to 9.7 gigabytes of highly confidential data, before leaving the company in January 2016. He went on to start Otto, a driverless trucking startup that was acquired by Uber last year for $680 million.

Waymo alleges that Levandowski started talking with Uber about forming a self-driving car startup Uber would be interested in buying as early as mid-2015. It has urged the court to bar him from any work related to Ubers self-driving-car efforts.

Levandowski isnt a named defendant in the suitthose are Uber and Ottobut as a central figure he has retained his own counsel. In late March, Levandowski invoked the Fifth because of the potential for criminal action, precluding Uber from disclosing certain information requested by the court.

After multiple appeals, the court denied Levandowskis request as it applies to the documents sought from Uber. We are not persuaded that the district court erred in its ruling requiring defendants to produce an unredacted privilege log, states an order from the US court of appeals for the federal circuit, according to a copy viewed by Quartz. The unredacted privilege log is the evidence the court ordered Uber to produce and which Levandowski said could potentially incriminate him.

Mr. Levandowski has therefore failed to establish that he has a clear and indisputable right to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, the order concludes.

Levandowskis failed bid to use the Fifth here could prove very bad for Uber if it forces the company to serve up incriminating documents. Even without those documents, William Alsup, the federal judge overseeing the case, has called Waymos case against Uber extraordinary, saying earlier this month, I have never seen a record this strong in 42 years.

Correction: An earlier version of this story suggested the court denied Levandowskis ability to take the Fifth Amendment; what it specifically rejected was the argument that his Fifth Amendment rights should preclude Uber from turning over potentially incriminating documents sought in the case.

Read next: Waymo is hitting Uber where it hurts

Originally posted here:
The Uber engineer accused of stealing 14000 documents from Waymo can't use the Fifth Amendment to stop Uber from ... - Quartz

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on The Uber engineer accused of stealing 14000 documents from Waymo can’t use the Fifth Amendment to stop Uber from … – Quartz

Fifth Amendment won’t save Mautino, Wehrli argues – DuPage Policy Journal

Posted: at 1:45 am

Invoking the Fifth Amendment wont protect Auditor General Frank Mautino from House Joint Resolution 9, Rep. Grant Wehrli (R-Naperville) said after the State Board of Elections hearing on Mautino recently.

Today we heard that his Fifth Amendment rights were invoked in response to a State Board of Elections subpoena, Wehrli told the Edgar County Watchdogs (ECW), a government oversight group. That should tell us everything we need to know about the ethics of Mr. Frank Mautino.

Wehrli said a bill to force Mautinos ouster is currently in the General Assembly.

I think its time for Frank Mautino to resign, he said. House Joint Resolution 9 was filed back in January; it calls for his resignation. It would give him the opportunity to come forward and answer these questions questions that he has had multiple, multiple opportunities to answer, and he simply decides not to.

The scandal surrounding Mautinos campaign contribution spending began in January 2016 after the Illinois Times reported that Mautino had continued to collect campaign donations between his appointment to the auditor general post in October 2015 and assuming the position on Jan. 1, 2016.

The ECW, intrigued by the story and the campaigns explanation that the donations were used to pay for office expenses and close up shop, conducted an investigation of Mautinos campaign spending, reviewing data in his Campaign Disclosure Expenditure List. The group found that the campaign had paid more than $213,000 to one service station for fuel and repairs between March 2005 and December 2015.

The campaign also wrote checks totaling a similar amount to Spring Valley City Bank, which the campaign said was a method to get cash for campaign-related payments, but no receipts for those payments have been provided.

Illinois resident David Cooke submitted a complaint to the State Board of Elections that led to that bodys investigation and the recent hearing. Mautinos campaign contribution spending is also now the subject of a federal investigation.

Despite mounting evidence of suspicious spending, Mautino has not answered questions to ease the concerns of some lawmakers and Illinoisans, culminating in his invoking Fifth Amendment protections at the State Board of Elections hearing. While Mautino has refused to offer explanations, his supporters, including Speaker of the House Michael Madigan (D-Chicago), have maintained that a full review of the case will prove his innocence.

One of the things that Speaker Madigan said was that Frank Mautino would be vindicated once all evidence was out there, and now here today we heard that Frank Mautino invoked his Fifth Amendment [rights] in response to a subpoena, Wehrli said. So, I dont know how were ever going to get to the bottom of this if Frank wont even testify on his own behalf.

The ECW pointed out in its interview with Wehrli, who was accompanied by fellow Mautino critic Rep. Jeanne Ives (R-Wheaton), that the documents presented in the hearing have been sealed, even though the hearing itself was open.

It once again just makes me question the transparency of all of this, Wehrli said. These records should be public. This was a public hearing in which documents were provided. Those records should absolutely be a matter of public record. Now, as of today [] Im not a lawyer, but they should be.

Wehrli has also pushed for greater transparency in campaign spending through House Bill 0415, which would require copies or images of receipts to be submitted along with expenditure reports. At the hearing, Wehrli and Ives were the only two of the states 118 representatives to have their campaign reporting brought to the table.

You know youre over the target when youre taking flak, Wehrli said. That was a shot right at us [], but its simply a low form of intimidation, and it wont stick. If we can get the speaker to get HB 415 out of Rules and get that as law, then all of this goes away because everything will be out there for all to see.

Here is the original post:
Fifth Amendment won't save Mautino, Wehrli argues - DuPage Policy Journal

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Fifth Amendment won’t save Mautino, Wehrli argues – DuPage Policy Journal

Will the Supreme Court agree to hear the Fourth Amendment cell-site cases? (And should they?) – Washington Post

Posted: at 1:44 am

As John Elwood noted recently at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court has relisted a set of pending cert petitions on whether the Fourth Amendment protects historical cell-site data. The relisting means that the justices didnt turn down the petitions at the usual time. They are holding the petitions, deferring a decision on whether to grant them. Thats usually a sign of some interest at the court. How much interest there is, we dont yet know.

I have mixed views on whether the court should take these cases. On one hand, theres no split. Every circuit court and state supreme court to rule on the issue has ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not protect historical cell-site data. The cert petitions claim a circuit split with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, but I dont think thats right. The 3rd Circuit merely speculated about the possibility of Fourth Amendment protection in the course of making a statutory ruling.

A clear split would be helpful in this kind of case because once you say that historical cell-site data can be protected, you then get to the really hard issue of when it is protected. Is it always protected? Is it protected only in some aggregate fashion under a mosaic theory? Does the resolution of the location data in the records make a difference? Is there a warrant requirement? What is the particularity of a cell-site warrant? There are no obvious answers to those questions. It might help the justices in a future Supreme Court decision to have the benefit of circuit court rulings trying to answer those questions.

On the other hand, theres a plausible argument that the court should take the cases now without a split. That argument can draw on several different points. First, whether the Fourth Amendment protects historical cell site data is a hugely important question. The Supreme Court should step in and rule on it an some point. Second, while there is no split, there are certainly lots of opinions on the other side. Most obviously, there were 4th Circuit and 11th Circuit panel decisions, both later overturned en banc, that could provide the food for thought on the other side (even if rather unusual food for thought) that a split would ordinarily help provide.

Third, this issue is coming up so often, in almost every state and circuit, that a split is likely to emerge eventually. Fourth, the technology seems relatively stable, permitting the justices to weigh the need for equilibrium-adjustment. And fifth, the Davis good faith exception would apply down the road where a circuit has already ruled, which may counsel toward granting cert sooner to ensure that there are real stakes in the litigation when the Supreme Court decides it.

Of course, as a Fourth Amendment nerd I think it would be great if the court took these cases. The more Fourth Amendment cases on the docket, the better! As for whether they will, stay tuned as always.

Follow this link:
Will the Supreme Court agree to hear the Fourth Amendment cell-site cases? (And should they?) - Washington Post

Posted in Fourth Amendment | Comments Off on Will the Supreme Court agree to hear the Fourth Amendment cell-site cases? (And should they?) – Washington Post