Daily Archives: April 25, 2017

Ann Coulter Berkeley Address: Howard Dean’s Legal Argument … – National Review

Posted: April 25, 2017 at 4:43 am

On MSNBC yesterday, former Vermont Governor and DNC Chair Howard Dean elaborated on his argument that Ann Coulters upcoming speech at Berkeley does not have to occur because hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment:

Okay, several things to think about. One, the United States has the most far-reaching protections on speech of any country in the world. Two, its not absolute. Three, there are three Supreme Court cases you need to know about. One, the most recent, a John Roberts opinion, the Phelps people, that church out in Kansas, had a right to picket horrible offensive signs at military funerals. Well, two, in 2002, the Supreme Court said cross burning was illegal because it could incite violence. And three, Chaplinsky, the Chaplinsky case in 1942 said that speech was not permitted if it included fighting words that were likely to incite violence.

This is not a clear-cut carrying on the way the Right does. The Right loves to be able to say anything they like, no matter how offensive it is. Well, Ann Coulter has used words that you cannot use on television to describe Jews, blacks, gays, Muslims immigrants, and Hispanics. I think that theres a case to be made that that invokes the Chaplinsky decision, which is fighting words, likely to cause violence. I think Berkeley is within its rights to make the decision that it puts their campus in danger if they have her there. Ill be the first to admit its a close call.

Actually, its not a close call; Dean is making the wrong call under the Constitution. Deans entire answer piles wrong argument atop wrong argument until he completes a Dagwood sandwich of wrong.

Dean cites three court cases, and he mischaracterizes the decisions in all of them. The first case he references, Snyder v. Phelps, was an 8 to 1 decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Churchs freedom to chant the horrible slogans and hold up the horrible banners it favors at a military funeral. If the church is free to protest at a military funeral, it makes no sense to argue that Ann Coulter is not free to give a speech at Berkeley. Dean is perhaps unknowingly citing a case that argues the reverse of his position.

The second case Dean cites, Virginia v. Black, struck down a state law that deemed cross-burning a prima facie attempt at intimidation. The decision was complicated, with multiple justices concurring in part and dissenting in part, but its upshot was that if prosecutors wanted to charge someone with a crime for burning a cross, they had to prove that the cross-burner intended his action as a threat.

Criminal threats, intimidation and criminal harassment are already crimes on the books in many states. If Ann Coulter explicitly threatens an individual in her speech, she can be charged with a crime for that. But whatever her flaws, Coulter is unlikely to make an explicit incitement to violence in a speech at Berkeley.

The third case Dean cites, Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, has come up a bit more frequently as of late. Eugene Volokh points out that while the Chaplinsky precedent hasnt yet been struck down, subsequent decisions have drastically narrowed its definition of fighting words. In 1971, the court ruled that a vulgar phrase on a jacket didnt fall within said definition because it was unlikely that any individual actually or likely to be present could reasonably have regarded the words to be a direct personal insult. In R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, the Court struck down a hate-crime statute, decreeing that the state can restrict speech to a certain time, place, or manner, but only if those restrictions were justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech. (I.e., the government can ban flag-burning by, say, banning all outdoor fires in certain areas, but not explicitly because it dishonors the U.S. flag.)

Without knowing what Coulter would say in her speech, Dean suggests that it would contain fighting words, given her history of using words you cant say on television to describe minorities. Given the words you cant say on television have no bearing on the constitutionality of an (as-yet-undelivered) speech at Berkeley, the one-time front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination seems to be insisting that just by being offensive, Coulters words incite violence and must be restricted and banned. It is fair to ask Dean and his ilk why they are so focused on restricting and punishing speech that supposedly incites violence and much less focused on punishing those who actually commit violent acts.

If Deans real desire is to ban speech that he doesnt like, he should just say so.

Jim Geraghty is National Reviews senior political correspondent.

Visit link:
Ann Coulter Berkeley Address: Howard Dean's Legal Argument ... - National Review

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Ann Coulter Berkeley Address: Howard Dean’s Legal Argument … – National Review

Is the First Amendment dead? – Hays Daily News

Posted: at 4:43 am

On Wednesday, officials of the University of California-Berkeley announced they were canceling a speech to be given by conservative writer Ann Coulter scheduled for April 27. Then on Thursday, facing the prospect of a lawsuit, caught between the First Amendment and the fear of violence, university officials proposed Coulters speech be moved to May 2 a move she and her supporters quickly rejected, pointing out there would be no students on campus, as it coincided with a reading period before final exams.

This was a low point for the birthplace of the free-speech movement.

Ive known Ann Coulter for years, and Ive gone to great lengths truly great lengths to disagree with her. After she published a book called Godless, which accused liberalism of being a godless religion, I wrote a book called Soulless, which attacked the right-wing church of hate. I even donned her trademark sleeveless black dress, added about 10 inches of long blonde hair and posed for a cover that looked almost as sexy as hers.

We agree on almost nothing, except for the importance of free speech and public discourse. And we always have gotten along just fine.

Last summer, when a reporter went to her for comments about me, she could not have been more gracious. Thats how it should be in a democracy.

Our Founding Fathers understood something that seems to be getting lost in the ugly partisanship that has gripped our country. You dont deal with speech you dont like by shutting it down. You deal with it by speaking up yourself. Speech is powerful; it is protected not because it is harmless but because the alternative is even worse. And that alternative is what were facing now.

It is not just at Berkeley that this issue is rearing its ugly head. In response to the cancellation of a speech at Claremont-McKenna College by Heather Mac Donald, the president of Pomona College (part of the Claremont Colleges consortium) wrote an open letter defending the principle of free speech. To my shock, frankly, a group of black students went on the attack, claiming white supremacists (Mac Donald is a fellow of the conservative Manhattan Institute, not the Klan) have no right to free speech. Come again? Who is supposed to decide who gets to speak? Do these students not understand it is precisely oppressed minorities who have historically needed the protection of the First Amendment the most? Do they really think that if speech is regulated, they will be the beneficiaries? On which planet? Under which president?

For those who disagree with Coulter, shutting down her speech only elevates her position. Instead of speaking before a group of students two weeks before exams, the cancellation has brought her national attention and brought Berkeley the criticism it must surely have expected.

But blaming Berkeley is the easy way out. One way or another, the great majority of Americans who support the Constitution must stand up to the minority who think violence and censorship is the answer to speech they dont like. You cannot pick and choose which civil liberties to support, which opinions deserve protection.

As a writer myself, I get more than my share of ugly emails from people who disagree with me. No one enjoys reading those. And as a woman and a Jew, I have sharply felt the sting of hatred. But unless there is a threat of violence (the Constitution provides for shutting down speech if it poses an imminent threat of violence or an imminent threat to national security), the way to handle such ugly emails is simply hitting the Trash button, or better yet, responding with more speech. Because if you shut down free speech this time, next time, the one who is shut down might be you.

Susan Estrich is a columnist,

commentator and law and political science professor at USC.

See the original post here:
Is the First Amendment dead? - Hays Daily News

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Is the First Amendment dead? – Hays Daily News

Censorious students slapped down by First Amendment legend Mary Beth Tinker – The College Fix

Posted: at 4:43 am

Censorious students slapped down by First Amendment legend Mary Beth Tinker

She was a child. And speech was all she had

Its tough being a liberal Democrat who supports free speech on campus these days, like the University of PennsylvaniasJonathan Zimmerman.

The history professor recently shared his gloom in The Philadelphia Inquirerthat hes become a de facto conservative in the realm of the campus,wherestudents believe they have a moral imperative to silence viewpoints they consider racist.

As Zimmerman says, thats a view at odds with every great champion of African American freedom in our history, including Frederick Douglass, who once said speech suppression is the equivalent of theft.

He has some interesting theories about this growing intolerance for diverse ideas, including thedecreasing stigma around mental health problems and the rising use of social media:

Arriving on campuses made up of diverse groups, students are warned that their comments and behavior could cause psychological distress to any of them.

But whats really interesting about his op-ed is Zimmermans description of his students recently meeting a woman whose name is a major Supreme Court precedent, Mary Beth Tinker.

MORE:Angry mob shuts down Blue Lives Matter speech

As a student during the Vietnam War, Tinker wore a black antiwar armband to school and won the right for students to express themselves as long as they didnt create a substantial disruption in school.

She has continued to get involved in First Amendment issues, arguing for the right of California students to wear American flag-themed clothing during Cinco de Mayo, and even startingan educational Tinker Tour with the Student Press Law Center.

Zimmermans students clearly didnt know what they were getting into when they tried to defendtheir censorious attitudes to Tinker, as the professor recounts:

All of my students said they should be allowed to engage in antiwar demonstrations, of course, but they drew the line at racist or sexist speech that causes yes psychological injury. But Tinker wasnt having it. Surely, she said, parents whose children were fighting in Vietnam or, especially, students whose parents had died there were profoundly wounded by her very public act of protest. Yet that wasnt a good enough reason to silence her, or anybody.

You get the feeling that if Mary Beth Tinker were invited to speak on campus by a College Republicans chapter, she would be shouted down and denounced as a white supremacist colonialist imperialist blah blah blah:

Other students argued that free speech is really a matter of power, which has become another popular line on our campuses. In a society marred by racial inequality, the argument goes, speech is used by whites to oppress minorities. Hence white speech must be restrained, so that minorities can be protected.

But Tinker wasnt buying that, either. Historically, free speech has been a weapon often, the only weapon of the powerless, not the powerful. At the time her case began, Tinker reminded us, she was a child. And speech was all she had.

Its amazing that Zimmermans students and thousands of others are so blind that they cant see all of their anti-racist, anti-classist, anti-fascist advocacy is speech and its just as vulnerable to censorship when an administrator decides itis psychologically injuring someone else.

MORE: First Amendment legends demand students right to wear the flag

LikeThe College Fixon Facebook/Follow us on Twitter

About the Author

Associate Editor

Read the original here:
Censorious students slapped down by First Amendment legend Mary Beth Tinker - The College Fix

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Censorious students slapped down by First Amendment legend Mary Beth Tinker – The College Fix

Encrypted Chat Took Over. Let’s Encrypt Calls, Too – Huffington Post

Posted: at 4:42 am

By Lily Hay Newman for WIRED.

WIRED

As end-to-end encrypted messaging apps have exploded in popularity, several well-known services have added encrypted calls as well. Why not, right? If it works for text-based chat, voice seems like a natural extension. If only it were that easy.

Encrypting calls has plenty of value, keeping conversations strictly between the two parties. They can circumvent government wiretaps, or criminal snooping. But a host of technical challenges with facilitating the calls themselves has slowed the spread of voice over internet protocol overall. Bandwidth is expensive. Firewalls and network filters make it harder to route data streams. Even basic call quality issues, like delays and echoes, prove difficult to fix. Adding encryption on top of all of this takes additional resources and specialized developers.

All of which has delayed encrypted calling but not stopped it. And a new groundswell of enthusiasm is bringing more options than ever.

The challenges of making reliable encrypted calling starts with the underlying premise of internet-based calls. Theyre hard. While VoIP calling has become more reliable over the years, it remains technically challenging in itself, especially when people use cellular data instead of more stable ethernet or Wi-Fi connections.

Despite those challenges, Signal, the well-regarded secure communication platform, has offered encrypted calling since 2014. And when WhatsApp followed in 2016, bringing encrypted calls and video chat to more than a billion users, it helped shake off some longstanding inertia. Other secure messaging apps like Wire and Telegram have added encrypted calling over the last year. Signal itself even rolled out call quality improvements in February.

Signal developer Open Whisper Systems open-sources its code, so that companies can borrow from it to build their own encrypted chat and calling features. For example, while WhatsApps overall setup is proprietary, it bases the key exchange for its end-to-end encrypted messages and calls on Signal Protocol. Its users have to trust that it is implementing true end to end encryption in the way it claims. In exchange it brings some form of end to end encryption to an enormous user base that would probably otherwise have little exposure to or protection from the feature. And customers who dont have faith in a large provider like WhatsApp now have other options, given the recent proliferation of both VoIP in general and encryption specifically.

Theres so much happening right now in this space which is really exciting, says Nathan Freitas, the founder and director of the Guardian Project, a privacy and security nonprofit that worked on an encrypted calling platform called Open Secure Telephony Network. In 2012 there was just Skype basically. Google Hangouts didnt even exist. FaceTime existed kind of. So were really happy when theres so much public innovation that includes privacy and security.

Though not nearly as much as there could be, if everyone could get on the same page.

As with messaging, end-to-end encrypted calls require that both ends of the conversation use the same system. In other words, using Signal to call a landline wont cut it; you need to connect with another Signal user. Given this reality, many developers naturally gravitate to implementing encryption in closed systems; its easier both to manage and monetize.

For users, though, this approach has downsides. Unless the developer makes the product fully open source, or allows for extensive independent auditing, theres no guarantee that the encryption implementation works as advertised. The lock-in factor also limits who you can safely communicate with, which slows adoption.

Imagine, instead, an open communication standard that includes end-to-end encryption. It would allow secure communication with more people between different products and interfaces, because the protocols facilitating the end to end encryption would be the same.

The Guardian Projects OSTN experiment attempted to create exactly that sort of comprehensive, open communication suite. It focuses on using existing open, interoperable communication standards, employing classic protocols like ZRTP, which was developed in the mid 2000s by PGP creator Phil Zimmerman, and SRTP, which was developed in the early 2000s at Cisco. It also coordinates and controls its voice calls using the Session Initiation Protocol, developed by the telecom industry in the mid 1990s.

That retro backbone didnt come by choice; there simply arent a lot of more modern open protocol options available. Most big VoIP plus encryption advances have come from private companies like Skype (now owned by Microsoft), Google, and Apple, who offer varying degrees of encryption protection for calls and tend to value locked-in users over interoperability. That left OSTN with old tools.

While theyre very powerful, these are things that are 10, 20, 30 years old in terms of the architecture and the thinking, Freitas says. Theyre definitely showing their age.

And while a few smaller services, like PrivateWave and Jitsi, have adopted OSTN, the decision by larger companies to go it alone has limited its open-protocol dreams. Thats especially a shame for people who need absolute guarantees of security.

With proprietary apps, it can be hard for a user to tell if end-to-end encryption is enabled on both ends. Or, in the case of apps whose encryption protocols have not been fully vetted, whether it works as advertised to begin with.

For mainstream services, crypto is a nice add-on to give users the idea that they can feel more secure, but thats completely different than when your [customers] are people who are under threat, says Bjoern Rupp, the CEO of the boutique German secure communication firm CryptoPhone. If you have to fear for your life, not all secure communication systems are designed for that.

Encryption die-hards can host their own system using open standards like OSTN, similar to how you might host your own email server. Though it takes some technical knowhow, its an option that gives users real control and that isnt possible with closed systems. Another option is to use a security first service like CryptoPhone that offers an integrated, one-stop solution.

CryptoPhones can only call other CryptoPhones, but the company made that choice so it could control the security and experience of both hardware and software. To reconcile this closed system with transparency, the company is open source and invites independent review. It also has over a decade of experience. CryptoPhone has been making high-end commercial products for secure voice calling for a long time, the Guardian Projects Freitas says. They had these crypto flip phones, which were awesome.

None of which leaves the average consumer with widespread encrypted calling that works across multiple services. There may be some help on the way, though, in the form of a new, open, decentralized communication standard called Matrix that includes end to end encryption for chat, VoIP calling, and more. Matrix could be a clean, easy to implement standard underlying other software. For instance, if Slack and Google Hangouts both used the Matrix standard, you would be able to Slack someone from Hangouts and vice versa, similar to how you can send emails to anyone using their email address, regardless of what provider they use.

The net owes its existence to open interoperability, says Matthew Hodgson, technical lead of Matrix. Then people build silos to capture value, which is fair enough, but you get to a saturation point where the silos start really stifling innovation and progress through monopolism.

The catch, of course, is getting buy-in from companies that have little incentive, or getting new services built on a standard like Matrix to take off. Walled gardens tend to produce more profit than open ones.

Still, having these new options is an important first step. And combined with the broader proliferation of encrypted voice-calling apps, change finally seems to be coming from a lot of directions at once. I think theres a longer-term project going on called the internet, Freitas says. Some of us still believe in it.

Read more:
Encrypted Chat Took Over. Let's Encrypt Calls, Too - Huffington Post

Posted in Jitsi | Comments Off on Encrypted Chat Took Over. Let’s Encrypt Calls, Too – Huffington Post

BitTorrent Inventor Bram Cohen Will Start His Own Cryptocurrency – TorrentFreak

Posted: at 4:40 am

BitTorrent inventor Bram Cohen has already earned a spot in the Internet hall of fame, but he's not done yet. In recent years he's taken a strong interest in cryptocurrencies, something he will devote himself full-time to in the near future. This includes launching a new cryptocurrency which addresses some of the challenges facing Bitcoin.

BitTorrents inventor is known for his passion for puzzles, and more generally speaking, offering elegant solutions to complex problems through lines of code.

When Bram Cohen first launched BitTorrent he offered a solution to the bandwidth scarcity problem, by allowing anyone to distribute large files without having to invest in expensive infrastructure.

In recent years Cohen has closely followed the cryptocurrency boom. Not as a money hungry investor with dollar signs in his eyes, but as a programmer who sees problems that need solving.

In doing so, Cohen hasnt shied away from offering his opinions and suggestions. Most recently, he presented a paper and a talk at the Stanford blockchain conference, discussing proofs of space and proofs of time.

Without going into technical details, Cohen believes that Bitcoin is wasteful. He suggests that a cryptocurrency that pins the mining value on storage space rather than processor time will be superior.

In an interview with TorrentFreaks Steal This Show, Cohen revealed that his interest in cryptocurrencies is not merely abstract. It will be his core focus in the near future.

My proposal isnt really to do something to BitCoin. It really has to be a new currency, Cohen says. Im going to make a cryptocurrency company. Thats my plan.

By focusing on a storage based solution, BitTorrents inventor also hopes to address other Bitcoin flaws, such as the 51% attack.

Another benefit of storage based things is actually that theres a lot less centralization in mining. So theres a lot less concern about having a 51% attack, Cohen says.

Sometimes people have this misapprehension that Bitcoin is a democracy. No Bitcoin is not a democracy; its called a 51% attack for a reason. Thats not a majority of the vote, thats not how Bitcoin works.

While the idea of a storage based cryptocurrency isnt new, Burstcoin uses a similar concept, there is little doubt that Cohen believes he can do better. And with his status and contacts in the Bitcoin developer community, his project is likely to gain some eyeballs.

Before diving into it completely, Cohen will first finish up some other work at BitTorrent Inc. But after that, his full dedication will go into creating a superior cryptocurrency.

In the next few months Im going to devote myself full-time to the cryptocurrency stuff, Cohen concludes.

The full interview with Bran Cohen is available here, or on the Steal This Show website.

Read more:
BitTorrent Inventor Bram Cohen Will Start His Own Cryptocurrency - TorrentFreak

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on BitTorrent Inventor Bram Cohen Will Start His Own Cryptocurrency – TorrentFreak

Billionaire says he has 10% of his money in Bitcoin, Ether …

Posted: at 4:40 am

"Ten percent of my net worth is in this space," Novogratz said at a forum held at the Harvard Business School Club of New York Wednesday. He declined to say exactly how wealthy he is, but he's a former hedge fund manager at Fortress Investment Group and a Goldman Sachs partner who made the Forbes billionaire list in 2008.

It's the "best investment of my life," Novogratz said.

Bitcoin was worth under $500 a year ago. Today the digital currency trades at over $1,200. Back in 2013, Novogratz predicted Bitcoin's value would soar. He remembers people laughing at him at the time.

Since then, Bitcoin's price has been on a wild run. It surged to nearly $1,000 in late 2013 and then fell to under $250 in 2015. It started to fly again last year, around the time of the Brexit vote. It surpassed $1,000 in January of this year again and has kept climbing.

Now Novogratz is saying Bitcoin will go to $2,000.

But he also warned the Harvard Business School Club crowd that there will "likely be a bubble" in digital currencies. The best way to handle it, he argues, is the old Wall Street trick of diversification. Put a little money in a lot of different plays in digital currency.

Related: What is Bitcoin? Read CNN's explainer

For example, Novogratz was also an early investor in Ether. It's another digital currency that has quickly emerged as the No. 2 rival to Bitcoin. Novogratz says he bought Ether when it was trading for about $1. Today it's worth over $48.

Novogratz met Vitalik Buterin, the young Russian brainchild behind Ether at a dinner party at a prominent CEO's home. He recalls that Buterin, then 21, showed up late, which struck him as shocking -- and a bit ballsy. He figured it was worth paying attention to Buterin.

Ether is a currency with a "smart contract" function that gives users additional security and abilities to transfer information in addition to monetary value.

We're witnessing the "3rd inning" of this digital asset revolution, Novogratz predicts. He's not exactly sure how it will play out, but he plans to continue investing in digital currencies and Blockchain, the revolutionary technology behind the scenes that makes Bitcoin work.

Blockchain is literally a digital ledger to record and track transactions. What makes it so technologically advanced is that multiple companies or parties can access the Blockchain and see the history of what happened to an asset.

Related: Yext: The newest $1 billion tech company

Novogratz has emerged as one of the biggest Wall Street cheerleaders of Blockchain, but his bets haven't always gone so well. He exited Fortress in 2015 after the company shut down his Marco Fund for poor performance. It lost around 20% in its final year after his investments in emerging markets, especially Brazil, tanked.

"We have had an extremely challenging two years, and I do not believe the current environment is conducive to achieving our best results," Novogratz said at the time.

CNNMoney (New York) First published April 20, 2017: 12:44 PM ET

Link:
Billionaire says he has 10% of his money in Bitcoin, Ether ...

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Billionaire says he has 10% of his money in Bitcoin, Ether …

New Dual Blockchain Crowdfund set to run … – news.bitcoin.com

Posted: at 4:40 am

This is a paid press release, which contains forward looking statements,and should be treated as advertising or promotional material. Bitcoin.com does not endorse nor support this product/service. Bitcoin.com is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy or quality within the press release.

Summary: MobileGo is the new dual blockchain token developed by Gamecredits . The MobileGo Crowdsale begins April 25th and will help finance and brand the Gamecredits Mobile Store. MobileGo will operate within the mobile platform and will use both the Ethereum and Waves blockchains.

GameCredits Inc has announced an affiliated crowdsale beginning April 25th at 3:00 PM UTC. The crowdsale is supporting MobileGo, the first dual blockchain cryptocurrency aimed at providing decentralized solutions to the mobile gaming industry. The three main solutions the innovative coin provides are a player to player virtual item marketplace, player run wager tournaments, and player vs player wager match-play. These technologies are launching inside of the GameCredits Mobile Store, leveraging the hundreds of games already signed up for the platform. A demo of the GameCredits Mobile Store GameCredits, done by VP of Business Operations Sergey Sholom can be seen in the Gamecredits Inc social outlets.

Currently, virtual item exchange and e-sports are fast growing billion dollar industries for PC gaming. However, there are no such solutions for mobile gaming, which is the fastest growing sector, projected to reach a whopping 80.6 billion dollars in size by 2020. These three sectors are currently untapped markets, meaning MobileGo could be the first to take them over. With this in mind, the MobileGo foundation will take 50% of all funds raised to advertise the GameCredits Mobile Store, acquiring millions of gamers to the platform at an industry average cost of $1.50 per gamer. MobileGo and GameCredits will work in unison to bring competitive gaming to phones around the globe.

MobileGo is gearing up to be one of the most promising blockchain technology projects of the year. The project consists of incredibly qualified people from a variety of fields. Two head developers Maxim and Sergey Sholom, have over 25 combined years of combined experience developing successful PC and Mobile games. The team also consists of cryptocurrency and big data experts innovating the tokens dual blockchain platform. In addition, the core product behind MobileGo, the GameCredits Mobile Store, is entirely developed. Investing in MobileGo means investing in the success of the GameCredits Mobile Store since 10% of all store profit will be used to buyback and burn MobileGo tokens.

Chief Marketing Officer of MobileGo Jon Comer had this to say about the unique development of MobileGo. Its important to realize weve been working on these projects for almost two years, with almost two million dollars in self-financing. Many blockchain projects have a desire to solve problems but are trying to solve problems from the outside in. MobileGo, on the other hand, has been a collaboration from the inside out. Essentially, experts from the gaming blockchain and gaming industries have joined forces to solve gaming industry problems using MobileGo.

The MobileGo foundation has also implemented a discount schedule. During the first week there is a 15% discount for investments made with BTC, ETH, WAVES, and USD, with an additional 7% discount for investments made in GAME. Registration and introduction to the MobileGo Crowdsale can be seen at https://getmobilego.com/crowdsale-investors-only/

This is a paid press release. Readers should do their own due diligence before taking any actions related to thepromotedcompanyor any of its affiliates or services. Bitcoin.com is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in the press release.

Go here to see the original:
New Dual Blockchain Crowdfund set to run ... - news.bitcoin.com

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on New Dual Blockchain Crowdfund set to run … – news.bitcoin.com

Bitcoin traders are losing confidence in the rally – MarketWatch

Posted: at 4:40 am

As Bitcoins price is creeping back toward its all-time high, speculators are growing increasingly wary of the notion that its astonishing gains can be sustained.

The size of the total outstanding long positions on Bitfinex, one of a handful of large cryptocurrency exchanges that allows customers to buy and sell on margin, has shrunk to its lowest level since Sept. 15.

Meanwhile, the price of a single coin BTCUSD, +0.23% was hovering around $1,245 on Monday, leaving it within $40 of an all-time high reached in early March, when hopes that the Securities and Exchange Commission might soon approve the first bitcoin exchange-traded fund were still running high.

Since then, the agency has rejected two bitcoin ETF proposals. It is expected to issue a ruling on a third contender, the Grayscale Bitcoin Investment Trust, early in the third quarter.

Bitcoin has been largely stable even as support for a controversial software update called bitcoin unlimited has receded dramatically as developers have identified another bug in its code. The update would, if passes a threshold of 95% of the networks hashing power, increased the amount of transaction data that can be stored in each block of the bitcoin blockchain.

Bitfinexs customers are now long nearly 12,967 coins, while 18,775 coins are being held short. Positioning data like these are widely viewed as a counter indicator; that is, when bets against the currency rise, it raises the likelihood that any gains could be amplified as vulnerable investors scramble to buy back coins held short.

Read: Bitcoin bears ramp up bets virtual currency will fall

Read: Bitcoin touches record high as investors await SEC decision

Read: Heres whats next for bitcoin after the SEC killed the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust

Shorts surpassed longs earlier this month for the first time since February. The last time this happened, it preceded a nearly $300 rally in the price.

The blockchain is the cryptographically secured digital ledger that records all bitcoin transactions. A copy of the blockchain is stored by each computer node running the bitcoin software, and each transaction must first be independently approved by every node in the network before it can be confirmed.

After spending two years in the doldrums, bitcoin came roaring back in 2016 as the price more than doubled. The currency is up more than 30% so far this year.

Continued here:
Bitcoin traders are losing confidence in the rally - MarketWatch

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitcoin traders are losing confidence in the rally – MarketWatch

9 Things We Bought With Bitcoin – Huffington Post

Posted: at 4:40 am

Youve got to admit that everyone likes to go shopping once in a while, whether its to buy that designer shirt youve been eyeing or those nifty gadgets you saw in a catalog the other day. To do this youve got to spend money. But what happens if you want to shop with cryptocurrency?

Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency that has gained popularity over the years. Here are 9 things you can buy with bitcoin:

Time to go out again. We still have our socks, but maybe we need new shoes? Normally having leather shoes handcrafted for your foot size and shape cost a fortune, but in Iran, with its fine leather and shoe industry, these high quality products are affordable.

Interestingly the sanctions against Iran dont make it illegal to import shoes (unless you are American, maybe). But it does make it impossible to send payments. In this case, we literally have no other option than to pay with Bitcoin.

Ever wanted to visit North Korea? The China-based travel agency Young Pioneer Tours has 9 years of experience of organizing tours to North Korea, and can help you with flights, hotels, visa and a tour guide. Its difficult to make a wire transfer to China, so Bitcoin is our natural choice of payment.

Okay, we get it, Bitcoin is awesome. We constantly want to talk about it, tell others about our trip to North Korea, and how we were able to tweet pictures the entire trip from one of the most heavily locked down countries on earth.

But doing so would make us a bit annoying. We head over to South Korean company Kimchi Socks to buy their Bitcoin branded socks. That way, maybe people will notice and ask about Bitcoin themselves? Bitcoin socks, paid with Bitcoin. We are so much fun at parties!

So now we have shoes from Iran, been to North Korea and have these stylish new socks. Why put shoes on again? Why not just make your work life a whole lot better with some awesome office gadgets?

Gadgets and toys are enjoyed all around the world by people of all age, color and gender. But not everyone has a credit card to pay for it. Bitcoin to the rescue.

Quickly after the first game we realize we might need a better monitor. There are tons of places online that sell monitors for Bitcoins. Rakuten, Overstock, Dell, Tiger Direct and others.

Do you know that feeling when you make yourself coffee while playing a video game, and then you forget you made it and now its cold? That happens with tea as well, but cold tea is still delicious. Just put some Ice cubes inside! No idea how to combine ice cubes and Bitcoin, but for the tea, head to Beautiful Taiwan Tea.

VPNs are meant to protect our privacy and data when we browse the web from a coffee shop or airport Wi-Fi. Many of us live in countries that actively monitor and censor the internet, and a logless VPN protects us.

For more privacy, it makes perfect sense to not use your credit card (which is connected to your real name), but instead the pseudonymous currency Bitcoin.

No matter if you want jewelry for yourself or as a gift, Reeds takes Bitcoins and ships to wherever you are.

At the end of the day, why not donate your Bitcoins to one of over 10,000 charities in the United Kingdom? With Proof of Donation, you are issued a cryptographic receipt that irrefutably proves you did good. With Bitcoin.

Original post:
9 Things We Bought With Bitcoin - Huffington Post

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on 9 Things We Bought With Bitcoin – Huffington Post

North Korea May Be Responsible for Recent Spate of Bitcoin Attacks – Investopedia

Posted: at 4:40 am

North Korea May Be Responsible for Recent Spate of Bitcoin Attacks
Investopedia
Bitcoin offers a number of potential advantages over other types of currency. It is decentralized, by necessity digital, easily transacted, and more. On the other hand, though, the requirement that Bitcoin be tied with a digital footprint means that ...

and more »

See more here:
North Korea May Be Responsible for Recent Spate of Bitcoin Attacks - Investopedia

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on North Korea May Be Responsible for Recent Spate of Bitcoin Attacks – Investopedia