Daily Archives: April 27, 2017

Vanishing: Where Is The Music Of The Impending Apocalypse? – The Quietus

Posted: April 27, 2017 at 1:59 am

Do you catch yourself thinking about the end of the world? What prompts these thoughts? And are they all they seem? The idea pops into my head from time to time and I try and dismiss it quickly but it wasnt until writing this feature that I realised how these unwelcome imaginings manifest themselves. I've now worked out that, shamefully, what Im actually doing is playing a few frames worth of tsunami from the end of 2012 or running a mental GIF, culled from some other half-remembered CGI-blockbuster of skyscrapers falling down. On other occasions Im conjuring up a stark image from the television of my childhood: the usual suspects are Threads or a Protect And Survive public information film (and the latter image is probably remembered via the secondary medium of the 1980s pop music video).

In reality (if you discount certain religious or cosmological predictions) the fall of man is too big a concept for us to envisage with any great clarity. When the end comes for our species it will probably happen in so many different and complex stages that it is all but impossible to second guess. (As much as the tabloids during the Cretaceous were probably constantly full of comet-based scaremongering, I bet none of them predicted a post-impact future where dinosaur survivors slowly morphed into birds who got smaller and smaller until the monkeys took over.) The (entertaining and lively) Homo Deus: A Brief History Of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari is the latest product turned out by a publishing industry that caters to our still unquenchable millenarian thirst. Admittedly this book is unusual in that it actually has a relatively upbeat prognosis for us - homo sapiens is giving way to the god-like homo deus who will make war obsolete, conquer disease and achieve amortality - but like the rest of the literature dealing with the end of mankind as we know it, its no less far-fetched than most fantastical works of science fiction. Mapping out the future of man is like predicting the weather: experts can give us reasonable suggestions for the very near future but anything mid to long term is a fools errand due to the complexity of the model were talking about.

This publishing trend - a facet of a larger cultural obsession taking in TV series, magazines, films and comic books - services a large and amorphous client group of tens of millions who either believe that the world is about to end or fear that it could. These are the people who dont push the thought out of their minds immediately but rather spend a lot of their waking time grappling with it. But if the end of our species is essentially unfathomable, what are they actually thinking about? In 2012, when talking about religious predictions of the end, the neuroscientist Shmuel Lissek suggested that large numbers of people found comfort and validation in the fearful ancient bias provoked by the idea of doomsday. This would be the ultimate example of misery loving company, or, as Robert Smith of The Cure summed it up succinctly in 100 Years: It doesnt matter if we all die. Counterintuitively there is also responsibility absolving relief to be had in knowing when ones time is due. It can seem bewildering to outsiders that many people under the sway of apocalyptic religions and cults are willing to believe the very precise warnings of the end of the world (down to exact dates and times) when literally all of these predictions so far have come to absolutely nothing. But perhaps its not hard to see the attraction in knowing exactly when you are going to die. For some people the sheer existential exhaustion they suffer comes from not having this knowledge. The complete failure of Earth to crash into the non-existent planet Nibiru on December 21 2012, will not stop people from getting in a flap over Sir Isaac Newtons predictions of Armageddon when 2060 rolls around.

Eschatological and apocalyptic thinking is not just the sole provenance of followers of certain religious cults though. These ideas are often linked to those with poor mental health. Im not talking so much about paranoid schizophrenics here. While its not unknown for the unhappy souls blighted by this condition to develop delusions - some of which may be apocalyptic in nature - in nearly all cases these beliefs are clearly irrational and in-all likelihood not persuasive to anyone other than the sufferer themselves. More relevant here are the paranoid, who have relatively more rationalised fears, which are often easily expressed and shared, especially via the internet. (It is a common belief among hardcore conspiracy theorists for example that their government has information about an immanent disaster and are purposefully keeping the population in the dark so as not to cause panic.) And then there are the traumatised. There is evidence that people suffering from post traumatic stress disorder - especially those who have first hand experience of war itself - can buy into the mindset of apocalyptic survivalism becoming preppers. These characters are now so prevalent in American society that they have become a stock archetype of pop culture, with prominent examples such as John Goodmans survivalist character Howard in the smart sci-fi movie 10 Cloverfield Lane and the Indiana doomsday cult leader the Reverend Richard Wayne Gary Wayne from the Netflix comedy Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. In the States, bookstore shelves are heaving with titles on the subject of ultimate survivalism and there are even several popular magazines designed to help people with their preparations.

And all of this is before we get onto the beliefs of some folk who are simply very very depressed or fatalistic.

In some of these cases the standard pop-psychiatric explanation of apocalyptic thinking would be something along these lines: the damaged mind is unable to process its own collapse and projects its own chaos outwards onto the world. But - to paraphrase Tom Waits - just because youre crazy and thinking about the apocalypse doesnt mean the end isnt actually nigh

It was reported in the news recently that the notional big hand on the Doomsday Clock, a symbol which represents the likelihood of a human-caused global catastrophe, has been moved to two and a half minutes to midnight. It had previously been at three minutes to midnight for two years which was the closest it had been to 12 since the height of the American/Russian nuclear standoff in 1982. If youre having trouble interpreting what this recent change means, the Science And Security Board of The Doomsday Clock had this to say last year: The probability of global catastrophe is very high, and the actions needed to reduce the risks of disaster must be taken very soon. They have amended this statement thus: In 2017, we find the danger to be even greater, the need for action more urgent. It is two and half minutes to midnight, the clock is ticking, global danger looms.

As their name suggests, the Science And Security Board are not so much concerned with religious predictions as they are manmade disaster. But some these scientific scenarios are no less baroque when you read about them...

Phil Torres, author of The End: What Science And Religion Tell Us About The Apocalypse, lists a dizzying number of ways in which we may shuffle off the coil en masse. There is the threat of super-intelligence, grey goo nanotechnology run amok and the appalling idea of catastrophic vacuum decay (if youre excessively existentially nervous and dont already know what CVD is, I really wouldnt google it). And then we have the only slightly less bleak but all too tangible climate change and nuclear war scenarios - which rather than threatening to wipe everyone out in one fell swoop would light a long and complex touch paper on the process.

So, given this looming danger, Ive found myself wondering recently, why isnt more music being released in 2017 about the apocalypse or the idea of post apocalypse?

Now, this being the internet I have to explain very carefully what I mean here. First of all, I dont mean that no music at all currently deals with the idea that the world is ending. There have been quite a few examples of musicians indulging in apocalyptic thinking recently. Ed Harcourts album Furnaces may use the concept as a metaphor to explore the transcendent salvation offered by love but his vision is still mired in fire and brimstone. His manager, the critic Sean Adams, says that despite offering the listener the possibility of salvation Harcourt still imagines a world of terminal pollution and dissolution. And last November ANOHNI released '4 Degrees' as the lead single from her latest album Hopelessness a stark and lacerating ecological warning. But for the most part these sentiments are conspicuous by their absence in the mainstream - especially when TV channels, cinemas, computer game stores and bookshops are so replete with apocalyptic and post apocalyptic fiction and entertainment.

We also need to recognise the few hardy souls who have been proclaiming the end of the world for decades now. As such we should pause here momentarily and doff our caps towards Jaz Coleman of Killing Joke. This year marks the 35th anniversary of his departure from these shores for Iceland convinced of the coming apocalypse. Much mocked in the music press at the time, Coleman now lives in a jerry built house on an island in the relatively remote Hauraki Gulf of northern New Zealand (mythologised as Cythera by Coleman). His attitude of wishing to live as remotely from major cities as possible seems a bit more sensible in 2017 than it used to, not the least now that the idea of relocating the family to Canada, Patagonia or, yes, Reykjavik has supplanted house prices as the number one subject at dinner parties all over the UK. But it should be said that by their own standards at least, Colemans lyrics seem slightly less apocalyptic than they used to be and recently, in a Q and A after a screening of The Death And Resurrection Show Killing Joke documentary, when the subject of his initial stay in Iceland was mentioned, he brought up a life-long struggle with depression suggesting that there is perhaps a mental health aspect to at least some of the bands end time concerns.

For the sake of brevity we're going to have to give heavy metal a free pass here. The subject of the genre's obsession with the fall of man is enough to generate several volumes of scholarly work and cannot be generalised upon to any useful degree. There has been more amazing metal concerned with the end of days than from all other genres combined. From Black Sabbath's 'Electric Funeral', recorded in 1970, onwards, it has seen many towering peaks of achievement such as the foundational Viking metal album and poetic 1991 masterpiece Twilight Of The Gods by Bathory (named by Stephen O'Malley as one of his favourite meditations on the subject).

However, it is worth pointing out to the non-partisan and metalphobic that apocalypse doesn't always mean apocalypse when it comes to metal. Even after skipping over the heavily metaphorical nature of this music, things are not always as they seem. For example, the mushroom clouds on the cover of a neo-thrash LP by Reign Of Fury or Havok might seem in poor taste to someone with little interest in this genre, but to a metalhead of my age (mid-40s) this is primarily a nostalgic, comforting image, more redolent of a carefree adolescence lit golden coloured by rite of passage first beers and enjoyment of records by Megadeth, Nuclear Assault, Iron Maiden and The Cro-Mags, than it is symbol of imminent global destruction.

And its also worth bearing in mind that there can often be a disconnect between lyrical content in extreme metal and the art the album comes in. Take Texan thrashers Power Trip for example. The sleeve of this year's Nightmare Logic on Southern Lord is all demonic soldiers marching through a post nuclear cityscape with a deathly face surveying the carnage but the lyrics of singer Riley Gale - who has a sophisticated line in identity politics - are mainly about the effects of globalisation and neo-liberalism and what can be done to resist, inspired in part by UK second wave punk. Nothing is necessarily what it seems when it comes to metal.

One recent metal act that has really stood out to me because its entire aesthetic over several releases seemed to be exclusively and persistently about the end of the world was the Botanist. Even by black metal standards, the Californian who goes by the name of Otrebor and plays drums and hammered dulcimer while singing, is a complete outlier. He has released six albums proper as the Botanist - a character who represents the nemesis of mankind, his work: allowing plants to regain control of the planet after humanity has died. The intense lyrical devotion to this messianic eco-terrorist character, married to the transcendent blur of music, wrenched from non-standard instrumentation, marks this music out as totally unique.

Most other modern genres pale in comparison to metal in the apocalypse stakes. Some producers of noise, techno and dark ambient talk a good Omega game but the lack of lyrical content makes this little more than a colouring agent in my book. Elsewhere, I can detect a subtle millenarian undercurrent to hauntology - probably because of the shaded section on the Venn Diagram that crosses over into Protect And Survive booklets, public information films, Threads and so on. I asked Simon Reynolds if he believed these hauntological fetishes were totally removed from modern day worries about nuclear war: I dont think its to do with apocalypse or nostalgia for nuclear war or anything daft like that, its an aesthetic thing [people] love of the look and sound of those Public Information Films as little capsules from another time. Theres also a sense of wonder that such creepy, unnerving things were shown to children.

And even then, when we put our heads together my initial assumption that there would be untold numbers of hauntological recordings about impending doom seem to be somewhat fanciful. There is the Civil Defence Is Common Sense track on The Advisory Circles Other Channels album and the nuclear war inspired Tomorrows Harvest by Boards Of Canada (again, as much as an instrumental album can be said to be about anything).

A recent album he was keen to mention was A Year In The Countrys The Quietened Bunker, before adding: But again that is more about the bygone long-ago vibes of Britain at a certain time in post-War history than anything to do with current concerns.

So actual sonic hauntological artefacts dealing tangibly with apocalypse as we might fear it today are quite the rarity. A notable example would be the Radiophonic play, Eschatology, which the Langham Research Centre and Peter Blegvad performed on BBC Radio 3 in 2014. The full play is fantastic - like the shipping forecast broadcast from a vessel scuttled at the lip of oblivion, and mixes spoken word drama, musique concrete, vintage synth-scaping and tape experimentation.

When listening to this play again recently, the idea of a story told from the POV of the last people on Earth after an apocalyptic event, set to non-standard musical backing put me in mind of one of the jewels in the crown of American rock group Shellac - The End Of Radio. Over a tense solo snare beat that inexorably creeps up to double time and then beyond into a puncturing drum roll over a rigid, metronomic bassline, Steve Albini barks out the story of the final broadcast of a Modern Lovers-obsessed radio DJ who finds himself the last man on Earth broadcasting his final show to no-one. Is it really broadcasting if theres no one there to receive? asks Albini plaintively before eventually unleashing the riff of all riffs, which sounds like Link Wray on the deck of Event Horizon. As different as they are, the power of both pieces can be found in specific effects achieved by the combination of (non-standard) music and spoken word, but more on this later.

Now, anyone reading this article would be well within their rights to ask, why should people even want be reminded of the parlous state of international affairs or impending ecological destruction when theyre listening to music? Why shouldnt they be allowed to enjoy pure escapism - an attitude I have a lot of time for. But one only has to look back 35 years to when the Doomsday Clock was as perilously close to its terminal engagement as it is now to see how much things have changed. In the 1980s - when Russia and America seemed likely to engage in nuclear warfare, it wasnt just the thrash metallers, goths and punks who were obsessed with doomsday - it was everyone from Frankie Goes To Hollywood to Heaven 17 to Ultravox to Morrissey to David Bowie to Blondie to Queen to Nik Kershaw to Sting to Prince to Genesis to Nena to OMD... Name a top ten single from 1983 - theres a fighting chance the theme was nuclear annihilation.

So something has changed but what?

Recently, after the untimely passing of the theorist and music critic Mark Fisher, I had reason to go back and re-read his essential text Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? In his opening gambit he claims the idea that it is easier to picture the end of the world than it is the end of capitalism (attributed to both the erratic Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and the postmodernist Frederic Jameson) as the essential motto for Capitalist Realism.

There is a difference between 1982 and 2017 according to Fishers book and that is now there is simply no alternative economic system we can imagine to the one we're saddled with. In the 1970s and 1980s - no matter how naive, how unrealistic, how compromised, alternatives in name still existed to capitalism. Socialism existed as a genuine force, anarcho collectivism existed as a genuine possibility etc. Now that the after effects of Thatchers second and third terms have settled in comfortably - so the argument goes - we simply cannot imagine anything other than the system we have now. Fisher described the state of inertia we find ourselves in: What we are dealing with now... is a deeper far more pervasive sense of exhaustion of cultural and political sterility For most people under twenty in Europe and North America, the lack of alternatives to capitalism is no longer even an issue. Capitalism seamlessly occupies the horizons of the thinkable.

World destruction, of one kind or another, is the inevitable end product of capitalism. It is now a near global system predicated on continual and aggressive expansion of markets by any means necessary in a world of finite resources that has only a limited capacity to cope with our core rapaciousness. There is no other way things can pan out. So it struck me as being quite funny that its now equally as hard (for musicians at least) to imagine the end of the world as it is for the rest of us to imagine the end of the system thats causing it.

Im not sure what I think about the paucity of this kind of music in the mainstream these days. After all, even if it was widespread and popular, surely it would just be an example of pre-corporation (the pre-emptive formatting and shaping of desires, aspirations and hopes by capitalist culture). Just another temporary trend. And by the way, this isnt some semi-occluded old man cry about a so-called lack of protest music in the 21st Century. There is enough of that stuff about - Im aware that it doesnt look like it used to and most of it is now guided by liberal humanism rather than a naive desire to save the world from nuclear or ecological destruction.

But popular or not, the more music struggles to get away from the cultural exhaustion of late capitalism - the more it resists mere revivalism and straight up pastiche - the more effective I find it on several levels. I dont need music to be sui generis, I just need it to fight its own fucking corner, god damn it. And so it is with apocalyptic music. As with all of the examples mentioned above, Ive found myself returning to the self-titled debut album by Manchester based artist Vanishing time and time again recently.

Vanishing is a project led by Hull-born and Manchester-based poet and musician Gareth Smith (who is, among other things, a regular collaborator with LoneLady). His music isn't as overtly obsessed with the coming collapse of civilisation as that of the Botanist, say, but it has been riven by millennial angst. (Smith has only talked in very general terms about how Vanishing is concerned with "alienation and claustrophobia"; about "this terrible feeling of dread"; and "the madness of the current time" but it seems to me that it could present a means for him to articulate extreme sensitivity to modern life, as this music jangles like a symptom of generalised anxiety disorder.)

On this debut album, released recently on Salford's Tombed Visions, he has created a cast of characters such as The Forger and The Cleaners, and to breathe life into them he does the police in different voices. His words come flowing dynamically out of him in an East Yorkshire accent as heavy and blunt as a cosh; a necrotic black metal shriek; a granular baritone drawl; a tremulous whisper that rises and rises towards an ever ascending note of anxiety ringing clear like a struck bell. And his words exit him like ten thousand cubic metres of silt, suspended in the garbage rich, caramel brown waters of the Humber flowing right out into the desalinated and mercury poisoned North Sea.

Its not a particularly easy listen. But it is thrilling.

Vanishing by Vanishing, is on first listen heavily portentous, achingly pompous, grindingly dour and massively out of step with the current cultural times. Of the few who hear it, no doubt more will be annoyed than pleased by it; certainly more will find it wryly amusing rather than harrowing. It does however despite all this reveal itself on subsequent listens to be quite brilliant.

Vanishing is not an exploration of something that has already happened or something that is going to happen but something we are currently enduring. It is a sonic metaphor for how we are refusing to feel right now. The stab of panic late at night when anxiety stalks the hallway outside the door, when no amount of digital distraction will quell the thought, "What have we done?" Smith isn't saying what we're all thinking, he's saying what we're all desperately trying not to think.

Musically, this is a muscular and psychedelic mix of post rock, industrial, dark ambient, dub and other, less-easy to classify, fractured and cosmic sounds, provided mainly by Smith with Paddy Shine of GNOD. (Shine's bandmate Alex Macarte also turns up on synths at one point while Julie Campbell and Elizabeth Preston add a hint of Godspeed drama on cello here and there.) The churchical organ drones of Brighton 84, the brittle Suicide-beats of Night Vision, the nerve-jangling dub effects of Fountain, the future spiritual of The Forger and the reverberant, agonising power electronics of The Cleaners all thrill... Bronze Misnomer is a quirky but threatening reboot of Jack Kerouac, Al Cohn and Zoot Sims Blues And Haikus from 1959. Behind all things is glitchy electronica like the sound of the machines stuttering and failing for the last time. Over all things is a scree of noise as long since abandoned buildings eventually crumble, undermined by encroaching plant life. If I have one major criticism of Vanishing it is that, like TS Eliots Strawmen, it whimpers out of existence instead of ending with a bang. On final track Glacier, the guitars - bum notes and all - meander aimlessly about the track and for once the music is not really a match for Smiths simmering intensity. But perhaps this is an apt way to end proceedings.

Vanishing isn't going to change the way I vote. It's not going to affect the way I do my recycling. It's not going to make me join the Green Party. Listening to this album is not going to make me go and live in an island shack near the Hauraki Gulf. It isn't even going to make cross the room so I can turn the light off that's currently switched on needlessly in the hallway. But this album (along with the music mentioned by Langham Research Centre, the Botanist, Shellac and The Advisory Circle among many others) serves as a concrete reminder that there is respite to the cultural malaise created by late capitalism for those who are determined to seek it. It makes me think there is a glossary of effects begging to be written detailing how various literary techniques combine with certain musical processes to create dramatic new sonic spaces. And I'm not just talking about apocalypse music now, but songs about love, death and birth as well. Songs about cars. Songs about nightclubs. Songs about buildings. Songs about food. One really only needs to feel the surging connective potential when listening to something that doesn't sound quite like anything one has heard before, related from an angle one hasn't considered before - as infrequently as this may occur - to realise there is still everything left to fight for. Those who claim they've heard it all before? I lament their inability to see anything but the broadest of brushstrokes when the rest of us know the devil is in the detail. They say: "We're doomed! We're doomed!" I say: "Not a bit of it, there's enough hope left yet."

Continue reading here:

Vanishing: Where Is The Music Of The Impending Apocalypse? - The Quietus

Posted in Survivalism | Comments Off on Vanishing: Where Is The Music Of The Impending Apocalypse? – The Quietus

Taken For Granted Ghostbusters – 411mania.com

Posted: at 1:56 am

After two weeks in the dark and often depressing world of The Godfather, this column could use a palette cleanser. So this week Im picking a film that a lot of people love, but for which I was late to the party. Fortunately, the party was so fun that I still had a ton of fun.

Welcome to Taken For Granted; a column where I analyze films that are almost universally considered classics. Why? Because great movies dont just happen by accident. They connect with initial audiences and they endure for a reason. This column is designed to keep meaningful conversation about these films alive.

Ghostbusters

Wide Release Date: June 8, 1984 Directed By: Ivan Reitman Written By: Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis Produced By: Ivan Reitman Cinematography By: Lszl Kovcs Edited By: David E. Blewitt and Sheldon Kahn Music By: Elmer Bernstein Production Company: Black Rhino and Delphi Productions Distributed By: Columbia Pictures Starring: Bill Murray as Peter Venkman Dan Aykroyd as Raymond Ray Stantz Harold Ramis as Egon Spengler Ernie Hudson as Winston Zeddemore Sigourney Weaver as Dana Barrett

What Do We All Know?

The second highest grossing film of 1984, Ghostbusters dominated the summer for five weeks in a row, and managed to climb back to #1 again on two separate occasions. In the process, it spawned one of the most successful commercial empires of any 1980s movie; cartoon series, toys, lunchboxes, one delicious sugar drink, a sequel, and a reboot that wont be mentioned again in this column. Its been absorbed into the pop culture, and is a favorite for more than one generation of kids who grew up with it.

Me? I didnt see the movie in its entirety until last year, as I asked Michael Ornelas to pick it for our column From Under A Rock. I was obviously aware of it, but I dont have the nostalgia that many fans of the film have. Fortunately, I dont really need to; not only is Ghostbusters an exceptionally good movie, but it also hits a lot of my personal sweet spots. Itll be a movie I watch frequently going forward, and I wanted to talk about it again now that almost a year has passed since that column.

What Went Right?

There is no mystery why Ghostbusters is a good movie. Its a comedy and its funny. It has a cool, easily understood concept that was perfect for its time and had endured. Recasting exorcists as scientists and exterminators is a stroke of brilliance (though, admittedly, done before in a pretty good Disney short). Harold Ramis and Dan Aykroyd wrote a great script and got great talent to work with it. It isnt Bill Murrays best role, but its close. Ernie Hudson may not be Eddie Murphy like they originally planned, but he might be even better. And beyond the Ghostbusters themselves, we also get see the comedic stylings of Rick Moranis, William Atherton and Annie Potts. Not to mention Sigourney Weaver in a role thats pretty far from Ellen Ripley. When you have a good idea and good talent to bring it to life, you get a good product. Pretty simple.

The cast of characters is really quite impressive. Egon, Ray, Winston and Peter Venkman each have different kinds of humor; Egon makes deadpan scientific observations, Ray has a childlike innocence, Winston is a normal guy who doesnt always get everything, and Venkman is the snarkiest, most unlikable yet also the funniest. Its four comedians playing to their strengths, yes, but it also gives each character a distinct personality which allows them to bounce off of each other. Whats even more impressive is that the film doesnt have a lot of exposition; it gets right into the action, tells us background when we need it, and lets the actors and their chemistry tell the story of their friendship.

Ghostbusters is also very good at branding. The team has a unique uniform, not to mention a custom symbol and a cool theme song. The ghosts are decidedly unlike any others; Slimer and Mr. Staypuft are instantly recognizable, but so is Gozer. The movie has such a strong personal identity, and such a specific tone that any attempts to replicate it would just feel like a pale imitation of Ghostbusters. Its one of the first big summer blockbusters to also be primarily a comedy, and if you dont care for story, the film is likely to entertain you with its humor. And vice-versa.

And lets talk about that main concept a bit; cool name aside, the Ghostbusters job is essentially that of an exorcist. And Ghostbusters owes a lot of its immediate success to the environment in which it was created. In a world where Hollywood fed audiences Rosemarys Baby and The Exorcist and newspapers were claiming that everything from rock n roll to Dungeons and Dragons was devil worship, this movie took the idea of an evil Sumerian god invading earth and bringing about the end of the world and had a bunch of snarky comedians making fun of it. What could have easily been a serious threat under other circumstances is made to be a joke. But Ghostbusters isnt a parody (usually), and this subversion of how to treat satanism and the supernatural has a profound effect on kids, and some adults.

What Went Wrong?

Unlike some of the movies Ive covered, Ghostbusters is not an unassailable masterpiece of cinema. Its smarter than people give it credit for, but it does fall short in some areas. Rick Moranis is talented, but his character is pretty one note and shows up more than he really needs to. Conversely, Winston and Dana both feel like they could have used more screen time to really breathe. And it may be an odd thing to nitpick, but the ghost blowjob joke really feels like its from a different movie, even if it is funny. I could also nitpick the effects, few of which have aged well, but thats not really what this section has been about.

What Went Really Right?

I dont think I have to work too hard to argue that Ghostbusters is a good movie, but what makes it more than just good? What made this film thats mostly aimed at adults so popular with kids that it could endure as a pop culture phenomenon for over thirty years? Well, its actually pretty simple; young children dont have to imagine that there are ghosts haunting their house and monsters in their closet. For them, its reality. But the Ghostbusters can defeat the supernatural, and they dont need magic talismans or ancient books. They dont need to call their priest. Through science and their own ingenuity, they can trap the monsters. And even if you arent scientifically inclined, that tech is simple enough that anybody can pick it up and use it effectively. Its a power fantasy that kids latch onto.

And frankly, the power fantasy works for adults too. The film alludes to the idea that the Ghostbusters could be stopping the Biblical Armageddon, and Gozer is at one point nothing more than a booming voice in the clouds. In the battle of ancient supernatural forces against modern technology and science, the supernatural gets its ass kicked. Now, Im not saying Ghostbusters is an inherently atheist film. Winston refutes that by sharing his fondness for Jesus. But what Ghostbusters is saying is that, whether you believe in the supernatural or not, it does not have control over you or your destiny. You have the tools, you have the talent, you have the power. And that is pretty cool no matter what age you are.

Like This Column? Check out previous editions! Jurassic Park Back to the Future Chinatown Taxi Driver The Matrix Batman (1989) Casablanca Goldfinger X2 King Kong (1933) Beauty and the Beast (1991) The Dark Crystal The Manchurian Candidate (1962) Raiders of the Lost Ark The Godfather The Godfather, Part II

Or check out my column with Michael Ornelas; From Under A Rock. Last week, we turned our brains off to enjoy Bio-Dome. This week, we turn them back on so we can follow Christopher Nolans Memento.

Follow Me On Letterboxd! I log reviews for every film I see, when I see them. You can see my main page here. Recent reviews include Creed, the better than it has any right to be Power Rangers, and Iron Man 3.

Read the original post:

Taken For Granted Ghostbusters - 411mania.com

Posted in Modern Satanism | Comments Off on Taken For Granted Ghostbusters – 411mania.com

Campus free speech bill passes House – News & Observer

Posted: at 1:49 am


News & Observer
Campus free speech bill passes House
News & Observer
State lawmakers have waded into the charged campus free speech debate, 54 years after the legislature famously banned Communist speakers at the University of North Carolina. This time around, there's no speaker ban, but rather an insistence that ...
Free speech bill sponsored by Pender Rep. Millis passes state HouseWECT-TV6

all 3 news articles »

Continue reading here:
Campus free speech bill passes House - News & Observer

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Campus free speech bill passes House – News & Observer

Senate panel considers bill protecting university free speech … – Chron.com

Posted: at 1:49 am

Photo: Brett Coomer, Houston Chronicle

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texa A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texa A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

People stand next to a line of riot police outside the Memorial Student Center as they protest white nationalist Richard Spencer speaking at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

People stand next to a line of riot police outside the Memorial Student Center as they protest white nationalist Richard Spencer speaking at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

People are used back by riot police outside the Memorial Student Center as they protest white nationalist Richard Spencer speaking at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

People are used back by riot police outside the Memorial Student Center as they protest white nationalist Richard Spencer speaking at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Law enforcement officers line a crowd of protestors during a speech on campus by White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Law enforcement officers line a crowd of protestors during a speech on campus by White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Texas A&M freshman Marshall Sullivan holds a rainbow flag as students protest a speech at the university by white nationalist Richard Spencer Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Texas A&M freshman Marshall Sullivan holds a rainbow flag as students protest a speech at the university by white nationalist Richard Spencer Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Students line up in a silent protest against the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on the campus of Texas A&M University on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators march on the campus of Texas A&M University protesting the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators march on the campus of Texas A&M University protesting the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators argue the points during a protest march on the campus of Texas A&M University protesting the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

Demonstrators argue the points during a protest march on the campus of Texas A&M University protesting the speech of White Nationalist Richard Spencer on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016, in College Station.

White nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

White nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

A protestor holds up a sign that reads "Heil No" as white nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

A protestor holds up a sign that reads "Heil No" as white nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Students, protestors and supporters take video as white nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Students, protestors and supporters take video as white nationalist Richard Spencer speaks at Texas A&M University Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016 in College Station.

Senate panel considers bill protecting university free speech

Texas senators entered the polarizing discussion on campus free speech in a higher education committee hearing on Wednesday.

Sen. Dawn Buckingham, a Lakeway Republican, introduced legislation that forbids universities and colleges from punishing students for engaging in expressive activities and requires these schools to adopt a policy outlining students right to assemble, protest and circulate petitions.

The bill, she said, seeks to more clearly define what is permitted on college campuses in an effort to protect students' rights. It serves to remind schools of free speech guarantees set out by federal and state law, she said.

LOST CAUSE: University of Texas to leave Confederate statues in place, for now

Universities across the state and nation have grappled with how to balance the right to free speech and student calls for sensitivity amid controversial speakers and inflammatory fliers on campuses. Students have called for more restrictive speech policies and urged their schools to cancel events, arguing that this expression promotes discomfort and feelings of alienation, particularly among minority students.

The debate brought President Donald Trump into the fold in February as he criticized the University of California at Berkeley after riots required the school to cancel an appearance by a far-right writer. If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view NO FEDERAL FUNDS? he wrote on Twitter.

If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?

In Texas, sharp outcry followed the announcement that white supremacist Richard Spencer would speak at Texas A&M University in College Station last year. More than 10,000 people signed a petition asking the university to cancel the event after Spencer evoked Nazi salutes at a high-profile speech in the nations capitol.

EXTENSION POSSIBLE: Texas A&M weighing new deal for school's chancellor

The university stood firm: Leaders said that they found Spencers views reprehensible and did not invite him to campus, but they said they had no power to block him from speaking on campus. Since then, it has amended its speaker policy to require outside speakers to be sponsored by recognized Texas A&M student organizations, the Associated Press reported.

And universities across the state have seen white nationalist, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant posters on campuses since Trumps election in November. Administrators atRice Universityand the University of Texas at Austin cited campus policy as they removed those leaflets, saying that the posters were put up in restricted places.

Buckingham acknowledged that her bill largely reinforced the First Amendment and the Texas Constitution.

Sen. Larry Taylor, a Friendswood Republican, said the bill would allow lawmakers to take a stand against student intimidation that he said discourages conservative voices. If you have one group so forceful that they dont allow another group to express their opinions, weve lost a battle.

An initial version of the bill forbid university employees from dis-inviting campus speakers at the request of students. That provision was struck in the committee substitute, which Buckingham said was created after input from universities.

Scroll through the gallery above to see Texs A&M students protesting white supremacist Richard Spencer

Read the original post:
Senate panel considers bill protecting university free speech ... - Chron.com

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Senate panel considers bill protecting university free speech … – Chron.com

Who Will Take the Threats to Free Speech on Campus Seriously? – National Review

Posted: at 1:49 am

Nasty, thuggish attacks on free speech by leftist students, often aided by outside Antifa allies, has reached crisis stage. We have a large cadre of people whod have fit in perfectly with Maos Red Brigades because they are eager to enforce ideological purity and punish those who disagree with progressive beliefs. What must be done?

That is the question Martin Center president Jenna Robinson and Anna Beavon Gravely (the North Carolina spokeswoman for Generation Opportunity) explore in this article.

While some college leaders at least say they want to stop the attacks and restore free speech and civility, we shouldnt expect too much from the higher-education establishment itself. As the authors explain,

A recent survey of 440 American universities indicates that nearly half of them have adopted policies that infringe on the First Amendment rights of students. Also, many schools are willing to fire dissenting employees and create free speech zones for the sake of maintaining their public image and avoiding controversy. And in some cases a double standard has been established, where controversial expression is tolerated so long as it has a liberal slant.

Perhaps state politicians can use their authority over the colleges and universities they fund (and are supposed to be able to control but thats very problematic) to deal with the free-speech problem. Toward that end, the Goldwater Institute has drafted model legislation called the Restore Campus Free Speech Act and it is now under consideration in a number of states, including North Carolina. The General Assembly has begun hearings on a bill modeled on the RCFSA. Guess what? The general counsel for the UNC system testified that it is unnecessary and the ACLUs spokesperson objected that it is overly broad. The bill will probably pass despite such objections. Then we will find out if Governor Cooper, a Democrat who narrowly won last November, will sign it or veto it to make leftists happy.

One thing all the riots and disruptions have accomplished is to wake many Americans up the the fact that free speech is in danger. Perhaps soon, optimistically write Robinson and Gravely, higher education will return to being a bastion of free speech and intellectual diversity. That indeed must be the goal, and it it is not accomplished, more and more Americans might decide to do their college work at schools that havent let themselves become enclaves of, to use Jonah Goldbergs apt phrase, liberal fascism.

More here:
Who Will Take the Threats to Free Speech on Campus Seriously? - National Review

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Who Will Take the Threats to Free Speech on Campus Seriously? – National Review

Middlebury Campus : Free Speech vs. Civil Disobedience – Middlebury Campus (subscription)

Posted: at 1:49 am

Thomas Leaycraft, Middlebury Student April 26, 2017 Filed under Opinions

Share on Facebook

Share via Email

March 2, the day of the Charles Murray talk, was never going to be easy for Middlebury. Free speech and civil disobedience, two of our nations most challenging and sacred traditions, seemed to collide. In this war of virtues, everybody lost; the mob silenced Charles Murray, the media dragged Middleburys name through the mud for weeks and the protesters now face punishment.

Civil disobedience is a tremendously respectable endeavor. Standing up for ones principles in the face of certain punishment, as many in our community did to protest the ideas of Dr. Murrays book The Bell Curve, even after an administrator read aloud the Colleges code of conduct in the Wilson auditorium, reveals noble conviction. However, now many are demanding that the administration excuse these violations of college policy, and in essence, take a stance in this battle of ideals by deciding whether Murrays beliefs preclude him from the right to speak freely they should not.

Much can and has been written about the Murray incident. Even in its entirety, that weeks Campus could not contain the full range of perspectives on whether bringing controversial speakers like Murray to campus constitutes platforming or provides an understanding of deplorable ideas and institutions, which could be a valuable insight in the fight for change and social justice. While many find Dr. Murrays beliefs contribute to systems of oppression and racism, Middlebury must uphold the right to free speech.

Of course, the liberal arts philosophy, Middleburys guiding principle, deems the sharing of widely varying ideas as indispensable to developing an understanding of the world. But furthermore, free speech is a fragile privilege and requires protection, whereas civil disobedience, by definition, does not. Upholding this privilege and measure of equality the right to speak without censorship is essential. A precedent that speech can be restricted is a dangerous infringement on all of our rights.

Our college made a statement on March 2 and, while I disapprove of the means by which we silenced Dr. Murray, I take some pride in belonging to a community which so passionately defends women and people of color. However, the time has come to accept the consequences of our actions. The Colleges punishment of protesters serves as a defense of all of our rights to speak freely. Bernie Sanders recently said of Ann Coulters controversial visit to UC Berkley, what are you afraid of her ideas? Ask her the hard questions. Confront her intellectually. Our freedom to denounce Murray and institutionalized injustices and Murrays freedom of speech derive from a common, sacred privilege.

This has been a bad year for speech. The school year began with conversations surrounding the need for civility in discourse, and is ending with debates over whether or not people who say reprehensible things, or even hold deplorable beliefs, have the right to speak at all. We silenced Dr. Murray, though he came to discuss his latest book Coming Apart, which focuses largely on the growing rift between the values of upper and working class whites essentially the Trump coalition without any mention of racial supremacy or eugenics. We set a dangerous precedent: we silenced not because of what he planned to say, but because of what he believes.

Opinions Editor Thomas Leaycraft 20 writes about punishment in the wake of the Charles Murray protests.

Read the original:
Middlebury Campus : Free Speech vs. Civil Disobedience - Middlebury Campus (subscription)

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Middlebury Campus : Free Speech vs. Civil Disobedience – Middlebury Campus (subscription)

Ted Nugent debate: Free speech, or hate speech? – Wausau Daily Herald

Posted: at 1:49 am

Oshkosh welcomes Ted Nugent to the Leach Amphitheater Saturday night as a special to the summer Waterfest celebration of 2014.(Photo: Oshkosh Northwestern Media Mark Ebert / Oshkosh Northwester)Buy Photo

WAUSAU - Wisconsin Valley Fair board members expected their selection of Ted Nugent as the Friday night headliner to help break a string of financial losses for the fair.

They didn't expect the rocker to create such a divide in the Wausau community.

"He was the last slot to fill," said Keith Langenhahn, president of the fair board, which is overseen by the nonprofit Marathon County Agricultural Society. "People don't realize how hard it is to book music. I'm sorry it became controversial."

For those who fiercely oppose Nugent's appearance at Marathon Park in August, they're worried the topichas become not just controversialbut political. They'd rather focus on comments Nugent has made about African Americans and other minorities than anything he has said about politics or politicians.

But the first person to speak out publicly against the Nugent booking, announced April 7, was the chairwoman of the Marathon County Democratic Party.Nancy Stencil said Nugent "definitely isn't a good fit for the Wausau community," and that she will likely call for a boycott of the event.Local social media has been consumed by calls for protest but also by Nugent supporters expressing their excitement for the show and arguing that the rock musician's political beliefs make no difference.

Those who oppose the concert say they're concerned about the controversy Nugent's outlandish statements couldbring to Wausau.Community members are worried about what Nugent might say, and the mess hemay leave behindafter the fair is over.

Nugent, whose career in rock 'n' roll took off in the late 1970s, has lately become even better known for his outspoken conservative politics and occasional offensive statements, which he shares on social media and sometimes at concerts.He's toldPresident Barack Obamato"suck on my machine gun,"and hasthreatened to shootDemocraticofficials. He has postedracist and anti-Semitic comments on his social media pages. In 2014, he calledObama a "subhuman mongrel."In a March 2016 Facebook post, he posted a bogus photograph thatincluded the n-wordethnicslur and a stereotypical depiction of African Americans.

To Langenhahn, the choice to bring Nugent to the fair was one made to sell tickets. In the last two years, the fair has failed to show a profit, and the board knew, based on a 2007 performance, that Nugent would likely be a nearly sell-out show. The board had sought a number of other acts and been turned down.

RELATED:Ted Nugent responds to Wausau boycott threats

RELATED:Report: Fair won't cancel Ted Nugent show

Langenhahn said the board stands by itsdecision to bring Nugent to the fairand saidthe primary motivation was neveranything other than a need to bring in a popular musician. He said the board will ask promoters to tell Nugent to refrain from any type of offensive or political speech but in the end, it's the artist's decision.

"We don't promote that kind of behavior," Langenhahn said. "But he's gotten popular off of that kind of conduct, so I don't know."

Members of the community are worried about Nugent's message, and how it could work to polarize a city working hard to achieve peace with its diversity.

(Photo: Erich Schlegel)

Wausau-area residents such as David Deon, an African-American musician who performs with the band David Deon & the Soul Inspirations, have started to wonder if the fair board can really make a choice that represents the different people and ideasin the community. The board usually chooses from rock and country artists exclusively.

"This isn't even about Ted Nugent,"Deon said. "When you look at the lineup, it does not represent the community. We need to start looking at making sure the decision-making is representative of all of Wausau."

Other community members have concerns about what a performance by Nugent could do to undermine local movements to build and promote understanding.Nugent's performancecould end up unraveling that, said Aaron Zitzelsberger, state director of development for the Wisconsin Institute of Public Policy and Service, a nonpartisan organization that addresses local, state and national issues by linking people with resources. WIPPS is headquartered at the University of Wisconsin Marathon County Center for Civic Engagement, a block from where Nugent is scheduled to perform.

"I didn't want to look at this through a political lens," Zitzelsberger said. "I wanted to look at this through a lens of what's going to bring out the best in the community. What do we as a community want to bring out in ourselves? I did a lot of research, I looked at the things Ted Nugent has said. I felt like this is not the voice I would want representing our community, regardless of political affiliation. It's more the message being sent."

Zitzelsberger said he would not feel comfortable bringing his children to the fair amid such messages and that he fears it's setting back community-based efforts to bring people together.

But the community also includes Nugent fans who still want to hear the Motor City Madman play.

Brad Anderson, a Weston resident, said that he's looking forward to the concert, despite what Nugent has said in other venues.

"I don't like things that Madonna says, or things that Bruce Springsteen says, but that doesn't stop me from listening to them," he said. "I don't really care about what he's said in the past. He's got great music."

Comments online have also highlighted Nugent'sown right to free expression. Others believe that his speeches should be limitedbecause the fair is a family venue.

"My concern is that freedom of speech is tempered by many things," said Tony Gonzalezof Wausau, director ofEAG InterpretersHispanic Outreach. "For example, you can't just stand in the middle of a full theater and yell 'fire!'This is not taking place in a privatearena, it's taking place in a public place. Every individual in Wausau has the right to be present there and expect decency. They're going to hear what goes on at the concert. This may raise a lot of trouble we don't want in the fairgrounds."

Langenhahn said he isn't worried about violence or trouble during the concert, but he said there will be security present, just as there is at every grandstand show.

Kevin Jari, 51, a Weston resident,is another Nugent supporter whoplans to attend theconcert on Aug. 2. He said that for him, it's about the music.

"I'm going because I like Ted Nugent," Jari said. "I've been to his concerts several times over the years."

Jari said that he's not sure if politics really have a place in musicand that he's noticed that Nugent's speeches have become much more politically charged in recent years.

"I agree with some of (Nugent's) politics, and think he has the right to perform and speak, but he's said and done some screwed-up things so I'm not gonna go around like, 'Yeah, Ted, he's the man!'" Jari said in a Facebook message. "People also have the right to protest, peacefully. Other people have the right to counter-protest, and everyone has the right to boycott anything they want for any reason. As long as everyone is peaceful and the government isn't oppressing anyone, I'm golden."

Contact Going Out reporter Laura Schulte at 715-297-7532 or leschulte@gannett.com; on Twitter @schultelaura.

(Photo: JEANNETTE MERTEN / OSHKOSH NORTHWESTERN MEDIA)

Read or Share this story: http://wdhne.ws/2q6Y9fg

View post:
Ted Nugent debate: Free speech, or hate speech? - Wausau Daily Herald

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Ted Nugent debate: Free speech, or hate speech? – Wausau Daily Herald

The Women’s March just won a PEN award for courage and freedom of speech – Mashable

Posted: at 1:49 am


Mashable
The Women's March just won a PEN award for courage and freedom of speech
Mashable
Bob Bland, co-chair of the Women's March on Washington, has a simple yet resounding message for Donald Trump: "The resistance is female and we're not going anywhere." On Tuesday, PEN America, which was a formal partner of the Women's March, ...

Original post:
The Women's March just won a PEN award for courage and freedom of speech - Mashable

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on The Women’s March just won a PEN award for courage and freedom of speech – Mashable

Alyssa Neu: Free speech has limits – Boulder Daily Camera

Posted: at 1:49 am

I am a Boulder native. I have never been so outraged to call Boulder County my home as I was when I read O'Connor's recent disgusting excuse for free speech when he incited violence by calling for the elimination of "fracking and workers," even by exploding local oil wells. The editor admitted it was an error to print the attack on oil and gas workers but then pretends that it is somehow allowable civil disobedience law breaking to advance a greater moral issue. But the First Amendment freedom of speech has its limits and O'Connor crosses this line with his "opinion." He also wrongly misinformed the public about the science of oil and drilling. Park your car if you don't like oil and gas, and stop consuming petroleum based products (note everything in your home is petroleum based unless it is organic). Invest in greener solutions. But many of the oil and gas workers are military veterans and have families, too. I'd like to see O'Connor say this to their faces, but gone are the days of resorting to vigilante stupidity. Boulder, we owe more to our current events, newspaper editing and civility toward one another. Sometimes celebrating diversity means engaging in intellectual discourse, not inciting violence against fellow human beings. Boulder should be a peaceful place to live filled with people who may disagree, but who always make it physically safe for all who come here, for work or otherwise. Safety in our community is important regardless of how you feel about mining. Remember, O'Connor, many of those oil workers fought for your freedom to have opinions.

Alyssa Neu

Longmont

The rest is here:
Alyssa Neu: Free speech has limits - Boulder Daily Camera

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Alyssa Neu: Free speech has limits – Boulder Daily Camera

Why I Had To Make a Clean Break With Christianity – Patheos – Patheos (blog)

Posted: at 1:49 am

Look around the Big Tent of Paganism and youll find connections to virtually every ancestral tradition on Earth. Celtic Reconstructionism and my own Druidry draw on what we know of our ancestors in Britain, Ireland, Gaul, and other places where Celtic culture was prevalent. Heathenry and Asatru draw on the heritage of the Germanic peoples. Kemeticism attempts to revive the beliefs and practices of the ancient Egyptians.

We have to revive and restore these practices because Paganism in Europe and European-dominated countries was interrupted by the near-universal conversion to Christianity. While Christianitys influence has diminished since the Enlightenment and especially over the last hundred years, it remains a dominant force in our culture.

But Christianity was never a wholly new thing in any of its forms. It has mythical roots in Judaism, intellectual roots in Greek philosophy, and folklore roots in every land in which it was established. Some pagan beliefs and practices survived, but they were Christianized. They had to be in medieval and early modern Europe it was impossible to be anything other than a Christian (or possibly a Jew, in some places, at some times, for a while).

These survivals and continuations include magic a lot of magic.

Magic is part of our legacy as humans. It is something weve always done, from the earliest cave paintings to spells in verse to the sigils of chaos magic. Christianity couldnt wipe out magic, it just changed its forms.

Right now were seeing a revival of some Christian magic, particularly on the high magic side. Sorcery and grimoire magic seem to be gaining in popularity. Or maybe Im just paying too much attention to Gordon White, but it sure seems that way to me.

To be clear: this isnt magic worked with the approval of Pope Francis or Pat Robertson there is no such thing. This is magic worked within a monotheist worldview (even if their one God is very different from the God of orthodox Christianity) and drawing on Christian traditions, forms, and structures. Its not all that different from what many of the Revival Druids did and certainly not very different from the magic of Dion Fortune.

Magic doesnt care what you believe magic cares what you do. Work this magic properly and youll get results.

But I cant do this magic. I had to make a clean break with Christianity and I cant go back, not even to work magic with the aid of powerful spirits.

Christians have been arguing over definition of real Christianity ever since the death of the historical Jesus (who I think existed, but that cant be proved and its far from certain). There were many Christianities in its first couple of centuries. Despite the rise of the Catholic Church in the post-Constantine years, Christianity has never been one thing.

Today we have Catholics and Orthodox who claim to be an unbroken line back to the apostles, Protestants who claim to a be a restored and reformed version of the apostolic church, liberal Christians who claim to follow the teachings of the real Jesus, and countless variations on all of the above.

In 2014 Gordon White of Rune Soup made a strong case for a reasonable and non-exclusive Christian context for magic:

the churchy components of Joses Cyprian may represent an emotive barrier for a lot of todays occultists. This is a pity. You all know how I feel about the Church (Goldman Sachs with more paedophiles). But you also know how I feel about the saints. (Not just a modesty curtain for savage gods, but also an uninterrupted continuation of at least three different strands of European customs pertaining to the Dead). Only a moron would confuse a criminal bank run for and by paedophiles for the activities of a grandmotherly herbalist in a Venezuelan barrio.

We need to have more sophisticated eyes. Because there is that which remains.

Gordon isnt wrong, and if I had discovered this at age 10 or so things might have worked out very differently for me. But I didnt.

This was Southern low church Evangelical Protestantism: born again Christianity with an never-ending emphasis on the eternal torments awaiting those who werent saved and the Rapture that could happen at any moment. The people in the church were mostly good folks who meant well, but their theology was bad and questioning it was unimaginable.

At a very early age I realized it didnt make sense, but I didnt have the context to challenge it. By the time I started learning about other religions and the real history of Christianity, it was too late the tentacles of fundamentalism were firmly lodged in my subconscious.

I became a liberal Christian, then a universalist, then a Pagan, but the tentacles of fundamentalism were still there, still frightening me, and still keeping me from becoming who and what I wanted to be. I had to develop a new intellectual foundation, but I could not exorcise my inner fundamentalist with reason alone. It took a good and powerful religious experience to crowd out the remnants of fundamentalism.

My inner fundamentalist is powerless and dying but it is not dead. I dont think it can truly die as long as Im alive those experiences were too strong for too many years too early in my life. And if I feed that spirit, it will revive.

This isnt like being an alcoholic who cant be around alcohol for fear of having a relapse. I occasionally go the Methodist church where my wife sings in the choir. I read Christian bloggers and writers from time to time. Im still interested in the historical origins of Christianity. And I have many Christian friends and relatives who are good people doing good work, both individually and in their churches. None of this causes me any problems.

But theres a huge difference between intellectually exploring Christianity and practicing Christianity, even if that practice takes a very unorthodox, very unfundamentalist approach. The magic of Catholic saints is nothing like the hellfire and brimstone of Baptist preachers, and for many people that difference is enough to accept the good and reject the bad.

But if I open the door through deep magical and devotional practice, my inner fundamentalist will start to rise from the dead. It didnt respond to reason before and it wont respond to reason now this Christianity isnt that Christianity wont mean a thing.

Nothing is worth letting that fear back into my life. I will not open that door, not even for access to two thousand years of magic.

In general I have not found the Many Gods to be jealous. They want what They want, but as long as They get Theirs They dont seem to care who else or Who else you work with.

But if I start working within a system that says (officially, if not always in practice) that the Gods are not really Gods, something is going to change. I would be moving away from a polytheist religious worldview and toward a monotheist religious worldview. If I can see what will happen if I crack open the door that leads to fundamentalism, so can They.

And They are never eager to give up a worshipper, a follower, and a priest.

Last year I caught some flack from the occultist crowd for my post Why I Dont Work With Saint Cyprian. They complained that I presented a very superficial picture of St. Cyprian and that I misplaced a magical spirit in a very specific, very limited view of Christianity that was not his own. Those complaints were valid. And comparing Cyprianic magic to cultural appropriation was a poor rhetorical strategy on my part.

But they also missed the point:

Im not trying to work magic in a Christian context. Im trying to create a Pagan and polytheist context for the ecstatic, oracular, magical, devotional, ancestral religion Im practicing along with many others. While I occasionally dip my toe into the waters of sorcery, at the end of the day Im a devotional polytheist who prefers to worship and work with the mightiest of spirits Gods.

Magic is a part of my religion, but my primary concern is religion, not magic.

The grimoire tradition has centuries of power built up in its methods. As with any tradition, diving deeply into the whole system will bring results faster and with more certainty than picking a bit here and a bit there. Thats why I rant against buffet-style Paganism.

But if much of the magic in the Christian tradition is pagan in origin (and it is), then it can be recovered and reclaimed for contemporary Pagans.

This is not easy. It takes a lot more than substituting Pagan names and terms for Christian names and terms. It requires reading the material carefully, figuring out what the writer was trying to do and how they were trying to do it something thats doubly hard for those of us who cant read the original texts and are dependent on translations. We have to find the Christian elements, which arent always obvious the ancient Mediterranean world was a religious melting pot and what appears to be Christian may actually be, say, Greco-Egyptian in origin. Then we have to make a guess as to what the pre-Christian version looked like, and revise it to be intelligible to us here and now.

Then we have to try it out, see how it works, and hope it doesnt blow up in our faces.

Theres a phrase thats popular among many religious liberals (a group that includes the majority of the Pagan community): there are many paths up the same mountain.

I do not believe this is true. While at the ultimate level I am a pantheist (probably, depending on how you define pantheism) a more accurate phrase would be many paths up many mountains. The particular form of Pagan polytheism I practice is very different from Christianity. Im going to focus my efforts on my religion and not on someone elses religion even if they have some cool magical tech.

So if youre a Christian and youre envious of your Pagan friends, know that theres a long tradition of magic within your religion, even if the Pope or your preacher tells you not to do it. If youre a Pagan with no deep religious baggage, you may be able to work with this magic as a Pagan survival despite its Christian context.

But I cant. The only way I could escape fundamentalism, and the only way I can be sure it never returns to my life, was to make a clean break with Christianity.

See the original post here:
Why I Had To Make a Clean Break With Christianity - Patheos - Patheos (blog)

Posted in Pantheism | Comments Off on Why I Had To Make a Clean Break With Christianity – Patheos – Patheos (blog)