The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: April 23, 2017
Scientists across the world take to the streets to demand freedom from political interference – Telegraph.co.uk
Posted: April 23, 2017 at 12:45 am
In Los Angeles, Danny Lederman, the 26-year-old director of digital media for the county's Democratic party, said "We used to look up to intelligence and aspire to learn more and do more with that intellectual curiosity. And we've gone from there to a society where ... our officials and representatives belittle science and they belittle intelligence. And we really need a culture change."
The rallies in more than 600 cities put scientists, who generally shy away from advocacy and whose work depends on objective experimentation, into a more public position.
Scientists said they were anxious about political and public rejection of established science such as climate change and the safety of vaccine immunisations.
"Scientists find it appalling that evidence has been crowded out by ideological assertions," said Rush Holt, a former physicist and Democratic congressman who runs the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "It is not just about Donald Trump, but there is also no question that marchers are saying 'when the shoe fits.'"
Despite saying the march was not partisan, Holt acknowledged it was only dreamed up at the Women's March on Washington, a day after Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration.
But the rallies were also about what science does for the world.
"Most people don't know how much funding for the sciences supports them in their lives every day. Every medical breakthrough, their food, clothing, our cellphones, our computers, all that is science-based," said Pati Vitt, a plant scientist at the Chicago Botanic Garden. "So if we stop funding scientific discoveries now, in 10 years, whatever we might have had won't be; we just won't have it."
View original post here:
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on Scientists across the world take to the streets to demand freedom from political interference – Telegraph.co.uk
Freedom I: The essence of America – SalemNews.net
Posted: at 12:45 am
If you ask around the country, or around the world for that matter, what one word exemplifies the essence of America? What word best describes what America represents? What single concept is etched in our constitutional DNA? It would be freedom!
It was the quest for freedom that inspired a group of colonists to fight for and create a new nation. It is the idea of freedom that was pervasive in every word written into our founding documents. It was the desire to perpetuate freedom that lead to the creation of our unique system of government with its singular responsibility to defend our freedom from enemies both foreign and domestic. There cannot be a reference to America that doesnt contain the underlying principle of freedom.
Why then have we strayed so far from that most fundamental founding principle? We are no longer free to conduct our lives as we see fit. There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws. There are so many regulations that can be enforced criminally. They cannot even be counted but the number is estimated to be in the tens of thousands. And that doesnt account for all the state and local laws. Each of these laws and regulations is a little bit of our freedom stolen from us.
Now I am not an anarchist who believes there should be no law. I believe that we should be free to go about our lives as long as we do not harm or violate the rights of someone else. John Stuart Mill, author of the classic treatise On Liberty wrote: The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized society, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant. In other words, the legitimate role of government in a free society should be restricted to ensuring that only those offenses that injure another person should be purview of government force.
At one time, freedom was defined as the absence of coercion. The Progressive Era brought about an expanded definition as it applies to government, the freedom from want. If you believe that the federal government exists as originally intended, for the explicit purpose protecting your rights, then the pursuit of freedom from want has no place in governments role in our free society.
The Framers knew if they were to provide something to someone, that benefit could be used as an excuse, no matter how illegitimate, to impose the governments will upon not only the recipient but the population en masse, which is exactly what has happened. That is why the Framers where adamant that the central government be given no power or responsibility to provide goods and services beyond safety, defense, and a few to promote the economy and trade. The Framers went even further to explicitly limit the power of the federal government to eighteen enumerated powers. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution defines the governmental guardrails meant to keep the federal government from veering into areas they have no authority to venture.
It is the application of the freedom from want that has provided pseudo-justification for the government inserting itself into every aspect of our daily lives. If someone or something provides you with a good or service, is it not reasonable to expect that the provider would want you to behave in a manner that would not exacerbate your want or need for that good or service? And if the service provider is government, they can impose that behavior modification with force.
This completely changes the relationship between citizen and government. The citizen becomes a subject of government as opposed to the government acting with the consent of the citizen. Let us take a look at one easily understood example, the motorcycle helmet laws.
I doubt there is one case where the absence of a helmet made the rider more of a danger to their fellow citizens. So what is the justification for forcing a person to wear a helmet? Medicaid and Social Security. Should a person become disabled because they were not wearing a helmet they might become a lifelong liability on the social welfare system.
Thus the government has an interest in mitigating the injuries that can be sustained by someone operating a motorcycle. This is done at the expense of everyones freedom. Now all motorcyclists have lost the freedom to feel the wind in their hair in an effort to reduce the probability that some might become wards of the state.
The freedom from want or the redistribution of wealth, has been used for the past eighty years as rationalization to implement a plethora of unconstitutional, freedom squelching laws and programs. They use taxation and regulation to nudge people in a direction that is more advantageous to government and less conducive to individual freedom.
As usual the government acts like a bull in a china shop. Instead of holding the individual responsible they punish the entire community. It would be easy to pass a law that states if you are injured or disabled because you choose to ride a motorcycle, you relinquish all claims to government social welfare benefits. But no, that would connect voluntary actions to accepting responsibility for the outcome of those actions and the government works overtime to sever that connection.
We now have in Washington D.C. a group of a little over thirty Republican Representatives who are members of what is known as the Freedom Caucus. Now give that some thought for a moment. Only thirty or so members of the House of Representatives want to be affiliated with a group dedicated to getting government out of the way of our individual freedom. If you go back to the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries, the entire Congress was the Freedom Caucus.
Today, Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and Lincoln would be considered alt-right radicals. Even Democrat John F. Kennedy with his ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country and his tax cutting policies would be considered by the liberals and media as completely out of the mainstream.
If freedom is to prevail, we must eliminate the incentive for government to infringe on our liberty. We must demand that the government return to its Constitutional limits. James Madison, father of the Constitution, stated; Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government. Ronald Reagan once said, Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didnt pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
The question we must ask ourselves, do we want to go down in history as the generation that allowed the flame of freedom to be extinguished or do we rise up and force our government to again respect its Constitutional boundaries?
Area resident Jack Loesch is a longtime teacher at the University of Akron. Read his website at http://www.TorchnFork.info. He may be reached at: TorchNFork@frontier.com
When someone says, No, it doesnt mean yes or maybe. It means emphatically, No. When a ...
LISBON April 2017 is the National Council on Alcohol and Drug Addictions (NCADD's) 31st Annual Alcohol ...
Look at your watch. In the next hour, five Americans will die of a drug overdose. Ive been working on the ...
What did people do before cell and smart phones, those little things so many of us think we just cant live ...
Michelle and the baby get up about 7 a.m. She already is on the phone with her best friend and as they talk she ...
With the battle raging over the confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice to replace the late Antonin Scalia, the ...
More here:
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on Freedom I: The essence of America – SalemNews.net
Collins: I’m not working with Freedom Caucus chairman on healthcare – The Hill
Posted: at 12:45 am
Sen. Susan CollinsSusan CollinsCollins: I'm not working with Freedom Caucus chairman on healthcare Mexico: Recent deportations 'a violation' of US immigration rules White House denies misleading public in aircraft carrier mix-up MORE (R-Maine) on Friday reportedly denied that she has been working with the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus on a healthcare bill.
CNBC contributor Larry Kudlow claimed Thursday that the moderate senator was negotiating the details of the GOP healthcare bill with Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.). But that news came as a surprise to Collins, who said she "choked on [her]cereal" when she saw the report, according to theMaine Sun Journal.
Collins, who has been pushing her own healthcare measure in the Senate, said she couldn't remember meeting Meadows or discussing substantive policy issues with him, the Sun Journal reported.
Kudlow also said that Collins could help push a healthcare bill through the Senate next week if the House passes one. Collins rejected that notion outright, and said that she doesn't"believe in jamming legislation through."
The White House is holding out hope that a bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act could come to a vote in Congress as early as next week, but many Republican lawmakers though have expressed deep skepticism that a vote could come that quickly, noting that the text of such a bill hasn't even been written yet.
GOP lawmakers are eager to pass a healthcare bill after their first attempt to repeal and replace ObamaCare failed last month due to a dearth of support among Republicans, especially members of the Freedom Caucus.
While Collins also opposed that bill, she said it is unlikely that Meadows would be willing to work with her on a new bill, calling their rumored negotiations"a very improbable pairing" while saying she'd be "happy to talk" wth Meadows, according to the Sun Journal.
Read the original post:
Collins: I'm not working with Freedom Caucus chairman on healthcare - The Hill
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on Collins: I’m not working with Freedom Caucus chairman on healthcare – The Hill
If This is Freedom and Democracy, What is Tyranny? – Center for Research on Globalization
Posted: at 12:45 am
Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. Thats our problem people are obedient, all these herdlike people. Howard Zinn
If truth be known, Americans are no more free than were Germans under Gestapo Germany. Freedom and Democracy America is the greatest lie in the world.
Countries sink into tyranny easily. Those born today dont know the freedom of the past and are unaware of what has been taken away. Some American blacks might think that finally after a long civil rights struggle they have gained freedom. But the civil rights that they gained have been taken away from all of us by the war on terror. Today black Americans are gratuitously shot down in the streets by police in ways that are worse than in Jim Crow days.
American women might think that finally they have gained equality, and they havethe equality to be abused by police just like men. As John Whitehead reports,
women are forced by police to strip naked, often in public, and have their vaginas explored as part of a drug search. When I was a young man, society would not have tolerated any such intrusion on a woman. The officer and police chief would have been fired and if not prosecuted for rape, would have been beat into bloody pulps by the enraged men.
Tyranny was brought to Americans intentionally by their government. Perhaps it began in 1992 with the unaccountable use of police power against an American family at Ruby Ridge. Randy Weavers 12 or 13 year old son was shot in the back and murdered by federal marshals. Then his wife was murdered with a shot through her throat while she stood at the door of her home holding a baby in her arms. There was no justification for this gratuitous violence against a peaceful American family, and the federal marshals who murdered were not held accountable. The Congress, the peoples representatives held a hearing, and those responsible for murdering a family told the representatives that they had to trust the police.
A year later, 1993, the Clinton regime murdered, using poison gas as well as gun fire, more than 100 members of the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas.
Women and children comprised most of the victims of freedom and democracy America. The Branch Davidians had done nothing except be different. They were a threat to no one. But the Clinton criminal government knew that it could portray the Branch Davidians, as they were different, in unfavorable lights. They were said to be in possession of, and perhaps manufacturing, illegal machine guns. They were said to be having sex with underage girls in their collective.
When the Branch Davidian compound was attacked by a tank spewing chemical warfare and then burnt to the ground, insouciant Americans were told that justice had been done to child abusers. No one objected that the same justice had also been done to the allegedly abused children.
Again the representatives of the people held a hearing. The result was that the Clinton criminal regime and Janet Reno got approval for dealing effectively with those who violate gun laws.
Ruby Ridge and Waco established the precedents that the US government could murder large numbers of Americans, and at Waco some foreigners, without consequence. The representatives of the people accepted the executive branchs lies in order to avoid having to hold the executive branch accountable for what were clearly without any doubt capital crimes against American citizens for which the federal perpetrators of these crimes should have been tried and executed.
These two instances established the precedent that the US government could murder US citizens at will.
The next step was to take away the constitutional and legal protections of citizens that are in the Bill of Rights, the amendments to the US Constitution, and are, or were, institutionalized in legal practices.
The false flag attack of September 11, 2001, was the instrument for deep-sixing the bill of rights. The George W. Bush regime made us safe by taking away our civil liberties. Habeas corpus, the foundation of liberty, was destroyed by the executive branchs assertion that the President on his sole authority, the US Constitution notwithstanding, can detain US citizens indefinitely without evidence, without going before a court, without any accountability to law whatsoever.
The Obama regime not only endorsed this murder of the US Constitution, Americans First Black President even went further. Obama declared that he had the power to sit in his office and write down names of US citizens whom he could murder at his will without accountability.
Congress did not object. The Supreme Court did not object. The American media did not object. The law schools and bar associations did not object. The Republican Party did not object. The Democratic Party did not object. The American people did not object. Washingtons allies in Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada did not object. The Christian churches did not object.
I objected, and a few others like me, such as John Whitehead.
9/11 clearly, without any doubt, destroyed American liberty. Even if you are so brainwashed as to believe an obviously false story of the event, even if you believe that a few Saudi Arabians without government or intelligence service support outwitted all 16 US intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, all intelligence agencies of Washingtons vassals abroad, outwitted Israels Mossad, US Air Traffic Control, caused US Airport Security to fail four times in one hour on the same day, and prevented for the first time in history the US Air Force from sending fighters to intercept off course airliners, the fact remains the same: the US government used 9/11 to destroy the constitutional protections of US liberty.
The raw, ugly, but true fact that our government has destroyed American liberty is the reason that everyone of us is subject to experiencing the abuses that John Whitehead describes.
Who will be next? You? Me? Your Wife? Your Son? Your daughter? Your aged and infirm parents?
When it happens, it was the American people who permitted it.
Read this article:
If This is Freedom and Democracy, What is Tyranny? - Center for Research on Globalization
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on If This is Freedom and Democracy, What is Tyranny? – Center for Research on Globalization
How Trump can send a message to UC Berkeley about freedom of speech – Los Angeles Times
Posted: at 12:45 am
To the editor: A disturbing belief has taken hold recently: that university students have a right to an intellectual safe space and not to be offended by speech with which they disagree. (Conservative group threatens UC Berkeley over Ann Coulter appearance, April 21)
There are in fact no such rights. Students can choose not to attend a lecture or walk out if they choose, but they do not have the right to stifle the free speech rights of a speaker and of those who issued the invitation. Administrators and public officials have the responsibility to clearly explain this to the student populace, but they are not doing a very good job of it.
At UC Berkeley which rescheduled conservative commentator Ann Coulter's lecture after its previous cancellation of the event caused a backlash university officials have shown they are willing to surrender to the domestic terrorists who light fires, overturn cars and smash windows. If they will not provide safety for those exercising their 1st Amendment rights, then it behooves the president to act. There are precedents from Arkansas and Alabama during the civil rights movement, when past administrations stepped up to ensure the rights of black students to attend public schools and colleges.
This is an opportunity for UC Berkeley students and administrators to learn an important lesson regarding the constitutional rights of their fellow citizens.
Silas Mariano, Oceanside
..
To the editor: Coulter is scarcely the embodiment of a deep conservative thinker. Nobody would confuse her with Leo Strauss or Edmund Burke, for instance. And the right loves any chance to portray the left as stomping on the 1st Amendment.
UC Berkeley, in initially denying Coulter a platform, played into the right-wing agenda.
Joan Walston, Santa Monica
..
To the editor: Oh, the nugget of radioactive hypocrisy buried in the larger article covering conservative grievances over the short-lived cancellation of a hate-speech mavens appearance at UC Berkeley: the insistence by Coulter and her right-wing sponsor that campus police expel any students engaging in heckling.
Translation: Coulters free speech rights take precedence over those of opposing viewpoint. To paraphrase Truman, what is Coulter doing in the kitchen if she cannot stand the heat?
Blaise Jackson, Escondido
..
To the editor: It seems to me that the most effective nonviolent protest of a speaker is to stay home. Violence is childish and counterproductive.
The purpose of a university is to expose students to other ways of thinking. I resent my tax dollars going toward an institution that would deny the right of anyone to give a speech, regardless of how offensive it is.
Jefferson C. Romney, Westlake Village
::
To the editor: No one believes that fomenting violent protests serves to advance the interests of the right or the left, just as no one thinks conservatives have a white supremacy dream for America. All of these thugs just muddy the waters of our democratic discourse.
I for one would appreciate mindful media coverage of the real issues as opposed to the sensational marketing of a divisive narrative. The Times should strive to uphold the highest standards for our fourth estate to achieve that end.
Pam Brennan, Newport Beach
Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook
Originally posted here:
How Trump can send a message to UC Berkeley about freedom of speech - Los Angeles Times
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on How Trump can send a message to UC Berkeley about freedom of speech – Los Angeles Times
Technology | Cambridge Mask
Posted: at 12:44 am
Our inner filter is made from a 100% pure activated carbon cloth, which was originally invented by the UK Ministry of Defence. It was then extensively developed and made into a product for use in chemical, biological and nuclear warfare protection, used by armed forces around the world.
All activated carbons traditionally powders and granules generate Van der Waal forces due to their porous structure. These forces give activated carbons their unique potential to absorb molecules, including anions and cations into their internal pores.
Our filter material is comprised of a series of activated carbon filaments, each about 2,000 nanometres in diameter. The pores in each filament are 25 times smaller than those in standard carbon materials, and therefore more powerful. This means that bacteria and viruses are drawn to the surface from further away.
The high number of filaments spun into a yarn and then woven into cloth concentrate and intensify the Van der Waal forces, including powerful electrostatic charges. This way, not only are molecules such as endotoxins quickly absorbed into the pores from a much wider area, but these forces also attract and immobilise much larger particles including bacteria, which often have a negatively charged membrane. The material traps the bacteria and draws out the gel-like cytoplasm inside killing it and preventing infection.
Cambridge Masks are therefore powerful respirators that not only clear the air of pollution via the particulate filter, but also remove potentially harmful pathogens with the additional carbon filter.
Read more here:
Posted in Technology
Comments Off on Technology | Cambridge Mask
3-D technology is game-changer for recruiting future engineers – Phys.Org
Posted: at 12:44 am
April 22, 2017 by Dee Depass, Star Tribune (Minneapolis)
Stratasys Ltd. employees ran a marathon of sorts earlier this month as they dashed to dozens of Twin Cities schools to introduce 3,500 students to the wonderment of 3-D printing.
The effort was the company's first large-scale effort to instantly reach out to thousands of students about the so-called STEM fields of science, technology, engineering and math. It culminated with 93 students visiting the company's headquarters in a partnership with the national black sorority Delta Sigma Theta.
"So many kids and teachers and principals are intrigued about 3-D printing because they see it on TV, but a lot of times they don't get to engage with it. This changes that," said Jesse Roitenberg, Stratasys national education manager. "3-D printing makes sense to people when they can touch and feel and hold it. That's why Stratasys decided to accelerate its educational outreach."
In the past, a Stratasys employee here or there visited their child's school for career day. But for this "outreach week, we invited anyone in the company to go out to a school and talk about what they do for Stratasys and what Stratasys does," Roitenberg said.
About 80 employees helped with the effort that reached 31 schools. Each volunteer had an educational kit, videos and some fun 3-D printed products to introduce kids to the technology and what a career in manufacturing and engineering could look like.
The teens that visited Stratasys, from nine different schools, were part of the Deltas' Empowering Males to Build Opportunities for Developing Independence Scholars program. They gawked, squinted, pulled and giggled while using Stratasys design software and printers to convert digital drawings into 3-D salt shakers.
Stratasys, with $672 million in annual revenue, normally sells its large printing machines to manufacturers such as Airbus, Siemens, Ford Motor Co., Tesla and other industrial giants.
While the technology has grown into a $6 billion industry, the students of today are "the next generation (and) will be very key to taking 3-D printing to a whole new level," said Rich Garrity, president of Stratasys Americas.
While listening, Ronelle Porter, a 15-year-old high school student, scanned a table of sample products, grabbed a 3-D printed steering wheel and pretended to race it. He thumped a 3-D printed brake pedal to test its strength.
Nearby, Demond Bryant Jr., 16, felt the model of a heart that doctors had practiced on before doing actual surgery.
"I've never had this much of a hands-on experience with 3-D printing," he said. "I didn't know about its medical applications before. This is pretty cool."
In the station next door, Caleem Williams pressure washed a freshly printed velociraptor head until inches of molding gel slid off. That left him with a sharp-toothed little beast that became a keepsake keychain.
"These are cool. I've never seen this before in person. If I wasn't told this was 3-D printed, you would never know," said Williams, 17. Now he can't wait for his school to get a 3-D printer so he can make diorama models for his anatomy class. Chaperones for the day were black principals, engineers and financial experts from 3M, Medtronic, Optum, Bank of America, Ritchie Engineering, robotics firm CZX Solutions and Delta Sigma Theta.
"I know this is supposed to be for the kids, but this is just fantastic," said Michael Roberts from Optum as he peered through 3-D printed truck-engine housings. "I'm as excited about this as they are."
Miquel McMoore, a Stratasys recruiter, arranged the partnership with Delta EMBODI. The Deltas have several programs for girls. The EMBODI effort for boys, however, is in its third year, she said.
"I have been with Stratasys for two years. And this company fits exactly what EMBODI is," she said. "We are very STEM-focused."
Pleased that the students learned so much and had so much fun, "we will do this again," she said.
Explore further: 3-D printed operational drone with embedded electronics using aerospace-grade material
2017 Star Tribune (Minneapolis) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Researchers at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) have 3-D printed a ready-to-fly drone with embedded electronics using aerospace-grade material.
New 3D printing technology unveiled this week sharply increases the size of objects that can be produced, offering new possibilities to remake manufacturing in the auto, aerospace and other major industries.
Stratasys, a leading maker of 3-D printers, is buying another 3-D printer manufacturer, MakerBot, for $403 million in stock.
(Phys.org) An announcement of a multicolor 3D printer capable of automating the creation of complex prototypes with different material properties was made this week by 3D printer manufacturer, Stratasys. Of interest to ...
The features of 3D printing are significant for the movie industry. The US animation studio LAIKA, relies on using the cutting edge software and 3D printing hardware to make its films. A new collaboration with Fraunhofer ...
General Electric is continuing its push into the digital realm, spending $1.4 billion to acquire two European 3-D printing companies.
Everyone experiences stiff muscles from time to time, whether after a rigorous workout, in cold weather, or after falling asleep in an unusual position. People with cerebral palsy, stroke and multiple sclerosis, however, ...
It may not be quite like the Jetsons, but for over a million dollars you too can soon fly around in a car.
Google's voice-activated assistant can now recognize who's talking to it on Google's Home speaker.
Facebook wants to read your mind.
Google Earth is getting a revival, as the 3-D mapping service reorients itself to become more of a tool for adventure and exploration.
Samsung's new Galaxy S8 phone is stunning. But its $100 price hike is hard to swallow.
Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more
See the original post:
3-D technology is game-changer for recruiting future engineers - Phys.Org
Posted in Technology
Comments Off on 3-D technology is game-changer for recruiting future engineers – Phys.Org
Alphabet claims Uber was hiding the self-driving technology that it allegedly ripped off – Recode
Posted: at 12:44 am
A new court filing from Alphabet claims that Uber hid a key piece of self-driving technology that it allegedly copied from Waymo, the Google parent companys autonomous vehicle subsidiary.
They were hiding a device, Alphabet said in a filing today, supporting its motion for a preliminary injunction that would prevent Uber from working on self-driving technology.
Uber says it isnt hiding anything and did not infringe on Alphabets patents.
Alphabet has sued Uber over claims it stole its proprietary self-driving technology. At the center of the suit is a former Alphabet executive, Anthony Levandowski, who led its early efforts in developing self-driving technology.
Alphabet claims Levandowski stole 14,000 files from Alphabet before leaving to launch his own autonomous truck startup, Otto. Uber acquired Otto last August. The files include designs for Alphabets lidar (light detection and ranging) technology, a key component to most self-driving systems.
In the latest filing, Alphabet says Uber hid a lidar device Levandowski designed based on these files. The company says Uber obfuscated the existence of a piece of lidar technology at an April 12 hearing.
Uber denies this and says it eventually produced the device in question. A representative for Uber told Recode the company did not initially produce the device because they did not think they were required to do so as its designs had been abandoned.
Alphabet has declined to say whether it has inspected the device in question.
Uber said in a previous filing opposing the preliminary injunction Alphabets allegations are demonstrably false.
Read more:
Alphabet claims Uber was hiding the self-driving technology that it allegedly ripped off - Recode
Posted in Technology
Comments Off on Alphabet claims Uber was hiding the self-driving technology that it allegedly ripped off – Recode
How Technology Can Help Solve Societal Problems – Knowledge@Wharton
Posted: at 12:44 am
In the next article of theseries, The Network Revolution: Creating Value through Platforms, People and Technology, authorsBarry Libert,Megan Beck, Brian Komar and Josue Estrada debut the concept of Social Change as a Platform.Libert is a Wharton senior fellow and CEO of OpenMatters; Beck is the firms chief insights officer. Komar is vice president of community engagement for Salesforce.org, the nonprofit reseller of Salesforce.com Inc. Estrada is the senior vice president of strategy and operations at Salesforce.org.
As Charles Dickens so astutely observed about life during the French Revolution in A Tale of Two Cities, it was the best and worst of times. One could say the same thing today. The Fourth Industrial Revolution of technology networks and platforms could usher in an era of mass societal disruption as well as unprecedented social cooperation. Whether the latter would prevail depends on the ability of nonprofit entities and the broader social sector to boost their collective impact by adopting the new business models that are disrupting the for-profit world. It would also depend on whether they can embrace what we call Social Change as a Platform or SCaaP.
During the turbulent 1960s, Bob Dylan wrote the following powerful lyrics for The Times They Are A-Changin that seems apropos for today. Come gather round people, wherever you roam, and admit that the waters around you have grown. And accept it that soon, youll be drenched to the bone. If your time to you is worth savin, then you better start swimmin or youll sink like a stone. For the times they are a-changin. At the time, anti-war protests ruled the day. A generational collide over the future of America was afoot. And all the images of a nation coming apart at its seams were emblazoned across a new communications medium TV that was coming of age.
And so is it today. The Fourth Industrial Revolution what Klaus Schwab (founder of the World Economic Forum) defines as the fusion of technologies blurring the lines among the physical, digital and biological spheres is upon us. Meanwhile, nationalism is colliding with globalism, machine learning and artificial intelligence advancing geometrically, and global warming is on a direct path to changing the very nature of our planet. Despite these many challenges, this revolution, like the many that have preceded it, also comes with a great promise of opportunity.
To be sure, there are reasons for great optimism. In just the past 30 years, the global poverty rate halved with many of the poorest people in the world becoming significantly less poor. These gains mirror dramatic improvements in health and education including advances in life expectancy, child mortality, health care provision, among other important areas. Moreover, most of these gains predate the effective integration of digital technologies into the cause. In short, it is reasonable to argue that the potential for social changemakers armed with todays digital platforms in partnership with large and growing virtual networks can dramatically improve the human condition.
The potential for social changemakers armed with todays digital platforms in partnership with large and growing virtual networks can dramatically improve the human condition.
Self-organization Powered by Technology
Civil society the network of institutions that define us as actors in the civil sphere independent of governments is supposed to serve as the leader in promoting pluralism and social benefit. As Klaus Schwab notes that a renewed focus on the essential contribution of civil society to a resilient global system alongside government and business has emerged. Unfortunately, nonprofit groups, academic institutions and philanthropic organizations engaged in social change are struggling to adapt to the new global, technological and virtual landscape.
Legacy modes of operation, governance and leadership competencies rooted in the age of physical realities continue to dominate the space. Further, organizations still operate in internal and external silos far from crossing industry lines, which are blurring. And their ability to lead in a world that is changing at an exponential rate seems hampered by their mental models and therefore their business models of creating and sustaining value as well.
If civil society is not to get drenched and sink like a stone, it must start swimming in a new direction. This new direction starts with social organizations fundamentally rethinking the core assumptions driving their attitudes, behaviors and beliefs about creating long-term sustainable value for their constituencies in an exponentially networked world. Rather than using an organization-centric model, the nonprofit sector and related organizations need to adopt a mental model based on scaling relationships in a whole new way using todays technologies the SCaaP model.
Embracing social change as a platform is more than a theory of change, it is a theory of being one that places a virtual network or individuals seeking social change at the center of everything and leverages todays digital platforms (such as social media, mobile, big data and machine learning) to facilitate stakeholders (contributors and consumers) to connect, collaborate, and interact with each other to exchange value among each other to effectuate exponential social change and impact.
SCaaP builds on the government as a platform movement (Gov 2.0) launched by technologist Tim OReilly and many others. Just as Gov 2.0 was not about a new kind of government but rather, as OReilly notes, government stripped down to its core, rediscovered and reimagined as if for the first time, so it is with social change as a platform. Civil society is the primary location for collective action and SCaaP helps to rebuild the kind of participatory community celebrated by 19th century French historian Alexis de Tocqueville when he observed that Americans propensity for civic association is central to making our democratic experiment work. Americans of all ages, all stations in life, and all types of disposition, he noted, are forever forming associations.
But SCaaP represents a fundamental shift in how civil society operates. It is grounded in exploiting new digital technologies, but extends well beyond them to focus on how organizations think about advancing their core mission do they go at it alone or do they collaborate as part of a network? SCaaP requires thinking and operating, in all things, as a network. It requires updating the core DNA that runs through social change organizations to put relationships in service of a cause at the center, not the institution. When implemented correctly, SCaaP will impact everything from the way an organization allocates resources to how value is captured and measured to helping individuals achieve their full potential.
SCaaP requires updating the core DNA that runs through social change organizations to put relationships in service of a cause at the center, not the institution.
Digital Platforms Empower Social Change at Scale
To be sure, early adopters are already using technology to effectuate change at a pace and scale not previously available in the physical and digitally disconnected world. The marginal cost of delivery remains too high. But with todays technologies, with support from the board and management to make it happen, social change at scale is possible. Here are some organizations that are on the way to implementing SCaaP.
Just as Apple chose a platform approach when launching their App Store, these organizations are enabling their partners and contributors to share and co-create in the value chain they co-inhabit. Each has moved beyond allowing supporters to donate and promote, toward sharing real value through stakeholders talents and assets.
Tomorrows SCaaP
We are at the dawn of the SCaaP era. The future of social change as a platform is a world of connected platforms working to solve societys most pressing challenges more effectively as fast as possible. These platforms will supersede and encompass existing social change organizations. Those organizations that embrace social change as a platform will lead the way in helping to usher in this new era of connected social change platforms.
The core assets needed today to advance social change ideas, individuals and institutions continue to be the primary ingredients. What is changing and will continue to change, however, is the way these assets are assembled to deliver maximum social impact. Organizations can achieve SCAAP to the extent that those with a shared cause can gradually maximize shared capability (platforms) and minimize organization products. This represents a radical shift in approach.
Every organization relies on its information, capabilities and assets to be effective, but their networks are largely untapped or underutilized. Creating more value and scaling social impact requires the organizations leaders to leverage their networks, tapping into new sources of value, both tangible and intangible.
Value in the social impact supply chain will continue to come from new sources, for those who allow that to happen. Existing stakeholders in social change organizations will add value in new ways and new stakeholders will interact in new ways with the communitys resources and assets via the platform. SCaaP will increasingly bring all those actors and sectors together.
Philanthropic institutions supporting similar causes will be working together out in the open, ensuring all their resources and those supported through their grant-making are at the disposal of the community working to advance social change not any one individual or institution. These efforts will be focused on maximizing the way value is derived and how the agency is built, shared and advanced throughout the network.
The future of social change as a platform is a world of connected platforms working to solve societys most pressing challenges more effectively as fast as possible.
Key SCaaP Advantages to Nonprofits
Social change organizations that leverage their stakeholders networks as well as their tangible (programs and services) and intangible (expertise and relationships) assets will gain these and other advantages from embracing the SCaaP business model.
To succeed, a clear and understandable pathway to adopting SCaaP is necessary for this large, untapped market.
Seven Steps to Embracing SCaaP Today
Social change as a platform is first and foremost a business strategy, a theory of change that needs to be integrated into every organizations five-year strategic plan. That effort begins by identifying how and where an organization can accelerate the transition to a network-model across the entire organization. Specifically, organizations must assess their business model and inventory network assets, and start to reallocate resources and capital to networks as well as develop network key performance indicators (KPIs).
The biggest hurdle to SCaaP is changing the mental models and core competencies of the leadership team and board of directors. However, nonprofit organizations and academic institutions are better positioned to embrace SCaaP because they are more accustomed to imagining their community as active participants, instead of passive recipients. But it is critical that leaders significantly change how they embrace todays technologies.
With SCaaP, the nonprofit world will have the potential to enact social change on a scale previously unimagined. It is time to take up the mantle because doing so can unlock the future potential of every human being. People are worth it.
Excerpt from:
How Technology Can Help Solve Societal Problems - Knowledge@Wharton
Posted in Technology
Comments Off on How Technology Can Help Solve Societal Problems – Knowledge@Wharton
Harvard Business Review: Immigrants play ‘outsize role’ in technology and innovation – Daily Kos
Posted: at 12:44 am
Immigrants accounted for a little under 20 percentof all inventors during the late 19th and early 20th century, notesthe Harvard Business Review, with that numbersurgingto approximately 30 percent today.Their research is clearimmigrants are playing an outsize role in technology and innovation:
The largest share of immigrants were involved in developing medical technology inventions, such as surgical sutures. But medical technology accounted for just 1% of all U.S. patents. In areas that had a much larger effect on the U.S. economy at this time specifically electricity and chemicals, which accounted for 13.9% and 12.6% of all U.S. patents respectively immigrants were also strongly represented. Migrant influence was widespread, with migrant inventors accounting for at least 16% of patents in every technology area. The majority of immigrant inventors originated from European countries, with Germans playing a particularly prominent role.
Areas of technology with higher levels of foreign-born expertise experienced much faster patent growth between 1940 and 2000 than otherwise comparable technology areas, in terms of both the number of patents and a citation-adjusted measure of patent quality. That relationship isnt necessarily causal, however our results provide suggestive evidence that immigrant inventors played a key role in the development of Americas technology leadership.
Migrant inventors may have an outsized influence on innovation for two primary reasons. First, immigrant inventors like Nikola Tesla, who was born in Serbia, develop important ideas in their own right. Additionally, their insights may augment the skills of domestic inventors through collaboration. For example, in the 1940s Canadian immigrant James Hillier developed the first commercially viable electron microscope at Radio Corporation of America alongside Ladislaus Marton, a Belgian inventor, Vladimir Zworykin, a Russian inventor, and U.S.-born engineers.
Read more:
Harvard Business Review: Immigrants play 'outsize role' in technology and innovation - Daily Kos
Posted in Technology
Comments Off on Harvard Business Review: Immigrants play ‘outsize role’ in technology and innovation – Daily Kos