Daily Archives: April 23, 2017

Elon Musk’s new plan to save humanity from artificial intelligence – KOLO

Posted: April 23, 2017 at 12:53 am

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) -- Elon Musk has a new plan to protect humanity from artificial intelligence -- if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

In October 2014, Musk ignited a global discussion on the perils of artificial intelligence. Humans might be doomed if we make machines that are smarter than us, Musk warned. He called artificial intelligence our greatest existential threat.

Now he is hoping to harness AI in a way that will benefit society.

In a recent interview with the website waitbutwhy.com, Musk explained that his attempt to sound the alarm on artificial intelligence didn't have an impact, so he decided to try to develop artificial intelligence in a way that will have a positive affect on humanity.

So Musk, who is already the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, is now heading up a startup called Neuralink. The San Francisco outfit is building devices to connect the human brain with computers. Initially, the technology could repair brain injuries or cancer lesions. Quadriplegics may benefit from the technology.

But the most amazing and alarming implications of Musk's vision lie years and likely decades down the line. Brain-machine interfaces could overhaul what it means to be human and how we live.

Today, technology is implanted in brains in very limited cases, such as to treat Parkinson's Disease. Musk wants to go farther, creating a robust plug-in for our brains that every human could use. The brain plug-in would connect to the cloud, allowing anyone with a device to immediately share thoughts.

Humans could communicate without having to talk, call, email or text. Colleagues scattered throughout the globe could brainstorm via a mindmeld. Learning would be instantaneous. Entertainment would be any experience we desired. Ideas and experiences could be shared from brain to brain.

We would be living in virtual reality, without having to wear cumbersome goggles. You could re-live a friend's trip to Antarctica -- hearing the sound of penguins, feeling the cold ice -- all while your body sits on your couch.

But many technical hurdles remain. Musk believes it will be eight to 10 years before this kind of the technology will be ready to use by people without disabilities. Musk's companies have made a habit of achieving what seemed impossible. But he's also notorious for aggressive deadlines that his companies don't meet.

Neuralink told waitbutwhy.com that it would need to simulate one million brain neurons before a transformative brain-machine interface could be built. If current rates of progress hold, it won't reach that milestone until 2100.

In the meantime, there are many reasons for humans to be wary of implanting a computer in their brain. Any digital technology can be hacked. Humans might be unwittingly turned into malicious agents for unsavory causes. Computers crash too. If the interface fails, that could imperil our physical health.

With a brain-machine interface recording our lives, all of our experiences would be stored in the cloud. Privacy would be threatened. Governments or others would have incentives to access that information and track behavior.

If our brains merge with machines, our thoughts would become indistinguishable from what we'd downloaded from the cloud. We could struggle to know if our beliefs and views came from personal experiences, or from what the internet sent to our brains. Humans would be putting enormous trust in the maker of the brain-machine interface to share good information with them.

As Musk sees it, our options are limited.

"We're going to have the choice of either being left behind," Musk told waitbutwhy.com, "and being effectively useless, or like a pet."

Link:

Elon Musk's new plan to save humanity from artificial intelligence - KOLO

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on Elon Musk’s new plan to save humanity from artificial intelligence – KOLO

Supercharge healthcare with artificial intelligence – CIO

Posted: at 12:53 am

Pattern-recognition algorithms can transform horses into zebras; winter scenes can become summer; artificial intelligence algorithms can generate art; robot radiologists can analyze your X-rays with remarkable precision.

We have reached the point where pattern-recognition algorithms and artificial intelligence (A.I.) are more accurate than humans at the visual diagnosis and observation of X-rays, stained breast cancer slides and other medical signs involving general correlations between normal and abnormal health patterns.

Before we run off and fire all the doctors, lets better understand theA.I. landscape and the technology's broad capabilities.A.I. wont replace doctors it will help to empower them and extend their reach, improving patient outcomes.

The challenge with artificial intelligence is that no single and agreed-upon definition exists. Nils Nilsson definedA.I. as activity devoted to making machines intelligent, and intelligence is that quality that enables an entity to function appropriately and with foresight in its environment. But that definition isn't close to describing howA.I. evolved.

Artificial intelligence began with the Turing Test, proposed in 1950 by Alan Turing, the scientist, cryptanalyst and theoretical biologist. Since then, rapid progress has been made over the last 75 years, advancingA.I. capabilities.

Isaac Asimov proposed the Three Laws of Robotics in 1950. The firstA.I. program was coded in 1951. In 1959, MIT began research in the field of artificial intelligence. GM introduced the first robot into its production assembly line in 1961. The 1960s were transformative, with the first machine learning program written and the first demonstration of anA.I. program which understood natural language, and the first chatbot emerged. In the 1970s, the first autonomous vehicle was designed at the StanfordA.I. lab. Healthcare applications forA.I. were first introduced in 1974, along with an expert system for medical diagnostics. The LISP language emerged out of the 1980s, with natural networks integrating with autonomous vehicles. IBMs famous Deep Blue beat Gary Kasparov at chess in 1997. And by 1999, the world was experimenting with A.I.-based domesticated robots.

Innovation was further inspiredin 2004 when DARPA hosted the first design competition for autonomous vehicles in the commercial sector. By 2005, big tech companies, including IBM, Microsoft, Google and Facebook, were actively investing in commercial applications, and the first recommendation engines surfaced. The highlight of 2009 was Googles first self-driving car, some three decades after the first autonomous vehicle was tested at Stanford.

The fascination of narrative science, forA.I. to write reports, was demonstrated in 2010, and IBM Watson was crowned a Jeopardy champion in 2011. Narrative science quickly evolved into personal assistants with the likes of Siri, Google, Now and Cortana. Elon Musk and others launched OpenAI, to discover and enact the path to safe artificial general intelligence in 2015 to find a friendlyA.I. In early 2016, Google's DeepMind defeated legendary Go player Lee Se-dol in a historic victory.

What will 2017 have in store for artificial intelligence? With the history ofA.I. behind us, we can now determine howA.I. could potentially help advance our healthcare capabilities through four actions:

The foundation ofA.I. has been defined into four essential classifications. Next, identify the classification that has the greatest ability to advance your current business model.

NormallyA.I. is considered an alternative or replacement for replicating intelligent behavior. This replication could potentially surpass human abilities. However, to date, high-performanceA.I. has only performed in narrow fields, such as gaming, facial recognition and driving cars.

The full spectrum ofA.I. is much broader than the narrow fields we read about in the daily headlines.

Prior to outlining the technology stack and the domains where artificial intelligence offers value, we need to review the framework of artificial intelligence. The section of the broad categories ofA.I. will accelerate whereA.I. adds value and, more specifically, how we as CIOs can tap directly into that value for our organizations.

Artificial intelligence is broken out into 10 functional areas:

If we drill into machine learning, a subtype within artificial intelligence, we have three primary sub-classifications:

We live in a business climate where the norm is a continuous pressure to perform, deliver and innovate. CIOs are forever in search of thetool for competitive advantage. Attaining knowledge of the A.I. landscape andA.I. capabilities will drive more informed decisions, resulting in offering better services to consumers.

The simple version of this stack is:

The evaluation of the technology stack is challenging and can result in the incorrect identification of capabilities that are too immature to fully be integrated into conventional business functions, processes and workflows. Spend the required time with your teams to properly evaluate where business and technical capabilities should be extended.

TheA.I. foundation has been determined. The framework was selected. TheA.I. technology stack was evaluated. Were now ready to engage an emerging organization to help us achieve the expanded capabilities we have defined we require.

The following hot A.I. companies will help open the possibilities of howA.I. can generate new business models, fueling new organization growth.

Assessing the potential of artificial intelligence to differentiate your organizational capabilities starts with an understanding of the A.I. foundation, theA.I. framework, theA.I. technology stack and theA.I. companies offering dynamic and useful interactions. This strong background will serve you and your team well, as you venture into the uncharted world of artificial intelligence.

This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?

Excerpt from:

Supercharge healthcare with artificial intelligence - CIO

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on Supercharge healthcare with artificial intelligence – CIO

Artificial intelligence: fulfilling the failed promise of big data – Information Management

Posted: at 12:53 am

The topic of artificial intelligence is dominating discussions of data management this year. But while a growing number of organizations are interested in AI, many dont fully understand what the technology can do to help boost their customer engagement or the bottom line.

Forrester Research analyst Brandon Purcell has recently authored two reports on the current strong interest in artificial intelligence and what can be expected from it. In part one of Information Managements interviews with Purcell yesterday, we discussed The Top Emerging Technologies in Artificial Intelligence. In part two today we discuss the report Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Solutions, Q1 2017.

Information Management: Artificial intelligence seems to have replaced big data as the big data theme for 2017. What is your sense of exactly how many organizations are working with artificial intelligence and where are they in the process?

Brandon Purcell: Id agree that AI has replaced big data as the buzzword du jour, but in my mind it actually has the ability to fulfill big datas failed promise. Big data really focused on capturing massive amounts of data from multiple sources. Companies got really good at that, but theyve struggled to turn that data into insights and insight into action. The promise of AI is to complete that process - from data to insight to action - in a virtuous cycle that optimizes continuously.

According to Forresters Business Technographics survey of over 3,000 global technology and business decision makers from last year, 41percent of global firms are already investing in AI and another 20 percent are planning to invest in the next year.

Most large enterprises first foray into AI is with chatbots for customer service, what we call conversational service solutions. These run the gamut from hard coded rules-based chatbots which arent artificially intelligent to very sophisticated engines using a combination of NLP, NLG, and deep learning. From a customer insights perspective, many companies are starting to uses some of the sensory components of AI such as image and video analytics and speech analytics to unlock insights from unstructured data.

IM: What the top reasons that organizations are adopting artificial intelligence and what gains to they hope to realize?

Purcell: Organizations are adopting AI to optimize the customer journey from discovery through conversion, all the way to the end of the customer lifecycle. AI promises to automate the process of understanding customers and anticipating their needs, then delivering the right experience to them at the right time. Organizations are hoping to impact the top line by acquiring new customers and increasing the value and lifetime of existing ones, and theyre hoping to impact the bottom line as well by reducing costs through automation.

IM: What are some of the top obstacles or challenges to achieving success with an artificial intelligence effort?

Purcell: The primary challenge is and will always be the data. Data is the lifeblood of AI. An AI system needs to learn from data in order to be able to fulfill its function. Unfortunately, organizations struggle to integrate data from multiple sources to create a single source of truth on their customers. AI will not solve these data issues - it will only make them more pronounced.

After data, traditional people and process challenges come into play. Who owns the AI initiative? Typically the group in the organization with the technical skills to implement AI is not the same group that will actually own its execution. We see companies fumble this handoff all the time. And how will you measure success to prove the ROI of the effort? Rigorous measurement processes still remain elusive for most companies.

IM: What are your thoughts on artificial intelligence best practices that organizations should use to best achieve success?

Purcell: Start with a narrow use case and make sure you have data for it. Then bring together internal stakeholders and agree upon how youll measure success. For example, a subscription-based business may want to decrease customer churn.

They probably have historical data on past customers who have churned that they can use to train a model. They may also have data on retention incentives that have worked in the past. Assemble the marketers who will oversee the retention campaign as well as the data engineers and scientists responsible for building the model. And agree upon a measurement methodology.

Traditional text and control works quite well. Treat one set of customers and see how much higher their retention rate is than a holdout sample after a specified period of time. Assuming the success of the project, you can build the business case for further investment.

David Weldon is the editor-in-chief of Information Management.

Read the rest here:

Artificial intelligence: fulfilling the failed promise of big data - Information Management

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on Artificial intelligence: fulfilling the failed promise of big data – Information Management

The disruption and promise of artificial intelligence – CIO

Posted: at 12:53 am

By Peter Bendor-Samuel, star Advisor, CIO | Apr 21, 2017 9:20 AM PT

Opinions expressed by ICN authors are their own.

Your message has been sent.

There was an error emailing this page.

Theres no shortage of books, news articles and comments in social media about how artificial intelligence (A.I.) is shaping our future. Although its still blazing a trail, were on the brink of A.I. disruption that will change all industries and society at a very deep and fundamental level. I believe it will be one of the next great wealth generators.

My optimism about A.I.s growing potential arises from many successful use case examples as clear evidence that A.I. is now getting the scale, maturity and the ecosystem in which it can be effective. Although A.I. has been developing for 20 to 30 years, its gaining enough elements necessary for a supporting ecosystem.

Individuals active in the A.I. space discussed some use cases at a recent dinner I attended at the United Nations. Government entities, distinguished academics and journalists, and the leaders in AI at companies such as Facebook, Google, IBM Watson, Intel and IPSoft attended. We talked, for instance, about how A.I. affects drilling for oil and how it helps provide medicine to the under-served.

A particularly interesting case involves a special condition affecting about 120,000 people in the U.S. when they have a stroke. Currently, it is diagnosed in only 4,000 of 120,000 lives. Paralysis is the result if doctors cant diagnose the condition and treat it appropriately. The condition is largely not caught because healthcare providers lack the ability to diagnose the condition and treat it in the golden four-hour period after a stroke happens. An A.I. engine can quickly process the hundred or so MRI images and easily diagnose the condition, saving lives across the country.

Its clear that A.I. is a very powerful vehicle even though it is still in its nascent stage. The optimism shared by company A.I. users and governments at the meeting was very encouraging.

Over time, there is almost no endeavor that humans undertake that A.I. doesnt stand to augment, thus making humans more effective and more productive. In doing so, artificial intelligence answers the dilemma weve had for the last 20 years: a lack of productivity in the U.S. Our productivity growth has not been increasing. In fact, our productivity rate has fallen over the last 20 years and is now measured as 1 percent or less.

Productivity is the largest determinant of real wage gains. If were going to increase wealth, particularly in a sustainable and more balanced way, A.I. stands as a very important tool to dramatically increase broad productivity across almost every human endeavor.

This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?

Peter Bendor-Samuel is founder and CEO of Everest Group, which provides advisory and research services to Global 1000 enterprises, leading service providers, and private equity firms.

Sponsored Links

View post:

The disruption and promise of artificial intelligence - CIO

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on The disruption and promise of artificial intelligence – CIO

Can Data Be The Bridge To Communication Between Alternative Practitioners And Traditional Doctors? – Huffington Post

Posted: at 12:51 am

As a Metaphysician Ive been what many consider to be, an alternative medicine practitioner since 2011. The terminology alternative medicine is one that I dont care for much because like with any term it can be misconstrued, overused and misunderstand. But for the purposes of this post I will use the term to differentiate what people perceive to currently understand.

As a Process Improvement Consultant for physician practices, I have also been in the healthcare industry for over 24 years in various administrative capacities that include being an assistant administrator in a FQHC, running the day to day operations of various sub specialties and teaching process improvement in one of South East New Jerseys largest healthcare systems.

So I have come to see and understand a lot about, what is currently two sides re: alternative medicine and traditional healthcare models. I am also seeing a morphosis of collaboration between the two sides. However that is for another post.

In the capacity of teaching process improvement and facilitating numerous work-flow project teams, I came to learn and teach the value of data collection.

With every project team, a clearly defined opportunity statement and a clearly defined goal or outcome was invaluable to keeping projects on track,cost-effectiveness, keeping the team focused and much more. And as the projects and teams progressed, nothing was more valuable than data collection.

Why? Because its one thing to state that you believe you have an issue or concern worth paying attention to, however data collection removes opinion and either proves or disproves your statement.

In my approximate 7 years of being a Metaphysician I have noticed a gaping hole in the communication and professional respect between alternative practitioners and traditional physicians.

Again, I am also currently seeing a morphosis of this but there is still a long way to go.

It is my desire to bridge this gap.

For the purposes of this article I will speak from the perspective of what I have come to notice as an area of opportunity for my fellow practitioners.

This opportunity is in the area of data collection. Data collection is not the only area of opportunity however again, for the sake of this article I will remain focused on it.

There are various areas of expertise, skill and focus in the alternative health arena creating the various fields of specialty that a practitioner may provide service in.

Some of these areas are: metaphysics, reiki or energy, psychics, meditation, yoga, and more.

The tapestry of services available in the arena of alternative health is vast, however there is an even greater amount of potential clients who will not receive these services because of the lack of science to prove what we as practitioners know and/or believe to be what works.

Many people are not aware that science in many cases, is following what society is willing and ready to accept, as much as it may provide answers to what was once not understood.

But there is yet another opportunity to not only provide some of the answers to concerns that potential clients are looking for, but also to begin to have more valuable and substantiative communication with traditional physicians.

If its one thing I know from being in the healthcare industry for over 24 years, its that physicians respect science and data; and its an incredible opportunity for alternative health practitioners to learn what it may not know, and to understand the importance of why you may want to know more.

You can say that reiki works because one of your clients was actually cleared by their medical doctor of having to get that procedure done; and potentially as a reiki practitioner you have other clients that have said the same.

However this does not hold up as a form of data collection until its put on paper and until you take the opportunity to organize the data. Here is an example: (The specialty of reiki is only being used as an example.) You can associate and apply this to any area of practice.

Client goes to their own medical doctor and receives a specific diagnosis on specific date.

Client then goes to reiki practitioner to have some clearing work done on a specific date.

Client goes back to medical doctor and finds out through testing that procedure is no longer required.

Client tells reiki practitioner.

This seems to be where it stops. Information may be collected during other parts of the process, however it is not being compiled in a manner that shows the practitioner what they need and want to know.

Can doctor prove that it was due to pt.s reiki session, that procedure is no longer needed? If so, great!

If not, keep collecting data from more clients.

Notice that I kept citing, on a specific date. The reason for this is to capture noticeable time frames between when someone is diagnosed and when the energy that was causing the clients diagnosis is cleared.

The reiki practitioner will also want to collect information on the reason why their clients have come to see them in the first place, i.e., feeling depressed, anxiety, headache. etc.

Over time you will notice a pattern based on what your clients are telling you. This information can be used in your marketing and advertising in order to assist your current and future clients to know what types of energy and/or concerns cause an individual to pick up the phone to call you in the first place.

Your data collection will also substantiate the difference between your opinion and the information that supports it, therefore assisting in your clients decision to choose you.

Last but not least, you and your client will feel more confident in sharing your knowledge with the traditional medical community.

As we continue to get better at supporting our wisdom through efficient data collection, I perceive that communication will become easier between what is currently known as alternative medicine practitioners and traditional physicians; and we will continue to simultaneously and collectively build the bridges that allow people to enjoy holistic options to mind, body, spirit transformation.

Please comment, like and share if this post resonates with you.

Lisa is Metaphysician and Imagination Hacker who works with men and women who are ready to step into their own, are ready to move beyond their past experiences and programs, and are willing to unlearn to relearn what has been taught in this game we call Reality. Lisa knows through her own experience which she shares with her clients, that by understanding who you are foundationally and scientifically, and by paying attention to your thoughts and the effect your thoughts have on you vibrationally, mystery and dogma disappear allowing you to do your own inner work more freely. http://www.lisascott.org

Lisa is also a Process Improvement Consultant for Physician Practices. With over 24 years of healthcare business experience Lisa assists her clients to look at their work-flow processes to determine effectiveness and efficiency, and provides solutions for your practice needs. Your practice is speaking. Find out what it needs. Lisa

Excerpt from:

Can Data Be The Bridge To Communication Between Alternative Practitioners And Traditional Doctors? - Huffington Post

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Can Data Be The Bridge To Communication Between Alternative Practitioners And Traditional Doctors? – Huffington Post

Venture capitalists look beyond tech to the dietary supplements … – Los Angeles Times

Posted: at 12:50 am

How do you stay sharp and fit despite fatigue and age? By consuming substances extracted from blueberries, flowers and algae, say the makers of a new group of unregulated and unproven health pills.

Trusting natural chemicals to solve inevitable ailments is familiar to anyone who has visited a GNC store or contributed to the $30 billion spent annually in the U.S. on dietary supplements.

But the new supplement firms are grabbing attention because theyre founded and funded by people more at home at a Silicon Valley technology campus than a late-night infomercial.

Led by tech world veterans and funded by venture capitalists, dietary supplement start-ups such as Ritual, Elysium and Nootrobox are peddling daily multivitamins and energy-boosting gels with transparency and testing thats turning heads in the industry. Theyre taking the unusual steps of pointing to studies that justify ingredient choices and even publishing full lab test results.

Were not introducing a new drug or something very different, Ritual Chief Executive Katerina Schneider said. Were making something a lot better. The industry needs this disruption.

Thats plausible in an industry long associated with unreliable promises and dodgy characters. And the start-ups deep pockets and tech pedigree may cut through skepticism and instill a sense of authenticity craved by younger customers.

But there are signs that these start-ups, like many supplement companies before them, leave out key facts and overstate health claims.

Supplement start-ups are gaining traction as venture capitalists spread hundreds of millions of dollars in cash to lucrative areas beyond apps and gadgets.

The investors are lending their credibility from successful bets on Snapchat, Uber and Dollar Shave Club to offbeat ideas in food and health. They're backing products that resemble eggs and meat hoping to produce them in more environmentally friendly ways and start-ups seeking to turn breakfast, lunch and dinner into slurpable meal-replacing drinks.

Investors expect big paydays because of several apparent cultural shifts. People now are accustomed to paying monthly for a ration of products and services, whether its supplements or shows on Netflix. Having the Internet at their fingertips all day has made younger consumers more attuned to what they eat and they prize products that are cheap, simple and affordable.

Those desires are at odds with business models of struggling retailers such as GNC, but neatly addressed by the start-ups.

The firms also aspire to be more than pill pushers. By adding services such as coaching and offering online videos on healthy living, the start-ups could be as essential to millennials as Centrum or Weight Watchers are to seniors.

About half of U.S. adults and a third of children take supplements: some by choice, some by doctors' orders, some because they believe that their dietary restrictions (vegan, dairy-free, etc.) leave them unfulfilled. The tech-backed approaches could convert the other 50%, which skews younger, investors say.

Elysium and Nootrobox each say they have tens of thousands of subscribers, and Ritual reports 500% growth in subscribers since Jan. 1.

Many others are getting involved. Actress Gwyneth Paltrows online shop Goop peddles pill packs such as High School Genes. Life Boost sells a blender that mixes powders into vitamin shots, claiming that drinking vitamins leads to better absorption.

Supplements can launch and boast about improving health without approval of the Food and Drug Administration, as long as they aren't claiming to treat or prevent specific diseases.

The policy enables companies to sells billions of dollars of goods without authenticated evidence of their worth. Though companies typically stick with ingredients the FDA deems safe, the agency doesnt test the combinations found in supplements.

Its not to say these products dont have a role in health, but we dont have a lot of clinical trials investigating that question, said Regan Bailey, a Purdue University associate professor of nutritional science.

The start-ups websites tout research that they argue justifies ingredients and sometimes suppliers. They are far more specific than traditional supplement websites, where suppliers go unnamed and relevant studies arent cited.

But researchers the start-ups mention arent ready to recommend the pills.

Many study authors expressed surprise that their work has been referenced and shared their dismay about how their findings had been portrayed. The Los Angeles Times contacted authors of about 40 studies described on Rituals website, 10 from Elysium and seven from Nootrobox. Altogether, more than a dozen authors raised concerns.

Rituals semi-clear, vitamins-and-minerals pill aims to give women more vibrant lives and looks. Backed by $5 million and inspired by its founders pregnancy-fueled search for safer products, Ritual promises an obsessively researched vitamin directly to your door. It paraphrases studies into short declarations on its website, identifying only the authors, not the works themselves.

Purdues Bailey, who is mentioned on Rituals iron webpage, and several others described the companys conclusions as unsound.

Sarah Booth of Tufts University said that by condensing her work into food sources for K2 are difficult, Rituals site is incorrect because she has found that the vitamin is abundant in pork and dairy products. In addition, Booth said theres no established dietary requirement for K2, making it difficult to argue that people dont get enough.

Ritual intended to provide a synopsis that the non-scientist could wrap her head around, founder Schneider said. Studies didn't get links because of regulatory concerns and authors werent contacted since the works were in the public domain. Schneider also thought that the presentation wouldnt mislead consumers into assuming that the scientists endorsed the product.

But a Los Angeles Times inquiry prompted Harvard University professor Goodarz Danaei to have a school attorney request that Ritual remove a reference to his study about omega-3 oil. Danaei said the company complied. He had concerns because he examined fish-based oil, not the algae-based variety that Ritual employs. The company contends that the options are scientifically equivalent.

With Elysium, several researchers described feeling conflicted about the New York City firms efforts. The company co-founded by a former venture capitalist and a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher has received more than $20 million to produce sand-colored pills to combat aging. They say ingesting chemicals in quantities not feasible to attain through consuming blueberries, grapes and milk kicks the body into a state of hunger that extracts more life out of cells.

Professors whose studies Elysium cites online question its speculative science (theres no evidence that Elysium is using the right dosage, for example), though some are intrigued by its unconventional approach.

Company officials are right that the FDA is not likely to approve a drug to extend lifespan, so a vitamin supplement with the prospect to do so is a soft approach to the problem, said Anthony Sauve, an associate professor of pharmacology at Cornell University, whose work Elysium references.

Elysium reached out to several researchers, but not everyone who is referenced on its website.

Even scientists contacted by companies early on found issues with later references to their work. Matthew Pase, a fellow in Boston Universitys neurology department, said Nootroboxs website wrongly implies that his study found that the plant Bacopa monnieri improved memory. Nootrobox executives said the companys citations and explanations could have been clearer.

Nootrobox, based in San Francisco and financed by investors such as Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer, churns out several pills and gummies that aim to help ambitious people stay alert, executives say. That would include its techie co-founders, who concocted drinks and slipped powdered herbs under the tongue in hopes of extending workdays better than coffee does.

Nootrobox could face scrutiny for including links on its website to studies about diseases. For example, text on one ingredient webpage could be seen to imply that Nootrobox pills guard against Alzheimer's disease and dementia.

Chief Executive Geoffrey Woo said ingredient pages dont have buy buttons for fear of that very implication. Woo sees the ingredient guide as distinct, but he said he can see where the confusion is. The company removed some disease references after a Los Angeles Times inquiry.

Start-ups must balance their enthusiasm and blue-sky thinking with the realities of a precarious industry, said Duffy MacKay, senior vice president of science and regulatory affairs at industry trade group Council for Responsible Nutrition.

Ritual, Elysium and Nootrobox dont do their own verification of suppliers labor and environmental practices. But all say that they put pills through quality control and that consumers havent had issues yet. Theyre all preparing the type of product-effectiveness studies that the academic community wants to see.

For people who receive plentiful nutrients through food, supplements remain unnecessary, according to healthcare experts. In some cases, theyre viewed as harmful because chemicals may produce unreliable effects outside the items in which theyre normally found.

Elysium Chief Executive Eric Marcotulli acknowledged that theres a lot of work to do on the research front, but said the company believes the right thing is allowing the public to join the experiment.

We shouldnt have to wait until were broken to fix something, he said.

Those who abstain are missing out and thus worse off, Nootrobox co-founder Michael Brandt said. If something can improve your work performance, and the effects compound, its better to start sooner than later, Brandt said.

paresh.dave@latimes.com / PGP

Twitter: @peard33

ALSO

FCC clears way for big TV mergers, eases broadband price limits

Trump administration launches national security investigation into steel imports

Tesla recalls some Model S and Model X cars for parking brake problem

Read the rest here:

Venture capitalists look beyond tech to the dietary supplements ... - Los Angeles Times

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Venture capitalists look beyond tech to the dietary supplements … – Los Angeles Times

Beware of ‘anti-cancer’ herbal food supplements, doctors say – Davao Today

Posted: at 12:50 am

BEWARE. Dr. Ellie May Villegas of the Philippine Society of Medical Oncologists warns the public about food supplements claiming to be substitutes for conventional cancer treatment. Villegas said most advertised food supplements, if not actually effective, actually interfere with chemotherapy, causing even more problems. Villegas was among the resource persons of the forum titled Holistic Oncology: Understanding Complementary versus Alternative Medicine held at the Marco Polo Hotel on Friday, April 21. (Paulo C. Rizal/davaotoday.com)

DAVAO CITY, Philippines A group of doctors specializing in the treatment of cancers warned the public on Friday about several herbal food supplements advertising as replacements for traditional cancer treatment, such as radio and chemotherapy.

Usually, some patients would go to my clinic to ask for replacements to chemotherapy and radiation. Unfortunately, theres nothing in literature that says that, said Dr. Omid Etemadi of the Philippine Society of Medical Oncologists.

Etemadi said that there are actually very few scientific evidence to prove that these food supplements work, and at best, can only complement traditional treatment.

Apart from the lack of scientific evidence proving the potency of these food supplements, Etemadi said some of the purported anti-cancer supplements could interfere with treatment and may cause more problems.

Etemadi cited the case of grape seed extract, which interferes with the metabolism of tamoxifen, a drug that blocks the action of estroge, which in turn, is used to treat certain types of breast cancer.

He also warned against drinking too many herbal food supplements, saying this may stress the liver because it may be impairing its ability to metabolize properly.

With that, Etemadi advised the public to consult their doctors before taking any food supplements.

Dont hide it from your doctor. Actually were not against it if you want to take other pills. We just want to make sure that youre drinking the correct supplements to avoid endangering you, he said.

Meanwhile, another oncologist, Dr. Ellie May Villegas, said it could take many years of rigorous testing and clinical trials before the efficacy and safeness of a drug could be assured.

Villegas said that Xanthone, a compound extracted from the mangosteen, was proven to have positive effects only in the in vitro stage, which means it was only tested on cells in a test tube. Uson said this is only in the preliminaries, and has not been tested yet on animals, or humans.

Villegas also warned the public about alternative practitioners pitching their claims directly to the media, because it only emphasizes the purported benefits without discussing the possible side effects.

We do not go on TV to discuss scientific treatment because it has to be explained in person by a medical professional, Villegas said.

For his part, Food-Drug Regulation Officer III of the Food and Drug Administration, Willison John De Luna admitted that the marketing strategies of food supplements is not the responsibility of the FDA. De Luna said that while they are consulted in the content, ultimately, it is the Advertising Standards Council, an independent regulating agency that approves the commercials.

Nevertheless, De Luna encouraged the public to report to the FDA any food supplement with any suspicious and outrageous claims for further investigation.

Lets be critical on how to deal with this information, what are their evidences, sources, for example. In the end ang isipin natin dito ay public health, and if does this product really has an effect not just on us, but to the people who are taking this product, De Luna said.(davaotoday.com)

Read the original post:

Beware of 'anti-cancer' herbal food supplements, doctors say - Davao Today

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Beware of ‘anti-cancer’ herbal food supplements, doctors say – Davao Today

Citizenship changes reflect the Trumpist zeitgeist – Daily Advertiser

Posted: at 12:49 am

21 Apr 2017, 1:41 a.m.

A common feature in these ballots across Britain and France? Immigration.

Election-weary Britons head to the polls on June 8. The French will vote this weekend. Americans only recently concluded their distended democratic ritual. Different countries, different systems, different voters. A common theme? Immigration.

Donald Trump pulled off his unlikely victory by invoking a dichotomy: Americans versus others. The antediluvian promise to make America great again was pitched at a demoralised working class, deprived of a social safety net and denied real wage growth for decades.

It cleverly ignored the yawning gulf between a privileged, tax-astute billionaire and his new electoral quarry by excavating an even bigger hole in which immigration was conflated with national security, free trade with job losses, globalism with US decline.

In France, Marine Le Pen's far-right National Front exploits similar tensions by branding asylum seekers "illegal". "They have no reason to stay in France" Le Pen says blithely because "these people broke the law the minute they set foot on French soil".

Theresa May's snap British poll is an aftershock of last year's stunning Brexit quake when ordinary Brits ignored elite opinion to cut ties with Europe. Their disaffection derived substantially from the EU's free movement rules that had foreign labour transforming the British economy in ways that suited capital but left workers feeling worse off.

Le Pen, fanning the same anxieties, frames French citizenship as "either inherited or merited", which may be reasonable coming from a more moderate voice. Most, however, see it as the dog-whistle it is: extremism masquerading as common sense. It is typical of the new xenophobia that parades as an antidote to global uncertainty yet poses an existential threat to French cohesion, as well as European stability.

Against these trends, Turnbull's deification of "Australian citizenship" reflects Australia's more sober debate.

It locates Australian identity as a set of beliefs under the rubric of multiple differences: "We're not defined by race or religion or culture, as many other nations are. We're defined by commitment to common values, political values, the rule of law, democracy, freedom, mutual respect, equality for men and women. These fundamental values are what make us Australian."

Unsurprisingly, Turnbull's new muscularity on Aussie "values", which, rhetorically at least, sits more readily with his predecessor, Tony Abbott, has fuelled plenty of suspicion. Cynical observers will view it as a Clayton's boat people fight, the one you engender once the boats have actually stopped being an issue.

Doubtless an embattled prime minister would welcome any electoral dividend and the extra protection within his own party room. But that does not of itself, make the proposed changes wrong.

Follow us on Facebook

The story Citizenship changes reflect the Trumpist zeitgeist first appeared on The Sydney Morning Herald.

Continue reading here:

Citizenship changes reflect the Trumpist zeitgeist - Daily Advertiser

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on Citizenship changes reflect the Trumpist zeitgeist – Daily Advertiser

Event promotes innovation and technology expansion – Castlegar News

Posted: at 12:48 am

Event promotes innovation and technology expansion.

The BC Innovation Council (BCIC) was in Castlegar last week as part of their Regional Innovation Opportunities tour.

The BC Innovation Council (BCIC) was in Castlegar last week as part of their Regional Innovation Opportunities tour encouraging local companies and individuals to delve into the innovation and technology sector.

According to BCIC the initiative is intended to bring business and local tech companies together and spark further innovation and job growth in our regional economies.

The instructional and networking event promoted the idea that communities and businesses in the Interior can join in the new job economy through technology and innovation. Representatives from several companies from Kamloops were on hand to share how their companies had grown through introducing innovation and technology aspects to their businesses.

You can do the same type of thing in small towns like Castlegar, Nelson and Trail, said Castlegar Councillor Arry Dhillon, who attended the event.

The group was given examples of some challenges that large corporations are trying to overcome and encouraged that solutions could come from anywhere.

The point of the event was to spark discussion around innovation and how that can be brought into regions like ours, explained Dhillon. He thinks the ideas presented are a step in the right direction as we see resource-based economies faltering and tech-based sectors driving the future.

The tour is visiting seven cities with stops in Terrace, Kelowna and Nanaimo still to come in the next few weeks. BCIC is a Crown Agency of the Province of British Columbia. Locally BCIC is one of the funding partners for the Kootenay Association of Science and Technology.

Go here to read the rest:

Event promotes innovation and technology expansion - Castlegar News

Posted in Resource Based Economy | Comments Off on Event promotes innovation and technology expansion – Castlegar News

Will a universal basic income make the U.S. better? – News & Observer

Posted: at 12:47 am

Will a universal basic income make the U.S. better?
News & Observer
To better understand the future of our economy and work, especially in the wake of globalization and automation, there is a growing body of literature worth paying attention to. One recent book that deserves attention is Raising the Floor: How a ...

View post:

Will a universal basic income make the U.S. better? - News & Observer

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Will a universal basic income make the U.S. better? – News & Observer